alternative options for outsourcing aspects of airport operations
DESCRIPTION
Warren Adams, Executive Director with LeighFisher, gave a presentation at the ACI Board and Commissioners meeting on May 2, 2010, on the strengthening link between the growing challenges facing airports in the United States and the need to look at alternative forms of governance for addressing those challenges. Warren provided comparisons between governance models in the U.S. and in the European Union, and touched on the growing use of privatization as a form of governance change.TRANSCRIPT
PRESENTATIONPRESENTATION
Alternative Options for Outsourcing Aspects Alternative Options for Outsourcing Aspects of Airport Operationsof Airport Operations
Airport Board Member & CommissionersACI-NATucson, Arizona,May 2, 2011
Warren J AdamsWarren J. Adams
OverviewOverview
Conditions in the near-term: unprecedented challenges
R t t d i i t fi i l t i Recent trends in airport financial metrics
Airport capital funding needs
F d l f di d PFC Federal funding and PFCs
Governance at airports – U.S. and Europe
P i ti ti t d d l i h Privatization trends and role in governance changes
LeighFisher has offices in Chicago, Cincinnati, Dallas, London, Ottawa, the San Francisco area, and the Washington, D.C. area. For over 60 years, we have assisted our clients in achieving their vision and goals. We have extensive practical experience in all disciplines necessary for the planning and management of airports, including airfield and airspace analyses, airport management and operation, commercial and concession planning, forecasting and economics, facilities planning and design, federal funding and policy development, financial analysis and planning, financial feasibility and reporting, ground transportation planning, air quality analysis, noise and other environmental analyses, privatization, parking planning and analysis, rental car facility development and business planning, security planning and implementation, and simulation and operational analyses.
San Francisco Area Office:555 Airport Boulevard, Suite 300Burlingame, California 94010Telephone: (650) 579-7722
Washington D.C. Area Office:11730 Plaza America Drive, Suite 310Reston, Virginia 20190Telephone: (703) 961-9000
2 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
e ep o e (650) 5 9Fax: (650) 343-5220E-mail: [email protected]
Telephone: (703) 961 9000Fax: (703) 961-9318 www.leighfisher.com
Conditions in the NearConditions in the Near--TermTerm –– Unprecedented ChallengesUnprecedented Challenges
1. Slow national and regional economic growth – it’s about more than economic conditions in your community, but also in the communities that are served from your airport
2. Continued high unemployment and a tight credit market – will continue to make it difficult for passenger growth to take hold in a meaningful way,
i ll i th t t f hi h i li fespecially in the context of higher airline fares3. Higher airline fares (12 material industry attempts to increase fares
since mid-December, 9 of which have stuck) – the airlines have been very clear about their goal of focusing on financial sustainabilityclear about their goal of focusing on financial sustainability
4. Airline network restructuring related to consolidation and airline alliances – it is likely that airlines will use airports very differently in the future, particularly in the context of their alliancesp y
5. Continued oil price volatility – the question isn’t about if we will get back to June 2008 oil prices, but what happens to airline capacity when oil is consistently above current levels
3 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
The Lost Decade?The Lost Decade?
18% fewer domestic seats were available for U S passengers in 2010 than in 200018% fewer domestic seats were available for U.S. passengers in 2010 than in 2000
Percent Change in Scheduled Domestic Departing Seats at U.S. Airports
Several waves of capacity reductions as a result of:
– Fuel crisis– Recession and demand fall-off– Industry consolidation
Th t th f th U S i The strength of the U.S. economic recovery is uncertain Airports should expect, at best,
weak capacity growth in the nearweak capacity growth in the near term
– Fuel prices again volatile due to Middle East crisis and dollar depreciation
– Effects of United-Continental and Southwest-AirTran mergers not yet felt
Source: Official Airline Guides online database,accessed February 21, 2011.
4 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
Core Financial Operations Have Eroded for Many Airports Core Financial Operations Have Eroded for Many Airports
Median debt service coverage and safety margins fell to historical lows in FY 2009Median debt service coverage and safety margins fell to historical lows in FY 2009
2.5030%
1.50
2.00
1 %
20%
25%
Debt servicsa
fety
mar
gin
0.50
1.00
5%
10%
15%
ce coverage D
ebt s
ervi
ce s
0.000%
5%
1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Fiscal years
“Highly rated airports are expected to maintain consistently positive operating margins ”
Source: Moody’s Investors Service, “U.S. Airport Medians in FY 2009, December 2010. The fiscal year period varies by airport. Standard net revenue debt service coverage calculation shown.
Debt service safety marginDebt service coverage
5 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
consistently positive operating margins.-Rating Criteria for Airports, Fitch Ratings, November 2010
Debt service safety margin is calculated as net revenues less debt service, divided by gross revenues.
The Credit Environment is Getting TougherThe Credit Environment is Getting Tougher
The cost of borrowing could get more expensive
Access to the bond market will be more important in the future
The cost of borrowing could get more expensive
The Butcher’s BillPercent of Airports Receiving Rating or Outlook
Downgrades Since Financial Crisis
Without AIP grants and an increase in the PFC rate, capital costs will be paid with
Downgrades Since Financial Crisis
38% 35%
30%
40%
50%
airport equity and long-term debt
Rule of thumb: Each ratings notch increases borrowing costs by 25 basis
14%
0%
10%
20%
Large Medium Small increases borrowing costs by 25 basis points (0.25%)
A downgrade from AA to A+ (2 notches)
Large hubs
Medium hubs
Small hubs
Number of Airports Receiving Rating or Outlook Downgrades Since Financial Crisis
A downgrade from AA to A+ (2 notches) increases annual interest costs by $50,000 for each $10 million of debt
Hub sizeRatings
downgradesOutlook
downgrades
Large hubs 2 airports 8 airports
Medium hubs 9 airports 6 airports
6 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
Small hubs 8 airports 3 airportsSource: Rating agency reports, October 2008 and 2010.
Capital Planning is Increasingly Focused on Capital Planning is Increasingly Focused on Facility Maintenance and RenewalFacility Maintenance and RenewalThe average age of U S airport terminal facilities is 25 yearsThe average age of U.S. airport terminal facilities is 25 years
Slow growth (if any) means that capacity-enhancing capital projects have been postponed
– Federal funding mechanisms (AIP and PFC) and traditional planning
h f itapproaches favor capacity over maintenance and renewal
Many terminal facilities were t t d 25 i thconstructed 25+ years ago in the
post-deregulation era
– Aging building systems and deferred maintenance increase operating costsmaintenance increase operating costs and complicate budget and financial forecasting
– Some airport operators (TUS) are
7 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
Some airport operators (TUS) are optimizing their facilities
AIP Funding Levels Are Likely to Decrease AIP Funding Levels Are Likely to Decrease (If Not Today, Someday)(If Not Today, Someday)Legislators are focused on decreasing discretionary spendingLegislators are focused on decreasing discretionary spending
$6.00 $8
Uncommitted Balance of AATF (in billions) Average CPE Impact of AIP Grants
$5.20
$4.00
$5.00
$
$5
$6
$7
$8
$1.10 $1 00
$2.00
$3.00
$1
$2
$3
$4
S “Ai t d Ai T t F d D li i B l R i C
$0.40 $0.20 $0.00
$1.00
Nonhub Small Medium Large
$0
$1
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
S L i hFi h ti t A FFY 2009 AIP t fSource: “Airport and Airway Trust Fund: Declining Balance Raises Concerns over Ability to Meet Future Demands,” Government Accountability Office, February 3, 2011. AATF=Airport and Airway Trust Fund.
Source: LeighFisher estimates. Assumes FFY 2009 average AIP grants for each hub size would be bond financed using standard assumptions, with allocable debt service recovered in full from the airlines. CPE=Cost per enplaned passenger.
Lower ticket prices and decreased passenger numbers have led to decreased ticket tax receipts, providing fewer revenues for the FAA’s capital programs and operations account A solution to this structural problem
8 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
fewer revenues for the FAA s capital programs and operations account. A solution to this structural problem will likely involve revenue (i.e., new taxes and user fees) and cost (i.e., reduced AIP grants) components.
PFC WaitPFC Wait--andand--See for Another 4 Years?See for Another 4 Years?
Legislators are focused on limiting taxes and user feesLegislators are focused on limiting taxes and user fees
Airport Improvement Fees (AIFs) at 5 Busiest Canadian Airports
AIF
Share of New Funding Capacity from $1.50 Increase in PFC Rate
AirportAIF per
passenger
Toronto YYZ (originating) $25.00
Toronto YYZ
Small hub7%
Non hub3%
Toronto YYZ (connecting) $8.00
Vancouver (outside province) $15.00
Vancouver $5 00Large hub
71%
Medium hub19%
(within province) $5.00
Montreal $25.00
Calgary $25.00
Edmonton $20.00
71%
$
Source: Air Canada website, accessed February 21, 2011.Source: LeighFisher estimates.
To the extent PFCs provide a local funding solution, policymakerswill revisit the question in the long run. In today’s slow-growth
9 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
q g y genvironment, loosening restrictions on uses is also critical.
Possible Future ResultsPossible Future Results –– A Possible SolutionA Possible Solution
1. Increased financial pressure in the near-term – slower passenger growth in the future will place increased pressure on managing airport finances and margins
2. Continued capital investments are likely – airports are capital intensive, and while the size of capital programs will be revised based on available f d f di ill b d dfunds, funding will be needed
3. Uncertainty in federal funding adds to the pressure – the potential change in federal funding would place increased pressure on airport operators to increase financial performance in order to fund needed capitaloperators to increase financial performance in order to fund needed capital projects
4. More correct perception of airport purposes – airports are semi-commercial entities that are bound by the regulations of the federal y ggovernment and tied to local/municipal rules, which makes it difficult to react quickly to changing conditions
Governance of airports will become increasingly important in the future
10 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
Privatization could be viewed as a form of governance
Overview of Governance at AirportsOverview of Governance at Airports
Context is important
Governance at U.S. airports typically occurs through city and county
Context is important
Top 100 U.S. GovernanceStructures
ownership/governance
In Europe, governance typically occurs through public airport administrations
City and County
Airport Authoity
Port Authorityand “corporatization”, which is a 100% wholly owned public corporation
Privatization should be viewed as
Port Authority
State
another form of governance that could be used to address challenges or other structural issues that are facing U.S. airports
E.U. GovernanceStructures
airportsPublic
Mixed
Private
11 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
Making the ConnectionMaking the Connection
Why Should A City Pay Freeze Apply to my Airport?
Airports are typically governed by local regulations or
Why Should A City Pay Freeze Apply to my Airport?
requirements, such as – Procurement– Human resources
Accounting/financial management
HighDepartment
Commission or Board
– Accounting/financial management– Ordinances that dictate the purview
of Airport management– “Low bid” approach
Polit
ical
leve
rage
C ti ti
Authority
Other factors (such as politics) can make it difficult to realize the full potential of an opportunity HighLow
LowP Corporatization
Privatization
opportunity Traditional governance changes
have been about authority structures, but what about
Government operating cost
12 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
structures, but what about corporatization or privatization?
Privatization Can Take Many FormsPrivatization Can Take Many Forms
Privatization is not an all-or-nothing solutionPrivatization is not an all-or-nothing solution
Most U.S. airports have a high degree of private-sector involvement
PartialPrivatization
LEAST PRIVATIZATION
Contract ServicesPrivatization Management contract
Developer/project financing
Full
Long-term lease or concession agreement(including Privatization Pilot Program)
FullPrivatization
MOST PRIVATIZATION
Private airport development
13 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
PrivatizationPrivatization: History Dating Back to 1987: History Dating Back to 1987
UK Followed by Australia New Zealand Argentina South Africa Costa Rica Mexico EuropeUK Followed by Australia, New Zealand, Argentina, South Africa, Costa Rica, Mexico, Europe
Dublin
Pisa
St. Petersburg
Düsseldorf
Hamburg
F h
ASUR(Mexico)
Adelaide French Regionals
Athens
Ecuador
Chubu
Hong Kong
Adelaide
Argentina
Auckland
AustralianReg
Canberra
Birmingham
Bolivia
Brisbane g g
India
Kolkata
Chennai
NaviMumbai
Firenze
Larnaca
Copenhagen
Brussels
Bangalore
Hyderabad
Narita
FraportGAP
Costa Rica
Eindhoven
Hanover
Hobart
Luton
Bristol
Dusseldorf
Istanbul
Kent
Melbourne
Athens
Belfast
Bournemouth
Cardiff Brisbane
1990-19921987 19971993-1996 19991998 2004-20062000-2003 2007
Prague
Midway
Schiphol
AdP
Bratislava
Budapest
Delhi
Mumbai
Lima
Malta
Sydney
Zurich
(Mexico)
Jakarta
OMA
Stewart
Malaysia
Skavska
South Africa
Wellington
Naples
Perth
Rome
Sanford
Cochin
Copenhagen
E. Midlands
London City
Liverpool
Prestwick
Southampton
ViennaBAA
2008 2009 2010
Mackay
London City
Belfast City
Blackpool
London
Gatwick
Peel Airports
Cairns
Bristol
14 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
But…Privatization Is Not a PanaceaBut…Privatization Is Not a Panacea
Privatization is a significant decision with long-term consequences
Private airports do not necessarily provide the
Privatization is a significant decision with long-term consequences
highest level of service
Many airports serve broader community b oade co u tyinterests. Some private airports lack incentives to serve broader constituenciesconstituencies
Commercial performance is more dependent on factors such as infrastructure, tax rates, percent of international passengers etc
15 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
passengers etc.
The U.S. Experiment The U.S. Experiment –– Airport Privatization Pilot ProgramAirport Privatization Pilot Program
Initial interest in the APPP was limited
1996 AIP legislation allows lease of– No more than one large-hub
Initial interest in the APPP was limited
g– At least one general aviation airport (GA airport can be sold)– Balance available from non-large-hub and general aviation airports
65% of the airlines serving the airport accounting for at least 65% of the 65% of the airlines serving the airport accounting for at least 65% of the landed weight must approve
Limits increase in airline rates
Airport can receive AIP grants and levy a PFC
Recent legislative movement: increase the slots from 5 to 10, remove 65% require (consult instead), expands the type of
airport “slots” that are available
16 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
p
Activity/Inactivity in the U.S. APPPActivity/Inactivity in the U.S. APPP
InactiveActive
Large-Hub:1. Chicago Midway International Airport
(final application submitted October 2008, pending)
Stewart International Airport, Newburgh, New York by National Express Group (approved, no longer in program)
pending)
Medium/Small Hubs:2. Luís Muñoz Marín International Airport
(preliminary approval December 2009)
Brown Field/San Diego Commerce Center (application withdrawn 2001)
Niagara Falls International Airport (application withdrawn 2001)
GA Airports:3. Gwinnett County Briscoe Field Airport, Georgia (preliminary approval May 2010)
( pp ) Aguadilla Airport, Puerto Rico
(application withdrawn 2001) New Orleans Lakefront Airport
(application terminated 2008)4. Hendry County Airglades Airport, Florida
(FAA must approve by October 2010)
(app ca o e a ed 008) Louis Armstrong New Orleans
International Airport (preliminary approval September 2009, application withdrawn November 2010)
17 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
Disincentives to Privatization in U.S.Disincentives to Privatization in U.S.
U S Airport model is unique
Access to cheap tax-exempt debt
Airline agreements and federal policy that limit airline charges
U.S. Airport model is unique
Airline agreements and federal policy that limit airline charges
Restrictions on revenue diversion (reduces attractiveness)
Limited incentive for municipalities to sell unless gain can be realizedp g
High level of debt carried by many airports
Collective bargaining agreements and public sector unions
Desire to retain control – limited interest in partial ownership
Airlines content with status quo, have strong lobby voice, and have influenced Pilot Programg
18 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
What Just Happened and Is Slow Erosion a Risk?What Just Happened and Is Slow Erosion a Risk?
Getting in front of the challenge is key
U.S. airports are going through a structural change with respect to passenger levels, use by airlines, federal funding, and potentially, long-
Getting in front of the challenge is key
term financing capacity
There appears to be increasing acknowledgement that the needs of an airport as a semi-commercial enterprise (as opposed to local municipalities) require an increasing level of autonomy
In addressing local/regional goals and objectives (air service, economic vitality, etc), airport boards/management may need to look beyond traditional Airport authority transitions as a means to deliver results
Privatization—which is typically portrayed or viewed as a mechanism to solve municipal budgetary issues—could be a viewed as another way to change the governance of an airport
19 ACI-NA Airport Board Member & CommissionersMay 2, 2011AC
I547
way to change the governance of an airport