1 1 university course versus work experience alain jungman, marie-lise micheli, kristine jurski....

Post on 29-Dec-2015

214 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

11

UNIVERSITY COURSE

VERSUS WORK EXPERIENCE

Alain Jungman,

Marie-Lise Micheli,

Kristine Jurski.

Institut Universitaire de Technologie Paris Jussieu

Université Paris Diderot – Paris 7

FRANCE

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

2

University and enterprise are two different worlds

University Enterprise

General knowledge Competences Universal Approach Professional behaviour Traditionaly and historicaly designed Economic objectives

for job related to research and teaching (profit, efficiency, competition)

(non profit, objectivity...)

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

3

International competition and new technologies require a closer exchange between university knwoledges and technical competences of entreprise

- University must adapt to the demand of the students to acquire a practical training for better employment

- Enterprise must turn toward higher education to innovate in order to face the challenge of high tech and concurrence.

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

4

SUMMARYI - PRACTICAL PLACEMENT IN ENTERPRISEInternship : 2-3 monthes in enterprise, generaly at the end ofthe university year.

II - PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION Involvement of experts from enterprises in the curriculum Introduction of a corporate culture Professional approach to solve problems

III - ALTERNATE PERIODS UNIVERSITY- ENTERPRISE AND APPRENTICESHIPShorter sandwich periods of time spent alternately at universityand in companies all around the year.

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

5

PRACTICAL PLACEMENT

IN ENTERPRISE

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

6

PRACTICAL PLACEMENTS

Objectives :

• To train the student to industrial tasks in a professional environment

• To turn into practice academic knowledges

• To acquire professional skills

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

7

PRACTICAL PLACEMENTS

Added value :

It calls upon the three main qualifications

expected from a professional :

- Knowledge- Competences- Professional behaviour

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

8

PRACTICAL PLACEMENTS

All domains of education Science and technology : industry (e.g. : production, quality

control, research and development, maintenance…)

Management : services (e.g. : banks, insurances, administrations) and commercial activities

Humanities and Social Sciences : administrations, governement and states offices, publishing, human ressources, environment, communication, advertisements…

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

9

PRACTICAL PLACEMENTS

All level of education :

Bachelor : technician, employee

Master : engineer, manager

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

10

PRACTICAL PLACEMENTS

Evaluation of the practical work of the students

Written report Oral presentation Opinion grid Jury : academic and enterprise tutors

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

11

PRACTICAL PLACEMENTS

Evaluation grid

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

12

EVALUATION OF THE PLACEMENT

  Above the expected At the expected Only partialy Do not correspond Note Observations

  level level at the expected level to the expected level    

Note max 3max/4 de max/2 à max/4 0 max  

Appéciation of the supervisor         20  

Efficiency         4  

Ability to learn         2  

Motivation         4  

Initiative-autonomy         4  

Curiosity         2  

Assiduity-Punctuality         2  

Participation         1  

Sociability         1  

Written report            

Presentation of the project (problématic and stratégiy)         2  

Identification et analysis of problèms         2  

Analysis of résults         3  

Clarity of the reports         2  

Presentation of the report (use of software tools))         1  

Oral presentation            

Ability to synthetize the work         3  

Tools (power point…)         1  

Quality of the oral         2  

Quality of the answers to questions         3  

Respect for the duration         1  

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

13

PROFESIONALISATION OF

HIGHER EDUCATION

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

14

PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

- Put the student in a professional situation

- Fix learning objectives in order to solve enterprise problems

- Define competences, i.e. turn academic knowledge into practice

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

15

PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Methods

Study caseProject base learningProblem base learning

Main steps : Analysis of the problem Looking for documentation Formulation of hypothesis Bringing a solution

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

16

PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

1 - MATERIALS MEANS

Work in small groups

Information and Communication Technology (ICT) at students’s disposal

Scientific devices (self service…under control)

Documentary ressources

Adapted rooms and laboratories

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

17

PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

2 – HUMAN RESSOURCES

Technical staff

( Management and control of the instrumentation)

Academic staff to supervise the project

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

18

PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

3 – CORPORATE CULTURE Participation of experts from enterprises in the curriculum

a / Introduction of specific industrial fieldsProject managementEntrepreneurial approachCompetence managementEmployment and corporate lawQuality controlPrevention of risks

1/2

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

19

PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

CORPORATE CULTURE

b / Approach to practical industrial applicationsIllustration of academi topics in the frame of the industrial activities

c / Technical visits of enterprises

d / Evolution of the contain of the program to industrial requirements

2/2

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

20

PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Cross curriculum competences :

Communication

Written and oral presentations

Foreign language (english)

Direction for the use of an instrument

Summary and keywords of a report

Information and Communication Technology (ICT)

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

21

PROFESSIONALISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

EVALUATION

Self evaluation « Peer-to-peer » evaluation Competences (skills, abilities) instead of only

knowledge

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

22

ALTERNATE PERIODS

AND APPRENTICESHIP

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

23

ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP

Exists since more than a century for manual jobs

Spectacular rise in higher education since the

beginning of the 21st century

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

24

ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP

ALTERNATE PERIODS

During the whole university year :

Alternate periods : - learning at university

- working in enterprise Two supervisors : - university

- enterprise

1/2

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

25

ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP

APPRENTICESHIP

Same system + Job contract for the student Salary Management by an office (public or private)

CFA = Centre de Formation en Apprentissage

= Training Center for Apprenticeship

2/2

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

26

ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP

ORGANIZATION AND CONTRAINTS

Team work to conduct the relationship between the different partners Company manager Tutors / supervisors Students Academic staff

Pedogical engineering Time table planning the university and enterprise periods Pedagogical management of the academic program versus the entreprise training

Monitoring the work of the student By the supervisor of the entreprise By the academic tutor Using compulsory procedures

(written evaluations, visit in the enterprise)

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

27

ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP

ADVANTAGES(Compare to Practical placement)

Total Duration (per year) : ≈ 6 months (instead of less than 4 months)

Most significant work experience More relevant for a CV

Progressive learning of The competences The professional behaviours specific to a given job

Adaptation and improvement of the training courses by aContinuous « going back and forth » between academic learning and enterprise apprenticeship

1/2

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

28

ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP

ADVANTAGES

Stronger involvement of the student in the working environment

Stronger partnership between the university and the enterprise

Stepping stone to a first job

2/2

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

29

ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP

QUALITY CONTROL OF ALTERNATE AND APPRENTICESHIP TRAINING COURSES

Two different evaluations

Evaluation of the student

Evaluation of the alternate apprenticeship education system

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

30

ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP

EVALUATION OF THE STUDENTS

Assessment of the student’s work in the company

Report book

Definition of the objectives for the student

Definition of the tools to reach the objectives

1/2

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

31

ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP

EVALUATION OF THE STUDENTS

Evaluation grids written by the enterprise’s supervisor

Autoevaluation by the student through the apprenticeship diary

Reported by the student, based on 4 criteriums :

Efficiency Level of qualification Practical skill Behaviour

2/2

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

32

ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP

EVALUATION GRIDS

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

33

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

34

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

35

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

36

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

37

ALTERNATE PERIODS AND APPRENTICESHIP

QUALITY CONTROL OF THE ALTERNATE/APPRENTICESHIP

EDUCATION SYSTEM

I / By the student 1- The apprenticeship diary Evaluation of the work conditions Evaluation of the tasks to carry-out

2 – Regular interactive report at the university

II / By the academic tutorVisit(s) the company by the academic tutor Presentation of the student’s task(s) Visit of the work environment Talk with the supervisor of the enterprise

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

38

CONCLUSION

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

39

CONCLUSIONQUALITY OF STUDENTS PRACTICAL PLACEMENT

Three approachs :1- Formal approach

Grid 3 indicators : - efficiency

- autonomy

- technical competences

2 – Qualitative and informal approach Visit Reports : oral and written

1/2

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

40

CONCLUSIONQUALITY OF STUDENTS PRACTICAL PLACEMENT

3 – Post-diploma survey

6 months and 3 years after graduation Employment

• Type of jobs• Salary• Status in the company

More studies• Type of studies• Level

2/2

IUT Paris Jussieu – A. Jungman, M.L. Micheli, K. Jurski

EUE-NetBrasov, Roumania7-8 february 2008

41

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

QUESTIONS ?

COMMENTS ?

IDEAS ?

top related