airworthiness consultative committee … consultative committee workshop ... car m - continuing...

AIRWORTHINESS CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE WORKSHOP

21 May 2017CAR-M Continuing Airworthiness

Requirements

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

CAR-M Continuing Airworthiness Requirements

Changes to CAR M

Airworthiness Review Privileges

Continued Validity of CAMO Approval

CAMO Support for issuing a CFF by an AMO

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Changes to CAR M, Gap analysis

CAR M - CONTINUING AIRWORTHINESS REQUIREMENTS, at issue 03, revision 00 dated December 2015,

PART-M (ANNEX I TO COMMISSION REG. (EU) NO 1321/2014), at Publication EU 2015/1536 dated 16-09-2015 and applicable from 25 August 2016,

GAPs were reviewed and suitable provisions were adopted.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Changes to CAR M, Significant Changes

Adoption of term complex motor-powered aircraft. This term expands the applicability of certain CAR M requirements to aircraft in this category. Previously used terms ‘Large aeroplane’ and

‘Large Rotorcraft’ are included in the definition of the complex motor-powered aircraft.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


‘Complex motor-powered aircraft’ means;

an aeroplane:with a maximum certificated take-off mass

exceeding 5 700 kg, or certificated for a maximum passenger seating

configuration of more than nineteen, or certificated for operation with a minimum crew of

at least two pilots, orequipped with (a) turbojet engine(s) or more than

one turboprop engine, or

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


‘Complex motor-powered aircraft’ means:

a helicopter certificated: for a maximum take-off mass exceeding 3 175 kg,

or for a maximum passenger seating configuration of

more than nine, or for operation with a minimum crew of at least two

pilots, ora tilt rotor aircraft;

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Amending certain CARs and their associated AMCs to cope with the introduction of “Complex Motor-Powered Aircraft”;

CAR M.301(4)&(7), CAR M.302(f), CAR M.504(b), CAR M.706(k), CAR M.708(c)

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Removal APPENDIX II to CAR M.201 (h) 1 “Sub-contracting of Continuing Airworthiness Management Tasks”,

Addition APPENDIX II to AMC CAR M.711 (a) (3) “Sub-contracting of Continuing Airworthiness Management Tasks”,

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Amending CAR M.402 Performance of Maintenance and the associated AMC to enhance understanding the standards and to include clear provisions on; minimizing risk of maintenance errors, critical tasks and errors’ capturing methods, e.g. Independent Inspections and re-inspections.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


New AMCs and GMs:• AMC CAR M.305(d)(4) and CAR M.305(h) Aircraft

continuing airworthiness record system• AMC CAR M.402(g) Performance of maintenance• AMC1 CAR M.402(h) Performance of

maintenance, CRITICAL MAINTENANCE TASKS• AMC2 CAR M.402(h) Performance of

maintenance INDEPENDENT INSPECTION


New AMCs and GMs• AMC CAR M.706(a) Personnel Requirements,• AMC CAR M.706(k) Personnel requirements.• AMC1 CAR M.708(c) Continuing airworthiness

management,• AMC2 CAR M.708(c) Continuing airworthiness

management.


New AMCs and GMs• GM CAR M.708 Continuing airworthiness

management• GM CAR M.708(b)(4) Continuing airworthiness

management• GM CAR M.708(c) Continuing airworthiness

management

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


To ensure the validity of the CofA, an airworthiness review of the aircraft and its continuing airworthiness records, referred to in CAR M.901 of Subpart I, is carried out periodically,

An airworthiness review certificate (ARC) cannot be issued if there is evidence or reason to believe that the aircraft is not airworthy;

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


ARC is issued:By an appropriately approved CAMO based on

completion of a satisfactory airworthiness review. In this instance, the GCAA endorse the certificate (AWF-ARC-15b),

By the GCAA upon satisfactory assessment based on recommendation made by a CAMO appropriately approved sent together with the application from the owner or operator (AWF-ARC-15a).

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


The airworthiness recommendation is based on an airworthiness review carried out in accordance with CAR M.710

Current regulations require an airworthiness review being carried out either for issue an ARC (AWF-ARC-15b) by organization or to issue a recommendation for the GCAA assessment (AWF-ARC-15a).

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Changes to CAR M will include:

• Adding a provision to CAR M.711 to mandate the privilege to issue ARC (AWF-ARC-15b) by organization managing the continuing airworthiness of 10 or more aircraft.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


a continuing airworthiness management organizations approved pursuant to requirements of this chapter and manage the continuing airworthiness of 10 or more aircraft, if not already approved, shall demonstrate compliance with the applicable additional requirements to qualify for the issue of the related airworthiness review certificate in accordance with point (b)(1) of this section and additionally be approved to this privilege. CAR M.711(b)(1).

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


The new provision in CAR M.711 will become applicable when published by the GCAA,

The affected organizations need to demonstrate compliance with and obtain the privilege on/or before 30 June 2018

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Continued Validity of Approval, CAR M.715

Amending CAR M.715 to include provisions for the issuance of CAMO approval with unlimited duration subject to the compliance with the approval requirements.Approval fees will by paid and follow up

will be made by the Financial Department

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Introduction of Unlimited validity of CAMO Approval subject to:

• the organization remaining in compliance with CAR M and;

• The GCAA being granted access to the organisationto determine continued compliance with CAR M, and;

• Compliance with the additional conditions prescribed in the certificate; and

• The approval not being surrendered or revoked.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx


Continuing oversight; audits, inspections, surveys, …etc., will be conducted to verify that conditions under which a certificate has been granted continue to be fulfilled at any time during its period of validity, as well as the taking of any safeguard measure;

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

CAMO support for AMO to issue a CFF

The CAMO, in relation to aircraft it manages or if contracted by owner/operator to do so, shall;

• Identify where the aircraft does not meet one or more of following:The aircraft continuing airworthiness

requirements stated in CAR M.710(a),The physical survey requirements prescribed

in CAR M.710(c),

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

CAMO support for AMO to issue a CFF

Provide AMO with all required information, status of compliance, conditions, limitations and maintenance forecast, as applicable, in order to allow AMO to issue a CFF.

Thank You

Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

CAR M Presentation

THE VISION OF GCAA WITH REGARDS TO TRANSITION TO

EU AIR OPS

26

Contents

1. The Decision to Move Towards EASA2. Regulations Structure and Applicability

The Decision to move to EASA

27

The Decision to Move Towards EASA

In 2008, we adopted/adapted EASA Part-145 and developed and promulgated the CAR-145

Subsequently, we continued with- CAR 66 - CAR-FCL- CAR 147 - CAR-ORA- CAR M - CAR-CC- CAR 21

CAR OPS was mainly based on JAR OPS; altered by GCAA as needed

Where are we coming from?

https://www.gcaa.gov.ae/en/pages/default.aspx


https://easa.europa.eu/



• Some of our Operators are among the top airlines of the world and as such, our aim is to standardize with the international industry

• In the interest of the UAE, we needed to secure good relationship with a leading agency. Therefore, in 2013, the GCAA signed an agreement with EASA - “EASA-UAE Extended Cooperation Arrangement on Aviation Safety”.

• This arrangement covers rule making cooperation, aviation safety promotion and sharing of information

• This will also facilitate our transformation from the current rules to EU’s rules

• The Agreement with EASA is not binding on GCAA.

EASA-GCAA relationship






• Take advantage of the EASA expertise and resources

• The regulations are more proportionate – commercial versus non-commercial

• Risk based regulations moving towards performance based

• Philosophy of minimum necessary rules

• Less duplication of the rule making effort

• Part ARO will bring more transparency on what the obligations of GCAA are

• Take advantage of influencing leading “authorities” (we can always contribute to the EU RMP)

Benefits






Challenges imposed by a rule transformation

1. Over-all change to the regulations (Authority and Industry)• The familiarity and comfort level of using the CARs will be lost

(mind-shift)• Manuals to be reviewed and re-aligned to the new rule• Internal procedures to be reviewed and re-aligned to the new rule• Procedures to ensure standardisation across departments• Job descriptions for key Ops personnel to be reviewed • Certain technical expertise minimum requirements to be reviewed• Organisation structure and recruitment needs to be reviewed• Probable need for additional expertise and resources• Reassess budget requirements• Ensure no existing requirements are left behind






Challenges – continued..

2. Monitoring further amendments and its effect on the organization• Possible change to level of compliance monitoring• Active participation in rulemaking activities to keep up to date

and protect company interests• Adopt and adapt as required

3. Changes to methods of compliance • Interpretation and implementation during transition and

conversion processes





Regulations Structure and Applicability


Current GCAA Regulations





https://www.gcaa.gov.ae/en/ePublication/Pages/CARs.aspx?CertID=CARs

https://www.gcaa.gov.ae/en/ePublication/Pages/CARs.aspx?CertID=CARs


Current EASA Regulations

This image cannot currently be displayed.






CAR Part IV will be named “AIRCRAFT OPERATIONS”, except:

- STD will be removed since we are not FSTD State of Design

- Balloons regulations are currently incorporated in AIR OPS. However EASA is planning to move them outside the AIR OPS. So the GCAA will no change the way we are doing today.

- Ultralight and Microlight Ops (LSA) are under CAR Part II, Ch. 10. Operations in approved Flight Clubs only






The whole of Aircraft Operations and Special Operations is covered under EASA AIR OPS






EASA Basic Regulation ((EU) 216/2008)

GCAA has decided to adopt/adapt the relevant portions of the EASA Basic Regulations and the Cover Regulations of EASA AIR OPS

In all intents, the EASA Basic Regulation ((EU) 216/2008) is the equivalent of the UAE Federal Law No. 20 (1991) and No. 4 (1996) which is the Civil Aviation Law and the GCAA Law respectively

'Basic Regulation' (BR) designates Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency (EASA)






EASA Basic Regulation – continued..

One of EASA's tasks is to assist the Commission in the adoption of implementing rules

Therefore, Regulation (EC) No 216/2008, has been termed as the Basic Regulation in EASA's documentation

The implementing rules proposed by EASA take the form of Opinionsaddressed to the Commission. Once approved, such implementing rules are published as Commission Regulations and this term appears in their titles






Material Scope of EASA Basic Regulation

Airworthiness and environmental protection of aircraft

Pilots Air Operations Aerodromes ATM/ANS and Air Traffic

Controllers






• Describes the regulation's objective and scope• Defines the terms used in the Cover Regulation• Indicates to whom/what the regulation and its annexes apply• Provides one or more dates from when the rules become

applicable (opt-out provisions)• Including any grandfathering and transition measures for

adaptation to the new rules

Cover Regulation





Therefore the new CAR AIR OPS will, in all probability, appear as follows:

UAE Federal Laws






Sample of Topics under Discussion at GCAA

Oversight and control – continued..






The aim is to retain EASA regulations as much as possible

However, we are keeping in mind our operators interests as well as the geographical, political and legal aspects

Implementation of the EASA AIR OPS Regulations in UAE






Status of existing CAAPs

Declaration1. Notification2. List of alternative means of compliance3. Maintaining compliance4. Changes to declaration5. When it ceases






EASA AMC 20-xx relevance• The EASA plan is to do away with the operational portions in the AMC 20-xx series

in due course.

Alt Means of Compliance (AltMoC):• Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) illustrate a means, but not the only means,

by which the proposed requirement can be met

• Organisations are required to comply with the AMCs unless Alternative Means of Compliance (AltMoC) have been accepted by the Authority

• An acceptance process will be developed by GCAA

• Will AltMoCs be added as new AMCs or published on GCAA website?

Operational Suitability Data (OSD)





Mass & MAPSC CofA Recording capability

CVR-CAT.A MCTOM≤5.7T and MAPSC>9 multi engine turbine powered On or after 1/4/1998 Preceding 2 hours

CVR-CAT.H MCTOM>3.175T On and after 1/1/2016 Preceding 2 hours

CVR-NCC.A MCTOM>2.25T and MAPSC>9 On and after 1/1/2016 Preceding 2 hours

CVR-NCC.H MCTOM>3.175T On and after 1/1/2016 Preceding 2 hours

FDR-CAT.A MCTOM≤5.7T or MAPSC>9 multi On and after 1/1/2016 Preceding 25 hours

Data link recording -- on and after 8/4/2014 Same as CVR

CVR/FDR Gap Analysis

Difference on MOPS: CARs (ED-55/ED56), EASA ED-112 Impact

Sample of Topics





IDE New Impact Safety regression

Instrument and Equipment not required that do not need to be approved but carried on a flight(e.g. PED carried by crew, non installed pax entertainment, etc.)

Yes- Shall not be used to comply basic rules- Shall not affect AW of the aeroplane

Yes --

TAWS

- Reciprocating engine aeroplaneMCTOM>5.7T- Turbine powered with MCTOM>5.7T & MOPSC>9- Excessive downwards GS dev warning including SBAS, GBAS

Yes --

Additional crash axe for MOPSC>200 pax Yes Yes --

Sample of Topics

IDE Gap Analysis






Number and type of ELT for aeroplane with MOPSCs≤19

Yes- 1 automatic ELT for CofA after 01/07/2008- Any type of ELT for CofA on or before 01/07/2008

Yes --

ELT batteries replacement or recharged after more than 1 cumulative hour in some cases

Yes Yes --

Under water locating deviceEquivalent in CAR-OPS- All aeroplanes MCTOM>45.5T- By 01/01/2019

No unless change of date of effectivity

Yes ( CAR-OPS considers MCTOM>27T)By 2020

First Aid kit content- Some new items introduces(e.g. replenish after use in-flight at the first opportunity)

Yes --

Sample of Topics






Emergency medical kit content

- Some new items introduces(e.g. drugs administrated by students, if no qualified medical pro)

No Yes

LoA and Standards for electronic navigation data products(EUROCAE ED-76)/RTCA-DO200A

-- Yes --

Sample of Topics






Stage Achieved / Planned

Project Administration and Resources April 2015Rules comparison (ICAO, GCAA, EASA), gap analysis May 2015Review of first draft rule November 2015Establish Industry Rulemaking Advisory Group (IRAG) December 2015Preliminary discussion with IRAG February 2016Launch of NPA considering IRAG input June 2016Comment Response Document (CRD) of the NPA October 2016Final rule promulgation January 2017Date of effectivity of the final rule December 2018

EASA AIR OPS Implementation Timeline (proposed in 2016)






Today timelines?

Today Under review by the Industry involved in the sub-IRAG





Thank you

21 May 2017

Andrea Boiardi – EASA Chief Expert OSD

Régine Vadrot – Airbus OSD Senior Expert

17th Airworthiness Consultative Committee (ACC) Workshop

© AIRBUS S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document.

Agenda

1.2. Operational Suitability concept

1.1. Regulatory framework

1. Introduction

2. Operational Suitability Data (OSD)

21 May 2017OSD Overview

Page 2

Andrea Boiardi - Chief Expert OSD

Brief introduction to the OSD

“Data that is considered necessary for the safe operation of an aircraft!”

OSD is…

EASA - GCAA OSD Workshop

“Data to support operational aspects for which the design approval holder is responsible”

OSD is…


OSD is…


“Certification data associated to the specific type certificate”


Agenda



1. Introduction



Page 7

History and Background

JOEB JOEB > EOEB OSD

OSD Overview

Evolution of the OPS/FCL evaluation into the OSD

OSD vs OEB

JOEB

JOEB/EOEB

Voluntary for the OEMs

Non-binding to the end user

Limited to Flight Crew, Cabin Crew and MMEL

Legal status unclear

OSD Overview

OSD vs OEB

Based on Basic Regulation and Part 21

Required for the OEMs

Mandatory for the end user

Scope includes 5 (+1) OSD Constituents

OSD

OSD Overview

Deeper involvement of EASA TC holders in the development and approval of OSD

Links created within Aircrew and OPS requirements

Streamlining of the OSD in the certification/validation processes

Need to establish a certification basis

Need for DOAs to integrate the OSD process

Addressing changes to type design and STCs

Data owned and maintained by the TC holder

Inclusion in bilateral agreements with EASA Partners

OSD vs OEB - the effort and the challenge

OSD Overview


Operational

Suitability

Data

Part TCO

Part ART

Third country operators

Part-21

Initial Airworthiness

CS-25

“CS-OSD”

Part-FCL

Conversion of

national licences

Licences of

non-EU states

Part-MED

Part-CC

Part-ARA

Part-ORA

Aircrew

Part-M

Part-145

Part-66

Part-147

Continuing Airworthiness

DEF

Part-ARO

Part-ORO

Part-CAT

Part-SPA

Air Operations

Part-NCC

Part-NCO

Part-SPO

European regulatory framework

BASIC REGULATION

TC HoldersOperators

Training Organisations

Maintenance Organisations


Page 12

OSD implementation timelineCommission Regulation (EU) 69/2014

OSD Overview

OSD Implementation

OEMs to propose M vs NM elements

for grandfathering

Deadline for OSD approval(and extensionof DOA scope)

Applicability for STC and changes

Full applicability for

end users

17 Feb 2014

18 Jun 2014

18 Dec 2015 or EIS

19 Dec 2016

18 Dec 2017

(or 2 years after approval)

14

OSD FC – Transition Arrangements

OSD Overview

TC issued before 17 Feb 2014

Delivery on/after 17 Feb

2014

TC Application before 17 Feb

2014

OSD notrequired

OSD required (except MCSD and SIMD)Before EIS by EU Operator or 18 Dec 2015

(whichever is later)

OSD required before EIS by EU

Operator

YES

NO YES

NO

YES NO

Transition / Grandfathering

OEBOEB


Agenda



1. Introduction to operational certification



Page 15


Ops docMinimum

Equipment List,

manuals…

Maintenance

Trainingfor flight crew, cabin

crew, maintenance,

dispatcher

Operational Suitability Data concept

Continued validity of data

Aircraft manufacturerSAFE

&

EFFICIENT OPERATIONS

Training organizationsAircraft operators

Maintenance organizations

Aircraft manufacturer

Operational Suitability

OSD: Operational Suitability Data


Page 16



SAFE&



Ops docMinimum

Equipment List,

manuals…

Maintenance


crew, maintenance,

dispatcher

Operational Suitability



Page 17



SAFE&



Ops docMinimum

Equipment List,

manuals…

Maintenance


crew, maintenance,

dispatcher

Operational certification



Page 18


Agenda

2.2. OSD concept

2.1. Introduction to OSD

2.3. OSD constituents

2.4. OSD process




Page 19


What’s Operational Suitability Data?

EU operators,training & maintenance organisations

- Minimum Equipment List (MEL)

- Training for:

• Flight crew

• Cabin crew

• Maintenance certifying staff

- Simulator qualification



Page 20

“Data that is considered necessary for the safe operation of an aircraft!”

“Data to support operational aspects for which the design approval holder is responsible”




What’s Operational Suitability Data?

Mandatory

Data mandatory for the end user to comply with operational or training requirements

Non mandatory

Acceptable Means of Compliance (AMC) to operational or training requirements for the end user

(it is not the only mean)

Operational Suitability Data


Page 21


Agenda

2.2. OSD concept



2.4. OSD process




Page 22


OSD concept

Certification basis

for OSD

Part-21 Part-66

Part-147


Continuing Airworthiness

“CS-OSD”

Part-FCL

Part-ORA

Aircrew

Part-ORO

Part-CAT

Air Operations

Part-SPA

BASIC REGULATION

Requires

manufacturers to

develop OSD


SPA: SPecific Approvals

TCDS: Type Certificate Data Sheet

FCL: Flight Crew Licence

ORA: Organisation Requirements for Aircrew

ORO: Organisation Requirements for air operations

CAT: Commercial Air Transport ops

CC: Cabin Crew

CS: Certification Specifications

TCDS

Training

organisation Operator

Part-66 Aircraft Maintenance Licences

Part-147 Maintenance Training Organisations

Part-CC


Page 23




24

OSD FC – TCDS Content

OSD Certification Basis

OSD Reference

The legal

reference to

Operational

Suitability Data

is established

through the

TC/TCDS


Agenda

2.2. OSD concept



2.4. OSD process




Page 25


And other type related operational suitability elements

OSD constituents

Flight Crew

Simulator

Cabin Crew

Maintenance certifying

staff

MMEL: Master Minimum Equipment ListOSD: Operational Suitability Data


Page 26


Flight Crew Data

Certification basis

for Flight Crew Data

Part-21


CS-FCD

Part-FCL

Aircrew

Part-ORA

Part-ORO

Part-CAT

Air Operations

Part-SPA

BASIC REGULATIONRequires

manufacturers to

develop Flight

Crew Data

Flight

Crew

Data

ORO: Organisation Requirements for

air operations

SPA: SPecific Approvals

FCD: Flight Crew Data

FCL: Flight Crew Licence

ORA: Organisation Requirements for Aircrew

CAT: Commercial Air Transport ops


• Flight crew type

rating training

Training

organisation

• Flight crew training

• Operations manual

Operator


TCDS

Page 27




Flight Crew Data

Flight Crew Data

Pilot type rating determination

To determine if new type or variant

Operator Difference

Requirements (ODR) tables

To support the development of differences training programme

Training Areas of Special Emphasis

(TASE)

Identification of specific knowledge and skills required for the safe operations of an aircraft

Other flight crew type

related elements

Requirements for:

- specific operations

- instructor qualifications

- etc.


Page 28


Flight Crew Data – Results of process

Mandatory

Aircraft type designation

Pilot license endorsement

Operator Difference Requirements (ODR) tables

Training Areas of Special Emphasis (TASE)

Non mandatory

Type rating course overview

Credits for reduced transition course

Flight Crew Data


Page 29


Flight Crew Data – Pilot type rating determination process


Same Type Rating A320



Differences training & SFF

Same Type Rating* A350

* Projected and

subject to approval

from the Aviation Authorities

CCQ paths &

MFF combinations

Page 30


No Yes C CB

3 years

Base aircraft: A320 | Candidate aircraft: A380-800 Difference levels

Systems Differences FLT CHAR PROC CHG TRNG CHECK CUR

Flight Crew Data – Operator Difference Requirements

Operator Difference Requirements (ODR) table

Mean of compliance for the aircraft type rating determination

To be used and customized by operators and training organizations when developing

differences training program

Example:

Systems Description of the identified differences

Impact assessment

Difference Training Levels

(from A to E)


Page 31


Flight Crew Data – Training Areas of Special Emphasis

Training Areas of Special Emphasis (TASE)

High level training requirements (knowledge and skills) that shall be implemented within

pilot training

Examples:

- TASE Fly-by-wire applicable to all Airbus aircraft

- TASE ECAM checklist specific to A350 and A380

ECAM: Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitor


Page 32



• Cabin crew training

• Operations manual

Operator

Cabin Crew Data

Certification basis

for Cabin Crew

Data

Requires

manufacturers to

develop Cabin

Crew Data

CCD: Cabin Crew Data



Part-21

CS-CCD

BASIC REGULATION

Cabin

Crew

Data

Part-CC

Aircrew

Part-ORO

Air Operations


TCDS

Page 33




Cabin Crew Data

Cabin Crew Data

Type rating determination& ADT table

To determine if new type or variant, supported by an Aircraft Difference Table (ADT)

Type specific data

for cabin crew

To support the development of aircraft type specific and differencestraining programme

Cabin Aspects of Special Emphasis

(CASE)

Cabin crew requirements identified from airworthiness certification

(e.g. emergency evacuation demonstration)

Other cabin crew type

related elements

Requirements for:

- door training device

- etc.

Mandatory Non mandatory


Page 34


Base aircraft: A330-200/300 | Candidate aircraft: A350-900 Diff

Trg

LevSystems Differences DESC OPS

Cabin Crew Data – Aircraft Difference Table

Operator Difference Requirements (ODR) table – ADT in EASA terms

Mean of compliance for the aircraft type rating determination

To be used and customized by operators when developing difference training program

Example:

SystemsDescription of the identified differences

Impact assessment

Difference Training Levels

(from 1 to 3)


Page 35


Cabin Crew Data – Type specific data and CASE

Cabin Aspects of Special Emphasis

(CASE)

Elements identified during airworthiness certification

and that shall be included in procedures by operators

Example: specific slideraft transportation path in case

of ditching

Type specific data for cabin crew

Description of aircraft system for cabin crew duties. Elements

currently provided in Cabin Crew Operating Manual

Example: controls and indicator panel, Flight Attendant Panel

(FAP)


Page 36


Minimum Equipment

List (MEL)

Operator

Master Minimum Equipment List (MMEL)

Certification basis

for MMEL

Part-21


CS-MMEL

JAR-MMEL

Part-ORO

Air Operations

BASIC REGULATIONRequires

manufacturers to

develop and

maintain an MMEL

MMEL

JAR: Joint Aviation Requirements




TCDS

Page 37





Possible dispatch of an aircraft with temporarily inoperative items...

…with associated special operating conditions, limitations or procedures


Page 38

Safety

Methodology

A safety methodology agreed

with EASA is used to justify

MMEL items and to ensure an

acceptable level of safety



Mandatory

List of itemswith dispatch conditions

Non mandatory

Operational procedures

Maintenance procedures

Non-OSD

MMEL entries / dispatch messages

Content of Airbus MMEL



Page 39




MM

EL

ite

m –

Ma

nd

ato

ry

Dis

pa

tch

co

nd

itio

ns

–M

an

da

tory

Ops and maintenance procedures – Non-mandatory

Page 40




Purpose of the associated maintenance procedure (m):

- To close and lock the affected exit from the inside

- To placard the affected exit ‘DO NOT USE’

- To obscure all the EXIT markings, signs and lights associated to the affected exit

- To placard the affected seats.

Purpose of the associated operational procedure (o):

- The maximum passenger capacity is re-calculated

- All crewmembers are briefed on the location and condition of the affected exit,

passenger distribution and modified cabin safety procedures

- The affected exit, escape paths, and blocked seating layout are checked before

each takeoff and landing

- All the concerned passengers are informed that an exit is inoperative and

displays an appropriate placard.

Page 41


Agenda

2.2. OSD concept



2.4. OSD process



EDTO: Extended Diversion Time OperationsETOPS: Extended Twin engine A/C OPerationS



Page 42


Type Certificate

Aircraft designOperational

Suitability Data

(OSD)

OSD process


Page 43


Typ

e C

ert

ific

ate

OSD process


Issuance of a unique

Type Certificate

Aircra

ft d

esig

n1. Application

2. Certification basis

3. Means of compliance & certification plans

4. Compliance demonstration

OS

D

1. Application


3. Means of compliance & certification plan

4. Compliance demonstration (OSD development & operational evaluation)

Page 44


Operational suitability actors

FlightOperations Specialists

Flight Test

Design Office

Chief AirworthinessEngineer Team

ProjectCertification Manager

Certification PanelCertification Panel

Operational

Suitability

Managers/

DAE

EASAOSDExperts

Certification Panel

OSD

Compliance

Verification

Engineer

DAE: Designated Airworthiness Engineer


Chief Engineer Team

OSD Certification Panels

02 – Flight Crew Data

11 – Cabin Safety and

Cabin Crew Data

15 – Master Minimum

Equipment List

16 – Aircraft Validation

Source Data for Simulator


Page 45


Ch

an

ge

to

Typ

e C

ert

ific

ate

OSD change process


Unique approval of

Change to Type

Certificate

Aircra

ft d

esig

n1. Application


3. Means of compliance & certification plans

4. Compliance demonstration

OS

D

1. Application


3. Means of compliance & certification plan

4. Compliance demonstration (OSD development & operational evaluation)

Change to Type Design

Classification

Change to OSD

Classification

?

Page 46


Operational Suitability Data – Transition Arrangements

OSD Overview

47

TC issued before 17 Feb 2014

Delivery on/after 17 Feb 2014

TC Application before 17 Feb

2014

OSD not requiredOSD required (except MCSD and SIMD)

Before EIS by EU Operator or 18 Dec 2015(whichever is later)

OSD required before EIS by EU

Operator

YES

NO YES

NO

YES NO

O

E

B

O

E

B

A300

A310, A300-600

A340

A320

A330

A380

A350

21 May 2017

Part 21


Conclusion – Where we stand at Airbus?

A321neo ACF, A330neo, Beluga XL, A350-1000

Changes to OSD


A350 …A350-1000

A380

A340

A330 …A330neo

A320 …A321neo ACF

A300/A310

MMEL FCD CCD

CCD: Cabin Crew Data

FCD: Flight Crew Data

MMEL: Master Minimum Equipment List

Page 48


OSD: Bridging certification and operations.

Discussion


© Airbus S.A.S. All rights reserved. Confidential and proprietary document. This document and all information contained herein is the sole property of AIRBUS. No intellectual property rights are granted by the

delivery of this document or the disclosure of its content. This document shall not be reproduced or disclosed to a third party without the express written consent of AIRBUS S.A.S. This document and its content shall

not be used for any purpose other than that for which it is supplied. The statements made herein do not constitute an offer. They are based on the mentioned assumptions and are expressed in good faith. Where the

supporting grounds for these statements are not shown, AIRBUS S.A.S. will be pleased to explain the basis thereof.

AIRBUS, its logo, A300, A310, A318, A319, A320, A321, A330, A340, A350, A380, A400M are registered trademarks.


Page 50

airworthiness consultative committee … consultative committee workshop ... car m - continuing...

Documents