alternate means of wakefield suppression in clic main linac
DESCRIPTION
Alternate Means of Wakefield Suppression in CLIC Main Linac. Roger M. Jones Contribution from Cockcroft Institute and The University of Manchester. X-Band Structures and Beam Dynamics Workshop 1 st – 4 th December 2008 The Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 1
Alternate Means of Wakefield Suppression Alternate Means of Wakefield Suppression in CLIC Main Linacin CLIC Main Linac
Roger M. JonesContribution from
Cockcroft Institute andThe University of Manchester
X-Band Structures and Beam Dynamics Workshop1st – 4th December 2008
The Cockcroft Institute, Daresbury
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 2
Overview of FP7 Wakefield Suppression Kickoff Meeting
Integration of Task 9.2 within NC WP 9
Overall methodology and main goal
Possible goals and milestones
Very brief overview of past achievements
Review of some benefits of manifold damped and detuning wakefield suppression
Achievements and prospects for CLIC structure to date
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 3
Roger M. Jones (Univ. of Manchester faculty)Alessandro D’Elia (Dec 2008, Univ. of Manchester PDRA based at CERN)Vasim Khan (Ph.D. student, Sept 2007)
Collaborators: W. Wuensch, A. Grudiev (CERN)
FP7 Wakefield Suppression -Staff
V. Khan, CI/Univ. of Manchester Ph.D. student pictured at EPAC 08
A. D’Elia, CI/Univ. of Manchester PDRA based at CERN (former CERN Fellow).
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 4
Integration of Task 9.2 within NC WP 9
J-P Delahaye, XB08 Workshop, Cockcroft Inst., UK, 1 Dec 2008
E. Jensen, EuCARD Kickoff CERN, 5 Dec 2008
R.M. Jones attended as Univ. Manchester rep ofEuCARD Governing Board
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 5
Abstract of the planned activityThis work package will explore HOM damping in single multi-cell cavities and in groups of thereof. The features of both the long-range and short-range wake-fields will be explored. The consequences of the short-range wake-field on cavity alignment will be delineated. For the long-range wake-fields, trapped modes in particular will be focused upon. Global scattering matrix analysis will be employed in addition to current electromagnetic codes. The frequency sensitivity of the modes will be explored by exploiting a circuit analysis of the electromagnetic field and this will enable the sensitivity of the wake-field to fabrication errors to be evaluated over the complete collider.
At the University of Manchester and the Cockcroft Institute we are actively involved in simulating higher order modes of accelerating cavities and experimentally determining the structure of these modes with a purpose built stretched wire measurement set-up. We are actively involved in using intensive computer codes coupled with cascading of individual sections in order to rapidly compute the modal structure.
Integration of Task 9.2 within NC WP 9
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 6
List of Goals and MilestonesGoal 1. Develop a circuit model and a generalized scattering matrix technique to obtain accurate calculations on the global electromagnetic field from small segments thereof. This is a study of mode excitation.
Milestones1.1 Sep 09: Write report on circuit model and globalised scattering matrix technique. This will include an analysis of the partitioning of dipole modes in CLIC structures1.2 Apr 110: Produce a report for the design of damping and detuning a CLIC module
Goal 2. Make an accurate simulation of the wake-fields and HOMS. This is expected to be broadly verified with initial experiments on CTF3 and more precisely verified with an experiment at the SLAC FACET facility and stretched wire measurements.
Milestones2.1 Apr 10: Experiments on the measurement of HOMs on CTF3. This will enable the predicted features of HOM damping to be verified although only the broad characteristics of the modes are expected to be measurable.2.2 Aug 10: Perform additional measurements on the wake-field at the SLAC FACET facility. This will facilitate a detailed comparison between the predicted decrement in the wake envelope and experimentally determined values. ASSET typically is accurate to better than 0.01 V/pC/mm/m.
Integration of Task 9.2 within NC WP 9
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 7
2.3 Sept 10: Write up a report on the experimental measurement of modes.2.4 April 11: Conduct wire measurement on CLIC cavities to verify the distribution of frequencies and kick factors
Goal 3. Undertake beam dynamics simulations with Placet. These simulations will take into account both the long-range and short-range wake-fields. Simulations will be performed both with the baseline design and with relaxed fabrication tolerances. In addition to the standard wake-field the influence of x-y coupling of wake-fields from possible cavity distorsions will also be investigated. Milestones
3.1 April 11: Initial result on baseline beam dynamics simulations 3.2 June 11: Results on beam dynamics simulations with relaxed tolerances and initial simulations on transverse mode coupling3.3 August 11: Report on beam dynamics simulations including long and short range wakefields. 3.3 Sept 11: Report on beam dynamics simulations including transverse mode coupling
Integration of Task 9.2 within NC WP 9
Major goal: Design and measure wakefield suppression in module
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 8
Wealth of Experience on Detuned Structure and Manifold Wakefield Suppression
More than one and half decades of experience in this area
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 9
Circuit Model of DDS
**Wakefield damping in a pair of X-band accelerators for linear colliders.R.M. Jones , et al, Phys.Rev.ST Accel.Beams 9:102001,2006.
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 10
Wealth of Experience on Detuned Structure and Manifold Wakefield Suppression
DDS1 DDS3
RDDS1 H60VG4SL17A/B
1. SLAC-PUB 7287 (1996), 2. SLAC-PUB 8174 (1999)3. Wakefield damping in a pair of X-band accelerators for linear colliders.R.M. Jones , et al, Phys.Rev.ST Accel.Beams 9:102001,2006.
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 11
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 12
Determination of Modes in Structure via Stretched Wire Measurement
Measurement of RDDS1
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 13
Determination of Cell Offset From Energy Radiated Through Manifolds
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 14
Summary of Manifold Suppression of Wakefields in Detuned Structures
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 15
Beam Dynamics and Relaxed Tolerances
Emittance dilution (illustrated by the red dashed curve) versus the percentage change in the bunch spacing. Also shown is the corresponding rms of the sum wake-field (by the solid blue curve).
Emittance we incorporate random frequency errors into a set of 50 accelerating structures and randomly distribute them along the entire linac. In all cases the beam is injected into the linac with an offset of approximately one y, with an energy of 5 GeV and the progress of the
beam is monitored as it traverses the entire linac. The final emittance dilution, together with the rms of the sum wake-field, is illustrated for small changes in the bunch spacing. The particular simulation illustrated includes a cell-to-cell frequency error with an rms value of 20 MHz. We chose this rather large frequency error in order to gain an understanding of the impact of relaxed
**Wakefield damping in a pair of X-band accelerators for linear colliders.R.M. Jones , et al, Phys.Rev.ST Accel.Beams 9:102001,2006.
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 16
Summary of Manifold Wakefield Suppression
Detuning along with moderate damping has been shown to be well-predicted by the circuit model.
Interleaving of successive structures allows the detuning to be effective.
Manifold wakefield suppression has added benefits:1. Serves as built-in beam diagnostic2. Allows internal alignment of cells to be obtained from
manifold radiation3. Serves as vacuum pump-outs.
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 17
Achievements and Prospects for CLIC Structure
Current CLIC Baseline Design Heavily Damped Structure (Q ~ 10)
CAD of Conceptual Design for Alternate CLIC Moderately Damped Structure (Q ~ 500)
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 18
2. Parameters of WDS-120 protos 2. Parameters of WDS-120 protos @[email protected]
Structure number maxFoM 2(minCost) 4 6 CLIC_14Wu
RF phase advance per cell: Δφ [o] 120 120 120 120 120
Average iris radius/wavelength: <a>/λ 0.115 0.105 0.115 0.125 0.12
Input/Output iris radii: a1,2 [mm] 3.33, 2.4 2.85, 2.4 3.33, 2.4 3.84, 2.4 3.87, 2.13
Input/Output iris thickness: d1,2 [mm] 3.33, 0.83 1.5, 0.83 1.83, 0.83 2.00, 0.83 2.66, 0.83
Group velocity: vg(1,2)/c [%] 1.44, 1.0 1.28, 1.0 1.93, 1.0 2.93, 1.0 2.39, 0.65
N. of cells, structure length: Nc, l [mm] 12, 112 23, 204 25, 221 24, 212 24, 229
Bunch separation: Ns [rf cycles] 6 6 7 7 7
Number of bunches in a train: Nb 278 106 83 77 120
Pulse length, rise time: τp , τr [ns] 188.2, 17.3 126.9, 17.7 115.1, 17.3 101.5, 17.6 160, 30
Input power: Pin [MW], P/C1,2 [GW/m] 54, 2.6, 2.4 61, 3.4, 2.6 73, 3.5, 2.7 87, 3.6 76, 3.1, 2.7
Max. surface field: Esurfmax [MV/m] 262 274 277 323 323
Max. temperature rise: ΔTmax [K] 55 30 23 (const) 30 37
Efficiency: η [%] 25.9 19.0 18.4 19.3 21.5
Luminosity per bunch X-ing: Lb× [m-2] 2.4×1034 2.0×1034 2.4×1034 2.8×1034 2.6×1034
Bunch population: N 5.3×109 4.2×109 5.3×109 6.5×109 5.8×109
Figure of merit: ηLb× /N [a.u.] 11.6 8.8 8.3 8.3 9.5
Alexej Grudiev (CERN)
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 19
Bunch spacing is 6/7 cycles (depending on specific design) and this corresponds to 0.5003/0.5837 ns at a wavelength of 25 mm (0/2 = 11.9942 GHz).
C.f. NLC/JLC in which 0/2= 11.424 GHz and the bunch spacing was 1.4/2.8 ns –i.e. CLIC is ~ 3 times smaller in bunch spacing
Thus, it is clear the detuning must demand a more rapid fall-off in the wake-field.
In practise the bandwidth of the Gaussian needs to be increased.
C.f. NLC/JLC in which we investigated a bandwidth in terms of sigma: 4/5 sigma. We also investigated various bandwidths (in the range >9 % to <12 %)
Ambitious/demanding requirements!
Application to CLIC StructureApplication to CLIC Structure
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 20
Band partitioning of kick factors in 206 cell DDS1 X-band structure (facc=11.424 GHz). Largest kick factors located in the first band. Third and sixth bands although, an order of magnitude smaller, must also be be detuned along with the 1st band.
CLIC design facc =11.9942 GHz shifts the dipole bands up in frequency.
Band PartitioningBand Partitioning
Ref: Jones et. al, 2003, SLAC-PUB 9467
The partitioning of bands changes with phase advance. Choosing a phase advance close to pi per cell results in a diminution of the kick factor of the first band and and enhancement of the 2nd and 3rd bands. A similar effect occurs close to pi/2.
Kick factors versus phase advance for cells with an iris radius of ~ 4.23 mm.
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 21EPAC, 26 June 2008 W. Wuensch, CERN
HOM damping waveguides
Magnetic field concentration –pulsed surface heating
High electric field and powerflow region - breakdown
Short range wakefields
Cooling Vacuum pumping
Alignment
Beam and rf
11.9942 GHz, 2π/3 so 8.332 mm period
Current CLIC Baseline Accelerating Structure
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 22
High powerrf coupler
HOM coupler
Beam tube
Acceleration cells
Manifold
Alternate Design CLIC Accelerating Structure
RDDS structure illustrates the essential features of the conceptual design
Each of the cells is tapered –iris reduces with an Erf-like distribution
HOM manifold running alongside main structure remove dipole radiation and damp at remote location (4 in total)
Each of the HOM manifolds can be instrumented to allow: 1) Beam Position Monitoring2) Cell alignments to be inferred
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 23
Wake-field Suppression in CLIC Main Linac -Initial design
Circuit model provides rapid determination of optimal wakefield suppression results in a bandwidth of 3.6 (3.36 GHz) and f/ fc =20%.
Leftmost indicates the modal distribution and rightmost the coupled and uncoupled wakefield
Four-fold interleaving of successive structures results in excellent wake-field suppression at the location of each bunch
Meets CLIC beam dynamics requirements!
However, breakdown considerations require a redesign with additional constraints imposed
Envelope of Wakefield for Single 25-Cell Structure (Q ~ ∞)
Wakefield for 8-Fold Interleaved Structure (Q ~ ∞)
Kick Factor Weighted Density Function
Envelope of Wakefield for 4-Fold Interleaved Structure (Finite Q )
dn/df
Kdn/dfCoupled
Uncoupled
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 24
Wake-field Suppression in CLIC Main Linac -Modified design
Electrical breakdown considerations at a CLIC gradient of 100 MV/m restricts the group velocity of the fundamental mode
This forces the initial and final iris radii to be restricted and enforces a severe restriction on the bandwidth of the accompanying dipole modes.
The envelope of the wake-field is not sufficiently suppressed.
The option of forcing the bunches to be located at the zero-crossing is explored
Beam dynamics study with PLACET in progress
Results of initial study shown
See Khan & Jones, Proc. EPAC 2008 and LINAC 2008
Parameters of detuned CLIC structure CLIC_ZC Envelope of Wakefield for Single
24-Cell Structure (Q ~ 500)
Envelope of Wakefield for 4-Fold Interleaved Structures
Wakefield for 4-Fold Interleaved CLIC_ZC Structure
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 25
Summary
Analytical truncated Gaussian is a useful design tool to predict wakefield suppression.
Initial design provides a well-damped wakefield.
Including the constraints imposed by breakdown forces a consideration of zero-point crossing.
Beam dynamics study including systematic and random errors in progress –will provide detailed answer.
Manifold damping provides useful characteristics of built-in BPM together with a direct indication of internal alignments
FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009FP7 NC WP 9 Task 9.2, Kickoff Meeting, CERN, 26 Jan 2009 26
Overall Goals Provide proof-of-principle of manifold damped and
detuned design and structure test at CTF3 Overall properties of wakefield suppression to be
tested in modules at CTF3 (SLAC FACET?) Provide typical tolerances/alignments for practical
multi-structure operation (from PLACET beam dynamics simulations) –CLIC!
N.b. this structure has the potential for a significantly smaller pulse temperature rise than the present baseline design for CLIC