america and “holocaust” popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

16
America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

Upload: moses-goodman

Post on 24-Dec-2015

215 views

Category:

Documents


2 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

America and “Holocaust”

Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and

post- the miniseries

Page 2: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

Popular knowledge of the Holocaust pre-miniseries

• General knowledge from reporting during the War• The Diary of Anne Frank (1952)

– Highly edited• Eichmann trial (1961)• Nazi Imagery in science fiction, literature, film and plays in the

60s– I.e. Dr. Strangelove, The Deputy (Rolf Hochhuth play),

Judgment at Nuremberg (Stanley Kramer film, nominated for 11 Academy Awards)

Page 3: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

Intellectual Discourse on the Holocaust pre-miniseries

• Significant academic discourse, mostly by Jewish scholars, on the Holocaust from 40s through 70s mostly in the form political analogies to critique American system

• Often in ways that would would seem inappropriate or offensive in discourse today

• 40s-50s: commenting on USA racial policies, reacting to McCarthyism, Cold War policies– Defiance/wariness of bureaucracy, conformity, and mass society– specifically comparing Nazi camp system to American society

• 60s-70s: civil rights movement, Vietnam– Analogies enthusiastically received by American right as

appropriate and poignant to US politics of the day

Page 4: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

The Tone of Discourse

• These intellectual/political discourses on the Holocaust did not treat the Holocaust as a specifically Jewish tragedy, instead used universally applicable themes

– Dehumanization, conformity, alienation, moral conscience

The focus is on Hitler’s system and politics• The Holocaust as a term did not really exist in American vocabulary

until the 60s• Yet many scholars producing these analogies were Jewish

– Jews were beginning to be especially integrated into American intellectual society

Scholars came of age during Holocaust and knew of other feelings of anti-Semitism in the World-Jewish identity was a marker of difference, Jews focused on integration into American society

Page 5: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

Viewership of “Holocaust”

• 65 million people saw first episode• 27.1% of all homes with a television were tuned to

NBC• 43% of everyone watching television was watching

“Holocaust”• Viewers increased each night• Overall, more than 100 million people watched the

series• A survey conducted by Public Broadcasting revealed

that viewers consistently responded that “Holocaust” specifically left an impact on them

Page 6: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

Controversy: Response to “Holocaust”

Although the show was watched by millions, thus earning high ratings, the reaction was varied and intense, sparking continuous controversy played out most notably on the pages of the New York Times.

Page 7: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

Elie Wiesel Responds:“Trivializing the Holocaust: Semi-Fact

and Semi-Fiction• Criticizes name as dramatic and over-the-top• Insensitive: tries to capture what cannot even be imagined

– Adding special effects completely inappropriate• Not thoroughly researched; number of inaccuracies • Stereotyping Germans and Jews• Focused on two naïve themes in Holocaust study: passivity and heroism• “Too much drama, not enough documentary”• Tries to cover too much: “Far too much happens to one Jewish family and

too much evil perpetrated by one German officer…whatever happened anywhere, happened to this family”– All infamous events and places are experienced by two families

• Danger in mixing genres of fact and fiction• Danger in thinking we now understand and have this be the authority on

Holocaust knowledge • TV as inappropriate medium

Page 8: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

Author of Series, Gerald Green, Responds: “In Defense of

‘Holocaust’”• Wiesel’s language is extreme• Jewish leaders saw series/read script and approved• Combining fact and fiction is effective tool to bring

history to life• Characters are human and personable• Historical characters and events thoroughly

researched• Criticizes Wiesel for wanting Holocaust limelight• Teaching tool, spreads awareness

Page 9: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

John J. O’Connor Criticizes:“NBC ‘Holocaust,’ Art versus

Mammon”• Criticizing commercials• Business exploitation of tragedy to

make profit• Inappropriate juxtaposition of

commercials and show– “The effect can be shocking in its

insensitivity”– Lysol after gas chambers

Page 10: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

The Public Responds-High Ratings, generally well received

-NBC got 700 phone calls 1st night: 390 praised, 370 complained-New York Times received unusually high amount of letters to the Editor

• Critiques:– Commercials– Combined genres– Insensitive to

survivors

• Praises– Effective medium of

television– Reached and

educated millions– Must try to express

Page 11: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

Themes

•Resistance•Zionism

•Women’s influence•“Just following orders”

•Why didn’t the Jews leave sooner?

•Desk murderers

Page 12: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

Resistance

• Constantly questions why more Jews didn’t fight back

• Belittling of the millions of “passive” victims• “The Jew who fights back is the one that

survives” (Judith E. Joneson)• “let’s not hand Hitler any more victories”

(Fackenheim)

• (clip)

Page 13: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

Israel and Zionism

• Holocaust as justification for the necessity of the State of Israel

• “the holocaust, then, accounts for the importance of Israel and serves to explain Israel’s political and military actions”

• (clip)

Page 14: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

Creation of Holocaust “myth” and Jewish Identity

• Myth of destruction and then redemption of European Jewry

• “Without Zionism, the Holocaust is unbearable and to be avoided…the myth of the Holocaust is complete only in the redemption of the Jewish nation.”

• Creating Jewish identity through the Holocaust– “for Jews, the watching has about it the quality of a

religious obligation” Moment

Page 15: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

Historical Inaccuracies• Jewish refugees who crossed the Russian border before the German

invasion were not allowed to go free but were arrested, interrogated and jailed

• Auschwitz inmates were not allowed to keep suitcases, family pictures and music-sheets

• Jews do not wear prayer shawl at night• Everyone in extermination camps look well-fed and clean• There is a blessing for Torah-reading and another one for weddings—

the rabbi who recites the wedding in the film recites the wrong blessing

• Mordechai Anielewitz, the young commander of the Warsaw uprising, is shown as a caricature of himself

• Exaggerated emphasis on the brutality of Jewish ghetto-policemen and Jewish kapos

Page 16: America and “Holocaust” Popular and scholarly discourse/knowledge pre- and post- the miniseries

Criticisms

• Tried to tell too much• De-racialized• “Holocaust, a TV medium and drama. Holocaust,

a work of semi-fact and semi-fiction. Isn’t this what so many morally deranged scholars have been claiming recently all over the world? That the Holocaust was nothing else but an invention” (Elie Wiesel)