agenda special meeting of the board of …
TRANSCRIPT
AGENDA SPECIAL MEETING OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
HUMBOLDT BAY HARBOR, RECREATION AND CONSERVATION DISTRICT DATE: July 1, 2021 TIME: Closed Session – 5:00 P.M.
Special Session – 5:30 P.M. PLACE: Join Zoom Meeting https://us02web.zoom.us/j/3432860852
Meeting ID: 343 286 0852 One tap mobile (669) 900-9128, 343 286 0852# US
Consistent with Executive Orders N-25-20 and N-29-20, the Board of Commissioners meeting location will not be physically open to the public. Members of the public may observe and participate in the meeting via Zoom or teleconference using the information set forth above.
1. Call to Order Closed Session at 5:00 P.M.
2. Public Comment
Note: This portion of the Agenda allows the public to speak to the Board on the closed session items. Each speaker is limited to speak for a period of three (3) minutes regarding each item on the Closed Session Agenda. The three (3) minute time limit may not be transferred to other speakers. The three (3) minute time limit for each speaker may be extended by the President of the Board of Commissioners or the Presiding Member of the Board of Commissioners.
3. Move to Closed Session
a) CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATORS. Terms of lease of real property in Samoa Peninsula, Humboldt County, with Assessor’s Parcel Numbers, 401-031-055-000, 401-031-070-000, 401-031-054-000, 401-031-061-000, 401-112-013-000, 401-031-071-000, and 401-112-029-000,California pursuant to California Government Code § 54956.8. District negotiators: Larry Oetker, Executive Director and Ryan Plotz, District Counsel. Negotiating party: Town of Samoa, Green Diamond, Sniper Properties. Under negotiation: price and payment terms.
4. Call to Order Special Session at 5:30 P.M. and Roll Call
5. Pledge of Allegiance
Agenda for July 1, 2021 Special Board Meeting
2
6. Report on Closed Session
7. Public Comment
Note: This portion of the Agenda allows the public to speak to the Board on the various issues NOT itemized on this Agenda. Pursuant to the Brown Act, the Board may not take action on any item that does not appear on the Agenda. Each speaker is limited to speak for a period of three (3) minutes regarding each item on the Agenda. Each speaker is limited to speak for a period of three (3) minutes during the PUBLIC COMMENT portion of the Agenda regarding items of special interest to the public NOT appearing on the Agenda that are within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board of Commissioners. The three (3) minute time limit may not be transferred to other speakers. The three (3) minute time limit for each speaker may be extended by the President of the Board of Commissioners or the Presiding Member of the Board of Commissioners at the regular meeting of the District. Callers can “raise their hand” by pressing *9 and unmute themselves by pressing *6.
8. Business
a) Preliminary Cost Estimates for Conceptual Master Plan for Development of a New Multipurpose Terminal to Support the Emerging West Coast Offshore Wind Industry; Grant Application Preparations
9. Future Special Meeting Dates
a) Thursday, July 15, 2021: Closed Session at 5:00 PM, Special Session at 5:30 PM.
10. Adjournment
DREDGE AREA (INCLUDINGSIDE SLOPES) TO -38 ft MLLW
FEDERALCHANNELLIMIT
UPLANDS (ELEVATION +/- 14 FT NAVD88)
HUMBOLDT HARBOR DISTRICT - OFFSHORE WIND PORT DEVELOPMENTFULL BUILDOUT SKETCH6/23/21 DRAFT
REPRESENTATIVE WTGCOMPONENT DELIVERY VESSEL(+/-610' LOA, +/- 80' BEAM)
REPRESENTATIVEFLOATINGFOUNDATION
PURPOSE-BUILTSEMI-SUBMERSIBLEBARGE (+/-350' L x 350' W)
NOTES:1. ROAD IMPROVEMENT COMPONENTS ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SKETCH.2. PHASE QUANTITIES SHOWN ARE ADDITIONS NOT TOTALS.3. ASSUMES UPLANDS WILL BE RECONFIGURED TO ALLOW ACCESS TO PHASE 3&4 BERTH AREA UPON INITIATION OF PHASE 3&4.4. SITE ELEVATION ASSUMED TO BE +14 FEET NAVD88.5. ALL BOUNDARIES AND AREAS ARE APPROXIMATE.
PHASE 2A450 FT BERTH
18 ACRESUPLANDS
PHASE 2B1,150 FT BERTH
32 ACRES UPLANDS
PHASE 3&4500 FT BERTH
110 ACRES UPLANDS
PHASE 3&4BERTH AREA
PILE SUPPORTED WHARF(150 FT WIDTH)WITH RIP RAP SLOPEUNDERNEATH
PHASE TOTALS
PHASE 2A
PHASE 2B
PHASE 3&4
UPLANDS
18 ACRES
50 ACRES
160 ACRES
BERTH
450 FT
1,600 FT
2,100 FT
Draft Print06/29/2021 10:23:29 AM
©
2
0
2
1
M
i
c
r
o
s
o
f
t
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
©
2
0
2
1
M
a
x
a
r
©
C
N
E
S
(
2
0
2
1
)
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
A
i
r
b
u
s
D
S
APPROXIMATE LIMITSOF EXISTING PIER
HUMBOLDT HARBOR DISTRICT - OFFSHORE WIND PORT DEVELOPMENT
CONCEPTUAL DRAWINGNOT TO BE USED FOR CONSTRUCTION2021-06-23 EXISTING CONDITIONS
SK-01
NOTES1. BATHYMETRIC SURVEY DATA SOURCE: USACE HYDRO SURVEY,
HUMBOLDT BAY CHANNEL, SAMOA - CONDITION SURVEY, 22 APRIL2021. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO MEAN LOWER LOWWATER (MLLW).
2. TOPOGRAPHY DATA SOURCE: NOAA DATA ACCESS VIEWER, 2019LIDAR EUREKA, CA. ELEVATIONS ARE REFERENCED TO NAVD88.
3. DATA UNAVAILABLE FOR AREAS WITH NO BATHYMETRIC ORTOPOGRAPHIC DATA SHOWN.
4. ALL UNITS ARE FEET.
N
100' 0' 100' 200'
SCALE: 1''=100'
Draft Print06/29/2021 10:19:34 AM
0 oo o= "
~= .n ,.,,_ "' OD cd '
= ' "' 0
0
0
,_ 0 -=-ii:> 10
0 =' o'. 0
0 " 0 ,
0 0 -' - oo
' ' ' , 0'
-"\:)
()
0
' < I 0 OD ~
' --' 0 -~ Cco<;J-C?
~ 10 ' ~ -' ' ' 0
~
D 3 '
·,
37
37 i -\
i 39
39
- --- -llli 11111111 llli 11111111 m o ff a t t & n i c h o I
©
2
0
2
1
M
i
c
r
o
s
o
f
t
C
o
r
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
©
2
0
2
1
M
a
x
a
r
©
C
N
E
S
(
2
0
2
1
)
D
i
s
t
r
i
b
u
t
i
o
n
A
i
r
b
u
s
D
S
DR
ED
GE
AR
EA
TO -21' M
LLW
FLOA
TING
AS
SE
T
50'-0"100'-0"
75'-0"
150'-0"
75'-0"
FED
ER
AL C
HA
NN
EL LIM
IT
(5) 20'x20' MO
OR
ING
DO
LPH
INS
450'-0"
PILE
SU
PP
OR
TED
HE
AV
YLIFT W
HA
RF (5000 P
SF)
RE
PR
ES
EN
TATIV
ED
ELIV
ER
Y V
ES
SE
LD
RE
DG
E TO
-38' MLLW
UP
LAN
D A
RE
A (3000 P
SF)
±18 AC
RE
S E
L. ±14.0' NA
VD
88
RIP
RA
P S
LOP
EU
ND
ER
WH
AR
F
WIN
D TU
RB
INE
GE
NE
RA
TOR
CO
MP
ON
EN
T STO
RA
GE
FOR
AS
SE
MB
LY
71'-7"
52'-7"354'-9"
25'-9"
RE
PR
ES
EN
TATIV
ES
EM
I-SU
BM
ER
SIB
LEFLO
ATIN
G FO
UN
DA
TION
DR
ED
GE
SID
E S
LOP
E (±2:1)
WITH
RIP
RA
P
DR
ED
GE
SID
E S
LOP
E (±3:1)
HU
MB
OLD
T HA
RB
OR
DIS
TRIC
T - OFFS
HO
RE
WIN
D P
OR
T DE
VE
LOP
ME
NT
CO
NC
EP
TUA
L DR
AW
ING
NO
T TO B
E U
SE
D FO
R C
ON
STR
UC
TION
2021-06-23O
PE
RA
TION
AL LA
YO
UT
SK
-02
N
100'0'
100'200'
SC
ALE
: 1''=100'
LAY
OU
T NO
TES
1.LA
YO
UT S
HO
WN
IS FO
R P
HA
SE
2A O
F TER
MIN
AL B
UILD
OU
T.TH
IS LE
VE
L OF B
UILD
OU
T IS M
EA
NT TO
SU
PP
OR
T A S
MA
LLS
CA
LE C
OM
ME
RC
IAL P
RO
JEC
T.2.
PH
AS
E 2A
RE
PR
ES
EN
TS TH
E M
INIM
UM
QU
AY
LEN
GTH
AN
DIN
FILL/UP
LAN
D LA
YD
OW
N A
RE
A R
EQ
UIR
ED
TO FA
BR
ICA
TEA
ND
LOA
DO
UT FLO
ATIN
G FO
UN
DA
TION
S A
ND
INS
TALL O
FW
TG C
OM
PO
NE
NTS
ON
TO TH
E FO
UN
DA
TION
.3.
PH
AS
E 2A
BU
ILD O
UT R
EQ
UIR
ES
SH
AR
ING
OF B
ER
THLE
NG
TH FO
R A
LL AC
TIVITIE
S:
3.1.D
ELIV
ER
Y O
F WTG
CO
MP
ON
EN
TS3.2.
LOA
D O
UT O
F FAB
RIC
ATE
D FO
UN
DA
TION
ON
TOFLO
ATIN
G A
SS
ET
3.3.IN
STA
LLATIO
N O
F WTG
CO
MP
ON
EN
TS O
NTO
FLOA
TING
FOU
ND
ATIO
N4.
AD
DITIO
NA
L BU
ILD O
UT FO
R LA
RG
E C
OM
ME
RC
IAL S
CA
LEIN
STA
LLATIO
NS
(PH
AS
E 2B
) WILL LIK
ELY
BE
RE
QU
IRE
D.
5.TH
IS LA
YO
UT S
HO
ULD
BE
CO
NS
IDE
RE
D P
RE
LIMIN
AR
Y A
ND
ISB
AS
ED
ON
AV
AILA
BLE
INFO
RM
ATIO
N.
6.W
IND
TUR
BIN
E C
OM
PO
NE
NTS
SH
OW
N A
RE
RE
PR
ES
EN
TATIV
E IN
SIZE
THA
T WILL B
E S
TAG
ED
ON
THE
THE
TER
MIN
AL.
7.LE
NG
TH O
F QU
AY
ALLO
WS
FOR
WTG
CO
MP
ON
EN
T DE
LIVE
RY
BY
EITH
ER
BU
LK C
AR
RIE
R V
ES
SE
L OR
BA
RG
E.
8.FA
BR
ICA
TION
PR
OC
ES
S A
ND
LAY
OU
T IS N
OT S
HO
WN
. THIS
WILL B
E S
PE
CIFIC
TO TY
PE
AN
D M
ATE
RIA
L OF FO
UN
DA
TION
AN
D LO
GIS
TICS
PLA
N O
F THE
TER
MIN
AL U
SE
R.
9.FLO
ATIN
G A
SS
ET IS
AS
SU
ME
D TO
BE
A S
EM
I-SU
BM
ER
SIB
LEB
AR
GE
. SIZIN
G IS
TO A
CC
OM
MO
DA
TE A
SS
UM
ED
FOU
ND
ATIO
N S
IZE.
10.FO
UN
DA
TION
SIZE
HA
S B
EE
N S
CA
LED
FRO
M E
XIS
TING
SE
MI-S
UB
ME
RS
IBLE
INS
TALLA
TION
S TO
AC
CO
MM
OD
ATE
12-MW
TUR
BIN
E U
NIT.
PH
AS
E 2A
TER
MIN
AL O
PE
RA
TION
S
A.
WTG
CO
MP
ON
EN
TS (TO
WE
RS
, TUR
BIN
ES
, AN
D B
LAD
ES
) AR
ED
ELIV
ER
ED
TO TH
E TE
RM
INA
L VIA
BA
RG
E O
R V
ES
SE
L AN
DS
TAG
ED
ON
THE
UP
LAN
DS
.B
.R
EQ
UIR
ED
FOU
ND
ATIO
N M
ATE
RIA
L IS D
ELIV
ER
ED
TO TH
ES
ITE V
IA D
ELIV
ER
Y V
ES
SE
L AN
D/O
R U
PLA
ND
TRU
CK
S.
C.
FOU
ND
ATIO
NS
AR
E FA
BR
ICA
TED
IN S
ER
IAL M
AN
NE
R,
MO
VIN
G FR
OM
NO
RTH
TO S
OU
TH. FO
UN
DA
TION
MO
VE
ME
NT
IS D
ON
E V
IA S
ELF P
RO
PE
LLED
MO
DU
LAR
TRA
NS
PO
RTE
R(S
PM
T) OR
SK
IDD
ING
SY
STE
M.
D.
CO
MP
LETE
D FO
UN
DA
TION
IS M
OV
ED
QU
AY
SID
E A
ND
FLOA
TING
AS
SE
T IS B
RO
UG
HT TO
BE
RTH
(VIA
TUG
PO
WE
R)
AN
D S
EC
UR
ED
IN P
OS
ITION
.E
.FO
UN
DA
TION
IS LO
AD
ED
OU
T ON
TO FLO
ATIN
G A
SS
ET V
IAS
PM
T OR
SK
ID S
YS
TEM
.F.
FLOA
TING
AS
SE
T IS M
OV
ED
(VIA
TUG
) TO D
EE
P W
ATE
R TO
THE
SO
UTH
OF TH
E TE
RM
INA
L.G
.FLO
ATIN
G A
SS
ET IS
BA
LLAS
TED
DO
WN
AN
D S
UB
ME
RG
ED
UN
TIL FOU
ND
ATIO
N B
EC
OM
ES
BU
OY
AN
T.H
.FLO
ATIN
G FO
UN
DA
TION
IS A
TTAC
HE
D TO
TUG
S A
ND
TOW
ED
BA
CK
TO B
ER
TH.
I.W
TG C
OM
PO
NE
NTS
AR
E IN
STA
LLED
ON
TO FO
UN
DA
TION
VIA
LAN
D B
AS
ED
CR
AN
E.
I.A.
FOU
ND
ATIO
N P
RO
DU
CTIO
N LIN
E IS
INTE
RR
UP
TED
TOA
CC
OM
MO
DA
TE W
TG C
OM
PO
NE
NT M
OV
EM
EN
T AN
DIN
STA
LLATIO
NJ.
CO
MP
LETE
FLOA
TING
TUR
BIN
E A
SS
EM
BLY
IS C
ON
NE
CTE
DTO
OC
EA
N G
OIN
G TU
GS
AN
D TO
WE
D TO
INS
TALLA
TION
SITE
.
DR
AW
ING
NO
TES
1.TE
RM
INA
L GR
AD
E A
T THE
BE
RTH
IS +14.0'± N
AV
D88 IN
OR
DE
R TO
BE
AB
OV
E C
UR
RE
NT FE
MA
100 YE
AR
FLOO
DE
LEV
ATIO
N.
2.A
LL BO
UN
DA
RIE
S A
ND
AR
EA
S A
RE
AP
PR
OX
IMA
TE.
3.B
ATH
YM
ETR
IC IN
FOR
MA
TION
SH
OW
N IN
FT MLLW
.
Draft P
rint06/29/2021 10:22:10 A
M
.,. .. .. .. 3 0 ..... ..... C -+ -+
~ ::::, --() ::::,-0
~ ~
I I \
I \ , \ \ 'v-\ I \ I \ \ \ I '
j I\ \ \* \ I \ \ '
I I \-\-'\ ' \ I \ \ \,, / / I I \ ' (
\
\,
" V
~/\ \ ~ '\
v v, I \
i
u
lJ I
11/ j
/ I
(\ \
I I I \
)
r,
/ fl
JV \
flv,)
I
I
I I I
(\;
\ \I\\ I \ \ \
\ \ \ I \ \ 1\\ 1\1
I ' \ I I 1 I I
' I 'I I I \ I '
\ I I I \ I I I
1 I I • I I
\\111\ I I I I
I I 'I
I I I I I I I I
I I ) ; 1 /11/i I I ' I
I I I I I l I I I I
I I 111/1l11 I I ' I 11
I
I
1//1111
11///f!l1 I I I I
I I I I ' I I I
~ \.>1., 1'1 k> o !\lo ,,,_ VJ , IJ'}~ V,J ) , C 11/}l')
"~Cil'-li:ii:i ~JJJ~JJJ
"4:"-4).:i,1,, ....,o.,~ ..... ~Jt
:::: 1.::::.:::1 IIIIClllll.00111111110
1111011 IIOIIOOOOC
/"'/.
II " G II
ooool oooool
II II II II II II II II II II II II
II II II II II II II II O II II II
Ale: Q:ISEA 1210807/20 CADDLActiveLExhibi/sl210807SK-02: Plotted: 6/24/202112:09 PM by MOYA IGLESIAS, CRISTIAN; Saved: 6/24/2021 9:45 AM by CMOYAIGLESIAS
IE'.:
/
~
~
A B C D E F G H I J K
12
34
56
78
910
1112
1314
1516
1718
1920
2122
2324
2526
2728
29
28 SP
A. @
15'-0" = 420'-0"
12 SPA. @ 11'-9" = 141'-0"
30" STE
EL P
IPE
PILE
(TYP
)
L M
3031
2 SP
A. @
12'-9"= 25'-6"
HU
MB
OLD
T HA
RB
OR
DIS
TRIC
T - OFFS
HO
RE
WIN
D P
OR
T DE
VE
LOP
ME
NT
CO
NC
EP
TUA
L DR
AW
ING
NO
T TO B
E U
SE
D FO
R C
ON
STR
UC
TION
2021-06-23
N
WH
AR
F PILE
PLA
NS
K-03
20'0'
20'40'
SC
ALE
: 1''=20'
A1
SK
-04
Draft P
rint06/29/2021 10:22:19 A
M
• •
~ ::::, --0 ::::,-0
~ ~
9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I
1 I 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6-t------0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0 ,--
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
.-n r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
n - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C -----0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -----0
I I 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c;,+-------0
File: Q:ISEA/210807120 CAOO/_Active/_Exhibits/21080TSK-03; Plotted: 6/24/202112:0T PM by MOYA /GLESIAS, CRISTIAN; Saved: 6/24/202112:08 PM by CMOYAIGLESIAS
6'-0"3'-0"
DE
NS
E G
RA
DE
AG
GR
EG
ATE
BO
LLAR
D
FEN
DE
R
150'-0"W
HA
RF
AB
CD
EF
GH
IJ
KL
DR
ED
GE
DE
PTH
EL. -38.0' (M
LLW)
EL. -38.34' (N
AV
D88)
1
2.5
1.75
1
RO
CK
RE
VE
TME
NT
CU
TS
LOP
E
CO
NC
RE
TED
EC
K S
YS
TEM
13 x 30" DIA
. STE
EL P
IPE
PILE
S A
T 11'-9" SP
A. O
C = 141'-0"
M
TOP
OF D
EC
KE
L. +14.0'
HU
MB
OLD
T HA
RB
OR
DIS
TRIC
T - OFFS
HO
RE
WIN
D P
OR
T DE
VE
LOP
ME
NT
CO
NC
EP
TUA
L DR
AW
ING
NO
T TO B
E U
SE
D FO
R C
ON
STR
UC
TION
2021-06-23W
HA
RF C
RO
SS
SE
CTIO
NS
K-04
8'-0"0'-0''
4'-0"8'-0"
SC
ALE
: 3/16"=1'-0''
NO
TE1.
ELE
VA
TION
S A
RE
RE
FER
EN
CE
D TO
NA
VD
88U
NLE
SS
OTH
ER
WIS
E N
OTE
D.
Draft P
rint06/29/2021 10:22:28 A
M
.,. .. .,. ... 3 0 --Q -+ -+
~ ::::, --0 ::::,-0
I ''¼'¼"¼,> <x S: ._.,.
4
.r:•·•.f:::i. ~ D-----~ ::-.:: 4 ¾">; /:-«~
¾">; ~~ "' ,. »«« b, ~~ »«'< "' ~4 ~::-.::-'0;~ ~" 1/.."
I 't. 4
::-.:: ::-.::· "' , ~~"'
~ ~~4
D-----~
~~>, 4 ¾">; ~~
I
~ ~::-.::✓-4
'0;1 ~~ . "'
'I 4 ~ D-----~
" . ::-.:: ~">; ~~ b, ~~8 4
~-. "' ~::-.:: '0;">; ~~ ~4 ~~ bt,.
, '"' " i 4"' ~ ~ D-----~ b,
4
" "
. I,.
/ '[{ ;:--. 4
·I~\j • I' . / I "'
' LI c,. ~ 4 ~ u D-----~
"' 4 I y ~ '
4 t>
~ 4 "'
I I
~ LI .4 "' . -
~ D-----~ 0
t,b,
4 · w .A"..u"'¢c
~~s. 4 "'
b,
t,.
4. ~ D-----~
. 4_ . c,,
"' 4 Is .
~ ','
14 .. "' 4
I
I
I
I ~ D-----~ I
b, b, 4
"' 4 ..
D-----~ ~ "'
I 4
I I
I
---v
1· I I
"'
J I "' "
D-----~ ~ 4
I. b, b·
" " "'.
b, 4
. t,.
4
D-----~ ~ I I I
b, ,,;
"' 4
"' b,
A
"'
·4
ef:JJ'!;J_ "'
D-----~ ~ ·4
"' ·4.
"'
b, 4
"' I
I~ D-----~ ~ ~-/r---;;:,::,'------------------------------------------1""'· "' b,
4. "'
4
---- -- -- -- -- --
File: Q:ISEA/210807120 CAOO/_Active/_Exhibits/21080TSK-04; Plotted: 6/24/202112:12 PM by MOYA /GLESIAS, CRISTIAN; Saved: 6/24/202111:56 AM by CMOYAIGLESIAS
®
Port of Humboldt Date : 18-Jun-2021
PIDP Grant Estimate Project No. : 210807
Item Description Quantity Unit Unit Price Subtotal TOTAL1 Contractor Mobilization/Demobilization $4,952,000
1.1 Construction Mobilization 1 ls $3,802,000 $3,802,0001.2 Hydraulic Dredge Mobilization 1 ls $800,000 $800,0001.3 Mechanical Dredge Mobilization 1 ls $350,000 $350,000
2 Wharf $40,660,4002.1 Demolition of Existing Structure 200,000 sf $52 $10,499,5002.2 Steel Sheet Pile Bulkhead w/ King Piles 750 lf $4,641 $3,480,8002.3 Pile-Supported Wharf (Steel Piles & Concrete Superstructure) 45,000 sf $364 $16,380,0002.4 Concrete Fill for Wharf Piles (Seismic) 4,807 cy $250 $1,201,7002.5 Relieving Platform (Steel Piles & Concrete Superstructure) 22,500 sf $193 $4,341,6002.6 Concrete Fill for Relieving Platform Piles (Seismic) 2,670 cy $250 $667,6002.7 Installation of Dense Graded Aggregate Topping Surface 7,500 cy $55 $412,5002.8 Shoreline Grading at Relieving Platform (From Upland Cut) 5,833 cy $11 $64,2002.9 Rip Rap Slope Beneath Wharf 24,083 tons $150 $3,612,500
3 Earth Fill and Dredge $7,351,8003.1 Mechanical Dredge in Berth Area (Place at RMT1&2) 163,951 cy $32 $5,246,5003.2 Hydraulic Dredge in Berth Area (Pump to RMT1&2) 60,633 cy $13 $788,3003.3 Mechanical Dredge in Semi-Sub Barge Area (Place at RMT1&2) 32,381 cy $32 $1,036,2003.4 Hydraulic Dredge in Semi-Sub Barge Area (Pump to RMT1&2) 202 cy $13 $2,6003.5 Soil Cut from Uplands 40,142 cy $5 $200,8003.6 Stockpile of Soil (at RMT1&2) 9,663 cy $8 $77,400
4 Uplands $8,809,8004.1 Grading and Compaction of Uplands Soils 784,083 sf $0.96 $752,8004.2 Installation of Dense Graded Aggregate Topping Surface 58,080 cy $55 $3,194,5004.3 Site Stormwater system 18 ac $100,000 $1,800,0004.4 Site Water system 18 ac $20,000 $360,0004.5 Site Electrical system 18 ac $100,000 $1,800,0004.6 Access Road 1 ls $902,500 $902,500
5 Mooring Dolphins $6,029,8005.1 Mooring Dolphins for Vessel 2 ea $1,205,947 $2,411,9005.2 Mooring Dolphins for Semi-submersible Barge 3 ea $1,205,947 $3,617,900
6 Remediation $500,0006.1 Environmental Mitigation 1 ls $500,000 $500,000
Direct Costs Subtotal $68,303,800
7 Construction Indirects $21,431,2007.1 Supervision (General Conditions) 12 % $8,196,5007.2 Bonds & Insurance 2 % $1,530,1007.3 Corporate Overhead & Profit 15 % $11,704,600
Total Construction Costs $89,735,000
8 Contingency $26,920,6008.1 Design Contingency 15 % $13,460,3008.2 Owner Contingency 5 % $4,486,8008.3 Construction Contingency 10 % $8,973,500
Total Construction Costs with Contingency $116,655,600
9 Soft Costs $7,855,2009.1 Planning studies 0.5 % $341,6009.2 Field investigations 1 % $683,1009.3 Environmental & Permitting (covers CEQA & NEPA) 3 % $2,049,2009.4 Engineering design 4.5 % $3,073,7009.5 Construction Management/Support 2.5 % $1,707,600
Total Project Cost $124,510,800
Opinion of Probable Cost
DRAFT
Page 1 of 2
1111111111111111
11 o tfatt II. n icho l
Notes: 1) Pricing is based on US dollars.2) Volumes for site preparation are based on M&N understanding of site conditions, no survey information is available at this time.3) Price is based on aerial diagrams of site.4) Pricing assumes all resources are readily available locally.5) Price is based on unencumbered contractor access to the site.6) Price does not include any costs for construction site property lease or acquisition expenses.7) No extreme weather risk included (force majeure).8) Minimal geotechnical information is available at this time.9) Cost escalation is not included.
10) Price does not include environmental restrictions.11) Price does not include any associated costs due to hazardous waste.12) Price does not include any associated costs due to rock dredging.13) Price does not include any associated costs due to pile driving/drilling into rock.14) Price does not include any costs for post construction site remediation or reconstruction15) Costs for owner's project management or overhead expenses are not included.
When reviewing the above estimated costs it is important to note the following:
-
-
- This construction cost estimate is an 'Opinion of Probable Cost' made by a consultant. In providing opinions of construction cost, it is recognized that neither the client nor the consultant has control over the cost of labor, equipment, materials, or the contractor's means and methods of determining constructability, pricing or schedule. This opinion of construction cost is based on the consultant's reasonable professional judgement and experience and does not constitute a warranty, expressed or implied, that contractor's bids or negotiated prices for the work will not vary from the client's.
The costs have been developed based on historical and current data using in-house sources.
A contingency amount has been included to cover undefined items, due to the level of engineering carried out at this time. The contingency is not a reflection of the accuracy of the estimates but covers items of work which will have to be performed, and elements of costs which will be incurred, but which are not explicitly detailed or described due to the level of investigation, engineering and estimating completed today.
Page 2 of 2
Humboldt Harbor Offshore Wind Port – Basis of MARAD Grant Narrative 6/12/2021
Humboldt Harbor Offshore Wind Port Infrastructure Development
Draft Basis of Grant Narrative
1) Introduction
With a goal of zero-emissions electricity by 2045, California has one of the most ambitious clean energy objectives of any state in the US. Interim targets of 50% by 2025 and 60% by 2030 suggest that the coming decade will be critical to State in order if it is to meet this long-term goal. As such, the potential of California’s offshore wind generating capacity is being brought to the forefront, and the ability to facilitate the growth of this industry will serve not only as an am important step for the State to meet its zero-emissions goal but will also serve as an engine of growth for the broader California Economy.
BOEM is expected to officially open the lease process for California’s OSW call areas in the middle of 2022. This will likely include opportunities within the Morro Bay, Diablo Canyon and Humboldt call areas. While there are currently two submittals of unsolicited applications (one for Morrow Bay and one for Humboldt), these applications will be superseded by any response to the official bid process.
Humboldt Call Area Wind Farm Development Schedule (Shatz, 2020) – Process is 2 years delayed from this schedule shown
The bidding process is expected to result in agreements which will lead to the installation of approximately 4.6GW of installed capacity, split between Humboldt, Morrow Bay and Diablo Canyon, by the close of the decade. Additional installation capacity would either necessitate that BOEM designate new call areas.
2) Installation Activity
California’s first wind farms will begin operating in the late 2020’s/early 2030’s. Installations will likely be developed in both the Humboldt and Morro Bay call areas simultaneously.
The BOEM regulatory process timeline is about a seven-year process between the lease agreement and commencement of operations. Therefore, it is likely that the construction and installation of wind farms will begin in 2027/2028 and electricity generation will begin in 2029/2030. It is possible that the timeline could be accelerated to meet local State objectives, and if best practices in terms of site assessments, environmental reviews and construction can be adopted from the USEC activity.
California call areas are assumed to be first in line for auction and development based on BOEM announcement (May 25, 2021) followed by Oregon at some point later in the future. The marshalling port will be developed to support the California offshore wind market and could transition to supporting other offshore wind development in southern Oregon.
If 4.6GW of installed capacity are put in place by the early 2030’s this would imply roughly 383 turbines @ 12MW/turbine between the Humboldt and Morro Bay call areas. Construction would have to occur over a 3-to-4- year timeline beginning in the late 2020’s (anchor installation may have to begin earlier).
SOMW 150 MW
1,800 MW Planning & Analysis
Construction & Commissioning
All ~I __ P_or1_ 0e_ v_e_1opmen __ 1 ____ ~> __ P_or1_ o_pe_ ra_ti_o_n•--------------------~>
Overtand Transmission transmission upgrade planning
Transmission system construction
Subsea transmission
Transmission upgrade planning (subsea HVDC)
Transmission system construction
Legend O Wind farm development D Port development D Transmission system development
Humboldt Harbor Offshore Wind Port – Basis of MARAD Grant Narrative 6/12/2021
Humboldt Call Area
The call area is large enough to support the targeted 1.6GW of capacity for this site. This call area will prove attractive given its size and favorable proximity to Humboldt Harbor’s deep-water port infrastructure. There are currently three options being considered for the power use which will be finalized by the time the lease auction occurs. The larger transmission cable to export power outside of Humboldt would be for an expansion of Humboldt area wind energy for development beyond the 1.6 GW (and may not be a concern to developers during the 1st phase of lease auctions). It could be that a smaller installation (150MW) serves as a pilot before developers are confident to commit to a larger installation(s).
• 207 sq miles (537 km2) area appears sufficient for 1,600 – 2,100MW based on USEC capacity assessments. • 28 miles to Humboldt Harbor • Timing – First priority development area
o Small Commercial Scale = 150 MW 12 turbines @ 12 MW/Turbine Construction period = 12 to 24 months from receipt of approvals/permits for construction
o Large Commercial Scale = 1,800 MW 153 turbines @ 12MW/Turbine Construction period = 24 to 36 months from receipt of approvals/permits for construction
o Service Life = 20 years • Has an unsolicited application in place from RCEA for 150MW installation
If the State were to seek capacity above 1.6GW, this would necessitate that either the Cape Mendocino or Del Norte areas be opened by BOEM. This would likely come in a second lease auction.
• Not BOEM sites • No commercial interests • Both sites are within 75 miles of the Humboldt Harbor making them readily accessible (Cape Mendocino – 52 and Del
Norte – 75) • Additional generation capacity would necessitate upgrades to the transmission cables/grids and/or ability to find
alternate storage/uses for the electricity.
Morro Bay
The call area is roughly twice the size of the Humboldt call area and is large enough to support 3.0GW of installed capacity. Morro Bay could prove attractive because the grid can support the to-come installations without significant upgrades. There are challenges however, including the lack of port infrastructure, and the likelihood of challenges from the fishing industry (and potentially Navy) should the call areas get any larger. Given the existing interest from the private sector in the call area, provided that port infrastructure is in place, the Morro Bay call area could well be the site of California’s first large scale commercial installation.
Northern California Call Area
O caNAreas
- - - Federal / State Boundary
0
0 10 20
~
B EM Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management
Central California Call Area
O call Areas
- - - Federal / State Boundary
0
0 10 20
~
B EM Bureau of Ocean Energy
Management
Humboldt Harbor Offshore Wind Port – Basis of MARAD Grant Narrative 6/12/2021
• BOEM Call Area • 399 sq miles (1,033 km2) area appears sufficient for 3,000MW based on USEC capacity • 30 – 40 miles to shore • 425 miles to Humboldt Harbor • 125 miles to Hueneme • Has an unsolicited application in place from Castle Wind for 1GW installation
o About 84 turbines @12MW/Turbine
Diablo Canyon
Diablo Canyon is the second large call area (along with Morrow Bay) on the Central Coast. It has the same benefits of Morro Bay (access to a developed grid), but also faces the same challenges namely lack of port infrastructure and opposition from the local fishing industry and potentially the Navy.
• BOEM Call Area • 556 sq miles (1,440 km2) • 480 miles to Humboldt Harbor • 125 miles to Port of Hueneme • Nuclear plant to be retired in 2024/2025 need to replace 4.6GW of energy • There are currently no unsolicited application for the Diablo Canyon Area
3) Port Infrastructure
A dedicated ecosystem of maritime port facilities is going to be required along the California Coast to support the component construction, assembly, installation and maintenance of the turbines. These facilities serve as the crucial nodes in the supply chains used by the developers (Principal Power, Orsted, Equinor, ENBW e.g.) during the installation and maintenance of the wind farms. Therefore, the earlier in the process that developers can identify and secure access to these ports, thereby ensuring their supply chains, the stronger and more competitive their bids can be for the leases – which translates into lower energy costs for the State. stablishing a dedicated wind port in Humboldt Harbor is necessary. to facilitate the growth of California
Given the distance between the two call areas (Humboldt and Morro Bay/Diablo Canyon) it will be advantageous to the State, and attractive to the developers) that marshalling ports be established at both locations. And given the expected level of installation activity projected to in the small window (late 2020’s early 2030s) no single marshalling port would be large enough to support the development of multiple windfarms simultaneously.
A dedicated wind port in Humboldt Harbor is necessary in the establishment of California’s broader offshore wind supply chain. Without it the developers will be at a disadvantage which could result in either (or both) reduced interest to pursue the leases, and or more expensive electricity generating costs/prices as a result of higher capital expenditures.
Marshalling Port Requirements & Logistics
A marshaling port is where the various turbine components (bases, towers, nacelles, and blades) are brought from their production locations to be assembled into a complete turbine (in the case of floating) and towed out to the installation sites. One of the key desirable attributes of a marshalling port is its proximity to the installation site. The closer the marshalling port is to the site; the less travel time and cost is incurred.
For the Humboldt Call area – Humboldt Harbor is the most strategic location for a marshalling port.
If Humboldt were not developed to support the construction and operations/maintenance of a Humboldt Call Area Wind Farm, another location within the region would be needed to facilitate the construction that would also in turn support other offshore wind farm call areas (Such as Morro Bay and Coos Bay Call Areas). For comparison purposes
• Humboldt Harbor – 28 miles to Humboldt Call Area • Port of Hueneme – ~450 miles to Humboldt Call Area
Humboldt Harbor Offshore Wind Port – Basis of MARAD Grant Narrative 6/12/2021
• Port of Coos Bay – ~150 miles to Humboldt Call Area – But would likely not by available in time given Oregon is presumed to be behind California in terms of lease process and timing for bringing offshore power online for the OR marketplace.
• Sites in LALB and San Francisco would be air draft restricted by bridges and are therefore unlikely to be chosen as marshalling locations (for fully assembled turbines)
For the purpose of modeling it will be assumed:
• that Port Hueneme is the alternative site – as this could in theory become the marshalling site for Morro Bay.
• For every turbine (153 for the 1.6GW installation) – assuming roughly 16,750 tons per turbine (15,000 ton base + 1,750 tons per turbine)
• towing speeds of XX mph) • Benefits from reduced emissions ($/ton mile) • Benefits from reduced transportation costs ($/hr)
Additional considerations will be made to reflect:
• Downtime due to weather (X weeks per year) • Assembly production rate (1 turbine per week)
Operation & Maintenance Requirements
Operations & Maintenance (O&M) ports are locations where personnel and small equipment can be brought to and from the installation in case of repair needs and routine maintenance of the turbines. Again, it is advantageous to the developers that these facilities are located in close proximity to the wind farms and therefore for the Humboldt Call Area, Humboldt Harbor would be the most strategic location. Similarly, for the Morro Bay/Diablo Canyon call areas, it would be advantageous for an O&M port(s) to be developed in the Central Coast region.
Without the Humboldt Harbor facility O&M operations would have to come from a more distant location, resulting in addition costs and inefficiencies. For modeling purposes we’ll assume:
Port of Coos Bay is the alternate site – ~150 miles to Humboldt Call Area Frequency of the trip will be 4 trips per turbine per year Number of Turbines serviced per trip = 2 Benefits from reduced emissions ($/ton mile) Benefits from reduced transportation costs ($/hr)
4) Supply Chains
Manufacturing locations of component elements (bases, tower sections, nacelles and blades) too will become an integral part of the California’s offshore wind supply chain. The emergence of these operations however, will occur in phased approach, as we are seeing on the US East Coast. The first commitments will come from the lower value components, namely bases, transition pieces and tower sections. Higher value components/OEMs (nacelles and blades) will commit once there is a guaranteed pipeline of future projects.
Bringing manufacturing activity to California will significantly reduce the transportation costs associated with importing these components from distant US and international (predominantly North Asia) locations.
As floating technology is required for California’s call areas, there is a possibility that a base manufacturer will be the fist to seek a production location. There is the possibility to overlap the production of these bases with tower elements (Welcon/Stiesdal e.g.). Given the size of the floating bases, these need to be produced/assembled along the waterside where the can be submerged and fitted with the turbine before being towed to the installation site.
-
I I
Humboldt Harbor Offshore Wind Port – Basis of MARAD Grant Narrative 6/12/2021
Shanghai-headquartered Wison Offshore & Marine has shipped out China’s first floating wind foundation platform from its yard in Zhoushan - https://www.offshorewind.biz/
Construction of supply chain manufacturing facilities will depend on a regional level investment for offshore wind. It is assumed that regional level commitment is at 2GW is needed to justify investment in West Coast (which should be achieved following the first round of leases). The time lag from getting to a decision of commitment for west coast supply chain investment to a functioning manufacturing facility is assumed to be 5 years.
For the purpose of modeling:
Phase 1 (0 – 2GW Capacity)
• Bases are manufactured in California • Tower sections are manufactured in California • Nacelles
o Produced in North Asia (Taiwan) are shipped trans-Pacific o 700 tons per unit
• Blades o Produced in North Asia or East Coast US (TBD) o 65 tons per blade
Phase 2 (2GW + Guaranteed pipeline of 5GW)
• Bases are manufactured in California • Tower sections are manufactured in California • Nacelles
o Produced in California o 700 tons per unit
• Blades o Produced in California o 65 tons per blade
Assumed the manufacturing would transition to west coast to one of the following locations:
• SF Bay Area – would be the preferred choice for California • Coos Bay • Lower Columbia River
I
Humboldt Harbor Offshore Wind Port – Basis of MARAD Grant Narrative 6/12/2021
• Puget Sound (Referenced in 2021 CalPoly Study)
Benefits will be calculated:
• Benefits from reduced emissions ($/ton mile) by component element • Benefits from reduced transportation costs ($/hr) by component element