advanced environmental law real estate lawyers€¦ · statutory defenses to cercla liability...
TRANSCRIPT
6/1/2017
1
millercanfield.com
Presented to Miller Canfield Real Estate Group
Lawrence W. Falbe
October 20, 2016
Advanced Environmental Law for Real Estate Lawyers
Getting the deal done after a “bad” Phase I
millercanfield.com
Today’s Fun Fact Pattern
In 2016, Client owns industrial property that was once contaminated from former plating operations. A cleanup in the 1990s was believed to have addressed contamination (based on the standards at that time) related to the plating operations but no official closure was obtained.
Client decides to sell the property and orders a new Phase I to insure no environmental issues before it lets the property out of its control. Consultant recommends a new soil vapor survey since new regulations have been passed since the initial cleanup; soil vapor testing reveals likely vapor intrusion problems in the building.
Client is anxious that favorable current market conditions will diminish by the time a full investigation and possible cleanup is performed, but Client is concerned about possible liability down the road if it does not perform a cleanup.
What are Client’s options to get the deal done?
2
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 1
6/1/2017
2
millercanfield.com
Environmental Liability
3
millercanfield.com
What can affect a property from an environmental perspective?
Leaking Underground Storage Tanks
(LUSTs)
Landfills Midnight DumpingIndustry (solvents, paints, hydraulic fluid, petroleum)
Dry Cleaners
Asbestos‐containing materials; radon; lead in paint and
water
Wetlands, ecological resources,
endangered species
Industrial hygiene, health and safety
EMF/high voltage power lines
Off‐site treatment, storage, recycling or disposal of wastes or recyclables
Vapor Intrusion
4
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 2
6/1/2017
3
millercanfield.com
What can affect a property from an environmental perspective?
Types of contaminants:
• Metals (plating operations, foundries, other industry)
• Chlorinated solvents (dry cleaners, degreasers)
• Petroleum (leaking underground storage tanks, spills)
Affected media:
• Soil
• Groundwater
• Air
5
millercanfield.com
Costs Associated with Environmental Issues
First‐Party
Cost Overruns Associated with Cleaning Up Known Contamination
Clean Up Costs upon the Discovery of Unknown Contamination
Regulatory and Legal
Mandate from Agency to Clean Up Contamination
Fines and Penalties and Government Oversight Costs
Governmental Re‐Opening of Previously “Closed” Environmental Issues
Associated Legal Defense Costs
Third‐Party
Obligation to Clean Up Other Properties
Bodily Injury Claims as a Result of Contamination
Loss of Value of Property
Associated Legal Defense Costs
Business Risks
Interruption to Business Operations
Loss of Rents
Increased Development Costs
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 3
6/1/2017
4
millercanfield.com
Generally: Environmental Liability is strict, joint and several, and runs with the land.
Many people don’t realize that….... a purchaser/lessee/operator (and sometimes a lender) of contaminated property can be held liable, even though they are not responsible for contaminating the property at issue.
Environmental Liability Framework
7
millercanfield.com
CERCLA (a/k/a “Superfund”)The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act – Federal statute that applies to any release of hazardous substances at a facility.
– Enacted in 1980, amended in 1986 and 2002
– Passed in response to Love Canal in New York
– Poorly written statute
8
Environmental Liability Framework
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 4
6/1/2017
5
millercanfield.com
CERCLA (a/k/a Superfund)(cont.)
Joint and several liability for environmental cleanup (response) costs:
– the current owner and operator of a contaminated property
– any owner or operator at the time of disposal of any hazardous substances
– transporter
– generator
– Liability is strict, regardless of fault
9
Environmental Liability Framework
millercanfield.com
CERCLA (Superfund) Cont. Damages – recovery of costs of response
Typically allocated between PRPs
Injunctive Relief not available for private parties Available to USEPA under Section 106 Order
Attorneys’ Fees – generally not recoverable
10
Environmental Liability Framework
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 5
6/1/2017
6
millercanfield.com
Types of Environmental Liabilities
Statutory Defenses to CERCLA Liability Innocent Landowner– Must prove that contamination was caused
by 3rd party with whom purchaser has no contractual relationship and “all appropriate inquiry” was performed. (cannot have prior knowledge).
Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser –IF all appropriate inquiry performed, disposal on site took place before date of purchase and appropriate care exercised with respect to any discovered contaminants. (prior knowledge OK).
Contiguous Property Owner – Neighbors whose property is contaminated by the offending property.
Municipal Immunity – Governments who involuntarily acquire property through tax delinquency or demolition foreclosure, abandonment, eminent domain. 11
millercanfield.com
All disposal of hazardous substances at property occurred before purchase
Conduct All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) prior to purchase
Comply with “continuing obligations” after purchase
Not otherwise be a responsible party
Requirements to Establish BFPP
Environmental Liability Framework
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 6
6/1/2017
7
millercanfield.com
Comply with land use restrictions Comply with CERCLA information requests and subpoenas Provide legally required notices Exercise “appropriate care” with respect to hazardous
substances at the facility– Stop any continuing releases– Prevent any threatened future release– Prevent/limit exposure of people/environment
to past releases
Required Elements of BFPP Defense after property acquisition:
Environmental Liability Framework
millercanfield.com
Types of Environmental Liabilities
Michigan’s Baseline Environmental Assessment (BEA)Much like CERCLA’s Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser Defense –Avoids State environmental liability IF buyer performs a Baseline Environmental Assessment (BEA) prior to or within 45 days of purchase of the property. • Buyer must perform All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) and perform field work
that identifies contamination; • Contamination must exist on the property in excess of most stringent
(residential) state action levels (making it a “facility”);• Buyer must submit BEA (including results of AAI and sampling and
analysis) to MDEQ within six months of title transfer;• Buyer must draft (and periodically update or revise as conditions or use
changes) a “Due Care Plan” that protects human health and the environment from harm due to the contamination (which can be submitted to DEQ for approval but need not be). 14
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 7
6/1/2017
8
millercanfield.com
Types of Environmental Liabilities
Michigan’s Baseline Environmental Assessment (BEA)If the BEA is properly submitted, State Law then provides:• Buyer who performs the BEA and complies with the Due Care Plan has
liability protection under state environmental law for general remedial responsibilities related to the contamination.
• Buyer is protected from enforcement actions by USEPA through a Memorandum of Understanding with MDEQ.
15
millercanfield.com
Types of Environmental Liabilities
Michigan’s Baseline Environmental Assessment (BEA)However:• BEA protections do not protect from third-party CERCLA (Superfund)
Liability. • Property can be subject to use restrictions and other limitations on the
property that may devalue it.• Out-of-state lenders and prospective downstream purchasers may be
uncomfortable with BEA concept.• BEA does not protect against ‘indirect’ risks such as loss of rent,
interruption to business operations, personal injury claims, etc.• Vapor intrusion can cause heath and safety concern that may still
require remediation or controls, irrespective of BEA protections.
16
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 8
6/1/2017
9
millercanfield.com
Statutory defenses are great…• But consider…
• What happens if you buy some contaminated property and can establish a defense… but the original “polluter” is long since gone or is judgment-proof…
Environmental Liability Framework
YOU STILL OWN CONTAMINATED PROPERTY!
millercanfield.com
Discussion:
How do parties negotiate the latent cost of contamination if BFPP and/or BEA protections can be established?
Do they need to / should they?
18
Types of Environmental Liabilities
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 9
6/1/2017
10
millercanfield.com
Structuring the Deal
19
millercanfield.com
In a typical deal situation:
• Seller’s Concern: Neither indemnities nor any other contractual provisions can completely exculpate a seller from future liability.
• Buyer’s Concern: A purchaser of contaminated property can be held liable, even though it is not responsible for contaminating the property at issue. Inadequate due diligence can lead to unwanted surprises.
• Lender’s Concern: Latent discovery of environmental impairments can devalue the collateral and lower LTV, impede cash flow from rents, and raise foreclosure/property management concerns.
Environmental Liability Framework
20
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 10
6/1/2017
11
millercanfield.com
How to Protect the Seller
• Contractual Protections (indemnity, as-is/where-is, releases, express assumptions, covenant not to sue) geared towards shifting as much liability as possible to Buyer.
• Limit Representations and Warranties• Clean up the property / obtain NFR Letter.
• Can be done by seller, or by buyer (if sufficient protections are in place).
• Insurance ???
millercanfield.com
How to Protect the Buyer
• Investigate!!! / Due Diligence to Establish Statutory Defenses and avoid surprises!
• Obtain Reps and Warranties from Seller.• Contractual Protections (Indemnities, escrows).• Provide for clean up of the property in the
context of the deal.• Insurance ???
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 11
6/1/2017
12
millercanfield.com
Essential Contract Components
• Define Terms• Provide for Due Diligence / “All Appropriate Inquiry”
opportunity (and timing)• Allocate environmental liabilities• Reps and Warranties – or – “as-is, where-is”• Address remediation or “NFR Letter” responsibilities
if necessary• Termination parameters
millercanfield.com
Drafting Basics
Definitions
– “Hazardous Materials” - should refer to and include “hazardous substances” under CERCLA, “hazardous” and “solid” “wastes” under RCRA, petroleum (since excluded under CERCLA), “pollutants” under the IL Act, etc., etc.
– “Environmental Laws” - should include CERCLA, RCRA, Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, IL Act, regulations, ordinances, etc., etc.
24
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 12
6/1/2017
13
millercanfield.com
Due Diligence - how much and when?– Provide a Due Diligence period – Phase I,
ECAs– Scope - invasive testing? (ensure appropriate
protections to landowner)– “Tiering” (generally for Phase IIs)– Use of prior environmental reports– What if you already know of environmental
problems?– Who pays?– Termination 25
Drafting Basics
millercanfield.com
Liability Allocation
• “As-is, where-is” - standing alone, it provides little or no protection from most environmental claims
• Representations and Warranties (seller’s goals vs. buyer’s goals)
• “Shotgun Approach”: Obtain an express indemnity, a release/covenant not to sue and an assumption of environmental liabilities from buyer, and couple with an as-is, where-is clause.
26
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 13
6/1/2017
14
millercanfield.com
• “As-is, where-is” really only disclaims warranties as to condition of the property.
• In other words, an as-is, where-is clause simply means that seller is not making any promises about the environmental condition of the property.
• While a buyer can’t sue for breach of warranty, buyer may well be able to sue under CERCLA, common law or other causes of action.
• See Nat’l Law Journal Article
27
Liability Allocation
millercanfield.com
Warranties/Representations should cover:• Condition of current (and former?) properties: (Releases,
contamination, tanks (USTs), asbestos, lead paint, radon).
• No known impacts from former operations or from nearby properties or facilities.
• No releases / generation / storage / disposal / etc. of Hazardous Materials.
• No restrictions on use or other environmental requirements.
• Compliance with all existing environmental laws.
• No threat of enforcement actions or civil lawsuits.
• No off-site Hazardous Materials management.
• All permits needed for lawful operation.
28
Liability Allocation
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 14
6/1/2017
15
millercanfield.com
Warranties/Representations cont:• Insist on (or watch out for) limitations/qualifiers as to
knowledge (and whose knowledge is it?)
• Scheduled exceptions/disclosures
• Certify disclosure of all relevant reports, data, etc.
• Seller certifies due inquiry
• Recertify at closing
• Penalties for non-compliance
• Insurance???
29
Liability Allocation
millercanfield.com
Indemnities
– What does the indemnity cover?
• Pre-closing conditions / post-closing activities
• Breach of Representations and Warranties
– Is the Indemnity enforceable?
• Most are strictly construed
• Should be as specific as possible as to environmental issues (but beware toxic torts suits later on)
30
Liability Allocation
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 15
6/1/2017
16
millercanfield.com
CAUTION: What entity is providing the indemnity? (financial assurance)
Caveats:• Indemnity and assumption are only as good as the parties
that stand behind it.• Generally, no protection from suits by 3rd party or
government.
Excess of Indemnity Insurance
31
Liability Allocation
millercanfield.com
How to Limit Indemnities
– Materiality floor (reduces risk for giving reps/warranties)
– Cap overall liability (can be separate from non-environmental liability cap)
– Deductible “floor” for engaging indemnity coverage (discourages gratuitous cleanups)
– “Sunset” provision to limit temporal scope
– Governmental or Third-party trigger (i.e., no “voluntary” cleanups)
– Indemnify only for breach of reps/warranties
32
Liability Allocation
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 16
6/1/2017
17
millercanfield.com
Express assumptions
– The more specific, the more enforceable
– But, beware of creating a record
Covenants not to sue
Releases
33
Liability Allocation
millercanfield.com
Other Significant Provisions
Agreements to Remediate• There is no absolute guarantee against future liability.
• The best way to guard against future lawsuits is to actually clean up the property - this can be done in many different ways.
• Clean up prior to sale.
• Seller agrees to conduct cleanup obligation post-sale.
• Escrow money and allow buyer to conduct cleanup.
• Discount purchase price and buyer agrees to cleanup.
• Goal- actually get the property clean so that there is no reason to sue later – NFR/NFA Letter is a good idea.
• Potential Toxic Tort suits down the road (!)34
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 17
6/1/2017
18
millercanfield.com
Issues for Cleanups in the Contract– Who performs the work?
– Remediate pre- or post-closing?
– What are the cleanup criteria (e.g., TACO standards, NFR Letter, etc.?)
– Tied into discount for purchase price (obligate buyer to perform cleanup)
– Provide escrow or holdback to fund cleanup?
– Insurance (cost cap or as a funding source)
– Self-help for non-performance
35
Other Significant Provisions
millercanfield.com
Right to terminate
– Unconditional v. conditional (sole discretion of Buyer, for any reason, etc.?)
– Earnest money at risk or not?
– When does money “go hard” (if at all?)
– Often drafted in conjunction with Due Diligence provisions
36
Other Significant Provisions
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 18
6/1/2017
19
millercanfield.com
All environmental reps, warranties, indemnities and other provisions must survive the closing (but one party or another may wish to give some provisions limited life, i.e., one-year limit on reps/warranties and/or indemnity)
37
Other Significant Provisions
millercanfield.com
Environmental Due Diligence
38
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 19
6/1/2017
20
millercanfield.com
Evaluating Risk
The goal of due diligence is not to eliminate 100% of the environmental risks...The goal really is to reduce those risks to an acceptable level, dependent on THE CLIENT’sinternal risk management comfort level
39
millercanfield.com
Objectives of Due Diligence
Evaluate known
potential risks
Identify previously unknown risks
Quantify all risks
identified
Consider options for managing
risks
40
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 20
6/1/2017
21
millercanfield.com
Objectives of Due Diligence
41
Conducting robust environmental due diligence allows a party to:
• Avoid entering a transaction with unacceptable environmental risks
• Negotiate to allocate liability of a known environmental risk
• Establish eligibility for certain statutory defenses to environmental liability
• Mitigate risk through insurance or other strategies
millercanfield.com
Types of Environmental Assessments
ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) (ASTM Practice E1527-13)
Customized Mini Phase Is
Customized Environmental Questionnaire
ASTM Transaction Screen E1528-14
Phase I + (customized add-ons/non-scope considerations, e.g., asbestos, wetlands, mold)
Compliance Audits
Phase II Invasive Testing Investigations
42
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 21
6/1/2017
22
millercanfield.com
Use of Phase Is in the Purchase of Real Property: Why Do One?• Educate the prospective buyer about the property
• A Phase I which reveals no recognized environmental conditions can be used to obtain a “safe harbor” from future environmental liability. Prove “all appropriate inquiry” (AAI)
• Is it required? – Viewpoint of Lenders.
• Is there any advantage to NOT Doing a Phase I?
• Whose responsibility is it to obtain the Phase I?
• Value of Phase Is performed by others?
43
Due Diligence for Property
millercanfield.com
Phase I Environmental Site Assessments
What’s the procedure for a standard Phase I? An environmental professional performs historical research using a
variety of sources: old aerial photographs, city directories, fire insurance (Sanborn) maps.
Environmental databases (usually EDR) are used to identify any issues with the property or adjacent land (e.g., LUST databases, NPL sites, RCRA waste generators)
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests are made to U.S. EPA, IEPA, local government agencies
Interviews with current/former site owners, government officials, etc.
A visual “site reconnaissance” is performed
The Phase I report identifies “recognized environmental conditions” (“RECs”) or indicates they are absent
VAPOR INTRUSION NOW INCLUDED!44
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 22
6/1/2017
23
millercanfield.com
What’s the procedure for a standard Phase I? (cont.)REC = “.... The presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property (1) due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minimis conditions are not recognized environmental conditions.”
45
Phase I Environmental Site Assessments
millercanfield.com
Phase I “Non-Scope” Considerations– Asbestos-containing materials; radon; lead in paint and water
– Wetlands, ecological resources, endangered species
– Industrial hygiene, health and safety; indoor air
– EMF/high voltage power lines
– REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
– Former or adjacent sites
– Off-site treatment, storage, recycling or disposal of wastes or recyclables
– Third-Party Liabilities
46
Phase I Environmental Site Assessments
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 23
6/1/2017
24
millercanfield.com
What a Phase I is NOT A “clean” Phase I is NOT a guarantee that a site is clean.
A Phase I may NOT reveal every possible environmental problem on the property, nor does it define the extent of the problem, if any.
A Phase I is NOT a compliance audit.
A Phase I does NOT necessarily guarantee that a property purchaser will be able to claim a defense against future environmental liability.
A Phase I does NOT have eternal life.
A Phase I may not be usable by others.
All Phase Is are NOT created equally. 47
Phase I Environmental Site Assessments
millercanfield.com
Timing of Environmental Due Diligence Typically a Phase I ESA takes 30 days.
DO NOT time the environmental investigation so that you have the Phase I only the day before closing.
OTHERWISE – there is no opportunity to review the Phase I for errors, but also no time to follow up on possible issues.
48
Phase I Environmental Site Assessments
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 24
6/1/2017
25
millercanfield.com
Phase I Viability A Phase I completed less than 180 days prior to
the date of acquisition of the property is presumed to be valid. (ASTM E1527-13 sec 4.6)
49
Phase I Environmental Site Assessments
millercanfield.com
Phase I Viability A Phase I for which the information was collected
or updated within one year prior to the date of acquisition of the property may be used providedthat the following components are conducted or updated within 180 days of property acquisition:– Interviews with site owners, operators and/or occupants– Searches for recorded environmental cleanup liens– Reviews of federal, state and local government records– Visual inspection of the property
And – an updated declaration by the EP
50
Phase I Environmental Site Assessments
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 25
6/1/2017
26
millercanfield.com
What happens after the Phase I?
That depends…
• If the Phase I reveals no recognized environmental conditions, full speed ahead!
• Enables one to fairly value the deal
• Affords psychological comfort
• Lenders will lend money
• First step in establishing statutory protections later if needed
51
Post Phase I Considerations
millercanfield.com
Post Phase I Considerations
If the Phase I reveals one or more RECs, more work is (probably) needed
• Generally a Phase II is the next step
• Remediation may need to be performed
• Possibly pursue an NFR/NFA Letter
• Due Care (Continuing Obligations) may need to be taken later
52
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 26
6/1/2017
27
millercanfield.com
• Phase II ESA – environmental due diligence which includes physical sampling (generally of a limited nature) of the site. For example, a Phase II ESA may include laboratory analysis of soil, groundwater and/or surface water, for certain contaminants.– A Phase II ESA may also include testing for the presence of lead-based
paint, asbestos-containing materials (“ACMs”), and volatile organic compounds that may pose a risk of harm due to vapor intrusion.
Phase IIs
millercanfield.com
The Primary Goal is usually to investigate concerns identified in Phase I
–Testing can be performed for soil, groundwater, soil-gas, and interior air (vapor intrusion)
–Soil testing using Geoprobe, hand augers, etc.
–Groundwater testing using temporary or permanent wells
–Soil gas and/or interior air using probes or vacuum canisters
Phase IIs
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 27
6/1/2017
28
millercanfield.com
• Secondary Goal is to delineate extent of any problems
– Even a no-action remedy needs to determine the extent of the problem
– Most states insistent on full delineation before issuing closure letter
– Estimate of remediation costs is almost always desired
Phase IIs
millercanfield.com
Typical Phase II Data Table
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 28
6/1/2017
29
millercanfield.com
Typical Phase II Plume Diagram
millercanfield.com
Definition: Vapor intrusion is the migration of volatile chemicals from the subsurface into overlying buildings. Volatile chemicals in buried wastes and /or contaminated groundwater can emit vapors that may migrate through subsurface soil and into air spaces of overlying buildings. (USEPA 2002)
For purposes of the ASTM standard, not from naturally occurring substances
In addition to being part of the ASTM E1527‐13 Phase I Standard, government agencies – Federal and State – are focusing more on this, for investigation and mitigation
Hot Topic: Vapor Intrusion
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 29
6/1/2017
30
millercanfield.com
Figure 1. Migration of Soil Vapors to Indoor Air
59
millercanfield.com
Vapors can accumulate in dwellings or occupied buildings to levels that may pose short‐term or long‐term safety hazards, and/or health effects.
Average person drinks 2 liters of water per day
BUT – the Average person inhales 20,000 liters of air a day
Because of this health concern, VI can pose an economic risk to retail development
Why Worry about VI?
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 30
6/1/2017
31
millercanfield.com
Pressure‐driven flow
– Building underpressurization
• Stack Effect
• Wind loading
• Ventilation systems
• Barometric pressure
– Diffusion through cracks
How does it work?
millercanfield.com
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 31
6/1/2017
32
millercanfield.com
Sealing openings involves filling in cracks in the floor slab and gaps around pipes and utility lines found in basement walls. Concrete can be poured over unfinished dirt floors.
Installing vapor barriers involves placing sheets of “geomembrane” or strong plastic beneath a building to prevent vapor entry. Vapor barriers are best installed during building construction, but can be installed in existing buildings that have crawl spaces.
Passive venting involves installing a venting layer beneath a building. Wind or the build‐up of vapors causes vapors to move through the venting layer toward the sides of the building where it is vented outdoors. A venting layer can be installed prior to building construction as well as within existing buildings. It is usually used with a vapor barrier.
Passive Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Methods:
millercanfield.com
Mitigation Solutions
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 32
6/1/2017
33
millercanfield.com
millercanfield.com
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 33
6/1/2017
34
millercanfield.com
millercanfield.com
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 34
6/1/2017
35
millercanfield.com
millercanfield.com
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 35
6/1/2017
36
millercanfield.com
millercanfield.com
•Sub‐slab depressurization (SSD) involves connecting a blower (an electric fan) to a small suction pit(s) dug into the slab in order to vent vapors outdoors. (Most common method.)
• Building over‐pressurization involves adjusting the building’s heating, ventilation, and air‐conditioning system to increase the pressure indoors relative to the sub‐slab area. This method is typically used for office buildings and other large structures.
*Note that active systems require ongoing operation and maintenance (O&M) costs.
Active Vapor Intrusion Mitigation Methods:
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 36
6/1/2017
37
millercanfield.com
Typical fan and vent pipe
millercanfield.com
What happens after the Phase I? That depends…(cont.)• How to work a cleanup into the deal
• Cleanup before closing or after?• Who will have the responsibility?• How can you insure cleanup will be done?• Escrows/holdbacks/baskets/caps• Indemnities• Insurance?
74
Post - Phase II
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 37
6/1/2017
38
millercanfield.com
Achieving Site Closure
Post Phase II / Remediation – Site Closure Options
– Obtain a No Further Remediation (“NFR”) Letter (or equiv.)– NFRAP (No Further Remedial Action Planned, or equiv.)– Comfort Letter– Prospective Purchaser Agreement
75
millercanfield.com
Evaluating Site Closure NFA/NFR Letters
Do not assume that just because there is a closure letter in the chain of title that it signifies a “clean bill of health” for the property.
– Limitations for industrial/commercial use or other AULs– Restrictions on use of groundwater– Duty to maintain engineered barriers– Beware of pre-vapor intrusion closure letters!
76
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 38
6/1/2017
39
millercanfield.com
Fact Pattern Revisited
In 2016, Client owns industrial property that was once contaminated from former plating operations. A cleanup in the 1990s was believed to have addressed contamination (based on the standards at that time) related to the plating operations but no official closure was obtained.
Client decides to sell the property and orders a new Phase I to insure no environmental issues before it lets the property out of its control. Consultant recommends a new soil vapor survey since new regulations have been passed since the initial cleanup; soil vapor testing reveals likely vapor intrusion problems in the building.
Client is anxious that favorable current market conditions will diminish by the time a full investigation and possible cleanup is performed, but Client is concerned about possible liability down the road if it does not perform a cleanup.
What are Client’s options to get the deal done?
77
millercanfield.com
Options
Most Conservative (baseline) – Client takes property off market (or at least postpones active negotiations) and performs a comprehensive Phase II analysis on the property. Client pursues an NFA Letter from State EPA (which may or may not require remedial activities) or, at minimum, investigates and remediates the property as necessary to get a clean opinion from our environmental consultant. Client then markets the property as non-impacted by environmental issues (i.e., “clean”). Indemnities to shift pre-closing environmental liabilities are up to negotiations between the parties. Environmental PLL insurance may be of (limited) use to cover future issues (that are currently unknown issues), but the known contaminants must first have been identified and addressed. [This option gives Client the maximum amount of control over the process and stringency of the cleanup, and minimizes future legacy environmental risk, but it takes the longest].
78
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 39
6/1/2017
40
millercanfield.com
Options
Alternative #1 (Client obtains closure, no escrow) – Client continues to market property and discloses environmental conditions to prospective buyer. Siemens negotiates purchase price as if property was clean, and contractually commits to investigate (Phase II) and remediate property as necessary, post-closing, to obtain an NFA Letter or consultant opinion, as above. Closure to be obtained within a year (or as negotiated) with a right of self-help for Buyer if Client does not comply. Client indemnifies Buyer until remediation/closure is complete, at which point indemnity shifts to obligate Buyer in favor of Client for future environmental issues (if so negotiated). “Excess of Indemnity” insurance can be obtained, if desired by Buyer, to backstop Client’s obligation to Buyer – and/or also possibly Buyer’s future indemnity to Client, if applicable.
79
millercanfield.com
Options
Alternative #2 (Buyer obtains closure, no escrow) – Client negotiates purchase price at a discount (based on estimated cost of cleanup plus a premium to cover the risk) and contractually commits the Buyer to investigate and remediate property as necessary, post-closing, to obtain an NFR Letter or consultant opinion, as above. Closure to be obtained within a year (or as negotiated) with a right of self-help for Client if Buyer does not comply. Buyer indemnifies Client to shift all environmental risk to Buyer and “Excess of Indemnity” insurance can be obtained to backstop the Buyer’s obligation.
80
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 40
6/1/2017
41
millercanfield.com
Options
Alternative #3 (Client obtains closure, escrow) - Client negotiates purchase price as if property was clean, and contractually commits to investigate and remediate property as necessary, post-closing, to obtain an NFA Letter or consultant opinion, as above. Closure to be obtained within a year (or as negotiated) with a right of self-help for Buyer if Client does not comply. Buyer reserves an agreed-upon portion of the purchase price in escrow (or Client obtains LOC or similar third-party guarantee) to guarantee Client’s performance of the remediation. If the cost of remediation/closure is less than the escrow, CLIENT gets the remainder. If the cost is more, Client eats the additional cost. “Excess of Indemnity” insurance can be obtained to backstop the Client’s obligation to Buyer (if Buyer demands additional risk protection beyond the escrow).
81
millercanfield.com
Options
Alternative #4 (Buyer obtains closure, escrow) - Client negotiates purchase price as if property was clean, but a sum of money equal to the estimated cleanup costs plus a healthy premium (to compensate Buyer for taking risk of cost overruns) is held in escrow. Buyer contractually commits to investigate and remediate property as necessary, post-closing, to obtain an NFA Letter or consultant opinion, as above. If the cost of remediation/closure is less than the escrow, the BUYER gets the remainder (which is the upside for the Buyer). If the cost is more, the Buyer eats the additional cost and is contractually obligated to complete the remediation. “Excess of indemnity” insurance is obtained to backstop the Buyer’s obligation.
82
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 41
6/1/2017
42
millercanfield.com
Options
Alternative #5 (third party takes the risk, various scenarios) – Client negotiates purchase price as if clean, then contracts with an environmental consultant to provide a guaranteed fixed-price cleanup, plus indemnity. Risk of potential cost overruns is with the consultant. Client takes part of purchase price to pay consultant for estimated cleanup cost plus a premium for transferring the risk. “Excess of indemnity” insurance can be obtained to backstop the consultant’sobligation. – OR – Client sells property to a Brownfield Redevelopment company at
a (deep?) discount. Redevelopment company generally would perform some level of cleanup and then flip (or rent) the property to a user. Redevelopment Company takes the risk that future environmental issues arise by indemnifying Client. “Excess of indemnity” insurance could be obtained to backstop the Redevelopment company’s indemnity to Siemens (although the insurance would have a limited time duration, which limits its long-term effectiveness).
83
millercanfield.com
QUESTIONS?
84
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 42
6/1/2017
43
millercanfield.comUNITED STATES CANADA MEXICO POLAND CHINA
Lawrence W. [email protected]+1.312.460.4266
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 43
millercanfield.com
Economic Revitalization Through BrownfieldsConference, Springfield, IL
August 31, 2016
Lawrence W. Falbe, Esq.
Miller Canfield Paddock Stone PLC
Overview of BrownfieldLegal Issues
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 44
millercanfield.com
It’s a great time (legally) to redevelopbrownfields:
Risk-based remediation standards are fairly clear andcommonplace; new technologies make cleanups lessexpensive
Almost all states have voluntary cleanup programs andwill provide closure
The law is well developed with fewer uncertainties
Environmental risks are more commonly understoodand perceived to be manageable
The Good News
22017 Annual Real Estate Seminar
June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 45
millercanfield.com
There are still plenty of legal / liabilityhurdles:
Seller fears opening up “can of worms” by trying to sellor redevelop brownfield property
Buyer underestimates cleanup costs or becomes liablefor unknown environmental issues
Lender risks losing loan funds due to failure of projector worried about acquiring legal liability
New issues such as “vapor intrusion” not understood
Bad technical and/or legal advice can cause problems,cost overruns, delays
The Bad News
32017 Annual Real Estate Seminar
June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 46
millercanfield.com
Costs Associated with Environmental Issues
First-Party
Cost Overruns Associated withCleaning Up Known Contamination
Clean Up Costs upon the Discoveryof Unknown Contamination
Regulatory and Legal
Mandate from Agency to Clean UpContamination
Fines and Penalties and GovernmentOversight Costs
Governmental Re-Opening of Previously“Closed” Environmental Issues
Associated Legal Defense Costs
Third-Party
Obligation to Clean Up OtherProperties
Bodily Injury Claims as a Result ofContamination
Claims as a Result of Loss of Valueof Property
Associated Legal Defense Costs
Business Risks
Interruption to Business Operations
Loss of Rents
Increased Development Costs
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 47
millercanfield.com
Generally: Environmental Liability is strict, joint andseveral, and runs with the land.
Many people don’t realize that….
... a purchaser/lessee/operator (and sometimes a lender) ofcontaminated property can be held liable, even though they arenot responsible for contaminating the property at issue.
Environmental Liability Framework
52017 Annual Real Estate Seminar
June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 48
millercanfield.com
CERCLA (a/k/a “Superfund”)
The Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act – Federal statute that
applies to any release of hazardous substances at a
facility.– Enacted in 1980, amended in 1986 and 2002
– Passed in response to Love Canal in New York
– Poorly written statute
6
Environmental Liability Framework
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 49
millercanfield.com
CERCLA (a/k/a Superfund)(cont.)
Joint and several liability for environmental cleanup(response) costs:
– the current owner and operator of a contaminatedproperty
– any owner or operator at the time of disposal of anyhazardous substances
– transporter
– generator
– Liability is strict, regardless of fault
7
Environmental Liability Framework
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 50
millercanfield.com
CERCLA (Superfund) Cont. Damages – recovery of costs of response
Typically allocated between PRPs
Injunctive Relief not available for private parties
Available to USEPA under Section 106 Order
Attorneys’ Fees – generally not recoverable
8
Environmental Liability Framework
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 51
millercanfield.com
Types of Environmental Liabilities
Statutory Defenses to CERCLA Liability
Innocent Landowner– Must prove that contamination was causedby 3rd party with whom purchaser has no contractual relationshipand “all appropriate inquiry” was performed. (cannot have priorknowledge).
Bona Fide Prospective Purchaser –IF all appropriate inquiryperformed, disposal on site took place before date of purchase andappropriate care exercised with respect to any discoveredcontaminants. (prior knowledge OK).
Contiguous Property Owner – Neighbors whose property iscontaminated by the offending property.
Municipal Immunity – Governments who involuntarily acquireproperty through tax delinquency or demolition foreclosure,abandonment, eminent domain. 9
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 52
millercanfield.com
CERCLA Amended: Small Business LiabilityRelief and Brownfields Revitalization Act (2002)– one purpose was to promote the revitalization ofbrownfields
Environmental Liability Framework
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 53
millercanfield.com
2002 Brownfields Amendments
to CERCLA (cont’d)Created bona fide prospective purchaser(BFPP) defense to CERCLA liability
Environmental Liability Framework
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 54
millercanfield.com
All disposal of hazardous substances at propertyoccurred before purchase
Conduct All Appropriate Inquiry (AAI) prior to purchase
Comply with “continuing obligations” after purchase
Not otherwise be a responsible party
Requirements to Establish BFPP
Environmental Liability Framework
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 55
millercanfield.com
Comply with land use restrictions
Comply with CERCLA information requests and subpoenas
Provide legally required notices
Exercise “appropriate care” with respect to hazardoussubstances at the facility
– Stop any continuing releases
– Prevent any threatened future release
– Prevent/limit exposure of people/environment
to past releases
Required Elements of BFPP Defenseafter property acquisition:
Environmental Liability Framework
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 56
millercanfield.com
Statutory defenses are great…
• But consider…
• What happens if you buy some contaminatedproperty and can establish a defense… but theoriginal “polluter” is long since gone or isjudgment-proof…
Environmental Liability Framework
YOU STILL OWNCONTAMINATEDPROPERTY!
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 57
millercanfield.com
Environmental Liability Framework
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act(RCRA)
“Cradle-to-Grave” statute designed to govern thegeneration, identification, storage and disposal ofhazardous waste.
No private cause of action for a cost recovery claim underthe statute, but citizen suits may be asserted against anyparty for any release of hazardous wastes that currentlypose endangerment to health and environment.
Attorney’s fees can be recovered.
Injunctive relief available to private parties
152017 Annual Real Estate Seminar
June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 58
millercanfield.com
Types of Environmental Liabilities
State Environmental Statutes and Common Law
Claims
Illinois Environmental Protection Act / state “baby Superfund” laws.
Common law causes of action such as public and private nuisance,
trespass, strict liability, ultra hazardous activity.
Criteria for proving claims are same or less burdensome than
criteria for proving CERCLA or a RCRA claim and remedies can
be more expansive. Often, these are added to CERCLA/RCRA
claims in the same complaint.
Common law causes of action can sometimes be pre-empted by
state or federal law.
162017 Annual Real Estate Seminar
June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 59
millercanfield.com
In a typical deal situation:
• Seller’s Concern: Neither indemnities nor any other contractual
provisions can completely exculpate a seller from future liability.
• Buyer’s Concern: A purchaser of contaminated property can be held
liable, even though it is not responsible for contaminating the property
at issue. Inadequate due diligence can lead to unwanted surprises.
• Lender’s Concern: Latent discovery of environmental impairments
can devalue the collateral and lower LTV, impede cash flow from rents,
and raise foreclosure/property management concerns.
Environmental Liability Framework
172017 Annual Real Estate Seminar
June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 60
millercanfield.com
Seller’s Side- how do I protect myself from future liability?
What the Seller Wants
To leave all environmental liabilities with company or shift them to buyer
Not to have any surprises!
Buyer’s Side- how do I investigate a property and defineenvironmental problems?
What the Buyer Wants
To have liability only for post-closing matters
Not to have any surprises!
Lender’s Side-
What the Lender Wants
To avoid environmental liabilities interfering with debt repayment or valueof collateral
Not to have any surprises!
Environmental Liability Framework
182017 Annual Real Estate Seminar
June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 61
millercanfield.com
How to Protect the Seller
• Contractual Protections (indemnity, as-is/where-is, releases, express assumptions, covenant notto sue) geared towards shifting as much liabilityas possible to Buyer.
• Limit Representations and Warranties
• Clean up the property / obtain NFR Letter.
• Can be done by seller, or by buyer (ifsufficient protections are in place).
• Insurance ???
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 62
millercanfield.com
How to Protect the Buyer
• Investigate!!! / Due Diligence to EstablishStatutory Defenses and avoid surprises!
• Obtain Reps and Warranties from Seller.
• Contractual Protections (Indemnities, escrows).
• Provide for clean up of the property in thecontext of the deal.
• Insurance ???
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 63
millercanfield.com
Essential Contract Components
• Define Terms
• Provide for Due Diligence / “All Appropriate Inquiry”opportunity (and timing)
• Allocate environmental liabilities
• Address remediation or “NFR Letter” responsibilitiesif necessary
• Termination parameters
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 64
millercanfield.com
Evaluating Risk
The goal of due diligence is not to eliminate 100% ofthe environmental risks...
The goal really is to reduce those risks to anacceptable level, dependent on your organization’sinternal risk management comfort level
222017 Annual Real Estate Seminar
June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 65
millercanfield.com
Objectives of Due Diligence
Evaluateknown
potential risks
Identifypreviouslyunknown
risks
Quantify allrisks
identified
Consideroptions formanaging
risks
232017 Annual Real Estate Seminar
June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 66
millercanfield.com
Objectives of Due Diligence
24
Conducting robust environmental due diligenceallows a party to:
• Avoid entering a transaction withunacceptable environmental risks
• Negotiate to allocate liability of a knownenvironmental risk
• Establish eligibility for certain statutorydefenses to environmental liability
• Mitigate risk through insurance or otherstrategies
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 67
millercanfield.com
Types of Environmental Assessments
ASTM Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA)(ASTM Practice E1527-13)
Customized Mini Phase Is
Customized Environmental Questionnaire
ASTM Transaction Screen E1528-14
Phase I + (customized add-ons/non-scopeconsiderations, e.g., asbestos, wetlands, mold)
Compliance Audits
Phase II Invasive Testing Investigations
252017 Annual Real Estate Seminar
June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 68
millercanfield.com
Phase I Environmental SiteAssessments
What’s the procedure for a standard Phase I? An environmental professional performs historical research using a
variety of sources: old aerial photographs, city directories, fireinsurance (Sanborn) maps.
Environmental databases (usually EDR) are used to identify any issueswith the property or adjacent land (e.g., LUST databases, NPL sites,RCRA waste generators)
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests are made to U.S. EPA,IEPA, local government agencies
Interviews with current/former site owners, government officials, etc.
A visual “site reconnaissance” is performed
The Phase I report identifies “recognized environmental conditions”(“RECs”) or indicates they are absent
VAPOR INTRUSION NOW INCLUDED!26
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 69
millercanfield.com
What’s the procedure for a standard Phase I? (cont.)
REC = “.... The presence or likely presence of any hazardoussubstances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property (1)due to any release to the environment; (2) under conditionsindicative of a release to the environment; or (3) underconditions that pose a material threat of a future release to theenvironment. De minimis conditions are not recognizedenvironmental conditions.”
27
Phase I Environmental SiteAssessments
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 70
millercanfield.com
Phase I “Non-Scope” Considerations– Asbestos-containing materials; radon; lead in paint and water
– Wetlands, ecological resources, endangered species
– Industrial hygiene, health and safety; indoor air
– EMF/high voltage power lines
– REGULATORY COMPLIANCE
– Former or adjacent sites
– Off-site treatment, storage, recycling or disposal of wastes orrecyclables
– Third-Party Liabilities
28
Phase I Environmental SiteAssessments
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 71
millercanfield.com
What a Phase I is NOT
A “clean” Phase I is NOT a guarantee that a site is clean.
A Phase I may NOT reveal every possible environmentalproblem on the property, nor does it define the extent of theproblem, if any.
A Phase I is NOT a compliance audit.
A Phase I does NOT necessarily guarantee that a propertypurchaser will be able to claim a defense against futureenvironmental liability.
A Phase I does NOT have eternal life.
A Phase I may not be usable by others.
All Phase Is are NOT created equally. 29
Phase I Environmental SiteAssessments
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 72
millercanfield.com
Timing of Environmental Due Diligence
Typically a Phase I ESA takes 30 days.
DO NOT time the environmental investigation sothat you have the Phase I only the day beforeclosing.
OTHERWISE – there is no opportunity to reviewthe Phase I for errors, but also no time to follow upon possible issues.
30
Phase I Environmental SiteAssessments
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 73
millercanfield.com
Phase I Viability
A Phase I completed less than 180 days prior tothe date of acquisition of the property is presumedto be valid. (ASTM E1527-13 sec 4.6)
31
Phase I Environmental SiteAssessments
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 74
millercanfield.com
Phase I Viability
A Phase I for which the information was collectedor updated within one year prior to the date ofacquisition of the property may be used providedthat the following components are conducted orupdated within 180 days of property acquisition:– Interviews with site owners, operators and/or occupants
– Searches for recorded environmental cleanup liens
– Reviews of federal, state and local government records
– Visual inspection of the property
And – an updated declaration by the EP
32
Phase I Environmental SiteAssessments
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 75
millercanfield.com
What happens after the Phase I?
That depends…
• If the Phase I reveals no recognized environmental
conditions, full speed ahead!
• Enables one to fairly value the deal
• Affords psychological comfort
• Lenders will lend money
• First step in establishing statutory protections later if needed
33
Post Phase I Considerations
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 76
millercanfield.com
Post Phase I Considerations
If the Phase I reveals one or more RECs, more workis (probably) needed
• Generally a Phase II is the next step
• Remediation may need to be performed
• Possibly pursue an NFR/NFA Letter
• Due Care (Continuing Obligations) may need to be taken later
342017 Annual Real Estate Seminar
June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 77
millercanfield.com
• Phase II ESA – environmental due diligence whichincludes physical sampling (generally of a limited nature) ofthe site. For example, a Phase II ESA may includelaboratory analysis of soil, groundwater and/or surfacewater, for certain contaminants.
– A Phase II ESA may also include testing for the presence of lead-basedpaint, asbestos-containing materials (“ACMs”), and volatile organiccompounds that may pose a risk of harm due to vapor intrusion.
Phase IIs
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 78
millercanfield.com
The Primary Goal is usually to investigateconcerns identified in Phase I
–Testing can be performed for soil, groundwater, soil-gas, andinterior air (vapor intrusion)
–Soil testing using Geoprobe, hand augers, etc.
–Groundwater testing using temporary or permanent wells
–Soil gas and/or interior air using probes or vacuum canisters
Phase IIs
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 79
millercanfield.com
• Secondary Goal is to delineate extent of anyproblems
– Even a no-action remedy needs to determine the extent ofthe problem
– Most states insistent on full delineation before issuingclosure letter
– Estimate of remediation costs is almost always desired
Phase IIs
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 80
millercanfield.com
Typical Phase II Data Table
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 81
millercanfield.com
Typical Phase II Plume Diagram
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 82
millercanfield.com
Achieving Site Closure
Post Phase II / Remediation – Site ClosureOptions
– Obtain a No Further Remediation (“NFR”) Letter (or equiv.)
– NFRAP (No Further Remedial Action Planned, or equiv.)
– Comfort Letter
– Prospective Purchaser Agreement
402017 Annual Real Estate Seminar
June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 83
millercanfield.com
Achieving Site Closure
No Further Remediation Letters– Provides protection from liability under the Environmental Protection
Act, but not under federal statutes. Sec. 58.10(a): “Issuance of theNFR Letter signifies a release from further responsibilities under theAct…and shall be considered prima facie evidence that the site doesnot constitute a threat to human health and the environment….”
– Benefits are intended to run with the land to subsequent owners ofthe property.
– NFR letter can be limited in several ways:
• A focused NFR letter (area or constituents);
• NFR letter may limit future use of property (“AUL”);
• “Engineered Barriers.”
– Federal MOU offers comfort against federal enforcement but not lawsuitsunder CERCLA or other laws
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 84
millercanfield.com
Evaluating Site Closure NFA/NFRLetters
Do not assume that just because there is a closure letter inthe chain of title that it signifies a “clean bill of health” forthe property.
– Limitations for industrial/commercial use or other AULs
– Restrictions on use of groundwater
– Duty to maintain engineered barriers
– Beware of Pre-2013 Illinois NFR Letters!
422017 Annual Real Estate Seminar
June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 85
millercanfield.com
Top 10 Tips for Hiring Consultants
1. Build up your stable of trustworthy consultants (at variousprice points and capabilities).
2. Pre-negotiate standard terms and conditions (T&C).
3. Check contracts/T&C when "inheriting" consultants orobtaining a reliance letter; seek to renegotiate if necessary
4. Confirm the scope of the engagement and fee structure(estimates, lump sum/not-to-exceed, fund reimbursements,etc.).
5. Indemnities, and negotiating the limits of the consultant'sliability (beware limits to the value of the contract!).
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 86
millercanfield.com
Top 10 Tips for Hiring Consultants
6. Check the insurance coverage and limits;additional insureds (subs?).
7. Miscellaneous provisions: confidentiality, fee-shifting, fee mark-ups, permits.
8. Know when to give in: exclusion of consequentialdamages.
9. Who pays? Know who the client is, make sure theconsultant does too, and document it.
10.Who cleans up the mess? (IDW)
2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar June 2-3, 2017
CH. 6 Page 87
millercanfield.com
QUESTIONS?
45Lawrence W. Falbe [email protected] 2017 Annual Real Estate Seminar
June 2-3, 2017 CH. 6 Page 88