advancements in cement concrete research and testing
TRANSCRIPT
Advancements in Cement Concrete
Research and Testing
John Grieco –Director of R&M
June 19,2019
A need arises to incorporate
Different types of methods and technologies
for the evaluation of quality characteristics and mix
properties of concrete used for MassDOT construction
projects
Summary
2
0 20 40 60 80 100
Surface Resistivity (kΩ-cm)
Cement Concrete Cylinder Set
45 psi
SAM
Number
Ring Shrinkage
Super Air Meter / Freeze and Thaw
Surface Resistivity test
Maturity Meter
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
What has R&M been Focused on
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange 3
Freeze Thaw Damage
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange 4
• Takes on average 100 days
• Cannot be reproduced in the field
Freeze Thaw Testing
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange 5
Reference: FHWA
Super Air Meter
❑ Air Meter Type B
➢ Can only measure
total air content
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange 6
❑ Super Air Meter
➢ Provides air content
➢ SAM number
Super Air Meter / Freeze Thaw
7
❑ Study by Dr. Tyler Ley, Oklahoma State University
Fre
eze
Th
aw
Dura
bili
ty F
acto
r
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
Continuing the Research
82019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
9
Description of the methodologies to determine the permeability of concrete
Surface Resistivity Test
AASHTO T 358
❖ Electrical Resistivity
❖ Created in the 2000s
❖ Non-destructive
❖ Concrete Age: 28 days
❖ Aprox. 2 minutes per set
❖ Low cost
Rapid Chloride Penetrability Test
AASHTO T 277
❖ Cumulative Current Passing
❖ Created in the 1970s
❖ Destructive
❖ Concrete Age: 90 days
❖ Aprox. 2 work days per set
❖ High cost
Surface Resistivity Test
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
60
70
80
90
100
0 30 60 90 120 150 180 210 240 270 300 330 360
Cum
mula
tive C
urr
ent
Passin
g
Time (minutes)
Cummulative Current Passing
Charge (Trapezoidal Area) = 1870 Coulomb 28.9 28.3 26.4 30.829 28.3 26.4 30.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
0° 90° 180° 270°
Surf
ace R
esis
tivity (
kΩ
-cm
)
Angle (°)
Surface Resistivity Test Results
Average SR = 28.6 kΩ-cm
10
Description of the methodologies to determine the permeability of concrete
Surface Resistivity Test
Chloride Permeability Surface Resistivity (kΩ-cm) Charge Passed (C)
100 by 200 mm (4 by 8 in.)
High < 12 > 4000
Moderate 12-21 2000-4000
Low 21-37 1000-2000
Very Low 37-254 100-1000
Negligible > 254 < 100
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Surface Resistivity (kΩ-cm)
28-day Concrete Cylinder Sets Surface Resistivity ResultsSummer 2018
Cement Concrete Cylinder Set
High Moderate Low Very Low
Surface Resistivity Test
11
Chloride Permeability Surface Resistivity Test
100 by 200 mm (4 by 8 in.)
High < 12
Moderate 12-21
Low 21-37
Very Low 37-254
Negligible > 254
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
4%
21%
51%
24%
Overall 28-day Concrete Cylinder Sets Surface Resistivity Results Summer 2018
High Moderate Low Very LowPermeability
Surface Resistivity Test
122019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
While mixes are showing low permeability, some mixes have excess of paste content
36%
64%
SRT 28 Day Samples Concrete Mixes
Surface Resistivity Test
132019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
7%
47%
46%
SRT Results for 28 Day HP Mixes
Moderate Low Very Low
Other Mixes
HP Mix
y = 8458.4x-0.752
R² = 0.9184
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000
SR
T (
kΩ
-cm
)
RCPT Charge (Coulomb)
Surface Resistivity Test compared to Rapid Chloride Permeability Test
Surface Resistivity Test
14
Why is the Surface Resistivity Test an alternative to the Rapid
Chloride Penetrability Test?
Reliable
Fast Paced
Non-Destructive
Reference: Giatec Scientific Inc.
Cost Effective
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
Surface Resistivity Test
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange 15
y = 0.4105x + 5.1117R² = 0.3103
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Surf
ace R
esis
tivity
(kΩ
-cm
)
Concrete Age (days)
“Conventional” MassDOT Construction Mixes SRT Evaluation for a Single Industry
y = 0.8273x + 7.8497R² = 0.8858
0.00
10.00
20.00
30.00
40.00
50.00
60.00
70.00
80.00
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Surf
ace R
esis
tivity (
kΩ
-cm
)
Concrete Age (days)
“HP” MassDOT Construction Mixes SRT Evaluation for a Single Industry
How consistent are the SRT results when evaluating Concrete Mixes by Industry?
Hig
h
Mo
de
rate
Low
Ve
ry L
ow
Hig
h
Mo
de
rate
Lo
w
Ve
ry L
ow
How can we lower permeability (increase durability)?
Surface Resistivity Test (SRT)
16
❑ Lower water/cement ratio
❑ Use Supplementary Cementitious
Materials (SCMs)
❑ Control paste volume to minimize
cracking
❑ Optimize the gradation of the coarse
and fine aggregate (Tarantula Curve)
❑ Perform good curing practices Reference: FHWA
Reference: The Concrete Countertop Institute
Reference: The Portland Cement Association
Reference: The Constructor
Reference: Putzmeister – Best Support Underground
05
10152025
Perc
ent
Reta
ined
Sieve Size
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
Maturity Meters
17
❑ Time Temperature Factor (TTF)
❑ Mixture specific relationship
➢ Thermal history
➢ Strength
❑ ASTM C1074
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
Maturity Meters
182019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
Maturity Meters
19
Co
mp
ressiv
e S
tre
ng
th (
psi)
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
Maturity Meters
202019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
Questions?
212019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange
The State’s Reptile Problem
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange 22
SRT Compared to RCPT
23
y = 8458.4x-0.752
R² = 0.9184
0
50
100
150
200
250
0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000 4500
SR
T (
kΩ
-cm
)
RCPT Charge (Coulomb)
56-day Surface Resistivity Test compared to Rapid Chloride Permeability TestNegligible
Very Low
Low
Moderate
High
2019 Innovation & Mobility Exchange