albemarle county public schools school improvement plan filebelow grade level students will show 1.5...

12
2011-2012 Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan

Upload: others

Post on 10-Sep-2019

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

2011-2012

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan

To view Division Goals, Priorities, Strategies, and KPIs: http://www.k12albemarle.org/strategicplanning

Division Goals and School Board Priorities

Goal 1

Prepare all students to succeed as members of a global community and in a global economy.

Priority 1.1

Develop Lifelong-Learner (LLL) competencies in all students.

Goal 2

Eliminate the Achievement Gap.

Priority 2.1 Prepare all students for workforce/college readiness.

Goal 3 Recruit, retain, and develop a diverse cadre of the highest quality teaching personnel, staff, and administrators.

Priority 3.1

Improve the organization's capacity to build and maintain a high-quality workforce.

Goal 4

Achieve recognition as a world-class educational system.

Priority 4.1 Promote strategic alignment with the Vision, Mission, and Goals throughout the organization.

Priority 4.2 Expand two-way communication with and outreach to our stakeholders.

Goal 5

Establish efficient systems for development, allocation, and alignment of resources to support the Division’s

vision, mission, and goals.

Priority 5.1 Identify opportunities for improved efficiencies in operational departments and instructional programs.

Priority 5.2 Implement the Division's Student Information System (SIS) and Parent Portal.

To view Division Goals, Priorities, Strategies, and KPIs: http://www.k12albemarle.org/strategicplanning

General Information

School Name: Red Hill Elementary School

Principal Name: Art Stow

Members of School

Improvement Team:

All certified instructional staff

To view Division Goals, Priorities, Strategies, and KPIs: http://www.k12albemarle.org/strategicplanning

School Improvement Plan – SIP Goal 1

2011-2012

Strategic Goal(s): Place an “X” in front of those that apply

x Goal 1: Prepare all Students to succeed as members of a global community and in a global economy.

x Goal 2: Eliminate the Achievement Gap.

Goal 3: Recruit, retain, and develop a diverse cadre of the highest quality teaching personnel, staff, and administrators.

Goal 4: Achieve recognition as a world-class educational system.

Goal 5: Establish efficient systems for development, allocation, and alignment of resources to support the Division’s

vision, mission, and goals.

PL

AN

Board Priority(ies): Place an “X” in front of those that apply

x Priority 1.1: Develop Lifelong-Learner (LLL) competencies in all students.

x Priority 2.1: Prepare all students for workforce/college readiness.

Priority 4.1: Promote strategic alignment with the Vision, Mission, and Goals throughout the organization.

x Priority 4.2: Expand two-way communication with and outreach to our stakeholders.

Priority 5.1: Identify opportunities for improved efficiencies in operational departments and instructional programs.

SIP Goal: All Red Hill students who are performing below grade level in reading will make a minimum of 1.5 years of growth during the

2011-2012 school year, and all students in grades 3-5 will score a minimum of a 91% overall pass rate on the 2012 Reading SOL’s.

SIP Objective (SMART - Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timebound):

Below grade level students will show 1.5 years growth in literacy skills according to the ACPS literacy benchmarks, and students in

grades 3-5 will pass the 2012 Reading SOL’s with at least a 91% overall pass rate.

To view Division Goals, Priorities, Strategies, and KPIs: http://www.k12albemarle.org/strategicplanning

Supporting Data / Gap Evidence:

Grade

Below Grade Level

(Spring 2011)

Number/Percent

Pass Rate for RDG SOL

2011

Number/Percent

K 5 students / 23%

1 10 students / 34%

2 3 students / 20%

3 7 students / 22% 25 students / 78%

4 1 student / 3% 25 students / 87%

5 7 students / 30% 22 students / 96%

Anticipated Obstacles:

Key Performance Indicators (Measurable Outcomes):

ST

UD

Y

KPI (Quantitative - Using a

number or percentage)

Indicating Progress Towards

SIP Goal:

Q1 KPI Data

Q2 KPI Data

Q3 KPI Data

Q4/EOY KPI Data

Below grade level students will show 1.5 years growth in literacy

Grade student # %met PLPgoal

K 11 45%

1 9 56%

2 12 67%

3 8 57%

4 11 45%

5 3 100%

Grade student # %met PLPgoal

K 13 62%

1 9 67%

2 12 50%

3 9 67%

4 11 36%

5 3 33%

Grade student # %met PLPgoal

K 12 83%

1 9 88%

2 11 64%

3 9 55%

4 11 45%

5 3 67%

1.5 yrs growth or grdlevel bench

Grade student# %met goal

K 12 83% 1 9 55%

2 12 67%

3 9 89%

4 11 27%

5 3 67%

All on and above grade level students will meet end of quarter benchmarks in literacy.

Grade % met goal K 65%

1 100%

2 100% 3 100%

4 92%

5 100%

Grade % met goal K 59%

1 100%

2 100% 3 100%

4 100%

5 96%

Grade % met goal K 100%

1 100%

2 100% 3 100%

4 100%

5 100%

Grade % met goal K 100%

1 100%

2 100% 3 100%

4 100%

5 100%

To view Division Goals, Priorities, Strategies, and KPIs: http://www.k12albemarle.org/strategicplanning

Key Strategies and Qualitative

Progress Indicators

Q1 Progress on

Strategies

Q2 Progress on

Strategies

Q3 Progress on

Strategies

Q4 Progress on

Strategies & EOY

Reflections

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates Here>

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates Here>

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates

Here>

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates

Here>

DO

&

1. 100% of teachers will

differentiate literacy

instruction based on

student need.

Collaborative partnership has

been initiated with Carol

Tomlinson and Catherine

Brighton of UVA, experts in the

best practices of differentiated

instruction. All teachers will be

involved in PD that will increase

our capacity as a school to

recognize and better attend to

students’ academic diversity.

Throughout the months of

December and January, UVA

experts Carol Tomlinson and

Catherine Brighton observed

and engaged in conversation

with teachers regarding their

practices of differentiation. In

February, a whole staff PD

event led by Tomlinson and

Brighton is scheduled.

Observations and one one or

small group consultations

continued with Tomlinson,

Brighton and two grad

students: Hillary Dack and

Mindy Moran. Also, plans

were confirmed for 3 more

workshops scheduled for

April 11, 19 and May 2

All teachers received

the book:

Differentiation and the

Brain by Tomlinson.

NEA grant received

which will continue the

UVA partnership

ST

UD

Y &

2. Parents and students will be aware of and involved in attaining PLP goals.

PLPs shared at

Parent/Teacher

conferences

Report cards,

conferences

Report cards,

conferences

Report cards,

conferences

3. Work within multileveled

(PreK-2 and 3-5) PLC’s

monthly to focus on

strategies to promote

learning

(instructional, analytical,

test taking and intervention

strategies)

and SOL alignment of

curriculum

VPLCs (vertical PLC’s)

meet monthly as

scheduled

VPLCs (vertical PLC’s)

meet monthly as

scheduled

VPLCs (vertical

PLC’s) meet monthly

as scheduled

VPLCs (vertical

PLC’s) meet monthly

as scheduled

AC

T

To view Division Goals, Priorities, Strategies, and KPIs: http://www.k12albemarle.org/strategicplanning

4. Work within grade level

PLCs to administer

common assessments and

analyze data (biweekly,

mid-quarterly and

quarterly).

PLC’s implementing

common assessments as

noted.

PLC’s implementing

common assessments as

noted.

PLC’s implementing

common assessments

as noted.

PLC’s implementing

common assessments

as noted. This process

was highlighted

through SOL prep re:

Remediation Stations

5. Implement literacy

workstations, small group

guided reading instruction

and small group word study

instruction

All classes have implemented

literacy workstations. The

partnership with UVA will

support the effectiveness of this

as an instructional strategy.

Continuing progress Teachers continue

developing and

implementing literacy

workstations that reflect

differentiated instruction

Continuing progress,

reflected in many

SMART goal progress

reports

School Improvement Plan – SIP Goal 2

2011-2012

Strategic Goal(s): Place an “X” in front of those that apply

x Goal 1: Prepare all Students to succeed as members of a global community and in a global economy.

X Goal 2: Eliminate the Achievement Gap.

Goal 3: Recruit, retain, and develop a diverse cadre of the highest quality teaching personnel, staff, and administrators.

Goal 4: Achieve recognition as a world-class educational system.

Goal 5: Establish efficient systems for development, allocation, and alignment of resources to support the Division’s

vision, mission, and goals.

PL

AN

Board Priority(ies): Place an “X” in front of those that apply

x Priority 1.1: Develop Lifelong-Learner (LLL) competencies in all students.

X Priority 2.1: Prepare all students for workforce/college readiness.

Priority 4.1: Promote strategic alignment with the Vision, Mission, and Goals throughout the organization.

X Priority 4.2: Expand two-way communication with and outreach to our stakeholders.

Priority 5.1: Identify opportunities for improved efficiencies in operational departments and instructional programs.

To view Division Goals, Priorities, Strategies, and KPIs: http://www.k12albemarle.org/strategicplanning

SIP Goal: Students will perform on or above grade level in math and score a 91% overall pass rate on the 2012 Math SOLs.

SIP Objective (SMART - Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timebound): Through teacher focus on unit differentiation and

vertical-team PLC conversations, the percentage of Red Hill students identified on or above grade-level (green or purple) will

increase from 67% in 2010 to 75% by the end of the 2011 school year.

Supporting Data / Gap Evidence:

Students lacking

proficiency in math

Supporting DATA

7 students 14% 4th

qrt. below grd. Level

2 students 13% 4th

qrt. below grd. Level

4 students 9% Failed Spring 11 SOL

6 students 26% Failed Spring 11 SOL

3 students 22% Failed Spring 11 SOL

Anticipated Obstacles:

time and scheduling

faculty utilizing Unit Plan document to organize instruction and to guide Vertical Math instruction discussions

Key Performance Indicators (Measurable Outcomes):

ST

UD

Y

KPI (Quantitative – Using a

number or percentage)

Indicating Progress Towards

SIP Goal:

Q1 KPI Data

Q2 KPI Data

Q3 KPI Data

Q4/EOY KPI Data

1. Students identified as Red and

Yellow will meet PLP short term

goals.

Grade #identified %met goal

K 11 55%

1 10 50%

2 10 60%

3 7 43%

4 14 43%

5 5 40%

Grade #identified %met goal

K 13 62%%

1 10 70%

2 10 60%

3 7 43%

4 13 7%

5 5 40%

Grade #identified %met goal

K 12 83%

1 10 80%

2 9 56%

3 7 57%

4 13 38%

5 5 60%

Grade #identified %met goal

K 10 80%

1 7 100%

2 8 86%

3 7 86%

4 13 38%

5 5 60%

To view Division Goals, Priorities, Strategies, and KPIs: http://www.k12albemarle.org/strategicplanning

2. Pass rates for Unit Post

Assessments will be at least 80%.

Grade % met goal

K 64%

1 73%

2 82%

3 36% 4 84%

5 62%

Grade % met goal

K 59%

1 91%

2 79%

3 55% 4 38%

5 90%

Grade % met goal

K 69%

1 91%

2 86%

3 61% 4 64%

5 69%

Grade % met goal

K 69%

1 91%

2 83%

3 4 72%

5 81%

Key Strategies and Qualitative

Progress Indicators

Q1 Progress on

Strategies

Q2 Progress on

Strategies

Q3 Progress on

Strategies

Q4 Progress on

Strategies & EOY

Reflections

1. Develop a graphic organizer

that will facilitate

differentiated instruction in

mathematics

Completed. Will be

presented to the staff at

the September 22

faculty meeting.

Completed

Completed Completed

DO

&

2. For every math unit, teachers

will utilize Math unit planner.

First sharing will be

Dec. 1

Teachers have utilized

the math unit planners

and submitted.

Developing Developing… decision

will be made to

continue next year.

ST

UD

Y &

3. Work within multileveled

(PreK-2 and 3-5) PLC’s

monthly to focus on

strategies to promote

learning

(instructional, analytical,

test taking and intervention

strategies)

and SOL alignment of

curriculum

VPLCs (vertical PLC’s)

meet monthly as

scheduled

VPLCs (vertical PLC’s)

meet monthly as

scheduled

VPLCs (vertical PLC’s)

meet monthly as scheduled,

VPLCs (vertical PLC’s)

meet monthly as scheduled,

4. Work within grade level

PLCs to administer

common assessments and

analyze data (biweekly,

mid-quarterly and

quarterly).

PLC’s implementing

common assessments as

noted. A special 4th

grade MATH PLC

meets Mondays at 7:00

a.m. includes classroom

teachers and support

staff

PLC’s implementing

common assessments as

noted. A special 4th

grade MATH PLC

meets Mondays at 7:00

a.m. includes classroom

teachers and support

staff

PLC’s implementing

common assessments

as noted. The 4th

grade

math PLC continues to

meet, principal attends.

PLC’s implementing

common assessments

as noted. The 4th

grade

math PLC continued to

meet up until SOL

administration.

AC

T

To view Division Goals, Priorities, Strategies, and KPIs: http://www.k12albemarle.org/strategicplanning

5. Parents and students will be

aware of and involved in

attaining PLP goals.

PLPs shared at

Parent/Teacher

conferences

Report cards,

conferences

Report cards,

conferences

Information has been

shared with parents of

3rd

, 4th

and 5th

grade

students that reflect the

changes in math SOL

and related instruction.

Report cards,

conferences

School Improvement Plan – SIP Goal 3

2011-2012

Strategic Goal(s): Place an “X” in front of those that apply

x Goal 1: Prepare all Students to succeed as members of a global community and in a global economy.

x Goal 2: Eliminate the Achievement Gap.

Goal 3: Recruit, retain, and develop a diverse cadre of the highest quality teaching personnel, staff, and administrators.

Goal 4: Achieve recognition as a world-class educational system.

Goal 5: Establish efficient systems for development, allocation, and alignment of resources to support the Division’s

vision, mission, and goals.

PL

AN

Board Priority(ies): Place an “X” in front of those that apply

x Priority 1.1: Develop Lifelong-Learner (LLL) competencies in all students.

x Priority 2.1: Prepare all students for workforce/college readiness.

Priority 4.1: Promote strategic alignment with the Vision, Mission, and Goals throughout the organization.

x Priority 4.2: Expand two-way communication with and outreach to our stakeholders.

Priority 5.1: Identify opportunities for improved efficiencies in operational departments and instructional programs.

SIP Goal: Students will respond positively that they feel included in the classroom.

SIP Objective (SMART - Specific, Measurable, Attainable, Realistic, Timebound): A survey will be used to measure the level to which students feel their inclusion is valued in the classroom.

To view Division Goals, Priorities, Strategies, and KPIs: http://www.k12albemarle.org/strategicplanning

Supporting Data / Gap Evidence: On 2011 Spring Olweus survey, 50.6% of students at Red Hill repored they are teased, yet on the school’s kindness

survey, 93% of students at Red Hill reported they are treated with kindness. There is a disconnect between perception and experience among students.

Anticipated Obstacles:

Key Performance Indicators (Measurable Outcomes):

ST

UD

Y

KPI (Quantitative - Using a

number or percentage)

Indicating Progress Towards

SIP Goal:

Q1 KPI Data

Q2 KPI Data

Q3 KPI Data

Q4/EOY KPI Data

The overall level to which students in

K-5 feel their inclusion is valued will

increase each quarter.

K-1 17.0% (8)None

17.0% (8)Little

12.8% (6)Some

53.2% (25)A lot

2 23.1% (6)None

11.5% (3)Little

23.1% (6)Some

42.3% (11)A lot

3-5 9.6% (7)None

26.0% (19)Little

45.2% (33)Some

19.2% (14)A Lot

K-1 6.5% (3)None

10.9% (5)Little

32.6% (15)Some

50.0% (23)A lot

2 11.5% (3)None

23.1% (6)Little

23.1% (6)Some

42.3% (11)A lot

3-5 4.1% (3)None

28.8% (21)Little

45.2% (33)Some

21.9% (16)A Lot

K-1 6.5% (3)None

10.9% (5)Little

28.3% (12)Some

54.3% (25)A lot

2 10.3% (3)None

20.7% (6)Little

41.4% (12)Some

27.6% (8)A lot

3-5 3.9% (3)None

18.4% (14)Little

53.9% (41)Some

23.7% (18)A Lot

K-1 2.3% (1)None

23.3% (10)Little

30.2% (13)Some

44.2% (19)A lot

2 6.3% (1)None

12.5% (2)Little

37.5% (6)Some

43.8% (7)A lot

3-5 4.9% (3)None

23% (14)Little

47.5% (29)Some

24.6% (15)A Lot

Key Strategies and Qualitative

Progress Indicators

Q1 Progress on

Strategies

Q2 Progress on

Strategies

Q3 Progress on

Strategies

Q4 Progress on

Strategies & EOY

Reflections

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates Here>

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates Here>

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates

Here>

<Enter Qualitative

Progress Updates

Here>

DO

&

To view Division Goals, Priorities, Strategies, and KPIs: http://www.k12albemarle.org/strategicplanning

1. Implementation of Responsive

Classroom communities.

COMPLETED:

Rule creation and

Community Convention

Continued Morning

Meetings (classroom and

school-wide)

Book Club implemented for

volunteer staff, Academic

Choice, Staff wide analysis

and response to Responsive

Classroom survey, RC team

develops a plan for

professional development

utilizing a website:

LiveBinders.

Live Binders website

accessed now by all staff.

This will be a resource that

will be used next year.

ST

UD

Y &

2. Increase student empathy with a

focus on inclusion

COMPLETED:

Review Bucket Filling and

Dipping

Reteach bullying rules,

power levels, and

powerful peer behaviors.

Develop language

surrounding active,

empathetic listening.

Revisited RC website to

support needs as the year

wrapped up and to

reinforce earlier teachings

3. Information shared and input

sought from parents about

implement of strategies to

improve school community.

School rules shared and

published for all.

Newsletters, report

cards, tweets

Newsletters, report

cards, tweets

Newsletters, report

cards, tweets

AC

T