ambulatory venous hypertension components obstruction valve incompetence obstruction valve...
DESCRIPTION
63 patients: iliofemoral DVT Thrombectomy + AVF vs. Anticoagulation Follow-up: 6 mos, 5 yrs, 10 yrs Patency –Valve function –Venous hemodynamics –Clinical evaluation 63 patients: iliofemoral DVT Thrombectomy + AVF vs. Anticoagulation Follow-up: 6 mos, 5 yrs, 10 yrs Patency –Valve function –Venous hemodynamics –Clinical evaluation Plate G et al, J Vasc Surg 1984 Venous Thrombectomy vs. Anticoagulation Randomized TrialTRANSCRIPT
Ambulatory Venous HypertensionComponents
•Obstruction
•Valve incompetence
•Obstruction and valve incompetence…Highest venous pressure…Most severe morbidity
Iliofemoral DVT
Contraindication to Lysis
Yes No
Surgical Thrombectomy + AVF
Anticoagulation
Catheter-directedThrombolysis
Success
Yes
No
• 63 patients: iliofemoral DVT• Thrombectomy + AVF vs. Anticoagulation• Follow-up: 6 mos, 5 yrs, 10 yrs
• Patency– Valve function– Venous hemodynamics– Clinical evaluation
Plate G et al, J Vasc Surg 1984
Venous Thrombectomy vs. Anticoagulation
Randomized TrialRandomized Trial
Anticoag.Thrombectomy
60 mmHg43 mmHgAVP
27%11%Severe CVI
18%37%Asymptomatic
37%7%Reflux + obstruction
6%40%N Valve fct. (fempop)
50%78%Patent iliac*
Plate G et al, Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1990
Venous Thrombectomy vs. Anticoagulation
Results: 5 years (n=41)
*radionuclide phlebography
Acute DVT
“…There is no evidence that supports the use of thrombolytic agents for the initial treatment of DVT….”
Thrombolytic Therapy: ACCP 2004Thrombolytic Therapy: ACCP 2004
Buller H, et alChest 2004;126:401S
Recommend against the routine use of catheter-directed thrombolysis (Grade 1C)
…Treatment..[with lytic Rx] .. Be confined to patients requiring limb salvage. (Grade 2C)
Catheter-Directed Lysis Iliofemoral DVT
• Significantly better QOL with lysisPhysical function StigmaHealth distress Post thromb Sx
• Successful lysis correlated w/QOL
• Lytic failures and heparin Rx similar
Improvement in Quality of LifeImprovement in Quality of Life
Comerota AJ et alComerota AJ et alJ Vasc SurgJ Vasc Surg 2000 2000
• 35 consecutive patients• Iliofemoral DVT• Randomized
• Follow-up 1week/6mos–Clot lysis–Venous reflux
Cath-dir SK (pulse spray)vs.
Anticoagulation alone
Elsharawy M, et alEur J Vas Surg. 2002; 24:209
Catheter-Directed Lysis Iliofemoral DVT
Improvement in Quality of LifeImprovement in Quality of Life
Elsharawy M, et alEur J Vas Surg. 2002; 24:209
0.4 7d 6dLOS
0.04 11%41%*Reflux
<0.001 72%12%Patency
P-valve Lysis (n=18)
Anticoag(n=17)
*Underestimate 20 occlusion
Catheter-Directed Lysis Iliofemoral DVT
Randomized Trial: Outcome at 6 monthsRandomized Trial: Outcome at 6 months
Postthrombotic SyndromeElastic Stockings (30-40 mmHg)
Lancet 1997;349:759
<.0151%24%49%
<.0155%21%47%
P-valueRRRStockingControl
Postthrombotic Syndrome
Brandjes DP
Prandoni P
(n=194)
(n=170)Patho Hemst Thromb 2002;32(suppl 2):72
A Strategy of Thrombus Removal for Venous Thromboembolism:
We Owe it to Our Patients