7.dealing with brd in flemish veal calf production
Post on 04-Jul-2015
669 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
Dierengezondheidszorg Vlaanderen vzw
1
Dealing with BRD in Flemish veal calf productionDr. Koen De Bleecker
Dierengezondheidszorg Vlaanderen vzw
2
1. Introduction2. Situating the problem3. Evaluating the BRD-
complex4. Strategic approach
Content
3
Veal industry
4
• Small market: +/- 290.000 slaughtered calves on 1100 herds
• 95% in Flanders• 70% in the northern part (province of Antwerp)• Strongly integrated (>90%)• France (32%)> Netherlands (24%)> Belgium
(7%)
Veal calf production -Flanders
5
• 14 days on arrival – from different farms
• 3 breeds: dairy calves( 60%), Belgian Blue-calves(20%)and mixed breeds(20%)
• Individual untill 6 weeks after arrival, then groupe housing
• Slaughtered at 8 months (250kg)
• Nutrition‐ mainly milk powder‐ feed rich in fiber: 50 g to 250g at 20
weeks
• Production of white veal meat → ‘controlled’anemia
Veal calves
6
• Grown within ‘VEEPEILER’‐ Veepeiler= Monitoring program for cattle diseases
• Financed by Belgian Sanitary Fund= farmers money!!• Main Purpose: monitoring infectious diseases in cattle: both
existing and emerging• Means:
‐ Consultancy and advice for individual farms with specific problems: » guidance» extra analyses » follow-up
‐ Shorttime projects with focus on practical and current topics:» Veal calf BRD project
Situating the project
7
1/. Situate the problem: mortality/morbidity figures2/. Evaluate the BRD complex in the veal calf
industry identify the pathogens evaluate immunity evaluate environmental factors
3/. Strategic approach of BRD in the veal calf industry
Veal calf BRD project: aims & goals
8
• Gather figures on mortality/morbidity:‐ 15 herds (5837 calves)
• 5 HF – herds (2743 calves)• 5 Belgian Blue – herds (1487 calves)• 5 mixed breed – herds (1607 calves)
‐ between oct 2007- oct 2009
1/ Situate the problem
‘‘Measurement is the first step that leads to control and eventually to
improvement. If you can’t measure something, you can’t understand it. If
you can’t understand it, you can’t control it. If you can’t control it, you can’t
improve it.’’
H. James Harrington
Pneumonia border line the most important cause of mortality
Peritonitis/polyserositis and acute ruminitis important
Average mortality= 5,17% (127/2458)
Dairy 4,38 %
Mixed breed 4,76 %
Belgian Blue 7,43 %
9
Global mortality
Global mortality
2 peaks of mortality caused by pneumonia:
week 4‐8 (acute disease) and week 17‐23 (mainly loss due to chronic pneumonia) 10
1 large peritonitis peak: week 8‐11
Polyserositis/peritonitis peak immediatly after a pneumonia peak11
Global mortality
Peritonitis/polyserositis in veal calvesExsudative fibrinous peritonitis
often with pneumonia, sometimes pleuritis
Several agents have been cultured:
Pasteurella, Mannheimia, E. coli, Klebsiella,…
Etiology?
Hematogenous?
Primary source:• lung?
• abomasum?
Catry et al., 2005 J Clin Microbiol.43(3):1480-312
• Belgian Blue (7.43%)>> crossbreeds (4.76%) > dairy breed (4.38%)
• Pneumonia of greater importance in the Belgian Blue and crossbreed
• Belgian Blue: enterotoxaemia, arthritis, necrobacillosis
• Dairy breed: omphalitis and perforating abomasal ulcers
• All breeds: polyserositis/peritonitis, acute ruminitis and diarrhea13
Global morbidity
19.44% individually treated (478/2458 calves at risk)
Pneumonia most important reason for individual treatment
Diarrhea, otitis externa/media, peritonitis/polyserositis and arthritis important •14
Pneumonia peak: week 2‐5 (climax week 5) (age: 24‐49 days)
Diarrhea: week 1‐3
Peritonitis/polyserositis: week 7‐11
2e half: limited amount of individual treatment 15
Dairy 17.12 %
Mixed breed 21.73 %
Belgian Blue 21.62 %
• Pneumonia: more treatment in Belgian Blue
(expensive calves‐farmer influence?‐ increased susceptibility pneumonia)
• Belgian Blue: necrobacillosis, arthritis (also mixed breed)
• Otitis: dairy and mixed
• Peritonitis: dairy 16
Pneumonia on all farms the most important reason for treatment, but large variation
Farm related: peritonitis, otitis, arthritis, omphalitis
True differences or ‘farmers nature’?17
Morbidity parameters
farm 1 HF farm 2 HF farm 7 HF farm 3 BBxHF
farm 5 BBxHF
farm 4 BWB
farm 6 BWB average
SARGEANT ET AL. **
Percentage individually treated 15,72 27,31 13,77 25,81 16.67 21,84 20.35 20.3559,1
(46‐78,5)
Number of treatment days 941 238,00 222,00 115,00 70,00 394,00 334.43 334.43 ‐
Number of treatment days per treated calf 7.23 3.35 3.64 2,40 2,80 5,71 6.12 4.46
5,6(4,5‐10,6)
Number of treatment days per calf 1,14 0.91 0,50 0,62 0,47 1,25 1.31 0.89
3,3(3,1‐8,2)
* * Sargeant et al., 1994, Canadian Journal of Veterinary Research 58, 189‐195
In Belgium less individual treatments compared to Canada
Major farm differences
Number of individual treatments: high on both Belgian blues
Adequate individual therapy length, but not always on consecutive days
But substantial amount of group treatments 18
Group treatments
42 group treatments for 6 farms: average= 7 (4‐12)
BRD most important reason for group treatment
* Data on 6 farms (farm 4 excluded)
Conclusions• Mortality and morbidity: Belgian Blue > crossbreed > dairy
• Pneumonia– at very young age: 24-49 days (week 2-5 after arrival)– more problems in the Belgian Blue breed– all farms, large variation
• Peritonitis/polyserositis – farm related– all breeds: differences in clinical presentation between dairy
and Belgian Blue
• Acute ruminitis – all farms, large variation between farms 20
Conclusions• Breed predisposition
– Belgian Blue: arthritis, necrobacillosis, pneumonia, enterotoxaemia
– dairy breed: peritonitis/polyserositis, perforating abomasal ulcers
• Farm related prevalence– peritonitis/polyserositis, otitis, arthritis, omphalitis,
pneumonia, diarrhea, acute ruminitis
• Antibiotic use– extensive!! (group >> individual)
21
22
• Multifactorial• Complex interaction of different factors
(animal-environment-pathogens)• Tendency to overestimate the importance of
the pathogens involved!
2/ Evaluate the BRD-complex
Multifactorial model
Environ-
mentAnimal
Pathogens
BRD• Breed
• FPT ( colostrum)
• Oppressed
immunity (BVDV)
• Malnutrition
• Se-status
• Vaccinations
• Stress
• Ventilation and
climate
• Population density
• Hygiëne
• Herd management
• Humidity
• Dust
• Irritating gasses
• Viruses
• Bacteria
• Parasites
Identify the pathogens
I
d
e
n
t
i
f
y
Sampling 24 BRD-
’outbreaks’(okt. 07- Jan. 09)
-1.serumsamples of 10
calves: Ab BRD-virussen
and Mycoplasma bovis
-2.deep nasopharyngeal
swabs
-3.post mortems
Bacteria: calf level
Mycoplasma strongly present on calf level
32.7% of the calves: mixed infections
• 32.9% calves seroconverted clearly for M. bovis during
BRD-outbreak (63.2% showing increasing Ab- titer)
• Presence of Mycoplasma bovis during peak of BRD-
problems on 23/24 outbreaks
• M. haemolytica en P. multocida 70.8% each of the
outbreaks
• All three major bacterial pathogens found in 59.1% of the
outbreaks
Mycoplasma bovis
Antibiotics resistance
A lot of antibiotics frequently used orally seem to work inadequately
against the common pathogens
• BVD most found in serovonversions
• Mixed viral infections are seldom (5,6%) BVD frequently
found in those mixed infections
Viruses: calf level
Still BVD most present, followed by parainfluenza
IBR and bRSV seems to be less important
Viruses: herd level
• Outburst peak around 6.5 weeks after arrival (1-12.5 weken)
• 28.5% of the lungs = typical lesions for Mycoplasma bovis
• Mycoplasma bovis isolated in 61.9% of the lungs
• 33%: A. pyogenes ( suppurating bacteria)
• Mannheimia en Pasteurella found only sporadical
• 60% of the calves: BVD virus positive
• 20% of the calves: RSV positive
Post mortem
33
• What do we know so far?‐ A lot of information!‐ Problems that were found: frequent therapy failure!
• High presence of Mycoplasma bovis: few specific treatments
• High presence of BVDV• ‘Common’ BRD bacteria resistant to frequently used
antibiotics‐ Too many different types of antibiotics on herd and on calf level!‐ Insufficient in duration‐ Insufficient in indication
3/ Strategic approach of BRD
34
• What is failure of therapy?‐ Not working of a treatment = relapsing calves
• Evaluation of one of the outburst:
3/ Strategic approach of BRD
40/182 (22%) calves were individual
treated
72,2% single treatment (11% long
shot)
27,8% two or three days treatment
same antibiotic: 20%
different antibiotics: 80%
1e treatment Amount of calves (% of treated
animals)Lincospectin + Neopen
57.6%
Danofloxacine 15.3%Cefquinome 7.7%Tulathromycine 7.7%Florfenicol + marbofloxine
3.8%
Marbofloxacine 3.8%Tilmicosine 3.8%
35
• In conclusion of this outburst
3/ Strategic approach of BRD
Product Amount of daysAmoxycillin + Colistin
6
Doxycyclin 5Oxytetracyclin 10Oxytetracyclin + Tylosin
10
• 24% of the doses go to calves that finally die!!!
• 29% of the doses given to 3 calves !!!(1 BVD positive, died)
• Group treatments
Amount of treatmentdays /treated calf:
5 days (individual) + 31 days= 36 days
Product Nb of given dosesLincospectin 41Neopen 43Gentaject 1Advocin 27Nuflor 14Cobactan 9Vetalgin 3Vetodexin 28Meflosyl 9Micotil 10Metacam 3Floxadyl 3Emdofluxim 6Draxxin 6Marbocyl 5Dicural 1Multivit. 1Potencil 2
212
36
• What can we change in treatments?‐ Treat quickly‐ Treat long enough‐ Treat with broad-spectrum
• Won’t this increase labour for the farmer?‐ NO:
• Less relapsing calves, less treatments• Use longacting one-shot products!
3/ Strategic approach of BRD
SCORE 0 1 2 3Rectal t°C (°C)
< 38.5 38.5-39.0 39.0-39.5 > 39.5
Cough None Induced single cough Induced repeated cough or occasional spontaneous cough
Repeated spontaneous cough
Nasal discharge
Normal, serous Limited quantities of unilateral ‘cloud’colored discharge
Bilateral ‘cloud’ ofexcessive muceus discharge
Abundant bilateral and purulent
Awareness Normal Slower, but responding to stimulus
Isolated,responding slowly to stimulus, lying down a lot
Strongly reduced, few responding to stimulus
37
Decision making on treating or not: Score chart (McGuirk)
38
• When do we treat an animal?‐ Temp: 40°C → 3‐ Spontaneous cough → 2‐ Nasal discharge ‘cloud’ → 1‐ Eyes → 0‐ Moderate drooping ears → 1‐ Total = 7
3/ Strategic approach of BRD
When score> 5 = treatment
With the thermometer in hand…
39
S h f t l
40
3/ Strategic approach of BRD
Decision of first treatment:
Score chart
Long shot or 7 days
Therapy succes
Failure of therapy:
daily antibiotics
for 1 weekTherapy failure:
Moving to sick-
bay
Euthanasia?
BVD‐antigen test?
3e treatment round?
*B. Pardon
Fac. Vet.Med.
Ghent University
41
• Why moving to a sick-bay?‐ Chronically ill or relapsing calves: big shedders of
infection!• BVD carrier• chronically Mycoplasma infected
‐ ‘Sick-bay’: as far as possible from healthy calves
3/ Strategical approach of BRD
42
• Last but not least‐ we know that:
• calves arriving from different herds : a lot of different pathogens!
• some pathogens (Mycoplasma!) survive in wet and chilly stable conditions
‐ key words between 2 rounds of calves:• 1/ cleaning• 2/ desinfecting• 3/ sanitary void and drying!
3/ Strategical approach of BRD
4343
Thank you for your attention!
Any questions?
top related