AGENDA

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT MEETING

TUESDAY, MAY 6, 2014 - 3:00 P.M.

ST. TAMMANY PARISH GOVERNMENT COMPLEX BUILDING

21490 KOOP DRIVE, PARISH COUNCIL CHAMBERS

MANDEVILLE, LOUISIANA

CALL TO ORDER

ROLL CALL

APPROVAL OF THE APRIL 1, 2014 MINUTES

PUBLIC HEARINGS

BOA CASE NO. 14-04-008Request by applicant for variances of a side yard setback from 5’ required to approximately 2’ requested, and

open space requirements between the eave and the side property line from 2’ required to approximately 6”

requested for an “after the fact” accessory structure, in a Planned Unit Development zoning district. The

property is located at 1664 Vela Cove, in Clipper Estates Subdivision, Slidell, Louisiana.

Applicant: Judy Dubroca

(POSTPONED FROM THE APRIL 1, 2014 MEETING)

BOA CASE NO. 14-05-009

Request by applicant for a variance to permit the removal of a 10’ wide interior side yard planting buffer in

a HC-2 Highway Commercial zoning district. The property is located at 70457 LA Highway 21 in the

Pelican Landing Shopping Center, Covington, Louisiana.

Applicant: Jered Bowers/Barrister Global

BOA CASE NO. 14-05-010

Request by applicant for variance of a portion of a front yard setback requirement from 30’ required to 20’

requested in a Planned Unit Development zoning district. The property is located at 90 Hummingbird Road,

in Tchefuncta Country Club Estates, Phase II, Covington, Louisiana.

Applicant: Claude Lagalante

BOA CASE NO. 14-05-011

Request by applicant for variance of a side yard setback requirement for an accessory structure from 10’

required to approximately 5’ requested in an A-4 Single Family Residential zoning district. The property is

located at 351 Forest Loop, in Deer Run (a.k.a. Woodridge on the Lake, Phase 3) Subdivision, Mandeville,

Louisiana.Applicant: Jerry E. Schaefer

Page -1-

BOA CASE NO. 14-05-0 12

Request by applicant for variance of an “after the fact” side yard setback requirement for an addition from

7 Y2’ required to approximately 1.3’ requested, in an A-3 Suburban zoning district. The property is located

at 216 Highland Drive in De Val Estates Subdivision, Mandeville, Louisiana.

Applicant: Beatriz B. Reehlmann

BOA CASE NO. 14-05-013

Request by applicant for variances for the north and east planting buffers from 10’ and 20’ required to

approximately 4’ and 10’ requested respectively, and for a one-way driveway width from 15’ required to 18’

requested, in a HC-2 Highway Commercial zoning district. The property is located at 79055 Highway 40,

Covington, Louisiana.

Applicant: Executive Holdings, L.L.C.

BOA CASE NO. 14-05-014

Request by applicant for variance of a cellular tower setback radius of250’ in a 1-2 Industrial zoning district.

The property is located northeast of the intersection LA Highway 21 and LA Highway 1083, in the vicinity

of Waldheim, Louisiana.

Applicant: AP Towers, L.L.C.

BOA CASE NO. 14-05-015

Request by applicant for variance to allow the moving of an outdoor advertising sign within 500’ of a

residential zoning district closer by approximately 23’, in a HC-2 Highway Commercial zoning district. The

property is located at the intersection of LA Highway 21 and N. Azalea Drive, Covington, Louisiana.

Applicant: Advanced Mortgage Company

BOA CASE NO. 14-05-016

Request by applicant for variances to eliminate two 10’ wide adjacent internal side yard planting buffers, in

a HC-2 Highway Commercial zoning district. The property is located at 1665 Dove Park Road, Mandeville,

Louisiana.Applicant: JUM Development, L.L.C.

BOA CASE NO. 14-05-017

Request by applicant for variances to encroach into a planing buffer with aS’ wide side walk, and to reduce

the number of plantings within two adjacent internal side yard landscape buffers, in a HC-2 Highway

Commercial zoning district. The property is located at 180 New Camellia Boulevard, Covington, Louisiana.

Applicant: Gulf States Development Services, L.L.C.

OLD BUSINESS

NEW BUSINESS

ADJOURNMENT

Page -2-

MINUTESST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS MEETING

3:00 PM - TUESDAY, APRIL 1, 2014

LA HIGHWAY 59/KOOP DRWE ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX BUILDING

MANDEVILLE, LOUISIANA

The April 1, 2014 meeting of the St. Tammany Parish Board of Adjustments was called to order

by the Chairman, Mr. Tim Fandal.

The roll was called as follows:

PRESENT: Mr. Fandal, Mr. Brookter, Mr. Schneider, Mr. Gordon and Mr. Ballantine

ABSENT: None

STAFF PRESENT: Mr. Keller

APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES

Moved by Mr. Brookter and seconded by Mr. Schneider to accept the March 5, 2014 minutes as

typed and delivered.MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

BOA CASE NO. 14-04-006

Request by applicant for a variance to permit the 50’ wide perimeter no cut buffer on the property

to be waived in an A-i Suburban district.

Applicant: Brian Taylor & Dawn Trigueros

(Mr. Keller read the staff report into the record...)

The applicant appeared on his own behalf and made the following initial comments:

• There are fences all around my property line.

• I should have done more research on this issue.

Mr. Brookter: So you have fences around your property?

Mr. Trigueros: Only long the “strip” side.

Mr. Gordon: Are you clear cutting all the way around?

Mr. Trigueros: Just underbrush and scrub trees.

Page -1-

(General discussion ensued about the trees on the property and sizes...)

Moved by Mr. Gordon and seconded by Mr. Schneider to grant the variance as requested.

Mr. Ballantine: I’m opposed to it. The guy on the west side has not provided any comments.

MOTION CARRIED 4 YEAS AND 1 NAY

BOA CASE NO. 14-04-007

Request by applicant for variances for an “after the fact” boathouse relative to the length of the

structure from a maximum of 50’ permitted to 62’ requested, the size from a maximum of 800

square feet permitted to approximately 1340 square feet requested, and to permit the structure to

extend beyond the bulkhead in an A-4 Single Family Residential district.

Applicant: Phillip John Clesi

(Mr. Keller read the staff report into the record...)

The applicant appeared on his own behalf and made the following initial comments:

• I apologize for filing “after the fact”.

• I own two adjacent lots and put in a bulkhead.

• My contractor told me that I needed to build the boathouse first.

• When the contractor was almost finished, I asked him ifhe had obtained a permit because

I did not see any building permit sign on my property.

• I plan to put both lots together.

• I have over $450,000.00 invested in the property.

• I want to keep boats and ajet ski there.

Mr. Brookter: Any issues as to how far the boathouse extends into the canal?

Mr. Clesi: Not that I’m aware of.

Mr. Gordon: This needs to be addressed to the license board. They knew that they needed a

permit.

Ms. JoAnn Ferraia-Mo, 201 P.K. Way, Slidell, LA, appeared in opposition and made the

following initial comments:

• I don’t like conflict... I hate to be here.

• The boathouse lacks aesthetics... the look and the size.

• It diminishes the value of my property.

• It effects the visibility of the lake and the New Orleans skyline.

• This was built without a permit.

Page -2-

• It looks like a commercial structure.

• I’m amazed that Mr. Clesi didn’t know that he needed a permit.

(Ms. Ferraia-Mo presented a package of pictures for the board to review.)

(Mr. Clesi gave some rebuttal time to his neighbor, Mr. Paul Kosbob, 169 Carr Drive, Slidell, LA

whom made the following comments:)

• I have no problems with this.

• Her boathouse blocks the view more than Mr. Clesi’s.

• This in not commercial... he will be building a nice house.

• His boathouse is 7’ more inward than hers.

• He will be getting the house and boathouse permit together.

(Mr. Clesi’ s rebuttal...)

• My roof line is less intrusive.

• I know about permits. My contractor should have filed for the permit.

• I’m just trying to build a retirement home.

(Ms. Ferraia-Mo’s rebuttal...)

• I am worried about my property.

Moved by Mr. Ballantine and seconded by Mr. Schneider to deny the variance request and to

give the applicant ninety (90) days in which to comply with parish code.

MOTION CARRIED 4 YEAS AND 1 NAY

BOA CASE NO. 14-04-008

Request by applicant for variances of a side yard setback from 5’ required to approximately 2’

requested, and open space requirements between the eave and the side property line from 2’

required to approximately 6” requested for an “after the fact” accessory structure, in a Planned

Unit Development zoning district.

Applicant: Judy Dubroca

(Mr. Keller read the staff report into the record...)

The applicant appeared on his own behalf and made the following initial comments:

• I have an approval letter from the homeowners association.

Mr. Gordon: You have 2 setbacks in this subdivision of 5’ on one side and 7’ on the other. Also,

Page -3-

you have a 10’ wide drainage easement where the structure encroaches.

Mr. Fandal: Who did the pergola?

Ms. Dubroca: We did.

(Discussion ensued amongst the board members regarding tabling this matter to look further into

this matter before rendering a decision...)

Mr. Fandal: I would like to get some comments from our Engineering Department concerning the

structure being located within the drainage servitude.

Moved by Mr. Ballantine and seconded by Mr. Brookter to table this case until the next meeting.

MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

OLD BUSINESS

NEW BUSINESS

ADJOURNMENT

MR. TIM FANDAL, CHAIRMAN

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS

Disclaimer: These minutes are intended to represent an overview ofthe meeting and general representation of

the testimony given; and therefore, does not constitute verbatim testimony or a transcription of the proceedings.

Page -4-

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

STAFF ANALYSIS REPORT

Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-04-008

Initial Hearing Date: April 1, 2014

Date of Report: March 11, 2014

GENERAL INFORMATION

Applicant(s) Name: Judy Debroca

Location of Property: 1664 Vela Cove, Slidell, Louisiana

Zoning of Property: Planned Unit Development (P.U.D.)

Variance(s) Requested: Side yard setback and open space requirement

OVERVIEW

The applicant seeks variances for a side yard setback and open sky requirements only after

constructing an “after the fact” accessory structure without obtaining a parish building permit.

STAFF COMMENTS

First of all, if the applicant or contractor had simply contacted the permits department prior to

commencing any construction on the site, she would have been apprised as to what the code

requirements were and therefore could have avoided this predicament.

Secondly, it appears that the structure can be modified by either reducing the size of the imprint

and/or moving the structure by attaching it to the existing cabana, thereby eliminating or

mitigating the need for variances requested.

Thirdly, even though the applicant has provided a letter of no objection from the presumed

adjacent next door neighbor affected (no address or lot number depicted on letter), the applicant

has not produced a letter of no objection from the homeowners association.

And lastly, the proposed eaves being within 6” of the property line is not acceptable due to the

fact that it poses potential issues with runoff and/or erosion onto the next door neighbors

property.

Therefore, for the reasons as stated above, the staff recommends denial of the variances

requested, and also based on our opinion that the applicant has not demonstrated a practical

Page -1-

difficulty or particular hardship as mandated pursuant to Article 3. Administration and

Enforcement, Section 3.0104 Board of Adjustment, Paragraph (B.) Powers of the Board, Item

(3.) of the St. Tammany Parish Unified Development Code.

Page -2-

BOA CASENO. /L O (for office use only)

ST. TAMMA.NY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPLiCATiON FORM)

(Please print on the following lines below, if a company, please include a contact person name also.)

APPL1ANTS NAME:h ro

/t Ve Ia ( n u

jH L1 72

15 id/ L// )71

(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)

REQUEST FOR: % A variance of the (Unified Development Code)

I] Appeal of an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)

C Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified

Development Code)

VARIANCE/APPEAL REQUESTED:

t building setbacks (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard setbacks)

C landscape buffers (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard buffer setbacks)

C landscaping within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes and/or shrubs)

C parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspace islands, etc...)

C signage requirements (increase of sign area and/or sign height, lghUng, coloring, etc...)

C other(Specify other variance/appeal on line above)

(Please state on the following lines below your specific request for a variance/appeal:)

Example: Applicant is requesting a variance for a front yard setback requirement from 25’ required by

the parish, to approximately 201 requested.

MAiLING ADDRESS:

CITY/STATE/ZiP:

PHONE NUMBER:(Home Phone #) (Cell Phone #)

PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARiANCE REQUESTED: ZONING: ? ({ I)

Addressi City State

•Subdivision (if applicable)

_____

.i--

-ro

1i1(fr 4k

4 b4PPII

APPLiCANTDATE OF APPliCATION

Applicant wishes to acquire a semi shaded

area to keep and use outdoor cooking

supplies (barbeque pit, table and chairs.)

Structure is close to property line to avoid

interfering with plumbing and electrical

lines between pooi utilities (pumps, heater,

etc.) and the hot tub and pooi itself.

Ron Keller

From: Paul Carroll

Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:23 AM

To: Ron Keller

Cc: Alycia M. Adams

Subject: 1664 Vela Cove -- Lot 27 Clipper Ph 4b

Attachments: Clipper Estates Ph 4-B Recorded Plat_rs.pdf; Clipper Estates Ph 4-B As Built Paving &

Drainage_rs.pdf

I looked at this as requested. The structure is located on top of a 18” RCP based on the as-built

drainage plan. See attached. The aerial also makes it appear that this is the case. I didn’t find a

utility plan, but since this leads to a canal, there probably isn’t any utilities in it.

The drainage is privately maintained. The owner should be getting permission from Clipper

Estates Subdivision Master Homeowners, INC before keeping the structure in their easement.

Also, typically for a permit to be issued on something like this, we’d ask for a plan showing how

the lot drainage can be made to work without adversely affecting the neighbor’s drainage. They

should probably go ahead and submit this to Alycia for review to prove it can work; they’ll have

to anyway when they apply for the after-the-fact building permit.

Thanks

Paul Carroll, P.E.Drainage EngineerSt. Tammany Parish Government, Dept. of Engineering

898-2552

Any e-mail may be construed as a public document, and may be subject to a public records request.

1

Ron Keller

From: Paul Carroll

Sent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:25 AM

To: Ron Keller

Cc: Alycia M. Adams

Subject: RE: 1664 Vela Cove -- Lot 27 Clipper Ph 4b

I just found the water and sewer plans. It didn’t show water or sewer in the easement.

Thanks

Paul Carroll, P.E.i)rainage EngineerSt. Tammany Parish Government, Dept. of Engineering

898-2552

Any e-mail may be construed as a public document, and may be subject to a public records request.

From: Paul CarrollSent: Wednesday, April 23, 2014 10:23 AM

To: Ron KellerCc: Alycia M. AdamsSubject: 1664 Vela Cove -- Lot 27 Clipper Ph 4b

I looked at this as requested. The structure is located on top of a 18” RCP based on the as-built

drainage plan. See attached. The aerial also makes it appear that this is the case. I didn’t find a

utility plan, but since this leads to a canal, there probably isn’t any utilities in it.

The drainage is privately maintained. The owner should be getting permission from Clipper

Estates Subdivision Master Homeowners, INC before keeping the structure in their easement.

Also, typically for a permit to be issued on something like this, we’d ask for a plan showing how

the lot drainage can be made to work without adversely affecting the neighbor’s drainage. They

should probably go ahead and submit this to Alycia for review to prove it can work; they’ll have

to anyway when they apply for the after-the-fact building permit.

Thanks

Paul Carroll, P.E.Drainage EngineerSt. Tammany Parish Government, Dept. of Engineering

898-2552

Any e-mail may be construed as a public document, and may be subject to a public records request.

1

To Whom It May Concern:

The current structure being built at 1664 Vela Cove in

Slidell, La has been given notice by the St. Tammany Zoning

Board. The reason for this is due to the fact that the structure

currently does not meet their specifications based on the current

zoning laws. The poles that have been set in the ground with

concrete have been placed in their current locations due to the fact

that the plumbing underneath the ground for the pool would have

been compromised. There is supposed to be a 5 foot buffer area

from the property line of the adjacent property, but the current

buffer area is only at 6 inches. This structure is a free standing

overhang that is to be used for an outdoor kitchen area that has

been done with much time and effort to ensure that the quality does

not compromise the current property value of our dwelling or of

those around it. We have taken the necessary precautions to ensure

that it has been built and designed to with stand time and does not

pose any threat in the case that severe weather may occur. We are

applying for a variance with the zoning board to allow this

structure to be completed where it currently stands. We ask that

you please sign below this letter to show proof that this structure

has been done in good taste and does not any affect the

surrounding properties. We thank you in advance for your support

in this matter.

Sincerely,

/

Jimmy and Judy Dubroca

1/ V

S (r )

I(1

li

H

I

H

H

I

VH

):)2:J:1Li

‘Ill

-Th

cc

---SI-

To Whom It May Concern:

On October 24, 2013, we will begin construction on a new

over hang and outdoor kitchen in the pool area of our yard at 1664

Vela Cove in Slidell, La. Although there will be the use of power

tools during this process, we will try to keep the noise at a

minimum and not during the early or late hours of the day. This

new construction will be on the adjacent property line to yours but

will not exceed our property line. We would like you approval to

start this new addition to our property and move forward with this

process. Thank you for your time and consideration in this matter.

Sincerely,Jimmy and Judy Dubroca

/(Print

Sig atij74’

a4’ “.KLOr/,V zz-:2!

‘I

ADDRESS: // 2-

5/9°,95‘- 92Sc

I CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAT

REPRESENTS AN ACTUAL

GROUND SURVEY AND THAT TO

THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE NO

ENCROACHMENTS EXIST EITHER

WAY ACROSS ANY OF THE PROPERTY

LINES, EXCEPT AS SHOWN.

SURVEY NO.

/6’3/3 7t.7

SURVEYED IN ACCORDANCE WITH

THE LOUISIANA “MINIMUM

STANDARDS FOR PROPERTY

BOUNDARY SURVEYS” FOR A

CLASS C 5URVEY.

BEARINGS ARE BASED ON RECORD

BEARINGS UNLESS NOTED

OTHERWISE.

ENCUMBRANCES 5HOWN HEREON

ARE NOT NECESSARILY EXCLUSiVE.

ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD AS

SHOWN ON TITLE OPINION OR

TITLE POLICY WiLL BE ADDED

HERETO UPON REQUEST, AS

SURVEYOR HAS NOT PERFORMED

ANY TITLE SEARCH OR ABSTRACT.

F.I.R.M.

______

Z25&5&536P

ZONE’7”B.F.E. ‘—‘

‘Verify prior to Construction

with LocI Governing Body

‘N V/t0452’52

75./5 /

c

C

2Z?2,Z4/A/E5M7

/2‘4’5/Df’

&//4’fAD /3

I___________________________

_____________________

k1

A”O6’4Z /ii

S’A’,’-4D /.3&3/ -

V

co(JAJD ‘/2”

,ZL’M/& SETz3Ac/s:/

Y/z:7-5--5’ 7’-25 “c,w4f 1441r

1&J,Vt2 ‘/2”

¼-LA C&Ve

DATE4

-Z9113

J. V. BURKES & ASSOC., INC.

2990 GAUSE BLVD. EAST, STE. B • SLIDELL, LA 70461

985-649-0075 FAX 985-649-0154

REVISED

LOt/ND ‘/z”/ef,VD ‘/2”

___- -

5/9O/95‘92‘

¼-LA C2VE“X ‘24/ C’/zs //LD/A/G 5E72,4C/S:

/2YL’V Z7--2

IZEAIZ -25 ‘c,zLM L4-4r

ADDRESS: /%‘aid L/L4 CV

CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAY SURVEYED IN ACCORDANCE WiTH ENCUMBRANCES SHOWN HEREON F.I.R.M. 4-?-’9/ --

REPRESENTS AN ACTUAl. THE LOUISIANA ‘MINIMUM ARE NOT NECESSARILY EXCLUSIVE.

GROUND SURVEY AND THAT TO STANDARDS FOR PROPERTY ENCUMBRANCES OF RECORD AS 225 5&53’.S 42

THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE NO BOUNDARY SURVEYS” FOR A SHOWN ON TITLE OPINION OR

TITLE POLICY WILL BE ADDED ZONE A-/OB.F.E. /-‘ENCROACHMENTS EXIST EITHER CLASS C

_______

_____________

SURVEY.

______

HERETO UPON REQUEST, AS

WAYACROSSANYOFTHEPROPERTY BEARINGSARE BASEDON RECORD SURVEYOR HAS NOT PERFORMED Verify prior to Construction

LINES, EXCEPT AS SHOWN. BEARINGS UNLESS NOTED ANYTITLE SEARCH OR ABSTRACT. with Local Governing Body

OTHERWISE.

SURVEY NO I —‘DRAWN BY:j

/D3/3 7D I J. V. BURKES & ASSOC., INC. I——-‘----—-——-- 2990 GAUSE BLVD. EAST, STE. B • SLIDELL, LA 70461

DATE I-985-649-0075 FAX 9856492O154

REVISED:

5URVEY MAP OF: 27LOCATED i:C/PPEE ESZ47ES A’43f 4-

ST. TAMMANY PARISH, LOUISIANA

CERTIFIED To: 1/ELA 9Et/Zt2,’,VE,VZ Lie.

SUR YED BY: 2 /

M. BLJRKES

LA. REG. NO. 4785

1:1

ST. TAMIVIANY PARISH BOAR]) OF ADJUSTMENT

STAFF ANALYSIS REPORT

Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-009

Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014

Date of Report: April 24, 2014

GENERAL INFORMATION

Applicant(s) Name: Jered Bowers/Barrister Global

Location of Property: 70457 LA Highway 21, Covington, Louisiana

Zoning of Property: HC-2 Highway Commercial

Variance(s) Requested: 10’ wide side yard planting buffer

OVERVIEW

The applicant is requesting to add a “drive-thru” window for a proposed donut shop along the

east side of an existing building in Pelican Landing Shopping Center.

STAFF COMMENTS

The staff does not support the variance request for two reasons: First, we believe that the

applicant has not demonstrated a practical difficulty or particular hardship as mandated for

reasons to grant a variance pursuant to Article 3. Administration and Enforcement, Section

3.0104 Board of Adjustment, Paragraph (B.) Powers of the Board, Item (3.) of the St. Tammany

Parish Unified Development Code. Secondly, the proposed layout of the drive-thru window,

according to the parish’s traffic engineer (see email attached) could cause major traffic

circulation issues and confusion on the drivers part who would utilize the window and who seek

exit, which could result in traffic safety issues, and for which the parish could be held liable for if

it grants the variance.

BOA CASE NO. OSO (for office use only)

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPLICATION FORM)

1JT1iJ L )t/cc’ci

(Home Phone #)

(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)

REQUEST FOR:

Subdivision (if applicable)

variance of the (Unified Development Code)

D Appeal of an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)

D Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified

Development Code)

VARIANCE/APPEAL REQUESTED:

D building setbacks (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard setbacks)

C] landscape buffers (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard buffer setbacks)

ci landscaping within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes and/or shrubs)

ci parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspace islands, etc...)

O signage requirements (increase of sign area and/or sign height, lighting, coloring, etc...)

C other(Specify other variance/appeal on line above)

(Please state on the following lines below your specific requestfor a variance/appeal:)

Example: Applicant is requesting a variancefor a front yard setback requirementfrom 25’ required by

the parish, to approximately 20’ requested.

r - / Uo

CLU HJ S’ L44 (11d LL C)

(Please print on the following lines below. If a company, please include a contact person name also.).

/ /. .-,./ 4 ) j

APPLICANTS NAME I ‘ “ 1’ ( ( - /1 L / 1 , It (-‘ /1’ /1 L

MAILINGADDRESS: 17’!” ‘ :‘

CITY/STATE/ZIP:

PHONE NUMBER:

D-J hAddress

PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTED: ZONING: EEEEL(Cell Phone #)

{v.’rfrn )_ 4 )(/2

City ‘-‘ State

— C i:IDATE OF APPLICATION

___

III

_

/I)l4/

EX

IS

TIN

GJ

___

c;/

//

,

/

DU

MP

ST

RO

NIL

‘I

viW

-r/

//

CPN

C.

PD

.W

/16

5(C

RA

PEY

RTLES)

CJ

NE

WC

ON

C.

AR

ON

/7

h.W

D.

60.

ElE

‘A

RO

UN

DEX

ISTING

//

‘e.‘8.

•rcs

DR

AIN

INL

ET

/0

.—

EX

IST.

0P

INL

ET

0C

ON

PR

ON

—-

..

/oI

-...,

S

“S

SS

S,

I.A

DD

(5)

NEW

/4

J..

VE

RBIRCH

PRO

PER

T/IN

FOR

MA

TIO

N

iL-

‘

/PE

LIC

AN

Lf1

DN

GSU

BD

I’.SION

:-i’

5’

/s

/LA

.H

WY

fr

—0’o,

PA

RC

EL

/B

CONCA

PRO

N—

I/

,,

SE

CT

I0/47.

T0V

SH

P7

SO

UF

4,R

AN

(.

•0

‘/

(9ST

.TJ4M

MA

N’(

PA

RI5I-,

LA

•8.

,

/-,

>—E

XIST

1NG

/PIIO

JEC

TD

ESCR

IPTION

0o

RIV

ERB

IRC

Hf

WA

TC

.C

(TY

P.18

TR

EE

S)C

UP

AN

CY

NFPA

200B

IND

US

TR

IAL

24’W

IDE

/‘7.

TO

PO

F8

AN

i/

BC

200

6—

FA

CT

OR

Y—

•c

F’c

o.

DR

IVE-

•-

•/()

(AP

PR

OX

IMA

JE)

/C

ON

STR

UC

TIO

NTY

PE.,

IBC

2

EX

I.T.

18

15.-

I/

BLD

G.

AE

A1,508

S.F

_____________

__

__

__

DR

AIN

.-

-X

IST.O

INLET

—/

EM

PLO

YE

ES

ON

LA

RG

EST

WO

RK

SH

IF

I—

.R

EMO

VE

(5)

EX

ISTI

/TH

ISB

UILD

ING

ISA

SPEC

IAL

PJR

DO

SE

RIV

ERB

IRC

H/

/IN

DU

STRIA

LS

TR

UC

tRE

OC

CU

PAN

CY

—“

/E

XIS]1N

GG

RA

DE

—10

65’

0)

SHR

UB

S.A

ZA

LE

A/

fIS

AN

AU

TO

VO

T.V

EL

U8R

ICA

TO

NSE

RM

(

12.7

5\

W/

PI’4EM

ULC

HFA

CILITY

.C

UST

OM

ER

SR

EMA

INN

THEiR

20

LA

ND

SCA

PEB

UFFE

RA

RE

A—

iG

RO

UN

DC

OV

ER/

AU

TO

MO

BL

EA

ALL

TIM

ES

WH

ILETFC

,.i

EX

IS1N

GT

RE

ES

wI

CO

VE

R/

/)

CH

AN

GE

ThE

IRO

IL

IVA

LVESni

//

THER

EA

RE

NO

UB

LIC

CR

AD

VIN

ISTR

A

AR

EA

SI’

HS

PR

O,E

C

F.H-

/1

______________

MO

NU

MN

TI

BU

ILDIN

GSTR

UC

TUR

AL

DE

_______

/N

DS

PE

ED

—iT

SM

PH

(3SE

C

—

—1

ñ’

——

/B

LDG

JSE

CA

TA

GO

RY

S.

GE

NE

RA

LJS

E

-

/L

yELO

AD—

SOP

.SF

FLOO

R(A

S6

/V

EH

ICL

ES)

/2C

PS

F.

RC

O

/C

DP

\\E.

DEA

DLO

AC

2S

/O

OL

EA

_OA

D2

S

,N

3/

AP

DT

AC

‘IDO

R0

-.‘T1/

•..I

FD

I

I.

,,

—fE

S

ING

WI

WH

EELST

OP

__

__

__

_

D

BT

(1I

NW

SNUB

—

EX11NLD

CLSS

A

OO

’HD

O’R

L—

itnO

N

“°“

[—cSO

(Oflu

;IoNJD

INT

0(0

0

;HR

IJBPL

AN

TiN

GD

ETAIL

_______

EE

S_..N

C 1(1ST.EN

TRYD

RIV

E—\

10’B

UFFER

LIC

4L

Ekl.S

,

15’x25’C

LE

AR

SIGH

TT

RIA

NG

L

-I

D

tfl

.ING

W/

WH

EEL

STO

P\j1

OnT

ND

51C

.10 ‘C

.1.

1(51

101

CD

oit

ot,_

_i51

.110

‘iii

SIO

NJO

INT

j1

SHR

UB

PLA

NTI

NG

DET

AIL

_

V

_ic_I

12/

__

/\

)II

I

ii

__

/1/

TE

IN

G4Z

__

çaZ

LZ

,1j/

//

EXIS

INC

PAR

KIN

GM

AIL

BO

4)N

EW

_1

NG

S

_

I,)

SSB

IE

ES

0—

1.2

11;_

_.rZ

Y--.—

.j.

//

/

___

Ex

ii$:;

DU

MPS

TIR

ON

1I\13’T

Rr

I%

%,

//

CL

SS

AE

CO

NC

.P

1D.

W/

cRA

PE

1’

C..L

NEW

CO

NC

.A

PRO

N

I,lh

.‘A

D.

80

FE

CE

-160

AR

OU

ND

EX

IST

iNG

/,.

DR

AIN

INL

ET

‘-E

Ill

TC

ISE

XIS

T.

0P

INLE

T

10’

BU

FFE

W/

AD

D(5

NEW/

DE

—\

0c

—-

oV

ER

IRC

H/

PRO

PER

DIN

DJIO

N

——

——

J4/

IA.H

WY

1

—

—.1

.c

MM

YS

LA

RA

NG

Nl1

..l

PO

JEC

TD

ESC

RIP

TIO

NS

iR

CH

A00,

(TY

P,18

THE

5)

CU

PAN

CY

:N

FPA

2006

—IN

DU

ST

RIA

L

1/

4’W

iDE

IT

OP

OF

BA

NS

BC

2006—

FA

CT

OR

Y—

15’x

25’

CL

RD

RI

/0(A

PPR

OX

IMA

TE

)C

ON

STR

UC

TiO

NTY

PE:

H.

180

2

SIG

HT

IRIA

_

UE

XIS

T.

18.

.15

./

BLD

G.

AR

EA:

1.5

08

S.F

.

—.1——.I

_L\_

gE’T

h_..

______

______

_

DR

AIN

XIS

T.O

PIN

LE

T—

EM

PLO

YE

ES

ON

LA

RG

EST

WO

RK

SHIF

T:

II

‘Ii

I‘..—

.—

JJJ

\l\,J

a...‘

(‘.

‘,

..-

RE

MO

VE

(5)

EX

IST

./

THIS

BU

ILD

ING

ISA

SPE

CIA

LP

UR

PO

SE

\I

RIV

ERB

IRC

H/

IND

UST

HIA

LST

RU

CT

UR

E.

OC

CU

PAN

CY

\I

.‘

/EX

ISTi

NG

GR

AO

E—

100)

SH

RU

BS

.A

ZA

LE

A/

ISA

NA

UTO

MO

TIV

EL

UB

RIC

AT

ION

SER

VI(

-,

1275

W/

PIN

EM

ULC

HFA

CIL

ITY

.C

UST

OM

ER

SR

EMA

ININ

THEI

R

20

LA

ND

SCA

PEB

UFF

ER

AR

EA

GR

OU

ND

CO

VE

R/

AU

TOM

OB

ILE

AT

ALL

TIM

ES

WH

ILE

TEC

H

WA

R

EX

ISN

GE

ES

W/

CO

VE

R/

/C

HA

NG

ET

hEIR

OIL

.

fVA

dE

J,

1\

/T

HE

RE

AR

EN

OPU

BL

ICO

RA

DM

INIS

TR

A

AR

EA

SIN

Ti-II

SP

RO

.IC

T.

F.H

.

\M

ON

UM

EN

TI

BU

ILD

ING

STR

UC

TUR

AL

DEC

________

WiN

DSP

EE

D—

115

MP

H.

(3SE

C.

—

—1

61’

——

BLD

G.

USE

CA

TA

GO

RY

Ti,

GE

NE

RA

LU

SE.

LIV

EL

OA

D—

SO

P.S

.F.

FLO

OR

(PA

SS

VEH

ICLE

S)20

P.S

,FR

OO

F

RO

OF

PAN

EL

DEA

DLO

AD

2P

.S.

CO

LL

AT

ER

AL

LOA

D—

2P

.S.

NI

FX

PO

cI:P

T51/

VflP

Tdrrcn

51

Ron Keller

From: Helen Lambert

Sent: Monday, April 07, 2014 1:00 PM

To: Ron Keller

Subject: FW: 70457 Hwy 21 suite 118 Pelican landing Proposed drive through

See Rebecca’s comments below.

From: Rebecca Lala

Sent: Wednesday, February 05, 2014 01:57 PM Central Standard Time

To: Jared Bowers; Helen Lambert <hIambertstJgov.gfg>

Cc: Jessica Lacy; John S. Bowers, III

Subject: RE: 70457 Hwy 21 suite 118 Pelican landing Proposed drive through

I apologize for the delay in responding. I have reviewed the circulation plan and have some concerns about traffic using

the drive-thru blocking the entrance to the oil change business. I understand that signage and pavement markings will

be utilized to attempt to avoid this situation, however signage will not completely prevent customers from going the

path of least resistance. Other concerns I have are the exiting traffic attempting to turn left out of the oil change

business and thus traveling the wrong way on the one-way entrance off of LA 21. Signage will also need to be installed

to attempt to avoid this situation, but again I’m not sure the signage will prevent this from happening. My 3rd concern is

the fact that all drive-thru patrons will be required to use the parking lot and driveway of the oil change business. Is the

oil change business ok with this situation? A drive-thru donut shop does generate a good amount of traffic, as has been

evident by the drive-thru donut shop in the shopping center located on LA 59 near LA 1088.

If you wish to proceed with this circulation plan, please submit the proposed signage and pavement markings that you

will propose to install in order to prevent the aforementioned situations. Thanks.

Becky

‘Rebecca B. Lath, T.E., rTO’E

T’rajjIc ‘Engineer

St. T’aminanj TarLcIi

985-898-2552

Any e-mail may be construed as a public document, and may be subject to a public records request. The contents of this

e-mail reflect the opinion of the writer, and are not necessarily the opinion or policy of St. Tammany Parish Government.

From: Jared Bowers

Sent: Monday, February 03, 2014 6:15 PM

To: Rebecca Lala; Helen Lambert

Cc: Jessica Lacy; John S. Bowers, III

Subject: RE: 70457 Hwy 21 suite 118 Pelican landing Proposed drive through

Rebecca and Helen,

1

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOAR]) OF ADJUSTMENT

STAFF ANALYSIS REPORT

Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-0 10

Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014

Date of Report: April 24, 2014

GENERAL INFORMATION

Applicant(s) Name: Claude Lagalante

Location of Property: 90 Hummingbird Road, Covington, LA

Zoning of Property: Planned Unit Development

Variance(s) Requested: Front yard setback requirement

OVERVIEW

The applicant is seeking relief for a portion of his front yard setback requirement due to the

unusually shaped property which comes to a kind of “diamond-shaped” point that meets at two

intersecting streets (see survey attached).

STAFF COMMENTS

Since the lot is unusually shaped which creates a limited front yard setback from the perspective

of the two intersecting streets, a true hardship does appear to exist; and given that the proposed

new home only violates a portion of the 30’ front yard setbacks, and that the applicant appears to

have put great thought into the house plan design in order to mitigate the variance requested, the

staff has no objection to the variance request.

BOA CASE NO./L1t OS O Iô (for office use only)

9ç-o7 cc’/’(Cell Phone #)

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPLICATION FORM)

(Please print on the following lines below. Ifa company, please include a contactperson name also.)

APPLICANTS NAME: (‘ t’i€

MAILING ADDRESS: / /‘10 (‘ *

CITY/STATE/ZIP:

PHONE NUMBER:

___________________

/Y1a,v/ev,/k , c4 7o’/7/

Al/A

REQUEST FOR:

D other

(Home Phone #)

PROPERTY LOCATiON FOR VARiANCE REQUESTED: ZONING: (A,&QcQ A(4 :1dt90 I4ovnriitjbird IYCI (L133A) Couiivk’i, CI 70Lf31 Co &l.oe S1L&4’’

Address City State Subdivision (if applicable) p&s]t

(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)

_____________

o A variance of the (Unified Development Code)

O Appeal of an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)

0 Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified

Development Code)

VARIANCE/APPEAL REQUESTED:

‘ building setbacks (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard setbacks)

0 landscape buffers (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard buffer setbacks)

0 landscaping within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes and/or shrubs)

0 parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspace islands, etc...)

o signage requirements (increase of sign area and/or sign height, lighting, coloring, etc...)

(Specify other variance/appeal on line above)

(Please state on the following lines below your specific requestfor a variance/appeal:)

Example: Applicant is requesting a variance for a front yard setback requirementfrom 25’ required by

the parish, to approximately 20’ requested.

/1 pp/itaW4 is (ec/L)es.l’lr4JJ CL Vtv/tivC ior (r4ctovcl r-iback

1L)I(efl1eA)7 4’IOIri 30’ (ecjJ(c\ ‘o -re psk -

se ackyris.

SIGNATURE OF APFL1CANT DATE OF APPLICATION

Dear Board Members:

The purpose of this requested is to seek the Parish’s approval to decrease the front

building setbacks on Briar Hollow and Hummingbird for lot 533A in Tchefunta Club

Estates, Phase II, from 30 feet to 20 feet. No change to the back or side setbacks are

being requested. The Architectural Committee of Tchufunta Club Estates has approved

this request. Please see Appendix A, Amendment to Agreement to Purchase or Sell.

The following information demonstrates the lot’s unusually shape (Appendix B) and

supports the need to reduce the front setback:

1. This is not a corner lot yet it fronts equally on two streets, Briar Hollow and

Hummingbird.2. The lot and the corresponding building footprint closely resemble the shape of a

diamond. Therefore, the back and front of the lot and building footprint narrow

considerably.3. The front building footprint falls considerable below the widest portion of the lot

and begins to narrow before the widest portion of the lot.

4. The above factors restrict a home design that is consistent with the

neighborhood.

Thank you for your consideration.

Sincerely,

Claude Lagalante

OocuSlgn Envelope ID: 17838744-6007-4AEF-6765-0EC085371 15E

4ppeAJd/x A

AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE OR SELL [1E111w Sund.,d Fom. (wwwd lGI)

Nwd.MnepvlIe, M,acinivaalREALTOkS®. leo

Due: 15mPh 01 OfllA

FmeocWeo,m QIREALTO48kOALT0RBoa,de pwwide this eomeo b4

ed.o4 a,kgd adwee REALTOR emnebwseoweo w te1weRj1y ol hoa14etg

wee’:

lDnn4,..w

Is w be amended in lEe following mamier

(Please reference each line by number)

-TCE architectural committee flea approved a reduction in the front setback on Hummthgbfrd and Briar Hollow

-onLotS33A.

Line:

_______

Une:The currerft setback Is 30 feet. ft Is now approved 1cr this lot at 20 feet.

Line:•Tli sale of this lot Is contingent upon the parish approving the variance.

Line:

_______

:01 or bf0tc May 30,2014

Line: 161 :Inspadion period to be extended through May30, 2014.

Line:

________

Line:

________

Line:

__________

Ljnc

_______

Line:

________

All olberlernis and condItions era vo remain unchanged and binding upon holhpurdes.

,-

rc rRPE

xjIw.Lt iMyLiwdt 3/21/2014

DATE SELLE DATE

<_____________________

PURCHASER DATE SELLER DATE

GATE:March 20, 2014

— DATE:

Jenniler Rice Diane LaPlace

SELLING AGENT’S NAME LISTING AGENT’S NAME

January30. 2014

Claude Lagalante

James 0. Harp. Jr. (Seller)and

concerning Ito property Icnwn asLot 533A. 90 HummIngbird Road, Covinglon, LA 10433

itc

D

h

I-I S

U,

TU

,

I

Reference Surve(Basis of Bearg)1. Survey prepared ôy LandSurveying, Inc. ofTchefuncta Club EstatesPhase IL Nap File No.4702, SL 2’ammany ParishClerk of Court office2. Survey prepared by LandSurveying, LLC Nap FileNo. 49704, SL TammanyParish Clerk of Court office

2YJE Properties,Ø( A SLIVEY MADE CF PFOETY LO

Lot 5334 TcheftmctaSt. 2’ammany .Paris4

THIS MAP IS IN ACCORDANDE WITH p. PHYSICAL. 9JFIVEY MALE ON flE ii

SISNATLFE ANO STAMPED SEAL. 14.ST fl4 D CYl THIS PLAY IS NOT A TPLE

LAND SURVEYING LLCcOVThI6TON. LOUISIANA

Rp,rzspth 12 2011

4pd1 B10’ UtilityServil?J,de 8

20’

ii

I

533A /3uilding—4SetbackLines

—

Building Setback ZinesFront — 30’Side-5’Rear — 10’Building setback linesshould be determinedby owner or contractorprior to any construction

This lot is located in FloodZone C as per FEJIAFIRAf Comm. Panel No.225205 0220 C, mapdated 4—2—1991

SERVITUDES SHOWN HEREON (IF ANY) ARE NOT NECESSARILY EXCLUSIVE.SERVITIJOES OF RECORD AS SHOWN ON TITLE OPINION DIR TITLE POLICYWILL BE ADDED HERETO UPON REQUEST AS THE UNDERSIGNED HASPERFORMED ND ABSTRACT OR TITLE SEARCH. THE UNDERSIGNED HASMADE NO ATTEMPT To LOCATE ANY BURIED UTILITIES DIR ASSOCIATEDPEDESTALS.ThIS MAP IS IN ACCORDANCE WITh THE MINIMUM STANDARD DETAILEDREQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO THE ACCURACY STANDARDS OF A C SURVEYAND THE APPLICABLE STANDARDS OF PRACTICE CITED IN LAC 45: LXI.

LegeneL.Rebar SetRebar Found

F-

L NO. 4

SCALE = 40’

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

STAFF ANALYSIS REPORT

Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-011

Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014

Date of Report: April 24,2014

GENERAL INFORMATION

Applicant(s) Name: Jerry E. Schaefer

Location of Property: 351 Forest Loop, Mandeville, LA

Zoning of Property: A-4 Single Family Residential

Variance(s) Requested: Side yard setback requirement

OVERVIEW

The applicant wishes to replace an existing 1 8’x20’ carport, which is currently sitting on the side

property line, and replacing it with a 35’x42’ garage which would be set 5’ off of the side property

line.

STAFF COMMENTS

Based on the circumstances, the staff has no objections to the variance request based on the

following mitigating points:

• The old carport that violates code by sitting on the property line would be removed and

replaced with a new aesthetically pleasing garage that would be set 5’ off of the side

property line.

• At the time that the subdivision was constructed, a 5’ side yard setback was permitted for

accessory structures.

• There is limited room in which to move the proposed garage any farther away from the

side property line due to a 12’ wide driveway that exists between the proposed garage and

the house which is used to access the back yard for a boat and camper, as well as existing

obstructions that are located next to the house (garden and A/C unit), and existing citrus

trees.• The applicant’s next door neighbor has filed a letter of no objection.

BOA CASE NO. JL/- OS O 1! ((or office ise only)

T. TAMMANYPARISK BOARD OFADJ1JSTME!T

(VARUNCE/APPEAL AP.PUCATIONFORM)

(PlásepriiUee thefrUsssg liaes below. Ifa cemp.a,pkase indade cmrkctpersea same abe,)

APPLICANiNAME: e-tt4 £ &ccQ€r

MAILING ADDRJ!S4S3 I/

ek I- oc>fD

O A variance of the (Unified Development Code)

(JAppeal ofan adverse decision made by a parish official(s)

0 Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified

Development Code)

VARIANCE/APPEAL IeOUFSTED

fuilding setbacks (reduction of front, side arrdlor rear yard setbacks)

0 landscape buffers (reduction of front, side andtor rear yard buffer setbacks)

O landscaping within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes andlor shrubs)

0 parking area requirements (reduction ofparking stalls, parking censpuce islands, etc..)

O signage requirements (increase ofsign area andfor sign height, lighting, coloring. etc..)

C) other

(Mse sale on thefollo,thig linabeLwy.ur specific requestfor a vmnmacWqpeab)

Examp: Applicant is requesting a variancefor afrontyardseiback requirementfrom 25’required by

theparish, to appsvximace!y 20’requested.

CnTA7WZIP- I ve_\e Q. 9o2/

PHONE NUM8ER i(9’l7(Home Phone #)

Address

PROPERTYLOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTED ZOMNG

(Cell Phone #)

City

(Pleases ckeck the applicable boxes below:)

REOUESTFOR:

State

‘C y

L\&e3

(Specify other variancelappeal on line above)

r ; rrks r€en..efi

Prorv11Y r k - fke - e g. 1 Y) S

Jo I’cor’+ /ooS ,LA j’ç iIio.ve 1 Ayrr- y

cCLwfer. OR L hCkiir rvty +s *eJ ,nov bo4

SIGNATURE 0 APPLICANT DATE OfAPPLICATION1

To: Board ofAdjustment Variance/ Appeal Request

From: Jerry E. SchaeferDate: March 26,2014Subject: Variance request — Deer Run Sudv - Mandeville

To Whom It May Concern:

My name is Jerry Schaefer and I have been a homeowner in Deer Run subdivision

since its development by US Homes in 1981. One year after purchasing my home. 1

purchased the adjacent lot from US Homes and several years later I enlarged my

original home on to the part of the adjacent property. I would now like to build a

detached garage next to my home on this property. During my research into the

permitting process, I was informed that while the subdivision side setback

requirements for each original “nonconforming” lot is 5’, by purchasing the lot

adjacent to me and having the two lots re-subdivided into one lot, this now makes

my lot a uconformingJl lot. I’m told the parish rules for a “conforming” lot require a

10’ side setback.

I am respectfully requesting a variance to the required 10’ side property line set

back for a conforming lot, to allow me to construct a garage with the 5’ allowable

side set back of a nonconforming lot The main reason is to allow me to keep the 12’

access I have between my house and proposed new garage for my boat and camper.

I don’t want them in the driveway as I feel this looks tacky and lowers home values.

It was suggested that I move the garage back and over to the 10’ but as you can see

on my site plan this would cause me to remove some of my dtrus trees and leave me

very little backyard. I did not want either of those to happen. There will be no

adverse effects on the adjacent property because the building will have built in

gutters and down spouts to the existing front driveway that slopes to the street

where there is a catch basin. Even though I own the adjacent property and would

not do anything to cause harm to or cause a conflict with my neighbors I have also

obtained and included a no objection letter from my present tenant at 331 Forest

Loop.One other point I’d like for you to consider, as I have, is whether this would set

precedence for other homeowners in the subdivision to also request variances. The

fact is there are 137 lots in the subdivision, all ofwhich have homes built on them,

and all of which are “non-conforming” lots with aS’ side setback requirement

Therefore, there would not be any other possible variance request for side setbacks.

In fact, the only side setback that would be more than 5’ in the entire subdivision

would be this one I’m asking for a variance on.

As far as a homeowners association we had one 33 years ago and I was a part of it

and presently I am still the person everyone comes to for any repairs on entrance

signs, lights, etc. The association has been abolished for 20 plus years and I still have

my copy of the covenants and my garage doesn’t conflict with any ofthe covenants

even if they were still in effectThank you for your consideration,Jerry E. Schaefer351 Forest LoopMandeville LA. 70471

DISCR1PTTON OF PICTURES

If you look at page one, the top picture shows my 12’ rear yard access for my camper

and boat that I don’t want to loose. It also shows a few of the trees I would loose by

shifting the garage back and over to the 10’ set back. The bottom picture shows the

existing carport that would be removed from the property and where the new

garage would be located.

Page two the top picture shows where my camper and boat go which is why i need

to keep my 12’ access to the rear yard. The bottom picture gives you a view from the

back yard at the 5’ set back I am hoping for, the size and location of the proposed

new garage, and the 12’ access I need to keep.

Page three shows again a front and rear view ofwhere everything is and hopefully

will be located.

Thank you for your time,

Jerry E. Schaefer

p

AJ 0 4- cj

3 —

.-..,‘

--

•s4,.

4

G

4; 0<

‘I

j

••

..

I

DISCRIPTION OF PiCTURES

If you look at page one, the top picture shows my 12’ rear yard access for my camper

and boat that I don’t want to loose. It also shows a few of the trees I would loose by

shifting the garage back and over to the 10’ set back. The bottom picture shows the

existing carport that would be removed from the property and where the new

garage would be located.

Page two the top picture shows where my camper and boat go which is why I need

to keep my 12’ access to the rear yard. The bottom picture gives you a view from the

back yard at the 5’ set back I am hoping for, the size and location of the proposed

new garage, and the 12’ access I need to keep.

Page three shows again a front and rear view ofwhere everything is and hopefully

will be located.

Thank you for your time,

Jerry E. Schaefer

Fr

,..I

0L4,C

1T

I-

Pares

- —

ccs”ç; cj-J304c’r

Jeny Scheeter351 Fot LoopMaideviUe.LA 70471

‘F•gS ai -%

4*$

[“1c44

- Jeny Sc1ae1er351 FarLc.Mandee. LA 7LL7I

•i: I 3- _i_’__•-•

-

1)i\ess

‘opo.seA \J

Vieu

_‘

97-c

yJ)

so’c7/

4/2)/5

‘)d/—/22/drd

Sr25

,‘)///‘

06Q7/$/E

1LA/2)1/0)¶1

V/S

E‘ 1

I V

V’/ I’,

riN t7/

I

I:C.[‘1

I

I

iii

\Hi

1:! !,

I.,I’

SI

I ‘‘

•1

V

\ I1

>

3.”’

s_;;*VVV/V

.:‘.\

6’

V

1_—

3l

A

/

I

ii//

I

-

U‘Ii

\

0>

//

>L

L

rfl

S4

.

;;;;S

:

)‘

--

5—

.

.5.

*5

——

S —

•55

5;

5.

-1 •

5.

—-S

55

5.

—5

SS

r

-,

:.-S

1

—•

5-

1—

,

.

.5—

.-

:‘S

•S

—P

S

5_

S

S—

—

S

5—

S

S

—.5

_e

(F

’-) ‘-

‘i>

4S

.

d5-

.5;—

—S

11

54

55

5(?

‘

•S

5— .

.5’

.5 n 1”

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOAR]) OF ADJUSTMENTSTAFF ANALYSIS REPORT

Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-0 12Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014Date of Report: April 24, 2014

GENERAL INFORMATION

Applicant(s) Name: Beatriz B. RechlmannLocation of Property: 216 Highland Drive, Mandeville, LAZoning of Property: A-3 SuburbanVariance(s) Requested: Side yard setback requirement

OVERVIEW

The applicant made an “after the fact” addition to her home not aware that a permit was required.

STAFF COMMENTS

With all due respect, if the applicant had contacted the permits department prior to commencingconstruction on the site, she would have been apprised as to what the code requirements were andtherefore could have avoided this predicament. And since a hardship or practical difficulty doesnot appear to be evident, the staff does not support the variance request.

BOA CASENO. I (for office use only)

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPLICATION FORM)

(Cell Phone #)

PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTED: ZONING:

zV/ ///E

(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)

REQUEST FOR: D A variance of the (Unified Development Code)

D Appeal of an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)

C Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified

Development Code)

VARIANCEUPPEAL REQUESTED:

building setbacks (reduction of front, de andor rear yard setbacks)

o landscape buffers (reduction of front, sidendIor rear yard buffer setbacks)

0 landscaping within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes andlor shrubs)

0 parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspace islands, etc...)

O signage requirements (increase of sign area andJor sign height, lighting, coloring, etc...)

C other(Specify other variance/appeal on line above)

(Please state on thefoliowing lines below your specific requestfor a variance/appeal:)

Example: Applicant is requesting a variancefor a front yard setback requirement from 25’ required by

the parish, to approximately 20’ requested. - 5J ‘-Jo 44q.% I,..

7

// / k

kSIGNA TURE OF APPLANT DATE OF APPLIC’A HON

. A11

(Please print on thefollowing lines below. Ifa company, please include a contact person name also.)

/ 2 /APPLICANTS NAME: /i7’1 s /. I _&J?/7lf-i ))

MAILING ADDRESS: 1- cc , 5 5

CITY/STATE/ZIP: ii/ J d/ C

PHONE NUMBER:(Home Phone #)

Address City State Subdivision (if applicable)

AIJ112 7/ /W

I0-j

LiJ0

MAPLEWOOD DRIVE (SIDE)

REFERENCE SURVEY:

A 9009’20B = 8948’53C 90’O4’01D 8W57’46”

DRIVEWAY

00z

/ANGLES AT PROPERTY CORNERS

154161

155

156

157

0

60’

RIDGEWOOD DRIVENOTES:

1. ThIs property Is located in Flood Zone C.per F.E.M.A. Map No, 225205 0245 C. datedOctober 17. 1989.

2. Building Setbacks per covenants recorded inCOB 307 page 147. front = 35’, side & rear 10’

1)E IS NO REPRESENTA11ON ThAT AU. APPLICABLE S 1UOCS AND/ORRES1IBC11ONS HAVE smi sOi HEREON. ANY SER1UJO€S AND/ORRES1RIC11ONS SHORN ON ThIS PLAT ARE UI1ED 10 ThOSE SET FORThIN 1€ DESGRIP11ON AND/OR SWORMA11ON flJRMSH ThE UNOERGN.A llfl.E OR PUBLIC REC1D SEARO4 FOR 5304 IWORMA11ON WAS NOT MADEBY ThE UNDERSIONED IN CONPIUNG DATA FOR ThIS SURVEY.

LEGEND

= 5/8k IRON ROD FOUND= 1/2 IRON ROD SET

RS = REFERENCE SURVEY

Plot of Dc Vol Estates Sites, Section B by AdiosOrr, Jr. Associates doted November 7, 1960, filed

St. Tamamny Parish Clerk of Court Map File No.352.

(985) 892-1549 John G. Cnmmings and Associates FAX (985) 892-9250

503 N. ..EFFERSCN AUE PROFSSIONAL LAND SURkEVORS COI4NGTON, LA 704JJ

Bea triz Reehlxnarj.n

SIIOINNO A SURVEY OF: LOT 160, DE VAL ESTATES SITES, SEC11ON B,LOCATED IN SECTION 36, TOWNSHIP 7 SOUTH,RANGE 11 EAST, ST. TAMMANY PARISH. LOUISIANA.

/1HIS PLAY REPRl1S A PHYSICAL SURVEY MADE ON

,.- ) /ThE GROUND BY ME, OR 1HOSE UNDER MY DIREC11ON, .// ,-f /, J//ri’AND IS IN ACCCRDAN IN1N ThE APPLICABLE / -//tf L.STANDARDS OF PRAC11CE AND BEARS A CLASS C

PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR

I)1JI

r 4,

ftr..,’o,4?ffl

SCALE:1 = 50’

1JOB NO. 14078 1DArE 3—262O14 RE’dISED:

—.,

-

t’

—

4

—

‘:4i

tv

LI44

IEl

iiS

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOAR]) OF ADJUSTMENTSTAFF ANALYSIS REPORT

Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-013Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014Date of Report: April 24, 2014

GENERAL iNFORMATION

Applicant(s) Name: Executive Holdings, L.L.C.Location of Property: 79055 Highway 40, Covington, LAZoning of Property: HC-2 Highway CommercialVariance(s) Requested: Buffers and driveway width

OVERVIEW

The applicant is requesting variances for a reduction of landscape buffers on the north and eastsides of the property and an increase in a one-way driveway width on the Lee Road side all forthe purpose of preserving a majestic large mature live oak tree located at the southwest corner ofthe property.

STAFF COMMENTS

The staff has been working with the applicant through several plan revisions of the site in orderto come up with the least invasive plan relative to meeting parish code in order to save the liveoak tree. Therefore, the staff recommends approval of the variances as requested subject to thedeveloper planting all the necessary plantings on site; and if not able to, then by makingreparations in the form of payment for plant mitigation to the St. Tammany Parish TreeMitigation Bank for the loss of the trees not planted, which payment is based on $100.00 percaliper inch of tree.

ST. TAMMANYPARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPLICATION FORM)

(Please print on the following lines below. Ifa company, please include a contact person name also.)

APPLICANTS NAME: COREY J. SMITH D.B.A. “EXECUTIVE HOLDINGS, LLC” (DEVELOPER)

M4ILINGADDRESS: 311 TELLY ROAD

CITY/STATE/ZIP: PICAYUNE, MS 39466

PHONE NUMBER: 6017984000

(Home Phone #) (Cell Phone #)

PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTED: ZONING: HC2

79055 HIGHWAY 40 LAAddress State

(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)

REQUEST FOR: variance of the (Unified Development Code)0 Appeal of an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)0 Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified

Development Code)

VARIANCE/APPEAL REQUESTED:

Djiilding setbacks (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard setbacks)S4ndscape buffers (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard buffer setbacks)O landscaping within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes and/or shrubs)0 parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspace islands, etc...)O signage requirements (increase of sign area and/or sign height, lighting, coloring, etc...)

‘ther DRIVEWAY WIDTH IN PLANTING AREA

(Specify other variance/appeal on line above)

(Please state on the following lines below your specific requestfor a variance/appeal:)Example: Applicant is requesting a variance for a front yard setback requirement from 25’ required bythe parish, to approximately 20’ requested.

M1L44I. CODE 7.01078 !bBUFFER PLANTING AREA WIDTH. REQUEST REDUCTION FROM 10’ TO 4’.

BOA CASE NO.

O1

(for office use only)

COVINGTON

City Subdivision (if applicable)

2. CODE 7.0106C - ONE WAY DRIVEWAY WIDTH IN PLANTING AREA. REQUEST INCREASE FROM 15’ TO 18’

SI1ATU4JJAPPLICANT

3. c-r-6 &% j\ +

4—3—20 14

DATE OF APPLICATION

ExEcu’r1vF(X)1\4PANTES

April 3, 2014

St. Tammany Parish — Department of Planning

Attn: Mr. Ron Kellar21454 Koop Drive

Suite lBMandeville, LA 70471

RE: Proposed Family Dollar Store, Covington Louisiana - Variance Request

Mr. Kellar,

Please find the enclosed application for variance and payment for the fees associated with this

filing. As mentioned in our previous discussions, the variance is imperative in order for us to

preserve a very substantial live oak tree located on the property.

The site plan submitted along with this application depicts the building and improvement layout

being constructed entirely outside of the drip line of the tree, which we agree with your input, is

critical in preserving the health and longevity of the existing live oak tree.

Should you have any questions with regard to our specific requests, or feel the need to discuss

our application further, please do not hesitate to contact me on my cell phone at (601)916-4000

or via email at corey@execreal.com. We look forward to working together with your staff to

develop the property in harmony with the existing landscape and vegetation located on the site.

Kindest Regards,

Corey J. Smith, PresidenllCEO

Exiuiivi EXECu’nvi ExEcu’rIvF1I( )11)1NGS REAL ES’IA’l.’E

311 TELLY RoAD . PICAYUNE, MS 39466 601.798.4000 (office). 601.798.6161 (fax)

POWERS OF THE BOARD TO GRANT VARIANCES/APPEALS

The St. Tammany Parish Board of Adjustment is limited in its power to grant variance/appeal

requests as mandated by State and Parish Law. The board must consider the following in order

to determine if a variance/appeal is eligible for granting:

1. Is the variance/appeal request self-imposed?

Variances/appeals may not be granted by the board if the request is considered a

“personal preference”.

2. Does the variance/appeal request constitute a financial hardship?

Variances/appeals may not be granted by the board if the request is considered strictly a

fmancial hardship.

3. Does the variance/appeal requestpresent a practical difficulty or unnecessary

hardship?If the applicant can prove through testimony and presentation of factual documentation

andlor evidence to the board that a practical difficultly or unnecessary hardship would be

imposed if a variance/appeal was not granted, then the board may consider granting the

variance/appeal request. ALL VARIANCE REQUESTS ARE THE RESULT OF PUSHING IMPROVEMENTS

EAST TO SAVE THE LARGE LIVE OAK TREE ON THE SOUTHWEST CORNER

OF THE PROPERTY.

4. Does the variance/appeal request impose an adverse effect on the adjacent neighbors

property or surrounding neighborhood?

If the variance/appeal request adversely effects an adjacent property owner and/or the

surrounding neighborhood in general, and testimony is forthcoming from same that can

be proven within reason that an adverse affect would be imposed, the board may decide

not to grant the applicant’s variance/appeal request.

5. Will the granting of the variance/appeal request constitute establishing a precedent?

The board may deny the granting of a variance/appeal request which may result in the

establishment of a dangerous or unfavorable precedent to the parish.

——

——

Tuesday, April 08, 2014

Ethel Lanaux232 Lake Marina Dr 12CNew Orleans, LA7O 124

Executive Companies311 Telly RoadPicayune, MS 39466

To whom it may concern,

I, Ethel Lanaux, the owner of the property located at 79055 Hwy 40, Covington, LA 70435

(furthermore as the corner of Hwy 40 and Hwy 1129) give Executive Companies and their

representatives to authority to apply for any and all variances and or permits associated with the

planning, building, and or permitting process for their use on the above referenced property.

Sincerely,

EMEthel Lanaux

ST. TAMIVIANY PARISH BOAR]) OF ADJUSTMENTSTAFF ANALYSIS REPORT

Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-0 14Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014Date of Report: April 24, 2014

GENERAL INFORMATION

Applicant(s) Name: AP Towers, L.L.C.Location of Property: NE of intersection of LA 21 & LA 1083,Waldheim, LA

Zoning of Property: 1-2 IndustrialVariance(s) Requested: Tower fall radius

OVERVIEW

The applicant is requesting variances for a side yard setback (fall radius for a cellular tower) from

250’ to approximately 132’ to the west, and approximately 182’ to the east.

STAFF COMMENTS

The staff looks at three primary issues relative to giving relief for fall zone radii for towers. First,

is there a practical difficultly or hardship that would justify such a request? Secondly, does the

request adversely impact any properties from an aesthetic or visibility standpoint? And thirdly,

does the proposal create any health and safety concerns relative to life and property?

First, relative to whether there is a practical difficultly or hardship that would justify such a

request; the parent parcel does appear to be large enough so that the leased area could be to

expanded in order to meet parish setback requirements. So in our opinion, a hardship or practical

difficulty does not appear to exist.

Secondly, there appears to be no adverse impact to visual “line of site” aesthetics to other

properties based on what appears to be existing heavy vegetation surrounding the site.

And thirdly, there appears to be no health or safety issues with the tower since it’s located

sufficiently away from any existing structures.

Therefore, the staff recommends that the applicant try and work with the owner of the property in

order to expand the lease site so that parish code can be met.

BOA CASE NO. JL1L (for office use only)

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPliCATION FORM)

(Please print on the following lines below, ifa company, please include a contact person name also.)

APPL1ANTS NAME: A? Toc3 LL c. t4ri

MAILING ADDRESS: 10. \ iQ

I

CITY/STATE/ZIP:

PHONE NUMBER:

FCA4OV%. ,L.A 7Q-fL1 1C)

(Home Phone #) (Cell Phone #)

PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTED: ZONING:

(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)

REQUEST FOR: A variance of the (Unified Development Code)

fl Appeal 0 an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)

1 Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified

Development Code)

VARIANCE/APPEAL REQUESTED:

Ivhuilding setbacks (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard setbacks)

U landscape buffers (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard buffer setbacks)

i landscaping within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes and/or shrubs)

parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspacc islands, etc...)

U signage requirements (increase of sign area and/or sign height, lighting, coloring, etc...)

I other(Specify other variance/appeal on line above)

(Please state on thefollowing lines below your specific requestfor a variance/appeal:)

J’.xumpie: Applicant is requesting a variance for a front yard setback requirementfrom 25’ required by

the pnris!7, to approximately 20’ requested.

_______________

‘jç’ a. ,,-.4L-4-4 -

. .- -—

-— —--‘.--- - ------

.—-— -I---.-

Eov’ VS0’ ‘I 3’Z’ ‘ ‘i t.O

q’- .s-i (Se.e AAL

- :/‘ /

.cIGN9UtOF APPLICANT DATE OF APPLICATION

Vp4 C Aresf 111?ctsidex’tf ZD 1eAv, thC

-mc’ (e *4gL LAAddress City ‘ State Subdivision (if applicable)

Sábr€Towers and Poles -

April10, 2014

Mr. H. Brad CohenAPTowers4208 Six Forks Rd., Suite 1000

Raleigh, NC 27609

RE: Proposed 250 ft Sabre self-supporting tower for LA-i 094 Waldheim, LA

Dear Mr. Cohen,

The above referenced tower has been designed for a Basic 3-second Gust Wind Speed of 102 mph

with no ice and 30 mph with 1/4” radial ice, Structure Class II, Exposure Category C, Topographic

Category 1, in accordance with the Telecommunications Industry Association Standard ANSI/TIA

222-G, “Structural Standard for Antenna Supporting Structures and Antennas”.

When Sabre towers are designed according to this Standard, the wind pressures and steel strength

capacities include several safety factors, resulting in an overall minimum safety factor of 25%.

Therefore, it is highly unlikely that the tower will fail structurally in a wind event where the design wind

speed is exceeded within the range of the built-in safety factors. Should the wind speed increase

beyond the capacity of the built-in safety factors, to the point of failure of one or more structural

elements, the most likely location of the failure would be within one or more of the tower members in

the upper portion. This would result in a buckling failure mode, where the loaded member would

bend beyond its elastic limit (beyond the point where the member would return to its original shape

upon removal of the wind load).

Therefore, it is likely that the overall effect of such an extreme wind event would be localized buckling

of a tower section. Assuming that the wind pressure profile is similar to that used to design the tower,

the tower is most likely to buckle at the location of the highest combined stress ratio in the upper

portion of the tower. This would result in the portion of the tower above the failure location “folding

over” onto the portion of the tower below the failure location. Please note that this letter only

applies to the above referenced tower designed and manufactured by Sabre Towers & Poles.

In the unlikely event of total separation, this, in turn, would result in collapse of the section above,

within a radius equal to 50% of the tower height.

Sincerely,

Amy R. Herbst, P.E.Senior Design Engineer

Sabre Towers and Poles • 2101 Murray Street • RO. Box 658 • Sioux City, IA 51102-0658

P: 712-258-6690 F: 712-279-0814 W: www.SabreTowersandPoles.com

April 1st, 2014

To: St. Tammany Parish Board of Adjustment

P0 Box 628Covington, LA 70434

From: Karl Gottfried III309 Bordeaux CourtMadisonville, LA 70447-9349

RE: Agent Authorization Letter

Dear Sir or Madam:

This letter is to confirm that I have authorized Jeffrey Schoen, to file for a variance on behalf of

Waldheim-LA Why 21 LLC for a wireless cellular tower to be constructed on the property located at on

Highway 21, Bush, LA 70431 (Assessment # 120-100-6665).

If you have any questions about this matter, please feel free to contact me by e-mail at

kg3 @gottfried-us.com.

Karl Gottfried III

SWA

MP

Proposed

Accessl’JtiIE

tyE

asemen

t30’

x33’

ExFsting

Access

Road

832’

Existing

Gate

(Locked)

Existing

3P

hase

Pow

er

Existing

Pow

erand

Telco

aIoigH

wy

21

Existing

Culveit

3.0.563034,-89.997441

LOU

ISIAN

ASO

UTH

/-

7TO

WER

INEO

—/

EA

muoE

30

33

AS

701’

NO

RTH

/7

LON

GITU

DE

90

00

020

1NT

REST

/-

—(7

060

83)

/‘°‘.

°‘

GR

OU

ND

ELEVA

TION

87

0

/‘

PAR

ENT

TRA

CT

AB

OV

EREV

ElSEA

LEVEL

(NA

VD

B8)

/W

ALD

NIEM

—LA

HWY

21LLC

“-..

7PA

RC

EL50

20—700—

6685‘,,

A,

/IN

STN

O1834562

‘‘-

-“

VIC

INITY

MA

P

97

‘SEC

ON

D

__

____

__

___

__

___

__

___

___

___

7’

-“-

A,

“0

V7

1

TE

UPO

RA

RT

y-PDC

°‘.

7

BEN

CH

MA

RK

’,

A7

00

07

00

BO

ILIN

TREE

—,.‘i’

LEASE

AR

EA“

‘.

ADAMA

MA

GG

IOLIA

R

0tO

A8

60

2’,

/9

23

±A

CR

ES7

•‘_

PAR

CEL

NO

20—037—

8348

./-

“,,

INST

NO

1902678

Ori

7

PRO

JEC

TN

O

J/

I

—/

_99

6H

EA

VIL

Y

(

__

____

__

___

__

___

__

___

___

___

.—

/R

000ED

7,

LO‘-

)PO

E(7nL

A!

,_

POE

I

30IN

GR

ESS/E

GR

ESS

IS0

“..

IRE

6NR

I

6IJTILIT0

EASEM

ENT-

-“-

N752917

2261

077±

AC

RE

S_‘

_‘,,)

\-

25048

“E

37

05

79

79453

,N

FE

MA

.s

.,

‘1)

MO

BILE

RO

ME

.,—

‘ZO

NE

A’

-—

,‘

/‘

,.‘-.,,,,

BO

RN

-

-‘N5

09,

RAV

EL

______________

/s

-—

S-_

4°---.

ROADI

ILEG

END

>Z

sE

ZO

:M

Sj

,77

/‘ç’

“M

OB

ILEH

OM

E55

40IN)

H1

/2’

IF”°

I--

REB

AR

—40

R.-709

.A

S,h11’

FE

.

N

PA

RC

OS

N

EU

A.

__

ZON

EC

//

BEDI

2E

ZON

EA

/

SECTIO

N4166.6

100

0’SFLl/

——

—

/9

—--—

-—

—n

PIGI4T—

QF—

RA

Y

——

——

——

——

——

//

_.

OYEFAIAE4DPO

WER

/

LINE

EAR

ING

DISTA

NC

E

/

LI5

11

61

2’

N70000

/

0116

12’E

—10000

PZ

6//

L58

04

34

8’

W1500

651

L6S

LIM

12’A

15

00

/

L776’4O

36’

E4

09

0

I

LO4

42

11

7’

E2

29

22

/

o0

100’200

/

LII

74

55

2E

90

24

WA

LD

HE

IM

L12

78

06

21

E15176

___________

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

__

/L

A-1094

EX

ISTN

OA

53

24

38

EISO

40SCA

LEI -

100’,i

SE

C4,

T-6-S,

R-12-E

f’-JTO

NER

LEO5

2071

0’E

02

09

,,__.7

’”S

TT

AM

MA

NY

PA

RIS

HL

OU

ISIAN

A\

-IJ

S\\S

NO

TTO

SCA

LE

GRID

TOTR

UE

NO

RTH

C050

ERC

CN

CE

03

5

TRUE

NO

RTH

TOM

CON

ETICD

ECLIN

ATIO

N0

34

‘N

CO

MB

INED

SCA

LEFA

CTOR

0.4

59973912

O=

5/8

’REW

AR

SET

•FO

UN

DP

RO

PE

RT

YO

IAR

IIO’R

oSE

TPR

NAIL

PO

E—

POIN

TO

F6U

CIN

NIN

D

POE

POIN

T00

CO

MO

OESC

EMEN

T

PO

E—

POIN

TO

FEN

DIN

G

A=

CA

LCU

LATED

POIN

T

(RI

REC

OR

DED

INL

DR

RA

4050

—PO

WER

POL

E

GU

YA

NC

HO

R

POW

ERB

OX

—TELEPH

ON

EPEDESTAL

FLFLO

WLIN

EELEV

ATO

N

ASPH

ALT

--

-D

PAY

ES/DIR

T0

,

ED

UE

9,

cO

’-o.

TL

000N

OTE

By

R10PN

I(P

lottingO

nly,portio

nM

t

Oubjeot

propertyoppoorn

toII,

in

Eone

‘A’

&‘C

’of

IreFlO

Od

n9009flo

eR

obA

opC

Orn

nIO

n;ty

Punel

110.22N

2000TS

OC

.ehioh

Door,

on

IfeoIIu

doE

rof

Oolober

17,1989

ltdIS

in0

OPO

SINI

11008h000rd

ZoneA

’:V

Eele

MI

IE’3—

yeo;floudI

00cc

bloodeIeoO

IiOnC

ond

flood

board

tHE

bE

Snot

detn

nnirrd

.

Eon,

‘C’:

Hero,

ofm

inimol

1008150.

PAR

ENT

TRA

CT

(INST

RU

ME

NT

NO

:7834562)

aFrancthe

floeth

eestcanner

ofS

ectionF

our(4

).T

hS,

R12C

,S

t.T

omnaer5’

Perish,

Louisiana,

ronS

outhB

T’4S’

Cast

1316.7teat

toIron

Stoke

incen

terot

bran

ch,

andth

ePO

INT

OFB

CSItIN

INS:

Iron

theab

oae

pointat

beginningron

South

604S

’P

oet90t.N

teetto

theco

rner,

then

ceN

orth52’

then

ceS

ooth59’

Poet

475.2

feetto

comen

onS

tateH

igheay2t;

then

ceatong

coldttigheoy,

Nadh

5P

3S

’C

ost155

testto

corn

er.th

ence

North

59’W

eet1

67

teetto

corn

erin

center

of

brunch,th

ence

runolong

thecen

terof

bran

chin

aS

aoteesterIy

dirnotlonalong

aeetl

morbed

lineto

corn

erand

tha

POIN

TO

FR

CSt4N

INS.

Cootnining

13.162

Sobjeot

toa

Boundary

Agreem

entreco

rded

atC

OB

1534,P

age84.

StT

nrrr’raryP

orieb.

ISO’

X100’

LE

ASE

AR

EA(A

SSU

RV

EY

ED

)A

leasearea

beinga

portionct

that

certaintract

ofland

tdenticedac

Scccn

Cas

dnoonibsdin

lnntroment

Num

bert8

3d

502

ocreco

rded

inthe

Sto

ne

atth

e

Clerh

atC

oontcr

St.

Tom

mory

Pariah,

Looiciana,

Ving

inS

ection4,

Ocarch

ipB

Ocuth,

Range

t2C

astand

beingm

oreparticularly

deccribedas

tnlloesr

COt.’O

SCNCC

ata

treb

artoond

morN

inga

pabrtat

inferoectiacon

theS

outherlyhne

orsaid

front

traaingL

ooicianoS

oothS

tore

Plan

eC

oord

inates

of

N:2

525t7

.224t

C:3755357.N

453,being

thenorth

ernm

ost

nam

erct

the

Sherry

0firenin

parcel;th

ence

runN

44’34’30Or

tara

disranoeof

441.5

6teet

toa

set

N/N

Treb

arand

the

POIN

TO

FB

EGIN

NIN

G;

theace

nunS

Ot’tN

’r2N

tara

dieranaecc

100.04teet

faa

set5/N

Trebar;

them

ecoo

Ntt’43’4N

TN

tara

dietanaeat

100.00teat

toa

cot5/N

Trebar;

then

cerua

NO

t’IR’lZ

’C

tara

distan

ceof

05.0

5feet

toa

setN

/n’m

Oan

thero

erun

SB

R’43’4N

TC

for

distan

ceof

100.00feet

torho

POIN

TO

FB

EGIN

NIN

G.

The

abonadescribed

leasearea

tocontain

0.23acm

.,m

oreor

lass.

30’tN

OR

ES

S/E

CR

EO

S&

tJTILtTYE

ASE

ME

NT

(AS

SUR

VE

YE

D)

ncr0000m

entbrin

ga

pad

ioa

atth

atcertain

tractat

landIdoctihed

ae‘S

econd’

asdeecro

edin

tnatro

men

tN

umber

1630562

asren

crded

inthe

Otcce

atth

e

Ctsrk

atC

audbr

OL

Pcm

mary

Parish,

Louisiana,

ing

inS

scrior

4,T

oarsh

ip0

Onoth,

Rungs

f2Poor,

andbeing

more

pnrt’cu

larbdsarrib

adus

taltass:

CO

MM

ENC

Eat

a1’

rsbar

foundm

arkinga

pointat

intersectio

nan

theS

outherlylice

atsaid

Tract

hao

irgL

coisianaS

oothS

tateP

tarrC

ocrd

iratesof

R7N

ON

t7.220tC

:37507N7.N

053.being

the

narth

errmast

carrerat

theS

herry0

tirrnir

parn

rt;lb

eonsrun

N0

434

30’

Ntar

adictance

at4N

t06

lentto

aset

5/B

’rebari

hem

snun

SO

t’rN’t2

’N

tara

distan

ceat

100.00feet

toa

set5/B

”rebar;

then

cenon

N044

545’

Ntar

adistan

ceat

sos

reelto

thePO

INT

OF

BC

OIN

NtN

Oas

00

Irgm

se/Cgm

ss&

Gtilitp

Ccsencenc

bsing30

tent

ineid

thand

trrrg15

reelcc

eachside

atth

etailcein

gdescr.b

edcerfed

rneI

then

cerun

S

Ott

N’t2’

Ntar

oddta

ros

ot15.00

featto

apoin

tth

arue

run0

70’4t’3NT

Ctar

aaisto

rceot

40.9

0tact

toa

point:th

ence

rumS

O0’2

‘17

Ctar

a

distanceat

230.2

2tact

toa

point;thocoa

ranN

n2’rB’dr

Etar

adisfenno

atlo

st

Atent

toa

point;th’m

aecon

It704

737”

Ctar

adistan

ceof

595

7feet

toa

painttth

enas

rcn0

74’45’N2’

Etar

adistarae

at90.24

testto

apaint;

then

cerca

S30’06’2t

*E

tara

distan

ceat

tOt

.76test

roa

point;thsnoe

runS

t9’3

3’4

2’

Ctar

adistan

ceat

200.Bt

tedta

apaInt;

thecas

runS

5T

24’3

N’

Eta

ra

distan

ceut

t0040

tedto

apaint;

them

erun

02N

’t110’

Ctar

a

distan

ceat

4d.BN

tent

toa

nairt

anthe

Narth

aestertyedge

atasp

halt

atL

ouisianaH

igheay21

(publIcright—

ot—aay)

andth

rPO

INT

OFEN

OIN

S.T

heabooe

descr;ted

easemen

tto

adjointrees

ama

andhght—

ct—aoy

atL

ouisioraN

ighary2

taartig

.inosly

andccrtcire

0.7

7ao

rea.m

aream

taco.

SUR

VE

YO

R’S

NO

TE

S1.

This

isa

Raatacd

Tasar

Surrey,

mad

ean

theground

undertha

sopero

isiarat

aL

aoie000R

agistarsd

lard

Som

epar.T

ateat

Odd

surrayis

January

25.20t4

.2.

The

tallacing

sum

sping

icetrom

ents

acreused

attim

eor

ReId

aisihN

icocO

PL—

352,T

otalS

tation,R

sttactadaao

ondH

ipar+

Legaap

CR

OT,

00

fHZ

.

3.B

earingsare

based

or

Louisiana

Sooth

Stcta

PIano

Coardinatas

44042

byG

POobasroatian.

4.N

aordergm

cerdutitties,

ord

ergm

ucd

erorco

ohacen

tsor

brcildingtau

rdotian

saare

rraasored

orlocated

asa

part

atthis

surrey.urlesn

athereisa

abase.

freesand

shru

bs

natlocated,

unlessath

amisa

shas,c.

5.R

archm

arhused

isa

Cartinoarcely

Operatbrg

Ratem

nos

Station,

PlO0407

37

Orsits

bsro

hm

arhis

aseb

osc

hereo

r.C

le000crr

shoen

ma

‘nten

tand

referto

NAVO60.

6.T

hissu

rreyeaa

aanduoted

tarthe

purp

acaat

aN

oetnodT

aeerS

orasyonly,

rod

Isccl

intendedto

deOneats

rhoregulatory

)oriadiutionot

any

federal,stata,

regicn

alor

tonaloganay,

board,ocm

misaion

oroth

ersim

ilaren

tilt.

7.httsn

liac:5

diractad

tothe

lootIhot

Ibissoruey

crayhone

base

redured

oranlarged

instas

doeto

reproduction.T

hisshould

balak

scinto

connid

eratior

ahen

oblainingscaled

data.

B.Thie

Soroep

nas

cardooted

aithau

tthe

beraflt

ato

rA

bstractT

itleeeam

h.

prep

aredby

Old

Republic

Rational

OtIs

InsuranceC

a.,C

om

mitm

ent

Na:

OI—

t3t4

23tt—

StT

,dated

Rarem

ber

20,2013.

5.S

uraeyarhereby

statsethe

Oeadelic

Coordinates

andthe

eleoctio

nsh

oan

tarth

eprap

asedaen

tedice

atthe

00cr

arean

ourale

tosithin

u-f—2S

feelhariaontalty

ard

toeith

n/—

3fast

uertioallp(F

MA

ooomoy

Code

14).

TO.

Ourony

shoec

bensonnan

farms

toth

eM

inimum

Reg

oirsm

ertsas

sattooth

bythe

Slale

Board

fara

Class

•0’S

urrey.

tt.0514

data

uponehioh

Ibism

apor

plotis

based

has

aclosure

prenisiannt

actlass

thanarc—

tootin

tS,00A

tact(t’:tS

.OO

O’)

andan

arto

rnr

arrarth

atdoes

nat

saoeed

tOseco

nd

,tim

eslbs

sguars

rootat

thenum

ber

atan

gles

turned.Pield

tmaerae

oas

rat

adio

sted.

T2.

This

uuraeyis

cataolid

eitraur

theoriginal

s:gcatu

roand

rho

originalcoal

ata

starebuersed

soepo

rand

maay

sr.

t3.Thre

surrey

dan

era

tcacstb

ute

sboundary

surrey

orthe

Paren

tT

ract.A

nyIcro

of

Irantproperty

Ones

rhoen

Rem

anare

tramaupplind

intorrrratinn

andm

ayra

tbe

heldaerinod.

N.N

azaninT

information

pmnided

stthe

time

atthis

surrey.—040

05

lInP,o

e

PRO

JEC

TN

O14-SO

RT

63aIm

.

PLOTTA

BLE

EX

CE

PTIO

NS

Old

RepubliC

National

Title

Inau

ronue

Ca.,

Cn

mm

itmcn

tN

o.01—

13142211—01

T

loar.S

L

Inat.N

a:R

TOB

tt

Cooooorrot

Ones

aIledo

sahoan

>-di

>ftD02ftdiP0ft

(0-Ua

SUR

VE

YO

RS

CER

TIFICA

TION

Iaertity

that

allparts

atthis

surreyand

dm

eirghave

beencom

pletedin

accord

arc

sailh

thecu

rrent

reguirem

artsot

the

Stan

dard

sof

Practio

sfar

Ouraayicg

inth

sS

taleat

Lcuiciara

tothe

hostof

my

hro

eledca.

,ntarm

otio

r.and

bo

ld.

Nilliarn

LN

osetl

Loutsiana

Lirerse

Rn.

TC

S4R44

WA

LD

HE

IMLA

-i094

SEC

.4,

T-6-S,

R-12-E

ST.TA

MM

AN

’PPA

RISH

,LO

UISIA

NA

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTSTAFF ANALYSIS REPORT

Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-015Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014Date of Report: April 24, 2014

GENERAL INFORMATION

Applicant(s) Name: Advanced Mortgage Company

Location of Property: LA Highway 21 and N. Azela Drive, Covington, LA

Zoning of Property: HC-2 Highway Commercial

Variance(s) Requested: Moving billboard closer to residential zoned property

OVERVIEW

The applicant is requesting a variance to be permitted to move an existing billboard

approximately 23’ which is already within the required 500’ setback distance from residentially

zoned property for billboards.

STAFF COMMENTS

The staff has no objection to the variance request for the following reasons:

a.) As stated above, the existing billboard has been there for many years and is already

withing the 500’ setback from residentially zoned property.

b.) The applicant must move his billboard due to the fact that the LADOTD has expropriated

a portion of his property for the future expansion of LA Highway 21.

c.) The distance the sign is being moved (23’) is minimal.d.) The property directly behind the sign site is zoned commercial and has a medical clinic

on the property.

BO,i (Lci :‘O. /g_-— 6I C tt

Si. iJ.141LJNf i’ARISH BO1R1) (JFLI)JE1Th1

i.•1(U.1NCL4PPL4LAPI’L1C4iiO;\ kOR11)

rII ii dwitu1iIzec hC1o Jf C ilqUhi;. phict inr!ud t L-JflFUCF ,tai1c

Advance Mortgage Company

1LuLIctmrnLss. 321 Veterans Memorial Blvd. Suite 201

Cli is i li LIW- Metairie, Louisiana 70005

IWO\i i:IIISLK 504-834-55 1 1t1rL hot:. ‘ii) t( I’1iüri

FRO1’f1i tLO( 1JI(L I’(’II LlIi’.(E lLLcrLD: Ia!%c: HC-2

Triangular Parcel between N. Azela Dr., S. Tyler St. (Hwy 21) and Gardenia Dr. Covington, LA

C rv SLit bdvii t appib!i

fi’leu’es 4.-hc1 nw app/ict.rhk L’ hehiw:)

tU1i 1.Sl’I’OK ari if thi Unifd l1opnnt(id)

t..i adr t ifl.1TL[& iV aLi th inrrpr 3Ofl by a pirk[ tif thc i

Li iu.L(:L’4PPL4L RLOil:S1L1):

L. hu1dr. thck trCt :rn affrr.tz iirdr r.rvarilntp. hi:ffr’ ir uctur fiitt. $d Ii.tW rrvkrd huir ria1:)

L v;thn hir’ iC cf th r1rcficsltard trO ifl inca rct rnin {r :toI tprkr sta prkin ...tc..)

L LI t’ta:ofcaa av d’or:.in hilL ETnr.L. 11Lt1.

fiithr Billboard within 500’ of zoned residential{Spiiilrarnc. api! onrc hiv

fl’!’ fxtrr vn ii jlltuthn Jiuec heic tr c,p’tiJk retJthNIJr iirhwcc-’uppcrih)P 1J1 t s ..t Ii U1 Jf u %L I,. tt ?4 L1 r 2

th1 t4 J

Applicant is requesting a variance of ordinance 8.01 Outdoor Advertising (Billboards) section U,

to relocate a billboard roughly 30’ from its current location, which is already 500’ from zoned

Residential to an adjacent parcel due to DOTD expropriation of the attached parcel--—

4)7i+S1(Vi4tRL 01- IPI’Lt( 1\J D4I1- I tf’i’LiC1ii(’S

R18

6g

LI2

4.7

7.

•.

—cI1

’yT

’y124.74

.

/—

I...

-

r

T7S

—R

ilE

—.-

.

‘5)

..

II

/

w79.R

QO

fl/WI

0&

0P

R0P

OR

TIS

INC.

16

LE

GE

ND

0

SC

flO9

LIlIES

0060.R

/O

0050110

APPA

REIII

P11010111U

1.t

IIISIS

OF

00050110000

tOT

Nt

10000

10011050

11.011101101011

110

1101501110

000005IAIE

S&

8001116551105.0

1101001100

08100011110105

&000500IA

ICS

RATIOtIll

1140LO

IJOISIA

LA000111

5W1)I

LISLE

011.0555101

clINt)

03—97)..

1500110011

10000000

LEJJLIIGS.

LIELi

(1136I001100011

TOCONVERT

OIlS

01010100000

0100110N

SW

JCT

S

000A

01110FACTOR

EN0000957805

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

STAFF ANALYSIS REPORT

Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-016

Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014Date of Report: April 24, 2014

GENERAL INFORMATION

Applicant(s) Name: JDM Developments, L.L.C.Location of Property: 1665 Dove Park Road, Mandeville, LA

Zoning of Property: HC-2 Highway CommercialVariance(s) Requested: Landscape buffers

OVERVIEW

The applicant wishes to resubdivide their property into two commercial parcels with a

McDonald’s restaurant on one site and a strip center on the other.

STAFF COMMENTS

Due to the fact that a new internal property line will be created by the resubdivision, technically,

landscape and planting buffers are created on both sides of said line; however in this instance,

since the common property line will be used as a shared parking lot, the need for landscape

buffers and plantings are not required.

Therefore, the staff recommends approval of the proposed variances requested subject to

mitigation on behalf of the applicant for the absence of the buffers and plantings along the

common property line between the two properties. The applicant should be required to either:

plant the total required number of trees elsewhere on the property (14 Class A and 14 Class B);

or by making reparations in the form of payment for plant mitigation to the St. Tammany Parish

Tree Mitigation Bank for (‘/z) of the required number of trees that would normally be planted

within the buffer (7 Class A and 7 Class B) in the amount of $2,800.00, which payment is based

on $100.00 per caliper inch of tree required, inclusive of the cost for the tree and the labor

required to plant.

BOA CASE NO. I / / (for office use only)

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT

(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPLICATION FORM)

(Please print on the following lines below. If a company, please include a contact person name also.)

APPLICANTS NAME: JDM Developments, LLC

MAILING ADDRESS: 71385 Riverside Drive

CITY/STATE/ZIP:Covington, LA 70433

PHONE NUMBER: 985-327-5629 985-630-7459

(Home Phone #) (Cell Phone #)

PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTED: ZONING:HC2

1665 Dove Park Rd. Mandevilie LA

Address City State Subdivision (if applicable)

(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)

REQUEST FOR: ir A variance of the (Unified Development Code)

0 Appeal of an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)

C Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified

Development Code)

VARIANCE/APPEAL REOUESTED:

building setbacks (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard setbacks)

landscape buffers (reduction of front, side and/or rear yard buffer setbacks)

landscaping within buffeçs (reduction of the number of trees, bushes and/or shrubs)

C parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspace islands, etc...)

C signage requirements (increase of sign area and/or sign height, lighting, coloring, etc...)

C other(Specify other variance/appeal on line above)

(Please state on thefollowing lines below your specific requestfor a variance/appeal:)

Example: Applicant is requesting a variancefor afront yard setback requirementfrom 25’ required by

the parish, to approximately 20’ requested.

Applicant is requesting a waiver of the required 10’ greenspace & required number of trees, along the

side property lines.

Applicant is requesting a reduction of the required 10’ setback from 10’ to 5’ for a portion of the site, along

existing building (see attached drawing).

1 3/5/20 14

SIGNA U OF PU NT DATE OF APPLICATION

%77i 3:

ORGRflornneciar roprtL

The red outlined area is the parcel leased by McDonald’s.

Matthewi. Organ, CCIM Cell: 985-246-9715 organ@ccim.net

ORRflcornflerCaI piopertles

Matthew i. Organ, CCIM Cell: 985-246-9715 organ@ccim.net

ORG RflconnerciaI roptrts

April 7, 2014

St Tammany Parish Board of Adjustment

do: Ron Keller

Re: Subdivision of 1665 and 1687 Dove Park Road, Madisonville, LA.

Dear Mr. Keller,

My client, David Harvey, retained me to manage the subdivision of the referenced property he purchased in

May of 2013. To do this we need to secure the variance on the setback and green space requirements between the two

buildings located on site. The property is improved and consists of a single parcel that has two developed commercial

buildings: a 14,000 sf shopping center situated on 1.77 acres and a McDonald’s Restaurant situated on 0.95 acres.

We are requesting to subdivide the property for two reasons.

1. The subdivision will allow the tax assessor to property asses the properties. McDonald’s is obligated to pay

their prorated share of taxes. This is difficult to quantify with the assessor considering the parcel as one

parcel. We feel the hard corner that McDonald’s occupies is more valuable than the interior lot. This

subdivision will allow for a proper assessment whereby McDonald’s pays the correct taxes, and the tenants

in the adjacent shopping center pay their proper fees. The tax assessment is attached.

2. We have a pending sale of the McDonald’s parcel which is under a ground lease. The sate of the real estate

requires the creation of its own parcel. We designed the subdivision plat off the legal description defined in

the lease. McDonald’s has cross easement agreements in place for this specific parcel as well.

The improvements are in place. The variance does not affect any adjacent property owners as evidenced by Mrs. Asha

Mallick’s signature. The variance is in line with the tenant lease. It allows for proper tax assessment. We do not see any

negative affect in this variance. Please consider this variance request for approval.

Thank you,

In Christ Jesus.

Matthew J. Organ, CCIMInvestments, Sates & Leasing985-246-9715organ@ccim.net

Matthew J. Organ, CCIM Cell: 985-246-9715 organ@ccim.net

I

ORG Rflcommera prertes

March 16,2014

Ed MurphyCommercial Realty, Inc.

edmurphy@commrealtv.net

RE: Dove Park Rd

Dear Mr. Murphy,

My client, JDM Development, LLC owns the Dove Park Commons Shopping center which is adjacent to and east of your

listing of 11 acres on Dove Park Road.

We are requesting a minor subdivision of the Shopping Center and the McDonald’s pacrcel. To do this we need to

request a variance as the setbacks4, not meet code between the two buildings.

Here is the requested variance:

• Waiver of the required 10’ green space & required number of trees, along the side property lines.

• Reduction of the required 10’ setback from 10’ to 5’ for a portion of the site, along existing building (see

attached drawing).

If your owner has no objection to our requested variance, please evidence same by signing below.

Owner — 11 acres Dove Park Rd.

Let me know if you have any questions or comments.

In Christ Jesus.

Matthewi. Organ, CCIMCommercial Real Estate Investments

985-246-9715organ@ccim.net

Matthew i. Organ, CCIM Cell: 985-246-9715 organ@ccim.net

060

120180

N‘/2

IRO

NA

NO

DN

D..

-IN

(R

Hr.)

N8926’3

3E

307.60’3°,

__

____

5

19

44

’A

DD

N’

C

-.

...

14

iS-

..

-U

‘‘°°‘.

BU

ILDIN

G7/4

.•....

-.

0

*_• •cc;-

..

....-

-.

.

e-

.

IRN

.•.•••

i.77

AC

RE

S.

•.

•••./_

)•

•

5.1

CO

NC

HIG

HW

Ay

..

•S

5cT

DB

’1/

‘.

•.

FND

C—

•

•2.8

3.

•B

CO

NC

HIG

HW

Ay

).

-.

.•

.•

AG

NU

MC

NT

FND

35”

•C

ON

CPA

RH

,NG

•.•

CO

NC

PAN

KN

G(R

H,r

n)

2PA

RC

ELSO

FS

ketch

LOCA

TEDIN

.‘

SECTIO

N25,

TOW

NSH

IP7

SOU

TH—

RAN

GE

11EA

ST-.

•.

:%•.

>

ST.TA

MM

AN

YPA

RISH

,LO

UISIA

NA

,\c0+

•-

PC

•--.:.

.G

NA

RcE

1J

NO

c4,e)9

0.•

.•

••

•-

U

ALL

IMP

RO

VE

’EN

SSH

OW

NH

ER

EO

N0

•.O

.B.

WER

EL

OC

AT

ED

ON

9—22—

2011/

I

‘?Q4

//

ç\0

II

CO

NC

.H

IGH

WA

Y.

/j.’M

ON

UM

ENT

FND

P.O

B.IS

RE

POR

TE

DTO

BE

NO

B4

5W

T8

9.O

0/

DETA

IL.

(Ho

f,rne>

ThE500V

IIIJDES

NW

RESTRICI1ONSSFW

WN

ONI1NS

SURREYR

ELM

T!OTO

ThOSESET

No41736’E

467.1

7’,:

N8542’24”W

—20

00;

/lB

NO

TA

BO

UN

DA

RY

SUR

VEY

—I

NO

1IILS

EA

RC

HO

SP

US

IJCR

E00050C

OP

LJU

GT

HE

OA

TA

EO

RIH

SS

IJRR

EY

________________

SC

CT

ON

S25

&3

0T

OW

NSH

IP7

SOU

H/

‘

Randall

W.

Brow

n&

Associates,

Inc.O

.FEB

RU

AR

Y25,

201UR

AN

GE

11EA

ST./

..F

SK

ETCH

Professional

Land

Surveyors

sT

6D

’AR

EFE

RE

NC

ESU

RV

EY

BY

,I

P1.,,s

RJDD

AD

ING

.Y

AR

QU

ES

&A

SSOC

IAT

ES,

NC.

Ianners

•lO

U8

flO

BN

o‘2

54

O;

PA

TN

o.M

—874

SIC

\/

RondollW

.Brow

n.P.LS.

228.

Causew

ayA

pp.M

andeville,LA

70448D

ATED

3-2

3—

99

\\

//

5’x

14’

Pro

esnaiL

andS

uvyor

(985)624—

5368FAX

(985)624—

5309—

SIGN

AG

EL

ST. TAMMANY PARISH BOAR]) OF ADJUSTMENTSTAFF ANALYSIS REPORT

Case File Number: BOA Case No. 14-05-017Initial Hearing Date: May 6, 2014Date of Report: April 24, 2014

GENERAL INFORMATION

Applicant(s) Name: Gulf States Development Services, L.L.C.Location of Property: 180 New Camellia Blvd., Covington, LAZoning of Property: HC-2 Highway CommercialVariance(s) Requested:

OVERVIEW

The applicant is developing a property next to an existing project, and due to common sharedparking and driveway access between the two sites, the applicant seeks variances to allow for awalkway within an existing landscape buffer and to reduce the required number of plantingswithin the two adjacent side yard buffers between the two properties.

STAFF COMMENTS

The staff has worked with the applicant to come up with plan that the staff feels is workablebased on the circumstances. Therefore, the staff has no objections to the variances requestedsubject to mitigation on behalf of the applicant for the absence of the plantings along thecommon property line between the two properties. The applicant should therefore be required toeither: plant the total required number of trees elsewhere on the two properties (16 Class A and 6Class B); or by making reparations in the form of payment for plant mitigation to the St.Tanimany Parish Tree Mitigation Bank for the required number of trees that would normally beplanted within the buffers in the amount of $4,900.00, which payment is based on $100.00 percaliper inch of tree required, inclusive of the cost for the tree and the labor required to plant.

1304 CASENO._____________ (for office use only)

ST. TAMMANYPARISKI BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT(VARIANCE/APPEAL APPLICA TIONFOR4I)

(Please print on thefollowing lines below. Ifa company, please Include a contactperson name also.)

APPLIC4NTS NAME: (,tI( hf vt1oi’l “-.‘.c1 J..LL

!WAILJNGADDRESS: 19 Nr’t,j ik )O.Z

L.A )::,t{33

(4fS’) 1_L3r

(Home Phone #) (Cell Phone #)

tzviNçk/-’. L.A 1O1?.3City state - Subdivision (if applicable)

(Pleases check the applicable boxes below:)

REpUESTFOR: )(A variance of the (Unified DeveLopment Code)ci Appeal of an adverse decision made by a parish official(s)ci Appeal the interpretation by a parish official(s) of the (Unified

Development Code)

VARL4NCEMPPEAL REqUESTED:

a building setbacks (reduction of front, side and/or i-ear yard setbacks)ci landscape buffers (reduction affront, side and/or rear yard buffer setbacks)

Landscaplug within buffers (reduction of the number of trees, bushes and/or shrubs)ci parking area requirements (reduction of parking stalls, parking greenspace islands, dc...)C signage requirements (Increase of sign area and/or sign height, lighting, coloring, etc...)

)s(other EM4(,’ O? S’ i.drt.-’<ll( ,41ir’ A+ AI liji b(1(Spectf’ other variance/appeal on line above)

(Please state on the following lines below your specific requestfor a variance/appeal:)

Example: Applicant Is requesting a variancefor afront yard setback requirementfrom 25’ requIred by

the parish, to approximately 20’ requested.

9? rHrr- t-.- -

- ‘1

p1tJ.s

CITY/STA TErn?:

PHONE NUMBER:

PROPERTY LOCATION FOR VARIANCE REQUESTED: ZONING:•

iO N 4øt1):’Address

April 8, 2014

Mr. Ron KellerSenior Planner, St. Tammany Parish21454 Koop Dr.Mandeville, LA 70471

Variance Request1077 Phase!! Office Building180 New Camellia BlvdLot 2A-2, Tammany West MultiplexCovington, LA

Dear Ron,

Per our recent meetings, please fmd the enclosed variance application for the above reference

project.

We are requesting a variance for the following in order to protect the site plan as proposed:

• Encroach 5’ into Phase I east buffer for new, proposed sidewalk.

• Phase I East Buffer: 10 class A required, planting 2.

• Phase I East Buffer: 10 class B trees required, planting 2.

• Phase II West Buffer: 10 class A required, planting 2.

• Phase II West Buffer: 10 class B trees required, planting 2.

This new building is the second phase of office construction in the Tammany West Multiplex

and will be an identical structure to the first phase the adjacent lot, which was completed in 2008

and is presently fuliy occupied. As noted on the site plan, this project will share a common

driveway and have cross access/cross parking between the two lots.

The above variances are needed due to the internal property line that runs between these two

legal lots of record which must remain due to project lending and fmancing purposes.

As noted on the included landscape plan, we have included three (3) new trees (1- Class A; 2-

Class B) which are proposed to be planted close to, but fall outside of, the above referenced

buffers. We also indicated additional shrubs and planting material within these buffers which are

above Parish minimums for this project to help mitigate the request.

GULF STATES

REAL ESTATESERVICES,LIC

PROJECT MANAGEMENT • BROKERAGE • PROPERTY MANAGEMENT

1(19 Nw Can-iellia Boulevard, Suite 100 • Covington, Louisiana 70433 • 985-792-4385 • Fax 985-792-4392

The project is being constructed to support the growing businesses of Ballard Enterprises (WOW

Café, PJ’s Coffee) and Wegmaim-Dezet CPAs, which are current Tenants in this business park,

all of which will be owners/partners in this building. It is vitally important this building is

completed by the end of 2014 to ensure it is filly operable by fall season for Wegmann-Dezet.

We look forward to presenting this case to the Board on May 6th• If you have any further

questions in the interim, please advise.

Sincerely,

Michael SaucierManaging Member, Gulf State Development Services LLC

Northshore Office, LLC314 East Bayou RoadThibodaux, LA 70301

April 7, 2014

To Whom it may Concern:

Gulf States Development Services, LLC is currently in their due diligence process of developing

property owned by Northshore Office, LLC. The property is identified by being a 0.90 acre tract

of land on New Camellia Boulevard. Lot 2A-2.

Gulf States Development Services, LLC with our concurrence will apply for permits and

potential variances for the development of this property.

If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at (985) 688-2355.

Sincerely.

David L. DuplantisMember

1077 Properties, LLC

April 7, 2014

To whom it may concern:

1077 Properties LLC, current land owner of Lot 2A-1 (170 New Camellia Blvd), has no objection to Gulf States Development

Services LLC applying for any variance(s) or permit(s) relating to our property which may be required to perfect the site plan of

proposed Phase II office building to be located on Lot 2A-2.

Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me directly.

Michael SaucierManaging Member, 1077 Properties LLC

109 New Camellia Blvd., Suite 100, Covington, LA 70433 • Telephone: 985-792-4385 • Fax: 985-792-4392

CO

MB

NE

DL

O1

2.1

19

AC

RE

S

.

0

SHR

UB

PLAN

TING

DETA

ILA

HIS

0)

10C.)0I’SC’S

0):

2-IwI0

I.ALL

0.0

9*

TRESS.AT

11€IN

COF

PLARITARD91101.

RANtA

I11lA

CAPER

ocA

1L

rA72.r.N

CrA

it1N

tRE

o1aA

u.N

clR

Aa09

ICESITOF

10-12FEEL

2.*01

CARD11

TRIESAIR

ME

TIRES.ODOR

TiARACARD

ATIRES.

ATTIlt

Tilt

ccRAINTAC,

DOLLN

Ail

AIRAAIJA

I’A.F€ROF

At

lEAST1.5

11110911511

AW

IE11€

091BAlI.

NC

A1111111

WIT

ccAT

LEASTA

-TOTEST.

.0.A

STIREOR

9111OF

A111111111

OFt

WIT

Al

1W110

OF

4.11*110

FACIAlDM

11015*115*.

Pt.AATACAAOLRO

ORLIWAT

RELORD

11AM4

IIW

it

5ALl,

LM09A

RIAL

9411OF

AITTIUSTMA

AW

IT11*10110

NC

INA

*1A

Tt

WITH

109P1E559101*55

OFTilE

LOIJAUMREIRANIALAES

11111511FIR

flitERFAASFM

ENTN.ICATODLTIRE

MI1USTRr.

11P1.1W

IIITANAIS5411.

Al

SALt

TONAIlS

RARElYN

CTILE

PAID51411.

COF!O

RN10*01

AAPLATAAIEPR

IRSIR

EOF

lilt11010.131

511901105FIR

MLt10R

tSTA

ll,LATEST

lOO

SE

1.lIRE

19151*051W

500CIED

FIRR

MT

!C5411

lOOTlilt

REIAA91R

EOJA

DR

EISP

09109TM

THE111100.111

51*0510)FDA

UW

ITSTA

llSAlIT

ZMEI,

LATEST591CM

ASPIRSIRIES

INflit

111590.1111111101

ARTL

*AA

’EANDO1CTOL

0.01159

ORLTTNS

IRIR

Wi

TIORRE0955152

FDAINJAIIDIT

91111REEl

TiltA111*A1

RE

l(RT

SP

09520*1TIlt

A1

5111(1105FIR

IAW

RT

SW

MAO

ORE?,

LATEST59101

ASP

105909111

Oil

*1*10*11(W

iTN

CIA

RW

A*5

ARDREOATDO91110

TIlEO

WL

GOA

111111192-GAAJTOA

15

11

-09

11

50

90

WO

TiS.

9.09ITRACTIR

TIME.

09095M

i..

TW

it10A

WIA

RISO11110911.5.

AlIT509.5

109

ILLIA

INC

IA’t

lIENS

IOU

09

WtM

FIRP1(019

PT,A0910

TO.COITPICTDA

91111A

AT

E11TH

OIL

AJA

RFEW

PAPER

51*590*115ERPAUARE

11WSiN

EOF

ACSTAICAG

RAIlS

OW505

09ITRIC

IIRSA

lE.SL

EPt

ALLW

WFIR

POD

DO

[AllU

RE

Ti.

COATINARTIRDOLL

FIAt

1010€AlL

AREAS111W

111111141N

C091915/09*0.

IS.COATRAITTO1

51111RED

91lN

ALLAREAS

55111WFT

51AlL

1(13111011151

GE1109155

IACESATRICIIR

01111M

ollYL

NW

M’E

NC

ITOC

TOF

ARTW

OPA

ICE

SII

A111*8.11

11110,11IST

SART

0111*1CSRETDL0.TTON.

901109PH

ASE

A7

UII

STA

lEluA

U.

95C

OlA

IPIN

E09011

1111CR

AO

DST0N

AI,

51.105A

TR

EE

—’

I4

iI

095*01159

00

10

10

.O

Il

_______

STAK

ING

4,

OH

HH

O”

Ad

MULTI

TRUN

KTR

EESTA

KIN

G

PR

OP

OS

ES

PHA

SEA

11011.01MG

4.-

__

l1

4.PR

OPO

SES

5’SIDEwALK

I_____

rtZ

11

EXISIITFNDPA

USE

IBUILDING

——

-

AODITEENHLCLASS

BTREES

(flUflIN

FflPI4A

cFI

hPI4A

cFII

RIIFFFPFCIP

VA

PIAM

flFR

Th

IPT

U,

40z4IU,

IRO

UD

Iao

1111)09A1

i0)09

AIR

5915109

A1A

lTaW

Bl

505SB1

0)0

951W

I90909

1I

10913

I-

..

II

II

I,.

FP

RW

lP

HW

2FF9153159

BFO

OIT

OIIM

AIW

TO

WIPIREDO

1*0 51JT

Uty

W

Ii0)55A

I2

20(

92I2.08BI

I909

287X

220

22

20

LANDSCAPEORDINANCE

REQUIREMENTS:

150111511BUFFER

CLASSAIREODCLA

SSAIREES

CLASSB

IDlESCLASS

RIDERS

SIRU

ISBTJFTW

DRISNOONSRESIURTD

PROVIDED1(01)1159

PROViSO)

PASTEl

€90110’287’

102

102

0BUFPORY000IAORIH

TDrSRSRVPRO

136’5

55

544

EASTID’

BL)FFIRTNC287’

1010

1010

79

955110’

BFJFFTOTUMI

287’10

210

247

CAMEIULA9515

30’ITRETYH

RO136’

55

55

92

INTERIORPARAIAO

RJFFTIJESN

/A8

80

90

TOTALSN

/A48

3230

24262

55*051T

2D’—O

IN,ARATE

R101

155TH

5—

ETISTOICPHASE

ITREES

()23

—P910

CT

PD

—CLASS

A

5—

131.511110.O

Il—

CLASSA

RH-

CR10510110111-

01.1508

0303

—1011*11

RJRFORDHOLLY

—51158

SR—

591SFCR00111113

-SHRuB

3D—

EIAEOREPZALEA—SHRUI

450—

LJREIPE—

DROIUNXTY,TD

LA

JIR0

C*

PI

000111*14119pL

AN

L1.0

0