香港六合彩
Post on 01-Dec-2014
1.463 Views
Preview:
DESCRIPTION
TRANSCRIPT
Research for Patient Benefit
Professor Celia DaviesProgramme Director
National Institute for Health Research
Infrastructure
Clinical Research Facilities & Centres
Clinical Research Networks
Research
Research Projects & Programmes
Research Governance
Systems
Research Information
Systems
Systems
Patients&
Public
Universities
Investigators &Senior
InvestigatorsAssociates
Faculty
Trainees
Research Units & Schools
NHS Trusts
NIHR Research Programmes Translating research evidence into NHS practice
Basic Research (Biomedical, population,Social Science& engineering & technology)
Experimental Medicine
Effectivenessand cost-effectiveness
Adoption into theservice
Proof of concept Efficacy
Knowledge transfer for NHS
NICE
Research Centres
Programme Grants
Healthcare Technology Cooperatives
Health Technology Assessment
Service Delivery and Organisation
Research for Innovation, Speculation and Creativity
New & Emerging Applications of Tech.
Health Technology Devices
Research for Patient Benefit
Research for Patient Benefit
• response-mode funding programme • supports high quality health services and
public health research relevant to the NHS• administered by the NIHR Central
Commissioning Facility • ten Regional Funding Committees
Nicholas Tarrier
Research for Patient Benefit Regional Committee Chairs
Senga Bond
Paul Johnstone
Hywel Williams
Ian Harvey
Charles Wolfe
Helen SmithChristina Victor
Stuart Logan
Steve Cropper
Research for Patient Benefit- the programme
• funding building to £25 million per year after three years
• grants may be up to 36 months duration with a maximum cost of £250k
Aims
– study the way that NHS services are provided and used
– evaluate whether interventions are effective and provide value for money
– examine whether alternative means for providing healthcare would be more effective in terms of cost and effectiveness
– formally assess innovations and developments in healthcare
supporting projects in health services and public health research that could:
RfPB - A vision of research….
• arising from daily practice in the NHS• developed between NHS and other partners• open as to topic and as to method• generating tangible benefits in health • and health care
- a responsive programme with a strategic scope - both regionally delivered and centrally led
The first competition: the process…
• 651 ROIs• 279 full proposals• 141 peer reviewed• 25 funded
an overall success rate of 9% - but varying by
region and changing as the programme builds up
The first competition: the outcomes…
25 projects • based in a diversity of settings and care groups• concerned with clinical and non-clinical topics • using a diversity of methods and research techniques• building partnerships between the NHS, academia and
patient groups
not the usual suspects, not the established priorities
Preparing a proposal ... early stages
• Build the right team for the task
• Use the PPI grid not just at the end but at an early stage as a design aid
• Partnerships are possible and often preferable
Preparing a Proposal ... developing the application
• The usual rules for sound research apply
• Address the scope criteria explicitly
• Use critical readers not only inside but outside the specialist area
Preparing a Proposal … before you submit
• Scan all guidance and web resources again (include FAQs, Director’s Message &c.)
• Familiarise yourself with the submission rules
• If in doubt … contact CCF
RfPB
RDSUs INVOLVE
Improving Quality and Relevance
Towards an Agenda for Action
1. RDSU sign-up as peer reviewers
2. A timely and jointly agreed Director’s Message
3. ???
4. ???
5. ???
Visit the website… www.nihr-ccf.org.uk
for:• guidance to applicants• FAQs• application forms• closing dates (for ROI and full proposal) • help and advice from CCF• messages from the Programme Director
top related