>?3klemd:mkl::kj;b3?m ihklmidmih … › files › master-radovi › pesic-danilo.pdf ·...

Ј ИЈ

( а а )

: 022/14 –

, 2016.

..................................................................................................................................... 1

I : ............................................................................ 4

II : ....... 7

2.1 ........................................................... 7

..................................................................................... 9

( ) ............................... 13

2.4 ..................................................... 14

2.5 .................................................... 15

III : .............................. 17

3.1 ................................................................. 17

3.2 ..................... 19

3.3 ................................................... 21

3.4 ............................................................. 23

IV : ................................................................... 24

V : ............................................................................ 42

........................................................................... 46

Ђ ................................................................. 48

.......................................................................................... 49

.............................................................................................. 52

2006. ,

(1990), .

170. ,

ђ , ,

2015. ,

01.01.2015. 31.12.2015. .

01.01.2015. 31.12.2015. ,

, , 2014. ,

- , ђ

, - ђ

ђ , . ђ

ђ , , ,

.2 ђ ,

, , 1 . , : - , II , ,

ђ , , , 2012, . 16 2 . , ђ ђ , ,

, 57/2011, . 186

, ђ . ђ

1950. , ђ

1950. ,

1948. , ђ ђ

ђ , , 1966.

) . ђ

, ђ , ,

. 3 . , У , 3 , , 2014, . 95

4 . , –

, , . 56, 2010, . 154 5 . , –

, , , 1989, . 97 - 98

„ “.7 ,

, , ђ

6 . , , , . 23, 1983, . 323

7 : . ,

ђ , , , 2010, . 140

, „amparo“, ђ

. 1931. 8.

- , „ mparo“ ,

„ mparo“ .

1848. ,

1874. 1893. , ,

„ “ 1867. ,

, 1920. 1945. .

, ђ ,

1969. 9.

( , , , , ,

ђ , , , , , , ).

8 . Ђ , У , , 2000, . 32-35

9 . , ђ

, ђ – (З ), , , 2009, . 104

„amparo“ , ,

( . ), ( . ).

1963. 11,

„ “. , 229. . 2.,

“.12 1963. 13,

1974. 15,

1990. 16, ђ

. 1992. 17

„ “.

2003. 18 ђ

G. Dannemman, „Constitutional Complaints: The European Perspective“, International and comparative Law

Quarterly, Vol. 43, 1994, pp. 142 11

( , 14/63 ) 12

229. .2. ( , 14/63 ) 13

( , 54/63 ) 14

: . , „ ђ ?“,

, . 2/2007 , . 71-72 15

( , 8/74 ) 16

( , 1/90 ) 17

( , 1/92 ) 18

( , 1/03 )

ђ 19,

2006. 21, , ђ

. , 170.

ђ „

“. , ,

, ђ .22

“, . „

ђ “23. .

„ “24. .

“.25 .

ђ ( , 26/03 )

20 . , op.cit., . 73

21 ( , 98/06 )

22 . , У – II, , 2013, . 481

23 . , У , , 1960, .68-72, . , У – II, ,

2014, . 482 24

. , : , ђ ( ), , 2008, . 266

25 . , У , , 2011, 87

“.26 .

“27. .

. , „ ђ ?“, , . 2/2007 , . 71

27 . , У , , .

4/2007, . 202 28

. , У – , , . 1/2012, . 222

29 T. Karakamisheva-Jovanovska, PapОr „Constitutional Complaint-Procedural and Legal Instrument for

Development of the Constitutional Justice (Case study-Federal Republic of Germany, Republic of Croatia,

RОpublic oП SlovОnia and RОpublic oП MacОdonia)“, World Conference on Constitutional Justice on theme:

“IЧПХuОЧtТКХ CШЧstТtutТШЧКХ JustТce: its influence on Society and on developing a global human rights

УurТspruНОЧМО”, ШrРКЧТгОН Лв tСО CШЧstТtutТШЧКХ CШurt ШП ЋШutС AПrТМК КЧН tСО VОЧТМО CШЦЦТssТШЧ, CКpО TШаЧ, 23-24 January 2009, pp. 3 , http://www.venice.coe.int/WCCJ/WCCJ_papers_E.asp

( , ђ

„ “,

( ) ђ .

( ) , .

ђ , ( ,

, ђ )

( , , , .).

( ), ( ),

, 170.

ђ , .

e : . , . , ђ , , , 2010, . 106

ђ ђ ,

ђ ђ .

16. 194. , ђ ђ

ђ ђ ,

ђ ђ ђ

. , ђ ђ , , , 57/2011, . 189

32 30.10.2008. 02.04.2009. ,

http://www.ustavni.sud.rs/page/view/163-100890/stavovi-suda 33

. , У , , , 31/1991, . 142

ђ , .

ђ ( ). ,

. ( ) ђ

. ђ :

. , op.cit,, . 106 35

: . , У , , 14, , 2007, . 834

, ( , .).

, , „

“. . :

36. 30

84. ( , . 109/2007, 99/2011, 18/13 – , 40/2015 103/2015 )

– . ђ , ђ

, ђ ,

85. ( , . 109/2007, 99/2011, 18/13 – , 40/2015 103/2015 )

: . 38

( ) , ,

3) ђ ,

2) ђ ;

4) ђ ђ

. , У – II, , 2013, . 507

D. Kommers: The constitutional jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of Germany, Durham, London,

1997, p. 14

, , ђ

, „ “

ђ . ,

ђ ђ .

, , ђ

ђ , ђ ,

ђ . ђ ,

, „ 43“.

, inter partes, ђ ,

. , – У , , 65/2013, . 375

41 . , Љ , ђ

, , , 2012, . 90 42

. , У , , , , 2013, . 290 - 310

43 G. Harutyunyan & A.Mavcic, Constitutional Review and Its Development in theModern World: a

Comparative Constitutional Analysis, Yerevan-Ljubljana, 1999, p. 157

( , . 28/2008

. 27/2008)

. , ђ , ,

. , sui generis ,

86. .1 ( , . 109/2007, 99/2011, 18/13 – , 40/2015 103/2015 )

45 , . , У , , 2011, . 107 - 108

46 78. ( , . 103/2013 )

. : „

– 6445/2013 21.04.2016. )

– . ,

ђ , ,

: L.Garlicki, ''Constituional courts versus supreme courts'', ICON, Volume 5, No.1, 2007, pp. 49

2015. 48. ђ , 2015.

2014. 10.382 ,

2015. 9.538 9,13% . ,

9.162 , 376

( „ “).

, 2015. 8.810, 545 (5,83%)

2014. . (

) – 266 , 63 (19,15%)

2015. 79,

296 2014. .

( 7) ђ .

2015. 14.958

, 24.496

( . „ “ ).

94,12%

– 23.057 (14.247

8.810 );

– 1.063 (352 711

/ / ђ ђ

( 266 48

2015. , 2015. 2014. ,

http://www.ustavni.sud.rs/page/view/137-101100/pregled-rada

403 ) 353

(79 274

ђ , 505 „ “ .

2015. 11.516 . ђ

10.501 (

„ “), 621 / /

394 . „ “ (

„ “).

13.110 : 12.556

111 „ “ . ,

I – 621

621 394

1. 2015.

http://www.ustavni.sud.rs/page/jurisprudence/35/

, , , ,

13,46%, 1.700

, 2014. . ђ ,

ђ 2.635

, 2015.

( 2014. 10.853 ,

2015. 10.501 ).

. . 2015.

1 2006. 2009. , 7 2010.

, 66 2011 , 1520 2012. , 4067

2013. , 5505 2014. 349 2015. .

2. 2015.

1 1 7 66

01.01.2015. , 3.042

2014. .

44.578 .

, 31.12.2015. ,

57.141 .

2006 – 2015

2006 34 34 0

2007 325 325 0

2008 359 1567 1926 363

2009 1514 2843 4357 1225

2010 3118 5555 8673 3496

2011 5605 6929 12534 2806

2012 9346 10069 19415 7328

2013 12101 11654 23755 8013

2014 15744 9355 25099 10853

2015 14247 8810 23057 10501

57141 44580

2006 1

2009 1

2010 7

2011 66

2012 1520

2013 4067

2014 5505

2015 349

ђ , ђ ,

2015. 5.138

, 1.348.

. 3. 2015.

9538 11516

5138 7128

1348 1197

, ђ ,

2015. 4.723 , 4.616

, 1.003

, 2015. 964

. 4. /

/ 2015.

8810 10501

4723 4616

1003 964

/ 2015.

, 2015.

23.057 , 10.501

, 12.556 2016. .

2010. , 61 2011. , 1.498

2012. , 3.961 2013.

, 4742 2014. 235

2015. .

5. 2015.

2015. 10501

3961 4742

, 10.501 ,

1.164 (11,08%) , 467 (4,44%)

, 8.657 (82,43%) , 36

(0,34%) 177 (1,68%) .

6. 2015.

467 (4,44%)

1164 (11,08%)

8657 (82,43%)

36 (0,34%) 177 (1,68%)

Одлук о од ј њу у т л

Одлук о у ј њу у т л

е ење о од њу у т л

е ење о о у т по тупк

е е о д у

, 1296 (79,46%)

ђ , 89 (5,46%) , 244

(14,96%) 2 (0,12%) .

ђ 1296 79,46%

89 5,46%

244 14,96%

2 0,12%

: 1631 100%

79,46%

5,46% 0,12%

14,96%

7. 2015. %

8. 2015.

, 1.164

(71,37%), 467 (28,63%).

ђ – 987 ,

– 141 ,

, – 35 , 1

9. 2015.

ђ 987 309 1296

35 54 89

141 103 244

1164 467 1631

Г ђ ко п о

К о п о

п о п о

О т ле о л т п

54 103

ј јуће одлуке

Од ј јуће одлуке

( 21. ) – 1 ;

( 30. ) – 2 ;

( 31. ) – 2

ђ ( 32. ) – 544 ;

( 32. 1. ) – 543 ;

ђ ( 32. 1. ) – 11 ;

( 34. 2.

– „ “) – 1 ;

( 34. 3. ) – 2

( 36. 1. ) – 90

( 36. . 2. ) – 23

( 46. ) – 1

( 58. ) – 32 ;

( 60. 4. ) – 35

( 60. 4. ) – 4 ;

( 65. ) – 2 .

, 1 8.

л . т

л 59.

л . т

д к је - 1

у т л

т о - у т е л е

ј ње п т о - у т е л е

о п о уђење - 544

у т л

о уђење у у о оку у по тупку кој је око - 543

у т е л е о п у у о т к о

еле е т п п о уђење - у т л

у о т у к е о п у - у т л

о п етпо т ку е о т - у т е л е

о јед ку т ту п - у т л

о п о ед т о - 23

у т е л е

ло од љењ њ - у т л

о о у - у т е л е

о д - у т л

о ед п п у т ту у лу ју п е т к д о од о - у т е л е

ду о т од тељ - 2

у т е л е

10. 2015.

ђ 544

32. 1.

34. 2.

34. 3. 2

36. 1.

36. 2.

58. 32

60. 4.

ђ , ,

2015. ђ (544) 2014. (

1.415). ђ

ђ ( 2015.

2014. 2.

ђ , –

ђ , . ,

, ђ ,

, ђ ђ ,

. 8 , 8 8 ђ

01.01.2016. ,

ђ ( , 40/2015)

. ђ ,

ђ ( ,

40/2015) ђ

2016. ,

01.01.2016. ,

ђ , 408

660,217 , , 11

), 2 ђ

. 89. 2.

2015. 8.657

2012. 10.000

, 2013. 11.200 2014. 14.200

2015. . 2.698

, , 2015 –

, 2.491

, 17 .

„ “), 112 .

I 7 ђ

11. I 2015.

7 (6,25%) 5 (4,46%)

7 (6,25%)

91 (81,25%)

1 (0,89%)

I 2015.

ђ ђ :

30. 36.

(„ “, 36/09) – I 479/2014

09.04.2015. , „ “, 61/2015,

(„ “, 121/12) –

I 156/2014 26.03.2015. , „

“, 63/2015,

, ђ .;

(„ “, 72/11, 108/13 142/14) –

I 90/2014 15.07.2015. , „

“, 88/2015, ,

ђ („ “, 51/92,

53/93, 67/93, 17/99 33/99, „ “, 21/01 „

“, 29/01 101/15) – I 204/2013 09.04.2015.

, „ “, 88/2015,

312. 313.

(„ “, 41/09, 53/10, 101/11 32/13 –

) I 196/2013 17.12.2015. ,

„ “, 9/2016,

31. 7. („ “,

115/05) I 799/2012 09.04.2015. ,

„ “, 63/2015,

(„ “, 38/13) 02 – 3570/2013

22.04.2013. ,

. . , . .

, . . .

, „ ,

, „ “ ,

.“ ( I 180/2013 26.03.2015. .)

. 170. ,

, ђ , , ,

, – .

, . ђ

, ( 80%

95% ) ,

, a priori

2015. ђ (544) 2014. (

1.415). ђ

ђ ( 2015.

2014. 2.

ђ , –

ђ , . ,

, ђ ,

, ђ ђ ,

. 8 , 8 8 ђ

01.01.2016. ,

ђ ( , 40/2015)

. ђ ,

ђ ( ,

40/2015) ђ

2016. ,

01.01.2016. ,

2014. 2015. ,

, ђ ,

. 2012.

2013. 2016.

2014. 2015. .

1. Dannemman Gerhard, „Constitutional Complaints: The European Perspective“,

International and comparative Law Quarterly, Vol. 43, 1994

2. Ђ , У , , , 2000

3. , : - , II ,

, ђ ,

, , 2012

4. Garlicki Lech, ''Constituional courts versus supreme courts'', ICON, Volume 5, No.1,

5. Harutyunyan Gagik & Mavcic Arne, Constitutional Review and Its Development in

the Modern World: a Comparative Constitutional Analysis, Yerevan-Ljubljana, 1999

6. Karakamisheva-Jovanovska anja, PapОr „Constitutional Complaint-Procedural and

Legal Instrument for Development of the Constitutional Justice (Case study-Federal

Republic of Germany, Republic of Croatia, Republic of Slovenia and Republic of

MacОdonia)“, АШrХН CШЧПОrОЧМО ШЧ CШЧstТtutТШЧКХ JustТМО ШЧ tСОЦО: “IЧПХuОЧtТКХ

Constitutional Justice: its influence on Society and on developing a global human

rТРСts УurТspruНОЧМО”, ШrРКЧТгОН Лв tСО CШЧstТtutТШЧКХ CШurt ШП ЋШutС AПrТМК КЧН tСО

Venice Commission, Cape Town, 23-24 January 2009

7. Kommers Donald, The constitutional jurisprudence of the Federal Republic of

Germany, Durham, London, 1997

8. , У , , 1960

9. , „ ђ

?“, , . 2/2007

10. , У , ,

, , 2013

11. , У ђ

У , ђ –

, 3. , , 2009

12. , –

, 56/2010

13. , -

У , , 65/2013

14. , У ,

, 4/2007

15. , , ђ

, 2010

16. , У , , 2011

17. , У , 3 ,

, 2014

18. , У

, , , 31/1991

19. , У , , . 14,

, 2007

20. , :

, ђ ( ),

, 2008

21. , Љ , ђ

, 2012

22. , У – ,

, . 1/2012, . 222

23. , ,

, . 23, 1983

24. , –

, 1989

25. , У – II, , 2013

ђ , , ,

27. , ђ ђ

57/2011

1. ( , 98/06)

, 1/03)

3. ( , 1/92)

4. ( , 1/90)

5. ( , 8/74)

6. ( , 14/63)

7. ( , . 103/2013)

8. ђ (

, 26/03)

9. ( , . 109/2007, 99/2011, 18/13 –

, 40/2015 103/2015)

10. ( , 54/63)

11. ђ ( , 116/2008, 104/2009,

101/2010, 31/2011 – . , 78/2011 – . , 101/2011, 101/2013, 106/2015,

40/2015 – . 13/2016)

12. ђ ( ,

40/2015)

1. 30.10.2008.

02.04.2009. , http://www.ustavni.sud.rs/page/view/163-100890/stavovi-suda

2. – 6445/2013 21.04.2016.

3. I 180/2013 26.03.2015. , "

", . 65/2015

4. 2015. , http://www.ustavni.sud.rs/page/view/137-

101100/pregled-rada

5. 2014. , http://www.ustavni.sud.rs/page/view/137-

101100/pregled-rada

( 95%) ,

К : У , ,

, У , У

ABSTRACT

„TСО ОППОМt ШП tСО НОМТsТШЧs ШП the Constitutional Court of Serbia in the process of

МШЧstТtutТШЧКХ КppОКХ“

The essential function of the Constitutional Court is the implementation of

normative control and preservation of the principles of constitutionality and legality, but in

recent decades, deciding on constitutional appeals impose itself as one of the most important

tasks of the Constitutional Court. In this regard, the Constitutional Court has to deal with the

fact that control of the constitutionality of the law is no longer his numerically dominant

jurisdiction, constitutional appeal has become dominant. What is the importance of the

introduction of constitutional complaint shows the statistics, according to which the biggest

number of cases in front of the Constitutional Court (almost 95%) make the constitutional

appeal, perceived by citizens as a last resort for justice and protection of rights.

However, although it is considered as one of the most effective legal instruments of

direct protection of fundamental human rights and freedoms, the constitutional appeal in

practice, indicates on some flaws and problems related to its existence. Reconsideration and

abolition of court decisions, in legal systems which classify constitutional judiciary outside

the borders of regular judiciary, guaranteeing the independence of the judicial authority and

its primacy in resolving legal disputes, Constitutional Court goes beyond the limits of its

constitutional permission, avoiding the constitutional norm that the legally valid decisions of

the judicature, definitive, compulsory and can not be subject of extrajudicial control. A

possible solution for this problem should be look for in a precise definition of the range

(ambit) examination of court decisions on constitutional complaints by the Constitutional

Court, on the one hand, and the effects of the decision of the Constitutional Court in relation

to the court decision, on the other.

Finally, the last word in the interpretation of the constitution and determining

the violation of human rights and freedoms has a constitutional court, which must sanction

any forms of unconstitutionality, regardless of whether it comes from the legislative,

executive or judicial branches of government. In such treatment, the courts must accept the

constitutional court as a partner in a common goal - the protection of constitutionality, not as a

rival and competitor in the resolution of legal disputes.

Keywords: Constitutional Court, the protection of fundamental human rights and

freedoms, constitutional appeal, the effect of the decisions of the Constitutional Court, the

relationship between the Constitutional Court and the regular courts

, , ђ 13. 1990. .

- „ “ 2009. .

2009/2010 ,

02.07.2014. 8,88.

. 2014. ,

– „ 2015. “,

pНП , .

, 31.10.2016.

______________________________

УО ,

• ; • , ,

, ; • .

, 31.10.2016.

______________________________

>?3klemd:mkl::kj;b3?m ihklmidmih … › files › master-radovi › pesic-danilo.pdf ·...

Documents

effectsofsurfaceroughnessonthelocomotionof along...

where we are zml plants history 1971 -start of activity as a...

research article phenozan influence on the physiological...

w z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z z...

present status of ganges river dolphins platanista...

themarylandamphibianandreptileatlas:avolunteer-based...

zml: z formal specifications using...

zml zng zing “z39.50 over xml” “z39.50 next...

marketing planning ppt,a1,zml-kkkw-new corrected

research article cytochrome c oxidase sequences of zambian...

areviewofthe“open”and“closed”circulatorysystems...

6688==88..,, 66:::,,))777 - autonet suzuki · s ] µ v ] z...

mosaicandregulationphenomenaduringtheearlyformation...

research article phenotypic variation in freshwater murrel...

virtualized classroom – automated production,...

hlq ldou-22.ru/upload/dokumenti-1580824272-0.pdf ·...

· 2 39470 d v 8 .4.oes 5super ectp. ect- i ect- i...

research article cockroach infestation and factors...

contact sheet - brigade models · contact sheet author:...

revivingalegacycitizenscienceprojecttoilluminateshiftsin...