2 strategic planning - vsl council/improving school... · self-evaluation and review ... improving...
Post on 08-Sep-2018
220 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
STR
AT
EG
IC P
LAN
NIN
G
STRATEGIC PLANNING
2
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE
2.0 Introduction
GoalTo provide school councillors with further understandings about:
• working with the school leadership team to develop the key documents in the four year strategic planning cycle
• using data to identify what the school is doing well and what needs to be done to further improve student outcomes
• fulfilling their governance role by ensuring that the school’s planning and practices reflect Departmental guidelines and community expectations.
OverviewOne of the key functions of councils is to contribute to the establishment of the broad vision and direction for the school. Strategic planning is the process of reflecting on past performance, establishing future directions and deciding what will constitute success. In other words, it involves the school community considering these questions:
• where have we been?
• where do we want to go?
• how will we get there?
• how will we know if we have been successful?
The School Accountability and Improvement Framework outlines a clear process for developing the school strategic plan and planning for improving student outcomes.
The process includes:
• evaluating and reviewing of the school's performance against its current school strategic plan
• developing a four-year school strategic plan, which includes statements of the school’s purpose, values and environmental context, and the school's goals, targets and key improvement strategies
• developing annual implementation plans that describe how the key improvement strategies in the school strategic plan will be implemented and monitored
• publishing an annual report for the school community (including parents/guardians, students and other interested people) about the school’s successes and challenges in implementing the strategic plan and improving student outcomes.
The Framework also outlines a process for schools to assess their compliance with legislation and Departmental policies.
The following table provides an overview of how the principal and staff, school council, and the
school community would typically be involved in the strategic planning process. These roles and responsibilities are examined in detail in the three units of the strategic planning module.
The principal … The school council …
Self-evaluation and review
• plans and manages the self-evaluation • reviews the plan and timeline
• organises consultations, gathers and analyses data
• participates in working groups and involves the community in consultations
• drafts the self-evaluation report • endorses the final report
• plans for the school review, briefs the reviewer and provides performance data for the review
• the school council president endorses the terms of reference for negotiated, diagnostic and extended diagnostic reviews
• participates in review panel meetings as required
School strategic plan
• plans and manages the planning process • supports the development of a long term view of the school’s directions
• organises consultations • involves the community in consultations
• prepares a draft plan • endorses the draft plan
• communicates the plan • communicates the plan
• implements the plan • monitors the plan
Implementing, monitoring and reporting on the strategic plan
• develops the annual implementation plan • contributes to developing the annual implementation plan
• endorses the plan
• keeps the school community informed about progress in implementing the plan • monitors progress in implementing the plan
• drafts the annual report • endorses the annual report
• organises a public meeting to present the annual report to the school community
• reports to the community on the school’s performance
2
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
2.1 The school self-evaluation and review
3
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Why is this topic important?The school self-evaluation is the stage of the accountability and improvement cycle at which the school analyses its performance against what it set out to do in its current school strategic plan, as the first step in developing its next strategic plan. Effective schools continuously and regularly evaluate their performance as a matter of course. The school self-evaluation formalises these on-going activities.
Most importantly, this stage is about enabling the school community to reflect on what the school has achieved and to influence where it is headed for the next four years. The community can do this by contributing to discussion about:
• how well the school is meeting the community’s expectations
• where the school could improve its performance
• what the school’s priorities should be for the next four years.
The self-evaluation leads into a review stage during which a school reviewer from outside the school, working with the Department, looks at the school’s performance and makes recommendations for improvement. Combined, the recommendations from the self-evaluation and school review provide the basis for what will be in the school’s next four-year strategic plan.
On completing this unit, school councillors should be able to:
• understand the evidence related to school performance
• identify how the school community could engage with the self-evaluation process
• consider the school self-evaluation report for endorsement
• understand the school review process and the way the school community could be involved.
4
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
The principal will … Councillors will typically …
The school community might …
• plan the self-evaluation and timeline (over one school term)
• review the plan and timeline for the self-evaluation
• brief the school and its community about the self-evaluation process
• organise consultations with the council and school community
• participate in working groups
• participate in consultations with the school community
• contribute to surveys
• participate in parent meetings and focus groups
• gather and analyse data
• draft the self-evaluation report
• keep everyone informed about the contents of the report
• support the development of the report
• prepare the final report for council endorsement • endorse the final report
• forward the report to the reviewer and the Department
• receive feedback on the outcomes of the evaluation process via the school newsletter
The following table shows how the principal and staff, school councillors, and the school community (including parents, students and other interested people) would typically be involved in the self-evaluation process. The self-evaluation will usually be completed in term 1 for schools undertaking a review in term 2, and in term 2 for schools undertaking a review in term 3.
5
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Establishing evidence of school performanceInformation (evidence) from a range of sources is important in understanding a school’s performance. In the school self-evaluation, school performance is reviewed against the three student outcome areas: student learning, student engagement and wellbeing, and student pathways and transitions.
Student learning outcomesStudent learning outcomes relate to what students know and can do. Schools develop curriculum and report on achievement of student learning outcomes using data relating to:
National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN)
Every year, all students in Years 3, 5, 7 and 9 are assessed using national tests in reading, writing, language conventions (spelling, grammar and punctuation) and numeracy.
Victorian Essential Learning Standards (VELS)
For students in Years prep to 10, the VELS define three strands of student learning:
• Physical, Personal and Social Learning, which includes Health and Physical Education, Interpersonal Development, Personal Learning, and Civics and Citizenship
• Discipline Based Learning, which includes the Arts, English and Languages other than English, the Humanities (Economics, Geography and History), Mathematics and Science
• Interdisciplinary Learning, which includes Communication, Design, Creativity and Technology, Information and Communications Technology, and Thinking.
Towards level 1 of the VELS
This supports the delivery of the VELS and provides a framework for developing effective learning programs and assessing students with disabilities and additional learning needs in Victorian schools who are recognised as working towards level 1 of the VELS.
Student learning outcomes for students supported under the Program for Students with Disabilities (PSD)
Schools with PSD students assess their learning outcomes in relation to student progress in achieving the goals in their individual learning plans.
English and Mathematics online interviews
Along with teachers’ judgements in English, ESL and Mathematics, school achievement in literacy and numeracy outcomes is also measured in the English online interview, the Mathematics online interview and the Fractions and Decimals online interview.
The Victorian Early Years Learning and Development Framework
This builds continuity between the first years of schooling and the learning and development that precede these years. This Framework describes the key learning and development outcomes for children from birth to eight and links to the first stages of the VELS.
Senior secondary certificates and programs
Student learning outcomes in the senior secondary years are defined as attainment in the Victorian Certificate of Education (VCE), the Victorian Certificate of Applied Learning (VCAL) and Vocational Education and Training (VET in schools), including school-based new apprenticeships. Information on this area is provided through school performance data available on the Victorian Assessment Software System and through the VCE data service.
Other information
At the school level, many schools also collect information on student learning using a range of school developed and commercially produced assessment strategies and instruments.
6
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Student engagement and wellbeing outcomesStudent engagement and wellbeing outcomes relate to the extent to which students feel safe, secure and stimulated to learn at school.
Measures of student engagement and wellbeing include student attendance, students’ ratings of their connectedness to school, motivation to learn and safety (Student Attitudes to School Survey), teachers' assessments of students’ motivation (Staff Opinion Survey) and parents’ perceptions of the school climate (Parent Opinion Survey). Information collected at the school level can also be used (for example, information about participation in support programs, suspension and expulsion data, and information from the Student Mapping Tool).
The Effective Schools are Engaging Schools - Student Engagement Policy Guidelines provide advice for schools about improving student engagement, attendance and positive behaviours.
7
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Student pathways and transitions outcomesStudent pathways and transitions outcomes relate to the quality of student transitions into, through and out of a particular educational context and the extent to which pathways meet the needs of students.
In the compulsory years, key transitions include early childhood services into school, early years to middle years, and primary school to secondary school. Other transitions include students who move between schools, students who move from specialist schools or English language schools into primary or secondary schools, and students with chronic illness requiring long periods of time away from school. Student movements from one year level to the next are also crucial transition points.
To support a positive start to school for all children, a common Victorian approach has been developed to guide families, early childhood services and schools about what is important for children and their families during this time of transition.
The Transition Learning and Development Statement provides schools with important information to assist with planning support and learning programs for children starting school and in transition from primary to secondary school.
In the senior secondary years, this outcome area focuses on retention, the type of studies being undertaken (VCE, VCAL or VET in schools) as well as students’ destinations after leaving school. It also includes the quality of students’ experiences in moving from Year 10 to VCE or other senior secondary options.
The system makes available a number of data sets for senior secondary pathways and transitions (retention, participation and attainment of VCE, VCAL, VET in schools, On Track). The Parent Opinion Survey includes a measure on parent perceptions of the quality of support for student transitions.
At the school level, many schools also collect information on parent and student satisfaction with transitions into, through, and out of the school.
8
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Additional outcomes dataOther outcomes data available for children that may be relevant for primary schools include:
• the Australian Early Development Index (AEDI) – This is a population measure that provides information on how children are faring and the success of early childhood services in supporting children and families prior to a child’s entry to school. The AEDI is a summary indicator of children’s progress and how well children are faring relative to others based on areas of early childhood development.
• the Victorian Child and Adolescent Monitoring System (VCAMS) - This reports on the safety, health, learning, development and wellbeing of children and young people in Victoria. This data is reported against the 150 VCAMS indicators and provides a sound basis to support school strategic planning. This data is published in annual reports as well as community level profiles.
9
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Data analysisThe principal and leadership team will use the data to:
• examine trends, to see how performance has changed over time
• consider the achievements of specific groups of students to assess their performance
• analyse outcomes for individuals and groups of students as they move from one year level to the next through the school
• evaluate differences in outcomes between different skill areas within English and Mathematics
• make comparisons with state averages or statewide information about schools with similar student backgrounds.
An annual summary of each school’s performance is provided through the Government School Performance Summary and is available online on the Victorian Registration and Qualifications Authority State Register.
This information covers a summary of a school’s performance in student learning and student engagement and wellbeing for primary schools; and for both these areas plus pathways and transitions information for secondary schools. It also provides information about whether a school, taking into account its students, is performing higher than, lower than, or broadly similar to other Victorian schools with a similar student intake. A more detailed School Level Report is made available to the school principal.
The self-evaluation process will contribute to council’s understanding of the school’s performance. This process may include:
• engaging in discussions and presentations about data by the principal
• participating in working groups
• collecting information from areas relevant to the school community.
Multiple sources of information will enable a school to make better decisions about how to improve its performance. It is important not to draw conclusions from one set of data, but to try to use a range of sources to understand the various factors that are contributing to an aspect of the school’s performance.
Understandably, many councillors will not have experience in analysing data. The principal will explain to councillors the relevance of each set of data to school performance and will help councillors make sense of some specialised data, such as NAPLAN results.
The key points to remember with data analysis are that:
• absolute scores are useful for specifying targets and measuring increase or decrease in scores
• relative scores are useful for comparing one school’s performance with schools with students from a similar background.
Councillors also need to be aware of the importance of maintaining confidentiality in respect of the data they may examine during the school self-evaluation process.
10
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Engaging the school communityWhen considering how best to consult with its community, a school might consider what form of consultation has worked well before, the resources available to the school for consultation, and the geographic spread and diversity of the community.
Opportunities for face-to-face consultations include:
• inviting the community to participate in forums to discuss the school’s performance and its directions, making interpreters available if necessary
• holding small group discussions with parents/guardians, where performance data is presented and responses sought
• forming working groups to undertake a particular evaluation task.
Other considerationsSmall group discussions might also be an option if the school community is geographically dispersed, or has significant numbers of people who speak languages other than English. In these cases, the principal working with school councillors could:
• convene small group discussions in places, at times and in languages that suit participants
• talk to community organisations (such as cultural groups or local aboriginal education consultative groups in the case of Koorie families).
Other opportunities for consultation include:
• surveys of parents/guardians, asking for comments and opinions
• providing information about the self-evaluation in the school newsletter with an invitation to readers to comment
• suggestion boxes where people can leave their comments.
11
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
The self-evaluation reportThe principal and leadership team are responsible for drafting a report which draws together the evidence of the school’s performance and feedback from community consultations. The principal will provide a copy of the report to the school council for consideration and endorsement.
The Department publishes guidelines about the self-evaluation process, including a template to help schools prepare their self-evaluation report. The report template requires schools to answer five questions about the three student outcome areas: student learning, student engagement and wellbeing and student pathways and transitions.
The five questions are:
• what student outcomes were we trying to achieve?
• what student outcomes did we achieve?
• why did we achieve/not achieve improved student outcomes?
• how effectively did we manage resources to support the achievement of improved student outcomes?
• what can we do in the future to continue to improve?
Self-evaluation reports should include:
• an executive summary summarising the main elements of the report, the school’s strengths, areas for improvement, how effectively the goals of the last strategic plan were met, and recommendations
• a description of the self-evaluation process
• the school context, including the demographic and social characteristics of the school
• the evaluation of performance in detail for each of the three student outcome areas
• recommendations for improvement.
To provide feedback, councillors should reflect on the adequacy of the process to develop the draft, and particularly ensure that evidence from a wide range of sources has been considered to provide an accurate and agreed picture of the school’s context and performance. They should be satisfied that the process has complied with the Department’s guidelines for undertaking self-evaluations and that the views of the community are reflected in the evaluation report.
12
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Endorsing the reportThe principal will present the final report to council for endorsement. Councillors should satisfy themselves that:
• the evaluation provides a valid explanation of the school’s performance
• all relevant facts and opinions were assessed in the process of developing the report
• the conclusions and recommendations flow reasonably and logically from the information and data gathered
• the recommendations appear achievable given the likely resources available.
The amount of time that council spends discussing the report will depend in part on the degree of councillors’ involvement in the self-evaluation process. For example, the council of a small school might have been very hands-on developing the report and councillors would be very familiar with the contents. At a large school, working groups might have developed different sections and the whole report might have been brought together later in the process.
Once the report is endorsed, the principal briefs staff on the report and sends a copy to the regional network leader. The school community may also receive feedback on the important findings in the report through the school newsletter. The report is then used as the source of information for the school review.
Contributing to the school reviewThe school review is intended to provide expert, independent analysis of current school performance and practice, and to make a positive contribution to the school’s efforts to improve student outcomes.
There are four types of school review, of which the first three are undertaken by a school reviewer from outside the school, chosen for their educational expertise and trained in the Department’s policies and guidelines. The types of review are:
• a continuous improvement review, which aims to identify the school’s strengths and opportunities for improvement and is based on a one day panel meeting
• a diagnostic review, which provides detailed analysis of the school’s performance and includes two days of field work at the school and a panel meeting
• an extended diagnostic review, which is similar to the diagnostic review but is broader in reach or analyses performance in greater depth over a longer time. This review provides for four days of field work and a panel meeting.
The fourth type of review is a negotiated review, which focuses on one or more areas where the school requires an independent perspective about how to move to the next level of improvement. The review is supported by a critical friend who provides an external perspective and is selected by the school.
In advance of the negotiated, diagnostic and extended diagnostic reviews, terms of reference are developed to identify the purpose and methodology for the reviews. The terms of reference are endorsed by the principal, school council president and regional network leader.
13
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
14
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
The principal will … School councillors will ... The reviewer will ...
• plan and develop a timeline for the review
• help develop the negotiated, diagnostic and extended diagnostic reviews’ terms of reference with the regional network leader
• identify a critical friend for a negotiated review
• endorse the terms of reference
• the school council president endorses the terms of reference
• support the development of the terms of reference by providing advice on the most appropriate methodology
• coordinate the review panel and other review activities, in consultation with the regional network leader and reviewer if applicable
• brief the reviewer
• provide performance data to the reviewer
• visit the school before the review to gain an understanding of the school’s context and brief people on the process and the reviewer’s role
• analyse the school self-evaluation report and other data
• participate in focus groups, interviews etc. as required
• collect further information through focus groups /interviews etc.
The school council president (or their representative) attends the review panel meeting and provides feedback to the council. The following table shows
how councillors, the principal and leadership team and school reviewer would typically be involved in the review process.
15
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
The principal will … School councillors will ... The reviewer will ...
• participate in review panel meetings and ensure the regional network leader is involved
• participate in review panel meetings
• attend the review panel meeting at the school
• brief the principal, school council president and regional network leader on the progress of the review
• prepare and submit a review report
• set-up review meetings with staff and school council for the reviewer to present review findings
• participate in the reviewer presentation of the review findings at a school council meeting
• present review findings to meetings of staff and school council
• keep staff and council informed of progress
• provide feedback on the draft review report
• discuss the review report at school council
• prepare a response to the review report if considered necessary
• contribute to, and endorse the school’s response to the review report
• provide feedback to the School Improvement Division on the quality of the review process through an online survey
16
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Resources and links
Government School Performance Summary Summary of a school’s performance in student learning and student engagement and wellbeing (primary schools) and both these areas plus pathways and transitions (secondary schools)> http://www.vic.gov.au/news-detail/victorian-government-school-performance-summary.html
School Self-Evaluation Guidelines Provide the rationale for preparing a self-evaluation, its context and processes involved in undertaking a self-evaluation> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/sseguidelines4.pdf
Step-by-step Guide to Completing the School Self-Evaluation Report Comprehensive guide to the process, including prompts for questions and suggested data sources> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/ssestepbystep2.pdf
School Self-Evaluation Template A ready-made tool to assist schools prepare their self-evaluation document> http:/ www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/accountability/evaluation.htm
Summary of information sources that can be used in school self-evaluation and school review Lists sources of information for schools to consider> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/2010_SSE_Summary_of_Info_
sources.pdf
Information page for school communities A ready-made tool to assist schools inform their school communities about the year of self-evaluation, review and planning> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/2010_SSE_Info_flyer.pdf
Suggested procedure for school self-evaluation discussions Outlines a possible process to engage the school community> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/2010_SSE_discussions.pdf
School review DVD and transcript To enable school councillors to gain further insights into the review process> http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/accountability/review.htm
2.2 The school strategic plan
17
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Why is this topic important?The school strategic plan is the school’s statement to its community about what it stands for and intends to do over the next four years to improve student outcomes. It defines what the school values most and sets out the school’s goals and targets, key strategies for improvement, and it influences resourcing priorities. It provides an important means for involving the school community in setting the school’s directions.
18
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
On completing this unit, school councillors should be able to:
The principal … School councillors …
• briefs the school community about the process of developing the strategic plan
• develop a long term view of the school’s directions
• assist in setting the school’s purpose and values
• reviews the findings and recommendations from the self-evaluation and review process
• reflect on the findings and recommendations from the self-evaluation and review processes to identify priorities for the school
• develops draft goals, targets, key improvement strategies, key actions and milestones
• prepares a draft plan• read and comment on the draft plan
• endorse the plan
• communicates the plan • communicate the plan
• support the development of a long term view of the school’s direction
• help engage the community in the development of the strategic plan
• provide feedback on the draft plan
• consider the plan for endorsement
• help communicate the plan to the community.
The following table shows what councillors, the principal and leadership team are responsible for in the development of the school strategic plan.
19
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Developing a long term view of the school’s directionsCouncillors make an important contribution to the strategic planning process through their contribution to determining a long-term view of where the school is headed, and why.
They can do this by:
• reflecting on the findings and recommendations of the school’s self-evaluation and school review
• supporting the identification of environmental factors likely to influence the way the school operates over the next four years such as changing demographics, employment patterns and student and parent expectations
• contributing to the development of the school’s purpose and values. Engaging the
school communityWhen considering how best to consult with its community, a school might consider what form of consultation has worked well before, the resources available to the school for consultation, and the geographic spread and diversity of the community.
Opportunities for face-to-face consultations include forums, small group discussions, working groups and inviting observers to relevant parts of council meetings. Other opportunities for consultation include surveys of parents/guardians, coverage of the planning process in the school newsletter with an invitation to readers to comment, and suggestion boxes. There are more details about these methods of involvement in the school self-evaluation and review unit.
20
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Structure of the strategic planThe principal and leadership team will draft the strategic plan.
The Department publishes guidelines about how to prepare the school strategic plan, including a template for the plan. The template has three parts.
Part 1 the school profile covers the school’s:
• purpose, asking ‘What are we here for?' for example, to provide a friendly, caring and dynamic learning environment that engages students who work to achieve their personal best
• values, asking ‘What are our guiding principles and beliefs?' for example, our school demonstrates excellence, integrity, compassion and respect for all
• environmental context, asking ‘What are the factors and risks impacting on our community into the future?' for example, the potential impact of a new housing development within the school’s catchment area.
Part 2 the strategic intent lists goals, targets and key improvement strategies to improve student learning, student engagement and wellbeing and student pathways and transitions.
In terms of the strategic planning process:
• a goal is an aspirational statement that defines what student outcomes the school is trying to achieve
• a target is a measure of success in the achievement of the goal
• an improvement strategy is a high level action that the school will use to achieve its goals and targets.
For example, for student learning:
• a goal: to improve the numeracy of students at all year levels
• a related target: by 2015, the percentage of Year 5 students assessed at or above the national minimum standard in numeracy will increase by 10 per cent, from 80% to 90%
• a key improvement strategy: create a learning environment characterised by high expectations for all.
Part 3 is an indicative planner providing more information about each key improvement strategy, including:
• what actions the school will take in each of the four years (for example, establish learning teams across the school)
• the changes in practice and behaviours the school expects to see if the strategy is successful (for example, by the end of term 2, professional learning teams will meet fortnightly).
21
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Endorsing the planSchool council must endorse the final plan as part of its governance responsibilities. To do so, councillors must assure themselves that the plan:
• reflects the community’s values and views about the school’s purpose and direction and that the goals and targets in the plan are consistent with these views
• draws on the findings of the school self-evaluation and review
• provides a concise and clear picture of what the school wants to achieve over the next four years and the broad steps that will be undertaken to achieve this.
If a school’s circumstances change it is possible for the school’s strategic plan to be updated outside of the cycle. Endorsement by the school council and regional network leader is required.
Communicating the planCouncillors support the principal and leadership team in communicating the plan to the school community.
They can do this by:
• drawing on information in the plan when discussing issues with the school community; for example, to answer questions about what the school is doing to improve numeracy levels
• referring to the plan when opportune; for example, in meetings with parents/guardians and at open days
• supporting the principal at formal community reporting meetings; for example, when the annual report is presented to the community
• making reference to the plan when writing reports in school newsletters
• displaying the plan in school reception areas, on notice-boards, in offices, in classrooms and on websites
• encouraging celebration of important achievements, for example, at assemblies, in the newsletter or at a special function.
Resources and links
School Strategic Planning Guidelines To assist school communities to engage in strategic thinking and planning to set the future direction of the school> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/sspgdls2011updated.pdf
School Strategic Plan Template A ready-made tool to assist schools to document their school plan > http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/accountability/strategicplan.htm
Example School Strategic Plan (Primary) A ready-made tool to assist primary schools to document their school plan > http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/SSP_Primary_School_
EXAMPLE_2012-2015_v2.pdf
Example School Strategic Plan (Secondary) A ready-made tool to assist secondary schools to document their school plan> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/SSP_Secondary_College_
EXAMPLE_2012-2015_v2.pdf
22
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Why is this topic important?The strategic plan establishes the broad direction for the school that is operationalised through the annual implementation plan. The annual implementation plan enables the school to deliver on the goals and targets identified in the school strategic plan.
The school council is required to report annually to their community through the annual report that provides a summary of the school’s performance over the previous year. The reporting process also contributes to system level accountability and to meeting relevant legislative requirements.
On completing this unit, school councillors should be able to:
• understand the role and purpose of the annual implementation plan
• endorse the annual implementation plan
• monitor progress against the key improvement strategies and achievement milestones
• endorse the annual report.
The following table shows how councillors, the principal and leadership team would typically be involved in developing, monitoring and reporting on the annual implementation plan. As the table shows, the principal and leadership team are responsible for developing the annual implementation plan and for managing, monitoring and reporting activities.
2.3 Implementing, monitoring and reporting
23
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
The principal will … Councillors will typically …
Annual implementation plan
• develop the annual implementation plan • contribute to the development of the annual implementation plan
• endorse the plan
• keep the school community informed about progress in implementing the plan • monitor progress in implementing the plan
Annual report
• draft the annual report• review and comment on the draft report
• endorse the report
• organise a public meeting to present the annual report to the school community
• ensure that each member of the school community is provided with access to the report
• attend and present to (as appropriate) the public meeting
24
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Developing the annual implementation planThe annual implementation plan breaks down each improvement strategy into specific actions. For each action, it specifies:
• how it will be implemented and resourced
• the person or people who will implement the action and report back on progress
• the timeframe for completing the action.
One-year targets are developed as smaller steps towards achieving the broader targets set in the strategic plan. The school then reports to the community on its progress.
The annual implementation plan is operational. It is important for school councillors to be aware of the plan and how it reflects the goals and targets established in the strategic plan and understand their role in overseeing the annual budget and the resourcing of the identified actions.
Endorsing the planThe principal will present the final version of the annual implementation plan to school council for endorsement. Before endorsing it, councillors should satisfy themselves that:
• one-year targets are consistent with the goals and targets in the strategic plan
• the milestones are achievable given the likely available resources.
The plan must be endorsed by the school council and regional network leader by 31 March in the year of implementation.
25
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Monitoring progressThe annual implementation plan is the reference point to monitor the school’s performance as it relates to its implementation of the goals, targets and strategies outlined in the strategic plan.
The council’s role should focus on monitoring progress against the key improvement strategies, achievement of the annual milestones and one-year targets featured in the annual implementation plan.
Through this process it may become apparent that the school’s circumstances have changed which may require the school’s strategic plan to be updated outside of the cycle. In this situation any change will require endorsement of the school council and regional network leader.
Structure of the annual reportThe annual report contains:
• cover page
• What Our School Is Doing statement
• Government School Performance Summary
• financial performance and position statement
• National Partnerships annual statement (for participating schools).
26
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
27
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Approving the annual reportThe annual report provides the community with information about the school’s performance in implementing their improvement strategies and how the school’s resources have been used.
Councillors need to be aware that:
• an annual report must be produced each year, including the year in which the school is doing its self-evaluation, review and strategic plan
• the annual report is tabled at a school council meeting for ratification and endorsement and must be forwarded to the regional network leader by 31 March of the next year
• the council must verify that the financial summary and commentary featured in the report are accurate and satisfy government requirements
• the council’s endorsement of the annual report must be recorded in the school council minutes
• school councils are required by law to hold a public meeting each year to present the report
• the school’s annual report must be published on the Victorian Registration and Qualifications Authority’s State Register of Victorian Schools. This process is managed by the Department.
Monitoring compliance requirementsThe school compliance checklist is an online tool that enables schools to self-assess and monitor compliance with all relevant legislation and Departmental requirements. The checklist covers:
• facilities management
• emergency management
• financial management
• governance
• human resource management
• ICT management
• risk management
• student learning
• student engagement and wellbeing
• student pathways and transitions
• Commonwealth requirements.
The school’s designated approver (the principal or a delegated member of staff) completes the checklist online, self-assessing whether the school is fully compliant, partially compliant or non-compliant with relevant checklist items. Where a school has assessed itself as non-compliant or partially compliant, it is expected to be working towards full compliance.
The principal will typically consult council about areas where support is required to ensure compliance.
28
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Resources and links
Annual Implementation Planning Guidelines Outline the policy and process for annual implementation planning and how key improvement strategies and other significant projects will be put into operation> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/aipgdls2011updated.pdf
Annual Implementation Plan Templates 2011 A ready-made tool to assist schools to document their annual implementation plan> http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/accountability/implementation.htm
Sample Ultranet Actions and Milestones A resource to support schools implement their key improvement strategies> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/2010_AIP_Ultranet.pdf
National Partnerships Annual Implementation Plan Appendix (National Partnership schools only) A template to assist schools to document particular programs they are engaged in as part of the National Partnership initiative> http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/accountability/implementation.htm
Annual Implementation Plan Example 1 and 4 Year Targets and Key Improvement Strategies> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/aipexampletargets.pdf
Guidelines for the Annual Report to the School Community Provide the means for the school to reflect on and communicate to the whole school community the successes of their improvement strategies, the effectiveness of resource allocation and their future directions> http://www.eduweb.vic.gov.au/edulibrary/public/account/operate/saif2011/arguidelines3.pdf> http:// www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/accountability/report.htm
Handout A1Sample School Level Report and Government School Performance Summary
2010 School Level ReportNameless P-12 College (9999)
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD
Please check the data in this report. If, after comparing it with your own records, youdeem it to be incorrect or incomplete, follow the directions on the following website:
- http://www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/performancedatathen select 'School Performance Reports'.
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD
29
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Contents
Page No.
Privacy 3
SFO Density and LBOTE 4
English Online Interview - Reading 5- Writing 6- Speaking and Listening 7
Assessment of Reading Prep to Year 2 8-9
Teacher Judgments against the VELS 10-27
ESL Companion Guide 28
NAPLAN - Reading 29-30- Writing 31-32- Numeracy 33-34
AIM - Reading 35-36- Mathematics 37-38
VCE 39-42
VET 43
VCAL 44
Teacher Assessment of Student Progress (PSD students) 45-46
Enrolment 47
Student Retention - Apparent 48- Real 49
Exit Destination 50-53
Student Absence 54
Opinion Surveys - Parent 55- Staff 56
Performance & Development Culture 57
Staff Sick Leave 58
Bank Balances 59
Produced by Data, Outcomesand Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 2 of 59
30
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
It is important to note that information that identifies an individual or can be used with other readily available information to identify a person is now protected by the InformationPrivacy Act 2000 (http://www.education.vic.gov.au/about/deptpolicies/informationprivacy.htm ).
Where the School Level Report is provided to school council members as part of any annual reporting process, or used for discussion on a school’s performance, such as in consultation with the school community in the school self-evaluation process, it is important to remind school community members of their duty to only use this information for the purpose it was provided, and that the material must be kept confidential.
Privacy
When reporting on the school's performance to the school community, care must be taken to avoid the disclosure of information that can directly or indirectly identify an individual. This may be a particular issue when reporting on the achievement of specific cohorts of students or the opinions of staff where there are small numbers.
In situations where privacy cannot be assured, schools may wish to report on the mean result or provide a written comment on school, year level or cohort performance.
Produced by Data, Outcomesand Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 3 of 59
31
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
SFO Density and LBOTESchool no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: This page contains the school's SFO (Student Family Occupation) density^, LBOTE (Language Back-
ground Other Than English) proportion* and Stability rate† (a measure of student population stability).
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010SFO density^: 0.66 0.48 0.55 0.54 0.52 0.49 0.46
LBOTE proportion*: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.01 0.02
Stability rate†: 81.6%
School's 2010 SFO density and LBOTE proportion against that of all other government schools
School's SFO^ percentile range^^ over time
School stability rate as percentile
Notes: ^ The higher the SFO density, the lower the SFO percentile and the lower the socio-economic status (SES).^^ The school's SFO percentile range shows this school's SFO percentile +/- 10%.* From 2007, a student is LBOTE if either the student or one parent/guardian speaks a language other than English at home.
Prior to 2007, a student is LBOTE if the student or one of the parents was born in a non-English speaking country.† NAPLAN matched-cohort data is used to calculate the stability rate. Using 2010 stability as an example, the formula is:
no. of unique students at both yr3 (2008) and yr5 (2010) + no. of unique students at both yr7 (2008) and yr9 (2010)sum of unique students at yr3 (2008) and yr5 (2010) + sum of unique students at yr7 (2008) and yr9 (2010)
Nameless P-12 College
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
0 0.05 0.1 0.15 0.2 0.25 0.3 0.35 0.4 0.45 0.5 0.55 0.6 0.65 0.7 0.75 0.8 0.85 0.9 0.95 1
SFO
den
sity
LBOTE proportion
0 20 40 60 80 100
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Who
le S
choo
l
percentileSFO ̂percentile range^^0 20 40 60 80 100
2010
percentileSchool stability as percentile
Produced by Data, Outcomesand Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 4 of 59
32
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Engl
ish
Onl
ine
Inte
rvie
w (E
OI):
Rea
ding
Tabl
e 1:
Def
initi
on o
f EO
I gro
ups
Scho
ol n
o:Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a:En
glis
h O
nlin
e In
terv
iew
app
licat
ion.
Expl
anat
ion:
The
Engl
ish
Onl
ine
Inte
rvie
w is
an
asse
ssm
ent p
rogr
am th
at ta
kes
the
form
of a
n in
terv
iew
bet
wee
n a
teac
her a
nd a
stu
dent
, with
resp
onse
s be
ing
9999
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
0(b
ttf
l)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
btt
fl
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8th
bl
td
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4th
bl
td
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI
1
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 5
of 5
9
,p
gre
cord
ed b
y th
e te
ache
r in
an o
nlin
e sy
stem
. It
was
use
d fo
r ass
essm
ent o
fPr
ep-Y
ear 2
stu
dent
s in
Vic
toria
n go
vern
men
t sch
ools
from
Oct
ober
200
9*.
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
End
Prep
End
Year
1En
d Ye
ar 2
parti
cipa
tion
parti
cipa
tion
parti
cipa
tion
parti
cipa
tion
(n)
(%)†
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)†
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)†
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)†
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
2009
2310
04
1322
2235
41
311
2322
100
05
523
2345
240
177
1810
00
017
2833
222
642
24
stud
ent
stud
ent
Mea
n VE
LS
Scor
eM
ean
VELS
Sc
ore
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
sby
EO
I gro
upPe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by E
OI g
roup
stud
ent
Mea
n VE
LS
Scor
ePe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by E
OI g
roup
stud
ent
Mea
n VE
LS
Scor
ePe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by E
OI g
roup
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
2009
2310
04
1322
2235
41.
311.
2322
100
05
523
2345
2.40
1.77
1810
00
017
2833
222.
642.
2420
1029
100
041
550
03
0.6
0.4
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
by
EOI g
roup
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
B
egin
ning
Pre
p E
nd P
rep
End
Year
1En
d Ye
ar 2
Ung
rade
dSF
O p
erce
ntile
rang
e**
p
100
100
100
100
2009
2010
100
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Beginning Prep
020406080100
percent
406080100
ercent
020406080100
percent
020406080100
percent
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e406080100
percent
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Ung
rade
dst
uden
tpar
ticip
atio
n(n
)
End Prep
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Ung
rade
dst
uden
tpar
ticip
atio
n(n
)=
0
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
End
Pre
pEn
d Ye
ar 1
End
Year
2 U
ngra
ded*
*
d Year 1
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
2009
2010
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
%EO
I gro
up 1
^%
EOI g
roup
2^
%EO
I gro
up 3
^%
EOI g
roup
4%
EOI g
roup
5%
EOI g
roup
6
020406080100
2009
2010
percent 3.5
4.0
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
End ar 2
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
255075100
05
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ercent student participation .
mean VELS score
255075100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
255075100
05
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ercent student participation .
mean VELS score
255075100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ercent student participation .
mean VELS score
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
2009
2010
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
%EO
I gro
up 1
^%
EOI g
roup
2^
%EO
I gro
up 3
^%
EOI g
roup
4%
EOI g
roup
5%
EOI g
roup
6
020406080100
2009
2010
percent 05
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
mean VELS score
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Not
e:*
In 2
010,
onl
y th
e Be
ginn
ing
Prep
ass
essm
ent h
ad ta
ken
plac
e.†
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= (s
tude
nts
who
parti
cipa
ted
/ Feb
ruar
y or
Aug
ust c
ensu
s en
rolm
ents
) * 1
00.
**P
tild
tt
tli
blf
thd
dh
t
End Yea
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
Stat
e M
ean
Scor
eSt
uden
t Par
ticip
atio
n†
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
%EO
I gro
up 1
^%
EOI g
roup
2^
%EO
I gro
up 3
^%
EOI g
roup
4%
EOI g
roup
5%
EOI g
roup
6
020406080100
2009
2010
percent 0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
e
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
** P
erce
ntile
s an
d st
ate
mea
ns a
re n
ot a
pplic
able
for t
he u
ngra
ded
coho
rt.^
EO
I gro
up d
efin
ition
s va
ry b
y ye
ar le
vel.
Ref
er to
Tab
le 1
abo
ve fo
r EO
I gro
up d
efin
ition
s.
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
Stat
e M
ean
Scor
eSt
uden
t Par
ticip
atio
n†
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
%EO
I gro
up 1
^%
EOI g
roup
2^
%EO
I gro
up 3
^%
EOI g
roup
4%
EOI g
roup
5%
EOI g
roup
6
020406080100
2009
2010
percent 0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
e
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 5
of 5
9
33
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Engl
ish
Onl
ine
Inte
rvie
w (E
OI):
Writ
ing
Tabl
e 1:
Def
initi
on o
f EO
I gro
ups
Scho
ol n
o:Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a:En
glis
h O
nlin
e In
terv
iew
app
licat
ion.
Expl
anat
ion:
The
Engl
ish
Onl
ine
Inte
rvie
w is
an
asse
ssm
ent p
rogr
am th
at ta
kes
the
form
of a
n in
terv
iew
bet
wee
n a
teac
her a
nd a
stu
dent
, with
resp
onse
s be
ing
9999
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
0(b
ttf
l)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
btt
fl
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8th
bl
td
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4th
bl
td
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI
1
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 6
of 5
9
,p
gre
cord
ed b
y th
e te
ache
r in
an o
nlin
e sy
stem
. It
was
use
d fo
r ass
essm
ent o
fPr
ep-Y
ear 2
stu
dent
s in
Vic
toria
n go
vern
men
t sch
ools
from
Oct
ober
200
9*.
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
End
Prep
End
Year
1En
d Ye
ar 2
parti
cipa
tion
parti
cipa
tion
parti
cipa
tion
parti
cipa
tion
(n)
(%)†
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)†
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)†
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)†
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
2009
2310
017
013
229
391
591
3622
100
50
2714
550
233
178
1810
00
06
4417
332
792
36
stud
ent
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
sM
ean
VELS
Sc
ore
stud
ent
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
sM
ean
VELS
Sc
ore
stud
ent
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
sPe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
Mea
n VE
LS
Scor
eby
EO
I gro
upby
EO
I gro
upby
EO
I gro
upby
EO
I gro
upM
ean
VELS
Sc
ore
stud
ent
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
2009
2310
017
013
229
391.
591.
3622
100
50
2714
550
2.33
1.78
1810
00
06
4417
332.
792.
3620
1029
100
5938
30
00
0.1
0.1
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
by
EOI g
roup
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
B
egin
ning
Pre
p E
nd P
rep
End
Year
1En
d Ye
ar 2
Ung
rade
dSF
O p
erce
ntile
rang
e**
p
100
100
100
100
2009
2010
100
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Beginning Prep
020406080100
percent
406080100
ercent
020406080100
percent
020406080100
percent
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e406080100
percent
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Ung
rade
dst
uden
tpar
ticip
atio
n(n
)
End Prep
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Ung
rade
dst
uden
tpar
ticip
atio
n(n
)=
0
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
End
Pre
pEn
d Ye
ar 1
End
Year
2 U
ngra
ded*
*
d Year 1
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.10
0
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
2009
2010
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
%EO
I gro
up 1
^%
EOI g
roup
2^
%EO
I gro
up 3
^%
EOI g
roup
4%
EOI g
roup
5%
EOI g
roup
6
020406080100
2009
2010
percent 3.5
4.0
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
End ar 2
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
255075100
05
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ercent student participation .
mean VELS score
255075100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
255075100
05
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ercent student participation .
mean VELS score
255075100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ercent student participation .
mean VELS score
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
2009
2010
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
%EO
I gro
up 1
^%
EOI g
roup
2^
%EO
I gro
up 3
^%
EOI g
roup
4%
EOI g
roup
5%
EOI g
roup
6
020406080100
2009
2010
percent 05
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
mean VELS score
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Not
e:*
In 2
010,
onl
y th
e Be
ginn
ing
Prep
ass
essm
ent h
ad ta
ken
plac
e.†
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= (s
tude
nts
who
parti
cipa
ted
/ Feb
ruar
y or
Aug
ust c
ensu
s en
rolm
ents
) * 1
00.
**P
tild
tt
tli
blf
thd
dh
t
End Yea
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
Stat
e M
ean
Scor
eSt
uden
t Par
ticip
atio
n†
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
%EO
I gro
up 1
^%
EOI g
roup
2^
%EO
I gro
up 3
^%
EOI g
roup
4%
EOI g
roup
5%
EOI g
roup
6
020406080100
2009
2010
percent 0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
e
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
** P
erce
ntile
s an
d st
ate
mea
ns a
re n
ot a
pplic
able
for t
he u
ngra
ded
coho
rt.^
EO
I gro
up d
efin
ition
s va
ry b
y ye
ar le
vel.
Ref
er to
Tab
le 1
abo
ve fo
r EO
I gro
up d
efin
ition
s.
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
Stat
e M
ean
Scor
eSt
uden
t Par
ticip
atio
n†
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
%EO
I gro
up 1
^%
EOI g
roup
2^
%EO
I gro
up 3
^%
EOI g
roup
4%
EOI g
roup
5%
EOI g
roup
6
020406080100
2009
2010
percent 0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
e
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 6
of 5
9
34
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Engl
ish
Onl
ine
Inte
rvie
w (E
OI):
Spe
akin
g &
Lis
teni
ngTa
ble
1: D
efin
ition
of E
OI g
roup
sSc
hool
no:
Scho
ol n
ame:
Nam
eles
s P-
12 C
olle
geSo
urce
of d
ata:
Engl
ish
Onl
ine
Inte
rvie
w a
pplic
atio
n.Ex
plan
atio
n:Th
e En
glis
h O
nlin
e In
terv
iew
is a
n as
sess
men
t pro
gram
that
take
sth
e fo
rm o
f an
inte
rvie
w b
etw
een
a te
ache
r and
a s
tude
nt, w
ith re
spon
ses
bein
g
9999
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
0(b
ttf
l)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
btt
fl
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8th
bl
td
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4th
bl
td
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI
1
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 7
of 5
9
,p
gre
cord
ed b
y th
e te
ache
r in
an o
nlin
e sy
stem
. It
was
use
d fo
r ass
essm
ent o
fPr
ep-Y
ear 2
stu
dent
s in
Vic
toria
n go
vern
men
t sch
ools
from
Oct
ober
200
9*.
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
End
Prep
End
Year
1En
d Ye
ar 2
parti
cipa
tion
parti
cipa
tion
parti
cipa
tion
parti
cipa
tion
(n)
(%)†
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)†
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)†
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)†
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
2009
2310
04
035
174
391
601
3022
100
05
99
1859
267
187
1810
00
011
2222
442
852
29
stud
ent
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
sM
ean
VELS
Sc
ore
stud
ent
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
sM
ean
VELS
Sc
ore
stud
ent
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
sPe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
Mea
n VE
LS
Scor
eby
EO
I gro
upby
EO
I gro
upby
EO
I gro
upby
EO
I gro
upM
ean
VELS
Sc
ore
stud
ent
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
2009
2310
04
035
174
391.
601.
3022
100
05
99
1859
2.67
1.87
1810
00
011
2222
442.
852.
2920
1029
100
031
553
37
0.8
0.4
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
by
EOI g
roup
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
B
egin
ning
Pre
p E
nd P
rep
End
Year
1En
d Ye
ar 2
Ung
rade
dSF
O p
erce
ntile
rang
e**
p
100
100
100
100
2009
2010
100
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Beginning Prep
020406080100
percent
406080100
ercent
020406080100
percent
020406080100
percent
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e406080100
percent
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Ung
rade
dst
uden
tpar
ticip
atio
n(n
)
End Prep
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Ung
rade
dst
uden
tpar
ticip
atio
n(n
)=
0
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
End
Pre
pEn
d Ye
ar 1
End
Year
2 U
ngra
ded*
*
d Year 1
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
100
3.5
4.0
.
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
2009
2010
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
%EO
I gro
up 1
^%
EOI g
roup
2^
%EO
I gro
up 3
^%
EOI g
roup
4%
EOI g
roup
5%
EOI g
roup
6
020406080100
2009
2010
percent 3.5
4.0
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
End ar 2
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
255075100
05
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ercent student participation .
mean VELS score
255075100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
255075100
05
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ercent student participation .
mean VELS score
255075100
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
ercent student participation .
mean VELS score
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
2009
2010
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
%EO
I gro
up 1
^%
EOI g
roup
2^
%EO
I gro
up 3
^%
EOI g
roup
4%
EOI g
roup
5%
EOI g
roup
6
020406080100
2009
2010
percent 05
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
mean VELS score
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Not
e:*
In 2
010,
onl
y th
e Be
ginn
ing
Prep
ass
essm
ent h
ad ta
ken
plac
e.†
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= (s
tude
nts
who
parti
cipa
ted
/ Feb
ruar
y or
Aug
ust c
ensu
s en
rolm
ents
) * 1
00.
**P
tild
tt
tli
blf
thd
dh
t
End Yea
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
Stat
e M
ean
Scor
eSt
uden
t Par
ticip
atio
n†
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
%EO
I gro
up 1
^%
EOI g
roup
2^
%EO
I gro
up 3
^%
EOI g
roup
4%
EOI g
roup
5%
EOI g
roup
6
020406080100
2009
2010
percent 0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
e
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
** P
erce
ntile
s an
d st
ate
mea
ns a
re n
ot a
pplic
able
for t
he u
ngra
ded
coho
rt.^
EO
I gro
up d
efin
ition
s va
ry b
y ye
ar le
vel.
Ref
er to
Tab
le 1
abo
ve fo
r EO
I gro
up d
efin
ition
s.
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2009
2010
percent
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
Stat
e M
ean
Scor
eSt
uden
t Par
ticip
atio
n†
0255075100
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean VELS score
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
020
4060
8010
0
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
%EO
I gro
up 1
^%
EOI g
roup
2^
%EO
I gro
up 3
^%
EOI g
roup
4%
EOI g
roup
5%
EOI g
roup
6
020406080100
2009
2010
percent 0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
2009
2010
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
e
Beg
inni
ng P
rep
/ Ung
rade
dVE
LS s
core
>=
2.1
VELS
sco
re =
1.6
to 2
.0VE
LS s
core
= 1
.1 to
1.5
VELS
sco
re =
0.6
to 1
.0VE
LS s
core
= 0
.1 to
0.5
VELS
sco
re =
0 (b
otto
mof
sca
le)
End
Prep
>24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edup
to 1
2 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 6
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed6-
12 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
botto
m o
f sca
le
End
Year
1>2
4 m
ths
abov
e ex
pect
ed12
-24
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
at o
r up
to 1
2 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
12-1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>1
8 m
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed
End
Year
2>2
4 m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
12-2
4m
onth
s ab
ove
expe
cted
up to
12
mon
ths
abov
e ex
pect
edat
or u
p to
12
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed12
-24
mon
ths
belo
w ex
pect
ed>2
4 m
onth
s be
low
expe
cted
EOI g
roup
6:
EOI g
roup
5:
EOI g
roup
4:
EOI g
roup
3:
EOI g
roup
2:
EOI g
roup
1:
Not
e: In
201
0, o
nly
the
Begi
nnin
g Pr
ep a
sses
smen
t had
take
n pl
ace.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 7
of 5
9
35
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Ass
essm
ent o
f Rea
ding
: Pre
p to
Yea
r 2 (d
isco
ntin
ued
at th
e en
d of
200
8)Sc
hool
no:
Scho
ol n
ame:
Nam
eles
s P-
12 C
olle
geEx
plan
atio
n:St
uden
ts' a
bilit
y to
read
uns
ight
ed te
xt is
ass
esse
d at
the
end
of e
ach
year
. Th
e da
ta p
rese
nted
her
e in
clud
es 'd
eem
ed n
ot c
apab
le' s
tude
nts.
Mor
e de
taile
d in
form
atio
n (in
clud
ing
data
whe
re d
eem
ed n
ot c
apab
le s
tude
nts
are
excl
uded
) is
avai
labl
e in
the
Asse
ssm
ent o
f Rea
ding
repo
rt, a
vaila
ble
from
the
Scho
ol P
erfo
rman
ce R
epor
ts w
ebsi
te.
Sour
ce o
f dat
a:D
ata
trans
mitt
ed fr
om s
choo
l to
DEE
CD
via
an
onlin
e w
eb-fo
rm.
Stat
eSt
ate
Stat
e20
0820
0820
08(N
o.)
%(N
o.)
%(N
o.)
%(N
o.)
%(N
o.)
%%
(No.
)%
(No.
)%
(No.
)%
(No.
)%
(No.
)%
%(N
o.)
%(N
o.)
%(N
o.)
%(N
o.)
%(N
o.)
%%
100%
(23)
76.7
(20)
100.
0(2
1)10
0.0
(20)
90.9
(19)
90.5
69.0
(16)
100.
0(2
9)10
0.0
(20)
100.
0(1
8)10
0.0
(23)
100.
094
.790
-99%
(6)
20.0
(1)
4.5
(1)
4.8
25.4
4.7
80-8
9%(1
)3.
32.
30.
251
-79%
(1)
4.8
1.5
0.2
50%
or b
elow
(1)
4.5
1.7
0.3
Tota
l(3
0)10
0.0
(20)
100.
0(2
1)10
0.0
(22)
100.
0(2
1)10
0.0
100.
0(1
6)10
0.0
(29)
100.
0(2
0)10
0.0
(18)
100.
0(2
3)10
0.0
100.
0Su
btot
al 9
0-10
0%(2
9)96
.7(2
0)10
0.0
(21)
100.
0(2
1)95
.5(2
0)95
.294
.5(1
6)10
0.0
(29)
100.
0(2
0)10
0.0
(18)
100.
0(2
3)10
0.0
99.4
100%
(17)
56.7
(14)
70.0
(19)
90.5
(13)
59.1
(16)
76.2
45.3
(12)
75.0
(29)
100.
0(2
0)10
0.0
(18)
100.
0(2
3)10
0.0
81.0
(22)
100.
0(1
8)10
0.0
(30)
96.8
(18)
94.7
(18)
100.
090
.490
-99%
(11)
36.7
(5)
25.0
(2)
9.5
(8)
36.4
(3)
14.3
36.1
(4)
25.0
16.9
(1)
3.2
(1)
5.3
8.8
80-8
9%(1
)5.
0(1
)4.
85.
20.
80.
351
-79%
(2)
6.7
3.6
0.4
0.1
50%
or b
elow
(1)
4.5
(1)
4.8
9.8
1.0
0.4
Tota
l(3
0)10
0.0
(20)
100.
0(2
1)10
0.0
(22)
100.
0(2
1)10
0.0
100.
0(1
6)10
0.0
(29)
100.
0(2
0)10
0.0
(18)
100.
0(2
3)10
0.0
100.
0(2
2)10
0.0
(18)
100.
0(3
1)10
0.0
(19)
100.
0(1
8)10
0.0
100.
0Su
btot
al 9
0-10
0%(2
8)93
.3(1
9)95
.0(2
1)10
0.0
(21)
95.5
(19)
90.5
81.3
(16)
100.
0(2
9)10
0.0
(20)
100.
0(1
8)10
0.0
(23)
100.
097
.9(2
2)10
0.0
(18)
100.
0(3
1)10
0.0
(19)
100.
0(1
8)10
0.0
99.2
100%
(2)
12.5
(11)
37.9
(17)
85.0
(4)
22.2
(8)
34.8
37.1
(15)
68.2
(10)
55.6
(28)
90.3
(11)
57.9
(14)
77.8
62.9
90-9
9%(1
0)62
.5(1
8)62
.1(2
)10
.0(1
4)77
.8(1
5)65
.249
.2(7
)31
.8(8
)44
.4(1
)3.
2(7
)36
.8(4
)22
.233
.280
-89%
(2)
12.5
6.3
(2)
6.5
(1)
5.3
1.8
51-7
9%(2
)12
.5(1
)5.
03.
00.
850
% o
r bel
ow4.
31.
4To
tal
(16)
100.
0(2
9)10
0.0
(20)
100.
0(1
8)10
0.0
(23)
100.
010
0.0
(22)
100.
0(1
8)10
0.0
(31)
100.
0(1
9)10
0.0
(18)
100.
010
0.0
Subt
otal
90-
100%
(12)
75.0
(29)
100.
0(1
9)95
.0(1
8)10
0.0
(23)
100.
086
.4(2
2)10
0.0
(18)
100.
0(2
9)93
.5(1
8)94
.7(1
8)10
0.0
96.1
100%
(10)
45.5
(9)
50.0
(25)
80.6
(7)
36.8
(16)
88.9
47.4
90-9
9%(1
2)54
.5(9
)50
.0(4
)12
.9(1
1)57
.9(2
)11
.147
.180
-89%
(2)
6.5
2.4
51-7
9%(1
)5.
30.
950
% o
r bel
ow2.
2To
tal
(22)
100.
0(1
8)10
0.0
(31)
100.
0(1
9)10
0.0
(18)
100.
010
0.0
Subt
otal
90-
100%
(22)
100.
0(1
8)10
0.0
(29)
93.5
(18)
94.7
(18)
100.
094
.5
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
No.
of s
tude
nts
DN
C1 :
00
00
00
00
00
00
10
0N
o. o
f stu
dent
s at
risk
2 :1
00
11
00
00
00
02
10
Not
es:
1St
uden
ts c
an b
e D
NC
(dee
med
not
cap
able
) onl
y if
they
mee
t one
of t
he c
ondi
tions
(ins
uffic
ient
Eng
lish,
rece
ivin
g D
&I fu
ndin
g, in
suffi
cien
t atte
ndan
ce a
t the
sch
ool o
r ref
erre
dfro
m R
eadi
ng R
ecov
ery)
AN
D re
ad b
elow
the
min
imum
sta
ndar
d.2
The
num
ber o
f stu
dent
s at
risk
is th
e nu
mbe
r of s
tude
nts
read
ing
at le
ss th
en 9
0% a
ccur
acy
at L
evel
1 fo
r Pre
p, L
evel
5 fo
r Yea
r 1 o
r Lev
el 1
5 fo
r Yea
r 2.
Level 15 Level 20Level 599
99Level 1
Prep
Scho
ol20
0420
0520
0620
0720
08
Year
2Sc
hool
2004
2005
2004
Scho
ol20
0720
0520
0820
0720
0620
08
Year
1
2006
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 8
of 5
9
36
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Ass
essm
ent o
f Rea
ding
: Pre
p to
Yea
r 2 (d
isco
ntin
ued
at th
e en
d of
200
8)Sc
hool
no:
Not
e: ^
This
dat
a is
hig
hly
skew
ed, w
ith a
lot o
f sch
ools
obt
aini
ng th
e be
st p
ossi
ble
resu
lt, p
artic
ular
lySc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
in Y
ear 2
. Th
e m
axim
um a
chie
vabl
e pe
rcen
tile
is th
eref
ore
sign
ifica
ntly
less
than
100
.Ex
plan
atio
n:St
uden
ts' a
bilit
y to
read
uns
ight
ed te
xt is
ass
esse
d at
the
end
of e
ach
year
.So
urce
of d
ata:
Dat
a tra
nsm
itted
from
sch
ool t
o D
EEC
D v
ia a
n on
line
web
-form
.
Year
leve
l: Pr
epYe
ar le
vel:
Year
1Ye
ar le
vel:
Year
2Te
xt le
vel:
Leve
l 5Te
xt le
vel:
Leve
l 15
Text
leve
l: Le
vel 2
0
9999
0102030405060708090100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
90%
-100
% a
ccur
acy
50%
or b
elow
acc
urac
y
percent
Improvement
Improvement
0102030405060708090100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
90%
-100
% a
ccur
acy
50%
or b
elow
acc
urac
y
percent0102030405060708090100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
90%
-100
% a
ccur
acy
50%
or b
elow
acc
urac
y
percent
Scho
ol S
core
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line
Scho
ol S
core
at z
ero
perc
ent
Improvement
Improvement
Improvement
Improvement
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 9
of 5
9
90%
-100
% a
ccur
acy
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
0102030405060708090100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
90%
-100
% a
ccur
acy
50%
or b
elow
acc
urac
y
percent
Improvement
Improvement
0102030405060708090100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
90%
-100
% a
ccur
acy
50%
or b
elow
acc
urac
y
percent0102030405060708090100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
90%
-100
% a
ccur
acy
50%
or b
elow
acc
urac
y
percent
Scho
ol S
core
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line
Scho
ol S
core
at z
ero
perc
ent
020
4060
8010
0
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2005
-20
08
perc
entil
e0
2040
6080
100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2005
-20
08
perc
entil
e0
2040
6080
100
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2005
-20
08
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol S
core
as
perc
entile
Scho
ol p
erce
ntile
ha
s re
ache
d th
e m
axim
um^
Max
imum
sch
ool
scor
e pe
rcen
tile^
SFO
per
cent
ile
rang
e
Improvement
Improvement
Improvement
Improvement
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 9
of 5
9
37
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teac
her J
udgm
ents
aga
inst
the
VELS
- Ye
ar le
vels
Pre
p-6
com
bine
dSc
hool
no:
9999
Scho
ol n
ame:
Nam
eles
s P-
12 C
olle
geSo
urce
of d
ata:
Data
retri
eved
ele
ctro
nica
lly fr
om C
ASES
21.
Expl
anat
ion:
Sem
este
r 2 te
ache
r jud
gmen
ts o
f stu
dent
ach
ieve
men
t aga
inst
the
VELS
.
Year
Lev
els:
2008
152
1429
499
015
213
2850
72
152
120
735
115
37
1769
71
153
318
745
020
0914
822
2745
52
148
2427
3810
114
83
2766
40
149
933
507
114
68
2364
51
2010
151
1442
404
115
115
3442
90
151
033
643
115
111
2956
32
151
1026
603
1
Note
:*
The
scho
ol tr
endl
ine
is on
ly pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is da
ta fo
r eac
h ca
lend
ar y
ear.
% A
% B
Prep
-6(c
ombi
ned)
% C
% C
% D
tota
l st
uden
ts
% A
% B
tota
l st
uden
ts
% E
% D
% E
% E
% E
% B
tota
l st
uden
ts
% A
% B
% C
% E
% C
% D
tota
l st
uden
ts
% A
% B
% C
% D
% D
tota
l st
uden
ts
% A
Read
ing
Mea
sure
men
t, Ch
ance
& D
ata
Num
ber
Spea
king
& L
iste
ning
Writ
ing
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
percent.
%A
%B
%C
%D
%E
%AB
CTr
endl
ine*
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 1
0 of
59
38
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teac
her J
udgm
ents
aga
inst
the
VELS
- En
glis
h (p
rimar
y)Sc
hool
no:
Note
s:Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a: D
ata
retri
eved
ele
ctro
nica
lly fr
om C
ASES
21.
Expl
anat
ion:
Sem
este
r 2 te
ache
r jud
gmen
ts o
f stu
dent
ach
ieve
men
t aga
inst
the
VELS
.
Rea
ding
Writ
ing
tota
lto
tal
tota
lto
tal
stud
ents
AB
CD
ESc
hool
Stat
e^st
uden
tsA
BC
DE
Scho
olSt
ate^
stud
ents
AB
CD
ESc
hool
Stat
e^st
uden
tsA
BC
DE
Scho
olSt
ate^
2008
2119
3343
50
1.15
1.01
2008
2917
3838
70
3.13
2.99
2008
2119
4829
50
1.17
0.97
2008
297
4141
73
3.04
2.92
2009
234
3061
40
0.99
1.02
2009
2020
2535
1010
3.00
3.02
2009
2339
2235
40
1.16
0.98
2009
2010
2055
150
2.95
2.94
2010
297
4152
00
1.09
2010
1735
4712
60
3.26
2010
2914
3445
70
1.07
2010
1718
3541
60
3.12
2008
2326
3539
00
1.75
1.58
2008
170
1259
290
3.29
3.47
2008
2313
3057
00
1.62
1.49
2008
170
676
180
3.32
3.40
2009
2232
3632
00
1.74
1.58
2009
2914
3152
03
3.59
3.49
2009
2232
559
50
1.78
1.50
2009
2921
2434
173
3.51
3.42
2010
1822
6711
00
1.78
2010
190
1668
115
3.30
2010
180
5644
00
1.60
2010
195
3253
110
3.50
2008
1828
1756
00
2.18
2.06
2008
240
2958
130
3.96
3.96
2008
1839
1150
00
2.22
1.97
2008
240
1367
174
3.80
3.90
2009
1833
1744
60
2.25
2.07
2009
1712
1853
180
3.94
4.00
2009
1817
3350
00
2.21
1.98
2009
176
1259
240
3.87
3.92
2010
2214
5923
50
2.18
2010
280
3957
40
4.03
2010
2232
4123
50
2.27
2010
2811
2543
210
3.91
2008
205
3055
100
2.53
2.52
2008
2020
4035
05
2.64
2.44
2009
1942
2632
00
2.83
2.54
2009
1942
2132
50
2.76
2.46
2010
1833
2239
60
2.69
2010
1822
2250
60
2.64
Rea
ding
Writ
ing
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n^Sc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile a
gain
st S
FO p
erce
ntile
rang
e^Sc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean^
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge^
9999
Mea
n Sc
ore
% o
f stu
dent
s by
gra
de
Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3
Yr 5 Yr 6
Mea
n Sc
ore
Yr 4
% o
f stu
dent
s by
gra
de%
of s
tude
nts
by g
rade
% o
f stu
dent
s by
gra
deM
ean
Scor
eM
ean
Scor
e
Prep
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2
Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
Yr 3
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
perc
entile
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
-100-8
0-6
0-4
0-2
0020406080100
20082009
2010
200820092010
2008
20092010
2008
20092010
20082009
2010
200820092010
2008
20092010
Prep
Yr 1
Yr 2
Yr 3
Yr 4
Yr 5
Yr 6
percent
-100-8
0-6
0-4
0-2
0020406080100
20082009
2010
2008
20092010
2008
20092010
20082009
2010
2008
20092010
2008
20092010
20082009
2010
Prep
Yr 1
Yr 2
Yr 3
Yr 4
Yr 5
Yr 6
percent
%A
%B
%C
%D
%E
%AB
CTr
endl
ine*
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Prep
Yr 1
Yr 2
Yr 3
Yr 4
Yr 5
Yr 6
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
perc
entile
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Prep
Yr 1
Yr 2
Yr 3
Yr 4
Yr 5
Yr 6
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
only
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
data
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.^
201
0 be
nchm
arks
and
per
cent
iles
will
be c
alcu
late
d in
Aug
ust,
when
dat
a fro
mal
l sch
ools
has
been
sub
mitt
ed.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Divi
sion
, DEE
CD
Page
11
of 5
9
39
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teac
her J
udgm
ents
aga
inst
the
VELS
- En
glis
h (p
rimar
y)Sc
hool
no:
Note
s:Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a: D
ata
retri
eved
ele
ctro
nica
lly fr
om C
ASES
21.
Expl
anat
ion:
Sem
este
r 2 te
ache
r jud
gmen
ts o
f stu
dent
ach
ieve
men
t aga
inst
the
VELS
.
Spea
king
and
Lis
teni
ngto
tal
tota
lst
uden
tsA
BC
DE
Scho
olSt
ate^
stud
ents
AB
CD
ESc
hool
Stat
e^20
0821
019
810
01.
020.
9720
0829
331
623
03.
082.
9520
0923
939
520
01.
080.
9820
0920
030
655
03.
052.
9720
1029
010
900
00.
9720
1017
041
530
63.
0120
0823
017
784
01.
481.
4920
0817
00
8812
03.
323.
4420
0922
023
770
01.
501.
5020
0929
328
627
03.
513.
4620
1018
039
566
01.
5720
1019
016
795
03.
4220
0818
017
830
02.
011.
9820
0824
017
718
43.
863.
9520
0918
011
890
01.
962.
0020
0917
029
5912
03.
963.
9720
1022
036
640
02.
0820
1028
032
617
03.
9720
0820
035
5510
02.
512.
4620
0919
1126
585
02.
572.
4820
1018
072
280
02.
68
Spea
king
and
Lis
teni
ngSc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean^
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge^
Yr 3Prep Yr 1 Yr 2
Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
% o
f stu
dent
s by
gra
deM
ean
Scor
e%
of s
tude
nts
by g
rade
9999
Mea
n Sc
ore
-100-8
0-6
0-4
0-2
0020406080100
20082009
2010
200820092010
2008
20092010
2008
20092010
20082009
2010
200820092010
2008
20092010
Prep
Yr 1
Yr 2
Yr 3
Yr 4
Yr 5
Yr 6
percent
%A
%B
%C
%D
%E
%AB
CTr
endl
ine*
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Prep
Yr 1
Yr 2
Yr 3
Yr 4
Yr 5
Yr 6
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
perc
entile
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
only
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
data
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.^
201
0 be
nchm
arks
and
per
cent
iles
will
be c
alcu
late
d in
Aug
ust,
when
dat
a fro
mal
l sch
ools
has
been
sub
mitt
ed.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Divi
sion
, DEE
CD
Page
12
of 5
9
40
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teac
her J
udgm
ents
aga
inst
the
VELS
- M
athe
mat
ics
(prim
ary)
Scho
ol n
o:No
tes:
Scho
ol n
ame:
Nam
eles
s P-
12 C
olle
geSo
urce
of d
ata:
Dat
a re
triev
ed e
lect
roni
cally
from
CAS
ES21
.Ex
plan
atio
n:Se
mes
ter 2
teac
her j
udgm
ents
of s
tude
nt a
chie
vem
ent a
gain
st th
e VE
LS.
Num
ber
Mea
sure
men
t, C
hanc
e an
d D
ata
tota
lto
tal
tota
lto
tal
stud
ents
AB
CD
ESc
hool
Stat
e^st
uden
tsA
BC
DE
Scho
olSt
ate^
stud
ents
AB
CD
ESc
hool
Stat
e^st
uden
tsA
BC
DE
Scho
olSt
ate^
2008
2119
2952
00
1.18
1.00
2008
290
093
70
2.91
2.97
2008
215
3857
00
1.13
0.98
2008
290
097
30
2.94
2.96
2009
240
3863
00
1.01
1.01
2009
200
4540
150
3.01
2.99
2009
210
010
00
00.
980.
9820
0920
045
4015
03.
042.
9720
1029
734
590
01.
0920
1017
4124
246
63.
1320
1029
331
623
01.
0420
1017
6518
126
03.
3220
0823
917
740
01.
571.
5120
0817
00
946
03.
373.
4520
0823
013
870
01.
511.
4920
0817
00
946
03.
433.
4420
0922
541
550
01.
671.
5320
0929
1431
487
03.
533.
4620
0922
50
950
01.
571.
5020
0929
2434
383
03.
663.
4520
1018
011
890
01.
4920
1019
1121
585
53.
5020
1018
017
830
01.
5420
1019
011
7911
03.
4220
0819
2111
5811
02.
072.
0020
0824
417
6713
03.
933.
9520
0819
016
840
01.
991.
9820
0824
417
6713
03.
953.
9420
0918
1733
500
02.
172.
0220
0917
029
3529
63.
843.
9720
0918
039
610
02.
101.
9920
0917
06
7118
63.
793.
9520
1022
1445
410
02.
1820
1028
032
577
43.
9420
1022
527
680
02.
1120
1028
039
544
44.
0020
0820
050
3510
52.
472.
4920
0820
1545
2515
02.
592.
4720
0919
2611
585
02.
592.
5020
0919
1632
530
02.
622.
4820
1018
1128
610
02.
5320
1018
1133
560
02.
56
Num
ber
Mea
sure
men
t, C
hanc
e an
d D
ata
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n^Sc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile a
gain
st S
FO p
erce
ntile
rang
e^Sc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean^
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge^
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2
Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
Yr 3
Mea
n Sc
ore
Yr 4
% o
f stu
dent
s by
gra
de%
of s
tude
nts
by g
rade
% o
f stu
dent
s by
gra
deM
ean
Scor
eM
ean
Scor
e
Prep
9999
Mea
n Sc
ore
% o
f stu
dent
s by
gra
de
Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3
Yr 5 Yr 6
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
perc
entile
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
-100-8
0-6
0-4
0-2
0020406080100
20082009
2010
200820092010
2008
20092010
2008
20092010
20082009
2010
200820092010
2008
20092010
Prep
Yr 1
Yr 2
Yr 3
Yr 4
Yr 5
Yr 6
percent
-100-8
0-6
0-4
0-2
0020406080100
2008
20092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Prep
Yr 1
Yr 2
Yr 3
Yr 4
Yr 5
Yr 6
percent
%A
%B
%C
%D
%E
%AB
CTr
endl
ine*
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Prep
Yr 1
Yr 2
Yr 3
Yr 4
Yr 5
Yr 6
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6
perc
entile
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Prep
Yr 1
Yr 2
Yr 3
Yr 4
Yr 5
Yr 6
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
only
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
data
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.^
201
0 be
nchm
arks
and
per
cent
iles
will
be c
alcu
late
d in
Aug
ust,
when
dat
a fro
mal
l sch
ools
has
been
sub
mitt
ed.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Divi
sion
, DEE
CD
Page
13
of 5
9
41
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (primary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Reading
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.25
5.50
5.75
6.00
6.25
6.50
6.75
prep 2010 29 29 3 12 12 2 1.09
prep 2009 23 23 1 3 11 7 1 0.99 1.02 -0.03yr1 2010 18 18 2 12 4 1.78
prep 2008 21 21 1 1 8 7 2 1 1 1.15 1.01 0.14yr1 2009 22 22 2 5 8 6 1 1.74 1.58 0.16yr2 2010 22 22 1 1 4 13 3 2.18
yr1 2008 23 23 9 8 4 1 1 1.75 1.58 0.17yr2 2009 18 18 1 2 6 3 1 3 2 2.25 2.07 0.18yr3 2010 18 18 1 3 4 4 4 1 1 2.69
yr2 2008 18 18 10 3 5 2.18 2.06 0.12yr3 2009 19 19 1 5 5 5 1 2 2.83 2.54 0.29yr4 2010 17 17 1 2 8 6 3.26
yr3 2008 20 20 2 1 10 6 1 2.53 2.52 0.01yr4 2009 20 20 2 1 1 7 5 4 3.00 3.02 -0.02yr5 2010 19 19 1 1 1 9 4 3 3.30
yr4 2008 29 29 2 3 8 11 4 1 3.13 2.99 0.14yr5 2009 29 29 1 5 10 9 2 2 3.59 3.49 0.09yr6 2010 28 28 1 6 10 11 4.03
yr5 2008 17 17 1 4 5 5 2 3.29 3.47 -0.17yr6 2009 17 17 1 2 4 5 3 2 3.94 4.00 -0.06
yr6 2008 25 24 1 2 4 10 7 3.96 3.96 0.00
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
Year
Lev
el
Year
Tota
l1
Asse
ssed
2
State mean^
Difference between
school and state
mean^
9999
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
Level 4
-0.20
-0.10
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
2010
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2008
prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 14 of 59
42
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (primary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Writing
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.25
5.50
5.75
6.00
6.25
6.50
6.75
prep 2010 29 29 2 1 12 10 4 1.07
prep 2009 23 23 1 2 6 5 9 1.16 0.98 0.18yr1 2010 18 18 3 5 10 1.60
prep 2008 21 21 1 1 5 10 3 1 1.17 0.97 0.19yr1 2009 22 22 1 2 12 6 1 1.78 1.50 0.28yr2 2010 22 22 1 5 9 4 3 2.27
yr1 2008 23 23 4 9 7 2 1 1.62 1.49 0.13yr2 2009 18 18 9 6 3 2.21 1.98 0.23yr3 2010 18 18 1 3 6 4 2 1 1 2.64
yr2 2008 18 18 2 7 2 5 2 2.22 1.97 0.26yr3 2009 19 19 1 3 3 4 5 2 1 2.76 2.46 0.30yr4 2010 17 17 1 2 5 6 3 3.12
yr3 2008 20 20 1 1 6 8 4 2.64 2.44 0.19yr4 2009 20 20 2 1 4 7 4 2 2.95 2.94 0.01yr5 2010 19 19 1 1 3 7 6 1 3.50
yr4 2008 29 29 1 1 1 3 9 12 1 1 3.04 2.92 0.13yr5 2009 29 29 1 1 4 5 5 7 4 2 3.51 3.42 0.09yr6 2010 28 28 2 4 10 2 7 2 1 3.91
yr5 2008 17 17 1 2 6 7 1 3.32 3.40 -0.08yr6 2009 17 17 2 2 3 7 2 1 3.87 3.92 -0.05
yr6 2008 25 24 1 1 3 9 7 3 3.80 3.90 -0.09
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
Difference between
school and state
mean^
9999
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
Level 4
Year
Lev
el
Year
Tota
l1
Asse
ssed
2
State mean^
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
0.35
2010
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2008
prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 15 of 59
43
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (primary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Speaking and Listening
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.25
5.50
5.75
6.00
6.25
6.50
6.75
prep 2010 29 29 3 23 3 0.97
prep 2009 23 23 3 9 9 2 1.08 0.98 0.09yr1 2010 18 18 1 10 7 1.57
prep 2008 21 21 1 16 4 1.02 0.97 0.05yr1 2009 22 22 5 12 5 1.50 1.50 0.00yr2 2010 22 22 1 13 8 2.08
yr1 2008 23 23 1 4 14 4 1.48 1.49 -0.01yr2 2009 18 18 5 11 2 1.96 2.00 -0.04yr3 2010 18 18 5 13 2.68
yr2 2008 18 18 2 13 3 2.01 1.98 0.03yr3 2009 19 19 1 2 9 5 2 2.57 2.48 0.09yr4 2010 17 17 1 2 7 7 3.01
yr3 2008 20 20 1 1 1 10 7 2.51 2.46 0.05yr4 2009 20 20 1 13 6 3.05 2.97 0.08yr5 2010 19 19 1 7 8 3 3.42
yr4 2008 29 29 1 1 17 9 1 3.08 2.95 0.12yr5 2009 29 29 2 6 12 8 1 3.51 3.46 0.05yr6 2010 28 28 1 1 7 10 9 3.97
yr5 2008 17 17 1 1 7 8 3.32 3.44 -0.12yr6 2009 17 17 1 1 3 7 5 3.96 3.97 -0.01
yr6 2008 25 24 1 1 1 8 9 4 3.86 3.95 -0.08
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
Year
Lev
el
Year
Tota
l1
Asse
ssed
2
State mean^
Difference between
school and state
mean^
9999
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
Level 4
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
2010
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2008
prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 16 of 59
44
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Mathematics (primary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Number
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.25
5.50
5.75
6.00
6.25
6.50
6.75
prep 2010 29 29 2 15 10 2 1.09
prep 2009 24 24 4 11 9 1.01 1.01 0.00yr1 2010 18 18 3 13 2 1.49
prep 2008 21 21 1 10 6 3 1 1.18 1.00 0.18yr1 2009 22 22 1 11 9 1 1.67 1.53 0.14yr2 2010 22 22 5 4 10 2 1 2.18
yr1 2008 23 23 2 15 4 2 1.57 1.51 0.05yr2 2009 18 18 9 6 3 2.17 2.02 0.15yr3 2010 18 18 7 4 5 2 2.53
yr2 2008 19 19 2 1 10 2 4 2.07 2.00 0.06yr3 2009 19 19 1 2 9 2 5 2.59 2.50 0.09yr4 2010 17 17 1 1 3 1 4 7 3.13
yr3 2008 20 20 1 2 2 5 10 2.47 2.49 -0.01yr4 2009 20 20 1 2 1 7 9 3.01 2.99 0.03yr5 2010 19 19 1 1 1 10 4 2 3.50
yr4 2008 29 29 2 6 21 2.91 2.97 -0.06yr5 2009 29 29 1 1 10 4 9 3 1 3.53 3.46 0.06yr6 2010 28 28 1 2 7 9 9 3.94
yr5 2008 17 17 1 7 9 3.37 3.45 -0.08yr6 2009 17 17 1 1 4 1 5 5 3.84 3.97 -0.13
yr6 2008 25 24 2 1 5 11 4 1 3.93 3.95 -0.03
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
Difference between
school and state
mean^
9999
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
Level 4
Year
Lev
el
Year
Tota
l1
Asse
ssed
2
State mean^
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
2010
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2008
prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 17 of 59
45
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Mathematics (primary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Measurement, Chance and Data
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.25
5.50
5.75
6.00
6.25
6.50
6.75
prep 2010 29 29 1 1 17 9 1 1.04
prep 2009 24 21 1 20 0.98 0.98 0.00yr1 2010 18 18 15 3 1.54
prep 2008 21 21 1 11 8 1 1.13 0.98 0.15yr1 2009 22 22 21 1 1.57 1.50 0.07yr2 2010 22 22 3 12 6 1 2.11
yr1 2008 23 23 2 18 3 1.51 1.49 0.02yr2 2009 18 18 11 7 2.10 1.99 0.11yr3 2010 18 18 6 4 6 2 2.56
yr2 2008 19 19 4 12 3 1.99 1.98 0.01yr3 2009 19 19 5 5 6 1 2 2.62 2.48 0.13yr4 2010 17 17 1 1 1 3 11 3.32
yr3 2008 20 20 1 2 1 4 9 3 2.59 2.47 0.12yr4 2009 20 20 3 8 9 3.04 2.97 0.07yr5 2010 19 19 1 1 3 12 2 3.42
yr4 2008 29 29 1 5 23 2.94 2.96 -0.02yr5 2009 29 29 1 4 7 10 7 3.66 3.45 0.21yr6 2010 28 28 1 1 5 10 11 4.00
yr5 2008 17 17 1 3 13 3.43 3.44 -0.01yr6 2009 17 17 1 1 2 4 8 1 3.79 3.95 -0.16
yr6 2008 25 24 1 2 4 12 4 1 3.95 3.94 0.01
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
Year
Lev
el
Year
Tota
l1
Asse
ssed
2
State mean^
Difference between
school and state
mean^
9999
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 5 Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
Level 4
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
2010
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2008
prep prep yr1 prep yr1 yr2 yr1 yr2 yr3 yr2 yr3 yr4 yr3 yr4 yr5 yr4 yr5 yr6 yr5 yr6 yr6
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 18 of 59
46
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teac
her J
udgm
ents
aga
inst
the
VELS
- Ye
ar le
vels
7-1
0 co
mbi
ned
Scho
ol n
o:99
99Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a:Da
ta re
triev
ed e
lect
roni
cally
from
CAS
ES21
.Ex
plan
atio
n:Se
mes
ter 2
teac
her j
udgm
ents
of s
tude
nt a
chie
vem
ent a
gain
st th
e VE
LS.
Year
Lev
els:
2008
723
1758
211
720
1954
188
730
1863
181
706
2057
161
704
2657
111
2009
694
1951
206
691
2345
237
680
1263
250
607
1843
283
605
2243
255
2010
625
1848
245
623
1053
268
623
661
272
636
1452
1710
6311
1646
1710
Note
:*
The
scho
ol tr
endl
ine
is on
ly pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is da
ta fo
r eac
h ca
lend
ar y
ear.
% E
% C
Read
ing
Stru
ctur
eM
easu
rem
ent,
Chan
ce &
Dat
aSp
eaki
ng &
Lis
teni
ngW
ritin
g
% D
tota
l st
uden
ts
% A
% B
% C
% D
% D
tota
l st
uden
ts
% A
% B
% E
% E
7-10
(com
bine
d)
tota
l st
uden
ts
% A
% B
% C
% C
% C
% D
% D
tota
l st
uden
ts
% A
% E
% B
% E
tota
l st
uden
ts
% A
% B
-100-8
0
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
percent.
%A
%B
%C
%D
%E
%AB
CTr
endl
ine*
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 1
9 of
59
47
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teac
her J
udgm
ents
aga
inst
the
VELS
- En
glis
h (s
econ
dary
)Sc
hool
no:
Note
s:Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a: D
ata
retri
eved
ele
ctro
nica
lly fr
om C
ASES
21.
Expl
anat
ion:
Sem
este
r 2 te
ache
r jud
gmen
ts o
f stu
dent
ach
ieve
men
t aga
inst
the
VELS
.
Rea
ding
Writ
ing
tota
lto
tal
tota
lto
tal
stud
ents
AB
CD
ESc
hool
Stat
e^st
uden
tsA
BC
DE
Scho
olSt
ate^
stud
ents
AB
CD
ESc
hool
Stat
e^st
uden
tsA
BC
DE
Scho
olSt
ate^
2008
157
1373
70
4.38
4.39
2008
186
2833
330
5.32
5.34
2008
150
767
270
4.23
4.36
2008
180
3328
1722
5.21
5.31
2009
1817
1744
220
4.47
4.40
2009
230
1361
917
5.17
5.33
2009
186
2244
226
4.33
4.35
2009
230
3530
2213
5.21
5.29
2010
128
1758
170
4.46
2010
147
2929
360
5.34
2010
128
858
250
4.38
2010
147
743
430
5.25
2008
200
2555
155
4.85
4.84
2008
190
074
260
5.74
5.83
2008
200
3050
1010
4.81
4.82
2008
190
574
210
5.80
5.81
2009
140
2157
210
4.79
4.85
2009
140
2936
360
5.82
5.81
2009
140
1464
210
4.77
4.81
2009
140
1450
297
5.71
5.79
2010
180
1744
2811
4.64
2010
186
1161
176
5.79
2010
180
1744
2811
4.67
2010
180
667
1117
5.67
Rea
ding
Writ
ing
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n^Sc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile a
gain
st S
FO p
erce
ntile
rang
e^Sc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean^
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge^
9999
Yr 10
Yr 7 Yr 8
% o
f stu
dent
s by
gra
de%
of s
tude
nts
by g
rade
Mea
n Sc
ore
Yr 7 Yr 8
Yr 9 Yr 10
% o
f stu
dent
s by
gra
deM
ean
Scor
eM
ean
Scor
eM
ean
Scor
e%
of s
tude
nts
by g
rade
Yr 9
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10
perc
entile
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
-100-8
0-6
0-4
0-2
0020406080100
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Yr 7
Yr 8
Yr 9
Yr 1
0
percent
-100-8
0-6
0-4
0-2
0020406080100
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Yr 7
Yr 8
Yr 9
Yr 1
0
percent
%A
%B
%C
%D
%E
%AB
CTr
end
Line
*
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Yr 7
Yr 8
Yr 9
Yr 1
0
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10
perc
entile
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Yr 7
Yr 8
Yr 9
Yr 1
0
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
only
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
data
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.^
201
0 be
nchm
arks
and
per
cent
iles
will
be c
alcu
late
d in
Aug
ust,
when
dat
a fro
mal
l sch
ools
has
been
sub
mitt
ed.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Divi
sion
, DEE
CD
Page
20
of 5
9
48
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teac
her J
udgm
ents
aga
inst
the
VELS
- En
glis
h (s
econ
dary
)Sc
hool
no:
Note
s:Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a: D
ata
retri
eved
ele
ctro
nica
lly fr
om C
ASES
21.
Expl
anat
ion:
Sem
este
r 2 te
ache
r jud
gmen
ts o
f stu
dent
ach
ieve
men
t aga
inst
the
VELS
.
Spea
king
and
Lis
teni
ngto
tal
tota
lst
uden
tsA
BC
DE
Scho
olSt
ate^
stud
ents
AB
CD
ESc
hool
Stat
e^20
0815
027
730
04.
434.
3920
0818
039
2833
05.
335.
3420
0918
06
8311
04.
364.
3920
0923
09
4843
05.
215.
3220
1012
80
7517
04.
2920
1014
014
5036
05.
2920
0820
010
7510
54.
814.
8520
0820
00
7525
05.
755.
8320
0914
00
8614
04.
714.
8420
0913
038
3823
05.
905.
8220
1018
00
5644
04.
5420
1018
611
6711
65.
82
Spea
king
and
Lis
teni
ngSc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean^
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge^
Yr 7 Yr 8
Yr 9 Yr 10
% o
f stu
dent
s by
gra
deM
ean
Scor
e
9999 %
of s
tude
nts
by g
rade
Mea
n Sc
ore
-100-8
0-6
0-4
0-2
0020406080100
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010Yr
7Yr
8Yr
9Yr
10
percent
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Yr 7
Yr 8
Yr 9
Yr 1
0
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10
perc
entile
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
%A
%B
%C
%D
%E
%AB
CTr
end
Line
*
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
only
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
data
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.^
201
0 be
nchm
arks
and
per
cent
iles
will
be c
alcu
late
d in
Aug
ust,
when
dat
a fro
mal
l sch
ools
has
been
sub
mitt
ed.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Divi
sion
, DEE
CD
Page
21
of 5
9
49
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teac
her J
udgm
ents
aga
inst
the
VELS
- M
athe
mat
ics
(sec
onda
ry)
Scho
ol n
o:No
tes:
Scho
ol n
ame:
Nam
eles
s P-
12 C
olle
geSo
urce
of d
ata:
Dat
a re
triev
ed e
lect
roni
cally
from
CAS
ES21
.Ex
plan
atio
n:Se
mes
ter 2
teac
her j
udgm
ents
of s
tude
nt a
chie
vem
ent a
gain
st th
e VE
LS.
Mea
sure
men
t, C
hanc
e an
d D
ata
Stru
ctur
eto
tal
tota
lto
tal
tota
lst
uden
tsA
BC
DE
Scho
olSt
ate^
stud
ents
AB
CD
ESc
hool
Stat
e^st
uden
tsA
BC
DE
Scho
olSt
ate^
stud
ents
AB
CD
ESc
hool
Stat
e^20
0815
07
6033
04.
324.
3820
0816
038
630
05.
595.
3020
0815
020
6713
04.
404.
3820
0816
019
756
05.
455.
2720
0916
025
5013
134.
304.
3720
0922
1832
1832
05.
475.
2920
0916
025
5013
134.
284.
3620
0922
1436
1827
55.
415.
2620
1012
825
4217
84.
3520
1014
014
4336
75.
1420
1012
825
508
84.
4420
1014
014
4336
75.
1320
0820
020
5525
04.
864.
8220
0819
2116
535
55.
995.
7520
0820
040
4020
04.
954.
8120
0819
1621
535
55.
965.
7220
0914
00
4357
04.
634.
8220
098
00
100
00
5.91
5.75
2009
140
750
430
4.71
4.80
2009
80
088
130
5.78
5.70
2010
1817
1767
00
5.01
2010
190
553
2121
5.57
2010
1833
2244
00
5.21
2010
190
547
2621
5.54
Mea
sure
men
t, C
hanc
e an
d D
ata
Stru
ctur
eSc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean^
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge^
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n^Sc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile a
gain
st S
FO p
erce
ntile
rang
e^
Yr 10
% o
f stu
dent
s by
gra
deM
ean
Scor
e
Yr 9
Mea
n Sc
ore
Yr 7 Yr 8
Yr 9 Yr 10
9999
% o
f stu
dent
s by
gra
deM
ean
Scor
eM
ean
Scor
e
Yr 7 Yr 8
% o
f stu
dent
s by
gra
de%
of s
tude
nts
by g
rade
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10
perc
entile
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Yr 7
Yr 8
Yr 9
Yr 1
0
percent
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Yr 7
Yr 8
Yr 9
Yr 1
0
percent
%A
%B
%C
%D
%E
%AB
CTr
end
Line
*
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Yr 7
Yr 8
Yr 9
Yr 1
0
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10
perc
entile
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
4.5
5.0
5.5
6.0
6.5
7.0
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Yr 7
Yr 8
Yr 9
Yr 1
0
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
only
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
data
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.^
201
0 be
nchm
arks
and
per
cent
iles
will
be c
alcu
late
d in
Aug
ust,
when
dat
a fro
mal
l sch
ools
has
been
sub
mitt
ed.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Divi
sion
, DEE
CD
Page
22
of 5
9
50
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (secondary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Reading
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.25
5.50
5.75
6.00
6.25
6.50
6.75
yr7 2010 12 12 2 3 4 2 1 4.46
yr7 2009 18 18 1 3 2 6 3 3 4.47 4.40 0.08yr8 2010 18 18 2 2 3 7 1 3 4.64
yr7 2008 15 15 1 8 3 2 1 4.38 4.39 -0.01yr8 2009 14 14 1 2 8 3 4.79 4.85 -0.06yr9 2010 14 14 1 4 4 4 1 5.34
yr8 2008 20 20 1 1 2 6 5 5 4.85 4.84 0.01yr9 2009 23 23 1 1 2 2 10 4 3 5.17 5.33 -0.15yr10 2010 18 18 1 2 1 6 5 2 1 5.79
yr9 2008 18 18 2 4 6 5 1 5.32 5.34 -0.02yr10 2009 14 14 1 4 3 2 4 5.82 5.81 0.01
yr10 2008 19 19 2 3 8 6 5.74 5.83 -0.10
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
9999
Year
Lev
el
Year
Tota
l1
Asse
ssed
2 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5Difference between
school and state
mean^
Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
State mean^
-0.20
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
2010 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2008
yr7 yr7 yr8 yr7 yr8 yr9 yr8 yr9 yr10 yr9 yr10 yr10
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 23 of 59
51
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (secondary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Writing
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.25
5.50
5.75
6.00
6.25
6.50
6.75
yr7 2010 12 12 1 2 3 4 1 1 4.38
yr7 2009 18 18 1 4 4 4 4 1 4.33 4.35 -0.02yr8 2010 18 18 2 2 3 7 1 3 4.67
yr7 2008 15 15 2 2 7 3 1 4.23 4.36 -0.13yr8 2009 14 14 3 6 3 2 4.77 4.81 -0.05yr9 2010 14 14 1 5 4 2 1 1 5.25
yr8 2008 20 20 1 1 2 6 4 6 4.81 4.82 0.00yr9 2009 23 23 1 1 1 3 2 4 3 8 5.21 5.29 -0.09yr10 2010 18 18 1 2 1 1 5 7 1 5.67
yr9 2008 18 18 4 1 2 4 1 6 5.21 5.31 -0.10yr10 2009 14 14 1 3 1 3 4 2 5.71 5.79 -0.07
yr10 2008 19 19 1 3 7 7 1 5.80 5.81 -0.01
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5Difference between
school and state
mean^
Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
State mean^
9999
Year
Lev
el
Year
Tota
l1
Asse
ssed
2 Level 1
-0.14
-0.12
-0.10
-0.08
-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0.00
2010 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2008
yr7 yr7 yr8 yr7 yr8 yr9 yr8 yr9 yr10 yr9 yr10 yr10
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 24 of 59
52
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - English (secondary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Speaking and Listening
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.25
5.50
5.75
6.00
6.25
6.50
6.75
yr7 2010 12 12 1 1 7 2 1 4.29
yr7 2009 18 18 2 7 8 1 4.36 4.39 -0.03yr8 2010 18 18 8 9 1 4.54
yr7 2008 15 15 8 3 4 4.43 4.39 0.04yr8 2009 14 14 2 12 4.71 4.84 -0.13yr9 2010 14 14 5 4 3 2 5.29
yr8 2008 20 20 1 1 1 8 7 2 4.81 4.85 -0.03yr9 2009 23 23 3 7 6 5 2 5.21 5.32 -0.11yr10 2010 18 18 1 2 6 6 2 1 5.82
yr9 2008 18 18 2 4 5 7 5.33 5.34 0.00yr10 2009 14 13 1 2 3 2 5 5.90 5.82 0.09
yr10 2008 20 20 2 3 8 7 5.75 5.83 -0.08
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
9999
Year
Lev
el
Year
Tota
l1
Asse
ssed
2 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5Difference between
school and state
mean^
Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
State mean^
-0.15
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
2010 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2008
yr7 yr7 yr8 yr7 yr8 yr9 yr8 yr9 yr10 yr9 yr10 yr10
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 25 of 59
53
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Mathematics (secondary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Measurement, Chance and Data
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.25
5.50
5.75
6.00
6.25
6.50
6.75
yr7 2010 12 12 1 2 3 2 3 1 4.35
yr7 2009 16 16 2 2 5 3 4 4.30 4.37 -0.07yr8 2010 18 18 8 4 3 3 5.01
yr7 2008 15 15 5 2 7 1 4.32 4.38 -0.07yr8 2009 14 14 1 7 4 2 4.63 4.82 -0.19yr9 2010 14 14 1 3 2 5 1 2 5.14
yr8 2008 20 20 2 3 3 8 4 4.86 4.82 0.04yr9 2009 22 22 4 3 1 3 7 3 1 5.47 5.29 0.17yr10 2010 19 19 2 2 2 2 6 4 1 5.57
yr9 2008 16 16 10 6 5.59 5.30 0.29yr10 2009 8 8 3 5 5.91 5.75 0.16
yr10 2008 19 19 1 1 6 4 3 1 3 5.99 5.75 0.24
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5Difference between
school and state
mean^
Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
State mean^
9999
Year
Lev
el
Year
Tota
l1
Asse
ssed
2 Level 1
-0.30
-0.20
-0.10
0.00
0.10
0.20
0.30
0.40
2010 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2008
yr7 yr7 yr8 yr7 yr8 yr9 yr8 yr9 yr10 yr9 yr10 yr10
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 26 of 59
54
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teacher Judgments against the VELS - Mathematics (secondary)School no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Semester 2 teacher judgments of student achievement against the VELS.
Structure
0.00
0.50
1.00
1.25
1.50
1.75
2.00
2.25
2.50
2.75
3.00
3.25
3.50
3.75
4.00
4.25
4.50
4.75
5.00
5.25
5.50
5.75
6.00
6.25
6.50
6.75
yr7 2010 12 12 1 1 6 3 1 4.44
yr7 2009 16 16 2 2 6 2 4 4.28 4.36 -0.08yr8 2010 18 18 4 4 4 3 3 5.21
yr7 2008 15 15 2 5 5 3 4.40 4.38 0.02yr8 2009 14 14 3 3 2 5 1 4.71 4.80 -0.08yr9 2010 14 14 1 3 2 6 2 5.13
yr8 2008 20 20 1 3 3 5 8 4.95 4.81 0.14yr9 2009 22 22 1 4 2 2 2 8 3 5.41 5.26 0.15yr10 2010 19 19 2 2 3 2 5 4 1 5.54
yr9 2008 16 16 1 4 8 3 5.45 5.27 0.19yr10 2009 8 8 1 5 2 5.78 5.70 0.08
yr10 2008 19 19 1 1 7 3 4 1 2 5.96 5.72 0.24
shading indicates a 'C' grade (at the expected standard) on the VELS scale.
Notes:1 The total number of students eligible to be assessed. This figure will typically match, or be very close to, the Year Level enrolment.2 The number of students assessed against the VELS. The difference between this figure and the total (1) should be accounted for
by students assessed against Individual Learning Plans and/or the ESL companion in the case of English.^ 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
9999
Year
Lev
el
Year
Tota
l1
Asse
ssed
2 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5Difference between
school and state
mean^
Level 6 Level 6ESchool mean
State mean^
-0.10
-0.05
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.15
0.20
0.25
0.30
2010 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2010 2008 2009 2008
yr7 yr7 yr8 yr7 yr8 yr9 yr8 yr9 yr10 yr9 yr10 yr10
Difference between school mean and state mean^, by cohort group
diffe
renc
e be
twee
n sc
hool
mea
n an
d st
ate
mea
n
Produced by Data, Outcomes and Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 27 of 59
55
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
ESL Companion GuideSchool no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Data retrieved electronically from CASES21.Explanation: Assessment of students against the ESL (English as a Second Language) Companion Guide.
Students assessed on the ESL Companion Guide, 2010:Reading: 22
Writing: 22Speaking & Listening: 22
Enrolment at February 2010 census: 250
Reading, 2010
Writing, 2010
Speaking and Listening, 2010
9999
1
2 2
1 1
2
3
1 1
2
3
2
1
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
A1.1
A1.2
A1.3
A2.1
A2.2
A2.3
B0.1
B0.2
B0.3
B1.1
B1.2
B1.3
B2.1
B2.2
B2.3
B3.1
B3.2
B3.3
S0.1
S0.2
S0.3
S1.1
S1.2
S1.3
S2.1
S2.2
S2.3
S3.1
S3.2
S3.3
S4.1
S4.2
S4.3
Primary (Years P to 2) Primary (Years 3 to 6) Secondary (Years 7 to 10)
num
ber o
f stu
dent
s
1 1
2
1
2
3
1 1
2
1
2
1
2 2
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
A1.1
A1.2
A1.3
A2.1
A2.2
A2.3
B0.1
B0.2
B0.3
B1.1
B1.2
B1.3
B2.1
B2.2
B2.3
B3.1
B3.2
B3.3
S0.1
S0.2
S0.3
S1.1
S1.2
S1.3
S2.1
S2.2
S2.3
S3.1
S3.2
S3.3
S4.1
S4.2
S4.3
Primary (Years P to 2) Primary (Years 3 to 6) Secondary (Years 7 to 10)
num
ber o
f stu
dent
s
1 1
2
1 1
3
1 1 1
2
1
2
1 1
2
1
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
A1.1
A1.2
A1.3
A2.1
A2.2
A2.3
B0.1
B0.2
B0.3
B1.1
B1.2
B1.3
B2.1
B2.2
B2.3
B3.1
B3.2
B3.3
S0.1
S0.2
S0.3
S1.1
S1.2
S1.3
S2.1
S2.2
S2.3
S3.1
S3.2
S3.3
S4.1
S4.2
S4.3
Primary (Years P to 2) Primary (Years 3 to 6) Secondary (Years 7 to 10)
num
ber o
f stu
dent
s
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD This page last updated: 18/03/2011Page 28 of 59
56
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
NAP
LAN
Yea
r 3 a
nd 5
: Rea
ding
Scho
ol n
o:Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a: V
icto
rian
Cur
ricul
um a
nd A
sses
smen
t Aut
horit
y.Ex
plan
atio
n:Th
e N
atio
nal A
sses
smen
t Pro
gram
- Li
tera
cy a
nd N
umer
acy
(NAP
LAN
) is
cond
ucte
d ea
ch y
ear f
or s
tude
nts
in Y
ears
3, 5
, 7 a
nd 9
. Fo
r mor
e de
taile
d N
APLA
N d
ata,
refe
r to
the
NAP
LAN
Dat
a Se
rvic
ew
ebsi
te a
t http
://na
plan
ds.v
caa.
vic.
edu.
au.
A re
fere
nce
guid
e fo
r ana
lysin
g N
APLA
N d
ata
is a
vaila
ble
at h
ttp://
ww
w.v
caa.
vic.
edu.
au/v
caa/
prep
10/n
apla
n/sc
hool
s/an
alys
ingn
apla
ndat
a.pd
f.
Year
3Ye
ar 5
(n)
(%)
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)
34
56
78
Scho
olSt
ate
2008
1895
66
60
7112
430.
541
5.8
2008
1694
013
2556
06
478.
449
2.1
2009
1689
00
06
2569
530.
242
7.5
2009
2997
74
1414
3921
528.
650
2.4
Scho
olSt
ate
2010
1810
00
011
2222
4447
2.0
427.
420
1020
100
1020
3520
105
461.
449
7.9
2008
-10
1817
35.5
82.0
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
NAP
Ban
dPe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by N
AP B
and
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
aga
inst
Sta
te M
ean
Mea
n Sc
aled
Sc
ore
Gro
wth
MC
tota
lM
C w
ith 2
sc
ores
Num
ber o
f stu
dent
sM
atch
ed C
ohor
t (M
C)
9999
stud
ent
parti
cipa
tion*
*Ba
ndPe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by N
AP B
and
Mea
n Sc
aled
Scor
est
uden
tpa
rtici
patio
n**
Mea
n Sc
aled
Scor
eBa
ndPe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by N
AP B
and
-40
-20020406080100
percent
-40
-20020406080100
percent
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
120
160
200
240
ed score growth
Year
3Ye
ar 5
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n,Sc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile a
gain
stSc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean,
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
as
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
3 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
1&2
% B
and
3%
Ban
d 4
% B
and
5&6
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
5 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
3&4
% B
and
5%
Ban
d 6
% B
and
7&8
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
04080120
160
200
240
2008
-10
mean scaled score growth
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
Stat
e M
ean
Gro
wth
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
-10
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
3 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
1&2
% B
and
3%
Ban
d 4
% B
and
5&6
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
5 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
3&4
% B
and
5%
Ban
d 6
% B
and
7&8
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
04080120
160
200
240
2008
-10
mean scaled score growth
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
Stat
e M
ean
Gro
wth
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
-10
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
as
perc
entil
e
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 2
9 of
59
57
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
NAP
LAN
Yea
r 7 a
nd 9
: Rea
ding
Scho
ol n
o:Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a: V
icto
rian
Cur
ricul
um a
nd A
sses
smen
t Aut
horit
y.Ex
plan
atio
n:Th
e N
atio
nal A
sses
smen
t Pro
gram
- Li
tera
cy a
nd N
umer
acy
(NAP
LAN
) is
cond
ucte
d ea
ch y
ear f
or s
tude
nts
in Y
ears
3, 5
, 7 a
nd 9
. Fo
r mor
e de
taile
d N
APLA
N d
ata,
refe
r to
the
NAP
LAN
Dat
a Se
rvic
ew
ebsi
te a
t http
://na
plan
ds.v
caa.
vic.
edu.
au.
A re
fere
nce
guid
e fo
r ana
lysin
g N
APLA
N d
ata
is a
vaila
ble
at h
ttp://
ww
w.v
caa.
vic.
edu.
au/v
caa/
prep
10/n
apla
n/sc
hool
s/an
alys
ingn
apla
ndat
a.pd
f.
Year
7Ye
ar 9
(n)
(%)
45
67
89
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)
56
78
910
Scho
olSt
ate
2008
1510
00
1340
2027
053
9.2
531.
120
0819
955
2637
1616
056
5.0
572.
520
0917
100
024
1841
180
533.
853
4.5
2009
2010
05
525
555
558
7.0
576.
5Sc
hool
Stat
e20
1013
100
88
4631
80
515.
754
0.6
2010
1493
77
2936
210
577.
657
0.3
2008
-10
1313
42.1
37.5
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
NAP
Ban
dPe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by N
AP B
and
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
aga
inst
Sta
te M
ean
Mea
n Sc
aled
Sc
ore
Gro
wth
MC
tota
lM
C w
ith 2
sc
ores
9999
stud
ent
parti
cipa
tion*
*Pe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by N
AP B
and
Mea
n Sc
aled
Scor
est
uden
tpa
rtici
patio
n**
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
NAP
Ban
dM
ean
Scal
edSc
ore
Mat
ched
Coh
ort (
MC
)Ba
ndBa
ndN
umbe
r of s
tude
nts
-40
-20020406080100
percent
-40
-20020406080100
percent
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
6080100
ed score growth
Year
7Ye
ar 9
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n,Sc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile a
gain
stSc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean,
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
as
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
6 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
4&5
% B
and
6%
Ban
d 7
% B
and
8&9
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
7 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
5&6
% B
and
7%
Ban
d 8
% B
and
9&10
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
020406080100
2008
-10
mean scaled score growth
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
Stat
e M
ean
Gro
wth
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
-10
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
6 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
4&5
% B
and
6%
Ban
d 7
% B
and
8&9
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
7 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
5&6
% B
and
7%
Ban
d 8
% B
and
9&10
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
020406080100
2008
-10
mean scaled score growth
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
Stat
e M
ean
Gro
wth
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
-10
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
as
perc
entil
e
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 3
0 of
59
58
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
NAP
LAN
Yea
r 3 a
nd 5
: Writ
ing
Scho
ol n
o:Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a: V
icto
rian
Cur
ricul
um a
nd A
sses
smen
t Aut
horit
y.Ex
plan
atio
n:Th
e N
atio
nal A
sses
smen
t Pro
gram
- Li
tera
cy a
nd N
umer
acy
(NAP
LAN
) is
cond
ucte
d ea
ch y
ear f
or s
tude
nts
in Y
ears
3, 5
, 7 a
nd 9
. Fo
r mor
e de
taile
d N
APLA
N d
ata,
refe
r to
the
NAP
LAN
Dat
a Se
rvic
ew
ebsi
te a
t http
://na
plan
ds.v
caa.
vic.
edu.
au.
A re
fere
nce
guid
e fo
r ana
lysin
g N
APLA
N d
ata
is a
vaila
ble
at h
ttp://
ww
w.v
caa.
vic.
edu.
au/v
caa/
prep
10/n
apla
n/sc
hool
s/an
alys
ingn
apla
ndat
a.pd
f.
Year
3Ye
ar 5
(n)
(%)
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)
34
56
78
Scho
olSt
ate
2008
1895
00
1235
3518
429.
042
1.3
2008
1694
66
625
4413
518.
549
6.1
2009
1689
00
631
4419
438.
242
3.4
2009
2997
07
1829
2125
522.
349
1.9
Scho
olSt
ate
2010
1810
00
06
1744
3346
2.3
425.
620
1020
100
520
1515
2025
505.
849
2.5
2008
-10
1817
81.9
70.9
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
NAP
Ban
dPe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by N
AP B
and
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
aga
inst
Sta
te M
ean
Mea
n Sc
aled
Sc
ore
Gro
wth
MC
tota
lM
C w
ith 2
sc
ores
9999
stud
ent
parti
cipa
tion*
*Pe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by N
AP B
and
Mea
n Sc
aled
Scor
est
uden
tpa
rtici
patio
n**
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
NAP
Ban
dM
ean
Scal
edSc
ore
Mat
ched
Coh
ort (
MC
)Ba
ndBa
ndN
umbe
r of s
tude
nts
-40
-20020406080100
percent
-40
-20020406080100
percent
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
120
160
200
ed score growth
Year
3Ye
ar 5
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n,Sc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile a
gain
stSc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean,
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
as
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
3 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
1&2
% B
and
3%
Ban
d 4
% B
and
5&6
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
5 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
3&4
% B
and
5%
Ban
d 6
% B
and
7&8
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
04080120
160
200
2008
-10
mean scaled score growth
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
Stat
e M
ean
Gro
wth
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
-10
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
3 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
1&2
% B
and
3%
Ban
d 4
% B
and
5&6
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
5 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
3&4
% B
and
5%
Ban
d 6
% B
and
7&8
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
04080120
160
200
2008
-10
mean scaled score growth
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
Stat
e M
ean
Gro
wth
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
-10
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
as
perc
entil
e
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 3
1 of
59
59
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
NAP
LAN
Yea
r 7 a
nd 9
: Writ
ing
Scho
ol n
o:Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a: V
icto
rian
Cur
ricul
um a
nd A
sses
smen
t Aut
horit
y.Ex
plan
atio
n:Th
e N
atio
nal A
sses
smen
t Pro
gram
- Li
tera
cy a
nd N
umer
acy
(NAP
LAN
) is
cond
ucte
d ea
ch y
ear f
or s
tude
nts
in Y
ears
3, 5
, 7 a
nd 9
. Fo
r mor
e de
taile
d N
APLA
N d
ata,
refe
r to
the
NAP
LAN
Dat
a Se
rvic
ew
ebsi
te a
t http
://na
plan
ds.v
caa.
vic.
edu.
au.
A re
fere
nce
guid
e fo
r ana
lysin
g N
APLA
N d
ata
is a
vaila
ble
at h
ttp://
ww
w.v
caa.
vic.
edu.
au/v
caa/
prep
10/n
apla
n/sc
hool
s/an
alys
ingn
apla
ndat
a.pd
f.
Year
7Ye
ar 9
(n)
(%)
45
67
89
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)
56
78
910
Scho
olSt
ate
2008
1510
013
733
2013
1352
4.6
534.
220
0819
955
1632
375
556
3.2
571.
820
0917
100
612
2435
1212
534.
252
6.8
2009
2010
010
1025
2525
558
3.0
566.
0Sc
hool
Stat
e20
1013
100
88
318
2323
554.
452
6.8
2010
1493
036
2121
147
574.
856
3.5
2008
-10
1313
51.7
26.5
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
NAP
Ban
dPe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by N
AP B
and
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
aga
inst
Sta
te M
ean
Mea
n Sc
aled
Sc
ore
Gro
wth
MC
tota
lM
C w
ith 2
sc
ores
9999
stud
ent
parti
cipa
tion*
*Pe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by N
AP B
and
Mea
n Sc
aled
Scor
est
uden
tpa
rtici
patio
n**
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
NAP
Ban
dM
ean
Scal
edSc
ore
Mat
ched
Coh
ort (
MC
)Ba
ndBa
ndN
umbe
r of s
tude
nts
-40
-20020406080100
percent
-40
-20020406080100
percent
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
6080100
ed score growth
Year
7Ye
ar 9
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n,Sc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile a
gain
stSc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean,
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
as
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
6 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
4&5
% B
and
6%
Ban
d 7
% B
and
8&9
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent%
>=Ba
nd7
Scho
ol
Tren
dlin
e*%
Ban
d 5&
6%
Ban
d 7
% B
and
8%
Ban
d 9&
10
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
020406080100
2008
-10
mean scaled score growth
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
Stat
e M
ean
Gro
wth
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
-10
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
6 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
4&5
% B
and
6%
Ban
d 7
% B
and
8&9
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent%
>=Ba
nd7
Scho
ol
Tren
dlin
e*%
Ban
d 5&
6%
Ban
d 7
% B
and
8%
Ban
d 9&
10
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
020406080100
2008
-10
mean scaled score growth
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
Stat
e M
ean
Gro
wth
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
-10
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
as
perc
entil
e
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 3
2 of
59
60
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
NAP
LAN
Yea
r 3 a
nd 5
: Num
erac
ySc
hool
no:
Scho
ol n
ame:
Nam
eles
s P-
12 C
olle
geSo
urce
of d
ata:
Vic
toria
n C
urric
ulum
and
Ass
essm
ent A
utho
rity.
Expl
anat
ion:
The
Nat
iona
l Ass
essm
ent P
rogr
am -
Lite
racy
and
Num
erac
y (N
APLA
N) i
s co
nduc
ted
each
yea
r for
stu
dent
s in
Yea
rs 3
, 5, 7
and
9.
For m
ore
deta
iled
NAP
LAN
dat
a, re
fer t
o th
e N
APLA
N D
ata
Serv
ice
web
site
at h
ttp://
napl
ands
.vca
a.vi
c.ed
u.au
. A
refe
renc
e gu
ide
for a
nalys
ing
NAP
LAN
dat
a is
ava
ilabl
e at
http
://w
ww
.vca
a.vi
c.ed
u.au
/vca
a/pr
ep10
/nap
lan/
scho
ols/
anal
ysin
gnap
land
ata.
pdf.
Year
3Ye
ar 5
(n)
(%)
12
34
56
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)
34
56
78
Scho
olSt
ate
2008
1789
60
1319
3131
444.
041
6.1
2008
1694
019
3838
60
464.
148
7.8
2009
1689
00
019
4438
481.
641
0.6
2009
2997
04
1829
2921
526.
249
5.4
Scho
olSt
ate
2010
1810
00
017
3917
2842
8.0
411.
120
1020
100
1510
2545
50
464.
350
1.8
2008
-10
1816
30.9
85.8
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
NAP
Ban
dPe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by N
AP B
and
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
aga
inst
Sta
te M
ean
Mea
n Sc
aled
Sc
ore
Gro
wth
MC
tota
lM
C w
ith 2
sc
ores
9999
stud
ent
parti
cipa
tion*
*Pe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by N
AP B
and
Mea
n Sc
aled
Scor
est
uden
tpa
rtici
patio
n**
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
NAP
Ban
dM
ean
Scal
edSc
ore
Mat
ched
Coh
ort (
MC
)Ba
ndBa
ndN
umbe
r of s
tude
nts
-40
-20020406080100
percent
-40
-20020406080100
percent
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
120
160
200
240
ed score growth
Year
3Ye
ar 5
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n,Sc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile a
gain
stSc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean,
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
as
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
3 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
1&2
% B
and
3%
Ban
d 4
% B
and
5&6
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
5 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
3&4
% B
and
5%
Ban
d 6
% B
and
7&8
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
04080120
160
200
240
2008
-10
mean scaled score growth
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
Stat
e M
ean
Gro
wth
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
-10
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
3 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
1&2
% B
and
3%
Ban
d 4
% B
and
5&6
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
5 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
3&4
% B
and
5%
Ban
d 6
% B
and
7&8
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
04080120
160
200
240
2008
-10
mean scaled score growth
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
Stat
e M
ean
Gro
wth
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
-10
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
as
perc
entil
e
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 3
3 of
59
61
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
NAP
LAN
Yea
r 7 a
nd 9
: Num
erac
ySc
hool
no:
Scho
ol n
ame:
Nam
eles
s P-
12 C
olle
geSo
urce
of d
ata:
Vic
toria
n C
urric
ulum
and
Ass
essm
ent A
utho
rity.
Expl
anat
ion:
The
Nat
iona
l Ass
essm
ent P
rogr
am -
Lite
racy
and
Num
erac
y (N
APLA
N) i
s co
nduc
ted
each
yea
r for
stu
dent
s in
Yea
rs 3
, 5, 7
and
9.
For m
ore
deta
iled
NAP
LAN
dat
a, re
fer t
o th
e N
APLA
N D
ata
Serv
ice
web
site
at h
ttp://
napl
ands
.vca
a.vi
c.ed
u.au
. A
refe
renc
e gu
ide
for a
nalys
ing
NAP
LAN
dat
a is
ava
ilabl
e at
http
://w
ww
.vca
a.vi
c.ed
u.au
/vca
a/pr
ep10
/nap
lan/
scho
ols/
anal
ysin
gnap
land
ata.
pdf.
Year
7Ye
ar 9
(n)
(%)
45
67
89
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)
56
78
910
Scho
olSt
ate
2008
1510
00
740
337
1355
0.3
541.
220
0819
955
1626
4211
057
0.8
579.
020
0917
100
012
2918
356
556.
753
9.1
2009
2010
00
525
4025
561
3.3
586.
4Sc
hool
Stat
e20
1013
100
031
3931
00
508.
554
2.7
2010
1493
00
6421
77
581.
758
3.4
2008
-10
1313
38.2
38.8
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
NAP
Ban
dPe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by N
AP B
and
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
aga
inst
Sta
te M
ean
Mea
n Sc
aled
Sc
ore
Gro
wth
MC
tota
lM
C w
ith 2
sc
ores
9999
stud
ent
parti
cipa
tion*
*Pe
rcen
t of s
tude
nts
by N
AP B
and
Mea
n Sc
aled
Scor
est
uden
tpa
rtici
patio
n**
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
NAP
Ban
dM
ean
Scal
edSc
ore
Mat
ched
Coh
ort (
MC
)Ba
ndBa
ndN
umbe
r of s
tude
nts
-40
-20020406080100
percent
-40
-20020406080100
percent
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
6080100
ed score growth
Year
7Ye
ar 9
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n,Sc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile a
gain
stSc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean,
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
as
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
6 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
4&5
% B
and
6%
Ban
d 7
% B
and
8&9
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
7 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
5&6
% B
and
7%
Ban
d 8
% B
and
9&10
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
e
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
020406080100
2008
-10
mean scaled score growth
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
Stat
e M
ean
Gro
wth
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
-10
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
6 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
4&5
% B
and
6%
Ban
d 7
% B
and
8&9
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2008
2009
2010
percent
%>=
Band
7 Sc
hool
Tr
endl
ine*
% B
and
5&6
% B
and
7%
Ban
d 8
% B
and
9&10
0255075100
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
2008
2009
2010
percent student participation .
mean scaled score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
Not
es:
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= st
uden
ts w
ho p
artic
ipat
ed in
NAP
LAN
(not
abs
ent /
with
draw
n bu
t inc
ludi
ng e
xem
pt) /
tota
l num
ber o
f stu
dent
s (in
clud
ing
exem
pt /
abse
nt /
with
draw
n).
020406080100
2008
-10
mean scaled score growth
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
Stat
e M
ean
Gro
wth
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2008
-10
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
Gro
wth
as
perc
entil
e
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 3
4 of
59
62
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
AIM
Yea
r 3 a
nd 5
: Rea
ding
(dis
cont
inue
d at
the
end
of 2
007)
Scho
ol n
o:Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a: V
icto
rian
Cur
ricul
um a
nd A
sses
smen
t Aut
horit
y.Ex
plan
atio
n:Th
e Ac
hiev
emen
t Im
prov
emen
t Mon
itor (
AIM
) was
a s
tate
wid
e as
sess
men
t pro
gram
con
duct
ed e
ach
year
up
until
and
incl
udin
g 20
07 fo
r stu
dent
s in
Yea
rs 3
, 5, 7
and
9.
This
has
now
bee
n re
plac
ed b
y N
APLA
N.
For m
ore
deta
iled
AIM
dat
a, re
fer t
o th
e N
APLA
N D
ata
Serv
ice
web
site
at h
ttp://
aim
ds.v
caa.
vic.
edu.
au.
Year
3Ye
ar 5
(n)
(%)*
*Le
v1Le
v2Le
v3Le
v4Le
v5Le
v6Le
v6E
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)*
*Le
v1Le
v2Le
v3Le
v4Le
v5Le
v6Le
v6E
Scho
olSt
ate
2003
2083
015
4540
00
02.
82.
320
0317
810
012
5335
00
3.8
3.2
2004
1983
526
2642
00
02.
52.
320
0416
730
056
1331
00
3.2
3.2
2005
1774
66
5335
00
02.
72.
420
0521
880
029
1457
00
3.7
3.2
2006
1368
015
6915
00
02.
42.
320
0612
710
042
3325
00
3.2
3.1
2007
2991
010
3455
00
02.
82.
320
0720
800
545
3515
00
3.1
3.2
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
9999
Mea
n VE
LS S
core
Mea
n VE
LS S
core
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ion
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ion
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
60-40
-20020406080100
percent
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= (s
tude
nts
who
parti
cipa
ted
in A
IM /
Feb
enro
lmen
ts) *
100
60-40
-20020406080100
percent
Not
es:
Year
3Ye
ar 5
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n,Sc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile a
gain
stSc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean,
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
3 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
Lev
1%
Lev
2%
Lev
3%
>=L
ev4
0255075100
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Scho
olM
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
nSc
ore
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
e
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= (s
tude
nts
who
parti
cipa
ted
in A
IM /
Feb
enro
lmen
ts) *
100
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
4 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
<=L
ev2
% L
ev3
% L
ev4
% >
=Lev
5
0255075100
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Sh
lMS
Stt
MS
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
e
Not
es:
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
3 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
Lev
1%
Lev
2%
Lev
3%
>=L
ev4
0255075100
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= (s
tude
nts
who
parti
cipa
ted
in A
IM /
Feb
enro
lmen
ts) *
100
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
4 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
<=L
ev2
% L
ev3
% L
ev4
% >
=Lev
5
0255075100
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
Not
es:
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 3
5 of
59
63
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
AIM
Yea
r 7 a
nd 9
: Rea
ding
(dis
cont
inue
d at
the
end
of 2
007)
Scho
ol n
o:Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a: V
icto
rian
Cur
ricul
um a
nd A
sses
smen
t Aut
horit
y.Ex
plan
atio
n:Th
e Ac
hiev
emen
t Im
prov
emen
t Mon
itor (
AIM
) was
a s
tate
wid
e as
sess
men
t pro
gram
con
duct
ed e
ach
year
up
until
and
incl
udin
g 20
07 fo
r stu
dent
s in
Yea
rs 3
, 5, 7
and
9.
This
has
now
bee
n re
plac
ed b
y N
APLA
N.
For m
ore
deta
iled
AIM
dat
a, re
fer t
o th
e N
APLA
N D
ata
Serv
ice
web
site
at h
ttp://
aim
ds.v
caa.
vic.
edu.
au.
Year
7Ye
ar 9
(n)
(%)*
*Le
v1Le
v2Le
v3Le
v4Le
v5Le
v6Le
v6E
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)*
*Le
v1Le
v2Le
v3Le
v4Le
v5Le
v6Le
v6E
Scho
olSt
ate
2003
2385
00
039
3526
04.
34.
120
0320
0411
920
00
1855
270
4.5
4.2
2004
2005
1694
00
631
3131
04.
44.
220
0520
0618
860
017
2839
170
4.2
4.2
2006
1510
00
00
2047
277
4.8
5.1
2007
1579
00
020
5327
04.
54.
120
0717
850
00
012
5335
5.7
5.1
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
Mea
n VE
LS S
core
9999
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ion
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
Mea
n VE
LS S
core
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ion
60-40
-20020406080100
percent
60-40
-20020406080100
percent
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= (s
tude
nts
who
parti
cipa
ted
in A
IM /
Feb
enro
lmen
ts) *
100
Not
es:
Year
7Ye
ar 9
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n,Sc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile a
gain
stSc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean,
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
5 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
<=L
ev3
% L
ev4
% L
ev5
% >
=Lev
6
0255075100
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Scho
olM
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
nSc
ore
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
6 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
<=L
ev4
% L
ev5
% L
ev6
% L
ev6E
0255075100
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Sh
lMS
Stt
MS
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
e
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= (s
tude
nts
who
parti
cipa
ted
in A
IM /
Feb
enro
lmen
ts) *
100
Not
es:
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
5 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
<=L
ev3
% L
ev4
% L
ev5
% >
=Lev
6
0255075100
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
6 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
<=L
ev4
% L
ev5
% L
ev6
% L
ev6E
0255075100
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= (s
tude
nts
who
parti
cipa
ted
in A
IM /
Feb
enro
lmen
ts) *
100
Not
es:
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 3
6 of
59
64
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
AIM
Yea
r 3 a
nd 5
: Num
ber (
disc
ontin
ued
at th
e en
d of
200
7)Sc
hool
no:
Scho
ol n
ame:
Nam
eles
s P-
12 C
olle
geSo
urce
of d
ata:
Vic
toria
n C
urric
ulum
and
Ass
essm
ent A
utho
rity.
Expl
anat
ion:
The
Achi
evem
ent I
mpr
ovem
ent M
onito
r (AI
M) w
as a
sta
tew
ide
asse
ssm
ent p
rogr
am c
ondu
cted
eac
h ye
ar u
p un
til a
nd in
clud
ing
2007
for s
tude
nts
in Y
ears
3, 5
, 7 a
nd 9
. Th
is h
as n
ow b
een
repl
aced
by
NAP
LAN
.Fo
r mor
e de
taile
d AI
M d
ata,
refe
r to
the
NAP
LAN
Dat
a Se
rvic
e w
ebsi
te a
t http
://ai
mds
.vca
a.vi
c.ed
u.au
.
Year
3Ye
ar 5
(n)
(%)*
*Le
v1Le
v2Le
v3Le
v4Le
v5Le
v6Le
v6E
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)*
*Le
v1Le
v2Le
v3Le
v4Le
v5Le
v6Le
v6E
Scho
olSt
ate
2003
1979
011
5337
00
02.
82.
420
0319
900
032
635
00
3.2
3.1
2004
2087
015
5035
00
02.
62.
420
0414
640
750
430
00
2.7
3.2
2005
1878
622
4428
00
02.
52.
420
0521
880
533
3329
00
3.4
3.2
2006
1368
08
6923
00
02.
42.
420
0611
650
027
4527
00
3.4
3.2
2007
2888
47
5039
00
02.
62.
420
0722
880
1445
329
00
2.8
3.2
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
Mea
n VE
LS S
core
9999
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ion
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
Mea
n VE
LS S
core
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ion
60-40
-20020406080100
percent
60-40
-20020406080100
percent
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= (s
tude
nts
who
parti
cipa
ted
in A
IM /
Feb
enro
lmen
ts) *
100
Not
es:
Year
3Ye
ar 5
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n,Sc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile a
gain
stSc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean,
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
3 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
Lev
1%
Lev
2%
Lev
3%
>=L
ev4
0255075100
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Scho
olM
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
nSc
ore
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
4 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
<=L
ev2
% L
ev3
% L
ev4
% >
=Lev
5
0255075100
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Sh
lMS
Stt
MS
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
e
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= (s
tude
nts
who
parti
cipa
ted
in A
IM /
Feb
enro
lmen
ts) *
100
Not
es:
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
3 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
Lev
1%
Lev
2%
Lev
3%
>=L
ev4
0255075100
0.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
4 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
<=L
ev2
% L
ev3
% L
ev4
% >
=Lev
5
0255075100
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
% s
tude
nt p
artic
ipat
ion
= (s
tude
nts
who
parti
cipa
ted
in A
IM /
Feb
enro
lmen
ts) *
100
Not
es:
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 3
7 of
59
65
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
AIM
Yea
r 7 a
nd 9
: Mat
hem
atic
s (d
isco
ntin
ued
at th
e en
d of
200
7)Sc
hool
no:
Scho
ol n
ame:
Nam
eles
s P-
12 C
olle
geSo
urce
of d
ata:
Vic
toria
n C
urric
ulum
and
Ass
essm
ent A
utho
rity.
Expl
anat
ion:
The
Achi
evem
ent I
mpr
ovem
ent M
onito
r (AI
M) w
as a
sta
tew
ide
asse
ssm
ent p
rogr
am c
ondu
cted
eac
h ye
ar u
p un
til a
nd in
clud
ing
2007
for s
tude
nts
in Y
ears
3, 5
, 7 a
nd 9
. Th
is h
as n
ow b
een
repl
aced
by
NAP
LAN
.Fo
r mor
e de
taile
d AI
M d
ata,
refe
r to
the
NAP
LAN
Dat
a Se
rvic
e w
ebsi
te a
t http
://ai
mds
.vca
a.vi
c.ed
u.au
.
Year
7Ye
ar 9
(n)
(%)*
*Le
v1Le
v2Le
v3Le
v4Le
v5Le
v6Le
v6E
Scho
olSt
ate
(n)
(%)*
*Le
v1Le
v2Le
v3Le
v4Le
v5Le
v6Le
v6E
Scho
olSt
ate
2003
2489
00
429
4225
04.
34.
020
0320
0411
920
09
4527
180
4.1
4.0
2004
2005
1710
00
012
2947
120
4.1
4.0
2005
2006
1990
00
1626
580
04.
04.
020
0615
100
00
020
6020
04.
64.
820
0715
790
013
1353
200
4.4
4.1
2007
1995
00
011
2153
165.
24.
8
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
9999
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ion
Mea
n VE
LS S
core
stud
ent p
artic
ipat
ion
Mea
n VE
LS S
core
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
Perc
ent o
f stu
dent
s by
VEL
S le
vel
60-40
-20020406080100
percent
60-40
-20020406080100
percent
Year
7Ye
ar 9
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n,Sc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile a
gain
stSc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean,
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
incl
udin
g Pa
rtic
ipat
ion
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
5 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
<=L
ev3
% L
ev4
% L
ev5
% >
=Lev
6
0255075100
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Scho
olM
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
nSc
ore
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
6 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
<=L
ev4
% L
ev5
% L
ev6
% L
ev6E
0255075100
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Sh
lMS
Stt
MS
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
e
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
5 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
<=L
ev3
% L
ev4
% L
ev5
% >
=Lev
6
0255075100
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
e
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
-100-80
-60
-40
-20020406080100
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent
% >
=Lev
6 Sc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*%
<=L
ev4
% L
ev5
% L
ev6
% L
ev6E
0255075100
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
percent student participation
mean VELS score
Scho
ol M
ean
Scor
eSt
ate
Mea
n Sc
ore
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Stud
ent P
artic
ipat
ion*
*
020
4060
8010
0
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2004
-20
07
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 3
8 of
59
66
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
VCESchool no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: Only 2010 studies, which at least 1 student completed, are included.Source of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.Notes:- After allstudy, English, Further Maths and Maths Methods (CAS), studies are listed in descending order of the number of students in the latest year.- VET study scores are included.- Data is based on 'reported' study scores, not 'achieved' study scores.
No.
of s
tude
nts
scho
ol m
ean
No.
of s
tude
nts
scho
ol m
ean
No.
of s
tude
nts
scho
ol m
ean
No.
of s
tude
nts
scho
ol m
ean
No.
of s
tude
nts
scho
ol m
ean
allstudy 73 32.0 90 28.6 78 30.9 68 28.8 90 29.8
English EN01 14 30.5 14 26.6 16 31.1 10 24.8 15 27.9Further Mathematics MA07 6 28.0 5 25.8 6 26.3 8 25.6 11 33.6Mathematical Methods (CAS) MA11* 5 28.8 * 'Mathematical Methods MA08' was discontinued in 2010. See the 2009 School Level Report for historical MA08 data.Biology BI03 3 33.3 2 32.5 5 30.4 9 30.8Health & Human Dev. HH03 8 29.6 9 29.4 8 28.5 8 30.4Chemistry CH03 2 31.0 3 22.3 4 29.0 1 33.0 6 28.2Physical Ed. PE03 3 28.7 6 29.5 5 30.8 4 27.3 6 29.5Literature LI01 2 32.5 7 25.9 2 25.5 2 24.5 4 28.8Physics PH03 1 39.0 2 26.0 3 30.3 1 34.0 4 27.5Studio Arts SA03 6 31.2 7 29.3 3 24.7 5 24.4 4 23.5Visual Communication & Design VC03 3 29.7 4 24.8 4 31.5Australian History HI08 4 35.0 2 22.0 2 33.0 1 28.0 3 31.0IT Applications IT02 2 30.0 5 36.2 6 33.2 3 28.3Music (VCE VET) MI07 3 38.7 5 26.6 2 35.5Music Industry (Tech Prod) (VCE VET) MI09 1 21.0 2 30.5Psychology PY03 2 30.5Information Technology (VCE VET) IN21 1 36.0 1 36.0 1 41.0Software Development IT03 1 39.0 1 38.0 1 27.0
20102006 2007 2008 2009
Produced by Data, Outcomesand Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 39 of 59
67
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
VCE
Scho
ol n
o:99
99Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a:Vi
ctor
ian
Cur
ricul
um a
nd A
sses
smen
t Aut
horit
y.Sc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean
Scho
olM
ean
aspe
rcen
tile
agai
nstS
FOpe
rcen
tile
rang
e
2025303540
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
allst
udy
Engl
ish
EN01
Furth
er M
athe
mat
ics
MA0
7M
athe
mat
ical
M
etho
ds (C
AS)
MA1
1**
Biol
ogy
BI03
Heal
th &
Hum
an D
ev.
HH03
Chem
istry
CH0
3Ph
ysic
al E
d. P
E03
Lite
ratu
re L
I01
Phys
ics
PH03
Stud
io A
rts S
A03
Visu
al
Com
mun
icat
ion
& De
sign
VC0
3
study score
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
* The
sch
ool t
rend
line
is o
nly
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
dat
a fo
r eac
h ca
lend
ar y
ear.
-Afte
r alls
tudy
, EN0
1, M
A07
and
MA1
1, th
e re
mai
ning
stu
dies
are
cha
rted
in o
rder
of t
he n
umbe
r of s
tude
nts
who
com
plet
ed th
at s
tudy
in 2
010,
from
hig
hest
to lo
west
.-V
ET s
tudy
sco
res
are
incl
uded
.-D
ata
is b
ased
on
'repo
rted'
stu
dy s
core
s, n
ot th
e 'a
chie
ved'
stud
y sc
ores
.**
'Mat
hem
atica
l Met
hods
MA0
8' w
as d
isco
ntin
ued
in 2
010.
See
the
2009
Sch
ool L
evel
Rep
ort f
or h
isto
rical
MA0
8 da
ta.
Note
s:
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 4
0 of
59
Scho
olM
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
2025303540
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
allst
udy
Engl
ish
EN01
Furth
er M
athe
mat
ics
MA0
7M
athe
mat
ical
M
etho
ds (C
AS)
MA1
1**
Biol
ogy
BI03
Heal
th &
Hum
an D
ev.
HH03
Chem
istry
CH0
3Ph
ysic
al E
d. P
E03
Lite
ratu
re L
I01
Phys
ics
PH03
Stud
io A
rts S
A03
Visu
al
Com
mun
icat
ion
& De
sign
VC0
3
study score
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
* The
sch
ool t
rend
line
is o
nly
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
dat
a fo
r eac
h ca
lend
ar y
ear.
-Afte
r alls
tudy
, EN0
1, M
A07
and
MA1
1, th
e re
mai
ning
stu
dies
are
cha
rted
in o
rder
of t
he n
umbe
r of s
tude
nts
who
com
plet
ed th
at s
tudy
in 2
010,
from
hig
hest
to lo
west
.-V
ET s
tudy
sco
res
are
incl
uded
.-D
ata
is b
ased
on
'repo
rted'
stu
dy s
core
s, n
ot th
e 'a
chie
ved'
stud
y sc
ores
.**
'Mat
hem
atica
l Met
hods
MA0
8' w
as d
isco
ntin
ued
in 2
010.
See
the
2009
Sch
ool L
evel
Rep
ort f
or h
isto
rical
MA0
8 da
ta.
Note
s:
020
4060
8010
0
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
allstudy English EN01Further Mathematics
MA07
perc
entile
020
4060
8010
0
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
Mathematical Methods (CAS) MA11** Biology BI03
Health & Human Dev. HH03
perc
entile
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
020
4060
8010
0
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
Chemistry CH03 Physical Ed. PE03 Literature LI01
perc
entile
020
4060
8010
0
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
Physics PH03 Studio Arts SA03Visual Communication
& Design VC03
perc
entile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 4
0 of
59
68
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
VCE
(con
t'd)
Scho
ol n
o:99
99Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Sour
ce o
f dat
a:Vi
ctor
ian
Cur
ricul
um a
nd A
sses
smen
t Aut
horit
y.Sc
hool
Mea
n ag
ains
t Sta
te M
ean
Scho
olM
ean
aspe
rcen
tile
agai
nstS
FOpe
rcen
tile
rang
e
2025303540
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
Aust
ralia
n Hi
stor
y HI
08IT
App
licat
ions
IT02
Mus
ic (V
CE V
ET)
MI0
7M
usic
Indu
stry
(Tec
h Pr
od) (
VCE
VET)
M
I09
Psyc
holo
gy P
Y03
Info
rmat
ion
Tech
nolo
gy (V
CE
VET)
IN21
Softw
are
Deve
lopm
ent I
T03
study score
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Note
s:* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.-A
fter a
llstu
dy, E
N01,
MA0
7 an
d M
A11,
the
rem
aini
ng s
tudi
es a
re c
harte
d in
ord
er o
f the
num
ber o
f stu
dent
s wh
o co
mpl
eted
that
stu
dy in
201
0, fr
om h
ighe
st to
lowe
st.
-VET
stu
dy s
core
s ar
e in
clud
ed.
-Dat
a is
bas
ed o
n 're
porte
d' s
tudy
sco
res,
not
the
'ach
ieve
d' st
udy
scor
es.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 4
1 of
59
Scho
olM
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
SFO
per
cent
ile ra
nge
2025303540
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
20062007200820092010
Aust
ralia
n Hi
stor
y HI
08IT
App
licat
ions
IT02
Mus
ic (V
CE V
ET)
MI0
7M
usic
Indu
stry
(Tec
h Pr
od) (
VCE
VET)
M
I09
Psyc
holo
gy P
Y03
Info
rmat
ion
Tech
nolo
gy (V
CE
VET)
IN21
Softw
are
Deve
lopm
ent I
T03
study score
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
020
4060
8010
0
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
Australian History HI08 IT Applications IT02Music (VCE VET)
MI07
perc
entile
020
4060
8010
0
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
Music Industry (Tech Prod) (VCE VET) MI09 Psychology PY03
Information Technology (VCE
VET) IN21
perc
entile
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
020
4060
8010
0
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
-20
10
Software Development IT03
perc
entile
020
4060
8010
0pe
rcen
tileSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
Note
s:* T
he s
choo
l tre
ndlin
e is
onl
y pl
otte
d wh
en th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.-A
fter a
llstu
dy, E
N01,
MA0
7 an
d M
A11,
the
rem
aini
ng s
tudi
es a
re c
harte
d in
ord
er o
f the
num
ber o
f stu
dent
s wh
o co
mpl
eted
that
stu
dy in
201
0, fr
om h
ighe
st to
lowe
st.
-VET
stu
dy s
core
s ar
e in
clud
ed.
-Dat
a is
bas
ed o
n 're
porte
d' s
tudy
sco
res,
not
the
'ach
ieve
d' st
udy
scor
es.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 4
1 of
59
69
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
VCE: Study Scores of 40 or moreSchool no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: Of all VCE study scores, the percentage that were 40 or more.Source of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
State (all govt schools)
Year Total study scores % 40 or more* % 40 or more2002 90 4.4 6.02003 104 10.6 5.92004 90 11.1 6.02005 81 2.5 6.12006 73 6.8 6.02007 90 3.3 6.12008 78 10.3 5.92009 68 4.4 5.92010 90 6.7 5.9
School
8
10
12
t
VCE percentage of study scores of 40 or more*, 2002 to 2010
Produced by Data, Outcomesand Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 42 of 59
Note:* Prior to 2005, this data may not match the information published in The Age . Data presented on this pageprior to 2005 does not include study scores from the small number of VET studies that are given study scores.- From 2005, VET study scores are included.- From 2005, data is based on 'reported' study scores, not 'achieved' study scores.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
VCE percentage of study scores of 40 or more*, 2002 to 2010
School State (all govt schools)
Produced by Data, Outcomesand Evaluation Division, DEECD Page 42 of 59
70
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
VETSchool no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeSource of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
More detailed information is available on the VASS system provided by VCAA.
Participation CompletionSchool State School State
YearYearLevel
No. students undertaking at least 1 UOC1
% students2
undertaking at least 1 UOC1
UOCs1
undertakenper student3
% students2
undertaking at least 1 UOC1
Avg no. UOCs1
undertaken per student3
No. UOCs1 withsatisfactory
result
% UOCs1 with satisfactory
result
% UOCs1 with satisfactory
result2006 10 14 65.4 14.9 209 100
11 19 86.4 13.4 242 95.312 2 14.4 11.5 23 100
10-12 35 61.1 13.9 23.0 12.0 474 97.5 75.62007 10 5 31.3 14.6 73 100
11 10 51.5 7.1 52 73.212 6 35.3 10.3 42 67.7
10-12 21 40.1 9.8 23.8 11.7 167 81.1 76.42008 10 19 86.4 7.6 132 91.7
11 11 57.9 7.8 86 10012 5 28.7 11.2 56 100
10-12 35 59.9 8.2 24.6 12.0 274 95.8 76.72009 10 3 18.8 12.7 38 100
11 6 30 25.5 153 10012 6 50 13.8 59 71.1
10-12 15 31.3 18.3 25.1 11.8 250 91.2 78.92010 10 16 80 9.8 123 78.8
11 5 33.3 11 36 65.412 3 20 29.7 31 34.8
10-12 24 48 12.5 26.1 11.5 190 63.3 81.0Participation - % Yr10-12 students2 undertaking at least 1 UOC1
School against State School as percentile
80
100
t
2006
2007
* - The school trendline is only plotted when there is data foreach calendar year.
1 - UOC = Unit(s) of Competence.2 - % students based on yr10, 11 & 12 August enrolments.3 - Only includes students undertaking at least 1 UOC.
Notes:
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD Page 43 of 59
Avg no. UOCs1 undertaken per student3
School Mean against State Mean School Mean as percentile
Completion - % UOCs1 with satisfactory resultSchool against State School as percentile
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
0
5
10
15
20
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
no. o
f UO
Cs1
per
stud
ent3
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
School State Mean School Trendline*
0 20 40 60 80 100
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007-2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007-2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007-2010
percentileSchool as percentile
* - The school trendline is only plotted when there is data foreach calendar year.
1 - UOC = Unit(s) of Competence.2 - % students based on yr10, 11 & 12 August enrolments.3 - Only includes students undertaking at least 1 UOC.
Notes:
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
0
5
10
15
20
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
no. o
f UO
Cs1
per
stud
ent3
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
School State Mean School Trendline*
0 20 40 60 80 100
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007-2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007-2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007-2010
percentileSchool as percentile
* - The school trendline is only plotted when there is data foreach calendar year.
1 - UOC = Unit(s) of Competence.2 - % students based on yr10, 11 & 12 August enrolments.3 - Only includes students undertaking at least 1 UOC.
Notes:
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD Page 43 of 59
71
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
VCALSchool no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: 'No. of VCAL credits undertaken' is calculated by summing the number of credits undertaken
by each VCAL student across all VCAL students.The data contained in this page is for all VCAL strands and levels combined.
Source of data: Victorian Curriculum and Assessment Authority.More detailed information is available on the VASS system provided by VCAA.
Participation CompletionSchool State School State
YearYearLevel
No.students1
No. students undertaking
VCAL
% students1
undertakingVCAL
% students1
undertakingVCAL
No. VCAL unit credits undertaken
% satisfactory completion of VCAL credits
% satisfactory completion of VCAL credits
2006 11-12 35.9 24 66.8 11.5 165 93.3 77.7
2007 11-12 36.4 15 41.2 12.0 90 100.0 76.5
2008 11-12 36.4 16 44.0 12.7 61 100.0 75.8
2009 11-12 32 2 6.3 14.1 14 100.0 76.22010 11-12 15 7 46.7 15.5 28 75.0 82.5
Participation - % Yr11-12 students1 undertaking VCALSchool against State School as percentile
Completion - % satisfactory completion of VCAL creditsSchool against State School as percentile
* - The school trendline is only plotted whenthere is data for each calendar year.
1 - No. and % students based on yr11 & 12August enrolments.
Notes:
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
0
20
40
60
80
100
2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
perc
ent
School State Mean School Trendline*
0 20 40 60 80 100
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007-2010
percentile
0 20 40 60 80 100
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007-2010
percentileSchool as percentile
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD Page 44 of 59
72
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teacher Assessment of Student Progress (PSD students)School no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: Teachers assess their students' progress against the 8 VELS Domains using
a 6-point scale (students in special schools and those who cannot be assessedagainst the VELS).
Source of data: Data transmitted from school to DEECD via an online web-form.
Noprogress
Littleprogress
Satisfactoryprogress
Goodprogress
Very good progress
Excellentprogress
Total students assessed 1
(%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (%) (no.)2006English 5 7 35 35 13 5 10Mathematics 3 10 31 29 15 12 10Science 1 12 30 24 20 13 10ICT 4 8 28 37 18 5 10The Arts 3 11 36 24 10 16 10H&PE 1 13 31 30 13 12 10Civics & Citizenship 4 15 34 32 11 4 102007English 4 15 34 32 11 4 10Mathematics 5 7 35 35 13 5 10Science 3 10 31 29 15 12 10ICT 1 12 30 24 20 13 10The Arts 4 8 28 37 18 5 10H&PE 3 11 36 24 10 16 10Civics & Citizenship 1 13 31 30 13 12 102008English 1 13 31 30 13 12 10Mathematics 4 15 34 32 11 4 10Science 5 7 35 35 13 5 10ICT 3 10 31 29 15 12 10The Arts 1 12 30 24 20 13 10H&PE 4 8 28 37 18 5 10Civics & Citizenship 3 11 36 24 10 16 102009English 3 11 36 24 10 16 10Mathematics 1 13 31 30 13 12 10Science 4 15 34 32 11 4 10ICT 5 7 35 35 13 5 10The Arts 3 10 31 29 15 12 10H&PE 1 12 30 24 20 13 10Civics & Citizenship 4 8 28 37 18 5 102010English 4 8 28 37 18 5 10Mathematics 3 11 36 24 10 16 10Science 1 13 31 30 13 12 10ICT 4 15 34 32 11 4 10The Arts 5 7 35 35 13 5 10H&PE 3 10 31 29 15 12 10Civics & Citizenship 1 12 30 24 20 13 10
2009 Pri/Sec state benchmarks*English 4 36 36 11 14Mathematics 4 36 32 14 14Science 4 29 32 21 14ICT 4 18 43 21 7 7The Arts 4 14 18 54 11H&PE 3 14 17 41 7 17Civics & Citizenship 21 33 42 4
Notes: 1 If schools provided percentages only, it is not possible to report the number of students assessed.In these cases, the total percentage (100) will be shown.
* 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD Page 45 of 59
73
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Teacher Assessment of Student Progress (PSD students)School no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 College
Note: * 2010 benchmarks will be calculated inAugust, when data from all schools hasbeen submitted.
0
20
40
60
80
100
Noprogress
Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress
percent Mathematics
0
20
40
60
80
100
Noprogress
Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress
percent Science
0
20
40
60
80
100
Noprogress
Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress
percent ICT
0
20
40
60
80
100
Noprogress
Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress
percent The Arts
0
20
40
60
80
100
Noprogress
Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress
percent H&PE
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2009 Pri/Sec state benchmarks*
0
20
40
60
80
100
Noprogress
Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress
percent Civics & Citizenship
0
20
40
60
80
100
Noprogress
Little Satisfact. Good V. good Excellentprogress
percent English
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD Page 46 of 59
74
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
EnrolmentsSchool no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: Enrolments at February census.Source of data: February census.
Year boys girls total boys girls total boys girls total1997 140 116 256 12 10 22 10 8 181998 136 127 263 12 17 29 12 14 261999 134 132 266 15 11 26 7 11 182000 134 142 276 14 11 25 11 10 212001 133 140 273 6 12 18 12 11 232002 143 140 283 10 8 18 11 9 202003 138 136 274 9 8 17 12 9 212004 140 138 278 10 13 23 10 8 182005 146 127 272 13 8 21 11 6 172006 155 121 276 14 8 22 11 10 212007 153 121 274 12 10 22 10 9 192008 152 115 266 11 12 23 8 7 152009 144 106 250 9 14 23 12 6 182010 146 109 255 16 13 29 6 8 14
Total school enrolment Prep enrolment Year 7 enrolments
0
50
100
150
200
250
300Total school enrolments by gender total
boysgirls
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD Page 47 of 59
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009
Total school enrolments by gender totalboysgirls
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009
Prep enrolments by gender totalboysgirls
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009
Year 7 enrolments by gender totalboysgirls
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD Page 47 of 59
75
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
App
aren
t Stu
dent
Ret
entio
nN
ote:
Scho
ol n
o:Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Expl
anat
ion:
Appa
rent
rete
ntio
n ra
tes
are
base
d on
enr
olm
ents
. Fo
r exa
mpl
e, Y
ear 7
Feb-
12Au
g ap
pare
nt re
tent
ion
refe
rs to
yea
r 12
enro
lmen
tof
stu
dent
s in
full-
time
scho
ol e
duca
tion
in A
ugus
t exp
ress
ed a
s a
perc
enta
ge o
f yea
r 7 e
nrol
men
ts in
Feb
ruar
y fiv
e ye
ars
earli
er.
Sour
ce o
f dat
a:Fe
brua
ry a
nd A
ugus
t cen
sus.
Year
7 (F
eb) -
10
(Aug
)Sc
hool
aga
inst
Sta
te
Sc
hool
as
perc
entil
eC
ohor
ts:
AB
CD
EF
GH
Year
720
0020
0120
0220
0320
0420
0520
0620
07Ye
ar 1
020
0320
0420
0520
0620
0720
0820
0920
10Ye
ar 7
(Feb
)no
.21
2320
2712
1721
19Ye
ar 1
0 (A
ug)
no.
2319
1921
.416
2216
20Ye
ar 7
(Feb
) - 1
0 (A
ug)
%10
9.5
82.6
95.0
79.3
133.
312
9.4
76.2
105.
3St
ate
med
ian
%94
.594
.694
.393
.694
.293
.594
.897
.7
Year
10
(Aug
) - 1
1 (F
eb)
Coh
orts
:A
BC
DE
FG
Year
10
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Year
11
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Year
10
(Aug
)no
.23
1919
21.4
1622
16Ye
ar 1
1 (F
eb)
no.
2017
.924
23.1
1621
14Ye
ar10
(Aug
)11
(Feb
)%
870
942
126
310
79
100
095
587
5
9999
60708090100
AB
CD
EF
GH
percent
coho
rt
708090100
percent
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E F G H
perc
entil
e
cohort A B C D E F Gcohort
* The
sch
ool t
rend
line
is o
nly
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
dat
a fo
r eac
h ca
lend
ar y
ear.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 4
8 of
59
Year
10(A
ug) -
11
(Feb
)%
87.0
94.2
126.
310
7.9
100.
095
.587
.5St
ate
med
ian
%93
.893
.293
.392
.891
.592
.392
.4
Year
11
(Feb
) - 1
2 (A
ug)
Coh
orts
:A
BC
DE
FYe
ar 1
120
0420
0520
0620
0720
0820
09Ye
ar 1
220
0520
0620
0720
0820
0920
10Ye
ar 1
1 (F
eb)
no.
2017
.924
23.1
1621
Year
12
(Aug
)no
.17
.513
.917
17.4
1215
Year
11
(Feb
) - 1
2 (A
ug)
%87
.577
.770
.875
.375
.071
.4St
ate
med
ian
%77
.375
.976
.875
.676
.778
.0
Year
7 (F
eb) -
12
(Aug
)C
ohor
ts:
AB
CD
EF
Year
720
0020
0120
0220
0320
0420
05Ye
ar 1
220
0520
0620
0720
0820
0920
10Ye
ar 7
(Feb
)no
.21
2320
2712
17Ye
ar 1
2 (A
ug)
no.
17.5
13.9
1717
.412
15Ye
ar 7
(Feb
) - 1
2 (A
ug)
%83
.360
.485
.064
.410
0.0
88.2
Stat
e m
edia
n%
68.6
66.2
67.2
64.5
67.4
67.3
60708090100
AB
CD
EF
GH
percent
coho
rt
60708090100
AB
CD
EF
G
percent
coho
rt
60708090100
AB
CD
EF
percent
coho
rt
60708090100
AB
CD
EF
percent
coho
rtSc
hool
Stat
e M
edia
nSc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E F G H
perc
entil
e
cohort
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E F G
perc
entil
e
cohort
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E F
perc
entil
e
cohort
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E F
perc
entil
e
cohort Scho
ol a
s pe
rcen
tile
* The
sch
ool t
rend
line
is o
nly
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
dat
a fo
r eac
h ca
lend
ar y
ear.
60708090100
AB
CD
EF
GH
percent
coho
rt
60708090100
AB
CD
EF
G
percent
coho
rt
60708090100
AB
CD
EF
percent
coho
rt
60708090100
AB
CD
EF
percent
coho
rtSc
hool
Stat
e M
edia
nSc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E F G H
perc
entil
e
cohort
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E F G
perc
entil
e
cohort
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E F
perc
entil
e
cohort
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E F
perc
entil
e
cohort Scho
ol a
s pe
rcen
tile
* The
sch
ool t
rend
line
is o
nly
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
dat
a fo
r eac
h ca
lend
ar y
ear.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 4
8 of
59
76
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Rea
l Stu
dent
Ret
entio
nN
otes
:Sc
hool
no:
Scho
ol n
ame:
Nam
eles
s P-
12 C
olle
geEx
plan
atio
n:R
eal r
eten
tion
rate
s sh
ow th
e pe
rcen
tage
of s
tude
nts
who
hav
e be
en e
nrol
led
at th
e sa
me
scho
ol o
ver a
per
iod
of ti
me.
For e
xam
ple,
the
form
ula
for t
he re
al re
tent
ion
rate
for Y
ear 7
Feb
to 1
0Aug
for s
choo
l X in
201
0 is
as
follo
ws:
By d
efin
ition
, rea
l sch
ool r
eten
tion
will
be le
ss th
an o
r equ
al to
100
% (a
ssum
ing
ther
e ar
e no
stu
dent
s re
peat
ing
the
year
, or a
ccel
erat
ing
thro
ugh
year
s).
Gen
eral
ly, r
eal
scho
ol re
tent
ion
rate
s ar
e af
fect
ed b
y st
uden
ts tr
ansf
errin
g to
ano
ther
sch
ool &
stu
dent
s ex
iting
the
scho
ol s
yste
m.
They
are
a m
easu
re o
f the
'hol
ding
pow
er' o
f the
sch
ool.
Sour
ce o
f dat
a:D
ata
retri
eved
ele
ctro
nica
lly fr
om C
ASES
21 a
t tim
e of
rollo
ver.
Year
7 (F
eb) -
10
(Aug
)Sc
hool
aga
inst
Sta
te^
Scho
ol a
s pe
rcen
tile
agai
nst S
FO p
erce
ntile
rang
e^C
ohor
ts:
AB
CD
EF
GYe
ar 7
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
Year
10
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Year
7 (F
eb)
no.
2320
2712
1721
19Ye
ar 1
0 (A
ug)
no.
1516
17.4
1115
1213
Year
7 (F
eb) -
10
(Aug
)%
65.2
80.0
64.4
91.7
88.2
57.1
68.4
Stat
e m
edia
n^%
71.4
71.6
72.9
70.9
71.4
72.5
Year
10
(Aug
) - 1
1 (F
eb)
Coh
orts
:A
BC
DE
FYe
ar 1
020
0420
0520
0620
0720
0820
09
9999
(no.
of s
tude
nts
enro
lled
in Y
r10
in s
choo
l X a
s at
Aug
ust 2
010
cens
usan
d w
ho e
nrol
led
prio
r to
1/3/
2007
, ie,
enr
olle
d in
sch
ool X
at b
egin
ning
of Y
r7)
(enr
olm
ents
in Y
r7 F
eb in
200
7 ac
cord
ing
to c
ensu
s)
405060708090
AB
CD
EF
G
percent
coho
rt
708090 nt
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E F G
perc
entil
e
cohort A B C ort
* The
sch
ool t
rend
line
is o
nly
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
dat
a fo
r eac
h ca
lend
ar y
ear.
^ 20
10 b
ench
mar
ks w
ill be
cal
cula
ted
in A
ugus
t, wh
en d
ata
from
all
scho
ols
has
been
sub
mitt
ed.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 4
9 of
59
Year
11
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Year
10
(Aug
)no
.19
1921
.416
2216
Year
11
(Feb
)no
.17
2119
.415
2012
Year
10
(Aug
) - 1
1 (F
eb)
%89
.511
0.5
90.7
93.8
90.9
75.0
Stat
e m
edia
n^%
85.2
85.2
84.4
83.6
84.5
Year
11
(Feb
) - 1
2 (A
ug)
Coh
orts
:A
BC
DE
Year
11
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
Year
12
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Year
11
(Feb
)no
.17
.924
23.1
1621
Year
12
(Aug
)no
.12
.917
15.4
1114
Year
11
(Feb
) - 1
2 (A
ug)
%72
.170
.866
.768
.866
.7St
ate
med
ian^
%71
.571
.671
.171
.3
Year
7 (F
eb) -
12
(Aug
)C
ohor
ts:
AB
CD
EYe
ar 7
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
Year
12
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
Year
7 (F
eb)
no.
2320
2712
17Ye
ar 1
2 (A
ug)
no.
10.9
1412
.48
12Ye
ar 7
(Feb
) - 1
2 (A
ug)
%47
.470
.045
.966
.770
.6St
ate
med
ian^
%48
.348
.347
.347
.3
405060708090
AB
CD
EF
G
percent
coho
rt
405060708090
AB
CD
EF
percent
coho
rt
405060708090
AB
CD
E
percent
coho
rt
405060708090
AB
CD
E
percent
coho
rtSc
hool
Stat
e M
edia
nSc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E F G
perc
entil
e
cohort
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E F
perc
entil
e
cohort
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E
perc
entil
e
cohort0
2040
6080
100
A B C D E
perc
entil
ecohort
Scho
ol a
s pe
rcen
tile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
* The
sch
ool t
rend
line
is o
nly
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
dat
a fo
r eac
h ca
lend
ar y
ear.
^ 20
10 b
ench
mar
ks w
ill be
cal
cula
ted
in A
ugus
t, wh
en d
ata
from
all
scho
ols
has
been
sub
mitt
ed.
405060708090
AB
CD
EF
G
percent
coho
rt
405060708090
AB
CD
EF
percent
coho
rt
405060708090
AB
CD
E
percent
coho
rt
405060708090
AB
CD
E
percent
coho
rtSc
hool
Stat
e M
edia
nSc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E F G
perc
entil
e
cohort
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E F
perc
entil
e
cohort
020
4060
8010
0
A B C D E
perc
entil
e
cohort0
2040
6080
100
A B C D E
perc
entil
ecohort
Scho
ol a
s pe
rcen
tile
SFO
Per
cent
ile ra
nge
* The
sch
ool t
rend
line
is o
nly
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
dat
a fo
r eac
h ca
lend
ar y
ear.
^ 20
10 b
ench
mar
ks w
ill be
cal
cula
ted
in A
ugus
t, wh
en d
ata
from
all
scho
ols
has
been
sub
mitt
ed.
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 4
9 of
59
77
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Exit
Des
tinat
ion:
Yea
r 10
Scho
ol n
o:99
99Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Expl
anat
ion:
The
dest
inat
ion
of s
tude
nts
who
left
durin
g or
at t
he e
nd o
f Yea
r 10.
Sour
ce o
f dat
a:D
ata
retri
eved
ele
ctro
nica
lly fr
om C
ASES
21 fo
llowi
ng F
ebru
ary
cens
us.
Exit
Dest
inat
ion
n%
n%
n%
Cont
inui
ng e
duca
tion
and
train
ing
Gov
ernm
ent S
choo
l1
33.3
133
.31
16.7
Non-
Gov
ernm
ent S
choo
l1
33.3
266
.73
50.0
Univ
ersit
yO
ther
Tra
inin
g Pr
ovid
erTA
FE /
RTO
/ AC
EAp
pren
tices
hip
/ Tra
inee
ship
116
.7Ho
me
Scho
olin
gDe
ferre
dSU
BTO
TAL
266
.73
100.
05
83.3
Not c
ontin
uing
edu
catio
n an
d tra
inin
gEm
ploy
ed (p
art t
ime)
Empl
oyed
(ful
l tim
e)1
16.7
Unem
ploy
ed (s
eeki
ng w
ork)
Unem
ploy
ed (n
ot s
eeki
ng w
ork)
†SU
BTO
TAL
116
.7Un
know
n1
33.3
TOTA
L3
100.
03
100.
06
100.
0To
tal Y
r 10
Febr
uary
enr
olm
ent
2015
18
10.4
11.7
100.
0
1.5
4.4
3.4
1.1
12.4
6.0
0.3
0.1
77.9
47.8
6.9
0.1
4.3
2010
2008
2009
2009
sta
te^
%
Scho
ol a
gain
st S
tate
Not
es:*
The
sch
ool t
rend
line
is o
nly
plot
ted
whe
n th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.†
Incl
udes
dec
ease
d st
uden
ts.
^ 20
10 b
ench
mar
ks w
ill b
e ca
lcul
ated
in A
ugus
t, w
hen
data
from
all
scho
ols
has
been
sub
mitt
ed.
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Empl
oyed
(par
t tim
e)Em
ploy
ed(fu
ll tim
e)U
nem
ploy
ed(s
eekin
g w
ork)
Une
mpl
oyed
(not
se
ekin
g w
ork)
†SU
BTO
TAL
Not
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
and
Trai
ning
Unk
now
n
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Scho
ol a
t zer
o pe
rcen
t
0102030405060708090100
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Gov
ernm
ent
Scho
olN
on-G
over
nmen
t Sc
hool
Uni
vers
ityO
ther
Tra
inin
g Pr
ovid
erTA
FE /
RTO
/ AC
EAp
pren
tices
hip
/ Tr
aine
eshi
pH
ome
Scho
olin
gD
efer
red
SUBT
OTA
L
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
and
Trai
ning
perc
ent
Scho
olSt
ate
Mea
n
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
ision
, DEE
CD
Page
50
of 5
9
78
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Exit
Des
tinat
ion:
Yea
r 11
Scho
ol n
o:99
99Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Expl
anat
ion:
The
dest
inat
ion
of s
tude
nts
who
left
durin
g or
at t
he e
nd o
f Yea
r 11.
Sour
ce o
f dat
a:D
ata
retri
eved
ele
ctro
nica
lly fr
om C
ASES
21 fo
llowi
ng F
ebru
ary
cens
us.
Exit
Dest
inat
ion
n%
n%
n%
Cont
inui
ng e
duca
tion
and
train
ing
Gov
ernm
ent S
choo
l1
16.7
Non-
Gov
ernm
ent S
choo
l1
14.3
150
.01
16.7
Univ
ersit
yO
ther
Tra
inin
g Pr
ovid
er1
50.0
TAFE
/ RT
O /
ACE
Appr
entic
eshi
p / T
rain
eesh
ip2
33.3
Hom
e Sc
hool
ing
Defe
rred
SUBT
OTA
L1
14.3
210
0.0
466
.7No
t con
tinui
ng e
duca
tion
and
train
ing
Empl
oyed
(par
t tim
e)Em
ploy
ed (f
ull t
ime)
116
.7Un
empl
oyed
(see
king
wor
k)Un
empl
oyed
(not
see
king
wor
k)†
SUBT
OTA
L1
16.7
Unkn
own
685
.71
16.7
TOTA
L7
100.
02
100.
06
100.
0To
tal Y
r 11
Febr
uary
enr
olm
ent
1621
20
8.4
1.9
24.4
12.6
100.
0
10.1
22.5
5.0
0.3
5.1
16.7
13.1
0.2
0.2
63.0
4.0
2008
2009
2010
2009
sta
te^
%
Scho
ol a
gain
st S
tate
Not
es:*
The
sch
ool t
rend
line
is o
nly
plot
ted
whe
n th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.†
Incl
udes
dec
ease
d st
uden
ts.
^ 20
10 b
ench
mar
ks w
ill b
e ca
lcul
ated
in A
ugus
t, w
hen
data
from
all
scho
ols
has
been
sub
mitt
ed.
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Empl
oyed
(par
t tim
e)Em
ploy
ed(fu
ll tim
e)U
nem
ploy
ed(s
eekin
g w
ork)
Une
mpl
oyed
(not
se
ekin
g w
ork)
†SU
BTO
TAL
Not
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
and
Trai
ning
Unk
now
n
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Scho
ol a
t zer
o pe
rcen
t
0102030405060708090100
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Gov
ernm
ent
Scho
olN
on-G
over
nmen
t Sc
hool
Uni
vers
ityO
ther
Tra
inin
g Pr
ovid
erTA
FE /
RTO
/ AC
EAp
pren
tices
hip
/ Tr
aine
eshi
pH
ome
Scho
olin
gD
efer
red
SUBT
OTA
L
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
and
Trai
ning
perc
ent
Scho
olSt
ate
Mea
n
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
ision
, DEE
CD
Page
51
of 5
9
79
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Exit
Des
tinat
ion:
Stu
dent
s w
ho le
ft Ye
ar 1
2 be
fore
com
plet
ing
the
year
Scho
ol n
o:99
99Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Expl
anat
ion:
The
dest
inat
ion
of s
tude
nts
who
left
prio
r to
com
plet
ing
Year
12.
Sour
ce o
f dat
a:D
ata
retri
eved
ele
ctro
nica
lly fr
om C
ASES
21 fo
llowi
ng F
ebru
ary
cens
us.
Exit
Dest
inat
ion
n%
n%
n%
Cont
inui
ng e
duca
tion
and
train
ing
Gov
ernm
ent S
choo
l1
25.0
266
.7No
n-G
over
nmen
t Sch
ool
133
.31
25.0
Univ
ersit
yO
ther
Tra
inin
g Pr
ovid
erTA
FE /
RTO
/ AC
E1
25.0
Appr
entic
eshi
p / T
rain
eesh
ipHo
me
Scho
olin
gDe
ferre
dSU
BTO
TAL
125
.03
100.
02
50.0
Not c
ontin
uing
edu
catio
n an
d tra
inin
gEm
ploy
ed (p
art t
ime)
125
.0Em
ploy
ed (f
ull t
ime)
Unem
ploy
ed (s
eeki
ng w
ork)
Unem
ploy
ed (n
ot s
eeki
ng w
ork)
†1
25.0
SUBT
OTA
L2
50.0
Unkn
own
375
.0TO
TAL
410
0.0
310
0.0
410
0.0
Tota
l Yr 1
2 Fe
brua
ry e
nrol
men
t17
1418
10.6
2.7
36.1
12.4
100.
0
15.4
12.7
3.5
1.1
6.0
15.2
12.8
0.0
0.2
51.5
7.5
2008
2009
2010
2009
sta
te^
%
Scho
ol a
gain
st S
tate
Not
es:*
The
sch
ool t
rend
line
is o
nly
plot
ted
whe
n th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.†
Incl
udes
dec
ease
d st
uden
ts.
^ 20
10 b
ench
mar
ks w
ill b
e ca
lcul
ated
in A
ugus
t, w
hen
data
from
all
scho
ols
has
been
sub
mitt
ed.
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Empl
oyed
(par
t tim
e)Em
ploy
ed(fu
ll tim
e)U
nem
ploy
ed(s
eekin
g w
ork)
Une
mpl
oyed
(not
se
ekin
g w
ork)
†SU
BTO
TAL
Not
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
and
Trai
ning
Unk
now
n
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Scho
ol a
t zer
o pe
rcen
t
0102030405060708090100
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Gov
ernm
ent
Scho
olN
on-G
over
nmen
t Sc
hool
Uni
vers
ityO
ther
Tra
inin
g Pr
ovid
erTA
FE /
RTO
/ AC
EAp
pren
tices
hip
/ Tr
aine
eshi
pH
ome
Scho
olin
gD
efer
red
SUBT
OTA
L
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
and
Trai
ning
perc
ent
Scho
olSt
ate
Mea
n
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
ision
, DEE
CD
Page
52
of 5
9
80
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Exit
Des
tinat
ion:
Stu
dent
s w
ho le
ft at
the
end
of Y
ear 1
2O
n Tr
ack
Scho
ol n
o:99
99So
urce
of d
ata:
Dat
a re
ceiv
ed fr
om a
tele
phon
e su
rvey
of Y
ear 1
2 co
mpl
eter
s,Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
c
ondu
cted
in A
pril
/ May
of t
he s
ubse
quen
t yea
r.Ex
plan
atio
n:Th
e de
stin
atio
n of
stu
dent
s wh
o le
ft at
the
end
of Y
ear 1
2.Sc
hool
onl
ySo
urce
of d
ata:
Dat
a re
triev
ed e
lect
roni
cally
from
CAS
ES21
follo
wing
Feb
ruar
y ce
nsus
.
Exit
Dest
inat
ion
n%
n%
n%
Cont
inui
ng e
duca
tion
and
train
ing
Gov
ernm
ent S
choo
l1
5.9
Non-
Gov
ernm
ent S
choo
lUn
iver
sity
1210
0.0
1372
.2O
ther
Tra
inin
g Pr
ovid
erTA
FE /
RTO
/ AC
EAp
pren
tices
hip
/ Tra
inee
ship
Hom
e Sc
hool
ing
Defe
rred
SUBT
OTA
L1
5.9
1210
0.0
1372
.2No
t con
tinui
ng e
duca
tion
and
train
ing
Empl
oyed
(par
t tim
e)2
11.1
Empl
oyed
(ful
l tim
e)1
5.6
Unem
ploy
ed (s
eeki
ng w
ork)
Unem
ploy
ed (n
ot s
eeki
ng w
ork)
†2
11.1
Note
:The
exit
des
tinat
ion
data
from
On
Trac
k an
d C
ASES
21 is
not
dire
ctly
com
para
ble
SUBT
OTA
L5
27.8
for s
ever
al re
ason
s, o
ne o
f whi
ch is
the
diffe
rent
bas
es.
CAS
ES21
dat
a is
base
dUn
know
n16
94.1
on a
ll Yea
r 12
com
plet
ers,
whe
reas
On
Trac
k is
base
d on
Yea
r 12
com
plet
ers
who
TOTA
L17
100.
012
100.
018
100.
0re
spon
ded
to th
e su
rvey
. H
ence
the
CAS
ES21
dat
a ha
s an
"unk
now
n" c
ateg
ory
Tota
l Yr 1
2 Fe
brua
ry e
nrol
men
t17
1418
and
the
On
Trac
k da
ta d
oes
not.
Ano
ther
reas
on is
the
sligh
tly d
iffer
ent c
ateg
orie
sfo
r exa
mpl
e, C
ASES
21 in
clude
s a
"hom
e sc
hool
ing"
cat
egor
y.
4.0
0.6
18.0
4.9
100.
0
8.1
1.8
0.4
40.0
3.7
22.2
5.9
0.0
3.0
77.2
5.2
2008
2009
2010
2009
sta
te^
%
75767778
15141312
1321
3112
2334
4343
0102030405060708090100
2006200720082009
2006200720082009
2006200720082009
2006200720082009
2006200720082009
2006200720082009
Uni
vers
ity
enro
lled
TAFE
/ VE
T en
rolle
dAp
pren
tice
/ Tr
aine
eEm
ploy
edLo
okin
g fo
r w
ork
Def
erra
ls
perc
ent
Scho
ol a
gain
st S
tate
Not
es:*
The
sch
ool t
rend
line
is o
nly
plot
ted
whe
n th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.†
Incl
udes
dec
ease
d st
uden
ts.
^ 20
10 b
ench
mar
ks w
ill b
e ca
lcul
ated
in A
ugus
t, w
hen
data
from
all
scho
ols
has
been
sub
mitt
ed.
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Empl
oyed
(par
t tim
e)Em
ploy
ed(fu
ll tim
e)U
nem
ploy
ed(s
eekin
g w
ork)
Une
mpl
oyed
(not
se
ekin
g w
ork)
†SU
BTO
TAL
Not
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
and
Trai
ning
Unk
now
n
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Scho
ol a
t zer
o pe
rcen
t
0102030405060708090100
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Gov
ernm
ent
Scho
olN
on-G
over
nmen
t Sc
hool
Uni
vers
ityO
ther
Tra
inin
g Pr
ovid
erTA
FE /
RTO
/ AC
EAp
pren
tices
hip
/ Tr
aine
eshi
pH
ome
Scho
olin
gD
efer
red
SUBT
OTA
L
Con
tinui
ng E
duca
tion
and
Trai
ning
perc
ent
Scho
olSt
ate
Mea
n
75767778
15141312
1321
3112
2334
4343
0102030405060708090100
2006200720082009
2006200720082009
2006200720082009
2006200720082009
2006200720082009
2006200720082009
Uni
vers
ity
enro
lled
TAFE
/ VE
T en
rolle
dAp
pren
tice
/ Tr
aine
eEm
ploy
edLo
okin
g fo
r w
ork
Def
erra
ls
perc
ent
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
ision
, DEE
CD
Page
53
of 5
9
81
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Stud
ent A
bsen
ceSc
hool
no:
9999
Scho
ol n
ame:
Nam
eles
s P-
12 C
olle
geSo
urce
of d
ata:
Dat
a re
triev
ed e
lect
roni
cally
from
CAS
ES21
.Ex
plan
atio
n:Th
e av
erag
e (m
ean)
num
ber o
f abs
ent d
ays†
per
FTE
** s
tude
nt.
Not
e th
at 2
0 ab
sent
day
s eq
uate
s to
1 a
bsen
t day
per
fortn
ight
, and
10
abse
nt d
ays
to 1
abs
ent d
ay p
er m
onth
.Enrolments
Avg absent days / FTE** student
Enrolments
Avg absent days / FTE** student
Enrolments
Avg absent days / FTE** student
Enrolments
Avg absent days / FTE** student
25th
ptile
Mea
n75
thpt
ilePr
ep23
.416
22.4
11.5
23.4
18.8
28.2
26.6
12.0
14.7
18.0
Yr 1
18.9
15.9
23.0
16.8
22.7
21.8
18.6
17.8
12.1
14.4
17.0
Yr 2
20.4
15.4
19.4
15.8
18.2
18.6
22.1
20.3
11.6
14.0
16.6
Yr 3
31.7
20.2
20.7
15.5
18.3
22.3
18.2
18.5
11.2
13.6
16.1
Yr 4
19.1
14.7
29.6
18.8
20.5
18.8
16.6
19.9
11.3
13.7
16.0
Yr 5
24.0
14.9
17.3
13.6
30.0
18.8
19.4
26.5
11.4
14.0
16.3
Yr 6
19.2
15.3
24.1
19.8
16.5
1829
.721
.311
.914
.416
.8Yr
718
.318
15.0
18.5
17.6
26.3
12.8
23.7
13.3
16.2
21.2
Yr 8
20.6
17.9
21.1
23.9
14.2
1718
.020
15.4
19.8
24.4
Yr 9
20.7
22.7
19.3
35.2
22.3
27.6
15.2
31.7
17.6
22.5
27.8
Not
es:
Yr 1
016
.018
.221
.025
.715
.040
.220
.634
.715
.820
.926
.0Yr
11
21.5
2417
.115
.821
.232
.520
.030
11.6
15.8
21.5
Yr 1
217
.817
.117
.18.
212
.817
.515
.48.
69.
013
.015
.8
Ung
rade
d15
.9
2008
2009
2007
2009
sta
tebe
nchm
ark^
2010
Scho
ol
Incl
udes
non
-cur
ricul
um a
bsen
ces
only
(abs
ence
cod
es 2
00, 2
01, 2
02,
203,
205
, 206
, 207
, 208
, 209
, 210
, 211
, 300
, 401
, 500
, 700
, 800
, 804
,80
5, 9
00).
The
scho
ol tr
endl
ine
is o
nly
plot
ted
whe
n th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
ld
† *
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
SFO
per
cent
ile r
ange
^Im
prov
emen
t
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 5
4 of
59
Ung
rade
d15
.9
P-6
mea
n16
.416
.219
.621
.914
.17-
12 m
ean
19.9
21.8
27.5
2718
.3P-
12 m
ean
17.8
18.5
22.8
2315
.9
cale
ndar
yea
r.FT
E =
Full
Tim
e Eq
uiva
lent
(inc
udin
g pa
rt-tim
e &
part-
year
frac
tions
).20
10 b
ench
mar
ks a
nd p
erce
ntile
s w
ill be
cal
cula
ted
in A
ugus
t, w
hen
data
from
all
scho
ols
has
been
sub
mitt
ed.
** ^
051015202530354045
20072008200920102007200820092010200720082009201020072008200920102007200820092010200720082009201020072008200920102007200820092010200720082009201020072008200920102007200820092010200720082009201020072008200920102007200820092010
200720082009201020072008200920102007200820092010
Prep
Yr 1
Yr 2
Yr 3
Yr 4
Yr 5
Yr 6
Yr 7
Yr 8
Yr 9
Yr 1
0Yr
11
Yr 1
2U
n-gr
aded
Prep
-Yr6
Yr7
-Yr1
2Pr
ep-Y
r12
Days of absence per FTE** student .Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst S
tate
Mea
n^
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
ean
Scho
ol T
rend
line*
Improvement .
020
4060
8010
0
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
2007
2008
2009
2010
Prep Yr 1 Yr 2 Yr 3 Yr 4 Yr 5 Yr 6 Yr 7 Yr 8 Yr 9 Yr 10 Yr 11 Yr 12Un-
gradedPrep-Yr6
Yr7 -Yr12
Prep-Yr12
perc
entil
eSc
hool
as
perc
entil
eSF
O P
erce
ntile
rang
e
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
aga
inst
SFO
per
cent
ile r
ange
^Im
prov
emen
t
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 5
4 of
59
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 5
4 of
59
82
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Pare
nt O
pini
onSc
hool
no:
9999
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
(by
scho
ol ty
pe)
Scho
ol n
ame:
Nam
eles
s P-
12 C
olle
geEx
plan
atio
n:A
self-
com
plet
ion
ques
tionn
aire
to o
btai
n pa
rent
s' op
inio
ns o
f the
sch
ool.
Par
ents
rate
d a
num
ber o
f sta
tem
ents
usi
nga
scal
e w
here
1=s
trong
ly d
isag
ree
& 7=
stro
ngly
agr
ee.
The
stat
emen
ts w
ere
grou
ped
into
the
follo
win
g ca
tego
ries.
Sour
ce o
f dat
a: D
ata
scan
ned
from
que
stio
nnai
res
com
plet
ed b
y pa
rent
s.
Varia
ble
Varia
ble
Varia
ble
No.
Nam
eYe
arN
o.N
ame
Year
No.
Nam
eYe
ar1
Scho
ol Im
prov
emen
t20
085.
015.
217
Rep
ortin
g20
085.
115.
1513
Stud
ent S
afet
y^20
085.
455.
1520
094.
725.
1820
095.
065.
2620
095.
045.
1320
104.
835.
2820
105.
285.
2120
104.
915.
192
Appr
oach
abilit
y20
085.
515.
408
Lear
ning
Foc
us20
084.
675.
2714
Cla
ssro
om B
ehav
iour
^20
083.
963.
7120
095.
045.
3220
095.
065.
3120
093.
293.
7820
105.
515.
4220
105.
145.
3120
103.
333.
873
Teac
her M
oral
e20
085.
245.
199
Tran
sitio
ns20
085.
585.
3715
Con
nect
edne
ss to
Pee
rs20
085.
595.
6320
094.
835.
2020
095.
215.
4120
095.
545.
6720
105.
115.
3220
105.
345.
5620
105.
705.
704
Pare
nt In
put
2008
5.35
5.16
10Ex
tra C
urric
ula
2008
5.22
4.74
16St
uden
t Mot
ivat
ion
2008
5.31
5.06
2009
4.47
5.14
2009
4.44
4.70
2009
5.02
5.16
2010
4.95
5.11
2010
4.58
4.81
2010
5.18
5.18
5St
imul
atin
g Le
arni
ng20
085.
215.
1511
Hom
ewor
k20
084.
964.
7117
Soci
al S
kills
2008
5.43
5.51
2009
5.05
5.20
2009
4.74
4.71
2009
5.36
5.54
2010
5.14
5.29
2010
5.05
4.89
2010
5.53
5.55
6Be
havi
our M
anag
emen
t20
085.
144.
9012
Gen
eral
Sat
isfa
ctio
n20
085.
085.
3718
Scho
ol C
onne
cted
ness
2008
5.35
5.24
2009
4.74
5.02
2009
5.00
5.38
2009
5.51
5.33
2010
5.16
4.99
2010
5.00
5.38
2010
5.15
5.39
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst P
ri/Se
c St
ate
Mea
n
Not
es: *
The
scho
ol tr
endl
ine
is p
lotte
d w
hen
ther
e is
dat
a fo
r eac
h ca
lend
ar y
ear.
^^Be
nchm
arks
ava
ilabl
e fo
r Prim
ary,
Sec
onda
ry, P
ri/Se
c, S
peci
al a
nd S
DS
scho
ols.
**If
ther
e w
ere
6 or
less
resp
onde
nts,
tabl
e da
ta is
not
sho
wn
for c
onfid
entia
lity
reas
ons.
If t
here
wer
e 3
or le
ss re
spon
dent
s, g
raph
dat
a is
not
sho
wn
for c
onfid
entia
lity
reas
ons.
^Pa
rent
s' re
spon
ses
to a
ll ne
gativ
ely
phra
sed
ques
tions
hav
e be
en re
vers
ed fo
r rep
ortin
g pu
rpos
es. A
cros
s al
l var
iabl
es, t
he h
ighe
r the
sco
re o
r per
cent
ile ra
nk, t
he m
ore
posi
tive
pare
nts'
perc
eptio
ns.
Stat
ePr
i/Sec
med
ian
Scho
olm
ean
Scho
olm
ean
Scho
olm
ean
Stat
ePr
i/Sec
med
ian
Stat
ePr
i/Sec
med
ian
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
6.0
7.0
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Scho
ol
Impr
ov.
Appr
oa-
chab
ility
Teac
her
Mor
ale
Pare
nt
Inpu
tSt
im.
Lear
ning
Beh.
M
anag
.R
epor
t-in
gLe
arni
ng
Focu
sTr
an-
sitio
nsEx
tra
Cur
ricul
aH
ome-
work
Gen
eral
Sa
tis.
Stud
ent
Safe
ty^
Cla
ss.
Beh.
^C
onne
ct.
to P
eers
Stud
ent
Mot
iv.
Soci
al
Skills
Scho
ol
Con
nect
.
Scho
ol C
limat
eSt
uden
t Be
havi
our^
Stud
ent
Enga
gem
ent
1=strongly disagree, 7=strongly agree
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
edia
nSc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*
Improvement .
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
School ClimateStudent
Behaviour^Student
Engagement
perc
entil
eSc
hool
Mea
n as
per
cent
ile
Impr
ovem
ent
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luat
ion
Div
isio
n, D
EEC
DPa
ge 5
5 of
59
83
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Staf
f Opi
nion
Scho
ol re
spon
se ra
te**
aga
inst
Pri/
Sec
scho
ol d
istr
ibut
ion
Scho
ol n
o:99
99Sc
hool
nam
e:N
amel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Expl
anat
ion:
A se
lf-co
mpl
etio
n qu
estio
nnai
re to
obt
ain
the
staf
f's o
pini
ons
of th
e sc
hool
. Th
e su
rvey
was
adm
inis
tere
d on
line
usin
g th
e Sc
hool
Org
anis
atio
nal H
ealth
Que
stio
nnai
re.
Sour
ce o
f dat
a: D
ata
trans
mitt
ed fr
om s
choo
l sta
ff to
DEE
CD
via
an
onlin
e su
rvey
app
licat
ion.
Varia
ble
Varia
ble
Varia
ble
No.
Nam
eYe
arSc
hool
m
ean
No.
Nam
eYe
arSc
hool
m
ean
No.
Nam
eYe
arSc
hool
m
ean
120
0866
.967
.18
Appr
aisa
l & R
ecog
nitio
n20
0856
.661
.915
Lear
ning
Env
ironm
ent
2008
59.8
67.8
2009
66.7
68.1
2009
60.2
61.1
2009
66.6
67.6
No. i
nvite
d20
1059
.970
.520
1054
.264
.120
1061
.570
.820
0846
220
0864
.663
.49
Prof
essi
onal
Gro
wth
2008
69.4
66.2
16St
uden
t Mis
beha
viou r
2008
35.0
37.7
2009
4320
0961
.665
.020
0966
.466
.120
0936
.637
.820
1043
2010
55.7
67.2
2010
61.2
65.2
2010
37.2
38.6
320
0870
.267
.610
Cur
ricul
um C
oord
inat
ion
2008
53.5
62.3
17C
lass
room
Mis
beha
viou r
2008
20.4
17.7
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
(by
scho
ol ty
pe)
2009
65.4
67.7
2009
67.7
61.1
2009
17.7
16.7
2010
61.2
70.2
2010
57.5
63.5
2010
16.4
16.7
420
0871
.271
.311
Effe
ctive
Dis
cipl
ine
Polic
y20
0855
.364
.718
Exce
ssive
Wor
k D
eman
ds20
0848
.848
.520
0973
.370
.520
0955
.763
.120
0949
.352
.020
1068
.572
.320
1055
.064
.620
1048
.351
.65
2008
66.8
71.9
12St
uden
t Orie
ntat
ion
2008
72.3
76.5
19In
divid
ual D
istre
ss20
0826
.729
.020
0971
.371
.520
0979
.376
.820
0931
.629
.320
1066
.173
.320
1072
.878
.220
1035
.227
.16
2008
64.7
62.4
13St
uden
t Mot
ivatio
n20
0854
.059
.120
Scho
ol D
istre
ss20
0835
.840
.920
0967
.062
.020
0962
.460
.520
0944
.443
.120
1058
.364
.120
1060
.460
.720
1044
.538
.67
2008
64.0
70.0
14St
uden
t Dec
isio
n-M
akin
g20
0864
.060
.420
0969
.869
.620
0978
.961
.520
1061
.971
.620
1068
.862
.3
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst P
ri/Se
c St
ate
Med
ian
Not
es: *
The
scho
ol tr
endl
ine
is o
nly
plot
ted
whe
n th
ere
is d
ata
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.**
If th
ere
wer
e 6
or le
ss re
spon
dent
s, ta
ble
data
is n
ot s
how
n fo
r con
fiden
tialit
y re
ason
s. I
f the
re w
ere
3 or
less
resp
onde
nts,
gra
ph d
ata
is n
ot s
how
n fo
r con
fiden
tialit
y re
ason
s.^
The
high
er th
e sc
hool
mea
n, th
e m
ore
posi
tive
the
outc
ome
for v
aria
bles
1 to
15.
The
low
er th
e sc
hool
mea
n, th
e m
ore
posi
tive
the
outc
ome
for v
aria
bles
16
to 2
0.†
The
high
er th
e sc
hool
per
cent
ile, t
he m
ore
posi
tive
the
outc
ome
for a
ll va
riabl
es.
^^Be
nchm
arks
are
ava
ilabl
e fo
r Prim
ary,
Sec
onda
ry, P
ri/Se
c, S
peci
al &
SD
S sc
hool
s.
Stat
e Pr
i/Sec
m
edia
n In
divid
ual M
oral
e
Stat
e Pr
i/Sec
m
edia
n
Stat
e Pr
i/Sec
m
edia
n
Goa
l Con
grue
nce
Parti
cipa
tive
Dec
isio
n-M
akin
g
Scho
ol M
oral
e
Supp
ortiv
e Le
ader
ship
Rol
e C
larit
y
Prof
essi
onal
Inte
ract
ion
30
57%
58%
70%
No. o
f res
pond
ents
Res
pons
e R
ate
26 25
0102030405060708090100
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Indi
vidua
l M
oral
eSc
hool
M
oral
eSu
ppor
tive
Lead
ersh
ipR
ole
Cla
rity
Prof
essi
onal
In
tera
ctio
nPa
rtici
pativ
e D
ecis
ion
-Mak
ing
Goa
l C
ongr
uenc
eAp
prai
sal &
R
ecog
nitio
nPr
ofes
sion
al
Gro
wth
Cur
ricul
um
Coo
rdin
atio
nEf
fect
ive
Dis
cipl
ine
Polic
y
Stud
ent
Orie
ntat
ion
Stud
ent
Mot
ivatio
nSt
uden
t D
ecis
ion-
Mak
ing
Lear
ning
En
viron
men
tSt
uden
t M
is-
beha
viour
Cla
ssro
om
Mis
-be
havio
ur
Exce
ssive
W
ork
Dem
ands
Indi
vidua
l D
istre
ssSc
hool
D
istre
ss
MO
TIVA
TIO
NEM
PATH
YC
LAR
ITY
ENG
AGEM
ENT
LEAR
NING
OUT
CO
MES
MO
TIVA
TIO
N
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
edia
nSc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*
Improvement ^ .
Elem
ent:
Improvement ^ .
020406080100
2008
2009
2010
Response Rate (%)
020
4060
8010
0
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
2008
2009
2010
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20
MotivationEm-pathy Clarity Engagement Learning Outcomes Motivation
perc
entile
Scho
ol M
ean
as p
erce
ntile
Impr
ovem
ent †
.
Lege
nd:
Stat
e 90
th p
erce
ntile
Stat
e 75
th p
erce
ntile
Stat
e M
edia
nSt
ate
25th
per
cent
ile
Stat
e 10
th p
erce
ntile
Scho
ol
Prod
uced
by
Dat
a, O
utco
mes
and
Eva
luatio
n D
ivis
ion,
DEE
CD
Page
56
of 5
9
84
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Perf
orm
ance
& D
evel
opm
ent C
ultu
re (P
&DC)
††
Scho
ol n
o:99
99Sc
hool
nam
e:Na
mel
ess
P-12
Col
lege
Expl
anat
ion:
The
data
on
this
page
refe
rs to
the
Staf
f Opi
nion
Sur
vey.
Sour
ce o
f dat
a:D
ata
trans
mitt
ed fr
om s
choo
l sta
ff to
DEE
CD
via
an
onlin
e su
rvey
app
licat
ion.
Scho
ol M
ean
agai
nst P
ri/Se
c St
ate
Med
ian
Not
es:
††An
ass
essm
ent o
f the
cor
rela
tion
betw
een
the
P&D
C Q
uest
ionn
aire
and
the
Staf
f Opi
nion
Sur
vey
was
unde
rtake
n us
ing
data
from
Vict
oria
n G
over
nmen
t sch
ools
that
com
plet
ed b
oth
surv
eys
from
.20
05 to
200
7 (ie
. 699
sch
ools)
. Th
is le
d to
the
iden
tifica
tion
of th
e co
mpo
nent
s of
the
Staf
f Opi
nion
Sur
vey
that
cou
ld b
e us
ed to
ass
ist s
choo
ls wi
th th
e on
goin
g m
onito
ring
of th
eir p
erfo
rman
ce
.
and
deve
lopm
ent c
ultu
re.
Ref
er to
the
P&D
C w
ebsit
e fo
r fur
ther
info
rmat
ion:
http
://ww
w.ed
ucat
ion.
vic. g
ov.a
u/m
anag
emen
t/sch
oolim
prov
emen
t/pan
ddc/
defa
ult.h
tm.
For n
umer
ical r
esul
ts
.
rela
ting
to th
e ab
ove
grap
h, re
fer t
o th
e St
aff O
pini
on S
urve
y pa
ge in
this
repo
rt.
.
†N
ote
that
ther
e is
no s
i gni
fican
t cor
rela
tion
betw
een
the
Staf
f Opi
nion
Sur
vey
and
P&D
C e
lem
ents
1 (I
nduc
tion)
and
3 (C
usto
mise
d In
divid
ual D
evel
opm
ent P
lans
).
.
^Th
e P&
DC
thre
shol
d wa
s de
rived
from
the
P&D
C Q
uest
ionn
aire
'per
cent
favo
urab
le' m
etho
dolo
gy w
here
a s
choo
l is c
onsid
ered
at t
he s
tand
ard
of a
ccre
dita
tion
when
thei
r Ele
men
t sco
re is
>75
%
.
favo
urab
le (i
e. a
t lea
st 7
5% o
f sta
ff se
lect
ed th
e to
p tw
o re
spon
se c
ateg
orie
s in
the
P&D
C Q
uest
ionn
aire
).
.
*Th
e sc
hool
tren
dlin
e is
onl y
plot
ted
when
ther
e is
data
for e
ach
cale
ndar
yea
r.
.**
If th
ere
were
3 o
r les
s re
spon
dent
s, g
raph
dat
a is
not s
hown
for c
onfid
entia
lity re
ason
s.
.
^^Be
nchm
arks
are
ava
ilabl
e fo
r Prim
ary,
Sec
onda
ry, P
ri/Se
c, S
pecia
l & S
DS
scho
ols.
.
0102030405060708090100
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
200820092010
Prof
essi
onal
In
tera
ctio
nAp
prai
sal &
R
ecog
nitio
nLe
arni
ngEn
viron
men
tAp
prai
sal &
R
ecog
nitio
nLe
arni
ngEn
viron
men
tG
oal
Con
grue
nce
Prof
essi
onal
G
row
thPr
ofes
sion
al
Inte
ract
ion
Appr
aisa
l &
Rec
ogni
tion
Lear
ning
Envir
onm
ent
Goa
l C
ongr
uenc
ePa
rtici
pativ
e D
ecis
ion-
Mak
ing
ELEM
ENT
1†:
IND
UC
TIO
NEL
EMEN
T 2:
MU
LTIP
LE S
OU
RC
ESO
F FE
EDBA
CK
ELEM
ENT
3†:
CU
STO
MIS
ED
IND
IVID
UAL
DEV
. PLA
NS
ELEM
ENT
4:Q
UAL
ITY
PRO
FESS
ION
ALD
EVEL
OPM
ENT
ELEM
ENT
5:ST
AFF
BELI
EF IN
PER
FOR
MAN
CE
&D
EVEL
OPM
ENT
CU
LTU
RE
Scho
ol M
ean
Stat
e M
edia
nSc
hool
Tre
ndlin
e*P&
DC
thre
shol
d^
Improvement . Prod
uced
by
Data
, Out
com
es a
nd E
valu
atio
n Di
visio
n, D
EECD
Page
57
of 5
9
85
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Staff Sick LeaveSchool no:School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: The number of non-certificated and total sick leave days taken per staff member. A detailed
explanation on how staff sick leave is calculated is provided at: www.education.vic.gov.au/management/schoolimprovement/performancedata/performancereportsfaq.htm.
Source of data: Human Resources Management System (HRMS)^.
Non-Certificated sick leave days per staff member^
Staff Type 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008** 2009** 2010** 2010 State Median**
Teacher 2.03 2.01 2.46 2.13 2.05 2.09 2.55 2.16 2.50ES^^ 0.79 0.84 1.25 0.91 1.79 0.68 0.71 1.00
Total sick leave days per staff member^
Staff Type 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008** 2009** 2010** 2010 State Median**
Teacher 5.50 6.43 6.81 5.61 4.00 3.45 5.92 13.51 16.00ES^^ 12.36 2.71 16.60 6.00 7.44 5.27 8.84 11.00
NON-CERTIFICATED sick leave
9999
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
ays
per s
taff
mem
ber
.
TOTAL sick leave
Notes:* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.
** The way in which sick leave data are calculated changed in 2008. As such, data from2008 cannot be compared with previous years.
^ There may be some discrepancy between the results from CASES21 and those fromHRMS. The latter are considered to be more accurate.
^^ Data for ES (Education Support) staff is only available from 2003.
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
**
2009
**
2010
**
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
**
2009
**
2010
**
Teaching staff ES staff^^
avg
days
per
sta
ff m
embe
r .
02468
1012141618
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
**
2009
**
2010
**
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
**
2009
**
2010
**
Teaching staff ES staff^^
avg
days
per
sta
ff m
embe
r .
Legend: State 90th percentile
State 75th percentile
State Median
State 25th percentile
State 10th percentileSchool
School Trendline*
( ) y
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
**
2009
**
2010
**
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
**
2009
**
2010
**
Teaching staff ES staff^^
avg
days
per
sta
ff m
embe
r .
02468
1012141618
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
**
2009
**
2010
**
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
**
2009
**
2010
**
Teaching staff ES staff^^
avg
days
per
sta
ff m
embe
r .
Legend: State 90th percentile
State 75th percentile
State Median
State 25th percentile
State 10th percentileSchool
School Trendline*
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD Page 58 of 59
86
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Bank BalancesSchool no: 9999School name: Nameless P-12 CollegeExplanation: Account balance figures include official and investment accounts, and are
calculated by taking the opening balance at 1st January plus the total receiptsat 31st December less total payments at 31st December.
Account Balances (Official plus Investment Accounts)2003 $72,318 2007 $192,6802004 $40,389 2008 $117,8712005 $150,165 2009 $55,7402006 $133,229 2010 $146,559
Account Balances
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
Account Balances (Official plus Investment Accounts) per student†
2003 $268 2007 $7182004 $147 2008 $4412005 $552 2009 $2262006 $487 2010 $588
School account balances per student enrolled in August census plotted on state Pri/Sec benchmarks^
Legend:
Notes:* The school trendline is only plotted when there is data for each calendar year.† The account balance per student has been calculated to enable some comparison to be made between schools.^ Benchmarks for primary, secondary, pri/sec, SDS, special and language schools. 2010 benchmarks will be calculated in August, when data from all schools has been submitted.
$0
$50,000
$100,000
$150,000
$200,000
$250,000
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010
90th percentile
75th percentile
Median
25th percentile
10th percentileSchool
School Trendline*
Produced by Data, Outcomes andEvaluation Division, DEECD Page 59 of 59
87
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Key: Range of results for the middle 60% of Victorian government schools:
Result for this school: Median of all Victorian government schools:
Overall Measures Student Outcomes School Comparison
1. Student Learning
Lower HigherOutcomes Outcomes
2. Student Engagement and Wellbeing
Combining teacher assessments from the Victorian Essential Learning Standards (VELS), the results from the National Assessment Program – Literacy and Numeracy (NAPLAN) tests and the Victorian Certificate of Education (VCE).
Government School PerformanceSummary 2010
Nameless Secondary College
Results achieved by students at this school compared to students at other Victorian government schools.
How this school compares to all Victorian government schools
This page provides the overall picture of this school's performance in the past year.The following pages provide more detail on each of these measures.
Whether this school, taking into account its students, is performing higher than, lower than, or broadly similar to other schools, taking into account their students.
Lower Similar Higher
Lower HigherOutcomes Outcomes
3. Student Pathways and Transitions
Lower HigherOutcomes Outcomes
School Profile● ● ● Overall socio-economic profile
●
● ●
For more information regarding this school, please visit www.vrqa.vic.gov.au/sreg
Based on the school's Student Family Occupation index which takes into account parents' occupations.
high
Combining student attendance rates and results from the annual student Attitudesto School survey.
Combining the number of students remaining at school through to Year 10 and students going on to further study or full-time employment from Years 10 to 12.
1 5
All Victorian government school teachers meet the registration requirements of the Victorian Institute of Teaching (www.vit.vic.edu.au).
low low-mid mid
1
340 students (153 female, 187 male) were enrolled at this school in 2010.
Average level of parent satisfactionwith the school, as derived fromthe annual Parent Opinion survey.The score is reported on a scaleof 1 to 7, where 7 is the highestpossible score.
Average level of staff satisfaction with the school, as derived from the annual Staff Opinion survey. The score is reported on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 is the highest possible score.
7 mid mid-high highlow low-mid
Proportion of students with English as a second language
mid-high
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
9999 Version 1, February 2011
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
88
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Nameless Secondary College Key:
Range of results for the middle 60% of Victorian government schools:
Result for this school: Median of all Victorian government schools:
Student Learning Student Outcomes School ComparisonResults: English and Mathematics 2009
● English and Mathematics
Results: All other subjects 2009
5. NAPLAN Year 7 Results: Reading 2010
Band 4 5 6 7 8 9
Results: Reading 2008 - 2010(3-year average)
Band 4 5 6 7 8 9
●0
0
Results: All other subjects2007 - 2009 (3-year average)
100
Average score achieved on the NAPLAN Reading and Numeracy tests conducted in May each year.
The grades are the same as those used in your child's end of year report.
How this school compares to all Victorian government schools
Bands represent different levels of achievement. For Year 7, the National
Year 7 assessments are reported on a scale from Bands 4-9.
Being the first year of secondary
A ‘C’ rating means that a student is at the standard expected at the time of reporting.
4. Teacher assessments from the Victorian Essential Learning Standards (VELS)
Results: English and Mathematics2007 - 2009 (3-year average)
100
0
0
100
Percentage of students in Years 7 to 10 with a grade of C or above in:
100
All other subjects
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Band 4 5 6 7 8 9
Results: Numeracy 2010
Band 4 5 6 7 8 9
Results: Numeracy 2008-2010(3-year average)
Band 4 5 6 7 8 9
6. NAPLAN Year 9 Results: Reading 2010
Band 5 6 7 8 9 10
Results: Reading 2008 - 2010(3-year average)
Band 5 6 7 8 9 10
Results: Numeracy 2010
Band 5 6 7 8 9 10
Results: Numeracy 2008-2010(3-year average)
Band 5 6 7 8 9 10
Version 1, February 2011
Average score achieved on the NAPLAN Reading and Numeracy tests conducted in May each year.
Bands represent different levels of achievement. For Year 9, the National Minimum Standard is at Band 6.
Year 9 assessments are reported on a scale from Bands 5-10.
,Minimum Standard is at Band 5.
Being the first year of secondary school, Year 7 NAPLAN is not used for the School Comparison.
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
89
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Nameless Secondary College Key:
Range of results for the middle 60% of Victorian government schools:
Result for this school: Median of all Victorian government schools:
Student Learning Student Outcomes School Comparison7. Victorian Certificate of Education (VCE) Results: 2010
0 50
Results: 2007 - 2010 (4-year average)
Percent of students in 2010 who satisfactorily completed their VCE: 97%Percent of Year 12 students in 2010 undertaking at least one Vocational Education and Training (VET) unit of competence: 82%Percent of VET units of competence satisfactorily completed in 2010: 85%Percent of Victorian Certificate of Applied Learning (VCAL) credits satisfactorily completed in 2010: 90%
Student Engagement Student Outcomes School Comparison and Wellbeing
8. Student attendance Results: 2009
0 100
Results: 2006 - 2009 (4-year average)
0 100
This includes all Unit 3 and 4 studies (including those completed in Year 11) and any VCE VET studies awarded a study score. The maximum student study score is 50 and the state-wide mean (including government and non-government schools) is set at 30.
0 50
How this school compares to all Victorian government schools
Mean study score from all VCE subjects undertaken by students at this school.
Average attendance rate of all students in the school. Common reasons for non-attendance include illness and extended family holidays.
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Average 2009 attendance rate by year level:
9. Student attitudes to school Results: 2010
1 5
Results: 2007 - 2010 (4-year average)
1 5
Student Pathways Student Outcomes School Comparison and Transitions
10. Student retention Results: 2009
0
Results: 2006 - 2009 (4-year average)
0 100
Results: 2009
0 100
Results: 2006 - 2009 (4-year average)
0 100
100
93%81% 82% 80% 87% 94%Yr12Yr8 Yr9 Yr10 Yr11
Percentage of students from Years 10 to 12 going on to further studies or full-time employment.
11. Students exiting to further studies and full-time employment
Percentage of Year 7 students who remain at the school through to Year 10.
Derived from the Attitudes to School survey completed annually by Victorian government school students in Years 5 to 12. It includes questions about students’ engagement in and enjoyment of school. The school’s average score is reported here on a scale of 1 to 5, where 5 is the highest possible score.
Yr7
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Version 1, February 2011
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
Lower Similar Higher
90
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
The Governhow it compAll schools to improve oBy sharing ttogether to
What are stStudent outstudents in other subjecliteracy andcolleges, th(VCE) examinformationengagemenFor secondaPerformancabout how mfurther studYou can seeas the averaavailable). The Governalso allows students at students in
The first pyour schoits results
nment Schoopares to all oacknowledgeoutcomes fothis informatachieve exce
tudent outctcomes showthis school incts. They als numeracy tee Victorian C
minations. Thabout stude
nt at school. ary colleges,
ce Summary many studenies or full-time these resuage of the la
nment Schooyou to compthis school wall other Vict
page outlineool is doing to.
ol Performancother Victoriae the partnerr children anion with the cellence in ev
comes? w the achieven English, Mso show resuests and, forCertificate of hey provide imnt attendanc
, the Governalso provide
nts at this schme work after
lts for the latst four years
ol Performancpare student with the outcotorian govern
es what o improve
ce Summaryn governmenrship and sup
nd young peocommunity,
very school.
ements of athematics a
ults in nationar secondary Educationmportant
ce and
ment Schooes informationhool go on tor leaving schtest year, as s (where
ce Summaryoutcomes foomes of nment schoo
The seconyour schoo
Performy provides annt schools. pport of their
ople. our goal is to
andal
lnoool. well
yor
ols.
nd page sumol’s performa
Govmancen overview of
r parents and
o identify whe
mmarises ance.
How tvernmee Summ
f how this sc
d the commu
ere we need
The third aprovide a deof each of th
to readent Schmary 2chool is perfo
unity in worki
d to improve a
and fourth paetailed breakhe result are
d the hool010
orming, and
ng together
and to work
ageskdown eas.
91
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
What is a School Comparison?The School comparison is a way of comparing school performance that takes into account the different student intake characteristics of each school. A School comparison takes into account the school’s academic intake, the socio-economic background of students, the number of Indigenous students, the number of non-English speaking and refugee students, the number of students with a disability, and the size and location of the school. The School comparison measures show that most schools are doing well and are achieving results that are ‘similar’ to what we would estimate given the background characteristics of their students. Some schools are doing exceptionally well with the students they have, and have ‘higher’ performance.
Some schools have ‘lower’ performance after taking into account their students’ characteristics – these schools will receive targeted support to ensure that there is improvement.
Looking at both the student outcomes and school comparisons provides important information about what a school is doing well and the areas that require further improvement. More information on school comparison performance measures can be found at: www.education.vic.gov.au/aboutschool/
What is the meaning of ‘Data not available’?For some schools, there are too few students to provide data. For other schools, there are no students at some levels, so school comparisons are not possible. Newly opened schools have only the latest year of data and no averages from previous years. The Department also recognises the unique circumstances of Specialist, Select Entry, English Language and Community Schools where school comparisons are not appropriate.
What is this school doing to improve? All schools have a plan to improve outcomes for their students. The ‘What our school is doing’statement provides a summary of this school’s improvement plan.
92
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
Handout B1School strategic planning: quiz
No. Question Answer
1. Which of the following are councillors responsible for in the school self-evaluation process?
i. planning the self-evaluation
ii. keeping everyone informed about the contents of the report
iii. endorsement of the final report
iv. forwarding the report to the Department
v. participating in consultations with the community
vi. reviewing the plan and timeline for the self-evaluation.
Clue: only 3 are correct
2. School performance is measured against the student outcome areas, one of which is student learning. What is one of the other two areas?
3. What is the most effective way that councillors can become aware of the values and aspirations of their community?
4. How many different types of review are there?
Who determines the type of review that will be implemented in each school?
5. How does an external reviewer add value to the school strategic plan?
6. What can you do if you want to comment on the review process?
7. You may think a particular building or resource needs to be improved. On what grounds would you have the best chance of gaining funding for such an initiative?
8. How might information from the attitudes to school survey impact on setting goals and targets?
9. When does the school annual report need to be completed and forwarded to the regional network leader?
10. What do you see as the most important part of your role as a school councillor?
93
IMPROVING SCHOOL GOVERNANCE // STRATEGIC PLANNING
top related