alex and ani v. northeast diamond - complaint

Upload: sarah-burstein

Post on 04-Jun-2018

215 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    1/30

    UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

    DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS

    __________________________________________

    )

    ALEX AND ANI, LLC., d/b/a ALEX AND )

    ANI, )Plaintiffs, )

    )

    v. ) C.A. NO. 1:14-cv-10104)

    NORTHEAST DIAMOND AND )

    CASTING CO. INC., d/b/a )NORTHEAST JEWELERS, and ) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED

    NORI FUNDRAISING CONCEPTS INC., )

    )

    Defendants. )

    __________________________________________)

    COMPLAINT

    For its Complaint against Northeast Diamond and Casting Co. Inc. d/b/a Northeast

    Jewelers (Northeast Jewelers) and NORI Fundraising Concepts Inc. (NORI) (collectively

    Defendants), Alex and Ani, LLC (Alex and Ani) alleges as follows:

    NATURE OF THE ACTION

    1. This is an action at law and equity arising under the patent laws of the UnitedStates, Title 35 of the United States Code; the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq.; and for

    substantial and related Massachusetts and common-law claims.

    2. Alex and Ani is an American jewelry company based in Rhode Island. At alltimes relevant to this Complaint, Alex and Ani created, manufactured, and distributed a

    distinctive bangle that is the subject of United States Design Patent No. D498,167 entitled

    Expandable Wire Bracelet (the 167 Patent).

    3. Based on the design claimed in the 167 patent, Alex and Ani has created asignature line of distinctive Alex and Ani expandable bangles sharing a common design (the

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    2/30

    2

    Signature Bangle) that has achieved secondary meaning in the United States marketplace.

    4. Defendants Northeast Jewelersa former retailer partner of Alex and Ani thatsold Alex and Anis Signature Banglesand NORI have manufactured, imported, sold, and/or

    otherwise distributed knockoff bangle bracelets from their North Attleboro location and online

    throughout the United States, and attempted to capitalize on the goodwill of the distinctive Alex

    and Ani brand.

    THE PARTIES

    5. Alex and Ani is a limited liability company organized under the laws of the Stateof Rhode Island with its principal place of business located at 2000 Chapel View Boulevard,

    Cranston, Rhode Island.

    6. On information and belief, defendant Northeast Jewelers is a corporationorganized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts with its principal

    place of business located at 6 South Washington Street, North Attleboro, Massachusetts 02760.

    On information and belief, Northeast Jewelers has been doing business under the name

    Northeast Jewelers since September 2008.

    7. On information and belief, defendant NORI Fundraising Concepts Inc. (NORI)is a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts

    with its principal place of business located at 6 South Washington Street, North Attleboro,

    Massachusetts 02760.

    JURISDICTION AND VENUE

    8. This action arises under the patent laws of the United States, Title 35 of theUnited States Code; the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1051 et seq; and for substantial and related

    Massachusetts common-law claims. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 15

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 2 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    3/30

    3

    U.S.C. 1121 and 28 U.S.C. 1338 and 1367. As Massachusetts corporations sharing a place

    of business in North Attleboro, MA, this Court has personal jurisdiction over Defendants.

    9. Venue is proper in this District under 38 U.S.C. 1391(b) and (c) and 1400(b),because Defendants reside in this Judicial District and acts of infringement were committed in

    this Judicial District. Venue is also proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1391(b)(2),

    because a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to Alex and Anis claims

    occurred in this District.

    ALEX AND ANIS FAMOUS TRADE DRESS

    10.

    Alex and Ani manufactures and sells American-made, eco-friendly, spiritually

    uplifting, positive-energy jewelry, including bangle bracelets, earrings, necklaces, and rings that

    bear Alex and Anis distinctly recognizable designs, including its signature charms.

    11. Alex and Anis high quality fashion jewelry designs carry self-affirming messagesbased on the life and experiences of its Founder and Creative Director, Carolyn Rafaelian. Alex

    and Ani manufactures its products in Rhode Island and sells them through authorized retailers

    throughout the United States and internationally.

    12. Alex and Ani jewelry is made entirely in the United States using eco-friendly,recycled materials. Manufacturing in the United States and reusing and recycling materials is an

    integral part of Alex and Anis mission as a conscious and eco-friendly company.

    13. The distinctive Alex and Ani products feature a circular, one-piece bangle stylebracelet formed from a single piece of wire from approximately .050 to .064 gauge, the ends of

    which overlap in part, capturing the portion of the wire above and below each end by means of a

    stylistic twist, thereby creating a space between the upper and lower portions, creating the

    illusion that multiple bangles are being worn. Alex and Anis Signature Bangles also include a

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 3 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    4/30

    4

    prominent charm positioned within the overlapping portion of the bangle. This bangle design is

    common across Alex and Anis signature line of products.

    14. This unique combination of elements (the Alex and Ani Trade Dress) serves toreadily distinguish for consumers Alex and Anis products from the goods of competitors. Alex

    and Ani enjoys substantial goodwill in the design of the Alex and Ani Signature Bangles, owing

    to Alex and Anis lengthy, innovative and exclusive use of the distinctive product design.

    15. A sample of the Alex and Ani Signature Bangle illustrating the Alex and AniTrade Dress is shown below:

    16. Since at least as early as 2004, Alex and Ani has continuously used the Alex andAni Trade Dress in commerce in connection with its Signature Bangles.

    17. Alex and Ani has gone to great expense and effort to develop, promote, andprotect the Alex and Ani Trade Dress. As a result of Alex and Anis efforts and longevity, the

    Alex and Ani Trade Dress and all products sold bearing the Alex and Ani Trade Dress have

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 4 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    5/30

    5

    become widely recognized by consumers and the industry as being associated with Alex and

    Ani. Alex and Anis products have achieved a well-deserved reputation for quality and have

    experienced impressive sales growth and success over the last nine years.

    18. Alex and Ani has expended substantial sums to conduct advertising highlightingthe Alex and Ani Trade Dress throughout the United States.

    19. Since its launch in 2004, Alex and Ani has enjoyed enormous success. Its jewelryis sold at thousands of company-owned stores and carefully selected boutiques throughout the

    United States and around the world. Alex and Ani scrutinizes each prospective retail partner

    before allowing it to sell Alex and Ani jewelry, and monitors each retailers presentation of Alex

    and Ani merchandise throughout the duration of their partnership to ensure that the jewelry is

    displayed in a manner consistent with Alex and Anis brand.

    20. Alex and Ani has become one of the fastest growing privately owned companiesin America. Its innovative concepts and designs have received extensive accolades and awards.

    For example, Alex and Ani was ranked 4th among Top Retail Companies on the 2013 Inc. 5000

    list of the fastest-growing companies. Alex and Ani was the recipient of the Ernst & Young

    2012 Entrepreneur of the Year award, and Providence Business News listed Ms. Rafaelian, as

    the 2012 Woman to Watch in Creative Services.

    21. The excellence of Alex and Ani products has been widely recognized in theUnited States and worldwide and has favorably been reported upon by the press. Just a few of

    the many publications that have reported on Alex and Anis well-known Trade Dress are Vogue,

    Glamour, Redbook, InStyle Spain, Lucky Magazine, Daily Front Row, ELLE, ELLE Spain,

    Womens Health andBrides. Moreover, Alex and Anis products have been extensively featured

    in fashion magazines and news media, includingReal Simple Magazine, W Magazine, Us Weekly

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 5 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    6/30

    6

    Magazine, andRedbook Magazine, among others.

    22. Because of its distinctive nature and wide-ranging popularity, the Alex and AniSignature Bangle has frequently been a target of copying by competitors in the industry,

    including Cara Accessories, Ann Taylor Loft, Forever 21, Old Navy, and Max and Chloe. In

    each instance, Alex and Ani was successful in policing its intellectual property rights, and the

    copying was discontinued.

    23. The Alex and Ani Trade Dress has become well known and identified in theminds of the trade and the purchasing public as identifying products belonging to Alex and Anis

    signature line of expandable bangles. Indeed, as of the filing of this Complaint, the popular

    handmade and craft commerce website, www.etsy.com, featured nearly 200 knockoff

    expandable bangle designs promoted as Alex and Ani Inspired or Alex and Ani Style. To

    the extent these inspired-by products are simply infringing knock-offs, Alex and Ani has been

    engaged in a continuingand successfuleffort to enforce its intellectual property rights

    against such infringers.

    24. The Alex and Ani Trade Dress has come to indicate the source and quality ofthese products and to signify the association with Alex and Ani, a company that manufactures in

    the United States and reuses and recycles materials as an integral part of its mission to be

    socially conscious and eco-friendly.

    25. The Alex and Ani Trade Dress has become an important business asset ofimmense and incalculable value.

    26. The Alex and Ani Trade Dress is not functional. It is not essential to the purposeor use of Alex and Ani products that feature the Alex and Ani Trade Dress, nor does it affect the

    cost or quality of these Alex and Ani products. Further, exclusive use by Alex and Ani of the

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 6 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    7/30

    7

    Alex and Ani Trade Dress would not put competitors at a significant non-reputation-related

    disadvantage.

    ALEX AND ANIS PATENT

    27. To further protect her valuable intellectual property, Ms. Rafaelian applied forand received the 167 Patent.

    28. The 167 Patent was duly and legally issued by the United States Patent andTrademark Office on November 9, 2004 to Ms. Rafaelian, who assigned all rights, title, and

    interest in the patent to Alex and Ani.

    29.

    A true and correct copy of the 167 Patent is attached hereto as Exhibit A.

    DEFENDANTS WRONGFUL ACTS

    30. Northeast Jewelers was a retail partner of Alex and Ani until as late as August2013. During that time, Northeast Jewelers sold Alex and Anis distinctive fashion jewelry line,

    including Alex and Anis Signature Bangle, in the original Northeast Jewelers Attleboro,

    Massachusetts retail store location and, on information and belief, also online through

    northeastdiamond.com. Northeast Jewelers also markets its goods via Facebook.com.

    31. In August 2013, Alex and Ani terminated its retail partner relationship withNortheast Jewelers.

    32. Upon information and belief, soon thereafter, Defendants began knocking offAlex and Anis Signature Bangle by willfully and deliberately copying Alex and Anis Trade

    Dress and patented design.

    33. In December 2013, Alex and Ani discovered that Defendants were manufacturing,importing, selling, and/or distributing goods bearing the Alex and Ani Trade Dress (the

    Infringing Goods) and infringing the 167 Patent from the Northeast Jewelers North Attleboro,

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 7 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    8/30

    8

    Massachusetts retail store location as well as through online sales channels, including

    Facebook.com.

    34. A representative example of the Infringing Goods is shown below on the left,along with the genuine Alex and Ani design on the right.

    Defendants Infringing Bangle Genuine Alex and Ani Signature Bangle

    35. The likelihood of confusion between Defendants goods and Alex and Anisgoods is great because the average retail consumer is not likely to exercise a high degree of care

    in purchasing a relatively inexpensive product such as bangle bracelets. Given Northeast

    Jewelers prior relationship with Alex and Ani and its past sales of Alex and Ani products, the

    likelihood of customer confusion is especially strong.

    36. The likelihood of confusion is also great because the goods are related: both theInfringing Goods and Alex and Ani Signature Bangle bearing the Alex and Ani Trade Dress are

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 8 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    9/30

    9

    expandable bangle bracelets.

    37. The Infringing Goods are offered in the same channels of trade as Alex and Anisproducts bearing the Alex and Ani Trade Dress, which, upon information and belief, include

    boutique shops like Northeast Jewelers retail store location.

    38. Alex and Ani has not consented to Defendants use of the Alex and Ani TradeDress or the 167 Patent in connection with the Infringing Goods, nor has Alex and Ani

    sponsored, endorsed or approved the goods or services offered or promoted by Defendants.

    39. Defendants unauthorized use of the Alex and Ani Trade Dress is likely to causeconfusion, to cause mistake, and to deceive an appreciable number of customers and prospective

    customers into falsely believing that Defendants goods are provided, sponsored, approved by or

    affiliated with Alex and Ani or that there is a connection or affiliation between Alex and Ani and

    Northeast Jewelers.

    40. Upon information and belief, Defendants intentionally and deliberatelymisappropriated the Alex and Ani Trade Dress to mislead and confuse consumers into believing

    that Defendants goods are provided, sponsored, approved by or affiliated with Alex and Ani.

    As a direct and proximate result of Defendants conduct set forth above, Alex and Ani has been

    irreparably injured.

    41. On December 16, 2013, Alex and Ani sent Northeast Jewelers a letter, a true andcorrect copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, demanding that Northeast Jewelers cease

    and desist with its unlawful behavior immediately. Northeast Jewelers failed to respond to Alex

    and Anis demand letter.

    42. Defendants conduct is continuing and will continue, constituting an ongoingthreat to Alex and Ani and the public. Unless Defendants are restrained and enjoined from

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 9 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    10/30

    10

    engaging in the wrongful conduct described herein, Alex and Ani will suffer irreparable injury.

    It would be difficult to ascertain the amount of compensation that could afford Alex and Ani

    adequate relief for the acts of Defendants, present and threatened, and Alex and Anis remedy at

    law is not adequate in and of itself to compensate it for said harm and damage.

    43. Alex and Ani has extensively and continuously promoted and used the Alex andAni Trade Dress and its associated goodwill throughout the United States and the world, and the

    Trade Dress has thereby become a famous and well-known indicator of the origin of the Alex

    and Ani goods and has achieved significant secondary meaning.

    COUNT I: WILLFUL INFRINGEMENT OF U.S. PATENT 167 (35 U.S.C. 271)

    44. Alex and Ani repeats and realleges all the preceding paragraphs as if stated in fullherein.

    45. In violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(a), Defendants have made, used, offered for sale,distributed, imported, and/or sold in the United States, bangle bracelets that infringe the 167

    Patent.

    46. In violation of 35 U.S.C. 271(b) and (c), Defendants have actively induced theinfringement of, and/or contributed to the infringement of the 167 Patent.

    47. Defendants infringement of the 167 Patent has occurred with Defendantsknowledge of the 167 Patent and has been willful and wanton.

    48. Alex and Ani has suffered and will continue to suffer serious and irreparableinjury unless Defendants infringement of the 167 Patent is enjoined. Considering the balance

    of hardships between the parties, a remedy in equity is warranted. And the public interest would

    be served by an injunction as an injunction would protect the public from Defendants deceptive

    conduct. Alex and Ani is entitled to injunctive relief, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. 283, prohibiting

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 10 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    11/30

    11

    Defendants from infringing the 167 patent.

    49. Alex and Ani is also entitled to damages adequate to compensate for Defendantsinfringement of the 167 Patent in an amount to be determined at trial, but in no event less than a

    reasonable royalty, treble damages, interest, attorneys fees, and the costs incurred in this action.

    COUNT II: FEDERAL TRADE DRESS INFRINGEMENT (15 U.S.C. 1125(a))

    50. Alex and Ani repeats and realleges all the preceding paragraphs as if stated in fullherein.

    51. Upon information and belief, commencing at some time unknown to Alex andAni and continuing to the present, Defendants manufactured, advertised, offered for sale, and

    engaged in the sale, resale and distribution of the Infringing Goods without Alex and Anis

    consent, and thereby infringing the Alex and Ani Trade Dress.

    52. The design of the Infringing Goods creates the same general overall impressionand has the same look and feel as genuine Alex and Ani products. Upon information and

    belief, the similarities between the Alex and Ani Trade Dress and the design of the Infringing

    Goods are purposeful.

    53. Defendants Infringing Goods were designed intentionally to mimic the Alex andAni Trade Dress in that the designs of the bangles are confusingly similar, having virtually

    identical designs and distinctive arrangement of design elements. This creates the immediate

    commercial impression that goods bearing such designs are associated with and emanate from

    Alex and Ani. This is especially true, because Northeast Jewelers sold Alex and Anis Signature

    Bangles in its retail store location and online before Alex and Ani terminated its retail partner

    relationship with Northeast Jewelers.

    54. Defendants sale of its Infringing Goods in the United States constitutes a false

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 11 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    12/30

    12

    designation of origin and is intentionally designed to deceive, and has deceived, customers into

    believing that the Infringing Goods are genuine goods of Alex and Ani.

    55. Defendants have, without permission, willfully, and with the intention ofbenefiting from the reputation and good will of Alex and Ani, imitated the design, style, and

    layout of the Alex and Ani Trade Dress.

    56. As a consequence, the design of the Infringing Goods is likely to deceive anddivert, and has deceived and diverted, customers away from the genuine Alex and Ani products

    and created a likelihood of consumer confusion as to the source of the Alex and Ani products

    and the Infringing Goods.

    57. Defendants conduct, as alleged in the foregoing paragraphs, constitutes tradedress infringement in violation of Section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a), which

    prohibits the use in commerce in connection with the sale of goods of any word, term, name,

    symbol, or device, or any combination thereof which is likely to cause confusion, or to cause

    mistake, or to deceive as to the source of the goods.

    58. Without injunctive relief, Alex and Ani has no means by which to control thecontinuing injury to its reputation and goodwill, and Alex and Ani will continue to be irreparably

    harmed. No amount of money damages can adequately compensate Alex and Ani if it loses the

    ability to control the use of its Trade Dress, reputation, and goodwill through the false and

    unauthorized use of its Trade Dress. Considering the balance of hardships between the parties, a

    remedy in equity is warranted. And the public interest would be served by an injunction as an

    injunction would protect the public from Defendants deceptive conduct. Alex and Ani is

    entitled to injunctive relief prohibiting Defendants from using the design of the Infringing

    Goods, or any other trademark or designation that is likely to be confused with the Alex and Ani

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 12 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    13/30

    13

    Trade Dress.

    59. Because Defendants actions have been committed willfully and with intent toprofit from Alex and Anis goodwill in the Alex and Ani Trade Dress, this is an exceptional case,

    and Alex and Ani is entitled to recover Defendants profits together with Alex and Anis

    damages, trebled, costs of the action, and reasonable attorneys fees pursuant to Section 35(a) of

    the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1117(a).

    COUNT III: COMMON LAW UNFAIR COMPETITION AND MASSACHUSETTS

    CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT (Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 93A, 2 and 11)

    60.

    Alex and Ani repeats and realleges all the preceding paragraphs as if stated in full

    herein.

    61. Defendants have committed unfair and deceptive acts and practices affecting theconduct of trade and commerce in violation of the common law of the state of Massachusetts and

    the Massachusetts Consumer Protection Act, Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 93A, 2 and 11, by falsely

    passing off their Infringing Goods as those of Alex and Ani, causing a likelihood of confusion as

    to the source, sponsorship, or approval of its Infringing Goods, and causing a likelihood of

    confusion as to affiliation, connection, or association with Alex and Ani.

    62. Defendants unfair and deceptive trade practices have proximately caused Alexand Ani irreparable harm and injury and, unless they are enjoined by this Court, will continue to

    cause Alex and Ani irreparable harm and injury. Considering the balance of hardships between

    the parties, a remedy in equity is warranted. And the public interest would be served by an

    injunction as an injunction would protect the public from Defendants deceptive conduct.

    63. Defendants unfair and deceptive trade practices have been willful andintentional, as evidenced in part by the fact that Defendants had actual knowledge of Alex and

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 13 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    14/30

    14

    Ani and the Alex and Ani Trade Dress but have nevertheless produced confusingly similar

    bangles. Therefore, Alex and Ani is also entitled to recover, in an amount to be determined at

    trial, compensatory damages, double or treble damages, costs and expenses, and attorneys fees

    pursuant to Mass. Gen. Laws Ch. 93A 11.

    PRAYER FOR RELIEF

    WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Alex and Ani, LLC respectfully requests a judgment against

    Defendants Northeast Diamond and Casting Co. Inc. d/b/a Northeast Jewelers and NORI

    Fundraising Concepts Inc. that includes:

    1.

    A judgment in favor of Alex and Ani and against Defendants on all counts;

    2. Damages in an amount to be determined at trial, including Defendants unjustenrichment, and, because this is an exceptional case, such damages enhanced and/or trebled for

    willful infringement;

    3. An order awarding Alex and Ani its reasonable attorneys fees and costs incurredin this action;

    4. Exemplary and punitive damages;5. An order awarding Alex and Ani interest on the damages, costs, and attorneys

    fees incurred in this action, including pre-judgment interest;

    6. An order permanently enjoining Defendants and their agents, officers, employees,representatives, successors, assigns, attorneys, and all other persons acting for, with, by, through,

    or under authority from Defendants, or in concert or participating with Defendants, from:

    a. Using and infringing Alex and Anis design patent, the 167 patent;

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 14 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    15/30

    15

    b. Using the Alex and Ani Trade Dress, or any other copy, reproduction, orcolorable imitation or simulation of the Alex and Ani Trade Dress on or in

    connection with Defendants goods or services;

    c. Using any trademark, service mark, name, logo, design or sourcedesignation of any kind on or in connection with Defendants goods or

    services that is a copy, reproduction, colorable imitation, or simulation of,

    or confusingly similar to the trademarks, service names, or logos of Alex

    and Ani;

    d.

    Using any trademark, service mark, name, logo, design or source

    designation of any kind on or in connection with Defendants goods or

    services that is likely to cause confusion, mistake, deception, or public

    misunderstanding that such goods or services are produced or provided by

    Alex and Ani, or are sponsored or authorized or affiliated with Alex and

    Ani;

    e. Passing off, palming off, or assisting in passing off or palming off,Defendants goods or services as those of Alex and Ani, or otherwise

    continuing any and all acts of unfair competition as alleged herein.

    7. An order requiring Defendants to recall all products bearing the Alex and Ani TradeDress or any other confusingly similar mark, which have been shipped by Defendants or

    under their authority, to any customer including, but not limited to, any wholesaler,

    distributor, retailer, consignor, or marketer and also to deliver to each customer a copy of

    this Courts order as it relates to said injunctive relief;

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 15 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    16/30

    16

    8. An order requiring Defendants to deliver up for impoundment and for destruction allbangles, tags, signs, packaging, receptacles, advertising, sample books, promotional

    material, stationery or other materials in the possession, custody, or under the control of

    Defendants that are found to adopt or to infringe any of Alex and Anis trademarks or

    Trade Dress or that otherwise unfairly compete with Alex and Ani and its products and

    services;

    9. An order compelling Defendants to account to Alex and Ani for any and all profits derivedby Northeast Jewelers from the sale or distribution of the Infringing Goods as described

    herein.

    DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

    Alex and Ani, LLC demands trial by jury for all issues so triable.

    Dated: January 15, 2014 ALEX AND ANI, LLC,

    By its attorneys,

    /s/ Jack C. Schecter

    Jack C. Schecter (BBO #652349)Mary H. Adams (BBO #679329)

    MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS,

    GLOVSKY & POPEO P.C.One Financial Center

    Boston, MA 02111

    (617) [email protected]

    [email protected]

    Nada I. Shamonki (pro hac vice admission

    pending)MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS,

    GLOVSKY & POPEO P.C.2029 Century Park East, Suite 1370

    Los Angeles, CA 90067

    (310) [email protected]

    26305121v.1

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 16 of 16

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    17/30

    EXHIBIT A

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1-1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 9

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    18/30

    1 1 1 1 1 412) United States Design Patent 1 0 Patent No.: S D498,167 SFerlise 45) Date of Patent: Nov. 9, 2004

    (54) EXPANDABLE WIRE BRACELET(76) Inventor: Carolyn Rafaelian Ferlise, 41Highgate Rd., Cranston, RI (US) 02920(**) Term: 4 Years(21) Appl. No.: 29/194,053(22) Filed: ov. 19, 2003

    Related U.S. Application Data62) Division of application No. 29/181,844, filed on May 16,2003, now Pat. No. Des. 487,709.

    (51) LOC (7) Cl. 11-01(52) U.S. Cl. D11/5(58) Field of Search D11/1-15, 18-20,

    D11/22-25, 93; 59/79.1, 79.3, 78, 83; 63/3-4,9, 21, 3856) eferences Cited

    U.S. PATENT DOCUMENTS428,339 A * 5/1890 Howard 63/11D69,012 S * 12/1925 Dalin D11/30D247,102 S * 1/1978 Durante D11/55,247,814 A * 9/1993 McDonald 63/3.2

    D472,177 S * 3 /2003 M cCullough-McPherson D11/4* cited by examinerPrimary ExaminerLouis S. Zarfas

    ssistant ExaminerJohn Windmuller(74) Attorney Agent or FirmLinda M. Buckley;Christine C. O'Day; Edwards Angell, LLP(57) LAIMThe ornamental design for an expandable wire bracelet, asshown and described.

    DESCRIPTIONFIG. 1 is a perspective view of an expandable w ire bracelet,showing my new design;FIG. 2 is a top plan view thereof;FIG. 3 is a bottom view thereof;FIG..4 is a left side view thereof;FIG. 5 is a right side view thereof;FIG. 6 is a rear view thereof; and,FIG. 7 is a front view thereof.The subject matter depicted in dashed lines in FIGS. 1-7 isshown for illustrative purposes only and forms no part of theclaimed design.

    1 Claim, 7 Drawing Sheets

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1-1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 2 of 9

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    19/30

    U.S. Patent ov. 9 2004 heet 1 of 7 S D498,167 S

    F I G 1

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1-1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 3 of 9

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    20/30

    U.S. Patent ov. 9 2004 heet 2 of 7 S D498,167 S

    H o 2

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1-1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 4 of 9

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    21/30

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    22/30

    U.S. Patent Nov. 9 2004 heet 4 of 7 US D498 167 S

    F I G

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1-1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 6 of 9

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    23/30

    U.S. Patent Nov. 9 2004 heet 5 of 7 US D498,167 S

    F I G 5

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1-1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 7 of 9

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    24/30

    U.S. Patent Nov. 9 2004 Sheet 6 of 7 US D498,167 S

    FIG 6

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1-1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 8 of 9

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    25/30

    U.S. Patent Nov. 9 2004 heet 7 of 7 US D498,167 S

    F I G 7

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1-1 Filed 01/15/14 Page 9 of 9

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    26/30

    EXHIBIT B

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1-2 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 3

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    27/30

    Jack C. Schecter | 617 348 3083 | [email protected]

    One Financial CenterBoston, MA 02111

    617-542-6000617-542-2241 faxwww.mintz.com

    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

    BOSTON |LONDON |LOSANGELES |NEWYORK |SAN DIEGO |SAN FRANCISCO |STAMFO RD |WASH INGTO N

    December 16, 2013

    Stephen B. Krauss

    Northeast Jewelers

    6 South Washington Street

    North Attleboro, MA 02760

    VIA FEDEX AND VIA EMAIL ([email protected])

    Re: Infringement of Alex and Ani's Intellectual Property

    Dear Mr. Krauss:

    We represent Alex and Ani, LLC, and we write regarding the expandable banglebracelets that you are marketing and selling at your North Attleboro location and online,

    including via Facebook.com. These products infringe upon Alex and Anis valuable intellectual

    property, and we ask that you cease and desist immediately.

    As you are undoubtedly aware, given your past relationship with Alex and Ani, Alex and

    Ani offers a jewelry line of eco-friendly, positive energy products. Since its launch in 2004, Alexand Ani has become one of the fastest growing privately owned companies in America. Its

    innovative concepts and designs have received extensive accolades and awards. For example,

    Alex and Ani was ranked 4th among Top Retail Companies on the 2013 Inc. 5000 list of the

    fastest-growing companies. Alex and Ani was the recipient of the Ernst & Young 2012

    Entrepreneur of the Year award, and Providence Business News listed Alex and Ani's founderand Creative Director, Carolyn Rafaelian, as the 2012 "Woman to Watch in Creative Services."

    Moreover, its products have been extensively featured in fashion magazines and news media,including Real Simple Magazine, W Magazine, Lucky Magazine, Us Weekly Magazine, and

    Redbook Magazine, among others. As a result, Alex and Ani has become a well-known brand

    with highly recognizable, signature product designs.

    In connection with its business, in 2004, Alex and Ani obtained a patent for one of its

    signature bracelet designs (U.S. Patent No. D498,167). For your reference, a copy is attached. Inaddition, Alex and Ani enjoys trade dress protection for the design of its signature bracelet, as its

    unique combination of elements serves to readily distinguish for consumers Alex and Anis

    products from the goods of competitors. Alex and Ani enjoys substantial goodwill in the designof these Alex and Ani products, owing to Alex and Anis lengthy, innovative, and exclusive useof the distinctive product design.

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1-2 Filed 01/15/14 Page 2 of 3

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    28/30

    Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.

    Stephen B. KraussDecember 16, 2013Page 2

    2

    The expandable bangle bracelets that you are marketing and selling at your stores North

    Attleboro location and online, including via Facebook.com, use a product design that infringes

    Alex and Anispatent and/or protectable trade dress. Indeed, given your prior relationship withAlex and Ani and your past sales of Alex and Ani products, the likelihood of customer confusion

    is especially strong. As merely one possible example, your Attleboro bracelet(on the right)

    and Alex and Anisprotected bracelet (on the left) are shown below:

    In order to protect Alex and Anisintellectual property, we ask that you immediately

    cease offering for sale any and all products that incorporate our federally protected productdesigns. Given the importance of this matter, please provide us with written confirmation within

    five (5) business days of the date of this letter that you have taken the steps requested.

    We trust that you appreciate our concerns and that we may resolve this matter amicablyand expeditiously. Nonetheless, this letter is written without prejudice to any other claims or

    defenses Alex and Ani may have, all of which are hereby expressly reserved.

    We look forward to your response. In the meantime, please feel free to contact me should

    you have any questions.

    Very truly yours,

    /s/ Jack C. Schecter

    Jack C. Schecter

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1-2 Filed 01/15/14 Page 3 of 3

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1435911589957427&set=a.1409623515919568.1073741826.1409313052617281&type=1&relevant_count=1
  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    29/30

    2 3 3 2 2 2 4 5 6 7 8 2 9 9

    6 2 0 1 2 3 3 2 7 2 7 6 2 6 6 2 2 6 2 2 6 2 6 6 2 6 6 2 6 6 2 2 6 6 2 6 2 2 2 6 7 6 2 2 6 2 2 6 2 6 2 2 6 6 2 2 2 2 6 6 2 7 6 2 2 2 6 2 2 8 2 2 2 2 7 6 2 2 6 2 0 2 6 6 6 2 2 6 2 6 2 1 6 2 2 1 6 6 6 2 9 3 2 2 6 6 2 2 6 2 6 2 2 6 2 6 2 2 2 2 6 6 2 2 2 6 2 7 2 6 2 6 6 8 2 2 2

    2 2 2 2 2 5 6 6 6 2 2 2 6 2 2 2 5 6 6 6 2 2 2 6 2 6 6

    2 2 2 1 1 2 1 2 2 2 2

    2 5 2 2 2 8

    2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

    2

    2 2 6 2

    2 6 2

    2

    9 2 2 8 1 8 2 7 6 6 2 6 6 2 6

    6 2 2 2 1 6 9 2 9 6 2 2 2 6 3

    2 2 2 2 2 6 2 2 2 1 6

    2 2 8 1 8 2 7 6 6 3 2 7 6 6 2 2 6 2 1 6 2 6 2 2 2 6

    6 6 2 6 2 2 6 2 1 6

    6 2 2 1 6 2 2 2 6 2

    2 2 2 2 6 2

    2 9 9 2 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 5 6 6 2 1 6 6 3 2 6 2 2 1 2 9 2 6 2 2 9 2 6 9 2 6 2 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 2 9 2 1 2 9 3 2 3 2 1 6 2 5 6 69 2 6 2 9 2 6 2 2 2 2 2 6 2 2 2 1 2 9 3 9 2 9 3 2 6 6 2 6 2 2 2 6 2 6 3 2 2 2

    9 2 5 6 7 6 2 2 7 6 6 2 2 6 2 2 6 3 2 6 6

    2 2 6 6 2 2 0 6 2 2 1 6 2 6 2 2 3 2 6

    9 9 2 6 6 2 2 6 6 2 6 2 2 2 6 3 2 5 6 6 6 2 6 6

    9 2 5 6 7 6 2 2 6 6 2 2 2 6 2 6 3 2 6 2 2

    2 1 6 2 3 2 6 2 2 2 3 2 6 2 6

    2 4 6 2 6 6 3 2 6 2 2 2

    3 2 6 1 2

    9 2 5 6 7 6 2 2 7 6 6 2 2 2 9 2 2 2 1 9 2 2 4 9 2 1 6 6

    2 2 6 6 2 6 6 2 2 6 6 2 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 4 2 2 6

    9 2 1 6 2 1 2 2 6 6 9 2 2 2 6 2 6 6 2 2 4 3 4 2 6 2 1 2

    9 2 6 2 2 2 2 6 2 6 2 2 5 6 3 2 1 1 2 6 2 9 2 2

    9 2 2 2 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 6 3 2 5 2 2 2 5 1 2 4 3 4 2 7 6 2

    9 2 6 2 2 6 2 6 9 2 2 2 6 2 6 6 2 2

    2 6 2 2 2 2 2 2 6 7 6 2 2 2 2 6 2 6 2 6 2 2 2 9 2 6 6 2 5 6 6 6 2 7 6 2 9 2 2 6 3 3 2 6 2 7 2 5 2 6 2 1 6 2 2 6 2 4 8 1 8 2 2 5 6 7 6 2 2 6 2 6 6 3 3 9 2 3 2 6 2 6 6 6 2 2 2 6 6 2 6 2 6 2 5 6 2 6 6 2 2 6 6 3 3 2 6 9 2 2 2 6 9 2 5 1 2 2 2

    3 2 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 6 6 6 2 2 2 1 2 2 1 6 2 1 6

    3 2 2 2 2 2 6 6

    2 2 6 2 5 6 2 6 3 3 2 6 8 2 6 2 2 6 2 6

    2 6

    3 2 2

    3 3 2 6 8 2 6 2 3 2 2 2 6 3 2 6 2

    2 6 2 7 2 5 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

    3 3 2 2 2

    2 7 2 6 6 6 2

    2 2 2

    2 6 6

    2

    9 6 6 5 6 7 6 2 1 6 2 2 5 6 6 2 6 6 2 3 5 6 6 2 5 6 6 6 2 6 6 2 6 2

    2

    6 2 6 2 8 1 8 2 7 2 1 6 2 6 2 2 2 6 2 2

    2 6 2 6 2 2 6

    2 2 1 2 1 2 2

    5 2 5 2 2 8 5 8 7 8 8

    2 1 2 2 2 6 6 2 2

    6

    0 2 5

    1 5 2 2 5 2 2 5 5

    0 1 0 2 0 3 4 5 6 7 6 0 1 0 2 0 3 6 6 4 8 9

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1-3 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 1

  • 8/13/2019 Alex and Ani v. Northeast Diamond - Complaint

    30/30

    0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3 8 3 4 7 6 5 2 7 3 9 2 3 6 0 9 35 2 7 3 9 2 3 6 6 8 7 7 8 0 7 4 3 3 7

    3 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

    6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

    6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 6

    6

    6 6 6 6 6 2 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 9 6 9 4 8 9 5 4 7 7 6 6 1 8 3 0 9 4 6 6 7 0 2 3

    6 6 6 6 6 2 2 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 2 2 2 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

    8 6 6 8 6 6 6 8 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

    3 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 6 6 6 6 6 2 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

    6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

    6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

    6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 4 7 6 6

    6

    1 6 6

    6

    6

    5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 6 6 0 7 6

    4 7 6 6 6

    6

    6 1 6 6 6

    6

    6 6

    6 2 6 6 6 6 0 7 8 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 7 6 6 6

    4 7 6 6 6

    6

    6 1 6 6 6

    6

    6

    2 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 7 6 6

    6 6 4 7 6 6 6 6 6 1 6 6 6 6 6

    5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 7 6 6 9 6 6 66 4 7 6 6 6 6

    6

    1 6 6 6 6

    6

    8 2 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

    4 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 66 6 5 6 6 6 6

    2 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

    6 6 6

    4 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 5 6 6 66 6 5 6 6 6 6

    2 6 6 6 1 6 6 9 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 2 6

    6 6 6 6 6 6

    4 7 6 6 6 6

    6

    1 6 6 6 6

    6

    4 8 7 4 6 3 4 6 9 6 9 2 1 3 8 3 3 9 1 4 7 6 1 8 4 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

    8 5 5 9 4 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

    3 4 4 1 4 6 1 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

    6 6 6 6

    Case 1:14-cv-10104 Document 1-4 Filed 01/15/14 Page 1 of 1