advanced process control in exxonmobil chemical company: successes and challenges · 2015. 8....

12
2010 AIChE Annual Meeting Salt Lake City, UT November 7-12, 2010 Advanced Process Control in ExxonMobil Chemical Company: Successes and Challenges Tyler A. Soderstrom PhD. Yang Zhang PhD. John Hedengren PhD. Session 10B01: In Honor of Tom Edgar’s 65 Birthday II

Upload: others

Post on 08-Feb-2021

4 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 2010 AIChE Annual MeetingSalt Lake City, UTNovember 7-12, 2010

    Advanced Process Control in ExxonMobil Chemical Company: Successes and Challenges

    Tyler A. Soderstrom PhD.

    Yang Zhang PhD.

    John Hedengren PhD.

    Session 10B01: In Honor of Tom Edgar’s 65 Birthday II

  • 222010 AIChE Annual Meeting

    November 8, 2010, Salt Lake City, UT

    Outline

    • Process Industries Advanced Control Toolbox

    • ExxonMobil Chemical’s Advanced Control Experience

    • Engineering Specialists: Process Control

    • Advanced Control Improvement Needs

    • Tom Edgar’s Impact

    • Summary & Conclusions

  • 332010 AIChE Annual Meeting

    November 8, 2010, Salt Lake City, UT

    Process Industries Advanced Control Toolbox

    Closed Loop Multi-period economic

    Closed Loop economic

    Multi-variable constraint

    Base Regulatory

    Primary Function

    Process Characteristic:

    T P F A

    Continuous Cyclic Semi- Continuous

    Technology MaturityModel Rigor

    Technology Maturity

    Model Rigor

    Sequentiallogic-based, discrete

    PIDsingle input-single output control, multilevel

    cascade, surge margin

    MPRTOMulti-Period Real Time Optimization

    Approximate nonlinear economicoptimization over a time horizon

    RTOReal Time Optimization

    Provides economically optimal targets to LMPC

    LMPCLinear Model Predictive Control

    stabilizes plant, push linearity to constraints

    DynOptDynamic Optimization

    provides nonlinear economic optimization over a time horizon

    NMPCNonlinear Model Predictive Control

    provides combined nonlinear economic optimization and control

  • 442010 AIChE Annual Meeting

    November 8, 2010, Salt Lake City, UT

    Linear Model Predictive Control (LMPC)

    • LMPC is the most widely used advanced control technology• Medium Size application routinely delivers significant energy savings as

    well as additional production

    • Example: Butadiene Recovery Unit, Baton Rouge Chemical Plant• 40 Manipulated Inputs, 50 Controlled Variables

    • Reduced steam consumption 12MBTU/hr ($800k/yr)

    • Example: “Typical” Ethylene Plant• 77 Manipulated Inputs,

    189 Controlled Variables

    • 109 Additional Feed Forward Inputs

    • Energy Reduction / Feed Increase on similar scale

    Stabilize Optimize

  • 552010 AIChE Annual Meeting

    November 8, 2010, Salt Lake City, UT

    Real Time Optimization (RTO) Long time-scale

    Disturbances

    Short time-scale Disturbances

    Plant

    R T OEconomic optimization

    MPC1 MPC2 MPC3

    Dynamic move calculation

    Long time-scale Disturbances

    Short time-scale Disturbances

    Plant

    R T OEconomic optimization

    MPC1 MPC2 MPC3MPC1 MPC2MPC2 MPC3MPC3

    Dynamic move calculation

    • Optimize the plant automatically on hourly basis by setting the underlying MPC setpoint

    • Utilize real time price / cost information and plant constraints

    • Cover all key unit operations in the plant

    • Utilize rigorous thermodynamics and reaction kinetics to represent plant steady-state behavior

    • Plant wide scope provides substantial benefits

    F1

    F2

    F3

    F4

    F5

    F6

    F7

    F8

    RecycleFeeds

    Feed-1

    Feed-k

    PF/QWT/DS

    PGC Chilling Train

    DC1

    DC2

    DC3

    DC4

    C2S

    C3S

    ERC/PRC

    TAR

    SCGO

    C2=

    C3=

    DC5

    DBZ

    STAB

    RRT

    MOGAS

    BHC

    FG

  • 662010 AIChE Annual Meeting

    November 8, 2010, Salt Lake City, UT

    Nonlinear Model Predictive Control

    • Most ExxonMobil Chemical Company applications are first-principles based with some empirical elements

    • Largest penetration of technology in polymers area

    • Consistent control of properties through grade transitions is significant benefit of applications

    • Modeling and parameter estimation require significant effort

    • Little (if any) plant testing required0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900 1000

    0

    0.002

    0.004

    0.006

    0.008

    0.01

    0.012

    0.014

    0.016

    0.018

    0.02

    Transition Amount (Klb)

    Pro

    babi

    lity

    NLC TransitionOperator Transition

    NLC TransitionMean: 256.4 StDev: 21.9

    Operator TransitionMean: 342.8 StDev: 142.6

    Process DAE CV MV FFLDPE-1 21 2 2 3

    LLDPE 42 8 5 7

    PP-1 128 4 4 22

    LDPE-2 21 2 2 16

    PP-2 2300 6 3 31

    Process DAE CV MV FFLDPE-1 21 2 2 3

    LLDPE 42 8 5 7

    PP-1 128 4 4 22

    LDPE-2 21 2 2 16

    PP-2 2300 6 3 31

  • 772010 AIChE Annual Meeting

    November 8, 2010, Salt Lake City, UT

    Engineering Specialists: Process Control

    • Relatively small central group

    • Maintain expertise in supported technologies

    • Support site projects and initiatives

    • Provide higher level support for applications worldwide• Sites maintain significant expertise in supported technologies

    • Central group facilitates application updates, troubleshoots modeling and technology issues

    • Keep up to date with “State of the Art Technology”• Collaboration with academic researchers to deliver proof of concept

    applications

    • Work with vendors to drive technology improvements to address issues discovered at manufacturing sites

  • 882010 AIChE Annual Meeting

    November 8, 2010, Salt Lake City, UT

    Importance of Industrial Participation

    • Actively contribute to professional societies

    • Actively participate in joint academic / industry consortia

    • Maintain a fresh perspective• Seminars from visiting professors

    • Support graduate student internships

    • Actively participate in vendor user groups

    • Collaborate with colleagues internally

  • 992010 AIChE Annual Meeting

    November 8, 2010, Salt Lake City, UT

    Advanced Control Improvement Needs

    • Linear MPC• Better control infrastructure design

    • Model consistency and closer integration to RTO

    • Identification tools that systematically enforce relationships between variables

    • Real Time Optimization• Better NLP & MINLP solvers and parallel computing to handle large scale, mix-

    integer, and complementarity problem

    • Better understanding of distributed optimization & control

    • Nonlinear MPC• Improved state / disturbance estimation methods

    • Parameter estimation

    • Improved integration of first principals and empirical models

    • Evolution to dynamic optimization

  • 10102010 AIChE Annual Meeting

    November 8, 2010, Salt Lake City, UT

    Tom Edgar’s Impact

    • Education• Undergraduate – embraced new technology for course organization,

    teaching concepts, and working problems• Graduate – direct research of and maintain funding for a substantial

    research group

    • ExxonMobil has directly benefited from the quality of graduates produced

    • Research• More than 250 refereed journal articles and significantly more conference

    publications

    • Industrial Collaboration

    • Making students available for internships and to work directly on problems of interest to industry

  • 11112010 AIChE Annual Meeting

    November 8, 2010, Salt Lake City, UT

    Summary & Conclusions

    • Advanced control has been extremely successful applied to industrial problems.

    • Advanced control is not a “solved problem”, many research challenges still exist.

    • Ongoing academic and industrial collaboration is needed.

    • Maintaining capability to sustain applications is an ever-present challenge.

    • Educators such as Tom Edgar are key to supplying the next generation of engineers with understanding of the technology and its capability.

  • 12122010 AIChE Annual Meeting

    November 8, 2010, Salt Lake City, UT

    ©2010 ExxonMobil. To the extent the user is entitled to disclose and distribute this document, the user may forward, distribute, and/or photocopy this copyrighted document only if unaltered and complete, including all of its headers, footers, disclaimers, and other information. You may not copy this document to a Web site. ExxonMobil does not guarantee the typical (or other) values. Analysis may be performed on representative samples and not the actual product shipped. The information in this document relates only to the named product or materials when not in combination with any other product or materials. We based the information on data believed to be reliable on the date compiled, but we do not represent, warrant, or otherwise guarantee, expressly or impliedly, the merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, suitability, accuracy, reliability, or completeness of this information or the products, materials, or processes described. The user is solely responsible for all determinations regarding any use of material or product and any process in its territories of interest. We expressly disclaim liability for any loss, damage, or injury directly or indirectly suffered or incurred as a result of or related to anyone using or relying on any of the information in this document. There is no endorsement of any product or process, and we expressly disclaim any contrary implication. The terms, “we”, “our”, "ExxonMobil Chemical", or "ExxonMobil" are used for convenience, and may include any one or more of ExxonMobil Chemical Company, Exxon Mobil Corporation, or any affiliates they directly or indirectly steward. ExxonMobil, the ExxonMobil Logo, the Interlocking "X” Device, and all other product names used herein are trademarks of ExxonMobil unless indicated otherwise.

    The TWCCC logo is a trademark of the Texas-Wisconsin-California Control Consortium and is used with permission