file · web view9/13/2012 ·
Post on 19-May-2019
225 Views
Preview:
TRANSCRIPT
TRANSPORTATION CONCEPT REPORT TEMPLATE
GENERAL INSTRUCTIONS - This is a companion document to the Transportation Concept Repot (TCR) Guidelines. Please reference
the guidelines for more information on completing a TCR.- Delete this cover page, the “Action” boxes, italic text, “Beginning of Template” page, and “End of
Template” page.- The information within the data tables are meant as hypothetical examples to communicate an
appropriate level of complexity. This information must be deleted before utilizing the tables. The first blank row/column has been included for the planner to start filling out the table.
- Keep the “About the TCR/Stakeholder Participation” page to a one page maximum.- The example cells of optional and required as applicable datasets have been shaded for reference.- It is suggested to include a table of contents that has hyperlinks to the corresponding sections of the
document, similar to the table of contents found in the TCR Guidelines. For Instructions on creating the hyperlinks in a word and pdf document click here.
- Hidden TextO The TCR Template Instructions that are included in the guidelines are also included in the
template as hidden text for a quick and easy reference. O It is suggested to turn off the hidden text before beginning to type again.O To see the hidden text just click the paragraph button that is indicated below by the red arrow.
STYLE GUIDANCE The style guidelines listed below are mirrored in the TCR Template. These styles are recommended for readability, accessibility, and statewide consistency. If the District has mandated style guidelines they may follow those in lieu of these guidelines.Text Requirements:
- All font should be in Calibri. Arial and Tahoma are acceptable as well. The font size suggestions below are for Calibri. Use the District’s discretion when choosing the font size for Arial and Tahoma.
- Primary Header: 16 point font, All Caps, Bold, Centered (see “Corridor Overview” in the template)- Secondary Header: 14 point font, Small Caps, Bold, Underlined, Aligned Left (see “Route Description” in
the template)- Tertiary Header: 12 point font, Bold, Aligned Left (see “Route Location” in the template)- Body Text: 11 point font, Justified
Table Requirements:- Districts have the discretion to rearrange and reformat all of the tables to best meet the need of their
document; however, the following standards must be followed.o Header text in table must be black, bold, and at minimum 9 point.o Cell color of header must alternate between two colors.o Gray out cells that are not applicable and cannot be deleted from the data table.o The template tables have all possible datasets; please delete any rows or columns that are not
applicable to the corridor.
BEGINNING OF TEMPLATEDelete this page and the previous page
Transportation Concept ReportState Route XX
District XXDate
[Insert Visual]
Disclaimer: The information and data contained in this document are for planning purposes only and should not be relied upon for final design of any project. Any information in this Transportation Concept Report (TCR) is subject to modification as conditions change and new information is obtained. Although planning information is dynamic and continually changing, the (insert District) System Planning Division makes every effort to ensure the accuracy and timeliness of the information contained in the TCR. The information in the TCR does not constitute a standard, specification, or regulation, nor is it intended to address design policies and procedures.
California Department of TransportationCaltrans Improves Mobility Across California
Approvals:
__________________ _______ ____________________ _______ Name Date Name Date [Insert Title] [Insert Title]
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABOUT THE TRANSPORTATION CONCEPT REPORT..................................................................................................1
STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION.................................................................................................................................1
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY..............................................................................................................................................2
CORRIDOR OVERVIEW..............................................................................................................................................3
Route Segmentation.............................................................................................................................................3
Route Description.................................................................................................................................................3
Community Characteristics...................................................................................................................................4
Land Use...............................................................................................................................................................4
System Characteristics..........................................................................................................................................5
Bicycle Facility......................................................................................................................................................6
Pedestrian Facility................................................................................................................................................7
Transit Facility......................................................................................................................................................8
Freight..................................................................................................................................................................9
Environmental Considerations...........................................................................................................................10
CORRIDOR PERFORMANCE.....................................................................................................................................11
KEY CORRIDOR ISSUES............................................................................................................................................13
CORRIDOR CONCEPT..............................................................................................................................................13
Concept Rationale..............................................................................................................................................13
Planned and Programmed Projects and Strategies............................................................................................14
Projects and Strategies to Achieve Concept.......................................................................................................14
APPENDIX...............................................................................................................................................................15
Appendix A: Glossary of terms and Acronyms....................................................................................................15
Appendix B: Factsheets......................................................................................................................................15
Appendix C: Additional Corridor Data................................................................................................................15
Appendix D: Resources.......................................................................................................................................15
ABOUT THE TRANSPORTATION CONCEPT REPORT
System Planning is the long-range transportation planning process for the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The System Planning process fulfills Caltrans’ statutory responsibility as owner/operator of the State Highway System (SHS) (Gov. Code §65086) by evaluating conditions and proposing enhancements to the SHS. Through System Planning, Caltrans focuses on developing an integrated multimodal transportation system that meets Caltrans’ goals of safety, mobility, delivery, stewardship, and service.
The System Planning process is primarily composed of four parts: the District System Management Plan (DSMP), the Transportation Concept Report (TCR), the Corridor System Management Plan (CSMP), and the DSMP Project List. The district-wide DSMP is strategic policy and planning document that focuses on maintaining, operating, managing, and developing the transportation system. The TCR is a planning document that identifies the existing and future route conditions as well as future needs for each route on the SHS. The CSMP is a complex, multi-jurisdictional planning document that identifies future needs within corridors experiencing or expected to experience high levels of congestion. The CSMP serves as a TCR for segments covered by the CSMP. The DSMP Project List is a list of planned and partially programmed transportation projects used to recommend projects for funding. These System Planning products are also intended as resources for stakeholders, the public, and partner, regional, and local agencies.
STAKEHOLDER PARTICIPATION
Action:This is required. Include a high-level summary of the stakeholder coordination effort.
Page | 1
TCR PurposeCalifornia’s State Highway System needs long range planning documents to guide the logical development of transportation systems as required by CA Gov. Code §65086 and as necessitated by the public, stakeholders, and system users. The
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Action:Include a narrative that very briefly summarizes the setting of the route, any notable characteristics, and notes the base year and horizon year for the document. In addition, include a concept summary, concept rationale, and a description of the proposed strategies
Concept Summary
Segment Segment Description
Existing Facility
20-25 Year Capital Facility
Concept
20-25 Year System Operations and Management
Concept
20-25 Year Facility Concept
Post-25 Year
Concept
1 Solano/Yolo County line to County Road 87 2C 2C Maintain Only 2C, Maintain Only 2C
2 County Road 87E to I-505 2C 3C
Park and Ride Facility, Highway Advisory Radio
3C, Park and Ride Facility, Highway Advisory Radio
4C
Concept Rationale
Proposed Projects and Strategies
Page | 2
CORRIDOR OVERVIEW
ROUTE SEGMENTATION
Action: Segment the route, complete the segmentation data table, and provide a map of the segmentation
Segm
ent #
Location Description County_Route_Beg. PM
County_Route_End PM
1Solano/Yolo County line to County Road
87EYOL_128_0.000 YOL_128_7.550
2 County Road 87E to I-505 YOL_128_7.550 YOL_128_9.835
ROUTE DESCRIPTION
Action: Provide an introduction and summary of the route and its major characteristics. Include the following topics: Route Location, Route Purpose, Major Route Features, and Route Designations.
Route Location:
Route Purpose:
Major Route Features:
Route Designations and Characteristics:
Segment # 1 2
Freeway & Expressway Yes YesNational Highway System
No No
Strategic Highway Network
No No
Scenic Highway No NoInterregional Road System
Yes Yes
High Emphasis No No
Focus Route No NoFederal Functional Classification Minor Arterial Other Principal Arterial/ Minor
Arterial
Page | 3
Goods Movement Route
No No
Truck Designation CA Legal Advisory/ CA Legal/
Terminal Access Terminal Access
Rural/Urban/Urbanized Rural Urban ClusterMetropolitan Planning Organization SACOG SACOG
Regional Transportation Planning Agency
SACOG SACOG
Congestion Management Agency Yolo County Transportation District Yolo County Transportation
DistrictCounty Transportation Commission N/A N/A
Local Agency Yolo County, City of Winters Yolo County, City of Winters
Tribes N/A N/A
Air District Yolo Solano Air Quality Management District
Yolo Solano Air Quality Management District
Terrain Mountainous/Rolling Flat
COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS
Action:Develop a brief community profile, a summary of the social and economic characteristics of the area along the corridor. Determine demographic characteristics, economic base, location of major trip generating community facilities in close proximity to the route (e.g. convention center, amusement park, theater), and other relevant characteristics.
LAND USE
Action:Summarize the existing and expected land use at the route level. The following items must be discussed at the level appropriate for the setting and type of route:
1. Local and regional land use, environmental, and development plans. (Describe the land use types. These could include: residential, commercial/industrial, recreational, institutional/public services, community/emergency services, transportation, utilities, agriculture, undeveloped land, and tribal lands)
2. This item is optional. Place types and strategies as identified by the Smart Mobility Framework3. Existing growth trends and development4. Anticipated major growth affecting the corridor and the source of growth (significant traffic generators)5. Long-term right of way needs6. The economic significance of the route to the state and region7. Commute patterns in relation to land use8. Noise and air quality sensitive land uses located along the corridor
Segment Place Type
1 Urban Core2 Close-in Centers
Page | 4
SYSTEM CHARACTERISTICS
Action:Complete the System Characteristics data table. Include a narrative that explains and summarizes the information included in the template table.
Page | 5
BICYCLE FACILITY
Action:Complete the data table and include a narrative summarizing the facility, opportunities for improvement, and any related issues or projects.
Page | 1
Segment # 1Existing Facility
Facility Type FGeneral Purpose Lanes 6
Lane Miles 15.10
Centerline Miles 2.5
Median Width 10Median Characteristics Paved
HOV Lanes 2
HOV Characteristics
2 or more persons
per vehicle
HOT/Express Lanes 0HOT/ Express Lanes Characteristics N/A
Toll Lanes 0Toll Lane Characteristics N/A
BRT Lanes 0
Auxiliary Lanes 25%
Passing Lanes 0
Truck Climbing Lanes 0
Distressed Pavement 5%
Current ROW 90-110 ft
Concept Facility
Facility Type FGeneral Purpose Lanes 8
Lane Miles 25.330
Centerline Miles 2.500
HOV Lanes 2
HOT Lanes 0
BRT Lanes 0
Toll Lanes 0
Aux Lanes 35%
Passing Lanes 0
Truck Climbing Lanes 0
Post 25 Year facility
Facility Type FGeneral Purpose Lanes 8
Lane Miles 25.33
Centerline Miles 2.5
HOV Lanes 0
HOT Lanes 2
BRT Lanes 0
Toll Lanes 0
Aux Lanes 40%
Passing Lanes 0
Truck Climbing Lanes 0
ROW Needs 130-150 ft
TMS Elements
TMS Elements (BY)
Mainline Detection
, Fwy Ramp Meter
Seg
State Bicycle FacilityParallel Bicycle Facility
Seg
ID
Post
Mile
Loca
tion
Desc
riptio
n
Bicy
cle
Acce
ss
Proh
ibite
d
Faci
lity
Type
Out
side
Pave
d Sh
ould
er W
idth
Faci
lity
Desc
riptio
n
Dist
ress
ed
Shou
lder
Vol.
Role
Post
ed S
peed
Li
mit
Para
llel F
acili
ty
Pres
ent
Seg
ID
Nam
e
Loca
tion
Desc
riptio
n
Faci
lity
Type
1
A 0.000-0.230
Junction with SR-
65 to the
Junction with SR-
175
No Bike Lane
>8 ft.
no obstacle
s5% 50 45
mph.
B 0.230-1.045
Junction with SR-175 to
Milliken Ave.
Yes Yes
1 Main St.
3rd St. - 12th St. II
2 Main St.
12th - 30th I
3 Main St.
30th - 40th II
4 Main St.
40th - 60th III
2
C1.045
- 5.067
Milliken Ave. to
Junction with SR-
99
No Shared
4-8 ft.
Few obstacle
s10% 20 45mp
h
D5.067-10.25
0
Junction with SR-
99 to County
Line
Yes No
PEDESTRIAN FACILITY
Action:Complete the data table and include a narrative summarizing the facility, opportunities for improvement, and any related issues or projects.
Seg
Seg
ID
Post
mile
Loca
tion
Desc
riptio
n
Ped.
Acc
ess
Proh
ibite
d
Side
wal
k Pr
esen
t
Side
wal
k W
idth
Cros
sing
Dist
ance
Faci
lity
Desc
riptio
n
Role
Vol.
Junction
Alt.
Faci
lity
Loca
tion
Role
Type
Larg
e Co
rner
1
E 0.000-0.230
Junction with SR-65 to the Junction with SR-175
No Yes 4-8 ft.
30 ft.
No obstruction, sidewalk
cafes
200
SR-65 major Grade separated, not signalized Yes
Baseline Ave. minor
At-grade, signalize,Nocrosswalks &
sidewalks
SR-175 minor
Grade separated, signalize, Yescrosswalks & sidewalks
F R0.230-1.502
Junction with SR-175
to Milliken
Ave.
No Yes <4 ft.
30 ft.
Few obstacles 150
No Interchang
e
2 G 1.502- Milliken No No 30 Many 100 SR-99 major Ped/Bike No
Page | 2
5.650
Ave. to Junction with SR-99
ft. obstacles. Over/Undercrossing
TRANSIT FACILITY
Action:Complete the data table and include a narrative summarizing the facility, opportunities for improvement, and any related issues or projects.
S e
g
Mod
e &
Co
llate
ral
Faci
lity
Nam
e
Rout
e En
d Po
ints
Ride
rshi
p
Head
way
Ope
ratin
g Pe
riod
ITS
&
Tech
nolo
gy Stations
Amen
ities
Bike
s Allo
wed
on
Tra
nsit
Loca
tion
Desc
riptio
n
# Pa
rkin
g Sp
aces
Citie
s
Post
mile
s
1
Rail
Amtrak: CA
Zephyr
San Francisco to
Chicago## Long Real-
timeDavis,
Sacramento
Amtrak: Capitol
Corridor
San Jose to Auburn ## Long Real-
timeDavis,
Sacramento
Light Rail
Regional Transit:
Gold Line
Sacramento to Folsom ## Shor
t
Transit signal
prioritySacramento
Express Bus/BRT
Yolobus Dixon to Sacramento
## Med Transit signal
priority, Real-time info
Davis 2.365
Bike Locks,
Lighting,
Shelter, BRT
3
Page | 3
Lane
Davis 3.421
Bike locks,
No shelter,
BRT Lane
3
Sacramento 5.375
Bus pad, BRT Lane
3
Traditional Bus Yolobus Dixon to
Sacramento ## Long N/A
Davis(multiple stops),
Sacramento (multiple
stops)
3
CA High Speed Rail
CA High Speed
Rail
San Diego to Sacramento
/ San Francisco
## Med N/A Sacramento
Park & Ride
Unitrans, Amtrak
Real-time Davis
Bike Lockers, 2 Bike Racks
Davis Amtra
k Depot
130
Yolobus Real-time Davis
Bike Lockers, 2 Bike Racks
Mace Blvd. 147
FREIGHT
Action:Describe the freight system as it exists within the corridor.
Provide a map that depicts the freight system within the corridor. Include a narrative that characterizes the freight system. Complete the table provided in the template
Facility Type/Freight
GeneratorLocation Mode Name Major Commodity/
Industry Comments/Issues
Port [Location] Ship, Rail, truck POLA/LB
Electronics, Manufactured
Products, Agriculture
- Environmental constraints- Air Quality
Intermodal Freight Facility [Location] Truck, Rail Hobart Yard
Electronics, Manufactured
Products, Agriculture
Rail yard [Location] Rail Maersk Rail Yard
Electronics, Manufactured
Products, Agriculture
Rail Line [Location] Rail Burlington Northern Santa Fe
Electronics, Manufactured
- Grade-crossing @ R0.987, 1.045, 1.734
Page | 4
Railway (BNSF) (Class I)
Products, Agriculture
Rail Line [Location] Rail Union Pacific (UP) (Class I)
Electronics, Manufactured
Products, Agriculture
Air Cargo Airport [Location] Airplane LAX Agriculture
Highway [Location] Truck I-10 (National Network) Agriculture
-Bottleneck at Central St.-Truck VMT predicted to
double-Potential for dedicated
Truck Lane-Weigh-in-motion located
@ 1.538
Freight Generator [Location] Truck Manufacturing District Food
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS
Action:-Consult with information sources from applicable State and federal resource agencies, local planning or conservation entities, and public stakeholders.-Consider the following resources:
Recreational Land (Section 4(f)) Waters and Wetlands Coastal Zone Wild and Scenic Rivers Farmland/Timberland Species Considerations (Special Status, Air Quality Threatened, Endangered, Critical Habitat)Community Impacts/Environmental Justice Fish PassageVisual Aesthetics Habitat ConnectivityCultural Resources Hazardous Materials Floodplain NoiseClimate Change and Sea Level Rise Naturally Occurring Asbestos
Geology/Soils/Seismic/Topography
-Complete an environmental scan-Provide a summarizing narrative-Use conclusions to inform concept rationale and project recommendations
Page | 5
S e
g
Secti
on 4
(f) L
and
Coas
tal Z
one
Farm
land
/ Ti
mbe
rland
Env.
Justi
ce
Cultu
ral
Reso
urce
sVi
sual
Aes
theti
cs
Geol
ogy/
Soils
/Se
ismic
Floo
dpla
in
Clim
ate
Chan
ge
and
Sea
Leve
l Ri
se V
ulne
rabi
lity
Haza
rdou
s M
ater
ials
Nat
ural
ly
Occ
urrin
g As
best
os
Air
Qua
lity
Noi
se
Wat
ers a
nd
Wet
land
sW
ild a
nd S
ceni
c Ri
vers
Spec
ial S
tatu
s Sp
ecie
s
Fish
Pas
sage
Habi
tat
Conn
ectiv
ity
Ozo
ne PM
CO
2.5 10
1
High
No
High
Low
Med Lo
w
Low
N/A
N/A
Low
Low
Attai
nmen
t/Un
clas
sified
Non
-Atta
inm
ent
Non
-Atta
inm
ent
Attai
nmen
t/M
aint
enan
ce
Low
Med
N/A
Low
N/A
Med
2M
ed
100
yr.
High
High
3
Med
High
Med
High
4
N/A
High
N/A
N/A5
Med
Med
6
Med
Low M
ed
7 Low
Low
Low
Low
Med
High
Med
Med
Low
CORRIDOR PERFORMANCE
Action:Complete the Corridor Performance data table. Include a narrative that explains and summarizes the information included in the template table.
Segment # 1Basic System Operations
AADT (BY) 9200
AADT (HY) 13340
AADT: Growth Rate/Year 1.55%
LOS Method HCM
LOS (BY) E
LOS (HY) E
LOS Concept E
VMT (BY) 21022
VMT (HY) 30482
Vehicle Occupancy Rate (BY) 1.1
Vehicle Occupancy Rate (HY) 1.2
Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay (35 MPH)(BY)
50
Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay (35 MPH)(HY)
70
Daily VHD (35 MPH) Method PeMS
Page | 6
Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay (60 MPH)(BY)
N/A
Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay (60 MPH)(HY)
N/A
Daily VHD (60 MPH) Method N/ATruck Traffic
Total Average Annual Daily Truck Traffic (AADTT) (BY)
322
Total Average Annual Daily Truck Traffic (AADTT) (HY)
700
Total Trucks (% of AADT) (BY) 3.5%
Total Trucks (% of AADT)(HY) 5.2%
5+ Axle Average Annual Daily Truck Traffic (AADTT)(BY)
129
5+ Axle Average Annual Daily Truck Traffic (AADTT)(HY)
300
5+ Axle Trucks (as % of AADT)(BY)
1.40%
5+ Axle Trucks (as % of AADT)(HY)
2.2%
Bottlenecks
Bottleneck Existing Yes
Bottleneck Location SR-128 and I-505 Junction
Bottleneck Queue (length) 3 miles
Bottleneck Causality Merging
trafficPeak Hour Traffic Data
Peak Period Length 1
Peak Hour Direction N/A
Peak Hour Time of Day am
Peak Hour Directional Split (BY)
70/30
Peak Hour Directional Split (HY)
80/20
Peak Hour VMT (BY) 10000
Peak Hour VMT (HY) 20000
Peak Hour V/C (BY) 1
Peak Hour V/C (HY) 1
Peak Hour Avg. Speed (mph)(BY)
30
Peak Hour Avg. Speed (mph)(HY)
25
Peak Hour Vehicle Hours of Delay (35 mph) (BY)
100
Peak Hour Vehicle Hours of Delay (35 mph) (HY)
140
Peak Hour VHD (35 MPH) Method
PeMS
Page | 7
Peak Hour Vehicle Hours of Delay (60 mph) (BY)
N/A
Peak Hour Vehicle Hours of Delay (60 mph) (HY)
N/A
Peak Hour VHD (60 MPH) Method
N/A
Managed Lane Performance
AADT (BY) 200
AADT (HY) 400
AADT Method
LOS Method HCS
LOS (BY) B
LOS (HY) C
LOS Concept C
VMT (BY) 500
VMT (HY) 1000
Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay (35 MPH)(BY)
N/A
Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay (35 MPH)(HY)
N/A
Daily VHD (35 MPH) Method N/A
Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay (45 MPH)(BY)
0
Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay (45 MPH)(HY)
0
Daily VHD (45 MPH) Method PeMS
Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay (60 MPH)(BY)
N/A
Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay (60 MPH)(HY)
N/A
Daily Vehicle Hours of Delay (60 MPH) Method
N/A
Reliability
Reliability (%)(East/Northbound)(BY)
98%
Reliability (%)(West/Southbound)(BY)
98%
95th percentile (East/Northbound)(BY)
N/A
95th percentile (West/Southbound)(BY)
N/A
Median Free Flow Travel Time (East/Northbound)(BY)
N/A
Median Free Flow Travel Time (West/Southbound)(BY)
N/A
Page | 8
ADDITIONAL TOPICS
Action:If there are any additional topics that the District would like to discuss they may do so at this point in the template.
KEY CORRIDOR ISSUES
Action: Include a summary of key issues within the corridor.
CORRIDOR CONCEPT
CONCEPT RATIONALE
Action: Include a narrative that describes the concept rationale.
PLANNED AND PROGRAMMED PROJECTS AND STRATEGIES
Action: Use the table provided in the template to list the planned and programmed projects that have been identified for the corridor.
Page | 9
Seg. Description Planned or Programmed Location Source Purpose Implementation
Phase
2
South Side of SR 128 (Grant Ave.), from St. Anthony Parish
Hall to West Main St: fill in
missing sidewalks
Planned
St. Anthony Parish Hall
to West Main St.
SACOG MTP/SCS 2035 Appendix A.1.
Project List
Pedestrian Circulation Long Term
PROJECTS AND STRATEGIES TO ACHIEVE CONCEPT
Action: Use the table provided in the template to list the projects and strategies to achieve the concept.
Seg. Description Location Source Purpose Implementation Phase
1Widen Shoulder to
accommodate bicyclist and meet min. facility concept
West of City of Winters and Putah
Creek Bridge
Caltrans District 3Circulation and
Operational Enhancement
Long Term
2 Interchange Improvements at SR 128/I-505. PM 9.835
City of Winters General Plan,
1992
Operational Enhancement Long Term
2Pedestrian circulation at the intersection of SR 128/Grant Avenue and Morgan Street.
PM 9.100
SACOG Regional Bicycle,
Pedestrian, and Trails Master Plan
Pedestrian Circulation and
Operational Enhancement
Long Term
Page | 10
APPENDIX
APPENDIX AGLOSSARY OF TERMS AND ACRONYMS
Action:This is a required appendix. Provide a glossary of terms and acronyms that are used within the report. This is critical in providing outreach to internal and external stakeholders.
APPENDIX BFACTSHEETS
This is an optional appendix to include any State, District, route, segment, or miscellaneous factsheets. The content and format is left completely to the District’s discretion.
APPENDIX CADDITIONAL CORRIDOR DATA
This is an optional appendix to include any additional data, analysis, or graphs that are not included within the report but are pertinent to the corridor.
APPENDIX DRESOURCES
Action:This is a required appendix. Provide a bibliography of the works cited and resources used throughout the document. The format is up to the District’s discretion. The District may also use footnotes in lieu of Appendix D.
Page | 11
END OF TEMPLATEDelete this page and the following pages
Page | 12
TEMPLATE RESOURCES
Page | 13
top related