all sky in the far infrared: first results from the akari all sky survey agnieszka pollo ipj...
TRANSCRIPT
All sky in the far infrared: first results from the AKARI All Sky Survey
Agnieszka PolloIPJ
Warszawa, 12.05.2010
Electromagnetic spectrum
Infrared range: longer than optical and shorter than microvawe waves.
Infrared
Astronomers roughly divide infrared into three ranges:
1. near- (NIR: 1 – 5 micrometers),
2. mid- (Mid-IR: – 5 -- 30 micrometers)
3. far- (FIR: 30 – >200 micrometers).
Infrared = heatAll objects in the Universe with ANY temperature radiate in the infrared
Humans in the Infrared
Human body of a normal temperature has radiates with a maximum in the infrared around 10-12 microns.
Humans in the Infrared
Human body of a normal temperature has radiates with a maximum in the infrared around 10-12 microns.
Infrared astronomical observations
Astronomy: observations in the infrared
Atmosphere– absorbs infrared– emits in the infrared itself
Atmospheric emission is the strongest at ~10 μm
There are a few IR “windows” in the atmosphere where there is no emission and no strong absorption, mainly above ~ 4 μm (NIR).
Infrared windows in the atmosphere
Band Sky Transparency J high low at night H high very low K high very low
L low
M low high
N very high
17 - 40 microns very low very high
WavelengthRange
Sky Brightness
1.1 - 1.4 microns 1.5 - 1.8 microns 2.0 - 2.4 microns
3.0 - 4.0 microns
3.0 - 3.5 microns: fair3.5 - 4.0 microns:
high 4.6 - 5.0 microns
7.5 - 14.5 microns
8 - 9 microns and 10 -12 microns: fair
others: low 17 - 25 microns: Q28 - 40 microns: Z
Astronomical observations in the infrared
Telescopes in high dry mountains (Atacama)
airplanes
balloons
satellites
What can we observe in IR?
Everything hidden behind dust
Everything cold:– dust – cold stars– planets
Everything (?) far: strongly redshifted galaxies
Spitzer: star forming regions in Cygnus
What can we observe in IR?
Everything hidden behind dus
Everything cold:– dust – cold stars– planets
Everything (?) far: strongly redshifted galaxies
Spitzer, “hot Jupiter” HD 189733b
650oC 930oC
What can we observe in IR?
Hubble Deep Field in NIR
Spitzer:cosmic IR background from very first galaxies?
Everything hidden behind dus
Everything cold:– dust – cold stars– planets
Everything (?) far: strongly redshifted galaxies
What can we observe in IR?
Astronomical objects in IR look different than in other wavelengths
Different parts of the spectrum show different things: Far IR: dust, UV: young hot stars optical: most of stars which are not obscured by
dust near-IR: stars hidden behind the dust (here the
dust becomes relatively transparent)
What can we observe in IR?
This makes IR a very important range for galaxy observations
– it allows to see the parts of galaxies which are completely hidden by dust (and sometimes whole galaxies faint or invisible in optical range) – important for a total census of stellar light (and mass) in the Universe
– it gives a possibility to discover very distant galaxies
Copyright by: Kasia Małek
Orion in optical and IR
M31 (Andromeda)
optical
FUVFIR
IRAS
Satellite IR observatories
First IR satellite, launched by NASA in January 1983
First ever map of (almost - 98%) all sky in IR during a ten month period from January to November, 1983
All sky in IR - IRAS (80')
IRAS – All Sky in IR 60 cm helium-cooled
telescope 4 IR bands at effective
wavelengths: 12, 25, 60, 100 μm
The angular resolution varied between about 0.5' at 12 microns to about 2' at 100 microns
After a 10 month long mission, IRAS exhausted its cryogen and ceased operations on November 21, 1983
IRAS – All Sky in IR ~ 350 000 IR point sources
in the sky which increased the number
of cataloged astronomical sources of 70%
most of them belong to Milky Way: cool stars, nebulae, cirruses...
plus a few tens of dusty galaxies
some sources still remain unidentified
AKARI
• 68.5 cm diameter telescope• two main instruments:
– the Infrared Camera (IRC) – for mid-IR– the Far-Infrared Surveyor (FIS) – for FIR
• launched in February 2006• 16 month cryogenic mission lifetime
between May 2006 and August 2007 (needed for FIR observations; liquid helium ran out on 26 August 2007 )
• now – the “warm” phase • deeper; much better resolution than IRAS
AKARI
6 IR bands from 9 to 180 μm (broader range than IRAS and reaching longer wavelengths)
Planned: All Sky Survey + two deep surveys (NEP and ADF-S) + a series of dedicated pointed observations
Improvement of resolution comparing to IRAS
In MIR
In FIR
Akari All Sky Surveys: point source catalogs at FIR and MIR
• public release 31 March 2010• (not yet crossed-matched)• first (simple) science results published in a
dedicated A&A special issue
Akari All Sky Surveys: point source catalogs at FIR and MIR
• in total, more than 1.3 mln sources (> 3 times more than IRAS) in 6 bands
• AKARI-IRC Point Source Catalogue v. 1:– 870 973 objects in two MIR bands (9 and 18
μm) – 10 times more sensitive (at 18 μm) than
IRAS– an accuracy of arcseconds (compared to
arcminutes with IRAS)• AKARI-FIS Bright Source Catalogue v. 1:
– 427 071 sources in 4 FIR bands (65, 90, 140, and 160 μm)
– (IRAS longest band was 100 μm)
Infrared sources at 9 μm: blue, at 18 μm: green, at 90 μm: red.
Galactic center Galactic plane
AKARI All-Sky survey at 9 μm
• Emission from the photospheres of stars dominates the 9 μm catalogue: the galactic disc and nuclear bulge are clearly visible at this wavelength
NEP (North Ecliptic Pole)
ADF-S (South Ecliptic Pole, AKARI Deep Field South)
AKARI All-Sky survey at 9 μm
Infrared sources at 9 μm: blue, at 18 μm: green, at 90 μm: red.
Galactic center
Galactic plane
•dust and star formation in the disc of our Galaxy become more prominent at 90 micrometres;
•Away from the Galactic Plane, many extragalactic objects are detected
FIR: AKARI ASS (AKARI All-Sky Survey: Bright Source Catalog)
v. β-1: 94% of the sky in 16 months
>43 000 sources with fluxes measured in all four FIS bands (160, 140, 90, 65 μm), i.e. “colors”
What are these sources?
• Statistical analysis of all sky surveys provides a powerful tool to understand the properties of all classes of objects in the Universe.
• But first, we need to know: what they are?• From our point of view, the crucial point was:
which of these sources are the galaxies, how they can be distinguished from sources which belong to Milky Way?
• If, e.g., we want to make a (costly) measurement of galaxy distances by spectrophotometry, we do not want our sample to be “poluted” by too many stars (and vice versa, stellar researches do not want to be bothered by galaxies).
What are these sources?
• In case of FIR studies there is no credible way to find good galaxy candidates (yet)
• At first, we have at our disposal only FIR fluxes (i.e. FIR colors)
Preceding Study from IRAS
With IRAS four bands (12, 25, 60, 100 μm), a very detailed classification was possible. However, in the case of AKARI FIS ASS, we must rely only on four FIR bands (at longer wavelengths), and this cannot be a trivial application of IRAS methodology, since the physical processes behind emission in these bands are different.
(Walker et al. 1989)
Classical method: color-color diagrams.
The color-color diagrams
• The basic idea: different classes of astronomical (and not not only) objects have different colors
• Color is defined as a difference between fluxes at different wavelengths (also far from optical)
The color-color diagrams
• Such differences were first observed in the optical range: it is well known that, e.g. young stars are bluer than old ones, and spiral galaxies are bluer than ellipticals.
The color-color diagrams
• This is (broadly speaking) related to the fact, that different object have different spectra, and their shape may in a complex way vary depending on their properties
Here: templates from Buzzoni at al. 2005
1. The sample was matched with SIMBAD and NED (astronomical database for stars, nebulae, and galaxies).
Star-Galaxy Separation by FIS Color-Color Diagrams
Data
1. Since we were looking mainly for galaxies, we selected sources in a low-cirrus region (I100 < 10 MJy sr-1) on the sky to avoid contamination in FIR flux (5176 objects), which in practice meant mainly avoiding Galactic plane.
Objects in the All Sky Survey
• In this way, we found– 4272 galaxies– 382 other
extragalactic objects– 399 Galactic objects– among them, 349
Milky Way stars– for 101 sources it
remains unclear whether they are Galactic or not
– only 22 sources were left unidentified
Color-color diagram (an example)
We found that we can define a separation line on practically all the FIS color-color plots to select >97% of galaxies and reject > 80\% of stars. (Pollo, Rybka & Takeuchi, 2010, A&A).
galaxies
stars
Other and unidentified objects
Only sources with the best photometry:
stars (green)
galaxies (red) other
(violet)
Star-galaxy separation in the color-color plots
• Color-color diagrams allow for a very good star-galaxy separation
• Stars form two branches: – a bigger, “bluer” branch is dominated by optically
bright stars, mostly evolved stars and pulsating variables (often Mira-type)
– a smaller branch overlapping galaxies contains a few bright stars with known IR excess (due to, e.g. dusty disks) – most notable among them is Vega, and a certain number of stars optically very faint, usually known before only thanks to their IR identifications (IRAS, 2MASS) – these stars would be in any case very difficult to be distinguished from galaxies only from FIR colors
Star-galaxy separation in the color-color plots
• Our method allows for a good separation of galaxies from stars – the contamination of a “blue branch” of stars by galaxies is very low
• This applies to FIR-bright objects from outside of the Galactic plane
• Most of the observed galaxies (with known z) are nearby galaxies (z<0.1) – however, we expect that more distant galaxies should be even redder – the method should remain valid
How does it apply to the Galactic plane
• In the remaining part (i.e. disk of the Galaxy):
– much more unidentified sources (40% vs 0.5% in the analyzed part) – this is probably related to much better resolution of AKARI with respect to previous experiments
– much less galaxies (15% vs 80%)– similar percentage (!) of stars and nebulae –
again, the reason is most probably the limited resolution of previous observations
– much more sources objects of unknown nature (observed before but not identified) – 30% vs 3%
– classification of objects from the Galactic plane will require more and much more careful analysis