agenda and papers f ormal meeting of the kent community … · 2019-01-25 · steve howe,...
TRANSCRIPT
Agenda and Papers
for the
Formal meeting of the
Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Board
In Public
to be held at 10am on
Thursday 31 January 2019
in
Oak Room Oakwood House Oakwood Park
Maidstone ME16 8AE
Meeting of the Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Board
to be held at 10am on Thursday 31 January 2019 in the Oak Room, Oakwood House, Oakwood Park,
Maidstone ME16 8AE
This meeting will be held in Public
AGENDA
1. STANDARD ITEMS
1.1
Introduction by Chair
Trust Chair
1.2 To receive any Apologies for Absence
Trust Chair
1.3 To receive any Declarations of Interest
Trust Chair
1.4 To agree the Minutes of the Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Board meeting held on 29 November 2018
Trust Chair
1.5 To receive Matters Arising from the Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Board meeting held on 29 November 2018
Trust Chair
1.6 To receive the Trust Chair’s Report
Trust Chair
Verbal
1.7 To receive the Chief Executive’s Report
• Care Quality Commission
Chief Executive
2. BOARD ASSURANCE/APPROVAL
2.1
To receive the Patient Story Chief Nurse (Interim)
2.2
To receive the Board Assurance Framework
Corporate Services Director
Age
nda
Page 1 of 144
Board Committee Reports
2.3
To receive the Quality Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Chair of Quality Committee
2.4
To receive the Strategic Workforce Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Chair of Strategic Workforce Committee
2.5
To receive the Audit and Risk Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Chair of Audit and Risk Committee
2.6 To receive the Charitable Funds Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Deputy Chair of Charitable Funds Committee
2.7 To receive the Integrated Performance Report
• Assurance on Strategic Goals
• Quality
• Workforce
• Finance
• Operational
Director of Finance
Chief Nurse (Interim)
Director of Workforce, Organisational Development and Communications
Director of Finance
Chief Operating Officer/ Deputy Chief Executive
2.8 To receive the Trust Preparedness for Brexit Report
Corporate Services Director
2.9 To receive the Winter Pressures Update Report
Chief Operating Officer/Deputy Chief Executive
3. STRATEGY AND PLANNING
3.1
To receive the NHS Long Term Plan and Impact for Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Report
Director of Strategy
4. REPORTS TO THE BOARD
4.1
To receive the Learning From Deaths Report
Medical Director
Page 2 of 144
4.2 To receive the Freedom To Speak Up Report
Corporate Services Director
4.3 To receive the Community Hospitals Safer Staffing Review
Chief Nurse (Interim)
4.4 To receive the Minutes of the Charitable Funds Committee meeting of 25 July 2018
Deputy Chair of Charitable Funds Committee
5. ANY OTHER BUSINESS
To consider any other items of business previously notified to the Trust Chair
Trust Chair
6. QUESTIONS FROM MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC RELATING TO THE AGENDA
7. DATE AND VENUE OF NEXT MEETING
Thursday 28 March 2019
Rooms 6 and 7, Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Offices, Trinity House, 110 – 120 Upper Pemberton, Kennington, Ashford, Kent TN25 4AZ
Age
nda
Page 3 of 144
Unconfirmed Minutes
of the Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Board meeting held at 10am on Thursday 29 November 2018
in Rooms 6 and 7, Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Offices, Trinity House, 110 – 120 Upper Pemberton, Eureka Park, Kennington, Ashford,
Kent TN25 4AZ
Meeting held in Public
Present: John Goulston, Trust Chair (Chair) Pippa Barber, Non-Executive Director Paul Bentley, Chief Executive Peter Conway, Non-Executive Director Martin Cook, Non-Executive Director Designate Professor Francis Drobniewski, Non-Executive Director Designate Richard Field, Non-Executive Director Gordon Flack, Director of Finance Steve Howe, Non-Executive Director Louise Norris, Director of Workforce, Organisational
Development and Communications Dr Sarah Phillips, Medical Director Dr Mercia Spare, Interim Chief Nurse Bridget Skelton, Non-Executive Director Gerard Sammon, Director of Strategy Lesley Strong, Deputy Chief Executive/Chief Operating Officer Jen Tippin, Non-Executive Director Nigel Turner, Non-Executive Director In Attendance: Gina Baines, Committee Secretary (minute-taker) Natalie Davies, Corporate Services Director
29/11/1 Introduction by Chair
Mr Goulston welcomed everyone present to the Public Board meeting of Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust (the Trust). Mr Goulston advised that this was a formal meeting of the Board held in public, rather than a public meeting, and as such there would be an opportunity for public questions relating to the agenda at the end of the meeting.
29/11/2 Apologies for Absence
There were no apologies
Min
utes
Page 4 of 144
Page 2 of 7
The meeting was quorate.
29/11/3 Declarations of Interest
No conflicts of interest were declared other than those formerly recorded.
29/11/4 Minutes of the Meeting of 27 September 2018
The Board AGREED the minutes.
29/11/5 Matters Arising from the Meeting of 27 September 2018
The actions were confirmed and closed. The Board RECEIVED the Matters Arising.
29/11/6 Chair’s Report Mr Goulston presented the verbal report to the Board for information.
Mr Goulston had met with various stakeholders since becoming Trust Chair on 1 November 2018. These included the members of the Board, the Council of Governors, the chairs of the other NHS providers in Kent and also Glenn Douglas the Chief Executive of the Kent and Medway Sustainability and Transformation Partnership (STP) and Accountable Officer for the Kent and Medway CCGs. Mr Goulston had also visited Birmingham Community Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust as part of his induction to see how the Board and Council of Governors in a similar organisation worked. Mr Goulston and Mr Bentley had attended an NHS Provider community services network meeting where support had been expressed for further investment in the frailty pathway within community services. It had been agreed that NHS Providers would take this forward. The concept of moving from age-related to risk-based services for older people had also been discussed. Mr Goulston was undertaking a number of visits to services within the Trust. He had visited Sevenoaks Hospital the previous week. The following day he would be visiting the One You Shop in Ashford. Earlier in the month, he had visited the Medway Campus of Canterbury Christ Church University where he had been shown the healthcare campus simulation suite by Dr Susan Plummer, Campus Director and Appointed Governor (Universities) of the Trust’s Council of Governors. Mr Goulston had also participated in a meeting with the Chair of NHS Improvement (NHSI). He had been one of eight chairs of community trusts to attend the session which had been organised by NHS Providers. There had been a good discussion where a range of ideas had been well received.
Page 5 of 144
Page 3 of 7
The Board RECEIVED the Chair’s Report.
29/11/7 Chief Executive’s Report Mr Bentley presented the report to the Board.
Mr Bentley added that a number of Listening Events had taken place in east Kent over the last few weeks regarding the reconfiguration options for urgent care services in the area. The report on the events was yet to be received. Members of the Board had been present at the majority of the meetings. Kent and Medway Medical School had made the required, formal submission to the General Medical Council. The Trust wished to play a central role in the school in the future and the new Dean had indicated that he supported this. With regards to the Trust’s Staff Flu Vaccination Campaign, Prof Drobniewski underlined the importance of maximising the vaccination programme to protect patients, their families and staff. Mr Bentley confirmed that there was a comprehensive vaccination programme in place internally which was easily accessible to staff. In response to a question from Mr Field regarding whether the initiative to partner with UNICEF had been effective in increasing the take-up of the vaccination to date, Ms Strong indicated that it had been. In response to a question from Ms Barber regarding how the Trust might identify and measure the impact of the Time to Change initiative, Mr Bentley suggested metrics relating to the level of staff absence, productivity and how staff saw the organisation would be relevant. It was agreed that the Strategic Workforce Committee would receive this assurance on behalf of the Board. Action – Ms Norris Ms Skelton added that the Time to Change initiative had been discussed at the Strategic Workforce Committee the previous day. It too had considered the identification and measurement of the impact of the initiative. It had also considered what else the Trust might do to address mental health issues such as reducing stress and increasing how staff felt valued. It had been agreed that this was a critical initiative. Ms Norris indicated that the Time to Change champions would be involved in identifying how their contribution was measured and the Strategic Workforce Committee would receive further updates. The Board RECEIVED the Chief Executive’s Report.
29/11/08 Patient Story Dr Spare presented the video to the Board in relation to an error which had occurred in the Home Enteral Nutrition (HEN) Service.
Min
utes
Page 6 of 144
Page 4 of 7
Dr Spare confirmed that the Trust and HEN Service had worked collaboratively with the patient’s mother at every stage of the investigation and that the findings had been shared across the wider HEN network. There was a desire to reduce the number of non-value adding handoffs to improve safety and this would be addressed through the Trust’s Quality Improvement (QI) programme. In response to a question from Mr Conway as to why the Trust was involved in the pathway, Dr Spare explained that this had been a commissioning decision. In response to his comment regarding whether better use could be made of technology to reduce the chance of error in the future, it was agreed that this and the commissioning decision would be investigated further. Dr Phillips added that issues with the manufacturer’s website had been identified in the investigation and these had been fed back to the manufacturer. Action – Dr Spare In response to Mr Conway’s suggestion that staff should be encouraged and supported to challenge established routines, Dr Phillips commented that the QI programme would address this. It would provide an opportunity for a fresh approach towards learning from mistakes; allowing for a greater focus on human factors as well as exploring new ways of supporting the relevant staff during a Serious Incident (SI) investigation. In response to a question from Ms Tippin regarding whether the incident should have been classified earlier as an SI, Dr Phillips explained that the incident had initially been identified as a potential SI when the complaint was raised by the mother. All potential SIs were reviewed by the Trust and it was at that time that it was classified as a Serious Incident because of the potential national significance of the incident. Mr Howe added that he had participated in the conference call where the incident had been reviewed following its investigation. He confirmed that there had been a similar discussion to that of the Board on the call. Mr Sammon reflected that the video highlighted the importance of having patient groups involved in service redesign. The Board RECEIVED the Patient Story.
29/11/9 Quality Committee Chair’s Assurance Report Mr Howe presented the report to the Board for assurance.
Ms Barber added that she had visited Canterbury Long Term Services earlier in the month. She had met with the clinical leads and other members of staff in the team and seen how they managed their staffing issues. She could confirm that the escalation process was in place. Staff had also spoken to her about their QI projects. These were seeking to reduce the number of incidents that occurred and complaints received by the service.
Page 7 of 144
Page 5 of 7
Ms Barber also highlighted that the Quality Committee had received the six- monthly review of the Trust’s Quality Goals for 2018/19 at its meeting earlier in the month. The Trust was on target for all, bar two which related to staff turnover and care plans. The Strategic Workforce Committee was monitoring turnover and the Quality Committee would continue to scrutinise care plans. The Board RECEIVED the Quality Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
29/11/10 Strategic Workforce Committee Chair’s Assurance Report Ms Skelton presented the report to the Board for assurance.
The Strategic Workforce Committee had met the previous day. There had been a wide ranging discussion which included seeking assurance on the Staff Flu Vaccination Programme, the impact of the Time to Change initiative, the use of statistical process control methodology in workforce performance reporting, progress on the Nursing Academy, the devolved authority framework, the introduction of the Advanced Clinical Practitioner (ACP) role, scrutiny of the Integrated Performance Report Operational Report, the work by the Human Resources Team to align workforce initiatives with strategy and workforce priorities, reducing duplication, embedding safe staffing across all services and talent management. In response to a question from Mr Cook regarding what the Trust was doing to improve retention and reduce sickness absence, Ms Skelton reported that there were distinct issues in different parts of the organisation. The data that had been gathered from the Big Listen exercise earlier in the year had provided valuable pointers about what the Trust could do to reduce stress and turnover and improve retention. It had also provided good data regarding how people felt valued which had impacted positively on sickness rates. The Committee had agreed to focus on hotspots and learn from good practice rather than address generalities. In response to a question from Ms Tippin regarding whether the Trust would be implementing the guidelines on workforce engagement which have been published by the Financial Reporting Council (FRC) recently, Ms Norris explained that the NHS was committed to implementing best practice. Ms Skelton suggested that a gap analysis of the published guidelines would be helpful. Action – Ms Norris In response to a question from Ms Tippin regarding whether the Trust would be reporting its performance on Black and Asian Minority and Ethnic (BAME) pay as well as gender pay, Ms Norris indicated that the Trust’s Equality and Diversity Group would welcome the opportunity to carry out this further work on pay. Action – Ms Norris
Min
utes
Page 8 of 144
Page 6 of 7
In response to a question from Mr Bentley as to whether BAME staff were more likely to be disciplined than white members of staff in the Trust, Ms Norris confirmed that the Trust’s analysis of data from the last two years indicated that this was not the case. With regards to the Dental Service, the recent addition of the London teams had prompted a change in the ethnicity mix of the service. The report that had been received by the Strategic Workforce Committee indicated that there had been no change in the application of the Disciplinary Policy amongst BAME staff in that service. Mr Goulston provided an update on his action to review the role of the non-executive director in the Kent and Medway STP that had been proposed in the Committee Chair’s report in relation to the Well-Led Review. He confirmed that the STP was forming a governance group. Four equivalent non-executive directors from the local authority, the clinical commissioning groups (CCGs), an acute provider and a non-acute provider would be members of the group. With regards to membership by the non-acute provider, it had been agreed that Mr Andrew Ling, Chairman of Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust (KMPT) would attend for half the year followed by Mr Goulston for the second half of the year. The Board RECEIVED the Strategic Workforce Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
29/11/11 Audit and Risk Committee Chair’s Assurance Report Mr Conway presented the report to the Board for assurance.
It was confirmed that the November meeting of the Audit and Risk Committee (ARC) had been postponed until mid-December. The Board RECEIVED the Audit and Risk Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
29/11/12 Integrated Performance Report Mr Flack presented the report to the Board for assurance.
The report would continue to evolve over the coming months as it reflected a move away from a RAG rating of performance to a greater use of statistical process control techniques. This change would provide greater assurance and clarity to the Board around the data presented. Representatives from NHSI had attended the Management Committee meeting earlier that week and presented an informative session on reporting and interpreting performance data to support this change of approach. A number of non-executive directors had attended the session which had been welcomed. Quality Committee Dr Spare and Dr Phillips presented the report to the Board for assurance.
Page 9 of 144
Page 7 of 7
Dr Spare confirmed that with regards to staffing levels at the community hospitals in Deal, Tonbridge and Edenbridge she was confident that the right measures were in place to maintain them. She would work closely with Ms Strong to ensure that they were achieved. In response to a question from Mr Field regarding the current status of West View Integrated Care Centre, Ms Strong confirmed that this unit, registered with Kent County Council, (KCC) had been inspected by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) who had produced a report with recommendations for KCC. The delineation of health beds and social care beds had required further clarity and this had now been addressed. Discussions were continuing with the relevant CCG regarding contractual arrangements relating to beds and this was expected to be resolved in the next few weeks. Ms Strong confirmed that the Trust had informed the CCG that it would cease the provision of these beds in March 2019 unless a satisfactory resolution was reached. In response to a question from Mr Goulston regarding whether the downward trend in the response rates for patient experience in the minor injuries units and community hospitals was significant, and if so what actions were in place, Mr Flack confirmed that this had been reviewed. While both patient satisfaction and waiting times still benchmarked very favourably, the pressure in the system, and Accident and Emergencies particularly had correlated with a slight increase in waiting times. Mr Goulston suggested that a narrative which explained how the Trust was addressing this would be helpful. It was agreed that this would be addressed. Action - Mr Flack Workforce Report Ms Norris presented the report to the Board for assurance. The report had been scrutinised by the Strategic Workforce Committee the previous day. Ms Norris identified an error in the report with regards to the level of mandatory training compliance in Month Seven. This should read 85% and not 75%. This would be amended and republished. Action – Ms Norris Mr Cook stated that as the Trust pushed on with its changing approach to mental health support, a spike in sickness absence rates might be seen as staff became more open about this illness. In response to a question from Mr Cook regarding how the Trust was addressing the range of sickness absence reasons beyond the top five identified in the report, Ms Norris confirmed that deep dives were carried out locally covering all reasons for absence. The Strategic Workforce Committee would be carrying out its own deep dive at its meeting in January 2019 where it would address the various sickness absence themes
Min
utes
Page 10 of 144
Page 8 of 7
and scrutinise how the Trust was addressing them. Finance Report Mr Flack presented the report to the Board for assurance. The Finance, Business and Investment (FBI) Committee had received the report the previous day. It had been assured that the Cost Improvement Programme (CIP) scheme deficits were on track to deliver by the end of the financial year. Operational Report Ms Strong presented the report to the Board for assurance. With regards to the Health Visiting Six to Eight Week Checks Key Performance Indicator (KPI), the Quality Committee had received assurance that work was underway to improve performance and meet the target. With regards to Referral To Treatment (RTT) waiting times across all services, there would be a deep dive at the Quality Committee in January 2019 to understand what was happening within those services and the potential risk to patients. The Board would receive assurance through the Quality Committee Chairs Assurance report at its January 2019 Board meeting. In response to a question from Ms Barber as to why no further investment had been forthcoming from the CCGs to support the Trust’s management of the Orthopaedic Services waiting lists in east Kent, Ms Strong indicated that the CCGs were financially. The Trust continued to review its approach to ensure every possible improvement could be made. The Board RECEIVED the Integrated Performance Report.
29/11/13 Winter Plan Ms Strong presented the report to the Board for approval. The Strategic Workforce Committee had reviewed the workforce elements of the winter plan at its meeting the previous day. In response to a question from Ms Skelton regarding how the Trust’s community hospitals would respond to the issues that were highlighted in the daily conference calls that took place at the peak of winter activity, Ms Strong indicated that decisions would centre on the rapid transfer of patients and these would be addressed by the acute hospitals. Mr Sammon highlighted the use of the Single Health Resilience Early Warning Database (SHREWD) tool in providing up-to-date information to support the decision making by the Trust and its partners.
Page 11 of 144
Page 9 of 7
In response to a question from Mr Cook regarding the contribution that volunteers would make during winter, Ms Strong explained that their contribution was recognised as part of the whole system plan. The Red Cross contributed to supporting patient discharge and would be present at A&E departments within the acute hospitals in east Kent. In response to a comment from Mr Turner regarding the recruitment and retention of staff in the relevant services to provide the capacity that was needed during the winter pressures, Ms Strong confirmed that in east Kent operations, a resourcing team was in place to focus on the recruitment process and provide an administrative lead. This was proving to have some success. In response to a question from Prof Drobniewski regarding how quickly the Trust could set up an additional ward in order to increase capacity, Ms Strong explained that in the previous year an escalation ward had been opened at Sheppey Community Hospital. This had taken two weeks to put in place. The main challenge had been staffing, but lessons had been learnt in preparation for the forthcoming winter. In response to a question from Mr Conway regarding what additional resource had been provided to Kent Social Services, Ms Strong confirmed that it had received additional government money. It would publish its winter plan following approval by the KCC Cabinet in December 2018. It was agreed that a progress report would be presented to the Board at its meeting in January 2019. Action – Ms Strong
The Board APPROVED the Winter Plan.
29/11/14 Standing Financial Instructions Mr Flack presented the report to the Board for approval.
In response to a question from Mr Goulston regarding whether a non-executive director had been nominated to oversee the NHS security management service, it was confirmed that this appointment was still outstanding. The non-executive directors were asked to discuss this further outside of that day’s meeting and suggest a nomination to Mr Goulston and Mr Flack. Action – Non-executive directors The Board APPROVED the Standing Financial Instructions.
29/11/15 Board Membership and Non-Executive Director Responsibilities Report Mr Goulston presented the report to the Board for approval.
Min
utes
Page 12 of 144
Page 10 of 7
It was agreed that the Council of Governors would receive the report for noting when it met in February 2019. Action – Ms Davies The Board APPROVED the Board Membership and Non-Executive Director Responsibilities Report.
29/11/16 Seasonal Infection Prevention and Control Report
Dr Spare presented the report to the Board for assurance. The Quality Committee had received and scrutinised the report earlier that month. The Board RECEIVED the Infection Prevention and Control Report.
29/11/17 Learning From Deaths Report Dr Phillips presented the report to the Board for assurance.
In response to questions from Ms Skelton regarding how the Trust implemented lessons learnt, how it could satisfy itself that the lessons had been implemented, and how the results were fed back to staff, Dr Phillips confirmed that the membership of the investigation team rotated and monthly Matrons meetings were used to disseminate learning. Where the same issues were repeatedly disseminated, these would be investigated further via an audit. Ms Barber confirmed that she was the Non-Executive Director Trust Lead for Mortality and Learning from Deaths. She had observed an investigation meeting and highlighted that the addition of a pharmacist as a member of the meeting was helpful. She had observed the discussions and the learning that had been identified and indicated that it was a constructive process. She would be attending a further investigation meeting in January 2019 and would be focusing on the process in relation to patients with learning disabilities. In response to a question from Dr Spare regarding the work that was being carried out by the Kent and Medway Learning Disabilities Mortality Review (LeDeR) Strategy Group, Dr Phillips confirmed that its work would be monitored by herself. She was liaising with KCC’s Director of Public Health who was involved. The Trust was supportive of the group’s aims and objectives. As it was an NHS England (NHSE) commissioned service, the Trust would continue to escalate issues it identified which were not being addressed. In response to a question from Ms Tippin regarding identifying the top three learning outcomes which the Board could monitor going forward, it was agreed that this would be included in the next report that the Board received. Action – Dr Phillips
Page 13 of 144
Page 11 of 7
In response to a question from Ms Strong regarding investigating children’s deaths across both KCC and the Trust, Dr Phillips confirmed that the Trust’s Head of Safeguarding, Ms Julie Beavers was a member of the Trust’s Mortality Surveillance Group and provided a link between the two organisations. Mr Howe added that both the Trust’s End of Life Steering Group and Mortality Surveillance Group had an overlap of membership. The Board RECEIVED the Learning From Deaths Report.
29/11/18 Patient Experience and Complaints Report Dr Spare presented the report to the Board for assurance.
The Quality Committee had received and scrutinised the report earlier that month. Ms Tippin commented that staff should be proud of the results that were contained within the report. In response to her question as to how this data was used internally, Mr Bentley confirmed that it was fed back regularly to staff at the Trust’s Senior Leaders Conference and Team Leaders Conference that took place during the year. In addition, he and the other executive directors also highlighted the positive feedback that was received when they visited services. He was pleased that performance remained consistent even at times of pressure within services. It underlined that the Trust was serving its community well. In response to questions from Mr Cook as to whether it was good to encourage people to complete the survey, and why in the summer months other trusts had an upward trend in the number of survey responses compared to the Trust, it was agreed that this would be investigated. Action – Dr Spare The Board RECEIVED the Patient Experience and Complaints Report
29/11/19 Freedom To Speak Up (FTSU) Report Ms Davies presented the report to the Board for assurance.
The Audit and Risk Committee reviewed the process and controls in place to manage concerns reported by staff and the Strategic Workforce Committee would review the cultural recommendations from the November 2018 report by the National Guardian’s Office that had reviewed the handling of speaking up cases at Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust. In response to a comment from Mr Field that greater diversity was needed amongst the Trust’s FTSU ambassadors, it was agreed that this would be addressed with the support of its diversity networks. Action – Ms Davies
Min
utes
Page 14 of 144
Page 12 of 7
Ms Tippin confirmed that she was the Non-Executive Director with responsibility for Freedom To Speak Up. In response to a question from Ms Tippin as to who carried out the investigation of individual concerns, Ms Davies confirmed that this was carried out by an independent manager. The ambassador’s role was to support the member of staff who had raised the concern. In response to a question from Ms Tippin as to how the Trust protected the anonymity of the staff member who had raised the concern, Mr Conway reported that the ARC had reviewed this. It was confirmed that the report that was presented to the ARC would be shared with Ms Tippin. In response to a question from Mr Flack regarding the support that was provided to the FTSU ambassadors, Ms Davies confirmed that there was a support network but that this could be improved. It was agreed that this would be addressed. Action – Ms Davies It was confirmed that the Board would receive a report twice a year. It was agreed that the report on Nottinghamshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust would be circulated to the Board. Action – Ms Davies The Board RECEIVED the Freedom To Speak Up Guardian’s Report
29/11/20 Any Other Business
There was no further business to discuss. Mr Bentley extended his thanks on behalf of the Board to Mr Field for his contribution as Interim Chair.
29/11/21 Questions from members of the public relating to the agenda
In response to a question from Mr John Fletcher, Public Governor Ashford regarding whether there was one body in Kent that had oversight of the continuing problems faced by the county’s GPs, clinical commissioning groups, and the acute trusts, Mr Goulston suggested that this was the responsibility of the Kent and Medway STP. Mr Bentley added that he was optimistic that health service commissioning in Kent and Medway would improve. He supported the STP’s ambitions to improve stroke outcomes for patients. He also added that he welcomed the work being done to support GPs across Kent and Medway coming together to work in a more effective way.
The meeting closed at 12.45pm.
Page 15 of 144
Page 13 of 7
29/11/22 Date and Venue of the Next Meeting
Thursday 31 January 2019, The Oak Room, Oakwood House, Oakwood Park, Maidstone ME16 8AE
Min
utes
Page 16 of 144
MA
TT
ER
S A
RIS
ING
FR
OM
BO
AR
D M
EE
TIN
G O
F 2
9 N
OV
EM
BE
R 2
018
(P
AR
T O
NE
)
Ag
en
da
n
um
be
r A
ge
nd
a I
tem
A
cti
on
ag
ree
d l
as
t m
ee
tin
g
By W
ho
m
Cu
rre
nt
Sta
tus
/Up
da
te
29
/11
/7
Ch
ief
Exe
cu
tive
’s
Re
po
rt
Fo
r th
e S
tra
tegic
Work
forc
e C
om
mitte
e
to r
ece
ive
assu
ran
ce
on
beh
alf o
f th
e
Bo
ard
re
ga
rdin
g th
e ide
ntifica
tio
n a
nd
m
ea
su
rem
ent
of
the
im
pa
ct of
the
Tim
e
To C
ha
nge
pro
gra
mm
e.
Ms N
orr
is
Th
is ite
m w
ill b
e a
dd
ed t
o th
e S
tra
tegic
W
ork
forc
e C
om
mitte
e fo
rwa
rd p
lan
.
Pro
po
se
d c
losu
re.
29
/11
/8
Pa
tie
nt
Sto
ry
To in
ve
stiga
te f
urt
he
r th
e b
ette
r of
use
of
tech
no
logy in
th
e H
om
e E
nte
ral
Nu
tritio
n (
HE
N)
Se
rvic
e t
o r
ed
uce
the
ch
an
ce
of
err
or
as w
ell
as t
he
co
mm
issio
nin
g d
ecis
ion
re
latin
g t
o t
he
p
atien
t pa
thw
ay.
Dr
Sp
are
An
in
ve
stiga
tio
n is u
nde
rwa
y a
nd
fu
rth
er
info
rma
tio
n is a
wa
ite
d.
29
/11
/10
Str
ate
gic
Wo
rkfo
rce
C
om
mitte
e C
ha
ir’s
A
ssu
ran
ce
Re
po
rt
To u
nd
ert
ake
a g
ap
ana
lysis
of
the
gu
ide
line
s o
n w
ork
forc
e e
nga
gem
ent
pu
blis
hed
by t
he
Fin
ancia
l R
ep
ort
ing
Co
un
cil
(FR
C).
Ms N
orr
is
Th
is ite
m w
ill b
e a
dd
ed t
o th
e S
tra
tegic
W
ork
forc
e C
om
mitte
e fo
rwa
rd p
lan
.
Pro
po
se
d c
losu
re.
Mat
ters
Aris
ing
Page 17 of 144
Ag
en
da
n
um
be
r A
ge
nd
a I
tem
A
cti
on
ag
ree
d l
as
t m
ee
tin
g
By W
ho
m
Cu
rre
nt
Sta
tus
/Up
da
te
29
/11
/10
Str
ate
gic
Wo
rkfo
rce
C
om
mitte
e C
ha
ir’s
A
ssu
ran
ce
Re
po
rt
To lia
ise
with
th
e T
rust’s E
qu
alit
y a
nd
D
ive
rsity G
rou
p o
n th
e T
rust’s
pe
rfo
rma
nce
on
Bla
ck a
nd
Asia
n
Min
ority
an
d E
thn
ic (
BA
ME
) p
ay.
Ms N
orr
is
The
BA
ME
gro
up
ha
s b
een
in
vite
d t
o
co
nsid
er
this
are
a o
f w
ork
. P
ropo
se
d
clo
su
re.
29
/11
/12
Inte
gra
ted
P
erf
orm
an
ce
Re
po
rt (
IPR
)
To in
clu
de
a n
arr
ative
in
fu
ture
IP
Rs o
n
ho
w t
he
Tru
st
wa
s a
ddre
ssin
g a
ny
do
wn
wa
rd t
ren
ds in
the
re
sp
on
se
rate
s
for
pa
tie
nt e
xp
erie
nce
or
up
wa
rd t
rend
s
in w
aitin
g t
ime
s.
Mr
Fla
ck
Th
is h
as b
een
in
co
rpo
rate
d in
to t
he
n
ew
IP
R d
esig
n t
o h
igh
ligh
t sta
tistica
lly
sig
nific
an
t va
ria
tio
n.
Pro
po
se
d c
losu
re.
29
/11
/12
Inte
gra
ted
P
erf
orm
an
ce
Re
po
rt (
IPR
)
To a
me
nd
th
e W
ork
forc
e R
epo
rt t
o
co
rre
ct
the
err
or
rela
ting t
o t
he le
ve
l of
ma
nd
ato
ry t
rain
ing c
om
plia
nce
in
Mon
th
Se
ve
n.
Ms N
orr
is
Actio
n c
om
ple
ted
. P
rop
osed
clo
su
re.
29
/11
/13
Win
ter
Pla
n
To p
resen
t a
pro
gre
ss r
ep
ort
to
the
B
oa
rd a
t its m
ee
tin
g in
Ja
nua
ry 2
01
9.
Ms S
tro
ng
Age
nd
a ite
m.
Pro
po
sed
clo
su
re.
29
/11
/14
Sta
nd
ing F
ina
ncia
l In
str
uction
s
To s
ugge
st
a n
om
ina
tio
n fo
r a
no
n-
exe
cu
tive
dire
cto
r to
ove
rse
e t
he
Tru
st’s
NH
S s
ecu
rity
ma
na
ge
me
nt
se
rvic
e t
o
Mr
Go
uls
ton a
nd
Mr
Fla
ck.
No
n-
Exe
cu
tive
D
ire
cto
rs
Mr
Be
ntle
y h
as c
onfirm
ed
th
at th
is
ma
tte
r w
ill b
e d
iscu
ssed
at th
e C
ha
ir –
N
on
Exe
cu
tive
Dire
cto
r M
ee
tin
g t
akin
g
pla
ce
on
31
Jan
ua
ry 2
01
9.
29
/11
/15
Bo
ard
Mem
be
rsh
ip
an
d N
on
-Exe
cu
tive
D
ire
cto
r R
esp
on
sib
ilitie
s
Re
po
rt
Fo
r th
e C
ou
ncil
of
Go
ve
rno
rs t
o r
ece
ive
th
e r
ep
ort
fo
r n
otin
g a
t its n
ext
mee
tin
g.
Ms D
avie
s
Th
is m
att
er
be
en
in
clu
de
d o
n th
e
age
nd
a o
f th
e F
eb
rua
ry 2
01
9 C
oun
cil
of
Go
ve
rno
rs m
ee
tin
g.
Pro
po
se
d
clo
su
re.
Page 18 of 144
Ag
en
da
n
um
be
r A
ge
nd
a I
tem
A
cti
on
ag
ree
d l
as
t m
ee
tin
g
By W
ho
m
Cu
rre
nt
Sta
tus
/Up
da
te
29
/11
/17
Le
arn
ing F
rom
D
ea
ths R
ep
ort
To in
clu
de
the
to
p th
ree
le
arn
ing
ou
tcom
es in
th
e n
ext
rep
ort
to
th
e
Bo
ard
. D
r P
hill
ips
Th
is w
ill b
e in
clu
de
d in t
he
rep
ort
th
at
the
Bo
ard
re
ce
ive
s a
t its J
an
ua
ry 2
01
9
me
etin
g a
nd
futu
re r
epo
rts.
Pro
po
sed
clo
su
re.
29
/11
/18
Pa
tie
nt
Exp
erie
nce
a
nd
Co
mp
lain
ts
Re
po
rt
To in
ve
stiga
te w
hy in
th
e s
um
me
r m
onth
s o
the
r tr
usts
had
an u
pw
ard
tr
en
d in t
he
nu
mb
er
of su
rve
y
resp
on
se
s c
om
ple
ted c
om
pa
red t
o
KC
HF
T.
Dr
Sp
are
Th
is is u
nde
r co
ntin
uou
s r
evie
w w
ith
th
e c
urr
en
t o
rga
nis
ation
s t
he
Tru
st
be
nch
ma
rks a
ga
inst.
29
/11
/19
Fre
ed
om
To S
pe
ak
Up
(F
TS
U)
Re
po
rt
To a
dd
ress th
e n
eed
fo
r gre
ate
r d
ive
rsity a
mo
ngst
the
Tru
st’s F
TS
U
am
ba
ssad
ors
th
rou
gh
its
div
ers
ity
ne
two
rks.
Ms D
avie
s
Th
is h
as b
een
dis
cu
sse
d w
ith
th
e
Gu
ard
ian
an
d w
ill b
e a
ctio
ned
. P
rop
ose
d c
losu
re.
29
/11
/19
Fre
ed
om
To S
pe
ak
Up
(F
TS
U)
Re
po
rt
To a
dd
ress th
e im
pro
ve
men
t of
the
su
ppo
rt n
etw
ork
pro
vis
ion
fo
r th
e F
TS
U
am
ba
ssad
ors
. M
s D
avie
s
Th
is h
as b
een
dis
cu
sse
d w
ith
th
e
Gu
ard
ian
an
d w
ill b
e a
ctio
ned
. S
up
po
rt
for
the G
ua
rdia
n is a
lso
be
ing
de
ve
lop
ed.
Pro
po
sed
clo
su
re.
29
/11
/19
Fre
ed
om
To S
pe
ak
Up
(F
TS
U)
Re
po
rt
To c
ircu
late
th
e N
ott
ingh
am
sh
ire
H
ea
lth
ca
re N
HS
Fo
und
ation
Tru
st
rep
ort
to
the
Bo
ard
. M
s D
avie
s
Actio
n c
om
ple
te.
Pro
po
se
d c
losu
re.
Mat
ters
Aris
ing
Page 19 of 144
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 31 January 2019
Agenda Number: 1.7
Agenda Item Title: Chief Executive’s Report
Presenting Officer: Paul Bentley, Chief Executive
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☒ Assurance ☐
Report Summary
This report highlights key business and service developments in Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust in recent weeks.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
Not applicable.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
Not applicable.
Paul Bentley, Chief Executive Tel: 01622 211903
Email: [email protected]
Chi
ef E
xecu
tive'
s R
epor
t
Page 20 of 144
CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT
January 2019
As previously I wanted to highlight to the Board the following significant developments since my last formal report during the Board meeting in November 2018, my regular practice is to categorise the report into patients, our staff teams and partnerships. Since we last met as a board there have been a number of national developments, some local developments and the expected and planned for increase in demand on services generated by winter. Staff
1. Service Visits
I was fortunate to speak at a celebration of our Wound Centre in Herne Bay, attended by a wide range of patients, carers, team members and others associated with the Centre, the Chief Nurse and I also visited Heron Ward in Herne Bay, both were uplifting and a strong testament to the compassion and skill of our teams in both settings. In mid-January I spent some time with our health-visiting team based in Gravesend, which was another uplifting visit as I was able to see the enthusiasm and professionalism with which the team undertake their often challenging roles.
2. Care Quality Commission
On 2 January 2019 on behalf of the Trust I received the formal notification that our regulators the CQC will undertake a well-led inspection of the Trust within a maximum of six months from the date of the letter, this inspection process will include an inspection of a least one of our seven core services. As part of this process the Trust submitted its completed Provider Information Request on 22January 2019, incorporating the Trust self-assessment ratings and well-led submission which the Board scrutinised in January 2019. The information about the forthcoming inspection has been widely communicated throughout the Trust.
Chi
ef E
xecu
tive'
s R
epor
t
Page 21 of 144
3. Launch of NHS 10 Year Plan
In January the NHS long term plan was launched, a full paper exploring the plan is included later in the agenda, but the publication of the plan is significant for both the NHS and the Trust. The direction of the NHS is consistent with that identified in the Five Year Forward View published in 2014, and presents opportunities for the people we serve to receive better care closer to home. It also crystallises the role of the Kent and Medway STP which is important to note for the Board, and again is explored in the full report.
Partnerships
1. New Contracting Round
Contract discussions have started in all systems and all are taking place collaboratively. Local care investments are jointly agreed as the top priority for the Trust. Consistent with the national timetable draft Trust plans will be submitted on 12th February, with the full plan in early April 2019. The Trust is expected to make a surplus of £2.2m (1%) underpinned by breakeven plus £2.2m of Provider Sustainability Funds from NHSI. 2. New Planning Guidance
The planning guidance for the NHS was published in two parts, one in late December and the second part in January, the guidance is significant as it establishes a new financial architecture to return the NHS provider sector to financial balance, with changes included but not limited to Payment by results tariff, market forces factor, the use of financial control totals and payments made to the Trust under Commissioning for Quality and Innovation national goals. These are significant changes which have been explored in the sub-committee of the Board but are worthy of Board attention.
3. Procurement and Commercial Standards Accreditation
The Trust has been formally awarded Level 1 Procurement & Commercial Standards accreditation the first community or mental health trust to achieve this in any of the southern regions.
Patients
1. Hospital at Home We launched Hospital@home in December 2018, the scheme is designed to reduce the demand on the acute hospital sector and we developed out approach with the support of and in conjunction with acute trust colleagues. Early
Page 22 of 144
indicators are that in the first six weeks since it launched, we have saved around 150 bed days and helped more than 30 patients. The service attracted some positive media coverage, which the board can view using the link: https://www.itv.com/news/meridian/2019-01-17/medical-care-and-support-for-
patients-at-home/
2. Winter Planning Nationally the NHS, although seeing an increase in demand in December and early January, is managing more effectively than last year. The role of KCHFT services is to maintain patient flow throughout the system and facilitate discharges and prevent hospital admissions. Our staff have been working hard to maintain capacity in the services with the emphasis on reducing the number of patients experiencing delays to discharge. The new schemes agreed in both East and West Kent are beginning to have an impact on the system and these are set out in more detail in the winter update report later in the agenda. There is an expectation with colder weather forecast that the demand on services will increase towards the end of the month and the services are to creating additional capacity.
3. Planning for exiting the European Union
Since the last time we met as a Board the Trust and the Kent and Medway STP has spent time contingency planning in the event of leaving the European Union without a transitional agreement in place. Whilst planning is taking place nationwide the particular geographical issues presented by delivering services in Kent are being addressed Kent and Medway wide with the STP co-ordinating a system view and the Trust undertaking Trust wide planning. A separate briefing is included in the Board agenda. I would like to take the opportunity to thank all team members for their hard work since the last time we met as a board at this very busy and demanding time of year.
Paul Bentley Chief Executive January 2019
Chi
ef E
xecu
tive'
s R
epor
t
Page 23 of 144
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 31 January 2019
Agenda Number: 2.2
Agenda Item Title: Board Assurance Framework
Presenting Officer: Natalie Davies, Corporate Services Director
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The function of the Board Assurance Framework (BAF) is to inform and elicit discussion about the significant risks which threaten the achievement of the Trust’s strategic objectives.
To provide assurance that these risks are being effectively managed, the BAF details the controls in place to mitigate each risk, any gap in control, assurance of the controls’ effectiveness, the actions planned and being executed together with the date by when the actions are due to be completed.
The full BAF as at 23 January 2019 is shown in Appendix 1.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board is asked to note this report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required.
Barry Norton, Head of Risk Management Tel: 01233667744
Email: [email protected]
Boa
rd A
ssur
ance
Fra
mew
ork
Page 24 of 144
1
BOARD ASSURANCE FRAMEWORK
1. Introduction
1.1 The Board Assurance Framework (BAF) is comprised of strategic risks
identified against the strategic goals defined within the Integrated Business Plan (IBP) in addition to risks identified against the achievement of business and operational objectives with a high gross (inherent) risk rating.
1.2 The BAF is therefore comprised of high risks. Refer to section 7 below for a definition of high risk.
1.3 Risks may be identified by Services or Directorates and escalated
upwards to the Executive Team, or may be identified at the Board or any of its sub Committees.
1.4 The Executive Team review newly identified high risks to ensure that those
with significant potential to impact on the achievement of strategic goals are recorded on the BAF and reported to the Board. This allows the Board to monitor mitigating actions. As actions are implemented, controls improve and this can enable the exposure to risk to reduce.
1.5 The full BAF as at 23 January 2019 is shown in Appendix 1. This version
was presented at any other meetings or committees.
2. Amendments to the BAF
2.1 Since the BAF was last seen by the Board the document has undergone a subtle refresh. All risks are now categorised in line with the Trust’s goals: ‘Prevent ill health’, ‘Deliver high-quality care at home and in the community’, ‘Integrate services’ and ‘Develop sustainable services’. The following headings ‘Assurances’ and ‘Gaps in control and assurance’ have been amended to ‘Positive Assurances’ and ‘Gaps in control or Negative Assurance’ respectively.
3. New risks
3.1 Since the BAF was last presented to the Board there have been three new risks added.
Boa
rd A
ssur
ance
Fra
mew
ork
Page 25 of 144
2
3.2 BAF ID101 ‘Develop Sustainable Services (Strategic Objective Enablers)’ Uncertainty around Brexit may affect our ability to deliver core objectives.
3.3 BAF ID102 ‘Deliver High Quality Care at Home and in the Community’
Inability to recruit and retain staff appropriately could have a detrimental impact on maintaining quality of care and morale.
3.4 BAF ID103 ‘Integrate Services’ Changes in the system architecture may
provide uncertainty in the future delivery of integrated services
4. Risks that have been closed since the last report 4.1 BAF ID37 ‘Ensuring that patients and clinicians have access to high quality
specialist community services’ Patient care may suffer if we are unable to recruit and retain a quality workforce with the right clinical leadership. This risk has been superseded by risk BAFID102 which was introduced to the BAF in January 2019.
4.2 BAF ID73 ‘Dedicating time, resources, expertise and leadership to fully implement the 'Home First' service model across Kent’ That the organisation may not be able to adapt and implement the change and transformation of service due to poor morale and the changes needed in the organisational culture. This risk has also been superseded by risk BAFID102.
5. Risks that have been de-escalated since the last report
5.1 BAF ID98 ‘Strategic Objective Enablers’ Deteriorating financial position in Kent and Medway, particularly in east Kent jeopardises the stability of the system to maintain commitment to local care and/or places additional pressures on the Trust as seen as organisation with financial flexibility as over delivered financial surplus.
6. Risks previously de-escalated to Directorate risk registers that have
closed 6.1 There are no risks that have been de-escalated to Directorate risk
registers that have now closed.
6.2 The total number of risks documented on the BAF is five. Figure 1 (below) provides a visual representation of the organisational risk profile based on the current risk rating within section 1 of the BAF.
6.3 Figure 1: Organisational High Risk Profile
Page 26 of 144
3
7. High risk definition 7.1 A high risk is defined as any risk with an overall risk rating of 15 or above,
as well as those risks rated as 12 with a consequence score of 4. The risk matrix below provides a visual representation of this.
7.2 Figure 2: Trust risk matrix
← Consequence / Severity →
Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic
↓Likelihood ↓ 1 2 3 4 5
Rare 1 1 2 3 4 5
Unlikely 2 2 4 6 8 10
Possible 3 3 6 9 12 15
Likely 4 4 8 12 16 20
Almost Certain 5 5 10 15 20 25
The scores obtained from the risk matrix are assigned grades as follows:
1 – 6 Low risk
8 – 12 Medium Risk
12 – 25 High Risk
Boa
rd A
ssur
ance
Fra
mew
ork
Page 27 of 144
4
8. Risk Overview 8.1 The total number of open risks within the Trust stands at 275 this is
comprised of 120 low risks, 145 medium risks and 10 high risks. Figure 3 (below) provides a visual representation. Low risks are initially reviewed by Heads of Service with further reviews by the responsible officer at least bi monthly. Medium risks would initially be reviewed by Heads of Service and then onward to the Community Service Director/Assistant Director for approval, these would normally be reviewed on a monthly basis. All risks are extracted by the Risk Team on a weekly basis and the officer responsible for those risks that have passed their review date or target completion date are contacted by the team to prompt a review.
8.2 Figure 3: Organisational Risk Overview.
9. Recommendation
9.1 The Board is asked to consider the Board Assurance Framework in Appendix 1 and determine whether sufficient mitigating actions are in place to address these.
Barry Norton Head of Risk 23 January 2019
Page 28 of 144
G A R
ID
Opened
Board Level Risk Owner
CL
Rating
Con
trol
s D
escr
iptio
nPo
sitiv
e A
ssur
ance
sG
aps
in c
ontr
ol o
r Neg
ativ
e A
ssur
ance
CL
Rating
Action owner
Confidence Assessment
Target Date (end)
Indi
vidu
al A
ctio
nsO
wne
rTa
rget
Com
plet
ion
(end
)St
atus
Prog
ram
me
Man
ager
bei
ng a
ppoi
nted
to C
IS c
hang
e pr
ojec
tG
ordo
n Fl
ack
Sep
2018
G
Set u
p go
vern
ance
stru
ctur
eG
ordo
n Fl
ack
Nov
201
8G
Stru
ctur
ed p
rogr
amm
e of
clin
ical
eng
agem
ent i
nclu
ded
in th
e pr
ogra
mm
e.
Sara
h Ph
illips
Nov
201
9G
Def
initi
on o
f pro
gram
me
stru
ctur
e an
d pr
ogra
mm
e te
amG
ordo
n Fl
ack
Sep
2018
G
Proj
ect l
eade
rshi
p ap
poin
ted.
Gor
don
Flac
kD
ec 2
018
G
Indi
vidu
al A
ctio
nsO
wne
rTa
rget
Com
plet
ion
(end
)St
atus
Loc
al C
are
Gro
up im
plem
enta
tion
Paul
Ben
tley
Jul 2
018
GKC
HFT
invo
lvem
ent i
n C
CG
wor
kfor
ce g
roup
Loui
se N
orris
GR
evie
w m
itiga
tion
plan
sG
ordo
n Fl
ack
Oct
201
8G
Rec
over
y pl
an fo
r eas
t Ken
tG
ordo
n Fl
ack
Oct
201
8G
Proa
ctiv
ely
seek
opp
ortu
nitie
s to
sta
bilis
e th
e sy
stem
and
su
ppor
t inv
estm
ent i
n lo
cal c
are
Gor
don
Flac
kM
ar 2
019
G
Hos
pita
l at H
ome
laun
chG
ordo
n Fl
ack
Nov
201
8G
Indi
vidu
al A
ctio
nsO
wne
rTa
rget
Com
plet
ion
(end
)St
atus
Mon
itor W
inte
r Pre
ssur
e Pl
ans
thro
ugh
Gov
erna
nce
stru
ctur
es -
KPI's
for E
ast &
Wes
t Ken
t hav
e be
en a
gree
d Le
sley
Stro
ngM
ar 2
019
A
Flu
Vacc
inat
ion
Prog
ram
me
Del
iver
yM
erci
a Sp
are
Feb
2019
AO
vers
ee th
e ne
wly
impl
emen
ted
'Rap
id T
rans
fer s
ervi
ce i
n th
e Ea
st in
add
ition
to th
e cr
eatio
n of
loca
l car
e sc
hem
es.
Lesl
ey S
trong
Mar
201
9A
12H
43
Indi
vidu
al A
ctio
nsO
wne
rTa
rget
Com
plet
ion
(end
)St
atus
Coo
rdin
atio
n w
ith th
e ST
P on
goin
gPa
ul B
entle
yFe
b 20
19A
Staf
f tra
inin
g on
stra
tegy
and
com
man
d gr
oups
whi
ch w
ill be
co
mpl
eted
by
the
end
of F
ebru
ary
Nat
alie
Dav
ies
Feb
2019
A
Inte
rnal
Bre
xit w
orks
hop
and
tabl
e to
p ex
erci
se to
be
held
Nat
alie
Dav
ies
Dec
201
8G
Fortn
ight
ly re
view
s - t
o ke
ep p
lans
und
er re
view
Nat
alie
Dav
ies
Feb
2019
G
Medium
Lesley Strong
100
Nov 2018
Inte
grat
e Se
rvic
es
Ris
k th
at th
e or
gani
satio
n’s
serv
ices
may
suf
fer s
igni
fican
t ch
alle
nges
as
resu
lt of
the
impa
ct o
f win
ter p
ress
ures
.4
416
Emer
genc
y Pl
anni
ng e
xerc
ises
Flu
vacc
inat
ion
Prog
ram
me
An e
stab
lishe
d N
atio
nal E
mer
genc
y Pr
essu
res
Pane
l has
bee
n es
tabl
ishe
d to
iden
tify
leve
ls o
f sys
tem
risk
and
reco
mm
end
resp
onse
s
R
epor
ting
perfo
rman
ce fo
r Min
or In
jury
Uni
ts
Who
le s
yste
m w
inte
r pla
ns h
ave
been
agr
eed
by th
e Lo
cal A
&E
Del
iver
y Bo
ards
. Th
ese
incl
ude
esca
latio
n pl
ans
with
key
ac
tions
to b
e ta
ken
if ce
rtain
trig
gers
are
reac
hed.
Extra
bed
cap
acity
by
redu
cing
del
ayed
tran
sfer
s of
car
e
Emer
genc
y Pl
ans
succ
essf
ul d
urin
g te
stin
g
St
aff f
lu v
acci
natio
n pr
ogra
mm
e –
this
is
unde
rway
for K
CH
FT s
taff.
Loc
al
targ
ets
have
bee
n se
t whi
ch in
clud
e m
axim
um o
f 14
patie
nts
at a
ny o
ne ti
me
in
KCH
FT c
omm
unity
hos
pita
ls
W
inte
r Pre
ssur
e Pl
ans.
A
ctio
ns
have
bee
n id
entif
ied
in o
rder
to re
duce
the
gap
in c
ontro
ls re
latin
g to
this
risk
.
Upd
ated
23
Janu
ary
2019
Def
initi
ons:
Initi
al R
atin
g =
The
risk
ratin
g at
the
time
of id
entif
icat
ion
Cur
rent
Rat
ing
= R
isk
rem
aini
ng w
ith c
urre
nt c
ontro
ls in
pla
ce. T
his
is
revi
ewed
mon
thly
and
sho
uld
decr
ease
as
actio
ns t
ake
effe
ct.
Targ
et D
ate
= M
onth
end
by
whi
ch a
ll ac
tions
sho
uld
be c
ompl
eted
Initi
al ra
ting
Cur
rent
ratin
g
Appe
ndix
1
Ris
ks w
ith a
hig
h ne
t ris
k ra
ting
whi
ch h
ave
not b
een
tole
rate
d.
Act
ion
stat
us k
ey:
Act
ions
com
plet
edO
n tra
ck b
ut n
ot y
et d
eliv
ered
Orig
inal
targ
et d
ate
is u
nach
ieva
ble
Plan
ned
Act
ions
and
Mile
ston
es
Boa
rd A
ssur
ance
Fra
mew
ork
Sect
ion
1
Ris
k D
escr
iptio
n(S
impl
e Ex
plan
atio
n of
the
Ris
k)
43
Dev
elop
Sus
tain
able
Ser
vice
s (S
trat
egic
Obj
ectiv
e En
able
rs)
101
Dec 2018
Natalie Davies
Unc
erta
inty
aro
und
Brex
it m
ay a
ffect
our
abi
lity
to d
eliv
er c
ore
obje
ctiv
es4
3Lo
cal H
ealth
Res
ilienc
e Pa
rtner
ship
(LH
RP)
term
s of
refe
renc
eEx
ecut
ive
lead
app
oint
edH
ead
of R
esilie
nce
JDAc
tion
plan
dev
elop
edBr
exit
risk
regi
ster
est
ablis
hed
Reg
ular
dis
cuss
ion
and
revi
ew a
t Ex
ec/M
anag
emen
t Com
mitt
ee a
nd B
oard
.N
HS
Engl
and
(NH
S E)
repo
rting
re
quire
men
ts m
et.
LHR
P m
eetin
gs a
ttend
ance
. Fu
rther
dev
elop
pla
n in
resp
onse
to n
ew
info
rmat
ion.
Mon
thly
Tru
st B
rexi
t mee
tings
hel
d.
Wor
king
in c
olla
bora
tion
with
Clin
ical
C
omm
issi
onin
g G
roup
s (C
CG
s)
Natalie Davies
Medium
Jan 2019
12H
Lesley Strong
April 2019
312
HG
over
nanc
e st
ruct
ure
& pr
ojec
t pla
n in
pla
ceEn
gage
men
t with
the
proj
ect t
eam
del
iver
ing
the
Kent
Car
e R
ecor
d Pr
ojec
t Lea
ders
hip
team
job
desc
riptio
nsPh
ase
impl
emen
tatio
n pl
an a
nd re
sour
cing
app
ropr
iate
lyC
omm
unic
atio
n pl
ans
deve
lope
d w
ith s
take
hold
ers
inc.
co
mm
issi
oner
s.
Reg
ular
Boa
rd re
ports
link
ed to
oth
er
proj
ects
Proj
ect G
roup
repo
rt to
Exe
c T
eam
and
Bo
ard
Tim
esca
les
to im
plem
ent n
ew s
yste
mC
ompr
ehen
sive
pro
gram
me
plan
for
repl
acem
ent s
yste
m to
be
deve
lope
d in
re
spon
se to
em
ergi
ng ti
mes
cale
s
Prev
ent I
llnes
s
Nov 2019
43
12H
Gordon Flack
Medium
Ove
rsee
the
new
ly im
plem
ente
d H
ospi
tal a
t Hom
e' s
chem
e in
th
e W
est '
in a
dditi
on to
the
crea
tion
of lo
cal c
are
sche
mes
.
99
Lesl
ey S
trong
Mar
201
9A
February 2019
12H
Gordon Flack
Impl
emen
ting
a cl
inic
al s
yste
m in
clud
ing
doub
le ru
nnin
g w
ith
the
exis
ting
syst
em a
nd a
t the
sam
e tim
e as
the
Ken
t Car
e R
ecor
d is
bei
ng im
plem
ente
d m
ay n
egat
ivel
y im
pact
on
prod
uctio
n of
tim
ely
info
rmat
ion.
4
43
12H
High
Mar 2019
Paul Bentley
103
Jan 2019
Gordon Flack
Cha
nges
in th
e sy
stem
arc
hite
ctur
e m
ay p
rovi
de u
ncer
tain
ty
in th
e fu
ture
del
iver
y of
inte
grat
ed s
ervi
ces
43
12H
Sust
aina
bilit
y an
d Tr
ansf
orm
atio
n Pl
an (S
TP) P
rogr
amm
e Bo
ard
TOR
s an
d m
embe
rshi
pTO
Rs
for:
Loca
l Car
e Bo
ards
; Fra
ilty
Gro
up; C
hief
Exe
cutiv
es
Foru
mST
P G
over
nanc
e St
ruct
ures
Dire
ctor
of S
trate
gy jo
b de
scrip
tion
Wes
t Ken
t Im
prov
emen
t Boa
rd te
rms
of re
fere
nce
East
Ken
t Tra
nsfo
rmat
ion
Boar
d te
rms
of re
fere
nce
NH
S I/E
sys
tem
mee
ting
term
s of
refe
renc
e
Loca
l Car
e In
vest
men
t rec
eive
d fo
r bot
h ea
st a
nd w
est K
ent -
Hos
pita
l at H
ome
and
Rap
id T
rans
fer o
f Car
e sc
hem
e.C
omm
unity
Car
e Fu
ndin
g in
crea
se in
fin
anci
al s
ettle
men
tC
hief
Exe
c re
port
to th
e bo
ard
Reg
ular
Stra
tegi
c de
velo
pmen
t upd
ate
to
the
boar
dN
on e
xecu
tive
mem
bers
hip
of th
e ST
P bo
ard.
Boa
rd A
ssur
ance
Fra
mew
ork
Page 29 of 144
ID
Opened
Board Level Risk Owner
CL
Rating
Con
trol
s D
escr
iptio
nPo
sitiv
e A
ssur
ance
sG
aps
in c
ontr
ol o
r Neg
ativ
e A
ssur
ance
CL
Rating
Action owner
Confidence Assessment
Target Date (end)
Initi
al ra
ting
Cur
rent
ratin
g
Plan
ned
Act
ions
and
Mile
ston
esR
isk
Des
crip
tion
(Sim
ple
Expl
anat
ion
of th
e R
isk)
Indi
vidu
al A
ctio
nsO
wne
rTa
rget
Com
plet
ion
(end
)St
atus
Ope
n C
linic
al A
cade
my
with
50
stud
ents
Loui
se N
orris
Feb
2019
A
Scop
ing
exte
nsio
n to
clin
ical
aca
dem
yLo
uise
Nor
risSe
p 20
19A
Inte
rnat
iona
l rec
ruits
arr
ive
Loui
se N
orris
Jun
2019
A
Impl
emen
t Big
Lis
ten
actio
n pl
anPa
ul B
entle
yAp
r 202
0A
Impl
emen
t QI s
trate
gy a
ctio
n pl
anSa
rah
Philli
psM
ar 2
020
A
Impl
emen
t wel
l bei
ng a
ctio
n pl
anLo
uise
Nor
risM
ay 2
019
A
Impl
emen
t WR
ES a
ctio
n pl
anLo
uise
Nor
risM
ar 2
019
A
Del
iver
Hig
h Q
ualit
y C
are
at H
ome
and
in th
e C
omm
unity
Louise Norris
43
12H
vaca
ncie
s 9.
69%
, tur
nove
r 18.
14%
Medium
Dec 2020
Stra
tegi
c W
orkf
orce
Com
mitt
ee T
oRs,
Serv
ice
qual
ity v
isits
Dire
ctor
of W
orkf
orce
JD
;W
orkf
orce
Stra
tegy
Agr
eed
Ope
ratio
nal w
orkf
orce
repo
rtsC
ompl
aint
s sy
stem
est
ablis
hed
agai
nst a
gree
d po
licy
Frie
nds
and
Fam
ily T
est
Tale
nt M
anag
emen
t Stra
tegy
Tim
e to
Cha
nge
Cha
mpi
ons
syst
em e
stab
lishe
d
Serv
ice
visi
t rep
orte
d to
qua
lity
com
mitt
ee,
Wor
kfor
ce re
port
to b
oard
, IPR
KPI
s re
porte
d an
d re
view
ed b
y Bo
ard,
Saf
er
Staf
fing
repo
rts, w
orkf
orce
pla
ns, T
ime
to
hire
ben
chm
arks
pos
itive
ly, b
ank
fill r
ates
im
prov
ing,
age
ncy
usag
e re
port.
Wor
kfor
ce re
port
to S
WC
102
Jan 2019
Louise Norris
Inab
ility
to re
crui
t and
reta
in s
taff
appr
opria
tely
cou
ld h
ave
a de
trim
enta
l im
pact
on
mai
ntai
ning
qua
lity
of c
are
and
mor
ale
43
12H
Page 30 of 144
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 31 January 2019
Agenda Number: 2.3
Agenda Item Title: Quality Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Presenting Officer: Steve Howe, Chair of Quality Committee
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The paper summarises the Quality Committee meetings held on 22 January 2019.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board is asked to receive the Quality Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required. The paper will have no
impact on people with any of the nine protected characteristics
Steve Howe, Non-Executive Director Tel: 01622 211906
Email:
Qua
lity
Com
mitt
ee C
hair'
sR
epor
t
Page 31 of 144
QU
AL
ITY
CO
MM
ITT
EE
CH
AIR
’S A
SS
UR
AN
CE
RE
PO
RT
JA
NU
AR
Y 2
01
9
Th
is r
ep
ort
co
ve
rs t
he
Qu
alit
y C
om
mitte
e m
ee
tin
g h
eld
on
22
Ja
nu
ary
20
19
A
ge
nd
a i
tem
A
ss
ura
nc
e a
nd
Ke
y p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Assu
ran
ce
re
po
rts w
ere
rece
ive
d f
rom
:
Pa
tie
nt
Safe
ty a
nd
Clin
ica
l R
isk G
rou
p;
Pa
tie
nt
Exp
erie
nce
Gro
up
;
Clin
ica
l E
ffe
ctive
ne
ss
Gro
up
.
Qu
ali
ty M
etr
ics
: It
wa
s n
ote
d th
at th
ere
wa
s a
re
du
ctio
n
in t
he n
um
be
r of
sh
ifts
acro
ss t
he
Tru
st
wh
ere
on
ly o
ne
Re
gis
tere
d N
urs
e (
RN
) w
as o
n d
uty
– 9
3 in D
ece
mb
er
from
10
3 in
No
ve
mb
er.
Ed
en
brid
ge
Com
mu
nity H
osp
ita
l is
the
ou
tlie
r w
ith
31
sh
ifts
in
De
cem
be
r, b
ut
this
ha
s b
een
mitig
ate
d w
ith
a H
ea
lth C
are
Assis
tan
t (H
CA
) sh
ift fill
rate
of
be
twe
en
12
3.4
% o
n d
ays a
nd
10
4%
on
nig
hts
.
The
Com
mitte
e w
as p
lea
sed
to n
ote
th
ere
were
no
avo
ida
ble
cate
go
ry t
hre
e o
r fo
ur
pre
ssu
re u
lce
rs in
the
Tru
st’s c
are
du
rin
g t
he
mo
nth
s o
f N
ove
mb
er
an
d
De
ce
mb
er
20
18.
The
re w
as a
slig
ht
rise in
the
nu
mb
er
of
avo
ida
ble
fa
lls
(tw
o in
No
ve
mb
er
and
fo
ur
in D
ece
mb
er)
bu
t a
vo
ida
ble
me
dic
atio
ns in
cid
en
ts c
on
tinu
e to
fa
ll w
ith
18
avo
ida
ble
incid
en
ts r
eco
rded
in
De
ce
mb
er.
The
Tru
st
rem
ain
s o
n tra
jecto
ry f
or
ach
ievin
g a
10
%
The
Com
mitte
e d
iscu
sse
d th
e t
rian
gu
latio
n
of
all
the
ava
ilab
le q
ua
lity m
etr
ics f
or
Ed
enb
rid
ge
Com
mu
nity H
osp
ita
l w
hic
h w
ere
in n
orm
al bo
und
s, b
ut w
ou
ld r
em
ain
a fo
cu
s
for
the g
rou
p.
Qua
lity
Com
mitt
ee C
hair'
sR
epor
t
Page 32 of 144
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
red
uction
of
avo
ida
ble
ha
rms a
t th
e e
nd
of
this
fin
an
cia
l
ye
ar.
Pa
tie
nt
Ex
pe
rie
nc
e C
om
bin
ed
Sa
tis
fac
tio
n S
co
re: In
Qu
art
er
3,
15
,66
2 s
urv
eys w
ere
co
mp
lete
d w
ith
a
sa
tisfa
ction
sco
re o
f 9
7%
. T
he
Frien
ds a
nd
Fam
ily T
est
(FF
T)
sco
re a
t 96
.5%
wa
s s
ligh
tly lo
we
r th
an
th
e p
revio
us
qu
art
er’s r
esu
lt o
f 9
7.4
%.
Co
mp
lain
ts r
em
ain
at a
his
torica
l lo
w,
wh
en
co
mpa
red t
o
the
la
st
thre
e y
ea
rs’ d
ata
, w
ith
51
co
mp
lain
ts lo
gge
d in
Qu
art
er
Th
ree
.
It w
as n
ote
d th
at a
gre
at
de
al of
wo
rk h
as b
ee
n
un
de
rta
ken
on
NIC
E a
ssu
ran
ce
. F
rom
630
po
licy
gu
ida
nce
cla
ssifie
d a
s ‘n
ot
asse
sse
d’ in
Ma
y 2
018
, th
ere
we
re o
nly
12
NIC
E g
uid
an
ce
po
licie
s r
equ
irin
g a
ssu
ran
ce
in D
ecem
be
r 2
018
.
Me
dic
al D
evic
es
The
Bo
ard
will
re
ca
ll th
at
the
Au
dit a
nd R
isk C
om
mitte
e
requ
este
d th
at
the
Qu
alit
y C
om
mitte
e r
evie
w t
he
assu
ran
ce
of
eff
ective
ne
ss o
f E
ME
ma
inte
nan
ce
of
me
dic
al d
evic
es.
On
exa
min
atio
n a
hig
h n
um
be
r of
me
dic
al d
evic
es w
ere
sh
ow
n a
s ‘o
ut of
da
te’ th
rou
gh
issu
es w
ith
th
e d
ata
base
(I-
Le
ad
er)
. A
tem
pora
ry
ad
min
istr
ato
r w
as r
ecru
ite
d to
ove
rse
e t
he
actio
n p
lan
an
d
It is r
equ
este
d th
at th
is r
ep
ort
is fo
rwa
rde
d
to t
he
Au
dit a
nd R
isk C
om
mitte
e a
s
evid
en
cin
g S
ign
ific
ant A
ssu
ran
ce
in
th
is
are
a.
Page 33 of 144
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
assis
t in
cle
an
sin
g t
he
da
ta h
eld
. T
he
Com
mitte
e w
as
ple
ased
to r
ece
ive
a p
ap
er
pro
vid
ing s
ign
ific
an
t a
ssu
ran
ce
tha
t a
ction
s t
ake
n h
ave
mitig
ate
d th
e r
isk a
nd
the
Tru
st
is
me
etin
g in
tern
al K
ey P
erf
orm
an
ce
In
dic
ato
rs (
KP
I) a
nd
is
exp
ecte
d to
mee
t a s
tre
tch
ta
rge
t of
98
% c
om
plia
nce
by
Ma
rch
201
9.
Le
arn
ing f
rom
Dea
ths
The
Com
mitte
e r
ece
ive
d th
e L
ea
rnin
g f
rom
De
ath
s R
ep
ort
pro
du
ce
d in a
cco
rda
nce
with
na
tio
na
l gu
idan
ce
. T
he
rep
ort
ide
ntifie
s a
rea
s o
f go
od p
ractice id
en
tifie
d f
rom
th
e
revie
ws,
an
d t
he
me
s fo
r le
arn
ing w
he
re im
pro
ve
me
nts
ca
n b
e m
ade
. A
lth
ou
gh
the
Tru
st
is o
nly
re
qu
ire
d t
o r
evie
w
inp
atien
t de
ath
s in
com
mu
nity h
osp
ita
ls,
a p
roce
ss h
as
be
gu
n fo
r sam
plin
g o
ne
or
two
dea
ths p
er
mon
th in t
he
co
mm
un
ity.
Qu
alit
y I
mpa
ct
Asse
ssm
en
t P
roce
ss
The
Tru
st
co
ndu
cte
d a
ga
p a
na
lysis
fo
llow
ing
th
e r
ep
ort
into
th
e fa
ilin
gs w
ith
in L
ive
rpo
ol C
om
mun
ity N
HS
Tru
st
an
d th
e K
irku
p 2
019
Re
po
rt. It
wa
s r
eco
gn
ised
tha
t w
hile
the
re w
as a
rob
ust
inde
pen
den
t re
vie
w b
y n
on
-exe
cu
tive
dire
cto
rs (
NE
Ds)
of
the Q
ua
lity I
mpa
ct A
sse
ssm
ent
(QIA
)
pro
ce
ss,
the
wid
er
impa
ct
of
co
st
imp
rove
men
t
pro
gra
mm
e
(CIP
s)
there
we
re t
wo
are
as f
or
imp
rove
men
t:
Qua
lity
Com
mitt
ee C
hair'
sR
epor
t
Page 34 of 144
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Go
ve
rna
nce
arr
an
ge
me
nts
fo
r Q
IA’s
fo
r p
rogra
mm
es a
nd
pro
jects
no
t co
nsid
ere
d a
CIP
.
Fu
rth
er
de
ve
lop
me
nt of
the N
ED
dee
p d
ive
pro
ce
ss.
The
Com
mitte
e w
as b
rie
fed
on
th
e f
ind
ings o
f th
e N
ED
de
ep
div
e in
to th
e S
pee
ch
an
d L
an
gua
ge
The
rap
y (
SA
LT
)
Se
rvic
e C
IP Q
IA fo
r fina
ncia
l ye
ar
201
8/1
9 tha
t w
as
co
ndu
cte
d in
De
ce
mb
er
20
18
.
Re
ferr
al to
Tre
atm
ent
Pe
rfo
rma
nce D
eep
Div
e
The
Ch
ief
Ope
ratin
g O
ffic
er
had
pre
vio
usly
id
en
tified
a
co
nce
rn th
at
the
Tru
st w
as m
issin
g its
18
-we
ek R
efe
rra
l to
Tre
atm
en
t ta
rge
t in
a n
um
be
r of
co
nsu
lta
nt-
led
are
as a
nd
the
Com
mitte
e w
as b
riefe
d b
y s
erv
ice
le
ad
s o
n t
he
ba
ckgro
un
d a
nd
pro
pose
d m
itig
atio
ns to
th
e issu
e.
Data
reve
als
th
at
the
re w
as a
de
clin
e in
bo
th c
om
ple
te a
nd
inco
mp
lete
path
wa
ys s
ince
Fe
bru
ary
/Ma
rch
20
18
an
d t
he
ch
ron
ic p
ain
an
d o
rth
op
aed
ic s
erv
ice
s w
ere
of
pa
rtic
ula
r
co
nce
rn w
ith
a s
ign
ific
an
t n
um
be
r (3
13
fo
r O
cto
be
r)
wa
itin
g lo
nge
r th
an
18 w
ee
ks.
Th
rou
gh
mitig
atio
n a
ctio
n
this
num
be
r w
as r
ed
uce
d to
18
2 in N
ove
mbe
r, w
ith
pa
rtic
ula
r im
pro
ve
men
t n
ote
d in t
he
Ch
ron
ic P
ain
Se
rvic
e
wh
ich
is n
ow
on
ta
rge
t. A
ll re
ferr
als
are
tria
ge
d b
y a
sen
ior
clin
icia
n a
nd
pa
tie
nts
are
ad
vis
ed
to c
onta
ct th
e s
erv
ice
or
the
ir G
P s
hou
ld t
he
ir c
on
ditio
n d
ete
rio
rate
.
While
it
is n
ote
d th
at th
ere
is a
n im
pro
vin
g
sta
tistica
l p
ictu
re,
the
Co
mm
itte
e h
as
requ
este
d r
egu
lar
assura
nce
up
da
tes.
Page 35 of 144
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
He
alth
Vis
itin
g S
erv
ice
T
he
Bo
ard
will
re
ca
ll th
e C
om
mitte
e, a
lert
ed
by t
he
Ch
ief
Op
era
tin
g O
ffic
er,
he
ld c
on
ce
rns o
ve
r th
e w
ork
forc
e
me
tric
s a
nd
mo
rale
of
the
Hea
lth
Vis
itin
g S
erv
ice
;
alth
ou
gh
qu
alit
y m
etr
ics a
t th
at tim
e w
ere
giv
ing n
o c
au
se
for
co
nce
rn.
Fo
llow
ing a
n in
itia
l d
eep
div
e,
the C
om
mitte
e
requ
este
d a
six
-mo
nth
re
po
rt o
n tu
rna
roun
d. V
aca
ncie
s in
Mo
nth
Nin
e w
ere
13
.06
%,
bu
t th
ere
ha
d b
een
a
de
ve
lop
me
nt of
a B
and
5 r
ole
and
17
RN
s w
ere
no
w in
pla
ce
. M
ost
no
tice
ab
le w
as a
re
du
ction
in
str
ess r
ela
ted
ab
sen
ce
fro
m 4
% in
July
to
1.5
% in
No
ve
mb
er.
In
tern
al
sta
ff s
urv
ey r
esu
lts s
ho
w a
n im
pro
ve
men
t in
all
ke
y a
rea
s,
he
lped
by a
com
bin
atio
n o
f str
on
g lea
de
rsh
ip a
nd p
ractica
l
me
asu
res s
uch
as t
he
mo
ve
fro
m t
ab
lets
to
lap
top
s.
The
Com
mitte
e h
as r
equ
este
d a
fu
rth
er
up
da
te in f
ou
r m
on
ths.
Ra
tifica
tio
n o
f P
olic
y
The
Com
mitte
e r
atifie
d t
he
po
licy f
or
Clin
ica
l R
eco
rd
Ke
ep
ing (
QC
04
3).
SC
Ho
we
CB
E
Ch
air
of
Qu
ali
ty C
om
mit
tee
23
Ja
nu
ary
20
19
Qua
lity
Com
mitt
ee C
hair'
sR
epor
t
Page 36 of 144
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 31 January 2019
Agenda Number: 2.4
Agenda Item Title: Strategic Workforce Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Presenting Officer: Bridget Skelton, Chair of Strategic Workforce Committee
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The paper summarises the Strategic Workforce Committee meeting held on 28 November 2018. A verbal update on the meeting held on 30 January 2019 will also be provided.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board is asked to receive the Strategic Workforce Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required. The paper will have no
impact on people with any of the nine protected characteristics
Bridget Skelton, Non-Executive Director Tel: 01622 211906
Email:
Str
ateg
ic W
orkf
orce
Com
mitt
ee C
hair'
s R
epor
t
Page 37 of 144
ST
RA
TE
GIC
WO
RK
FO
RC
E C
OM
MIT
TE
E (
SW
C)
CH
AIR
’S A
SS
UR
AN
CE
RE
PO
RT
Th
is r
ep
ort
is fo
un
ded
on
th
e S
tra
tegic
Wo
rkfo
rce
Com
mitte
e m
ee
tin
g h
eld
on
Wedn
esd
ay 2
8 N
ove
mb
er
20
18
. A
ge
nd
a i
tem
A
ss
ura
nc
e a
nd
Ke
y p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Work
forc
e R
ep
ort
R
ece
ive
d r
ep
ort
with
an
upd
ate
on
the
cu
rrent
wo
rkfo
rce
po
sitio
n a
s a
t O
cto
be
r 2
018
, de
taili
ng
a v
arie
ty o
f m
etr
ics
inclu
din
g a
bse
nce,
turn
ove
r, a
ge
ncy u
sa
ge
, va
ca
ncie
s
an
d tra
inin
g c
om
plia
nce
.
Assu
ran
ce
wa
s g
ive
n o
n p
rovid
ing
ma
xim
um
op
po
rtu
nity
for
sta
ff t
o h
ave
flu
ja
bs t
o e
nsu
re t
he T
rust m
inim
ised
sic
kn
ess t
hro
ugh
the
win
ter
pe
riod
.
The
se
co
nd w
ave
of
Tim
e to
Cha
nge
Cha
mp
ion
s w
ere
ab
ou
t to
be
tra
ine
d. Im
pa
ct m
ea
su
rem
en
t qu
erie
d -
ju
st
on
e o
f se
ve
ral in
dic
ato
rs t
o e
vid
en
ce a
ta
rge
t re
du
ction
in
str
ess le
ve
ls.
Da
ta to
cap
ture
accu
racy o
f a
pp
rais
al co
mp
letio
ns
hin
de
red
by c
om
ple
x u
se
r e
xp
erie
nce
. S
up
plie
r of
syste
m
to b
e c
on
tacte
d to
ma
ke
it
mo
re u
se
r-fr
ien
dly
.
Be
nchm
ark
da
ta to
be
co
llecte
d o
n s
tre
ss
leve
ls t
o m
ake
com
pa
riso
ns o
n T
rust
va
ria
nce
.
Sta
tistica
l P
roce
ss C
on
tro
l m
eth
od
olo
gy t
o
be
ad
opte
d t
o e
nsu
re r
ep
resen
tatio
n o
f da
ta.
Nu
rsin
g A
ca
dem
y
Re
po
rt h
ea
rd a
bo
ut th
e p
rogre
ss w
ith
se
ttin
g u
p th
e
KC
HF
T N
urs
ing A
cad
em
y (
Th
e in
tro
du
ctio
n o
f n
urs
e
ap
pre
ntice
s a
nd a
sso
cia
te n
urs
e a
pp
ren
tice
s a
s p
art
of
Str
ateg
ic W
orkf
orce
Com
mitt
ee C
hair'
s R
epor
t
Page 38 of 144
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
the
Tru
st’s r
ecru
itm
en
t a
nd
rete
ntio
n s
tra
tegy).
Fu
rth
er
recru
itm
ent
has h
ad t
o ta
ke p
lace t
o fill
pla
ce
s.
No
w f
ille
d a
ll nu
rse
posts
, tw
o d
ow
n o
n a
ssocia
tes.
Ba
se
s
ha
ve
be
en
fo
und
an
d p
lace
me
nts
map
pe
d o
ut. S
om
e
fun
din
g h
as b
een
se
cure
d f
rom
He
alth
Ed
ucatio
n
En
gla
nd
. F
ull
imp
lem
en
tation
pro
gra
mm
e w
ith
asso
cia
ted
risk r
egis
ter
un
de
rpin
s th
is in
itia
tive
.
De
vo
lvin
g A
uth
ority
Fra
me
wo
rk
A p
iece o
f w
ork
de
sig
ne
d to
en
ga
ge
an
d e
mpo
we
r p
eo
ple
at
the
fro
nt
line.
De
vo
lve
d f
ram
ew
ork
cro
sse
s o
ve
r w
ith
th
e e
xis
tin
g T
rust’s
va
lue
s a
nd
beh
avio
urs
; n
ee
ds to
be
alig
ne
d o
r in
tegra
ted
toge
the
r.
Work
in
pro
gre
ss a
s to w
ha
t is
de
vo
lve
d in
both
fin
an
ce
an
d H
R. It
no
w n
ee
ds to
fu
lly in
clu
de
op
era
tion
s a
nd
le
arn
from
Tra
nsfe
rrin
g I
nte
gra
ted
Ca
re in
th
e C
om
mu
nity
(TIC
C).
Pa
pe
r to
th
e J
an
ua
ry 2
01
9 S
WC
se
ttin
g o
ut
wh
at
is t
o b
e d
evo
lve
d a
nd
ho
w t
he
imp
lem
enta
tion
of
this
ne
w w
ay o
f w
ork
ing
will
be
ach
ieve
d.
Pe
op
le S
trate
gy A
ctio
n
Pla
n
Up
da
te o
n t
he
pro
gre
ss o
f th
e 2
018
/19
im
ple
me
nta
tion
pla
n to
sup
po
rt t
he
Peo
ple
Str
ate
gy.
Th
is h
as m
ostly
be
en
com
ple
ted.
The
pla
n fo
r 2
01
9/2
0 to
com
e to
th
e S
WC
in
Ma
rch
201
9.
Ad
va
nce
d C
linic
al
Pra
ctitio
ne
rs (
AC
P)
Re
po
rt
Assu
ran
ce
wa
s p
rovid
ed
on
th
e s
ucce
ssfu
l in
tro
du
ction
of
the
AC
P r
ole
, su
pe
rvis
ed
by c
on
su
lta
nt
ge
ria
tric
ian
s,
Fra
ilty G
Ps a
nd
Le
ad
AC
P.
Ro
bu
st
str
uctu
res a
re in
pla
ce
an
d a
n a
pp
rais
al p
rocess.
Dis
cu
sse
d p
ote
ntia
l e
xp
an
sio
n o
f th
e A
CP
ro
le,
The
ca
se
fo
r a
fu
rth
er
co
ho
rt to
be
te
ste
d in
on
-go
ing d
iscu
ssio
n w
ith
str
ate
gic
pla
nn
ing
mo
de
ls.
Con
clu
sio
ns to
be p
art
of
a s
tra
tegic
wo
rkfo
rce
pla
nn
ing p
ap
er
com
ing b
ack to
the
SW
F in M
arc
h 2
019
.
Page 39 of 144
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
reco
gn
isin
g t
he
su
cce
ss o
f th
e p
rogra
mm
e b
ut
ca
utio
us
ab
ou
t cap
acity,
rete
ntio
n a
nd
fit w
ith
wid
er
str
ate
gic
wo
rkfo
rce
pla
nn
ing.
Op
era
tion
al W
ork
forc
e
Re
po
rt
Assu
ran
ce
wa
s p
rovid
ed
th
at o
pe
ratio
na
lly t
he
Tru
st
un
de
rsto
od
wh
ere
the
ch
alle
ngin
g w
ork
forc
e h
ots
po
ts
we
re a
nd
actio
ns w
ere
in
pla
ce
to a
dd
ress the
m.
Re
cru
itm
en
t U
pd
ate
R
ece
ive
d a
pa
pe
r se
ttin
g o
ut
the
ch
alle
nge
s fa
ce
d in
recru
itm
en
t an
d th
e a
ctio
ns b
ein
g t
aken
to r
em
ed
y t
he
m.
Ove
r th
e s
um
me
r th
e te
am
wa
s w
ork
ing a
t h
alf c
ap
acity
with
bo
th v
aca
ncie
s a
nd
sic
kn
ess,
wo
rkin
g a
ga
inst
an
incre
asin
g v
olu
me
of
va
ca
ncie
s. T
he t
ea
m is n
ow
at fu
ll
ca
pa
city w
ith
tra
inin
g a
nd
re
ten
tion
activitie
s t
o e
nsu
re
qu
alit
y a
nd
co
nsis
ten
cy o
f se
rvic
e.
Issue
s w
ith
Occu
patio
na
l H
ea
lth a
re b
ein
g a
dd
resse
d b
y c
lose
pe
rfo
rma
nce
ma
na
ge
me
nt,
as w
ell
as a
n a
lte
rna
tive
pro
vid
er
be
ing s
ou
gh
t. M
an
age
me
nt m
ee
tin
gs a
re b
ein
g
att
en
ded
to
en
su
re ind
ivid
ua
l is
su
es a
re u
nders
too
d a
nd
ad
dre
sse
d.
NH
S E
mp
loye
es P
olic
y
Up
da
te
The
up
date
on
th
e N
HS
Em
plo
ye
rs P
olic
y B
oa
rd a
ssu
res
tha
t th
e T
rust
is s
igh
ted
on n
atio
na
l p
rio
ritie
s a
nd
issu
es.
Alig
nin
g I
nitia
tive
s
Tru
st-
wid
e w
ork
forc
e in
itia
tive
s h
ave
bee
n s
et
ou
t a
ga
inst
the
Pe
op
le S
tra
tegy a
nd
lo
ca
l in
itia
tive
s id
en
tifie
d a
ga
inst
wo
rkfo
rce
prio
ritie
s.
Furt
he
r w
ork
is r
equ
ire
d o
n
me
asu
rem
ent
an
d w
he
the
r in
itia
tive
s a
re lo
ng t
erm
or
Str
ateg
ic W
orkf
orce
Com
mitt
ee C
hair'
s R
epor
t
Page 40 of 144
Ag
en
da
ite
m
As
su
ran
ce
an
d K
ey p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
qu
ick w
ins a
nd
sh
ort
term
. T
he v
alu
e o
f h
avin
g a
n
ove
rvie
w is t
o b
e e
xp
lore
d t
o r
ed
uce
du
plic
atio
n, e
nsu
re
lesso
ns a
re le
arn
t an
d c
ap
acity is t
arg
ete
d o
n t
he
mo
st
imp
actfu
l p
iece
s o
f w
ork
.
De
ve
lop
ing W
ork
forc
e
Safe
gu
ard
s
NH
S I
mp
rove
me
nt (N
HS
I) h
as issue
d g
uid
an
ce
to
tru
sts
on
em
be
dd
ing s
afe
sta
ffin
g g
ove
rna
nce
on
all
se
rvic
es,
usin
g e
vid
en
ce
, p
rofe
ssio
na
l ju
dgem
en
t an
d o
utc
om
es.
An
asse
ssm
en
t of
the n
urs
ing e
sta
blis
hm
en
t a
nd
skill
mix
mu
st b
e r
ep
ort
ed
tw
ice
a y
ea
r a
nd
a s
tate
me
nt
ma
de
to
NH
SI
to c
onfirm
th
e T
rust’s s
taff
ing g
ove
rna
nce
pro
ce
sse
s
are
safe
an
d s
usta
ina
ble
on
ce
a y
ea
r.
A g
ap
an
aly
sis
to
dete
rmin
e w
ha
t fu
rthe
r
wo
rk is r
equ
ire
d t
o e
nsu
re c
om
plia
nce
is
un
de
rwa
y a
nd
will
co
me
to
th
e S
WC
in
Ma
rch
201
9.
Ta
len
t M
an
agem
ent
Assu
ran
ce
wa
s p
rovid
ed
th
at
the T
rust
is b
ein
g p
roa
ctive
to d
eve
lop
and
re
tain
its
ta
lent
po
ol, w
ith
fu
rthe
r le
sso
ns
lea
rnt fo
r th
e 2
01
9 ta
len
t m
ana
ge
men
t ro
und
, to
en
su
re
the
info
rma
tio
n c
olle
cte
d is o
bje
ctive
and
consis
ten
t.
Bri
dg
et
Sk
elt
on
Ch
air
, S
tra
teg
ic W
ork
forc
e C
om
mit
tee
We
dn
es
da
y 2
8 N
ove
mb
er
201
8
Page 41 of 144
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 31 January 2019
Agenda Number: 2.5
Agenda Item Title: Audit and Risk Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Presenting Officer: Peter Conway, Chair of Audit and Risk Committee
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The paper summarises the Audit and Risk Committee meeting held on 12 December 2018.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board is asked to receive the Audit and Risk Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required. The paper will have no
impact on people with any of the nine protected characteristics
Peter Conway, Non-Executive Director Tel: 01622 211906
Email:
Aud
it an
d R
isk
Com
mitt
eeC
hair'
s R
epor
t
Page 42 of 144
AU
DIT
AN
D R
ISK
CO
MM
ITT
EE
(A
RA
C)
CH
AIR
’S A
SS
UR
AN
CE
RE
PO
RT
Th
is r
ep
ort
is fo
un
ded
on
th
e A
ud
it a
nd
Ris
k C
om
mitte
e m
ee
tin
g h
eld
on
Wedn
esd
ay 1
2 D
ece
mb
er
20
18
. A
rea
A
ss
ura
nce
Is
su
es
an
d/o
r N
ext
Ste
ps
Ris
k M
ana
gem
ent
Ris
k m
anag
em
ent a
nd
re
po
rtin
g c
ontin
ue
s to
be
eff
ective
alth
ou
gh A
RA
C r
ecom
me
nd
s th
at
the
Exe
cu
tive
Ma
na
ge
me
nt u
nd
ert
ake
s a
refr
esh o
f th
e B
oard
Assura
nce
Fra
me
wo
rk (
BA
F).
Th
e E
xe
cu
tive t
o r
efr
esh th
e B
AF
, p
ayin
g p
art
icu
lar
att
entio
n t
o:
-defin
ing t
he r
isk m
ore
pre
cis
ely
-c
reatin
g a
bette
r lin
k b
etw
een
ga
ps in
co
ntr
ol a
nd
action
s
-in
div
idua
l a
ction
s b
ein
g r
ele
va
nt,
tim
ely
and
inclu
din
g
outc
om
es
-ris
k a
pp
etite
and
confide
nce
-r
esid
ua
l risk r
ating
s b
ase
d o
n e
vid
en
ce
.
Inte
rnal A
udit a
nd C
oun
ter
Fra
ud
Po
sitiv
e a
ssu
rance
on p
erf
orm
ance m
onito
ring
, a
ction
pla
n p
rog
ress a
nd t
he im
ple
me
nta
tion
of
prior
recom
me
nd
atio
ns.
Th
e S
trate
gic
Work
forc
e C
om
mitte
e (
SW
C)
to c
onsid
er
and
ga
in a
ssura
nce
on:
-co
ntr
ols
on o
ve
rtim
e
-peo
ple
ris
ks p
ost th
e B
AF
refr
esh
-me
ssag
ing
to E
U n
ationa
ls
-issu
es a
risin
g fro
m t
he n
ew
pa
yro
ll a
rra
ng
em
ents
.
Clin
ica
l A
udit
Pa
pe
r re
ce
ive
d a
nd
accep
ted
. F
utu
re r
eport
ing
to
be r
evis
ed t
o r
em
ove
du
plic
ation
with
B
oard
/Qu
alit
y C
om
mitte
e a
nd
mo
re c
losely
alig
ned
with
A
RA
C’s
Term
s o
f R
efe
ren
ce
(b
y F
eb
ruary
2019).
Leg
al S
erv
ice
s
Ne
glig
en
ce c
laim
s,
coro
ner
activity,
He
alth
&
Sa
fety
and
oth
er
leg
al a
ctivity a
re a
ll b
ein
g w
ell
ma
nag
ed
.
(1)
Fu
ture
Leg
al S
erv
ice
s r
eport
ing
to
AR
AC
to
be
re
fin
ed
to
avo
id d
up
lica
tio
n w
ith
th
e Q
ualit
y C
om
mitte
e
(QC
) scru
tinis
ed a
ctivity a
nd
AR
AC
’s T
erm
s o
f
Aud
it an
d R
isk
Com
mitt
eeC
hair'
s R
epor
t
Page 43 of 144
A
rea
A
ss
ura
nce
Is
su
es
an
d/o
r N
ext
Ste
ps
Re
fere
nce (
by F
eb
ruary
2019).
(2
) T
he S
WC
to c
onsid
er
co
nsu
lta
nt
wo
rk p
lans,
su
pe
rvis
ion a
nd
ap
pra
isals
(if n
ot a
lre
ad
y c
ove
red
by t
he
Me
dic
al D
ire
cto
r’s r
epo
rts t
o t
he A
RA
C)
(3)
The Q
C to
ga
in a
ssu
rance
on
clin
ica
l re
cord
ke
ep
ing
(4
) M
r F
lack,
Dire
cto
r of F
inan
ce
to
ensu
re M
oJ e
sta
tes
risk (
£32
0,0
00)
addre
ssed
by y
ear
end
(5
) M
s D
avie
s,
Co
rpo
rate
Se
rvic
es D
ire
cto
r to
rep
ort
b
ack o
n c
om
plia
nce
with
su
bje
ct a
ccess r
eq
uests
tim
e
limits.
Ris
ks in P
art
ners
hip
Work
ing
O
utlin
e p
ap
er
on K
ent a
nd
Me
dw
ay (
K&
M)
Ca
re
Re
cord
rece
ive
d.
Th
e A
RA
C is s
upp
ort
ive
of
obje
ctive
s a
nd t
he p
rop
ose
d
risk m
itig
atio
ns. T
he b
usin
ess c
ase is to
be s
ubm
itte
d t
o
the B
oard
. A
reas t
o c
onsid
er
– s
kin
in
th
e g
am
e fo
r a
cute
s a
nd p
rim
ary
care
plu
s invo
lve
me
nt
of
KC
C.
Esta
tes
Po
sitiv
e a
ssu
rance
. T
he r
ela
tion
ship
with
NH
S P
rope
rty S
erv
ice
s (
NH
SP
S)
rem
ain
s c
halle
ng
ing
. N
o im
me
dia
te n
ee
d fo
r e
scala
tion
to
CE
O le
ve
l d
iscu
ssio
ns.
De
pe
nd
ing
on p
rog
ress in
th
e
next
ye
ar,
co
nsid
era
tio
n to
be g
ive
n t
o a
ppro
ach
ing
NH
SE
with
oth
er
com
mun
ity t
rusts
sug
gesting
a
lte
rna
tive
op
era
tin
g m
od
els
.
Da
ta I
nte
grity
P
ositiv
e a
ssu
rance
re
ceiv
ed a
cro
ss th
e r
ang
e o
f d
ata
an
d info
rmatio
n s
yste
ms f
rom
th
is a
nnu
al
Da
ta I
nte
grity
Re
vie
w.
Ele
ctr
onic
re
cord
s a
nd
co
mp
lete
ne
ss o
f d
ata
lo
ad
ing
to
re
ceiv
e f
ocus u
nd
er
futu
re C
linic
al A
udit a
ctivity.
Bre
xit
Lim
ite
d a
ssura
nce a
s t
he p
rob
abili
ty a
nd
se
ve
rity
of
risks r
em
ain
flu
id w
ith
su
bsta
ntia
l dependencie
s o
n t
hird p
art
ies s
uch a
s D
oH
(d
rug
s),
KC
C (
sta
ff m
obili
ty,
part
icu
larly M
20
co
rrid
or)
and S
TP
(b
uild
ing o
n e
xis
tin
g r
esili
ence
arr
ang
em
ents
, p
lann
ing
sce
na
rios, e
tc).
Bre
xit t
o b
e u
nd
er
mo
nth
ly r
epo
rtin
g to
th
e B
oard
until
the o
utc
om
e is c
leare
r an
d r
isks q
uan
tifie
d a
nd
m
itig
ate
d. T
he A
RA
C r
eco
mm
end
ed t
he a
pp
oin
tme
nt
of
a B
oard
Le
ve
l S
RO
for
Bre
xit.
Sin
gle
Te
nd
er
Waiv
ers
, L
osse
s
and
Sp
ecia
l P
aym
ents
Pro
cesse
s b
ein
g w
ell
ma
na
ge
d a
nd
po
sitiv
e
assura
nce r
eceiv
ed
. T
he tre
nd
lin
e o
f D
entistr
y p
atie
nt
write
-off
s t
o b
e
revie
we
d.
Page 44 of 144
A
rea
A
ss
ura
nce
Is
su
es
an
d/o
r N
ext
Ste
ps
AR
AC
Eff
ective
ne
ss a
nd
Eva
luatio
n o
f th
e M
eetin
g
Pro
po
sals
for
de-d
up
lica
tio
n (
with
Bo
ard
an
d
oth
er
co
mm
itte
es)
plu
s tig
hte
r fo
cus o
n A
RA
C’s
T
erm
s o
f R
efe
rence
acce
pte
d.
Pe
ter
Co
nw
ay
Ch
air
, A
ud
it a
nd
Ris
k C
om
mit
tee
17 D
ece
mb
er
201
8
Aud
it an
d R
isk
Com
mitt
eeC
hair'
s R
epor
t
Page 45 of 144
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 31 January 2019
Agenda Number: 2.6
Agenda Item Title: Charitable Funds Committee Chair’s Assurance Report
Presenting Officer: Richard Field, Deputy Chair of Charitable Funds Committee
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The paper summarises the Charitable Funds Committee meeting held on 29 November 2018. A verbal report will be given of the meeting held on 30 January 2019.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board is asked to receive the Charitable Funds Committee Chair’s Assurance Report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required. The paper will have no
impact on people with any of the nine protected characteristics
Jen Tippin, Non-Executive Director Tel: 01622 211906
Email:
Cha
ritab
le F
unds
Com
mitt
eeC
hair'
s R
epor
t
Page 46 of 144
CH
AR
ITA
BL
E F
UN
DS
CO
MM
ITT
EE
CH
AIR
’S A
SS
UR
AN
CE
RE
PO
RT
Th
is r
ep
ort
is fo
un
ded
on
th
e C
ha
rita
ble
Fu
nds C
om
mitte
e m
eetin
g h
eld
on
Thu
rsd
ay 2
9 N
ove
mb
er
20
18
. A
ge
nd
a i
tem
A
ss
ura
nc
e a
nd
Ke
y p
oin
ts t
o n
ote
F
urt
he
r a
cti
on
s a
nd
fo
llo
w u
p
Dra
ft 2
01
7/8
Accou
nts
T
he
dra
ft a
cco
un
ts fo
r 2
017
/18 w
ere
re
vie
we
d a
nd
will
be
pre
se
nte
d fo
r fina
l a
ppro
va
l in
Ja
nu
ary
20
19
. T
he
acco
un
ts h
ad
als
o b
een
in
de
pen
den
tly r
evie
we
d b
y t
he
Tru
st’s a
ud
ito
rs,
Gra
nt T
ho
rnto
n.
The
acco
unts
will
be
pre
se
nte
d fo
r fina
l
ap
pro
va
l a
t th
e J
anu
ary
20
19
me
etin
g o
f th
e
Ch
arita
ble
Fu
nd
s C
om
mitte
e a
he
ad
of
the
de
ad
line
fo
r th
e C
ha
ritie
s C
om
mis
sio
n.
Ma
rke
tin
g t
he
Ch
arita
ble
Fu
nd
s
A r
ep
ort
wa
s r
ece
ive
d fro
m th
e M
ark
etin
g T
eam
on
pro
gre
ss.
A q
ue
stion
wa
s r
ais
ed
on
ho
w c
om
fort
ab
le th
e
Tru
st
wa
s o
n c
on
tin
uin
g t
o u
se
th
e b
rand
‘i-
care
’, g
ive
n
the
sim
ilarity
in
na
me
to
oth
er
org
an
isa
tio
ns a
nd
th
e
inte
ntio
n to
pro
mote
the
ch
arity
on
so
cia
l m
edia
.
The
Exe
cu
tive
Te
am
wa
s a
sked
to
re
-
co
nsid
er
the
use
of
the n
am
e ‘i-
ca
re’ ah
ead
of
the
ne
xt
Ch
arita
ble
Fu
nd
s C
om
mitte
e in
Ja
nua
ry 2
01
9.
Re
se
rve
s P
olic
y
Fo
llow
ing its
an
nu
al re
vie
w,
the
Re
se
rve
s P
olic
y w
as
pre
se
nte
d fo
r ap
pro
va
l. N
o c
ha
nge
s w
ere
pro
po
sed
.
No
ne
re
qu
ire
d.
Fu
nd
Man
age
r
Pre
se
nta
tio
n
A p
resen
tatio
n w
as r
ece
ive
d f
or
assu
ran
ce
on t
he
pla
ns
for
He
ron
Ward
, Q
ue
en
Vic
toria
Mem
oria
l H
osp
ita
l, H
ern
e
Ba
y w
hic
h w
ill b
en
efit fr
om
th
e u
se
of
the
Me
rmik
ide
s
Re
str
icte
d F
un
d.
The
Com
mitte
e w
ill r
ece
ive
an
assu
ran
ce
rep
ort
fro
m th
e B
ow
Ro
ad
Fu
nd M
an
age
r in
Ja
nua
ry 2
01
9.
Je
n T
ipp
in,
Ch
air
of
the
Ch
ari
tab
le F
un
ds
Co
mm
itte
e,
10 D
ecem
be
r 2
01
8
Cha
ritab
le F
unds
Com
mitt
eeC
hair'
s R
epor
t
Page 47 of 144
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 31 January 2019
Agenda Number: 2.7
Agenda Item Title: Integrated Performance Report
Presenting Officer: Gordon Flack, Director of Finance
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The Integrated Performance Report has been revised for this month, taking on board recommendations from NHS improvement in the way that the report is presented with the use of Statistical Process Control (SPC) chart. The use of these charts has been presented and agreed through the Executive Team, as well as the revised summary scorecard. It should be noted that the full Finance, Workforce and Quality reports will still be presented at their respective committees. The report has been produced in collaboration with the Executive Team and their support teams. This report contains the following sections:
• Corporate Scorecard and Summary
• Quality Report
• Workforce Report
• Finance Report
• Operational Report
Historic data has been provided to show trends, with the SPC charts being used to show a rolling 25 month view of performance for each indicator. Upper and Lower control limits are used to indicate a shift in performance over a sustained period and to highlight where performance deviates from these expected ranges. Key Highlights from report Quality
• One new grade 2 pressure ulcers categorised this month (twelve
for the year and on target to meet annual target)
• Grade 3/4 pressure ulcers (5) well below target for the year to
date. None for November and December.
• Community Hospital fill rates positive at 95% (day) and 95%
(night)
• Reducing overall trend for medication incidents, however
increased low harm incidents.
Workforce
• Turnover remains above the 16.47% target and although
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 48 of 144
reducing is still unlikely to meet target with process change.
• Sickness absence remains above the Trust target at 4.55% for
the month and consistently above the mean.
• Vacancy rates remain consistently high at 9.7%, with a high
level or recruitment activity ongoing.
• An increase in temporary staff shift requests, although fill rates
are showing normal variation.
Finance
• CIP savings currently 9.6% behind target, although forecast year
end position is for full achievement
• Capital Expenditure year to date is £2,062k, representing 67%
of the YTD plan
• YTD surplus ahead of plan (2.2%)
Operations
• NHS Health Checks (76.4%) and Stop smoking Quits (55.9%)
remain behind plan but are improving through a period of normal
variation.
• Health Visiting mandatory check performance against the New
Birth and 6-8 week visit are both on target and showing normal
variation.
• Referral to treatment incomplete wait times for consultant-led
services has improved above the 92% target, following a period
of adverse variation. No patients are now waiting above 52
weeks.
• Some waiting times for other AHP services on an non
consultant-led pathway are high, with particular reference to
MSK Physio in west Kent (Block)
• Audiology 6 week diagnostics are marginally below the 99%
target, although showing normal variation
• The newly introduced End of Life indicator, measuring the level
of electronic care planning for End of Life patients continues to
fall below the 60% target.
• Delayed Transfers of Care (DTOCs) consistent and below target
year to date, although showing a slight increasing trend on the
last 2 months.
• For Specialist and Children’s service, reported outcomes are
being either partially or fully achieved in 90% of cases.
• Late requests from KCC are impacting the performance against
the Looked After Children 28 day initial assessment national
target, although still being achieved most months. Internal
timescales are meeting the standard but are reliant on receiving
the requests within 5 working days
Page 49 of 144
• Activity for Intermediate Care services in east Kent, as well as
some Specialist and Elective Services (in particular Podiatry,
Epilepsy, Diabetes and Continence) continue to fall significantly
below the annual plan.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board is asked to note this report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Not Applicable
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required.
Nick Plummer, Assistant Director of Performance and Business Intelligence
Tel: 01233 667722
Email: [email protected]
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 50 of 144
Integrated
Perform
ance Rep
ort 2
018/19
Janu
ary 2019
repo
rt
Part One
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 51 of 144
Con
tent
s
P
age
3
P
age
4
Glo
ssar
y of
Ter
ms
Ass
uran
ce o
n St
rate
gic
Goa
ls
Pag
e 5-
8
Cor
pora
te S
core
card
Pag
e 9-
16
Q
ualit
y R
epor
t
Pa
ge 1
7-22
Wor
kfor
ce R
epor
t P
age
23
F
inan
ce R
epor
t
Pa
ge 2
4-37
Ope
ratio
nal R
epor
t P
age
38
A
ppen
dix
1 –
SPC
Cha
rts
Page 52 of 144
Glo
ssar
y of
Ter
ms
SPC
– S
tatis
tical
Pro
cess
Con
trol
LTC
– L
ong
Term
Con
ditio
ns N
ursi
ng S
ervi
ce
ICT
– In
term
edia
te C
are
Ser
vice
Qua
lity
Scor
ecar
d –
Wei
ghte
d m
onth
ly ri
sk ra
ted
qual
ity s
core
card
s
C.D
iff –
Clo
strid
ium
Diff
icile
MR
SA –
Met
hici
llin
Res
ista
nt S
taph
yloc
occu
s A
ureu
s
MIU
– M
inor
Inju
ry U
nit
RTT
– R
efer
ral t
o Tr
eatm
ent
GU
M –
Gen
itour
inar
y M
edic
ine
CQ
UIN
– C
omm
issi
onin
g fo
r Qua
lity
and
Inno
vatio
n
MTW
– M
aids
tone
and
Ton
brid
ge W
ells
NH
S T
rust
WTE
– W
hole
Tim
e E
quiv
alen
t
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 53 of 144
Non
-SPC
KPI
on
targ
etN
on-S
PC K
PI p
erfo
rman
ce u
nder
revi
ewN
on-S
PC K
PI o
ff ta
rget
Spec
ial C
ause
Not
e - t
his
indi
cate
s th
at s
peci
al c
ause
var
iatio
n is
occ
urrin
g in
a K
PI,
with
the
varia
tion
bein
g in
a fa
vour
able
dire
ctio
n.
Hig
h ( H
)spe
cial
cau
se n
ote
indi
cate
s th
at v
aria
tion
is u
pwar
ds in
a K
PI w
here
per
form
ance
is id
eally
abo
ve a
targ
et li
ne e
.g. N
ew B
irth
Vis
its. L
ow (L
) spe
cial
cau
se c
once
rn is
whe
re th
e va
rianc
e is
dow
nwar
ds fo
r a b
elow
targ
et K
PI e
.g. D
NA
Rat
e
1.0
Ass
uran
ce o
n St
rate
gic
Goa
ls
Spec
ial C
ause
Con
cern
- th
is in
dica
tes
that
spe
cial
cau
se v
aria
tion
is o
ccur
ring
in a
KP
I, w
ith th
e va
riatio
n be
ing
in a
n ad
vers
e di
rect
ion.
Lo
w ( L
) spe
cial
cau
se c
once
rn in
dica
tes
that
var
iatio
n is
dow
nwar
ds in
a K
PI w
here
per
form
ance
is id
eally
abo
ve a
targ
et li
ne e
.g. N
ew
Birt
h V
isits
. Hig
h sp
ecia
l cau
se c
once
rn (H
) is
whe
re th
e va
rianc
e is
upw
ards
for a
bel
ow ta
rget
line
KP
I e.g
. DN
A R
ate
Ove
rall,
of t
he 3
6 in
dica
tors
that
we
are
able
to p
lot o
n a
stat
istic
al p
roce
ss c
ontro
l (SP
C) c
hart,
2.8
% a
re e
xper
ienc
ing
favo
urab
le in
-mon
th v
aria
tion
(1, K
PI 4
.3),
11.1
% a
re s
how
ing
in- m
onth
adv
erse
var
ianc
e (4
, K
PIs
2.14
, 2.2
0, 5
.3 a
nd 5
.5 )
and
the
rem
aini
ng 8
6.1%
(30)
are
sho
win
g no
rmal
var
iatio
n.
25%
of t
he K
PIs
are
cons
iste
ntly
ach
ievi
ng ta
rget
(KPI
s 1.
4, 2
.12,
2.1
3, 2
.18,
2.1
9, 4
.3, 4
.5 a
nd 5
.4),
16.7
% (K
PIs
1.1,
1.2
, 2.8
, 3.5
, 4.1
and
5.3
) are
con
sist
ently
faili
ng,
with
the
rem
aini
ng 5
8.3%
var
iabl
y ac
hiev
ing
targ
et w
ith n
o tre
nd o
f con
sist
ent a
chie
vem
ent/f
ailu
re.
Of t
he 9
indi
cato
rs w
here
an
SPC
cha
rt is
not
app
ropr
iate
, 77.
8% (7
) hav
e ac
hiev
ed th
e in
-mon
th ta
rget
, with
11.
1% (1
, KPI
3.3
) rat
ed a
s am
ber a
nd 1
1.1%
(1, K
PI 2
.7) f
ailin
g th
e ta
rget
.
0%20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Preven
t Ill He
alth
Deliver high‐qu
ality
care at
home an
d in th
e commun
ity
Integrate Services
Develop
Sustainab
le Services
Be The
Best E
mployer
Favourable Variance KP
Is (%
)
0%20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Preven
t Ill He
alth
Deliver high‐qu
ality
care at
home an
d in th
e commun
ity
Integrate Services
Develop
Sustainab
le Services
Be The
Best E
mployer
Common
Variance KP
Is (%
)
0%20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Preven
t Ill Health
Deliver high‐qu
ality
care
at hom
e an
d in th
ecommun
ity
Integrate Services
Develop
Sustainab
leServices
Be The
Best E
mployer
Adverse Va
riance KP
Is (%
)
Page 54 of 144
Met
ricLo
wer
Mea
nU
pper
KPI
1.1
Sto
p Sm
okin
g - 4
wee
k Q
uitte
rsN
ovem
ber 2
018
62.9
%Fa
il10
0%35
%60
%85
%KP
I is
expe
rienc
ing
natu
ral v
aria
tion,
follo
win
g a
reca
lcul
atio
n of
the
cont
rol l
imits
from
Apr
il 20
18.
KPI i
s cu
rren
tly u
nlik
ely
to m
eet t
arge
t with
out
a pr
oces
s ch
ange
with
the
uppe
r con
trol l
imit
at th
en ta
rget
leve
l
KPI
1.2
Hea
lth C
heck
s C
arrie
d O
ut
Nov
embe
r 201
876
.4%
Fail
100%
52%
69%
86%
KPI i
s ex
perie
ncin
g na
tura
l var
iatio
n, fo
llow
ing
a re
calc
ulat
ion
of th
e co
ntro
l lim
its fr
om A
pril
2018
.
KPI i
s cu
rren
tly u
nlik
ely
to m
eet t
arge
t with
out
a pr
oces
s ch
ange
with
the
uppe
r con
trol l
imit
at th
en ta
rget
leve
l
KPI
1.3
Hea
lth V
isiti
ng -
New
Birt
h Vi
sits
Und
erta
ken
by 1
4 da
ysN
ovem
ber 2
018
91.3
%90
%88
%92
%95
%KP
I will
mos
tly a
chie
ve ta
rget
but
the
cont
rol
limits
indi
cate
that
faili
ng th
e ta
rget
is a
po
ssib
ilty
with
in th
e cu
rren
t pro
cess
KPI
1.4
Hea
lth V
isiti
ng -
6-8
wee
k ch
eck
unde
rtak
en b
y 8
wee
ksN
ovem
ber 2
018
87.6
%80
%86
%89
%93
%KP
I is
cons
iste
ntly
ach
ievi
ng th
e ta
rget
with
th
e lo
wer
lim
it ab
ove
the
targ
et. T
his
sugg
ests
fa
iling
to m
eet t
he ta
rget
is u
nlik
ely
to o
ccur
.
KPI
1.5
Sch
ool H
ealth
- R
ecep
tion
Chi
ldre
n Sc
reen
ed fo
r Hei
ght a
nd
Wei
ght
Dec
embe
r 201
880
.1%
90%
(yea
r en
d)KP
I is
cum
ulat
ive
thro
ugh
the
scho
ol y
ear
KPI i
s on
traj
ecto
ry to
ach
ieve
targ
et b
y th
e en
d of
the
18/1
9 sc
hool
yea
r
KPI
1.6
Sch
ool H
ealth
- Ye
ar 6
C
hild
ren
Scre
ened
for H
eigh
t and
W
eigh
tD
ecem
ber 2
018
78.2
%90
% (y
ear
end)
KPI i
s cu
mul
ativ
e th
roug
h th
e sc
hool
yea
rKP
I is
on tr
ajec
tory
to a
chie
ve ta
rget
by
the
end
of th
e 18
/19
scho
ol y
ear
KPI
1.7
LTC
/ICT
- Adm
issi
ons
Avoi
danc
e (u
sing
agr
eed
crite
ria)
Nov
embe
r 201
864
2352
5742
8056
7670
73KP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
KPI
1.8
% L
TC/IC
T pa
tient
s th
at
had
at le
ast o
ne v
isit
whi
ch
Avoi
ded
a H
ospi
tal A
dmis
sion
Nov
embe
r 201
816
.4%
15.0
%11
.9%
16.2
%20
.5%
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
Met
ric
18/1
9 YT
D
Actu
al
18/1
9 YT
D
Targ
etK
PI 2
.1 N
umbe
r of T
eam
s w
ith a
n Am
ber o
r Red
Qua
lity
Scor
ecar
d R
atin
g N
ovem
ber 2
018
01
58
Ther
e ha
ve b
een
5 Am
ber/R
ed ra
tings
for t
he
finan
cial
yea
r to
date
with
Apr
il (2
) bei
ng th
e hi
ghes
t mon
th
KPI
2.2
Nev
er E
vent
sD
ecem
ber 2
018
00
00
No
neve
r eve
nts
expe
rienc
ed th
is y
ear.
Last
ev
ent i
n D
ecem
ber 2
016
KPI
2.3
Infe
ctio
n C
ontr
ol: C
.Diff
Dec
embe
r 201
80
00
0N
o C
-Diff
cas
es th
is y
ear.
Last
cas
e w
as in
Fe
brua
ry 2
018
KPI
2.4
Infe
ctio
n C
ontr
ol: M
RSA
ca
ses
whe
re K
CH
FT p
rovi
ded
care
Dec
embe
r 201
80
04
04
case
s th
is y
ear (
One
in e
ach
of A
pril,
Au
gust
, Sep
tem
ber a
nd O
ctob
er)
Met
ricLo
wer
Mea
nU
pper
KPI
2.5
Inpa
tient
Fal
ls (M
oder
ate
and
Seve
re H
arm
) per
100
0 O
ccup
ied
Bed
Day
sD
ecem
ber 2
018
CC
V0.
000.
19-0
.28
0.18
0.63
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
1. Prevent Ill Health 2. Deliver high-quality care at home and in the community
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 55 of 144
Met
ricLo
wer
Mea
nU
pper
KPI
2.6
Avo
idab
le P
ress
ure
Ulc
ers
- G
rade
3 &
4D
ecem
ber 2
018
01
-2.4
0.9
4.2
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs. T
here
hav
e be
en 5
inci
dent
s th
is y
ear c
ompa
red
to 1
0 by
the
sam
e st
age
of
2017
/18
KPI
2.7
Per
cent
age
of E
nd o
f Life
pa
tient
s w
ith a
n up
date
d Pe
rson
alis
ed C
are
Plan
(PC
P)N
ovem
ber 2
018
18.9
%60
.0%
Cur
rent
ly to
o fe
w d
ata
poin
ts to
plo
t an
SPC
ch
art
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly fa
iling
the
targ
et, a
lthou
gh
is a
new
targ
et a
nd d
ata
colle
ctio
n. S
ee
Ope
ratio
nal R
epor
t for
mor
e de
tail
KPI
2.8
Con
trac
tual
Act
ivity
: YTD
as
% o
f YTD
Tar
get
Nov
embe
r 201
898
.2%
100.
0%95
.0%
97.3
%99
.5%
KPI w
ill c
onsi
sten
tly fa
il th
e ta
rget
, with
the
uppe
r lim
it be
low
the
targ
et. T
his
sugg
ests
ac
hiev
emen
t is
likel
y to
be
dow
n to
cha
nce
with
out a
pro
cess
or t
arge
t cha
nge
KPI
2.9
Tru
stw
ide
Did
Not
Atte
nd
Rat
e: D
NAs
as
a %
of t
otal
act
ivity
Nov
embe
r 201
83.
3%4.
0%3.
1%3.
6%4.
2%
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs.H
owev
er, t
he ta
rget
is n
ear t
he
uppe
r lim
it su
gges
ting
failu
re to
mee
t tar
get i
s un
likel
y.
KPI
2.1
0 LT
C/IC
T R
espo
nse
Tim
es
Met
(%) (
requ
ired
time
varie
s by
pa
tient
)N
ovem
ber 2
018
97.5
%95
.0%
94.8
%96
.5%
98.2
%KP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
, alth
ough
failu
re is
unl
ikel
y w
ith
the
targ
et m
argi
nally
abo
ve th
e lo
wer
lim
it
KPI
2.1
1 Pe
rcen
tage
of R
apid
R
espo
nse
Con
sulta
tions
sta
rted
w
ithin
2hr
s of
refe
rral
acc
epta
nce
Nov
embe
r 201
895
.5%
95.0
%88
.0%
94.3
%10
0.7%
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
2.1
2 To
tal T
ime
in M
IUs:
Les
s th
an 4
hou
rsN
ovem
ber 2
018
99.8
%95
.0%
99.5
%99
.8%
100.
1%KP
I is
cons
iste
ntly
ach
ievi
ng th
e ta
rget
with
th
e ta
rget
sig
nific
antly
bel
ow th
e lo
wer
lim
it
KPI
2.1
3 C
onsu
ltant
Led
18
Wee
k R
efer
ral t
o Tr
eatm
ent (
RTT
) -
Inco
mpl
ete
Path
way
sN
ovem
ber 2
018
96.4
%92
.0%
92.9
%95
.6%
98.2
%KP
I is
now
sho
win
g co
mm
on c
ause
var
iatio
n fo
llow
ing
a pe
riod
of n
egat
ive
vario
atio
n eb
low
th
e m
ean
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
the
targ
et w
ith
the
low
er li
mit
abov
e th
e ta
rget
, sug
gest
ing
failu
re to
mee
t tar
get i
s an
unl
ikel
y ev
ent.
KPI
2.1
4 AH
P (N
on-C
onsu
ltant
Led
) R
efer
ral t
o Tr
eatm
ent T
imes
(RTT
) N
ovem
ber 2
018
89.9
%92
.0%
91.1
%94
.1%
97.0
%KP
I is
expe
rienc
ing
low
adv
erse
var
iatio
n w
ith
the
last
thre
e m
onth
s be
low
the
low
er c
ontro
l lim
it
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
2.1
5 Ac
cess
to G
UM
: with
in 4
8 ho
urs
Nov
embe
r 201
810
0.0%
100.
0%10
0.0%
100.
0%10
0.0%
Con
sist
ently
mee
ting
targ
et. F
ailu
re to
mee
t ta
rget
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
a c
hanc
e ev
ent
with
out a
pro
cess
cha
nge.
Has
met
targ
et fo
r th
e la
st 5
yea
rs
KPI
2.1
6 Le
ngth
of C
omm
unity
H
ospi
tal I
npat
ient
Sta
y (M
edia
n Av
erag
e)
Nov
embe
r 201
820
.121
.014
.820
.225
.6KP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
KPI
2.1
7 R
esea
rch:
Par
ticip
ants
re
crui
ted
to n
atio
nal p
ortfo
lio
stud
ies
(Yea
r to
Dat
e)D
ecem
ber 2
018
252
160
KPI i
s cu
mul
ativ
eKP
I is
cons
iste
ntly
ach
ievi
ng th
e ta
rget
of 6
0 pe
r qua
rter
KPI
2.1
8 Pe
rcen
tage
of p
atie
nt
goal
s ac
hiev
ed u
pon
disc
harg
e fo
r pl
anne
d an
d th
erap
y se
rvic
esN
ovem
ber 2
018
90.8
%80
.0%
84.5
%89
.6%
94.6
%
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
the
targ
et a
s th
e lo
wer
lim
it is
sig
nifc
antly
abo
ve th
e ta
rget
. Th
is w
ould
mea
n fa
ilure
to m
eet t
arge
t wou
ld
likel
y be
due
to c
hanc
e
KPI
2.1
9 Fr
iend
s an
d Fa
mily
- Pe
rcen
tage
of P
atie
nts
who
wou
ld
Rec
omm
end
KC
HFT
Dec
embe
r 201
896
.3%
95.0
%95
.9%
97.2
%98
.5%
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
the
targ
et a
s th
e lo
wer
lim
it is
abo
ve th
e ta
rget
. Thi
s su
gges
ts
faili
ng to
mee
t tar
get i
s an
unl
ikel
y ev
ent.
KPI
2.2
0 Fr
iend
s an
d Fa
mily
Tes
t (P
atie
nts
surv
eyed
for M
IUs
&
Com
m. H
osp)
- R
espo
nse
Rat
eD
ecem
ber 2
018
12.7
%20
.0%
12.9
%18
.2%
23.5
%KP
I is
expe
rienc
ing
low
adv
erse
var
iatio
n w
ith
the
last
11
mon
ths
belo
w th
e m
ean
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
2.2
1 C
linic
al A
udit:
% o
f aud
it re
com
men
datio
ns im
plem
ente
d by
de
adlin
eD
ecem
ber 2
018
86.0
%85
.0%
45.8
%75
.9%
105.
9%KP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
KPI
2.2
2 N
ICE
Tech
nica
l Ap
prai
sals
revi
ewed
by
requ
ired
time
scal
es fo
llow
ing
revi
ewD
ecem
ber 2
018
100.
0%10
0.0%
100.
0%10
0.0%
100.
0%
Con
sist
ently
mee
ting
targ
et. F
ailu
re to
mee
t ta
rget
wou
ld b
e co
nsid
ered
a c
hanc
e ev
ent
with
out a
pro
cess
cha
nge.
Has
met
targ
et fo
r th
e la
st 5
yea
rs
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
2. Deliver high-quality care at home and in the community
Page 56 of 144
Met
ricLo
wer
Mea
nU
pper
KPI
3.1
Del
ayed
Tra
nsfe
rs o
f Car
e fr
om a
Com
mun
ity H
ospi
tal b
ed a
s a
% o
f Occ
upie
d B
ed D
ays
Nov
embe
r 201
813
.2%
9.5%
4.3%
10.3
%16
.3%
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
3.2
Per
cent
age
of L
TC/IC
T R
efer
rals
com
ing
from
with
in
KC
HFT
Nov
embe
r 201
818
.6%
10.0
%14
.9%
18.8
%22
.7%
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
the
targ
et w
ith
the
targ
et c
onsi
dera
bly
belo
w th
e lo
wer
lim
it
KPI
3.3
CQ
UIN
s (%
of C
QU
IN
mon
ey a
chie
ved
to 1
8/19
Q2)
Sept
embe
r 201
894
.5%
100%
SPC
not
app
ropr
iate
for t
his
met
ricKP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
, with
2 o
f the
last
8 q
uarte
rs
achi
evin
g 10
0%
KPI
3.4
Hom
e Fi
rst c
ost s
avin
g -
redu
ctio
n of
exc
ess
bed
days
- M
onth
ly A
vera
ge £
s (W
est K
ent)
Nov
embe
r 201
8£1
8,11
2£4
0,00
0-£
69,6
10£2
3,85
5£1
17,3
19KP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
KPI
3.5
Ave
rage
wai
t tim
e (m
inut
es) f
or M
TW A
ccid
ent a
nd
Emer
genc
y Se
rvic
esD
ecem
ber 2
018
297
240
247
313
380
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly fa
iling
the
targ
et a
s th
e lo
wer
lim
it is
abo
ve th
e ta
rget
. Thi
s su
gges
ts
perfo
rman
ce is
unl
ikel
y to
dec
reas
e to
mee
t ta
rget
with
out a
pro
cess
cha
nge
Met
ricLo
wer
Mea
nU
pper
KPI
4.1
Per
cent
age
of L
TC/IC
T Fa
ce to
Fac
e C
onta
cts
carr
ied
out
in a
clin
ic (t
arge
t to
incr
ease
)N
ovem
ber 2
018
3.4%
5.0%
2.9%
3.8%
4.6%
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly fa
iling
the
targ
et w
ith th
e ta
rget
abo
ve th
e up
per l
imit.
Thi
s su
gges
t ac
hiev
ing
targ
et w
ithou
t a p
roce
ss c
hang
e w
ill
be d
own
to c
hanc
e an
d ne
eds
revi
ew
KPI
4.2
Bed
Occ
upan
cy: O
ccup
ied
Bed
Day
s as
a %
of a
vaila
ble
bed
days
Nov
embe
r 201
890
.2%
87.0
%83
.2%
89.2
%95
.3%
Tren
d ha
s im
prov
ed fo
llwin
g 6
mon
ths
of
adve
rse
perfo
rman
ce b
elow
the
mea
nKP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
KPI
4.3
Inco
me
& E
xpen
ditu
re -
Surp
lus
(%)
Dec
embe
r 201
82.
2%1.
0%1.
1%1.
4%1.
8%KP
I is
expe
rienc
ing
high
favo
urab
le v
aria
tion
with
the
this
mon
th's
sur
plus
per
form
ing
abov
e th
e up
per c
ontro
l lim
it
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
the
targ
et a
s th
e lo
wer
lim
it is
abo
ve th
e ta
rget
. Thi
s su
gges
ts
perfo
rman
ce is
unl
ikel
y to
dec
reas
e to
bel
ow
targ
et
KPI
4.4
Cos
t Im
prov
emen
t Pla
ns
(CIP
) Ach
ieve
d ag
ains
t Pla
n (%
)D
ecem
ber 2
018
90.4
%10
0.0%
67.5
%84
.5%
101.
5%KP
I will
var
iabl
y m
eet t
he ta
rget
som
e m
onth
s an
d fa
il ot
hers
, exp
ecia
lly e
arly
in e
ach
finan
cial
yea
r
KPI
4.5
Ext
erna
l Age
ncy
spen
d ag
ains
t Tra
ject
ory
(£00
0s)
Dec
embe
r 201
8£4
65,6
26£6
28,0
00£2
03,9
93£3
84,3
36£5
64,6
79
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly a
chie
ving
the
targ
et a
s th
e up
per l
imit
is b
elow
the
targ
et. T
his
sugg
ests
pe
rform
ance
is u
nlik
ely
to in
crea
se to
abo
ve
targ
et
Met
ric
18/1
9 YT
D
Actu
al
18/1
9 YT
D
Targ
etK
PI 4
.6 A
nnua
l Val
ue o
f Ten
ders
W
on b
y K
CH
FT (o
f tho
se th
at
reac
h aw
ard
stag
e - £
000s
)D
ecem
ber 2
018
£0N
o Ta
rget
No
tend
ers
that
hav
e be
en s
ubm
itted
by
KCH
FT h
ave
been
aw
arde
d th
is y
ear
KPI
4.7
Ann
ual V
alue
of T
ende
rs
Lost
by
KC
HFT
(of t
hose
that
reac
h aw
ard
stag
e - £
000s
)D
ecem
ber 2
018
£0N
o Ta
rget
No
tend
ers
that
hav
e be
en s
ubm
itted
by
KCH
FT h
ave
been
aw
arde
d th
is y
ear
4. Develop sustainable services
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
No
Targ
et
No
Targ
et
£0£0
3. Integrate Services
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 57 of 144
Met
ricLo
wer
Mea
nU
pper
KPI
5.1
Sic
knes
s R
ate
Dec
embe
r 201
84.
55%
3.90
%3.
83%
4.50
%5.
17%
KPI w
ill s
omet
imes
ach
ieve
the
targ
et,
alth
ough
will
fail
mor
e of
ten
due
to th
e lo
wer
lim
it be
ing
mar
gina
lly b
elow
the
targ
et
KPI
5.2
Sic
knes
s R
ate
(Str
ess
and
Anxi
ety)
Dec
embe
r 201
81.
13%
1.15
%1.
04%
1.24
%1.
43%
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
KPI
5.3
Unp
lann
ed T
urno
ver
Dec
embe
r 201
815
.9%
14.1
%14
.5%
15.5
%16
.5%
KPI i
s ex
perie
ncin
g hi
gh a
dver
se v
aria
tion
with
the
last
12
mon
ths
perfo
rmin
g ab
ove
the
mea
n
KPI i
s co
nsis
tent
ly fa
iling
the
targ
et w
ith th
e ta
rget
bel
ow th
e lo
wer
lim
it. T
his
sugg
est
achi
evin
g ta
rget
with
out a
pro
cess
cha
nge
will
be
dow
n to
cha
nce
and
need
s re
view
KPI
5.4
Man
dato
ry T
rain
ing:
C
ombi
ned
Com
plia
nce
Rat
eD
ecem
ber 2
018
95.9
%85
.0%
88.1
%95
.7%
103.
4%KP
I is
cons
iste
ntly
ach
ievi
ng th
e ta
rget
as
the
low
er li
mit
is a
bove
the
targ
et
KPI
5.5
Gro
ss V
acan
cy F
acto
r (%
of
the
budg
eted
WTE
unf
illed
by
perm
anen
t wor
kfor
ce)
Dec
embe
r 201
89.
7%9.
7%6.
7%8.
8%10
.9%
KPI i
s ex
perie
ncin
g hi
gh a
dver
se v
aria
tion
with
the
last
12
mon
ths
perfo
rmin
g ab
ove
the
mea
n
KPI w
ill v
aria
bly
mee
t the
targ
et s
ome
mon
ths
and
fail
othe
rs
Actu
alTa
rget
Com
men
tary
5. Be The Best Employer
Page 58 of 144
2.0
2.1
As
Qua
lity
Re
ssur
ance
on
Sa
The
shift
fiin
crea
sing
Onl
y E
den
Thre
e ho
spR
N s
hifts
wre
sulte
d in
be
en t
o c o
addi
tiona
l s
Whi
le P
riman
d so
had
Wes
tvie
w w
nigh
t shi
fts
Sta
ffing
is
unde
rtaki
n g
epor
t af
er S
taffi
ng
ill r
ates
for
com
1% fr
om N
ove m
brid
ge H
ospi
tal
pita
ls h
ad a
nig
hw
ere
unab
le to
an
ove
rfill
rate
fov
er w
hen
the
staf
f to
prov
ide
s
mro
se w
ard
has
d 43
RN
day
shi
fw
hich
cur
rent
ly
s. re
view
ed d
aily
ag
the
audi
t for
th
mun
ity h
ospi
tal
mbe
r. T
he n
ight
had
a da
y fil
l rat
ht fi
ll ra
te u
nder
9be
fille
d by
ban
for H
CA
s. T
here
RN
shi
fts c
ould
safe
car
e fo
r pat
no p
lann
ed R
N
fts a
nd 3
0 R
N n
iha
s on
ly o
ne u
n
and
shor
tage
s a
he 6
mon
thly
saf
war
ds a
re s
et o
shift
fill
rate
for
te b
elow
95%
, in
95%
. Ede
nbrid
gnk
or
agen
cy th
ee
have
bee
n ad
dd
not
be f
illed
, tie
nts
with
cog
ni
shift
s be
caus
e ig
ht s
hifts
on
e-r
nit o
f 15
beds
an
are
subj
ect t
o th
fer s
taffi
ng re
viewou
t bel
ow.
The
RN
’s w
as 9
5%,
ncre
asin
g by
0.7
ge h
ad d
ropp
ed t
e w
ards
incr
eas
ditio
nal H
CA
s on
and
addi
tiona
lltiv
e im
pairm
ent .
it is
a th
erap
y w
rost
er.
nd th
e re
gist
ered
he s
ame
esca
law
s.
day
fill
rate
for
drop
ping
from
9
7% fr
om th
e pr
ev
to 8
7.1%
, whi
le
sed
the
use
of H
n a
num
ber o
f sh
y W
hits
tabl
e an
. war
d, th
ey e
mpl
o
d nu
rse
fill r
ate
i
tion
proc
esse
s arre
gist
ered
nur
s99
% in
Nov
embe
viou
s m
onth
to 8
Dea
l and
QV
MH
HC
A s
taff
to e
xphi
fts in
mos
t hos
nd T
anke
rton,
Q
oyed
tem
pora
ry
s am
ber a
t 90%
as o
ther
KC
HFTse
s (R
N)
in D
ecer
.
81.5
% in
Dec
em
H b
oth
drop
ped
pand
gen
eral
ca
spita
ls, t
he m
ajo
QV
MH
and
Fav
staf
fing
to p
rov
% fo
r day
s an
d g
T w
ards
. A
ll w
a
cem
ber
was
95%
ber.
to 9
1.9%
. W
her
apac
ity w
hich
ha
ority
of t
hese
hav
vers
ham
req
uire
ide
nurs
ing
cove
reen
at 9
1.7%
fo
ards
are
cur
rent
%, re
as
ve
ed
er
or
tly
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 59 of 144
2.2
A 2.2
2.2ss
uran
ce o
n Pr
2.1
Cat
egor
y 2
The
num
b eag
reed
traj
finan
cial
ye
Ther
e ha
s as
avo
idab
The
belo
w
2.2
Cat
egor
y 3,
The
num
b etra
ject
ory
o
ress
ure
Ulc
ers
Pres
sure
Ulc
er
er o
f avo
idab
le
ecto
ry o
f a 1
0 %ea
r to
date
.
been
1 c
ateg
ory
le. T
his
occu
rred
char
t sho
ws
tha
4 or
Ung
rada
b
er o
f avo
idab
le s
of 1
0% re
duct
ionrs
cate
gory
2 h
arm
% re
duct
ion
in a
v
y 2
pres
sure
ulc
ed
in L
ong
Term
at th
e le
vel o
f ca
ble
Pres
sure
Ulc
serio
us h
arm
s a
n in
avo
idab
le h
ams
acqu
ired
in o
void
able
har
ms
er a
cqui
red
in o
uS
ervi
ces,
Tha
ne
tego
ry 2
pre
ssu
cers
acqu
ired
in o
ur
arm
s, re
achi
ng aou
r ca
re to
the
on th
e pr
evio
us
ur c
are
durin
g D
et. re u
lcer
s is
acq
u
care
to th
e en
d a
72%
redu
ctio
n
end
of D
ecem
bye
ar o
f 18,
rea
Dec
embe
r tha
t, fo
uire
d w
ithin
our
c
of N
ovem
ber
isfo
r the
fina
ncia
lber
is 1
2. T
he tr
chin
g a
33%
red
ollo
win
g in
vest
ig
care
is n
ot o
f co
s 5.
The
trus
t is
l yea
r to
date
.
rust
is o
n ta
rget
duct
ion
in a
void
gatio
n, h
as n
ow
once
rn.
on
targ
et to
act o
f ach
ievi
ng th
able
har
m fo
r th
been
cat
egor
ise
chie
ve th
e ag
ree
he
he
ed
ed
Page 60 of 144
2.3
A
Ther
e w
ere
serio
us in
c
The
char
t bso
me
mon
t
The
Tiss
ueoc
cur t
o id
e
ssur
ance
on
Fa
Ther
e w
ere
com
mun
ity Th
e fo
urth
su
ppor
ted
prop
erty
. T
e no
avo
idab
le c
iden
ts.
belo
w s
how
s th
ath
s an
d fa
il ot
he
e V
iabi
lity
Team
entif
y ke
y th
eme
alls
e 56
fal
ls r
epor
y ho
spita
l and
on
fall
occu
rred
in t
livin
g ac
com
mod
The
num
ber o
f avca
tego
ry 3
or a
b
at c
ateg
ory
3 or
rs.
lead
s a
pres
sues
less
ons
to a
llo
rted
acro
ss K
Cne
in a
clin
ic a
rea
the
Com
mun
ity
datio
n an
d su
sta
void
able
falls
habo
ve p
ress
ure
ul
r ab
ove
pres
sur
ure
harm
red
ucti
ow le
arni
ng to
b
HFT
in
Dec
ema
whi
ch re
sulte
d
unde
r the
car
e o
aine
d a
fract
ure
as re
duce
d si
ncece
rs a
cqui
red
in
re u
lcer
s ar
e al
s
ion
grou
p, a
nd t
e sh
ared
.
ber
2018
, 4
of
d in
no
harm
to t
of th
e In
tegr
ated
d ne
ck o
f fem
ure
Q1
May
201
7 a
n ou
r car
e du
ring
so e
xper
ienc
ing
the
team
are
wo
thes
e w
ere
fou
he p
atie
nt.
d C
are
Team
, To
r whi
lst a
ttem
ptin
and
rem
ain
consg
Nov
embe
r or D
com
mon
cau
se
orki
ng c
lose
ly w
und
to b
e av
oid
onbr
idge
. Th
e p
ng to
hel
p th
e P
sist
ently
low
withD
ecem
ber t
hat w
e va
riatio
n an
d w
with
team
s w
here
dabl
e.
Two
of
patie
nt fe
ll in
the
hysi
othe
rapi
st g
h a
slig
ht ri
se in
wer
e id
entif
ied
a
will
ach
ieve
targ
e pr
essu
re h
arm
thes
e w
ere
in
mai
n en
tranc
e ga
in a
cces
s to
thD
ecem
ber.
as
et
ms a of
he
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 61 of 144
2
.4 A
ssur
ance
on
A to
tal o
f 1A
void
able
m
Med
icat
ion
inc
18 a
void
able
me
med
icat
ion
inci
dcide
nts
edic
atio
n in
cide
nde
nts
cont
inue
tonts,
acq
uire
d in
o
redu
ce.
our
care
, hav
e
been
rep
orte
d aan
d in
vest
igat
ed
d to
dat
e du
ring
Dec
embe
r 20
1
8.
Page 62 of 144
The
high
e snu
mbe
r du
prep
arat
ion
Of t
he 1
8 a
15
3 ( 1
Thes
e re
laan
d a
dou b
All
inci
dent
Ther
e w
ere
The
re w
ere
failu
re in
C
st r
epor
ted
cate
ring
Dec
embe
r n/
supp
ly in
cide
nt
avoi
dabl
e in
cide
n(8
3%) r
esul
ted
i17
%) r
esul
ted
inte
d to
a c
ontra
cbl
e do
se o
f a d
ruts
wer
e in
vest
iga
e no
inci
dent
s th
e a
larg
e nu
mbe
IS to
dow
nloa
d egor
y of
avo
idab
2018
. Th
e se
cots
mak
ing
up 1
7
nts
that
occ
urre
dn
no h
arm
to th
e lo
w h
arm
to th
ece
ptio
n in
ject
ion
ug b
eing
adm
inis
ated
and
the
less
at re
sulte
d in
se
er o
f low
har
m
patie
nts’
vis
its t obl
e in
cide
nts
we
ond
high
est r
ep7%
eac
h of
the
to
d du
ring
Dec
eme
patie
nt w
ith th
ee
patie
nt w
ith th
en
bein
g ad
min
ist
ster
ed. T
he p
atie
sons
lear
nt h
ave
ever
e ha
rm o
r de
inci
dent
s in
Sep
o ta
blet
s. T
his
uere
omitt
ed m
eor
ted
cate
gory
oot
al n
umbe
r dur
ber 2
018:
e
maj
ority
of t
hees
e in
cide
nts
bete
red
afte
r on
e en
ts w
ere
mon
itoe
been
sha
red.
eath
of a
pat
ient
ptem
ber,
abov
e un
derly
ing
issu
edica
tion
and
wr
of a
void
able
inc
ing
Oct
ober
201
ese
bein
g om
itte
eing
wro
ng fr
equ
wee
k in
stea
d of
ored
in a
ll ca
ses
t. the
uppe
r co
ntr
has
now
bee
n rro
ng q
uant
ity m
iden
ts is
wro
ng
8.
d m
edic
atio
n.
ency
, wro
ng q
u af t
wo
wee
ks, t
hes.
rol l
imit,
indi
cati
reso
lved
.
mak
ing
up 2
2%
frequ
ency
, and
antit
y an
d w
rong
e ad
min
istra
tion
ng w
hich
wer
e
each
of
the
tot
wro
ng m
etho
d
g dr
ug /
med
icin
n of
a w
rong
dru
as a
res
ult o
f th
ta
l of
e.
ug
he
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 63 of 144
2.5
A
2.
5
2.5ss
uran
ce o
n Pa
5.1
Mer
idia
n Pa
4,32
9 su
rvD
ecem
ber.
rece
nt y
ear
trend
and
in
5.2
The
NH
S Fr
i
The
NH
S F
2018
, 0.7
%‘d
on’t
know
the
dent
al s
To a
ssis
t win
clud
ed in
by K
CH
FT at
ient
Exp
erie
n
atie
nt E
xper
ienc
veys
wer
e co
m S
urve
y vo
lum
ers
due
to th
e C
hnc
reas
e in
Jan
u
iend
s an
d Fa
m
Frie
nds
and
Fam
% o
f our
pat
ient
s w
’ res
pons
e in
Dse
rvic
e, 2
for M
S
with
ben
chm
arki
repo
rting
. Nor
foas
a ra
tio o
f thenc
e
ce s
urve
y re
sul
plet
ed b
y K
CH
es h
ave
decr
eahr
istm
as p
erio
d ar
y 20
19.
ily T
est (
FFT)
mily
Tes
t sco
re f
chos
e no
t to
rec
Dec
embe
r co
mp
SK
phy
siot
hera
p
ing,
Nor
folk
Com
olk
aver
age
arou
eir s
ervi
ce p
rovi
slts
FT p
atie
nts,
re
sed
in D
ecem
ban
d is
not
rel
at
for D
ecem
ber o
fco
mm
end
the
sear
ed to
37
in N
py, 1
for p
ulm
ona
mm
unity
Hea
lth
und
98%
for t
hesi
on.
elat
ives
and
car
ber
com
pare
d w
ted
to a
ny s
peci
f 96.
3% re
com
mer
vice
they
rece
ovem
ber.
30
o far
y re
hab,
1 fo
r
and
Car
e N
HS
eir N
HS
FFT
sco
rers
with
a s
trow
ith N
ovem
ber.
Tifi
c se
rvic
es. S
u
men
d is
con
sist
eiv
ed, a
repe
titio
nf t
he ‘d
on’t
know
inte
rmed
iate
ca
S T
rust
, who
hav
ore,
how
ever
theon
g co
mbi
ned
This
is in
line
wrv
ey v
olum
es a
nt w
ith N
ovem
bn
of th
e 0.
7% in
w
’ res
pons
es w
ere
and
1 fo
r hea
ve b
een
give
n a
ey c
olle
ct le
ss th
satis
fact
ion
sco
with
the
gen
eral
re a
ntic
ipat
ed to
ber’s
sco
re (9
6.6
Nov
embe
r. 3
8 er
e ch
ildre
n an
dal
th w
alks
.
a C
QC
rat
ing
ofan
a ¼
of t
he s
u
ore
of 9
6.99
%
tre
nd s
een
ove
o fo
llow
the
usu
6%).
In D
ecem
bepe
ople
cho
se th
d th
ere
wer
e 3
fo
f out
stan
ding
, ar
urve
ys c
ondu
cte
in
er
al
er
he
or
re
ed
Page 64 of 144
2.6
Ass
uran
ce o
n C
linic
al A
udit
and
Res
earc
h
2.6.
1 A
udit
The
annu
al K
PI t
arge
t is
for 9
5% o
f clin
ical
aud
it re
com
men
datio
ns to
be
impl
emen
ted.
Thi
s is
ach
ieve
d vi
a a
step
ped
targ
et d
urin
g th
e ye
ar.
Targ
et fo
r Dec
embe
r has
bee
n ac
hiev
ed.
2.6.
2 C
linic
al A
udit
Rep
ortin
g
This
rel
ates
to
rece
ivin
g th
e fu
ll re
port
with
in a
spe
cifie
d tim
efra
me
afte
r re
ceip
t of
das
hboa
rd r
epor
ting.
Ste
pped
tar
get
intro
duce
d fo
r re
porti
ng a
nd ta
rget
for e
nd o
f yea
r inc
reas
ed fr
om 5
0% to
80%
follo
win
g on
goin
g im
prov
emen
t in
perfo
rman
ce. T
arge
t for
Dec
embe
r not
ac
hiev
ed w
ith 9
repo
rts o
verd
ue.
Rep
orts
ove
rdue
for A
dults
, Adu
lts S
ES
, Chi
ldre
n’s
Spe
cial
ist,
Pub
lic H
ealth
and
Den
tal.
2.6.
3 R
esea
rch
KC
HFT
wor
ks to
del
iver
an
annu
al r
ecru
itmen
t ple
dge
to th
e K
ent S
urre
y an
d S
usse
x C
linic
al R
esea
rch
Net
wor
k to
del
iver
hig
h qu
ality
na
tiona
l stu
dies
(kno
wn
as p
ortfo
lio s
tudi
es) t
o lo
cal p
atie
nts.
Thi
s is
a K
ey P
erfo
rman
ce In
dica
tor f
or re
sear
ch.
2.6.
4 N
atio
nal I
nstit
ute
for C
linic
al E
xcel
lenc
e (N
ICE)
The
num
ber o
f NIC
E g
uida
nce/
sta
ndar
ds th
at w
ere
issu
ed in
Dec
embe
r 201
8 w
as s
even
teen
.
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 65 of 144
Th
e nu
mbe
r of
gui
danc
e/st
anda
rds
issu
ed in
Aug
ust 2
018
that
wer
e du
e fo
r as
sess
men
t in
Nov
embe
r 20
18 w
as fo
urte
en. T
hree
of t
he
guid
ance
/ sta
ndar
ds is
sued
wer
e de
emed
app
licab
le to
at l
east
one
ser
vice
thro
ugho
ut th
e Tr
ust.
Page 66 of 144
3.0
3.1
A 3.1
3.1W
orkf
orce
ssur
ance
on
Re
1.1
Turn
over
The
cont
r oB
ank
wer
e
Follo
win
g t
dow
nwar
d
At
the
pea
resu
lting
in
1.2
Stab
ility
This
dat
a h
seen
that
tco
ntra
ct. T
now
a s
hifte
Rep
ort:
eten
tion
ol li
mits
wer
e re
s tr
eate
d. It
was
a
this
reb
asin
g, t
utre
nd in
turn
ove
ak i
n A
ugus
t 20
n st
aff l
eavi
ng.
has
only
bee
n co
ther
e w
as a
sig
This
was
then
fot t
o a
posi
tive
vaset i
n D
ecem
ber
antic
ipat
ed th
at
urno
ver
is e
xpe
er in
rece
nt m
ont
018
ther
e w
ere
onsi
dere
d as
pa
nific
ant s
hift
cha
ollo
wed
by
a ru
nar
iatio
n bu
t out
sir 201
7 to
refle
ct
this
cha
nge
wou
erie
ncin
g co
mm
oth
s as
the
outp
u
sign
ifica
nt s
truc
art o
f thi
s re
port
ange
the
autu
mn
of d
eter
iora
tinde
the
cont
rol l
i mthe
Boa
rd a
gre
uld
have
a 2
% im
on c
ause
var
iat
uts
of th
e B
IG L
is
ctur
al c
hang
es i
for t
he la
st 2
mo
mn
of 2
017
whi
cg
perfo
rman
ce
mits
aga
in. T
his em
ent t
o ch
ang
mpa
ct o
n th
e tu
r
ion
but
is f
ailin
gst
en a
re im
plem
in H
ealth
Vis
itin
onth
s. W
hen
loch
we
belie
ve w
whi
ch w
ould
ha
is b
eing
inve
stige
the
way
in w
hrn
over
rate
whi
ch
g to
mee
t th
e ta
ente
d.
ng,
Chi
ldre
n an
d
okin
g at
the
dat
as a
con
sequ
enav
e w
arra
nted
inga
ted
furth
er.
hich
leav
ers
who
h is
refle
cted
in
arge
t. H
owev
er
d S
peci
alis
t an
d
a in
the
form
of
nce
of th
e lo
ss
nves
tigat
ion
at to
rem
aine
d on
thth
e da
ta.
we
have
see
n
d D
enta
l se
rvic
e
an S
PC
it c
an b
of th
e no
rth K
ehe
tim
e. T
here
he a es
be
nt
is
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 67 of 144
3.2
A 3.2ss
uran
ce o
n Si
2.1
Sick
ness
Ab
The
sick
neth
e lik
elih
osy
stem
nee
A s
epar
ate
man
age
sipr
ovid
ers
thickn
ess
bsen
ce
ess
abse
nce
per
od o
f the
targ
eted
s to
be
rede
sig
e pa
per h
as b
eeck
ness
abs
enc e
he T
rust
has
perrfo
rman
ce is
cur
t bei
ng m
et is
sgn
ed.
n pr
esen
ted
to t
e.
In r
each
ing
rform
ed b
ette
r thre
ntly
ope
ratin
g su
bjec
t to
rand
o
the
Stra
tegi
c W
oth
is d
ecis
ion
it ha
n ot
her T
rust
swith
in th
e co
ntr
m v
aria
tions
. T
orkf
orce
Com
mi
may
be
wor
th
s un
til th
e la
st 2
rol l
imits
but
as
tTh
is m
eans
that
ttee
prov
idin
g a
cons
ider
ing
tha
mon
ths
of th
e dath
e Tr
ust t
arge
t ei
ther
the
targ
e
assu
ranc
e on
the
at w
hen
benc
hmat
a se
t
is s
et n
ear t
he
et s
houl
d be
rec
e co
ntro
ls a
nd a
mar
ked
agai
nst lo
wer
con
trol l
imco
nsid
ered
or
th
actio
ns in
pla
ce t
othe
r co
mm
uni
mit he
to
ty
Page 68 of 144
3.22.
2 St
ress
Abs
e
Stre
ss a
bsin
crea
se c
ath
e au
tum
nto
det
erm
in
Initi
ativ
es i
taki
ng p
lac
with
eve
ntsen
ce
ence
is re
porti
n gan
not b
e at
tribu
tn
and
win
ter o
f 2ne
whe
ther
per
fo
n pl
ace
incl
ude
ce in
Nov
embe
r as
happ
enin
g ac
rog ab
ove
the
upp
ted
to a
ny o
ne s
2018
as
initi
ativ
eor
man
ce w
ill re
tu
the
Tim
e to
Cha
and
loca
l act
ion
oss
the
Trus
t.
per c
ontro
l lim
it a
serv
ice
but i
ncre
aes
aim
ed a
t red
uur
n to
with
in th
e
ange
pro
ject
, wh
plan
s be
ing
devan
d w
ell a
bove
tas
ed a
cros
s a
rauc
ing
this
met
ric
cont
rol l
imits
or
hich
con
tinue
s at
velo
ped
with
in sta
rget
s, fo
llow
ing
ange
. The
re h
asha
ve b
egun
to t
r whe
ther
furth
er
t pac
e, w
ith th
e s
ervi
ces
in J
anuag
an in
crea
se d
us
how
ever
bee
n ta
ke e
ffect
. Thi
s r r
edes
ign
need
s
seco
nd in
duct
ion
ary.
Our
ant
i-bu
urin
g th
e su
mm
ea
slow
dow
nwa
data
sho
uld
be
s to
take
pla
ce
n of
Tim
e to
Cha
llyin
g ca
mpa
igner
of 2
018.
Thi
s rd
tren
d ac
ross
w
atch
ed c
lose
l y
ange
cha
mpi
ons
has
also
beg
un
y s n
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 69 of 144
3.3
A 3.3ss
uran
ce o
n Fi
3.1
Esta
blis
hme
Vac
anci
es
the
incr
eas
effe
ct.
Janill
ing
Vaca
ncie
s
ent a
nd V
acan
c
are
curr
ently
rese
in v
acan
cies
nu
ary
will
hav
e vs ci
es
porti
ng a
bove
thin
Dec
embe
r, r
very
hig
h le
vels
ohe m
ean,
with
ac
rece
nt tr
ends
ha
of n
ew s
tarte
rs tch
ieve
men
t of t
hav
e be
en d
ownw
to c
ount
erac
t thehe
targ
et b
eing
vw
ards
as
cont
inu
e in
crea
se in
vac
varia
ble
depe
ndue
d hi
gh le
vels
ca
ncie
s se
en in
dant
on
natu
ral v
of r
ecru
itmen
t aD
ecem
ber.
varia
tion.
Des
pit
activ
ity h
as ta
ke
te
en
Page 70 of 144
3.3
3.33.
2 Te
mpo
rary
S
Ther
e is
no
top
of th
e c
qual
ity im
p
3.3
Age
ncy
Spe
The
shar
p w
ith b
udg e
curr
ent
fina
win
ter p
resSt
aff U
sage
o ta
rget
set
for t
hco
ntro
l lim
its, t
hero
vem
ent p
roje
c
end
drop
in s
pend
inet
ed y
ear
to d
ate
anci
al p
ositi
on s
ssur
es a
nd th
is ishe
Ban
k fil
l rat
e e
proc
ess
wou
ldct
and
mon
itor t
h
n A
pril
2017
is a
e tra
ject
orie
s ha
serv
ices
hav
e be
s th
e ca
use
of th
alth
ough
loca
llyd
need
to b
e re
dhe
impa
ct g
oing
attri
buta
ble
to th
eas
just
mov
ed o
een
enco
urag
edhe
incr
ease
in s
py th
e te
am a
re s
esig
n to
mak
e t
forw
ard
of c
han
e in
trodu
ctio
n of
outs
ide
the
uppe
d to
use
tem
por
pend
aga
inst
thise
t a 7
0% b
ank
his
chan
ge b
ut t
nges
.
f the
nat
iona
l cap
er c
ontro
l lim
it a
rary
sta
ff, in
clud
s ta
rget
.
fill r
ate
of th
e to
this
is a
n id
eal o
ps in
age
ncy
rat
and
is a
ppro
ach
ding
age
ncy,
to
tal f
ill ra
te. A
s th
oppo
rtuni
ty to
co
tes.
Age
ncy
spe
hing
the
100
% t
redu
ce b
ackl
og
his
rate
is a
t the
onsi
der t
his
as a
end
in c
ompa
riso
arge
t. G
iven
th
s or
to
cope
wit
e a on
he
th
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 71 of 144
3.4
A 3.4ss
uran
ce o
n Tr
4.1
Man
dato
ry T
Man
dato
ry
App
rais
al o
was
99.
3 %ra
inin
g C
ompl
ia
Trai
ning
Com
p
Trai
ning
figu
res
obje
ctiv
e se
tting
%
ance
lianc
e
s ar
e cu
rrent
ly in
for
the
curr
ent n
a st
ate
of n
atur
appr
aisa
l yea
r ral v
aria
tion
arou
(FY
18/1
9) is
cuun
d th
e m
ean,
a
rren
tly r
epor
tingan
d ar
e co
nsis
te
g at
80%
com
ple
ntly
on
targ
et.
ete.
App
rais
al s
i
gn o
ff fo
r 17
/18
Page 72 of 144
4.0
Fina
nce
Rep
ort:
4.1
Ass
uran
ce o
n Fi
nanc
ial S
usta
inab
ility
4.
2 K
ey M
essa
ges
Surplus: T
he Trust achieved a surplus of £3,72
1k to the en
d of Decem
ber. Pay has und
erspen
t by
£8,33
7k, a
nd non
‐pay and
dep
reciation/interest
have overspe
nt by £3
,471
k and £5
4k re
spectiv
ely. Incom
e has u
nder‐recovered
by £3
,208
k.
Continuity of S
ervices Risk Rating: EBITD
A Margin achieved
is 3.7%. The
Trust sc
ored
1 against th
e Use of R
esou
rces Rating, th
e be
s t possib
le sc
ore.
CIP: The
Trust achieved CIPs of £
2,81
3k to
the en
d of Decem
ber a
gainst a plan of £3,11
1k, w
hich is £29
8k beh
ind target.
Cash and
Cash Eq
uivalents: The cash and
cash eq
uivalents balance was £32
,531
k, equ
ivalen
t to 56 days expen
diture. The Trust recorded
the
following YTD pu
blic se
ctor paymen
t statistics 9
9% fo
r volum
e and 98
% fo
r value
.
Capital: Capita
l Expen
diture year to date is £2,06
2k, rep
resenting 67
% of the
YTD
plan. The
Trust's forecast capita
l expen
diture fo
r 201
8‐19
is £3.7m
, represen
ting a £2
64k varia
nce to plan. The
forecast overspe
nd of £
262k re
lates to investmen
t in WiFi infrastructure for w
hich add
ition
al cen
tral
fund
ing (PDC
) has been agreed
.
Agen
cy: Tempo
rary staff costs for De
cembe
r were £9
66k, rep
resenting 7.6%
of the
pay bill. Of the
tem
porary staffing
usage in
Decem
ber, £3
61k
related to external agency and £1
04k to locums, 3.7% of the
pay bill.
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 73 of 144
5.0
5.1
A 5.1O
pera
tion
ssur
ance
on
Na
1.1
Hea
lth C
hec
Hea
lth C
he
Hea
lth C
hedu
e to
the
pr
ocur
ed b
on th
e ne
wpe
rform
anc
will
be
initi
ada
ta e
rror
s18
/19
targ
eon
ce th
ere
prac
tices
aqu
ality
of d
‘am
ber’
figim
prov
e p e
al re
port
: at
iona
l Per
form
cks
and
SS Q
ui
ecks
ecks
is n
ow e
xpe
sign
ifica
nt c
han
y K
CC
. How
eve
w s
yste
m a
nd c
once
man
agin
g th
eat
ed o
n a
mon
ths
and
impr
ove
aet
as
this
is th
e f
is a
poo
r st
art
and
a fe
w a
re s
tat
a im
porte
d an
ures
, al
thou
gh
erfo
rman
ce a
s mm
ance
Sta
ndar
d
ts
erie
ncin
g a
perio
nge
whe
n th
e N
er, t
he tr
end
look
nseq
uent
ly th
e p
e co
ntra
ct to
try
hly
basi
s fro
m O
ssur
ance
for
the
first
yea
r of a
fiv
to th
e ye
ar.
Pe
till n
ot b
eing
abl
nd re
solv
ed m
osK
CH
FT a
re c
o nm
uch
as p
ossi
bleds
and
Con
trac
od o
f com
mon
cN
HS
Hea
lth C
heks
to b
e a
posi
tivpr
actic
es h
ave
ban
d re
solv
e th
eO
ctob
er 2
018
(the
GP
pra
ctic
es.
ve y
ear c
ohor
t to
erfo
rman
ce c
ont
e to
impo
rt fo
ll ot o
f the
invi
tatio
nnt
inui
ng t
o ex
plo
e.
ctua
l Tar
gets
ause
var
iatio
n fo
ecks
IT
infra
stru
ve s
hift
abov
e th
been
una
ble
to in
e is
sues
out
lined
is w
as o
rigin
ally
Thi
s on
the
He
o se
e if
the
targ
ein
ues
to b
e si
gnow
ing
the
Apo
llon
erro
rs th
at w
eror
e ot
her
oppo
ror th
e la
st 4
mon
ctur
e ch
ange
d o
he m
ean.
The
re
nvite
thei
r pop
ula
d. In
this
res
pec
y ag
reed
as
qua
ealth
Impr
ovem
eet
cou
ld b
e sp
rea
nific
antly
impa
cto
quer
y ru
ns.
Tre
repo
rted.
The
rtuni
ties
for
Hea
nths
, fol
low
ing
aon
the
1st
Apr
ilha
ve b
een
som
atio
n fo
r 18/
19.
ct, i
t has
bee
n a
arte
rly),
whi
ch s
hen
t ris
k re
gist
er
ad a
s th
is p
rogr
ed d
ue to
the
dhe
cha
nge
to m
e ta
rget
traj
ecto
alth
Che
ck d
eliv
a re
calc
ulat
ion
of 2
018
whi
ch is
e
prob
lem
s w
it hK
CC
is a
war
e o
agre
ed th
at th
e A
houl
d he
lp m
inim
also
. K
CH
FT tr
ram
me
is v
ery
diel
ay in
ava
ilabl
em
onth
ly q
uerie
s h
ry h
as b
een
ame
very
in a
n ef
fortf t
he c
ontro
l lim
ia
new
IT
syst
eh
load
ing
softw
arof
this
issu
e an
d A
pollo
que
ry r
unm
ise
any
pote
nti
ryin
g to
neg
otia
tiff
icul
t to
catc
h u
e da
ta fo
r th
e G
has
impr
oved
then
ded
in li
ne w
itt
to m
aint
ain
an
ts
m
re
is
ns
al
te
up
GP
he
th
nd
Page 74 of 144
5.1
Stop
Sm
ok
Sto
p S
mok
path
way
s i
inte
rven
tion
supp
ort
to
enco
urag
i npr
egna
nt m
smok
ers
1.2
Hea
lth V
isiti
New
Birt
h
A s
light
do
arou
nd th
ere
ports
.
king
Qui
ts
king
qui
ts a
lso
hin
to o
ne a
s pe
n ou
tcom
es o
nto
upda
te o
utco
me
ng.
Sm
okin
g pr
em
ums,
KC
C a
nd
ing Visi
ts
ownw
ard
trend
w m
ean
leve
l. Th
had
a si
gnifi
cant
r th
e ne
w c
ont
o th
e ne
w d
ata
ses
pul
ling
us in
ev
alen
ce c
ontin
d K
CH
FT w
ill b
e
was
evi
dent
for m
e ta
rget
of 9
0%
t eve
nt a
fter
the
tract
ual
agre
emsy
stem
. Q
3 sh
olin
e w
ith 2
017
ues
to m
ove
in
e m
eetin
g to
dis
mon
ths
5 an
d 6,
has
bee
n co
ns
ON
E Y
OU
Ser
ent
with
KC
C,
ows
an u
plift
from
perfo
rman
ce (
Na
dow
nwar
ds t
scus
s ne
w a
ppro
, alth
ough
this
his
tent
ly a
chie
vedrv
ices
had
impl
em
ainl
y im
pact
inm
Q1
and
Q2
asN
ov 1
8 -
43.5
8%tre
nd,
and
with
oa
ches
to e
ngag
as s
tabi
lised
in
d an
d w
ill b
e cl
oemen
ted
a ne
w
ng t
he a
bilit
y o
3rd
par
ties
have
% o
f ta
rget
, N
ovth
e su
cces
sful
ogi
ng th
e co
unty
’
the
last
cou
ple
osel
y m
onito
red
IT s
yste
m c
omb
f ou
r 3rd
par
ties
e re
ceiv
ed fo
cus
v 17
- 4
5.68
% o
outc
omes
of
the
’s to
ughe
st a
nd
of m
onth
s w
ith
thro
ugh
the
mobi
ning
thre
e cl
ies
to u
ploa
d th
ese
d an
d su
stai
neof
targ
et)
whi
ch
e H
ome
Vis
its f
oha
rdes
t to
reac
perfo
rman
ce n
oon
thly
dis
trict
lev
nt
eir
ed
is
or
ch
ow
vel
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 75 of 144
6-8
Wee
k C
As
with
new
and
8 an
d do
wn
into
aChe
cks
w b
irth
visi
ts, t
heha
ve im
prov
ed
any
adve
rse
trener
e w
as a
dip
inan
d ho
pefu
lly t
nds.
n m
onth
s 5
and
the
posi
tive
tren6,
with
bot
h m
ond
will
con
tinue
.nths
per
form
ing
Mon
thly
pro
cesou
tsid
e of
the
css
es c
ontin
ue to
cont
rol l
imits
. Ho
o be
in p
lace
fo
owev
er, m
onth
s or
loca
litie
s to
dr
7 rill
Page 76 of 144
5.1
5.11.
3 N
atio
nal C
h
The
mea
supr
ogra
mm
e
1.4
Min
or In
jury
KC
HFT
’s a
Alth
ough
tsi
gnifi
cant
lyild M
easu
rem
e
urem
ent p
rogr
ames
cur
rent
ly a
bo
y U
nits
(MIU
) 4
achi
evem
ent o
f the
re w
as a
sm
y ab
ove
targ
et fo
Curren
t Mo
18/19 Scho
Year to
Nov
17/18 Scho
Year
Annu
al Ta ren
t Pro
gram
me
mm
e fo
r Yea
r R
ove
75%
and
imp
Hou
r Wai
t Tar
g
he 4
hou
r wai
t ta
mal
l de
crea
se i
nor
the
mon
th. I
nd
Year
R
onth
80.1%
ool
v‐18
80.1%
ool
97.3%
rget
90%
(NC
MP)
and
6 pu
pils
is p
prov
ed o
n th
e sa
get
arge
t for
Min
or I
n M
arch
201
8 de
ed, t
he c
ontro
Year
6
78.2%
78.2%
95.7%
90%
0.0%
50.0%
100.0%
prog
ress
ing
wel
lam
e po
sitio
n in
t
Inju
ries
Uni
ts h
aw
hich
res
ulte
d ol
rang
e su
gges
t
%%%
Sep
Oct l a
gain
st tr
ajec
toth
e pr
evio
us s
ch
as c
onsi
sten
tly b
in m
argi
nally
bts
that
failin
g ta
r
tNov
De
18/19 Scho
o
Year R
Ye ory
for t
he 1
8/19
hool
yea
r
een
high
, with
vbr
each
ing
the
lrg
et is
hig
hly
unl
ecJan
F
ol Year
ear 6
9 sc
hool
yea
r, w
i
very
littl
e va
riatio
ower
con
trol
limik
ely
to h
appe
n.
Feb
Mar
th b
oth
on fr
om th
e m
eam
it, t
his
was
st
n.
till
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 77 of 144
5.1
5.11.
5 G
UM
48h
r
Acc
ess
to G
1.6
Con
sulta
nt-
The
prop
o rw
orse
ned
bbe
en w
ithin
bein
g th
at t
The
abov
ebe
low
18
w
GU
M c
linic
s w
ith
-Led
RTT
Inco
m
rtion
of p
atie
nts
betw
een
Aug
ust
n ou
r A
dult
Chr
oth
e ta
rget
has
be
tab
le s
how
s th
wee
ks, w
ith o
nly KC O C Chi
n 48
hrs
has
be
mpl
ete
Wai
ts O
v
on a
con
sulta
nt 2
017
and
Mar
con
ic P
ain
and
Oee
n ac
hiev
ed a
n
he c
urre
nt b
reak
2 w
aits
abo
ve 3
KCHF
T To
tal
Chronic Pain
Ortho
paedics
Children's A
udiolo
Community
Paediaee
n co
nsis
tent
ly
ver 1
8 w
eeks
nt-le
d R
efer
ral t
och
201
8 an
d th
eO
rthop
aedi
cs s
ernd
per
form
ance
kdow
n of
the
wa
36 w
eeks
. The
a
0‐12
W80
926
036
154
043
1
gy atrics
y 10
0%, w
ith n
o r
o Tr
eatm
ent (
RT
en s
tabi
lised
. Th
rvic
es in
eas
t Ke
has
impr
oved
a
aitin
g lis
t fo
r al
l ve
rage
wai
t for
Wks
12‐18 Wks
189
143
525
51
00
127
552
5
repo
rted
brea
ch
TT)
path
way
at
e va
st m
ajor
ity o
ent a
nd th
ese
hbo
ve th
e m
ean.
serv
ices
on
a c
patie
nts
wai
ting
8‐36
Wks
36‐52 W
660
106
10
08
018
01
es
mon
th e
nd w
hoof
our
inco
mpl
etha
ve g
reat
ly im
p co
nsul
tant
-led
pov
er 1
8 w
eeks
ks52
+ Wks
< 18
19
09
010
09
19
o ar
e w
aitin
g le
ste
pat
hway
s ov
epr
oved
in m
onth
athw
ay.
96.4
%
is 2
1.4
wee
ks.
8 Weeks
93.4%
96.4%
00.0%
98.8%
96.4%
ss th
an 1
8 w
eek
er 1
8 w
eeks
hav
8, w
ith th
e re
su
of w
aits
are
no
ks
ve
ult
ow
Page 78 of 144
5.1
5.11.
7 6
Wee
k D
iag
Whi
le 6
we
perfo
rman
cth
e ch
alle
n
1.8
End
of L
ife C
gnos
tics
(Aud
io
eek
diag
nost
ics
ce h
as im
prov
edgi
ng 9
9% ta
rget
Car
e
Curren
18/19
17/18
Annu
aolog
y)
wai
ts f
or p
aed
d in
rece
nt m
onth
t nt M
onth
18.9
YTD
30.9 N/
al Target
60.0ia
tric
audi
olog
y hs
and
is e
xper
i
9% 9% /A 0%0.0%
10.0%
20.0%
30.0%
40.0%
50.0%
expe
rienc
ed a
ie
nce
com
mon
c
May
Jun
La
perio
d of
neg
aca
use
varia
tion.
Jul
Aug
ast 1
2 mon
ths treat
ive
varia
tion
frH
owev
er, r
ece n
Sep
Oct
end
om J
anua
ry 2
0nt
per
form
ance
i
Nov
18 t
o A
pril
201
s ge
nera
lly b
elo
8,
ow
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 79 of 144
5.1
The
end
ofth
eir
time
o31
%, t
he p
year
has
be
1.9
Del
ayed
Tra
KC
HFT
’s ta
9.5%
as
a al
thou
gh t h
in E
ast K
en
f life
indi
cato
r is
of d
eath
; the
refo
pers
onal
ised
car
een
set a
t 60%
ansf
ers
of C
are
arge
t for
del
aye
rate
of o
ccup
iehi
s pe
riod
has
ennt
. Thi
s le
vel w
ill
new
for 1
8/19
, or
e no
tren
d da
re p
lann
ing
win
d
(DTO
Cs)
d tra
nsfe
rs is
t oed
bed
day
s. T
hnd
ed w
ith th
e la
l be
mon
itore
d tore
porti
ng th
e pe
ata
is a
vaila
ble
pdo
w o
n C
IS is
st
o re
duce
to a
n a
ere
was
a s
usta
ast 2
mon
ths
abo
o se
e if
the
trender
cent
age
of E
ndpr
ior
to A
pril
20til
l bei
ng e
mbe
dd
aver
age
of 7
per
aine
d pe
riod
of
ove
the
mea
n. T
d co
ntin
ues.
d of
Life
pat
ient
s18
. Whi
le th
e p
ded
and
perfo
rm
r da
y in
bot
h ea
sim
prov
ed p
erfo
This
has
bee
n cas
who
had
an
uer
form
ance
for
man
ce s
houl
d st
a
st K
ent a
nd w
esrm
ance
from
Oc
ause
d by
an
incpd
ated
per
sona
the
year
to d
ate
art t
o im
prov
e. T
st K
ent,
whi
ch e
ctob
er 2
017
to
crea
sed
leve
l of al
ised
car
e pl
an
e eq
uate
s to
on
The
targ
et fo
r th
equa
tes
to a
roun
Sep
tem
ber
201
dela
yed
trans
fe
at
nl
y hi
s nd
8,
rs
Page 80 of 144
5.1
5.1
5.1
1.10
Loo
ked
Aft
Initi
al H
ealt
perfo
rman
cK
CH
FT is
sw
hich
was
Com
plia
nce
mon
th 8
Pe
1.11
NH
S N
umb
NH
S N
umb
have
a N
HS
1.12
Bed
Occ
up
Bed
Occ
uppa
rticu
lar
cm
onth
8 im
ter C
hild
ren
Ini
th A
sses
smen
t (ce
is s
till v
aria
ble
stru
gglin
g to
influ
100%
for t
his
re
e w
ith th
e R
evie
erfo
rman
ce a
t 93
ber C
ompl
eten
e
ber
com
plet
ene
S n
umbe
r ass
ig
panc
y
panc
y is
sho
win
conc
ern.
Alth
oug
mpr
ovin
g. T
his
ha
tial H
ealth
Ass
(IHA
) per
form
ane
and
liabl
e to
faue
nce.
We
have
epor
ting
perio
d.
ew H
ealth
Ass
es3.
8%
ess
ss a
cros
s K
CH
ned
(alth
ough
l a
ng a
var
ying
tre
gh m
onth
s 5-
7 as
hig
hlig
hted
th
essm
ents
(IH
A
ce is
sho
win
g co
ailin
g ta
rget
som
e an
add
ition
al K
ssm
ent t
arge
t is
FT’s
mai
n sy
ste
ater
upd
ated
) an
end
with
no
pew
ere
belo
w t
arha
t the
dip
in p
erAs)
and
Rev
iew
omm
on c
ause
vm
e m
onth
s. T
his
KPI
to e
nsur
e th
a
cont
inui
ng to
ex
ems
are
cons
ist
nd O
vers
eas
MIU
erio
ds o
f sp
ecia
rget
and
low
er t
rform
ance
sho
ul
Hea
lth A
sses
s
varia
tion
and
is a
is d
ue to
late
req
at w
e co
mpl
ete
t
xper
ienc
e a
perio
tent
ly c
.100
%,
wU
atte
ndan
ces.
l ca
use
varia
ti oth
an t
he m
ean
d no
t be
of c
oncm
ents
(RH
As)
achi
evin
g ta
rget
qu
ests
bei
ng re
cth
e IH
A w
ithin
23
od o
f pos
itive
va
with
the
mai
n ex
on o
r ch
ange
s i
leve
l of
occu
pace
rn a
t thi
s st
agem
ost m
onth
s. H
ceiv
ed fr
om K
CC
3 da
ys o
f rec
eip
aria
tion
abov
e th
xcep
tion
bein
g
in p
erfo
rman
ce
ncy,
thi
s ha
s n o
e.
How
ever
, C
and
whi
ch
pt o
f the
refe
rral
e m
ean,
with
new
birt
hs y
et t
that
wou
ld b
e ot
con
tinue
d w
it
to a th
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 81 of 144
5.1
5.2
A 5.21.
13 C
QU
IN
The
Q2
CQ
prop
ortio
na
ssur
ance
on
ac
2.1
Act
ivity
Dur
ing
No v
2018
KC
HF
The
larg
es5.
5%) a
nd Q
UIN
ach
ieve
mal
ly h
ighe
r val
ue
ctiv
ity a
nd p
rod
vem
ber
2018
KC
FT a
re 1
.8%
be
st v
aria
nces
are
D
enta
l Ser
vice
sent
(% o
f po
ten
is p
lace
d on
Q4
duct
ivity
CH
FT c
arrie
d ou
low
targ
et fo
r se
with
in L
ong
Tes
(-3.
6%).
ntia
l inc
ome)
is
4.
ut 1
96,0
77 c
linic
ervi
ces
that
hav
erm
Con
ditio
ns at
94.
5% (
100%
cal c
onta
cts,
of w
ve c
ontra
ctua
l ac
(-1.
8%),
Inte
rme%
in Q
1),
alth
ou
whi
ch 1
0,10
0 w
ect
ivity
targ
ets
in
edia
te C
are
Serug
h th
e w
eigh
tin
ere
MIU
atte
nda
plac
e, a
slig
ht i
rvic
es (
-9%
), S
p
ng o
f th
e C
QU
IN
ance
s. F
or th
e y
impr
ovem
ent o
npe
cial
ist
and
EleN
S m
eans
tha
t
year
to N
ovem
ben
the
M7
posi
tioec
tive
Ser
vice
s
a er
n. (-
Page 82 of 144
The
follo
wi
Ele
ctiv
e S
epe
riods
of
leve
ls in
8 o
Interm
ediate Care
Community
Hospita
Long Term Con
ditio
Service Type
Children's S
pecialist
Learning Disa
bilities
Dental Service ‐ All
All Services (contra
*Children's U
nivers
All Services (includ
MIU Attendances
Community
Hospita
Specialist a
nd Elect
Community
Hospita in
g ch
arts
sho
wer
vice
s, w
hich
aco
mm
on c
ause
of th
e la
st 9
mon
al Occupied Be
d Da
ys (EK)
ons
t Services
s ‐ Face to Face
currencies
actual)
sal Services
ding
those with
out targets)
al Adm
issions
tive Services
al Occupied Be
d Da
ys (W
K) w th
e m
onth
ly a
cal
l sho
wed
an
ime
varia
tion,
alth
ont
hs.
58 18 10 1 2, 2, 28 3, 41 17 12 147
196
M8 A ct
ivity
aga
inst
tam
prov
emen
t in
mou
gh t
he b
igge
s
,437
433,558
,401
158,414
,100
92,009
198
1,514
210
16,913
297
18,382
,025
217,223
835
65,546
,988
650,913
,714
124,112
,872
79,132
7,957
1,122,875
6,077
1,443,060
Actual
YTD Ac
tual
arge
t for
Lon
g T
mon
th 8
, par
ticu
st c
once
rn is
IC
441,586
‐1
174,164
‐9
75,139
22
1,213
24
17,346
‐2
229,746
‐5
121,919
1.
82,100
‐3
1,143,213
‐1
N/A
N
YTD Target
YTD V er
m C
ondi
tions
,la
rly in
Lon
g Te
T/R
apid
Res
pon
1.8%
Positive
9.0%
Negative
2.5%
Negative
4.8%
Negative
2.5%
Positive
Positive
5.5%
Negative
Negative
Positive
.8%
Positive
.6%
Negative
1.8%
Positive
N/A
Positive
Mov
emen
tVa
riance
, Int
erm
edia
te C
erm
Con
ditio
ns.
nse
whi
ch h
as
Contrac
Internal BRA
G
Car
e S
ervi
ces
aA
ll th
ree
area
s ex
perie
nced
low
*these figures a
rtotals as th
ey do
target
ct BRG
nd S
peci
alis
t an
are
expe
rienc
inw
er t
han
aver
ag
Internal
Contract
>+5%
>+10%
>‐5%
>‐10%
+/‐ 2
.5‐5%
n/a
<+/‐ 2.5%
<+/‐ 10%
No Target
e no
t included in th
e table
n’t h
ave a contractual
nd
ng
ge
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 83 of 144
5.2
5.22.
2 D
NA
rate
s
DN
A ra
tes
The
gene
r ata
rget
clo
se
2.3
Clin
ic b
ased
cont
inue
to fa
ll al
var
iatio
n is
co
e to
the
uppe
r co
d ac
tivity
belo
w th
e ta
rge
omm
on c
ause
, von
trol l
imit
then
et o
f 5%
, alth
oug
varia
bly
perfo
rmth
is w
ould
indi
cagh a
re s
igni
fican
min
g ab
ove
and
ate
that
it is
unl
ikntly
hig
her w
ithin
belo
w th
e m
eake
ly th
at le
vels
wn so
me
serv
ices
n w
ith n
o di
sce
wou
ld in
crea
se a
, par
ticul
arly
ch i
rnib
le p
atte
rn. H
abov
e ta
rget
.
ildre
n’s
ther
apie
How
ever
, with
th
s.
he
Page 84 of 144
5.2
5.3
The
targ
et
incr
ease
d t
achi
eve
thi
wou
ld s
ugg
2.4
Adm
issi
ons
Whi
le th
ere
mea
n to
inpe
rform
anc
3 A
ssur
ance
on
Wai
ting
timpe
rform
anc
dow
n to
the
Blo
ck A
QP
serv
ice
is im
for L
ong
Term
ath
roug
h in
itiat
ive
s ta
rget
with
out
gest
reac
hing
5%
s A
void
ed
e ap
pear
s to
hav
dica
te th
at p
erfo
ce b
eing
var
iabl
e
n Lo
cal W
ait T
im
mes
for a
ll no
n co
ce b
eing
bel
ow
e cl
earin
g of
the
P P
hysi
othe
rapy
.m
pact
ing
the
ov
and
ICT
serv
ices
es s
uch
as th
e w
som
e fo
rm o
f pr
% w
ithou
t som
e
ve b
een
a hi
ghe
orm
ance
is s
till
e, a
chie
ving
the
mes
onsu
ltant
-led
AH
the
mea
n, w
ith
e ba
cklo
g in
som
Thi
s is
like
ly to
eral
l per
form
ancs
is to
incr
ease
cw
ound
clin
ics,
wit
roce
ss c
hang
e.
form
of c
hang
e
er le
vel o
f adm
isva
riabl
e m
onth
ta
rget
mon
thly
i
HP
ser
vice
s ar
e th
e la
st 3
mon
t hm
e se
rvic
es, w
ito
cont
inue
in th
ece
.
clin
ic b
ased
act
ivth
the
proc
ess
liTh
e ab
ove
cha r
wou
ld b
e un
like
ssio
ns a
void
ed in
to m
onth
. Yea
r is
not
alw
ays
gu
curr
ently
exp
eri
hs a
lso
falli
ng b
th a
vie
w to
red
ue
com
ing
mon
thsvi
ty to
at l
east
5m
its re
calc
ulat
ert
show
s th
at th
ely
to o
ccur
.
n th
e la
st 8
mon
to d
ate
perfo
rmua
rant
eed.
enci
ng a
per
iod
belo
w th
e ta
rget
uc
ed lo
ng w
aits
s w
ithin
Wes
t Ke%
of a
ll ac
tivity
ced
form
Aug
ust 2
e cu
rren
t upp
er c
nths
, thi
s ha
d re
dm
ance
aga
inst
ta
of s
peci
al c
aus
leve
l of 9
2%. T
on th
e w
aitin
g en
t Blo
ck M
SK
Pcarr
ied
out.
Whi
2017
, we
are
cur
cont
rol l
imit
is a
r
duce
d in
Sep
tem
arge
t is
favo
urab
e va
riatio
n w
ith
The
dip
in r
ecen
tlis
t, pa
rticu
larly
P
hysi
o, w
hich
d
le th
is h
as
rren
tly u
nlik
ely
toro
und
4.6%
whi
c
mbe
r to
belo
w th
ble,
alth
ough
wit
the
last
7 m
onth
t mon
ths
is p
art
with
in W
est K
eue
the
size
of t
h
o ch
he
th
hs
tly
nt
he
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 85 of 144
5.
44 O
utco
mes
Agg
rega
te
outc
ome
i nab
ove
char
the
rang
e oou
tcom
es a
re
n th
e va
st m
ajor
rt al
so s
how
s th
aof
per
form
ance
vcurr
ently
rep
ort
rity
of c
ases
on
at a
chie
vem
ent
vary
ing
mon
th to
ed f
or A
dult
Sp
a co
nsis
tent
ba
of ta
rget
is a
lwa
o m
onth
sho
uld
npeci
alis
t an
d C
has
is, w
ith th
e ab
ays
likel
y to
occ
not f
all l
ow e
nouhi
ldre
n’s
Ther
apy
bove
sho
win
g n
ur u
nles
s a
proc
ugh
to b
reac
h ta
y se
rvic
es,
with
o sp
ecia
l cau
sece
ss c
hang
e oc
crg
et.
h pa
tient
s re
ceiv
e va
riatio
n in
rec
curs
, as
the
con
ving
a f
avou
rab
cent
mon
ths.
Th
trol l
imits
indi
ca
le
he
te
Page 86 of 144
The
follo
wi
deta
il on
osu
mm
aris
e
Worsene
Not Ach
Partially
Mostly
AFully Achng
tabl
e an
d ch
outc
omes
. E
ach
ed.
S Ele
ed ieved
y Ac
hieved
Achieved
hieved
hart
show
s th
e p
out
com
e w
ill b
pecialist and
ectiv
e Services
C
2.4%
7.5%
33.1%
11.7%
45.2%
prop
ortio
n of
the
be s
peci
fic t
o th
Children's S
peciali
Services
0.0%
2.3%
13.4%
14.5%
69.8%
e gr
adin
g of
eac
he p
atie
nt a
nd w
st
ch o
utco
me
for
tw
ill b
e pe
rson
althe
year
to d
ate
lised
, th
eref
ore e,
spl
it by
ser
vic
not
allo
win
g fuce
type
for
furth
erth
er d
etai
l to
b
er
be
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 87 of 144
App
endi
x - S
core
card
SPC
Cha
rts
1. P
reve
nt Il
l Hea
lth
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
140.0%
Stop
Smok
ing Quits
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
40.0%
50.0%
60.0%
70.0%
80.0%
90.0%
100.0%
110.0%
120.0%
Health Che
cks
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
70.0%
75.0%
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
6‐8 Wee
k Ch
ecks
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
3750
4250
4750
5250
5750
6250
6750
7250
Admission
s Av
oide
d
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
% LT
C/ITC Patie
nts with
an avoide
d ad
mission
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
80.0%
82.0%
84.0%
86.0%
88.0%
90.0%
92.0%
94.0%
96.0%
New
Birth Visits
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Data Outsid
e Limits
Common
Variance
Page 88 of 144
2. D
eliv
er h
igh-
qual
ity c
are
at h
ome
and
in th
e co
mm
unity
‐0.40
‐0.20
0.00
0.20
0.40
0.60
0.80
Mod
erate an
d Severe fa
lls per 1,000
bed
days
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
‐3.0
‐2.0
‐1.00.0
1.0
2.0
3.0
4.0
5.0
Category 3/4 Pressure Ulcers
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
90.0%
92.0%
94.0%
96.0%
98.0%
100.0%
102.0%
Contractua
l activity
against ta
rget
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
2.0%
2.5%
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
DNA Ra
te
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
93.0%
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
99.0%
LTC/ICT Re
spon
se Tim
es Being
Met
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
100.0%
105.0%
% 2Hr
Rap
id Respo
nses m
et
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
94.0%
95.0%
96.0%
97.0%
98.0%
99.0%
100.0%
101.0%
MIU 4Hr
Target
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
82.0%
84.0%
86.0%
88.0%
90.0%
92.0%
94.0%
96.0%
98.0%
100.0%
102.0%
Consultant‐Led
RTT
Incomplete Waits
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
99.0%
99.2%
99.4%
99.6%
99.8%
100.0%
100.2%
GUM Access with
in 48H
rs
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 89 of 144
2. D
eliv
er h
igh-
qual
ity c
are
at h
ome
and
in th
e co
mm
unity
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
Med
ian length of stay (days)
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
70.0%
75.0%
80.0%
85.0%
90.0%
95.0%
100.0%
Positiv
e ou
tcom
es achieved for p
lann
ed care an
d therap
y services
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
93.00%
94.00%
95.00%
96.00%
97.00%
98.00%
99.00%
Percen
tage of p
atients who
wou
ld re
commen
d ou
r services
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
Friend
s an
d Family Respo
nse Ra
te (M
IU and
Inpa
tients)
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
Clinical Aud
it Im
plem
entatio
ns by de
adlin
e
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
98.0%
98.5%
99.0%
99.5%
100.0%
100.5%
NICE gu
idan
ce re
view
ed with
in timescales
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
87.0%
89.0%
91.0%
93.0%
95.0%
97.0%
99.0%
AHP Non
Con
sulta
nt‐le
d 18
Wee
k complete waits with
in 18
wee
ks
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
Page 90 of 144
3. In
tegr
ate
Serv
ices
0.0%
2.0%
4.0%
6.0%
8.0%
10.0%
12.0%
14.0%
16.0%
18.0%
Delayed Tran
sfers of Care
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
0.0%
5.0%
10.0%
15.0%
20.0%
25.0%
30.0%
Percen
tage of ICT/LTC
Referrals from with
in KCH
FT
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
‐£100,00
0
‐£50,000£0
£50,00
0
£100,000
£150,000
Home First saving ‐W
est K
ent
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
050100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
Average wait tim
e (m
inutes) for Acciden
t and
Emergency
Services (W
est K
ent)
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 91 of 144
4. D
evel
op s
usta
inab
le s
ervi
ces
0.0%
1.0%
2.0%
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
LTC/ICT % Con
tacts in clin
ic
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
76.0%
78.0%
80.0%
82.0%
84.0%
86.0%
88.0%
90.0%
92.0%
94.0%
96.0%
98.0%
Bed Occup
ancy
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
0.00
%
0.50
%
1.00
%
1.50
%
2.00
%
2.50
%
Income an
d Expe
nditu
re Surplus vs plan
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
0.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
100.0%
120.0%
CIP Ac
hieved
Against Plan
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
600000
700000
External Agency Sp
end
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
Page 92 of 144
5. B
e Th
e B
est E
mpl
oyer
3.0%
3.5%
4.0%
4.5%
5.0%
5.5%
Sickne
ss Rate
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
0.0%
0.2%
0.4%
0.6%
0.8%
1.0%
1.2%
1.4%
1.6%
1.8%
Sickne
ss Rate (Stress)
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
13.0%
14.0%
15.0%
16.0%
17.0%
Unp
lann
ed Turno
ver
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
82.0%
87.0%
92.0%
97.0%
102.0%
107.0%
Man
datory Training Ra
te
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riance
Negative Va
riance
Breach
Common
Variance
3.0%
4.0%
5.0%
6.0%
7.0%
8.0%
9.0%
10.0%
11.0%
12.0%
13.0%
Vacancy Ra
te
values
Target
Mean
UCL
LCL
Positive Va
riatio
nNegative Va
riatio
nBreach
Common
Variatio
n
Inte
grat
ed P
erfo
rman
ceR
epor
t
Page 93 of 144
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 31 January 2019
Agenda Number: 2.8
Agenda Item Title: Preparedness for Brexit Report
Presenting Officer: Natalie Davies, Corporate Services Director
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
This report provides information and assurance to the Board of the Trust’s position
in relation to its preparedness for Brexit.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
For the Board to note the report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required.
Natalie Davies, Corporate Services Director Tel: 01622 211904
Email: [email protected]
Tru
st P
repa
redn
ess
for
Bre
xit
Rep
ort
Page 94 of 144
PREPAREDNESS FOR BREXIT
1. Introduction
The United Kingdom (UK) is scheduled to exit the European Union (EU) at 2300
(GMT) on 29 March 2019.
The Secretary of State for Health and Social Care has issued a number of letters
and information on the Government’s revised Border Planning Assumptions to
industry and the health and care system.
These letters focus on supply chain implications in the event that the UK leaves the
EU without a ratified agreement – a ‘no deal’ exit.
The potential implications of a ‘no deal’ exit or indeed one with a deal are difficult to
fully quantify but it is our duty to prepare for all scenarios. The impact in Kent could
be felt particularly acutely with the entry and exit points to mainland Europe and in
response a coordinated plan across the county is required. This preparation is being
undertaken in partnership with health, social care, police and other organisations in
Kent.
2. Background
With the publication of the Department of Health and Social Care’s 'EU Exit
Operational Readiness Guidance' in December 2018, the Government set out its
expectation for all health and care commissioners and providers (including adult
social care providers) to undertake local EU Exit readiness planning, local risk
assessments and test and plan appropriately for the UK’s withdrawal from the EU on
the 29 March 2019.
The guidance covered seven key areas of risk:
1. supply of medicines and vaccines,
2. supply of medical devices and clinical consumables,
3. supply of non-clinical consumables, goods and services,
4. workforce,
5. reciprocal healthcare,
6. research and clinical trials,
7. data sharing, processing and access.
In addition, Kent and Medway health and care organisations are part of the Kent
Resilience Forum (KRF) multi-agency EU Exit planning.
Page 95 of 144
Owing to its unique geography and large number of UK border ports, (Dover
Harbour, Euro Tunnel and Ramsgate Harbour) these plans focus primarily on the
potential increased traffic volume caused by border checking delays.
To ensure a consistent and joined up approach to planning and assurance, the Kent
and Medway Sustainability and Transformation Partnership (STP) is coordinating the
business continuity (BC) review and planning for health and care commissioners and
providers.
In November 2018, NHS provider organisations were also directed by NHS
Improvement to review their supply chains. The outputs from these reviews were fed
into the Governments EU Exit Operational Readiness Guidance.
3. Assessment
3.1 Governance structure
The Chief Executive has appointed the Corporate Services Director as the lead
Director for the EU exit. The Trust has set up a small team lead by the emergency
planning function to coordinate the Trust response. A Trust wide committee has
been formed reporting to the Executive Team to develop and test the readiness
plans.
A number of working groups report to the Committee. These are:
• Adults East including CYP and SES
• Adults West
• Pharmacy
• Contracts, Procurement and Estates
• Service Prioritisation
• IT
• Dental
• Facilities
The issue of transportation and movement across the county is considered by each
group and coordinated through the committee.
The Trust work programme echoes the Sustainability and Transformation
Partnership in dividing it into three phases:
• Planning phase (Current – March 2019)
o Identification of impacts
o Assurance of Business Continuity plan and service plans
o Coordination of plans with key partners
o Command and Control structure review
Tru
st P
repa
redn
ess
for
Bre
xit
Rep
ort
Page 96 of 144
o Training, testing and exercise
o Communications
• Response phase (March 2019 - )
o Operational response active
o STP Strategic and tactical response teams operational
o Communications
• Recovery phase
o Asses and support recovery as required
o Communications
The STP has appointed a Director with responsibility for EU Exit and is coordinating with the Local Health Resilience Partnership (LHRP) and the other statutory organisations. Monthly meetings of the LHRP are being held at which the Trust is represented.
3.2 Committee Sub-Groups
3.2.1 Workforce
The impact on the workforce of Britain leaving the EU has been considered. The Trust is aware of 101 members of staff with nationality aligned with the EU. Each of these members of staff has been written to and the Trust has offered to fund their application fee to remain. There will be no change to staff’s current rights under EU law until the end of the planned implementation period on 31 December 2020.
3.2.2 Medicines
The Chief Pharmacist is part of a communication group with NHS England (NHSE) reviewing the implications of Brexit. This group communicates weekly to assess the on-going implications. At this stage, NHSE advises that no drugs should be stockpiled but to ensure that stores are kept up to date. This is in place.
3.2.3 Procurement contract
Procurement has completed a review of all expenditure contracts with suppliers
which has been, or is set to be, over £100k. Suppliers have been reviewed for
any implications for the supply chain. NHSE has requested a return on this
matter in which the trust identified priority areas for review. 17 contracts have
been identified under these categories with an assessment and mitigations
completed.
Services are in the process of identifying any contract that they hold directly
with suppliers or are held through a third party. Clinical commissioning groups
Page 97 of 144
who hold some contracts e.g. the supply of continence products, have been
contacted for assurance. This is being coordinated through the STP.
3.2.4 Medical devices
Medical devices have been considered as part of the supply of contracts and
suppliers. In addition, assurance has been provided that the list of devices is up
to date and maintained appropriately.
4. Travel
The STP, on behalf of the Kent and Medway CCGs and providers, has been
contributing to the KRF road traffic planning to ensure the health and care needs are
recognised in these national plans.
Several tests of the Kent Resilience Forum plan have been held; including the recent
lorry test between Manston and Dover, and the learning from these is being collated
and will be fed into a series of health specific exercises. The potential impact of
Brexit on Kent’s roads could be significant. The Police are planning for between
three and six months of disruption to Kent roads. This has been the discussion of the
Local Health Resilience Partnership over the last few months. However, preparations
in the last two months have increased.
A Brexit workshop was held on 22 November 2018 where the plans for Operation
Brock including plans for haulage storage at Manston and the potential closure of the
M26 will all be reviewed together with corresponding management plans and tactical
response. The introduction of Operation Brock and related plans is solely the
decision of the Kent Police Service. The decision to implement one of these
operations will also trigger command groups to be established to coordinate the
implementation and take an over view. The NHS will be required to attend these
command groups and NHSE has asked both commissioners and providers to ensure
they are ready to attend as needed. In readiness for this, the Police are holding
training days for both Strategic and Tactical Command. A multi-agency table top
exercise is scheduled for 12 February 2019 at which the Trust will be represented.
In the Trust, services have been looking at the potential impact of Brexit on travel for
a number of months. The issue of travel across the county is incorporated in service
Business Continuity Plans and these measures are being coordinated across the
trust. A specific transport plan, akin to the previous Fuel Strike plan is being
refreshed. This will include different levels of response and work is on-going to
identify:
• Staff’s closest base
• Alternative methods of travel and their feasibility for specific services
Tru
st P
repa
redn
ess
for
Bre
xit
Rep
ort
Page 98 of 144
• Alternative methods of communication
• Staff accommodation at bases
• Use of the voluntary sector
• Core service response
5. Plans
The Trust has a draft operational Brexit plan which will be tested through a number
of table top exercises, the STP exercise held on 12 February 2019 and an internal
exercise facilitated by the Head of Emergency Preparedness, Resilience and
Response on 13 February 2019.
Following this exercise and the identified learning, the plan will be updated and
brought for approval to the executive early March 2019.
6. Multi Agency Assurance and Risk
An assurance template has been created by the STP and circulated to all
commissioners and providers (including general practice) of health and social care. It
has been designed to identify assurance gaps and risks as well as prompt
organisations to test their contingency plans against the seven key areas of activity
and the scenario of major traffic disruption caused by delays at the borders. This will
be completed by the Trust by the deadline of the end of January. The STP will then
collate responses into an action plan to address any identified gaps. The current
Trust risk register is shown at Appendix A and the STP EU Exit Risk Register is
shown at Appendix B.
7. Conclusion
Planning is well underway for the UK’s exit from the European union, however, it is an area of uncertainty and plans must remain flexible to respond. Kent Community Trust is integrated into the whole system planning and work to coordinate across organisations has stepped up in the last few weeks. Natalie Davies Corporate Services Director 24 January 2019
Page 99 of 144
Ap
pe
nd
ix A
K
CH
FT
Ris
k R
eg
iste
r K
en
t C
om
mu
nit
y H
eal
th N
HS
Fou
nd
atio
n T
rust
No
De
al E
xit
fro
m t
he
Eu
rop
ean
Un
ion
Ris
k A
sse
ssm
en
tG
ree
n =
Ris
k <
5A
mb
er =
Ris
k >
10R
ed =
Ris
k b
etw
een
10
- 1
5
Ris
k n
o.
Haz
ard
/ T
hre
atIm
pac
tsR
isk
Typ
eLi
kelih
oo
dIm
pac
tR
isk
Sco
reM
itig
atio
nR
isk
Ow
ne
r
Tru
stW
ork
forc
e in
clu
din
g r
eci
pro
cal h
eal
thca
re0
1
10
1 k
no
wn
sta
ff w
ith
EU
nat
ion
alit
y
If s
taff
are
no
t aw
ard
ed E
U c
itiz
ensh
ip (
202
1)
the
Tru
st w
ill
enco
un
ter
a st
aff
sho
rtag
e.
Clin
ical
Rep
uta
tio
nal
Reg
ula
tory
23
6
Tru
st h
as w
ritt
en t
o a
ll kn
ow
n e
ffec
ted
sta
ff a
nd
re
qu
est
that
th
ey
app
ly f
or
citi
zen
ship
. Th
e Tr
ust
will
re
fun
d t
he
app
licat
ion
fee
of
£6
5.U
pd
ate
10
.01
.19
Pu
blic
ity
on
-go
ing
for
all s
taff
. U
pd
ate
: N
o lo
nge
r
a fe
e f
or
Cit
ize
nsh
ip
Louis
e N
orr
is –
Dire
cto
r o
f
Wo
rkfo
rce
,
Com
munic
ations
and O
D
Tru
st S
up
ply
of
Me
dic
ine
s an
d V
acci
ne
s 0
2
Pre
dic
ted
to
be
an
imp
act
on
imp
ort
ed
ph
arm
ace
uti
cal p
rod
uct
sP
atients
may n
ot re
ceiv
e a
ppro
pri
ate
medic
ines
Clin
ical
Rep
uta
tio
nal
Reg
ula
tory
23
6
Ch
ief
Ph
arm
aci
st is
in c
om
mu
nic
atio
n w
ith
NH
S E
ph
arm
aci
sts
and
rece
ivin
g w
eekl
y ad
vice
fro
m D
epu
ty C
hie
f P
har
ma
cist
En
glan
d.
Ad
vise
d t
o k
eep
un
der
re
view
at
this
sta
ge b
ut
no
t to
tak
e an
y fu
rth
er
acti
on
. U
pd
ate
: N
ew
agr
ee
me
nt
wit
h B
oo
ts f
or
acce
ss t
o 2
4 h
ou
r
me
dic
ine
s th
rou
gh P
har
mac
ist
on
cal
l.
Sara
h L
eave
r -
Tru
st C
hie
f
Ph
arm
aci
st
Tru
st Su
pp
ly o
f C
linic
al C
on
sum
able
s (P
rocu
rem
en
t /
con
trac
ts)
Sup
ply
of
no
n c
linic
al g
oo
ds
and
se
rvic
es
(Fac
iliti
es/
Ho
tel S
erv
ice
s)0
3
Pro
cure
me
nt
are
co
mp
leti
ng
revi
ew
s o
f al
l exp
en
dit
ure
wit
h s
up
plie
rs o
ver
£1
00
k to
de
term
ine
an
y ri
sks.
Po
ssib
le d
ela
y o
f N
HSP
S to
re
pai
r b
roke
n s
yste
ms
and
eq
uip
me
nt.
Co
nce
rn r
e:
the
dis
po
sal o
f cl
inic
al w
aste
The
Tru
st w
ou
ld n
ot
be
able
to
acc
ess
goo
ds
and
ser
vice
s af
ter
a
no
dea
l Bre
xit
.
A r
isk
/ h
arm
to
pat
ien
ts
An
infe
ctio
n r
isk
Fin
anci
al
Rep
uta
tio
nal
Reg
ula
tory
23
6
NH
S Se
lf a
sses
smen
t m
eth
od
olo
gy c
om
ple
ted
Esta
tes
KC
HFT
wo
rk s
tre
am a
re r
evi
ewin
g th
ese
issu
es
Co
ntr
act
is b
ein
g re
view
ed
An
nab
elle
Wh
ible
y-
Smit
h
Mar
gare
t La
ng
Rac
hel
GIL
HO
OLY
Tru
stSu
pp
ly o
f M
ed
ical
De
vice
s0
4
Ava
ilab
ility
of
me
dic
al d
evi
ces
cou
ld b
e im
pac
ted
by
tran
spo
rt c
on
cern
s.
Pat
ien
ts a
nd
sta
ff m
ay
no
t re
ceiv
e th
e d
evic
es r
eq
uir
ed
.
Clin
ical
Rep
uta
tio
nal
Reg
ula
tory
Fin
anci
al
13
3
Ass
essm
ent
of
ma
in c
on
tra
cts
for
med
ical
dev
ices
del
iver
y an
d
pro
cure
men
t co
mp
lete
d.
The
Tru
st t
o a
gre
e an
d id
enti
fy a
lea
d f
or
new
sys
tem
an
d a
sset
ma
nag
eme
nt.
Exec
Tea
m
Tru
stTr
ave
l0
5Tr
ansp
ort
in
th
e a
rea
incl
ud
ing
mo
torw
ays,
th
e p
ort
an
d t
he
ch
ann
el t
un
ne
l
cou
ld b
e s
eve
rely
co
mp
rom
ise
d w
ith
th
e in
tro
du
ctio
n o
f e
xte
nsi
ve b
ord
er
con
tro
ls
Ris
k o
f st
aff
no
t b
ein
g ab
le t
o g
ain
acc
ess
to w
ork
pla
ce.
If
Op
Bro
ck is
in p
lace
th
e h
ealt
h r
isk
to t
he
pu
blic
wh
ich
co
uld
imp
act
on
th
e Tr
ust
. D
elay
ed d
eliv
er o
f eq
uip
men
t an
d m
edic
ines
Clin
ical
Rep
uta
tio
nal
Fin
anci
al
34
12
Ensu
re c
urr
en
t in
form
ati
on
is c
om
mu
nic
ated
to
ap
pro
pri
ate
staf
f as
it
is a
vaila
ble
. B
usi
nes
s C
on
tin
uit
y P
lan
s re
fre
shed
an
d u
pd
ated
. Tr
igge
r
do
cum
ents
cu
rre
ntl
y b
ein
g w
ritt
en w
hic
h w
ill f
orm
par
t o
f th
e Tr
ust
op
erat
ion
al p
lan
. Map
pin
g o
f st
aff
is in
pro
gre
ss. N
HS
E an
d t
he
KR
T
are
fac
ilita
tin
g w
ork
sho
ps.
Jan
Alle
n
Tru
stP
erf
orm
an
ce
an
d M
ap
pin
g o
f S
erv
ice
s, M
ap
pin
g o
f sta
ff0
6C
QC
Re
qu
ire
me
nts
KC
HF
T R
eq
uir
em
en
t
KC
HFT
ma
y n
ot
be
fully
co
mp
lian
t
KC
HFT
do
no
t h
ave
an in
tera
ctiv
e m
ap
of
staf
f lo
cati
on
s
Clin
ical
Rep
uta
tio
nal
Reg
ula
tory
Fin
anci
al
23
6C
on
sid
er w
ith
th
e C
QC
th
eir
req
uir
em
ents
Rev
iew
th
e lo
cati
on
s o
f st
aff
Nic
k P
lum
me
r
Shar
on
Bar
ker
Tru
st I
T/T
ele
co
ms
0
7
IT a
nd
te
leco
ms
syst
em
s m
ay b
e o
verw
he
lme
d.
Re
vie
w t
he
fo
llow
ing
syst
em
s;
Skyp
e f
or
Bu
sin
ess
VP
N
Tele
con
fere
nce
Lap
top
pro
visi
on
Staf
f m
ay
no
t b
e p
rep
are
d f
or
vid
eo c
on
fere
nci
ng
.
Tele
con
fere
nce
eq
uip
men
t m
ay
nee
d r
ep
laci
ng
.
Lack
of
rep
lace
me
nt
lap
top
s
Imp
act
on
th
e sy
stem
if
ther
e is
a in
cre
ased
nu
mb
er o
f st
aff
wo
rkin
g fr
om
ho
me
Clin
ical
Rep
uta
tio
nal
Reg
ula
tory
Fin
anci
al
13
3C
om
ms/
tra
inin
g to
en
cou
rage
sta
ff t
o d
ow
nlo
ad S
KYP
E fo
r b
usi
nes
s
Rep
lace
tel
eph
on
es in
key
are
as a
nd
re
pla
ce w
ith
a r
ob
ust
sys
tem
Inve
stig
ate
the
pu
rch
ase
of
lap
top
s
Rev
iew
imp
act
of
staf
f w
ork
ing
fro
m h
om
e o
n d
eliv
ery
of
care
Mar
k A
shb
y
Tru
st D
ata
sh
ari
ng
an
d a
cc
es
s
8N
on
e id
en
tifi
ed
Tru
st R
ese
arc
h a
nd
Clin
ical A
ud
it
9
For
rese
arch
- t
hre
at t
o r
ecr
uit
me
nt
nu
mb
er.
For
clin
ical
au
dit
- t
hre
at t
o c
om
ple
tin
g lo
cal c
linic
al a
ud
its
and
fai
lure
to
fulf
il re
qu
ire
me
nts
of
nat
ion
al a
ud
its
wh
ich
fo
rm p
art
of
the
Qu
alit
y
Acc
ou
nts
.
Res
earc
h -
re
sea
rch
del
iver
y st
aff
ma
y n
ot
be
able
fu
lfil
stu
dy
req
uir
em
ents
fo
r ti
me
and
tar
get
in t
he
recr
uit
men
t o
f p
atie
nts
to
stu
die
s an
d c
linic
al t
rial
s. T
his
will
mea
n t
hat
we
fail
to m
eet
rese
arc
h o
bje
ctiv
es a
nd
fai
l to
fu
lfil
ou
r p
led
ged
re
cru
itm
ent
figu
res
- th
is h
as t
he
po
ten
tial
to
imp
act
on
ou
r fu
nd
ing
fro
m K
SS
Clin
ical
Res
earc
h N
etw
ork
.
Clin
ical
au
dit
- p
ote
nti
al im
pac
t o
n o
ur
abili
ty t
o m
eet
the
sub
mis
sio
n r
eq
uir
em
ents
of
aud
its
on
th
e N
atio
nal
Clin
ical
Au
dit
of
Pat
ien
t O
utc
om
es P
rogr
am
me
(N
CA
PO
P)
wh
ich
are
ma
nd
ated
nat
ion
ally
an
d f
orm
par
t o
f th
e Q
ual
ity
Acc
ou
nts
.
Clin
ical
Rep
uta
tio
nal
Reg
ula
tory
Fin
anci
al
13
3
Rai
se i
ssu
e w
ith
Ch
ief
Op
erat
ing
Off
icer
at
KSS
Clin
ical
Res
earc
h
Net
wo
rk.
Ind
ivid
ual
str
ate
gies
re
qu
ire
d f
or
each
stu
dy.
Mo
nit
or
pro
gre
ss a
gain
st n
atio
nal
au
dit
s an
d d
iscu
ss a
lter
nat
e st
rate
gies
fo
r
sub
mis
sio
n w
ith
au
dit
lea
ds.
Daw
n N
ort
ma
n
Tru
st P
repa
redn
ess
for
Bre
xit
Rep
ort
Page 100 of 144
Appendix B STP Risk Register
Area Concern Possible mitigation
Business Continuity (BC) Existing BC plans have not been tested against EU Exit risk assessment scenarios.
- Kent and Medway NHS organisations involved in the EU Exit planning programme.
- CCG table top exercises to be held in February against key risks.
- Assurance around provider BC plans and risk assessment being collated and reviewed.
-
Medication Management of drug stocks in England is being centrally managed by the DoH and NHSE. This sits outside the control of the STP.
- Ensuring a consistent message goes out to patients and clinicians about not stockpiling medication.
- Encouraging 28 day prescribing in the majority of patients to reduce medication 'held' by patients
- Encouraging patients to only order what they need.
- Working with local community pharmacies and GP practices to manage specific stock issues
-
Command and Control The potential longevity and input requirement to Tactical Command Group (TCG) during the response phase presents capacity issues for Category two responders.
- CCGs to review its on-call provision (including equipment and training) and availability for an extended period of time.
- Providers to review their incident response provision and availability for an extended period of time.
- CCGs consider creating a dedicated resource to respond to the demands of the TCG.
Page 101 of 144
Area Concern Possible mitigation
Traffic disruption Traffic management actions may increase local traffic levels and impact on staff movement and service delivery. Impact for all agencies.
- Assurance around provider BC plans and risk assessment being collated and reviewed.
- Input into traffic management plans to ensure mitigations are identified.
- Map potential “hot spots” and design specific solutions.
Communications National communications have centred on supply chain maintenance. In addition local plans will address any issue that could impact patients and service delivery, including, traffic disruption.
- Kent and Medway comms plan.
Tru
st P
repa
redn
ess
for
Bre
xit
Rep
ort
Page 102 of 144
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 31 January 2019
Agenda Item: 2.9
Subject: Winter Pressures Update Report
Presenting Officer: Lesley Strong, Chief Operating Officer/Deputy Chief Executive
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Assurance X
Report Summary (including purpose and context)
The Board received a paper at the December 2018 meeting outlining the Trust’s plans to
manage the additional pressures over winter. This paper is to update the Board on the
actions taken by Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust (KCHFT) to manage patient
care during this time.
Overall, the wider systems have been able to cope with the increase in pressure during
December and early January and have remained at OPEL 2 escalation levels. There is an
expectation with the forecast of colder weather that these pressures will increase.
The paper sets out the position within KCHFT services and includes the impact of the new
schemes.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board is asked to note the update.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No
High level position described and no decisions required.
Lesley Strong, Chief Operating Officer, Deputy Chief Executive
Tel: 01622 211937
Email: [email protected]
Win
ter
Pre
ssur
es U
pdat
eR
epor
t
Page 103 of 144
WINTER PRESSURES UPDATE REPORT
Updates on actions taken by Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust
(KCHFT)
1. Introduction
The Board received a paper at the December meeting outlining the Trust plans to
manage the additional pressures over winter. This paper is to update the Board on
the actions taken by KCHFT to manage patient care during this time.
2. Background
The winter of 2017/18 presented significant challenges to the health and social care
system. At this point last year the level of demand for services was high with severe
pressures across the health and social care system. The increased demand was
due to sicker and frailer patients with increasing numbers of respiratory conditions,
flu and norovirus.
For this reason planning for winter 2018/19 started much earlier both internally and
within the local systems. The KCHFT plan was approved by the Board at its meeting
in December 2018. The aim of the plan is to ensure that services are in place to
face the expected increase in demand and to ensure the continued safe and
responsive delivery of high quality of care.
Community services have a key role to play in managing winter pressures
particularly in supporting patient flow. The plan focused on the following key areas:
• Supporting system flow through improving patient discharge and preventing
admission
• Workforce
• Increasing capacity of existing services
• Escalation plans
3. Assessment
3.1 Whole System Performance
National analysis by NHS Providers showed that on the whole trusts have coped
better than expected with demand pressures in December. The pressures have
increased in the systems in January but to date performance is stable with both East
Win
ter
Pre
ssur
es U
pdat
eR
epor
t
Page 104 of 144
and West Kent systems mostly staying at escalation level OPEL 2. However the
pressure is expected to increase imminently with the forecast of colder weather.
System Performance Indicators taken from NHS Improvement scorecard, 1 week
average for w/e 14/1/19
Indicator MTW EKHUFT
A&E performance 91.5% 78.9%
Bed occupancy 94.1% 90.8%
Delayed transfers of care 4.25% 6.3%
• A&E performance has been maintained around normal levels in both acute
trusts although this has been under the 95% target for some time
• Bed occupancy within the acute trusts continues to fluctuate.
• Delayed transfers of care in the acute trusts are rising in West Kent and
decreasing in East Kent
The whole system escalation status is constantly under review with regular
conference calls when the system pressures escalate.
The key role of community services at this time is to ensure good patient flow
through our services to support the timely discharge of patients from acute hospitals
to community services and community services to other settings. The emphasis is
on reducing the number of patients experiencing delays to discharge to improve their
care and free up capacity.
3.2 Key Areas of Focus
Supporting patients to return home or preventing an admission
Core services have continued to respond to referrals to maintain patient care. The
focus since Christmas is on maintaining flow and this means that the community
hospitals, rapid response teams, Home Treatment Service and community nursing
and therapy teams are working to capacity at this time e.g. rapid response service in
West Kent is reporting activity of 48% above target.
There have been a higher number of patients whose transfer has been delayed from
community services particularly in East Kent and we are working with other partners
to move patients to where they should be cared for.
Supporting patients with rehabilitation needs in Community Hospitals
Currently the hospitals have been able to maintain patient flow through daily board
rounds to review patients’ needs and agree discharge plans. There have been a
higher number of patients whose discharge has been delayed in East Kent since
Christmas. There are ongoing discussions with partners to resolve this and KCHFT
Page 105 of 144
is currently working with a company, CHS, to support those patients who are self-
funding a placement or package of care.
Last week there was been greater pressure on the beds and higher bed occupancy.
Both East and West Kent have access to independent sector spot purchased beds
and our teams are working to place patients in the most effective environment to
meet their needs.
Up until 20 January there has been no requirement for additional escalation beds but
with the expectation of a rise in demand towards the end of the month, 6 escalation
beds in East Kent will be opened in the week commencing 21 January.
Infection control outbreaks:
There have been three outbreaks since the beginning of December. Outbreak
precautions were agreed with the Infection Control Team and no unit closed to
admissions
• Elizabeth Ward Deal Norovirus
• Goldsmid Ward, Tonbridge respiratory outbreak.
• Hawkhurst Hospital, respiratory outbreak
New models of service to support acute trusts to assess and discharge patients
As part of winter planning and the development of local care initiatives, new
schemes in both East and West Kent were agreed at the end of last year. This
section outlines the impact these schemes are having during a period of increased
demand.
West Kent
Hospital at Home (Virtual Ward)
The new model of care enables patients to leave the acute hospital as soon as they
are clinically stable and complete the remainder of their acute pathway at home
remaining under the care of the Consultant.
The new service started in November 2018 with the clinical coordinators working
within the acute trust to develop the initial pathway of care for patients with cellulitis.
The first patients were accepted on to the service at the end of November.
Win
ter
Pre
ssur
es U
pdat
eR
epor
t
Page 106 of 144
Performance as of 21 January:
Number of patients through the scheme 38
Bed days saved 205
Average length of stay of patients on service 7 days
Treatment / Intervention 67% IV antibiotics
The service is not yet achieving the target of 30 patients at any one time but is
continuing to increase number of referrals
East Kent
Rapid transfer service:
There is an ongoing focus on improving discharges from EKUHFT. This service is
formed of the following parts:
• Rapid Transfer of Care team based in the acute hospital sites. The teams are
now in place to identify complex patients and facilitate their discharge. There
is a target of 245 complex discharges per week. Performance is improving as
the service becomes more established as follows:
Week Beginning: Total
26/11 144 (58%)
3/12 171 (69%)
10/12 136 (55%)
17/12 189 (77%)
24/12 153 (62%)
31/12 170 (69%)
7/1 199 (81%)
14/1 221 (90%)
The team are working closely with EKHUFT and KCC staff to increase the number of
patients who are supported to leave the acute trust under the following pathways.
• Rapid transfer service home
The current model is changing at the end of January with the remodelled
service to be provided by the rapid response service with additional health
care assistants in the teams. There has been a successful recruitment
campaign with the new staff coming into post during January. Part of the
service will be provided by domiciliary care agencies providing a domiciliary
care plus model under contract with KCHFT. This will be in place by the end
of the month.
• Rapid transfer of care bed based model
Page 107 of 144
The bed based model within the independent sector has been remodelled to
provide a block contract for 40 beds and the ability to spot purchase beds
against individual patient needs. The service is for patients with complex
needs who need a longer period of assessment outside of the acute trust.
Between 18 December 2018 to 18 January 2019, 35 beds have been spot
purchased with a further 21 patients currently under assessment.
The rapid transfer service has taken on management of both the contracted
beds and the spot purchasing arrangements with the contract moving to
KCHFT in April.
The service will deliver an increase in the number of patients discharged
through a reduction in length of stay in the block contract beds and improved
bed occupancy.
Alternatives to A&E
The winter edition of our Community Health Magazine promoted how to keep well in
winter and alternatives to A&E including the KCHFT minor injury units. Activity is
6.3% higher in the units in December 2018 compared to December 2017.
Staff Health and Wellbeing
There is increased demand on all community services and the need for additional
staff to support our substantive staff. All bank staff were directly contacted to ask if
they were available for additional shifts in January and February and an incentive
scheme agreed. It is too early at this point to measure its impact.
Staff flu campaign.
Staff flu vaccination uptake as of 21 January
Patient Facing 48%
Non Patient Facing 54%
Grand Total 50%
The Chief Nurse has revised the plan and the team are now specifically targeting the
groups who have the highest non-compliance rates.
4. Conclusion
The systems are expected to come under increased pressure over the coming
weeks with colder weather forecast. The plans are under constant review both
internally and within the whole system.
The Board is asked to note the actions taken by KCHFT in response to the
pressures and the work across the whole systems.
Win
ter
Pre
ssur
es U
pdat
eR
epor
t
Page 108 of 144
Lesley Strong Chief Operating Officer/Deputy Chief Executive January 2019
Page 109 of 144
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 31 January 2019
Agenda Number: 3.1
Agenda Item Title: NHS Long Term Plan and Impact for Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust Report
Presenting Officer: Gerard Sammon, Director of Strategy
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☒ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
This paper sets out a brief summary of The NHS Long Term Plan which was published earlier in the month. It goes onto provide an initial high level assessment of its impact on the Trust and our planned next steps.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
To note the report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required.
Gerard Sammon, Director of Strategy Tel: 01622211938
Email: [email protected]
NH
S L
ong
Ter
m P
lan
Rep
ort
Page 110 of 144
NHS LONG TERM PLAN
1. Introduction
1.1 This paper sets out a brief summary of The NHS Long Term Plan (the Plan) which was published earlier in the month. It goes onto provide an initial high level assessment of its impact on the Trust and our planned next steps.
1.2 A full copy of the Plan alongside a number of case studies can be found at: https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk .
2. Background
2.1 The Plan sets out a strategy for the NHS for the next ten years. This follows on from last June’s announcement by the Prime Minister of a £20.5bn annual real terms uplift for the NHS by 2023/24.
2.2 It is therefore a broad reaching and aspirational document which describes a new service model for the 21st Century and the continuation of a policy direction towards an Integrated Care System (ICS) architecture. There is greater emphasis on primary and community care, mental healthcare, prevention and tackling health inequalities.
2.3 Prominence is also placed on giving a strong start in life for children and
young people and better care for major health conditions tackling causes of early death in areas such as heart disease and stroke, cancer, respiratory conditions, dementias, and self-harm.
2.4 The principles behind workforce reforms are also set out and so too are far reaching ambitions for the NHS in digital services and changes to the financial regime.
2.5 The Plan emphasises the importance of the NHS returning to sustainable financial balance and confirms a funding path containing an average increase of 3.4% a year over the next five years. It gives a new guarantee that during this same time period the investment in primary medical and community services will grow faster than the overall NHS budget to create a ring-fenced local fund worth at least an extra £4.5 billion a year in real terms by 2023/24.
3. Assessment
3.1 Much of what the Plan describes is not new, but a continuation of the direction set out in the 2014 Five Year Forward View with collaboration and integration as its touchstones. The organisation has already aligned to
NH
S L
ong
Ter
m P
lan
Rep
ort
Page 111 of 144
the Plan’s direction and continuity is welcomed as it is consistent with our current strategies and priorities and means the organisation is already well calibrated to make the best of the opportunities that it presents.
3.2 The Trust is uniquely placed in Kent to enable more joined-up care in the community and will have a key leadership role to play in ensuring that the greater investment and focus on community, primary care and mental health services is optimised.
3.3 We have already been co-creating better integrated and more
collaborative care models for people and are actively involved in both partnering and providing leadership to local care and frailty services. As the Plan signals the further development of primary care networks and new funding models to back them can be supported by the Trust’s scale and range of offerings, This will mean is has a key role to play in supporting their development and exploring innovations. It also endorses the current organisational priority of workforce which will be required to meet the ambitions of these new care models, and has already led to initiatives such as the establishment of our Nursing Academy.
3.4 The roll out of ICS’s across the country by 2021, and the enhancements of
the role of system working through the revised financial framework and in relation to commissioning structures, regulation and performance management is significant. As noted earlier, much of this direction is not new and so work is already underway in the Kent and Medway Sustainability and Transformation Partnership (STP) in making changes. The STP footprint is already aligned to how the Plan describes an ICS and CCG’s are collaborating in strategic commissioning. The Trust will therefore continue to be fully engaged in shaping what they will look like.
3.5 Having previously embedded the prevention of ill health as part of its strategy and one of its four key goals the Trust is again well positioned to continue to take a key role with implementing this particular part of the Plan. The Trust’s existing partnership with Kent County Council will continue to assist in making the move away from reactive to anticipatory care and active population health management.
3.6 The Trust had hitherto recognised that digital technology can transform how staff and people engage with services and make improvements in care co-ordination. Investment in technology to enable new ways of working has been one of the four key priorities for the Trust in 2018/19 and the Plan will assist in securing further investments against it at a system level.
3.7 The Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) allocation formulae have been
updated, making them more responsive to extremes of health inequalities and un-met need. Kent and Medway CCG cash uplifts for 2019/20 are 5.9% for core services and 6.8% for primary care The control total in 2019/20 for the Trust has been set at a £2.2m surplus (£3.1m in 2018-19)
Page 112 of 144
supported by a £2.2m (£2.5m in 2018-19) Provider Sustainability Fund.
3.8 A number of key interdependencies for the success of the Plan remain to be addressed and are awaited in future publications. Notably, they include the national workforce implementation plan, along with training and education funding, capital investment, and a sustainable solution for social care funding.
4. Next steps
4.1 The Trust will continue to engage the organisation in sharing what the Plan means and the challenge will then turn to how the plan is implemented. The timing of its publication does give an opportunity for involvement to be had with the development of our 2019/20 priorities and operational plans. This is the start of engagement with local populations and Health Watch has been given a funding source to take that forward.
4.2 The Trust will be working closely with Kent and Medway STP about the future of its integrated care system and the changes it requires given its alignment to the development of an integrated care system.
4.3 We will also be working with the STP to engage in the development of the
detailed national implementation programme which is required by the autumn. To support this planning, local health systems will receive five-year indicative financial allocations for 2012/20 to 2023/24, but will still be asked to produce local plans by Spring for implementing commitments in 2019/20 as it is being viewed as a transitional year.
Gerard Sammon Director of Strategy January 2019
NH
S L
ong
Ter
m P
lan
Rep
ort
Page 113 of 144
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 31 January 2019
Agenda Number: 4.1
Agenda Item Title: Learning from Deaths Report
Presenting Officer: Dr Sarah Phillips, Medical Director
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
National guidance on learning from deaths requires Kent Community Health NHS Foundation Trust (KCHFT) to collect and publish mortality data and learning points quarterly via a paper to Quality Committee and Public Board. Guidance states this data should include the total number of the Trust’s inpatient deaths and those deaths that the Trust has subjected to case record review. Of these deaths subjected to review, Trusts need to provide estimates of how many deaths were judged more likely than not to have been due to problems in care. The dashboard included has been based on national suggested format. As the Board is aware, the KCHFT Mortality Review Policy was developed following the recommendations made by the National Guidance on Learning from Deaths (2017). Other national publications were also used to guide the content of the policy. The scope of reviews includes all community hospital inpatient deaths, any patients who die under our care with serious mental health needs and all patients with learning disability. Since May 2018, mortality reviews of community hospital inpatient deaths have been conducted through a centralised process where the review team is made up of a doctor, a ward matron or other senior clinical staff member, a pharmacist, a quality lead and centralised administrative support. Members rotate on a monthly basis to maintain a degree of independence and this replaces the previous process of hospital multi-disciplinary team (MDT) teams being allocated deaths from another hospital for review. The new process allows for a more efficient way of reviewing deaths, feeding back learning to teams responsible for patient care and monitoring actions. An internal process for reviewing deaths of patients with Learning Disabilities has been put in place alongside the LeDeR process for additional assurance, for best practice and to meet the Trust’s ethical obligations. Learning from these reviews is taken to the Mortality Surveillance Group and will be included in this report. As defined in the Policy, the Trust Board has overall responsibility for ensuring compliance with all legal and statutory duties, along with best practice including having an overview of the mortality review process and knowledge of the learning that emerges from the reviews that drive improvements in care. The focus of Trust mortality review is on meaningful learning and sharing ways to improve care.
Lear
ning
Fro
m D
eath
s R
epor
t
Page 114 of 144
Proposals and /or Recommendations
For assurance.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required.
Dr Sarah Phillips, Medical Director Tel: 01622 211922
Email: [email protected]
Page 115 of 144
LEARNING FROM DEATHS REPORT Themes from Mortality Reviews (October to December 2018)
1. Introduction 1.1 National guidance on learning from deaths requires KCHFT to collect and
publish mortality data quarterly via a paper to the Quality Committee and Public Board. The quarterly report must include mortality data and learning points. Guidance states this data should include the total number of the Trust’s inpatient deaths and those deaths that the Trust has subjected to case record review. Of these deaths subjected to review, Trusts need to provide estimates of how many deaths were judged more likely than not to have been due to problems in care.
2. December Dashboard 2.1 The dashboard below has been based on national suggested format and refers
to deaths in community hospitals.
Total Number of Deaths in Scope
Total Deaths Reviewed
Number of deaths judged to be more likely than not due to problems in healthcare
This Month Last Month This Month Last Month This Month Last Month
1 4 2* 8 0 0
This Quarter (QTD) Last Quarter
This Quarter (QTD) Last Quarter
This Quarter (QTD) Last Quarter
12 14 12 15 0 0
This Year (YTD) Last Year This Year (YTD) Last Year
This Year (YTD) Last Year
65 22 58 22 0 0
*Deaths reviewed in a given calendar month can exceed the number of deaths reported that month because the figure includes deaths which took place in the previous month, but have fallen into the next month for review. 2.2 The graph below shows the number of deaths per month this quarter along with
the average.
Lear
ning
Fro
m D
eath
s R
epor
t
Page 116 of 144
3. Themes from Mortality Reviews 3.1 The table below outlines the three most common key themes around good
practice and areas for improvement which have emerged from Mortality Reviews this quarter.
3.2 All areas of good practice and areas for learning are reported at the monthly matrons’ meetings in the East and West and wider dissemination to all ward staff is encouraged. These are also reviewed in the monthly Mortality Surveillance Group (MSG).
3.3 The three most common themes in good practice emerging this quarter, aligned to the Five Priorities for Care of the Dying Person:
• Good evidence of communication with family and documentation of patient’s religious wishes, demonstrating person-centred, holistic care (Communicate, Support and Involve)
• Thorough documentation of consent (Communicate, Involve)
• Anticipatory medicines in place early (Recognise, Plan & Do) 3.4 The three most common themes in areas for improvement emerging this quarter,
and actions to take forward.
Themes Comments/Actions
Transfers of Care
1. There is often a lack of handover or SBAR from the acute trust.
Transfer of Care issues are being reported on Datix and will be taken forward with the acute. A Task and Finish Group is planned for 1st February to discuss next steps.
Documentation a) Personalised Care Plans Personalised Care Plans could be more detailed and written plans do not appear to consistently translate into day-to-day action.
Feedback sent to Ward Matrons for dissemination to teams.
Page 117 of 144
Themes Comments/Actions
b) Drug Charts In some cases, two separate drug charts
are used which could cause confusion, as the palliative care chart alone could be used. Some inconsistencies have also been identified, such as morphine sensitivity mentioned on a chart where morphine is prescribed and administered, but the routine medication chart annotates the morphine allergy as having no documented evidence.
This will be incorporated into training. Following the emergence in the previous quarter of themes around medications, the End of Life Nurse Consultant and Pharmacy had programmed updates at the December EOL Champions meetings and arranged two training sessions for community teams, with one to follow in January/February 2019. Further work is ongoing with pharmacists to highlight issues and training for next year.
Recognition of End of Life In some cases, the dying patient could have been recognised earlier and Advance Care Plans completed sooner. While doctors may have identified patients at end of life early, documentation does not always evidence that the whole team is aware.
End of Life Nurse Consultants will be working to encourage earlier recognition of end of life.
Sarah Phillips Medical Director January 2019
Lear
ning
Fro
m D
eath
s R
epor
t
Page 118 of 144
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 31 January 2019
Agenda Number: 4.3
Agenda Item Title: Community Hospitals Safer Staffing Review
Presenting Officer: Mercia Spare, Chief Nurse (Interim)
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The National Quality Board (2016) expects the Trust to ensure safe, effective,
caring, responsive and well-led care on a sustainable basis, and that the Trust will
employ the right staff with the right skills in the right place and at the right time. To
demonstrate the Trusts commitment to the above requirement, a twice yearly
assessment and evaluation is undertaken in all community hospital wards. This
report details the findings of the safe staffing review completed during November
2018 for community hospitals.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
For the Board to note the report.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required. The paper will have no
impact on people with any of the nine protected characteristics
Sue Mitchell, Assistant Director Patient Safety and Experience
Tel: 073930240018
Email: [email protected]
Com
mun
ity H
ospi
tals
Saf
erS
taffi
ng R
evie
w
Page 119 of 144
1
1.0. Introduction
1.1. Patients have the right to be cared for by appropriately qualified and experienced clinical
staff. The National Quality Board (2016) expects the Trust to ensure safe, effective,
caring, responsive and well-led care on a sustainable basis, and that the Trust will
employ the right staff with the right skills in the right place and at the right time. It is
expected that safe staffing reviews will be reported to a Public Board twice a year, and
the Board last received a review in July 2018 with data relating to January to May 2018.
1.2. To demonstrate the Trusts commitment to the above requirement, a twice yearly
assessment and evaluation is undertaken in all community hospital wards. In addition to
this, staffing levels are monitored daily with the option to request additional short term
resource, should the acuity and dependency of patients on the ward increase. Fill rates
are reported to Board monthly.
1.3. KCHFT Board is committed to ensuring safe staffing in all services. As the Community
Hospitals are essentially nurse led, and are isolated units, the Board has committed to
ensuring the safety of patients by having no less than 2 Registered Nurses (RN) on any
given shift. In recognition that rehabilitation patients require a higher level of the key
fundamentals of care, it is considered appropriate to have a higher skill mix of Health
Care Assistants (HCA) to registered nurses than would be the case in an acute ward.
This is monitored and reported to Board monthly by the Chief Nurse. It is recognised that
in addition to nursing care the wards provide rehabilitation which is delivered by
Physiotherapists, Occupational Therapists and Therapy Assistants and therefore it has
been recognised nationally that staffing levels for Therapy staff should be included in the
Safer Staffing Review (Care Hours per Patient Day (CHPPD):Guidance for Mental Health
and Community Trusts, NHS Improvement, October 2018).
1.4. The Ward Matron is not included in the staffing numbers and is supervisory, allowing time
for management and leadership duties to be undertaken, as well as mentoring and
supporting of staff.
2.0. Background
2.1. An accurate calculation of staffing levels to provide safe care is a crucial part of the
planning of clinical care. Therefore the Trust has developed a methodology for
undertaking the assessment that reflects the principles of work undertaken nationally
COMMUNITY HOSPITALS SAFER STAFFING REVIEW
December 2018
Com
mun
ity H
ospi
tals
Saf
erS
taffi
ng R
evie
w
Page 120 of 144
2
related to calculating safer staffing levels (Safer Nursing Care Tool 2013, NICE SG1, July
2014, Nurse Staffing Levels, Wales 2016). The principles remain the same in that the
three elements of patient acuity, quality indicators, and professional judgement, as
pictured in the below diagram, are considered independently and form the basis on which
to make an informed judgement regarding safe staffing levels.
2.2. KCHFT is commissioned to provide rehabilitation inpatient care and the wards
predominantly care for older patients. It is well recognised that older patients often have
complex care needs and may have significant levels of dependency, and wards therefore
require a workforce with time to deliver appropriate care in a dignified manner.
2.3. This review process has previously only taken account of nursing staff, registered nurses,
assistant practitioners and health care assistants. This audit has included the ward based
physiotherapists and occupational therapists, including therapy assistants.
2.4. The last review in May 2018 determined that, overall the acuity of the patients has
reduced slightly in the east and has increased in the west. This was mainly due to the
number of patients being admitted with cognitive impairment. It found that the therapeutic
workers, where in place were working very well. Some wards were maximising the
support of volunteers with good effect. Quality and safety metrics remained very positive
with an improving picture in reduction of harms for patients and a very positive patient
experience.
3.0. Methodology of review
3.1. All wards returned 21 days of data as required for accurate completion of the audit during
November 2018. The audit focused on the acuity/dependency of the patients with an
allocation of a Red/Amber/Green rating to each bed, as described in appendix 2. A
review meeting was held with the ward matrons and therapy leads and the findings were
analysed and triangulated with six months of quality data for the period of June to
November 2018.
The data focused on:
Page 121 of 144
3
• The quality indicators of avoidable falls, medication incidents, avoidable
pressure harms and serious incidents.
• Patient experience feedback and complaints.
• Professional opinion of the Matron, including any relevant information.
4.0. Summary of findings – Acuity and Dependency
4.1. The data demonstrates that over the period June to November 2018, 50% of the patients
cared for in KCHFT wards had moderate care needs (denoted below in amber), which is
to be expected in patients who are rehabilitating and just over 30% were fairly self-caring
as they prepare for discharge (denoted in green). It is of note that almost 20% of patients
were significantly dependant requiring high levels of support and nursing care (denoted
below in red).
4.2. In the tables below the data has been split by East and West. In the West the green
category has reduced and both the amber and red category has increased indicating an
increase in acuity and dependency since the previous audit which also saw an increase.
In the East the green category has increased, amber category has reduced but there has
been a significant increase in red category which is mostly at Deal.
05
101520253035404550
Dec-17 May-18 Nov-18
Total
Nu
mb
er
of
Be
ds
West Kent Community Hospitals Average patient Acuity December 2017, May 2018 and November 18
Green
Amber
Red
Com
mun
ity H
ospi
tals
Saf
erS
taffi
ng R
evie
w
Page 122 of 144
4
4.3. The below tables demonstrates the number of beds for each ward and also the average
length of stay for a patient during November. At the time of the audit Faversham had 4 of
its 25 beds closed. Each admission and discharge creates demand on registered nursing
and therapy resource which has a greater impact on those hospitals with shorter stays
4.4. The below chart demonstrates acuity and dependency weighted by beds. The wards with
the highest dependency weighted by beds are Deal and Whit & Tank. Notably Whit &
Tank also having the shortest stay patients and a relatively high number of beds. Most
wards have at least one third of patients who are in the green category and would be
fairly self-caring, the exceptions to this are Deal and Whit & Tank. A data comparison
chart of audit data from November and May is detailed at Appendix 1.
05
101520253035404550
Dec-17 May-18 Nov-18
Total
Nu
mb
er
of
Be
ds
East Kent Community Hospitals Average patient Acuity December 2017, May 2018 & November 2018
Green
Amber
Red
22 21 2318
2218
14 14 12 15
0
5
10
15
20
25
Number of Beds
30
15 14 12
2515
23 22 25
05
101520253035
Average length of stay in November
Page 123 of 144
5
5.0 Summary of Findings – Staffing
5.1 The tables below outlines the planned nursing staffing hours and the actual nursing
staffing hours, this has been broken down further into day and night. Tonbridge –
Primrose ward has not been included in this analysis as it is a Therapy Lead unit.
Monthly planned and actual staffing is relatively consistent with the exception of
Hawkhurst night having more actual staff than planned. Deal, QVMH, Sevenoaks,
Edenbridge and Tonbridge Goldsmid all have lower actual staffing than planned due to
sickness and vacancies. Staffing data for Westview was not being collected at the time of
the audit.
5.2 In several wards there is more actual care staff than planned to assist with personal care, as detailed below.
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%
100.0%P
erc
en
tage
of
be
ds
by
Acu
ity
Percentages of Average Patient Acuity November 2018 (excluding empty beds)
Red
Amber
Green
Data source: Patient
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
Hours
Monthly Planned and Actual staff hours for Registered Nurses
DayTotal monthly Planned Staffing HoursRN
DayTotal Monthly Actual staff hours RN
NightTotal monthly Planned Staffing HoursRN
NightTotal Monthly Actual staff hours RN
Com
mun
ity H
ospi
tals
Saf
erS
taffi
ng R
evie
w
Page 124 of 144
6
6.0. Summary of findings - Care Hours Per Patient Per Day
6.1. The charts below highlight the number of care hours provided for patients per day by both care staff and registered nurses. Of note, Deal has low care hours per day when considered alongside the acuity and dependency weighted by bed which is noted as being high. Additionally, Edenbridge have low care hours per patient per day. Low care hours per patient per day may pose a risk to patient safety.
7.0 Summary of findings – Therapy Staff
7.1 Therapy staffing hours have been collected over the three week period for qualified therapy staff and for assistants as detailed in the first chart below. During the audit there were some staff vacancies which are detailed in the Professional Opinion section below and have affected the therapy staffing hours particularly for Edenbridge, Tonbridge, and Whit &Tank and QVMH. Daily average therapy cumulative staffing hours are also detailed in the second chart. This is the first time the Trust has collected data in this way and therefore it is difficult to conclusions at this point. Therapists do not work to the same
0200400600800
100012001400
Hours
Monthly Planned and Actual hours for Care Staff
DayCare staff monthly planned staff hours
DayCare staff
NightCare staff monthly planned staff hours
NightCare staff
4.8 6.8 7.6 7.53.2
7.6 7.8 6.3
22 23
18
21
14
18
14
22
0
5
10
15
20
25
DEAL HOSPITAL QUEEN VICTORIAMEMORIALHOSPITAL
WHIT & TANKHOSPITAL
FAVERSHAMHOSPITAL
EDENBRIDGEHOSPITAL
SEVENOAKSHOSPITAL
TONBRIDGEGOLDSMID
HAWKHURSTHOSPITAL
Cumulative care hours per patient per day Cumulative CareHours from RNand care staffper patient perday
Number of Beds
Page 125 of 144
7
establishment template as registered and non-registered nurses at this current time, therefore data such as care hours per patient per day could not be determined.
8.0 Summary of Findings - Patient Safety Metrics
8.1 The chart on page 10 triangulates staffing with quality indicators which include incidents,
complaints and patient feedback during two data periods; Column 1: December 2017 to
May 2018 and Column 2: June to November 2018. The narrative below is a summary of
the data.
8.2 Faversham
8.2.1 Faversham currently has 21 beds open. The average length of stay is 15 days. 78% of
the patients are reported as having dementia or cognitive impairment, however, acuity
and dependency of patients is consistent with the same period last year. Registered
nurse fill rate is 98% during the day and 100% at night with unregistered staff being over
planned for both day and night. The daily average of therapy input is 23 hours. The
vacancy rate is high at 23.64 vacancies and agency use is 21% of the pay bill.
Cumulative care hours per patient per day are 7.5. There has been a reduction over the
period in avoidable medication incidents; however, one of those was raised as a Serious
Incident when a patient was not administered anti-epileptic medication. There have been
6 complaints over the previous 12 months which is higher than the other community
0
50
100
150
200
Deal QVMH Whit&Tank Faversham Edenbridge Sevenoaks Tonbridge -Goldsmid
Tonbridge -Primrose
Hawkhurst
Total Hours
Therapy Staffing Hours
OT &Physiotherapists
Therapy Assistants
21.4 20.3 17.5 23.1 13.7 25.5 16.7 17 22.15
22 23
1821
1418
1412
22
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Deal QVMH Whit&Tank Faversham Edenbridge Sevenoaks Tonbridge -Goldsmid
Tonbridge -Primrose
Hawkhurst
Daily average Therapy cumulative staffing hours
Average dailyTherapy hours
Number of beds
Com
mun
ity H
ospi
tals
Saf
erS
taffi
ng R
evie
w
Page 126 of 144
8
hospitals. Friends and Family Test scores and overall patient satisfaction scores remain
high with a minimal drop since the previous reporting period.
8.3 Deal
8.3.1 Deal currently has 22 beds open. The average length of stay is 30 days. High levels
(88%) of the patients are reported as having dementia or cognitive impairment; however,
whilst the number of patients who are fairly self-caring remains consistent and those with
moderate care needs have reduced, the highly dependent patients have significantly
increased. When weighted by beds, Deal has the highest levels of acuity and
dependency across all the Community Hospitals. Registered nurse fill rate is 92.9%
during the day and 97.6% at night with unregistered staff being over planned for day
(103.8%) and under at night 95.2%. The daily average of therapy input is 21.4 hours. The
vacancy rate is 14.94 and agency use is 21% of the pay bill. Cumulative care hours per
patient per day are low at 4.8. There has been an increase in avoidable medication
incidents since the same period last year, however there have been no serious incidents.
Patient complaints have reduced. Friends and Family Test remain high with a slight
reduction on the previous period. Overall satisfaction scores have improved.
8.4 QVMH
8.4.1 QVMH currently has 23 beds open. The average length of stay is 14 days. 74% of the
patients are reported as having dementia or cognitive impairment. Acuity and
dependency remains consistent. Registered nurse fill rate is 90.5% during the day and
100% at night with unregistered staff being over planned for both day and night. The
daily average of therapy input is 20.3 hours. The vacancy rate is 14.39 and agency use is
20% of the pay bill. Cumulative care hours per patient per day are 6.8. All quality metrics
remain consistently good with a slight reduction in the Friends and Family Test score.
8.5 Whit & Tank
8.5.1 Whit & Tank currently has 18 beds open. The average length of stay is 12 days so has a
higher turnover of patients than the other community hospitals. A lower number (35%) of
the patients are reported as having dementia or cognitive impairment. Acuity and
dependency remains consistent, but when weighted by beds are also high in comparison
with all other hospitals other than Deal. Registered nurse fill rate is 100% during both day
and night with unregistered staff being over planned for both day and night. The daily
average of therapy input is 17.5 hours. The vacancy rate is low at 4.25 and and agency
use is also low at 12% of the pay bill. Cumulative care hours per patient per day are high
at 7.6. All quality metrics remain consistently good with a reduction in avoidable
medication incidents and high patient experience scores.
8.6 Sevenoaks
8.6.1 Sevenoaks currently has 18 beds open. The average length of stay is 15 days. 79% of
the patients are reported as having dementia or cognitive impairment. Patients with
moderate care needs have increased and those with high dependency have significantly
Page 127 of 144
9
decreased. When weighted by beds acuity and dependency is low in comparison with the
other hospitals. Registered nurse fill rate is 96.4%% during the day and 100% at night
with unregistered staff being over planned for both day and night. The daily average of
therapy input is high at 25.5 hours. The vacancy rate is high at 19.37 and agency use is
17% of the pay bill. Cumulative care hours per patient per day are high at 7.6. All quality
metrics remain consistently good.
8.7 Tonbridge – Goldsmid
8.7.1 Tonbridge currently has 14 beds open. The average length of stay is 22 days. 48% of the
patients are reported as having dementia or cognitive impairment. Acuity and
dependency remains consistent and when weighted by beds acuity and dependency is
low in comparison with the other hospitals. Registered nurse fill rate is 92.9%% during
the day and 103.8% at night with unregistered staff being 97.6% during the day and
95.2% at night. The daily average of therapy input is 16.7 hours. The vacancy rate is high
at 18.34 and agency use is high at 35% of the pay bill. Cumulative care hours per patient
per day are high at 7.8. All quality metrics remain consistently good with a reduction in
avoidable medication incidents.
8.8 Tonbridge – Primrose
8.8.1 While Primrose ward has no planned RN shifts because it is a therapy ward, they
employed temporary staffing to provide nursing cover and so had 43 RN day shifts and
30 RN night shifts during November on e-roster. The unit and model of care is currently
under review. Quality metrics remain good.
8.9 Hawkhurst
8.9.1 Hawkhurst currently has 22 beds open. The average length of stay is 25 days. High
levels (86%) of the patients are reported as having dementia or cognitive impairment.
Acuity and dependency remains consistent and when weighted by beds acuity and
dependency is relatively low in comparison with the other hospitals. Actual staffing for
Registered nurses is over planned with fill rate at 106%% during the day and 121% at
night with unregistered staff being 100% during both day and night. The daily average of
therapy input is 22.2 hours. The vacancy rate is high at 34.9 and agency use is also high
at 29% of the pay bill. Cumulative care hours per patient per day are at 6.3. All quality
metrics remain consistently good with a reduction in avoidable medication incidents.
8.10 Edenbridge
8.10.1 Edenbridge currently has 14 beds open. The average length of stay is 23 days. 71% of
the patients are reported as having dementia or cognitive impairment. Acuity and
dependency remains consistent and when weighted by beds acuity and dependency is
low in comparison with the other hospitals. Registered nurse fill rate is very low at 81%
during the day and 97.6% at night with unregistered staff being 97.6% during the day and
95.2% at night. The daily average of therapy input is also lower than the other hospitals
Com
mun
ity H
ospi
tals
Saf
erS
taffi
ng R
evie
w
Page 128 of 144
10
at 13.7 hours. The vacancy rate is high at 44.87 and agency use is high at 38% of the
pay bill. Cumulative care hours per patient per day are the lowest across the community
hospitals at 3.2. There were two serious incidents over the 12 months – both avoidable
falls with fracture. However, other quality metrics remain good.
8.11 Westview
8.11.1 Westview currently has 15 beds open. Neither the average length of stay nor the
percentage of patients reported as having dementia or cognitive impairment is recorded.
Acuity and dependency remains consistent and when weighted by beds acuity and
dependency is low in comparison with the other hospitals. Registered nurse fill rate is
90% during the day and 91.7% at night with unregistered staff being 63.6% during the
day and 74.4% at night. There is no therapy data, cumulative care hours per patient per
day or vacancy rate or agency use available. There were two serious incidents over the
12 months – both avoidable falls with fracture. Westview has not returned any patient
feedback or received any complaints.
Page 129 of 144
11
Ho
spit
al
Avo
idab
le
Falls
wit
h
Frac
ture
Avo
idab
le
Med
icat
ion
In
cid
ents
Avo
idab
le
Pre
ssu
re
Ulc
ers
Seri
ou
s in
cid
ents
P
atie
nt
Co
mp
lain
ts
Frie
nd
s &
Fam
ily T
est
Ove
rall
Sati
sfac
tio
n
Sco
re
Fave
rsh
am
0
0
4
2
0
0
0
1
3
3
98
%
97
.90
%
97
.88
%
98
.00
%
Dea
l 1
0
5
8
0
0
1
0
2
1
1
00
%
97
.90
%
93
.44
%
99
.40
%
QV
MH
0
0
6
7
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
00
%
95
.50
%
87
.58
%
88
.80
%
Wh
it &
Tan
k 0
0
1
1
4
0
1
0
0
0
2
97
.0%
1
00
.0%
9
4.7
%
93
.5%
Seve
no
aks
0
0
14
9
0
0
0
0
1
0
9
3.7
%
90
.5%
9
0.5
%
89
.5%
Ton
bri
dge
-
Go
ldsm
id
0
0
14
7
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
00
.0%
1
00
.0%
9
5.6
%
91
.9%
Ton
bri
dge
P
rim
rose
0
0
1
1
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
96
.1%
1
00
.0%
8
9.4
%
92
.3%
Haw
khu
rst
0
0
9
3
0
0
0
0
1
1
98
.3%
9
4.2
%
91
.1%
8
9.4
%
Eden
bri
dge
1
1
5
2
0
0
1
1
1
0
9
8.1
%
94
.2%
9
7.6
%
97
.7%
Wes
tvie
w
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
N/A
N
/A
N/A
N
/A
Day
N
igh
t
Reg
iste
red
Nu
rses
C
are
Staf
f R
egis
tere
d N
urs
es
Car
e St
aff
Ho
spit
al
Bed
s A
vera
ge
Len
gth
o
f St
ay
% P
atie
nts
w
ith
D
emen
tia
or
Co
gnit
ive
Imp
airm
ent
Cu
mu
lati
ve
care
ho
urs
p
er p
atie
nt
per
day
Tota
l M
on
thly
P
lan
ned
St
aff
Ho
urs
Tota
l M
on
thly
A
ctu
al
Staf
f H
ou
rs
% F
ill
Rat
e
Tota
l M
on
thly
P
lan
ned
St
aff
Ho
urs
Tota
l M
on
thly
A
ctu
al
Staf
f H
ou
rs
% F
ill
Rat
e
Tota
l M
on
thly
P
lan
ned
St
aff
Ho
urs
Tota
l M
on
thly
A
ctu
al
Staf
f H
ou
rs
% F
ill
Rat
e
Tota
l M
on
thly
P
lan
ned
St
aff
Ho
urs
Tota
l M
on
thly
A
ctu
al
Staf
f H
ou
rs
% F
ill
Rat
e
Vac
ancy
R
ate
Use
of
agen
cy -
%
of
pay
b
ill
Dai
ly
aver
age
Ther
apy
and
Th
erap
y A
ssis
tan
t h
ou
rs
Fave
rsh
am
21
1
5
78
%
7.5
6
30
62
2.5
9
8.8
%
94
5 1
44
0 1
52
.4%
4
62
46
2 1
00
.0%
4
62
62
7 1
35
.70%
-2
3.6
4 2
1%
2
3.1
Dea
l 2
2
30
8
8%
4
.8
63
0 5
85
92
.9%
7
87
.5
81
7.5
1
03
.8%
4
62
45
1 9
7.6
%
23
1 2
20
95
.2%
-1
4.9
4 2
1%
2
1.4
QV
MH
2
3
14
7
4%
6
.8
63
0 5
70
90
.5%
9
45
12
07
.5
12
7.8
%
46
2 4
62
10
0.0
%
46
2 5
94
12
8.6
%
-14
.39
20
%
20
.3
Wh
it &
Ta
nk
18
1
2
35
%
7.6
6
30
63
0 1
00
.0%
7
87
.5
11
17
.5
14
1.9
%
46
2 4
62
10
0.0
%
46
2 5
17
11
1.9
%
-4.2
5 1
2%
1
7.5
Seve
no
aks
18
1
5
79
%
7.6
6
30
60
7.5
9
6.4
%
94
5 1
09
5 1
15
.9%
4
62
46
2 1
00
.0%
6
93
71
5 1
03
.2%
-1
9.3
7 1
7%
2
5.5
Ton
bri
dge
-
Go
ldsm
id
14
2
2
48
%
7.8
6
30
58
5 9
2.9
%
78
7.5
8
17
.5
10
3.8
%
46
2 4
51
97
.6%
2
31
22
0 9
5.2
%
-18
.34
35
%
16
.7
Ton
bri
dge
P
rim
rose
1
4
25
7.8
1
7.0
Haw
khu
rst
22
2
5
86
%
6.3
6
30
66
7.5
1
06
.0%
4
62
46
2 1
00
.0%
9
45
11
47
.5
12
1.4
%
46
2 4
62
10
0%
-3
4.9
2
9%
2
2.2
Eden
bri
dge
1
4
23
7
1%
3
.2
63
0 5
10
81
.0%
6
30
88
5 1
40
.5%
4
62
45
1 9
7.6
%
46
2 4
62
10
0.0
%
-44
.87
38
%
13
.7
Wes
tvie
w
15
90
0.0
8
10
90
.0%
8
10
11
40
63
.6%
6
60
.0
60
5 9
1.7
%
99
0 7
37
74
.4%
No
vem
ber
2
018
Com
mun
ity H
ospi
tals
Saf
erS
taffi
ng R
evie
w
Page 130 of 144
12
9.0 The professional opinion of the Ward Matrons and Therapy Staff
9.1. A number of common themes were expressed by the matrons and therapy staff during the
review meetings.
9.2. Evaluation of the tool suggested that further improvements could be made for ease of use
and staff would benefit by receiving training on the tool.
9.3. Registered nurses felt they had little time to spend with patients due to high volume of
paperwork and discharge planning.
9.4. Short average length of stays impact on resources due to the amount of admission and
discharge processes.
9.5. Where workforce is an issue, morning shifts are particularly challenging.
9.6. High reliance on agency staff has the potential to impact the capacity of substantive staff
as agency staff are sometimes unfamiliar with the ward and processes and do not have
access to systems.
9.7. The model for some therapy teams where they share resources across the three hospitals
provides challenges to maintain flexibility especially taken into account sickness, annual
leave and vacancies.
10.0. Conclusion
10.1. The safer staffing review has applied a methodology to identify the right numbers of staff
required for the delivery of safe, quality care in the community hospital inpatient wards. The
review takes into account levels of staffing and a wide range of factors including the type of
ward, professional judgement from ward matrons and therapy leads, and quality and safety
metrics.
10.2. The majority of wards actual registered nurse rota fill is less than planned during the day
with the exception of Whit & Tank at 100% and Hawkhurst being overfilled at 106%.
10.3. Three of the wards night fill rate for registered nurses is at 100%. A further 3 are over 90%
and only Hawkhurst is over planned registered nurse fill at 121.4%.
10.4. Additionally the majority of wards are also using more care staff than planned the day with
the exception of Hawkhurst at 100% and Westview being 63.6%.
10.5. Care staff is over planned for most hospitals at night with the exception of Hawkhurst and
Edenbridge at 100% and Westview being 74.4%.
10.6. Those hospitals with low cumulative care hours per patient per day require further
investigation and benchmarking with peer organisations.
Page 131 of 144
13
10.7. With regard to the therapy input to the ward, it is difficult to draw any conclusions as
provision appears variable and individual patient input was not recorded as part of the audit.
10.8. Key safety and quality metrics for each hospital have remained stable between June and
November 2018 indicating that the wards have provided safe care for patients.
11.0. Recommendations
11.1. The planned rotas for Registered Nurses and Care Staff should be reviewed for individual
hospitals as there may be some opportunity for sharing staff across the wards.
11.2. Further investigation and benchmarking is required to understand the cumulative care
hours per patient per day.
11.3. The therapy data recorded within this audit can be used to benchmark for the next audit;
however, the methodology should be reviewed to ensure that individual patient
rehabilitation is captured.
11.4. Admission criteria must be defined for each ward which is essential to ensure that the right
patients are admitted in order to receiving the right care by the right staff.
Mercia Spare
Chief Nurse (Interim)
January 2018
Com
mun
ity H
ospi
tals
Saf
erS
taffi
ng R
evie
w
Page 132 of 144
14
Appendix 1 Audit Results December 2018
Page 133 of 144
15
Appendix 2
Green
This type of patient may need help with a limited number of areas of daily living and will be progressing
well along the rehabilitation pathway. They will be stable in terms of their health, and able to manage a
degree of self-care. They may need minimal or no help with walking, washing and dressing, eating and
drinking and repositioning. They are likely to be able to communicate well, or with minimal help and have
an awareness of safety. If they have pain this is likely to be controllable and they are likely to be able to
take medication independently. They will be able to self-manage any personal condition or be in the
process of learning to do this.
Amber
This patient is likely to need support with several areas of daily living including washing, dressing, eating
and drinking. They will probably need help when walking, and support to reposition to prevent pressure
damage. They may have fluctuating pain and need help to manage this. These patients may need
assistance with bed/chair transfers. Safety awareness may be limited and they may be confused and/or
have a degree of socially inappropriate behaviour and/or aggression. These patients need a degree of
nursing care and may have one or more long term condition that is unstable, needs treatment and
requires monitoring.
Red
This patient requires a high degree of nursing care. They will include heavily dependent patients, and
medically unstable patients who require frequent monitoring. Patients may be receiving care at the end
of their life. Alternatively patients may be aggressive and disruptive. Patients are likely to require 1-1
care.
Com
mun
ity H
ospi
tals
Saf
erS
taffi
ng R
evie
w
Page 134 of 144
16
Appendix 4 - References
Nurse Staffing Levels (Wales) Act 2016 (2016) Statutory Guidance Welsh Government
Supporting NHS providers to deliver the right staff, with the right skills, in the right place at the right time:
Safe sustainable and productive staffing (July 2016) National Quality Board
Five Year Forward View (2014) NHSE
Health and Social Care Act (2012) UK Parliament
Making the Case for ward sisters/team managers to be supervisory (2011) Royal College of Nursing
NHS Constitution for England (2013) Department of Health
Safer Nursing Care Tool (2013) Shelford Group. The Association of UK University Hospitals
Safe staffing for nursing in adult inpatient wards in acute hospitals (2014) NICE
Safer staffing for older peoples wards, an RCN toolkit (2012) Royal College of Nursing
Care Hours per Patient Day (CHPPD):Guidance for Mental Health and Community Trusts, NHS
Improvement, October 2018
Page 135 of 144
Committee / Meeting Title: Board Meeting - Part 1 (Public)
Date of Meeting: 31 January 2019
Agenda Number: 4.4
Agenda Item Title: Minutes of the Charitable Funds Committee Meeting of 25 July 2018
Presenting Officer: Richard Field, Deputy Chair of Charitable Funds Committee
Action - this paper is for: Decision ☐ Information ☐ Assurance ☒
Report Summary
The paper presents the confirmed Minutes of the Charitable Funds Committee meeting of 25 July 2018.
Proposals and /or Recommendations
The Board is asked receive the confirmed minutes.
Relevant Legislation and Source Documents
Has an Equality Analysis (EA) been completed?
No ☒
High level position described and no decisions required. The paper will have no
impact on people with any of the nine protected characteristics
Jen Tippin, Non-Executive Director Tel: 01622 211906
Email:
Cha
ritab
le F
unds
Com
mitt
eeM
inut
es
Page 136 of 144
CONFIRMED Minutes of the Charitable Funds Committee
held on Wednesday 25 July 2018 in The Boardroom, The Oast, Hermitage Court, Hermitage Lane, Maidstone Kent
ME16 9NT
Present: Jennifer Tippin, Non-Executive Director (Chair) Carol Coleman, Public Governor, Dover and Deal Peter Conway, Non-Executive Director Richard Field, Interim Trust Chair Steve Howe, Non-Executive Director Jane Kendal, Community Services Director, East Kent Fay Sinclair, Head of Communications Bridget Skelton, Non-Executive Director Carl Williams, Head of Financial Accounting In Attendance: Gina Baines, Committee Secretary/Assistant Trust Secretary
(note-taker) 022/18 Introduction by Chair
Jennifer Tippin welcomed everyone present to the meeting of the Charitable
Funds Committee meeting.
023/18 Apologies for Absence
Apologies were received from Jo Bing, Assistant Financial Accountant; Victoria Cover, Head of Clinical Services Urgent Care And Hospitals; Gordon Flack, Director of Finance; Neil Sherwood, Convenor Staffside; Lesley Strong, Chief Operating Officer/ Deputy Chief Executive; Jane Thackwray, Strategic Delivery Manager and Jo Treharne, Head of Marketing. The meeting was quorate.
024/18 Declarations of Interest There were no Declarations of Interest given apart from those formally noted on the record.
Cha
ritab
le F
unds
Com
mitt
eeM
inut
es
Page 137 of 144
Page 2 of 5
025/18 Minutes and Matters Arising from the Meeting of 27 April 2018
The Minutes were AGREED by the Committee. Matters Arising The Matters Arising from the previous meeting were reviewed and updated as follows: 030/17 Annual Marketing Plan – An article would appear in the autumn edition of Community Health. Action open. All other open actions were closed. The Matters Arising Table was AGREED.
026/18 Relevant Feedback from Other Committees
Finance, Business and Investment Committee Bridget Skelton highlighted that there were budgets available to enhance the environment of the community hospitals and suggested that the Committee should consider how it could support this.
027/18 Marketing the Charitable Funds Report Fay Sinclair presented the report to the Committee for assurance.
In response to a question from Richard Field regarding how the fund could raise awareness of its activities amongst the membership of the Trust and appeal to them to support fund-raising activities, Fay Sinclair confirmed that the database would be used to support this and in line with the new General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). With regards to raising awareness of legacy-giving at the Trust’s Annual General Meeting, Carol Coleman suggested that it would be more appropriate to change this to general awareness-raising of the charity instead. In response to a question from Jen Tippin regarding whether the target for donations to the general fund was too ambitious, it was agreed that the process for collecting donations when they came into the community hospitals would be reviewed with the aim of improving it. Action – Fay Sinclair on behalf of Jo Treharne In response to a question from Jen Tippin regarding the cost of the 2018 Staff Awards, Fay Sinclair confirmed that it was similar to previous years, with the Charitable Funds and the Trust funding a proportion.
Page 138 of 144
Page 3 of 5
The Committee APPROVED the marketing objectives for 2018/19 as set out in the report. The Committee NOTED the Marketing the Charitable Funds Report.
028/18 Restricted/Unrestricted Funds Financial Update Quarter One Carl Williams presented the report to the Committee for assurance.
With regards to the £20k of requested spend which had not yet been processed, this had been reviewed the previous week and £8k had been redirected to Trust budgets. There was no further news on the Mermikides Heron Ward Restricted Fund and it was suggested that a presentation be given at the November 2018 Committee meeting. Action – Jane Kendal on behalf of Lesley Strong The draft 2017/18 Accounts and Report would be presented at the November 2018 meeting for comment and the final version would be presented at the January 2019 meeting for approval. In response to a question from Jen Tippin regarding the plans to spend the Mermikides Heron Ward Restricted Fund, Jane Kendal explained why there had been a delay in spending the fund. She confirmed that plans were in place and Phase Two of the project which would utilise the Charitable funds was scheduled to begin in Spring 2019. With regards to the Sensory Room Appeal, Jen Tippin suggested that the remaining money should be used to buy toys to close down the fund. It was agreed that a presentation on the Bow Road Restricted Fund would be made at the November 2018 Committee meeting. Action – Victoria Cover The Committee NOTED the Restricted/Unrestricted Funds Financial Update Quarter One
029/18 Committee Effectiveness Review Jen Tippin presented the report to the Committee for approval.
It was agreed that a presentation from the fund managers would be a standing item on the agenda. In response to a comment from Jen Tippin that ‘i care’ might not have been as successful in fundraising as had been expected, Fay Sinclair commented that charities did take time to embed and required continuous actions if they were to succeed. She recognised that more could be done and suggested that it was too early to say whether the charity had been successful or not. The Committee agreed that the charity had been more proactive than
Cha
ritab
le F
unds
Com
mitt
eeM
inut
es
Page 139 of 144
Page 4 of 5
previously and had been taking a different approach towards fund-raising. It was agreed that a further review would be undertaken in July 2019 to assess how well it had worked. Action – Fay Sinclair on behalf of Jo Treharne In response to a comment from Jane Kendal that the digital presence of the charity could be strengthened, it was agreed this would be addressed. Action – Fay Sinclair on behalf of Jo Treharne The Committee NOTED the Committee Effectiveness Review.
030/18 Forward Plan Jen Tippin presented the report to the Committee for approval.
The agenda items for November and January were agreed. In response to a question from Carol Coleman regarding whether there was a target set for spending from the unrestricted funds at each of the hospitals, Jen Tippin suggested that a spending plan to address their environments would be helpful. Carol Coleman indicated that the external environment of those hospitals managed by NHS Property Services (NHSPS) needed to be addressed and it was suggested that this should be raised with Natalie Davies, Corporate Services Director. She in turn would be able to raise this with NHSPS. One off items could be considered by the Committee. In response to a question from Peter Conway regarding whether the Audit and Risk Committee could receive the Charitable Funds Annual Report and Accounts, Carl Williams confirmed that the rules required for this to remain with the Charitable Funds Committee. In response to a question from Richard Field regarding how the Committee could keep abreast with developments in charitable funding, Carl Williams confirmed that he and Jo Bing monitored the briefings that were received by the Trust. It was agreed to bring an annual assurance report in January 2018 that set out any changes which had been advised by relevant bodies and to confirm that they had been noted by the Trust. This would then be included in the Committee’s Annual Report to the Board in May 2019. Action – Jo Bing It was agreed to update the Forward Plan. Action – Gina Baines The Committee APPROVED the Forward Plan.
031/18 Any Other Business
There was no other business.
Page 140 of 144
Page 5 of 5
The meeting ended at 1.07pm.
032/18 Date and time of next meeting Thursday 29 November 2018, 4pm, Room 6 and 7, Kent Community Heath NHS Foundation Trust Offices, Trinity House,110 – 120 Upper Pemberton, Eureka Business Park, Kennington, Ashford, Kent TN25 4AZ
Cha
ritab
le F
unds
Com
mitt
eeM
inut
es
Page 141 of 144
M
ee
ting
of th
e K
en
t Co
mm
un
ity H
ea
lth N
HS
Fo
un
da
tion
Tru
st B
oa
rd
to b
e h
eld
at 1
0a
m o
n T
hu
rsd
ay 3
1 J
an
uary
20
19
in th
e
Oa
k R
oo
m, O
akw
oo
d H
ou
se
, Oa
kw
oo
d P
ark
, M
aid
sto
ne
ME
16 8
AE
Th
is m
ee
ting
will b
e h
eld
in P
ub
lic
A
GE
ND
A
1. S
TA
ND
AR
D IT
EM
S
1.1
In
trodu
ctio
n b
y C
ha
ir
Tru
st C
ha
ir
1.2
T
o re
ce
ive
an
y A
po
logie
s fo
r A
bse
nce
T
rust C
ha
ir
1.3
T
o re
ce
ive
an
y D
ecla
ratio
ns o
f In
tere
st
T
rust C
ha
ir
1.4
T
o a
gre
e th
e M
inute
s o
f the
Ke
nt
Com
mu
nity
He
alth
NH
S F
oun
datio
n
Tru
st B
oa
rd m
ee
ting h
eld
on
29
Nove
mb
er 2
018
T
rust C
ha
ir
1.5
T
o re
ce
ive
Ma
tters
Aris
ing fro
m th
e
Ke
nt C
om
mun
ity H
ea
lth N
HS
F
ou
nda
tion
Tru
st B
oa
rd m
ee
ting h
eld
o
n 2
9 N
ove
mb
er 2
018
T
rust C
ha
ir
1.6
T
o re
ce
ive
the T
rust C
ha
ir’s
Rep
ort
T
rust C
ha
ir
Ve
rba
l
1.7
T
o re
ce
ive
the C
hie
f Exe
cu
tive
’s
Rep
ort
• C
are
Qu
ality
Co
mm
issio
n
C
hie
f Exe
cu
tive
2. B
OA
RD
AS
SU
RA
NC
E/A
PP
RO
VA
L
2.1
To re
ce
ive
the P
atie
nt S
tory
Chie
f Nu
rse
(Inte
rim)
2.2
To re
ce
ive
the B
oa
rd A
ssu
ran
ce
F
ram
ew
ork
Corp
ora
te S
erv
ice
s
Dire
cto
r
Agenda
Page 142 of 144
B
oa
rd C
om
mitte
e R
ep
orts
2.3
To re
ce
ive
the Q
ua
lity C
om
mitte
e
Cha
ir’s A
ssu
ran
ce
Re
po
rt
Cha
ir of Q
ua
lity
Com
mitte
e
2.4
To re
ce
ive
the S
trate
gic
Work
forc
e
Com
mitte
e C
ha
ir’s A
ssu
ran
ce
Re
po
rt
Cha
ir of S
trate
gic
W
ork
forc
e C
om
mitte
e
2.5
To re
ce
ive
the A
ud
it an
d R
isk
Com
mitte
e C
ha
ir’s A
ssu
ran
ce
Re
po
rt
C
ha
ir of A
ud
it an
d R
isk
Com
mitte
e
2.6
T
o re
ce
ive
the C
ha
ritab
le F
und
s
Com
mitte
e C
ha
ir’s A
ssu
ran
ce
Re
po
rt
Dep
uty
Cha
ir of
Cha
ritab
le F
un
ds
Com
mitte
e
2.7
T
o re
ce
ive
the In
tegra
ted
P
erfo
rma
nce R
epo
rt
• A
ssu
ran
ce
on S
trate
gic
Go
als
• Q
ua
lity
• W
ork
forc
e
• F
ina
nce
• O
pe
ratio
na
l
D
irecto
r of F
inan
ce
Chie
f Nu
rse
(Inte
rim)
Dire
cto
r of W
ork
forc
e,
Org
an
isatio
na
l D
eve
lop
men
t an
d
Com
mu
nic
atio
ns
Dire
cto
r of F
inan
ce
Chie
f Ope
ratin
g O
ffice
r/ D
ep
uty
Ch
ief E
xe
cu
tive
2.8
T
o re
ce
ive
the T
rust P
rep
are
dn
ess
for B
rexit R
ep
ort
C
orp
ora
te S
erv
ices
Dire
cto
r
2.9
T
o re
ce
ive
the W
inte
r Pre
ssu
res
Upd
ate
Re
po
rt
C
hie
f Ope
ratin
g
Offic
er/D
epu
ty C
hie
f E
xe
cu
tive
3. S
TR
AT
EG
Y A
ND
PL
AN
NIN
G
3.1
To re
ce
ive
the N
HS
Lon
g T
erm
Pla
n
an
d Im
pa
ct fo
r Ke
nt C
om
mun
ity
Hea
lth N
HS
Fou
nd
atio
n T
rust R
ep
ort
D
irecto
r of S
trate
gy
4. R
EP
OR
TS
TO
TH
E B
OA
RD
4.1
To re
ce
ive
the L
ea
rnin
g F
rom
De
ath
s
Rep
ort
M
ed
ical D
irecto
r
Page 143 of 144
4.2
T
o re
ce
ive
the F
ree
dom
To
Sp
ea
k
Up R
ep
ort
C
orp
ora
te S
erv
ices
Dire
cto
r
4.3
T
o re
ce
ive
the C
om
mun
ity H
osp
itals
S
afe
r Sta
ffing R
evie
w
C
hie
f Nu
rse (In
terim
)
4.4
T
o re
ce
ive
the M
inu
tes o
f the
C
ha
ritab
le F
un
ds C
om
mitte
e m
eetin
g
of 2
5 J
uly
20
18
D
ep
uty
Cha
ir of
Cha
ritab
le F
un
ds
Com
mitte
e
5. A
NY
OT
HE
R B
US
INE
SS
T
o c
on
sid
er a
ny o
the
r item
s o
f b
usin
ess p
revio
usly
no
tified
to th
e
Tru
st C
ha
ir
T
rust C
ha
ir
6. Q
UE
ST
ION
S F
RO
M M
EM
BE
RS
OF
TH
E P
UB
LIC
RE
LA
TIN
G T
O T
HE
AG
EN
DA
7. D
AT
E A
ND
VE
NU
E O
F N
EX
T M
EE
TIN
G
Th
urs
da
y 2
8 M
arc
h 2
01
9
Ro
om
s 6
an
d 7
, Ken
t Co
mm
un
ity H
ea
lth N
HS
Fo
un
datio
n T
rus
t Offic
es
, Trin
ity H
ou
se
, 11
0 –
12
0
Up
pe
r Pe
mb
erto
n, K
en
nin
gto
n, A
sh
ford
, Ken
t TN
25
4A
Z
Agenda
Page 144 of 144