09 i as 39 differences
Post on 05-Apr-2018
218 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
1/29
1-1
Listing of Major Difference
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/caseans/canada.htm
Differences Between
IAS 39 Versus FAS 133
http://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/caseans/canada.htmhttp://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/caseans/canada.htmhttp://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/caseans/canada.htmhttp://www.trinity.edu/rjensen/caseans/canada.htm -
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
2/29
1-2
Reference Source
SOME KEY DIFFERENCES BETWEEN
IFRSs AND US GAAP AS OF AUGUST 2005
http://www.iasplus.com/usa/ifrsus.htm
http://www.iasplus.com/usa/ifrsus.htmhttp://www.iasplus.com/usa/ifrsus.htm -
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
3/29
1-3
IFRS Versus FASB Standards
General approach
s IFRS: More 'principles-based' standards with limited application
guidance.
s US: More 'rule-based' standards with more specific application
guidance.
s Status: Not currently being addressed.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
4/29
1-4
Most Differences are Not in Writing
Since US GAAP is much more detailed, specific, and bright lined,
there are many contractual clauses that are covered in US GAAP
that are not addressed in writing in IFRS.
International auditors sometimes, but not always, look to US GAAP
when IFRS is silent about a particular issue.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
5/29
1-5
IAS 1 Comprehensive Income
IAS 1 Reporting "comprehensive income"
s IFRS: Statement of changes in equity is required. A grand total of"comprehensive income" is permitted but not required. Comprehensive income isnet income plus gains and losses that are recognised directly in equity rather than
in net income.
s US: Must present grand total of "comprehensive income". Can present in incomestatement, statement of comprehensive income, or statement of changes in equity.
s
Status: IASB's Comprehensive Income project is likely result in a multi-columnperformance statement separating current income flows from remeasurements ofpreviously recognised items. The grand total would be similar to FASB's"comprehensive income".
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
6/29
1-6
IAS 1 Extraordinary Items
IAS 1 Extraordinary items
s IFRS: Prohibited.
s US: Extraordinary items are permitted but restricted to items that
are both infrequent in occurrence and unusual in nature.
s Status: IASB abolished the category in its 2003 Improvements
Project.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
7/29
1-7
IAS 2 LIFO
IAS 2 Method for determining inventory cost
s IFRS: LIFO is prohibited.
s US: LIFO is permitted.
s Status: IASB prohibited LIFO in its 2003 Improvements Project.
Not currently being addressed
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
8/29
1-8
IAS 32 Debt vs. Equity
IAS 32 Classification of convertible debt instruments by the issuer
s IFRS: Split the instrument into its liability and equity components at
issuance.
s US: Classify the entire instrument as a liability. However, the
intrinsic value of the conversion feature at the commitment date of
the instrument, if any, is recognised as additional paid-in capital.
s Status: Not currently being addressed.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
9/29
1-9
IAS 39 Basis Adjustment
IAS 39 Use of "basis adjustment"
s IFRS:Fair value hedge: Required.Cash flow hedge of a transaction resulting in a financial asset or liability: Sameas US GAAP.Cash flow hedge of a transaction resulting in a non-financial asset or liability:Choice of US GAAP or basis adjustment.
s US:Fair value hedge: Required.Cash flow hedge of a transaction resulting in an asset or liability: Gain/loss on
hedging instrument that had been reported in equity remains in equity and isreclassified into earnings in the same period the acquired asset or incurredliability affects earnings.
s Status: Not currently being addressed.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
10/29
1-10
Net Investment in Foreign Operations
IAS 39 Hedging gain or loss on net investment in a foreign entity
s IFRS: The portion determined to be an effective hedge is recognised
in equity.
s US: Gains and losses relating to hedge ineffectiveness is recognised
in profit or loss immediately.
s Status: Not currently being addressed.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
11/29
1-11
IAS 39 Macro Hedging
IAS 39 Macro hedging
s IFRS: Fair value hedge accounting treatment for a portfolio hedge
of interest rate risk is allowed if certain specified conditions are met
s US: Hedge accounting treatment is prohibited, though similar
results may be achieved by designating specific assets or liabilities
as hedged items.
s Status: FASB does not have a project to address macro hedging.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
12/29
1-12
IAS 30 Partial-Term Hedges
IAS 39 Use of "partial-term hedges" (hedge of a fair value exposure
for only a part of the term of a hedged item)
s IFRS: Allowed.
s US: Prohibited.
s Status: Not currently being addressed.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
13/29
1-13
FX Risk and HTM Classification
IAS 39 Hedging foreign currency risk in a held-to-maturity
investment
s IFRS: Can qualify for hedge accounting.
s US: Cannot qualify for hedge accounting.
s Status: Not currently being addressed.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
14/29
1-14
FX Risk of Firm Commitment
IAS 39 Hedging foreign currency risk in a firm commitment to acquire
a business in a business combination
s IFRS: Can qualify for hedge accounting.
s US: Cannot qualify for hedge accounting.
s Status: Not currently being addressed.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
15/29
1-15
Shortcut Method
IAS 39 Assuming perfect effectiveness of a hedge if critical terms
match
s IFRS: Prohibited. Must always measure effectiveness.
s US: Allowed for hedge of interest rate risk in a debt instrument if
certain conditions are met "Shortcut Method".
s Status: Not currently being addressed
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
16/29
1-16
IAS 39 Fair Value Option
IAS 39 Option to designate any financial asset or financial liability to
be measured at fair value through profit or loss ('fair value option')
s IFRS: Option is allowed.
s US: No such option.
s Status: This option was added in the December 2003 revisions to
IAS 39. In 2006 the FASB has a new Exposure Draft
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
17/29
1-17
IAS 39 Available for Sale
IAS 39 Option to designate loans and receivables as available for sale
to be measured at fair value through equity ('available-for-sale
option')
s IFRS: Option is allowed.
s US: No such option.
s Status: This option was added in the December 2003 revisions to
IAS 39.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
18/29
1-18
Investments in unlisted equity instruments
IAS 39 Investments in unlisted equity instruments
s IFRS: Measured at fair value if reliably measurable; otherwise at
cost.
s US: Measured at cost.
s Status: Not currently being addressed.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
19/29
1-19
IAS 39 Measurement of derivatives
IAS 39 Measurement of derivatives
s IFRS: All derivatives are measured at fair value except that a
derivative that is linked to and must be settled by delivery of an
unquoted equity instrument whose fair value cannot be reliablymeasured is measured at cost.
s US: All derivatives are measured at fair value (though the definition
of a derivative is not identical to that of IAS 39).
s Status: Not currently being addressed.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
20/29
1-20
IAS 39 Multiple embedded derivatives
in a single hybrid instrument
IAS 39 Multiple embedded derivatives in a single hybrid instrument
s IFRS: Sometimes accounted for separately.
s US: Always treated as a single compound embedded derivative.
s Status: Not currently being addressed.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
21/29
1-21
Trading Classification
IAS 39 Reclassification of financial instruments into or out of the
trading category
s IFRS: Prohibited.
s US: Permitted, but generally transfers into or from the trading
category should be rare.
s Status: Not currently being addressed.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
22/29
1-22
Held-to-Maturity Classification
IAS 39 Effect of selling investments classified as held-to-maturity
s IFRS: Prohibited from using held-to-maturity classification for the
next two years.
s US: Prohibited from using held-to-maturity classification. SEC
indicates that prohibition is generally for two years.
s Status: Not currently being addressed.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
23/29
1-23
Subsequent reversal of an impairment loss
IAS 39 Subsequent reversal of an impairment loss
s IFRS: Required for loans and receivables, held-to-maturity, and
available-for-sale debt instruments if certain criteria are met.
s US: Prohibited for held-to-maturity and available-for-sale
securities. Reversal of valuation allowances on loans is recognised
in the income statement.
s Status: Not currently being addressed.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
24/29
1-24
Derecognition of financial assets
IAS 39 Derecognition of financial assets
s IFRS: Combination of risks and rewards and control approach. Can
derecognise part of an asset. No "isolation in bankruptcy" test.
Partial derecognition allowed only if specific criteria are compliedwith.
s US: Derecognise assets when transferor has surrendered control
over the assets. One of the conditions is legal isolation in
bankruptcy. No partial derecognition.s Status: This is a subject that both Boards are likely to address in the
future.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
25/29
1-25
Use of "Qualifying SPEs" (VIEs)
IAS 39 Use of "Qualifying SPEs"
s IFRS: No such category of SPEs.
s US: Necessary for derecognition of financial assets if transferee is
not free to sell or pledge transferred assets.
s Status: This is a subject that both Boards are likely to address in the
future.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
26/29
1-26
Offsets for Two Different Parties
IAS 39 Offsetting amounts due from and owed to two different parties
s IFRS: Required if legal right of set-off and intent to settle net.
s US: Prohibited.
s Status: Not currently being addressed.
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
27/29
1-27
N
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
28/29
1-28
N
-
7/31/2019 09 i as 39 Differences
29/29
1-29
N
top related