agenda - aqmd.gov
TRANSCRIPT
SCIENTIFIC, TECHNICAL & MODELING PEER REVIEW (STMPR) ADVISORY GROUP
Thursday, November 4, 2021 ■ 2:30 pm
Pursuant to Assembly Bill 361, the STMPR Advisory Group meeting will only be conducted via video conferencing and by telephone. Please follow the instructions below to join the meeting remotely.
ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION INFORMATION (Instructions provided at bottom of the agenda)
Join Zoom Meeting - from PC, Laptop or Phone https://scaqmd.zoom.us/j/92837087356
Meeting ID: 928-3708-7356 (applies to all) Teleconference Dial In +1 669 900 6833
Audience will be allowed to provide public comments through telephone or Zoom connection.
In addition, a webcast is available for viewing and listening at: https://aqmd.gov/home/news-events/webcast
AGENDA Members of the public may address this body concerning any agenda item before or during consideration of that item (Gov’t. Code Section 54854.3(a)). Please notify South Coast AQMD staff of your desire to speak. All agendas for regular meetings are posted at South Coast AQMD Headquarters, 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, California, at least 72 hours in advance of the regular meeting. Speakers may be limited to three (3) minutes each.
1. Welcome and Introduction Ian MacMillan Assistant Deputy Executive Officer
2. Spatial and Temporal Allocation of Emissions from On-Road Mobile,Ocean Going Vessels and AircraftStaff will present allocation factors to distribute emissions from on-road mobile,ocean going vessels and aircraft in spatial and temporal domains.
Eric Praske, Ph.D. Air Quality Specialist
3. Ozone Isopleths and Preliminary Carrying Capacity EstimatesStaff will present ozone isopleths and preliminary carrying capacity estimated forattainment of the 2015 70ppb ozone NAAQS.
Sang-Mi Lee, Ph.D. Program Supervisor
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 1 November 4, 2021
4. South Coast AQMD Socioeconomic Impact Assessments and Scope of2022 AQMP Socioeconomic ReportStaff will present the history and background of South Coast AQMD’s SocioeconomicImpact Assessments, the proposed scope and content of the 2022 AQMPSocioeconomic Report, and the anticipated timeline for AQMP development.
Ryan Finseth, Ph.D. Air Quality Specialist Paul Stroik, Ph.D. Air Quality Specialist Shah Dabirian, Ph.D. Program Supervisor
5. Other BusinessAny member of the Advisory Group, or its alternate, on his or her own initiative or inresponse to questions posed by the public, may ask a question for clarification, maymake a brief announcement or report on his or her own activities, provide a referenceto staff regarding factual information, request staff to report back at a subsequentmeeting concerning any matter, or may take action to direct staff to place a matter ofbusiness on a future agenda (Govt. Code Section 54954.2).
Advisory Group Members
6. Public CommentMembers of the public may address the Advisory Group concerning any agenda itembefore or during consideration of that item (Govt. Code Section 54954.3). All agendasfor regular meetings are posted at South Coast AQMD Headquarters, 21865 CopleyDrive, Diamond Bar, California, at least 72 hours in advance of a regular meeting.At the end of the regular meeting agenda, an opportunity is also provided for thepublic to speak on any subject within the Advisory Group’s authority. Speakers maybe limited to three (3) minutes each.
Members of the Public
7. Next Meeting –First Quarter 2022
Document Availability All documents (i) constituting non-exempt public records, (ii) relating to an item on an agenda for a regular meeting, and (iii) having been distributed to at least a majority of the Advisory Group after the agenda is posted, are available at SouthCoast AQMD’s AQMP webpage: http://www.aqmd.gov/home/air-quality/clean-air-plans/air-quality-mgt-plan
Americans with Disabilities Act and Language Accessibility Disability and language-related accommodations can be requested to allow participation in the Advisory Group meeting. The agenda will be made available, upon request, in appropriate alternative formats to assist persons with a disability (Gov’t Code Section 54954.2(a)). In addition, other documents may be requested in alternative formats and languages. Any disability or language-related accommodation must be requested as soon as practicable. Requests will be accommodated unless providing the accommodation would result in a fundamental alteration or undue burden to the District. Please contact Zorik Pirveysian, Planning and Rules Manager, at (909) 396-2431 from 7:00 a.m. to 5:30 p.m., Tuesday through Friday, or send the request to [email protected].
South Coast Air Quality Management District ● 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765-4182 ● www.aqmd.gov
INSTRUCTIONS FOR ELECTRONIC PARTICIPATION
The public may provide comments during the meeting following the directions below. Once you raise your hand to provide a comment, you will be added to the speaker list and your name will be called when it is your turn to comment. The host will then unmute your line. Directions for Video ZOOM on a DESKTOP/LAPTOP or a SMARTPHONE:
• If you would like to make a comment, please click on the “Participants” button on the bottom of the screen.• On a DESKTOP/LAPTOP: A list of participants will appear on the right side of the screen. At the bottom of the list,
please click on the grey “Raise Hand” button.• On a SMARTPHONE: A new screen will pop up with the list of participants. Look for the “Raise Hand” button on
the screen and click the button.• This will signal to the host that you would like to provide a comment and you will be added to the list.
Directions for TELEPHONE line only:
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 2 November 4, 2021
• If you would like to make a comment, please dial *9 on your keypad to signal that you would like to comment.
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 3 November 4, 2021
Spatial and Temporal Allocation of Emissions from On-Road Mobile, Ocean Going Vessels
and Aircraft
STMPR meeting on Nov. 4, 2021
Eric Praske, Ph.D. Air Quality Specialist
South Coast Air Quality Management District
Item #2
Item 2
Spatial Surrogates to Allocate Emissions
2
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 4 November 4, 2021
Improvements using Satellite and Sensor Data
• Heavy and light duty vehicles– California Department of Transportation (Caltrans)
Performance Measurement System (PeMS)• Ocean-Going Vessels (OGV)
– Automated Identification System (AIS) as provided byMarine Cadastre
• Aircraft– Aircraft Communication Addressing and Reporting System
(ACARS) as provided by NOAA MADIS
3
All data were processed for 2018
On-Road Emissions Allocation for the 2022 AQMP• Based on hourly sensor data• Light and Medium duty vehicles
– Same method used in MATES V– California Department of Transportation
Performance Measurement System(Caltrans PeMS)
– > 9000 single loop detectors in SCAB• Heavy duty vehicles
– New to the 2022 AQMP– 2016 AQMP approach used Weight in Motion
(WIM) sensors• Data was too sparse to use in modeling in 2018 due to
offline sensors• Only about 20 sensors across the Basin
– As an alternative to WIM, HD flows can be estimatedusing single loop detectors
• Although specificity is lower, coverage is much greater• Kwon et al. algorithm has been validated and is
implemented on PeMS1
41 Kwon et al. Transportation Research Record. 2003; https://doi.org/10.3141/1856-11
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 5 November 4, 2021
Caltrans PeMS for Light Duty Vehicles
• Light duty flows follow rush hour pattern during the week,smoother pattern with mid-afternoon peak on weekends
5
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Norm
alize
d Fl
ow
Hour
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24No
rmal
ized
Flow
Hour
Monday Sunday
Caltrans PeMS for Heavy Duty Vehicles
• Reduced flow on weekends and holidays• Flows do not follow rush hour pattern observed in light duty
6
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
1.6
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Norm
alize
d Fl
ow
Hour
Monday Sunday
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 6 November 4, 2021
Ocean Going Vessel Positioning Data
• New approach developed for 2022 AQMP• AIS transponders communicate speed, position, and operational
mode for maritime safety• Data from Marine Cadastre is downloaded, processed, and
allocated to the modeling domain
7
Vessel Types Operational ModesCargo (all types)MilitaryPassengerTanker
TransitAnchorageManeuveringHotelling
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
log
10 N
Ox
(ton/
hr)
Spatial Allocation of Ocean Going Vessel Emissions
• Emissions highest along major shipping channels, but AIS dataalso resolves emissions from less traveled routes
8
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
NO
x (to
ns/h
r)
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 7 November 4, 2021
Aircraft Emissions
• New approach developed for 2022 AQMP• Aviation Environmental Design Tool (AEDT) is Federal Aviation
Administration’s official model to estimate aircraft emissions• AEDT segregates emissions into 4 vertical layers:
– Ground level: Auxiliary Power Unit + Climb/Descend emissions– Below 1,000 feet– Below Mixing Height– Below 10,000 feet
• ACARS data contain coordinates/altitude and are used as spatialsurrogate
9
-118.6 -118.5 -118.4 -118.3 -118.2 -118.1Longitude (°)
33.7
33.75
33.8
33.85
33.9
33.95
34
34.05
34.1
34.15
Latit
ude
(°)
Aircraft Communication Addressing and Reporting System (ACARS)
• Raw ACARS pings at LAX with cutoff applied at mixed layerheight (~550 m)
10
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 8 November 4, 2021
3-Dimensional Aircraft Emission Allocation Factors
• ACARS spatial surrogates at LAX by vertical layer– Sum of ACARS pings within each grid cell are normalized to the sum
of all pings within the layer
11
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
Nor
mal
ized
Cou
nts
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
Nor
mal
ized
Cou
nts
0.05
0.1
0.15
0.2
0.25
Nor
mal
ized
Cou
nts
Layer 1 Layer 5 Layer 10
Aircraft Emissions for Smaller Airports
• CARB’s Gridded Aircraft Trajectory Emissions (GATE) is used toallocate emissions at small GA airports– Computes 3D trajectory of aircraft during landing and takeoff– Computes intersection with modeling grid
12
Intersection of LAX flight trajectories with a modeling gridSource: https://github.com/mmb-carb/GATE_Documentation/blob/master/docs/SCIENCE_GUIDE.md
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 9 November 4, 2021
CMAQ-ready Aircraft Emissions
13
• Subtract AEDTemissions from input
• Run GATE for SCdomain
GATE
• Aggregate all ACARSpings by ORIG/DESTairport
• Normalize by verticallayer
ACARS • Apply ACARS spatial,GATE temporalallocation
• Add AEDT emissionsto GATE output
Final
0 50 100 150Norm. Emissions (arb. units)
0
500
1000
1500
2000
Gro
und
Altid
ue (m
)
ACARS/GATEPoint/Inline
Vertical Allocation of Aircraft Emissions
• Below, emissions within each layer normalized to layer thickness (thickerlayers aloft)
• Original method (point/inline) does not have any ground level emissions– Highest single-layer emission rate at ground level, consistent with AEDT
14
Los Angeles International Airport
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 10 November 4, 2021
Summary and Conclusion
• Improved spatial and temporal accuracy of emissions inventory withsensor and transponder-based data
• Perturbation to mean top 10 days MDA8 O3 was highest for aircraft– Primarily due to much greater emissions in layer 1 compared to default
• Change in ozone reflects sensitivity toward each change compared to the2016 AQMP methods
15-1.00
-0.50
0.00
0.50
1.00
Light/heavy duty OGV Aircraft
Top
10 d
ays m
ean
MDA
8 O3
(p
pb)
Ozone Isopleths and Preliminary Carrying Capacity Estimates
Item #3
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review (STMPR)Advisory Group Meeting
November 4, 2021
1
Item 3
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 11 November 4, 2021
WRF-CMAQ-SMOKE Modeling System
Weather Research and Forecast (WRF) v4.0.3– North American Region Re-analysis with The Group for High Resolution Sea Surface Temperature
(GHRSST) updates– Yonsei University (YSU) boundary layer and Unified Noah Land Surface Model schemes– Nested modeling with three domains - 36, 12 and 4 km grid spacing
Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) v5.2.1– Chemical mechanism: State Air Pollution Research Center (SAPRC) SAPRC07tc– Aerosol mechanism: “aero6”– Point sources using inline modeling– Two nested domains 12 km and 4 km
Sparse-Matrix Operational Kernel Emissions (SMOKE) v4.8 used to generate gridded emissions ofanthropogenic emissions (except for on-road sources and aircraft)
2
WRF-CMAQ-SMOKE Modeling System (Cont’d)
EMFAC2017 with travel activity data fromthe SCAG’s 2020 Regional TransportationPlanOzone Simulation– 2018 May 1 to September 30, 2018
PM2.5 simulation– 2018 January 1 to December 31, 2018
3
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 12 November 4, 2021
Development of Ozone Isopleths
CMAQ nested domains– 12 km including the entire California and portions of neighboring states and northern Mexico– 4km is the AQMP analysis domain
Basin total anthropogenic VOC and NOx emissions used as x and y axis, respectivelySimulations were conducted with NOx and VOC emissions in 50 tons per day (tpd) increments withMatLab spatial interpolation function– Emission reductions were assumed to occur equally in the entire modeling domain
Preliminary basin total summer planning emissionsYear VOC (tpd) NOx (tpd)2018 417 3472037 389 220
Ozone Isopleths – Inland San Bernardino
Crestline San Bernardino
• Upper right corner represents 2018 condition• Blue dot represents 2037 business-as-usual (BAU)
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 13 November 4, 2021
Ozone Isopleths – Western Basin
Pasadena Central Los Angeles
Ozone Isopleths – Foothill Area
Glendora Azusa
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 14 November 4, 2021
Ozone Isopleths – Coachella Valley
Palm Springs Indio
2022 Air Quality Management Plan
2022 AQMP focuses on attaining the 70 ppb 8-hour ozone National
Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS)
– South Coast Air Basin’s (SCAB) attainment due – 2037
– Coachella Valley’s attainment due – 2032
Preliminary baseline NOx emissions in SCAB in 2037 are 224 tpd
Preliminary NOx carrying capacity* in SCAB in 2037 is 60 – 70 tpd
*Carrying capacity is the maximum allowable emissions to attain NAAQS
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 15 November 4, 2021
Factors Influencing Carrying Capacity
• Transport from the central valley and Mexico
Lateral boundary values
• Kern, Ventura, Santa Barbara and San Diego
Controls in adjacent air basins
• Final attainment scenario relies on control factors developed forindividual source category
Category specific vs. across-the-board reductions
95 10090 96
77 7987 88 94
84 8798
80 77 7179 74 72 77 73 75 75 71 7674 70 65 72 70 68 71 69 68 65 64 69
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Azusa Crestline Fontana Glendora Indio Palm Springs Pasadena Pomona Redlands Reseda Rubidoux SanBernardino
ppbV
2037 RRF adjusted Design Value
2037 baseline 70% reductions from the baseline 70% reductions with cleaner boundary
Lateral Boundary Values
With approximately 70% reductions beyond the baseline condition, the 2037 DesignValue (DV) is reduced by 17 ppb at Glendora– If all of CA, neighboring states and Mexico reduced emissions by 70% beyond future baseline
conditions, the 2037 DV will be reduced by up to another 7 ppb
*RRF is Relative Response Factor defined as the ratio of model predictions for future to base year
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 16 November 4, 2021
Controls in Adjacent Air Basins
The same level of controls in adjacent air basins can lower the DV by up to 5 ppb
9298
8896
77 7985 83
93
84 87
97
68 6763
70 70 66 6560
66 65 6570
63 6358
65 6358 60
5662
58 6065
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
Azusa Crestline Fontana Glendora Indio Palm Springs Pasadena Pomona Redlands Reseda Rubidoux San Bernardino
2037 RRF adjusted Design Vaule
2037 baseline 70% NOx reductions for SCAB 70% reductions for the entire modeling domain
* Emissions inventory and lateral boundary values used in the simulations shown in the previous and this slides are different
Summary and Preliminary Carrying Capacity
Transport from neighboring air basins/states/countries significantlyaffects attaining the NAAQS in South CoastOzone responds to emission reductions differently, depending onthe source of emissions– Final attainment scenario relies on control profiles specified for individual
source categoryGlendora and San Bernardino are expected to have the highestozone level in the future attainment yearPreliminary carrying capacity is expected to be in the range of 60-70 tons of NOx
13
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 17 November 4, 2021
11
Socioeconomic Analysis UnitRyan Finseth, Ph.D.Paul Stroik, Ph.D.
Brian VlasichShah Dabirian, Ph.D.
South Coast Air Quality Management District2022 Air Quality Management Plan
Science, Technical, and Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group Socioeconomic Analysis Meeting #1
November 4, 2021
South Coast AQMD Socioeconomic Impact Assessment and Scope of 2022 AQMP Socioeconomic Report
Item 4
2
South Coast AQMD Socioeconomic Team
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 18 November 4, 2021
3
Air Quality Management PlanAQMP: Plan to attain NationalAmbient Air Quality Standards
Ozone: Extreme nonattainment for1997, 2008, and 2015 8-hour ozonestandards, and 1979 1-hour ozonestandard*PM2.5: Serious nonattainment for2006 24-hour and 2012 annualPM2.5 standards (2020 dataindicates South Coast Air Basin met24-hour standard – redesignationrequest pending)
2022 AQMP: Focuses on attaining2015 8-hour ozone standard by 2037
AQMP Socioeconomic Report quantifies:Incremental costs and/or savings of AQMPcontrol measuresRegional benefits from air-qualityimprovements (reduced ozone and PM2.5)Regional macroeconomic impacts (e.g.jobs) from associated costs and benefits
* 1979 1-hour ozone standard has been revoked.
4
Socioeconomic Analysis Evolution (1/3)
MIT AuditMIT Audit
Range of Control Cost
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 19 November 4, 2021
5
Socioeconomic Analysis Evolution (2/3)
Abt Audit
6
Socioeconomic Analysis Evolution (3/3)
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 20 November 4, 2021
7
AQMP Socioeconomic Analysis
Environmental justice of health risk distribution
Incremental costs of
pollution control measures
Public health & welfare benefits of
clean air
Jobs and other macroeconomic impacts of AQMP
implementation
Emission reduction for
NAAQS attainment
Cost-effectiveness of each control
measure
8
AQMP Socioeconomic Report Chapters
Executive SummaryChapter 1: IntroductionChapter 2: Control Measures Compliance CostChapter 3: Public Health and Other BenefitsChapter 4: Jobs and Other Macroeconomics ImpactsChapter 5: Sub-Regional Distribution of ImpactsChapter 6: Environmental JusticeChapter 7: CEQA Alternatives
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 21 November 4, 2021
9
Ch. 1: IntroductionHistorical regional air quality and economyAir quality attainment challengesHealth effects of air pollutionEconomic outlook of potentially affected industries
Covid-19 impacts Baseline of 2022 AQMP socioeconomic analysisEvolution of South Coast AQMD socioeconomic analysis
2016 AQMP Socioeconomic Report charts
-
10
Ch. 2: Control Measures Compliance CostCompliance costs:
Compiled by South Coast AQMD staffCapital, operating and maintenance, and administrative costs/savings through timeIncremental (i.e., relative to the baseline costs)Expressed in present value and constant dollars
Estimated costs by:Control measureSource and jurisdiction
South Coast AQMD stationary/mobile sources, and CARB mobile sourcesAffected industry sectorsSmall businesses (if data available)
Cost effectiveness by control measure (using both discounted and levelized cash flow analysis)
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 22 November 4, 2021
11
Ch. 3: Public Health and Other Benefits
Main tool: U.S. EPA’s Environmental Benefits Mapping and Analysis Program – Community Edition (BenMAP-CE)
In-house estimates of pollutant concentration changesConcentration-response functions and health benefit valuation review to be updated if applicable
Qualitative discussion of visibility, material, and agriculture benefits
Due to uncertain confidence in underlying modeling and/or outdated literature
12
Ch. 4 & 5: Macroeconomics ImpactsMain tool: REMI Policy Insight Plus model
Aggregate and sub-regional macroeconomic impactsSEI module allows for impacts by gender and race
Job impacts from incremental compliance costs and public health benefits
Increased cost of doing businessIncreased demand for low-to-zero emission technologies and pollution control equipmentReduced healthcare spending and increased worker productivity Increased regional labor pool due to better amenity of clean air
Job impact and sectoral distributionCompetitiveness impacts by industry sector
Cost of production (for those who cannot pass through costs)Delivery prices (for those who can pass through costs)
2016 AQMP Socioeconomic Report charts
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 23 November 4, 2021
13
Ch. 6: Environmental Justice Analysis
Environmental justice community screening and designationTo be based off CalEnviroScreen 4.0
Each community is a census tract2016 AQMP SIA explored several variations of CalEnviroScreen:
All included poverty status, toxic cancer risk, and PM2.5 and ozone airquality indicatorsVariations included demographic (e.g. age, education, unemployment, etc.) and non-air related environmental indicators (e.g. drinking water, pesticides, toxic releases, etc.)
Distributional analysisQuantified health benefits and valuation: EJ and non-EJ areas2016 AQMP SIA also included distributional analysis using inequality indices
Inter- and intra-area changes in health risk inequalityConcerns about accessibility to the publicSeek STMPR input whether to retain for 2022 AQMP
Environmental justice discussion and analysis will also be explicitly folded into every
chapter of the AQMP document
14
Ch. 7: CEQA Alternatives
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires analysis of range of alternatives to AQMP sufficient to permit a reasoned choice among proposed and alternative approachesDescriptions of each alternative
List of control measures included in eachCompliance costs/savings and job impacts by alternative
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 24 November 4, 2021
15
Preliminary AQMP and Socioeconomic Impact Assessment Timeline
March, 2022Release Preliminary Draft Socioeconomic Report
January, 2022Release Draft AQMP
April, 2022Release Revised Draft AQMP
May, 2022Release Draft Socioeconomic Report 60-day
July, 2022Release Final Socioeconomic Report 30-day
June, 2022Release Draft Final AQMP
November, 2021Draft AQMP Control Measures
August, 2022Board Hearing
Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug
16
Contact Us
Socioeconomics Unit
• Ryan Finseth, Ph.D., Air Quality Specialist [email protected] 909.396.3575
• Paul Stroik, Ph.D., Air Quality Specialist [email protected] 909.396.2851
• Brian Vlasich, Air Quality [email protected] 909.396.2176
• Shah Dabirian, Ph.D., Program Supervisor [email protected] 909.396.3076
• Elaine Shen, Ph.D., Acting Manager [email protected] 909.396.2715
General AQMP Inquiries
• Kalam Cheung, Ph.D., Program Supervisor [email protected] 909.396.3281
• Ian MacMillan, Assistant Deputy Executive Officer, Planning & Rule Development [email protected] 909.396.3244
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 25 November 4, 2021
17
How to Raise Your Hand to Speak
ZOOM: Click on the “Raise Hand” button at the bottom of your screen.
TELECONFERENCE: Dial *9 to “raise your hand”
Your name will be called when it is your turn to speak and the meeting host will unmute your line.
17
Scientific, Technical & Modeling Peer Review Advisory Group 26 November 4, 2021