airline labor relations 1980 to today and...
TRANSCRIPT
Airline Labor Relations1980 to Today and Beyond
Thomas A. KochanMIT Institute for Work & Employment
Research
EU-US Aviation Forum on Liberalisationand Labour
December 3, 2008
Objectives• Review Evolution since Deregulation
• Understand Recent Pressures & Problems
• Explore Variations Across Carriers & Reasons
• Suggest How to Avoid the Coming Crisis
Up in the Air: How Airlines Can Improve Performance
by Engaging their Employees
Greg Bamber, Monash University, Melbourne, AustraliaJody Hoffer Gittell, Brandeis University, Boston
Thomas Kochan, Sloan School of Management, MIT, BostonAndrew von Nordenflycht, Simon Fraser Univ., Vancouver
"And you thought the passengers were mad. Airline employees are fed up, too-with pay cuts, increased workloads and
management's miserly ways, which leave workers to explain to often-enraged passengers why flying has become such a
miserable experience.“ New York Times, December 22, 2007.
Key Features of Airline Labor Relations
• 70% unionized—most highly unionized industry in US• Occupational groups bargain separately in each firm, but
linked through strong “pattern bargaining”• Covered by Railway Labor Act• National Mediation Board:
– must “release” from mediation before a countdown to a strike can occur
– can recommend “Public Emergency Board” (PEB)• Lengthy Negotiations (16 months), long periods of
mediation, very little use of PEBs, few strikes
Figure 5Airline Dispute Resolution under the Railway Labor Act
102
39
7
33
3 6
205
0
50
100
150
200
TotalContracts
Mediated 1st TARejected
Arbitrated Released PEB Strike
# of Contracts
Source: Airline Industrial Relations Conference
Figure 6Comparison of Delays Past Contract Expiration
Under NLRA and for Airlines Industry(MIT Airlines Industry Data 1984-2001 and FMCS National Performance Review Surveys
1994-1996 & 1997-1999)
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Private Sector --FMCS Survey(1994-1996)
Private Sector --FMCS Survey(1997-1999)
Public Sector --FMCS Survey(1997-1999)
All Airlines --MIT Airlines
Industry Data
Major Airlines --MIT Airlines
Industry Data
Early or On Time (within one month of expiration/amendable date)More than one month past expiration/amendable date)
Source: Airline Industrial Relations Conference; and Federal Mediation and Conciliation Service
Variations Over Time-1980-93• Early 1980s: Post Deregulation and Recession
– new non union entrants (People Express, NY Air... – labor concessions--wide use of “2-tier” wage
structures– Frank Lorenzo--Texas Air, Continental, Eastern…
• 1985-90: Economic Recovery– End of Concessions: Some restoring of wages & gains
in bargaining but with lower cost structure– 1985 United Pilot Strike as a turning point– Lorenzo’s empire collapses in bankruptcy
• 1990-93: Recession and wages held back again
Variations over Time-1994-2000• 1994-2000: Growth in Traffic & Profits
• Slow return to wage growth--very slow negotiations
• 1998-2000 Negotiations Climate--Expectations Gap:– Workers looking to make up for wages foregone when times
were good– Companies looking forward to tough times ahead– Result: Increased labor conflicts, slowdowns, protracted
negotiations and ultimately very large wage settlements
Figure 4
Average 4-yr Change in Pilot Pay Rates by Aircraft Type vs. 4-yr Change in Revenue per Employee, 1993-1997 & 1997-2001
0.03
0.23
0.04
0.24
0.00
0.28
0.05
0.23
0.18
-0.08-10%
-5%
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
%change 1993-1997 %change 1997-2001
B767 / B757B727 / MD80A319-321B737 / DC9
Rev. / Emp.
Source: Department of Transportation Form 41 (from Database Products, Inc.) and Airline Industrial Relations Conference
Variations over time: 2000 to present
• 2000-2001: Traffic down, Losses Return...– frustrated public; embittered labor relations
• 9/11 & Beyond: Struggling to Recover
• 2003-6: Restructuring/Concession Agreements in or near Bankruptcy: UA, AA, US Air, .Delta, NW
• 2006-present: lead up to upcoming negotiations—pent up expectations about to explode…
POSITIVE VIEWS OF HOW MANAGEMENT IS RUNNING THE AIRLINE
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
12/00 12/01 12/02 12/03 12/04 09/05
• Source: The Wilson Center for Public Research, Inc. – based on 150,674 interviews conducted with pilots or flight attendants from 1/1/2001 to 9/20/2005
POSITIVE VIEWS OF MANAGEMENT’S TREATMENT OF EMPLOYEES
0%20%
40%60%
80%
100%
12/00 12/01 12/02 12/03 12/04 09/05
• Source: The Wilson Center for Public Research, Inc. – based on 150,674 interviews conducted with pilots or flight attendants from 1/1/2001 to 9/20/2005
Variations Across Carriers
• Traditional Collective Bargaining– AA, UA, NW….
• Union Suppression-Busting: Lorenzo• Union Substitution: Delta up to 1993• Joint Governance-Ownership: UA after 94• Workplace Culture-employee centered:
– Southwest; Delta pre 1993; Continental after 94
• Low Cost Airlines—same variations among them???
Labor Costs: Only Part of the Problem & Solution
• Real unit labor costs 21% lower today than 1980• But RASM are 32% lower than 1982—costs exceed
revenues• Labor costs of low cost airlines were 50% lower than
top carriers; more recently converging • Wage movements out of synch with revenue
movements• Past Labor cost reductions provided short term relief
but not long term improvements in operational performance (productivity or service)
Labor Relations
WagesUnionization
Shared Governance
Operational Outcomes
Labor ProductivityAircraft Productivity
Service Quality
Financial Outcomes
Operating marginAsset returns
Low Conflict
PositiveWorkplace
Culture
Labor Relations & Firm Performance
Summary of Results
• Unions increase wages• Unions & wages increase aircraft productivity• Union & wage effects on margins not significant• Shared governance: reductions in wages bring short
term rise in margins—no sustained performance benefits
• Strong positive effects for workplace culture• Strong negative effects for labor conflict
POSITIVE VIEWS OF EMPLOYEE MORALE
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%
12/00 12/01 12/02 12/03 12/04 09/05
• Source: The Wilson Center for Public Research, Inc. – based on 150,674 interviews conducted with pilots or flight attendants from 1/1/2001 to 9/20/2005
Labor Relations Quality Matters!
• Positive workplace relations linked to shorter contract negotiations and less labor conflict
• Lower labor conflict & positive culture linked to higher service quality, productivity, and margins
Two Key Conclusions & a Question
• Wage cuts/weakening unions will at best bring short term cost relief but not long term performance improvements
• Recovery strategies need to focus on improving quality of workforce and labor relations
• Are we headed for another crisis—”a perfect storm” as contracts once again come up for re-negotiations???
Key Conclusions• All firms seeking to compete on low costs
• Labor cost gaps narrowed but not total costs
• Labor cost reductions of post 2000 era:– Necessary but not sufficient for recovery– Has produced extremely low morale, pent up demands for equity
of sacrifice and recovery of wage concessions
• Successful, sustained performance improvements require improved employee and labor-management relations– Commitment, positive workplace culture, coordination– Labor peace—in organizing and in negotiations– Engagement of unions: Shared vision and support for firm and
industry wide strategies
The Future for the US Industry: 3 Potential Scenarios
1. Status quo: Headed toward a “Perfect Storm”– Multiple contracts in major firms due 2009-10– Pent up workforce pressures will explode– Economy and transportation system in crisis
2. Firm by firm/union by union transformation– Possible, difficult, mixed results in the past
3. New government policy as a catalyst for transforming airline labor relations as part of response to current economic crisis?
Potential Scenario 3: Elements of a Recovery Compact?
• Joint efforts to engage workforce, build positive culture, achieve coordination across work groups
• Company-wide negotiations and compensation strategies– Gradual recovery of wages tied to cost of living– Expanded pay-performance linkages– Equity in wage growth; including
management/executive compensation– Long term agreements: predictable wages; labor peace
• Transparency, information sharing, consultation