aem accepts, published online ahead of print on 12...
TRANSCRIPT
1
2
Microarray based analysis of IncA/C Plasmid Associated Genes from Multidrug 3
resistant Salmonella enterica 4
5
6
Rebecca L. Lindsey*, Jonathan G. Frye, Paula J. Fedorka-Cray, and Richard J. 7
Meinersmann 8
9
10
11
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Bacterial Epidemiology 12
and Antimicrobial Resistance Research Unit, Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research 13
Center, 950 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2720, USA. 14
15
16
17
* Corresponding author. Mailing address: USDA-ARS-BEAR, Richard J. Russell 18
Research Center, and P.O. Box 5677, Athens, GA 30604-5677. Phone: (706) 546-3676. 19
Fax: (706) 546-3018. E-mail: [email protected]. 20
21
Running title: Microarray analysis of IncA/C Plasmid Genes in Salmonella 22
23
Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.00567-11 AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 12 August 2011
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
2
ABSTRACT 24
25
In Enterobacteriaceae, plasmids have been classified according to 27 incompatibility 26
(Inc) or replicon types which are based on the inability of different plasmids with the 27
same replication mechanism to co-exist in the same cell. Certain replicon types such as 28
IncA/C are associated with multidrug resistance (MDR). We developed a microarray that 29
contains 286 unique 70 mer oligonucleotide probes based on sequences from five IncA/C 30
plasmids: pYR1 (Yersinia ruckeri), pPIP1202 (Yersinia pestis), pP99-018 31
(Photobacterium damselae), pSN254 (Salmonella enterica serovar Newport) and 32
pP91278 (Photobacterium damselae). DNA from 59 Salmonella enterica isolates was 33
hybridized to the microarray and analyzed for the presence/absence of genes. These 34
isolates represented 17 serovars from 14 different animal hosts and from different 35
geographical regions in the United States. Qualitative cluster analysis was performed 36
using CLUSTER 3.0 to group microarray hybridization results. We found that IncA/C 37
plasmids occurred in two lineages distinguished by a major insertion-deletion (indel) 38
region that contains mostly hypothetical proteins. The most variable genes were 39
represented by transposon associated genes as well as four antimicrobial resistance genes 40
(aphA, merP, merA, aadA). Sixteen mercury resistance genes were identified and highly 41
conserved suggesting that mercury ion-related exposure is a stronger pressure than 42
anticipated. We used these data to construct a core IncA/C genome as well as an 43
accessory genome. Our studies suggest that the transfer of antimicrobial resistance 44
determinants by transfer of IncA/C plasmids is relatively less common compared to 45
exchange within the plasmids orchestrated by transposable elements such as transposons, 46
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
3
ICEs and ISCRs and thus pose a lesser opportunity for exchange of antimicrobial 47
resistance. 48
49
INTRODUCTION 50
51
The control of bacterial infections is threatened by the apparent increase in the number of 52
bacteria that carry antimicrobial resistance (AR) genes (1). Plasmids are transmissible 53
extra-chromosomal genetic material that can carry AR genes (4,7,17). Other mobile 54
elements responsible for the transfer of genetic material like AR genes include 55
transposable elements such as transposons, integrating and conjugative elements (ICEs) 56
and insertion sequence common regions (ISCR) (5,21,37,38,40). In the 57
Enterobacteriaceae, plasmids have been classified into incompatibility (Inc) groups that 58
are based on the inability of plasmids with the same replication mechanism to be 59
maintained in the same cell lineage. In Enterobacteriaceae there are 27 described Inc or 60
replicon types (8). IncA/C plasmids are associated with multidrug resistance (MDR) 61
(16,39). We have previously found that IncA/C plasmids are prevalent in multidrug 62
resistant Salmonella enterica (23). 63
64
Population genetics studies that have included data on the distribution of plasmids are 65
common, but there have been very few studies on the distribution and flow of genes 66
within a set of plasmids. Cataloging the genetic composition of plasmid populations can 67
be used to make inferences about their history, which may be useful in understanding the 68
selective pressures that have led to the prevalence of the plasmids and the appreciation of 69
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
4
how anthropogenic effects may continue to influence their evolution. Such a study may 70
not be meaningful with small plasmids, but a study of large plasmids may reveal how the 71
plasmid evolved, accumulating and discarding various genes. IncA/C plasmids tend to be 72
relatively large, generally 130 to 180 kb, with a complement of 160-210 genes (6,16). 73
Available DNA sequences indicate that there is heterogeneity in the complement of genes 74
(6,16). Welch et al. (39) presented data on the presence or absence of 12 loci based on 75
polymerase chain reaction analysis of IncA/C plasmids from 51 isolates of S. enterica 76
and 19 isolates of other Enterobacteriaceae, but they did not analyze the data for linkage 77
disequilibrium. Here we used a previously described microarray with oligonucleotide 78
probes for all the unique genes in five IncA/C plasmids that have been previously 79
sequenced (24) to evaluate the gene content (286 loci) of IncA/C plasmids from a 80
population of 59 different S. enterica isolates and to report on the core and accessory 81
genome. We then used linkage disequilibrium analysis to examine the population 82
genetics of these genes in these isolates. 83
84
MATERIALS AND METHODS 85
86
Bacterial isolates and plasmids. The 59 S. enterica isolates in this study were selected 87
from a diverse subset of 98 IncA/C-positive diagnostic isolates with known PFGE 88
patterns (23). Diverse isolates were selected based on cluster analysis, antibiotic 89
resistance, plasmid profile, source animal and region. Cluster analysis revealed 48 90
unique PFGE types among the 59 isolates studied here, suggesting a variable population. 91
These isolates represented 17 serovars from 14 different sources including canine (dog) 92
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
5
(n=4), cattle (n=17), chicken (n=3), dairy cattle (n=7), equine (horse) (n=6), feline 93
(domestic cat) (n=1), reptile (turtle, lizard) (n=3), swine (n=12), turkey (n=3), mammal 94
(mammal, alpaca) (n=2) and unknown (n=1). Strains were obtained from all five regions 95
in the United States as defined for the NARMS program 96
(http://www.ars.usda.gov/Main/docs.htm?docid=6750). 97
Salmonella isolates were grown on brilliant green sulfa agar (BGSA) or blood agar plates 98
(BAPs) at 37°C after recovering from frozen stock cultures stored at −70°C using 99
standard methods (http://www.ars.usda.gov/Main/docs.htm?docid=6750&page=1). 100
101
DNA extraction and labeling. Total DNA from S. enterica isolates was extracted from 102
5 mL of overnight cultures grown in LB broth (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA) 103
using the GenElute Bacterial Genomic DNA kit (Sigma, St Louis, MO) following 104
manufacturers’ instructions for Gram-negative bacteria. DNA was labeled using random 105
priming with N15 (Operon, Huntsville, AL) and incorporation of Cy3- or Cy5-dCTP 106
(Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) during extension with Klenow fragment (New England 107
Biolabs, Beverly, MA) as previously described (28). DNA targets were purified 108
following the manufacturer’s directions using the QIAquick PCR purification kit 109
(Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and eluted in 1 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0; the sample was then dried 110
down to a volume of 20µl. Positive control DNA from Yersinia ruckeri YR71 (39) was 111
labeled with Cy3 while Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi CT18 (26), and negative 112
control DNA from Escherichia coli DH10B (11) was labeled with Cy5 and hybridized to 113
arrays. The 59 study isolates were labeled with Cy3 or Cy5 and hybridized to arrays. 114
115
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
6
Microarray construction, hybridization and data analysis. The plasmid/antimicrobial 116
resistance (PAR) microarray was constructed as previously described with70-mer 117
oligonucleotide probes for 286 unique IncA/C genes, 207 IncH1 plasmid genes and 775 118
antimicrobial resistance genes (18,24,42) printed in triplicate. This study focused 119
exclusively on the 286 unique IncA/C probes that were designed based on sequence 120
obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database 121
(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) from five IncA/C plasmids: pYR1 (Y. ruckeri str. YR71, 122
NCBI Accession # CP000602 ), pIP1202 (Yersinia pestis biovar Orientalis str. IP275, 123
CP000603), pP99-018 (Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida, AB277723), pSN254 124
(Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Newport str. SL254, CP000604) and 125
pP91278 (Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida, AB277724). The array was 126
comprised of probes for all of the genes identified in pYR1 plus all the unique genes from 127
the remaining plasmids. 128
129
Protocols for hybridizations in formamide buffer were used for hybridization and the 130
post-hybridization wash processes as previously described (18,19,24,28). The hybridized 131
slides were scanned with a GenePix 4100A laser scanner (Axon, Foster City, CA) using 132
laser light wavelength at 532nm or 635nm to excite the Cy3 or Cy5 dye, respectively. 133
Fluorescent images were captured as separate single image tagged image file (TIF) 134
format and analyzed with ScanArray Express Software Version 1.1 (Packard 135
BioChip Technologies). Hybridization signal intensities were measured and the means of 136
the triplicate spots were recorded and a cut-off of two times the median of the mean 137
hybridization intensity to all 70-mer probes was used. Microsoft excel (Microsoft 138
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
7
corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) was used to process hybridization results and to make 139
comparisons of microarray hybridizations as previously described (19,24). A positive 140
hybridization to an oligonucleotide probe on the array was interpreted to indicate that the 141
gene was present. 142
143
Relationships between isolates were determined by hierarchical cluster analysis using 144
open source CLUSTER 3.0 with Euclidean distance for gene content (10,12). 145
146
Statistical analysis. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) of probes on the array was calculated 147
as an extension of Fisher’s exact probability test on contingency tables (31) as instituted 148
by the program Arlequin (13). Standard settings were used, 10,000 steps in the Markov 149
chain and 1,000 dememorization steps; and calculations of D, D', and r2 coefficients were 150
made with a significance level of 0.05. LD was not calculated for probes associated with 151
hypothetical genes or genes that displayed all positive or all negative hybridizations. 152
153
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of blaSHV-1. The blaSHV-1 gene was 154
amplified using primers, conditions and controls as previously described by Rasheed et 155
al. 1997 (29). 156
157
158
159
160
161
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
8
RESULTS 162
163
DNA isolated from 59 S. enterica isolates was hybridized to the PAR microarrays 164
(23,24). These isolates represented 17 serovars, from 14 different host sources and were 165
obtained from five regions of the United States (24). 166
167
Fifty-nine different hybridization profiles were found. Hybridization results are 168
illustrated in Figure 1. Isolates are ordered across the top of Figure 1 based on 169
hierarchical cluster analysis that was performed with results of the microarray 170
hybridizations. Analysis of the 180 oligonucleotide probes on the microarray that 171
correspond specifically to Region 1 section of the array (the pYR1 genes; Figure 1, 172
column 2, labeled with a black line or hashed black and white line) reveals the presence 173
of a region of insertions or deletions (indel) affecting 53 of those probes (pYR1x0087- 174
pYR1x0142, hashed black and white line). The first 18 isolates in Figure 1 showed no or 175
reduced hybridization (except for isolate 552) to the probes in the indel that consists 176
mostly of probes that correspond to hypothetical protein genes (35 of 53, 66%) and 177
traCNUW, a single stranded DNA binding protein (ssb), assorted domain genes (cyclic 178
diguanylate phosphodiesterase, von Willebrand factor type A, [2Fe-2S]-binding protein) 179
and transposase insB1, to name a few. The remaining 41 isolates showed positive 180
hybridizations to the probes in the indel. 181
182
A second notable indel in Region 1 of the array consists of 13 (pYR1x0147- pYR1x0160) 183
contiguous probes that correspond genes for three hypothetical proteins, resolvase tnpR 184
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
9
for transposon Tn5393, transposase insC for insertion sequence (IS) IS903, transposase 185
insD for IS1133, transposase insE1 for IS10R, tetracycline resistance tetA (class B), 186
tetCD, transcriptional regulator (ArsR family), tetracycline repressor tetR (class B) and a 187
sodium/glutamate symporter. Analysis of the remaining 127 oligonucleotide probes on 188
the microarray in Region 1 showed large regions of hybridizations (Figure 1, column 2, 189
labeled as a black line or hashed black and white line); 114 of these probes bound to 190
DNA from 53 of 59 (90%) or more of the isolates and 106 probes bound to DNA from 191
95% or more of the isolates. 192
193
Region 2 (Figure 1, column 2, blue line) of the microarray contains 40 oligonucleotide 194
probes that correspond specifically to pIP1202 genes. Analysis of Region 2 195
(pIP1202x0044 - pIP1202x0198) showed most of these genes were present in two 196
contiguous blocks; mercury resistance (8 oligonucleotide probes) and tetracycline 197
resistance associated regions. We also found positive hybridizations to aphA 198
(aminoglycoside 3’-phosphotransferase). 199
200
Region 3 (Figure 1, column 2, red line) of the microarray contains 13 oligonucleotide 201
probes that correspond specifically to pP99-018 genes. Analysis of Region 3 showed 202
variability in an alcohol dehydrogenase and one of nine hypothetical proteins that were 203
present. The oligonucleotide probe that corresponds to a transposase (P99018ORFx148) 204
was not present in any of the isolates. 205
206
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
10
Region 4 (Figure 1, column 2, yellow line) of the microarray contains 47 oligonucleotide 207
probes that correspond specifically to pSN254 genes. Analysis of Region 4 showed one 208
contiguous block pSN254x0143- pSN254x0157, the aadA region. Region 4 contains 209
oligonucleotides for genes associated with aadA and showed evidence of multiple, 210
apparently unlinked insertions/deletions. Oligonucleotide probes associated with 211
tetracycline repressor tetAR, blaCMY-2 and tnpA for transposase Tn21 showed positive 212
hybridizations in 98% of the isolates. Oligonucleotide probes associated with floR 213
showed positive hybridizations in 90% of the isolates. Oligonucleotide probes associated 214
with mercury resistance (merA), aminoglycoside (aadA), transposases insEF (ISCR2 and 215
16) and insAG and transposition tniB showed the most variability in our population. 216
217
Region 5 (Figure 1, column 2, orange line) of the microarray contains 5 oligonucleotide 218
probes that correspond specifically to pP91278 genes. Analysis of Region 5 showed 219
three of four hypothetical proteins were present in 95% of the isolates. The 220
oligonucleotide probe that corresponds to dihydrafolate reductase (YP_908609) was only 221
present in isolate 858. 222
223
A summary of positive probes is listed in Table 1. The first row shows lists the forty-two 224
positive probes for the IncA/C core genome of our isolates (i.e. found in all analyzed 225
isolates). These include probes for genes of seven membrane proteins including (blc1, 226
putative membrane proteins, a putative lipoproteins and an outer membrane lipoprotein), 227
two antimicrobial resistance (sugE1 and strA), heavy metal resistance (merE), a signal 228
peptide peptidase (sppA ), two domain-containing proteins, partition (parB) and a couple 229
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
11
of transposases. Twenty-four probes present in all isolates were of hypothetical function. 230
The second row lists positive probes for thirty-nine accessory genes (i.e. genes present in 231
only 58 of 59 analyzed plasmids) include conjugation genes (traABGIV), antimicrobial 232
resistance genes (blaCMY-2,tetAR, sulII were not present in isolate 527 and strB), three 233
transposon related genes, and twenty- one of hypothetical function (Table 1). Some of the 234
114 additional accessory genes (ie, genes not present in 31 to 57 analyzed isolates) 235
include conjugation genes (traDEHL), antimicrobial resistance genes (aac, aad, floR, 236
qac, strB and sulI), heavy metal resistance (merABDERT), six transposon related genes, 237
and sixty-one of hypothetical function (Table 1). 238
239
IncA/C plasmid core regions were described by Welch et. al. (2007) and numbered in 240
order 1-12 around the plus strand of the IncA/C plasmid (39). We used our microarray 241
hybridization results to detect the presence or absence of these core regions (Table 2). 242
The majority of our plasmids (42 of 59 hybridizations) were positive for all of the probes. 243
244
Pairwise LD was calculated among all the probes on the array that were not hypothetical 245
or invariantly positive or negative (supplementary data figure 1). The PAR3 array 246
contained 1395 (22.4%) probe pairs positive for linkage at P values of <0.05, out of the 247
total of 6216 pairs that were analyzed. The PAR3 array contained nine pairs of 248
antimicrobial gene probes that were contiguous, eight (88.9%) of which showed linkage 249
disequilibrium: 162 pairs were not contiguous, 26 (16%) of which were linked. The 250
PAR3 array contained 35 pairs of conjugation gene probes that were contiguous, 23 251
(66%) of which were linked: 85 pairs were not contiguous, 42 (49%) of which were 252
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
12
linked. The PAR3 array contained 25 pairs of transposon gene probes that were 253
contiguous, 11 (44%) of which were linked: 132 pairs were not contiguous, 23 (17%) of 254
which were linked. The PAR3 array contained 3 pairs of DNA binding-protein gene 255
probes that were contiguous, all 3 (100%) of which were linked: 63 pairs were not 256
contiguous, 6 (9.5%) of which were linked. 257
258
DISCUSSION 259
260
The objective of this study was to learn more about the population genetics of IncA/C by 261
characterizing a diverse population of 59 S. enterica isolates from different animal 262
sources. Isolates were hybridized to a PAR hybridization array with 286 unique 263
oligonucleotide plasmid probes from IncA/C plasmids and results were analyzed to 264
determine a core and accessory genome in our isolates (Figure 1, Table 1). The 265
universally present core gene set appeared to be very limited in expected plasmid 266
maintenance related genes; parB was the only core gene recognized as needed for 267
replication. But there were 30 genes of unknown function in the core set, some of which 268
are likely to be used in plasmid maintenance. The accuracy of the PAR hybridization 269
array was previously analyzed (24) with control strains; S. Typhi CT18 (26), Y. ruckeri 270
str. YR71 (39) and S. Typhimurium LT2 (25). All the probes on the array originated 271
from IncA/C sequences, however it is possible for chromosomal DNA from the tested 272
strains to report a positive hybridization to some of the IncA/C associated probes. 273
274
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
13
Cluster analysis of the oligonucleotide probes on the microarray showed two lineages of 275
IncA/C plasmids that differed mainly on the presence of an insertion, deletion or 276
combination of the two (indel) of 53 (pYR1x0087- pYR1x0142) of the 180 277
oligonucleotide probes that correspond to Region 1 (Figure 1 column 2 labeled with a 278
black line or hashed black and white line). The lineage that consists of isolates 928-915 279
(Figure 1, top row) was 30% (18 of 59) of the total isolates and did not hybridize to 280
approximately 53 oligonucleotide probes from the pYR1 backbone section of the array. 281
Interestingly, this indel occurred at the same location as an integrating and conjugative 282
element (ICEs) hot spot 2 (HS2) (40). The indel in the lineage did not hybridize to the 283
probe for the single-strand DNA-binding protein gene (ssb), in previous findings the 284
sequence for ssb was present in pYR1, pSN254, pIP1202, p99-018, p91278 but missing 285
in pRA1 (16). Because the indel was not identical in all the plasmids, it is likely that it 286
was shaped by more than one genetic event. Welch et al used twelve loci along the 287
pYR1, IncA/C backbone for a PCR-based screening assay (highlighted first column 288
Figure 1to investigate the core backbone of IncA/C plasmids (39). In this study we found 289
an indel dividing our IncA/C plasmids into two lineages in which loci 6-9 (pYR1x0087- 290
pYR1x0142) had no or reduced hybridization in one lineage of seventeen isolates and 291
loci 6-9 present in the second lineage of 42 isolates (Figure 1, Table 2) (39). In the 292
lineage of seventeen isolates with no or reduced hybridization; six isolates were negative 293
for the Welch primers as listed on Figure 1 in regions 6-9, six isolates were negative for 294
the Welch primers as listed on Figure 1 in regions 7-9, and the five remaining isolates 295
were negative for at least one of the Welch primers as listed on Figure 1 in regions 7-9 296
(Table 2). Regions 6-9 and 7-9 are within a previously defined insertion/deletion (indel) 297
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
14
for IncA/C plasmids, and is in the same location as an integrating and conjugative 298
element (ICEs) hot spot 2 (HS2) Forty-one isolates had genes detected in all 12 regions 299
located around the genome of IncA/C plasmids (Figure 1, Table 2). Welch et al 300
examined 70 IncA/C positive isolates recovered from retail meats from 2000-2005 and 301
16% of their isolates did not contain loci 6-9 exclusively. Here the lineage without 302
Welch loci 6-9 by microarray hybridizations comprises 30% of our population. The 303
differences in the two studies could be due to the different isolate sources (retail meats vs. 304
veterinary clinical isolates from sick animals) or timeframe (2000-2005 vs. 2005). 305
306
In Region 1 (Figure 1) there were 16 (pYR1x0148- pYR1x0163) contiguous probes 307
associated with a combined Tn10 and Tn5393 transposon cassette previously found in 308
IncA/C plasmids (15,39). In this study three genes associated with the Tn5393 309
transposon were highly conserved, 98% (58 of 59) of our isolates showed a positive 310
hybridization to tnpA for Tn5393 (pYR1x0148), strA and strB (pYR1x 0162 and 311
pYR1x0163). These genes are part of the Tn5393 transposon cassette with widespread 312
dissemination that confers aminoglycoside resistance (34). The Tn5393 cassette has been 313
found in the U.S. associated with the apple and pear tree pathogen Erwinia amylovora (9) 314
in Italy from multidrug resistant S. enterica of mostly poultry origin (27) and in Norway 315
in the fish pathogen Aeromonas salmonicida (20) as well as Pseudomonas syringae and 316
Xanthomonas campestris (35). The remaining 127 oligonucleotide probes in Region 1 of 317
the microarray showed large regions of similarity among the 59 isolates hybridized. 318
319
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
15
In addition to plasmids there are other mechanisms for the transfer of genes responsible 320
for antibiotic or heavy metal resistance, including transposable elements such as 321
transposons and their corresponding integrons, ICEs and ISCRs (5,21,36-38,40). Probes 322
on the array associated with transposable elements like transposons, ICEs and ISCRs 323
showed the most variability. Analysis showed the four antimicrobial or heavy metal 324
resistance probes on the array with the greatest variability were aminoglycoside 3’-325
phosphotransferase (aphA, Region 2, pIP1202X0052), mercuric transport protein 326
periplasmic component (merP, Region 2, pIP1202X0159), mercuric reductase (merA, 327
Region 2, pIP1202X0161) and aminoglycoside adenyltransferase (aadA, Region 4, 328
pSN254X0144). All four probes had significant linkage to transposon related probes 329
(supplementary table 1). Aminoglycoside 3'-phosphotransferase (aphA) provides 330
resistance to kanamycin-type aminoglycoside antibiotics (30). Hybridizations to this 331
array showed 54% (32 of 59) of the isolates with a positive hybridization to the aphA 332
(pIP1202X0156) probe from Y. pestis. Aminoglycoside adenyltransferase (aadA, 333
pSN254X0144) which confers resistance to streptomycin is within an integron 334
designated In2 (32) and is part of the Tn21 transposon family (21). LD analysis of our 335
microarray results found aadA was significantly linked to the five Tn21 related probes on 336
the array. In pSN254 the aadA region includes genes for aadA, aacC, qac∆, sul1, groS 337
and groL (6,16,39) and had a high degree of variability in our isolates. 338
339
This array contains two distinct variants of mer operons that contain merP, in Region 2 340
from pIP1202 (Y. pestis biovar Orientalis str. IP275) and another from Region 4 from 341
pSN254 (S. enterica subsp. enterica serovar Newport str. SL254). Both mer operons 342
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
16
contain the basic set of gram negative mer genes: merRTPADE and are associated with 343
transposons. The Y. pestis probe set also contains the mercuric transporter merC which is 344
redundant to merT. Here we found merC less frequently than merT, which corresponds 345
to an earlier study (22). The S. enterica probe set contains the organomercurial lyase 346
MerB and the corresponding organomercurial responsive version of MerR. It is 347
interesting to note that the mercury resistance genes on the IncA/C backbone were highly 348
conserved in both lineages. The periplasmic MerP protein (merP, pIP1202X0159) and 349
the cytosolic mercuric reductase (merA, pIP1202X0161) have been frequently found in 350
IncA/C backbones (6). We found significant linkage disequilibrium between merA or 351
merP probes and tetracycline resistance and transposon related probes (Supplementary 352
figure 1). In a phylogenetic study of 213 bacterial merA sequences Barkay et al. found 353
bacterial and plasmid MerA loci were often associated with insertion elements and 354
integrase or transposase genes (3). Barkay et al examined MerA evolution and concluded 355
that MerA originated in a thermophilic bacterial lineage after the divergence of the 356
Archaea and Bacteria from the most-recent common ancestor approximately 2.4 billion 357
years ago (3). Mercury resistance could have evolved in the microflora of animals living 358
in or near natural mercury deposits. However, resistance to other heavy metals may be 359
the driving force for selection of these genes. The selective pressure for mercury 360
resistance in humans and animals like the ones in this current study could be attributed to 361
the use of mercury as a therapy for parasites and syphillis during the 17th
through early 362
20th
century and the current exposure of humans to mercuric mercury from “silver” 363
amalgam dental fillings which is continuously leached into the saliva and gut contents of 364
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
17
humans with these fillings (33). Currently ~35 metric tons of mercury is used per year in 365
the US in dental fillings. 366
367
It is interesting to note the positive hybridization of probes insE (ISCR element ISCR2) 368
and insF (ISCR element ISCR16) in this study that were present in 34 and four isolates, 369
respectively (Figure 1, Column 2, Region 4). ISCRs include elements capable of 370
antibiotic resistance gene capture and movement and can construct clusters of antibiotic 371
resistance genes on chromosomes and in plasmids (36-38). Toleman et al noted ISCR16 372
had only been found in three IncA/C plasmids to date; here we found it present in four 373
additional IncA/C plasmids. LD analysis of ISCR2 and 16 revealed significant linkage to 374
transposon related, mercury resistance and antibacterial resistance probes (supplementary 375
figure 1). 376
377
All of the S. enterica isolates in this study except for isolate 527 showed a positive 378
hybridization to the beta-lactamase blaCMY-2 probe. More than one copy of blaCMY is 379
frequently found in S. enterica isolates (6,39) however this microarray does not 380
distinguish how many copies of each gene is present; it can only distinguish presence or 381
absence of hybridization to an oligonucleotide that is representative of a gene. Isolate 382
888 displayed a positive hybridization to the beta-lactamase blaSHV-1 located in Region 2 383
of the array (YP_001102238). This isolate was assayed by PCR because blaCMY and 384
blaTEM have been associated with beta-lactam resistant isolates from S. enterica 385
(16,39,41) while blaSHV is found in Klebsiella (2,14). The assay failed to detect blaSHV, 386
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
18
indicating a false positive hybridization possibly due to the blaSHV probe cross 387
hybridizing with other detected genes 388
389
Hybridization analysis of the 47 oligonucleotide probes in Region 4 of the array 390
displayed the most variability of all Regions of the array (Figure 1). This is interesting 391
because DNA hybridized to the array was extracted from S. enterica isolates, which is 392
presumably more closely related than the sequences from the other species. Region 4 of 393
the microarray contains oligonucleotides of genes associated with merA, aadA, floR and 394
transposases. As expected, oligonucleotide probes associated with tetracycline repressor 395
proteins TetA and TetR, blaCMY-2 and TnpA for transposase Tn21 were highly conserved 396
with positive hybridizations in 98% of the isolates in this study. 397
398
LD analysis revealed that linkage for all groups (antibacterial, conjugation, transposon 399
and DNA binding) was enriched if genes were contiguous. Conjugation genes that were 400
not contiguous also showed enrichment for linkage (Figure 1, supplementary data figure 401
1). This may reflect selective pressures from the functional properties of the gene 402
products. 403
404
In summary we found the IncA/C core genome of our isolates (i.e. positive hybridizations 405
in all analyzed isolates) consists of forty-two genes of which twenty-four were for genes 406
with hypothetical proteins. IncA/C plasmids occur in two lineages separated by a major 407
insertion-deletion (indel) that contains mostly hypothetical proteins. The most variable 408
genes were represented by transposable elements like transposons, ISCRs and ICEs as 409
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
19
well as four antimicrobial or mercury resistance genes. Mercury resistance genes are 410
highly conserved in these IncA/C plasmids. Our previous study showed that the 411
associations of Salmonella species, the IncA/C plasmids, and MDR genes is very old 412
(23). Mercury resistance is also very old (3) and has been associated with plasmids and 413
transposable elements for a long time so it is not surprising that they have been found 414
together on IncA/C plasmids. Based on differences in linkage disequilibrium, our studies 415
suggest that the transfer of antimicrobial resistance determinants by transfer of IncA/C 416
plasmids is relatively less common compared to exchange within the plasmids 417
orchestrated by transposable elements. Thus, the IncA/C plasmids have been remodeled 418
by transposons more often than the plasmid was exchanged with other bacterial lineages. 419
The donors of the transposons remain unknown but may be other plasmids or conjugative 420
units that are more transient in the bacterial population. 421
422
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 423
424
The authors gratefully acknowledge Anne O. Summers critical reading of this manuscript 425
as well as her expertise and input on the mercury resistance operon. The authors thank 426
Linda Genzlinger, LaShanda Glenn, Tiffanie Woodley and Tyler Wilcher for technical 427
assistance. 428
429
The mention of trade names or commercial products in this manuscript is solely for the 430
purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or 431
endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. 432
433
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
20
REFERENCES 434
435
1. Alanis, A. J. 2005. Resistance to antibiotics: are we in the post-antibiotic era? 436
Arch. Med. Res. 36:697-705. 437
2. Babini, G. S. and D. M. Livermore. 2000. Are SHV beta-lactamases universal in 438
Klebsiella pneumoniae? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2230. 439
3. Barkay, T., K. Kritee, E. Boyd, and G. Geesey. 2010. A thermophilic bacterial 440
origin and subsequent constraints by redox, light and salinity on the 441
evolution of the microbial mercuric reductase. Environ. Microbiol. 12:2904-442
2917. 443
4. Bennett, P. M. 2008. Plasmid encoded antibiotic resistance: acquisition and 444
transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria. Br. J. Pharmacol. 153 445
Suppl 1:S347-S357. 446
5. Burrus, V., G. Pavlovic, B. Decaris, and G. Guedon. 2002. Conjugative 447
transposons: the tip of the iceberg. Mol. Microbiol. 46:601-610. 448
6. Call, D. R., R. S. Singer, D. Meng, S. L. Broschat, L. H. Orfe, J. M. Anderson, 449
D. R. Herndon, L. S. Kappmeyer, J. B. Daniels, and T. E. Besser. 2010. 450
blaCMY-2-positive IncA/C plasmids from Escherichia coli and Salmonella 451
enterica are a distinct component of a larger lineage of plasmids. 452
Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:590-596. 453
7. Carattoli, A. 2001. Importance of integrons in the diffusion of resistance. Vet. Res. 454
32:243-259. 455
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
21
8. Carattoli, A. 2009. Resistance plasmid families in Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob. 456
Agents Chemother. 53:2227-2238. 457
9. Chiou, C. S. and A. L. Jones. 1993. Nucleotide sequence analysis of a transposon 458
(Tn5393) carrying streptomycin resistance genes in Erwinia amylovora and 459
other gram-negative bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 175:732-740. 460
10. de Hoon, M. J., S. Imoto, J. Nolan, and S. Miyano. 2004. Open source clustering 461
software. Bioinformatics. 20:1453-1454. 462
11. Durfee, T., R. Nelson, S. Baldwin, G. Plunkett, III, V. Burland, B. Mau, J. F. 463
Petrosino, X. Qin, D. M. Muzny, M. Ayele, R. A. Gibbs, B. Csorgo, G. 464
Posfai, G. M. Weinstock, and F. R. Blattner. 2008. The complete genome 465
sequence of Escherichia coli DH10B: insights into the biology of a 466
laboratory workhorse. J. Bacteriol. 190:2597-2606. 467
12. Eisen, M. B., P. T. Spellman, P. O. Brown, and D. Botstein. 1998. Cluster 468
analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. 469
Sci. U. S. A 95:14863-14868. 470
13. Excoffier, L., G. Laval, and S. Schneider. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3. 0: an integrated 471
software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary 472
Bioinformatics Online 1:47-50. 473
14. Ford, P. J. and M. B. Avison. 2004. Evolutionary mapping of the SHV beta-474
lactamase and evidence for two separate IS26-dependent blaSHV 475
mobilization events from the Klebsiella pneumoniae chromosome. J. 476
Antimicrob. Chemother. 54:69-75. 477
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
22
15. Fricke, W. F., P. F. McDermott, M. K. Mammel, S. Zhao, T. J. Johnson, D. A. 478
Rasko, P. J. Fedorka-Cray, A. Pedroso, J. M. Whichard, J. E. Leclerc, 479
D. G. White, T. A. Cebula, and J. Ravel. 2009. Antimicrobial resistance-480
conferring plasmids with similarity to virulence plasmids from avian 481
pathogenic Escherichia coli strains in Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky 482
isolates from poultry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:5963-5971. 483
16. Fricke, W. F., T. J. Welch, P. F. McDermott, M. K. Mammel, J. E. Leclerc, D. 484
G. White, T. A. Cebula, and J. Ravel. 2009. Comparative genomics of the 485
IncA/C multidrug resistance plasmid family. J. Bacteriol. 191:4750-4757. 486
17. Frost, L. S., R. Leplae, A. O. Summers, and A. Toussaint. 2005. Mobile genetic 487
elements: the agents of open source evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:722-32. 488
18. Frye, J. G., T. Jesse, F. Long, G. Rondeau, S. Porwollik, M. McClelland, C. R. 489
Jackson, M. Englen, and P. J. Fedorka-Cray. 2006. DNA microarray 490
detection of antimicrobial resistance genes in diverse bacteria. Int. J. 491
Antimicrob. Agents 27:138-151. 492
19. Frye, J. G., R. L. Lindsey, G. Rondeau, S. Porwollik, F. Long, M. McClelland, 493
C. R. Jackson, M. D. Englen, R. J. Meinersmann, M. E. Berrang, J. A. 494
Davis, J. B. Barrett, J. B. Turpin, S. N. Thitaram, and P. J. Fedorka-495
Cray. 2010. Development of a DNA microarray to detect antimicrobial 496
resistance genes identified in the National Center for Biotechnology 497
Information database. Microb. Drug Resist. 16:9-19. 498
20. L'Abee-Lund, T. M. and H. Sorum. 2000. Functional Tn5393-like transposon in 499
the R plasmid pRAS2 from the fish pathogen Aeromonas salmonicida 500
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
23
subspecies salmonicida isolated in Norway. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 501
66:5533-5535. 502
21. Liebert, C. A., R. M. Hall, and A. O. Summers. 1999. Transposon Tn21, flagship 503
of the floating genome. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:507-522. 504
22. Liebert, C. A., A. L. Watson, and A. O. Summers. 2000. The quality of merC, a 505
module of the mer mosaic. J. Mol. Evol. 51:607-622. 506
23. Lindsey, R. L., P. J. Fedorka-Cray, J. G. Frye, and R. J. Meinersmann. 2009. 507
Inc A/C plasmids are prevalent in multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica 508
isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:1908-1915. 509
24. Lindsey, R. L., J. G. Frye, P. J. Fedorka-Cray, T. J. Welch, and R. J. 510
Meinersmann. 2010. An oligonucleotide microarray to characterize 511
multidrug resistant plasmids. J. Microbiol. Methods 81:96-100. 512
25. McClelland, M., K. E. Sanderson, J. Spieth, S. W. Clifton, P. Latreille, L. 513
Courtney, S. Porwollik, J. Ali, M. Dante, F. Du, S. Hou, D. Layman, S. 514
Leonard, C. Nguyen, K. Scott, A. Holmes, N. Grewal, E. Mulvaney, E. 515
Ryan, H. Sun, L. Florea, W. Miller, T. Stoneking, M. Nhan, R. 516
Waterston, and R. K. Wilson. 2001. Complete genome sequence of 517
Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. Nature 413:852-856. 518
26. Parkhill, J., G. Dougan, K. D. James, N. R. Thomson, D. Pickard, J. Wain, C. 519
Churcher, K. L. Mungall, S. D. Bentley, M. T. Holden, M. Sebaihia, S. 520
Baker, D. Basham, K. Brooks, T. Chillingworth, P. Connerton, A. 521
Cronin, P. Davis, R. M. Davies, L. Dowd, N. White, J. Farrar, T. 522
Feltwell, N. Hamlin, A. Haque, T. T. Hien, S. Holroyd, K. Jagels, A. 523
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
24
Krogh, T. S. Larsen, S. Leather, S. Moule, P. O'Gaora, C. Parry, M. 524
Quail, K. Rutherford, M. Simmonds, J. Skelton, K. Stevens, S. 525
Whitehead, and B. G. Barrell. 2001. Complete genome sequence of a 526
multiple drug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi CT18. Nature 527
413:848-852. 528
27. Pezzella, C., A. Ricci, E. DiGiannatale, I. Luzzi, and A. Carattoli. 2004. 529
Tetracycline and streptomycin resistance genes, transposons, and plasmids 530
in Salmonella enterica isolates from animals in Italy. Antimicrob. Agents 531
Chemother. 48:903-908. 532
28. Porwollik, S., J. Frye, L. D. Florea, F. Blackmer, and M. McClelland. 2003. A 533
non-redundant microarray of genes for two related bacteria. Nucleic Acids 534
Res. 31:1869-1876. 535
29. Rasheed, J. K., C. Jay, B. Metchock, F. Berkowitz, L. Weigel, J. Crellin, C. 536
Steward, B. Hill, A. A. Medeiros, and F. C. Tenover. 1997. Evolution of 537
extended-spectrum beta-lactam resistance (SHV-8) in a strain of Escherichia 538
coli during multiple episodes of bacteremia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 539
41:647-653. 540
30. Shaw, K. J., P. N. Rather, R. S. Hare, and G. H. Miller. 1993. Molecular 541
genetics of aminoglycoside resistance genes and familial relationships of the 542
aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. Microbiol. Rev. 57:138-163. 543
31. Slatkin, M. 1994. Linkage disequilibrium in growing and stable populations. 544
Genetics 137:331-336. 545
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
25
32. Stokes, H. W. and R. M. Hall. 1989. A novel family of potentially mobile DNA 546
elements encoding site-specific gene-integration functions: integrons. Mol. 547
Microbiol. 3:1669-1683. 548
33. Summers, A. O., J. Wireman, M. J. Vimy, F. L. Lorscheider, B. Marshall, S. B. 549
Levy, S. Bennett, and L. Billard. 1993. Mercury released from dental 550
"silver" fillings provokes an increase in mercury- and antibiotic-resistant 551
bacteria in oral and intestinal floras of primates. Antimicrob. Agents 552
Chemother. 37:825-834. 553
34. Sundin, G. W. 2002. Distinct recent lineages of the strA- strB streptomycin-554
resistance genes in clinical and environmental bacteria. Curr. Microbiol. 555
45:63-69. 556
35. Sundin, G. W. and C. L. Bender. 1995. Expression of the strA-strB streptomycin 557
resistance genes in Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas campestris and 558
characterization of IS6100 in X. campestris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 559
61:2891-2897. 560
36. Toleman, M. A., P. M. Bennett, and T. R. Walsh. 2006. ISCR elements: novel 561
gene-capturing systems of the 21st century? Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 562
70:296-316. 563
37. Toleman, M. A. and T. R. Walsh. 2008. Evolution of the ISCR3 group of ISCR 564
elements. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:3789-3791. 565
38. Toleman, M. A. and T. R. Walsh. 2010. ISCR elements are key players in IncA/C 566
plasmid evolution. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:3534. 567
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
26
39. Welch, T. J., W. F. Fricke, P. F. McDermott, D. G. White, M. L. Rosso, D. A. 568
Rasko, M. K. Mammel, M. Eppinger, M. J. Rosovitz, D. Wagner, L. 569
Rahalison, J. E. Leclerc, J. M. Hinshaw, L. E. Lindler, T. A. Cebula, E. 570
Carniel, and J. Ravel. 2007. Multiple antimicrobial resistance in plague: an 571
emerging public health risk. PLoS ONE 2:e309. 572
40. Wozniak, R. A., D. E. Fouts, M. Spagnoletti, M. M. Colombo, D. Ceccarelli, G. 573
Garriss, C. Dery, V. Burrus, and M. K. Waldor. 2009. Comparative ICE 574
genomics: insights into the evolution of the SXT/R391 family of ICEs. 575
PLoS. Genet. 5:e1000786. 576
41. Zhao, S., K. Blickenstaff, A. Glenn, S. L. Ayers, S. L. Friedman, J. W. Abbott, 577
and P. F. McDermott. 2009. beta-Lactam resistance in salmonella strains 578
isolated from retail meats in the United States by the National Antimicrobial 579
Resistance Monitoring System between 2002 and 2006. Appl. Environ. 580
Microbiol. 75:7624-7630. 581
42. Zou, W., J. G. Frye, C. W. Chang, J. Liu, C. E. Cerniglia, and R. Nayak. 2009. 582
Microarray analysis of antimicrobial resistance genes in Salmonella enterica 583
from preharvest poultry environment. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107:906-914. 584
585
586
587
588
589
590
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
27
Figure 1. Microarray hybridization results for this study. 591
592
a Column 1 lists the probe names and yellow highlighted probes correspond to the 593
location of primers from Welch et al (39). 594
b Column 2 is color coded to indicate Regions 1-5 on the array; region 1 with pYR1 595
probes is black or black and white hashed, region 2 with pIP1202 probes is blue, region 3 596
with pP99-018 probes is red, region 4 with pSN254 probes is yellow and region 5 with 597
pP91278 probes is colored orange. Columns 3-62 show hybridization results; blue 598
indicates the trait is present, and red indicates the trait is absent. Isolate numbers are 599
arranged across the top according to CLUSTAL 3.0 analysis. 600
c The last column is the probe class and has color coded gene regions; merA (light blue), 601
aadA (light brown), beta-lactamase (light yellow) and floR (light pink) from Call et al (6). 602
603
604
605
606
607
608
609
610
611
612
613
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
28
Table 1. IncA/C core genome based on positive hybridization of microarray probes. 614
615
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
29
Total #
of genes
detected
Probe Description
(# of positive probes representing genes/genetic elements with the
same description)
All 59 isolates-
core genome
42 hypothetical protein (17), conserved hypothetical protein (7),
putative membrane protein (4), putative lipoprotein (2), mercuric
resistance merE (1), outer membrane lipoprotein blc1(1),
phosphoadenosine phosphosulfate reductase domain protein (1),
putative parB partition (1), quaternary ammonium compound-
resistance sugE1 (1), signal peptide peptidase sppA domain (1),
staphylococcal nuclease domain protein (1), streptomycin
resistance strA (1), transposase insB2 for insertion sequence (IS)
IS26 (1), transposase insC3 for ISEc9 (1)
58 of 59 isolates 39 hypothetical protein (14), conserved hypothetical protein (7), type
IV conjugative transfer system traABGIV (5), transposase tnpA for
transposon Tn21 and Tn5393 (2), beta-lactamase blaCMY-2(1),
dihydropteroate synthase sul2 (1), mercuric transport merT (1),
Ner-like DNA-binding protein (1), putative membrane protein (1),
putative parA partition (1), putative type IV conjugative transfer
system coupling factor (1), streptomycin resistance strB (1),
tetracycline repressor, tetAR class A (2), transposase insD1 for
IS4321R (1)
57 of 59 isolates 25 hypothetical protein (9), conserved hypothetical protein (5), type
IV conjugative transfer system traDEHL (4), DNA topoisomerase
III (1), phage integrase (1), putative exonuclease (1), putative
membrane protein (2), resolvase (1), transposase insA (1)
31-56 isolates of 59
isolates
89 hypothetical protein (32), conserved hypothetical protein (15),
[2Fe-2S]-binding domain protein(1), alcohol dehydrogenase class
III (1), alkylmercury lyase merB (1), aminoglycoside 3-N-
acetyltransferase aac (1), aminoglycoside 3'-phosphotransferase
(1), aminoglycoside adenylyltransferase aad (1), ATPase, AAA
family (1), C-5 cytosine-specific DNA methylase (1), cyclic
diguanylate phosphodiesterase (EAL) domain (1), dihydropteroate
synthase 1 sul (1), DNA replication terminus site-binding (1),
EAL domain urf2 (2), florfenicol/chloramphenicol resistance floR,
Hg(II)-responsive transcriptional regulator merR (2), integrase
intI1 for transposon Tn21 (1), mercuric reductase merA (1),
mercuric resistance merE (3), mercuric resistance transcriptional
repressor merD (2), mercuric transport merT (1), mercuric
transport periplasmic component merP (2), modulator tnpM for
transposon Tn21 (1), phage recombination bet (1), putative 5'-
nucleotidase (1), quaternary ammonium compound-resistance
protein (1), protein family HMM PF00893 (1), Rhs family protein
(1), single-strand DNA-binding protein (1), transcriptional
regulator (1), LysR family protein (1), transglycosylase SLT
domain protein (1), transposase insC for IS903(1), transposase
insE, transposase tnpA for transposon Tn21 (1)
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
30
Table 2. Summary of positive hybridizations to IncA/C plasmid core regions as 616
detected by microarray. 617
618
Isolate
# IncA/C core regions detected a n
710 1 2 3 4 - - 7 - - 10 - 12 1
544 b
1 2 3 4 5 - - - - 10 11 12 6
604 c 1 2 3 4 5 6 - - - 10 11 12 6
928 1 2 3 4 - - 7 8 - 10 - - 1
743 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - - - - - 1
728d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 - 10 11 12 2
527 1 2 - 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1
552e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 41
Total on
array 59
619
a IncA/C plasmid core regions are based upon the assay by Welch et al. (40). Core 620
regions are numbered in order 1 to 12 around the plus strand of the IncA/C plasmid 621
sequence. Regions are scored as present if the probes (highlighted in Figure 1) were 622
detected by microarray analysis of the isolate. 623
b Isolates 544, 517, 910, 897, 515, and 911 show the same pattern 624
c Isolates 604, 894, 518, 918, 915, and 573 show the same pattern 625
d Isolates 728 and 886 show the same pattern 626
e Isolates 552, 528, 674, 617, 587, 562, 845, 745, 514, 631, 930, 584, 519, 856, 633, 851, 627
752, 625, 550, 521, 621, 667, 600, 824, 934, 822, 563, 889, 812, 732, 733, 553, 548, 890, 628
888, 858, 589, 792, 784, 612, and 649 are positive for all 12 core regions. These regions 629
are identified with the full hybridization data in Figure 1. 630
631
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from
Namea
reg
ion
b
928
710
743
911
515
517
544
910
897
518
604
894
918
915
728
552
573
886
527
649
888
784
612
858
745
528
514
930
584
631
856
519
733
563
550
934
633
548
600
822
890
589
553
812
824
792
889
562
845
732
521
621
674
625
752
851
667
617
587
Classc
pYR1x0001 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0002 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0004 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0005 putative membrane protein
pYR1x0006 phosphoadenosine phosphosulfate reductase domain protein
pYR1x0007 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0008 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0009 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0010 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0011 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0012 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0013 signal peptide peptidase SppA domain protein
pYR1x0014 DSBA-like thioredoxin domain protein
pYR1x0015 putative lipoprotein
pYR1x0016 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0017 putative membrane protein
pYR1x0018 putative membrane protein
pYR1x0019 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0020 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0021 staphylococcal nuclease domain protein
pYR1x0022 DNA-binding protein HU
pYR1x0023 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0024 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0025 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0026 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0027 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0028 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0029 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0030 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0031 putative membrane protein
pYR1x0032 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0033 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0034 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0035 ATPase, AAA family domain protein
pYR1x0036 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0037 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0038 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0039 putative membrane protein
pYR1x0040 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0041 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0042 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0043 putative membrane protein
pYR1x0044 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0045 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0046 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0047 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0048 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0049 DNA methylase
pYR1x0050 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0051 transposase InsA
pYR1x0052 dihydropteroate synthase sul2
pYR1x0053 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0054 putative ParA partition protein
pYR1x0055 putative ParB partition protein
pYR1x0056 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0057 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0058 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0059 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0060 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0061 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0062 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0063 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0064 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0065 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0066 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0067 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0068 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0069 putative lipoprotein
pYR1x0070 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0071 DNA topoisomerase III
pYR1x0072 putative lipoprotein
pYR1x0073 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraI
pYR1x0074 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraD
pYR1x0075 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0076 putative type IV conjugative transfer system coupling factor
pYR1x0077 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0078 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0079 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0080 putative membrane protein
pYR1x0081 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraL
pYR1x0082 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraE
pYR1x0083 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0084 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraB
pYR1x0085 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraV
pYR1x0086 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraA
pYR1x0087 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0088 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0089 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraC
pYR1x0090 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0091 type IV conjugative transfer system signal peptidase
pYR1x0092 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraW
pYR1x0093 cyclic diguanylate phosphodiesterase (EAL) domain protein
pYR1x0094 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraU
pYR1x0095 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraN
pYR1x0096 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0097 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0098 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0099 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0100 ATPase, AAA family
pYR1x0101 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0102 single-strand DNA-binding protein
pYR1x0103 phage recombination protein Bet
pYR1x0104 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0105 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0106 von Willebrand factor type A domain protein
pYR1x0107 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0108 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0109 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0110 transcriptional regulator, ArsR family
pYR1x0111 predicted permease
pYR1x0112 transposase InsB1
pYR1x0113 putative sulfate transport protein CysZ
pYR1x0114 dihydrofolate reductase
pYR1x0118 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0119 [2Fe-2S]-binding domain protein
pYR1x0120 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0121 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0122 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0123 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0124 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0125 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0126 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0127 C-5 cytosine-specific DNA methylase
pYR1x0128 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0129 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0130 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0131 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0132 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0133 putative 5'-nucleotidase
pYR1x0134 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0135 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0136 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0137 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0138 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0139 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0140 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0141 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0142 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0143 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0144 Rhs family protein
pYR1x0145 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0146 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0148 transposase TnpA for transposon Tn5393
pYR1x0147 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0149 resolvase TnpR for transposon Tn5393
pYR1x0150 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0151 transposase InsC for insertion sequence IS903
pYR1x0152 transposase InsD for insertion sequence IS1133
pYR1x0153 transposase InsE1 for insertion sequence IS10R
pYR1x0154 tetracycline resistance protein D
pYR1x0155 tetracycline resistance protein C
pYR1x0156 tetracycline resistance protein A, class B
pYR1x0158 transcriptional regulator, ArsR family
pYR1x0157 tetracycline repressor protein R, class B
pYR1x0159 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0160 sodium/glutamate symporter
pYR1x0162 streptomycin resistance protein A
pYR1x0163 streptomycin resistance protein B
pYR1x0164 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0165 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0166 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0167 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0168 phage integrase
pYR1x0169 putative exonuclease
pYR1x0170 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0171 DNA replication terminus site-binding protein
pYR1x0172 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0173 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0174 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0175 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraF
pYR1x0176 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraH
pYR1x0177 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraG
pYR1x0178 putative membrane protein
pYR1x0179 Ner-like DNA-binding protein
pYR1x0180 transglycosylase SLT domain protein
pYR1x0181 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0182 conserved hypothetical protein
pYR1x0183 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0184 hypothetical protein
pYR1x0185 conserved hypothetical protein
pIP1202x0044 type IV conjugative transfer system protein
pIP1202x0045 type IV conjugative transfer system protein
pIP1202x0046 type IV conjugative transfer system protein
pIP1202x0047 putative nuclease
pIP1202x0048 fipA
pIP1202x0052 aminoglycoside 3'-phosphotransferase,aphA
pIP1202x0057 conserved hypothetical protein
pIP1202x0058 conserved hypothetical protein
pIP1202x0061 cytosine-specific methyltransferase
pIP1202x0062 type II restriction enzyme
pIP1202x0063 chloramphenicol acetyltransferase
pIP1202x0064 acetyltransferase, GNAT family
pIP1202x0065 putative lipoprotein
pIP1202x0072 phosphoglucosamine mutase
pIP1202x0156 Hg(II)-responsive transcriptional regulator MerR
pIP1202x0158 mercuric transport protein MerT
pIP1202x0159 mercuric transport protein periplasmic component MerP
pIP1202x0160 mercuric resistance protein MerC
pIP1202x0161 mercuric reductase MerA
pIP1202x0162 mercuric resistance transcriptional repressor protein MerD
pIP1202x0163 mercuric resistance protein MerE
pIP1202x0164 EAL domain protein Urf2
pIP1202x0165 transposase TniA for transposition module tn
pIP1202x0169 conserved hypothetical protein
pIP1202x0171 class II aldolase/adducin domain protein
pIP1202x0172 ygbK domain protein
pIP1202x0173 NAD binding domain protein
pIP1202x0174 transcriptional regulator, DeoR family
pIP1202x0175 beta-lactamase blaSHV-1
pIP1202x0176 conserved hypothetical protein
pIP1202x0177 RecF/RecN/SMC domain protein
pIP1202x0178 oligosaccharide:H+ symporter
pIP1202x0181 glutathione dehydrogenase/class III alcohol dehydrogenase
pIP1202x0182 tetracycline resistance protein TetA, class D
pIP1202x0183 tetracycline repressor protein TetR, class D
pIP1202x0192 modulator protein TnpM for transposon Tn21
pIP1202x0195 transposase TnpA for transposon Tn21
pIP1202x0196 Rhs family protein
pIP1202x0197 hypothetical protein
pIP1202x0198 hypothetical protein
P99018ORFx008 esterase
P99018ORFx015 conserved hypothetical protein
P99018ORFx016 alcohol dehydrogenase class III
P99018ORFx023 hypothetical protein
P99018ORFx027 hypothetical protein
P99018ORFx033 hypothetical protein
P99018ORFx035 hypothetical protein
P99018ORFx048 hypothetical protein
P99018ORFx148 transposase
P99018ORFx149 hypothetical protein
P99018ORFx159 hypothetical protein
P99018ORFx172 hypothetical protein
P99018ORFx182 hypothetical protein
pSN254x0028 hypothetical protein
pSN254x0029 hypothetical protein
pSN254x0034 hypothetical protein
pSN254x0035 transposase InsB2 for insertion sequence IS26
pSN254x0036 conserved hypothetical protein
pSN254x0037 resolvase
pSN254x0039 conserved hypothetical protein
pSN254x0040 florfenicol/chloramphenicol resistance protein FloR
pSN254x0041 transcriptional regulator, LysR family protein
pSN254x0042 tetracycline repressor protein TetA, class A
pSN254x0043 tetracycline repressor protein R, class A
pSN254x0044 conserved hypothetical protein
pSN254x0062 hypothetical protein
pSN254x0085 quaternary ammonium compound-resistance protein SugE1
pSN254x0084 outer membrane lipoprotein Blc1
pSN254x0086 beta-lactamase blaCMY-2
pSN254x0088 transposase InsC3 for insertion sequence ISEc9
pSN254x0140 transposase InsD1 for insertion sequence IS4321R
pSN254x0141 transposase TnpA for transposon Tn21
pSN254x0143 integrase IntI1 for transposon Tn21
pSN254x0144 aminoglycoside adenylyltransferase aad
pSN254x0145 aminoglycoside 3-N-acetyltransferase aac
pSN254x0146 10 kDa chaperonin GroS
pSN254x0147 60 kDa chaperonin GroL
pSN254x0148 transposase InsE - ISCR2
pSN254x0149 transposase InsF - ISCR16
pSN254x0150 quaternary ammonium compound-resistance protein
pSN254x0151 dihydropteroate synthase 1 sul
pSN254x0152 conserved hypothetical protein ORF5
pSN254x0153 conserved hypothetical protein
pSN254x0154 transposition protein IstB for insertion
pSN254x0155 transposase IstA for insertion sequence IS1326
pSN254x0156 transposase InsG for insertion sequence IS1353
pSN254x0157 transposition protein TniB
pSN254x0161 EAL domain protein Urf2
pSN254x0162 mercuric resistance protein MerE
pSN254x0163 mercuric resistence transcriptional repressor protein MerD
pSN254x0164 alkylmercury lyase MerB
pSN254x0165 mercuric reductase MerA
pSN254x0166 mercuric transport protein periplasmic component MerP
pSN254x0167 mercuric transport protein MerT
pSN254x0168 Hg(II)-responsive transcriptional regulator MerR
pSN254x0170 hypothetical protein
pSN254x0174 hypothetical protein
pSN254x0175 hypothetical protein
pSN254x0178 hypothetical protein
pSN254x0190 putative membrane protein
P91278ORFx005 esterase
P91278ORFx009 hypothetical protein
P91278ORFx010 hypothetical protein
P91278ORFx014 Dihydrofolate reductase
P91278ORFx015 hypothetical protein
P91278ORFx025 hypothetical protein
on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem
.asm.org/
Dow
nloaded from