advanced issues in labeling and promotion
DESCRIPTION
Advanced Issues in Labeling and Promotion. presented by Bradley Merrill Thompson Epstein Becker & Green, P.C. August 7, 2007. Topics. Part OneRegulatory Requirements Part TwoOff-Label Promotion Part ThreeMarketing in a Regulated Environment Part FourCase Studies. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Advanced Issues inLabeling and Promotion
presented by
Bradley Merrill Thompson Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
August 7, 2007
Topics
Part One Regulatory Requirements
Part Two Off-Label Promotion
Part Three Marketing in a Regulated Environment
Part Four Case Studies
Regulatory RequirementsTopics Definitions Fundamental prohibitions
FDAFTCLanham ActStates
Investigational device rules Risks in interactions with physicians
Definitions
“Label" is a:
display of written, printed, or graphic matter upon the immediate container of any article....
“Labeling" is:
all labels and other written, printed, or graphic matter (1) upon any article or any of its containers or wrappers, or (2) accompanying such article.
Definitions
“Accompanying": Is interpreted liberally to mean more than physical
association with the product Extends to posters, tags, pamphlets, circulars,
booklets, brochures, instruction books, direction sheets, fillers, etc., depending how they are used
Includes labeling that is brought together with the device after shipment or delivery for shipment in interstate commerce.
But what of an oral sales pitch?
Definitions
Advertising
Not defined in the FFDCA FDA likes to treat advertising as labeling
According to an appellate court decision: "Most, if not all advertising, is labeling.… Congress did not, and we cannot, exclude from the definition printed matter which constitutes advertising.”
But consider radio and TV ads Where do magazine ads fit
FTC has jurisdiction over device advertising other than for restricted devices
Fundamental Prohibition
The term misbranded means: “False or misleading in any particular.”
– False generally is understood to mean a statement that in any material respect is untrue.
– Misleading is less clear
Twin goals of—– Safety and effectiveness– Preventing economic fraud
Fundamental Prohibition
Examples of false labeling include: Incorrect, inadequate or incomplete identification
Unsubstantiated claims of therapeutic value
Substitution of parts or material
Inaccuracies concerning condition, state, treatment, size, shape or style
Fundamental Prohibition
Examples of misleading labeling include:
Ambiguity, half-truths, and trade puffery
Expressions of opinion or subjective statements
Failure to reveal material facts, consequences
that may result from use, or the existence of
difference of opinion
Fundamental Prohibition Examples of other objectionable labeling practices include
Deceptive pictorial matter Misleading testimonials Misleading list of parts or components Use of brand or trade names instead of
"established names"
What Else is Misbranded? FDA specifically requires certain information,
prominently displayed (unless exempt): Established name of the product Name and place of business of the
manufacturer, packer, or distributor Net quantity of contents Adequate directions for use and
adequate warnings
Exemptions from Adequate Directions for Use
Prescription devices Commonly-known directions IVDs Products intended for further processing Teaching, law enforcement and research
FTC Regulation of Advertising
FTC has jurisdiction over advertising for a non-restricted device
FTC applies three requirements Adequate substantiation No deception, from the standpoint of the
reasonable consumer Fairness
Agency influenced by lawyers who focus on consumers and how they are affected
Lanham Act Action against a competitor in federal court Liability arises from deceptive statements about
either the competitor’s or the company’s own product alleged to harm the other party, including: False or misleading claims Unsubstantiated comparative claims Overstatements of efficacy Minimization of risks
Damages & injunctive relief are available
State Regulation of Advertising
State Food Drug & Cosmetic Acts
State consumer protection laws
Enforcement by state attorneys general
Consumer class actions
Investigational Device Labeling Rules Promotion and commercialization of devices subject to
an IDE is prohibited Disclosure of commercial price Taking or being prepared to take orders Prolonging the investigation
Price charged may not be greater than necessary to recover costs of manufacture, research, development and handling FDA may seek justification Medicare reimbursement special rules
Investigational Device Labeling Rules Sponsors may publicize the availability of the device for
the purpose of obtaining clinical investigators Directed at appropriate audience (publication in scientific
publications only, mailings only to qualified professionals
Expressly stating purpose to obtain investigators
Limiting disclosure to the proposed use of the device, sponsor contact information, how to apply to be an investigator & obtain the device, and responsibilities of investigators
Prominently displaying the investigational device caution
Avoiding claims or comparisons with other devices
Avoiding volume discounts
Investigational Device Labeling Rules
Sponsors may publicize the availability of the device for the purpose of recruiting study subjects Only IRB-approved advertisements Neither coercive or containing express or implied safety or
efficacy claims Clearly indicating the investigational nature of the device Including:
– Investigator/institution name and location– Condition/intended use under study– Summary entry criteria– Benefits of participation – Time or other commitment required of subjects– Contact information for additional information
Risks in Interactions with PhysiciansApplicable law
Federal Anti-kickback statute Fraud and Abuse provisions of the Social
Security Act (Medicare/Medicaid statute) Federal False Claims Act State Anti-kickback statutes State False Claims Acts State statutes requiring disclosure of gifts to
prescribers
Risks in Interactions with Physicians
Basic risk areas Federal law prohibits companies from giving anything of
value to a health care provider if any purpose of the remuneration is to induce referral of the company’s product
Extending business courtesies common in other industries (e.g. meals, gifts, entertainment) puts drug and device companies at risk for substantial enforcement liability
OIG has established guidance, and AdvaMed and PhRMA have established guidelines for interactions with health care providers
Risks in Interactions with PhysiciansGovernment enforcement risks arise in the
context of: Business courtesies
– Ensure sales personnel follow applicable guidance with respect to gifts, meals and entertainment
Consulting arrangements– Consulting arrangements must be for necessary services
pursuant to written agreements in compliance with regulatory requirements
Research grants– Grants should be administered outside marketing function,
based on objective criteria Educational activities & meetings
– Sponsored meetings must take place in locations conducive to educational activities, without providing entertainment and with only modest meals and accommodations
Topics
Part One Regulatory Requirements
Part Two Off-Label Promotion
Part Three Marketing in a Regulated Environment
Part Four Case Studies
Off-Label Promotion Off-Label Use Rules
Basic Intended Use Framework Evolution of the Legal Landscape Promotion Dos & Don’ts
First Amendment Issues
Basic Intended Use Framework
Under 21 CFR 801.4, the words “intended uses” … refer to
the objective intent of the persons legally responsible for the labeling of devices. The intent is determined by such persons' expressions or may be shown by the circumstances surrounding the distribution of the article. This objective intent may, for example, be shown by labeling claims, advertising matter, or oral or written statements by such persons or their representatives. It may be shown by the circumstances that the article is, with the knowledge of such persons or their representatives, offered and used for a purpose for which it is neither labeled nor advertised. …
Off-Label Use Rules: Basic Framework
The uses promoted are “intended uses” under 21 CFR 801.4 If an intended use is for other than the
approved indication, the lack of approval and inadequate labeling make device “adulterated” and “misbranded”
If promoted off-label, a device may be deemed “misbranded” or “adulterated”
Evolution of the Legal Landscape
Where FDA was:
Strict regulation of off-label promotion FDA Guidances
Guidance on Dissemination of Reprints and Reference Texts (1996)
Guidance on Industry Supported Scientific and Educational Activities (1997)
Evolution of the Legal Landscape
Then FDAMA Section 401 (1997) Sets forth process for disseminating off-
label information Requires disclosure statements & labeling Requires later filing for approval of any
unapproved uses in the materials Sets forth audience restrictions Limited to dissemination of certain reference
journals Now codified in regulations (Part 99)
Evolution of the Legal Landscape
The Next Change FDA’s authority to regulate off-label promotion has
been limited by the courts
► Washington Legal Foundation
► Western States Medical Center
► More on those later
Result: FDA cannot infringe on the right of medical device companies to promote their products – on-label or off-label – if other, less restrictive measures can achieve FDA's goals
Evolution of the Legal Landscape
What the Law is NOW FDCA sections on misbranding are still
in effect
FDAMA 401 provisions on dissemination of off-label materials and regulations are still in effect
CME guidance is still in effect
FDA cannot infringe on promotion of products if it has other options
Promotion Dos & Don’ts
Do: Promote products for cleared indications Describe product features Tell customers generally that the company
continues to invest in future innovation Respond to unsolicited, specific questions
customers may have on specific products under development, and international products
Promotion Dos & Don’tsDon’t: Encourage off-label questions, or assume a question
relates to an off-label use Make any statements about clinical performance related
to an off-label use unless you are merely providing data for the doctor to assess
Forget to disclose the FDA status of such unapproved uses
Provide any instructions for use for an off-label use, unless merely referring the doctor to a published IFU, for example, in Europe.
Answer a question without clarifying any misleading aspects, such as “Which is the most common dose?” (Common for what? Each dose fits a different use.)
First Amendment Issues
First Amendment
Washington Legal Foundation WLF brought action challenging 1996/1997
Guidances (and later, FDAMA) as unconstitutional under the First Amendment
WLF won at trial On appeal, when FDA asserted they were not
mandatory, but created only safe harbors, the court held the matter was not ripe for determination—a technicality
First AmendmentWashington Legal Foundation Trial court suggested restrictions of its own, which many
manufacturers have adopted. Articles from bona fide peer-reviewed journals or text books
published by a bona fide independent publisher
Product must be cleared or approved for at least one indication
False and misleading materials still open to FDA enforcement
Must disclose off-label use
Must disclose any relationship between the company and product or authors
First Amendment
Impact of the Litigation
FDA cannot infringe on the right of medical device companies to promote their products if other, less restrictive measures can achieve FDA's objectives, such as:
Disclaimers and warning labels
Disclosures
Limitations on non-speech related activity
Narrowing of speech restrictions FDA is reassessing its own authority On May 16, 2002, FDA requested comments on its authority to
regulate communications -- more than 730 comments received
Topics
Part One Regulatory Requirements
Part Two Off-Label Promotion
Part Three Marketing in a Regulated Environment
Part Four Case Studies
Marketing in a Regulated Environment
General Risk Areas1. Pre-approval phases
2. Unsolicited requests
3. Contracts for future generations
4. Peer reviewed articles
5. Press Releases
6. Trade shows
7. Meetings
Trends in Enforcement Good Promotional Practices
Development Phases
A blend of both phase 2 and 4.Cleared and investigational
5
A whole slew of restrictions apply, including limits on off-label promotion, truth in labeling, adequate directions for use, and a number of affirmative requirements related to name, quantity, etc...
Cleared or approved
4
According to FDA CPG section 300.600:“Although a firm may advertise or display a device that is the subject of a pending 510(k)--in the hope that FDA will conclude that the device is substantially equivalent to a pre-amendments device--a firm may not take orders, or be prepared to take orders, that might result in contracts of sale for the device unless limited to research or investigational use.”
510(k) pending3
IDE regulation places explicit restrictions. For example, no promotion is allowed beyond what is necessary for its use in investigations (e.g. recruiting subjects). Here, no clinical performance claims are permitted.
Investigational (Human use)
2
Arguably none on promotion until introduced into interstate commerce. See CPG 300.600. Remember design control requirements that will apply to labeling. And remember customers and FDA will remember what is said.
Early Development
1
Requirements Related to PromotionRegulatory Category
Phase
Basic Rules For Pre-approval Promotion
1. Thou Shall Not Promote Beyond the Approved Label
Whatever the company says now about its upcoming
product will create an impression in the minds of the
customers who may ultimately be asked to purchase
that product.
If the company describes uses that do not ultimately get
approved, the company will be creating an off-label
promotion situation once the product is introduced into
commercial distribution.
Basic Rules For Pre-approval Promotion
2. Thou Shall Tell the Truth in Promotional Materials Both FDA and FTC would have difficulty proceeding
against the company for statements made in advance of any product being placed in commercial distribution. (But other laws may still be relevant.)
However, once the opportunity to acquire the product exists, any prior statements made would be evaluated for their truthfulness. Being truthful means, among other things, the statements made are adequately supported by the appropriate evidence (a reasonable basis) at the time they are made.
Issues by Development Phase
PhaseRegulatory Category
Special settings and issues
1Development 1. Investor communications about research
2Investigational (Human use)
1. Trade shows2. Investor communications about clinical trials3. Medical meeting discussions of clinical trials4. Peer reviewed articles about marketed devices
3510(k)
pending
1. Trade shows2. Investor communications about clinical trials3. Medical meeting discussions of clinical trials4. Peer reviewed articles about marketed devices
4Cleared or approved
1. Contracts for future generations2. Investor communications about clinical trials3. Medical meeting discussions of clinical trials4. Peer reviewed articles about marketed devices
5Cleared and
investigational
1. Contracts for future generations2. Investor communications about clinical trials3. Medical meeting discussions of clinical trials4. Peer reviewed articles about marketed devices
2. Unsolicited Requests When may off-label information be provided?
In response to an unsolicited request of a health care provider
Best Practices: Unsolicited Requests Make sure unsolicited Keep the discussion objective, non-promotional in
nature, and fairly balanced
Confine responses to the specific question asked, narrowing broad questions before responding
Clearly disclose that the device has not been cleared or approved for the discussed use
Document all responses to unsolicited requests
3. Contracts for Future GenerationsSome Provisions Marketers May Want:
Option to purchase at unspecified price Option to purchase as specified price Commitment to provide by certain date Commitment as to features or performance of next
generation Commitment to notify when available Commitment to upgrade as part of the contract price Lease agreement that includes any future generations
over the course of the lease Clause subject to obtaining regulatory
approval/clearance
3. Contracts for Future Generations
FDA’s Policy Concerns Rush to develop/design, less quality Temptation to ship before approval/clearance Company loss of control Promise that the company can’t fulfill Premature promotion that creates intended uses that
may not be suitable Freedom of choice among healthcare
providers/patients Rationale—this is where interstate commerce begins
3. Contracts for Future GenerationsThe Law, or Some Rules of Thumb Can’t sign, or perhaps even negotiate, a contract
where successful performance (e.g. delivery) would require FDA approval/clearance Some believe this is true even if the contract
conditions performance on FDA clearance or approval (penalty free)
Note that exempt devices or changes that do not require a new 510(k) would not be included
Can’t pre-promote except in compliance with the rules for pre-approval communication
3. Contracts for Future Generations
Some Provisions Marketers GetOption to purchase at unspecified priceOption to purchase as specified priceCommitment to provide certain features by certain
dateCommitment as to features or performance of next
generationCommitment to notify when availableCommitment to upgrade as part of the contract priceLease agreement that includes any future
(unspecified) generations over the course of the lease
4. Peer Reviewed Articles About Marketed Devices
FDAMA Process—Part 99 Dozens of requirements, including a
commitment to file a supplement
Common law process Undefined by FDA, relies heavily on WLF
4. Factors to Consider for Peer Reviewed
1. Regulatory Status-- 510(k) or PMA or investigational2. Type of Off Label Content
a. Any new indications for use, or intended use?b. Any difference in directions for use?c. Any difference in performance claims made?
3. Public Health Value4. Ability to Avoid Off Label Content5. Regulatory History6. Health Risk7. Evidence Quality8. Author Ties9. Peer Review Process Robustness10. Fair Balance11. Disclosures and Disclaimers
4. Level Of Restriction For Peer Reviewed
1. Don’t use
2. Medical fulfillment of unsolicited request
3. Sales fulfillment of unsolicited request
4. Sales dissemination with restrictions
5. Sales dissemination without restriction
5. Press Releases What legal standard applies to information for
investors regarding investigational uses?
Labeling regulations apply, unless disclosure can be classified as purely business or a scientific exchange
BUT, pre-approval off-label information, including study announcements, will be tolerated by FDA if segregated in the investor or news section of a website and/or distributed to the press concurrently with a newsworthy event
5. Press Releases Best Practices:
Be truthful, accurate and objective
Present information in a fair & balanced manner
Avoid investor information that is promotional in tone or makes claims of safety or effectiveness for an unapproved use
Be consistent with prior truthful releases & PI Disclose material information required
by SEC but avoid promotional “spin”
5. Press ReleasesBest Practices:
When discussing clinical trials, limit discussions to study data -- avoid conclusory statements or interpretations
Attach product insert to press releases & provide reference to website in presentations
Unless reporting results of a head-to-head trial, avoid referencing competitors
Redistribution of press releases to actual or potential customers will be deemed promotional
5. Press Releases
Best Practices: Media Communications – IDEs and Pending PMAs
Issue a press release only for the purpose of recruiting clinical investigators or study subjects
Make only objective statements about the physical nature of the product
Make no claims about the product Include no pricing information
5. Press Releases Best Practices: Media Communications –
IDEs and Pending PMAs
Disclose the regulatory status of the product and that the product is limited by Federal law to investigational use
Limit distribution to medical and scientific media if the goal is to recruit clinical investigators, and to appropriate other media to recruit patients
6. Trade Shows
What standards apply to information disseminated at trade shows? Labeling regulations apply
FDA frequently cites companies for their trade show activities.
6. Trade Shows
Best Practices: Train marketing personnel extensively in
permitted disclosures Consider having clinical personnel present to
respond to questions that are off-label Maintain a separate space for international
uses
6. Trade Shows Special Rules—510(k) Pending1. For 510(k) pending devices, special accommodation to
account for infrequent trade shows2. Show demo model, with conspicuous statement that not
cleared, 510(k) pending3. No performance claims4. Can explain intended use and existence of basic
features5. Can collect business leads6. But do not take orders, or be prepared to take orders,
that might result in contracts of sale for the device unless limited to research or investigational use (e.g. no discussion of commercial price)
7. Meetings – Two Types “Controlled” - speakers under the control of
the sponsor (e.g., employees, consultants) Investigator meetings Speaker training Trade show booths
“Supported” - speakers are not under the sponsor’s control but sponsor provides support for the program (speakers without employment/consultant relationships with the sponsor) Sponsored CME
7. Meetings
Controlled Communications Regulated as promotional material Remarks should:
Be consistent with intended use Conform to rules applicable to unsolicited requests
Also consider rules applicable to: Dissemination of written materials Appropriate locations Interactions with healthcare professionals
Speaker agreements
7. Meetings
Supported Communications Unregulated scientific exchange, unless
sponsor is in a position to influence the presentation of information about its products by, for example:
Selection of speakers Control of content
7. Meetings
Supported Communications In determining independence, FDA will consider:
Meaningful disclosure of sponsor support, relationships with speakers, regulatory status of any unapproved uses discussed
Focus of the program (e.g., on a single product or single company’s products when alternatives are available)
Relationship between provider and sponsor Provider involvement in sales or marketing
7. Meetings
Supported Communications FDA also will consider:
Provider’s demonstrated failure to meet standards Multiple presentations Audience selection Opportunities for discussion Dissemination Ancillary promotional activities Complaints Written agreement between provider and sponsor
7. Meetings
Best Practices: Controlled Speakers Respond to questions openly, but follow
guidelines for responding to unsolicited questions on off-label uses
Focus prepared remarks and materials on cleared or approved uses, or disease state
Trends in Enforcement
FDA focus is on “low hanging fruit” Trade show exhibits and booths Website advertising and links Broadcast and print advertising Promotional materials
FDA Creativity Connection of off-label promotion to Medicaid
or Medicare reimbursement claims (Parke-Davis)
Trends in Enforcement
OIG continues to investigate off-label promotion Warner-Lambert Serono Bristol-Myers Squibb
FCA actions have alleged off-label promotion Parke-Davis Eli Lilly Pharmacia
Good Promotional Practices
Many leading companies are developing their own GPPs
Essentially a risk management tool—sets the company’s preferred path forward in a gray area
Looked favorably upon by regulators if done well.
Become the basis for training and auditing
Topics
Part One Regulatory Requirements
Part Two Off-Label Promotion
Part Three Marketing in a Regulated Environment
Part Four Case Studies
Part Four: Case Studies
Topics Meetings Sales Scenarios Promotional Materials
Meetings
Case Study - Meetings Speaker: Thought-leader physician who has a
consulting agreement with the company Motivation: Speaking at CME for educational
purposes. Content: Discussing an off-label use of the
generic category of devices that includes the manufacturer’s product
Audience: Doctors attending CME Setting: Aspen Hotel
Case Study - Meetings Speaker: Company Medical Director Motivation: CME Seminar, education purpose,
but an official company spokesman who gets paid partly based on stock performance
Content: Primary remarks are on label, but an audience member asks about an off label use
Audience: Physicians Setting: Aspen Hotel
Sales Scenarios
Case Study – Sales Scenarios Background: Your joint replacement device is
labeled for use in individuals 65 years and older while your competitor’s device is designed and labeled for a younger population.
Scenario: By way of comparison with its device, your competitor is disseminating case studies demonstrating failures of your device when implanted in younger, more physically active patients.
Is this a violation of:
A. Lanham Act?B. FDCA?C. FTC Act?
D. State FD&C Acts?E. State Unfair Trade
Practices Acts?
Case Study – Sales Scenarios A peer reviewed journal article describes an
independent clinical trial comparing on-label, lumbar spine uses of your bone screw device with your biggest competitor. Superior efficacy of your product is clearly demonstrated.
In the introductory paragraph describing the devices, authors note in a single paragraph the off-label use of these devices in the cervical spine.
Can you disseminate this article to prescribers?
Promotional Materials
Case Study – Promotional Material? Speaker: Physician who serves as an
investigator in a company-sponsored clinical trial Motivation: Publishes an article in a peer
reviewed journal for prestige Content: The journal discusses an off label use
for the company’s product under investigation. Audience: Physicians Setting: The journal is subscription based, so
they get it through the mail.
Comments or Questions?