2013-14 data review. consecutive year grade grouping comparisons reading proficiency 3 rd to 4 th...

2013-14 Data

Review

Consecutive Year Grade Grouping ComparisonsREADING Proficiency

3rd to 4th 73% to 87% UP 14%

4th to 5th 69% to 62% Down 7%

5th to 6th 62% to 76% UP 14%

2012-13 to 2013-14

Consecutive Year Grade Grouping ComparisonsMath Proficiency

3rd to 4th 76% to 63% Down 13%

4th to 5th 63% to 46% Down 17%

5th to 6th 62% to 72% UP 10%

2012-13 to 2013-14

Where are we ranked within Clay County?

READING: 3rd : 6th 4th: 1st 5th: 17th 6th: 9th

MATH: 3rd : 17th 4th: 16th 5th: 23rd 6th: 9th

WRITING: 4th

SCIENCE: 14th

In READING, ROE 3rd to 4th Graders moved up 8 positions to 1st!In MATH, ROE 3rd to 4th Graders moved down 14 positions.

Reading Math0

5

10

15

20

25

Growth by District Ranking3rd-4th Grade Reading & Math, 2013-2014

20132014

In READING, ROE 4th to 5th Graders moved down 5 positions.In MATH, ROE 4th to 5th Graders moved down 8 positions.

Growth by District Ranking4th-5th Grade Reading & Math, 2013-2014

Reading Math0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Growth by District Ranking4th-5th Grade Reading & Math, 2013-2014

20132014

In READING, ROE 5th to 6th Graders moved up 8 positions.In MATH, ROE 5th to 6th Graders moved down 1 position.

Reading Math0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Growth by District Ranking5th-6th Grade Reading & Math, 2013-2014

20132014

Learning Gains

Roughly 70% of ROE 4th-6th graders made learning gains in reading.

4th 5th 6th0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Percent of Students Making Learning GainsReading, Grades 4-6

Roughly 2/3 of ROE 4th-6th graders made learning gains in math.

4th 5th 6th0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Percent of Students Making Learning GainsMath, Grades 4-6

Growth

of

Lower Quartile

4th Grade: 73% evidenced adequate growth.5th Grade: 60% evidenced adequate growth.6th Grade: 82% evidenced adequate growth.

4th Grade: 46% evidenced adequate growth.5th Grade: 65% evidenced adequate growth.6th Grade: 72% evidenced adequate growth.

Let’s Put It

All Together!

READING RATES

PROFICIENCY 74%GAINS 72%LQ 78%

MATH RATESPROFICIENCY 61%GAINS 66%LQ 68%

Writing Proficiency Rates

59% (L3.5)

4th in Clay County!

Percentage of students scoring 3.5 and above on FCAT Writes. ROE made a 5% gain while the district and state made declines.

2013 20140

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

FCAT 2.0 WritingGrowth from 2013-2014, Percent ≥ 3.5

SchoolDistrictState

Students scoring at Level 4 on the FCAT Writes at ROE decreased by 12 percentage points, while the district remained static and the state declined dramatically.

2013 20140

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

FCAT 2.0 WritingGrowth from 2013-2014, Percent ≥ 4.0

SchoolDistrictState

2013 20140

5

10

15

20

25

Growth by Rank in District Writing ≥ 3.5

ROE ranked 4th in the county!

Science Proficiency Rate:

59%

School Grade 2014Proficiency %:Reading: 74 Writing: 59Math: 61 Science: 59

Learning Gains (Weighted %) : Reading: 72 Math: 66

Lowest Quartile % :

Reading: 78 Math: 68

537 POINTS!

8th in the county!

You did an“A”mazing job!!!

What do we need to work

on?