aem accepts, published online ahead of print on 12...

31
1 2 Microarray based analysis of IncA/C Plasmid Associated Genes from Multidrug 3 resistant Salmonella enterica 4 5 6 Rebecca L. Lindsey*, Jonathan G. Frye, Paula J. Fedorka-Cray, and Richard J. 7 Meinersmann 8 9 10 11 U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Bacterial Epidemiology 12 and Antimicrobial Resistance Research Unit, Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research 13 Center, 950 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2720, USA. 14 15 16 17 * Corresponding author. Mailing address: USDA-ARS-BEAR, Richard J. Russell 18 Research Center, and P.O. Box 5677, Athens, GA 30604-5677. Phone: (706) 546-3676. 19 Fax: (706) 546-3018. E-mail: [email protected] . 20 21 Running title: Microarray analysis of IncA/C Plasmid Genes in Salmonella 22 23 Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.00567-11 AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 12 August 2011 on July 1, 2018 by guest http://aem.asm.org/ Downloaded from

Upload: ngodan

Post on 27-May-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

1

2

Microarray based analysis of IncA/C Plasmid Associated Genes from Multidrug 3

resistant Salmonella enterica 4

5

6

Rebecca L. Lindsey*, Jonathan G. Frye, Paula J. Fedorka-Cray, and Richard J. 7

Meinersmann 8

9

10

11

U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, Bacterial Epidemiology 12

and Antimicrobial Resistance Research Unit, Richard B. Russell Agricultural Research 13

Center, 950 College Station Road, Athens, Georgia 30605-2720, USA. 14

15

16

17

* Corresponding author. Mailing address: USDA-ARS-BEAR, Richard J. Russell 18

Research Center, and P.O. Box 5677, Athens, GA 30604-5677. Phone: (706) 546-3676. 19

Fax: (706) 546-3018. E-mail: [email protected]. 20

21

Running title: Microarray analysis of IncA/C Plasmid Genes in Salmonella 22

23

Copyright © 2011, American Society for Microbiology and/or the Listed Authors/Institutions. All Rights Reserved.Appl. Environ. Microbiol. doi:10.1128/AEM.00567-11 AEM Accepts, published online ahead of print on 12 August 2011

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

2

ABSTRACT 24

25

In Enterobacteriaceae, plasmids have been classified according to 27 incompatibility 26

(Inc) or replicon types which are based on the inability of different plasmids with the 27

same replication mechanism to co-exist in the same cell. Certain replicon types such as 28

IncA/C are associated with multidrug resistance (MDR). We developed a microarray that 29

contains 286 unique 70 mer oligonucleotide probes based on sequences from five IncA/C 30

plasmids: pYR1 (Yersinia ruckeri), pPIP1202 (Yersinia pestis), pP99-018 31

(Photobacterium damselae), pSN254 (Salmonella enterica serovar Newport) and 32

pP91278 (Photobacterium damselae). DNA from 59 Salmonella enterica isolates was 33

hybridized to the microarray and analyzed for the presence/absence of genes. These 34

isolates represented 17 serovars from 14 different animal hosts and from different 35

geographical regions in the United States. Qualitative cluster analysis was performed 36

using CLUSTER 3.0 to group microarray hybridization results. We found that IncA/C 37

plasmids occurred in two lineages distinguished by a major insertion-deletion (indel) 38

region that contains mostly hypothetical proteins. The most variable genes were 39

represented by transposon associated genes as well as four antimicrobial resistance genes 40

(aphA, merP, merA, aadA). Sixteen mercury resistance genes were identified and highly 41

conserved suggesting that mercury ion-related exposure is a stronger pressure than 42

anticipated. We used these data to construct a core IncA/C genome as well as an 43

accessory genome. Our studies suggest that the transfer of antimicrobial resistance 44

determinants by transfer of IncA/C plasmids is relatively less common compared to 45

exchange within the plasmids orchestrated by transposable elements such as transposons, 46

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

3

ICEs and ISCRs and thus pose a lesser opportunity for exchange of antimicrobial 47

resistance. 48

49

INTRODUCTION 50

51

The control of bacterial infections is threatened by the apparent increase in the number of 52

bacteria that carry antimicrobial resistance (AR) genes (1). Plasmids are transmissible 53

extra-chromosomal genetic material that can carry AR genes (4,7,17). Other mobile 54

elements responsible for the transfer of genetic material like AR genes include 55

transposable elements such as transposons, integrating and conjugative elements (ICEs) 56

and insertion sequence common regions (ISCR) (5,21,37,38,40). In the 57

Enterobacteriaceae, plasmids have been classified into incompatibility (Inc) groups that 58

are based on the inability of plasmids with the same replication mechanism to be 59

maintained in the same cell lineage. In Enterobacteriaceae there are 27 described Inc or 60

replicon types (8). IncA/C plasmids are associated with multidrug resistance (MDR) 61

(16,39). We have previously found that IncA/C plasmids are prevalent in multidrug 62

resistant Salmonella enterica (23). 63

64

Population genetics studies that have included data on the distribution of plasmids are 65

common, but there have been very few studies on the distribution and flow of genes 66

within a set of plasmids. Cataloging the genetic composition of plasmid populations can 67

be used to make inferences about their history, which may be useful in understanding the 68

selective pressures that have led to the prevalence of the plasmids and the appreciation of 69

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

4

how anthropogenic effects may continue to influence their evolution. Such a study may 70

not be meaningful with small plasmids, but a study of large plasmids may reveal how the 71

plasmid evolved, accumulating and discarding various genes. IncA/C plasmids tend to be 72

relatively large, generally 130 to 180 kb, with a complement of 160-210 genes (6,16). 73

Available DNA sequences indicate that there is heterogeneity in the complement of genes 74

(6,16). Welch et al. (39) presented data on the presence or absence of 12 loci based on 75

polymerase chain reaction analysis of IncA/C plasmids from 51 isolates of S. enterica 76

and 19 isolates of other Enterobacteriaceae, but they did not analyze the data for linkage 77

disequilibrium. Here we used a previously described microarray with oligonucleotide 78

probes for all the unique genes in five IncA/C plasmids that have been previously 79

sequenced (24) to evaluate the gene content (286 loci) of IncA/C plasmids from a 80

population of 59 different S. enterica isolates and to report on the core and accessory 81

genome. We then used linkage disequilibrium analysis to examine the population 82

genetics of these genes in these isolates. 83

84

MATERIALS AND METHODS 85

86

Bacterial isolates and plasmids. The 59 S. enterica isolates in this study were selected 87

from a diverse subset of 98 IncA/C-positive diagnostic isolates with known PFGE 88

patterns (23). Diverse isolates were selected based on cluster analysis, antibiotic 89

resistance, plasmid profile, source animal and region. Cluster analysis revealed 48 90

unique PFGE types among the 59 isolates studied here, suggesting a variable population. 91

These isolates represented 17 serovars from 14 different sources including canine (dog) 92

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

5

(n=4), cattle (n=17), chicken (n=3), dairy cattle (n=7), equine (horse) (n=6), feline 93

(domestic cat) (n=1), reptile (turtle, lizard) (n=3), swine (n=12), turkey (n=3), mammal 94

(mammal, alpaca) (n=2) and unknown (n=1). Strains were obtained from all five regions 95

in the United States as defined for the NARMS program 96

(http://www.ars.usda.gov/Main/docs.htm?docid=6750). 97

Salmonella isolates were grown on brilliant green sulfa agar (BGSA) or blood agar plates 98

(BAPs) at 37°C after recovering from frozen stock cultures stored at −70°C using 99

standard methods (http://www.ars.usda.gov/Main/docs.htm?docid=6750&page=1). 100

101

DNA extraction and labeling. Total DNA from S. enterica isolates was extracted from 102

5 mL of overnight cultures grown in LB broth (Hardy Diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA) 103

using the GenElute Bacterial Genomic DNA kit (Sigma, St Louis, MO) following 104

manufacturers’ instructions for Gram-negative bacteria. DNA was labeled using random 105

priming with N15 (Operon, Huntsville, AL) and incorporation of Cy3- or Cy5-dCTP 106

(Amersham, Piscataway, NJ) during extension with Klenow fragment (New England 107

Biolabs, Beverly, MA) as previously described (28). DNA targets were purified 108

following the manufacturer’s directions using the QIAquick PCR purification kit 109

(Qiagen, Valencia, CA) and eluted in 1 mM Tris–HCl pH 8.0; the sample was then dried 110

down to a volume of 20µl. Positive control DNA from Yersinia ruckeri YR71 (39) was 111

labeled with Cy3 while Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi CT18 (26), and negative 112

control DNA from Escherichia coli DH10B (11) was labeled with Cy5 and hybridized to 113

arrays. The 59 study isolates were labeled with Cy3 or Cy5 and hybridized to arrays. 114

115

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

6

Microarray construction, hybridization and data analysis. The plasmid/antimicrobial 116

resistance (PAR) microarray was constructed as previously described with70-mer 117

oligonucleotide probes for 286 unique IncA/C genes, 207 IncH1 plasmid genes and 775 118

antimicrobial resistance genes (18,24,42) printed in triplicate. This study focused 119

exclusively on the 286 unique IncA/C probes that were designed based on sequence 120

obtained from the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) database 121

(http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) from five IncA/C plasmids: pYR1 (Y. ruckeri str. YR71, 122

NCBI Accession # CP000602 ), pIP1202 (Yersinia pestis biovar Orientalis str. IP275, 123

CP000603), pP99-018 (Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida, AB277723), pSN254 124

(Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Newport str. SL254, CP000604) and 125

pP91278 (Photobacterium damselae subsp. piscicida, AB277724). The array was 126

comprised of probes for all of the genes identified in pYR1 plus all the unique genes from 127

the remaining plasmids. 128

129

Protocols for hybridizations in formamide buffer were used for hybridization and the 130

post-hybridization wash processes as previously described (18,19,24,28). The hybridized 131

slides were scanned with a GenePix 4100A laser scanner (Axon, Foster City, CA) using 132

laser light wavelength at 532nm or 635nm to excite the Cy3 or Cy5 dye, respectively. 133

Fluorescent images were captured as separate single image tagged image file (TIF) 134

format and analyzed with ScanArray Express Software Version 1.1 (Packard 135

BioChip Technologies). Hybridization signal intensities were measured and the means of 136

the triplicate spots were recorded and a cut-off of two times the median of the mean 137

hybridization intensity to all 70-mer probes was used. Microsoft excel (Microsoft 138

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

7

corporation, Redmond, WA, USA) was used to process hybridization results and to make 139

comparisons of microarray hybridizations as previously described (19,24). A positive 140

hybridization to an oligonucleotide probe on the array was interpreted to indicate that the 141

gene was present. 142

143

Relationships between isolates were determined by hierarchical cluster analysis using 144

open source CLUSTER 3.0 with Euclidean distance for gene content (10,12). 145

146

Statistical analysis. Linkage disequilibrium (LD) of probes on the array was calculated 147

as an extension of Fisher’s exact probability test on contingency tables (31) as instituted 148

by the program Arlequin (13). Standard settings were used, 10,000 steps in the Markov 149

chain and 1,000 dememorization steps; and calculations of D, D', and r2 coefficients were 150

made with a significance level of 0.05. LD was not calculated for probes associated with 151

hypothetical genes or genes that displayed all positive or all negative hybridizations. 152

153

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of blaSHV-1. The blaSHV-1 gene was 154

amplified using primers, conditions and controls as previously described by Rasheed et 155

al. 1997 (29). 156

157

158

159

160

161

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

8

RESULTS 162

163

DNA isolated from 59 S. enterica isolates was hybridized to the PAR microarrays 164

(23,24). These isolates represented 17 serovars, from 14 different host sources and were 165

obtained from five regions of the United States (24). 166

167

Fifty-nine different hybridization profiles were found. Hybridization results are 168

illustrated in Figure 1. Isolates are ordered across the top of Figure 1 based on 169

hierarchical cluster analysis that was performed with results of the microarray 170

hybridizations. Analysis of the 180 oligonucleotide probes on the microarray that 171

correspond specifically to Region 1 section of the array (the pYR1 genes; Figure 1, 172

column 2, labeled with a black line or hashed black and white line) reveals the presence 173

of a region of insertions or deletions (indel) affecting 53 of those probes (pYR1x0087- 174

pYR1x0142, hashed black and white line). The first 18 isolates in Figure 1 showed no or 175

reduced hybridization (except for isolate 552) to the probes in the indel that consists 176

mostly of probes that correspond to hypothetical protein genes (35 of 53, 66%) and 177

traCNUW, a single stranded DNA binding protein (ssb), assorted domain genes (cyclic 178

diguanylate phosphodiesterase, von Willebrand factor type A, [2Fe-2S]-binding protein) 179

and transposase insB1, to name a few. The remaining 41 isolates showed positive 180

hybridizations to the probes in the indel. 181

182

A second notable indel in Region 1 of the array consists of 13 (pYR1x0147- pYR1x0160) 183

contiguous probes that correspond genes for three hypothetical proteins, resolvase tnpR 184

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

9

for transposon Tn5393, transposase insC for insertion sequence (IS) IS903, transposase 185

insD for IS1133, transposase insE1 for IS10R, tetracycline resistance tetA (class B), 186

tetCD, transcriptional regulator (ArsR family), tetracycline repressor tetR (class B) and a 187

sodium/glutamate symporter. Analysis of the remaining 127 oligonucleotide probes on 188

the microarray in Region 1 showed large regions of hybridizations (Figure 1, column 2, 189

labeled as a black line or hashed black and white line); 114 of these probes bound to 190

DNA from 53 of 59 (90%) or more of the isolates and 106 probes bound to DNA from 191

95% or more of the isolates. 192

193

Region 2 (Figure 1, column 2, blue line) of the microarray contains 40 oligonucleotide 194

probes that correspond specifically to pIP1202 genes. Analysis of Region 2 195

(pIP1202x0044 - pIP1202x0198) showed most of these genes were present in two 196

contiguous blocks; mercury resistance (8 oligonucleotide probes) and tetracycline 197

resistance associated regions. We also found positive hybridizations to aphA 198

(aminoglycoside 3’-phosphotransferase). 199

200

Region 3 (Figure 1, column 2, red line) of the microarray contains 13 oligonucleotide 201

probes that correspond specifically to pP99-018 genes. Analysis of Region 3 showed 202

variability in an alcohol dehydrogenase and one of nine hypothetical proteins that were 203

present. The oligonucleotide probe that corresponds to a transposase (P99018ORFx148) 204

was not present in any of the isolates. 205

206

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

10

Region 4 (Figure 1, column 2, yellow line) of the microarray contains 47 oligonucleotide 207

probes that correspond specifically to pSN254 genes. Analysis of Region 4 showed one 208

contiguous block pSN254x0143- pSN254x0157, the aadA region. Region 4 contains 209

oligonucleotides for genes associated with aadA and showed evidence of multiple, 210

apparently unlinked insertions/deletions. Oligonucleotide probes associated with 211

tetracycline repressor tetAR, blaCMY-2 and tnpA for transposase Tn21 showed positive 212

hybridizations in 98% of the isolates. Oligonucleotide probes associated with floR 213

showed positive hybridizations in 90% of the isolates. Oligonucleotide probes associated 214

with mercury resistance (merA), aminoglycoside (aadA), transposases insEF (ISCR2 and 215

16) and insAG and transposition tniB showed the most variability in our population. 216

217

Region 5 (Figure 1, column 2, orange line) of the microarray contains 5 oligonucleotide 218

probes that correspond specifically to pP91278 genes. Analysis of Region 5 showed 219

three of four hypothetical proteins were present in 95% of the isolates. The 220

oligonucleotide probe that corresponds to dihydrafolate reductase (YP_908609) was only 221

present in isolate 858. 222

223

A summary of positive probes is listed in Table 1. The first row shows lists the forty-two 224

positive probes for the IncA/C core genome of our isolates (i.e. found in all analyzed 225

isolates). These include probes for genes of seven membrane proteins including (blc1, 226

putative membrane proteins, a putative lipoproteins and an outer membrane lipoprotein), 227

two antimicrobial resistance (sugE1 and strA), heavy metal resistance (merE), a signal 228

peptide peptidase (sppA ), two domain-containing proteins, partition (parB) and a couple 229

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

11

of transposases. Twenty-four probes present in all isolates were of hypothetical function. 230

The second row lists positive probes for thirty-nine accessory genes (i.e. genes present in 231

only 58 of 59 analyzed plasmids) include conjugation genes (traABGIV), antimicrobial 232

resistance genes (blaCMY-2,tetAR, sulII were not present in isolate 527 and strB), three 233

transposon related genes, and twenty- one of hypothetical function (Table 1). Some of the 234

114 additional accessory genes (ie, genes not present in 31 to 57 analyzed isolates) 235

include conjugation genes (traDEHL), antimicrobial resistance genes (aac, aad, floR, 236

qac, strB and sulI), heavy metal resistance (merABDERT), six transposon related genes, 237

and sixty-one of hypothetical function (Table 1). 238

239

IncA/C plasmid core regions were described by Welch et. al. (2007) and numbered in 240

order 1-12 around the plus strand of the IncA/C plasmid (39). We used our microarray 241

hybridization results to detect the presence or absence of these core regions (Table 2). 242

The majority of our plasmids (42 of 59 hybridizations) were positive for all of the probes. 243

244

Pairwise LD was calculated among all the probes on the array that were not hypothetical 245

or invariantly positive or negative (supplementary data figure 1). The PAR3 array 246

contained 1395 (22.4%) probe pairs positive for linkage at P values of <0.05, out of the 247

total of 6216 pairs that were analyzed. The PAR3 array contained nine pairs of 248

antimicrobial gene probes that were contiguous, eight (88.9%) of which showed linkage 249

disequilibrium: 162 pairs were not contiguous, 26 (16%) of which were linked. The 250

PAR3 array contained 35 pairs of conjugation gene probes that were contiguous, 23 251

(66%) of which were linked: 85 pairs were not contiguous, 42 (49%) of which were 252

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

12

linked. The PAR3 array contained 25 pairs of transposon gene probes that were 253

contiguous, 11 (44%) of which were linked: 132 pairs were not contiguous, 23 (17%) of 254

which were linked. The PAR3 array contained 3 pairs of DNA binding-protein gene 255

probes that were contiguous, all 3 (100%) of which were linked: 63 pairs were not 256

contiguous, 6 (9.5%) of which were linked. 257

258

DISCUSSION 259

260

The objective of this study was to learn more about the population genetics of IncA/C by 261

characterizing a diverse population of 59 S. enterica isolates from different animal 262

sources. Isolates were hybridized to a PAR hybridization array with 286 unique 263

oligonucleotide plasmid probes from IncA/C plasmids and results were analyzed to 264

determine a core and accessory genome in our isolates (Figure 1, Table 1). The 265

universally present core gene set appeared to be very limited in expected plasmid 266

maintenance related genes; parB was the only core gene recognized as needed for 267

replication. But there were 30 genes of unknown function in the core set, some of which 268

are likely to be used in plasmid maintenance. The accuracy of the PAR hybridization 269

array was previously analyzed (24) with control strains; S. Typhi CT18 (26), Y. ruckeri 270

str. YR71 (39) and S. Typhimurium LT2 (25). All the probes on the array originated 271

from IncA/C sequences, however it is possible for chromosomal DNA from the tested 272

strains to report a positive hybridization to some of the IncA/C associated probes. 273

274

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

13

Cluster analysis of the oligonucleotide probes on the microarray showed two lineages of 275

IncA/C plasmids that differed mainly on the presence of an insertion, deletion or 276

combination of the two (indel) of 53 (pYR1x0087- pYR1x0142) of the 180 277

oligonucleotide probes that correspond to Region 1 (Figure 1 column 2 labeled with a 278

black line or hashed black and white line). The lineage that consists of isolates 928-915 279

(Figure 1, top row) was 30% (18 of 59) of the total isolates and did not hybridize to 280

approximately 53 oligonucleotide probes from the pYR1 backbone section of the array. 281

Interestingly, this indel occurred at the same location as an integrating and conjugative 282

element (ICEs) hot spot 2 (HS2) (40). The indel in the lineage did not hybridize to the 283

probe for the single-strand DNA-binding protein gene (ssb), in previous findings the 284

sequence for ssb was present in pYR1, pSN254, pIP1202, p99-018, p91278 but missing 285

in pRA1 (16). Because the indel was not identical in all the plasmids, it is likely that it 286

was shaped by more than one genetic event. Welch et al used twelve loci along the 287

pYR1, IncA/C backbone for a PCR-based screening assay (highlighted first column 288

Figure 1to investigate the core backbone of IncA/C plasmids (39). In this study we found 289

an indel dividing our IncA/C plasmids into two lineages in which loci 6-9 (pYR1x0087- 290

pYR1x0142) had no or reduced hybridization in one lineage of seventeen isolates and 291

loci 6-9 present in the second lineage of 42 isolates (Figure 1, Table 2) (39). In the 292

lineage of seventeen isolates with no or reduced hybridization; six isolates were negative 293

for the Welch primers as listed on Figure 1 in regions 6-9, six isolates were negative for 294

the Welch primers as listed on Figure 1 in regions 7-9, and the five remaining isolates 295

were negative for at least one of the Welch primers as listed on Figure 1 in regions 7-9 296

(Table 2). Regions 6-9 and 7-9 are within a previously defined insertion/deletion (indel) 297

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

14

for IncA/C plasmids, and is in the same location as an integrating and conjugative 298

element (ICEs) hot spot 2 (HS2) Forty-one isolates had genes detected in all 12 regions 299

located around the genome of IncA/C plasmids (Figure 1, Table 2). Welch et al 300

examined 70 IncA/C positive isolates recovered from retail meats from 2000-2005 and 301

16% of their isolates did not contain loci 6-9 exclusively. Here the lineage without 302

Welch loci 6-9 by microarray hybridizations comprises 30% of our population. The 303

differences in the two studies could be due to the different isolate sources (retail meats vs. 304

veterinary clinical isolates from sick animals) or timeframe (2000-2005 vs. 2005). 305

306

In Region 1 (Figure 1) there were 16 (pYR1x0148- pYR1x0163) contiguous probes 307

associated with a combined Tn10 and Tn5393 transposon cassette previously found in 308

IncA/C plasmids (15,39). In this study three genes associated with the Tn5393 309

transposon were highly conserved, 98% (58 of 59) of our isolates showed a positive 310

hybridization to tnpA for Tn5393 (pYR1x0148), strA and strB (pYR1x 0162 and 311

pYR1x0163). These genes are part of the Tn5393 transposon cassette with widespread 312

dissemination that confers aminoglycoside resistance (34). The Tn5393 cassette has been 313

found in the U.S. associated with the apple and pear tree pathogen Erwinia amylovora (9) 314

in Italy from multidrug resistant S. enterica of mostly poultry origin (27) and in Norway 315

in the fish pathogen Aeromonas salmonicida (20) as well as Pseudomonas syringae and 316

Xanthomonas campestris (35). The remaining 127 oligonucleotide probes in Region 1 of 317

the microarray showed large regions of similarity among the 59 isolates hybridized. 318

319

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

15

In addition to plasmids there are other mechanisms for the transfer of genes responsible 320

for antibiotic or heavy metal resistance, including transposable elements such as 321

transposons and their corresponding integrons, ICEs and ISCRs (5,21,36-38,40). Probes 322

on the array associated with transposable elements like transposons, ICEs and ISCRs 323

showed the most variability. Analysis showed the four antimicrobial or heavy metal 324

resistance probes on the array with the greatest variability were aminoglycoside 3’-325

phosphotransferase (aphA, Region 2, pIP1202X0052), mercuric transport protein 326

periplasmic component (merP, Region 2, pIP1202X0159), mercuric reductase (merA, 327

Region 2, pIP1202X0161) and aminoglycoside adenyltransferase (aadA, Region 4, 328

pSN254X0144). All four probes had significant linkage to transposon related probes 329

(supplementary table 1). Aminoglycoside 3'-phosphotransferase (aphA) provides 330

resistance to kanamycin-type aminoglycoside antibiotics (30). Hybridizations to this 331

array showed 54% (32 of 59) of the isolates with a positive hybridization to the aphA 332

(pIP1202X0156) probe from Y. pestis. Aminoglycoside adenyltransferase (aadA, 333

pSN254X0144) which confers resistance to streptomycin is within an integron 334

designated In2 (32) and is part of the Tn21 transposon family (21). LD analysis of our 335

microarray results found aadA was significantly linked to the five Tn21 related probes on 336

the array. In pSN254 the aadA region includes genes for aadA, aacC, qac∆, sul1, groS 337

and groL (6,16,39) and had a high degree of variability in our isolates. 338

339

This array contains two distinct variants of mer operons that contain merP, in Region 2 340

from pIP1202 (Y. pestis biovar Orientalis str. IP275) and another from Region 4 from 341

pSN254 (S. enterica subsp. enterica serovar Newport str. SL254). Both mer operons 342

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

16

contain the basic set of gram negative mer genes: merRTPADE and are associated with 343

transposons. The Y. pestis probe set also contains the mercuric transporter merC which is 344

redundant to merT. Here we found merC less frequently than merT, which corresponds 345

to an earlier study (22). The S. enterica probe set contains the organomercurial lyase 346

MerB and the corresponding organomercurial responsive version of MerR. It is 347

interesting to note that the mercury resistance genes on the IncA/C backbone were highly 348

conserved in both lineages. The periplasmic MerP protein (merP, pIP1202X0159) and 349

the cytosolic mercuric reductase (merA, pIP1202X0161) have been frequently found in 350

IncA/C backbones (6). We found significant linkage disequilibrium between merA or 351

merP probes and tetracycline resistance and transposon related probes (Supplementary 352

figure 1). In a phylogenetic study of 213 bacterial merA sequences Barkay et al. found 353

bacterial and plasmid MerA loci were often associated with insertion elements and 354

integrase or transposase genes (3). Barkay et al examined MerA evolution and concluded 355

that MerA originated in a thermophilic bacterial lineage after the divergence of the 356

Archaea and Bacteria from the most-recent common ancestor approximately 2.4 billion 357

years ago (3). Mercury resistance could have evolved in the microflora of animals living 358

in or near natural mercury deposits. However, resistance to other heavy metals may be 359

the driving force for selection of these genes. The selective pressure for mercury 360

resistance in humans and animals like the ones in this current study could be attributed to 361

the use of mercury as a therapy for parasites and syphillis during the 17th

through early 362

20th

century and the current exposure of humans to mercuric mercury from “silver” 363

amalgam dental fillings which is continuously leached into the saliva and gut contents of 364

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

17

humans with these fillings (33). Currently ~35 metric tons of mercury is used per year in 365

the US in dental fillings. 366

367

It is interesting to note the positive hybridization of probes insE (ISCR element ISCR2) 368

and insF (ISCR element ISCR16) in this study that were present in 34 and four isolates, 369

respectively (Figure 1, Column 2, Region 4). ISCRs include elements capable of 370

antibiotic resistance gene capture and movement and can construct clusters of antibiotic 371

resistance genes on chromosomes and in plasmids (36-38). Toleman et al noted ISCR16 372

had only been found in three IncA/C plasmids to date; here we found it present in four 373

additional IncA/C plasmids. LD analysis of ISCR2 and 16 revealed significant linkage to 374

transposon related, mercury resistance and antibacterial resistance probes (supplementary 375

figure 1). 376

377

All of the S. enterica isolates in this study except for isolate 527 showed a positive 378

hybridization to the beta-lactamase blaCMY-2 probe. More than one copy of blaCMY is 379

frequently found in S. enterica isolates (6,39) however this microarray does not 380

distinguish how many copies of each gene is present; it can only distinguish presence or 381

absence of hybridization to an oligonucleotide that is representative of a gene. Isolate 382

888 displayed a positive hybridization to the beta-lactamase blaSHV-1 located in Region 2 383

of the array (YP_001102238). This isolate was assayed by PCR because blaCMY and 384

blaTEM have been associated with beta-lactam resistant isolates from S. enterica 385

(16,39,41) while blaSHV is found in Klebsiella (2,14). The assay failed to detect blaSHV, 386

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

18

indicating a false positive hybridization possibly due to the blaSHV probe cross 387

hybridizing with other detected genes 388

389

Hybridization analysis of the 47 oligonucleotide probes in Region 4 of the array 390

displayed the most variability of all Regions of the array (Figure 1). This is interesting 391

because DNA hybridized to the array was extracted from S. enterica isolates, which is 392

presumably more closely related than the sequences from the other species. Region 4 of 393

the microarray contains oligonucleotides of genes associated with merA, aadA, floR and 394

transposases. As expected, oligonucleotide probes associated with tetracycline repressor 395

proteins TetA and TetR, blaCMY-2 and TnpA for transposase Tn21 were highly conserved 396

with positive hybridizations in 98% of the isolates in this study. 397

398

LD analysis revealed that linkage for all groups (antibacterial, conjugation, transposon 399

and DNA binding) was enriched if genes were contiguous. Conjugation genes that were 400

not contiguous also showed enrichment for linkage (Figure 1, supplementary data figure 401

1). This may reflect selective pressures from the functional properties of the gene 402

products. 403

404

In summary we found the IncA/C core genome of our isolates (i.e. positive hybridizations 405

in all analyzed isolates) consists of forty-two genes of which twenty-four were for genes 406

with hypothetical proteins. IncA/C plasmids occur in two lineages separated by a major 407

insertion-deletion (indel) that contains mostly hypothetical proteins. The most variable 408

genes were represented by transposable elements like transposons, ISCRs and ICEs as 409

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

19

well as four antimicrobial or mercury resistance genes. Mercury resistance genes are 410

highly conserved in these IncA/C plasmids. Our previous study showed that the 411

associations of Salmonella species, the IncA/C plasmids, and MDR genes is very old 412

(23). Mercury resistance is also very old (3) and has been associated with plasmids and 413

transposable elements for a long time so it is not surprising that they have been found 414

together on IncA/C plasmids. Based on differences in linkage disequilibrium, our studies 415

suggest that the transfer of antimicrobial resistance determinants by transfer of IncA/C 416

plasmids is relatively less common compared to exchange within the plasmids 417

orchestrated by transposable elements. Thus, the IncA/C plasmids have been remodeled 418

by transposons more often than the plasmid was exchanged with other bacterial lineages. 419

The donors of the transposons remain unknown but may be other plasmids or conjugative 420

units that are more transient in the bacterial population. 421

422

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 423

424

The authors gratefully acknowledge Anne O. Summers critical reading of this manuscript 425

as well as her expertise and input on the mercury resistance operon. The authors thank 426

Linda Genzlinger, LaShanda Glenn, Tiffanie Woodley and Tyler Wilcher for technical 427

assistance. 428

429

The mention of trade names or commercial products in this manuscript is solely for the 430

purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or 431

endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. 432

433

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

20

REFERENCES 434

435

1. Alanis, A. J. 2005. Resistance to antibiotics: are we in the post-antibiotic era? 436

Arch. Med. Res. 36:697-705. 437

2. Babini, G. S. and D. M. Livermore. 2000. Are SHV beta-lactamases universal in 438

Klebsiella pneumoniae? Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 44:2230. 439

3. Barkay, T., K. Kritee, E. Boyd, and G. Geesey. 2010. A thermophilic bacterial 440

origin and subsequent constraints by redox, light and salinity on the 441

evolution of the microbial mercuric reductase. Environ. Microbiol. 12:2904-442

2917. 443

4. Bennett, P. M. 2008. Plasmid encoded antibiotic resistance: acquisition and 444

transfer of antibiotic resistance genes in bacteria. Br. J. Pharmacol. 153 445

Suppl 1:S347-S357. 446

5. Burrus, V., G. Pavlovic, B. Decaris, and G. Guedon. 2002. Conjugative 447

transposons: the tip of the iceberg. Mol. Microbiol. 46:601-610. 448

6. Call, D. R., R. S. Singer, D. Meng, S. L. Broschat, L. H. Orfe, J. M. Anderson, 449

D. R. Herndon, L. S. Kappmeyer, J. B. Daniels, and T. E. Besser. 2010. 450

blaCMY-2-positive IncA/C plasmids from Escherichia coli and Salmonella 451

enterica are a distinct component of a larger lineage of plasmids. 452

Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:590-596. 453

7. Carattoli, A. 2001. Importance of integrons in the diffusion of resistance. Vet. Res. 454

32:243-259. 455

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

21

8. Carattoli, A. 2009. Resistance plasmid families in Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob. 456

Agents Chemother. 53:2227-2238. 457

9. Chiou, C. S. and A. L. Jones. 1993. Nucleotide sequence analysis of a transposon 458

(Tn5393) carrying streptomycin resistance genes in Erwinia amylovora and 459

other gram-negative bacteria. J. Bacteriol. 175:732-740. 460

10. de Hoon, M. J., S. Imoto, J. Nolan, and S. Miyano. 2004. Open source clustering 461

software. Bioinformatics. 20:1453-1454. 462

11. Durfee, T., R. Nelson, S. Baldwin, G. Plunkett, III, V. Burland, B. Mau, J. F. 463

Petrosino, X. Qin, D. M. Muzny, M. Ayele, R. A. Gibbs, B. Csorgo, G. 464

Posfai, G. M. Weinstock, and F. R. Blattner. 2008. The complete genome 465

sequence of Escherichia coli DH10B: insights into the biology of a 466

laboratory workhorse. J. Bacteriol. 190:2597-2606. 467

12. Eisen, M. B., P. T. Spellman, P. O. Brown, and D. Botstein. 1998. Cluster 468

analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. 469

Sci. U. S. A 95:14863-14868. 470

13. Excoffier, L., G. Laval, and S. Schneider. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3. 0: an integrated 471

software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary 472

Bioinformatics Online 1:47-50. 473

14. Ford, P. J. and M. B. Avison. 2004. Evolutionary mapping of the SHV beta-474

lactamase and evidence for two separate IS26-dependent blaSHV 475

mobilization events from the Klebsiella pneumoniae chromosome. J. 476

Antimicrob. Chemother. 54:69-75. 477

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

22

15. Fricke, W. F., P. F. McDermott, M. K. Mammel, S. Zhao, T. J. Johnson, D. A. 478

Rasko, P. J. Fedorka-Cray, A. Pedroso, J. M. Whichard, J. E. Leclerc, 479

D. G. White, T. A. Cebula, and J. Ravel. 2009. Antimicrobial resistance-480

conferring plasmids with similarity to virulence plasmids from avian 481

pathogenic Escherichia coli strains in Salmonella enterica serovar Kentucky 482

isolates from poultry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:5963-5971. 483

16. Fricke, W. F., T. J. Welch, P. F. McDermott, M. K. Mammel, J. E. Leclerc, D. 484

G. White, T. A. Cebula, and J. Ravel. 2009. Comparative genomics of the 485

IncA/C multidrug resistance plasmid family. J. Bacteriol. 191:4750-4757. 486

17. Frost, L. S., R. Leplae, A. O. Summers, and A. Toussaint. 2005. Mobile genetic 487

elements: the agents of open source evolution. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:722-32. 488

18. Frye, J. G., T. Jesse, F. Long, G. Rondeau, S. Porwollik, M. McClelland, C. R. 489

Jackson, M. Englen, and P. J. Fedorka-Cray. 2006. DNA microarray 490

detection of antimicrobial resistance genes in diverse bacteria. Int. J. 491

Antimicrob. Agents 27:138-151. 492

19. Frye, J. G., R. L. Lindsey, G. Rondeau, S. Porwollik, F. Long, M. McClelland, 493

C. R. Jackson, M. D. Englen, R. J. Meinersmann, M. E. Berrang, J. A. 494

Davis, J. B. Barrett, J. B. Turpin, S. N. Thitaram, and P. J. Fedorka-495

Cray. 2010. Development of a DNA microarray to detect antimicrobial 496

resistance genes identified in the National Center for Biotechnology 497

Information database. Microb. Drug Resist. 16:9-19. 498

20. L'Abee-Lund, T. M. and H. Sorum. 2000. Functional Tn5393-like transposon in 499

the R plasmid pRAS2 from the fish pathogen Aeromonas salmonicida 500

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

23

subspecies salmonicida isolated in Norway. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 501

66:5533-5535. 502

21. Liebert, C. A., R. M. Hall, and A. O. Summers. 1999. Transposon Tn21, flagship 503

of the floating genome. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 63:507-522. 504

22. Liebert, C. A., A. L. Watson, and A. O. Summers. 2000. The quality of merC, a 505

module of the mer mosaic. J. Mol. Evol. 51:607-622. 506

23. Lindsey, R. L., P. J. Fedorka-Cray, J. G. Frye, and R. J. Meinersmann. 2009. 507

Inc A/C plasmids are prevalent in multidrug-resistant Salmonella enterica 508

isolates. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:1908-1915. 509

24. Lindsey, R. L., J. G. Frye, P. J. Fedorka-Cray, T. J. Welch, and R. J. 510

Meinersmann. 2010. An oligonucleotide microarray to characterize 511

multidrug resistant plasmids. J. Microbiol. Methods 81:96-100. 512

25. McClelland, M., K. E. Sanderson, J. Spieth, S. W. Clifton, P. Latreille, L. 513

Courtney, S. Porwollik, J. Ali, M. Dante, F. Du, S. Hou, D. Layman, S. 514

Leonard, C. Nguyen, K. Scott, A. Holmes, N. Grewal, E. Mulvaney, E. 515

Ryan, H. Sun, L. Florea, W. Miller, T. Stoneking, M. Nhan, R. 516

Waterston, and R. K. Wilson. 2001. Complete genome sequence of 517

Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium LT2. Nature 413:852-856. 518

26. Parkhill, J., G. Dougan, K. D. James, N. R. Thomson, D. Pickard, J. Wain, C. 519

Churcher, K. L. Mungall, S. D. Bentley, M. T. Holden, M. Sebaihia, S. 520

Baker, D. Basham, K. Brooks, T. Chillingworth, P. Connerton, A. 521

Cronin, P. Davis, R. M. Davies, L. Dowd, N. White, J. Farrar, T. 522

Feltwell, N. Hamlin, A. Haque, T. T. Hien, S. Holroyd, K. Jagels, A. 523

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

24

Krogh, T. S. Larsen, S. Leather, S. Moule, P. O'Gaora, C. Parry, M. 524

Quail, K. Rutherford, M. Simmonds, J. Skelton, K. Stevens, S. 525

Whitehead, and B. G. Barrell. 2001. Complete genome sequence of a 526

multiple drug resistant Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi CT18. Nature 527

413:848-852. 528

27. Pezzella, C., A. Ricci, E. DiGiannatale, I. Luzzi, and A. Carattoli. 2004. 529

Tetracycline and streptomycin resistance genes, transposons, and plasmids 530

in Salmonella enterica isolates from animals in Italy. Antimicrob. Agents 531

Chemother. 48:903-908. 532

28. Porwollik, S., J. Frye, L. D. Florea, F. Blackmer, and M. McClelland. 2003. A 533

non-redundant microarray of genes for two related bacteria. Nucleic Acids 534

Res. 31:1869-1876. 535

29. Rasheed, J. K., C. Jay, B. Metchock, F. Berkowitz, L. Weigel, J. Crellin, C. 536

Steward, B. Hill, A. A. Medeiros, and F. C. Tenover. 1997. Evolution of 537

extended-spectrum beta-lactam resistance (SHV-8) in a strain of Escherichia 538

coli during multiple episodes of bacteremia. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 539

41:647-653. 540

30. Shaw, K. J., P. N. Rather, R. S. Hare, and G. H. Miller. 1993. Molecular 541

genetics of aminoglycoside resistance genes and familial relationships of the 542

aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes. Microbiol. Rev. 57:138-163. 543

31. Slatkin, M. 1994. Linkage disequilibrium in growing and stable populations. 544

Genetics 137:331-336. 545

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

25

32. Stokes, H. W. and R. M. Hall. 1989. A novel family of potentially mobile DNA 546

elements encoding site-specific gene-integration functions: integrons. Mol. 547

Microbiol. 3:1669-1683. 548

33. Summers, A. O., J. Wireman, M. J. Vimy, F. L. Lorscheider, B. Marshall, S. B. 549

Levy, S. Bennett, and L. Billard. 1993. Mercury released from dental 550

"silver" fillings provokes an increase in mercury- and antibiotic-resistant 551

bacteria in oral and intestinal floras of primates. Antimicrob. Agents 552

Chemother. 37:825-834. 553

34. Sundin, G. W. 2002. Distinct recent lineages of the strA- strB streptomycin-554

resistance genes in clinical and environmental bacteria. Curr. Microbiol. 555

45:63-69. 556

35. Sundin, G. W. and C. L. Bender. 1995. Expression of the strA-strB streptomycin 557

resistance genes in Pseudomonas syringae and Xanthomonas campestris and 558

characterization of IS6100 in X. campestris. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 559

61:2891-2897. 560

36. Toleman, M. A., P. M. Bennett, and T. R. Walsh. 2006. ISCR elements: novel 561

gene-capturing systems of the 21st century? Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 562

70:296-316. 563

37. Toleman, M. A. and T. R. Walsh. 2008. Evolution of the ISCR3 group of ISCR 564

elements. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 52:3789-3791. 565

38. Toleman, M. A. and T. R. Walsh. 2010. ISCR elements are key players in IncA/C 566

plasmid evolution. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 54:3534. 567

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

26

39. Welch, T. J., W. F. Fricke, P. F. McDermott, D. G. White, M. L. Rosso, D. A. 568

Rasko, M. K. Mammel, M. Eppinger, M. J. Rosovitz, D. Wagner, L. 569

Rahalison, J. E. Leclerc, J. M. Hinshaw, L. E. Lindler, T. A. Cebula, E. 570

Carniel, and J. Ravel. 2007. Multiple antimicrobial resistance in plague: an 571

emerging public health risk. PLoS ONE 2:e309. 572

40. Wozniak, R. A., D. E. Fouts, M. Spagnoletti, M. M. Colombo, D. Ceccarelli, G. 573

Garriss, C. Dery, V. Burrus, and M. K. Waldor. 2009. Comparative ICE 574

genomics: insights into the evolution of the SXT/R391 family of ICEs. 575

PLoS. Genet. 5:e1000786. 576

41. Zhao, S., K. Blickenstaff, A. Glenn, S. L. Ayers, S. L. Friedman, J. W. Abbott, 577

and P. F. McDermott. 2009. beta-Lactam resistance in salmonella strains 578

isolated from retail meats in the United States by the National Antimicrobial 579

Resistance Monitoring System between 2002 and 2006. Appl. Environ. 580

Microbiol. 75:7624-7630. 581

42. Zou, W., J. G. Frye, C. W. Chang, J. Liu, C. E. Cerniglia, and R. Nayak. 2009. 582

Microarray analysis of antimicrobial resistance genes in Salmonella enterica 583

from preharvest poultry environment. J. Appl. Microbiol. 107:906-914. 584

585

586

587

588

589

590

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

27

Figure 1. Microarray hybridization results for this study. 591

592

a Column 1 lists the probe names and yellow highlighted probes correspond to the 593

location of primers from Welch et al (39). 594

b Column 2 is color coded to indicate Regions 1-5 on the array; region 1 with pYR1 595

probes is black or black and white hashed, region 2 with pIP1202 probes is blue, region 3 596

with pP99-018 probes is red, region 4 with pSN254 probes is yellow and region 5 with 597

pP91278 probes is colored orange. Columns 3-62 show hybridization results; blue 598

indicates the trait is present, and red indicates the trait is absent. Isolate numbers are 599

arranged across the top according to CLUSTAL 3.0 analysis. 600

c The last column is the probe class and has color coded gene regions; merA (light blue), 601

aadA (light brown), beta-lactamase (light yellow) and floR (light pink) from Call et al (6). 602

603

604

605

606

607

608

609

610

611

612

613

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

28

Table 1. IncA/C core genome based on positive hybridization of microarray probes. 614

615

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

29

Total #

of genes

detected

Probe Description

(# of positive probes representing genes/genetic elements with the

same description)

All 59 isolates-

core genome

42 hypothetical protein (17), conserved hypothetical protein (7),

putative membrane protein (4), putative lipoprotein (2), mercuric

resistance merE (1), outer membrane lipoprotein blc1(1),

phosphoadenosine phosphosulfate reductase domain protein (1),

putative parB partition (1), quaternary ammonium compound-

resistance sugE1 (1), signal peptide peptidase sppA domain (1),

staphylococcal nuclease domain protein (1), streptomycin

resistance strA (1), transposase insB2 for insertion sequence (IS)

IS26 (1), transposase insC3 for ISEc9 (1)

58 of 59 isolates 39 hypothetical protein (14), conserved hypothetical protein (7), type

IV conjugative transfer system traABGIV (5), transposase tnpA for

transposon Tn21 and Tn5393 (2), beta-lactamase blaCMY-2(1),

dihydropteroate synthase sul2 (1), mercuric transport merT (1),

Ner-like DNA-binding protein (1), putative membrane protein (1),

putative parA partition (1), putative type IV conjugative transfer

system coupling factor (1), streptomycin resistance strB (1),

tetracycline repressor, tetAR class A (2), transposase insD1 for

IS4321R (1)

57 of 59 isolates 25 hypothetical protein (9), conserved hypothetical protein (5), type

IV conjugative transfer system traDEHL (4), DNA topoisomerase

III (1), phage integrase (1), putative exonuclease (1), putative

membrane protein (2), resolvase (1), transposase insA (1)

31-56 isolates of 59

isolates

89 hypothetical protein (32), conserved hypothetical protein (15),

[2Fe-2S]-binding domain protein(1), alcohol dehydrogenase class

III (1), alkylmercury lyase merB (1), aminoglycoside 3-N-

acetyltransferase aac (1), aminoglycoside 3'-phosphotransferase

(1), aminoglycoside adenylyltransferase aad (1), ATPase, AAA

family (1), C-5 cytosine-specific DNA methylase (1), cyclic

diguanylate phosphodiesterase (EAL) domain (1), dihydropteroate

synthase 1 sul (1), DNA replication terminus site-binding (1),

EAL domain urf2 (2), florfenicol/chloramphenicol resistance floR,

Hg(II)-responsive transcriptional regulator merR (2), integrase

intI1 for transposon Tn21 (1), mercuric reductase merA (1),

mercuric resistance merE (3), mercuric resistance transcriptional

repressor merD (2), mercuric transport merT (1), mercuric

transport periplasmic component merP (2), modulator tnpM for

transposon Tn21 (1), phage recombination bet (1), putative 5'-

nucleotidase (1), quaternary ammonium compound-resistance

protein (1), protein family HMM PF00893 (1), Rhs family protein

(1), single-strand DNA-binding protein (1), transcriptional

regulator (1), LysR family protein (1), transglycosylase SLT

domain protein (1), transposase insC for IS903(1), transposase

insE, transposase tnpA for transposon Tn21 (1)

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

30

Table 2. Summary of positive hybridizations to IncA/C plasmid core regions as 616

detected by microarray. 617

618

Isolate

# IncA/C core regions detected a n

710 1 2 3 4 - - 7 - - 10 - 12 1

544 b

1 2 3 4 5 - - - - 10 11 12 6

604 c 1 2 3 4 5 6 - - - 10 11 12 6

928 1 2 3 4 - - 7 8 - 10 - - 1

743 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 - - - - - 1

728d 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 - 10 11 12 2

527 1 2 - 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1

552e 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 41

Total on

array 59

619

a IncA/C plasmid core regions are based upon the assay by Welch et al. (40). Core 620

regions are numbered in order 1 to 12 around the plus strand of the IncA/C plasmid 621

sequence. Regions are scored as present if the probes (highlighted in Figure 1) were 622

detected by microarray analysis of the isolate. 623

b Isolates 544, 517, 910, 897, 515, and 911 show the same pattern 624

c Isolates 604, 894, 518, 918, 915, and 573 show the same pattern 625

d Isolates 728 and 886 show the same pattern 626

e Isolates 552, 528, 674, 617, 587, 562, 845, 745, 514, 631, 930, 584, 519, 856, 633, 851, 627

752, 625, 550, 521, 621, 667, 600, 824, 934, 822, 563, 889, 812, 732, 733, 553, 548, 890, 628

888, 858, 589, 792, 784, 612, and 649 are positive for all 12 core regions. These regions 629

are identified with the full hybridization data in Figure 1. 630

631

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from

Namea

reg

ion

b

928

710

743

911

515

517

544

910

897

518

604

894

918

915

728

552

573

886

527

649

888

784

612

858

745

528

514

930

584

631

856

519

733

563

550

934

633

548

600

822

890

589

553

812

824

792

889

562

845

732

521

621

674

625

752

851

667

617

587

Classc

pYR1x0001 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0002 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0004 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0005 putative membrane protein

pYR1x0006 phosphoadenosine phosphosulfate reductase domain protein

pYR1x0007 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0008 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0009 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0010 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0011 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0012 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0013 signal peptide peptidase SppA domain protein

pYR1x0014 DSBA-like thioredoxin domain protein

pYR1x0015 putative lipoprotein

pYR1x0016 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0017 putative membrane protein

pYR1x0018 putative membrane protein

pYR1x0019 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0020 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0021 staphylococcal nuclease domain protein

pYR1x0022 DNA-binding protein HU

pYR1x0023 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0024 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0025 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0026 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0027 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0028 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0029 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0030 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0031 putative membrane protein

pYR1x0032 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0033 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0034 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0035 ATPase, AAA family domain protein

pYR1x0036 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0037 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0038 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0039 putative membrane protein

pYR1x0040 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0041 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0042 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0043 putative membrane protein

pYR1x0044 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0045 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0046 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0047 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0048 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0049 DNA methylase

pYR1x0050 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0051 transposase InsA

pYR1x0052 dihydropteroate synthase sul2

pYR1x0053 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0054 putative ParA partition protein

pYR1x0055 putative ParB partition protein

pYR1x0056 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0057 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0058 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0059 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0060 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0061 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0062 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0063 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0064 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0065 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0066 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0067 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0068 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0069 putative lipoprotein

pYR1x0070 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0071 DNA topoisomerase III

pYR1x0072 putative lipoprotein

pYR1x0073 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraI

pYR1x0074 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraD

pYR1x0075 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0076 putative type IV conjugative transfer system coupling factor

pYR1x0077 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0078 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0079 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0080 putative membrane protein

pYR1x0081 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraL

pYR1x0082 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraE

pYR1x0083 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0084 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraB

pYR1x0085 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraV

pYR1x0086 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraA

pYR1x0087 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0088 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0089 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraC

pYR1x0090 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0091 type IV conjugative transfer system signal peptidase

pYR1x0092 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraW

pYR1x0093 cyclic diguanylate phosphodiesterase (EAL) domain protein

pYR1x0094 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraU

pYR1x0095 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraN

pYR1x0096 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0097 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0098 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0099 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0100 ATPase, AAA family

pYR1x0101 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0102 single-strand DNA-binding protein

pYR1x0103 phage recombination protein Bet

pYR1x0104 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0105 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0106 von Willebrand factor type A domain protein

pYR1x0107 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0108 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0109 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0110 transcriptional regulator, ArsR family

pYR1x0111 predicted permease

pYR1x0112 transposase InsB1

pYR1x0113 putative sulfate transport protein CysZ

pYR1x0114 dihydrofolate reductase

pYR1x0118 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0119 [2Fe-2S]-binding domain protein

pYR1x0120 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0121 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0122 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0123 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0124 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0125 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0126 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0127 C-5 cytosine-specific DNA methylase

pYR1x0128 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0129 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0130 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0131 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0132 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0133 putative 5'-nucleotidase

pYR1x0134 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0135 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0136 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0137 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0138 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0139 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0140 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0141 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0142 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0143 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0144 Rhs family protein

pYR1x0145 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0146 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0148 transposase TnpA for transposon Tn5393

pYR1x0147 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0149 resolvase TnpR for transposon Tn5393

pYR1x0150 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0151 transposase InsC for insertion sequence IS903

pYR1x0152 transposase InsD for insertion sequence IS1133

pYR1x0153 transposase InsE1 for insertion sequence IS10R

pYR1x0154 tetracycline resistance protein D

pYR1x0155 tetracycline resistance protein C

pYR1x0156 tetracycline resistance protein A, class B

pYR1x0158 transcriptional regulator, ArsR family

pYR1x0157 tetracycline repressor protein R, class B

pYR1x0159 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0160 sodium/glutamate symporter

pYR1x0162 streptomycin resistance protein A

pYR1x0163 streptomycin resistance protein B

pYR1x0164 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0165 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0166 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0167 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0168 phage integrase

pYR1x0169 putative exonuclease

pYR1x0170 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0171 DNA replication terminus site-binding protein

pYR1x0172 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0173 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0174 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0175 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraF

pYR1x0176 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraH

pYR1x0177 type IV conjugative transfer system protein TraG

pYR1x0178 putative membrane protein

pYR1x0179 Ner-like DNA-binding protein

pYR1x0180 transglycosylase SLT domain protein

pYR1x0181 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0182 conserved hypothetical protein

pYR1x0183 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0184 hypothetical protein

pYR1x0185 conserved hypothetical protein

pIP1202x0044 type IV conjugative transfer system protein

pIP1202x0045 type IV conjugative transfer system protein

pIP1202x0046 type IV conjugative transfer system protein

pIP1202x0047 putative nuclease

pIP1202x0048 fipA

pIP1202x0052 aminoglycoside 3'-phosphotransferase,aphA

pIP1202x0057 conserved hypothetical protein

pIP1202x0058 conserved hypothetical protein

pIP1202x0061 cytosine-specific methyltransferase

pIP1202x0062 type II restriction enzyme

pIP1202x0063 chloramphenicol acetyltransferase

pIP1202x0064 acetyltransferase, GNAT family

pIP1202x0065 putative lipoprotein

pIP1202x0072 phosphoglucosamine mutase

pIP1202x0156 Hg(II)-responsive transcriptional regulator MerR

pIP1202x0158 mercuric transport protein MerT

pIP1202x0159 mercuric transport protein periplasmic component MerP

pIP1202x0160 mercuric resistance protein MerC

pIP1202x0161 mercuric reductase MerA

pIP1202x0162 mercuric resistance transcriptional repressor protein MerD

pIP1202x0163 mercuric resistance protein MerE

pIP1202x0164 EAL domain protein Urf2

pIP1202x0165 transposase TniA for transposition module tn

pIP1202x0169 conserved hypothetical protein

pIP1202x0171 class II aldolase/adducin domain protein

pIP1202x0172 ygbK domain protein

pIP1202x0173 NAD binding domain protein

pIP1202x0174 transcriptional regulator, DeoR family

pIP1202x0175 beta-lactamase blaSHV-1

pIP1202x0176 conserved hypothetical protein

pIP1202x0177 RecF/RecN/SMC domain protein

pIP1202x0178 oligosaccharide:H+ symporter

pIP1202x0181 glutathione dehydrogenase/class III alcohol dehydrogenase

pIP1202x0182 tetracycline resistance protein TetA, class D

pIP1202x0183 tetracycline repressor protein TetR, class D

pIP1202x0192 modulator protein TnpM for transposon Tn21

pIP1202x0195 transposase TnpA for transposon Tn21

pIP1202x0196 Rhs family protein

pIP1202x0197 hypothetical protein

pIP1202x0198 hypothetical protein

P99018ORFx008 esterase

P99018ORFx015 conserved hypothetical protein

P99018ORFx016 alcohol dehydrogenase class III

P99018ORFx023 hypothetical protein

P99018ORFx027 hypothetical protein

P99018ORFx033 hypothetical protein

P99018ORFx035 hypothetical protein

P99018ORFx048 hypothetical protein

P99018ORFx148 transposase

P99018ORFx149 hypothetical protein

P99018ORFx159 hypothetical protein

P99018ORFx172 hypothetical protein

P99018ORFx182 hypothetical protein

pSN254x0028 hypothetical protein

pSN254x0029 hypothetical protein

pSN254x0034 hypothetical protein

pSN254x0035 transposase InsB2 for insertion sequence IS26

pSN254x0036 conserved hypothetical protein

pSN254x0037 resolvase

pSN254x0039 conserved hypothetical protein

pSN254x0040 florfenicol/chloramphenicol resistance protein FloR

pSN254x0041 transcriptional regulator, LysR family protein

pSN254x0042 tetracycline repressor protein TetA, class A

pSN254x0043 tetracycline repressor protein R, class A

pSN254x0044 conserved hypothetical protein

pSN254x0062 hypothetical protein

pSN254x0085 quaternary ammonium compound-resistance protein SugE1

pSN254x0084 outer membrane lipoprotein Blc1

pSN254x0086 beta-lactamase blaCMY-2

pSN254x0088 transposase InsC3 for insertion sequence ISEc9

pSN254x0140 transposase InsD1 for insertion sequence IS4321R

pSN254x0141 transposase TnpA for transposon Tn21

pSN254x0143 integrase IntI1 for transposon Tn21

pSN254x0144 aminoglycoside adenylyltransferase aad

pSN254x0145 aminoglycoside 3-N-acetyltransferase aac

pSN254x0146 10 kDa chaperonin GroS

pSN254x0147 60 kDa chaperonin GroL

pSN254x0148 transposase InsE - ISCR2

pSN254x0149 transposase InsF - ISCR16

pSN254x0150 quaternary ammonium compound-resistance protein

pSN254x0151 dihydropteroate synthase 1 sul

pSN254x0152 conserved hypothetical protein ORF5

pSN254x0153 conserved hypothetical protein

pSN254x0154 transposition protein IstB for insertion

pSN254x0155 transposase IstA for insertion sequence IS1326

pSN254x0156 transposase InsG for insertion sequence IS1353

pSN254x0157 transposition protein TniB

pSN254x0161 EAL domain protein Urf2

pSN254x0162 mercuric resistance protein MerE

pSN254x0163 mercuric resistence transcriptional repressor protein MerD

pSN254x0164 alkylmercury lyase MerB

pSN254x0165 mercuric reductase MerA

pSN254x0166 mercuric transport protein periplasmic component MerP

pSN254x0167 mercuric transport protein MerT

pSN254x0168 Hg(II)-responsive transcriptional regulator MerR

pSN254x0170 hypothetical protein

pSN254x0174 hypothetical protein

pSN254x0175 hypothetical protein

pSN254x0178 hypothetical protein

pSN254x0190 putative membrane protein

P91278ORFx005 esterase

P91278ORFx009 hypothetical protein

P91278ORFx010 hypothetical protein

P91278ORFx014 Dihydrofolate reductase

P91278ORFx015 hypothetical protein

P91278ORFx025 hypothetical protein

on July 1, 2018 by guesthttp://aem

.asm.org/

Dow

nloaded from