aggregate effects of expanded biofuel production: myth & reality c. robert taylor auburn ronald...

8
AGGREGATE EFFECTS OF EXPANDED BIOFUEL PRODUCTION: Myth & Reality C. Robert Taylor Auburn Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M AgriLife

Upload: rose-lane

Post on 01-Jan-2016

214 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: AGGREGATE EFFECTS OF EXPANDED BIOFUEL PRODUCTION: Myth & Reality C. Robert Taylor Auburn Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M AgriLife

AGGREGATE EFFECTS OF EXPANDED BIOFUEL PRODUCTION:Myth & Reality

C. Robert Taylor AuburnRonald D. Lacewell Texas A&M AgriLife

Page 2: AGGREGATE EFFECTS OF EXPANDED BIOFUEL PRODUCTION: Myth & Reality C. Robert Taylor Auburn Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M AgriLife

Ethanol from Corn will not impact food prices

TRUE: if quality cropland is limitless and/or very limited ethanol production

Neither of these conditions are true: land is limited and goals for ethanol quantity are huge• increased demand for corn pushes production on to marginal lands and

costs increase. Price of corn and other commodities increase• increases cost of corn and cost for livestock feed and will be reflected in

cost of food

Page 3: AGGREGATE EFFECTS OF EXPANDED BIOFUEL PRODUCTION: Myth & Reality C. Robert Taylor Auburn Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M AgriLife

Dedicated Bioenergy crops as cellulosic ethanol will not affect conventional food crops

Growing second generation biofuels on marginal soils avoids the fuel versus food issue

The myth: assuming these crops will only be grown on marginal soils – if profitable on poor soils then much more so on prime cropland – displacing food crops Second myth: even if grown on marginal soils, production will use inputs and irrigation competing with conventional crops driving up prices for feedstock and food

Page 4: AGGREGATE EFFECTS OF EXPANDED BIOFUEL PRODUCTION: Myth & Reality C. Robert Taylor Auburn Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M AgriLife

Crop residues used for fuel will not affect food prices

Removing crop residue takes plant nutrients and organic matter Added cost in nutrients Potential yield reduction Soil deterioration Higher input prices Higher food prices

Page 5: AGGREGATE EFFECTS OF EXPANDED BIOFUEL PRODUCTION: Myth & Reality C. Robert Taylor Auburn Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M AgriLife

FALLACY OF COMPOSITION

True at individual unit does not necessarily extrapolate to the aggregate Paradox of thrift/saving Yield increase for individual versus nationallyExtrapolating per acre crop budget data does not reflect whole farm Per acre cost for cellulosic feedstock suggests $60/ton Whole farm analysis with weather days, risk, machinery, etc., suggests $130/ton

Page 6: AGGREGATE EFFECTS OF EXPANDED BIOFUEL PRODUCTION: Myth & Reality C. Robert Taylor Auburn Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M AgriLife

CONCLUSIONS AND FINAL THOUGHTS

TOO OFTEN POLICY DECISIONS ARE BASED ON MICRO REASONING WITH UNDESIRABLE OUTCOMES

OFTEN ALL COSTS ARE NOT ACCOUNTED, FOR EXAMPLE THE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPLICATIONS OF HIGH TONNAGE DEDICATED FEEDSTOCK Extra nutrition for plant growth Irrigation requirements Externalities on water bodies Impact on transportation system (road deterioration) Net energy gain (significant energy to produce, harvest, haul, store and convert)

Page 7: AGGREGATE EFFECTS OF EXPANDED BIOFUEL PRODUCTION: Myth & Reality C. Robert Taylor Auburn Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M AgriLife

Texas AgriLife

BIOMASS LOGISTICS

Page 8: AGGREGATE EFFECTS OF EXPANDED BIOFUEL PRODUCTION: Myth & Reality C. Robert Taylor Auburn Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M AgriLife

This and other biofuel reports available at:

https://sites.auburn.edu/academic/ag/group/bioenergy/_layouts/viewlsts.aspx?BaseType=1

COMMENTS - QUESTIONS

Miscanthus Sugarcane

Miscane