2009 itbs results. itbs reading comprehension fay 2009 percent proficient 74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7...
Post on 03-Jan-2016
213 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
2009 2009 ITBS ITBS
RESULTSRESULTS
ITBS Reading ComprehensionFAY 2009 Percent Proficient
75.5 77.1 75.1
70.3
77.4
65.4
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
2009
74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.5 73.3
State Performance Targets
ITBS Reading ComprehensionFAY Comparing Percent Proficient
Cross Sectional
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
2007
2008
2009
ITBS Reading ComprehensionFAY Comparing Percent Proficient--
Simple Cohort Grouping
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade
2007
2008
2009
2009-2010 Annual Reading Goals
• In 2009-2010, Grade 8 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the reading comprehension subtest of the ITBS than Grade 7 full academic year students in 2008-2009.
Gr. 7
2008-200971.2
Gr. 8
2009-201065.4
Corrective Actions
If you teach 7th and 8th grade language arts, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help students succeed in the area of reading comprehension in grades 7 & 8. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009-2010 APR in September.
AYP Proficiency TrajectoriesReading Comprehension
2007-2010
11th Grade 79.3%
2009-2010 Annual Reading Goal: In 2009-2010, Grade 11 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the reading comprehension subtest of the ITED than Grade 11 full academic year students in 2008-2009.
73.9 74.7 76.6 72.8 72.0 72
ITBS MathematicsFAY 2009 Percent Proficient
79
91.8
75 74.777.3
61.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
2009
State Performance Targets
ITBS/ITED MathematicsFAY Comparing Percent Proficient
Cross Sectional
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
2007
2008
2009
ITBS MathematicsFAY Comparing Percent Proficient
Simple Cohort Grouping
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade
2007
2008
2009
2009-2010 Annual Math Goals
• In 2009-2010, Grades 7 and 8 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the mathematics total subtest of the ITBS than full academic year students in Grades 6 and 7 in 2008-2009.
2008-2009
2009-2010
Grade 6 to
Grade 767.9 77.3
Grade 7 to
Grade 863.5 61.6
Corrective Actions
If you teach 7th and 8th grade math, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help students succeed in the area of mathematics in grades 7 & 8. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009-2010 APR in September.
AYP Proficiency TrajectoriesMathematics2007-2010
11th Grade 79.3%
2009-2010 Annual Math Goal: In 2009-2010, Grade 11 full academic year students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the mathematics total subtest of the ITED than full academic year students in Grade 11 in 2008-2009.
ITBS ScienceFAY 2009 Percent Proficient
87.7
81.3 73 81.8 73.6
61.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
2009
ITBS ScienceFAY Comparing Percent Proficient
Cross Sectional
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
2007
2008
2009
ITBS ScienceFAY Comparing Percent Proficient
Simple Cohort Grouping
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
4th grade 5th grade 6th grade 7th grade 8th grade
2007
2008
2009
ITBS Reading ComprehensionFAY 2009 Low SES Percent Proficient
70.5
60.8 59.1 60.6
50.1 45
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
2009
74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.5 73.3
State Performance Targets
FAY ITBS Reading Comprehension2009 SES Gap Proficiency Data
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3rdgrade
4thgrade
5thgrade
6thgrade
7thgrade
8thGrade
Low SES
Non SES
2009-2010 Annual Reading Goals
• In 2009-2010, Grades 4, 5, 7, and 8 full academic year Low SES students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the reading comprehension subtest of the ITBS than Grades 3,4, 6, and 7 full academic year Low SES students in 2008-2009.
2008-2009
2009-2010
Gr. 3- Gr. 4 63.0 60.8
Gr. 4- Gr. 5 69.6 59.1
Gr. 6- Gr. 7 50.0 50.1
Gr. 7- Gr. 8 59.1 45.0
Corrective Actions
If you teach language arts in grades 3,4, 5,6, 7, and 8, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat or Mrs. Koether. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help Low SES students succeed in the area of reading comprehension. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009-2010 APR in September.
**Check back to the 2008-2009 APR to see what was written for Grade 3 reading comprehension.
73.9 74.7 76.6 72.8 72.0 72
ITBS MathematicsFAY 2009 Low SES Percent Proficient
73.5
86.9
59
66.6
55.6
45
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
2009
State Performance Targets
FAY ITBS Mathematics2009 SES Gap Proficiency Data
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3rdgrade
4thgrade
5thgrade
6thgrade
7thgrade
8thgrade
Low SES
Non SES
2009-2010 Annual Math Goals
• In 2009-2010, Grades 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11 full academic year Low SES students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the mathematics total subtest of the ITBS/ITED than full academic year students in grades 4, 5, 6, 7, and 10 in 2008-2009.
2008-2009
2009-2010
Gr. 4- Gr. 5 69.6 59.0
Gr. 5- Gr. 6 66.7 66.6
Gr. 6- Gr. 7 45.0 55.6
Gr. 7- Gr. 8 45.5 45.0
Gr. 10-
Gr. 1161.1 TBD
Corrective Actions
If you teach math in grades 4, 5,6, 7, and 8, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help Low SES students succeed in the area of mathematics. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009-2010 APR in September.
FAY ITBS Science2009 SES Gap Proficiency Data
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
7th grade 8th grade
Low SES
Non SES
2009-2010 Annual Science Goal
• In 2009-2010, Grade 8 Low SES students will have a greater percentage of students proficient on the science subtest of the ITBS than Low SES students in Grade 7 in 2008-2009.
2008-2009
2009-2010
Gr.7 to
Gr.850.0 45.0
Corrective Actions
If you teach 7th or 8th grade science, you will need to submit corrective actions to Mr. Mallicoat. These include instructional strategies, professional development, programs, technology, resources, etc. that will be used to help Low SES students succeed in the area of science. These ideas will be submitted in the 2009-2010 APR in September.
**Check back to see what was written in the 2008-2009 APR.
ITBS Reading ComprehensionFAY 2009 Gender Percent Proficient
60
64 66.6
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
Males
Females
74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.5 73.3
State Performance Targets
FAY ITBS Reading Comprehension2009 Gender Proficiency Data
87.6
60
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3rd grade
Females
Males
State Trajectory for 4th grade is 76%
73.9 74.7 76.6 72.8 72.0 72
ITBS MathematicsFAY 2009 Gender Percent Proficient
96.1
70.3 66.6 70.8
60 62.9
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
Males
Females
State Performance Targets
FAY ITBS Mathematics2009 Gender Proficiency Data
80.5
66.6
82.7
70.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
6th Grade 7th grade
Females
Males
FAY ITBS Science2009 Gender Proficiency Data
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
5th Grade 7th Grade
Females
Males
FAY ITBS Reading Comprehension2009 IEP Proficiency Data
IEP Proficiency
Average percentage per reporting grade
12.7
N=51
Non-IEP Proficiency Average percentage per
reporting grade
85.5
N=278
ITBS Reading ComprehensionFAY 2009 Gender Percent Proficient
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
IEP
Not IEP
74.1 76.0 76.4 69.7 71.5 73.3
State Performance Targets
FAY ITBS Mathematics2009 IEP Proficiency Data
IEP Proficiency
Average percentage per reporting grade
39.4
N=51
Non-IEP Proficiency Average percentage per
reporting grade
85.0
N=278
73.9 74.7 76.6 72.8 72.0 72
ITBS MathematicsFAY 2008 Gender Percent Proficient
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
3rd Grade 4th Grade 5th Grade 6th Grade 7th Grade 8th Grade
IEP
Not IEP
State Performance Targets
FAY ITBS Science2009 IEP Proficiency Data
IEP Proficiency
Average percentage per reporting grade
49.65
N=51
Non-IEP Proficiency Average percentage per
reporting grade
82.32
N=278
ITBS Iowa Grade Equivalent Assessment Results
for Reading ComprehensionCurrent Grade
LevelGrade Equivalent
from Last YearGrade Equivalent
2009-2010
2nd Grade NA 2.5
3rd Grade 2.6 3.4
4th Grade 3.2 4.1
5th Grade 4.0 4.5
6th Grade 5.3 6.2
7th Grade 6.1 7.0
8th Grade 6.6 7.4
ITBS Iowa Grade Equivalent Assessment Results
for MathematicsCurrent Grade
LevelGrade Equivalent
from Last YearGrade Equivalent
2009-2010
2nd Grade NA 2.0
3rd Grade 1.9 3.1
4th Grade 3.3 4.4
5th Grade 4.0 4.8
6th Grade 5.4 6.5
7th Grade 6.1 7.3
8th Grade 6.5 7.0
ITBS Iowa Grade Equivalent Assessment Results
for ScienceCurrent Grade
LevelGrade Equivalent
from Last YearGrade Equivalent
2009-2010
2nd Grade NA 1.9
3rd Grade 2.0 3.4
4th Grade 3.4 4.2
5th Grade 4.0 5.0
6th Grade 6.0 6.4
7th Grade 6.9 7.0
8th Grade 6.7 6.8
Past Data Presentations Online
Curriculum and Other Documents
www.mflmarmac.k12.ia.us
http://www.mflmarmac.k12.ia.us/School%20Website/curriculum/index.htm
top related