agenda item gb-2 city of tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/planning/muc/pc_review...sm:ds draft. mixed -use...

147
City of Tacoma Community and Economic Development Department 747 Market Street, Room 1036 Tacoma, Washington 984023793 (253) 5915365 http://www.cityoftacoma.org/planning Agenda Item GB-2 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Peter Huffman, Manager, Planning Division SUBJECT: Mixed-Use Centers Zoning and Regulations DATE: May 14, 2009 At the next meeting, the Commission will conclude the review and discussion of the proposed changes to the mixed-use center zoning and regulations. Following on the discussion from the last meeting, the intended focus for this meeting is: Height bonus palette items, including CPTED Design Review, Green Roof, and Community Benefit Agreements Other issues or questions that arise from the upcoming, May 19 joint study session with the City Council At the conclusion of this discussion, the Commission will consider their recommendations to the City Council. The following documents are attached for the Commission’s information and consideration: Attachments: o Draft letter to the City Council forwarding the Commission’s recommendations o Draft “Findings and Recommendations” report, which documents the public process and key actions o Revised draft code amendments o Summary of the proposed height bonus palette (the “green sheet”) o Area-wide zoning maps for each center (which also show the height bonus area) o Updated summary of the modifications made by the Commission since the public hearing, which incorporates the additional direction received from the Commission during the last meeting o Updated summary of comments from the community presentations held to date If you have any questions, please contact Donna Stenger at 591-5210 or [email protected] or Brian Boudet at 573-2389 or [email protected] PH:bb Attachments (7)

Upload: others

Post on 28-Feb-2021

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

   City of Tacoma   Community and Economic Development Department 

747 Market Street, Room 1036  ▌ Tacoma, Washington 98402­3793  ▌ (253) 591­5365 http://www.cityoftacoma.org/planning 

Agenda ItemGB-2

TO: Planning Commission FROM: Peter Huffman, Manager, Planning Division SUBJECT: Mixed-Use Centers Zoning and Regulations DATE: May 14, 2009 At the next meeting, the Commission will conclude the review and discussion of the proposed changes to the mixed-use center zoning and regulations. Following on the discussion from the last meeting, the intended focus for this meeting is:

Height bonus palette items, including CPTED Design Review, Green Roof, and Community Benefit Agreements

Other issues or questions that arise from the upcoming, May 19 joint study session with the City Council

At the conclusion of this discussion, the Commission will consider their recommendations to the City Council. The following documents are attached for the Commission’s information and consideration:

Attachments:

o Draft letter to the City Council forwarding the Commission’s recommendations o Draft “Findings and Recommendations” report, which documents the public process and

key actions o Revised draft code amendments o Summary of the proposed height bonus palette (the “green sheet”) o Area-wide zoning maps for each center (which also show the height bonus area) o Updated summary of the modifications made by the Commission since the public

hearing, which incorporates the additional direction received from the Commission during the last meeting

o Updated summary of comments from the community presentations held to date If you have any questions, please contact Donna Stenger at 591-5210 or [email protected] or Brian Boudet at 573-2389 or [email protected] PH:bb Attachments (7)

Page 2: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 3: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

City of Tacoma Planning Commission

747 Market Street, Room 1036 ❚ Tacoma, Washington 98402-3793 ❚ (253) 591-5365 ❚ FAX (253) 591-2002 www.cityoftacoma.org/planning

May 20, 2009 HONORABLE MAYOR AND MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL On behalf of the Planning Commission, I am pleased to forward our recommendations concerning Tacoma’s Mixed-Use Centers. One of the many challenges that we have encountered in developing proposed code changes that remove barriers to private investment is making sure that we put in place a regulatory scheme that assures new development will meet the expectations and desires of citizens, developers and the City Council. Tacoma’s economic environment, even before the national downtown in the economy, has a number of unique factors that have dissuaded many potential investors and attracted only a few hardy entrepreneurs willing and able to sustain risk. The Commission worked diligently to develop recommendations that we believe will help to achieve results on the ground. However, we realize that zoning regulations are only one aspect of a complicated market that affects the feasibility of new development. Even a well-crafted zoning code cannot guarantee that new investment will occur. It is one tool of many that are needed in the City. From the Commission’s perspective much more needs to be done. The City needs to focus resources in the Mixed-Use Centers to improve the quality of the physical environment. If the vision is to achieve high-density, livable neighborhoods, more attention is needed on creating green spaces, gathering places, walkable tree-lined streets, and bicycle paths. Citizens in and near the centers are more likely to welcome density if their neighborhood is improved with quality amenities and other tangible benefits. Less visible, but still needed, is an investment in basic infrastructure to support the anticipated higher density and intensity of development and encourage it to happen. The cost of improving these necessary facilities cannot be borne by new development alone. Finally, the Commission strongly believes that a more refined level of planning is needed in each of the neighborhood centers to identify unique needs and to tailor strategies and priorities to address the individual character of each center. We understand that developing master plans for neighborhood centers will be a multiyear endeavor and will require considerable time, resources and a continuing commitment; however, the benefits of fully engaging citizens in planning their future neighborhood more than compensates for the additional cost. We take our responsibility to provide the Council with the best possible recommendations very seriously and in turn request that you give our concerns serious consideration. We hope that you will support the full development of the Mixed-Use Centers by prioritizing City services and

DRAFT

Page 4: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mayor and Members of the City Council May 20, 2009 Page 2 capital expenditures. Together, we can achieve vibrant centers that are prosperous and livable for all. Sincerely, SCOTT MORRIS Chair SM:ds

DRAFT

Page 5: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MIXED-USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT

TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION

DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

May 20, 2009

A. SUBJECT Adoption of amendments to the City of Tacoma’s Land Use Regulatory Code, including text changes and area-wide zoning reclassifications, pertaining to 16 of Tacoma’s Mixed-Use Centers. The Downtown Center is not included in this proposal. The mixed-use centers are the cornerstone of the Comprehensive Plan’s growth strategy and are intended to accommodate a significant share of Tacoma’s future population and employment growth by allowing a more intense level of development that is well-served by multimodal transportation facilities. The mixed-use centers are to be areas that provide a range of housing choices, employment opportunities, transit-supportive development, pedestrian and bicycle facilities and a mix of shops, services and public spaces. Directing future growth into the mixed-use centers helps to protect the residential character of single-family neighborhoods.

The 16 centers included in these amendments are listed below.

Neighborhood Centers Community Centers Urban Center

• 6th & Pine • Lincoln • 56th & South Tacoma Way • MLK • Proctor • Stadium • Narrows • McKinley

• 72nd & Pacific • 72nd & Portland • James Center/TCC • Lower Portland • Tacoma Central • Westgate • 34th & Pacific

• Tacoma Mall

B. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS

Following is a brief summary of the proposed regulatory code and zoning map amendments that will revise various portions of the Land Use Regulatory Code as it applies to the mixed-use centers to facilitate future growth and development. The proposed amendments will revise development regulations for the 16 mixed-use centers identified above, including design, building and landscaping standards, allowable uses, height limits and parking requirements. The proposed text amendments to the Land Use Regulatory Code apply to the centers as a whole, although there are a small number of exceptions for individual centers. Zoning in the existing centers will be changed to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. The Official Zoning Map will be modified to change the zoning classifications (rezone) of numerous properties within the centers from commercial, residential, and industrial zoning districts to mixed-use zoning classifications (X-districts) affecting approximately 1,000 acres.

Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (DRAFT) Page 1 Mixed-Use Centers Update Project

Page 6: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

The proposed amendments will: • Create three new mixed-use zones: NRX – Neighborhood Residential Mixed-Use, URX –

Urban Residential Mixed-Use, and HMX – Hospital Medical Mixed-Use; • Apply mixed-use center (X-district) zoning classifications to all land within the centers,

except that some areas zoned PRD will remain and the T Street Gulch area located in the Lower Portland Center which will remain R-2, and the area within the 56th & South Tacoma Way Mixed-Use Center that is east of South Tacoma Way and is currently zoned R-4 Multiple-Family Dwelling District, will remain R-4;

• Restrict future rezoning of property within the mixed-use centers to the area-wide reclassification process;

• Revise development, design, residential compatibility, landscaping and buffering, parking, and pedestrian and bicycle support standards for the X-districts;

• Revise the designation of pedestrian streets and add the designation of core pedestrian streets; • Create a height bonus program, where additional height can be allowed in certain areas of the

centers for projects that provide one or more features that benefit the centers, the public and/or achieve community goals. These include features related to CPTED, street-front retail and restaurants, public art, structure parking, transit improvements, residential uses, low-impact development, green roofs, alternative energy use, historic preservation, energy efficiency, affordable housing, open space and transfer of development rights (TDRs);

• Allow height increases of up to 20 feet within 200 feet of the centerline of a Core Pedestrian Street in neighborhood mixed-use centers through the height bonus program;

• Allow height increases of up to 40 feet within 200 feet of the centerline of a Core Pedestrian Street in the MLK and 56th & South Tacoma Way Centers;

• In the MLK Center, allow height increases of up to 20 feet in areas zoned NCX that are outside of the core area;

• Decrease the NCX base height in the Stadium Center to 65 feet; • Reduce the allowable height in portions of the centers abutting single-family zones; • Increase the minimum densities for the RCX, NCX, CCX and UCX zoning districts; • Exempt mixed-use and non-residential projects from the minimum density requirements; • Prohibit certain uses including new single-family residential uses (except new single-family

uses will be allowed in the NRX district); other uses will be restricted from locating along the Core Pedestrian Streets;

• Add standards for drive-throughs and gas stations located along Designated Pedestrian Streets;

• Add building envelope standards, including an upper story setback requirement, for tall buildings along pedestrian streets;

• Add an exemption from certain design standards for small buildings; • Add an exemption to the maximum setback standards for large public facilities; • Add specific design standards for duplex and triplex developments, including covered entry,

windows on the street side, garage design standards, and standards for corner buildings. • Add specific design standards for townhouse developments, including a maximum of 6 units

per building, minimum 10-foot separation between buildings, required ground floor pedestrian entries, building articulation, emphasized pedestrian entries, yard space, and address garage configurations (not facing a street);

• Replace current Mass Reduction features with a new “toolbox” approach for articulation features for both residential and non-residential buildings;

• Add a maximum façade width standard for upper stories of larger/wider buildings;

Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (DRAFT) Page 2 Mixed-Use Centers Update Project

Page 7: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

• Add new requirements for building details, window/trim detailing, and street corner design to add visual interest, depth and integrity to buildings;

• Remove the existing exemption from transparency for residential buildings and add a requirement of 15% transparency for upper levels;

• Increase required pedestrian weather protection from 25% to 50% for buildings not located on Pedestrian Streets;

• Add a height limitation for fences in front yards and require terracing for tall retaining walls, to enhance the pedestrian environment along streets and enhance safety;

• Modify a number of standards to implement CPTED design principles, including those associated with fences, parking lot lighting, tree plantings, and parking garage openings.

• Provide a tiered system for how building design standards apply to additions and remodels to existing, non-conforming structures;

• Require upper story stepbacks above a height of 25 feet where the mixed-use center abuts or is across an alley from a single-family residentially-zoned property, and above a height of 35 feet where the development is across the street from single-family residentially-zoned property;

• Modify the existing business occupancy size limitations to exempt office uses in NCX Districts;

• Eliminate off-street parking requirements for new development along Core Pedestrian Streets in neighborhood centers (height bonus area) and community centers;

• Provide a parking credit program to allow a reduction to off-street parking requirements within other portions of the centers;

• Simplify the existing parking exemption for street-front retail and restaurants; • Require alley access where available (restrict street driveways when an alley is available); • Revise walkway standards to ensure provision of internal walkway circulation within large

developments and add internal pedestrian paths and circulation requirements for large sites with multiple buildings to improve internal pedestrian-orientation and connectivity;

• Modify landscaping quantity requirements to better ensure the human-oriented design of the centers and support the City’s overall sustainability and environmental goals; and

• Provide additional guidance on appropriate trees and plants.

C. FINDINGS: 1. The Comprehensive Plan, adopted in 1993 by Ordinance 25360 and amended by ordinance

once every year thereafter, is Tacoma's comprehensive plan as required by the Growth Management Act (GMA) and consists of several plan and program elements.

2. GMA imposes a substantive requirement that any change to development regulations shall be demonstrably consistent with and implement the Comprehensive Plan. GMA requires any amendments to the Comprehensive Plan and/or development regulations conform to the requirements of the Act.

3. Development regulations include, but are not limited to, zoning controls, critical area ordinances, shoreline master programs, official controls, planned unit development ordinances, subdivision ordinances, and binding site plan ordinances.

4. Title 13 of the Tacoma Municipal Code is the Land Use Regulatory Code and its chapters comprise the City’s development regulations.

Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (DRAFT) Page 3 Mixed-Use Centers Update Project

Page 8: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

5. The recommended amendments to the code requirements, zoning and area-wide zoning reclassifications for the mixed-use centers (MUC) fit within the definition of development regulations.

6. Chapter 13.02 of the Tacoma Municipal Code sets forth the procedures and criteria for amending the Comprehensive Plan, development regulations and for area-wide zoning reclassifications.

7. The City entered into a contract agreement with AHBL, Inc. as lead consultant and Heffron Transportation and Property Counselors as sub-consultants on December 27, 2006 to conduct a review of the City’s designated mixed-use centers, with the exception of the Downtown Mixed-Use Center. The mixed-use center review was one of five priority planning projects identified by the City Council.

8. The proposed zoning and code amendments are outcomes of the 2007 MUC analysis jointly undertaken by the City and Pierce Transit and the AHBL team.

9. The purposes of the Mixed-Use Centers Update Project is to fine tune the growth strategy in the Comprehensive Plan, of which the mixed-use centers are a primary component, to provide incentives for investment, to refine the regulations and zoning controlling development in the centers to better achieve the Plan’s growth vision, and to identify ways to improve the pedestrian and cycling environment and increase opportunities for transit.

10. The growth strategy of the Comprehensive Plan calls for creating compact mixed-use centers of development that are connected via transit and an efficient, multi-modal road network. It is intended that these centers contain a variety of residential and commercial development at higher intensities and densities than single-family residential areas, while the single-family residential areas outside these centers are to be maintained and preserved. Each center is to have an array of amenities and facilities that contribute to the livability of the area.

11. Increasing transit orientation in the centers, in terms of urban form, walkability, the quality of the pedestrian environment, and programs to support these goals, is also a key element of the centers strategy.

12. In May 2007, the Planning Commission reviewed the Tacoma Mixed Use Centers-Existing Conditions Analysis produced by AHBL, Inc., Heffron Transportation and Property Counselors on thirteen existing centers and on three proposed new mixed-use centers located in the McKinley Business district area, along 6th Avenue between Mildred and Jackson and along Pacific Avenue between approximately Wright Avenue and 40th Street. The report provided an analysis of physical characteristics, land use and zoning, development character, urban form, transit and transportation facilities, walking environment, surrounding neighborhood character and market conditions.

13. In June 2007, the Planning Commission reviewed the Mixed Use Centers Analysis-Draft Recommendations prepared by the AHBL team which incorporated Planning Commission, City Council and community feedback on the existing conditions report. The preliminary recommendations included a vision and guiding principles for the centers, an overview of urban form typologies that better define the individual centers and their future growth direction, and a series of recommendations related to the character of development, bonuses and incentives to encourage development, and addressed issues such as compatibility with adjacent areas, quality of life, public art, and culture. The recommendations also addressed

Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (DRAFT) Page 4 Mixed-Use Centers Update Project

Page 9: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

the management of parking so that it serves the overall vision and growth strategy for the centers.

14. In July 2007, the Planning Commission reviewed draft recommendations concerning code revisions for the mixed-use centers including height bonuses, residential compatibility buffers, minimum densities, permitted uses, new and revised zoning classifications, and other recommendations.

15. The Commission, on July 18, 2007, agreed with staff’s proposal for considering proposed Comprehensive Plan amendments and code amendments associated with the Mixed-Use Center Update Project in two separate but related tracks: (1) changes to the Comprehensive Plan to continue as part of the 2007 Annual Amendment schedule; and (2) proposed regulatory amendments and area-wide zoning reclassifications within the mixed-use centers to be considered on a schedule following behind the 2007 Annual Amendment timeline.

16. The proposed changes to the Comprehensive Plan in 2007 included designating three new centers, modifying the boundaries of existing centers, changing the land use intensity designation within the centers and adding and revising policies.

17. Implementation of the 2007 Comprehensive Plan changes necessitate changes to zoning classifications and regulatory requirements for the mixed-use centers to achieve consistency between the Plan and development regulations as required by GMA. The changes are also needed to fully carry out the adopted intent found in the Comprehensive Plan.

18. The proposed amendments to design and landscaping standards are outcomes of the Design Review Project conducted by MAKERS Architecture + Urban Design starting in 2006 and which will continue through 2010. The first part of the study involved review of the City’s Comprehensive Plan policies, existing development/design review process, and standards for Building Design, Residential Compatibility, Parking, Pedestrian and Bicycle Support, and Landscaping and Buffering, which resulted in a set of recommendations to revise development standards as they relate to MUC regulations. The proposed revisions to these standards are based on community input from the Design Review Project, previous input from Planning Commission meetings, public outreach conducted as a part of the Mixed-Use Center review, ongoing coordination with City staff, AHBL and Makers and the consultants’ regional experience with design standards and the development review process.

19. In 1997, the City adopted new zoning districts to implement the MUC designations. While the existing X-district zones (RCX, NCX, CCX, UCX, and CIX) were created to shape the character and type of development occurring within the MUCs, they were not applied uniformly to each of the centers. In many of the MUCs, existing zoning that does not fully implement the intent and vision for the centers is still in place

20. The 12 years since the original adoption of MUC zoning regulations have served as a test for the MUC policies and regulations, allowing the City to consider whether actual development has been consistent with the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. While some centers have experienced development and redevelopment, the overall amount of actual development toward fulfilling the strategy has been limited. Most of the centers lack high-density housing.

21. Chapter 13.02 of the Tacoma Municipal Code defines area-wide zoning reclassifications as legislative actions to change zoning classifications on an area-wide basis to implement and maintain consistency with the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission may consider

Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (DRAFT) Page 5 Mixed-Use Centers Update Project

Page 10: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

area-wide zoning reclassifications in association with or independent of proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan.

22. The proposed amendments will classify all land within MUCs with an X-zone classification, with the exception of some areas zoned PRD and the T Street Gulch area located in the Lower Portland Center, which will remain R-2. (The PRD zone is a residential zone intended to provide for greater flexibility in large scale residential developments and effectively provides for a “master planned development”). Additionally, the areas within the 56th & South Tacoma Way Center that are east of South Tacoma Way and are currently zoned R-4 Multiple-Family Dwelling District will remain zoned R-4 and the area will be considered for removal from the Center as part of the next round of amendments.

23. The proposed rezoning fits within the definition of area-wide zoning reclassifications.

24. The proposed new Urban Residential Mixed-Use District (URX) will be used to define the lower intensity multifamily residential portions of the MUCs. The URX zone is an urban residential zone, allowing for townhouses and low-rise multifamily residential dwellings, adult family homes, retirement homes, family daycares, and similar uses, but not allowing for commercial uses.

25. The proposed new Neighborhood Residential Mixed-Use District (NRX) is to apply to a specific area of the MLK Center in the vicinity of South 8th Street & South I Street to address the unique characteristics and targeted types of development for this area. The zone will allow one-family dwellings; family day care homes; special needs housing; foster homes; existing duplexes and triplexes; new duplexes, triplexes and townhouses with approval of a Conditional Use Permit and multi-family dwellings lawfully in existence at the time of rezone.

26. Property zoned Hospital Medical (HM) located within mixed use centers is proposed to change to Hospital Medical Mixed-Use (HMX) which will add design and development standards consistent with the mixed-use vision.

27. Future changes to the X-District zoning classifications within the mixed-use centers can only occur through a subsequent legislative area-wide zoning process.

28. Each center contains one or more designated pedestrian streets. The pedestrian streets are considered key streets in the development of the MUCs, due to pedestrian use, traffic volumes, transit connections, and/or visibility. Certain requirements apply to Designated Pedestrian Streets, including use restrictions and requirements for increased transparency, weather protection and street furniture.

29. The proposed amendments identify specific segments of the Designated Pedestrian Streets in the core of each neighborhood MUC, which will be called Core Pedestrian Streets. Within the NCX zone, the Core Pedestrian Streets will be the focus of incentives for more intensive mixed-use development, as well as stricter standards to ensure a pedestrian-friendly and transit-oriented environment.

30. A height bonus area is defined for Core Pedestrian Streets where additional height can be achieved in exchange for incorporating a variety of features into the project.

31. In the MLK Center, additional height also can be achieved using the height bonus features in the areas zoned NCX that are outside of the core area.

Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (DRAFT) Page 6 Mixed-Use Centers Update Project

Page 11: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

32. The proposed amendments will reduce allowable height through zoning, setbacks and stepbacks where an X-district abuts single-family zones.

33. Minimum densities are proposed to increase in the RCX, NCX, CCX and UCX zoning districts. The purpose of higher minimum residential density is to support increased transit use, foster commercial development and accommodate population growth.

34. The off-street parking requirements for new development within 200 feet of the Core Pedestrian Streets (height bonus area) in the neighborhood mixed-use centers will be eliminated. Off-street parking requirements will also be eliminated for projects located along Core Pedestrian Streets in the community centers. Parking requirements may be reduced through the use of credits in the remainder of the centers.

35. New standards for townhouse development are proposed that enhance safety, help to create an attractive environment for residents, reinforce pedestrian orientation, reduce vehicle/pedestrian conflicts, and provide usable outdoor space.

36. Enhancements to existing design standards are proposed to increase options, provide flexibility, foster the pedestrian environment and encourage more attractive buildings.

37. To better understand the effect of increasing height, an interactive, computer-based 3-D model was prepared for two representative centers. The model showed different heights and stepback requirements. The model was presented to the Commission and Council at various meetings as well as to community groups. The goals of having a variety of heights are to create a vibrant pedestrian-friendly streetscape, build on and enhance the unique character of each center, create economic vitality, promote investment, and retain and provide a sense of human scale.

38. A Feasibility Analysis was prepared by Property Counselors for mixed-use prototypical developments in the two representative centers used in the 3-D model. The Analysis concluded that investor return was in the range of feasibility assuming a future market with improved conditions and if the project incorporated the multifamily tax incentive.

39. Mr. Radim Blazej, of Caron Architecture, presented an analysis of the proposed code and other existing City building requirements and how they apply to, and affect the feasibility of potential development on a smaller (12,000 square foot) site in response to the Commission’s concern that small lots may offer less flexibility in meeting code requirements, especially for parking. Mr. Blazej concluded the proposed development and design requirements, combined with the elimination/reduction of the parking requirements and increase in height, would provide additional flexibilities to make development more feasible on smaller sites.

40. The Commission considered the above analysis and made several revisions to the proposed code to exempt development on smaller sites to increase the flexibility for these projects.

41. A staff report was prepared by the Planning Division of the Community and Economic Development Department. The report provided a general description of the proposed amendments and identified applicable provisions of the Growth Management Act, Comprehensive Plan and the Land Use Regulatory Code. The proposed amendments were analyzed using the eleven criteria found in Chapter 13.02 of the Tacoma Municipal Code pertaining to proposed amendments to the Comprehensive Plan or development regulations.

Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (DRAFT) Page 7 Mixed-Use Centers Update Project

Page 12: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

42. Area-wide zoning reclassifications also were reviewed using the six additional criteria found in Chapter 13.02. An economic impact assessment was also provided.

43. The Commission reviewed, on June 18, 2008, the staff analysis report concerning the proposed text, zoning and area-wide zoning reclassifications for the mixed-use centers.

44. All of the proposed amendments were presented to and discussed by the Planning Commission during their regular and/or special meetings, which are open to the public. Specifically, the Commission discussed proposed code revisions for the mixed use centers at their meetings on August 15, 2007, September 19, 2007, October 17, 2007, November 7, 2007, December 5 and 19, 2007, January 16, 2008, March 12, 2008, April 2, and 16, 2008, May 7 and 21, 2008, June 4 and 18, 2008 and July 2, 2008.

45. Planning Division staff conducted community workshops and presentations concerning the proposed revisions to the zoning and regulations in the mixed-use centers including:

Community Meeting • City wide meeting on April 30, 2008

City Council • Neighborhoods and Housing Committee on May 19, 2008 • City Council study session on June 17, 2008.

Neighborhood Councils and Neighborhood Groups • New Tacoma Land Use Committee meeting on April 16, 2008. • West End Neighborhood Council meeting on April 16, 2008 and April 15, 2009 • Eastside Neighborhood Council (ENACT) meeting on April 21, 2008 and April 20,

2009 • Central Neighborhood Council meeting on May 1, 2008. • 8th and I Neighbors Land Use Committee meeting on May 2, 2008. • North End Neighborhood Council meeting on May 5, 2008 and May 4, 2009. • New Tacoma Neighborhood Council meeting on May 14, 2008. • Hilltop Action Coalition Block Leaders on May 19, 2008. • Evergreen Neighbors on July 28, 2008.

Business District Associations • Upper Tacoma Business Association on April 17, 2008 and April 16, 2009. • Cross District Forum meeting on May 6, 2008 and May 5, 2009. • Stadium Business District Focus Group on May 13, 2008 and Executive Board on

April 9, 2009.

Others • MLK Stakeholders Focus Group on April 23, 2008. • Urban Developers Focus Group on April 28, 2008.

46. After completing a review of all of the proposed amendments, the staff report, other information produced by the AHBL team and Makers, including the 3-D model, community comments, and the Comprehensive Plan policy direction, the Commission modified the proposals as warranted and on July 2, 2008, authorized the proposed amendments for distribution for public review and comment.

Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (DRAFT) Page 8 Mixed-Use Centers Update Project

Page 13: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

47. The proposed amendments were compiled into a single document for public distribution, which included the staff report, the complete text of the proposed amendments, maps depicting the zoning changes, the preliminary environmental determination and completed environmental checklist, and notice of the Planning Commission’s public hearing.

48. All of the draft amendments to the development regulations and the proposed area-wide zoning reclassifications were prepared under the auspices of the Planning Commission with public participation consistent with GMA requirements and the procedures of Chapter 13.02 of the Tacoma Municipal Code.

49. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on the draft amendments to the Land Use Regulatory Code on Wednesday, August 8, 2008.

50. Written and/or electronic notice of the Planning Commission’s public hearing was provided to Neighborhood Council board members, state, federal and regional agencies, City Council members, environment, development, civic and social organizations, adjacent jurisdictions, the Puyallup Tribal Nation, other local governments, City departments, major institutions and employers, and other individuals who indicated an interest to staff and/or the Planning Commission concerning any of the proposed amendments including those that testified concerning the 2007 Plan amendments pertaining to the centers. Notice was also mailed to taxpayers of record for properties within each of the centers and for properties within 400 feet of the boundaries of the centers. Nearly 10,000 notices were distributed.

51. The public hearing notice included general information regarding the time, place and date of the public hearing. It included a summary of the proposed changes as well as information pertaining to the environmental determination and where additional information could be obtained.

52. Public notice signs were posted for areas under consideration for a change in zoning classification for each of the mixed-use centers which included a map depicting the proposed rezone areas.

53. A 24-hour planning inquiry phone line was established (573-2529) where citizens could call in to receive more information about the proposed amendments and leave messages or ask questions. Staff responded to the messages providing individualized information depending on the request or question.

54. The public hearing notice and the proposed amendments to the Land Use Regulatory Code, including the preliminary environmental determination and completed environmental checklist, were posted on the City’s website at www.cityoftacoma.org/planning.

55. A copy of the public review document was available for review at the offices of the Community and Economic Development Department and at all branches of the Tacoma Public Library.

56. Advertisement of the public hearing was published in The News Tribune on July 16, 2008.

57. Pursuant to WAC 197-11 and Tacoma's SEPA procedures, a Preliminary Determination of Environmental Nonsignificance concerning the Proposed Amendments, was issued on July 9, 2008. This preliminary determination, SEPA File Number SEP2008-40000116363 was made based upon a an expanded environmental checklist. The expanded checklist is intended to accomplish the objectives set forth in the SEPA/GMA integration rules.

Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (DRAFT) Page 9 Mixed-Use Centers Update Project

Page 14: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

58. The environmental checklist and Preliminary Determination of Nonsignificance were provided to the Planning Commission, Department of Ecology, Tacoma’s Neighborhood Councils, City departments, adjacent jurisdictions, State and federal agencies, the Puyallup Tribe, and other appropriate entities. Legal notice announcing the availability of the checklist for review was placed in the City of Tacoma’s official newspaper, the Tacoma Daily Index, on July 9, 2008.

59. The City reconsidered the preliminary determination based on timely public comments regarding the checklist and determination that were received by 5:00 pm on Friday, August 15, 2008. The preliminary determination became final on August 19, 2008.

60. Future proposed development projects can rely on the Determination of Non-Significance (DNS) if a proposed development project meets the thresholds set out in the checklist and complies with adopted City, State, and Federal regulations. Future project submittals may use and not repeat relevant information and analysis in the expanded checklist for purposes of SEPA compliance.

61. It is the City’s intent to use addendums to the DNS issued for the Mixed Use Centers Zoning and Regulations Amendments rather than issuance of a new DNS for projects that fall within the scope of the environmental review. The timeline for future development projects will be reduced by elimination of the comment period followed by the appeal period for environmental determinations. This approach to SEPA review supports GMA and may facilitate and stimulate investment while continuing to protect the natural and built environments.

62. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.370 and following the guidelines prepared by the Washington State Attorney General pursuant to RCW 36.70A.370, the draft amendments were reviewed by the City Attorney to assure that adoption of the changes will not result in an unconstitutional taking of property.

63. Pursuant to RCW 36.70A.530(4), the Community and Economic Development Department notified the Commander of McChord Air Force Base on July 18, 2008 of the City's intent to amend its Land Use Regulatory Code. No response from the Commander was received within the 60 days required by law, which indicates the Commander has no objections to the proposed amendments.

64. In accordance with RCW 36.70A.106, the City of Tacoma, on July 21, 2008, notified the State Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development and other required State agencies of its intent to adopt amendments to its development regulations. The notice included transmittal of the proposed amendments, the Planning Commission’s public hearing notice and the preliminary determination of environmental non-significance and the environmental checklist. No comments were received from the Department of Community, Trade and Economic Development or any other State agency.

65. A public informational session was held on July 23, 2008 where staff provided a detailed explanation of the proposed code and zoning amendments and answered questions. Notice of this community meeting was provided on the public hearing notice. A separate notice of this meeting was provided to all recipients of the Planning Commission’s agenda (approximately 350 individuals) and posted on the City’s website.

66. Forty-two individuals testified at the public hearing and 45 comment letters and 129 e-mails were submitted by the closing of the public hearing record on August 15, 2008. A copy of all

Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (DRAFT) Page 10 Mixed-Use Centers Update Project

Page 15: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

comment letters and e-mails were provided to the Planning Commission for their consideration along with a summary of the oral testimony. Staff from the Planning Division reviewed all of the testimony, summarized the key issues that were raised and provided staff responses to the testimony for consideration by the Commission.

67. Staff analysis and recommendations to modify the proposed amendments in response to public testimony and further review were presented to the Commission by Planning Division staff on August 20, 2008, September 3 and 17, 2008, November 5, 2008, December 3, 2008, January 21, 2009, February 4 and 18, 2009, March 4 and 18, 2009, April 1 and 15, 2009, May 6 and May 20, 2009.

68. To better understand the Tacoma development market and how the proposed code and zoning regulations would operate in the market and at the request of the Commission, Mr. Bob Levin, and Ms. Ellen Walkowiak, Private Capital Division, provided the Commission with a briefing on Tacoma’s market conditions, development potential, and business recruitment and retention strategies.

69. At the request of the Commission, Bob Bengford from Makers Architecture + Urban Design and Radim Blazej from Caron Architecture reviewed the proposed design requirements, including a comparison of the current and proposed standards, and the financial impacts associated with the new and revised design requirements. The review also included an analysis of the feasibility of the proposed revisions to the standards and to the relative equality between the various height bonus features.

70. In response to this analysis, the Commission recommended several revisions to provide additional options and flexibility for the developer while still achieving better design.

71. Mr. Mike Teskey, Public Works Department, provided an overview of the principles and applications of Crime Prevention Through Environmental Design (CPTED). The presentation included a discussion of City staff’s effort to apply the principles to public spaces and the intent to expand the use of the principles in private development projects when procedures are developed and staff resources are assigned.

72. The Commission modified the proposed code amendments to provide voluntary CPTED design review as an option for the height bonus palette and to incorporate several principles into the design and development standards as requirements.

73. The City Council held joint study sessions with the Planning Commission t on April 28 and May 19, 2009. These study sessions provided the Council an opportunity to review the status of the project, discuss the Commission’s preliminary direction, ask questions of staff and the Commission about the draft proposal, and provide direction to the Commission on the zoning and code amendments.

74. The Commission reevaluated and modified the proposed code and zoning amendments in response to Council questions and direction regarding the height bonus program and palette, the residential transition requirements, and the proposed zoning in a number of the centers.

75. After review and discussion at numerous meetings, the Commission agreed to numerous revisions to the proposed amendments as may have been recommended by Commission members or staff and as further modified by the Commission. These revisions are described in the attached recommendations.

Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (DRAFT) Page 11 Mixed-Use Centers Update Project

Page 16: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

D. CONCLUSIONS:

The Planning Commission concludes that: The proposed amendments implement policies in the Comprehensive Plan to encourage more compact development of appropriate size, scale, and character, achieve appropriate transitions to adjoining neighborhood areas through the use of design, building form, setbacks, landscaping, lower scale and massing, screening and other techniques, encourage walkability, provide development incentives and bonuses, provide supportive infrastructure such as sidewalks, bicycle and transit facilities, reduce parking requirements and revise design and development standards.

The proposed increase in height limits will direct the tallest buildings and greatest intensity of development to the core areas of the neighborhood mixed-use centers which will facilitate business development and vitality, support increases in transit ridership, walking and biking, encourage a diversity of housing types and accommodate future population growth. The proposed changes to eliminate parking requirements in the core areas and provide for parking reductions throughout the centers are consistent with the City’s intent to move toward a market basis for the quantity of parking provided to serve future development needs and to encourage alternatives to single-occupancy vehicle travel. The changes in the zoning classifications for properties in the centers will achieve consistency between the Comprehensive Plan designation of mixed-use centers and the zoning within those centers. The mixed-use zoning classifications allow a mix of uses and include requirements for pedestrian and transit-orientation, enhanced design, and incentives to help realize mixed-use development. The proposed changes to increase minimum density requirements will help assure that the development and redevelopment of land will achieve the City’s growth strategy and population/employment targets, facilitate increased transit service and achieve a diversity of housing types. The proposed changes to design and development standards will increase safety by reducing opportunities to commit crime, enhance the attractiveness of development, provide increased flexibility for developers to meet City goals and encourage mixed-use projects and housing density. The financial impact of the proposed revisions to the design and development standards are relatively small compared to other more significant development costs for a project, such as stormwater treatment, utility relocation, and infrastructure upgrades. The built-in flexibility of the code will help to ensure project feasibility without compromising the quality of materials and design and the long term vision for the centers. Zoning and development regulations are tools that the City can use to encourage and foster economic revitalization within the centers, but are not the only tools that should be used. The proposed code and zoning amendments are consistent with the Growth Management Act, are consistent with and implement the City’s Comprehensive Plan, and are in the best interests of the citizens of Tacoma.

Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (DRAFT) Page 12 Mixed-Use Centers Update Project

Page 17: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Planning Commission Findings and Recommendations (DRAFT) Page 13 Mixed-Use Centers Update Project

E. RECOMMENDATIONS:

The Planning Commission recommends that the City Council adopt amendments to the Land Use Regulatory Code, as recommended by the Commission on May 20, 2009. The Planning Commission further recommends that the City Council amend the official zoning map consistent with the proposed area-wide zoning reclassifications recommended by the Planning Commission on May 20, 2009. The recommended code and zoning amendments, including maps of the proposed zoning changes, are contained in the document entitled Mixed Use Centers Review Phase II, Proposed Amendments, Planning Commission Recommendations, May 20, 2009 (the “Blue Book”) and attached hereto. The Planning Commission further recommends that the City should prioritize programs, services and capital dollars to improve the infrastructure and public spaces within the Mixed-Use Centers to help spur private investment and create livable neighborhoods. A first step should include master planning for each center that addresses the unique qualities, conditions and community attributes that distinguish each center from all other centers.

Page 18: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 19: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 1 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

MIXED-USE CENTER REGULATIONS AND ZONING AMENDMENTS DRAFT

Proposed Land Use Regulatory Code Amendments

MAY 13, 2009 Summary The draft land use regulatory code revisions include new/modified standards based on the following overall concepts: New Zoning Classifications and Mixed-Use Centers

• Add NRX and URX zoning districts to MUC zoning use table and design/development standards

• Create new HMX zoning district for areas previously zoned HM but located within the Mixed-Use Centers

• Add NRX and URX intent statements • Add designated pedestrian streets for the three new MUCs (Narrows, McKinley and 34th

& Pacific) Use and Development Standards

• Add a height bonus program, including locations where available and palette of bonus features required to get additional height

• Modify Residential Compatibility Section to incorporate new Height Transition Requirements for edges of MUCs that abut single-family residential zoning

• Remove certain allowed uses from MUCs, such as golf courses and new single-family dwellings

• Restrict additional uses from locating along the core portions of designated pedestrian streets, such as building materials and services, self-storage, and vehicle service and repair

• Add duplexes, triplexes and townhouses as separate uses with specific design and development standards, including maximum building size, orientation, yard space, etc.

• Restrict the construction of new single-family detached housing within the centers • Provide additional standards for drive-throughs and gas stations located along

designated pedestrian streets • Increase Minimum Density Requirements • Modify height limits in RCX and NCX districts

Design Standards • Revise exemptions so that only single-family detached homes are exempt from design

standards • Add specific design standards for duplex, triplex and townhouse developments • Replace current Mass Reduction features with new toolbox approach for articulation

features • Add upper floor stepback requirements along pedestrian streets • Add maximum façade width standard for upper stories of larger/wider buildings • Add vertical articulation requirement and modify blank wall limitations • Add new building details and window/trim detailing requirements

MIXED-USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT

Page 20: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 2 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

• Add a requirement for transparency for residential buildings • Clarify existing standards to ensure appropriate results • Provide tiered system for how building design standards apply to additions and remodels

to existing, non-conforming structures • Increase required pedestrian weather protection for buildings not on pedestrian streets • Add fencing height limitation for fences in front yards and require fencing along streets

and alleys to allow visibility into and out of the use • Require terracing for tall retaining walls

Parking Standards

• Remove parking requirements for the portions of the Neighborhood Centers eligible for the height bonus program (the “core” area)

• Provide a parking credit program for other portions of the Neighborhood and Community Centers

• Revise location standards for large developments to encourage broken-up parking areas and interconnected pedestrian activity

• Require alley access where available • Require non-pedestrian street access for sites abutting multiple streets • Revise parking garage standards along street frontages to limit their impact on the

pedestrian environment • Add new multi-family parking design standards

Pedestrian and Bicycle Support Standards

• Revise walkway standards to ensure provision of internal walkway circulation within large developments

Landscaping and Buffering Standards

• Revised format of landscaping section to include a list of “landscaping/buffer types,” each with its own specific standards

• Increase landscaping quantity requirements to better ensure the human-oriented design of the MUCs and support the City’s overall sustainability and environmental goals

• Provide additional guidance on appropriate trees and plants, including requiring landscaping to maintain CPTED clear visibility zone between 3 and 7 feet

• Modify the landscaping exemptions

Page 21: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 3 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

*Note – These amendments show all of the draft changes to the existing land use regulations. The sections included are only those portions of the code that are associated with the Mixed-Use Centers Update project. Text that is proposed to be added is underlined and text that is proposed to be deleted is shown in strikethrough. Also, in this draft sections that include proposed revisions to the draft code dated April 28, 2009 are highlighted.

CHAPTER 13.06

ZONING

Sections: 13.06.100 Residential Districts. 13.06.100.B.1 R-1 Single-Family Dwelling District. 13.06.100.B.2 R-2 Single-Family Dwelling District. 13.06.100.B.3 R-2 SRD Residential Special Review District. 13.06.100.B.4 HMR-SRD Historic Mixed Residential Special Review District. 13.06.100.B.5 R-3 Two-Family Dwelling District. 13.06.100.B.6 R-4-L Low-Density Mutltiple Family Dwelling District. 13.06.100.B.7 R-4 Multiple Family Dwelling District. 13.06.100.B.8 R5 Multiple-Family Dwelling District. 13.06.140 PRD Planned Residential Development District. 13.06.145 Small-lot Single-Family Residential Development. 13.06.150 Accessory dwelling units. 13.06.155 Day care centers. 13.06.200 Commercial Districts. 13.06.200.A District purposes. 13.06.200.B Districts established. 13.06.200.B.1 T Transitional District. 13.06.200.B.2 C-1 General Neighborhood Commercial District. 13.06.200.B.3 C-2 General Community Commercial District. 13.06.200.B.4 HM Hospital Medical District. 13.06.200.B.5 PDB Planned Development Business District. 13.06.200.C Land use requirements. 13.06.200.D Building envelope standards. 13.06.200.E Maximum setback standards on designated streets. 13.06.200.F Common requirements. 13.06.300 Mixed-Use Center Districts. 13.06.300.A District purposes. 13.06.300.B Districts established. 13.06.300.B.1 NCX Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-Use District. 13.06.300.B.2 CCX Community Commercial Mixed-Use District. 13.06.300.B.3 UCX and UCX-TD Urban Center Mixed-Use District. 13.06.300.B.4 RCX Residential Commercial Mixed-Use District. 13.06.300.B.5 CIX Commercial Industrial Mixed-Use District. 13.06.300.B.6 NRX Neighborhood Residential Mixed-Use District. 13.06.300.B.7 URX Urban Residential Mixed-Use District 13.06.300.B.8 HMX Hospital Medical Mixed-Use District 13.06.300.C Applicability and pedestrian streets designated. 13.06.300.D Land use requirements. 13.06.300.E Building envelope standards. 13.06.300.F Maximum setback standards. 13.06.300.G Residential X-District Yard Space Standards 13.06.300.GH Common requirements.

Page 22: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 4 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.400 Industrial Districts. 13.06.400.A Industrial district purposes. 13.06.400.B Districts established. 13.06.400.C Land use requirements. 13.06.400.D Building envelope standards. 13.06.410 Repealed. 13.06.420 Repealed 13.06.430 Repealed 13.06.500 Requirements in all preceding districts. 13.06.501 Building design standards. 13.06.502 Landscaping and/or buffering standards. 13.06.503 Residential compatiblity standards. 13.06.510 Off-street parking. 13.06.511 Transit support facilities. 13.06.512 Pedestrian and bicycle support standards. 13.06.520 Signs. 13.06.521 General sign regulations. 13.06.522 District sign regulations. 13.06.525 Adult uses. 13.06.530 Juvenile community facilities. 13.06.535 Special needs housing. 13.06.540 Surface mining. 13.06.545 Wireless communication facilities. 13.06.550 Work release centers. 13.06.555 View-Sensitive Overlay District. 13.06.600 Zoning code administration - General purposes. 13.06.602 General restrictions 13.06.603 Mineral resource lands. 13.06.605 Interpretation and application. 13.06.610 Enforcement of land use regulatory code. 13.06.620 Severability. 13.06.625 Violations – Penalties. 13.06.630 Nonconforming parcels/uses/structures. 13.06.635 Temporary use. 13.06.640 Conditional use permit. 13.06.645 Variances. 13.06.650 Application for rezone of property. 13.06.655 Amendments to the zoning regulations. 13.06.700 Definitions in all preceding districts.

Page 23: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 5 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

13.05.030 Land Use Administrator – Creation and purpose – Appointment – Authority. A. Creation and Purpose. The position of Land Use Administrator is hereby created. The Land Use Administrator shall act upon land use regulatory permits as specified in this chapter. In order to ensure that the Land Use Administrator is free from improper influence, no individual, City employee, and member of the City Council, or other City board, commission or committee shall interfere with the exercise of the Land Use Administrator’s duties and responsibilities set forth herein.

B. Appointment. The Land Use Administrator shall be appointed by the Director of Public Works, upon advice of the Director of the Community and Economic Development Department and the City Attorney. The Director of Public Works may also designate an Acting Land Use Administrator who shall, in the event of the absence or the inability of the Land Use Administrator to act, have all the duties and powers of the Land Use Administrator.

C. Authority. The Land Use Administrator shall have the authority to act upon the following matters:

1. Interpretation, enforcement, and administration of the City’s land use regulatory codes as prescribed in this title;

2. Applications for conditional use permits;

3. Applications for site plan approvals;

4. Applications for special development permits;

5. Applications for variances;

6. Applications for waivers;

7. Applications for preliminary and final plats as outlined in Chapter 13.04, Platting;

8. Applications for Wetland/Stream/FWHCA Development Permits, Wetland Delineation Verifications, Wetland/Stream/FWHCA Assessments as outlined in Chapter 13.11;

9. Applications for Shoreline Management Substantial Development Permits/conditional use/ variances as outlined in Chapter 13.10;

10. Modifications or revisions to any of the above approvals;

11. Approval of landscape plans;

12. Extension of time limitations;

13. Application for permitted use classification for those uses not specifically classified.

14. Boundary line adjustments, binding site plans, and short plats;

15. Approval of building or development permits requiring Land Use Code and Environmental Code compliance.

16. Adoption of an Administrative CPTED Project Review Checklist for use with the Mixed-Use Centers height bonus program (see TMC 13.06.300.E.2).

D. Interpretation and Application of Land Use Regulatory Code. In interpreting and applying the provisions of the Land Use Regulatory Code, the provisions shall be held to be the minimum requirements for the promotion of the public safety, health, morals or general welfare. It is not intended by this code to interfere with or abrogate or annul any easements, covenants or agreements between parties. Where this code imposes a greater restriction upon the use of buildings or premises or upon the heights of buildings or requires larger yards or setbacks and open spaces than are required in other ordinances, codes, regulations, easements, covenants or agreements, the provisions of this code shall govern. An interpretation shall be utilized where the factual basis to make a determination is unusually complex or there is some problem with the veracity of the facts; where the applicable code provision(s) is ambiguous or its application to the facts unclear; or in those instances where a person applying for a license or permit disagrees with a staff determination made on the application. Requests for interpretation of the provisions of the Land Use Regulatory Code shall be processed in accordance with the requirements of Section 13.05.040.

* * *

Page 24: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 6 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

13.05.020 Notice process. A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to provide notice requirements for land use applications.

B. Process I – Minor Land Use Decisions.

* * *

C. Process II – Administrative Decisions Requiring an Environmental Determination and Height Variances, Shoreline Permits, Conditional Use, Special Development Permits, Wetland/Stream/Fish & Wildlife Habitat Conservation Area (FWHCA) Development Permits, Wetland/Stream/FWHCA Assessments, and Wetland Delineation Verifications, and Adoption of an Administrative CPTED Project Review Checklist.

1. A notice of application shall be provided within 14 days following a notice of complete application being issued to the applicant as identified in Section 13.05.010.E.

2. Notice of application shall be mailed by first-class mail to the applicant; property owner (if different than the applicant); neighborhood councils in the vicinity where the proposal is located; qualified neighborhood or community organizations consistent with the requirements set forth for Process I land use permits; the Tacoma Landmarks Commission (for proposals located within a historic district or affecting a designated landmark); the Puyallup Indian Tribe for “substantial action” as defined in the “Agreement Between the Puyallup Tribe of Indians, Local Governments in Pierce County, the State of Washington, the United States of America, and Certain Private Property Owners,” dated August 27, 1988; and to owners of property and/or taxpayers of record, as indicated by the records of the Pierce County Assessor/Treasurer, within the distances identified in Section 13.05.020.G. For major modifications to development approved in a PRD District rezone and/or site approval, the notice of application shall also be provided to all owners of property and/or taxpayers of record within the entire PRD District and owners of property and/or taxpayers of record, as indicated by the records of the Pierce County Assessor/Treasurer, within the distances identified in Section 13.05.020.G from the boundary of the PRD District.

3. Parties receiving notice of application shall be given 30 days, with the exception of five to nine lot preliminary plats which shall be given 20 days, and Wetland/Stream Assessments which shall be given 14 days from the date of mailing (including the day of mailing) to provide any comments on the proposed project to the Department, unless a Public Meeting is held, as provided by Section 13.05.020.F. The notice shall indicate that a copy of the decision taken upon such application will be provided to any person who submits written comments on the application within 30 days of the mailing of such notice, or who requests receipt of a copy of the decision.

4. A public information sign (or signs), provided by the Department for applications noted in Table G (Section 13.05.020.G), indicating that a land use permit application for a proposal has been submitted, shall be erected on the site by the applicant, in a location specified by the Department, within seven calendar days of the date on which a notice of complete application is issued to the applicant. The sign shall remain on the site until the date of final decision, at which time the sign shall be removed by the applicant. The sign shall contain, at a minimum, the following information: type of application, name of applicant, description and location of proposal, and where additional information can be obtained.

5. Notice shall be published in a newspaper of general circulation for applications identified in the table in subsection G of this section.

6. For the adoption of an Administrative CPTED Project Review Checklist, notice shall, in addition to the standard notification list outlined above, be provided to local building design and development companies and associations, to the extent practicable.

* * *

Page 25: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 7 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

Table G – Notice, Comment and Expiration for Land Use Permits

Permit Type Preapplication Meeting

Notice: Distance

Notice: Newspaper

Notice: Post Site

CommentPeriod

Decision

Hearing Required

City Council

Expiration of Permit

Interpretation/determination of code

Recommended

100 feet for site specific

For general application

Yes 14 days LUA No No None

Uses not specifically classified

Recommended

400 feet Yes Yes 30 days LUA No No None

Boundary line adjustment

Required No No No No LUA No No 5 years***

Binding site plan Required No No No No LUA No No 5 years*** Environmental SEPA DNS/EIS

Optional Same as case type

Yes if no hearing required

Yes for EIS

Same as case type

Dept. Director

No No None

Variance , height of main structure

Required 400 feet No Yes 30 days LUA No* No 5 years

Open space classification

Required 400 feet No Yes ** Hearing Examiner

Yes Yes None

Plats 10+ lots Required 400 feet Yes Yes 21 days SEPA**

Hearing Examiner

Yes Final Plat 5 years***

Plats 5-9 lots Required 400 feet Yes Yes 20 days LUA No* Final Plat 5 years*** Rezones Required 400 feet No Yes 21 days

SEPA** Hearing Examiner

Yes Yes None

Shoreline/CUP/ variance

Required 400 feet No Yes 30 days*****

LUA No* No 2 years/ maximum 6

Short plat Required No No No No LUA No No 5 years*** Site approval Optional 400 feet No Yes 30 days***

** LUA No* No 5 years

Conditional use Required 400 feet No Yes 30 days*****

LUA No* No 5 years****

Special development

Optional 400 feet No Yes 30 days*****

LUA No* No 5 years

Variance Optional 100 feet No Yes 14 days LUA No* No 5 years Waiver Optional 100 feet No Yes 14 days LUA No* No Condition of

permit Wetland/Stream/ FWHCA development permits

Required 400 feet No Yes 30 days LUA No* No 5 years

Wetland/stream/ FWHCAassessment

Required 400 feet No Yes 14 days LUA No No 5 years

Wetland delineation verification

Required 400 feet No Yes 30 days LUA No No 5 years

Adoption of Administrative CPTED Project Review Checklist

No No Yes No 30 days LUA No No None

INFORMATION IN THIS TABLE IS FOR REFERENCE PURPOSE ONLY. * When an open record hearing is required, all other land use permit applications for a specific site or project shall be considered

concurrently by the Hearing Examiner (refer to Section 13.05.040.E). ** Comment on land use permit proposal allowed from date of notice to hearing. *** Must be recorded with the Pierce County Auditor within five years. **** Special use permits for wireless communication facilities, including towers, are limited to two years from the effective date of the Land

Use Administrator’s decision. ***** If a public meeting is held, the public comment period shall be extended 7 days beyond and including the date of the public meeting.

* * *

Page 26: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 8 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.200 Commercial Districts. A. District purposes. The specific purposes of the Commercial Districts are to:

1. Implement goals and policies of the City’s comprehensive plan.

2. Implement Growth Management Act goals, county-wide, and multi-county planning policies.

3. Create a variety of commercial settings matching scale and intensity of use to location.

4. Attract private investment in commercial and residential development.

5. Provide for predictability in the expectations for development projects.

6. Allow for creative designs while ensuring desired community design objectives.

B. Districts established.

1. T Transitional District. This district is intended as a transition between commercial or institutional areas and residential areas. It may also provide a transition between residential districts and commercial districts on arterial street segments supported by the comprehensive plan. It primarily consists of office uses with negligible off-site impacts. It is characterized by lower traffic generation, fewer operating hours, smaller scale buildings, and less signage than general commercial areas. Residential uses are also appropriate. A T Transitional District may, in limited circumstances, also be applied to locations that meet the unique site criteria of the comprehensive plan. This classification is not appropriate inside a designated mixed-use center.

2. C-1 General Neighborhood Commercial District. This district is intended to contain low intensity land uses of smaller scale, including office, retail, and service uses. It is characterized by less activity than a community commercial district. Building sizes are limited for compatibility with surrounding residential scale. Residential uses are appropriate. Land uses involving vehicle service or alcohol carry greater restriction. This classification is not appropriate inside a plan designated mixed-use center or single-family intensity area.

3. C-2 General Community Commercial District. This district is intended to allow a broad range of medium- to high-intensity uses of larger scale. Office, retail, and service uses that serve a large market area are appropriate. Residential uses are also appropriate. This classification is not appropriate inside comprehensive plan designated mixed-use centers or low-intensity areas.

4. HM Hospital Medical District. This district is intended for limited areas that contain hospitals and/or similar large scale medical facilities with limitations on non-medical uses to only allow uses which may serve typical needs of medical centers such as food and lodging. It is not intended for introduction into areas not containing or non-contiguous to a hospital or similar facility. Residential uses are also appropriate. This classification is not appropriate inside comprehensive plan designated low-intensity areas.

5. PDB Planned Development Business District. This district is intended to provide limited areas for a mix of land uses that includes warehousing, distribution, light assembly, media, education, research, and limited commercial. The developments in this district are intended to have fewer off-site impacts than would be associated with industrial or community commercial areas. Retail uses are size limited and signage is reduced. These areas should be designed for improved residential compatibility on boundaries by landscaping and other design elements. Sites should have reasonably direct access to a highway or major arterial. This district is not appropriate inside comprehensive plan designated mixed-use centers or low-intensity areas.

C. Land use requirements.

1. Applicability. The following tables compose the land use regulations for all districts of Section 13.06.200. All portions of Section 13.06.200 and applicable portions of Section 13.06.500 apply to all new development of any land use variety, including additions and remodels, in all districts in Section 13.06.200, unless explicit exceptions or modifications are noted. The requirements of Section 13.06.200.A through Section 13.06.200.C are not eligible for variance. When portions of this section are in conflict with other portions of Chapter 13.06, the more restrictive shall apply.

2. Use requirements. The following use table designates all permitted, limited, and prohibited uses in the districts listed. Use classifications not listed in this section or provided for in Section 13.06.500 are prohibited, unless permitted via Section 13.05.030.E. Certain street level use restrictions may apply; see Section 13.06.200.C.4 below.

[See next page for table.]

Page 27: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed-Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 9 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

3. Use table abbreviations.

P = Permitted use in this district. CU = Conditional use in this district. Requires conditional use permit, consistent with the criteria and procedures of Section 13.06.640. TU = Temporary use permit is required, consistent with Section 13.06.635. N = Prohibited use in this district.

4. District use table.

Uses T C-1 C-2 HM PDB Additional Regulations

Adult retail and entertainment N N N N N Prohibited except as provided for in Section 13.06.525. Adult family home P P P P P See definition for bed limit. Ambulance services N P P P P Animal sales and service N P P N N Must be conducted entirely within an enclosed building. See Table

13.06.200.D for setback requirements specific to animal sales and service. Art/craft production N P P N P Contained entirely within a building. Assembly facility CU P P N P Building materials and services N N P N N Brewpubs/taverns N N P N N 2,400 barrel annual brewpub production maximum, equivalent volume winery

limit. Business support services N P P N P Carnivals TU TU TU TU TU Subject to Section 13.06.635. Cemetery/internment services N N N N N Enlargement of cemeteries in existence at the time of adoption of this chapter

may be approved in any zoning district, subject to a conditional use permit. Commercial parking facility P P P P P Commercial recreation and entertainment

N N P N N

Communication facility N N P N P Confidential shelter P P P P P See Section 13.06.535. Limit: 15 residents in T District. Continuing care retirement community

P P P P P See Section 13.06.535.

Correctional facility N N N N N Cultural institution P P P N N Day care, family P P P P P Day care, center P P P P P Subject to regulations set forth in Section 13.06.155. Detoxification center N N N CU N Drive-throughs with any permitted use

N N P N N Prohibited in any commercial district combined with a VSD View-Sensitive Overlay District and adjacent to a Shoreline District (i.e., Old Town Area).

Page 28: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed-Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 10 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Uses T C-1 C-2 HM PDB Additional Regulations

Dwellings/residential P P P P P Eating and drinking N P P P P a. In C-1 and PDB, live entertainment limited to that consistent with a Class

“C” Cabaret license as designated in Chapter 6B.70.14; b. In C-2, live entertainment limited to that consistent with either a Class “B”

or Class “C” Cabaret license as designated in Chapter 6B.70.14; c. Alcohol service, in C-1 and PDB, requires a conditional use permit. (See Table 13.06.200.D for size limitation in HM and PDB)

Emergency and transitional housing

CU CU P CU CU See Sections 13.06.535 and 13.06.640.

Extended care facility P P P P P See Section 13.06.535. Food and non-alcoholic beverage production and processing, limited

N N P N P Not to exceed 4,000 square feet or 45 percent of the gross floor area, whichever is less, and must include a retail component fronting the street at the sidewalk level.

Foster home P P P P P Funeral homes P P P P N Gas stations N P P N N Golf course P P P P P Group housing P P P P P Heliport N N N CU N Hospital N CU CU P N Hotel/motel N N P P P Intermediate care facility P P P P P See Section 13.06.535. Juvenile community facility N N N N N Prohibited except as provided for in Section 13.06.530. Lodging house P P P P P Microbrewery/winery N N N N N Microwinery, limited N CU P N CU Alcohol service, in C-1 and PDB zones, requires a conditional use permit.

Must include a retail component that occupies a minimum of 500 gross square feet of usable space, fronts the street at sidewalk level or has a well-marked and visible entrance at sidewalk level, and is open to the public a minimum of forty (40) hours per week. All production activities must be conducted within an enclosed building. Within C-1 districts, no outside storage is allowed. Outside storage is allowed in all other districts where this use is permitted provided screening and/or buffer planting areas are provided in accordance with Section 13.06.502.B.

Mobile home/trailer court N N CU N N Nursery N N P N N

Page 29: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed-Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 11 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Uses T C-1 C-2 HM PDB Additional Regulations

Office P P P P P Parking areas P P P P P All parking areas shall comply with Sections 13.06.502 and 13.06.510. Park and recreation P P P P P Passenger terminal N N P N N Personal services N P P P P See Table 13.06.200.D for size limitation in PDB and HM. Public safety facility P P P P P Religious assembly P P P P P Research and development industry

N N N N P

Residential care facility for youth

P P P P P See Section 13.06.535. See definition for bed limit.

Residential chemical dependency treatment facility

P P P P P See Section 13.06.535.

Retirement home P P P P P See Section 13.06.535. Repair services N P P N N Must be contained within a building with no outdoor storage. Engine repair,

see Vehicle Repair. Retail N P P P P See Table 13.06.200.D for size limitation in PDB and HM. Schools, public or private P P P P P Self-storage N N P N P Any other use of the facility shall be consistent with this section. Staffed residential home P P P P P See Section 13.06.535. See definition for bed limit. Student housing P P P P P Surface mining CU CU CU CU CU See specific requirements in Section 13.06.540. Temporary uses TU TU TU TU TU Subject to Section 13.06.635. Theater N P P N N Movie theaters are limited to 4 screens. This does not include adult

entertainment. Utilities CU CU CU CU CU Vehicle rental and sales N N P N N Prohibited in any commercial district combined with a VSD View-Sensitive

Overlay District and adjacent to a Shoreline District (i.e., Old Town Area). Vehicle service and repair N N P N N Car washes: limited to 2 stalls in C-1. Washing bays shall be enclosed on at

least 2 sides covered with a roof. No water shall spray or drain off-site. Subject to development standards contained in Section 13.06.510.E. Prohibited in any commercial district combined with a VSD View-Sensitive Overlay District and adjacent to a Shoreline District (i.e., Old Town Area).

Vehicle service and repair, industrial

N N N N N

Vehicle storage N N N N N Wholesale/distribution N N N N P

Page 30: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed-Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 12 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Uses T C-1 C-2 HM PDB Additional Regulations

Wireless communication facility P*/CU** P*/CU** P*/CU** P*/CU** *Wireless communication facilities are also subject to Section 13.06.545.D.1. **Wireless communication facilities are also subject to Section 13.06.545.D.2.

Work release center N N N N N Prohibited except as provided for in Section 13.06.550. Designated Pedestrian Streets: For segments here noted, additional use limitations apply to areas with C-2 Commercial District zoning to ensure continuation of development patterns in certain areas that enhance opportunity for pedestrian based commerce. North 30th Street from 200 feet east of the Starr Street centerline to 190 feet west of the Steele Street centerline: street level uses are limited to retail, personal services, eating and drinking, and customer service offices.

Page 31: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed-Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 13 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

D. Building envelope standards.

T C-1 C-2 HM PDB Minimum Lot

Area 0 non-residential;

1,500 square feet per residential unit

0 0 0 0

Minimum Lot Width

0 0 0 0 0

Maximum Lot Coverage

None None None None None

Minimum Front Setback

In all districts listed above, 0 feet, unless abutting a residential zoning, then equal to the residential zoning district for the first 100 feet from that side. Maximum setbacks (Section 13.06.200.E) superscede this requirement where applicable. Animal sales and service: shall be setback from residential uses or residential zoning district boundaries at least 20 feet.

Minimum Side Setback

In all districts listed above, 0 feet, unless created by requirements in Section 13.06.502. Animal sales and service: shall be setback from residential uses or residential zoning district boundaries at least 20 feet.

Minimum Rear Setback

In all districts listed above, 0 feet, unless created by requirements in Section 13.06.502. Animal sales and service: shall be setback from residential uses or residential zoning district boundaries at least 20 feet.

Maximum Setback from Designated

Streets

See Section 13.06.200.E for application with any district listed above on designated segments of North 30th Street and 6th Avenue.

Maximum Height Limit

35 feet 35 feet 45 feet 150 feet 45 feet

Height will be measured consistent with Building Code, Height of Building, unless a View-Sensitive Overlay District applies. Height may be further restricted in View-Sensitive Overlay Districts.

Maximum Height Exceptions

1. Schools, libraries, structures for religious assembly, colleges: In districts with a height limit of 35 feet, these facilities, when permitted as a use, are allowed at a maximum 45 feet in height.

2. Structures, above height limits: Chimneys, tanks, towers, steeples, flagpoles, smokestacks, silos, elevators, fire or parapet walls, and/or similar necessary building appurtenances may exceed the district height limit provided all structural or other requirements of the City of Tacoma are met and no usable floor space above the district height limit is added.

Maximum Gross Floor Area per

Building

None 30,000 square feet gross floor area

None 7,000 square feet gross floor area for eating and drinking, retail and personal service uses

7,000 square feet gross floor area for eating and drinking, retail and personal service uses

Page 32: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed-Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 14 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

E. Maximum setback standards on designated streets. To achieve a pedestrian supportive environment, where buildings are located in close proximity to the street and designed with areas free of pedestrian and vehicle movement conflicts, maximum building setbacks are required as follows:

Designated Pedestrian Streets in Commercial Districts

Requirements

1. Designated Pedestrian Streets Requiring Maximum Setback

a. 6th Avenue (Madison Street to Alder Street). b. 6th Avenue (Sprague Avenue to I Street). c. North 30th Street (from 200 feet east of the Starr Street centerline to 190 feet west of the Steele Street centerline).

2. Maximum Setback Applied a. 10 feet maximum front and/or corner side setback from property lines at the public right-of-way shall be provided for at least 75 percent of building facing the designated street frontage.

b. When the site is adjacent to a designated pedestrian street, that street frontage shall be utilized to meet the maximum setback requirement with the front, side, and/or corner side of the facade as indicated above.

c. This requirement superscedes any stated minimum setback. d. Maximum setback areas shall be designed to be sidewalk, pedestrian plaza, public open space, landscaping,

and/or courtyard and to be free of motor vehicles at all times. 3. Exceptions a. Additions to legal, nonconforming buildings are exempt from maximum setbacks, provided the addition does not

increase the level of nonconformity as to maximum setback. b. Buildings that are 100 percent residential do not have a maximum setback. c. The primary building of a gas station, where gas stations are allowed, is subject to the maximum setback on only

one side of the building on corner parcels. Kiosks without retail and intended for fuel payment only are exempt.

, ,-

Examples for Application of Maximum Setback

P e d e s t r i a n A r e a

7 5 % M i n i m u m R e q u i r e d F r o n t a g e

P e de str ianA rea

M i n i m u m R e q u ire d F ro n ta g e5 0 % S i n g l e B u ild in g2 5 % S h o p p in g C e n te r

50% M in im u mR e q u ired F ro nta ge

P e de str ia nA re a

Page 33: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed-Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 15 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

F. Common requirements. To streamline the Zoning Code, certain requirements common to all districts are consolidated under Section 13.06.500. These requirements apply to Section 13.06.200 by reference.

Refer to Section 13.06.500 for the following requirements in Section 13.06.200 districts:

13.06.501 Building design standards. 13.06.502 Landscaping and/or buffering standards. 13.06.503 Residential compatiblity standards. 13.06.510 Off-street parking. 13.06.511 Transit support facilities. 13.06.512 Pedestrian and bicycle support standards. 13.06.520 Signs.

Page 34: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed-Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 16 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.300 Mixed-Use Center Districts. A. District Purposes. The specific purposes of the Mixed-Use Center Districts regulations are to:

1. Increase the variety of development opportunities in Tacoma by encouraging greater integration of land uses within specific districts in a manner consistent with the Growth Management Act, the Regional Plan: Vision 2020, the County-Wide Planning Policies for Pierce County, and the City’s comprehensive plan.

2. Strengthen the City’s economic base by encouraging more efficient use of existing infrastructure and limited land supply through mixed-use, density, and design, as well as transit and pedestrian orientation in specified centers.

3. Allow and encourage a variety of housing options within mixed-use centers, including residences over businesses that can promote live-work arrangements which reduce demands on the transportation system.

4. Help provide employment opportunities closer to home and reduce vehicular trips for residents of the City and surrounding communities by encouraging mixed-use development.

5. Create a variety of suitable environments for various types of commercial and industrial uses, and protect them from the adverse effects of inharmonious uses.

6. Allow commercial and industrial growth in specified centers and/or districts while minimizing its impact on adjacent residential districts through requirements of buffering, landscaping, compatible scale, and design.

7. Accommodate and support alternative modes of transportation, including transit, walking, and bicycling, to reduce reliance on the automobile by making specified centers more “pedestrian-oriented” and “transit-oriented” through the provision of street amenities, landscaping, windows, continuous building frontages, limited curb cuts, and direct pedestrian entrances adjacent to the right-of-way and/or public sidewalk.

8. Ensure the provision of adequate off-street parking and loading facilities in a manner which will not conflict with the previously described transit and pedestrian-oriented design. Locate and design parking to be consistent with the overall intent of providing a pedestrian and transit-supportive environment that encourages human-oriented design instead of vehicle-oriented design and promotes alternatives to single-occupancy vehicles. Examples include building location at the street, parking location behind or within buildings to the rear, adequate screening, avoidance of pedestrian-vehicle conflicts, and conveniently located transit stops.

9. Within Centers, the core areas of the district are the central hub and focus for the greatest level of growth and activity. Within these core areas, additional building height, enhanced standards, and design flexibility is appropriate to ensure that they are developed consistent with the community vision and goals for these areas, as outlined in the Comprehensive Plan.

B. Districts established. The following specific districts are established to implement the purposes of this section and the goals and policies of Tacoma’s comprehensive plan:

1. NCX Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-Use District. To provide areas primarily for immediate day-to-day convenience shopping and services at a scale that is compatible and in scale with the surrounding neighborhood, including local retail businesses, professional and business offices, and service establishments. This district is intended to enhance, stabilize, and preserve the unique character and scale of neighborhood centers and require, where appropriate, continuous retail frontages largely uninterrupted by driveways and parking facilities with street amenities and direct pedestrian access to the sidewalk and street. Residential uses are encouraged as integrated components in all development.

2. CCX Community Commercial Mixed-Use District. To provide for commercial and retail businesses intended to serve many nearby neighborhoods and draw people from throughout the City. These areas are envisioned as evolving from traditional suburban development to higher density urban districts. Walking and transit use are facilitated through designs which decrease walking distances and increase pedestrian safety. Uses include shopping centers with a wide variety of commercial establishments; commercial recreation; gas stations; and business, personal, and financial services. Residential uses are encouraged in CCX Districts as integrated development components.

3. UCX and UCX-TD Urban Center Mixed-Use District. To provide for dense concentration of residential, commercial, and institutional development, including regional shopping centers, supporting business and service uses, and other regional attractions. These centers are to hold the highest densities outside the Central Business District. An urban center is a focus for both regional and local transit systems. A TD designation is used for the Urban Center Mixed-Use District in the Tacoma Dome area to provide specific transit-oriented development,

Page 35: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed-Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 17 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

consistent with the Tacoma Dome Area Plan. Walking and transit use is facilitated through designs which decrease walking distances and increase pedestrian safety. Residential uses are encouraged in UCX Districts as integrated development components.

4. RCX Residential Commercial Mixed-Use District. To provide sites for medium- and high-intensity residential development in centers, with opportunities for limited mixed use. This district is primarily residential in nature and provides housing density on the perimeter of more commercial mixed-use zones.

Commercial uses in this district are small in scale and serve the immediate neighborhood. These uses provide opportunities for employment close to home. This district frequently provides a transition area to single-family neighborhoods.

5. CIX Commercial Industrial Mixed-Use District. To provide sites for a mix of commercial establishments and limited industrial activities, including light manufacturing, assembly, distribution, and storage of goods, but no raw materials processing or bulk handling. Larger scale buildings are appropriate. Residential uses are permitted.

6. NRX Neighborhood Residential Mixed-Use District. To provide for a predominantly residential neighborhood, to discourage removal of existing single-family residential structures; and to encourage in-fill residential development of appropriate size and design. This district is designed for areas characterized by an established mix of housing types and limited neighborhood commercial uses, in areas which were formerly zoned to permit residential development at densities greater than single-family, where redevelopment removed many existing single-dwelling structures and where there is continued development pressure that threatens single-family dwellings. Adaptive reuse of existing single-family detached structures as duplexes or triplexes is permitted with special review. Multiple-family dwellings in existence at the time of reclassification to NRX are conforming uses.

7. URX Urban Residential Mixed-Use District. To provide sites for medium intensity residential development, such as townhouses, condos and apartments. This district is residential in nature and provides housing density in proximity to more commercial mixed use zones. This district serves as a transition between more intensive MUC uses and surrounding residential areas.

8. HMX Hospital Medical Mixed-Use District. This district is intended for limited areas that contain hospitals and/or similar large scale medical facilities with limitations on non-medical uses to only allow uses which may serve typical needs of medical centers such as food and lodging. It is not intended for introduction into areas not containing or non-contiguous to a hospital or similar facility. Residential uses are also appropriate. This classification is not appropriate inside comprehensive plan designated low-intensity areas.

C. Applicability and pedestrian streets designated.

Applicability. The following tables compose the land use regulations for all Mixed-Use Center Districts. All portions of Section 13.06.300 and applicable portions of Section 13.06.500, apply to all new development of any land use variety, including additions and remodels, in all Mixed-Use Center Districts, unless explicit exceptions or modifications are noted. The requirements of Sections 13.06.300.A through 13.06.300.D are not eligible for variance. When portions of this section are in conflict with other portions of Chapter 13.06, the more restrictive shall apply.

Page 36: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed-Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 18 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

TABLE C.1: MIXED-USE CENTER PEDESTRIAN STREETS ESTABLISHED The following pedestrian streets are considered key streets in the development and utilization of Tacoma’s mixed-use centers, due to pedestrian use, traffic volumes, transit connections, and/or visibility. They are designated for use with other tables herein as follows: with certain provisions in the mixed-use zoning regulations, including use restrictions and design requirements, such as increased transparency, weather protection and street furniture standards. In some centers, these “pedestrian streets” and/or portions thereof are further designated as “core pedestrian streets” for use with certain additional provisions, including Section 13.06.300.E.2, Height Bonuses. The “core pedestrian streets” are a subset of the “pedestrian streets,” and thus, those provisions that apply to designated “pedestrian streets” also apply to designated “core pedestrian streets.” Mixed-Use Center Designated Pedestrian Streets

(All portions of the streets within Mixed-Use Center District zoning, unless otherwise noted.)

Designated Core Pedestrian Streets (All portions of the streets within Mixed-Use Centers, unless otherwise noted)

6th Avenue and Pine Street 6th Avenue 6th Avenue Narrows (6th Avenue and Jackson)

6th Avenue 6th Avenue

Downtown Tacoma (Tacoma Dome Area) CBD (Tacoma Dome)

Puyallup Avenue; East 25th Street*; East 26th Street; East D Street

N/A

McKinley (East 34th and McKinley)

McKinley Avenue from Wright Avenue to East 39th Street*

McKinley Avenue from Wright Avenue to East 36th Street

Lower Portland Avenue Portland Avenue*, East 32nd Street, East 29th Street Portland Avenue

Proctor (North 26th Street and Proctor Street)

North 26th Street; North Proctor Street*

North 26th Street; North Proctor Street

Stadium (North 1st Street and Tacoma Avenue) (Stadium)

Division Avenue from North 2nd Street to Tacoma Avenue; Tacoma Avenue*; North 1st Street; North I Street

Division Avenue from North 2nd Street to Tacoma Avenue; Tacoma Avenue*; North 1st Street

Martin Luther King Jr. (South 11th Street and Martin Luther King Jr. Way)

Martin Luther King Jr. Way*; South 11th Street; South 12th Earnest S. Brazill Street; 6th Avenue

Martin Luther King Jr. Way from S. 9th to S. 15th, South 11th Street; Earnest S. Brazill Street

Lincoln (South 38th Street and G Street) (Lincoln)

South 38th Street*; South G and Yakima Avenue from South 36th Street to South 39th Street

South 38th Street, South G Street north of Division Avenue

South 34th and Pacific Pacific Avenue Pacific Avenue South 56th Street and South Tacoma Way

South Tacoma Way*; South 56th Street

South Tacoma Way

South East 72nd Street and Portland Avenue

South East 72nd Street*; Portland Avenue

East 72nd Street, Portland Avenue

South 72nd Street and Pacific Avenue

South 72nd Street; Pacific Avenue* Pacific Avenue

Tacoma Central/Allenmore Union Avenue*; South 19th Street between South Lawrence Street and South Union Avenue

Union Avenue south of South 18th Street; South 19th Street between South Lawrence Street and South Union Avenue

Tacoma Mall Area South 47th/48th Transition Street; Steele Street*

N/A

TCC/James Center Mildred Street*; South 19th Street Mildred Street south of South 12th Street; South 19th Street

Westgate Pearl Street*; North 26th Street Pearl Street * Indicates primary designated pedestrian streets for use with certain requirements of Chapter 13.06). In centers where multiple streets are designated, one street is designated the Primary Pedestrian Street. This is used when applying certain provisions, such as the maximum setback requirements for projects that abut more than one pedestrian street.

Page 37: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 19 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

D. Land use requirements.

1. Use requirements. The following use table designates all permitted, limited, and prohibited uses in the districts listed. Use classifications not listed in this section or provided for in Section 13.06.500 are prohibited, unless permitted via Section 13.05.030.E.

2. Use table abbreviations.

P = Permitted use in this district. CU = Conditional use in this district. Requires conditional use permit, consistent with the criteria and procedures of Section 13.06.640. TU = Temporary use consistent with Section 13.06.635. N = Prohibited use in this district.

3. District use table.

Type of Mixed-Use Center District

NCX CCX UCX UCX-TD RCX*

CIX NRX HMX URX Additional Regulations* The gross floor area of any development in RCX must be at least 75 percent residential unless otherwise noted.

Adult retail and entertainment

N N N N N N N N N Prohibited, except as provided for in Section 13.06.525.

Adult family home P P P P P P P P P See definition for bed limit. Prohibited at street level along designated pedestrian streets in NCX. Not subject to minimum densities found in Section 13.06.300.E.

Ambulance services

N CU CU CU N P N P N

Animal sales and service

P P P P N P N N N Must be conducted entirely within an enclosed building. See Table 13.06.200.D for setback requirements specific to animal sales and service. Must be set back 20 feet from any adjacent residential district or use.

Art/craft production P P P P P P N N N Assembly facility P P P P CU P N N N Prohibited at street level along designated pedestrian streets in

NCX. Brewpubs/taverns P P P P P P N N N Brewpubs located in NCX, CCX, UCX, and RCX shall be limited

to producing, on-premises, a maximum of 2,400 barrels per year of beer, ale, or other malt beverages, as determined by the annual filings of barrelage tax reports to the Washington State Liquor Control Board. UCX-TD is limited to 5,000 barrels in the same manner. Equivalent volume winery limits apply.

Building materials and services

N P P CU N P N N N Prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets.

Business support services

P P P P N P N N N In NCX, all activities must occur within buildings; outdoor storage/repair is prohibited. Customer service offices must be located at building fronts on designated pedestrian streets in NCX.

Page 38: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 20 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

Type of Mixed-Use Center District

NCX CCX UCX UCX-TD RCX*

CIX NRX HMX URX Additional Regulations* The gross floor area of any development in RCX must be at least 75 percent residential unless otherwise noted.

Carnivals TU TU P TU N TU N TU TU Subject to Section 13.06.635. Cemetery/internment services

N N N N N N N N N New facilities are not permitted. Enlargement of facilitiescemeteries in existence prior to the effective date of this provision (May 27, 1975) at the time of adoption of this chapter may be approved in any zoning district subject to a conditional use permit. See Section 13.06.640.

Commercial recreation and entertainment

P P P P N P N N N

Commercial parking facility

P P P P N P N P N In UCX-TD, only permitted if provided in a structure or below ground facility. Prohibited at street level along frontage ofon designated pedestrian streets in NCX and CCX Districts.

Communication facility

CU CU P P N P N N N Prohibited at street level along frontage of designated pedestrian streets in NCX and CCX Districts.

Confidential shelter

P P P P P P P P P See Section 13.06.535. Prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets in NCX. Not subject to minimum densities founding Section 13.06.300.E.

Continuing care retirement community

P P P P P P P P P See Section 13.06.535. Prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets in NCX.

Correctional facility N N N N N N N N N Cultural institutions P P P P N P N N N Day care, family P P P P P N P P P Day care, center P P P P P P CU P P Not subject to RCX residential requirement. Detoxification center

N N N N N CU N CU N

Drive-throughs with any use

P P P P N P N N N Drive-through driveways must be located at least 150 feet from any bus stop or transit center. Drive-through windows shall not face or orient toward any designated pedestrian street, and waiting and/or stacking lanes shall be screened from view. Drive-through uses that are not located within a building are prohibited from locating within 100 feet of a light rail street. See Section 13.06.510 Table 2 for driveway standards.

Dwellings/ residential

P P P P P P Prohibited at street level along designated pedestrian streets in NCX. See Section 13.06.300.E for minimum densities.

Dwelling, single-family detached

N N N N N N P N N See Section 13.06.300.C. See Section 13.06.300.E for minimum densities.

Page 39: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 21 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

Type of Mixed-Use Center District

NCX CCX UCX UCX-TD RCX*

CIX NRX HMX URX Additional Regulations* The gross floor area of any development in RCX must be at least 75 percent residential unless otherwise noted.

Dwelling, two-family

P P P P P P CU P P In NCX and CCX Districts, prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets. See Section 13.06.300.C. See Section 13.06.300.E for minimum densities.

Dwelling, three-family

P P P P P P CU P P In NCX and CCX Districts, prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets. See Section 13.06.300.C. See Section 13.06.300.E for minimum densities.

Dwelling, multiple-family

P P P P P P N P P In NCX and CCX Districts, prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets. See Section 13.06.300.C. See Section 13.06.300.E for minimum densities. In the NRX District, multiple-family dwellings lawfully in existence on XXXXX, the time of reclassification to this district, shall be considered permitted uses. Said multiple-family dwellings continue and may be changed, repaired replaced or otherwise modified, provided, however that the use may not be expanded beyond property boundaries owned, leased, or operated as a multiple-family dwelling on XXXXXXX.

Dwelling, townhouse

P P P P P P CU P P In NCX and CCX Districts, prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets. See Section 13.06.300.C. See Section 13.06.300.E for minimum densities.

Dwelling, accessory (ADU)

P P P P P P P P P In NCX and CCX Districts, prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets. See Section 13.06.300.C. See Section 13.06.150 for specific Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU) Standards.

Eating and drinking

P P P P P P N P N Outdoor seating permitted with a 12-seat Maximum in RCX. In RCX live entertainment limited to that consistent with a Class “C” Cabaret license, as designated in Chapter 6B.70.14. In all other districts, live entertainment limited to that consistent with a either a Class “B” or Class “C” Cabaret license, as designated in Chapter 6B.70.14. See Section 13.06.200.D for size limitations in HMX.

Emergency and transitional housing

CU P P P CU N CU CU CU See Section 13.06.535. In NCX and CCX Districts, pProhibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets.

Extended care facility

P P P P P P P P P See Section 13.06.535. In NCX and CCX Districts, prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets.

Food and non-alcoholic beverage production and processing, limited

P P P P N P N N N Not to exceed 4,000 square feet or 45 percent of the gross floor area, whichever is less, and must include a retail component fronting the street at the sidewalk level.

Page 40: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 22 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

Type of Mixed-Use Center District

NCX CCX UCX UCX-TD RCX*

CIX NRX HMX URX Additional Regulations* The gross floor area of any development in RCX must be at least 75 percent residential unless otherwise noted.

Foster home P P P P P P P P P In NCX and CCX Districts, prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets.

Funeral homes P P P P N P N P N Gas stations N P P P N P N N N Prohibited along frontage of designated pedestrian streets within

the UCX and CCX Districts. Gas station pump islands, stacking lanes and parking areas shall be located at the side or rear of the building.

Golf course P N P N P N P N P N P N N N N Group housing P P P P P P P P P In NCX and CCX Districts, prohibited at street level along

frontage of designated core pedestrian streets in NCX. Heliport N N N N N CU N CU N Home Occupation P P P P P P P P P Home occupations shall be allowed in all X-Districts pursuant to

the standards found in Section 13.06.100.E Hospitals N CU CU CU N P N P N Hotel/motel P P P P N P N P N Industry, limited light

N N N P N P N N N In UCX-TD, only permitted if 50 percent of site contains an enclosed building.

Intermediate care facility

P P P P P P P P P See Section 13.06.535. In NCX and CCX Districts, prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets in NCX.

Juvenile community facility

P P P P P/CU

P CU N P/CU In NCX and CCX Districts, prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets. See Section 13.06.530 for additional information about size limitations and permitting requirements. Permitted with no more than 16 residents in the NCX, CCX, UCX, and CIX zoning districts. Permitted with no more than 8 residents in the RCX zoning district. Permitted with a Conditional Use Permit for more than 8, but not more than 16, residents in the RCX zoning district. All development is subject to Section 13.06.530.

Lodging house P P P P P P CU P P Prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets in NCX and CCX Districts.

Page 41: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 23 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

Type of Mixed-Use Center District

NCX CCX UCX UCX-TD RCX*

CIX NRX HMX URX Additional Regulations* The gross floor area of any development in RCX must be at least 75 percent residential unless otherwise noted.

Microwinery, limited

P P P P N P N N N Must include a retail component that occupies a minimum of 500 gross square feet of usable space, fronts the street at sidewalk level or has a well-marked and visible entrance at sidewalk level, and is open to the public a minimum of forty (40) hours per week. All production activities must be conducted within an enclosed building. Outside storage is allowed provided screening and/or buffer planting areas are provided in accordance with Section 13.06.502.DB.

Mobile home/trailer court

N N N N N N N N N

Nurseries P P P N N P N N N Office P P P P P P N P N Not subject to RCX residential requirement for properties

fronting the west side of South Pine Street between South 40th Street and South 47th Street.

Park and recreation

P P P P P P P P P Not subject to RCX residential requirement.

Parking area P P P P P P Parking may be located in structures, consistent with Section 13.06.510.

Passenger terminals

P P P P N P N N N

Personal services P P P P P P N P N See Section 13.06.200.D for size limitation in HMX. Public safety facilities

P P P P P P CU P P Not subject to RCX residential requirement.

Religious assembly

P P P P P P CU P P Not subject to RCX residential requirement.

Repair services P P P P N P N N N In NCX, all activities must occur within buildings; outdoor storage/repair is prohibited.

Research and development industry

N N N N N P N N N

Residential care facility for youth

P P P P P P P P P See Section 13.06.535. See definition for bed limit. In NCX and CCX Districts, prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets in NCX Districts. Not subject to minimum densities found in Section 13.06.300.E.

Residential chemical dependency treatment facility

P P P P P P P P P See Section 13.06.535. In CCX and NCX Districts, prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets.

Page 42: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 24 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

Type of Mixed-Use Center District

NCX CCX UCX UCX-TD RCX*

CIX NRX HMX URX Additional Regulations* The gross floor area of any development in RCX must be at least 75 percent residential unless otherwise noted.

Retirement home P P P P P P P P P See Section 13.06.535. In NCX and CCX Districts, prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets in NCX.

Retail P P P P P P N P N See Section 13.06.200.D for size limitation in HMX. Schools, public or private

P P P P P P N P N Not subject to RCX residential requirement.

Self-storage N P P P N P N N N In NCX and CCX Districts, prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets.

Shipping Container

N N N N N N N N N Allowed only as a temporary use associated with an ongoing construction project.

Staffed residential home

P P P P P P P P P See Section 13.06.535. See definition for bed limit. Prohibited at street level along designated core pedestrian streets in NCX and CCX Districts. Not subject to minimum densities found in Section 13.06.300.E.

Student housing P P P P P P N P P Prohibited at street level along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets in NCX and CCX Districts.

Surface mining CU CU CU CU CU CU N CU CU Temporary uses TU TU TU TU TU TU TU TU TU See Section 13.06.635 Theater P P P P N P N N N Theaters only permitted up to 4 screens in NCX and CCX.

Theaters only permitted up to 6 screens in CIX. Utilities CU CU CU CU CU CU CU CU CU In NCX and CCX Districts, prohibited at street level along

frontage of designated core pedestrian streets in NCX. Not subject to RCX residential requirement.

Vehicle rental and sales

N* P P P N P N N N In UCX-TD, only permitted if 50 percent of site contains an enclosed building. In CCX Districts, prohibited along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets. *Use permitted in the 56th Street and South Tacoma Way Mixed-Use Center NCX only, if all activities occur within buildings; outdoor storage repair, and sales are prohibited.

Vehicle service and repair

N* P P P N P N N N All activities must occur within buildings; outdoor storage and/or repair is prohibited. In UCX-TD, only permitted if 50 percent of site contains an enclosed building. In CCX Districts, prohibited along frontage of designated core pedestrian streets. *Use permitted in the 56th Street and South Tacoma Way Mixed-Use Center NCX only, if all activities occur within buildings; outdoor storage and/or repair is prohibited.

Page 43: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 25 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

Type of Mixed-Use Center District

NCX CCX UCX UCX-TD RCX*

CIX NRX HMX URX Additional Regulations* The gross floor area of any development in RCX must be at least 75 percent residential unless otherwise noted.

Vehicle service and repair, industrial

N N P P N P N N N

Vehicle storage N N N N N P N N N Subject to development standards contained in Section 13.06.510.D.

Warehouse, storage

N N N N N P N N N

Wholesale or distribution

N N N N N P N N N

Wireless communication facility

P*/CU**P*/CU**P*/CU**P*/CU** P*/CU**P*/CU**P*/CU** P*/CU** P*/CU** *Wireless communication facilities are also subject to Section 13.06.545.D.1. **Wireless communication facilities are also subject to Section 13.06.545.D.2.

Work release center

N N CU N N CU N N N Permitted with no more than 15 residents in the UCX and no more than 25 residents in the CIX, subject to a Conditional Use Permit and the development regulations found in Section 13.06.550.

Page 44: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 26 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

E. Building envelope standards.

1. The following table contains the primary building envelope requirements. See Section 13.06.501 for additional requirements:

NCX~ CCX UCX UCX-TD* RCX CIX NRX HMX URX Additional Requirements

Minimum lot area

0 square feet

minimum

0 square feet

minimum

0 square feet

minimum

0 square feet

minimum

0 square feet

minimum

0 square feet

minimum

3,750 square feet for single-family dwellings;

2,500 square feet per unit for duplexes; 6,000

square feet for triplexes and multi-family dwellings; 5,000 square feet total per townhouse development

0 square feet

0 square feet

Minimum lot width

0 feet minimum

0 feet minimum

0 feet minimum

0 feet minimum

0 feet minimum

0 feet minimum

25 feet for single-family dwellings, duplexes and

triplexes; 14 feet for townhouses

0 feet 0 feet

0 feet minimum

0 feet minimum

0 feet minimum

0 feet minimum

0 feet minimum

0 feet minimum

0 feet 0 feet Minimum yards: • Front • Side • Corner

side • Rear

For townhouse developments, a setback of at least 5 feet shall be provided along the perimeter of the development on all sides that do not

abut public street or alley right-of-way

For single, two- and three-family dwellings and

townhouses: 10-foot front, 5-foot sides,

15-foot rear For other uses:

10-foot front, 7.5-foot sides, 20-foot rear

For townhouse developments, a

setback of at least 5 feet shall be provided along the perimeter of the development on all sides that do not abut public street or alley

right-of-way (see diagram to left)

See Section 13.06.300.F;

sSee Section 13.06.503. If a buffer is required, a minimum setback is

created. Townhouse setback standards apply to

the perimeter property lines of the development and not to individual internal

property lines between townhouses

in the same development.

See 13.06.501.N for additional

requirements applicable to duplex,

triplex and townhouse developments.

Page 45: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 27 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

NCX~ CCX UCX UCX-TD* RCX CIX NRX HMX URX Additional Requirements

45 feet; 7565 feet

in the North 1st

Street and

Tacoma Avenue

Mixed-Use Center

NCX Stadium Mixed-

Use CenterDistricts).

60 feet; 75 feet, if at least

25 percent of gross

floor area is

residential.

75 feet; 120 feet, if at least 25 perce

nt of gross

floor area is

residential.

75 feet*,120 feet, if for a cultural

institution or at least

25 percent of gross

floor area is

residential,

including hotels.

60 feet; unless an

RCX zone

abuts a NCX zone

then the maximum

height shall

equal the abutting

NCX maximum

height.

75 feet 35 feet 150 feet 45 feet

~ In NCX Districts, additional height may be allowed is certain areas through the NCX District Height Bonuses – see Section 13.06.300.E.2

Maximum height of

structures (feet)

* In UCX-TD, for all properties lying south of a line running parallel to the center line of the alley between East 26th Street and East 27th Street starting at the western district boundary of the UCX-TD zone and running east to the center line of East E Street, then north to the center line of East 26th Street, then east to the eastern district boundary of the UCX-TD zone, height is 120 feet, if at least 4 of the design elements found in Section 13.06A.080 (excluding Section 13.06A.080(8)) are incorporated into the project. Height can be increased to 225 feet, if at least 4 of the design elements are incorporated and 2 of the special features found in Section 13.06A.090 (excluding Section 13.06A.090(7)) are included.

Height will be measured consistent with Building Code, Height of Building. Maximum heights,

shall be superseded by the provisions of

Section 13.06.503.A.

Upper story setback

None See

Section 501.C.2

for stepback standards along

pedestrian streets

None See

Section 501.C.2

for stepback standards along

pedestrian streets

None 10 feet from

adjacent lot line for

portion over

50 feet in height

None None None None None See Section 13.06.503; residential transition standards

compatibility requirement may also

apply.

Page 46: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 28 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

NCX~ CCX UCX UCX-TD* RCX CIX NRX HMX URX Additional Requirements

Maximum business

occupancy size (gross floor area)

30,000 square feet;

45,000 square feet for

full service grocery stores only;

offices shall be exempt

from these limits.

None None None 25 percent of the building’s

gross floor area

of the developm

ent. (75 perce

nt of gross

floor area must be

residential.)

None None 7,000 SF for eating, drinking, retail and personal service uses

None See Section 13.06.300.D

for limited excemptions for RCX

District

9 30; 40 on

designated

pedestrian streets

(see Section

13.06.300.C

15 30; 40 on

designated

pedestrian streets

(see Section

13.06.300.C

30 40 30 15 30; 40 on

designated

pedestrian streets

(see Section

13.06.300.C

None None None 25 Minimum density

(units/acre)

For purposes of this provision, density shall be calculated by dividing the total number of dwelling units in a development by the area, in acres, of the development site, excluding any accessory dwelling units or areas dedicated or reserved for public rights-of-way or private streets.

One-family dwellings; projects that do not include residential

uses; and mixed-use projects (such as

residential & commercial, residential & industrial, or residential &

institutional) are exempt from

minimum-density requirements.

2. X-District Height Bonuses. The X-District Height Bonus program provides a mechanism to allow for additional height for projects within certain portions of the Neighborhood Mixed-Use Centers. It is designed to encourage new growth and foster economic vitality within the centers, consistent with the State Growth Management Act and the City’s Comprehensive Plan, while balancing taller buildings and greater density with public amenities that help achieve the community’s vision for the centers, with improved livability, enhanced pedestrian and transit orientation, and a quality built environment, and realize other City-wide goals. Through this program, projects within certain areas may qualify for additional building height, above and beyond the standard maximum height limits outlined above, under Subsection E. In order to achieve these increased height limits, projects are required to provide one or more public benefit bonus features.

Page 47: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 29 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

a. Applicability. Where applicable in the Mixed-Use Centers, the height bonus provision allows for projects to be eligible to increase the standard maximum height limit through the incorporation of one or more public benefit features into the development of the project. These pubic benefit features are divided into two levels, each of which is outlined below. Eligibility for this height bonus program is as follows:

(1) Outside of the Stadium, MLK and 56th & South Tacoma Way Mixed-Use Centers, properties or portions of properties located within the NCX District and within 200 feet of the centerline of a designated core pedestrian street are eligible for this bonus program. Projects within these areas shall be eligible to increase the applicable maximum height limit up to 20 feet through inclusion of one or more of the public benefit features outlined in the Height Bonus Palette – Level 1.

(2) In the Stadium Mixed-Use Center, properties or portions of properties located within the NCX District and within 200 feet of the centerline of a designated core pedestrian street are eligible for this bonus program. Projects within these areas shall be eligible to increase the applicable maximum height limit up to 10 feet through inclusion of one or more of the public benefit features outlined in the Height Bonus Palette – Level 1. In addition, projects within these areas shall also be eligible to increase the applicable maximum building height limit up to an additional 10 feet (for a total maximum increase of 20 feet) through the inclusion of public benefit features outlined in the Height Bonus Palette – Level 2.

(3) In the MLK and 56th & South Tacoma Way Centers, properties or portions of properties located within the NCX District and within 200 feet of the centerline of a designated core pedestrian street are eligible for this bonus program. Projects within these areas shall be eligible to increase the applicable maximum height limit up to 20 feet through inclusion of one or more of the public benefit features outlined in the Height Bonus Palette – Level 1. In addition, projects within these areas shall also be eligible to increase the applicable maximum building height limit up to an additional 20 feet (for a total maximum increase of 40 feet) through the inclusion of public benefit features outlined in the Height Bonus Palette – Level 2.

(4) In the MLK Mixed-Use Center, properties or portions of properties located within the NCX District that are not within 200 feet of the centerline of a designated core pedestrian street are eligible for this bonus program. Projects within these areas shall be eligible to increase the applicable maximum height limit up to 20 feet through inclusion of one or more of the public benefit features outlined in the Height Bonus Palette – Level 1.

(5) As used in Subsections (1) through (3), above, the 200-foot depth used to define the areas eligible for the height bonus program shall be extended to encompass an entire development site when at least 60% of the development site is within the standard 200-foot deep bonus area. For purposes of this provision, the “development site” can include multiple parcels as long as they are part of the same project proposal and are abutting or separated by no more than an alley right-of-way.

(6) Projects that qualify for this program are still subject to the upper-story stepback restrictions found in Section 13.06.503.A.

b. Height Bonus Palettes. The two tables below outline the various public benefit features available for incorporation as part of a project in order to increase maximum height limits, as described above. The following limitations and guidelines apply to the use of the bonus palettes:

(1) In no case, regardless of how many bonus features are incorporated, can the additional maximum height limits outlined above be exceeded.

(2) In cases where the bonus height associated with a feature exceeds the maximum bonus height available, that bonus feature can be incorporated but shall only be worth the maximum amount available. For example, if the maximum amount available is 10 feet and a project incorporates the “Affordable Housing” bonus feature (which is normally worth 20 feet), that feature would only be worth 10 feet in that case.

(3) Within each level, projects can include any combination of the available features to achieve the additional allowed height. In those areas where the maximum height bonus available is divided into two steps, the bonus features in the Level 2 palette can not be utilized for the first step of additional height and the bonus features in the Level 1 palette can not be utilized for the second step of additional height.

(4) The bonus palettes identify the minimum of what must be incorporated in order to achieve each feature and qualify for the associated bonus height. Bonus features must be provided in full in order to qualify and partial credit is not available. For example, the “Residential Use” bonus feature requires that at least 50% of the project be residential in order to receive 10 feet of additional height – providing 25% of the project as residential is not worth 5 feet.

Page 48: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 30 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

(5) Bonus features can not be counted more than once toward the additional allowed height or be worth more than the maximum height identified for that feature, even if the project provides more than the minimum amount required to qualify (providing a bonus feature twice or at twice the level described is not worth twice the bonus amount). However, features that can achieve more than one bonus item can be counted toward multiple bonus items (for example, a green roof can count as the “Green Roof” bonus item and also be part of the design strategy to achieve the “LID Stormwater Management” or “Energy Efficiency” bonus items).

(6) Bonus features are not subject to variance.

(7) Height Bonus Palette – Level 1:

HEIGHT BONUS PALETTE – LEVEL 1 BONUS FEATURE DEFINITION BONUS HEIGHT

PEDESTRIAN-ORIENTED ENVIRONMENT

Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED)

Project designed and constructed to achieve 75% of the available and applicable points on the City’s CPTED project review checklist. Must coordinate with City’s CPTED specialist. 5 feet

Ground Floor Retail or Restaurant

At least 70% of ground floor project street frontage along the designated core pedestrian street designed to accommodate retail and/or restaurant uses. Retail space(s) shall be a minimum of 1,000 square feet and have a minimum depth and width of 25 feet. Restaurant space(s) shall be a minimum of 2,000 square feet and shall incorporate necessary venting and sewer facilities. The space shall have a minimum interior height of 12 feet from the finished floor to the finished ceiling above and have direct visibility and accessibility from the public sidewalk

5 feet

Public Art (1%)

A feature worth 1% of the value of the building (as calculated using the latest Building Valuation Data published by the International Code Council), to be installed on-site, exterior to the building with a location and design that benefits the streetscape, or in an approved off-site location within the same Mixed-Use Center and within 1,000 feet of the project site. Art features shall be coordinated with the City’s Arts Administrator and approved by the Arts Commission.

5 feet

Structured Parking (50%) At least 50% of the required parking is provided within the building footprint (above or below ground). For project that do not require parking but wish to utilize this feature, the amount required shall be based on the amount of parking that would be required for the proposed development if it were not exempted.

10 feet

Structured Parking (100%) All parking is provided within building footprint (above or below ground). For project that do not require parking but wish to utilize this feature, the amount required shall be at least the amount of parking that would be required for the proposed development if it were not exempted.

20 feet

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

Transit Stop/Station Improvement Provide twice the level of improvements that are required by code. If no improvements are required, provide the first level of required improvements. Only applicable to transit stops located within 500 feet of the project site. Must coordinate with Pierce Transit. See Section 13.06.511, Transit Support Facilities.

5 feet

Residential Use Residential use for at least 50% of a mixed-use project’s floor area. 10 feet

SUSTAINABILITY

Page 49: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 31 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

HEIGHT BONUS PALETTE – LEVEL 1 BONUS FEATURE DEFINITION BONUS HEIGHT

LID Stormwater Management

Manage stormwater through an integrated system and management plan that utilizes various low impact development techniques, such as permeable surfaces, roof rainwater collection systems, bioretention/rain gardens, etc. System shall be designed to result in no net increase in the rate and quantity of stormwater runoff from existing to developed conditions or, if the amount of existing imperviousness on the project site is greater than 50%, the system shall be designed to result in a 25% decrease in the rate and quantity of stormwater runoff. The system shall be designed and installed under the direction of a professional with demonstrated expertise in the design and construction of such facilities.

10 feet

Green Roof

Provide a green roof that covers at least 60% of the building footprint. Green roofs shall be designed and installed under the direction of a professional with demonstrated expertise in the design and construction of such facilities. Green roofs shall conform to best available technology standards, such as those published by Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED).

10 feet

Solar Energy Collection Install a solar energy collection system on the site that is designed to provide at least 15% of the expected annual operating energy for the building. The system shall be designed and installed under the direction of a professional with demonstrated expertise in the design and construction of such systems.

10 feet

Adjacent Historic Rehabilitation

Retention, renovation and incorporation of a designated or listed City Landmark adjacent to new construction. Renovation must qualify as a “substantial rehabilitation” as defined in RCW 84.26.020(2). Incorporation and renovation shall be coordinated with the City’s Historic Preservation Officer and approved by the Landmarks Preservation Commission.

10 feet

Landmark Designation

Voluntary placement of any significant, historic building in the same Mixed-Use Center on the Tacoma Register of Historic Places. Notice of intent to utilize incentive required in writing prior to submittal of Landmark Nomination. Listing is subject to the approval of the Landmarks Preservation Commission and City Council.

10 feet

Historic Façade Retention

Retention and incorporation of an existing façade that is 50 or more years in age. The project shall retain 100% of the original front wall surface, window and door configurations, cornice line, parapet and any original architectural ornamentation. New construction exceeding the height of the original façade must be setback behind the street-side plane of the original façade. Subject to the approval of the Historic Preservation Officer.

10 feet

Energy Efficiency Design the structure to reduce energy usage beyond the prerequisite standards by at least 20% for new structures and 10% for existing structures or existing portions of structures. Project shall utilize an energy cost budget analysis to demonstrate energy savings over current standards.

10 feet

QUALITY OF LIFE

Affordable Housing At least 20% of residential units provided for households making less than 80% of area median income. In order to qualify, the affordable units shall meet all of the standards prescribed through the City’s Multi-family Property Tax Incentive program.

20 feet

Open Space Fund Contribution (0.5%)

Contribution to the City’s Open Space Fund in an amount equal to 0.5% of the value of the building (as calculated using the latest Building Valuation Data published by the International Code Council). These 10 feet

Page 50: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 32 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

HEIGHT BONUS PALETTE – LEVEL 1 BONUS FEATURE DEFINITION BONUS HEIGHT

funds would be utilized for acquisition and management of open spaces within the City, with a particular focus, when appropriate, on acquiring and managing open spaces within and in close proximity to the subject Mixed-Use Center.

(8) Height Bonus Palette – Level 2:

HEIGHT BONUS PALETTE – LEVEL 2 BONUS FEATURE DEFINITION BONUS HEIGHT

QUALITY OF LIFE

Community Benefit Agreement (CBA)

Execution of a Community Benefit Agreement for the project. This feature shall become effective as of the date of adoption of a CBA program by the City.

10 feet (Stadium Center); 20 feet (MLK and 56th & South

Tacoma Way Centers)

Open Space Fund Contribution (0.5%)

Contribution to the City’s Open Space Fund in an amount equal to 0.5% of the value of the building (as calculated using the latest Building Valuation Data published by the International Code Council). These funds would be utilized for acquisition and management of open spaces within the City, with a particular focus, when appropriate, on acquiring and managing open spaces within and in close proximity to the subject Mixed-Use Center.

10 feet (Stadium Center); 20 feet (MLK and 56th & South

Tacoma Way Centers)

Transfer of Development Rights (TDR)

Use of TDRs from an identified TDR sending area. This feature shall become effective as of the date of adoption of a TDR program by the City.

10 feet (Stadium Center); 20 feet (MLK and 56th & South

Tacoma Way Centers)

c. The Land Use Administrator, or their authorized agent, shall have the authority to require any and all necessary agreements, as they deem appropriate, to ensure that projects utilizing the height bonus program maintain all required bonus features for the life of the project. Any such agreements shall be in a format acceptable to the City Attorney and shall be recorded on the title of the property.

F. Maximum setback standards. To achieve a pedestrian serviceable environment, where buildings are located in close proximity to the street and designed with areas free of pedestrian and vehicle movement conflicts, maximum building setbacks are required as follows:

Non-residential buildings and/or shopping centers of 30,000 square feet or less gross floor area

Non-residential buildings greater than 30,000 square feet gross floor area

Shopping centers greater than 30,000 square feet gross floor area

NCX, RCX, and UCX-TD Districts

• 5 feet maximum front and corner side setback from the property lines at the public right-of-way for 75 percent of front and corner side facade.

• 5 feet maximum setback from property lines at the public right-of-way for 75 percent of front and corner side facade.

• 5 feet maximum setback from property lines at the public right-of-way for at least 75 percent of the front and corner side street frontage of the shopping center.

CCX Districts • 10 feet maximum front and corner side setback from the property lines at the public right-of-way for 50 percent of front and corner side facade.

• 10 feet maximum setback from the property line at the public right-of-way for 50 percent of the front or side of the facade.

• 10 feet maximum setback from the property lines at the public right-of-way for at least 25 percent of the front and corner side street frontage of the shopping center.

Page 51: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 33 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments –Draft (5-13-09)

UCX, HMX and CIX Districts

• 20 feet maximum front and corner side setback from the property lines at the public right-of-way for 50 percent of front and corner side facade.

• 20 feet maximum setback from the property line at the public right-of-way on either 50 percent of the front or side of the facade.

• 20 feet maximum setback from the property lines at the public right-of-way for at least 25 percent of the front and corner side street frontage of the shopping center.

Pedestrian Streets

• When the site is adjacent to a designated pedestrian street(s), that street(s) frontage shall be utilized to meet the maximum setback requirement with the front, side, and/or corner side of the facade, as indicated above.

• When the site has more than two pedestrian street frontages, the primary pedestrian street frontage shall be utilized to meet the maximum setback requirement. Motor Vehicles • Maximum setback areas shall be designed to be sidewalk, pedestrian plaza, public open space, landscaping, and/or courtyard, and to be free of motor vehicles at all times.

Exceptions • In UCX-TD, setback distance beyond the maximum may be used if the additional area is devoted to pedestrian plazas, public open spaces, and/or courtyards, with no motor vehicle use and at least 25 percent of the building frontage meets the maximum setback.

• In the Tacoma Mall RCX, for all non-residential buildings located on properties fronting the west side of South Pine Street between South 40th Street and South 47th Street, the developer may choose either a five-foot maximum front and corner side setback from the property lines at the public right-of-way for 50 percent of front and corner side facade or a ten-foot maximum front and corner side setback from the property lines at the public right-of-way for 75 percent of front and corner side facade.

• In all X-Districts, when there is a steep slope (at least 25% slope with a vertical relief of 10 or more feet) located adjacent to the sidewalk the maximum setback requirement shall be measured from the top or toe of the slope, as appropriate.

• When a residential buffer is required, the buffer requirement shall supersede the maximum setback requirement (see Section 13.06.502.D). Exemptions in all Mixed-Use Center Districts

• Additions to legal, nonconforming buildings are exempt from maximum setbacks, provided, the addition reduces the level of nonconformity as to maximum setback. • Buildings that are 100 percent residential do not have a maximum setback. • The primary building of a gas station, where gas stations are allowed, is subject to the maximum setback on only one side of the building on corner parcels. Kiosks without retail,

and intended for fuel payment only, are exempt. • Public facilities on sites greater than 5 acres in neighborhood, community and urban mixed-use centers shall be exempt from maximum setback requirements. This exemption shall

expire upon the establishment of a new Institutional Zoning designation, an Institutional Master Plan process, or similar zoning process for reviewing, evaluating and approving large, public, campus-like facilities.

, ,-

Examples for Application of Maximum Setback

P e d e s t r i a n A r e a

7 5 % M i n i m u m R e q u i r e d F r o n t a g e

P e de strianArea

M i n i m u m R e q u ire d F ro n ta g e5 0 % S i n g l e B u ild in g2 5 % S h o p p in g C e n te r

50% M in im u mRe q u ired F ro nta ge

P e de str ia nAre a

Page 52: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 34 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

G. Residential X-District Yard Space Standards. The following standards apply to all new duplex/triplex, townhouse, multi-family or mixed-use development in X-Districts. They are intended to provide yard space for residents of these developments.

1. Duplexes and Triplexes. At least 200 square feet of yard space is required for each dwelling unit. Required yard space could include a combination of front porches, private or shared rear yards, balconies, or rooftop decks. Vehicular access areas and required walkways shall not count as yard space and front yard areas may not be counted towards this requirement, except for those yard areas set back beyond the minimum requirement.

2. Townhouse Development. At least 200 square feet of yard space is required for each townhouse. Required yard space could include a combination of private front or rear yard space, porches, balconies, rooftop decks, or shared common yard space amongst groups of townhouses. Vehicular access areas and required walkways shall not count as yard space.

3. Multi-Family and Mixed-Use Development. At least 100 square feet of yard space is required for each dwelling unit. Required setback and buffer areas, vehicular access areas and required walkways shall not count towards the yard space requirement. Projects located within 300 feet of a public park or public school that includes outdoor recreational facilities are exempt from this requirement.

a. Common Yard space. Where accessible to all residents, common yard space may count for up to 100 percent of the required yard space. This includes landscaped courtyards or decks, front porches, gardens with pathways, children’s play areas, or other multi-purpose recreational and/or green spaces. Special requirements and recommendations for common yard spaces include the following:

(1) No dimension shall be less than fifteen feet in width (except for front porches).

(2) Spaces shall be visible from multiple dwelling units and positioned near pedestrian activity.

(3) Spaces shall feature paths, landscaping, seating, lighting and other pedestrian amenities to make the area more functional and enjoyable.

(4) Individual entries shall be provided onto common yard space from adjacent ground floor residential units, where applicable.

(5) Space should be oriented to receive direct sunlight for part of the day, facing east, west, or (preferably) south, when possible.

(6) Common yard space shall be open to the sky, except for clear atrium roofs.

(7) Shared porches qualify as common yard space provided:

(a) No dimension is less than eight feet.

(b) It is open on at least two sides.

(8) Decks and courtyards located on the top of a portion of a building may count as common open space as long as they are visible from multiple dwelling units within the building (this is distinguished from rooftop decks that are not visible from multiple units, which are addressed separately under subsection c, below).

b. Balconies. Private balconies, porches, decks, patios or yards may be used to meet up to 50 percent of the required yard space. To qualify as yard space, such spaces shall be at least thirty five square feet, with no dimension less than four feet.

c. Rooftop decks may be used to meet up to 25 percent of yard space for all multi-family uses and up to 50 percent of the required yard space mixed-use developments, provided they:

(1) Must be accessible to all dwelling units.

(2) Must include amenities such as seating areas and landscaping.

(3) Must feature hard surfacing appropriate to encourage residential use.

(4) Must include lighting for residents’ safety.

G H. Common requirements. To streamline the Zoning Code, certain requirements common to all districts are consolidated under Section 13.06.500. These requirements apply to Section 13.06.300 by reference.

Refer to Section 13.06.500 for the following requirements for development in Mixed-Use Center Districts:

Page 53: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 35 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.501 Building design standards.

13.06.502 Landscaping and/or buffering standards.

13.06.503 Residential compatibility standards.

13.06.510 Off-street parking.

13.06.511 Transit support facilities.

13.06.512 Pedestrian and bicycle support standards.

13.06.520 Signs.

* * *

Page 54: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 36 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.501 Building design standards. A. General applicability. The design standards of this section are required to implement the urban design goals of the comprehensive plan of the City of Tacoma. The building design standards apply to all new development in C-1, C-2, HM, T, PDB, and Mixed-Use Center Districts, except as follows:

1. Standards. Each item of this section shall be addressed individually. Exceptions and exemptions noted for specific development situations apply only to the item noted.

2. Additions. Additions of less than 5,000 square feet of gross floor area are exempt from the design standards of this section; provided they do not exceed 75 percent of the existing gross floor area.

2. Additions/Remodels. Three thresholds are used to gauge the extent of design standard compliance on additions/remodels:

a. Level I Remodels and additions include all remodels and/or additions within a three year period with cumulative value of less than 60% of the existing building value, as determined by the applicable Building Code. The requirement for such remodels is only that the proposed improvements meet the standards and do not lead to further nonconformance with the standards. For example, if a property owner decides to replace a building façade’s siding, then the siding shall meet the applicable exterior building material standards, but elements such as building modulation would not be required.

b. Level II Remodels and additions include all remodels and/or additions within a three year period whose cumulative value ranges from 60% to 200% of the value of the existing structure, as determined by the applicable Building Code. All standards that do not involve repositioning the building or reconfiguring site development shall apply to Level II Remodels.

c. Level III Remodels and additions include all remodels and/or additions within a three year period whose cumulative value exceeds 200% of the value of the existing structure, as determined by the applicable Building Code. Such remodels shall conform to ALL standards.

d. The standards do not apply to remodels that do not change the exterior form of the building. However, if a project involves both exterior and interior improvements, then the project valuation shall include both exterior and interior improvements.

e. No addition or remodel shall increase the level of nonconformity or create new nonconformities to the development or design standards.

3. Super regional malls. Additions to super regional malls of less than 10,000 square feet of gross floor area are exempt from the design standards of this section.

4. Temporary. Temporary structures are exempt from the design standards of this section.

5. Remodel. Remodel projects valued below 60 percent of the building value, as determined by the Building Code, are exempt from the design standards of this section.

6 5. Residential and/or mixed-use. The standards apply only to residential structures of five dwelling units or greater. The standards apply to all mixed-use structures.

a. Single-family dwellings are exempt from these standards.

b. Two and three-family dwellings are subject only to the design standards in Section N.

c. Townhouses are subject only to the design standards in Section O.

d. The standards herein apply to all other residential uses unless otherwise noted.

76. Historic. In any conflict between these standards and those applied by the Tacoma Landmarks Preservation Commission, the standards of the commission shall prevail.

87. Religious assembly and religious facilities which can demonstrate that the design standards impose a substantial burden, administratively or financially, on their free exercise of religion, shall be exempt from compliance.

[See next page for table.]

Page 55: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 37 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

B. General Mass Reduction Standards. The following requirements apply to the C1, C2, T, HM and PDB zoning districts. See Section 13.06.501.H, below, for X-District requirements. The design choices of this item are intended to help reduce the apparent mass of structures and achieve a more human scale environment by providing physical breaks in the building volume that reduce large, flat, geometrical planes on any given building elevation.

1. Size to choice ratio for 2 below

a. Buildings under 7,000 square feet gross floor area are not required to provide mass reduction.

b. Buildings from 7,000 square feet gross floor area to 30,000 square feet gross floor area shall provide at least one mass reduction feature.

c. Buildings over 30,000 square feet gross floor area shall provide at least two mass reduction features.

2. Mass reduction choices

a. Upper story. Buildings with a maximum footprint of 7,000 square feet gross floor area, that do not exceed 14,000 square feet gross floor area, may count use of a second story as a mass reduction feature.

b. Upper story setback. An 8 feet minimum setback for stories above the second story for elevations facing the street or parking lots over 20 stalls. This requirement applies to a maximum of 2 elevations.

c. Wall modulation. Maximum 100 feet of wall without modulation, then a minimum 2 feet deep and 15 feet wide offset of the wall and foundation line on each elevation facing the street, parking lots over 20 stalls, or residential uses.

d. Public plaza. A public plaza of at least 800 square feet of gross floor area or 5 percent of building gross floor area, whichever is greater. The plaza shall be located within 50 feet of and visible to the primary public entrance; and contain a minimum of a bench or other seating, tree, planter, fountain, kiosk, bike rack, or art work for each 200 square feet of gross floorplaza area. Plaza contents may count toward other requirements when meeting the required criteria. Walkways do not count as plazas. Plazas shall not be used for storage. Required parking stalls may be omitted to the minimum necessary if needed to provide the plaza.

e. Housing. The provision of upper story residential dwelling units at a site density consistent with the applicable land use intensity designation of the comprehensive plan.

Page 56: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 38 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

C. General Rooflines Standards. The following requirements apply to the C1, C2, T, HM and PDB zoning districts. See Section 13.06.501.I, below, for X-District requirements. These requirements are intended to ensure that roofline is addressed as an integral part of building design to avoid flat, unadorned rooflines that can result in an industrial appearing, monotonous skyline. Roofline features are also intended to further reduce apparent building volume and further enhance features associated with residential and human scale development. Roofline Choices (All buildings shall use one or more of the roofline options)

1. Sloped roof. Use of a roof form with a pitch no flatter than 5/12. Rounded, gambrel, and/or mansard forms may be averaged. 2. Modulated roof. Use of features such as a terracing parapet, multiple peaks, jogged ridge lines, dormers, etc., with a maximum of 100 feet

uninterrupted roofline between roof modulation elements. Modulation elements shall equal a minimum of at least 15 percent of the roofline on each elevation. The maximum shall be 50 feet of uninterrupted roofline along the eave between roof modulation elements in C-1 Districts and on sides facing residential uses or districts. Roof forms with a pitch flatter than 5/12 are permitted with this option; provided, the appropriate modulation is incorporated.

3. Corniced roof*. A cornice of two parts with the top projecting at least 6 inches from the face of the building and at least 2 inches further from the face of the building than the bottom part of the cornice. The height of the cornice shall be at least 12 inches high for buildings 10 feet or less in height; 18 inches for buildings greater than 10 feet and less than 30 feet in height; and 24 inches for buildings 30 feet and greater in height. Cornices shall not project over property lines, except where permitted on property lines abutting public right-of-way.

4. Canopy Exemption. Gas station canopies, drive-through canopies, or similar canopies are exempt from roofline requirements.

Page 57: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 39 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

D. General Windows and openings. The following requirements apply to the C1, C2, T, HM and PDB zoning districts. See Section 13.06.501.J, below, for X-District requirements. These requirements are intended to increase public visibility for public safety, to provide visual interest to pedestrians that helps encourage pedestrian mobility, and to provide architectural detailing and variety to building elevations on each story.

1. Street level a. Front, side, or corner side exterior walls facing streets or that contain customer entrances and face customer parking lots of 20 stalls or greater shall have transparent window or openings for at least 50 percent of the area of the ground level wall area, which is defined as the area between 2 feet and 8 feet above the sidewalk on a minimum of 2 such building elevations. The window and opening requirements shall be reduced to 40 percent of the ground level wall area for building elevations that are impacted by steep grades, as outlined below in the steep grade exemption section. The requirement shall be further reduced to 20 percent of the ground level wall area in instances where the application of this standard is not possible due to steep grades and the correlating location of the floor plates of the building. Rough openings are used to calculate this requirement.

b. Mixed-Use Center District designated pedestrian streets. All requirements in 4.a.1. above except the minimum transparent window or openings is 60 percent of the area of the ground level wall area.

c. Required view. Required windows or openings must provide either views into building work areas, sales areas, lobbies, merchandise displays, or artworks. d. Limited alternatives. Alternatives of decorative grilles, art work, or similar features can be substituted for those portions of uses where the provision of natural

light can be demonstrated to nullify the intended use (examples include movie theater viewing areas and light sensitive laboratories) and for parking structures, provided an equivalent wall area is covered.

2. Upper levels a. Front, side, or corner side exterior walls facing streets or walls that contain customer entrances and face customer parking lots of 20 stalls or greater shall use a combination of transparent windows or openings and architectural relief that provide visual demarcation of each floor on a minimum of 2 such building elevations.

b. Upper level windows shall be a different type than the ground level windows on the same elevation. c. For purposes of this requirement, a window type is either a grouping of windows, a window size, or a window shape.

3. Exemptions a. Steep grades. The window and opening requirement shall not apply to that portion of a facade where the grade level of the sidewalk of the abutting street is 4 feet or more above or below the adjacent floor level of the building.

b. Residential privacy. On sides where C, HM, T, PDB, or Mixed-Use Center District boundaries adjoin R-1, R-2, R-2SRD, or R-3 District boundaries, structures within the C, HM, T, PDB, or Mixed-Use Center District that are set back at least 7 feet from the property line and screened by landscaping to a minimum height of 6 feet are exempt from the window and opening requirements on the effected side.

c. Residential buildings. Residential buildings or residential portions of mixed-use buildings are exempt from street level windows or openings.

Page 58: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 40 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

E. General Facade Surface Standards. The following requirements apply to the C1, C2, T, HM and PDB zoning districts. See Section 13.06.501.K, below, for X-District requirements. These requirements are intended to help reduce the apparent mass of structures and achieve a more human scale environment by providing visual breaks at more frequent intervals to the building volume that reduce large, flat, geometrical planes on any given building elevation, especially at the first story. The choices are also intended to encourage variety in the selection of facade materials and/or treatment and to encourage more active consideration of the surrounding setting. 1. Blank wall

limitation a. Unscreened, flat, blank walls on the first story more than 25 feet in width are prohibited facing a public street and/or highway right-of-way, residential zone, or

customer parking lot. These walls shall use modulation, windows, openings, landscaping, or architectural relief such as visibly different textured material to achieve the required visual break. The visual break shall be at least 1 foot in width. Items provided for other requirements may satisfy this requirement as appropriate. Stored or displayed merchandise, pipes, conduit, utility boxes, air vents, and/or similar equipment do not count toward this requirement.

b. NCX District facades. Pedestrian access to uses above or below street level shall not exceed a maximum of 25 percent of the width of the structure’s front facade.

2. Facade variety a. Buildings under 2,000 square feet gross floor area are exempt from the variety requirement. b. Buildings from 2,000 square feet gross floor area to 30,000 square feet gross floor area shall use at least 2 different materials, textures, or patterns on each

building elevation. c. Buildings over 30,000 square feet gross floor area shall use at least 3 different materials, textures, or patterns on each building elevation. d. For purposes of this requirement, each material, texture, or pattern must cover a minimum of 10 percent of each building elevation. Glass does not count

toward this requirement. Different texture or pattern shall be visibly different from adjacent public right-of-way or parking area. 3. Building face

orientation a. The building elevation(s) facing street or highway public rights-of-way shall be a front, side, or corner side and shall not contain elements commonly associated

with a rear elevation appearance, such as loading docks, utility meters, and/or dumpsters. b. This requirement applies to a maximum of 2 building elevations on any given building.

F. Pedestrians. The following requirements apply to all development in the C1, C2, T, HM, and PDB districts, except where noted or specifically exempted. See Section 13.06.501.L, below, for X-District requirements These requirements are intended to enhance pedestrian mobility and safety in commercial areas by providing increased circulation, decreasing walking distances required to enter large developments, and providing walkways partially shielded from rain and/or snow. 1. Customer

entrances a. Additional entrances. An additional direct customer entrance(s) shall be provided to the same building elevation which contains the primary customer entrance

so that customer entrances are no further than 250 feet apart when such elevations face the public street or customer parking lot. If a corner entrance is used, this requirement applies to only 1 elevation.

b. Designated streets. Non-residential or mixed-use buildings on designated pedestrian streets noted in Section 13.06.200.E or Section 13.06.300.C shall provide at least 1 direct customer entrance, which may be a corner entrance, within 20 feet, facing, and visible to the designated street. For such buildings over 30,000 square feet of gross floor area, the maximum distance is increased to 60 feet.

2. Street level weather protection

a. Weather protection shall be provided above a minimum of 25 percent of the length of hard surfaced, public or private walkways and/or plazas along facades containing customer and/or public building entries or facing public street frontage.

b. Mixed-Use Center District designated pedestrian streets. Weather protection shall be provided above a minimum of 80 percent of the length of hard surfaced, public or private walkways and/or plazas along facades containing customer and/or public building entries or facing public street frontage.

c. Weather protection may be composed of awnings, canopies, arcades, overhangs, marquees, or similar architectural features. It is required to cover only hard surfaced areas intended for pedestrian use and not areas such as landscaping.

d. Weather protection must cover at least 5 feet of the width of the public or private sidewalk and/or walkway, but may be indented as necessary to accommodate street trees, street lights, bay windows, or similar building accessories to not less than 3 feet in width.

Page 59: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 41 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

trash enclosure

rooftop utilitiesfull parapet screening

landscapetreatment

Screened

Option 2trash enclosure

rooftop utilities

fencetreatment

gate

Screened Option 1

Utility Storage

G. General Fencing and Utilities. The following requirements apply to the C1, C2, T, HM, and PDB zoning districts. See Section 13.06.501.M, below, for X-District requirements. These requirements are intended to minimize visibility of utilities, mechanical equipment, and service areas to mitigate visual impact on residential privacy, public views, and general community aesthetics. 1. Utility

screening a. Rooftop. All rooftop mechanical for new construction shall be screened with an

architectural element such as a high parapet, a stepped or sloped roof form or an equivalent architectural feature which is at least as high as the equipment being screened. Fencing is not acceptable. The intent of the screening is to make the rooftop equipment minimally visible from public rights-of-way within 125 feet of the building, provided said rights-of-way are below the roof level of the building. In those instances where the rights-of-way within 125 feet of the building are above the roof level of the building, the mechanical equipment should be the same color as the roof to make the equipment less visible. The function of the HVAC equipment may not be compromised by the screening requirement.

b. All ground level. Mechanical or utility equipment, loading areas, and dumpsters shall be screened from adjacent public street right-of-way, including highways, or residential uses. Items that exceed 4 feet in height must use fencing, structure, or other form of screening, except landscaping.

c. Small ground level. Items that do not exceed 4 feet above ground level may be screened with landscaped screening. All landscape screening should provide 50 percent screening at the time of planting and 100 percent screening within 3 years of planting.

Types: Chain link fencing, with or without slats, is prohibited for required screening. 2. Fencing

type limitation

a. Barbed or razor wire. The use of barbed or razor wire is limited to those areas not visible to a public street or to an adjacent residential use. b. Chain link. Chain link or similar wire fencing is prohibited between the front of a building and a public street, except for wetland preservation and recreation uses. c. Electrified. The use of electrified fencing is prohibited in all zoning districts.

Page 60: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 42 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

H. X-District Mass Reduction Standards. The following requirements apply to all development located in any X-District, unless specifically exempted. 1. Façade Articulation: The following design choices are intended to help reduce the apparent mass of structures and achieve a more human scale

environment by providing physical breaks in the building volume that reduce large, flat, geometrical planes on any given building elevation. a. All building facades

fronting directly on a Designated Pedestrian Street must include at least two of the following articulation features at intervals no greater than 40 feet to reinforce the desired pattern of small storefronts adjacent to the sidewalk. Buildings that have 60 feet or less of frontage on the designated pedestrian street are exempt from this standard.

(1) Use of window and/or entries that reinforce the pattern of small storefront spaces. (2) Use of vertical piers to reinforce the pattern of small storefront spaces. Such piers must project at least 2 inches from the façade and extend from the ground floor to the roofline. (3) Use of weather protection features that reinforce the pattern of small storefronts. For example, for a business that occupies three lots, use three separate awnings to break down the scale of the storefronts. Alternating colors of the awnings may be useful as well. (4) Roofline modulation as defined in Section 13.06.501.E (5) Change in building material or siding style. Example Figures Right: This building uses roofline modulation, window configurations, and weather protection elements to reinforce the pattern of small storefronts. Below: Other acceptable façade articulation examples. All use window configurations to reinforce the desired small storefront pattern. Other features used in these examples to meet the standards include: Vertical piers: Roofline modulation Different weather protection elements

b. All non-residential facades fronting on a non-Pedestrian Designated Street or containing a pedestrian entrance must include at least three of the

(1) Use of window configurations and/or entries that reinforce the pattern of storefront spaces. (2) Vertical building modulation. The minimum depth and width of modulation shall be 2 and 4 feet, respectively, if tied to a change in

building material/siding style and/or roofline modulation as defined in Section 13.06.501.E. Otherwise, the minimum depth and width of modulation shall be 10 and 15 feet, respectively.

(3) Use of separate weather protection features that reinforce the pattern of storefront spaces.

Page 61: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 43 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

following articulation features at intervals no greater than 60 feet. Buildings that have 120 feet or less of frontage on the non-designated street are exempt from this standard. Buildings that employ brick as the siding material on a majority of the subject façade are required to only provide two of the articulation features instead of three.

(4) Roofline modulation as defined in Section 13.06.501.E (5) Horizontal modulation (upper level step-backs). To qualify for this measure, the minimum horizontal modulation shall be 5 feet and

the treatment must be used in increments at no greater than the articulation interval or provided along more than 75 feet of the facade. (6) Change in building material or siding style. (7) Use of vertical piers. Such piers must project at least 2 inches from the façade and extend from the ground floor to the roofline. (8) Providing a trellis, tree, or other landscape feature within each interval. Such feature must be at least one-half the height of the

building (at planting time for any landscaping element).

c. All residential buildings and residential portions of mixed-use buildings shall include at least three of the following articulation features at intervals of no more than 30 feet along all facades facing a street, common open space, or common parking areas. Buildings that have 60 feet or less of frontage on the street or façade width facing the common open space or common parking area are exempt from this standard. Buildings that employ brick as the siding material on a majority of the subject façade are required to only provide two of the articulation features instead of three.

(1) Repeating distinctive window patterns at intervals less than the required interval. (2) Vertical building modulation. Minimum depth and width of modulation is 2 feet and 4 feet, respectively, if tied to a change in

building material/siding style and/or roofline modulation as defined in Section 13.06.501.E. Otherwise, minimum depth and width of modulation is 10 and 15 feet, respectively. Balconies may not be used to meet modulation option unless they are recessed or projected from the facade at least 18 inches.

(3) Horizontal modulation (upper level step-backs). To qualify for this measure, the minimum horizontal modulation shall be 5 feet and the treatment must be used in increments at no greater than the articulation interval or provided along more than 75 percent of the façade

(4) Roofline modulation as defined in Section 13.06.501.E (5) Vertical articulation of the façade. This refers to design treatments that provide a clear delineation of the building’s top, middle and

bottom. (a) Top features may include a sloped roofline or strong cornice line as defined in Section 13.06.501.E. For facades utilizing upper

level stepbacks, the “top” design treatment may be applied to the top of the front vertical plane of the building or the top of the building where it is set back from the building’s front vertical wall (provided the top of the building is visible from the centerline of the adjacent street).

(b) Middle features: provide consistent articulation of middle floors with windows, balconies, exterior materials, modulation, and detailing

(c) Bottom: provide a distinctive ground floor or lower floors design that contrasts with other floors through the use of both contrasting window design/configuration and contrasting exterior materials

(d) Façade reduction elements including balconies and bay windows may project into street rights-of-way, where allowed by the Public Works Department, but not into alley rights-of-way

Page 62: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 44 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Above: Residential building articulation at 30-foot or less intervals. Below: Articulation examples of mixed-use buildings containing residential uses on upper floors. These examples include vertical and horizontal modulation and changes in building materials at no more than 30-foot articulation intervals.

2. Mass Reduction: Upper Floor Streetfront Stepbacks. The following standards are intended to reduce the appearance of bulk and reduce the potential for

shade and shadow impacts on pedestrian streets. They apply to all development along designated pedestrian streets, unless specifically exempted. a. 8’ minimum stepback along the streetfront façade for 4th floor and above in

RCX Districts b. 8’ minimum horizontal stepback along for 5th floor and above in X Districts

other than RCX, where the ROW width is less than 100’ c. 8’ minimum horizon stepback for 6th floor and above in X zones other than

RCX, where the ROW width is 100’ or greater d. Exceptions to b and c, above: Portions of buildings adjacent to street corners

along designated pedestrian streets can depart from this standard to incorporate distinctive street corner design elements such as a turret. Such corner building features shall be no more than 25 feet in width along both streets and other portions of the building shall meet applicable stepback standards.

Page 63: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 45 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

3. Mass Reduction: Maximum Façade Widths. The following standards are intended to incorporate a significant modulation of the exterior wall through all floors except the ground floor. They apply to the upper story facades of multi-story buildings that are greater than 120 feet in width. Such buildings shall include at least one of the following features to break up the massing of the building and add visual interest:

a. Provide vertical building modulation at least 20 feet deep and 30 feet wide. For multi-story buildings the modulation must extend through more than one-half of the building floors.

b. Use of a contrasting vertical modulated design component that extends through all floors above the first floor fronting on the street (upper floors that are stepped back more than 10 feet from the façade are exempt) and featuring at least two of the following: (1) Utilizes a change in building

materials that effectively contrast from the rest of the façade.

(2) Component is modulated vertically from the rest of the façade by an average of 6 inches.

(3) Component is designed to provide roofline modulation per 13.06.501.I, below.

c. Façade employs building walls with contrasting articulation that make it appear like two distinct buildings. To qualify for this option, these contrasting facades must employ the following: (1) Different building materials and/or

configuration of building materials.

(2) Contrasting window design (sizes or configurations). Examples of facades wider than 120 feet that effectively use techniques to reduce the apparent bulk and scale of the structure. The image on the left uses street and upper level courtyards whereas the right image uses both vertical building modulation and the use of contrasting building materials and articulation.

Page 64: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 46 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

I. X-District Roofline Standards. The following requirements apply to all development located in any X-District, unless specifically exempted. They are intended to ensure that roofline is addressed as an integral part of building design to discourage flat, unadorned rooflines that can result in an industrial appearing, monotonous skyline. Roofline features are also intended to further reduce apparent building volume and further enhance features associated with human scale development.

1. Roofline modulation. In order to qualify as a façade articulation element in other mass reduction standards herein, the roofline shall meet the following modulation requirements along façades facing a street:

a. For flat roofs or facades with horizontal eave, fascia, or parapet, the minimum vertical dimension of roofline modulation is the greater of 2 feet or 0.1 multiplied by the wall height (finish grade to top of the wall) when combined with vertical building modulation techniques. Otherwise, the minimum vertical dimension of roofline modulation is the greater of 4 feet or 0.2 multiplied by the wall height.

b. Buildings with pitched roofs must include a minimum slope of 5:12 and feature modulated roofline components (such as gabled, hipped, shed, or other similar roof forms) at the interval required per the applicable standard in Section D, above. Rounded, gambrel, and/or mansard forms may be averaged.

2. Flat roof standards. Buildings (or portions thereof) featuring flat roofs shall employ decorative cornice lines incorporating one or more of the following design elements along façades facing a street:

a. A cornice of two parts with the top projecting at least 6 inches from the face of the building and at least 2 inches further from the face of the building than the bottom part of the cornice. The height of the cornice shall be at least 12 inches high for buildings 10 feet or less in height; 18 inches for buildings greater than 10 feet and less than 30 feet in height; and 24 inches for buildings 30 feet and greater in height. Cornices shall not project over property lines, except where permitted on property lines abutting public right-of-way.

b. Use of balcony/deck railings that function as a visual roofline element. Such railings must be at least 2 feet in height and extend along at least 75 percent of the facade and shall be visible from the adjacent street centerline.

c. Use of contrasting building materials on the top floor or top two floors for buildings five stories or taller.

d. A cornice element that projects at least 18 inches from the façade for buildings four stories or less or at least 2 feet from the façade for buildings taller than 4 stories. The cornice line must extend along at least 75 percent of the façade.

3. Roofline elements shall not project over property lines, except where permitted on property lines abutting public right-of-way. 4. Canopy Exemption. Gas station canopies, drive through canopies, or similar canopies are exempt from roofline requirements.

Page 65: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 47 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

J. X-District Windows and Openings: Façade Transparency and Solar Access. The following requirements apply all development in any X District, unless specifically exempted. These requirements are intended to increase public visibility for public safety, to provide visual interest to pedestrians that helps encourage pedestrian mobility, to provide for natural lighting to buildings interiors to conserve energy, and to provide architectural detailing and variety to building elevations on each story. 1. Street level

transparency standards for non-residential uses:

a. Facades facing a designated Core Pedestrian Street shall have transparent window or openings for at least 60 percent of the ground level wall area. b. Facades facing a designated Pedestrian Street shall have transparent window or openings for at least 50 percent of the ground level wall area. c. Facades facing a non-pedestrian street, internal courtyard, plaza or containing customer entrances and facing customer parking lots of 20 stalls or greater

shall have transparent window or openings for at least 40 percent of the ground level wall area. d. Flexibility for sloping properties. The window and opening requirements shall be reduced to 30 percent of the ground level wall area for building

elevations where the finished grade level adjacent to the building is four feet above or below the level of the sidewalk. The requirement shall be further reduced to 20 percent of the ground level wall area in instances where the application of this standard is not possible due to steep grades running parallel to the elevation and crossing the floor plates of the building.

e. Required view. Required windows or openings must provide either views into building work areas, sales areas or lobbies. Art or display windows may substitute for transparent elements for up to 25% of the requirement on facades facing designated Pedestrian Streets and up to 50% on all other applicable facades. Art and display windows shall be at least 2 feet deep, recessed and integrated into the façade of the building (tack on display cases do not qualify).

f. The “ground level wall area” is defined as the area between 2 feet and 8 feet above the sidewalk. For building elevations where the finished grade level adjacent to the building is four feet above or below the level of the sidewalk, the “ground-level wall area” shall be defined as the portion of the façade between 2 feet and 8 feet above the adjacent finished grade.

g. Rough openings are used to calculate this requirement. 2. Upper level

transparency standards for non-residential uses:

a. Exterior walls facing streets or containing a customer entrance and facing customer parking lots of 20 stalls or greater shall use a combination of transparent windows or openings and architectural relief that provide visual demarcation of each floor.

b. Upper level windows shall be a different type than the ground level windows on the same elevation. c. For purposes of this requirement, a window type is either a grouping of windows, a window size, or a window shape.

3. Residential buildings and residential portions of mixed-use buildings shall incorporate transparent windows and doors equal to at least 15% of all vertical façade surfaces facing the street and equal to at least 10% of all vertical surfaces facing alleys, courtyards, plazas and surface parking lots.

4. Solar access for residential units.

a. Buildings or portions thereof containing dwelling units whose solar access is only from the side or rear of the building (facing towards the side or rear property line) shall be set back from the applicable side or rear property lines at least 15 feet. This standard shall not apply in cases where the rear or side property line abuts an alley. Examples are provided below.

Page 66: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 48 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

5. Window/Trim Detailing. Building facades shall employ techniques to recess or project individual windows or groupings of windows above the ground floor at least two inches from the surrounding facade or incorporate window trim at least four inches wide surrounding the windows. Windows on façades that face the rear property line or alleys are exempt from this standard.

Examples:

Recessed window OK Projected window OK Window with trim OK Unacceptable

K. X-District Façade Surface Standards. The following requirements apply to all development in any X-Districts, unless specifically exempted. These requirements are intended to help reduce the apparent mass of structures and achieve a more human scale environment by providing visual breaks at more frequent intervals to the building volume that reduce large, flat, geometrical planes on any given building elevation, especially at the first story. The choices are also intended to encourage variety in the selection of facade materials and/or treatment and to encourage more active consideration of the surrounding setting. 1. Blank walls

limitation a. Blank wall definition: A ground floor wall or portion of a ground floor wall that is over 4 feet in height and has a horizontal length greater than 15 feet without a

transparent window or door b. Blank walls facing a street, internal pathway, or customer parking lot of 20 stalls or greater must be treated in one or more of the following ways:

(1) Transparent windows or doors. (2) Display windows at least 2 feet in depth and integrated into the façade (tack-on display cases do not qualify). (3) Landscape planting bed at least 5 feet wide or a raised planter bed at least 2 feet high and 3 feet wide in front of the wall. Such planting areas shall include

planting materials that are sufficient to obscure or screen at least 60 percent of the wall’s surface within 3 years. (4) Installing a vertical trellis in front of the wall with climbing vines or plant materials sufficient to obscure or screen at least 60 percent of the wall’s surface

within 3 years. For large areas, trellises should be used in conjunction with other blank wall treatments. 2. Building face

orientation a. The building elevation(s) facing street public rights-of-way shall be a front, side, or corner side and shall not contain elements commonly associated with a rear

elevation appearance, such as loading docks, utility meters, and/or dumpsters. b. For buildings that have more than 2 qualifying elevations, this requirement shall only be applied to two of them.

3. Building Details

Storefront details for designated Core Pedestrian Streets. All buildings fronting on designated Core Pedestrian Streets shall be enhanced with appropriate details. All new buildings shall employ at least one detail element from each of the three categories below. To qualify as an element, features must be used continuously along the façade or at 30-foot intervals. a. Window and/or entry treatment:

(1) Display windows divided into a grid of multiple panes.

Page 67: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 49 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

(2) Transom windows. (3) Roll-up windows/doors. (4) Recessed entry. (5) Decorative door. (6) Arcade. (7) Landscaped trellises or other permanent decorative elements that incorporate landscaping near the building entry.

b. Decorative facade attachments: (1) Decorative weather protection element(s) such as a steel canopy or glass, fixed-fabric, or retractable awning. (2) Decorative building-mounted light fixtures.

c. Decorative building materials and other facade elements: (1) Use of brick, stonework, and architectural pre-cast concrete for at least 10 percent of siding material on the façade. (2) Incorporating a decorative mix of building materials. (3) Decorative kick-plate, pier, or belt course.

Decorative elements referenced above must be distinct and unique elements or unusual designs that require a high level of craftsmanship. The examples below include a decorative door, use of materials, transom windows, and a retractable awning (left image), decorative lights, arcade, use of brick, and decorative planters near the entry (center image), and decorative canopies, decorative windows, and use of brick (right image).

L. Pedestrians. The following requirements apply to all development in any X-District, except where noted or specifically exempted. These requirements are intended to enhance pedestrian mobility and safety in commercial areas by providing increased circulation, decreasing walking distances required to enter large developments, and providing walkways partially shielded from rain and/or snow. 1. Customer

entrances a. Additional entrances. An additional direct customer entrance(s) shall be provided to the same building elevation which contains the primary customer entrance

so that customer entrances are no further than 250 feet apart when such elevations face the public street or customer parking lot. If a corner entrance is used, this requirement applies to only 1 elevation.

b. Designated streets. Non-residential or mixed-use buildings on designated pedestrian streets noted in Section 13.06.200.E or Section 13.06.300.C shall provide at least 1 direct customer entrance, which may be a corner entrance, within 20 feet, facing, and visible to the designated street. For such buildings over 30,000 square feet of gross floor area, the maximum distance is increased to 60 feet.

Page 68: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 50 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

2. Street level weather protection

a. Weather protection shall be provided above a minimum of 50 percent of the length of hard surfaced, public or private walkways and/or plazas along facades containing customer and/or public building entries or facing public street frontage. Facades where planting strips that are at least 5 feet in width separate the walkway from the building wall are exempt from these standards

b. Mixed-Use Center District designated pedestrian streets. Weather protection shall be provided above a minimum of 80 percent of the length of hard surfaced, public or private walkways and/or plazas along facades containing customer and/or public building entries or facing public street frontage.

c. Weather protection may be composed of awnings, canopies, arcades, overhangs, marquees, or similar architectural features. It is required to cover only hard surfaced areas intended for pedestrian use and not areas such as landscaping.

d. Weather protection must cover at least 5 feet of the width of the public or private sidewalk and/or walkway, but may be indented as necessary to accommodate street trees, street lights, bay windows, or similar building accessories to not less than 3 feet in width.

e. Weather protection is required for all multi-family building entries. For private entries, required weather protection must be at least 3 feet deep along the width of the entry. For common building entries, the required weather protection shall be 5 feet.

M. Fencing, Retaining Walls and Utilities. The following requirements apply to all development in any X-District, unless specifically exempted. They are intended to provide for thoughtful placement and design of utilities, mechanical equipment, service areas and fences to mitigate visual impact on public views, general community aesthetics and residential privacy. 1. Utility

screening a. Rooftop. All rooftop mechanical for new construction shall be screened with an architectural element such as a high parapet, a stepped or sloped roof form or an

equivalent architectural feature which is at least as high as the equipment being screened. Fencing is not acceptable. The intent of the screening is to make the rooftop equipment minimally visible from public rights-of-way within 125 feet of the building, provided said rights-of-way are below the roof level of the building. In those instances where the rights-of-way within 125 feet of the building are above the roof level of the building, the mechanical equipment should be the same color as the roof to make the equipment less visible. The function of the HVAC equipment may not be compromised by the screening requirement.

b. All ground level. Utility meters, electrical conduit, and other service utility apparatus shall be located and/or designed to minimize their visibility from the street and other pedestrian areas. If such elements are mounted in a location visible from the street, common open space or pedestrian plaza, internal pedestrian pathway, customer parking lots (alleys are excluded), or shared internal access roads for residential uses, they shall be screened with vegetation or by architectural features. All landscape screening shall provide 50 percent screening at the time of planting and 100 percent screening within 3 years of planting.

c. Small ground level. Service, loading, and garbage areas. Developments shall provide a designated area for service elements (refuse and disposal). Such elements shall be sited along the alley, where available. Where there is no alley available, service elements shall be located and/or screened to minimize the negative visual, noise, odor, and physical impacts. Items that exceed 4 feet in height and visible from a street, common open space or pedestrian plaza, internal pedestrian pathway, customer parking lots (alleys are excluded), or shared internal access roads for residential uses, must use an opaque fence or structure to screen the element.

2. Fencing type limitation

a. Chain link fencing, with or without slats, is prohibited for required screening. b. Barbed or razor wire. The use of barbed or razor wire is limited to those areas not visible to a public street or to an adjacent residential use. c. Chain link. Chain link or similar wire fencing is prohibited between the front of a building and a public street, except for wetland preservation and recreation uses. d. Electrified. The use of electrified fencing is prohibited in all zoning districts. e. The maximum height of free-standing walls, fences, or hedges between any public street and building shall be 3 feet. Exception: Decorative fences up to 8 feet in

height may be allowed between a public street and any residential use provided the portion of the fence between 3 and 7 feet above grade is at least 50 percent transparent and features a planting strip at least 5 feet wide with Type C or D landscaping to soften the view of the fence and contribute to the pedestrian environment.

f. The maximum height of free-standing fences along an alley shall be 3 feet, except that fences greater than 3 feet in height are allowed if the portion of the fence between 3 and 7 feet above grade is at least 20% transparent.

3. Retaining Walls

a. Retaining walls located adjacent to public street rights-of-way shall be terraced such that individual sections are no greater than 4 feet in height. Bench areas between retaining wall sections shall be planted with Type C or D landscaping to soften the view of the wall and contribute to the pedestrian environment.

Page 69: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 51 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

N. X-District Two and Three-Family Dwelling Standards. The following requirements apply to all two and three-family dwellings (duplexes and triplexes) in X-Districts. They are intended to emphasize pedestrian access, compatibility with residential neighborhoods, building orientation to the street, and to minimize impacts of vehicular access.

1. Covered entries are required for each common entry or individual dwelling unit entry with minimum dimensions of 4 feet by 6 feet.

2. Windows on the street. At least 15 percent of the street-facing facades (all vertical surfaces facing the street) shall be comprised of transparent windows and/or doors. Rough openings are used to calculate this requirement.

3. Garage design standards.

a. Vehicular access and garages for all units shall be placed off of the alley, where suitable access, such as an abutting right-of-way that is or can be developed, is available.

b. Garages fronting the street shall be set back a minimum of 20 feet.

c. The garage face or side wall shall occupy no more than 50 percent of the length of the ground-level facade facing the street.

d. Where the garage faces the side yard, but is visible from the street, the garage shall incorporate a window on the street-facing facade so that it appears to be a habitable portion of the building. The window size and design must be compatible with the windows on habitable portions of the dwelling.

e. Driveway approaches shall also be consistent with the standards in Section 13.06.510.

4. Corner duplexes. Duplexes located on corner lots shall be designed with pedestrian entries located on opposite street frontages so that the structure appears to be a single-family dwelling from each street. Where no alley is available for vehicular access, separate driveways for each unit may be placed on opposite streets.

5. Building design. Duplexes and triplexes shall be articulated to either look like two or three distinct dwelling units from the street or to look like one single-family dwelling. Specifically:

a. Buildings articulated to look like distinct dwelling units shall include individual covered entries plus one of the following:

(1) Roofline modulation consistent with Section 13.06.501.E.1 to distinguish one unit from another (or the appearance of separate units) as viewed from the street; or

(2) Vertical building modulation to help distinguish between the different units in the building. The minimum depth and width of modulation shall be 2 and 4 feet, respectively, if tied to a change in building material/siding style. Otherwise, the minimum depth and width of modulation shall be 10 and 15 feet, respectively.

b. Buildings designed to look like one single-family dwelling shall feature only one entrance visible from the street. This could be a common entrance for all units, or the entrances for additional units could be provided at the side or rear of the building.

7. Utilities:

Page 70: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 52 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

a. Utility meters, electrical conduit, and other service utility apparatus shall be located and/or designed to minimize their visibility from the street. If such elements are mounted in a location visible from the street, common open space, or shared auto courtyards, they shall be screened with vegetation or by architectural features.

b. Service, loading, and garbage areas. Developments shall provide a designated area for service elements (refuse and disposal). Such elements shall be sited along the alley, where available. Such elements shall not be located along the street frontage. Where there is no alley available, service elements shall be located to minimize the negative visual, noise, odor, and physical impacts and shall be screened from view from the street and sidewalk.

8. Fencing.

a. Chain link fencing, with or without slats, is prohibited for required screening.

b. Barbed or razor wire. The use of barbed or razor wire is limited to those areas not visible to a public street or to an adjacent residential use.

c. Chain link. Chain link or similar wire fencing is prohibited between the front of a building and a public street, except for wetland preservation and recreation uses.

d. Electrified. The use of electrified fencing is prohibited in all zoning districts.

e. The maximum height of free-standing walls, fences, or hedges between any public street and building shall be 3 feet. Exception: Decorative fences up to 8 feet in height may be allowed between a public street and any residential use provided such fence is at least 50 percent transparent and features a planting strip at least 5 feet wide with Type C or D landscaping to soften the view of the fence and contribute to the pedestrian environment.

O. X-District Townhouse Standards. The following requirements apply to all townhouse dwellings in X-Districts. These requirements are intended to provide façade articulation that emphasizes individual units and reduces the apparent mass of structures, minimize impacts of vehicular access and service elements, and emphasize pedestrian access and building orientation to the street.

1. Building Mass:

a. The maximum number of units in one building is six, with minimum spacing between clusters of 10 feet.

b. Unit articulation. Facades with more than two townhouses facing a street, alley, common open space or common parking area shall be articulated to emphasize individual units. This can be accomplished by either roofline modulation consistent with Section 13.06.501.E.1 and/or vertical building modulation. To qualify for vertical building modulation, the minimum depth and width of modulation shall be 2 and 4 feet, respectively, if tied to a change in building material/siding style. Otherwise, the minimum depth and width of modulation shall be 10 and 15 feet, respectively.

2. Garage Orientation & Vehicular Access:

a. Garages shall not face any street

b. Vehicular access and garages for all units shall be placed off of the alley, where suitable access, such as abutting right-of-way that is or can be developed, is available.

c. Where street-front vehicular access is necessary, driveway approaches shall be limited to no more than one for every 9 units in the development.

d. Driveway approaches shall also be consistent with the standards in Section 13.06.510.

Page 71: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 53 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

3. Pedestrian Orientation:

a. Townhouses fronting on a street must all have individual ground-related entries accessible from the street.

b. A continuous pedestrian walkway, which can be a shared walkway, must be provided between the front entrance of each unit and the nearest public sidewalk. Walkways shall be at least 4 feet in width and either a raised sidewalk or composed of materials different from any adjacent vehicle driving or parking surfaces.

4. Windows on the street. At least 15 percent of the facade (all vertical surfaces facing the street) shall be comprised of transparent windows and/or doors. Rough openings are used to calculate this requirement.

5. Utilities:

a. Utility meters, electrical conduit, and other service utility apparatus shall be located and/or designed to minimize their visibility from the street. If such elements are mounted in a location visible from the street, common open space, or shared auto courtyards, they shall be screened with vegetation or by architectural features.

b. Service, loading, and garbage areas. Developments shall provide a designated area for service elements (refuse and disposal). Such elements shall be sited along the alley, where available. Such elements shall not be located along the street frontage. Where there is no alley available, service elements shall be located to minimize the negative visual, noise, odor, and physical impacts and shall be screened from view from the street and sidewalk.

6. Fencing.

a. Chain link fencing, with or without slats, is prohibited for required screening.

b. Barbed or razor wire. The use of barbed or razor wire is limited to those areas not visible to a public street or to an adjacent residential use.

c. Chain link. Chain link or similar wire fencing is prohibited between the front of a building and a public street, except for wetland preservation and recreation uses.

d. Electrified. The use of electrified fencing is prohibited in all zoning districts.

e. The maximum height of free-standing walls, fences, or hedges between any public street and building shall be 3 feet. Exception: Decorative fences up to 8 feet in height may be allowed between a public street and any residential use provided such fence is at least 50 percent transparent and features a planting strip at least 5 feet wide with Type C or D landscaping to soften the view of the fence and contribute to the pedestrian environment.

Page 72: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 54 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.502 Landscaping and/or buffering standards. General requirements. The landscaping requirements, as a whole, are intended to contribute to the aesthetic environment of the City; provide green spaces that can support wildlife, such as birds, in the urban environment; help reduce storm water runoff; filter pollution; and buffer visual impacts of development.

* * *

Section 13.06.502.B Commercial and X-District Landscaping

T, C-1, C-2, HM, PDB, RCX, NCX, CCX, UCX, UCX-TD, CIX

Applicability A landscaping plan shall be provided consistent with this table for all new development of structures and/or parking lots, unless exempted below. Any requirement resulting in a fraction, when applied, shall be rounded up or down to the nearest whole numberfrom the midpoint as appropriate. The same planting may satisfy more than one requirement, except as noted.

Exemptions Single-family, two-family, and three-family homes dwellings are exempt from all landscaping requirements contained in this table. New buildings that are less than 250 square feet of gross floor area are exempt from all landscaping requirements contained in this table. However, such new buildings shall

not be constructed within required Buffer Planting Areas. Building remodels are exempt from all landscaping requirements contained in this table. Building additions and buildings added to sites with existing structures are exempt from the landscaping requirements contained in this table, except for street tree

requirements and Buffer Planting Areas. Street trees and Buffer Planting Areas are only required along property lines adjacent to the building addition. If the required Buffer Planting Area cannot be provided because of legally existing development, the maximum possible Buffer Planting Area shall be provided and this area shall be planted with a mixture of trees, shrubs, and groundcover.

Parking lots of 20 stalls or less, loading areas, and gas stations are exempt from the Interior Landscaping Distribution requirements contained in the Planting Requirements section of this table, to allow flexibility in placement of required landscaping.

Parking lots of 20 stalls or less, located behind buildings and accessed by alleys, are exempt from the Perimeter Strip, Buffer and Interior Landscaping Distribution requirements below.

C, T, HM, or PDB, or X District property across an arterial street from R-District property is not required to provide a Buffer Planting Area along the affected property line abutting the arterial street.

Minimum Landscaping Area (unless exempted above) Overall site A minimum of 10 percent of the entire site minus the area covered by structures in T, C-1, C-2, HM, PDB, CCX, UCX, and CIX Districts.

A minimum of 5 percent of the entire site minus the area covered by structures in NCX, UCX-TD, and RCX Districts, and conditional uses permitted in Section 13.06.640.

Parking lots of 20 stalls or less, located behind buildings and accessed by alleys, are only required to meet the minimum percent for overall site landscaping, outlined above.

Landscaped areas shall be covered with a mixture of trees, shrubs, and/or groundcover. Site perimeter strip A minimum 7-foot wide site perimeter strip on sides without abutting street trees.

A minimum 5-foot wide site perimeter strip on sides with abutting street trees. The perimeter strip may be reduced to 5 feet for parcels of 150 feet or less in depth. The perimeter strip shall be covered with a mixture of trees, shrubs, and/or groundcover. Perimeter strips may be broken only for vehicle lanes, walkways, or primary structures.

Page 73: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 55 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Buffer Planting Areas. In addition to the intent of the landscaping requirements noted above, buffer planting areas are intended to provide substantial vegetative screening between dissimilar zoning districts to soften visual and aesthetic impacts (unless exempted above). C, T, HM, or PDB, or X District property abutting R-District property

• A continuous planting area on the required property with a minimum width of 15 feet that contains: • A minimum of 6 trees, at least 2-inch caliper, per 100 lineal feet of abutting property line. • A minimum of 12 shrubs, minimum 3-gallon size per 100 lineal feet of abutting property line. • Where the property required to provide a buffer is 150 feet or less in depth, measured perpendicularly from the residential parcel, the buffer

can be reduced to the minimum 7-foot wide buffer listed below. C, T, HM, or PDB, or X District property across the street or alley from R-District property; or adjacent to R-District property within a mixed-use center

• A continuous planting area on the required property with a minimum width of 7 feet that contains: • A minimum of 4 trees, at least 2-inch caliper, per 100 lineal feet of abutting property line. • A minimum of 10 shrubs, minimum 3-gallon size per 100 lineal feet of abutting property line.

Street trees are not required on frontage where a buffer is required, but may be used to satisfy buffer tree requirements. Buffer planting areas may be broken only for vehicle lanes and/or walkways.

Tacoma Mall RCX • Any non-residential development located on property fronting the west side of Pine Street between South 40th Street and South 47th Street shall provide a continuous planting area with a minimum width of seven feet at the rear property line that contains:

• A minimum of 4 trees, at least 2.5-inch caliper, per 100 lineal feet of abutting property line. • A minimum of 10 shrubs, minimum 3-gallon size per 100 lineal feet abutting property line. • All sites shall meet the tree and shrub requirements in a proportionate manner based on the 4:100 ratio. (Fractions will be rounded up from

the midpoint.)

Planting Requirements. These requirements are intended to provide trees of sufficient maturity at planting to provide more immediate mitigation to the site, to provide trees adequate space to avoid damage and continue growth, and to visually break up parking lots (unless exempted above). Tree size and quantity Minimum 1 tree of at least 2-inch caliper per 1,000 square feet of new parking lot area.

For parking areas behind buildings of 20 stalls or less that are shielded by buildings from public street view, a minimum of 1 tree at least 2-inch caliper per 2,000 square feet of parking lot area.

If more trees are needed to meet distribution or street tree requirements, that total is the minimum requirement. Minimum unpaved planting area per tree

Parking lot trees and street trees on private property. 60 square feet; 5-foot minimum width. Street trees in right-of-way. 24 square feet; 4-foot minimum width. Street trees in right-of-way with tree grates. 16 square feet; 4-foot minimum width.

Minimum tree trunk setbacks 2 feet from a sidewalk or curb, 5 feet from a structure. Interior landscaping distribution

Trees and planting areas shall be at aisle ends and evenly distributed throughout the new parking lot with no stall more than 50 feet from a tree trunk.

At least 1 tree shall be located within 10 feet of required walkway for each 40 feet of said walkway. Street trees 3 trees per 100 feet of site street frontage, including buildings; at least 2-inch caliper; compatible with other trees in the vicinity by variety,

species, and planting pattern. Trees and grates must comply with adopted business area improvement plans and/or the City’s Tree Planting Program. Trees planted within the right-of-way or within 10 feet of the right-of-way or property line boundary are considered street trees for purposes

of this requirement. Native landscaping Required landscape planting quantities may be reduced by 20 percent when installing Pacific Northwest native planting materials for required

landscaping. “Landscape planting quantities” means the total number of plants for the site required by this table.

Page 74: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 56 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Credit for Retaining Existing Trees and Shrubs. These requirements are provided to encourage tree and shrub preservation because of the greater visual and ecological benefits of mature plantings. Credit ratios The following tree planting credits are available for existing trees, provided an arborist’s or landscape architect’s appraisal determines that the tree(s) is healthy

and can be saved: • One required tree for every retained tree of at least equal size; • Two required trees for every retained tree that is 25 inches to 63 inches in circumference (measured 4.5 feet from the ground); • Three required trees for every retained tree 63 inches to 100 inches in circumference; • Four required trees for every retained tree over 100.5 inches in circumference.

If retained trees are damaged during or after construction, replacement shall be based upon the same ratios. Existing shrubs, which comply with the minimum plant size specifications of this table, may count towards the required landscape plantings. Invasive

plants such as blackberry, scotch broom, etc. shall not count towards the required plantings.

Maintenance Landscaping meeting the standards of this section shall be installed by the time of occupancy. Landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy, growing, and safe condition for the life of the project. Modifications to the landscaping shall be in conformance with these standards.

* * *

Page 75: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 57 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Section 13.06.502.D X-District Landscaping

RCX, NCX, CCX, UCX, UCX-TD, CIX, URX, HMX, NRX

Applicability A landscaping plan shall be provided consistent with this table for all new development of structures and/or parking lots, unless exempted below. Any requirement resulting in a fraction, when applied, shall be rounded up or down to the nearest whole number. The same planting may satisfy more than one requirement, except as noted.

Exemptions Single-family detached dwellings are exempt from all landscaping requirements contained in this table. Buildings that are less than 250 square feet of gross floor area are exempt from all landscaping requirements contained in this table. However, such new buildings shall not

be constructed within required Buffer Planting Areas. Parking lots of 15 stalls or less, loading areas, and gas stations are exempt from the Interior Landscaping Distribution requirements contained in the Planting Requirements

section of this table, to allow flexibility in placement of required landscaping. Parking lots of 15 stalls or less, located behind buildings and accessed by alleys, are exempt from the Perimeter Strip, Buffer and Interior Landscaping Distribution

requirements below. Property across an arterial street from R-District property is not required to provide a Buffer Planting Area along the affected property line abutting the arterial street.

Additions/Remodels. Three thresholds are used to gauge the extent of landscaping standard compliance on additions/remodels:

a. Level I remodels/additions include all remodels and/or additions within a three year period with value of less than 60% of the existing building value, as determined by the Building Code. The requirement for such remodels is only that the proposed improvements meet the standards and do not lead to further nonconformance with the standards. For example, for an expanded parking area, landscaping would be required for the new parking area, but the applicant would not be required to bring an existing parking lot into conformance with these landscaping standards.

b. Level II remodels/additions include all remodels and/or additions within a three year period whose value ranges from 60% to 200% of the value of the existing structure, as determined by the Building Code. All standards that do not involve repositioning the building or reconfiguring site development shall apply to Level II.

c. Level III remodels/additions include all remodels and/or additions within a three year period whose value exceeds 200% of the value of the existing structure, as determined by the Building Code. Such remodels shall conform to ALL standards.

The standards do not apply to remodels that do not change the exterior appearance of the building. However, if a project involves both exterior and interior improvements, then the project valuation shall include both exterior and interior improvements.

Page 76: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 58 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Landscaping Types

Landscaping Type A - A dense landscaping screen separating different uses. Specifically:

a. For landscaping strips 10 to 15 feet wide: i. At least one row of evergreen trees, minimum 8 feet in height and 10 feet maximum separation. ii. Permitted evergreen tree species are those with the ability to develop a minimum branching width of 8 feet within 5 years. Smaller evergreen trees may be

integrated into the strip provided they are in addition to the required larger trees. iii. Shrubs at a rate of one shrub per 20 square feet of landscaped area. Shrubs shall be from minimum 3-gallon sized containers, at least 16 inches tall at planting and

have a mature height of at least 3 feet. iv. Ground cover. v. Bioretention cells or swales can be incorporated into these landscaping strips.

b. For landscaping strips wider than 15 feet: i. A minimum of one evergreen tree at least 8 feet tall for every 150 square feet arranged in a manner to obstruct views into the property. ii. Permitted evergreen tree species are those with the ability to develop a minimum branching width of 8 feet within 5 years. Smaller evergreen trees may be

integrated into the strip provided they are in addition to the required larger trees. iii. Shrubs and ground cover as required above. iv. Bioretention cells or swales can be incorporated into these landscaping strips

Page 77: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 59 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Landscaping Type B - A moderately dense and naturalistic vegetation screen to offer visual relief and integrate built elements into the natural environment. Specifically:

a. For landscaping strips less than 15 feet wide: i. Informal groupings of evergreen (minimum 8 feet in height) and/or deciduous trees (minimum 2 inch caliper as measured 4 feet from the root ball).

At least 50 percent of the trees must be evergreen. Trees to be spaced at an average of 20 feet on-center, but may be grouped in asymmetrical arrangements.

ii. Permitted tree species are those with the ability to develop a minimum branching width of 8 feet within 5 years. Smaller tree species are permitted for vegetated areas in front of walls provided they are spaced at an average of 15 feet on-center.

iii. Shrubs at a rate of one shrub per 20 square feet of landscaped area. Shrubs shall be from minimum 3-gallon sized containers, at least 16 inches tall at planting and have a mature height of at least 3 feet.

iv. Ground cover. v. Bioretention cells or swales can be incorporated into these landscaping strips.

b. For landscaping strips wider than 15 feet: i. At least one tree per 300 square feet of landscaped area. At least 50 percent of the trees must be evergreen. ii. Tree species, shrubs, and ground cover as required above. iii. Bioretention cells or swales can be incorporated into these landscaping strips.

c. Trees and shrubs shall be selected and maintained to maximize visibility at eye level for safety. To meet this requirement, choose and maintain shrubs at no taller than 3 feet. Prune trees (once tall enough) to maximize views below 7 feet in height.

Page 78: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 60 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Landscaping Type C - Landscaping provides visual relief in parking areas and along roadways where both a canopy of trees and visibility is required.

a. For landscaping strips 5 to 20 feet wide: i. Trees at 20 feet on-center (minimum 2 inch caliper as measured 4 feet from the root ball). ii. Permitted tree species are those that reach a mature height of at least 30 feet. iii. Shrubs at a rate of one shrub per 20 square feet of landscaped area. Shrubs shall be from minimum 3-gallon sized containers and have a mature height of at least 2

feet. iv. Ground cover. v. Bioretention cells or swales can be incorporated into these landscaping strips.

b. For landscaping strips wider than 20 feet: i. At least one tree per 300 square feet of landscaped area or 20 foot separation (on average). Place trees to create a canopy in desired locations without obstructing

necessary view corridors. ii. Tree species, shrubs, and ground cover as required above. iii. Bioretention cells or swales can be incorporated into these landscaping strips.

c. Trees and shrubs shall be selected and maintained to maximize visibility at eye level for safety. To meet this requirement, choose and maintain shrubs at no taller than 3 feet. Prune trees (once tall enough) to maximize views below 7 feet in height.

Page 79: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 61 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Landscaping Type D - A decorative landscaped display with colorful flowers or foliage as a focal setting for signs, special site elements and/or high visibility or pedestrian areas. Specifically:

a. Shrubs, at least 50 percent of which must exhibit decorative floral or foliage, shall cover at least 50 percent of the landscaped area within 3 years.

b. The remaining 50 percent of the landscaped area may be planted with trees, shrubs, perennials, ground cover, or cultivated flower beds.

c. Trees and shrubs shall be selected and maintained to maximize visibility at eye level for safety. To meet this requirement, choose and maintain shrubs at no taller than 3 feet. Prune trees (once tall enough) to maximize views below 7 feet in height.

Landscaping Type E - Enhancing natural areas to better integrate developments into existing conditions. Specifically:

a. Landscaping shall consist of trees, shrubs, and ground covers that are native to the Puget Sound and are appropriate to the conditions of the site.

b. Arrangement of plants shall be asymmetrical and plant material shall be sufficient in quantity to cover the soil in one growing season.

c. Minimum 20 feet in width if used as a screen or required front yard treatment.

Page 80: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 62 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

General Landscape Plan, Planting and Maintenance Standards 1. Required landscape plans shall be stamped by a licensed landscape architect or certified nursery person. Exempted developments:

a) Residential developments with less than 7 units. b) Non-residential and mixed-use developments featuring less than 500 square feet of landscaping

2. Trees a) Deciduous trees shall be 2 inch minimum caliper at the time of planting, unless otherwise specified. Evergreen trees shall be minimum 6 feet in height at the time of

planning, unless otherwise specified. Additional trees provided that are beyond minimum requirements may be smaller. b) Tree trunks shall be setback at least 2 feet from curbs and 5 feet from buildings. c) All trees shall be staked and tied at the time of planting.

3. Shrubs shall be from minimum 3-gallon containers at the time of planting. 4. Ground cover shall be planted in the following amounts:

a. Flats or four inch pots at 18 inches on-center or one gallon containers at 24 inches on-center. 5. New landscaping materials shall include species native to the coastal region of the Pacific Northwest or non-invasive naturalized species that have adapted to the climactic

conditions of the region in the following amounts: a. 75 percent of ground cover and shrubs. b. 50 percent of trees.

Minimum Landscaping Area (unless exempted above) Overall site A minimum of 15 percent of the entire site for single-purpose residential developments.

Exceptions and departures to landscaped area requirement. i. Requirements for developments with structured parking are relaxed based on the percentage of structured parking to the total

number of on-site parking spaces. For example, if all parking is structured, there is no landscaping requirement. If 50 percent of the parking is structured, then the amount of required landscaping is reduced by 50 percent (to 7.5 percent).

ii. Green roofs and roof gardens may be used to meet up to one-third of the landscaped area requirements. iii. Planting strips within street rights-of-way shall not be included in required landscaped areas.

Landscaped areas shall be covered with a mixture of trees, shrubs, and/or groundcover.

Page 81: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 63 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Residential Buffer Planting Areas. In addition to the intent of the landscaping requirements noted above, buffer planting areas are intended to provide substantial vegetative screening between dissimilar zoning districts to soften visual and aesthetic impacts (unless exempted above). These landscaping provisions are also intended to soften the appearance of buildings from the street and enhance the aesthetics of development. X District property abutting R-1, R-2 or R-2SRD District property

• A continuous planting area at least 15 feet wide along abutting the R-District property line containing Type A Landscaping. • Where the property is required to provide a buffer is 150 feet or less in depth, measured perpendicularly from the residential parcel, the

buffer can be reduced to 10 feet in width. X District property across the street from R-1, R-2 or R-2SRD District property

Minimum 10-foot front yard setbacks are required except for corner lots that also front on a designated Pedestrian Street. The setback exemption shall apply for a distance of 130 feet, measured from edge of the designated Pedestrian Street right-of-way.

Covered porches and entry features may project up to 6 feet into the setback. The setback area may include landscaping, walkways, pedestrian plazas, private patios, porches, or vehicular lanes (where allowed), but not

include parking. X District property across the alley from R-1, R-2 or R-2SRD District property

A continuous planting area on the required property with a minimum width of 7 feet that contains Type B or C Landscaping. Buffer planting areas may be broken only for vehicle lane crossings and/or walkways.

Front Yard Front Yard Landscaping In areas where buildings are not located adjacent to the sidewalk, the area between the public sidewalk and buildings shall be landscaped

with a combination of trees, shrubs, and/or ground cover. Landscaped areas may only be broken by walkways and pedestrian plazas Foundation Planting All street-facing elevations must have landscaping along any exposed foundation. The landscaped area may be along the outer edge of a

porch instead of the foundation. This landscaping requirement does not apply to portions of the building facade that provide access for pedestrians or vehicles to the building. The foundation landscaping must meet the following standards: 1. The landscaped area must be at least three feet wide. 2. There must be at least one shrub for every three lineal feet of foundation. 3. Ground cover plants must fully cover the remainder of the landscaped area.

Planting Requirements. These requirements are intended to provide trees of sufficient maturity at planting to provide more immediate mitigation to the site, to provide trees adequate space to avoid damage and continue growth, and to visually break up parking lots (unless exempted above). Street Trees Tree species, location, spacing, and grates must comply with adopted business area improvement plans, streetscape design plans, and/or the

City’s Tree Planting Program. Street trees shall be provided at a ratio of 3 trees per 100 feet of site street frontage, including buildings; at least 2-inch caliper; compatible

with other trees in the vicinity by variety, species, and planting pattern. For example, a site with 50 feet of street frontage would require 2 trees and a site with 90 feet of street frontage would require 3 trees.

Trees shall be selected and maintained to maximize visibility at eye level for safety. To meet this requirement, choose and prune trees (once tall enough) to maximize views below 7 feet in height.

Trees planted within the right-of-way are considered street trees for purposes of this requirement. Street trees shall generally be placed adjacent to the curb and between the pedestrian lane and curb.

Street trees in planting area: Minimum 25 square feet planting area; 5-foot minimum width. Street trees with tree grates: Minimum16 square feet; 4-foot minimum width.

Page 82: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 64 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Parking Lot Landscaping 1. Perimeter parking lot landscaping buffers: a. Streets: 10-foot wide planting strip with Type C Landscaping. b. Side and rear yards: 10-foot wide planting strips with Type B or C Landscaping. Where the subject property is 150 feet or less in depth,

the perimeter strip can be reduced to 5 feet in width. c. Trees and shrubs shall be selected and maintained to maximize visibility at eye level for safety. To meet this requirement, choose and

maintain shrubs at no taller than 3 feet. Prune trees (once tall enough) to maximize views below 7 feet in height. 2. Internal parking lot landscaping:

a. Planting areas with trees are required at all parking aisle ends. b. There shall be no more than eight parking stalls in a row without a tree. c. Trees shall be provided at an average of 30-foot intervals along walkways within or adjacent to parking lots. d. Type C Landscaping shall be used for internal parking lot landscaping. e. Trees and shrubs shall be selected and maintained to maximize visibility at eye level for safety. To meet this requirement, choose and

maintain shrubs at no taller than 3 feet. Prune trees (once tall enough) to maximize views below 7 feet in height. f. Trees shall be planted a minimum of 10 feet from pedestrian light standards or parking lot light standards g. An average of 60 square feet of landscaped area is required per tree. Planting islands containing trees shall feature minimum dimensions

of 5 feet on all sides. h. Bioretention cells or swales may be incorporated into required planting areas.

Credit for Retaining Existing Trees and Shrubs. These requirements are provided to encourage tree and shrub preservation because of the greater visual and ecological benefits of mature plantings. Credit ratios The following tree planting credits are available for existing trees, provided an arborist’s or landscape architect’s appraisal determines that the tree(s) is healthy

and can be saved: • One required tree for every retained tree of at least equal size; • Two required trees for every retained tree that is 25 inches to 63 inches in circumference (measured 4.5 feet from the ground); • Three required trees for every retained tree 63 inches to 100 inches in circumference; • Four required trees for every retained tree over 100 inches in circumference.

If retained trees are damaged during or after construction, replacement shall be based upon the same ratios. Existing shrubs, which comply with the minimum plant size specifications of this table, may count towards the required landscape plantings. Invasive plants such as blackberry, scotch broom, etc. shall not count towards the required plantings.

Maintenance Landscaping meeting the standards of this section shall be installed by the time of occupancy. Landscaping shall be maintained in a healthy, growing, and safe condition for the life of the project. Modifications to the landscaping shall be in conformance with these standards.

Page 83: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 65 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.503 Residential transitioncompatibility standards. The following items are required to help ensure compatibility appropriate transitions between non-residential and/or higher intensity development and adjacent residential districts, in terms of building bulk and scale, location of activity areas for privacy and noise reduction, provision of greenspace, and visual separation:

A. Upper Story Stepetback

1. Structures shall not intercept a 25-degree daylight plane inclined into the C, T, PDB, HM, M, or PMI, or Mixed-Use Center District from a height of 25 feet above existing grade at any R-District / C, T, PDB, HM, M, or PMI, or Mixed-Use Center District boundaries, excluding boundaries with R-4 Districts, R-5 District, and/or non-residential uses in any R District (see diagram at right).

2. The following requirements apply in all X-Districts, where a Mixed-Use Center boundary is adjacent to single-family zoning (R-1, R-2 and R-2SRD Districts), except where the adjacent use within the single-family zone is a park, permanent open space, undevelopable steep slope, public facility or freeway.

a. An upper story stepback equal to 10 feet back for each 10 feet up above 25 feet shall be incorporated in projects abutting a single-family zone at an alley or rear or side property line (example of abutting scenario below). This stepback is measured from the inside edge of the required buffer or yard.

b. An upper story stepback equal to 10 feet back for each 10 feet up above 35 feet shall be incorporated in projects abutting a single-family zone at a street. This stepback is measured from the property line.

B. Storage and/or

Service Openings Vehicle ingress, vehicle egress, and/or loading bay doors of self-storage uses and/or vehicle service uses shall not face any residentially-zoned property.

C. Buffer Planting Areas

SEE SECTION 13.06.502.

25degrees

7.5' 15 'buffers etback

R District Boundary& Property Line

Buil ding Height Se tback at R Distr ict B oundaries ( exce pt R 4 & R 5 )

Page 84: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 66 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

D. Lighting 1. Light trespass. Light trespass from sites in non-residential zoning districts shall not exceed 3 lux (0.3 foot candles) at parcel boundaries with residential zoning districts. This luminance value shall be measured at the eye in a plane perpendicular to the line-of-sight when looking at the brightest source in the field of view at any point on the property line of any residential parcel.

2. Residential light pollution. To ensure control of and to minimize glare, any lighting within 100 feet of an R District shall use luminaires which meet the Illuminating Engineering Society’s cutoff light distribution specification.

3. General light pollution. To control and minimize glare, all other luminaries for area and/or off-street parking shall meet the Illuminating Engineering Society’s semi-cutoff light distribution specification. Lighting shall be directed toward the site, with cutoff shields or other means, to prevent spillover glare to adjacent properties or vehicular traffic. Luminaires with a light source not greater than 1800 lumens (100 watt incandescent) are exempt from this requirement.

4. View-Sensitive Overlay Districts. Parking lot lighting shall not exceed 20 feet in height. 5. Any lighting from a non-residential development located within the Tacoma Mall RCX zone on property fronting the west side of Pine

Street between South 40th Street and South 47th Street and within 100 feet of the rear property line shall meet this standard.

Page 85: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 67 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.510 Off-street parking and storage areas. A. Purpose. To ensure the safe and adequate flow of traffic in public right-of-way, it is deemed in the interest of the public health, safety, and general welfare that off-street parking areas be required as a necessary part of the development and use of land, and to ensure that required parking areas are designed to perform in a safe and efficient manner.

Minimum parking requirements are particularly important in order to ensure resident, visitor, customer, and employee parking within reasonable distance to the uses served, reduce congestion on adjacent streets; and to minimize, to the extent possible, spillover parking into adjacent residential areas. The requirements herein set forth are also established to discourage under-used parking facilities and to minimize the amount of land dedicated to parking, consistent with the comprehensive plan, that encourages economic development, transit use, carpooling, energy conservation, and air quality improvement by providing for: only the minimum number of stalls necessary, compact stalls, shared parking between uses, transportation demand management, and incentives for reducing the size of parking areas.

Applicability. Buildings, structures, or uses hereafter established, built, enlarged, increased in capacity, or changed in principal use in all districts shall provide the following off-street parking areas:

1. Off-street parking spaces - quantity. The quantity of off-street parking shall be provided in accordance with the standards of the tables below.

a. Fractions. Fractions resulting from required parking calculations will be rounded up or down to the nearest whole numberfrom the midpoint as appropriate.

b. Multiple uses. Where an establishment on a lot contains multiple types of uses, the required parking spaces shall be equal to the total spaces determined by computing each use type separately, except where specifically stated otherwise herein.

c. Use not listed. In the case of a use not specifically mentioned in this section, the requirements for off-street parking facilities shall be determined by the City Traffic Engineer. Such determination shall be based upon the requirements for the use specified in this section that is most nearly comparable to the unspecified use and traffic engineering principles and studies.

TABLE 1 – Required Off-Street Parking Spaces 9, 14 Use Unit Required parking

spaces Min. Residential Single-family dwelling, Adult family home, Staffed residential home 1, 2, 12

Dwelling. 2.00

Two-family dwelling in all districts 1, 2, 12 Dwelling. 2.00

Three-family in R-2SRD, HMR-SRD and R-3 1, 2, 12 Dwelling. 2.00

Lots not conforming to area/width 3 Dwelling. 1.00

Multiple-family dwelling and mobile home park 1, 2,

12

Located in R-4-L, T, HMR-SRD, and PRD Districts 12

Dwelling. 1.50

Located in R-4, C-1, C-2, HM, and M-1 Districts 12 Dwelling. 1.25

Located in R-5 District 12 Dwelling. 1.00

Mixed-Use Center District See TABLE 2 (next table).

Retirement homes, apartment hotels, residential hotels, residential clubs, fraternities, sororities, and group living quarters of a university or private club 1

Guest room, suite, or dwelling.

Same as for multiple-family.

Residential in DR, DCC, DMU, and WR Districts See Chapter 13.06A.

Page 86: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 68 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

TABLE 1 – Required Off-Street Parking Spaces 9, 14 Retail 10 (View-Sensitive)

Retail commercial establishments, except as otherwise herein, less than 15,000 square feet of gross floor area

1,000 square feet of gross floor area.

2.50

Shopping Center 1,000 square feet of gross floor area.

4.00

Retail commercial establishments, except as otherwise herein

1,000 square feet of gross floor area.

4.00

Eating and drinking establishments 11 (View-Sensitive) 1,000 square feet of gross floor area.

10.00

Office Business and professional offices 1,000 square feet of gross

floor area. 3.00

Medical and dental clinics 1,000 square feet of gross floor area.

3.00

Lodging Hotel 1 Guestroom or suite. 0.50

Motel 1 Guestroom or suite. 1.00

Institutional Libraries, museums, art galleries 1,000 square feet of gross

floor area. 2.50

Hospitals Bed. 1.75

Special needs housing, as listed in the use table in Section 13.06.535.B and not otherwise listed in this table

Bed 0.10 plus one per employee

Extended care facilities Bed. 0.33

Religious assembly Seat4 0.20

Elementary, middle, and junior high schools Teaching station. 1.20

High school Student. 0.40

College and university Student. 0.75

Work release or juvenile rehabilitation Employee. 1.00 5

Recreational Auditoriums, stadiums, and theaters Seat 4 0.25

Miniature golf course 1,000 square feet of lot area, excluding parking.

2.50

Skating rink 1,000 square feet of gross floor area.

6.00

Bowling establishment Lanes. 5.00

Public dance halls and private clubs 1,000 square feet of gross floor area.

7.50

Marina Moorage space. 0.50

Boat launch Ramp. 25.00 6

Recreational uses not listed elsewhere Same as retail, based on size.

Warehouse/Industrial 13 Self-service storage Storage unit. See note 7.

Warehousing 1,000 square feet of gross floor area.

1.00

Page 87: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 69 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

TABLE 1 – Required Off-Street Parking Spaces 9, 14 Industrial/manufacturing 1,000 square feet of gross

floor area. 1.50

Services

Laundromat Washing and dry-cleaning machine.

0.50

Car wash Wash stall or 25 feet of wash lane.

4.00 8

Day-care centers Each 10 children in care. 2.00

TABLE 1 Footnotes

1. Guest rooms or suites in retirement homes, apartment hotels, residential hotels, and residential clubs shall be construed to be dwelling units for purposes of determining the number of off-street parking stalls required. The parking requirements may be reduced to one parking space every three dwelling units; provided, the following conditions exist:

a. The use will provide residency for retirement age persons with an estimated average persons-per-dwelling unit factor of 1.5 or less, or low-income elderly persons, or a combination thereof;

b. Yard space is available on the same lot the use is to be located upon or an adjoining lot, where off-street parking at a future time could be provided should the use be converted to an apartment or for other reasons additional parking is needed to serve the premises.

If these conditions do not exist, a variance of the number of parking spaces to be provided is required.

2. For purposes of this regulation, a mobile home shall be construed to be a single-family dwelling. Tandem parking is permitted for single-family, two-family, and three-family dwellings.

3. Single unified parcel of land as indicated by the records of the Pierce County Auditor as of May 18, 1953, having an average width of less than 50 feet and an area of less than 5,000 square feet.

4. Seat, 18 inches of bench or 25 square feet of floor space.

5. There shall be 2 visitor-parking stalls provided for each 10 required employee stalls.

6. Parking spaces shall be minimum 10 feet wide and 40 feet long.

7. Parking shall be provided by parking/driving lanes adjacent to the buildings. These lanes shall be at least 20 feet wide when storage facilities open onto one side of the lane only and at least 25 feet wide when storage facilities open onto both sides of the lane. Driving lanes shall be designed to accommodate single unit vehicles. Two parking spaces shall be provided adjacent to the manager’s quarters. One parking space for every 200 storage spaces or fraction thereof shall be located adjacent to, or within 100 feet of, the office. A minimum of two such spaces shall be provided. Required parking spaces may not be rented as, or used for, long-term vehicular storage.

8. The required stalls may include waiting and finishing or drying space.

9. The number and size of required handicapped accessible parking spaces shall be consistent with the Uniform applicable Building Code.

10. In commercial districts combined with a View-Sensitive Overlay District and adjacent to a shoreline district (i.e., Old Town), 0 stalls are required for the first 3,000 square feet of retail space.

11. In commercial districts combined with a View-Sensitive Overlay District and adjacent to a shoreline district (i.e., Old Town), 0 stalls are required for the first 750 square feet of eating and drinking establishments.

12. Additional off-street parking for existing residential uses, including those nonconforming as to off-street parking, in all “R” Residential Dwelling Districts shall only be required if the number of dwelling units is increased.

Page 88: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 70 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13. Storage warehousing, distribution warehousing, and industrial uses.

a. The off-street parking requirements, set forth in Table 1 of this section, shall not include space devoted to office or other non-industrial related use. Where a warehousing or industrial facility contains office or other non-industrial related use, off-street parking for such spaces shall be computed utilizing the requirements set forth in Table 1.

b. In determining whether to apply the parking standard based on floor area or the standard based on the number of employees, the City shall consider the following:

(1) The extent to which automation is utilized in the operation of the facility;

(2) The long-term versus the short-term nature of the use;

(3) The means of product delivery and distribution;

(4) The need for storage of company vehicles on-site;

(5) The availability of accurate employee counts;

(6) Future expansion plans;

(7) The amount of available area which could be converted to additional off-street parking should the need arise; for example, due to an increase in the work force or change in use.

If, after reviewing the project in light of the above factors, the City finds that the off-street parking standard based on number of employees more accurately reflects the parking needs of the facility while still protecting the general health, safety, and welfare of the community, such standards shall be applied.

14. In instances where the parking requirement is based on number of employees and the employees work in shifts, the number of regular employees in the largest shift shall be used for the purpose of determining the required number of parking stalls.

TABLE 2 – Parking in Mixed-Use Center Districts

Quantity Residential Uses. Minimum 1.0 stall per unit.

Commercial or Office Uses. Minimum 2.5 stalls per 1000 square feet of gross floor area.

UCX-TD Commercial or Office Uses (including retail, service and eating and drinking establishments). Minimum 0 stalls per 1000 square feet of gross floor area.

Other Uses. For uses not specifically listed above, the parking requirement in the Mixed-Use Center Districts shall be 70% of the parking requirement for that use identified in Table 1.

See Section 13.06.510.B.2.f for use of compact stalls.

Exemptions No parking is required for any structure in existence upon the date the Mixed-Use Center was created within which it exists (see Section 13.17.020) adoption of these regulations in any Mixed-Use Center District. New development shall provide parking as required.

In NCX Districts, no parking is required for new development on properties or portions of properties within 200 feet of the centerline of the designated core pedestrian streets (see Section 13.06.300.C) This 200-foot depth shall be extended to encompass an entire development site when at least 60% of the development site is within the standard 200-foot deep exception area (for purposes of this provision, the “development site” can include multiple parcels as long as they are part of the same project proposal and are abutting or separated by no more than an alley right-of-way). Sites that remain split by this exception shall be required to provide parking based on the amount required for the portion of the project that is outside of the parking exception area; however, the parking provided to meet the requirement can be provided anywhere on the site or off-site, as normally allowed.

Page 89: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 71 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

In CCX Districts, no parking is required for buildings that are located within 10 feet of the right-of-way of a designated core pedestrian street.

In NCX, CCX, and UCX Districts, no parking is required for the first 3,000 square feet of a ground-level retail orand service space or the first 750 square feet of patron-serving area in a ground-level eating and drinking establishment.

Parking Quantity Reductions. The parking requirements for mixed-use, multi-family, commercial, institutional and industrial developments within X-Districts may be reduced as follows:

Transit Access Parking requirement shall be reduced by 25% for sites located within 500 feet of a transit stop and 50% for sites located within 500 feet of a transit stop at which a minimum of 15-minute peak hour service is provided (routes which serve stops at least every 15 minutes during peak hours). Applicants requesting this reduction must provide a map identifying the site and transit service schedules for all transit routes within 500 feet of the site.

Trip Reduction Plan Parking requirement shall be reduced by 25% for developments that create and implement a site-specific Trip Reduction plan and program that includes features such as employer-provided transit passes, telecommuting, ridesharing, carpooling, car-sharing, bicycling, flexible work schedules, etc. The trip reduction plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City’s CTR Coordinator and yearly reports shall be provided to evaluate the effectiveness of the program and ensure its continued maintenance and operation.

Car-Sharing Stalls Parking requirements shall be reduced by one stall for each stall that is dedicated and designated for use by a locally-operating car sharing program, such as “Zipcar.”

Mixed-Use/Shared Parking Credit

No parking shall be required for the residential units in a mixed-use project where at least 50 percent of the gross floor area is designed for commercial or institutional use.

On-Street Parking Credit Parking requirements shall be reduced ½ stall per each new public, on-street parking stall provided as part of the project (through the installation of angled or perpendicular spaces with bulb-outs and curbs or other methods). Any modifications to the right-of-way are subject to the acceptance and approval of the Public Works Department. This one-time credit applies at the time of the development and shall not be affected by any future changes to the right-of-way configuration, design or alignment.

Bicycle Parking Credit For every five non-required bicycle parking spaces provided on the site (beyond the standard requirements, as found in Section 13.06.512.D), the automobile parking requirement shall be reduced by one space. This credit is limited to a maximum of 5 automobile spaces, or 15% of the standard parking requirement for the development, whichever is less.

Motorcycle/Scooter Parking Credit

For every 4 motorcycle/scooter parking spaces provided, the automobile parking requirement shall be reduced by one space. Each motorcycle/scooter parking space must be at least 4 feet wide and 8 feet deep and may be located in areas that are otherwise unusable for automobile parking (such as in corners, at aisle ends and near pillars). This credit is limited to a maximum of 5 automobile spaces, or 5% of the standard automobile parking requirement for the development, whichever is less.

Location. NCX, RCX, NRX, URX and UCX-TD Districts

Parking shall be located to the rear, side, within, or under a structure, or on a separate lot.

Parking located to the side of a structure shall not exceed a maximum of 60 feet in width for paved vehicular area along designated pedestrian street frontages.

CCX, UCX, HMX and CIX Districts

Parking may be located on any side provided maximum setback requirements are met.

Page 90: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 72 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Multi-Family Development Parking

In multi-family residential developments with multiple buildings, off-street surface parking and circulation areas shall, to the extent practicable, be located on the sides and rear portions of the development site. Areas between buildings and along street frontages shall be used to fulfill yard space requirements (see Section 13.06.501.N).

Loading Spaces In NCX and RCX Districts, off-street loading spaces for retail sales and service uses shall only be required in shopping centers.

Driveways. Driveways shall be located and developed in a manner that recognizes the overall goals for promoting pedestrian activity over vehicle orientation. They shall be limited in size and number and locatein the preference order described below: NCX/RCX Ddriveway location 1. Driveways shall be located from an alley when suitable access is

available, such as an abutting right-of-way that is or can practicably be developed; or street without pedestrian designation:

If no alley or street without arterial or pedestrian designation is available to the site, then from an arterial street without pedestrian designation.

2. When suitable alley access is not available, driveways shall be limited to the lowest classified roadway adjacent to the site (non-designated street, designated pedestrian street, designated core pedestrian street)

3. If none of the previous options are available to the site then from a street with pedestrian designation.

3. Projects that utilize an alley for vehicle access and can not practicably limit vehicular access only to the alley, shall also be allowed to have additional vehicular access from abutting non-designated pedestrian streets.

4. Driveways shall be located as close as practical to the property line most distant from any street intersections. Location shall be subject to the approval of the City’s Traffic Engineer.

Driveway size The maximum driveway approach width shall be 25 feet on designated pedestrian streets and 30 feet on all other streets.

For two and three-family and townhouse dwellings, driveway approach widths on streets are limited to 14 feet when serving one unit and 20 feet in width when serving multiple units.

Pedestrian street driveway frequency

Driveways shall be no closer than 150 feet to another driveway as measured from centerlines on designated pedestrian streets.

The centerline of a driveway shall be no closer than 50 feet to a designated pedestrian street corner.

Review of new driveways New driveways in Mixed-Use Center Districts are subject to review and approval by the City Engineer pursuant to Chapter 10.14, taking into account safe traffic flow, existing and planned transit operations, the objectives and requirements of this chapter, and the efficient functioning of the development.

When portions of Chapter 10.14 or this chapter are in conflict, the more restrictive shall apply.

Exceptions may be allowed by the City Engineer for public safety or if strict application of these standards would prohibit vehicular access to a development, pursuant to Chapter 10.14.

Any proposed exception to the standards and/or requirements for driveways in Chapter 10.14 or this chapter shall be forwarded to Pierce Transit for review and comment.

Page 91: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 73 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

Parking Garages. The following standards apply to parking garages. They are intended to limit parking garage impacts on the pedestrian environment and reduce opportunities for crime in parking garages.

Core Pedestrian Streets Parking garages are prohibited at street level along the frontage of designated core pedestrian streets.

Parking Garage Openings These standards apply to parking garages for five or more vehicles.

Parking garage openings, including vehicular access openings, shall not exceed 50% of the total ground floor façade adjacent to a public street or sidewalk.

Parking garage openings facing a street, alley, courtyard, plaza, or open parking area shall incorporate decorative grilles or doors, architectural elements, planters, and/or artwork that effectively reduces the visibility of vehicles within the garage while still allowing for limited visibility into and out of the garage. Any portion of the screening that is between 3 and 7 feet above the adjacent grade shall be at least 20% transparent but not more than 80% transparent. Vehicular access openings that do not include garage doors shall be exempt from this standard.

Drive-throughs in Mixed-Use Centers. The following standards apply to drive-throughs located in Mixed-use Centers. See section 13.06.300D for permitted zones.

1. Drive-through driveways and stacking lanes must be located at least 150 feet from any bus stop or transit center

2. All vehicle use areas associated with a drive-through shall be located at the side or rear of the building 3. Drive-though windows shall not face a designated pedestrian street and stacking areas shall not lie between

a building and a designated pedestrian street 4. Drive-through stacking lane(s) and service window(s) shall be designed and screened from the view of

adjacent properties with landscaping and/or structures 5. Pedestrian paths that cross a drive-through aisle shall use a raised platform and be marked with symbols,

signage and/or special painting. 6. Within MUC’s, drive-throughs shall be limited to 1 stacking lane maximum unless the portion with multiple

lanes is fully screened from public view. 7. Drive-through uses that are not located within a building are prohibited from locating within 100 feet of a light

rail station or streetcar station

* * *

Page 92: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 74 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.512 Pedestrian and bicycle support standards.

A. General Applicability. 1. Application. The pedestrian and bicycle support standards apply to all new development, unless specifically

exempted hereinexcept the follows. 2. Standards. Each item of this section shall be addressed individually. Exceptions and exemptions noted for

specific development situations apply only to the item noted. 3. Additions. Additions up toof more than 5,000 square feet of gross floor area or 75 percent of gross floor area,

whichever is less, shall be exempt from these standards. Larger additions shall meet the requirements of this table at a ratio of at least 15 to 51 (such that a 15 percent increase in gross floor area will necessitate provision of 25 percent of the requirements of this table for the site; a 2 percent increase in gross floor area will necessitate provision of 10 percent of the requirements; and so forth, up to where a 20 percent or larger increase in gross floor area will necessitate provision of 100 percent of the requirements).

4. Super regional malls. Additions to super regional malls which add less than 10,000 or more square feet of gross floor area shall be exempt from these standards. Larger additions shall meet the requirements of this table at a ratio of at least 13 to 31 for the entire mall site (in the same manner described above, under subsection 3)a 5 percent increase in gross floor area will necessitate a provision of 15 percent of the requirements of this table for the entire mall site)., except that aAdditions to a super regional mall of an anchor tenant or 140,000 or more square ft. shallwill require full provision of these requirements for the entire mall site.

5. Temporary. Temporary structures are exempt from the standards of this section. 6. Remodel. Remodel projects valued below 60 percent of the building value, as determined by the Building Code

are exempt from the standards of this section. 7. Residential or Mixed-Use. The standards apply only to residential structures of 5 dwelling units or greater. The

standards apply to all mixed-use structures. 8. Historic. In any conflict between these standards and those applied by the Tacoma Landmarks Preservation

Commission, the standards of the commission shall prevail. 9. Fractions. Any requirement resulting in a fraction when applied shall be rounded up or down to the nearest

whole numberfrom the midpoint as appropriate. B. Walkways (Illustrated). To support transportation choices, including walking, the following standards shall be met to assist pedestrian safety, comfort, and mobility, including access to uses from public ways and access from parking areas. 1. Direct. A direct walkway shall be provided between all customer and/or public entrances and the nearest public

sidewalk. 2. Multiple use sites. Shopping centers and sites with multiple uses shall provide a walkway network along

building facades and through the parking lot that provides pedestrian circulation within the development and that links all customer and/or public building entrances to the public sidewalk. Trees shall be provided adjacent to the walkway at a ratio of 3 per 100 feet and pedestrian-scaled lighting at a ratio of 2 per 100 feet. Trees shall be planted a minimum of 10 feet from pedestrian light standards or parking lot light standards.

3. Minimum connection frequency. Additional walkways are required when needed to provide at least one connection to the public sidewalk for each 250 150 feet of street frontage or every three parking aisles, whichever is less. Walkways shall be located to provide the shortest practical route from the public sidewalk or walkway network to customer and/or public building entrances.

Page 93: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 75 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

4. Size and materials. All walkways must either be a raised sidewalk or composed of materials different from parking lot paving and must be at least 5 feet wide, excluding vehicular overhang. When more than one walkway is required, at least one walkway must be 10 feet wide.

5. Transit access. A direct walkway shall be provided between the principal customer and/or public building entry and any bus stop adjacent to the site. This may be the same as the walkways above. A separate walkway is required if the bus stop is not within 100 feet of a walkway connection to the sidewalk.

C. Street Furniture. To support transportation choices, including walking, the following standards shall be met to assist pedestrian safety, comfort, and mobility, including resting places at reasonable intervals. 1. Minimum. A minimum of one fixed bench or equivalent seating area for every 250 feet of street frontage. This

requirement determines quantity and not distribution, not required if site has less than 250 feet of street frontage. Projects in the PMI District are exempt from this requirement.

2. Minimum on designated pedestrian streets in Mixed-Use Center Districts. A minimum of one fixed bench or equivalent seating area for every 150 feet of street frontage. This requirement determines quantity and not distribution, not required if site has less than 150 feet of street frontage.

3. Plan consistency. Furniture shall be consistent with any applicable adopted business area improvement plans.

4. Credit. Any adjacent public street furniture can be counted toward this requirement.

D. Bicycle Parking. To support transportation choices, including biking, the following standards shall be met for more visible and secure locations for bicycle parking. 1. Quantity in T, C-1, C-2, HM, and PDB. Minimum 3 percent of the requirement for automobile parking spaces

for the first 300 car stalls and 1 percent of car stalls in excess of 300. A minimum of 2 bike spaces is required, except sites requiring 5 or fewer car stalls are exempt from bike parking. Adjacent public bike racks can be counted toward this requirement.

2. Quantity in Mixed-Use Center Districts. Five percent of the requirement for automobile parking spaces for the first 300 car stalls and 1.5 percent of car stalls in excess of 300, but no less than 2 bicycle stalls. Sites requiring 5 or fewer car stalls are exempt from this requirement, except for sites exempted from parking requirements due to their location along core pedestrian streets in neighborhood centers (see Section 13.06.510.A.1 Table 2), where the number of required bicycle parking stalls shall be based on the amount of parking that would’ve been required for the project if it were not exempted. A minimum of 2 bike spaces is required, except sites requiring 5 or fewer car stalls are exempt from bike parking. Adjacent public bike racks can be counted toward this requirement. Any form of vehicle storage, including auto dealers, counts only customer and employee parking to determine bike parking requirement.

3. Location. Bicycle parking shall be located within 50 feet of the primary building entrance for individual sites. Bicycle parking may be grouped near an owner designated primary entrance in shopping centers. Bicycle parking may be shared at a common location on the same block and same side of the street; provided, the quantity meets the total requirement and is no more than 100 feet from any site served. Bicycle parking shall not block pedestrian use of a walkway.

* * *

Page 94: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 76 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.522 District sign regulations. A. R-1 Sign regulations. One non-illuminated sign, not exceeding 12 square feet in area shall be allowed pertaining to the lease, rental, or sale of a building or premises on which it is located. One non-illuminated nameplate, not exceeding one and one-half square feet in area, placed flat against the building, shall be allowed for each adult family home, staffed residential home, group home, residential care facility, and family day care home. One ground sign shall be allowed, with a maximum area of 30 square feet identifying a subdivision. A subdivision identification sign shall be approved by the Land Use Administrator. A 32-square-foot temporary sign advertising a subdivision during construction shall be allowed adjacent to each street abutting the site, in conformance with Chapter 13.04.

B. R-2 Sign Regulations. Sign regulations shall be the same as stated for the R-1 SingleOne-Family Dwelling District, except that one non-illuminated nameplate not exceeding one and one-half square feet in area, placed flat against the building, shall be allowed for each boarding home.

C. R-2SRD, NRX and HMR-SRD Sign Regulations. Sign regulations shall be the same as stated for the R-2 SingleOne-Family Dwelling District, except that boarding and lodging houses shall be allowed one non-illuminated nameplate not exceeding one and one-half square feet in area, placed flat against the building.

D. R-3 Sign regulations. Sign regulations shall be the same as stated for the R-2 SingleOne-Family Dwelling District, except that boarding and lodging houses shall be allowed one nonilluminated nameplate not exceeding one and one-half square feet in area placed flat against the building.

E. R-4 Sign Regulations. 1. One freestanding sign not exceeding 30 square feet in area for all faces and not greater than six feet in height, or one building face sign of the same maximum dimensions, shall be allowed for each development site. 2. Indirect illumination, floodlighting, or internal illumination shall be the only allowable means of illumination of signs. All external lighting shall be directed away from adjacent properties to minimize the effects of light and glare upon adjacent uses. No bare bulb or neon illumination of signs shall be allowed. No flashing or animated signs shall be allowed. No electrical wire or cable serving an electric or illuminated sign shall be laid on the surface of the ground. 3. Signs shall only identify the name of the development or business and may contain secondary information related to rental or sale of units. Public identification signs may be placed upon public service structures such as telephone booths and bus shelters. 4. All signs shall be of permanent materials (no cardboard, cloth, paper, etc.). No flags, banners, or other devices shall be displayed for the purpose of attracting attention to a development or site. No temporary or portable signs shall be allowed. The display of the national flag, state flag, and flags of other political subdivisions shall not be restricted. 5. No sign shall be placed in a location which obstructs sight distance for an adjacent driveway or street right-of-way. No signs for a development shall be placed in any public right-of-way. No sign shall be erected which imitates or resembles any official traffic sign, signal, or device. Incidental public service signs less than four square feet in area, which contain no advertising but are intended for the convenience of the public and provide such messages as “entrance,” “exit,” “emergency entrance,” “no parking,” or other incidental service messages, shall be allowed. 6. All signs shall be submitted for the review of the Buildings Division of the Department of Public Works, as required by the Building Code and the Electrical Sign Code. Additionally, the proposed design of all signs shall be submitted to the Building and Land Use Services Division of the Department of Public Works prior to construction for review to insure conformance with the standards listed hereinabove.

F. R-4-L sign regulations. Sign regulations shall be the same as stated for the R-4 Multiple-Family Dwelling District.

G. R-5 sign regulations. Sign regulations shall be the same as stated for the R-4 Multiple-Family Dwelling District.

H. PRD sign regulations. Sign regulations shall be the same as specified herein for the R-4 Multiple-Family Dwelling District. Design of signs shall be submitted with development plans at the time of site approval for review and approval of the Hearing Examiner. A single identification sign for the overall development shall be allowed at each major access to the PRD District; provided, only one overall development sign shall be allowed adjacent to each right-of-way frontage of the PRD District, irrespective of the fact that more than one major access may enter said right-of-way.

Page 95: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 77 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

I. Sign regulations for conditional uses in residential districts and specified uses in all districts. 1. Application. The following regulations apply to conditional uses as designated. These regulations also apply to the uses noted as permitted uses in any district when the provisions below provide the greater sign allowance, in whole or in part. 2. For conditional uses in residential districts limited to public and private schools, public park facilities, and churches on sites that are over one acre in area and have a minimum of 100 feet of street frontage, one freestanding sign, not exceeding 40 square feet in area per face and not greater than 15 feet in height, and one building face sign, of the same maximum dimension, shall be allowed for each conditional use. Building face signs shall not extend above or beyond the edge of any wall or other surface to which they are attached, nor shall they extend more than 12 inches beyond the surface to which they are attached. 3. For conditional uses in residential districts, other than public and private schools, public park facilities, and churches, and all conditional uses in residential districts, on sites less than one acre or sites with less than 100 feet of frontage, one freestanding sign, not exceeding 30 square feet in area for all faces and not greater than six feet in height, and one building face sign, of the same maximum dimensions for each conditional use; provided, the total area for the freestanding and building face signs may not exceed 30 square feet. Building face signs shall not extend above or beyond the edge of any wall or other surface to which they are attached, nor shall they extend more than 12 inches beyond the surface to which they are attached. 4. Lighting. Indirect illumination, floodlighting, or internal illumination shall be the only allowable means of illumination of signs. All external lighting shall be directed away from adjacent properties to minimize the effects of light and glare upon adjacent uses. No bare bulb or neon illumination of signs shall be allowed. No flashing or animated signs shall be allowed. No electric wire or cable serving an electric or illuminated sign shall be laid on the surface of the ground. 5. All signs shall be of permanent materials (no cardboard, cloth, paper, etc.). No flags, banners, or other devices shall be displayed for the purpose of attracting attention to a development or site. No temporary or portable signs shall be allowed. The display of the national flag, state flag, and flags of other political subdivisions shall not be restricted. 6. No sign shall be placed in a location which obstructs sight distance for an adjacent driveway or street right-of-way. No signs for a development shall be placed in any public right-of-way. No sign shall be erected which imitates or resembles any official traffic sign, signal, or device. Incidental public service signs less than four square feet in area which contain no advertising, but are intended for the convenience of the public and provide such messages as “entrance,” “exit,” “emergency entrance,” “no parking,” or other incidental service messages, shall be allowed. 7. Freestanding signs larger than 30 square feet for all faces or taller than six feet shall be located a minimum of 50 feet from a lot occupied by a single-family residence. Freestanding signs for conditional uses may be constructed to the front property line. 8. In addition to the signage otherwise permitted, one sponsor identification logo sign may be included on a freestanding or wall sign for a conditional use. The sponsor identification logo shall not be internally illuminated and shall be limited to a maximum of one square foot per sign face.

[See next page for table.]

Page 96: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 78 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.522.L T, NCX, URX, Non-Residential Districts with VSD HM, HMX Signage Allocation Maximum total sign area 1-1/2 square feet per 1 linear feet of building frontage abutting a street frontage,

applies to the first 50 feet, with 1/2 square foot per 1 linear foot of building frontage over 50 feet.

HM and HMX sign regulations for use by hospitals only, all other uses in HM and HMX to follow T sign regulations.

Signs Attached to Buildings

Maximum number 2 per primary frontage (1 may be ground sign), 1 per perpendicular frontage(s), 1 per alley frontage with a public entrance.

One per elevation.

Maximum area per sign Shall not exceed size allocation on primary frontage, 50 square feet on perpendicular frontage(s), 25 square feet on alley frontage, 10 square feet on upper story or basement uses.

Identification signs at 75 square feet. Directional signs at 25 square feet.

Minimum sign area 30 square feet, except for upper story or basement uses. Wall Provisions of Section 13.06.521.E shall apply. Same as T. Awning, canopy Provisions of Section 13.06.521.J shall apply. Same as T. Marquee, under-marquee Provisions of Section 13.06.521.H and I shall apply. Same as T. Projecting 40 square feet with frontage of at least 25 feet and not allowed on alleys, provisions

of Section 13.06.521.F shall apply. Provisions of Section 13.06.521.G shall apply.

Roof signs Prohibited. Same as T. Billboards Prohibited. Same as T.

Freestanding Signs Maximum number 1 per site, sign area shared with building sign allocation (not allowed on an alley). 1 per right-of-way frontage or 1 per access,

regardless the number of major accesses on one right-of-way frontage.

Maximum area per sign 30 square feet. Identification or directory signs at 50 square feet. Directional signs at 25 square feet.

When not allowed When the building signage has utilized the allowed sign area for wall signage or when a projection sign exists on the site.

N/A.

Maximum height 6 feet. Identification or directory signs at 15 feet. Directionals Shall be limited to 4 feet in height. Shall be limited to 6 feet in height. Setback None, but signs shall be on private property. Same as T. Billboards Prohibited. Same as T.

Page 97: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 79 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.522.L T, NCX, URX, Non-Residential Districts with VSD HM, HMX Sign Features Lighting Indirect, flood lighting, or internal illumination allowed. No bare bulb illumination

allowed. All external lighting to be directed away from adjacent properties to minimize effects of light and glare upon adjacent uses.

Same as T.

Rotating, animated Prohibited. Same as T. Flashing Prohibited. Same as T. Changing message center Allowed. Same as T.

Temporary Signs A-boards 1 per business, on private property, 12 square feet per side, 4 feet height. Prohibited. Banners, pennants Prohibited. Banners allowed at 30 square feet. Flags Prohibited, except for the national flag, state flag, flags of other political

subdivisions. Same as T.

Window signs Exempt, but shall not exceed 25 percent of the window area. Same as T. Incidental public service signs

Less than 4 square feet, contains no advertising, intended to provide messages such as "no parking," "exit,” "entrance," etc.

Same as T.

Searchlights, beacons Prohibited. Same as T.

Page 98: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 80 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.530 Juvenile community facilities. A. Intent. It is found and declared that juvenile community facilities are essential public facilities which provide a needed community service. However, the public interest dictates that they shall be subject to special regulations. The intent of these regulations is to reduce incompatible uses within established neighborhoods, to encourage equitable regional and statewide distribution of such essential public facilities, and to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare.

B. Conditional use permit required. A conditional use permit shall be required for juvenile community facilities in the following instances: a juvenile community facility for no more than eight residents in the R-1, R-2, R-2SRD, HMR-SRD, NRX, R-3, R-4-L, and C-1 Districts. A juvenile community facility for greater than eight residents, but no more than 16 residents, in the R-4, R-5, URX and RCX Districts. The Land Use Administrator, in reviewing a request for a conditional use permit for juvenile community facilities, shall use the criteria found in subsection D below, as well as the conditional use permit criteria found in Section 13.06.640.

C. Standards.

1. Maximum number of residents. No juvenile community facility shall house more than eight residents in the R-1, R-2, R-2SRD, HMR-SRD, NRX, R-3, R-4-L, and C-1 Districts. No juvenile community facility shall house more than 16 residents in the R-4, R-5, URX, RCX, NCX, CCX, UCX, CIX, C-2, M-1, M-2, and PMI Districts.

2. Location requirements. a. The lot line of any new or expanding juvenile community facility shall be located one-half mile or more from any other juvenile community facility. b. The Land Use Administrator shall determine whether the proposed facility meets the dispersion criteria from maps which shall note the location of current juvenile community facilities. Any person who disputes the accuracy of the maps may furnish the Land Use Administrator with the information and, if determined by the Land Use Administrator to be accurate, this information shall be used in processing the application. 3. In addition to compliance with local siting and development requirements, the Department of Social and Health Services (“DSHS”), or a private or public entity under contract with DSHS, shall comply with the siting process found in RCW 72.05.400 and RCW 72.62.220, as incorporated below: a. DSHS shall conduct public meetings in the local communities affected, as well as provide for written and oral comments in the following manner: (1) If there are more than three sites initially selected as potential locations and the selection process by DSHS, or the service provider reduces the number of possible sites for a community facility to not fewer than three, DSHS, or the chief operating officer of the service provider, shall notify the public of the possible siting and hold at least two public hearing in each community where a community facility may be sited. (2) When DSHS, or the service provider, has determined the location of the community facility, DSHS, or the chief operating officer of the service provider, shall hold at least one additional public hearing in the community where the community facility will be sited. (3) When DSHS has entered negotiations with a service provider and only one site is under consideration, then at least two public hearings shall be held. (4) To provide adequate notice of, and opportunity for interested persons to comment on, a proposed location, DSHS, or the chief operating officer of the service provider shall provide, at least 14 days advance notice of the meeting to all newspapers of general circulation in the community, all radio stations, television stations, and cable networks available to persons in the community, any school district in which the community facility would be sited or whose boundary is within two miles of a proposed community facility, any private schools or kindergartens whose boundary is within two miles of a proposed community facility, any library district in which the community facility would be sited, local business or fraternal organizations, local chamber of commerce or local economic development agencies that request notification from the secretary or agency, and any government offices, person, or property owner within a one-half mile radius of the proposed community facility. Before initiating this process, the department shall contact local government planning agencies in the community containing the proposed community facility. The department shall coordinate with local government agencies to ensure that opportunities are provided for effective citizen input to reduce the duplication of notice and meetings. b. Compliance with the siting process must be completed before local permits are issued. The applicant shall provide verifiable proof of compliance with the above siting requirements.

Page 99: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 81 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

4. Persons convicted of serious violent offenses, as defined in RCW 9.94A.030(31), and/or sexually violent offenses, as defined in RCW 71.09.020(6), are not permitted in juvenile community facilities within the City.

D. Criteria. The Land Use Administrator’s decision shall be based on the applicable goals and policies of the comprehensive plan and applicable ordinances of the City, the conditional use criteria, as found in Section 13.06.640, and the additional following criteria:

1. The extent to which the proposed location furthers the equitable distribution (“fair sharing”) of essential public facilities within various areas of the City. 2. The extent to which the applicant has demonstrated that the facility will be made secure. The applicant shall submit a proposed security plan to the Land Use Administrator for review. The security plan shall address, but is not limited to, the following: a. Plans to monitor and control the activities of residents, including methods to verify the presence of residents at jobs or training programs, policies on sign-outs for time periods consistent with the stated purpose of the absence for unescorted trips by residents away from the facility, methods of checking the records of persons sponsoring outings for juvenile community facility residents, and policies on penalties (i.e., placement back in the prison system for drug or alcohol use by residents); and b. Qualified staff numbers, level of responsibilities, and scheduling. 3. The extent to which the applicant can demonstrate that the site size and building size is adequate for housing the requested number of residents. A copy of the American Corrections Association (“ACA”) Residential Standards shall be supplied with the project application to demonstrate compliance with this criteriona. The Hearing Examiner, Land Use Administrator, or other presiding administrative body shall take into consideration, but not be limited to, the ACA Residential Standards and Title 2. 4. The extent to which proposed lighting is located so as to minimize spillover light on surrounding properties while maintaining appropriate intensity and hours of use to ensure that security is maintained. 5. The extent to which the landscape plan of the facility meets the requirements of the zone while allowing visual supervision of the residents of the facility. 6. The extent to which appropriate measures are taken to minimize noise impacts on surrounding properties. Measures to be used for this purpose may include landscaping, sound barriers or fences, berms, location of refuse storage areas, and limiting the hours of use of certain areas. 7. The extent to which the impacts of traffic and parking are mitigated by increasing on-site parking or loading spaces to reduce overflow vehicles or changing the access to and location of off-street parking. 8. The extent to which the facility is well-served by public transportation or to which the facility is committed to a program of encouraging the use of public or private mass transportation. 9. Verification from DSHS, or applicable federal authority, that the proposed juvenile community facility meets DSHS standards, or the standards of the applicable federal authority, for such facilities and that the facility will meet state and local laws and requirements.

E. Discontinuance of Use. Any authorized conditional use, which has been discontinued, shall not be reestablished or recommence, except pursuant to a new conditional use permit. The following shall constitute conclusive evidence that the conditional use has been discontinued:

1. A permit to change the use of the property has been issued and the new use has been established; or 2. The property has not been devoted to the authorized conditional use for more than 12 consecutive months.

Property which is vacant, except for dead storage of materials or equipment of the conditional use, shall not be considered as being devoted to the authorized conditional use. The expiration of licenses necessary for the conditional use shall be evidence that the property is not being devoted to the conditional use.

Page 100: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 82 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.535 Special needs housing. A. Intent. It is found and declared that special needs housing facilities are essential public facilities which provide a needed community service. It is also recognized that these types of facilities often need to be located in residential neighborhoods. Thus, in order to protect the established character of existing residential neighborhoods, the public interest dictates that these facilities be subject to certain restrictions. The intent of these regulations is to minimize concentrations of certain types of facilities, mitigate incompatibilities between dissimilar uses, preserve the intended character and intensity of the City’s residential neighborhoods, and to promote the public health, safety, and general welfare.

B. Use Requirements. The following use table designates all permitted, limited, and prohibited uses in the districts listed.

Special Needs Housing – Use Table (P = Permitted Outright, CU = Conditional Use Permit Required, N = Not Permitted)

*Note: See Subsection C, below, for additional siting restrictions

**Note: The residency limitations indicated in this use table apply to the number of residents housed at a facility, exclusive of any support or care staff. Where specific residency limitations are provided in the definition of the use, the size information herein is provided for reference only.

Size (number of residents)

R-1, R-2, R-2SRD,

HMR-SRD, NRX

R-3 R-4L, R-4, R-5, PRD,

URX, RCX,

NCX, T, C-1, HM,

HMX, PDB

UCX, UCX-TD,

CCX, CIX, C-2,

M-1, DCC, DMU,

DR, WR

M-2, PMI

Emergency and Transitional Housing

Limit 6 N N CU P N

Emergency and Transitional Housing

7-15 N N CU P N

Emergency and Transitional Housing

16 or more N N CU P N

Confidential Shelter, Adult Family Home, Staffed Residential Home

Limit 6 P P P P N

Confidential Shelter, Extended Care Facility, Intermediate Care Facility, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Retirement Home, Residential Care Facility for Youth

7-15 N P P P N

Confidential Shelter, Residential Chemical Dependency Treatment Facility, Extended Care Facility, Intermediate Care Facility, Continuing Care Retirement Community, Retirement Home, Residential Care Facility for Youth

16 or more N N P P N

Page 101: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 83 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

C. Dispersion requirement.

1. Facilities lawfully in existence on the adoption date of this section, are exempt from the dispersion requirement. Such facility shall be permitted to expand from the site it lawfully occupied at the time of the passage of this section only onto contiguous property owned by or under lease to the use at the time of the adoption of this section.

2. This requirement shall apply only to development in the PRD, R-4-L, R-4, R-5, URX and RCX districts.

3. The lot line of any emergency and transitional housing shall be located 600 feet or more from the lot line of any other emergency and transitional housing. Where existing proximity to a limited access highway or freeway affords comparable protection, the 600 foot distance requirement may be waived.

4. The City shall determine whether a proposed facility meets the dispersion requirement criteria from maps which shall note the location of emergency and transitional housing. Such maps shall be generated and maintained by the City as a reference document. Any person who disputes the accuracy of the maps may furnish the staff with the information and, if determined by the staff to be accurate, this information shall be used in processing the application.

D. Should the state adopt siting requirements in excess of those required by this section, this section shall be considered amended to be in compliance with state law.

* * *

Page 102: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 84 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.545 Wireless communication facilities. * * *

E. Wireless communication towers and facilities use category.

1. Wireless communication towers or wireless communication facilities. Wireless communication towers or wireless communication facilities use type refers to facilities used in the transmission of information by wire, radio, optical cable, electromagnetic, or other similar means. These types of facilities also include central office switching units, remote switching units, telecommunications radio relay stations, and ground level equipment structures.

Level 1: Modification, including the complete replacement of an existing wireless communication tower or antenna support structure to its existing height, to accommodate collocation, or the installation of a concealed antenna. Also, an antenna attached to the roof or sides of a building, an existing tower, water tank, or a similar structure. This level is limited to the following types of antenna(s): an omni-directional or whip antenna no more than seven inches in diameter and extending no more than 16 feet above the structure to which it is attached; a panel antenna no more than 16 square feet in total area per panel and extending above the structure to which it is attached by no more than 16 feet; or a parabolic dish no greater than three feet in diameter per dish and extending no more than 16 feet above the structure to which it is attached.

Level 2: Wireless communication towers with associated antennas or dishes to a height of 60 feet.

Level 3: Wireless communication towers with associated antennas or dishes over 60 feet in height and not exceeding 140 feet in height.

Level 4: Wireless communication towers with associated antennas or dishes over 140 feet in height.

Wireless Communication Tower or Wireless Facility Use Category

Zoning District Classifications - Table A

R-1; R-2; R-2SRD; R-3; R-4; R-4-L; R-5; PRD; T; HM; HMX; DR; NRX

PDB C-1; C-2

NCX; CCX; RCX; URX

UCX; UCX-TD; CIX; M-1; M-2; PMI

DCC; DMU; WR

Level 1 A 1, 3, 4 A3 A3 A3 A A Level 2 S4 S2 S2 S2 A A Level 3 S4 S S S A S Level 4 S4 S S S S S

Notes – Symbols A - Administrative review - Subject to building permit.

S - Requires conditional use permit and building permit.

1 - Permitted on public facility sites, subject to administrative review and building permit.

2 - Allowed 16 feet above underlying zoning district height limit, except in the C-1, C-2, and NCX Districts.

3 - Attached, rooftop antennas are permitted outright, a maximum of 16 feet over the height of an existing building or water tank, regardless of the height of the structure

4 - New wireless communication towers and antennas prohibited in R-1, R-2, R-2SRD, and R-3 Districts, except on public or quasi-public property developed with existing public or quasi-public facilities and properties developed with existing wireless communication facilities.

F. Site selection criteria. The following criteria shall be utilized to evaluate all conditional use permits, in addition to the criteria set forth in Section 13.06.640:

Page 103: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 85 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

1. Any applicant proposing to construct an antenna support structure, or mount an antenna on an existing structure, shall demonstrate by engineering evidence that the antenna must be located at the site to satisfy its function in the applicant’s grid system. Further, the applicant must demonstrate, by engineering evidence, that the height requested is the minimum height necessary to fulfill the site’s function within the grid system, and that collocation is not feasible. If a technical dispute arises, the Land Use Administrator may require a third-party technical study to resolve the dispute. The cost of the technical study shall be borne by the applicant or wireless service provider.

2. Applications for necessary permits will only be processed when the applicant demonstrates either that it is an FCC-licensed wireless communication provider or that it has agreements with an FCC-licensed wireless communication provider for use or lease of the support structure.

3. Wireless service facilities shall be located and designed to minimize any significant adverse impact on residential uses. Facilities shall be placed in locations where the existing topography, vegetation, buildings, or other structures provide the greatest amount of screening.

4. In all zones, location and design of facilities shall consider the impact of the facility on the surrounding neighborhood and the visual impact within the zoning district.

G. Priority for siting and type of facility. The order of priority for the siting of new wireless communication towers and facilities is intended as guidance to applicants for the development of sites with wireless communication towers, antennas, and associated facilities. The priority for the type of facility shall be subject to the provisions set forth in Section 13.06.545.G.3.a(4).

1. Priority for siting.

a. Place antennas on appropriate rights-of-ways and existing public and private structures, such as buildings, towers, water towers, and smokestacks.

b. Place antennas and any necessary support structures, on public property developed with existing public facilities and properties developed with existing telecommunication facilities and, if practical, on non-residentially-zoned sites.

c. Place antennas and any necessary support structures, in M-1, M-2, and PMI Industrial Districts.

d. Place antennas and any necessary support structures in UCX, UCX-TD, and CIX Mixed-Use Center Districts.

e. Place antennas and any necessary support structures in other non-residentially-zoned property.

f. Place antennas and any necessary support structures on public property developed with existing public facilities and, if practical, on multiple-family structures in residentially-zoned sites.

g. Place antennas and any necessary support structures in R-4-L, R-4, R-5, NCX, URX, RCX, CCX, T, HMX, and HM Districts. Such placement shall be subject to the following criteria:

(1) An applicant that proposes to locate a new antenna support structure in a residential, mixed commercial, or transitional zone shall demonstrate that a diligent effort has been made to locate the proposed wireless communications facility on a public facility, a private institutional structure, or other appropriate existing structures within a non-residential zone, and that due to valid considerations including physical constraints, and economic, or technological feasibility, no appropriate location is available.

(2) Applicants are required to demonstrate:

(a) That in the R-4-L, R-4, R-5, NCX, URX, RCX, CCX, T, HMX, and HM Districts, they have contacted the owners of structures in excess of the permitted height of the applicable district within a one-quarter mile radius of the site proposed and which, from a location and height standpoint, could provide part of a network for transmission of signals; and

(b) After proposing a lease agreement for the site consistent with the documented average market rate for similar properties, were denied permission to use such property or, due to other onerous lease-related terms, chose not to pursue the lease.

(3) The information submitted by the applicant shall include:

(a) a map of the area served by the tower or antenna;

(b) its relationship to other cell sites in the applicant’s network; and

Page 104: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 86 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

(c) an evaluation of existing buildings as addressed by Section 13.06.545.G.1.g(2)(a) within one-quarter mile of the proposed tower or antenna, which, from a location and height standpoint, could provide part of a network to provide transmission of signals.

h. Place antennas and any necessary support structures on public property developed with existing public facilities and properties developed with existing wireless communication facilities in R-1, R-2, R-2SRD, NRX, and R-3 Districts.

i. New antennas and necessary support structures shall be prohibited in R-1, R-2, R-2SRD, NRX, and R-3 Districts, except as noted above.

2. Siting priority on public property. Where public property is sought to be utilized by an applicant, priority for the use of City-owned land for wireless communication facilities shall be given to the following entities in descending order:

a. City of Tacoma, General Government and Public Utilities; and

b. Other governmental agencies.

3. Priority for type of facilities.

a. Facility preference. Proposed antennas, associated structures, and placement shall be evaluated, based on available technologies, for approval and use in the following order of preference:

(1) Collocation of facilities and the installation of concealed antennas and attached facilities;

(2) Free-standing facilities, which extend no more than 16 feet above adjacent existing vegetation or structures, only when subsection (1) cannot be reasonably accomplished;

(3) Free-standing facilities, which extend more than 16 feet above adjacent existing vegetation or structures, only when subsections (1) and (2) cannot be reasonably accomplished; or

(4) If the applicant chooses to construct new free-standing facilities, the burden of proof shall be on the applicant to show a facility of a higher order of preference cannot reasonably be accommodated on the same or other properties. The City reserves the right to retain a qualified consultant, at the applicant’s expense, to review the supporting documentation for accuracy.

H. Development standards. The following special requirements and performance standards shall apply to any wireless communication tower or wireless facility:

1. Visual impacts. Wireless communication towers or antenna support structures and related facilities shall be located and installed in such a manner so as to minimize the visual impact on the skyline and surrounding area. The use of attached antennas, concealed facilities, or the camouflaging of towers, antennas, and associated equipment is strongly encouraged, to the greatest degree possible, in all residential districts and in the URX, NRX, RCX, NCX, and CCX Mixed-Use Center Districts. Visual impacts shall be addressed in the following manner: a. Site location and development shall preserve the pre-existing character of the surrounding buildings, land use, and the zoning district to the extent possible, while maintaining the function of the communications equipment. Wireless communication facilities shall be integrated through location, siting, and design to blend in with the existing characteristics of the site through application of as many of the following measures as possible: (1) Existing on-site vegetation shall be preserved, insofar as possible, or improved, and disturbance of the existing topography shall be minimized, unless such disturbance would result in less visual impact of the site to the surrounding area; (2) Towers or mounts shall be screened by placement of the structure among and adjacent to, within 20 feet, of three or more trees at least 50 percent of the height of the facility; (3) Location of facilities close to structures of a similar height; (4) Location of facilities toward the center of the site, and location of roof-mounted facilities toward the interior area of the roof and the use of screening, in order to minimize view from adjacent properties and rights-of-way; (5) Provision of required setbacks; and (6) Incorporation of the antenna, associated support structure, and equipment shelter as a building element or architectural feature.

Page 105: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 87 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

b. Related equipment facilities used to house wireless communications equipment shall be located within buildings or placed underground when possible. When they cannot be located in existing buildings or placed underground, equipment shelters or cabinets shall be limited to a maximum floor area of 400 square feet and a maximum height of 12 feet, shall be screened, and shall be insulated to ensure noise levels do not exceed the ambient pre-development noise level at any residential receiving property abutting the site with a maximum sound pressure level of 40 dB, pursuant to the 1993 ASHRAE Hardbook. Alternate methods for screening may include the use of building or parapet walls, sight-obscuring fencing and/or landscaping, screen walls, or equipment enclosures or camouflaging; and c. Wireless communication facilities and related equipment facilities shall be of neutral colors such as white, gray, blue, black, or green, or other appropriate color designed to disguise, conceal, or camouflage the facility or equipment, or similar in building color in the case of facilities incorporated as part of the features of a building, unless specifically required to be painted another color by a federal or state authority. Other screening methods, such as the use of siding which is architecturally compatible with adjacent buildings, or site-obscuring fencing materials may also be utilized. Wooden poles are not required to be painted. 2. Setbacks. a. Towers up to 60 feet in height shall provide the setbacks required for the underlying zone. Where a conditional use permit is required, minimum setbacks of 20 feet from all property lines or the setbacks of the underlying zone, whichever are greater, shall be required. Towers over 60 feet shall provide one additional foot of setback for every foot over 60 feet of height.

b. Towers located in M-1, M-2, and PMI Districts, which meet the height limit of the underlying zone and abut residential zones, shall provide the required setback of the underlying zone. Towers located in M-1, M-2, and PMI Districts, which exceed the height of the underlying zone, shall be setback from the abutting residential district one additional foot for each foot of height over the maximum height permitted by the zone.

c. All setbacks shall be measured from the property lines of the site to the base of a monopole, lattice tower, or equipment mount, or in the case of a guyed tower, from the property lines of the site to the base of the guy wires which support it.

d. Attached facilities located on existing structures, which are nonconforming as to setback requirements, shall be allowed no closer to a property line than the nonconforming structure.

e. Equipment structures shall comply with the setback requirements of the underlying zone, except in the R-1, R-2, R-2SRD, NRX, and R-3 Districts, in which case a minimum setback of 20 feet from all property lines shall be provided, or the minimum setback of the underlying zone, whichever is greater.

* * *

Page 106: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 88 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.602 General restrictions. A. Except as hereinafter provided, and except where modified by the provisions of Chapter 13.06A relating to Downtown Districts and 13.10 relating to Shoreline Management:

1. No new subdivision, parcel or lot shall be created that prevents compliance with the standards of this or any other applicable Code, Title or standard of the City of Tacoma.

12. Use. Any building, structure, premises, or part thereof, shall be erected, raised, moved, reconstructed, extended, enlarged, or altered; or any land shall be used or occupied; only for the uses or purpose of accommodating the uses permitted in the district in which such building, structure, premises, or land is located, and then only after applying for and securing all permits and licenses required by law and city ordinances. While listed uses may not be varied, dimensional and/or design requirements contained in the additional regulations listed in the use tables may be varied; however, this does not allow uses to be varied.

23. Height. Any building, structure, or portion thereof, hereafter erected, shall not exceed the height limits established for the district wherein such building or structure is located except:

a. As provided in Section 13.06.640 relating to conditional uses.

b. As provided in Section 13.06.645 relating to height variances for residential structures located in the View-Sensitive Districts.

c. Schools, libraries, structures for religious assembly, colleges. In districts with a height limit of 35 feet, these facilities, when permitted as a use, are allowed at a maximum 45 feet in height.

d. Structures, above height limits. Chimneys, tanks, towers, steeples, flagpoles, smokestacks, silos, elevators, fire or parapet walls, and/or similar necessary building appurtenances may exceed the district height limit provided all structural or other requirements of the City of Tacoma are met and no usable floor space above the district height limit is added.

e. Shipping cranes or other freight moving equipment is exempt from height limits.

34. Area and yards. Any building or structure hereafter built, enlarged, or moved on a lot shall conform to the area regulations of the district in which such building or structure is located.

a. No lot area, now existing or hereafter established, shall be so reduced or diminished that the yards, open spaces, or total lot area be made smaller than required by the chapter, except in conformity with the regulations of this chapter.

b. No yard or other open space, now provided for any building or structure or hereafter provided in compliance with the regulations of this chapter, shall be considered as any part of a yard or open space for any other building or structure, nor shall any yard or open space of abutting property be considered as providing a yard or open space for a building or structure on a lot it abuts.

c. No permit for the construction, alteration, enlarging, or moving of any building or structure shall be granted where it shall appear from the records of the Building Official that the plat, as required by Chapter 13.04, contains any lot or tract of land, or a part of any lot or tract of land previously designated as the plat, or part of the plat, for any building or structure, for the construction, alteration, enlarging, or moving of which a permit has been granted, if the original plat will thereby be reduced to an area which will not comply with the lot area and yard requirements of this chapter.

d. No yard shall include any land dedicated, reserved, or set aside for street purposes, except as provided in this chapter.

e. No yard shall include any land condemned for or upon which notice of condemnation has been given for public purposes.

f. Side yards for schools, religious assemblies, and institutions. Public schools, public libraries, religious assemblies, colleges, universities, fraternities, sororities, private clubs, lodges, hospitals, sanitariums, educational institutions, philanthropic institutions, and other institutions, hereafter built in an R-1, R-2, R-3, HMR-SRD, or R-4-L District, shall provide a side yard on each side of the building of not less than 20 feet in width.

g. Side yards, institutions in Multiple-Family Dwelling Districts. Side yards for public schools, public libraries, religious assemblies, colleges, universities, fraternities, sororities, private clubs, lodges, hospitals, sanitariums,

Page 107: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 89 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

educational institutions, philanthropic institutions, and other institutions, hereafter built in an R-4 Multiple-Family Dwelling District, shall be not less than 25 feet in width and, in an R-5 Multiple-Family Dwelling District, not less than 30 feet in width.

h. Side yard regulations. For the purpose of side yard regulations, a semi-detached two-family dwelling or four-family dwelling, or a row house having common-party walls, shall be considered as one building occupying one lot.

i. Yards for group buildings.

(1) In the case of group buildings on one site, including institutions and dwellings, the yards on the perimeter of the site or lot shall not be less than required for one building on one lot in the district in which the property is located.

(2) The distance separating buildings, exclusive of accessory buildings, shall not be less than 15 feet twice the district side yard setback requirement.

(3) For a building exceeding six stories in height, separation from other buildings on the site shall be increased by one foot in width for each additional story or part thereof that such building exceeds six stories. Where two adjacent buildings on one site both exceed six stories in height, the building separations between them shall be increased by two feet in width for each additional story or part thereof that such buildings exceed six stories.

(4) No multiple-family dwelling court shall be less than 25 feet in width.

(5) In the case of row houses or dwellings rearing on one side yard and fronting upon another, in districts where multiple-family dwellings are permitted, the side yard on which dwellings rear shall be increased one foot for each dwelling unit abutting on such side yard, and the side yard on which dwellings front shall be not less than 20 feet in width.

* * *

Page 108: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 90 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.640 Conditional use permit. A. Purpose. The purpose of this section is to allow certain specified uses, which are deemed necessary to the public convenience but are found to possess characteristics which make impractical such uses being identified exclusively with any particular zone classification as herein defined. The conditional use permit is a mechanism by which the City may require special conditions on development or on the use of land in order to insure that designated uses or activities are compatible with other uses in the same land use district and in the vicinity of the subject property.

B. Conditional uses and height. Since certain conditional uses have intrinsic characteristics related to the function or operation of such uses, which may necessitate buildings or other structures associated with such uses to exceed the height limits of the zoning districts in which the conditional uses may be located, the Land Use Administrator may authorize the height of buildings or other structures associated with the following conditional uses to exceed the height limit set forth in the zoning district in which such uses are located; provided, such height is consistent with the criteria contained in subsection D of this section:

1. Airports and airfields.

2. Religious assembly such as churches, temples, and synagogues.

3. Educational institutions.

4. Governmental buildings.

5. Hospitals.

6. Wireless communication towers or wireless facilities, subject to the requirements set forth in Section 13.06.545, and the time limitations set forth in Chapter 13.05, Table G.

7. Necessary public utilities and public service uses or structures on approved sites.

8. Recreational facilities.

9. Surface Mining, and subject to the requirements of Section 13.06.540.

In order to insure that the location and character of these uses will be compatible with the comprehensive plan, a review and decision by the Land Use Administrator are required prior to the issuance of any conditional use permit.

C. Conditional uses. The Land Use Administrator may permit only the following uses in districts from which they are now prohibited by this chapter, or in certain districts as herein provided:

1. Airports, airfields, and heliports.

2. Religious assembly, such as churches, temples, and synagogues.

3. Educational institutions.

4. Student housing.

5. Governmental buildings.

6. Day care centers or nursery schools.

7. Group housing operated in conjunction with another conditional use.

8. Parks, playgrounds, recreational facilities, or community centers.

9. Wireless communication towers or wireless facilities, subject to the requirements set forth in Section 13.06.545 and the time limitations set forth in Chapter 13.05, Table G. An applicant may, at the applicant’s discretion, file a single conditional use permit application, together with a single fee for wireless communication towers or wireless facilities at multiple locations within the City of Tacoma; provided, each facility is part of the network of a carrier. Likewise, at the applicant’s discretion, an application for more than one carriers’ facilities at a single site may be submitted as a single application for a conditional use permit.

10. Mobile home parks in R-4-L and C-2 Districts.

11. Juvenile community facilities, in accordance with Section 13.06.530, for no more than eight residents in the R-1, R-2, R-2SRD, HMR-SRD, R-3, R-4-L, and C-1 Districts.

Page 109: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 91 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

12. Juvenile community facilities, in accordance with Section 13.06.530, for greater than eight residents, but no more than 16 residents in the R-4, R-5, and RCX Districts.

13. Work release centers, in accordance with Section 13.06.450, for no more than 15 residents in the UCX District; 25 residents in the CIX District; and 25 residents in the M-1 and M-2 Districts.

14. Necessary public utilities and public service uses or structures on approved sites.

15. Commuter parking areas in residential districts developed in accordance with Section 13.06.510.

16. Cemeteries, extension of existing, in all zoning districts.

17. Detoxification centers.

18. Agricultural uses (except livestock) operated as, or in conjunction with, a commercial operation, including truck gardening and horticultural nurseries. Such uses shall not be located on a parcel of land containing less than 20,000 square feet of area. Buildings shall not be permitted in connection with such use, except greenhouses having total floor area not in excess of 600 square feet.

19. Master plans for any conditional use which encompasses a large site with multiple buildings, a complex program, and a detailed plan developed by the applicant. The purpose of this process is to allow an applicant to seek approval for a development program which would be implemented in phases and which would extend beyond the normal expiration date, to be reviewed after a ten-year period for those portions of the plan which have not been developed.

20. Radio or television stations. Antennas for such facilities are subject to the requirements of Section 13.06.545.

21. Surface Mining, and subject to the requirements of Section 13.06.540.

D. Criteria. A conditional use permit shall be subject to the following criteria:

1. There shall be a demonstrated need for the use within the community at large which shall not be contrary to the public interest.

2. The use shall be consistent with the goals and policies of the comprehensive plan, any adopted neighborhood or community plan, and applicable ordinances of the City of Tacoma.

3. The use shall be located, planned, and developed in such a manner that it is not inconsistent with the health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of persons residing or working in the community. The following shall be considered in making a decision on a conditional property use:

a. The generation of noise, noxious or offensive emissions, traffic, lighting, or other nuisances which may be injurious or to the detriment of a significant portion of the community.

b. Availability of public services which may be necessary or desirable for the support of the use. These may include, but shall not be limited to, availability of utilities, transportation systems (including vehicular, pedestrian, and public transportation systems), education, police and fire facilities, and social and health services.

c. The adequacy of landscaping, screening, yard setbacks, open spaces, or other development characteristics necessary to mitigate the impact of the use upon neighboring properties.

An application for a conditional use permit shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 13.05.

E. Special needs housing. A conditional use permit for a special needs housing facility shall only be approved upon a finding that such facility is consistent with all of the following criteria:

1. There is a demonstrated need for the use due to changing demographics, local demand for services which exceeds existing facility capacity, gaps in the continuum of service, or an increasing generation of need from within the community.

2. The proposed use is consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Tacoma Comprehensive Plan and the City of Tacoma Consolidated Plan for Housing and Community Development.

3. The proposed location is or will be sufficiently served by public services which may be necessary or desirable for the support and operation of the use. These may include, but shall not be limited to, availability of utilities, access, transportation systems, education, police and fire facilities, and social and health services.

Page 110: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 92 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

4. The use shall be located, planned, and developed such that it is not inconsistent with the health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of persons residing in the facility or residing or working in the surrounding community. The following shall be considered in making a decision:

a. The impact of traffic generated by the proposed use on the surrounding area, pedestrian circulation and public safety and the ability of the proponent to mitigate any potential impacts.

b. The provision of adequate off-street parking, on-site circulation, and site access.

c. The adequacy of landscaping, screening, yard setbacks, open spaces, or other development characteristics necessary to mitigate the impact of the use upon neighboring properties, to include the following development criteria:

(1) All program activities must take place within the facility or in an appropriately designed private yard space.

(2) Adequate outdoor/recreation space must be provided for resident use.

d. Compatibility of the proposed structure and improvements with surrounding properties, including the size, height, location, setback, and arrangements of all proposed buildings, facilities, and signage, especially as they relate to less intensive, residential land uses.

e. The generation of noise, noxious, or offensive emissions, or other nuisances which may be injurious or to the detriment of a significant portion of the community.

f. Demonstration of the owner’s capacity to own, operate, and manage the proposed facility, to include the following:

(1) Provision of an operation plan which will provide for sufficient staffing, training, and program design to meet the program’s mission and goals.

(2) Provision of a maintenance plan which will provide for the exterior of the building and site to be maintained at a level that will not detract from the character of the surrounding area, including adequate provision for litter control and solid waste disposal.

(3) Demonstration of knowledge of the City’s Public Nuisance Code, TMC 8.30, and plans to educate the facility staff in the provisions of the nuisance code.

(4) Participation in the City’s Multi-Family Crime-Free Housing program by both the property owner and by on-site staff.

(5) Provision of a point of contact for the facility to both the Neighborhood Council and the City.

(6) Written procedures for addressing grievances from the neighborhood, City, and facility residents.

An application for a conditional use permit for a special needs housing facility shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 13.05 and Section 13.06.535. The Land Use Administrator may, when appropriate, utilize other staff or outside parties in the review of such applications, such as the City’s Human Rights and Human Services Department.

F. Duplex, Triplex and Townhouse Development in NRX Districts. In addition to the standard decision criteria for conditional use permits, as outlined above under subsection D, a conditional use permit for a duplex, triplex or townhouse in the NRX District shall only be approved upon a finding that such development is consistent with all of the following additional criteria:

1. The intent and regulations of the NRX district.

2. The proposed use and development shall be compatible with the quality and character of surrounding residential development, shall be designed in a manner consistent with existing neighboring structures, and shall not be materially detrimental to the overall residential environment and character of the general area. In the case of conversion of an existing single-family dwelling to a two- or three-family dwelling, the existing architectural features shall be maintained to the maximum extent practicable.

* * *

Page 111: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 93 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.650 Application for rezone of property. A. Application submittal. Application for rezone of property shall be submitted to the Building and Land Use Services Division. The application shall be processed in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 13.05. Final action on the application shall take place within 180 days of submission.

B. Criteria for rezone of property. An applicant seeking a change in zoning classification must demonstrate consistency with all of the following criteria:

1. That the change of zoning classification is generally consistent with the applicable land use intensity designation of the property, policies, and other pertinent provisions of the comprehensive plan.

2. That substantial changes in conditions have occurred affecting the use and development of the property that would indicate the requested change of zoning is appropriate. If it is established that a rezone is required to directly implement an express provision or recommendation set forth in the comprehensive plan, it is unnecessary to demonstrate changed conditions supporting the requested rezone.

3. That the change of the zoning classification is consistent with the district establishment statement for the zoning classification being requested, as set forth in this chapter.

4. That the change of the zoning classification will not result in a substantial change to an area-wide rezone action taken by the City Council in the two years preceding the filing of the rezone application. Any application for rezone that was pending, and for which the Hearing Examiner’s hearing was held prior to the adoption date of an area-wide rezone, is vested as of the date the application was filed and is exempt from meeting this criteria.

5. That the change of zoning classification bears a substantial relationship to the public health, safety, morals, or general welfare.

C. Amendment of boundaries of districts. 1. Whenever this chapter has been, or is hereafter, amended to include in a different district, property formerly included within classified district boundaries of another district, such property shall be deemed to thereupon be deleted from such former district boundaries. 2. Right-of-way, which has had prior approval for vacation pursuant to Chapter 9.22 or which is hereafter approved for vacation, shall be deemed to be added to the district boundaries of the property which the vacated right-of-way abuts. In instances where a vacated right-of-way is bordered on one side by a district which is different from the district on the other side, the right-of-way shall be deemed to be added apportionately to the respective districts.

D. Limitation on rezones in downtown districts. After the area-wide reclassification establishing the downtown district boundaries has occurred, no property shall be reclassified to a downtown district, except through a subsequent area-wide reclassification.

E. Limitations on rezones in Mixed-Use Centers. After adoption of the area-wide reclassifications establishing and confirming the Mixed-Use Center district boundaries in 2009, no property shall be reclassified to a Mixed-Use Center district except through a subsequent area-wide reclassification.

Page 112: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 94 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

13.06.700 Definitions and illustrations. For the purposes of this chapter, certain words and terms are defined as follows: words used in the present tense include the future, words in the singular number include the plural, and words in the plural number include the singular; the word “building” includes the word “structure”; the word “shall” is mandatory and not directory. For words that are not defined in this chapter, or that do not incorporate a definition by reference, refer to a Webster’s Dictionary published within the last ten years.

* * *

Green roof. A green roof is a roof of a building that is partially or completely covered with vegetation and soil, or a growing medium, planted over a waterproofing membrane. This does not refer to roofs which are merely colored green, as with green shingles. Container gardens on roofs, where plants are maintained in pots, are not considered to be true green roofs.

* * *

Modulation, horizontal. The horizontal stepping back of one or more upper levels of a building from the facade.

Modulation, vertical. A stepping back or projecting forward of vertical walls of the building face as a means of breaking up the apparent bulk of a structure's continuous exterior walls.

* * *

Vegetated wall. A vegetated wall is a vertical surface designed and planted to be covered at maturity by plants that:

• Can include the wall of a structure (such as a masonry wall), or a trellis or lattice structure either free standing or on the side of a building, or a wire screen or other framework that allows coverage by plants.

• Is at least 6 feet tall;

Page 113: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 95 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

• Does not consist of invasive species; and

• Has demonstrated viability in the planned environment.

* * *

Page 114: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 96 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

CHAPTER 13.17

MIXED-USE CENTER DEVELOPMENT

Sections: 13.17.010 Definitions. 13.17.020 Residential target area designation and standards. 13.17.030 Repealed.

13.17.010 Definitions. A. “Multi-family housing” means building(s) having four or more dwelling units designed for permanent residential occupancy resulting from new construction or rehabilitation or conversion of vacant, underutilized, or substandard buildings.

B. “Owner” means the property owner of record.

C. “Mixed-use center” means a center designated as such in the land use element of the City’s comprehensive plan. A mixed-use center is a compact identifiable district containing several business establishments, adequate public facilities, and a mixture of uses and activities, where residents may obtain a variety of products and services.

D. “Director” means the Director of the Community and Economic Development Department or authorized designee.

E. “Permanent residential occupancy” means multifamily housing that provides either rental or owner occupancy for a period of at least one month. This excludes hotels and motels that predominately offer rental accommodation on a daily or weekly basis.

F. “Rehabilitation improvements” means modifications to existing structures that are vacant for 12 months or longer, that are made to achieve a condition of substantial compliance with existing building codes or modification to existing occupied structures which increase the number of multi-family housing units.

G. “Residential target area” means an area within a mixed-use center that has been designated by the City Council as lacking sufficient, available, desirable, and convenient residential housing to meet the needs of the public.

13.17.020 Residential target area designation and standards. A. Criteria. Following a public hearing, the City Council may, in its sole discretion, designate one or more residential target areas. Each designated target area must meet the following criteria, as determined by the City Council:

1. The target area is located within a designated mixed-use center;

2. The target area lacks sufficient available, desirable, and convenient residential housing to meet the needs of the public who would likely live in the mixed-use center if desirable, attractive, and livable places were available; and

3. The providing of additional housing opportunity in the target area will assist in achieving the following purposes:

a. Encourage increased residential opportunities within the target area; or

b. Stimulate the construction of new multi-family housing and the rehabilitation of existing vacant and underutilized buildings for multi-family housing.

In designating a residential target area, the City Council may also consider other factors, including, but not limited to: whether additional housing in the target area will attract and maintain a significant increase in the number of permanent residents; whether an increased residential population will help alleviate detrimental conditions and social liability in the target area; and whether an increased residential population in the target area will help to achieve the planning goals mandated by the Growth Management Act under RCW 36.70A.020. The City Council may, by ordinance, amend or rescind the designation of a residential target area at any time pursuant to the same procedure as set forth in this chapter for original designation.

B. Target Area Standards and Guidelines. For each designated residential target area, the City Council shall adopt basic requirements for both new construction and rehabilitation supported by the City’s property tax exemption for multi-family housing program, including the application procedures specified in Section 6A.110.020. The City Council may also adopt guidelines including the following:

Page 115: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Mixed Use Center Regulations and Zoning Amendments Page 97 of 97 Proposed Code Amendments – Draft (5-13-09)

1. Requirements that address demolition of existing structures and site utilization; and

2. Building requirements that may include elements addressing parking, height, density, environmental impact, public benefit features, compatibility with the surrounding property, and such other amenities as will attract and keep permanent residents and will properly enhance the livability of the residential target area.

The required amenities shall be relative to the size of the proposed project and the tax benefit to be obtained.

C. Designated Target Areas. The proposed boundaries of the “residential target areas” are the boundaries of the 17 mixed-use centers listed below and as indicated on the Generalized Land Use Plan and in the Comprehensive Plan legal descriptions which are incorporated herein by reference and on file in the City Clerk’s Office.

The designated target areas do not include those areas within the boundary of the University of Washington Tacoma campus facilities master plan (per RCW 84.14.060.

MIXED-USE CENTER CENTER TYPE ORIGINALLY ADOPTED South 56th and South Tacoma Way Neighborhood November 21, 1995 Downtown Tacoma CBDDowntown November 21, 1995 Proctor (North 26th and Proctor) Neighborhood November 21, 1995 Tacoma Mall Area Urban November 21, 1995 Martin Luther King Jr. (South 11th and MLK Jr. Way) Neighborhood November 21, 1995 Westgate Community November 21, 1995 Lincoln (South 38th and “G” Street) (Lincoln) Neighborhood November 21, 1995 6th Avenue and Pine Street Neighborhood November 21, 1995 Tacoma Central Plaza/Allenmore Community November 21, 1995 South 72nd and Pacific Avenue Community November 21, 1995 East 72nd and Portland Avenue NeighborhoodCommunity November 21, 1995 Stadium (North 1st and Tacoma) Neighborhood November 21, 1995 James Center/TCC Community November 21, 1995 Lower Portland Avenue Community January 16, 1996 South 34th and Pacific Avenue Community December 11, 2007 McKinley (E. 34th and McKinley) Neighborhood December 11, 2007 Narrows (6th Avenue and S. Jackson) Neighborhood December 11, 2007

13.17.030 Tax exemptions for multi-family housing in residential target areas. A. The application, review, and decision guidelines and procedures for multi-family housing property tax exemptions are contained in TMC Title 6, Tax and License Code, Section 6A.110.

Repealed by Ord. 27710

Page 116: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 117: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MIXED-USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT DRAFT MIXED-USE CENTERS HEIGHT BONUS PROGRAM

Based on Preliminary Planning Commission Direction, as of May 13, 2009 The following Height Bonus provision applies in the NCX zoning districts. Projects may qualify for a maximum of 20 feet of additional building height in exchange for a combination of the following bonus features. Only properties or portions of properties located within the NCX Districts and within 200 feet of the centerline of a designated core pedestrian street within a Mixed-Use Center qualify for this bonus program.

BONUS FEATURE BONUS HEIGHT

PEDESTRIAN ENVIRONMENT

Crime Prevention through Environmental Design (CPTED project review, beyond standard requirements) 5 feet or Eliminate Item

Designed for Ground Floor Retail or Restaurant (at least 70% of street frontage) 5 feet

Public Art (1% of building value) 10 feet

Structured Parking (at least 50% of required parking) 10 feet

Structured Parking (100% of required parking) 20 feet

TRANSIT-ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT

Transit Stop/Station Improvement (beyond standard requirements) 5 feet

Residential Use (at least 50% of building) 10 feet

SUSTAINABILITY

Low-Impact Development Stormwater Management (beyond standard requirements) 10 feet

Green Roof (at least 60% of building footprint) 10 feet or Eliminate Item

Solar Energy Collection (at least 15% of expected energy use) 10 feet

Adjacent Historic Rehabilitation 10 feet

Landmark Designation of an existing building (not the building getting the height bonus) 10 feet

Historic Façade Retention 10 feet

Energy Efficiency (beyond standard requirements) 10 feet

QUALITY OF LIFE

Affordable Housing (at least 20% of units) 20 feet

Open Space Fund Contribution (0.5% of building value) 10 feet

MLK, 56TH & SOUTH TACOMA WAY, AND STADIUM MIXED-USE CENTERS In the MLK and 56th & South Tacoma Way Mixed-Use Centers, use of the standard bonus palette (above) would be limited to a maximum height bonus of 20 feet (45-65 feet). In the Stadium Mixed-Use Center, use of the standard bonus palette shall be limited to a maximum height bonus of 10 feet (65-75 feet). Where allowed in the MLK and 56th & South Tacoma Way Mixed-Use Centers, the second 20 feet of bonus height (65-85 feet) would only be available through incorporation of one of the two bonus items in the list below. Where allowed in the Stadium Mixed-Use Center, the second 10 feet of bonus height (75-85 feet) would also only be available through incorporation of one of the following two bonus items:

BONUS FEATURE BONUS HEIGHT

QUALITY OF LIFE

Open Space Fund Contribution (0.5% of building value) 10/20 feet

Transfer of Development Rights 10/20 feet

Page 118: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 119: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MIXED-USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT

DRAFT MIXED-USE CENTERS ZONING CONCEPT Based on Preliminary Planning Commission Direction, as of May 7, 2009

ZONE DEVELOPMENT STYLE EXISTING

BASE HEIGHT

EXISTING WITH

BONUS

PROPOSED BASE

HEIGHT

PROPOSED WITH

BONUS

NRX – Neighborhood Residential Mixed-

Use District

Low-rise residential development (largely single-family with some duplexes,

triplexes and multi-family uses), with limited existing commercial uses

n/a n/a 35’ n/a

URX – Urban Residential Mixed-

Use District

Low-rise multi-family development (including townhouses, condos and apts.) n/a n/a 45’ n/a

RCX – Residential Commercial Mixed-

Use District

Mid-rise residential development (largely condos and apts.) with some limited

commercial development that is small-scale and serves the immediate

neighborhood

60’/45’ n/a 60’ n/a

NCX – Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-

Use District

Mid-rise residential, commercial and mixed-use development, with a focus on neighborhood services and pedestrian and transit-oriented development along

corridors

45’ n/a 45’ 65’

NCX – Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-

Use District (Stadium)

Mid-rise residential, commercial and mixed-use development, with a focus on neighborhood services and pedestrian and transit-oriented development along

corridors

75’ n/a 65’ 85’

NCX – Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-

Use District (MLK; 56th & STW)

Mid-rise residential, commercial and mixed-use development, with a focus on neighborhood services and pedestrian and transit-oriented development along

corridors

45’ n/a 45’ 85’

CCX – Community Commercial Mixed-

Use District

Mid- to high-rise residential and mixed-use development, with commercial uses that serve many nearby neighborhoods

and the entire City

60’ 75’ 60’ 75’

UCX – Urban Center Mixed-Use District

High-rise residential and mixed-use development, with commercial uses,

institutions and attractions that serve the larger region

75’ 120’ 75’ 120’

CIX – Commercial Industrial Mixed-Use

District

Mid- to high-rise residential, commercial and mixed-use development with some

limited industrial uses 75’ n/a 75’ n/a

HMX – Hospital Medical Mixed-Use

District

Mid- to high-rise institutional/medical facilities, with limited commercial and

residential uses 150’ n/a 150’ n/a

Page 120: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 121: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/20/09

\\Geobase-win\ced\GADS\R2009\R137\34thandPacific07-08_11x17.mxd

34th and Pacific Proposed ZoningE

D S

T

S 40TH ST

S 37TH ST

E 36TH ST

S 34TH ST

FA

WC

ET

T A

VE

S WRIGHT AVE

S 32ND ST

E 35TH ST

E 34TH ST

E HARRISON ST

S C

RA

ND

AL L

L N

A S

T

S DIVISION LN

A S

T

E 37TH ST

FAW

CE

TT

AV

E

E B

ST

S D

ST

E DIVISION LN

S 35TH ST

E C

ST

S C

ST

E B

ST

E 40TH ST

S 36TH ST

S 38TH ST

TAC

OM

A A

VE

S

DE

LIN

ST

E 38TH ST

S G

ST

PA

CIF

IC A

VE

7

5

HMX

URX

CCX

RCX

URX

RCX

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

HMX: Hospital-Medical Mixed-Use

URX: Urban Residential Mixed-Use

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

CCX: Community Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 500250

Feet

Page 122: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/20/09

\\Geobase-win\CED\GADS\R2009\R137\38thandG07-08_11x17.mxd

38th and G Proposed Zoning

S J

ST

S 34TH ST

S K

ST

S 35TH ST

S J

ST

S 36TH ST

S 34TH ST

S 35TH ST

S G

ST

S 32ND ST

S D

ST

S DIVISION LN

FA

WC

ETT

AV

E

S 36TH ST

S 39TH ST

S WRIGHT AVE

S WRIGHT AVE

S 40TH ST

YA

KI M

A A

VE

F AW

CE

TT

AV

E

S K

ST

S 40TH ST

S 37TH ST

S P

AR

K A

VE

T AC

OM

A A

VE

S

DE

LIN

ST

S G

ST

YA

KIM

A A

VE

S 38TH ST

S TH

OM

PS

ON

AV

E

5

RCX

NCX

RCX

URX

RCX

URX

Height bonus area

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

URX: Urban Residential Mixed-Use

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

NCX: Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 500250

Feet

Page 123: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/20/09

\\Geobase-win\ced\GADS\R2009\R137\56thandSTW07-08_11x17.mxd

56th and STW Proposed Zoning

S A

DA

MS

ST

S P

UG

ET

SO

UN

D A

VE

S LA

WR

EN

CE

ST

S W

AR

NE

R S

T

S 58TH ST

S C

ED

AR

ST

S 47TH ST

S 58TH ST

S 54TH ST

S P

RO

CT

OR

ST

S M

AD

ISO

N S

T

S JU

NE

TT

ST

S B

IRM

ING

HA

M S

T

S W

AR

NE

R S

T

S 50TH ST

S 60TH ST

S 52ND ST

S 60TH ST

S 48TH ST

S A

LDE

R S

T

S JU

NE

TT

ST

S A

L DE

R S

T

S M

ON

TG

OM

ER

Y S

T

S W

AS

HIN

GT

ON

ST

S C

ED

AR

ST

S A

DA

MS

ST

S P

UG

ET

SO

UN

D A

VE

S W

AR

NE

R S

T

S H

OO

D S

T

S J U

NE

TT

ST

S U

NI O

N A

VE

S P

UG

ET

SO

UN

D A

VE

S LA

WR

EN

CE

ST

S C

ED

AR

ST

S D

UR

AN

GO

ST

S W

AS

HI N

GT

ON

ST

S B

UR

L ING

T ON

WA

Y

S C

LEM

EN

T A

VE

S 56TH ST

S 47TH ST

SO

UTH

TAC

OM

A W

AY

RCX

NCX

CIX

Height bonus area

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

NCX: Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-Use

CIX: Commercial Industrial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 500250

Feet

bboudet
Polygon
bboudet
Callout
Area proposed to remain zoned R-4 and be considered for removal from the Mixed-Use Center in 2010
Page 124: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/20/09

\\Geobase-win\CED\GADS\R2009\R137\6thandPine07-08_11x17.mxd

6th Ave and Pine Proposed Zoning

S 8TH ST

N S

PR

AG

UE

AV

EN

7TH

ST

N CUSHMAN AVE

S P

INE

ST

N 8TH ST

S A

ND

ER

SO

N S

T

N M ST

N L ST

N 9TH ST

S P

RO

SP

EC

T S

T

N GRANT AVE

N JU

NE

T T S

T

N P

INE

ST

N S

TE

EL E

ST

N C

ED

AR

ST

N 8T

H ST

N T R

AF

T ON

ST

S F

ER

RY

ST

N SHERIDAN AVE

N S

TA

TE

ST

S T

RA

FT

ON

ST

N 11

TH ST

S O

AK

ES

ST

N 10

TH ST

S S

TE

ELE

ST

S JU

NE

TT

ST

S A

LDE

R S

T

N 14TH ST

N 9T

H ST

N 11TH ST

N 12TH ST

S 7TH ST

S 10TH ST

S 13TH ST

S 14TH ST

S C

ED

AR

ST

S 14TH ST

N 10TH ST

S 8TH ST

N A

ND

ER

SO

N S

T

N AINSWORTH AVEN

OA

KE

S S

T

N F

IFE

ST

S F

IFE

ST

N P

RO

SP

EC

T S

T

KELLOGG ST

S 9TH ST

N 7TH ST

S 10TH ST

N 13TH ST

N FI

FE

ST

S S

T AT

E S

T

S 7TH ST

S 11TH ST

N A

LDE

R S

T

S 12TH ST S 11TH ST

6TH AVE

S A

LDE

R S

TS

SP

RA

GU

E A

VE

S C

ED

AR

ST

URX

NCXRCX

URX

Height bonus area

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

URX: Urban Residential Mixed-Use

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

NCX: Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 500250

Feet

Page 125: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/20/09

\\Geobase-win\CED\GADS\R2009\R137\72ndandPacific07-08_11x17.mxd

72nd and Pacific Proposed ZoningE LINDEN ST

S C

ST

S B

ELL

ST

FA

WC

ET

T A

VE

S G

ST

FAW

CE

TT

AV

E

S 76TH ST

S 78TH ST

E B

ST

S 74TH ST

A S

TTA

CO

MA

AV

E S

S W

INN

ETK

A S

T

S 70TH ST

S 68TH ST

S D

ST

S 80TH ST

S 79TH ST

S D

ST

S C

ST

S B

EL L

ST

E 74TH ST

E 68TH ST

E 70TH ST

E 72ND STP

AC

IFI C

AV

ES 72ND ST

CCX

URX

RCX

URX

URX

URX

URX

URX

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

URX: Urban Residential Mixed-Use

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

CCX: Community Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 500250

Feet

Page 126: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/20/09

\\Geobase-win\CED\GADS\R2009\R137\72ndandPortland07-08_11x17.mxd

72nd and Portland Proposed Zoning

SWEET ST

E M

ST

E 66TH ST

E N

ST

E 67TH ST

E 67TH ST

E 68TH ST

E 66TH ST

E 71ST ST

E 69TH ST

E 70TH ST

E T

ST

E S

ON

IA S

T

E 72ND ST

E P

OR

T LA

ND

AV

E

PRD

RCX

URX

CCX

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

PRD: Planned Residential Development

URX: Urban Residential Mixed-Use

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

CCX: Community Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 500250

Feet

Page 127: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/20/09

\\Geobase-win\CED\GADS\R2009\R137\JamesCenter07-08_11x17.mxd

James Center Proposed Zoning

S 15TH ST

S R

OC

HE

ST

ER

ST

S H

OW

AR

D S

T

S H

AW

TH

OR

NE

ST

S W

HIT

MA

N S

T

S M

AC

AR

TH

UR

ST

S 17TH ST

S V

AS

SA

ULT

ST

S 15TH ST

S 10TH ST

ROSEMOUNT CIR

S 18TH ST

S 8TH ST

S O

XF

OR

D S

T

S M

AC

AR

TH

UR

ST

S V

ISS

CH

ER

ST

S M

EY

ER

S S

T

S W

OO

DLA

WN

ST

6TH AVE

S 19TH STCOLUMBIA ST

REGENTS BLVD

19TH ST W

S 12TH ST

S M

ILD

RE

D S

T

S P

EA

RL

ST

AL A

ME

DA

AV

E

MIL

DR

ED

ST

W

16

CCX

RCX

RCXPRD

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

PRD: Planned Residential Development

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

CCX: Community Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 500250

Feet

Page 128: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/20/09

\\Geobase-win\CED\GADS\R2009\R137\LowerPortland07-08_11x17.mxd

Lower Portland Proposed Zoning

E L

ST

E N

ST

E M

ST

E M

ST

E WRIGHT AVE

E T

ST

E DIVISION LN

E 34TH ST

E 32ND ST

E MORTON ST

VA

LLEY

VIE

W TE

R

E 26TH ST

E SHERMAN STE FAIRBANKS ST

E 35TH ST

E 30TH ST

E 35TH ST

E K

ST

E N

ST

E R

ST

E M

ST

E 32ND ST

E L

ST

E 31ST ST

LENNOX PL

E HARRISON ST

E Q

STE 28TH ST

E FAIRBANKS ST

E 29TH ST

E HARRISON ST

E 29TH ST

E WRIGHT AVE

E MORTON ST

E 34TH ST

E 27TH ST

E L

ST

PUYALLUP AVE

E 25TH ST

E P

OR

TLAN

D A

VE

E 26TH ST

BAY

ST5

CCX

URX

R2

RCX

RCX

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

URX: Urban Residential Mixed-Use

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

CCX: Community Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 500250

Feet

Page 129: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 5/7/09

\\Geobase-win\CED\GADS\R2009\R161\MLK07-08_11x17.mxd

Martin Luther King Proposed Zoning

N CUSHMAN AVE

S G

RA

NT

AV

E

N M ST

N 5T

H S

T

N 7T

H ST

ST

HE

LEN

S A

VE

CO

UR

T E

CO

UR

T D

N 6T

H ST

S S

HE

RI D

AN

AV

E

S C

US

HM

AN

AV

E

S 4TH ST

CO

UR

T F

S G

ST

S J

ST

N 4T

H ST

FA

WC

ET

T A

VE

N K ST

YA

KIM

A A

VE

S J

ST

S 8TH ST

S 3RD ST

S 14TH ST

S 2ND ST

S 7TH ST

S 10TH ST

S 13TH ST

EARNEST S BRAZILL ST

S 5TH ST

N 3R

D ST

S 16TH ST

N 2N

D ST

N L ST

N J ST

N SHERIDAN AVE

CO

UR

T G

S B

AK

ER

ST

S G

ST

BRO

ADWAY

CO

UR

T F

CO

UR

T C

S A

INS

WO

RT

H A

VE

S L

ST

S I S

T

S M

ST

EARNEST S BRAZILL ST

S 13TH ST

DIVISION AVE

S 9TH ST

S I S

T

TAC

OM

A A

VE

S

6TH AVEM

AR

TIN LU

THE

R K

ING

JR W

AY

S 15TH ST

S 11TH ST

YA

KIMA

AV

E

N I ST

NCX

HMX

RCX

NRX

NCX

URX

RCX

HMXParcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

HMX: Hospital-Medical Mixed-Use

URX: Urban Residential Mixed-Use

NRX: Neighborhood Residential Mixed-Use

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

NCX: Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 680340

Feet

bboudet
Polygon
Page 130: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 5/7/09

\\Geobase-win\CED\GADS\R2009\R161\MLK07-08_11x17.mxd

Martin Luther King Proposed ZoningS

AS

H S

T

S A

L AS

KA

ST Y

AK

IMA

CT

S A

INS

WO

RT

H A

VE

S 21ST ST

S 17TH ST

S G

ST

S 27TH ST

S J

ST

S G

RA

NT

AV

E S 25TH ST

S C

US

HM

AN

AV

E

S 18TH ST

S 16TH ST

S 14TH ST

S 13TH ST

S 23RD ST

S 20TH ST

S I S

T

S S

HE

RID

AN

AV

E

S M

ST

S 28TH ST

S L

ST

CO

UR

T F

S W

ILK

ES

ON

ST

CO

UR

T G

EARNEST S BRAZILL ST

S 25TH ST

YA

KIM

A A

VE

S 19TH ST

S 15TH ST

TAC

OM

A A

VE

S

MA

RTIN

LUTH

ER

KI N

G JR

WA

Y

NCX

RCX

NCX

RCX

HMX

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

HMX: Hospital-Medical Mixed-Use

URX: Urban Residential Mixed-Use

NRX: Neighborhood Residential Mixed-Use

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

NCX: Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 680340

Feet

bboudet
Polygonal Line
Page 131: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/20/09

\\Geobase-win\CED\GADS\R2009\R137\McKinley07-08_11x17.mxd

McKinley Proposed Zoning

E J

ST

E I

ST

WILEY AVE

E I

ST

E D

ST

E K

ST

E K

ST

E K

ST

E 37TH ST

E 34TH ST

E DIVISION LN

E L

ST

E J

ST

E 34TH ST

E F

ST

E J

ST

E HARRISON ST

E 36TH ST

E WRIGHT AVE

E G

ST

E MCKINLEY RD

E WRIGHT AVE

UPP

ER PA

RK

ST

E E

ST

VA

L LEY

VIE

W T

ER

MC

KIN

L EY

AV

E

E 31ST ST

E 35TH ST

E 32ND ST

E L

ST

E MORTON ST

E 35TH ST

E 32ND ST

E C

ST

E G

ST

E S

PO

KA

NE

ST

E H

OW

E S

T

MCKINLEY WAY

E 38TH ST

E D

ST

MC

KIN

LEY

AV

E

7

5

NCX

URX

RCX

URX

NCX

Height bonus area

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

URX: Urban Residential Mixed-Use

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

NCX: Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 500250

Feet

Page 132: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/15/09

\\Geobase-win\ced\GADS\R2009\R137\Narrows09_11x17.mxd

Narrows Proposed Zoning

N 9TH ST

N SKYVIEW LN

N SKYVIEW PL

N M

ILD

RE

D S

T

N 10TH ST

N S

KY

LIN

E D

R

LEN

OR

E D

R

BRIDGEVIEW DR

N H

EA

TH

ER

WO

OD

WE

ST

S 10TH ST

N 11TH ST

S O

XF

OR

D S

T

S M

AC

AR

THU

R S

T

S 8TH ST

N R

OC

HE

STE

R S

T

N H

OW

AR

D S

T

N H

AW

TH

OR

NE

ST

N 11TH ST

N S

KY

L IN

E D

R

RO

SE

L N

S H

AW

TH

OR

NE

ST

S R

OC

HE

ST

ER

ST

S H

OW

AR

D S

T

S M

EY

ER

S S

T

N H

AR

MO

N S

T

S G

EIG

ER

ST

N JA

ME

S S

T

S JA

CK

SO

N A

VE

6TH AVE

S M

ILD

RE

D S

T

N JA

CK

SO

N A

VE

16

PRD

URX

NCX

URXURX

URX

RCX

RCX

Height bonus area

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

PRD: Planned Residential Development

URX: Urban Residential Mixed-Use

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

NCX: Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 500250

Feet

Page 133: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/20/09

\\Geobase-win\CED\GADS\R2009\R137\Proctor07-08_11x17.mxd

Proctor Proposed Zoning

N M

AD

I SO

N S

T

N 24TH ST

N W

AS

HI N

GT

ON

ST

N M

AS

ON

AV

E

N M

AD

ISO

N S

T

N 22ND ST

N 25TH ST

N 31ST ST

N M

ON

RO

E S

T

N 29TH ST

N 27TH ST

N 28TH ST

N 29TH ST

N M

ON

RO

E S

T

N TY

LER

ST

N A

DA

MS

ST

N 26TH ST

N 30TH ST

N P

RO

CTO

R S

T

NCX

RCX

URX

Height bonus area

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

URX: Urban Residential Mixed-Use

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

NCX: Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 500250

Feet

Page 134: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/20/09

\\Geobase-win\CED\GADS\R2009\R137\Stadium07-08_11x17.mxd

Stadium Proposed Zoning

N BROADWAY

N 4T

H ST

BRO

ADWAY

S 4TH ST

N B

OR

OU

GH

RD

S J

ST

N 7T

H ST

S 4TH STCO

UR

T D

N E ST

N STADIUM

WAY

N 4T

H ST

CO

UR

T C

N YAKIMA AVE

S 5TH ST

S 3RD ST

S 2ND ST

N 6T

H ST

N G ST

N J ST

N 5T

H ST

N 2N

D S

T

N 3R

D ST

S G

ST

S M

ST

N L ST

N K ST

FAW

CE

TT A

VE

CO

UR

T F

N D ST

N C ST

S L

ST

ST

HE

LEN

S A

VE

N 1S

T ST

S I S

T

N E ST

S STADIUM

WAY

TAC

OM

A A

VE

SMA

RT IN

LUTH

ER

KIN

G JR

WA

Y

N SCHUSTER

PKWY

N TACOMA AVE

DIVISION AVE

N I ST

RCX

NCX

URX

Height bonus area

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

URX: Urban Residential Mixed-Use

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

NCX: Neighborhood Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 500250

Feet

Page 135: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/20/09

\\Geobase-win\CED\GADS\R2009\R137\TacomaCentral07-08_11x17.mxd

Tacoma Central Proposed Zoning

S D

UR

AN

GO

ST

S A

DA

MS

ST

WE

ST

UN

I ON

AV

E

S A

DA

MS

ST

S 30TH ST

S 17TH ST

S MELROSE ST

S 14TH ST

S J U

NE

T T S

T

S 17TH ST

S 14TH ST

S 15TH ST

S L A

WR

EN

CE

ST

S 16TH ST

S A

LDE

R S

T

S P

UG

ET

SO

UN

D A

VE

S A

LDE

R S

T

S 18TH ST

S W

AS

HIN

GT

ON

ST

S 21ST ST

S 29TH ST

S 15TH ST

S 16TH STS

WA

SH

ING

TON

ST

S 23RD ST

S P

INE

ST

S 15TH ST

S 19TH ST

S C

ED

AR

ST

S U

NIO

N AV

E

S U

NIO

N A

VE

S P

RO

CTO

R S

T

S PIN

E ST

CENTER ST

16

CCX

PRD

HMX

RCX

RCX

CCX

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

PRD: Planned Residential Development

HMX: Hospital-Medical Mixed-Use

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

CCX: Community Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 500250

Feet

Page 136: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/20/09

\\Geobase-win\ced\GADS\R2009\R137\TacomaMall07-08_11x17.mxd

Tacoma Mall Proposed Zoning

S WRIGHT AVE

S 37TH ST

S A

RIZ

ON

A A

VE

S 40TH ST

S 46TH ST

S 35TH ST

S T

RA

FT

ON

ST

S 41ST ST

S 45TH ST

S W

AS

HI N

GT

ON

ST

S

CALIFORNIA

AVE

S 44TH ST

S 54TH ST

S 47TH ST

S 50TH ST

S 52ND ST

S JU

NE

TT

ST

S P

UG

ET

SO

UN

D A

VE

S U

NIO

N A

VE

S W

I LK

ES

ON

ST

S 45TH ST

S L A

WR

EN

CE

ST

S 49TH ST

S 53RD ST

S 43RD ST

S 48TH ST

S 40TH ST

S A

LDE

R S

T

S 37TH ST

S 31ST ST

S A

DA

MS

ST

S 35TH ST

S 51ST ST

S S

TE

EL E

ST

S W

AP

AT O

ST

S P

RO

SP

EC

T S

T

S F

IFE

ST

S P

INE

ST

S H

OS

ME

R S

T

S 36TH ST

S 42ND ST

S A

DA

MS

ST

S 39TH ST

NE

VA

DA A

VE

OR

EG

ON

AV

E

S C

ED

AR

ST

S A

SH

ST

S HOOD ST

S S

TA

TE

ST

S W

AR

NE

R S

T

MO

NTA

NA

AV

E

CENTER ST

S 38TH ST

S 47TH ST

S 48TH ST

S S

TEE

LE S

T

S O

AK

ES

ST

SOUTH TACOMA WAY

S P

INE

ST

S U

NI O

N A

VE

TACOMA MALL B

LVD

S S

PR

AG

UE

AV

E16

5

UCX

RCX

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

UCX: Urban Center Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 1,000500

Feet

Page 137: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

16 705

5

5

City of Tacoma | Community & Economic Development Department | GIS Analysis & Data Services | 4/20/09

\\Geobase-win\CED\GADS\R2009\R137\Westgate07-08_11x17.mxd

Westgate Proposed Zoning

CLAREMONT DR

N V

AS

SA

ULT

ST

N D

EF

IAN

CE

ST

N H

I GH

LAN

D S

T

N 23RD ST

N 18TH ST

N V

AS

SA

ULT

ST

N W

HIT

MA

N S

T

N 30TH ST

AUGUSTA PL

N B

RIS

TOL

ST

N 15TH ST

N 28TH ST

N S

HIR

L EY

ST

N W

I NN

I FR

ED

ST

N 23RD ST

N 16TH ST

N 31ST STN

WH

ITM

AN

ST

N VI S

SC

HE

R S

T

N H

IGH

LAN

D S

T

N W

INN

IFR

ED

ST

N 24TH ST

N W

OO

DL A

WN

ST

N B

RIS

TO

L S

T

N N

AR

RO

WS

DR

N 21ST ST

N P

EA

RL

ST

N 30TH ST

N 26TH ST

WESTGATE BLVD

RCX

PRD

CCX

RCX

PRD

Parcels

Mixed use centers

Proposed zoning

PRD: Planned Residential Development

RCX: Residential Commercial Mixed-Use

CCX: Community Commercial Mixed-Use

Proposed zoning changes in GREEN

Map is for reference only.

0 500250

Feet

Page 138: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Page 139: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

SUMMARY OF PLANNING COMMISSION PRELIMINARY DIRECTION as of May 13, 2009

These recommendations are based on potential modifications to the draft proposal that was

submitted for public review and was the subject of the public hearing in August 2008.

BUILDING HEIGHT – HOW HIGH 1. Remove the CCX district from the proposed height bonus program (the CCX district will stay with its

existing height scheme, with 60 feet allowed outright and 75 feet allowed for mixed-use projects)

2. 56th & South Tacoma Way – Increase the maximum possible height limit in the NCX District within the “core area” from 65 feet, as was originally proposed, to 85 feet (additional height to be achieved through the bonus program)

3. MLK – Reduce the base height limit in the NCX District in the MLK Center from 65 feet, as was originally proposed, to 45 feet

BUILDING HEIGHT – WHERE SHOULD THE BONUS APPLY 1. Address the concern about split development sites by allowing the height bonus provision to extend

beyond the 200-foot depth to encompass an entire development site when at least 60% of the site is within the standard 200-foot deep bonus area. Also, provide a definition for “development site,” based on the similar definition in the downtown code.

2. MLK – Add Earnest S. Brazil Street (South 12th) as a Core Pedestrian Street (this would allow for the height bonus within those areas zoned NCX along Brazil Street – generally from the west edge of the MUC to the alley between I and J Streets)

HEIGHT BONUS PALETTE (HOW) 1. In the Stadium Mixed-Use Center, limit the bonus available through the standard bonus palette to the

first 10 feet (from 65 to 75 feet) and limit the second 10 feet of bonus height (from 75 feet to 85 feet) to two specific palette items – the TDR item or a contribution to the City’s Open Space Fund of 0.5% of the building value

2. In the MLK and 56th & South Tacoma Way Mixed-Use Centers, limit the bonus available through the standard bonus palette to the first 20 feet (from 45 to 65 feet) and limit the second 20 feet of bonus height (from 65 feet to 85 feet) to two specific palette items – the TDR item or a contribution to the City’s Open Space Fund of 0.5% of the building value

3. Eliminate the following bonus palette items: Artistic Building Lighting; Pedestrian Lighting; Pedestrian Weather Protection; Distinctive Sidewalk Paving; High-Quality Materials; Outside Seating; Daycare Facility; Public Meeting Facility; Public Plaza; Public Art (0.5%); and Mature Vegetation

4. Eliminate the separate Ground Floor Restaurant bonus item and instead, combine it with the Ground Floor Retail bonus item, with an associated bonus height of 5 feet for Ground Floor Retail or Restaurant.

5. Reduce the bonus height associated with the CPTED Design Review item from 10 feet to 5 feet

6. Reduce the bonus height associated with the Public Art (1%) item from 20 feet to 5 feet

MUC – Summary of Preliminary Direction May 13, 2009 Page 1 of 6

Page 140: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

7. Reduce the bonus height associated with the Transit Stop/Station Improvement item from 10 feet to 5 feet

8. Reduce the bonus height associated with the Solar Power Generation item from 15 feet to 10 feet

9. Reduce the bonus height associated with the Green Roof item from 15 feet to 10 feet

10. Increase the bonus height associated with the Energy Efficiency item from 5 feet to 10 feet

11. Increase the bonus height associated with the Structured Parking (50%) item from 5 feet to 10 feet

12. Increase the bonus height associated with the Structured Parking (100%) item from 10 feet to 20 feet

13. Add a Landmark Designation item, for the listing of a historic building, with an associated bonus height of 10 feet

14. Add a Historic Façade Retention bonus palette item, with an associated bonus height of 10 feet

15. Add Open Space Fund Contribution into standard bonus palette with an associated bonus height of 10 feet (to be available in all districts)

16. Add Community Development Agreements (CBAs) as a placeholder item in the bonus palette (recognizing that this would need to be further defined and a framework for CBAs created through a future process)

17. Remove TDR as a bonus option in the standard bonus palette, at this time

18. Modify the Solar Power Generation bonus palette item to allow for other uses of solar energy, such as solar hot water heating.

19. Provide a minimum depth and width for the Ground Floor Retail bonus item of 25 feet, and reduce the minimum size for the use from 3,000 sq. ft. to 1,000 sq. ft.

20. Reduce the minimum size for the Ground Floor Restaurant bonus item from 3,000 sq. ft. to 2,000 sq. ft.

21. Clarify the following bonus palette items: Transit Stop/Station Improvement; Ground Floor Retail; Ground Floor Restaurant; Adjacent Historic Rehabilitation; Affordable Housing; CPTED Design Review; and Public Art

DESIGN STANDARDS 1. C.1.a – Mass Reduction Standards, Pedestrian Streets

Change the required articulation interval from 30 feet to 40 feet along designated pedestrian streets, and provide an exemption from the requirement for buildings that have 60 feet or less frontage on the pedestrian street

2. C.1.b – Mass Reduction Standards – Non-pedestrian Streets

Provide an exemption from this standard for buildings with 120 feet or less frontage on the non-pedestrian street, and reduce the number of features required from three to two for façades that employ brick as the predominate siding material

3. C.1.c – Mass Reduction Standards – Residential Buildings

Provide an exemption from this standard for building façades that are 60 feet or less in width, and reduce the number of features required from three to two for façades that employ brick as the predominate siding material

MUC – Summary of Preliminary Direction May 13, 2009 Page 2 of 6

Page 141: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

4. C.2.b – Mass Reduction Standards – Upper Floor Streetfront Stepbacks

Increase, from 20 feet to 25 feet, the maximum width associated with the exemption for distinctive street corner building design elements

5. C.3.b – Mass Reduction Standards – Maximum Façade Widths

Provide additional flexibility by requiring that the feature must extend through all floors above the first floor but then allowing the feature to meet two of the three remaining design elements instead of all three

6. G. – X-District Windows and Openings: Façade Transparency and Solar Access

Modify the existing requirement for residential buildings and residential portions of mixed-use buildings to also require transparent windows and doors on facades or portions of facades facing alleys, courtyards, plazas and surface parking lots (minimum 10% of such vertical façade surfaces). The current proposal only requires transparency on sides facing streets.

7. I.2 – Window/Trim Detailing

Provide an exemption from this standard for façades facing alleys or the rear property line

8. I.3 – Façade Surface Standards – Building Details

Revise this standard so that it only applies to façades along Core Pedestrian Streets (as this provision is most appropriate for those areas where we are promoting continuous storefront-type buildings – which is, through this process, being reduced to the “core” area)

9. I.3 – Façade Surface Standards – Building Details

Revise b(1) to add glass and fixed fabric awnings as examples of decorative weather protection elements

10. I.3 – Façade Surface Standards – Building Details

Revise c(1) to add architectural pre-cast concrete to the list of decorative building materials

11. L. – Fencing, Retaining Walls and Utilities

Modify the fencing standards to not allow solid fencing that is more than 3 feet tall on sides adjacent to streets and alleys (current requirement is 3½ feet and just applies to sides facing streets). Fences along alleys that are more than 3 feet tall must be at least 20% transparent (current requirement for tall fences along streets is at least 50% transparent).

12. L. – Fencing, Retaining Walls and Utilities

Add a requirement that parking garage openings facing streets, alleys or open parking areas shall incorporate decorative grilles, planters and/or artwork that that effectively reduces the visibility of vehicles within the garage while still allowing for limited visibility into and out of the garage. Such screening shall be at least 20% transparent but not more than 80% transparent in the portion that is between 3 and 7 feet above the adjacent grade.

RESIDENTIAL TRANSITIONS 1. Modify the Residential Transition requirement so that it applies to the height bonus area (the required

residential transition stepdowns will be required, even in the height bonus area)

2. Provide one additional exception to the transition requirement to allow for distinctive street corner building design elements at the entrances to the centers (maximum 25 feet in width)

MUC – Summary of Preliminary Direction May 13, 2009 Page 3 of 6

Page 142: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

OFF-STREET PARKING REQUIREMENTS 1. Modify the parking exemption in the community centers so that it is no longer tied to the height

bonus concept and area (the original parking exemption was tied to and applied in the areas within 200 feet of designated core pedestrian streets). The new parking exemption will still apply to the core area of the centers.

2. Address the concern about development sites that are split by the boundary of the parking exemption area (which is tied to the height bonus area) by allowing the parking exemption provision to extend beyond the 200-foot depth to encompass an entire development site when at least 60% of the site is within the standard 200-foot deep bonus area (this is similar to the preliminary recommendation regarding the height bonus provision). Sites that remain split shall be required to provide parking based on the amount required for the portion of the project that is outside of the parking exemption area; however, the parking provided to meet the requirement can be provided anywhere on the site

3. Modify the parking exemption for ground-level retail and restaurants so that it applies to the first 3,000 square feet of either

MAXIMUM SETBACKS 1. Modify the proposed maximum setback exemption for large public facilities to eliminate the time

limitation and the required pedestrian improvements

LANDSCAPING, BUFFERING & YARD SPACE REQUIREMENTS 1. Provide an exemption from the residential yard space requirement for mixed-use and multi-family

residential projects (does not include townhouse projects) located within 300 feet of a public park or public school that includes outdoor recreational facilities

2. Clarify that “common yard space” (which can count for up to 100% of the yard requirement) may include courtyards built above the ground floor on the “roof” of a part of the structure provided they meet all of the standards and are visible from multiple dwelling units within the building. This is to distinguish this type of “rooftop courtyard” (which is allowed to count for up to 100% of the yard requirement) from “rooftop decks” (which are allowed to count for only 50% of the yard requirement)

3. Modify parking lot interior landscaping requirements to institute a clear visibility zone of 3-7 feet above grade (previous proposal specified 3-8 feet)

4. Modify parking lot interior landscaping to specify that trees shall be planted a minimum of 10 feet from pedestrian light standards or parking lot light standards

5. Modify parking lot perimeter landscaping requirement to institute a clear visibility zone of 3-7 feet above grade

6. Modify landscaping types B, C and D to institute a clear visibility zone of 3-7 feet above grade

7. Modify buffer requirement for X-District property across the alley from R-District property to allow landscaping types B or C (and not type A)

8. Modify street tree requirement to institute a clear visibility zone of 3-7 feet above grade

9. Modify tree requirement along walkways to specify that trees shall be planted a minimum of 10 feet from walkway or parking lot light standards

10. Clarify the yard space requirements that for common yard spaces to count they must be directly visible from at least two units (previous proposal just said “from dwelling units”)

MUC – Summary of Preliminary Direction May 13, 2009 Page 4 of 6

Page 143: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

DRIVEWAYS 1. In the Driveway Standards, provide an allowance for projects that abut an alley and utilize the alley

for vehicular access to also have additional vehicular access to abutting, non-pedestrian streets

MAXIMUM BUSINESS OCCUPANCY 1. Modify the NCX District Maximum Business Occupancy Size limitation to exempt offices from the

30,000 sq. ft. limitation

USE FRONTAGE REQUIREMENTS 1. Clarify Mixed-Use District Use Table provisions where certain uses are prohibited from locating

along the frontage of a designed core pedestrian street so that the provision would more clearly prohibit the uses at the street level and adjacent to the pedestrian street but not restrict these uses from being located behind and/or above allowed uses located at street level. This restriction applies to uses such as dwellings, commercial parking facilities, self-storage, and utilities

MINIMUM DENSITY 1. Clarify the Minimum Density exemption provision so that it clearly exempts both mixed-use projects

and fully-commercial projects from the minimum density standards

AREA-WIDE REZONES Tacoma Central Plaza/Allenmore 1. Modify the proposed rezone for the parcel at 2702 South Union so that it aligns with the parcel

boundary. Whereas the original proposal would’ve split the property into two zones, with the eastern majority of the property zoned CCX and a small portion along the eastern edge zoned RCX, the revised recommendation is to rezone the entire parcel to CCX.

34th & Pacific 2. Modify the proposed zoning for the property at 3425/3427 Pacific Avenue so that the zoning does not

split the existing duplex building and flat development site. The CCX zoning should be extended approximately 70 feet east, putting the eastern edge at the top of the slope, where it was originally intended to be.

Lower Portland Avenue 3. Modify the original proposal to exclude rezoning the area east of Portland Avenue that is currently

zoned CCX. This is an area that was originally proposed to be rezoned to RCX.

McKinley 4. Modify the original proposal with respect to the zoning for the northernmost portion of the center.

Rezone the northern portion of the center, generally north of the alley between E Wright Ave. and E 34th St, to URX. This is an area that was originally proposed to be rezoned to RCX.

MLK 5. Modify the original proposal with respect to the zoning in the area of South 7th and Yakima. Rezone

the area between I Street and Yakima Avenue, and between 6th Avenue and the NCX zoning along South 8th Street, to URX. This is an area that was originally proposed to be rezoned to NRX.

MUC – Summary of Preliminary Direction May 13, 2009 Page 5 of 6

Page 144: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MUC – Summary of Preliminary Direction May 13, 2009 Page 6 of 6

6. Modify the original proposal for the zoning around the northern edge of the St. Joseph’s Medical Center so that it incorporates all of their existing campus, which was the original intent. Rezone the block between South 15th and 16th Streets and between South I and J Streets to HMX. This block is currently owned by Franciscan Health System, is part of the existing hospital campus, contains an existing hospital parking lot and was originally and inadvertently proposed to be rezoned to RCX.

7. Modify the proposed zoning between South 10th and Earnest Brazil Streets to extend the NCX zoning from the existing core area down 1½-blocks to the eastern edge of the Center. This is an area that was originally proposed to be rezoned to RCX.

56th & South Tacoma Way 8. Modify the original proposal with respect to the zoning in the area east of South Tacoma Way that is

currently zoned R-4. Instead of rezoning the area to RCX, as was originally proposed, leave the area zoned R-4 and consider removing this area from the Mixed-Use Center as part of the next round of amendments.

Page 145: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

MIXED-USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT

SUMMARY OF COMMUNITY INPUT Planning Commission Meeting – May 20, 2009

REVISED May 15, 2009

Stadium Business District Association--April 9, 2009

Concern about reducing the base height of 75 ft to 65 ft in NCX zoned area

Concern about the rezone of R-5 areas to RCX which would reduce the maximum height from the current 150 ft to 60 ft. This change would take away the development potential in the center.

Believe that promises were made by the Planning Commission not to change the Stadium district

zoning. (The Commission recommended not to lower the High Intensity designation to Medium Intensity that was proposed as a part of the annual amendments in 2007 due to testimony from the Stadium Business District that the intensity change would affect future redevelopment potential.)

West End Neighborhood Council--April 15, 2009

Sought clarification that the bonus features need to be complied with in full even if only a portion of the development project would exceed the base height.

Upper Tacoma Business District Association--April 16, 2009

Support the following changes as preliminarily recommended by the Commission: o NCX extension along the 11th Street corridor o RCX2 height bonus provision and area o revision from NRX to URX along Yakima

Support the retention of the 65 ft base height for the NCX zoned areas

ENACT--April 20, 2009

URX area proposed for the north end of the McKinley center should retain existing height of 35 ft

The City should require parking in the core area otherwise developers will not provide any parking

Support the change that the residential transition provision will prevail over height bonus area as preliminarily recommended by the Commission

Asked if any development project in the McKinley center was waiting for the changes to go into

effect

Open space contribution should be used in the mixed-use center where the proposed development project is located and not used elsewhere in the city.

North End Neighborhood Council--May 4, 2009

The maximum height should remain at 45 ft. in the Proctor mixed-use center. This mixed-use center is unique because of its relatively small size and that the entire center is surrounded by single-family homes.

Page 146: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Increased height will benefit the property owners within the center to the detriment of those outside the center who can not take advantage of greater economic opportunity for their homes.

If greater heights are allowed, the height bonus area should be revised to pull back from the edges of

the Proctor center. The residential transition as proposed is not adequate to mitigate tall buildings next to single-family

homes in the Proctor center. Concerned about the elimination of the parking requirement without a plan in place to manage

spillover parking in the neighborhoods. Already have a parking problem in the Proctor district which could get worse if new buildings do not provide parking or less parking than needed.

The proposed allowance for a corner feature as a gateway element is too tall for the Proctor center.

The proposed RCX height of 60 ft at the edges of the center does not make sense. It is higher than

the base height of 45 ft in the NCX commercial area. The area proposed to be rezoned to RCX in the Proctor center abuts the neighborhood.

Cross District Association--May 5, 2009

The height bonus palette items provide greater value to green roofs than providing retail and restaurants which is what will bring the business districts needed vitality.

Retail and restaurants should be a requirement for ground floor use on the main street.

There should be greater heights achieved for those items that contribute to the health of the business

district rather than those items that are of a community benefit. Structured parking should be valued more on the palette. Would add more to the district than a piece

of art. The City needs a citizen based design review that has authority over what gets built to make sure

new developments fit in with the character of the business district. New buildings are meeting the code but are still ugly. Better standards are needed.

Open space contribution needs to be used to develop open space within the business district where

the project is located. If site is not available, consult with the business district association for alternative sites.

CPTED should be required for all development.

Central Neighborhood Council--May 7, 2009

Concerned about removing parking requirements. 6th Avenue Mixed-Use Center already experiencing parking spill over in adjacent neighborhood.

Question valuing structured parking at 20 ft on the bonus palette in areas where we are trying to

encourage transit.

The City should impose some mechanism to retain affordable housing units built using the height incentive to prevent their conversion to market rate housing and displacing residents.

Page 147: Agenda Item GB-2 City of Tacomacms.cityoftacoma.org/Planning/MUC/PC_Review...SM:ds DRAFT. MIXED -USE CENTERS UPDATE PROJECT TACOMA PLANNING COMMISSION DRAFT FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

Concern expressed about how the items on the bonus palette will be administered and enforced in the long term

The open space contribution needs to be used in the center where it is collected and not used

elsewhere in the city.

New Tacoma Neighborhood Council--May 13, 2009

Question incenting structured parking in an area where we are removing the parking requirement and generally trying to promote other transportation modes. Perhaps we should be providing an incentive for projects that provide no parking.

Question why TDRs are only available in the MLK, Stadium and 56th & South Tacoma Way

Centers. TDRs appear to be the best program/idea to achieve what Tacoma is trying to achieve and to preserve farms in the area so we can continue to have local food production.

Questioned whether the proposal to reduce/eliminate parking is tied to proposed increases in

alternative transportation, such as busses and streetcars. Portland’s public transportation system is so good that people living downtown really don’t need to own a car.

Concerned about the unfairness of having a base height in the MLK NCX district of 45 feet and a

base height in the adjacent RCX district of 60 feet. Why do we make the project on MLK Jr. Way provide bonuses to get to 65 feet while the adjacent project in the RCX can get to 60 feet without providing any bonuses?

Concerned about the hospitals expanding into the neighborhoods and their being no good buffering,

particularly for tall buildings (considering the 150-foot height limit) and parking lots with their ugly security fencing. The hospitals should be building parking garages instead of spreading surface parking lots further and further into adjacent neighborhoods.

South Tacoma Business District Association--May 14, 2009

Support the height changes as preliminarily recommended by the Commission and study of residential area in 2010

Some concern about increasing height limit on the east side of South Tacoma Way

Raising the height to 180 ft in the CIX zoning district sends a message to potential investors that

South Tacoma welcomes growth South Tacoma needs higher density and allowing high-rise development in an area that does not

abut single-family residences recognizes the unique circumstances found in the South Tacoma center

Extend the mixed-use center and NCX zoning to South 60th Street, the gateway to the commuter

rail station