alleniv

Upload: mrlucky09855

Post on 29-May-2018

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    1/27

    Organics in the Suisun Marsh

    Harry L. Allen, U.S. EPA

    Region 9 FOSC

    Bioremedation of Diesel Range

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    2/27

    Background Pipeline spill occurred on April 27, 2004 Greater than 100,000 gallons of diesel fuel

    released to a wetland

    Area is approximately 242 acres in size and ismanaged as a duck hunting clubs

    Water levels controlled by levees and gates Responders designated 2 divisions: A (a

    brood pond) and B (a shooting area)

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    3/27

    A B

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    4/27

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    5/27

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    6/27

    Incident Command

    Logistics Planning Operations

    JIC

    EPA

    Safety

    Area A Crew

    Area B Crew

    Liaison

    Unified CommandFOSC USCG/U.S..EPA

    SOSC CA DFGRP Kinder Morgan EP

    FinanceKMEP, Contractors KMEP, Contractors KMEP, Contractors

    Environmental UnitCA DFG

    KMEP,

    CA DFG OSPR,KMEP, USCG PST

    KMEP, EPA, OSPR

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    7/27

    Response Strategies Mechanical

    Booming, absorbent materials, skimming, andexcavation

    Water level management Tide gate adjustments were utilized to drain

    Division B

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    8/27

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    9/27

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    10/27

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    11/27

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    12/27

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    13/27

    Response Strategies An evaluation of cleanup alternatives

    determined that bioremediation was highlyfeasible and cost effective

    Add polyphosphate (Div A) & di-ammoniumphosphate (Div B) to affected soils to facilitatebiodegradation of diesel in soil

    Tilling for aeration

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    14/27

    Response Coordination State:

    Department of Fish & Game and Regional WaterQuality Control Board

    Federal:

    NOAA, U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Endangered Species Issues

    DOI Cultural and Historic Properties Issues

    Regional Response Team

    Approval of nutrient addition

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    15/27

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    16/27

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    17/27

    Will bioremediation work.before winter arrives?

    Heterotrophic plate count and respirometrystudy (KMEP lead) High populations of TPH degraders present

    Populations increase in presence of oxygen

    Bench-scale tests (EPA lead) Up to 40% degradation observed in bench flasksafter 14 days

    Preparations!ConstructionMouse catching

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    18/27

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    19/27

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    20/27

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    21/27

    Monitoring Water and soil samples collected regularly by

    EPA and KMEP Effectiveness of response measures will be

    determined by decreases in Total PetroleumHydrocarbon (TPH analysis) and by sheen tests

    Bioremediation will be measured specifically byModified GC/MS fingerprint analysis

    Biomarker ratios will be derived

    C17:Pristane C18:Phytane

    Pristane:Phytane

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    22/27

    Soil Sampling Results (Division A)Mean

    Concentration 8653 1907 1380 606 352

    Time (days) T0 T27 T32 T62 T99

    PercentRemoval NA 77.96 84.04 92.99 95.93

    Maximum

    Concentration 160000 13000 8700 1600 860

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    23/27

    Biomarker Ratio Trends

    Division A

    R2

    R2

    0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    7/ 7/

    i

    ( i

    (

    Untransformed Biomarker Data - Samples TS-A-10

    = 0.8424

    = 0.985

    7/1/2004 8/2004 7/14/2004 21/2004 7/28/2004 8/2/2004

    Sampling Date

    Ratio

    C17:Pr stane TS-A-10

    C18:Phytane TS-A-10

    Linear C17:Pr stane TS-A-10)

    Linear C18:Phytane TS-

    A-10)

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    24/27

    Biomarker Ratio Trends Division A

    R2

    R2

    7

    /1/200

    4

    7

    /8/200

    4

    7/14

    /200

    4

    7/21

    /200

    4

    7/28

    /200

    4

    8

    /2/200

    4

    i

    i

    i

    ( i

    )(

    )

    LN-Transformed Biomarker Data

    = 0.8669

    = 0.961

    -0.2000

    0.0000

    0.2000

    0.4000

    0.6000

    0.8000

    1.0000

    1.2000

    Sampling Date

    L

    NR

    atio

    C17:Pr stane TS-A-10

    C18:Phytane TS-A-10

    C17:Pr stane TS-A-15

    C18:Phytane TS-A-15

    C17:Pr stane TS-A-20

    C18:Phytane TS-A-20

    Linear C17:Pr stane

    TS-A-10Linear C18:Phytane

    TS-A-10

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    25/27

    Biomarker Ratio Trends Division B

    Transformed Biomarker Ratios - Samples ES-1 & ES-4

    R2 = 0.7251

    R2 = 0.5893

    -0.80

    -0.60

    -0.40

    -0.20

    0.00

    0.20

    0.40

    0.60

    0.80

    7/1/200

    4

    7/8/200

    4

    7/14/200

    4

    7/22

    /200

    4

    7/28

    /200

    4

    8/4/200

    4

    Sampling Dates

    LN

    Ratio

    ln C17/Pristane (ES-4)

    ln C18/Phytane (ES-4)

    ln C17/Pristane (ES-1)

    ln C18/Phytane (ES-1)

    Linear (ln C18/Phytane (ES-4))

    Linear (ln C17/Pristane (ES-4))

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    26/27

    Bioremediation Lessons Learned Start early!

    A more timely application of nutrients in future spillswill allow for improved evaluation.

    Response measures achieved interim remediation goals but raise questions Was nutrient addition necessary?

    Consider other lines of evidence prior tocrediting the specific approach as clearly

    successful. TPH data should be normalized to reduce potential

    errors.

  • 8/9/2019 allenIV

    27/27

    Keep in TouchHarry Allen, OSC

    Phone: 415-972-3063

    Email: [email protected]

    Website: www.epaosc.org