air quality a perspective · recent headlines-–u.s. air quality is getting worse. here are the...
TRANSCRIPT
Air Quality A Perspective
Small Business Compliance Advisory Committee
July 22, 2020
Harrisburg, PATom Wolf, Governor Patrick McDonnell, Secretary
– Perception of our Air
– Historical Emissions Trends
– Ozone Design Values
– Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) Design Values
• Annual
• Daily
– Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Design Values
– Challenges
– EPA’s View
– The AQI
– Then and Now
Agenda
2
Corner of 5th and Liberty circa 1940
Corner of Liberty and Fifth Avenue (Archives Services Center, U. of Pittsburgh))
3
Recent Headlines-– U.S. air quality is getting worse. Here are the costs- Oct 23, 2019
– 20 Pa. counties, including several near Clairton Coke Works, on code orange air quality alert –FEB 4, 2019
– Six mid-state counties on code orange air quality alert - FEB 5,2019
– Snow-less in Boston. From deep freeze to “air quality” alert in Philly. What is with this winter?- FEB 3, 2019
– Group says air quality in Pennsylvania is getting worse –JULY 15, 2018
– Editorial: We need to know what's in our air- APRIL 14,2019
Perception
4
https://stateimpact.npr.org/pennsylvania/2019/02/04/20-pa-counties-including-several-near-clairton-coke-works-on-code-orange-air-quality-alert/http://www.witf.org/news/2019/02/six-midstate-counties-on-code-orange-air-quality-alert.phphttp://www.witf.org/news/2018/07/group-says-air-quality-in-pennsylvania-is-getting-worse.phphttps://www.philly.com/news/philadelphia-snow-boston-raleigh-winter-new-york-blizzard-equinox-20190203.htmlhttps://poststar.com/opinion/editorial/editorial-we-need-to-know-what-s-in-our-air/article e7512fd9-799a-59d0-a55c-b492d5144aeb.htmlhttps://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/u-s-air-quality-is-getting-worse-here-are-the-costs
– The 2017 American Lung Association report ranks Philadelphia #24 nationally for ozone pollution
– Pittsburgh and Lancaster are tied for #8, Philadelphia at #12, Harrisburg at #15 and Johnstown at #18 for long term fine particulate pollution
– Pittsburgh is ranked at #10, Lancaster at #13 and Harrisburg at #22 for short term fine particulate pollution
Perception
5
https://www.lung.org/our-initiatives/healthy-air/sota/city-rankings/most-polluted-cities.html
American Lung Association
- 14 counties are graded as an F, eight get a D, six get a C, six get a B and only two get an A ( Bradford and Franklin) for Ozone pollution
- Four counties get an F, one gets a D, three get a C, seven get a B and nine get an A short term fine particulate pollution
Perception
6
https://www.lung.org/our-initiatives/healthy-air/sota/city-rankings/states/pennsylvania/
The Penn Environment Policy and Research Center issued a report in July of 2018 named Trouble in the Air -
"The Gettysburg area experienced 81 days of degraded air quality. York and Hanover experienced 128 bad air days. Harrisburg suffered 132 days of bad air,.. and finally in Lebanon and Lancaster there were over 170 bad air days. That's one out of every two days," she said.
Perception
7
https://pennenvironmentcenter.org/reports/pae/trouble-airhttp://www.witf.org/news/2018/07/group-says-air-quality-in-pennsylvania-is-getting-worse.php
Emissions Trends
8
NOx Emissions (Tons)
90
100,000
200,000
300,000
400,000
500,000
600,000
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
NOx Emissions (Tons)
NOx Emissions are down 83%
SOx Emissions (Tons)
10
0
200,000
400,000
600,000
800,000
1,000,000
1,200,000
1,400,000
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
SOx Emissions (Tons)
SOx Emissions are down 93%
PM Emissions (Tons) Particulate Matter Emissions (Tons)
50,000
PM Emissions are down 31% 45,000
40,000
35,000
30,000
25,000
20,000
15,000
10,000
5,000
0
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
• Particulate Matter 10 Microns Particulate Matter 2.5
11
VOC Emissions (Tons)
12
0
10,000
20,000
30,000
40,000
50,000
60,000
70,000
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
VOC Emissions (Tons)
VOC Emissions are down 60%
Total Emissions (Tons) Total Criteria Pollutants (Tons)
2,000,000
1,800,000
1,600,000
Total Emissions are down 88% 1,400,000
1,200,000
1,000,000
800,000
600,000
400,000
200,000
0
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
• NOx • SOx • PM10 PM2.5 • voe 13
Total Emissions (Tons)
14
0
20000000
40000000
60000000
80000000
100000000
120000000
140000000
160000000
180000000
1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017
Total Criteria Pollutants (Tons)
Historical 8-hour Ozone Concentrations in PA
15
1980 8-Hour Ozone Design Values
Appearing in Red - 1980 8-Hour Ozone Design Value above 70 ppb (2015 Ozone Standard)
Appearing in Blue - 1980 8-Hour Ozone Design Value at or below 70 ppb (2015 Ozone Standard)
16
1991 8-Hour Ozone Design Values
88
V!l.RREN
CRA\"'1'0RD
MERCER
90
89
:As BEl.vfR
BUTLER
SOr.ERSET FAYETTE
Appearing in Red - 1991 8-Hour Ozone Design Value above 70 ppb (2015 Ozone Standard)
Appearing in Blue - 1991 8-Hour Ozone Design Value at or below 70 ppb (2015 Ozone Standard)
17
92
2002 8-Hour Ozone Design Values
88
\i.RREH IACKEAPI BRADFORD ~IQUEH~tOl4
POTTER CRA\'IFORD 83 •
tERCER
LYCOM l/G
BUTLER
Appearing in Red - 2002 8-Hour Ozone Design Value above 70 ppb (2015 Ozone Standard)
Appearing in Blue - 2002 8-Hour Ozone Design Value at or below 70 ppb (2015 Ozone Standard)
18
83
2005 8-Hour Ozone Design Values
83
\i.RREH IACKEAPI BRADFORD ~IQUEH~tOl4
POTTER CRA\'IFORD 81 •
tERCER
LYCO UG
BUTLER
Appearing in Red - 2005 8-Hour Ozone Design Value above 70 ppb (2015 Ozone Standard)
Appearing in Blue - 2005 8-Hour Ozone Design Value at or below 70 ppb (2015 Ozone Standard)
19
2016 8-Hour Ozone Design Values
20
65
CIU.V#ORO
r---- 66 • t.ERCEll
68
2017 8-Hour Ozone Design Values
Wd\Afl/
66
.CKEAN
66
• CLEA Rf ELD
POTTER TIOGA
BR,;.DFORD 57
• 64
• SliLL I/Ali
SUSQUUIAllPIA
BUTLER
65
lll.DfORD
70 66 66"'\. LA~Amtt
vof" '--70 •
Appearing in Red - 2017 8-Hour Ozone Design Value above 70 ppb (2015 Ozone Standard)
Appearing in Blue - 201 7 8-Hour Ozone Design Value at or below 70 ppb (2015 Ozone Standard) 21
CRA\Jl'ORD
---~--65 • IERCER
69
2018 8-Hour Ozone Design Values
VARRfl• ".'C EAll
64
• CLEARflELC
POTTER TIOGA BRADFORD
64
• 59
•
BlJTlER
CREE <E 66 • FAYETTE
69 63 65~ u.11: ... mO
vof K 67
•
Appearing in Red - 2018 8-Hour Ozone Design Value above 70 ppb (2015 Ozone Standard)
Appearing in Blue - 2018 8-Hour Ozone Design Value at or below 70 ppb (2015 Ozone Standard) 22
CRA\#ORD
-----63" • t.£RCER
67
61 uvO t.cE
GREEl,f 63" •
BlJTlER
2019 8-Hour Ozone Design Values
As of October 22, 2019 - 2019 Ozone Data Has Not Been Fully QA/QC'd
VARRfl•
FAYETTE
:c EAll
60 • CLEARflELC
POTTER TIOGA BRADFORD 57
60 • •
67 62 63~ u.11: ... mO
vof K 61
•
Appearing in Red - Projected 2019 8-Hour Ozone Design Value above 70 ppb (2015 Ozone Standard)
Appearing in Blue - Projected 2019 8-Hour Ozone Design Value at or below 70 ppb (2015 Ozone Standard) 23
Historical Annual PM2.5
Concentrations in PA
24
2005 Annual PM 2.5 Design Values
CIUWFORD
r.ERCER
13.7
BUTLER
• 1~6.4 AR,,.STRDt<G
BE..v'ER 13.6 ALLEG NY. ,J.14.4'
13 6 15.4 ...... • . • • 16.6
""-14•5 15'-1 • ,/' . . 14
1~15.1 w. 0 ..i;Tot<
SOr.ERSET FAYETTE
GREEr E
Appearing in Red - 2005 Annual PM2.5 Design Value above 12.0 ug/m3 (2012 PM2.5 Standard)
Appearing in Blue - 2005 24-Hour PM2.5 Design Value at or below 12.0 ug/m3 (2012 PM2.5 Standard)
25
2016 Annual PM2.5 Design Values
26
2019 Annual PM 2.5 Design Values
Appearing in Red - 2019 Annual PM25 Design Values Above the Standard of 12.0 ugfm3
Appearing in Blue - 2019 Annual PM25 Design Values Below the Standard of 12.0 ug/m3
27
Historical 24-hour PM2.5
Concentrations in PA
28
2005 24-hour PM 2.5 Design Values
Appearing in Red - 2005 24-Hour PM2.5 Design Value above 35 ug/m3 (2006 PM2.5 Standard)
Appearing in Blue - 2005 24-Hour PM2.5 Design Value at or below 35 ug/m3 (2006 PM2.5 Standard)
29
2016 24-hour PM2.5 Design Values
30
22
21 • 17 •
2017 24-hour PM 2.5 Design Values
_rec
17 •
Appearing in Red - 2017 24-hou r PM25 0esign Values Above the Standard of 35 ug/m3
Appearing in Blue - 2017 24-hour PM25 Design Values Below the Standard of 35 ug/m3
31
C r "
21
T "'.
•
•
2018 24-hour PM 2.5 Design Values
TIOGA " 17 •
Appearing in Red - 2019 24-hour PM25 0esign Values Above the Standard of 35 ug/m3
Appearing in Blue - 2019 24-hour PM25 Design Values Below the Standard of 35 ug/m3
32
Historical 1-hour SO2
Concentrations in PA
33
1980 1-hour 502 Design Values
11ARREtl MCKEAll TIOGA BRADFORD
Wl00Ett>.t4!1A
POITER CRA11FORO
r.ERCER
GREEt f
JU'FERSO"
ELK
CJ.MOR A
1so·
AO.. ,
Appearing in Red - 1980 1-Hour S02 Design Value above 75 ppb (2010 S02 Standard)
Appearing in Blue - 1980 1-Hour S02 Design Value at or below 75 ppb (2015 S02 Standard)
34
19911-hour 502 Design Values
174
Appearing in Red - 1991 1-Hour S02 Design Value above 75 ppb (2010 S02 Standard)
Appearing in Blue - 1991 1-Hour S02 Design Value at or below 75 ppb (2015 S02 Standard)
35
58
79
2005 1-hour 502 Design Values
235 62 \URE~
CRA\'IFORO
tERCER
BUTLER
SOtERSET FAYETTE
Appearing in Red - 2005 1-Hour S02 Design Value above 75 ppb (2010 S02 Standard)
Appearing in Blue - 2005 1-Hour S02 Design Value at or below 75 ppb (2015 S02 Standard)
36
2016 1-hour SO2 Design Values
37
CRAWFORD
2019 1-hour 502 Design Values
llCKE AN TIOG" BRADFORD
SUSOUEHANN,... POTIER
Appearing in Red - 2019 1-Hour S02 Design Value above 75 ppb (2010 S02 Standard)
Appearing in Blue - 2019 1-Hour S02Design Value at or below 75 ppb (20 10 S02Standard)
Asterick (")Appearing Behind the 2019 1-Hour S02 Design Value Means the Data is Incomplete Durin g 3-Year Period 38
Challenges
39
Of course we still have challenges
40
• Staffing and funding are always a challenge.• We have an ozone issue in Philadelphia that will not be easy to solve.• There are facilities statewide that we spend quite a bit of time on from coke
batteries to zinc smelters.• We have picked the most of the low hanging fruit so future improvements
will require a lot more effort. • Cars are cleaner.• Major facilities have emissions controls.• We have taken lead out of gasoline.
• Asthma rates have climbed from 3.1% in 1980 to 10.1% in 2015.• Approximately 90% of adults from western countries spend almost 22 hours
a day INDOORS where air pollution can be many times worse than outdoor air.
• Children spend half the time their parents did playing outside.• Medical research indicates possible health effects at levels below the
current NAAQS.
https://www.cdc.gov/asthma/most recent data states.htmhttps://www.usatoday.com/story/sponsor-story/velux/2018/05/15/indoor-generation-and-health-risks-spending-more-time-inside/610289002/https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/jul/27/children-spend-only-half-the-time-playing-outside-as-their-parents-did
EPA’s View
41
EPA’s View
42https://gispub.epa.gov/air/trendsreport/2018/documentation/AirTrends Flyer.pdf
EPA’s View
43https://gispub.epa.gov/air/trendsreport/2018/#growth w cleaner air
262%
189%
59%
44%
-73%
23%
EPA’s View
44https://gispub.epa.gov/air/trendsreport/2018/#growth w cleaner air
SO2 Satellite Imagery
45
Air Quality Index
46
100.00%
90.00%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
- Very Unhealthy
- unhealthy
- unhealthy for Sensitive Groups
Moderate
- Good
Historic AQI
::: .... =---~ -
Then and Now
48
Corner of 5th and Liberty circa 1940
Corner of Liberty and Fifth Avenue (Archives Services Center, U. of Pittsburgh))
49
Corner of 5th and Liberty Today
50
Bureau of Air Quality
Nick Lazor Environmental Program Manager Air Quality Monitoring Division
717-783-9268 [email protected]