aesthetic theory (1)

2
THEORY OF ART As a self-proclaimed priest of art, Stephen needs his own dogma- a system of belief. He claims to base his aesthetic views on those formulated by Aquinas. Stephen's aesthetic discussions are among the most complex and intellectually demanding sections in Portrait of the Artist. Many readers have debated their meaning, wondering whether Joyce shared Stephen's theories or whether he wanted to show them to be inconsistent and immature. To make Stephen's long discussion easier to understand, Joyce has Stephen expound his theory to Lynch, whose down-to-earth responses to Stephen's high-minded discourse provide comic relief by poking fun at his friend's solemn literary pretensions. Some think that Lynch is really the voice of Joyce taking the opportunity to mock his own youthful dependence on Jesuit modes of philosophy, modes that give Stephen's theory "the true scholastic stink." (The word "scholastic" refers not only to school in general, but in particular to medieval philosophy that was based on the Church fathers and Aristotle, especially as the two were combined in the writings of Aquinas.) Stephen begins by saying that the feelings inspired by true art are static, unmoving, while the feelings inspired by untrue, improper art are kinetic, or moving. Improper art excites the emotions; it urges us to go out and do something. For example, art that is improper and didactic (designed to morally instruct) might be intended to make us sign a petition, join a worthy cause. At the other extreme, pornography is improper art because it seeks to inspire us to commit acts of lust. Proper art, however, doesn't inspire us to do anything: it raises the mind above desire and loathing to a purer state. (Aristotle called this result catharsis.) What do you think of Stephen's distinction between proper and improper art? Can you name any works of art (literature, painting, or music) that Stephen might categorize as improper? How would you defend them? Stephen goes on to say that true art is beautiful and that beauty and truth are closely related. Truth appeals to the intellect and beauty to the imagination. Again quoting Aquinas, Stephen says that while people's taste in beauty may vary, all beautiful objects must meet three requirements. They must possess wholeness, harmony, and radiance. Wholeness (integritas) means that the object at first presents itself to the observer as a single image, a complete whole. After that, the object is seen to possess harmony, consonantia. That is, the complete whole is seen to be made up of many separate parts, but the parts are so well- balanced and arranged that they form a unity. The third quality, radiance- claritas- is the most difficult to define; it can be seen as the product of the first two qualities. A beautiful object makes you see it as a single whole; then it makes you see it as a harmonious composition of

Upload: jazib1200

Post on 18-Dec-2015

219 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

vjjjjjjjj

TRANSCRIPT

  • THEORY OF ARTAs a self-proclaimed priest of art, Stephen needs his own dogma- a system of belief. He claimsto base his aesthetic views on those formulated by Aquinas.Stephen's aesthetic discussions are among the most complex and intellectually demandingsections in Portrait of the Artist. Many readers have debated their meaning, wondering whetherJoyce shared Stephen's theories or whether he wanted to show them to be inconsistent andimmature.To make Stephen's long discussion easier to understand, Joyce has Stephen expound his theoryto Lynch, whose down-to-earth responses to Stephen's high-minded discourse provide comicrelief by poking fun at his friend's solemn literary pretensions. Some think that Lynch is reallythe voice of Joyce taking the opportunity to mock his own youthful dependence on Jesuit modesof philosophy, modes that give Stephen's theory "the true scholastic stink." (The word"scholastic" refers not only to school in general, but in particular to medieval philosophy thatwas based on the Church fathers and Aristotle, especially as the two were combined in thewritings of Aquinas.)Stephen begins by saying that the feelings inspired by true art are static, unmoving, while thefeelings inspired by untrue, improper art are kinetic, or moving. Improper art excites theemotions; it urges us to go out and do something. For example, art that is improper and didactic(designed to morally instruct) might be intended to make us sign a petition, join a worthy cause.At the other extreme, pornography is improper art because it seeks to inspire us to commit actsof lust.Proper art, however, doesn't inspire us to do anything: it raises the mind above desire andloathing to a purer state. (Aristotle called this result catharsis.)What do you think of Stephen's distinction between proper and improper art? Can you nameany works of art (literature, painting, or music) that Stephen might categorize as improper?How would you defend them?Stephen goes on to say that true art is beautiful and that beauty and truth are closely related.Truth appeals to the intellect and beauty to the imagination.Again quoting Aquinas, Stephen says that while people's taste in beauty may vary, all beautifulobjects must meet three requirements. They must possess wholeness, harmony, and radiance.Wholeness (integritas) means that the object at first presents itself to the observer as a singleimage, a complete whole. After that, the object is seen to possess harmony, consonantia. That is,the complete whole is seen to be made up of many separate parts, but the parts are so well-balanced and arranged that they form a unity. The third quality, radiance- claritas- is the mostdifficult to define; it can be seen as the product of the first two qualities. A beautiful objectmakes you see it as a single whole; then it makes you see it as a harmonious composition of

    MUHAMAD AHMADHighlight

    MUHAMAD AHMADHighlight

    MUHAMAD AHMADHighlight

  • many parts. Finally it makes you understand that thiswholeness and harmony could onlyhave been achieved in one way. The object is unique. It could not exist in any other form.That's radiance, the "whatness" of a thing.Goaded by the laughing Lynch, Stephen further refines his theory. Even among true works ofart one must make distinctions. Art can be categorized as lyric, epic, and dramatic. The lyricform expresses the emotions of the artist only; it's a completely personal narrative. The epicform expresses the emotions of characters other than the artist, but the presence of the artistremains continually visible in the narrative. In the dramatic form the artist vanishescompletely. Only his characters appear. You can think of these three forms as proceeding fromthe personal to the semi-personal to the impersonal. One work can contain more than oneform. Some readers have called Portrait of the Artist essentially lyric.Stephen's speech on art is not a mere sideshow, as some readers contend. Even if Joyce doesn'twant you to agree with Stephen's theories, he wants to show that Stephen has a right tosome intellectual pretensions. His theory has already made his reputation on campus, and it'sone of the reasons Stephen's friends tolerate his aloofness.

    MUHAMAD AHMADHighlight