alt.theatre 7.2 - sample article

10
VOL. 7, NO. 2 DECEMBER 2009 $5.00

Upload: alttheatre

Post on 10-Mar-2016

213 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

alt.theatre: cultural diversity and the stage. A sample of our 7.2 issue. To order this issue, contact [email protected]. To subscribe, visit http://www.alttheatre.ca

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: alt.theatre 7.2 - Sample article

VOL. 7, NO. 2 DECEMBER 2009 $5.00

Page 2: alt.theatre 7.2 - Sample article

“Never Again”

A view from the diaspora

A Theatrical Awda:Palestine, Sahmatah, Refugees, and Going Home

Excavating Yesterday: The Birth, Growth,and Evolution of a Resident Artist

in the Downtown Eastside

Writing Peace: Can art be a powerful tool in building peace in the context of Truth and Treason?

Dispatch

Book Review

4Editorial by Edward Little

11Lisa Ndejuru reflects on Jennifer Capraru’s reporton Isôko’s production of The Monument in Rwanda (alt.theatre Vol. 6.3).

16Samer Al-Saber explores the political and emotional power of theatre through Sahmatah—a play that faces head-on the 1948 catastrophe of Palestine on a very personal level.

24Savannah Walling reflects on her personal and professional journey as an artist in and of Vancouver’s Downtown Eastside.

34Rob Nunn reviews the second volume of Staging Coyote’s Dream: An Anthology of First Nations Drama in English, edited by Monique Mojica and Ric Knowles.

Vol. 7, No. 2 DECEMBER 2009

29In the winning essay of Teesri Duniya’s “Writing Peace Contest,” high school student Nicholas Backman muses on how art can build peace through the evocation of compassion.

33It Happened in a TentAlex Bulmer on the Theatre Centre/Abit Omen/Die In Debt production of The Book of Judith.

Page 3: alt.theatre 7.2 - Sample article

EDITOR IN CHIEFEdward Little

ASSOCIATE EDITORDenis Salter

EDITORIAL BOARDEdward Little, Denis Salter, Rahul Varma, Lina de Guevara, Shelley Scott, and Nina Lee Aquino

CONTRIBUTORS Samer Al-Saber, Nicholas Backman, Alex Bulmer, Edward Little, Lisa Ndejuru, Rob Nunn, and Savannah Walling. MARKETING & SALESL inda Levesque GRAPHIC DESIGN ATELIER 6/ DFIGRAPHIK.CA

COVER PHOTO Terry HughesAbdelghafour Elaaziz as Omar Abdul Ahad, Christine Aubin Khalifah as Nahla Abdul Ahad in the world pre-miere of Truth and Treason by Rahul Varma. Teesri Duniya Theatre, Montreal, September 2009.

COPY EDITOR Colette Stoeber

alt.theatre:cultural diversity and the stage is Canada's only professional journal examining intersectionsbetween politics, cultural plurality, social activism, and the stage. Our readership includes theatre practitioners,academics, plus others interested in issues pertaining to arts and cultural diversity.

alt.theatre welcomes suggestions or proposals for interviews, news, pieces of self-reflection, analytical articles,and reviews of books, plays, and performances.

Founded in 1998, alt.theatre is published quarterly by Teesri Duniya Theatre—an intercultural theatre companywith a mandate to produce socially engaged theatre that reflects Canada’s social and cultural diversity. alt.theatre is indexed in the MLA International Bibliography.

Bibliothèque Nationale du Québec / National Library of Canada ISSN 1481-0506

FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT TEESRI DUNIYA THEATRE1006 Rue de la Montagne, Suite 111Montreal, QC H3G 1Y7Tel: 514. 848. 0238email: [email protected]: www.teesriduniya.com

alt.theatre: cultural diversity and the stageis published quarterly by

“Change the World, One Play at a Time”

We acknowledge the support of the Canada Council for the Arts which last yearinvested $20.1 million in writing and publishing throughout Canada.

We acknowledge the financial support of the Government of Canada through the CanadaMagazine Fund toward our editorial and production costs.

Page 4: alt.theatre 7.2 - Sample article

“ N e v e r A g a in ”by Edward Little

© D

avid

Ward

/ R

ehears

al fo

r "C

ongo D

ram

a,"

directe

d b

y A

lly N

tum

ba

Page 5: alt.theatre 7.2 - Sample article

5

D e a r R e a d e r,

It’s been a while since I wrote to you about ourproject, Life Stories of Montrealers Displaced byWar, Genocide, and Other Human RightsViolations. Maybe you recall that just over a yearago I wrote an editorial reflecting on this work.1 Iwas on the banks of Montreal’s historic LachineCanal thinking about tensions between the needfor action and the potential for hubris in our pro-ject’s aspirations towards a culture of “neveragain” when I came across a sign lashed to therailing of the canal. Endorsed with the ParksCanada logo, the sign suggested I use my cell-phone to hear thestory of theRedpath SugarFactory—locatedon the other sideof the canal andrecently convertedinto luxury con-dos. My cell phone“tour” championeda decidedly reduc-tive, neoliberal,ahistorical world-view. Parks Canadahad contracted out,to a US-basedcompany, their cura-torial responsibili-ties to educate usabout what had been a hugely influential and pow-erful financial empire—entirely without referenceto power, racial politics, economics, distribution ofwealth, or the labour and living conditions of itsworkers. This was done on the watch of a govern-ment agency charged with safeguarding our her-itage and promoting understanding—in a nationalpark running through the heart of a majorCanadian centre for immigration and asylum.

The Life Stories project is now in its third year.This past November, we hosted the conference,“Remembering War, Genocide and Other HumanRights Violations: Oral History, New Media, andthe Arts” at Concordia University in Montreal.2 Theevent was an opportunity for academics, artists,and activists working in alliances across a range ofsectors and disciplines to share ideas, practices,and strategic initiatives. Many of the presentersspoke of their experience working with projectsthat must balance the complexities of commemo-ration with factors such as “compassion fatigue,”

outsider intervention, and the physical and psy-chological risks associated with premature pro-motion of reconciliation or forgiveness. Most of thepresenters shared a belief that commemoration—if it is to avoid an inward-looking historical focusthat risks perpetuating trauma—must be some-how linked to a forward-looking engagement with“never again.”

Keynote speaker Lorne Shirinian spoke of theessential need for difficult stories to be told.

Shirinian is thechild of one of theA r m e n i a nG e o r g e t o w nBoys—orphanedmale children whowere sent toCanada to escapethe 1915 genocide.As an academic,poet, playwright,and activist,Shirinian’s life’swork has focusedon the ArmenianGenocide and itsaftermath. Hespoke of the cru-cial role of storiesas a means of con-

verting private history into public knowledge. Heshared his conviction that pain and grief can betolerated and made meaningful as stories. Hepoignantly noted that traditional Armenian folk-tales always began, “once there was and wasnot”—an enduring encapsulation of transiency,testimony, and genocide denial.

The second keynote speaker was psychologistand playwright Henry Greenspan. His work withHolocaust survivors spans two decades andinvolves sustained dialogue through a process ofinterviews and re-interviews. Greenspan spoke ofthe essential need to break ritualized distinctionsbetween tellers and listeners so that we maybecome partners in conversation. WhileGreenspan reiterated the importance of stories, henoted that they invariably involve compromise—they can never communicate a totally disintegrat-ed human reality. As he has been told time andtime again, “What I have told you is not it.” Hestressed that the legacy of these stories must bepolitical action.

EDITORIAL / by Edward L i t t le

© David Ward / Lisa Ndejuru at the conference

Page 6: alt.theatre 7.2 - Sample article

6

Speakers from Project Refuge—an initiativeproviding temporary shelter and services to indi-viduals seeking asylum in Montreal—reported adramatic decrease in residents as a result ofrecent changes to Canada’s refugee system. OnJuly 15, 2009, Canada’s minister of immigration,Jason Kenney, introduced new visa requirementsfor Mexican and Czech citizens—ostensibly in abid to stem a surge in refugee claims from thosecountries. On July 23, 2009, Kenney removed anexception clause in the Safe Third CountryAgreement. The original clause had been writtento allow people seeking refuge from countriesunder a temporary suspension of removal (TSR) toland in the US on their way to making a refugeeclaim at a Canadian land border. TSR exceptionsrefer to dangerous conditions that make it impos-sible to ensure thesafety of personsreturned to theircountry of origin.The removal of thisexception clausemeans that legiti-mate refugees fromAfghanistan, theD e m o c r a t i cRepublic of Congo,Haiti, Iraq, Zimba-bwe—in fleeing fortheir lives—may nolonger seek imme-diate safe passagethrough the largestnation on our con-tinent.

While the conference bore witness to horrificcruelty and suffering—a substantial amount of itrelayed through direct experience—I suspect thatfor many the primary message was the unshake-able determination, courage, and faith in actionembodied by so many of those present. In thisregard, the pulse of the conference struck me asin time with that of the international grassrootsmovement seeking to pressure governments toestablish Ministries of Peace. For Canada’s part,on September 30, 2009, backbencher NDP MP BillSiksay presented a private member’s bill callingon the House of Commons to establish a FederalDepartment of Peace to be headed by a ministerwho would sit in Cabinet. As Linda McQuaig hascommented, “private members bills rarely pass,”particularly when “they challenge the orthodoxy ofthe military-industrial academic establishment.”McQuaig also points out that dueling and slaverywere once socially acceptable practices, and thatthat while the idea of a Department of Peace maysound utopian—“mushy and soft-hearted” as sheputs it—“it is actually a deeply, subtly revolution-ary idea, in that it threatens to undermine thewar-oriented mindset that dominates our cul-

ture.”3 Recently, Bill C-447 passed an importantmilestone when it achieved the requisite numbersof co-seconders that will permit it to go to secondreading.4

The conference also allowed those of us in theOral History and Performance (OHP) workinggroup—one of the seven research groups thatmake up the Life Stories project—to experienceeach other’s work in a public setting.5 We’re workingon a number of separate research-creation per-formance projects.

Sandeep Bhagwati’s “Gesturing within aRealm of Shadows” studies moments of socialand cultural rupture and displacement in the ges-tures, facial expressions, and body language of

videotaped LifeStories intervie-wees. Thesem o m e n t s —embodied byactors workingthrough a creativeprocess of imita-tion, analysis, andsynthesis—are thebasis of a per-formance text thatfocuses on the vis-ceral “essence ofdisplacement: abody, displacedinto a new socialand cultural envi-ronment, does notremain the same

body. Its very gestures, its most embodied lan-guage is taken over by the will to survive, re-mod-eled to conform, fit in, even basically communi-cate in this strange new world.”6 Sandeep avoidsincorporating words or language from the inter-views so as to eschew what Richard Sennett char-acterizes as the “Tyranny of Intimacy”—the shut-ting down of dialogue that can occur as a result of“survivor’s bias,” or the emotional authority of aconfessional mode proceeding from “I am here,this has happened to me.” Sandeep’s projectspeaks both to Greenspan’s call to dismantle theritualized roles of teller and listener and to hisobservation that the stories are never “it”—theyare always merely traces that must forever ges-ture beyond themselves (my emphasis).

The OHP Playback Theatre Ensemble, work-ing in partnership with Nisha Sajnani of CreativeAlternatives, draws on expertise in theatre, groupfacilitation, community counseling, and dramatherapy.7 The ensemble is developing approachesthat combine collective interviewing / story-gath-ering with debriefing for interviewers and intervie-wees. Playback typically involves a member of the

EDITORIAL / by Edward L i t t le

© David Ward / Henry Greenspan at the conference

© D

avid

Ward

/ R

ehears

al fo

r "C

ongo D

ram

a,"

directe

d b

y A

lly N

tum

ba

Page 7: alt.theatre 7.2 - Sample article

audience telling a story that is then “played back”by actors improvising under the direction of a“Conductor.” Traditionally, the performers work toshut down “self-talk”—to put aside their personalresponses to the stories told in order to concen-trate on listening deeply to the story and playing itback “objectively.” The OHP group is developingan “Overture” technique that requires the ensem-ble to first respond with resonant moments ofexperience or empathy drawn from their own livesbefore attempting to represent the recountedstory. This technique demands a more complexapproach to deep listening to both self and theother. It foregrounds the potential for both positiveand negative implications proceeding from per-sonal subject positions relating to bias, assump-tion, and judgment. The Overture requires thateach member of the ensemble attempt to meetthe teller in the story rather than simply playing itback—to approach, in Greenspan’s words, becom-ing “partners in a conversation.”

Page 8: alt.theatre 7.2 - Sample article

8 EDITORIAL / by Edward L i t t le

The OHP’s “Untold Histories” project is forg-ing alliances with artists and communities nototherwise represented by the six other workinggroups of the Life Stories project.8 Led by RahulVarma of Teesri Duniya Theatre, “UntoldHistories” has to date collected and staged storiesfrom various Armenian, Iranian, Chilean, SouthAsian, and First Nations perspectives.9 The pri-mary thrust of this project is on issues of socialjustice—whose stories are being told, who istelling them, in what contexts are they being told,and to what social and political ends. The projectinvolves progressive levels of presentation—eachinvolving audience feedback, reworking by theartists, and re-presentation. Currently, the storiesare being presented by emerging and communityartists to variously constituted community audi-ences. The next phase of the work will involve dra-maturgical selection and shaping by Rahul asplaywright for presentation as a fully mountedprofessional production by Teesri Duniya Theatre.

“Stories Scorched from the Desert Sun” is awork-in-progress by OHP artist-in-residence,Hourig Attarian, and artist-educator-dramaturgeRachael Van Fossen.10 The project—drawing onoral history interviews conducted by Hourig—usesthree voices to tell the stories of several girls wholived through the horrors of war and genocide indifferent places and times:11 Pergrouhi in 1915Turkey—a child of barely six, who, alone andunable to comprehend her loss, sleeps for sever-al nights in a field beside the body of her mur-dered Armenian mother; Pergrouhi as a ninety-year-old woman—recalling the events; Hourigherself and her friend Hermig in Beirut in 1975—two children of the Armenian diaspora on the cuspof puberty living on the same street while the reli-gious and ethnic violence of the civil war eruptsaround them; Hourig and Hermig as adults—recalling the deportation stories of grandparentsand great-aunts and the trauma of their ownexperience of war. The script adhered to the con-vention that all words spoken by the characterswould be taken verbatim from original sources—with the important exception that recollections ofthe past could be altered, when deemed dra-maturgically advantageous, to allow a characterto speak as if in the present. The structure of thepiece presented at the conference shifted betweenscripted narrative commentary by Hourig andRachael as creators, and the performance by thethree characters.

As performance research-creation, “StoriesScorched from the Desert Sun” focuses on ethicalproblems and dramaturgical solutions in thetranslation of written accounts of oral history intoa performative mode with an enhanced capacity tocontribute to a culture of “never again.” As Hourigputs it, “The importance of these stories is allabout memory against forgetting, public truth-

telling, knowing and understanding our past,doing justice to the stories and to the peopleinvolved, but at the same time, it is also cruciallyabout healing and creating awareness.”12

Evoking the power and immediacy of theatreto speak instances of graphic violence and traumacarries a risk that the audience will become cap-tive in a counterproductive experience of sensa-tionalized or eroticized violence. To counteractthis—in addition to the theatricalized narrativecontext provided by Rachael and Hourig—the proj-ect adopts a Brechtian “reporting” style that sup-ports a “more muted,” less emotional approach tothe more graphic elements. As Rachael describesit, the actor playing Young Pergrouhi speaks “as acurious young girl simply reporting the facts of thediscovery of her mother’s body. Her playableaction became ‘I am trying to figure this out as Iam speaking,’ with an absence of sentiment.” Asthis particular story is told, Young Pergrouhi andOld Pergrouhi share the telling, the ninety yearsbetween them working to ensure that, in Hourig’swords, “the story does not get bogged down in theviolence and the trauma, because that is not themessage, that is not where I want the story tostagnate. I also do not want us, as an audience, asreaders, listeners to be caught in that voyeuristicand grotesque trapping.”

Other members of the OHP presentedresearch in a number of other areas concernedwith strengthening a culture of “never again.”Lorna Roth looked at instances of “cognitive dis-sonance” in “reconciliation” films. She focused onthe transformational potential of moments thatbreak the narrative to arrest habitual thought inways that create dialogical spaces of emptiness—pre-conditions for truly affective relationships.Warren Linds looked at how the ViewpointsTheatre approach to performing polarities withIsraeli and Palestinian youth is leading partici-pants to a deeper critical analysis of the intentionsand values behind strategies of “talking nice, talk-ing tough, and reflective dialogue (often simplylistening in order to ‘reload’).”13 The objective is tomove towards “Generative Dialogue”—anapproach encouraging direct action on multiplepersonal, social, local, and political levels. TimSchwab looked at interactive uses of video—howvideo, film, photos, and other media artifacts arebeing archived, accessed, and subsequently“sampled” and reconfigured in creative ways. Thiswork addresses ethical questions concerning theuse of artifacts created by perpetrators.

The relationships between our conference,oral history, performance, and a culture of “neveragain” were very much on my mind recently whenI went to hear David Fennario read his new play“Bolsheviki”—a theatrical monologue based on aninterview and driven by David’s need to speak out

Page 9: alt.theatre 7.2 - Sample article

9EDITORIAL / by Edward L i t t le

on Canada’s war in Afghanistan. The reading wasa benefit for Montreal’s Immigrant WorkersAssociation. It was held in a Church basement inPointe St. Charles—the same Church whereAlgerian refugee Abdelkader Belaouni spentalmost four years in sanctuary.14 Fennario—esteemed as a kind of Poet Laureate of the peopleof “the Point”—was introduced by two youngwomen who spoke of growing up in the neigh-bourhood, of having to read Balconville in school,and of the subsequent profound and enduringeffect that David’s plays have had on their lives.

“Bolsheviki” is the story of Rosie, a World WarI veteran deeply politicized by his experience ofthe horrors of trench warfare as told to JerryNines, a “skinny-ass-23-year-old” wet-behind-the-ears reporter. The play is set in the present ina hotel bar on Remembrance Day—the same barwhere Rosie first told his story to Jerry who nowtells the story to us. David made the transitionfrom oral history to performance seem so easy.Across more than ninety years, Rosie’s wordsecho with the hopes, dreams, fears, and ultimatedisillusionment of a generation of young men.Rosie’s earthy and poetic expression, his particu-lar and peculiar use of stories and words as ameans of coping—a way to speak the unspeak-able—ring true and summon my memories ofmen like Rosie.

“Bolsheviki” is ostensibly a play about yester-day, yet the spectre of today’s wars haunt thescript. Afghanistan is mentioned only twice—onceat the beginning and once at the end of the play.When the reading was over—in spite of the audi-ence’s obvious deep respect for David’s craft—there were no questions about staging, theatricaltechnique, authorial intention, or lines betweenverbatim interview and dramatic adaptation. Theaudience wanted to talk about the implications ofthe work—“How can we be against the war inAfghanistan, and support the men who fight thatwar?” I was reminded of David’s reasons for leav-ing mainstream theatre to work in community set-tings—and of the very Canadian line about goingto see a fight and having a hockey game break out.

I went to hear a play reading and a public dis-cussion broke out.

In H o p e ,T e d

NOTES

1 Little, Edward. “Potential Impact.” alt.theatre: cultural diversity and the stage 6.1 (2008): 4-7. 2 Co-sponsored by the Centre for Oral History and Digital Storytelling, November 5-8, 2009.3 McQuaig, Linda. “Why not a federal Department of Peace? It’s a great idea.” CCPA Monitor 16.6 (2009): 5.4 For more information on Bill C-447 visit: www.departmentofpeace.ca 5 The OHP is led by Edward Little and consists of community partners Nisha Sajnani (Creative Alternatives) and Rahul Varma (Teesri Duniya Theatre); Sandeep Bhagwati (Theatre and Music); Steve High (Oral History); Warren Linds (Applied HumanSciences); Lorna Roth and Timothy Schwab (Communications Studies); Alan Wong (Ph.D. candidate); Hourig Attarian (2008-2009 artist-in-residence); and Ally Ntumba (2009-2010 artist-in-residence). For more information visit: www.lifestoriesmontreal.ca6 All quotes from Bhagwati, Sandeep. “Gesturing within a Realm of Shadows.” (Unpublished paper). Concordia University, November 5-8, 2009.7 The other members of the Playback ensemble presenting at the conference were Warren Linds and Alan Wong from the OHP, with community members Laura Mora, Lisa Ndejeru, and Deborah Simon. See also www.creative-alternatives.ca8 The seven research clusters that make up the Life Stories project are the Cambodian Working Group, the Refugee Youth Working Group, the Great Lakes of Africa Working Group, the Haiti Working Group, the Holocaust Working Group, the Education Working Group, and the Oral History and Performance Working Group. 9 Two works from Untold Histories were presented at the conference: a performance-video piece by Iran artist Shahrzad Arshadi entitled “Red Names and Je Me Souviens” and a work-in-progress by Gilda Monreal drawing on interviews she con-ducted with Chilean Refugees.10 Hourig is the 2008-2009 OHP artist-in-residence. Her first encounter with the Life Stories project occurred as a result of outreach by Rahul Varma as part of the Untold Histories project. Ally Ntumba, our 2009-2010 artist-in-residence, is workingon a community-engaged participatory theatre piece (“Congo Drama”) with Congolese youth from the neighbourhood ofMontreal North.11 The interviews are published in Attarian, H. and Yogurtian, H. “Survivor stories, surviving narratives: Autobiography, memory and trauma across generations.” Girlhood: Redefining the limits. Ed. Y. Jiwani, C. Steenbergen, and C. Mitchell.Montreal: Black Rose Books, 2006: 13-34. 12 All quotations from Attarian, H., and Van Fossen, R. “Stories Scorched from the Desert Sun: Testimony as Process.” (Unpublished paper) Concordia University, November 5-8, 2009.13 From my own notes of the conference.14 Belaouni was granted permission to remain in Canada on October 26, 2009.

Page 10: alt.theatre 7.2 - Sample article

10 EDITORIAL / by Edward L i t t le

From: Vancouver Moving Theatre <[email protected]>Date: 2009/11/5Subject: from savannah, Alt.theatre, letter to the editorTo: Edward Little <[email protected]>

Hi Ted,Enjoyed reading the recent issue (September) – including your very thought-provoking editorial.Found a lot to think about in the article “All White All Right? Vancouver Theatre Artists Talk about Vancouver’s Monochrome Stages.” Lots of important points raised that need to be heard and heeded. But the article effectively “disappeared” the creative contributions of Vancouver companies who regularly feature performing artists from a variety of cultural backgrounds on their stages (including the Firehall Arts Centre, urban ink and Vancouver Moving Theatre) and it “disappeared” the artists who have been performing on these stages, doing exciting and important work.

The picture is not monochrome. There’s tons of room for improvement in the city’s arts scene, but Vancouver’s stages are not all monochrome.

Savannah Walling Artistic DirectorVancouver Moving Theatre

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

LETTER TO THE EDITOR

© David Ward / Playback Theatre Ensemble l to r Chu-lynne Ng, Warren Linds, Deborah Simon.