264) assignment-part b.pdf 220179206 d g tharindu (hsns...qm qm qm qm page 5 comment 11 antibiotic...
Post on 13-Jul-2020
32 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
220179206 D G Tharindu (HSNS264) Assignment-Part B.pdf
by Tharindu Dushyantha Dewalegama Gamacharige
Submission date: 23-Apr-2018 01:52PM (UTC+1000)Submission ID: 951665646File name:140127_Tharindu_Dushyantha_Dewalegama_Gamacharige_220179206_D_G_Tharindu__HSNS_264__Assign.pdfWord count: 1853Character count: 11143
Paper Reviewed by Dr Z Smith U/C
well done
1
2
well done
3
Citat ion Needed
4
I
Citat ion Needed
Citat ion Needed
S
S
I
11
Support
12
Citat ion Needed
A
Citat ion Needed
14
Citat ion Needed
r
Weak T ransit ion16
Citat ion Needed
AS
B P
well done
21
well done
P
Citat ion Needed
PCitat ion Needed
A P
26
17%SIMILARITY INDEX
10%INTERNET SOURCES
4%PUBLICATIONS
16%STUDENT PAPERS
1 5%
2 2%
3 1%
4 1%
5 1%
6 1%
7 1%
8 1%
9 1%
220179206 D G Tharindu (HSNS 264) Assignment-Part B.pdfORIGINALITY REPORT
PRIMARY SOURCES
Submitted to University of NewcastleStudent Paper
Submitted to Charles Sturt UniversityStudent Paper
Submitted to Bath Spa University CollegeStudent Paper
Submitted to University of NorthamptonStudent Paper
Submitted to 97324Student Paper
Submitted to City High-Middle SchoolStudent Paper
faculty.mercer.eduInternet Source
Submitted to Queensland University ofTechnologyStudent Paper
Submitted to Flinders UniversityStudent Paper
10 1%
11 1%
12 1%
13 1%
14 <1%
15 <1%
Exclude quotes Of f
Exclude bibliography Of f
Exclude matches Of f
Submitted to University of Central LancashireStudent Paper
Submitted to University of New EnglandStudent Paper
Submitted to University of South AustraliaStudent Paper
admin.isprambiente.gov.itInternet Source
www.csu.edu.auInternet Source
www.nanda-books.comInternet Source
QM
QM
QM
FINAL GRADE
18/25
220179206 D G Tharindu (HSNS 264) Assignment-Part B.pdfGRADEMARK REPORT
GENERAL COMMENTS
Instructor
Well Done
A very well presented academic article.
You have good knowledge of the treatment required f or Asthmatic patients.
Some minor spelling errors throughout and you justneeded to support a f ew important pieces ofinf ormation f or me.
Fiona Wiggins. RN.
PAGE 1
Paper Reviewed by Dr Z Smith U/C
Paper Reviewed by Dr Z Smith U/C
well donewell done
PAGE 2
Comment 1oedma - spelling error.
Comment 2Please no need to ref erence within the introduction.
well donewell done
QM
QM
QM
Comment 3spelling error
PAGE 3
Citation NeededCite Source:Please use the link below to f ind links to inf ormation regarding specif ic citation styles:http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html
Comment 4spelling error.
PAGE 4
Text Comment. I
Strikethrough.
Citation NeededCite Source:Please use the link below to f ind links to inf ormation regarding specif ic citation styles:http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html
Citation NeededCite Source:Please use the link below to f ind links to inf ormation regarding specif ic citation styles:http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html
Text Comment. S
Strikethrough.
Text Comment. S
Strikethrough.
Text Comment. I
Strikethrough.
Strikethrough.
Strikethrough.
QM
QM
QM
QM
PAGE 5
Comment 11Antibiotic would have been a better word used here.
SupportSupport Needed:A well-written paper will include strong support f or its thesis. Support f or your thesis shouldcome f rom primary (original documents, interviews, and personal experiences) and secondary(inf ormation that has been processed or interpreted by someone else) sources. To use yoursupport ef f ectively, you must elaborate upon the inf ormation, quotations, and examples takenf rom your sources and connect them to your thesis. It is also important to remember to cite thesources of the evidence and support you use in your paper.
Comment 12Please use the f ull Upper Respiratory Tract Inf ection in the f irst instance then you mayabbreviate f ollowing same.
Citation NeededCite Source:Please use the link below to f ind links to inf ormation regarding specif ic citation styles:http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html
Text Comment. A
Strikethrough.
Citation NeededCite Source:Please use the link below to f ind links to inf ormation regarding specif ic citation styles:http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html
PAGE 6
Comment 14Non steroidal anti inf lammatory drugs.
Citation NeededCite Source:Please use the link below to f ind links to inf ormation regarding specif ic citation styles:http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html
Text Comment. r
Strikethrough.
QM
QM
QM
QM
Weak TransitionWeak paragraph transit ion:Although paragraphs are separate, individual steps of your paper, it is important to clearlydemonstrate a logical connection between them. Generally speaking, the way your paragraphsrelate to one another displays how sound your argument really is. A paragraph that begins with"also" or "in addition" of f ers a weak transit ion f rom the previous point, even though it maydevelop a highly interesting and related point.
Comment 16spelling.
Citation NeededCite Source:Please use the link below to f ind links to inf ormation regarding specif ic citation styles:http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html
Text Comment. A
Text Comment. S
Strikethrough.
Strikethrough.
Text Comment. B
Text Comment. P
Strikethrough.
Strikethrough.
well donewell done
Comment 21You need to discuss the multidisciplinary team here and 24 hours care plan.
PAGE 7
well donewell done
Text Comment. P
QM
QM
Strikethrough.
Citation NeededCite Source:Please use the link below to f ind links to inf ormation regarding specif ic citation styles:http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html
Text Comment. P
Citation NeededCite Source:Please use the link below to f ind links to inf ormation regarding specif ic citation styles:http://www.plagiarism.org/plag_article_citation_styles.html
Strikethrough.
Text Comment. A
Text Comment. P
Strikethrough.
Strikethrough.
Comment 26spelling error.
PAGE 8
PAGE 9
RUBRIC: HSNS264_T12018A3B
CRITERIA 1 (40%)
HD(100)
HD(95)
HD(85)
D(80)
D(75)
C(70)
C(65)
P(60)
P(55)
P(50)
N(45)
N(40)
N(35)
CRITERIA 2 (30%)
71.50 / 100
70 / 100
Content and f ocus\n \nDemonstrates an understanding of the pharmacodynamics of Asthma Medications
Discussion successf ully demonstrates supported and substantial arguments andideas<br /><br />Paper thoroughly reviews and integrates current and relevantliterature
Discussion successf ully demonstrates supported and substantial arguments andideas<br /><br />Paper thoroughly reviews and integrates current and relevantliterature
Discussion successf ully demonstrates supported and substantial arguments andideas<br /><br />Paper thoroughly reviews and integrates current and relevantliterature
Discussion demonstrates supported and substantial arguments and ideas with onlyminor digressions<br /><br />Paper suf f iciently reviews and integrates current andrelevant literature
Discussion demonstrates supported and substantial arguments and ideas with onlyminor digressions<br /><br />Paper suf f iciently reviews and integrates current andrelevant literature
Discussion demonstrates supported and substantial arguments and ideas with somedigression<br /><br />Paper reviews and integrates current and relevant literature
Discussion demonstrates supported and substantial arguments and ideas with somedigression<br /><br />Paper reviews and integrates current and relevant literature
Discussion has limited demonstrated support and substantial arguments and ideas<br /><br />Paper has limited review and integration of current and relevant literature
Discussion has limited demonstrated support and substantial arguments and ideas<br /><br />Paper has limited review and integration of current and relevant literature
Discussion has limited demonstrated support and substantial arguments and ideas<br /><br />Paper has limited review and integration of current and relevant literature
Discussion lacks demonstrated support and substantial arguments and ideas<br /><br />Paper lacks review and integration of current and relevant literature
Discussion lacks demonstrated support and substantial arguments and ideas<br /><br />Paper lacks review and integration of current and relevant literature
Discussion lacks demonstrated support and substantial arguments and ideas<br /><br />Paper lacks review and integration of current and relevant literature
70 / 100
Provides a comprehensive 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care, assessment,interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatric patient with Asthma
HD(100)
HD(95)
HD(85)
D(80)
D(75)
C(70)
C(65)
P(60)
P(55)
P(50)
N(45)
Provides a comprehensive 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma<br /><br />Paper thoroughly reviews and integrates current andrelevant literature
Provides a comprehensive 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma<br /><br />Paper thoroughly reviews and integrates current andrelevant literature
Provides a comprehensive 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma<br /><br />Paper thoroughly reviews and integrates current andrelevant literature
Provides a thorough 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma<br /><br />Paper suf f iciently reviews and integrates current andrelevant literature
Provides a thorough 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma<br /><br />Paper suf f iciently reviews and integrates current andrelevant literature
Provides a substantial 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma<br /><br />Paper reviews and integrates current and relevantliterature
Provides a substantial 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma<br /><br />Paper reviews and integrates current and relevantliterature
Provides an adequate 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma<br /><br />Paper presents limited reviews and integration ofcurrent and relevant literature
Provides an adequate 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma<br /><br />Paper presents limited reviews and integration ofcurrent and relevant literature
Provides an adequate 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma<br /><br />Paper presents limited reviews and integration ofcurrent and relevant literature
Limited or non-existent 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma<br /><br />Paper lacks adequate reviews and integration ofcurrent and relevant literature
N(40)
N(35)
CRITERIA 3 (10%)
HD(100)
HD(95)
HD(85)
D(80)
D(75)
C(70)
C(65)
P(60)
P(55)
P(50)
N(45)
N(40)
N(35)
Limited or non-existent 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma<br /><br />Paper lacks adequate reviews and integration ofcurrent and relevant literature
Limited or non-existent 24-hour nursing care plan encompassing nursing care,assessment, interdisciplinary roles and education requirements f or a paediatricpatient with Asthma<br /><br />Paper lacks adequate reviews and integration ofcurrent and relevant literature
75 / 100
Analysis and crit ical thinking
Succinctly and consistently exhibits higher- order crit ical thinking and analysis<br /><br />Research and Evaluation<br /><br />Synthesis and analysis<br /><br/>Application<br /><br />Comprehension<br /><br />Knowledge
Succinctly and consistently exhibits higher- order crit ical thinking and analysis<br /><br />Research and Evaluation<br /><br />Synthesis and analysis<br /><br/>Application<br /><br />Comprehension<br /><br />Knowledge
Succinctly and consistently exhibits higher- order crit ical thinking and analysis<br /><br />Research and Evaluation<br /><br />Synthesis and analysis<br /><br/>Application<br /><br />Comprehension<br /><br />Knowledge
Exhibits strong higher-order crit ical thinking and analysis<br /><br />Synthesis andanalysis<br /><br />Application<br /><br />Comprehension<br /><br />Knowledge
Exhibits strong higher-order crit ical thinking and analysis<br /><br />Synthesis andanalysis<br /><br />Application<br /><br />Comprehension<br /><br />Knowledge
Generally, exhibits limited higher-order crit ical thinking and analysis<br /><br/>Application<br /><br />Comprehension<br /><br />Knowledge
Generally, exhibits limited higher-order crit ical thinking and analysis<br /><br/>Application<br /><br />Comprehension<br /><br />Knowledge
Exhibits simplistic or reductive thinking and analysis<br /><br />Comprehension<br /><br />Knowledge
Exhibits simplistic or reductive thinking and analysis<br /><br />Comprehension<br /><br />Knowledge
Exhibits simplistic or reductive thinking and analysis<br /><br />Comprehension<br /><br />Knowledge
Minimal simplistic or reductive thinking and analysis<br /><br />Knowledge
Minimal simplistic or reductive thinking and analysis<br /><br />Knowledge
Minimal simplistic or reductive thinking and analysis<br /><br />Knowledge
CRITERIA 4 (10%)
HD(100)
HD(95)
HD(85)
D(80)
D(75)
C(70)
C(65)
P(60)
P(55)
P(50)
N(45)
N(40)
N(35)
75 / 100
Follows requirements f or structure, presentation\ngrammar and spelling.
Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment
Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment
Accurately and consistently adheres to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,grammatical conventions with no errors and is a logical / well and succinctly structuredassignment
Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,adheres to grammatical conventions with f ew errors and is a logical and well-structured assignment
Mostly accurate and consistent adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions,adheres to grammatical conventions with f ew errors and is a logical and well-structured assignment
Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, adheres togrammatical conventions, but with f requent errors, mainly a well- structuredassignment, lacking cohesion in places
Partial but close adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, adheres togrammatical conventions, but with f requent errors, mainly a well- structuredassignment, lacking cohesion in places
Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion
Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion
Minimal adherence to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, minimal adherence togrammatical conventions with multiple errors, a weakly structured assignment,f requently lacking cohesion
Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion
Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion
Litt le attempt to adhere to essay f ormat writ ing conventions, multiple grammaticalerrors with minimal attention to writ ing / spelling conventions that signif icantly distractthe reader f rom the content. A poorly structured assignment, lacking cohesion
CRITERIA 5 (10%)
HD(100)
HD(95)
HD(85)
D(80)
D(75)
C(70)
C(65)
P(60)
P(55)
P(50)
N(45)
N(40)
N(35)
75 / 100
Follows requirements f or ref erencing (APA 6th Edition) and the application of evidence
Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list<br /><br />Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughout theassignment
Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list<br /><br />Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughout theassignment
Accurately and consistently adheres to APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list<br /><br />Explicit ly acknowledges all sources used throughout theassignment
Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list<br /><br />Principally acknowledges sources used throughout theassignment
Mostly of f ers accurate and consistent APA ref erencing conventions f or the in- textand ref erence list<br /><br />Principally acknowledges sources used throughout theassignment
A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist<br /><br />Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment
A number of inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist<br /><br />Mostly acknowledges sources used throughout the assignment
Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist<br /><br />Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment
Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist<br /><br />Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment
Multiple inaccurate and inconsistent APA ref erences in the in- text and ref erencelist<br /><br />Minimal acknowledgment of sources used throughout the assignment
Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,multiple and consistent APA errors throughout<br /><br />Litt le or no acknowledgmentof sources used throughout the assignment
Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,multiple and consistent APA errors throughout<br /><br />Litt le or no acknowledgmentof sources used throughout the assignment
Did not adhere to the APA ref erencing conventions and/or made catastrophic,multiple and consistent APA errors throughout<br /><br />Litt le or no acknowledgmentof sources used throughout the assignment
top related