academic leadership retreat august 28, 2013 1. journey to the top25 2
Post on 11-Jan-2016
215 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Academic Leadership RetreatAugust 28,
20131
Journey to the Top
25
2
Students
§ We are a student-focused university
§ How we treat our
students is important
§ One Stop
3
June Board of Trustees
4
§ 6% Tuition Increase
§ 5% Raise Pool – 3rd year in a row
§ Fee Increases
§ Transfer streets to university
Governor’s Review of Higher Education
§ Access
§ Quality
§
Preparin
g
students
for
careers
5
Branding & Communications
6
Branding & Communications§ Branding
contributes to
success
§ Consistency is essential
§ Good stories reinforce
the brand and everyone
benefits
§ Buy-in is critical
7
§ We are strategic communicators
- Branding provides framework
- Work with campus partners
- Use data to make decisions
- Branding is a continual process
Branding & Communications
8
Branding & Communications
Development
$92,402,645 raised
32,540 donors
10
Development PrioritiesSupport the Journey to the Top 25
11
§ Chairs, professorships,
and faculty awards
§ Scholarships and Fellowships
§ College Priorities
§ Deans, Department Heads
vital to fundraising
Athletics
§ Not most important, but most visible
§ Clean, successful program is critical
§ Most top public universities succeed in both
§ Working toward better financial model
12
Athletics
13
§ Suspended $6 million/year of support -- no impact on
current commitments
§ Athletics funds facilities & utilities – budget reserve inadequate
§ 80% of student athletes pay out-of-state tuition
§ UTM and UTC each invest ~$5 million annually
§ 38 of Top 50 publics transfer money to athleticsVirginia $13.1 million
Georgia Tech $18 million
Rutgers $27 million
Texas A&M $5.2 million
Alabama $4.5 million
Athletics§ Academic success
– Record performance – student athletes 3.05+ GPA
– 58% of student athletes 3.0 GPA or higher
– 115 student athletes on Dean’s List
– Herman Lathers – Chancellor’s
Citation for Extraordinary
Community Service
14
New Tuition Model
15
§ Take 15, graduate in 4
§ Applies to new undergraduates in Fall 2013
§ Full-time students pay for 15 hours
§ No additional cost for 15+ hours
§ Expectation – limit tuition increases
to 3% annually for three years for
Class of 2017
Average Net Price of Tuition
$(5,619.00)
16
$2,945.00$3,700.00 $3,752.00
$(8,000.00)
$(6,000.00)
$(4,000.00)
$(2,000.00)
$- ‐
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$6,000.00
BoIom QuarKle ($0 - $46,515)‐
Second QuarKle ($46,516
- ‐$95,444)
Third QuarKle ($95,445
- ‐
$151,369)
Fourth QuarKle
($151,370 - ‐
$1,506,000)
In-State Tuition at Four-Year SchoolsFY 2012-2013A comparison of undergraduate in- state‐ maintenance and mandatory fees between four- year higher‐ educaKon insKtuKons in Tennessee.
InsKtuKon Mandatory UG Maint.Fees Fees* Total $ from
UTKInsKtuKon
TBR schools based on 15 credit hours each semesterSource – Tennessee Higher EducaKon Commission
17
Mandatory Fees
Middle Tennessee 1,594
UT ChaIanooga 1,490
UT Knoxville 1,290
University of Memphis 1,256
AusKn Peay 1,224
Tennessee Tech 1,200
UT MarKn 1,103
East Tennessee 1,075
Tennessee State 930
Sorted by Mandatory FeesSorted by Total Fees
*Higher than UT Knoxville
UT Knoxville 1,290 7,802 9,092
University of Memphis 1,256 6,978 8,234 858Middle Tennessee *1,594 5,898 7,492 1,600UT ChaIanooga *1,490 5,722 7,212 1,880UT MarKn 1,103 5,978 7,081 2,011East Tennessee 1,075 5,922 6,997 2,095Tennessee Tech 1,200 5,748 6,948 2,144AusKn Peay 1,224 5,694 6,918 2,174Tennessee State 930 5,772 6,702 2,390
Student DebtAverage UT student debt (2012-13):
UT students with NO
debt: Average expenses:
Less than $21,000
51%
Less than $26,000/year
Most scholarships expire:
4 years
18
We Remain a Great Value§ Great value
§ Future of tuition increases
§ Financial burden on our students
§ Net tuition is low
19
20
Journey to the Top 25
UTK Position
Metrics UTKJune 2010
UTKJune 2013
UTK Change 2010-2013
ACT Equivalent 29/24 29/24 No change
Retention Rate 84% 85% +1 pt
6-Year Graduation Rate 60% 66% +6 pt
Ph.D. Degrees 277 319 +42
Master’s and Professional Degrees 1,845 1835 - 10
Federal Research Expenditures $70 M $127 M +$57 M
Total Research Expenditures $165 M $230 M +$65 M
Tenure-Line Salary Range $66 to $107 K
$73 to $121 K
+$7 to $14 K
Undergraduate Student/Tenure-Line Faculty
20 Waiting ondata
Faculty Awards 10 Waiting ondata
Teaching and Support Expenditures/ Student
$16,100 $17,975 + $1,875
Endowment/ Student $14,380 $15,803 + $1,423
Progress
22
§ 1 stayed same – Met our goal
§ 8 Metrics improved
§ 1 decreased
§2 Metrics TBD
72
74
76
78
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011
Freshman Retention Rate
1st to 2nd Year Retention Rate; 2002-2011 Freshmen Cohort Years
23
77.8% 78%
79.6%
81.7%
84.0% 83.6% 83.8%
86.2%
84.5% 84.6%
80
82
84
86
88
Freshman Retention Rate
§ Even great players have a coach
§ We want all of our students to
succeed and complete their
degrees
24
Graduation RatesFour, Five and Six Year Graduation RatesFall Cohorts 1999 - 2008
FOUR- ‐YEAR
FIVE- ‐YEAR
SIX- ‐YEAR
Preliminary
28.7% 30.6% 29.4% 30.0% 31.2% 30.6% 33.7% 35.7% 36.7% 39.0% 40.0%
23.4%24.2% 23.7% 24.7% 24.3% 25.2%
24.8%25.8% 25.3%
5.1%5.3% 4.7% 5.1% 5.1% 4.7%
4.7%4.6% 6.0%
10%
0%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Fall Cohort Years
57.2%
63.2% 66.1% 68.0%
60.6% 60.5%
57.8% 59.8%60.1%
25
Graduates2011-2012 Academic Year
45393911
2724
16732146
1696 1514 1312959 1116 729
39
2205
954
1370
2047 826
462 556320
540 132
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
8000
Bachelor's Graduate/Professional
6,744
4,865
4,0943,720
3,001
2,158 2,070
1,4991,8801,248
768
26
Graduate Degrees
1845 1807 1726 1835
277 258 270319
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
2010 2011 2012 2013
PhD
Masters and Professional
27
ResearchMetrics
28
AREAS OF FOCUS
INDICATORS 2010BASELINE
2013ASSESSMENT
THREE- ‐YEAR PROGRESS
CHANGE IN GAP TO TOP 25
TARGET2010 VS. 2013
RESEARCH FEDERAL RESEARCH EXPENDITURES
$70 M $127 M +57 M FAVORABLE
TOTAL RESEARCH EXPENDITURES $165 M $230 M +65M FAVORABLE
Research/Scholarship§ Governor’s Chairs
§ National Academy of Science
§ National Academy of Engineering
§ Bredesen Center
§ Center for the Humanities
§ Anderson Center
for Entrepreneurship29
Faculty and StaffMetrics
30
AREAS OF FOCUS
INDICATORS 2010BASELINE
2013ASSESSMENT
THREE- ‐YEAR
PROGRESS
CHANGE IN GAP TO TOP 25
TARGET2010 VS. 2012
FACULTY AVG. TENURE- ‐LINE SALARY RANGE
$66 to$107K
$73 to$121K
+$7 to$14K Favorable
UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS/TENURE- LI‐ NE FACULTY
20 WaiKng on data
Faculty
$73
$90
$85
$80
$75
$70
$65
$60
$55
$50
$95
Average Assistant Professor Salary; Fall 2012
$100
31
AspiraKon Target Peer
FacultyAverage Associate Professor Salary, Fall 2012
$120
$86
$90
$80
$70
$60
$50
$100
$110
AspiraKon Target Peer
UTKup 1
positionsince 2011
32
FacultyAverage Full Professor Salary, Fall 2012
$190
$121
$130
$110
$90
$70
$50
$150
$170
AspiraKon Target Peer
UTK up 1 position
since 2011
33
Faculty and Staff
§ Raises since 2011 – 16%
compounded (5% per year)
§ $52M in salaries since 2011
§ Permanent
funding
stays within
college34
Faculty and StaffAccomplishments
§ Endowed 37 chairs, professorships, and
faculty awards
§ Implemented career paths for lecturers
§ Completed a benchmarking compensation study
§ Performance-based merit pay
35
Top 25 Infrastructure ProgressProjects
underway üStudent
Union üStrong Hall
üResidence Hall
üLandscape Master
Plan
Recently completed
ü Natalie Haslam Music Center
ü John D. Tickle Engineering Building
ü Humanities and Social Sciences
ü Greve Hall
ü Brehm Animal Science
and Food Science Buildings
36
Top 25 Investments§ $10.4M invested in the past 3 years
– Strategic Instructional Fund
– Research
– Relieve bottleneck courses
– Faculty Hires
– Development and Alumni
– Advising
– First Year and Transition Programs– Vice Chancellor for
Diversity37
38
Looking Forward
Civility/Diversity/Citizenship
§ Core value
§ Everyone’s
responsibili
ty
§ Critical to
achieving
excellence
§ Vice Chancellor
for Diversity
30
Internationalization
40
Productive Partnerships
41
§ $6.9M formula phase-in
§ $7.4M appropriation improvements
§ $3.0M College of Engineering
§ $1.2M fringe benefit funding
§ $2.6M 1.5% salary increase (55%)
$21.1M proposed funding
§ $24M steam plant
§ $6M deferred maintenance
§ $20 million ($5m/year x 4 years) fora successful NSF Super Computer Proposal
FY 2013-14 Budget
42
Fixed costs, key iniKaKves, and strategic investments
FY 2013- 14 ‐Budget
In millions
43
Salary plan $11.9
College of Engineering $ 3.0
Systems charge increase/ recalibraKon $ 1.9
Hires / promoKons / ladders $ 1.1
Faculty startup commitments $ 0.8
Contract escalaKons & new building costs $ 1.4
Scholarship commitments $ 4.7
Top 25/academic reinvestments $ 4.3
Benefits + Grad Health Insurance $ 1.6
Waivers / Summer / DE / Shares $ 6.0
FY 2012-13 Proposed Uses of Revenues
Finances
44
§ Why are budgets tight?
– Tuition increases also cost us more money
– Raises $52M
– Construction/Renovation
– Strategic Top 25 investments
– Missed UG enrollment projection last year
– Graduate Fellowships ($12M)
Plan Going Forward
45
§ Tuition primary revenue source
§ 15-4 is being implemented
§ UG Enrollment goal=21,500, Fall 2014
§ Creative proposals to the state
Plan Going Forward
46
§ How can we be more confident in year-to-
year funding?
§ Why is athletic funding model changing?
47
ChallengesUT Florid
a State
Clemson Texas A&M
UC-Davis
% of classes <20 33% 34% 52% 19% 33%
% of classes of 50 or more
8% 16% 14% 25% 25%
First-year retention
85% 91% 91% 92% 92%
Total students 27,018 40,695 20,768 50,227 32,354
Number of faculty 1,458 1.268 1,051 2,034 1,596
Student/Faculty Ratio
19 32 20 25 20
Challenges
48
§ Board of Trustees – What do faculty do?
How much do they teach?
§ What is the role of higher education?
§ How can the cost of a degree be reduced?
–Increase productivity? Cut costs?
§ Political challenges…
Future
49
§ We have set our vision
§ We have made significant progress
§ But I need your continuing
advice, support, and help
50
Questions/ Comments
top related