aggarwal satish bhiwani

8/2/2019 aggarwal satish bhiwani

1/3

ASHOK kr.SINGH, Advocate, Delhi Highcourt, 14, school lane, Bengali Market, NewDelhi110001,[email protected],9312306881

Chamber: 100, Lawyers Chamber, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi 110001 Office : B-7/1, Safdarjung Enclave Extn. , NewDelhi-110029 Luck now: IInd Floor, YMCA Complex, 13, Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow-226001 Page

Reference no. def105/Jan/24/2012LEGALNOTICECLAIMINGDAMAGEFORDEFAMATION

TO

MR. ANKIT KUMAR AGGRAWAL S/O SATISH CHANDER AGGARWAL,HOUSE NO.W 209,LOKMANYA STREET,NEAR KM TEMPLE, BHIWANI ,HARYANA 127021

Respected Sir /MadamUnder instructions from and on behalf of our client Mrs. Renu Prasad, Director Skylight Educare pvt.ltd. IIndfloor, Batra cinema complex, Dr.Mukherjee Nagar, We would like to serve upon the following legal notice

1.THAT YOU(ANKY)HAVE WRITTEN A FALSE AND MALICIOUS BLOG ABOUT SKYLIGHTINSTITUTE

AND A REPUTED AND ONE OF THE SENIOR MOST TEACHER ASSOCIATED WITH SEVERAL IAS

INSTITUTES,ONMARCH5TH,2011, WITH A POLLUTED MINDSET AND UNDER THE INFLUENCE

OF SOME RIVAL ELEMENTS ,TO DEFAME A REPUTED INSTITUTION AND ITS MEMBERS COMMITTED

FOR THE BETTERMENT OF EDUCATIONAL ENVIRONMENT AT LARGE.

2. THAT LEGAL PROVISION ILLUSTRATE Defamation as a false and unprivileged statement

of fact that is harmful to someone's reputation, and published "with fault," meaning as a

result of negligence or malice. Libel is a written defamation; slander is a spoken

defamation. The elements that must be proved to establish defamation are:-a

publication to one other than the person defamed; a false statement of fact, which is

understood as. being of and concerning the plaintiff; and tending to harm the

reputation of plaintiff. And accordingly,you(Ankit agarwal) are liable to be prosecuted

under the criminal law.

3. That Internet provides us with a very cheap and a quick way of communication. It

has made the world a close knit organisation. Also, with the growth of social


2/3


Chamber: 100, Lawyers Chamber, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi 110001 Office : B-7/1, Safdarjung Enclave Extn. , NewDelhi-110029 Luck now: IInd Floor, YMCA Complex, 13, Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow-226001 Page 2

networking sites like orkut, facebook, etc., lot of personal information is shared amongst

many people therefore, the chances of defamation through internet has become a major

threat in todays world. Even if a single defamatory email is forwarded, it becomes very

difficult to trace and stop its circulation. Any article published on a website is open for

the entire world to read. The damage or losses caused to the victim is very huge

especially if the imputation is intended to harm the business of an individual or a

business entity. As per the provisions of cyber crime act 2000, your act of baseless

allegation has ruined an institution and severely affected the life of a respectable citizen

Therefore you are guilty of committing criminal offence and deserve appropriate

punishment.

4. That Information Technology Act deals with the various cyber crimes in chapters IX

& XI under sections. 43/65/66/67 making a provision of imprisonment and monetary

penalty. Section 67 deals with publication of obscene/false material and provides for

imprisonment up to a term of 10 years and also with fine up to Rs. 20 lakhs. The white

lie made by you (Ankit aggrawal) naturally demands the application of penalty under

various sections of this act.

5. That Section 499 of IPC reads as under:whoever, by words either spoken or intended

to be read, or by signs or by visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation

concerning any person intending to harm, or knowing or having reason to believe that

such imputation will harm, the reputation of such person, is said, except in the cases

hereinafter excepted, to defame that person. According to section 500 of IPC

punishment for Defamation shall be simple imprisonment up to 2 years or fine or

both. IT Act replaces the words intending that the document forged, with the words

intending that the document or electronic record forged in section 469 of the Indian

Penal Code. The offence under this section is cognizable, bailable and triable by a

Magistrate of the first class. You(Ankit agrawal) have committed crime under

abovementioned section through his use of unconstitutional language in a public

domain, the evidence of which will be submitted in the court of law.


3/3


Chamber: 100, Lawyers Chamber, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi 110001 Office : B-7/1, Safdarjung Enclave Extn. , NewDelhi-110029 Luck now: IInd Floor, YMCA Complex, 13, Rana Pratap Marg, Lucknow-226001 Page 3

6. That through your baseless character assassination and malicious campaign he has

generated a heavy financial loss to a law abiding private limited company as well as

mental trauma to a sensitive and reputed teacher of this organisation .therefore you are

liable to be prosecuted under both criminal and civil law.

In the circumstances we call upon/advice you to kindly pay the damage amount of Rs.TEN

LAKH (Rs.1000000) for financial-social-personal-professional loss incurred to the institution

and individual, failing which we have definite instruction from our client to proceed against

you in court of law and in that event you shall be liable for the cost and consequences

resulting there from.

You are also liable to pay a sum of rupees 110000 toward charges to present this notice.

Thanks and regardsAshok k Singh, Advocate Delhi high court

[email protected]/0931236881.

aggarwal satish bhiwani

Documents