1. nacala dam hydrology executive summary

Post on 08-Apr-2018

215 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/7/2019 1. Nacala Dam Hydrology Executive Summary

    1/5

    SUMMARY OF HYDROLOGICAL SPECIALIST STUDY

    The Government of the Republic of Mozambique (GOM) has received a grant from theMillennium Challenge Corporation (MCC), an innovative United States established

    foreign assistance program designed to reduce poverty by promoting sustainable

    economic growth. The MCC operates on the principle that aid is most effective in

    countries that promote good governance, economic freedom and investments in people.

    The GOM, through MCA (Millennium Challenge Account-Mozambique, a public

    institution created by the GOM) and its National Directorate of Water (DNA-GOH) organ,

    intends to use a portion of the proceeds of this grant, to carry out feasibility studies

    relating to the rehabilitation and augmentation of the Nacala Dam and Reservoir.

    The Nacala Dam is located on the Muecula River approximately 30 kilometres south

    west of Nacala. The dam is the primary water source for the town of Nacala which is

    situated approximately 200 kilometres north east of Nampula City. This underlies the

    importance of the dam for the future development of Nacala Town and its port.

    The Nacala Dam was designed and constructed from 1968 to 1975. In 1982 the dam

    wall was overtopped for 10 consecutive hours due to the non operation of the spillway

    gates. This resulted in high seepage through the defective concrete on the right hand

    side of the spillway which flooded the fill downstream of the core and may have been the

    trigger for the concentrated erosion of the embankment in this area. In 1983 the wash

    away area was reinstated and a layer of stone pitching was placed on the downstream

    face of the wall as a protective measure against the possibility of future overtopping.

    Further repairs were undertaken in 1995 and 2002 resulting in a pre-feasibility study into

    the possibility of rehabilitating and raising the dam wall which was undertaken by

    Michael Baker Jr. Inc. (Baker) in 2006.

    In June 2009 Jeffares and Green (Pty) Ltd (J&G) were appointed to undertake the

    Nacala Dam Feasibility Study, Environmental and Social Impact Assessment, Design

    and Supervision Project. The Feasibility Study consists of many aspects and inaddressing these aspects J&G has developed a suite of reports comprising six volumes,

    with a volume for each of the key parts of the study. This document represents the

    Hydrological Report (Report No. FS/2010/HI02) which is Volume 2 of the suite of

    reports.

    The requirements of the hydrological investigation were as follows:

    Review the quality of the existing yield and flood hydrology undertaken by

    Michael Baker Jnr in 2006 (Baker 2006) during the pre-feasibility stage of this

  • 8/7/2019 1. Nacala Dam Hydrology Executive Summary

    2/5

    project. Take adequate measures to resolve the possible implications for the use

    of the data in subsequent hydrological analyses for the design and operational

    phases of the project. Undertake a yield analysis of the reservoir system currently in place as well

    investigating the impacts on the yield of raising the Full Supply Level (FSL) by a

    minimum of two metres. A minimum of a 30 year climate record was required to

    be used.

    Assess the Environmental Flow Requirements of the Muecula River and include

    this in the yield analysis to assess its impact on the yield of the dam. Using this

    information along with sedimentation information develop operating rules for the

    dam.

    Undertake the design flood hydrology to be used in spillway design. Ensure the

    peak flow figures make allowance for the tropical cyclones and large storms that

    frequent the northern Mozambique coast line. The return periods for the design

    floods should be in accordance with local standards but if there is a significant

    discrepancy between this standard and international best practice it is required to

    carry out an assessment of both.

    Undertake an assessment of the historical sedimentation rates from construction

    of the reservoir to present, including the bathymetrical survey undertaken in

    2001. Utilise the sedimentation rates to assess the potential impacts on the

    reservoir volume-area-storage rating curves.

    As a result of the above mentioned requirements the investigation was broken down into

    four main sections:

    Yield hydrology

    Environmental flow requirements

    Sediment yield

    Flood hydrology

    Yield Hydrology

    In essence, the purpose of the yield hydrology analysis was to assess the water

    resource capability (or yield) of Nacala Dam, both currently and after it has been

    raised. In addition to this assess the impacts of making releases to support downstream

    environmental flow requirements and the possible long-term loss of available storage in

    the dam as a result of sedimentation. The analysis included a number of aspects such

    as the following:

    The analysis and processing of hydro-meteorological data (i.e. rainfall,

  • 8/7/2019 1. Nacala Dam Hydrology Executive Summary

    3/5

    evaporation and streamflow) and the application of these in a rainfall-runoff

    modelling process

    The determination of the physical basin characteristics of Nacala Dam, the

    impacts of sedimentation and the magnitude and temporal distribution of

    appropriate environmental flow releases.

    Yield analyses were undertaken for selected scenarios based on the above

    information.

    A thorough data collection process was undertaken resulting in a comprehensive

    patching exercise to develop a catchment representative rainfall record of sufficient

    length and reliability. This was used in the generation of streamflows in conjunction with

    the WRSM2000 model with the results of this used as the input time series to the

    enhanced Water Resources Yield Model (WRYM). A summary of the scenarios used

    during the yield analysis is provided in the table below.

    Summary of Yield Analysis Scenarios

    # Name

    Nacala Dam characteristics EFR(3)

    Sedimentallocation

    to live

    storage

    (4)

    (millionm

    3)

    Raised(m)

    FSL(1)

    (mAMSL)

    Live storage

    Class

    Averagereq.

    (millionm

    3/a)

    (millionm

    3)

    % MAR(2)

    A Present - 76.50 3.99 34 % - - -

    B +2m 2.00 78.50 6.62 57 % - - -

    C +2m&EFR_C 2.00 78.50 6.62 57 % C 2.78 -

    D +2m&EFR_C&Sed 2.00 78.50 4.76 41 % C 2.78 1.86

    E +2.25m 2.25 78.75 7.01 60 % - - -

    Notes: (1) Full supply level, shown in metres above mean sea level.

    (2) Mean annual runoff, which equals 11.7 million m3/a (as discussed in Section 2.6.3).

    (3) Desktop Class C environmental flow requirement (EFR).

    (4) Sediment allocation to live storage over a planning period of 50 years.

    A summary of the results obtained from the yield analysis is provided in the table below.

    Summary of Yield Analysis Results

    # Name HFY(1)

    (million

    Yield (million m3/a)

    at indicated RI(2)

    (and annual assurance of supply)

  • 8/7/2019 1. Nacala Dam Hydrology Executive Summary

    4/5

    m /a) 1:20(95 %)

    1:50(98 %)

    1:100(99 %)

    1:200(99.5 %)

    Differenceat 1:50

    A Present 4.7 5.7 5.1 4.8 4.6 -

    B +2m 6.3 6.5 6.0 5.6 5.3 0.9

    C +2m&EFR_C 4.4 4.8 4.3 4.1 3.8 -1.6

    D +2m&EFR_C&Sed 3.9 4.2 3.7 3.5 3.3 -0.6

    E +2.25m 6.4 6.7 6.1 5.7 5.4 0.1

    Notes: (1) Historical firm yield, based on an analysis over a 50-years period, from 1956 to 2005 (hydrological years).

    (2) Recurrence interval of failure, in years, based on a long-term stochastic yield analysis of 201 50-year

    generated streamflow sequences.

    Environmental Flow Requirements

    Due to the Muecula River having insufficient flow for the initial part of the study, the

    Rapid Level IV Reserve determination has not yet been undertaken. Hence it was

    decided that a desktop reserve determination be completed as an interim measure. A

    conservative approach was adopted (taking into account that there have been no

    environmental releases from the dam since it was commissioned), thus selecting an

    environmental flow release equivalent to a Desktop Model Class C for the catchment.

    The Desktop Model produced the following figure for the EFR:2.497 Mm3/ann = 21.4 % MAR

    Sediment Yield Analysis

    The sedimentation deposition rate was calculated using the results of the bathymetric

    survey carried out in 2001 combined with the results of the bathymetric survey carried

    out as part of the current study. This provided 36 years of actual recorded sediment

    deposition when assessing the change in capacity of the reservoir from the time of

    construction until now. This figure was then converted into an annual average over the36 years and this was extrapolated forward to obtain a 50 year value. The 2009 survey

    showed that 14 % of the sediment fell within the dams dead storage, hence leaving 86%

    within the live storage portion of the dam. The sediment figure used in the yield analysis

    was:

    Nacala Dam V50 = 86 % 2.17 Mm3

    Nacala Dam V50 = 1.86 Mm3

  • 8/7/2019 1. Nacala Dam Hydrology Executive Summary

    5/5

    Design Flood Hydrology

    A review of the design flood hydrology was undertaken in order to determine the peak

    discharge figures to be used in the design of the new spillway and the freeboard of the

    raised embankment.

    Due to a shortage of information empirical methods were largely used as a basis for the

    calculation of the Safety Evaluation Flood (SEF) and the Recommended Design Flood

    (RDF). The local Mozambican Guidelines for dam classification were consulted along

    with the South African National Committee on Large Dams (SANCOLD) Guidelines. The

    Francou Rodier Method was used for the calculation of the SEF with a K factor of 5.2

    being applicable as per the specifications from the SANCOLD Guidelines. Five methods

    were used to calculate the intermediate return periods (specifically the 1:200 year return

    period) for the RDF. Some of these methods were empirically based and some

    deterministic. The RDF figure was then routed through the impoundment using the

    process of Level Pool Routing.

    The outcome of the design flood hydrology was the following:

    RMF+ = SEF = 1 530 m3/s

    RDF = 800 m3

    /sRouted RDF = 734 m3/s

    The results presented in this report were then used in the preliminary design of the

    spillway and the raised embankment (refer to Volume 4,Preliminary Design Report,

    FS/2010/PD04).

top related