1 running head: students’ perceptions of the efffectivness · students’ perceptions of the...
Post on 15-Mar-2020
1 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
1
Running head: STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS
(Rough Draft)
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS AND EASE OF USE OF
THE BLACKBOARD LEARNING MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
Dr. Ali M. Alghazo
Assistant Professor
College of Arts and Sciences
Prince Mohammad Bin Fahd University
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
aalghazo@gmail.com ABSTRACT
The following study investigated the ease of use of the learning management system
called Blackboard. The study utilized a quantitative approach to examine the effectiveness and
ease of Blackboard at a postsecondary educational institution within the Kingdom of Saudi
Arabia. The methodology utilized was a survey instrument administered across three colleges:
college of engineering, college of computer engineering and information technology, and college
of business. The data collected were analyzed using descriptive statistics and chi square. The
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 2
results showed that the majority of students viewed Blackboard as an effective learning tool. The
results also showed that though students find the information on Blackboard generally useful, a
high percentage (40%) of the participants did not find the information on Blackboard to be
useful. The majority of the students responded that the links on Blackboard are clear. The chi
square tests showed that there is no significant relationship between gender or college and the
types of responses. The results of the current research add to the field of that learning
management systems are viewed by students as useful educational tools. However, further
research on how to make content more interesting and useful is needed to maximize the best use
of any learning management system.
Keywords: Learning Management System, Blackboard, Student Perception, Post-secondary
Education, Online Education, Distance Education
Students’ perceptions of the effectiveness and ease of use of the Blackboard learning
management system
INTRODUCTION
The use of Learning Management Systems (LMS) in post-secondary education in current
times has become as familiar and required as a university library or a student center. In 2006, the
merger of the two leading LMSs in the industry, Blackboard and WebCT, has resulted in over
3100 clients worldwide. In 2011, there was nearly 13 million downloads for Blackboard mobile.
(Blackboard, n.d.). According to Jones, Morales, and Knezek (2005), about 90% of American
4year post-secondary institutions use learning management systems.
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 3
Learning management systems have been defined by Oakes (2002) as being student and
organization focused, concerned mainly with managing students, teaching and learning, and
outlining the effectiveness standards of an institution. Furthermore, Henderson and Stewart
(2007) define e-learning systems as web-based management tools and communication tools to
enhance teaching and learning in a web based environment. The use of learning management
systems in educational process assists enhancing student motivation, assessment, and
communication (Riad & El-Ghareeb, 2008). A study by Hussien (2011) has shown that the use
of learning management systems improves the overall teaching learning process, as well as
improving students’ attitudes and motivation.
According to Rovai & Barnum (2003), the importance of Blackboard lies in its contents
and its way of communication between students and their instructors. By using Blackboard,
students do not need to email their professors personally, but do so through accessing the university
learning management system. Also, students can access course documents and other information
through Blackboard allowing them to collect most of what they may have missed during lectures.
For many reasons, students trust Blackboard as a necessary tool to continue with their academic
process. Deepwell and Malik (2008) commented on this point stating that in many countries,
students consider university or school learning management systems (e.g. Blackboard) as much of
an important tool as textbooks and pens or pencils, which are essential to students.
LITERATURE REVIEW
Teachers and LMS
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 4
The use of learning management systems in education has proven to be effective with
constructive based education. However as with all technologies, they present physical limitations,
such as system down time, upgrades and technical difficulties. However, an identified limitation
in using a learning management system is learning how to use the system (Bradford, Porciello,
Balkon, & Backus, 2006-2007). Teachers need to understand the pedagogical foundation of the
use of learning management systems and how effective utilization and implementation of the
systems will improve students learning and comprehension (Christie & Garrote Jurado, 2009).
Instructors face many challenges with the new methods of teaching. One of these challenges is the
need to continuously update their knowledge and skills of the new technologies and to realize how
both time and money consuming it is to do so. Instructors acknowledge that E-learning differs
fundamentally from the traditional way of teaching, and it requires major commitment of time and
training (Gonzales, 2012). A study by Hussien (2011) found that faculty members teaching at King
Saud University in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia have positive attitudes toward using learning
management systems. He also identified training as a requirement for successful use of learning
management systems in universities in Saudi Arabia.
A study by Witt (2003) addressing teachers’ attitudes toward the effectiveness of course
management software revealed that faculty members believe that it enhances communication skills
and is important for course design. Crooks, Yang, and Duemer’s (2003) study found that faculty
members with more teaching experience and teaching at research based institutions showed
positive comments on the online resources. Bennett and Bennett (2003) found that providing
training to faculty improves their attitude toward using learning management systems.
We can find many challenges in the continuous growth of technological education.
Nevertheless, those barriers could be dealt with through proper training and planning. However,
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 5
technology is not the ultimate solution for all teaching and learning issues. Technology must be
utilized effectively, and this can be achieved through teaching instructors how to use the
technology effectively to produce the maximum results (Meloni, 2011).
Technical Obstacles
An additional challenge is giving students sufficient access to the technology. If students’
access to blackboard is continuously interrupted by technical difficulties, down time, and upgrade
issues, students’ access to Blackboard will be limited. While a study by Christie and Garrote Jurado
(2009) showed that American students access the technology provided by the academic institution
for 40 minutes a week, which was found to be suitable enough time for students to receive the
minimal benefits of integrating technology into learning. Doggett (2007) mentions that using
technology in learning or teaching saves time for students, and it improves their performance.
Universities need to set up a strategic plan to accommodate the technical obstacles that face the
effective implementation of learning management systems for incidents where the learning
management system is down for upgrades and/or technical problems. (Nichols, 2008) recommends
including students in developing such a plan and providing
possible solutions.
Using technology in post-secondary education makes the process of learning and teaching
easier. It also helps improve student and instructor performance. It is very important to get timely
and practical solutions to technical problems associated with learning management systems, a
backup system needs to be in plan should Blackboard fail. A separate website serves this purpose
(Doggett, 2000). Generally, using Blackboard in postsecondary educational institutions is very
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 6
important, but technical problems in the network will adversely affect students’ progress (Masi &
Winer, 2005).
LMS effect on student learning
Smith (2002) stated that it is difficult in this field to ignore hacking problems.
Universities invest much in protecting their websites, e-mail and learning management systems.
However, hackers interrupt student and faculty access to these services during their attempts.
Universities should be ready to solve such problems by assigning extra supervision when students
access their assignments or download any materials (Doggett, 2007).
Previous research studied the effect of using learning management systems on student
performance. The research designs utilized consisted of surveys, interviews, and comparison of
students end grades. The majority of research found that there is no significant difference between
students’ performance whether the instruction was face-to-face, online, or hybrid (Jones & Jones,
2005). However, studies pertaining to students’ attitudes towards the use of a learning management
system indicated that students overall find that the use of learning management systems such as
Blackboard to be effective and useful (Murphy & Lindner, 2001). A study by Figueroa and Huie
(2001) indicates that students like using Blackboard and its features, such as the grades and course
information.
According to Landry, Griffeth, and Hartman (2006), the perceived usage and the ease of
use need to be determined in order to assess students’ satisfaction with the use of software
application. A study by Altun, Gulbahar, and Madran (2008), which investigated students’
attitudes toward interacting with a learning management system, found that students showed
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 7
positive attitudes toward using learning management systems and are looking forward to using it
in their courses. Successful implantation of learning management systems depends on providing
training and support for faculty, on the level of engagement of students, and on the level of
satisfaction of both students and faculty (Hall, 2006). This and reported comments by clients
(students) that Blackboard has its negative effects on their learning, the following study
addresses the perceptions of students, concerning the effectiveness and ease of use of a learning
management system (Blackboard) for their learning.
MEOTHODOLGY
The following study utilized a quantitative research approach, where a survey instrument
was administered to students at a post-secondary education institution within the Kingdom of
Saudi Arabia. The survey instrument consisted of two sections: (i) a demographic section
addressing gender and college, and (ii) the perception section addressing the overall effectiveness
of Blackboard, usefulness of information found on Blackboard, and ease of use of Blackboard.
The sample used was a covenant sample. The sample consisted of 200 students, however only
110 students responded to the survey. The data collected were analyzed using simple descriptive
statistics and Pearson’s chi square test to identify the relationships between the variables. No
further statistical analysis was needed due to having chi square showing no significance at p<.05
RESULTS
Demographic Analysis
Demographic results of the survey showed that 28% of respondents were male students
and 72% were female students. This might be explained by that female students are more apt to
participate in filling out surveys. An attempt to even out the sample was done, however did not
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 8
result in any change of the current percentages. When analyzing the colleges of the respondents,
it was found that 30 % of the respondents were from the College of Computer Engineering and
Information Technology. The College of Business students made 22% of the total, and 48% from
the College of Engineering.
Table 1. Participants’ Gender
Gender Number Percentage
Male 31 28%
Female 79 72%
Total 110 100%
Table 2. Students’ Collage
Collage Amount Percentage
Computer science and Engineering 33 30%
Business 24 22%
Engineering 53 48%
Total 110 100%
Independent Variable Analysis
Students were asked whether Blackboard was an overall effective learning tool, using a 5-point
likert scale of Strongly Agree, Agree, Neutral, Disagree and Strongly Disagree. 16% of the
students strongly agree, 32% Agree and 36% Neutral, 12% disagreed, and 4% strongly disagree.
Table 3. Blackboard as an effective learning tool
Strongly Agree 18 16%
Agree 35 32%
Amount Percentage
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 9
Neutral 40 36%
Disagree 13 12%
Strongly Disagree 4 4%
Total 110 100%
Overall, about 48% of the respondents agreed that Blackboard is an effective learning tool,
supporting the findings of previous research. However from reviewing the literature we find that
Blackboard is the leading company in learning management systems and that most universities
worldwide are utilizing the system. Given the popularity of the software, it would be wise to
address the remaining 36% who don’t have an opinion on the question and the 16% that actually
disagree that Blackboard being an effective learning tool.
Students were also asked whether they found the information for their courses on
Blackboard to be useful, students answered through a 5-point likert scale of Strongly Agree,
Agree, Neutral, Disagree and Strongly Disagree. 12 % of the students strongly agreed that the
information on Blackboard is useful, where 48% agree and 32% had no opinion –neutral-, and
8% disagreed.
Table 4. Course information on blackboard is useful
Strongly agree 13 12%
Agree 53 48%
Neutral 35 32%
Disagree 9 8%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 110 100%
60% of the students agreed that the course information provided to them on Blackboard was
useful. However once again a noticeably high percentage 32% had no opinion and 8% disagreed.
Amount Percentage
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 10
The results of this question raise concerns which demand clear justification especially with the
prices educational institutions worldwide are paying for different learning management systems.
Finally students were asked about the ease of use of Blackboard. 14 % of the students
strongly agreed that the links in Blackboard are clear, while 40% agreed and 46% had no opinion
on the question.
Table 5. The ease of use of blackboard
Strongly agree 15 14%
Agree 44 40%
Neutral 51 46%
Disagree 0 0%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Total 110 100%
The results of the following study provide evidence that layout of Blackboard as learning
management system is simple and clear to its users. However the noticeable high percentage of
46% of respondents who do not have an opinion on the question may raise concerns as to
whether the design of the blackboard course is engaging to students, and/or it is designed to
motivate students to utilize their Blackboard account more effectively.
In order to further understand the results of the following study a chi square test was done
to test for the relationship between gender and blackboard effectiveness, usefulness of
information, and clearness of the links. The tables below show the results of the chi square test.
The results show that there was no significance found between the variables. Also a chi square
test was done to test the relationship between college and blackboard effectiveness, usefulness of
Amount Percentage
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 11
information, and clearness of the links, and no significance was noted. There was no further
statistical analysis due to having the chi square showing no significance at p<.05
Table 5. Perceived overall effectiveness of Blackboard
Male Female 𝑥 2 Sig.
Strongly Agree 6 16 0.745 n . s .
Agree 15 18
Neutral 10 22
Disagree 0 17
Strongly
Disagree 0 6
Notes * Significant at 95% confidence level, degrees of freedom = 4 . n.s. – Not significant.
Table 6. Perceived usefulness of information on Blackboard
Male Female 𝑥 2 Sig.
Strongly Agree 4 15 0.628 n . s .
Agree 14 33
Neutral 9 23
Disagree 4 8
Strongly
Disagree 0 0
notes * Significant at 95% confidence level, degrees of freedom = 4. n . s . – not significant.
Table 7. Perceived clearness of the links on Blackboard
Male Female 𝑥 2 Sig.
Strongly Agree 6 16 0.534 n . s .
Agree 16 29
Neutral 9 34
Disagree 0 0
Strongly
Disagree 0 0
Notes * Significant at 95% confidence level, degrees of freedom = 4. n. s . – Not significant.
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 12
Conclusion
The results of the current study show that students perceive the Blackboard learning
management system to be essential in their learning process and find it effective, useful, and
clear to use, which is what was expected and in alignment with previous research findings. Jones
& Jones (2005) found that students found course information to be useful in enhancing
communication and a useful tool for education. However, what the results of the following
research provide is an eye opening issue for educational institutions worldwide. Though a
considerable percentage of the respondents enjoy using Blackboard and believe that it is an
effective teaching and learning tool, there is a high percentage of students who do not have a
preference on the issue of using a learning management system within post-secondary
educational systems, and a percentage of students who disagree with that learning management
systems are effective, useful or easy to use. However according to a study at CSU Channel
Island identified that the cost of implementing blackboard is eighty one thousand four hundred
and seventy two dollar’s, with such an investment in an LMS the results of the following study
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 13
calls for further research by educational institutions to identify key concepts and applications in
order to have better use of the technology provided where almost all students see the importance
of the learning management systems utilized and to identify the key factors of a successful
implementation of learning management systems in post-secondary educational systems.
Universities worldwide are making sure to provide teachers with the required training needed for
effective implementation of a learning management system and are investing heavily in the
required infrastructure for a stable and reliable implementation (Johnson et al., 2004; Yohon,
Zimmerman & Keeler, 2004). This is also apparent in the institution where the study took place,
which raises a concern of how effective is the training and support being provided to faculty and
whether change of training methods used or even termination is required to provide the quality
service and potential a learning management system is to provide to students.
References
Altun, A., Gulbahar, Y., & Madran, O. (2008). Use of a content management system for blended learning:
Perceptions of pre-service teachers, Turkish online journal of distance education, 9(4), p138-153
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 14
Bennett, J., & Bennett, L. (2003). A review of factors that influence the diffusion of innovation when
structuring a faculty training program. Internet and Higher Education, 6(1), p53–63.
Blackboard (nd). About BB: Transforming a company into an industry. Retrieved from
http://www.blackboard.com/About-Bb/Our-Story.aspx
Bradford, P., Porciello, M., Balkon, N., & Backus, D. (2006-2007). The Blackboard learning system: The
be all and end all in educational instruction? Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 35(3),
p301-314.
Brett J. L. Landry,†Rodger Griffeth, and Sandra Hartman (2000). Measuring Student Perceptions of
Blackboard Using the Technology Acceptance Model. University of New Orleans, Lakeshore
Drive, New Orleans, LA 70148,
Christie, M., & Garrote Jurado, R. (2009). Barriers to innovation in online pedagogy. European Journal
of Engineering Education, 34(3), p273-279.
Crooks, S. M., Yang, Y., & Duemer, L. S. (2003). Faculty perceptions of Web-based resources in higher
education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 31(2), p103-13.
CSU Channel Islands. (2011). Dare to Compare: Blackboard 9 to Moodle, Learning Management Systems
Evaluation Report. Retrieved May 25, 2013, From http://www.csuci.edu/ats/documents/ci-lms-
eval-report.doc
Deepwell, F., & Malik, S. (2008). On campus, but out of class: an investigation into students’ experiences
of learning technologies in their self-directed study. ALT-J, 16, 1, 5–14. Doggett, A. Mark. (2007). The Videoconferencing Classroom: What Do Students Think? Journal of
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 15
Industrial Teacher Education, 44(4) p29-41
Figueroa, S., & Huie, C. (2001). The use of Blackboard in computer information systems courses. Paper
presented at the Teaching in the Community College Online Conference, April 17-19, 2001,
ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 469883.
Gonzalez, Carlos (2012). Instructional Science: An International Journal of the Learning Sciences, 40(6),
p975-998
Hall P. (2006). PH Grade Assist. Retrieved May 13, 2008, from http://www.prenhall.com/phga
Henderson R. G. and Stewart D. L. (2007). The influence of computer and internet access on e-learning
technology. Business education digest, 16(3)
Hussein, H. B. (2011). Attitudes of Saudi universities faculty members towards using learning
management system (JUSUR). The Turkish online journal of educational technology. 10(2).
Johnson, T. R., Zhang, J., Tang, Z., Johnson, C. & Turley, J. P. (2004). Assessing informatics students’
satisfaction with a web-based courseware system. Retrieved January 4, 2005, from
http://www.lib.umi.com/dissertations/
Jones, James g.; Morales, Cesareo; Knezek, Gerald A., (2005). 3-Dimensional online learning
environments: Examining attitudes toward information educational Media international, 42(3),
p219–236
Jones, G. H., & Jones, B. H. (2005). A Comparison of Teacher and Student Attitudes Concerning Use and
Effectiveness of Web-based Course Management Software. Educational Technology & Society, 8
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 16
(2), p125-135. Landry, B. J. L., Griffeth, R., & Hartman, S. (2006). Measuring student perceptions of blackboard using
the technology acceptance model. Decision Sciences, 4(1), p87–99.
Martorella, Peter. (1996). Interactive technologies and the social studies. New york: State university of
new york press.
Masi, A., & Winer, L. (2005). A university-wide vision of teaching and learning with information
technologies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 42(2), 147-155.
Meloni, Julie (2011). Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, v76 n8 p23-27
5 pp.
Murphy, T. H., & Lindner, J. R. (2001) Building and supporting online learning environments through
Web course tools: It is whippy, but does it work? Paper presented at the 97th Annual Meeting of
the Southern Association of Agricultural Scientists: Agricultural Communication Section,
January 27-31, Fort Worth, TX, USA.
Nichols, M. (2008). Institutional perspectives: the challenges of e-learning diffusion. British Journal of
Educational Technology, 39, 4, 598–609.
Oakes, K. (2002). E-learning: LCMS, LMS— They’re not Just Acronyms But Powerful Systems for
Learning. Training & Development, 56(3), 73-75.
Riad, a. & El-ghareeb h., (2008) A service oriented architecture to integrate mobile assessment in learning
management systems, Turkish online journal of distance education, 9(12)
Rovai, A. P., & Barnum, K. T. (2003). On-line course effectiveness: an analysis of student interactions
and perceptions of learning. Journal of Distance Education, 18(1), 57-73.
STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE EFFFECTIVNESS 17
Smith, Peter, Ed. (2002) Proceedings of the 2002 ASCUE Summer Conference (35th, North Myrtle
Beach, South Carolina, June 9-13, 2002). Santos, O., & Boticario, J. (2009). Guiding learners in learning management systems through
recommendations. In: 4th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (Nice,
France), LNCS 5794, Berlin: Springer, pp. 596-601.
Witt, P. L. (2003). Enhancing classroom courses with internet technology: Are course web sites worth the
trouble? Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27 (5), 429-438
Yohon, T., D. Zimmerman, and L. Keeler. (2004). An exploratory study of adoption of course
management software and accompanying instructional changes by faculty in the liberal arts and
sciences. Electronic Journal of eLearning, 2, 313–20.
top related