aect 2012 intersubjectivity in online discussion: design, facilitation, evaluation
DESCRIPTION
Presentation at 2012 AECT conference in session on IntersubjectivityTRANSCRIPT
11/5/12
1
Intersubjectivity Online: Design, Facilitation, and Evaluation Vanessa Dennen Florida State University [email protected] slideshare.net/vanessadennen meme.coe.fsu.edu/vanessa
Online Discussion Cycle
Design Facilitation Evaluation
11/5/12
2
Elements Contributing to Intersubjectivity
Intersubjectivity
Objectives
Power
Interest
Time
Attention
Design Issues � What is communicated to students about
performance expectations? � How do prompts scaffold performance
expectations? � What should be included in prompts?
� Number of messages? � Content of messages? � Timing of messages? � Interaction between message partners?
11/5/12
3
Intersubjectivity and Design � Course designers (instructors?) set the
design � Students must accept and adopt it � PROBLEM:
� Students execute at the checklist level
Facilitation Issues
Course
Why are you here?
Why are these other
people here?
Discussion
What is required?
What is the outcome?
Exchange What are you
saying? What am I replying?
11/5/12
4
Course Level Facilitation � Need agreement on
� Why students are in the course � What will be learned � How it will be learned
Discussion Level Facilitation � Need agreement on:
� What will be discussed � The outcomes of the discussion � Who may contribute
� Instructor-student agreement � Peer agreement
11/5/12
5
Message Posting vs Discussion � A collection of messages that respond to
an assignment ≠ intersubjectivity � Topically threaded messages ≠
intersubjectivity � Intersubjectivity is reliant on discursive
interchange working toward a goal or goals
Ownership, Complexity, and Different Media � Discussion Boards:
� Instructor as owner � Respond to instructor, respond to peers
� Blogs � Blogger as owner � Encourages essays with responses
� Twitter � Fragmented ownership and responses � Short messages impact complexity of thought
11/5/12
6
Exchange Level Facilitation � Micro-level examination of the discussion � Look at positioning and acceptance or
negotiation of position � Discursive interactions � Performance of expertise
Facilitation Goals � Encourage:
� Responsive discourse � Shared goals � Group identity
� Help in position negotiation � Work toward an outcome
� Perhaps group, perhaps related individual outcomes
11/5/12
7
Evaluation � Were outcomes reached?
� Whose outcomes?
� Sources of data � Archived discussions � Log files � Need something more …
� Focus group? � Interviews?
Closing Thought: An Instructional Cycle
Design
Participation
Facilitation
Assessment of outcomes
Evaluation of Design