!) á s4 b ² p b v ~) slibrary.jsce.or.jp/jsce/open/00906/2014/20-0283.pdf · 2016. 2. 2. · Ì ]...

Post on 10-Feb-2021

3 Views

Category:

Documents

0 Downloads

Preview:

Click to see full reader

TRANSCRIPT

  • , 20 ,2014 6

    CONSERVATION MEASURES OF CHANNEL STABILIZATION AND POOL-RIFFLE STRUCTURE RESTORATION IN THE HII RIVER

    1 2 3 4 Tomoyuki NAGAI, Morihiro HARADA, Hironori HAYASHI and Kuniharu TAKAHASHI

    1 812-0053 1 18 1

    2 501-6021

    3 819-0395 744 2 1008 4 812-0016 2-4-11

    This paper reports a series of actions to conserve channel stabilization and pool-riffle structure in the Hii River disaster restoration works. The Hii River is an urban river which flow through Fukuoka city. First, the outline of heavy rainfall disaster in July 2009 is presented. Secondly, some concerning matters in the improvement plan are discussed. The largest issue was lack of channel stability after changing cross-sectional channel form by riverbed excavation. One dimensional bed deformation analyses were conducted to discuss channel stability and necessity of countermeasure. In result, the river administrator employed two new types of river structure to conserve channel stability and pool-riffle structure in the Hii River. This case study presents a way to resolve the conflict between disaster prevention and ecosystem conservation in urban rivers.

    Key Words : pool-riffle structure, channel stabilization, movable bed simulation, rock riffle structure

    12.9km

    29.1km2

    21 7

    91mm410

    2226 5

    21

    30

    1)

    25 2)

    223)

    5,900m

    3)

    - 283 -

  • 4)5)

    24

    1m400m

    6)

    7)

    1/200 1/2,0007 2

    (1/640)(14m)

    0.9 1.1m

    (Leucopsarion petersii) 21km 12

    NT

    8)

    R² = 0.8751

    0

    5

    10

    15

    20

    25

    0 500 1000 1500 2000

    (m)

    (1/X)

    0

    0.2

    0.4

    0.6

    0.8

    1

    1.2

    0 500 1000 1500 2000

    (m)

    (1/X)

    N

    - 284 -

  • 400mm

    1m1:2.0

    1:1.5

    5

    B 10 13m HB/H 3

    1/3

    1,400m 37

    10

    4k760 6k300 1540m

    n=0.032 (70 )

    10

    500m

    8

    3)

    - 285 -

  • 32 12

    1/3

    2mm*=2.0 6.0

    217

    9)

    1.6m

    10

    100

    1000

    10000

    0.01 0.1 1 10

    R/d

    τ*

    Lower Regime,

    Upper Regime,

    NoMotioon

    Transition

    - 286 -

  • 2mm* R/d

    9)

    21 7

    3

    (rock riffle structure, gravel riffle)

    11)12)

    13)

    12)

    13)

    ( 150-200)

    - 287 -

  • 14)

    13)

    1:1.5

    251

    2

    26

    1) ?

    16 , pp.17-23, 2010. 2)

    2013.( http://www.pref.fukuoka.lg.jp/gyosei-shiryo/houshin-dl.html) 3)

    2010. 4)

    B1( ), Vol.68, No.4, I_1291-I_1296, 2012.

    5)

    B1( ) Vol.70, No.4, I_997-I_1002, 2014. 6)

    43-3, pp.148-159., 1970. 7)

    17 , pp.113-118., 2011. 8)

    , , 43(3), pp.289-296.,1995. 9)

    pp.49-60, 2007. 10)

    345 /II-1 pp.41-52., 1984.

    11) - 12 p.4-5 2001.

    12)

    ELR2012, p.52, 2012.

    13)

    , Vol.19, pp.87-92, 2013. 14)

    F Vol.66, No. 4, pp. 490-503, 2010.

    2014.4.3

    - 288 -

top related