10x6 fonds portenseigne
Post on 15-Aug-2015
713 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
local
platformdistribution
efficiency cross-borderfundscosts TER profitability
assets
mutualisation
proprietary
investment
services
administration
domiciles
competitiveness
synergiescentralization
management
405funds
500bn
AUM
5domiciles
• Luxembourg• Ireland• UK• France• Germany
3 asset classes
• Bonds
• Balanced
• Equities
Our analysis relies on a representative sample of funds and we keep adding participants
Average ongoing charges (%)
At first look, cross-border platforms are more expensive than domestic domiciles
Source: Funds KIID
Breakdown of ongoing charges – Luxembourg domiciled UCITS
Source: Annual Statements; Deloitte expenses Database; Deloitte Analysis
This represents between a significant portion of the market servicing fees
Source: Annual Statements; Deloitte expenses Database; Deloitte Analysis
10-15% = 500 million
• 2bps means that Lux would still be more expensive
12
Let’s have a closer look …
Equities
• So what are the issues ?
o Trailer fees: the RDR example
o Inefficiencies: the US example
o Scale: US funds are 3/4 times bigger than in Luxembourg
13
The profitable inefficiency issue
The US model
The X Border model
Retail
Retail
Retail
IFA
IFA
IFA
Brokers
Brokers
Brokers
NSCC
Funds
Funds
Funds
Retail
Retail
Retail
IFA
IFA
IFA
Banks
Insurers
Intermediaries
Platform
Platform
Platform
Funds
Funds
Funds
top related