advisory redistricting committee

Advisory Redistricting Committee

ADVISORY REDISTRICTING COMMITTEE MEMBERS

DISTRICT 1 – AMY BUCKMASTER DISTRICT 2 – JOSE MANUEL PENA DISTRICT 3 – LOUIS COVEY DISTRICT 4 – RUDY ESPINOZA MURRAY - CHAIR DISTRICT 5 – HYLA LACEFIELD -VICE CHAIR

DISTRICT 6 – MEGAN GARDNER DISTRICT 7 – DANIELA GASPARINI AT-LARGE – RAY BROWN AT-LARGE – RUMIKA CHAUDHRY AT-LARGE – LISA HICKS-DUMANSKE AT-LARGE – ESTHER SELK

DUE TO THE CONTINUING COVID-19 EMERGENCY, MEETINGS WILL BE HELD BY TELECONFERENCE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ASSEMBLY BILL 361 TO PROVIDE THE SAFEST ENVIRONMENT FOR THE PUBLIC, CITY

OFFICIALS AND STAFF WHILE ALLOWING FOR CONTINUED OPERATION OF THE GOVERNMENT AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION. PURSUANT TO THE RALPH M. BROWN ACT, ALL VOTES SHALL BE BY ROLL CALL.

Staff Participating by Teleconference: City Attorney Veronica Ramirez, Assistant City Manager Alex Khojikian, Communications Manager Jennifer Yamaguma, Management Analyst Kimberly Daniel and Assistant City Clerk Yessika Dominguez

LOCATION: Members of the public may access and observe the meeting by joining Zoom: https://redwoodcity.zoom.us/j/98707480568

Members of the public may provide comment by joining the meeting via Zoom: For web, visit the direct link

above, and use the Raise Hand feature to request to speak. For dial-in comments, call *67 (669) 900-6833, enter Meeting ID: 987 0748 0568 and press *9 to request to speak. All public comments are subject to a 3-minute time limit unless otherwise instructed.

Spanish translation is available for this meeting, and can be accessed via the following dial-in conference line: Call (669) 900-6833, enter Meeting ID: 346 830 8566 and enter Passcode: 1017. Contact the City Clerk for additional translation requests.

MEETING AGENDA Wednesday, November 3, 2021

6:00 p.m.

1. Welcome

2. Roll Call

3. Public Comment Written public comment submitted to [email protected] through

October 29, 2021 included as reference (Attachment A)

https://redwoodcity.zoom.us/j/98707480568

https://support.zoom.us/hc/en-us/articles/205566129-Raise-Hand-In-Webinar

mailto:[email protected]

4. Approve October 20, 2021 Meeting Minutes (Attachment B)

5. Receive Presentation by the City’s Redistricting Consultant on Draft Maps Prepared UsingCommunity of Interest (COI) Testimony, Draft District Maps Received From theCommunity and 2020 U.S. Census Data and Provide Committee Feedback (Attachment C)

6. Adjourn. The next Advisory Redistricting Committee meeting is on November 17, 2021at 6 p.m.

ALTERNATE AGENDA FORMATS The City Council will provide materials in appropriate alternative formats to comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act. Please send a written request to Pamela Aguilar, City Clerk, at 1017 Middlefield Road, Redwood City, CA 94063 or e-mail address [email protected] including your name, address, phone number and brief description of the requested materials and preferred alternative format or auxiliary ad or service at least 24 hours before the meeting.


Redwood Shores is my Community Of Interest.

Redwood Shores is a diverse community comprised of all ethnicities, ages, backgrounds, and income levels. The Shores is a master planned community of single-family homes, town homes, condominiums and apartments, along with business, retail and restaurants.

The Shores is east of Hwy 101, separated from Redwood City and located on the bay with lagoon waterways, parks, walking, jogging, biking paths and levees that offer outdoor recreation desired and enjoyed by the entire community. The community is served by the Belmont-Redwood Shores school district. Our library, community center and Marlin Park serve as the main gathering areas for the community.

While the Shores is comprised of dozens of neighborhoods and homeowner associations, all are united under the Redwood Shores Community Association that sponsors community events, keeps the community informed via “The Pilot” publication, and advocates for the community, bringing to the forefront, topical matters of concern, and advising civic and community leaders on relevant matters that the community is passionate about such as the environment, levees, traffic, building development and overall quality of life in the Shores.

The peaceful, quiet and uniqueness of Redwood Shores and its diversity is something that all Shores residents embrace and celebrate. To best serve our unique community interests, Redwood Shores should continue as one district, and not divided or merged with other areas of Redwood City.

Rona Gundrum District 1 Redwood Shores resident, 33 years [email protected]

Attachment A

From: Joseph KuspaTo: GRP-District ElectionsSubject: RedistrictingDate: Sunday, October 10, 2021 5:18:36 PM

Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learnwhy this is important

Please keep Redwood Shores as ONE district and not divided or somehow merged w/ otherareas of Redwood City.

Thank you.

Joe Kuspa



http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification


From: Mary RodriguezTo: GRP-District ElectionsSubject: RedistrictingDate: Friday, October 08, 2021 2:55:33 PM

[Some people who received this message don't often get email from [email protected]. Learn why this isimportant at http://aka.ms/LearnAboutSenderIdentification.]

Hello,

I think Redwood Shores should be kept as one district. We can better address our unique needs. OtherRedwood City residents don’t understand the needs of Redwood Shpres.

Thank You,

Mary RodriguezCork Harbour Resident




RedwoodShoresCommunityAssociation274RedwoodShoresParkway,PMB#603RedwoodShores,CA94065

October25,2021AdvisoryRedistrictingCommittee1017MiddlefieldRoadRedwoodCity,[email protected]

SentViaE-Mail

RE:Redistricting

DearCommitteeMembers,

The Redwood Shores Community Association (“RSCA”) is a volunteer Association representing all ofRedwoodShores. Wearewriting toexpressourcommunity’sdesire thatRedwoodShores (District1)continuestobeoneseparatedistrict.

RedwoodShoresmeetstheFAIRMAPSActandRankedCriteria:- Relativelyequalsizeofthetotalpopulation- Contiguous- Maintainstheintegrityofneighborhoodsandcommunitiesofinterest- Boundbynaturalbarriers,streetsandcityboundaries- Compact- Doesnotfavorordiscriminateagainstanypoliticalparty

RedwoodShores isamasterplannedcommunityof single-familyhomes, townhomes, condominiumsand apartments, along with business, retail and restaurants located on the bay east of Hwy 101,separatedfromRedwoodCity.

Redwood Shores is a diverse community comprised of all ethnicities, ages, backgrounds, and incomelevels.Ourlocationonthebaywithlagoonwaterways,parks,walking,jogging,bikingpathsandleveesofferoutdoorrecreationdesiredandenjoyedbytheentirecommunity.ThecommunityisservedbytheBelmont-RedwoodShoresschooldistrict. Our library,communitycenterandMarlinParkserveasthemaingatheringareasforthecommunity.

WhiletheShoresiscomprisedofdozensofneighborhoodsandhomeownerassociations,allareunitedunder the Redwood Shores Community Association that sponsors community events, keeps thecommunity informed via “The Pilot” publication and electronic sign boards, and advocates for thecommunity, bringing to the forefront, topical matters of concern, and advising civic and communityleadersonrelevantmatters that thecommunity ispassionateaboutsuchas theenvironment, levees,traffic,buildingdevelopmentandoverallqualityoflifeintheShores.

The peaceful, quiet and uniqueness of Redwood Shores and its diversity is something that all Shoresresidents embrace and celebrate. To best serve our unique community interests, Redwood Shoresshouldcontinueasonedistrict,andnotbedividedormergedwithotherareasofRedwoodCity.

Sincerely,RedwoodShoresCommunityAssociation’sBoardofDirectors

Advisory Redistricting Committee (ARC) DRAFT MINUTES – Wednesday, October 20, 2021

ITEM 1 – WELCOME: Chair Espinoza Murray called the meeting to order at 6:00 p.m.

ITEM 2 – ROLL CALL: The following committee members were present:

District 1 – Amy Buckmaster District 2 – Jose Manuel Pena District 3 – Louis Covey District 4 – Rudy Espinoza Murray (Chair) At-Large – Rumika Chaudhry District 5 – Hyla Lacefield (Vice Chair) At-Large – Lisa Hicks-Dumanske District 6 – Megan Gardner At-Large – Esther Selk District 7 – Daniela Gasparini

Absent: At-Large – Ray Brown

STAFF PRESENT: City Attorney Veronica Ramirez, Assistant City Manager Alex

Khojikian, Management Analyst Kimberly Daniel and Assistant City Clerk Yessika Dominguez, and City’s redistricting consultant Sophia Garcia from Redistricting Partners

ITEM 3 – PUBLIC COMMENT: The following members of the public spoke:

Rona Gundrum

Jimmy Hedges

ITEM 4 – APPROVE AUGUST 11, 2021 MEETING MINUTES: Motion and

second, Lacefield and Buckmaster, to approve the August 11, 2021 Meeting Minutes passes 10-0-1 by roll call vote, with Member Brown absent.

Attachment B

ITEM 5, 6 AND 7 – OVERVIEW OF COMMUNITY OF INTEREST (COI) TESTIMONY AND COMMUNITY OUTREACH RECAP; REVIEW OF CURRENT CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS WITH NEW CENSUS 2020 DATA, INCLUDING CITIZEN VOTING AGE POPULATION INFORMATION; DEMONSTRATION OF DISTRICTR MAPPING SOFTWARE TO DRAW CITY COUNCIL DISTRICTS AND PAPER MAP DRAWING TUTORIAL

Sophia Garcia from Redistricting Partners gave a presentation on Communities of Interest (COI) and the DistrictR online mapping tool, COI testimony received during Phase 2 (Communities of Interest) of the redistricting process.

Assistant City Manager Alex Khojikian gave an update on the City’s outreach and engagement efforts.

ITEM 8 – ADJOURNMENT: The Advisory Redistricting Committee (ARC) meeting was

adjourned at 7:34 p.m. The next meeting will be held on Wednesday, November 3, 2021 at 6:00 p.m. via Zoom Teleconference.

Cit

y of

Red

woo

d C

ity

Dra

ft P

lan

A

Attachment C

City of Redwood CityDraft Plan A

A B C D E F G

Population 12,796 12,262 11,875 11,638 11,962 12,151 11,739

Deviation 736 202 -185 -422 -98 91 -321

Deviation % 6.1% 1.7% -1.5% -3.5% -0.8% 0.8% -2.7%

Other 6,083 5,582 2,918 2,873 5,440 8,269 8,159

Other % 47.5% 45.5% 24.6% 24.7% 45.5% 68.1% 69.5%

Latino 995 4,070 7,776 7,750 4,911 2,674 1,995

Latino % 7.8% 33.2% 65.5% 66.6% 41.1% 22.0% 17.0%

Asian 5,547 2,248 978 827 1,351 1,101 1,471

Asian % 43.3% 18.3% 8.2% 7.1% 11.3% 9.1% 12.5%

Black 171 362 203 188 260 107 114

Black % 1.3% 3.0% 1.7% 1.6% 2.2% 0.9% 1.0%

2020 Census

A B C D E F G

Total CVAP 7,710 6,053 6,063 5,281 7,383 9,231 8,315

Other CVAP 3,975 3,695 2,017 1,988 4,706 6,571 6,610

Other CVAP % 51.6% 61.0% 33.3% 37.7% 63.7% 71.2% 79.5%

Latino CVAP 595 1,451 3,201 2,711 1,597 2,035 884

Latino CVAP % 7.7% 24.0% 52.8% 51.3% 21.6% 22.0% 10.6%

Asian CVAP 2,890 701 604 369 850 566 784

Asian CVAP % 37.5% 11.6% 10.0% 7.0% 11.5% 6.1% 9.4%

Black CVAP 250 207 242 213 230 59 37

Black CVAP % 3.2% 3.4% 4.0% 4.0% 3.1% 0.6% 0.4%

Citizen Voting Age Population (CVAP)


District A

Other % Latino % Asian % Black %

2020 Census


Citizen Voting Age Population

Population Deviation Deviation % Other Other % Latino Latino % Asian Asian % Black Black %

12,796 736 6.1% 6,083 47.5% 995 7.8% 5,547 43.3% 171 1.3%

Total CVAP Other CVAP Other CVAP % Latino CVAP Latino CVAP % Asian CVAP Asian CVAP % Black CVAP Black CVAP %

7,710 3,975 51.6% 595 7.7% 2,890 37.5% 250 3.2%


District B


2020 Census




12,262 202 1.7% 5,582 45.5% 4,070 33.2% 2,248 18.3% 362 3.0%


6,053 3,695 61.0% 1,451 24.0% 701 11.6% 207 3.4%


District C


2020 Census




11,875 -185 -1.5% 2,918 24.6% 7,776 65.5% 978 8.2% 203 1.7%


6,063 2,017 33.3% 3,201 52.8% 604 10.0% 242 4.0%


District D


2020 Census




11,638 -422 -3.5% 2,873 24.7% 7,750 66.6% 827 7.1% 188 1.6%


5,281 1,988 37.7% 2,711 51.3% 369 7.0% 213 4.0%


District E


2020 Census




11,962 -98 -0.8% 5,440 45.5% 4,911 41.1% 1,351 11.3% 260 2.2%


7,383 4,706 63.7% 1,597 21.6% 850 11.5% 230 3.1%


District F


2020 Census




12,151 91 0.8% 8,269 68.1% 2,674 22.0% 1,101 9.1% 107 0.9%


9,231 6,571 71.2% 2,035 22.0% 566 6.1% 59 0.6%


District G


2020 Census




11,739 -321 -2.7% 8,159 69.5% 1,995 17.0% 1,471 12.5% 114 1.0%


8,315 6,610 79.5% 884 10.6% 784 9.4% 37 0.4%

Cit

y of

Red

woo

d C

ity

Dra

ft P

lan

B

City of Redwood CityDraft Plan B

A B C D E F G

Population 12,796 11,681 11,875 11,638 12,174 12,549 11,710

Deviation 736 -379 -185 -422 114 489 -350

Deviation % 6.1% -3.1% -1.5% -3.5% 0.9% 4.1% -2.9%

Other 6,083 5,184 2,918 2,873 7,598 8,801 5,867

Other % 47.5% 44.4% 24.6% 24.7% 62.4% 70.1% 50.1%

Latino 995 3,927 7,776 7,750 3,287 2,145 4,291

Latino % 7.8% 33.6% 65.5% 66.6% 27.0% 17.1% 36.6%

Asian 5,547 2,227 978 827 1,150 1,478 1,316

Asian % 43.3% 19.1% 8.2% 7.1% 9.4% 11.8% 11.2%

Black 171 343 203 188 139 125 236

Black % 1.3% 2.9% 1.7% 1.6% 1.1% 1.0% 2.0%

2020 Census

A B C D E F G

Total CVAP 7,710 5,434 6,063 5,281 8,624 9,220 7,704

Other CVAP 3,975 3,137 2,017 1,988 6,071 7,355 5,018

Other CVAP % 51.6% 57.7% 33.3% 37.7% 70.4% 79.8% 65.1%

Latino CVAP 595 1,386 3,201 2,711 1,949 1,045 1,587

Latino CVAP % 7.7% 25.5% 52.8% 51.3% 22.6% 11.3% 20.6%

Asian CVAP 2,890 732 604 369 508 771 890

Asian CVAP % 37.5% 13.5% 10.0% 7.0% 5.9% 8.4% 11.6%

Black CVAP 250 179 242 213 96 49 209

Black CVAP % 3.2% 3.3% 4.0% 4.0% 1.1% 0.5% 2.7%



District A


2020 Census




12,796 736 6.1% 6,083 47.5% 995 7.8% 5,547 43.3% 171 1.3%


7,710 3,975 51.6% 595 7.7% 2,890 37.5% 250 3.2%


District B


2020 Census




11,681 -379 -3.1% 5,184 44.4% 3,927 33.6% 2,227 19.1% 343 2.9%


5,434 3,137 57.7% 1,386 25.5% 732 13.5% 179 3.3%


District C


2020 Census




11,875 -185 -1.5% 2,918 24.6% 7,776 65.5% 978 8.2% 203 1.7%


6,063 2,017 33.3% 3,201 52.8% 604 10.0% 242 4.0%


District D


2020 Census




11,638 -422 -3.5% 2,873 24.7% 7,750 66.6% 827 7.1% 188 1.6%


5,281 1,988 37.7% 2,711 51.3% 369 7.0% 213 4.0%


District E


2020 Census




12,174 114 0.9% 7,598 62.4% 3,287 27.0% 1,150 9.4% 139 1.1%


8,624 6,071 70.4% 1,949 22.6% 508 5.9% 96 1.1%


District F


2020 Census




12,549 489 4.1% 8,801 70.1% 2,145 17.1% 1,478 11.8% 125 1.0%


9,220 7,355 79.8% 1,045 11.3% 771 8.4% 49 0.5%


District G


2020 Census




11,710 -350 -2.9% 5,867 50.1% 4,291 36.6% 1,316 11.2% 236 2.0%


7,704 5,018 65.1% 1,587 20.6% 890 11.6% 209 2.7%

Cit

y of

Red

woo

d C

ity

Dra

ft P

lan

C

City of Redwood CityDraft Plan C

A B C D E F G

Population 12,796 11,646 12,636 11,882 11,675 11,623 12,165

Deviation 736 -414 576 -178 -385 -437 105

Deviation % 6.1% -3.4% 4.8% -1.5% -3.2% -3.6% 0.9%

Other 6,083 5,016 2,603 4,699 7,344 4,986 8,593

Other % 47.5% 43.1% 20.6% 39.5% 62.9% 42.9% 70.6%

Latino 995 4,047 8,989 5,588 3,111 5,519 1,922

Latino % 7.8% 34.8% 71.1% 47.0% 26.6% 47.5% 15.8%

Asian 5,547 2,236 826 1,307 1,110 958 1,539

Asian % 43.3% 19.2% 6.5% 11.0% 9.5% 8.2% 12.7%

Black 171 347 218 288 110 160 111

Black % 1.3% 3.0% 1.7% 2.4% 0.9% 1.4% 0.9%

2020 Census

A B C D E F G

Total CVAP 7,710 5,178 6,314 6,865 8,445 6,808 8,716

Other CVAP 3,975 2,904 1,915 4,154 5,740 4,003 6,870

Other CVAP % 51.6% 56.1% 30.3% 60.5% 68.0% 58.8% 78.8%

Latino CVAP 595 1,396 3,569 1,551 1,978 2,340 1,046

Latino CVAP % 7.7% 27.0% 56.5% 22.6% 23.4% 34.4% 12.0%

Asian CVAP 2,890 689 561 880 640 332 771

Asian CVAP % 37.5% 13.3% 8.9% 12.8% 7.6% 4.9% 8.9%

Black CVAP 250 189 269 280 87 134 29

Black CVAP % 3.2% 3.6% 4.3% 4.1% 1.0% 2.0% 0.3%



District A


2020 Census




12,796 736 6.1% 6,083 47.5% 995 7.8% 5,547 43.3% 171 1.3%


7,710 3,975 51.6% 595 7.7% 2,890 37.5% 250 3.2%


District B


2020 Census




11,646 -414 -3.4% 5,016 43.1% 4,047 34.8% 2,236 19.2% 347 3.0%


5,178 2,904 56.1% 1,396 27.0% 689 13.3% 189 3.6%


District C


2020 Census




12,636 576 4.8% 2,603 20.6% 8,989 71.1% 826 6.5% 218 1.7%


6,314 1,915 30.3% 3,569 56.5% 561 8.9% 269 4.3%


District D


2020 Census




11,882 -178 -1.5% 4,699 39.5% 5,588 47.0% 1,307 11.0% 288 2.4%


6,865 4,154 60.5% 1,551 22.6% 880 12.8% 280 4.1%


District E


2020 Census




11,675 -385 -3.2% 7,344 62.9% 3,111 26.6% 1,110 9.5% 110 0.9%


8,445 5,740 68.0% 1,978 23.4% 640 7.6% 87 1.0%


District F


2020 Census




11,623 -437 -3.6% 4,986 42.9% 5,519 47.5% 958 8.2% 160 1.4%


6,808 4,003 58.8% 2,340 34.4% 332 4.9% 134 2.0%


District G


2020 Census




12,165 105 0.9% 8,593 70.6% 1,922 15.8% 1,539 12.7% 111 0.9%


8,716 6,870 78.8% 1,046 12.0% 771 8.9% 29 0.3%

Redwood City | COI Map Report

Minimize changes to election cycle ID: 69393 Submitted: October 24, 2021

Themes from COI testimony

-Keep Redwood Shores together -Draw district with Friendly Acres, Redwood Village, and split Stambaugh-Heller and portion of downtown. The district is also 50%+ Latino CVAP -Includes Farmhill and Stulsaft park in a single district -Have portions of Woodside Plaza and Palm in a single district -Farmhill, Canyon and Edgewood Park are in a single district -Seaport, Centennial and portions of Downtown are in a single district -Follows neighborhood lines

Preserve core of existing districts ID: 69390 Submitted: October 24, 2021



Current districts balanced ID: 69181 Submitted: October 23, 2021



Equitable distribution ID: 69124 Submitted: October 23, 2021


-Keep Redwood Shores together -Draw district with Friendly Acres, Redwood Village, and split Stambaugh-Heller and portion of downtown. The district is also 50%+ Latino CVAP -Includes Farmhill and Stulsaft park in a single district - Woodside Plaza and Palm in a single district -Farmhill, Canyon and Edgewood Park are in a single district -Seaport, Centennial and portions of Downtown are in a single district - Follows neighborhood lines

Keep_RedwoodShores_One District ID: 69003 Submitted: October 23, 2021

Plan Description from Submitter

District1 – Redwood Shores Redwood Shores, a master-planned community, meets the FAIR MAPS Act and Ranked Criteria.

#redwood_city Francine ID: 68150 Submitted: October 21, 2021


-Most of Redwood Shores is in a single district -Include Farmhill and Stulsaft park in a single district -Portion of Woodside Plaza and Palm are in a district -Farmhill and Canyon are in a district

Redwood Shores ID: 68135 Submitted: October 21, 2021


-Keep Redwood Shores together -Follows neighborhood lines

Intersecting Corridors ID: 67690 Submitted: October 20, 2021


-Keeps most of Redwood Shores in a single district -Draw district with Friendly Acres, Redwood Village, and split Stambaugh-Heller and portion of downtown. The district is also 50%+ Latino CVAP -Includes Farmhill and Stulsaft park in a single district -Have portions of Woodside Plaza and Palm in a district -Farmhill, Canyon and Edgewood Park are in a single district -Seaport, Centennial and portions of Downtown are in a single district - Follows neighborhood lines

Districts by Neighborhoods ID: 67669 Submitted: October 20, 2021


-Keeps Redwood Shores in a single district -Draw district with Friendly Acres, Stambaugh-Heller and portion of downtown. -Includes Farmhill and Stulsaft park in a single district -Have portions of Woodside Plaza and Palm in a single district -Farmhill, Canyon and Edgewood Park are in a single district -Seaport, Centennial and portions of Downtown are in a single district - Follows neighborhood lines

Rebalancing current districts ID: 67517 Submitted: October 20, 2021


-Keeps Redwood Shores in a single district -Draw district with Friendly Acres, Redwood Village, and portions of Stambaugh-Heller and downtown. -Includes Farmhill and Stulsaft park in a single district -Have portions of Woodside Plaza and Palm in a single district -Farmhill, Canyon and Edgewood Park are in a single district -Seaport, Centennial and portions of Downtown are in a single district - Follows neighborhood lines

Greater Neighborhoods ID: 67511 Submitted: October 20, 2021


-Keeps Redwood Shores in a single district -Draw district with Friendly Acres, Redwood Village and portions of Stambaugh-Heller. The district is also 50%+ Latino CVAP -Keep Farm Hill and Stulsaft park in a single district -District with portions of Woodside Plaza and Palm in a district -Farm Hills, Canyon and Edgewood Park are in a single district -Portions of Seaport in a district with portions of Centennial and Downtown - Follows neighborhood lines

Another balanced and compact plan ID: 67009 Submitted: October 19, 2021


-Keeps most of Redwood Shores in a single district -Drew district with Friendly Acres, portions of Stambaugh-Heller and Downtown -Have portions of Woodside Plaza and Palm in a district -Portions of Seaport with Centennial and Downtown

Central Plan 2 ID: 66996 Submitted: October 19, 2021


-Keeps most of Redwood Shores in a single district -Drew district with Friendly Acres, Redwood Village and portions of Stambaugh-Heller. This district is also 50%+ Latino CVAP -Farmhill and Stulsaft Park in a single district -Portions of Woodside Plaza and Palms are in a district -Drew Seaport with Centennial and parts of Downtown - Follows neighborhood lines

Balanced and compact plan ID: 66984 Submitted: October 19, 2021


-Keeps most of Redwood Shores in one district -Drew Friendly Acres, and portions of Stambaugh-Heller and Downtown -Portions of Woodside Plaza and Palm are in a district -Farm Hills and Stulsaft Park are in a single district.



-Drew district with Friendly Acres, and portions of Stambaugh-Heller and Downtown. -Include Farm Hills and Stulsaft park in a single district

Voting Population Balance ID: 65873 Submitted: October 18, 2021


Roosevelt Hills neighborhoods: West Roosevelt + Farm Hill Friendly Acres Village neighborhoods: Friendly Acres, Redwood Village, Stambaugh Heller school attendance zones: Hoover (K-8), Taft (K-5), Kennedy (6-8), Woodside HS (9-12), Sequoia HS (9-12) parks: not much shopping centers: Delucchi's, Middlefield Rd, Downtown main transportation routes: Woodside Rd., Broadway, Bay Rd., Middlefield Rd. freeway access: Woodside Rd., Marsh Rd. borders to: Caltrain, US 101, NFO Redwood Shores They want to be left alone. Woodside Redwood Oaks neighborhoods: Redwood Oaks, Woodside Plaza, Palm school attendance zones: Ford (K-5), Kennedy (6-8), Woodside HS (9-12) parks: only very small ones: Fleishmann, Palm , Selby Lane School, Maddux, Union Cemetery shopping centers: Woodside Plaza, Woodside Rd, El Camino Real main transportation routes: Woodside Rd, El Camino Real freeway access: Woodside Rd. borders to: Woodside Rd, El Camino, Caltrain, Arroyo Ojo Creek

Downtown Centennial neighborhoods: Centennial, Bair Island, Downtown school attendance zones: Clifford (K-8), Hoover (K-8), Sequoia HS (9-12) parks: Mezes, Bair Island shopping centers: along Whipple Ave., Veterans Blvd., Downtown main transportation routes: freeway access: Whipple Ave., Woodside Rd. borders to: Caltrain, US 101, San Carlos Mt. Carmel Canyon Mt. Carmel, Eagle Hill, Canyon, Edgewood school attendance zones: Clifford (K-8), Sequoia HS (9-12) parks: Garrett, Stafford, Edgewood, Dove Beeger shopping centers: Oak Knoll, Sequoia Station, El Camino Real main transportation routes: Edgewood Rd., Alameda de Las Pulgas, Jefferson Ave, El Camino Real freeway access: Edgewood Rd, Whipple Ave, Jefferson/Farm Hill Blvd. borders to: Emerald Hills, San Carlos, Jefferson Ave., Caltrain Palm Red Morton



-Drew district with Friendly Acres, and portions of Stambaugh-Heller and Downtown. -Include Farm Hills and Stulsaft park in a single district

N to S district map ID: 65642 Submitted: October 17, 2021


-Keeps Redwood Shores in a single district -Include Farm Hills and Stulsaft park in a single district -Portions of Woodside Plaza and Palm are in a district -Drew Farm Hills and Canyon together -Drew Seaport with portions of Centennial and Downtown

Neighborhoods and Schools ID: 64786 Submitted: October 15, 2021


Rosevelt Hills neighborhoods: West Roosevelt + Farm Hill school attendance zones: Roy Cloud (K-8), Roosevelt (K-8), Kennedy (6-8), Woodside HS (9-12) parks: Stulsaft, Red Morton, Westwood, Edgewood shopping centers: Roosevelt Center, Jefferson Plaza main transportation routes: Jefferson Ave, Alameda de Las Pulgas Roosevelt Ave, freeway access: Woodside Rd, Jefferson/Farm Hill Blvd. borders to: Emerald Hills, Woodside Hills, Woodside Rd, Jefferson Ave, Arroyo Ojo Creek Friendly Acres Village neighborhoods: Friendly Acres, Redwood Village, Stambaugh Heller school attendance zones: Hoover (K-8), Taft (K-5), Kennedy (6-8), Woodside HS (9-12), Sequoia HS (9-12) parks: not much shopping centers: Delucchi's, Middlefield Rd, Downtown main transportation routes: Woodside Rd., Broadway, Bay Rd., Middlefield Rd. freeway access: Woodside Rd., Marsh Rd. borders to: Caltrain, US 101, NFO Redwood Shores They want to be left alone Woodside Redwood Oaks neighborhoods:

Redwood Oaks, Woodside Plaza, Palm school attendance zones: Ford (K-5), Kennedy (6-8), Woodside HS (9-12) parks: only very small ones: Fleishmann, Palm , Selby Lane School, Maddux, Union Cemetery shopping centers: Woodside Plaza, Woodside Rd, El Camino Real main transportation routes: Woodside Rd, El Camino Real freeway access: Woodside Rd. borders to: Woodside Rd, El Camino, Caltrain, Arroyo Ojo Creek Downtown Centennial neighborhoods: Centennial, Bair Island, Downtown school attendance zones: Clifford (K-8), Hoover (K-8), Sequoia HS (9-12) parks: Mezes, Bair Island shopping centers: along Whipple Ave., Veterans Blvd., Downtown main transportation routes: freeway access: Whipple Ave., Woodside Rd. borders to: Caltrain, US 101, San Carlos Mt Carmel Canyon Mt. Carmel, Eagle Hill, Canyon, Edgewood school attendance zones: Clifford (K-8), Sequoia HS (9-12) parks: Garrett, Stafford, Edgewood, Dove Beeger shopping centers: Oak Knoll, Sequoia Station, El Camino Real main transportation routes: Edgewood Rd., Alameda de Las Pulgas, Jefferson Ave, El Camino Real freeway access: Edgewood Rd, Whipple Ave, Jefferson/Farm Hill Blvd. borders to: Emerald Hills, San Carlos, Jefferson Ave., Caltrain Palm Central neighborhoods: Central, Palm school attendance zones: Roosevelt (K-8), Ford (K-5), Kennedy (6-8), Sequoia HS (9-12), Woodside HS (9-12) parks: Red Morton, Palm, Cemetery shopping centers: El Camino Real main transportation routes: Roosevelt Ave, El Camino Real, Woodside Rd freeway access:

Woodside Rd. borders to: Jefferson Ave, Woodside Rd, Red Morton

Farmhill Neighborhood Assn. ID: 61691 Submitted: October 10, 2021


-Keeps most of Redwood Shores in a single district -District with Friendly Acres and portions of Stambaugh-Heller and Downtown -Farm Hills and Stulsaft Park are in a single district -Portions of Woodside Plaza and Palm are in a district -Portions of Seaport and Centennial and Downtown -Keeps Neighborhoods together

Farmhill Neighborhood Assn ID: 61669 Submitted: October 10, 2021


-Keeps most of Redwood Shores in a single district -Drew Friendly Acres with portions of Stambaugh-Heller and Downtown -Include Farm Hills and Stulsaft Park in a single district Portions of Woodside Plaza and Palm are in a district -Drew Seaport with Centennial and portions of Downtown -Keeps Neighborhoods together

7 Districts ID: 61370 Submitted: October 10, 2021


-Keeps most of Redwood Shores in a single district -Farm Hill and Stulsaft Park in a single district -Portions of Woodside Plaza and Palm are in a single district -Keeps neighborhoods together

District 7 ID: 61368 Submitted: October 9, 2021


-Farm Hill and Stulsaft Park in a single district

Farm Hills ID: 61194 Submitted: October 8, 2021


COI submitted as district map Population: 5,034

Fernside Neighborhood ID: 60032 Submitted: October 6, 2021


COI submitted as district map

RCSD-Zones ID: 60020 Submitted: October 7, 2021


Blue: Neighborhood School Attendance Area Yellow: Roy Cloud Area Teal: Clifford Area Green: Roosevelt Area Pink: Henry Ford Purple: Hoover Area Light Blue: Taft Area

Jimmy Hedges Suggestion 2 ID: 58517 Submitted: October 4, 2021


Population: 12,312 Deviation: 2.09%

District 3 Elections ID: 45142 Submitted: September 10, 2021


Community 1: Dense community housing, Senior housing, low-income housing, Middle-Class homeownership, condo ownership, high immigrant population, single households, housing for mentally ill, housing for developmentally disabled, supportive social services, Wings (Autism) School K-12, Christian K-8, Hoover Middle School (public), Hoover Pediatric Clinic, Taft Elementary School, Family Centers, Boys & Girls Club, PAL program, Summit Preparatory Charter High School, Satelite Stanford Clinics and supportive social services programs. A community with new three major projects supporting modern housing units with retail space on the ground floor. Prior projects also included the Franklin Project.

ID: 38681 Submitted: August 24, 2021


Edgewood Park: Single family homes with larger lots in the neighborhood

Additional Community of Interest Testimony:

- Keep Redwood Shores in a single district

- Fernside should not be a dividing line, Alameda should be a boundary between communities

- Stulsaft Park and Farm Hill should be in the same district

- Keep Stambaugh/Heller neighborhood together. Keep Jardin de ninos in a single district.

- Keep the three neighborhoods around Red Morton Park together: Roosevelt, Central and

EagleHill

- Consider the police beat when drawing district lines

- Look at the area of Palm and Woodside Plaza Neighborhoods. Specifically look at Popular

Aveunue. Ballota road to El Camino. Woodside to Roseville avenue. Sequoia YMCA and

woodside plaza

- Look at police beat information. Consider bus routes and parks.

- Keep Farmhill together

- Homeless community, mobile support mental health crisis team,

- Casias house, catholic worker house,

- Youth housing for foster care

- Mt Carmel/Eagle Hill/Edgewood Park Neighborhoods.

o Care about Downtown because it is walkable and has shops

o Care about Centennial because it is the way to get to the 101 and other Neighborhoods.

However access to the 101 is an issue.

o Love walkability and access to lots of parks

Themes

Keep Redwood Shores together

Draw district with Friendly acres, redwood village, split Stambaugh hellter and portions of

downtown. The district is also 50%+ cvap

Include Farmhill and Stulsaft park in a single district

Have Woodside Plaza and Palm Neighborhoods in a district

Have Farmhill Canyon, and Edgewood Park in a single district

Draw Seaport with Centennial and parts of Downtown

Follows neighborhoods lines

advisory redistricting committee

Documents