adr report--bacolta and barrete

Upload: may-v-blanco

Post on 04-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    1/31

    Main Reference: www.philippinesforum.com

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    2/31

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    3/31

    SpanishLaw of

    Civil

    Procedure

    R.A. No.876 (The

    Arbitration

    Law)

    New York

    Convention on

    the Recognition

    & Enforcement

    of Foreign

    Arbitral Awards

    The New Civil Code that was passed in 1949 containedseveral provisions on arbitration,

    but these provisions did not provide a comprehensive legalframework. They merely laid

    down certain principles.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    4/31

    Then, in 2004, Congresspassed Republic Act No.

    9285, otherwise knownas the

    Alternative Dispute

    Resolution Act of 2004.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    5/31

    The efforts of Congress and the judiciary at

    improving the system of arbitration

    are welcome and timely. Today, two

    contemporary circumstances, one a localproblem, the other an international

    phenomenon, acutely highlight the need to

    further promote and

    develop arbitration:

    and .

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    6/31

    Arbitration is an alternative to, or

    a substitute for, traditional

    litigation in court.

    Why do we need an alternative to

    the traditional court litigation?

    A review of relevant statistics

    relating to our courts provides the

    answer.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    7/31

    Recent data from the Supreme Court shows

    that, for the period January to

    November 2005, the cases filed continue to

    the cases resolved at the Regional

    Trial Court (RTC), Metropolitan Trial Court

    (MeTC), Municipal Trial Court in Cities

    (MTCC), Municipal Trial Court (MTC),Municipal Circuit Trial Court (MCTC) levels.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    8/31

    As of 30 November2004, the total number

    of pending cases was

    , with

    the trial courts bearing

    the brunt of the caseloadas follows:

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    9/31

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    10/31

    Not surprisingly, the data

    likewise shows that the

    problem of the

    has persisted through

    the years. The vacancy rate

    has hovered at around onaverage.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    11/31

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    12/31

    This shortage in judges is largely due to the relatively

    low pay of judges. Based on figures as of January

    2005, an:

    RTC judge

    receives

    monthly in

    salary and

    allowances

    MeTC judgereceives

    MCTC and MTC

    judges receive

    monthly in

    salary and

    allowances

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    13/31

    The obvious solution to the problem is tothe number of judges.

    However, this is easier said than done. Thesalaries of the judges are not determined by

    market forces but are subject toand the of our

    lawmakers.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    14/31

    The result is that our courts have not

    been able to function efficiently. While

    there is no ready data on the average

    number of years that it takes the courts

    to resolve

    disputes, anecdotal evidence shows that

    it usually takes for a case to be

    resolved at the trial court level, and

    another for a case to beresolved on appeal.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    15/31

    Under the circumstances, the need topromote arbitration becomes pressing.

    Arbitration directly benefits the parties andindirectly benefits the courts since it divertscases away from them and into the hands of

    arbitrators with much lesser caseloads.

    This indirect benefit has been recognizedboth by Congress and the Supreme Court.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    16/31

    The enactment of R.A. No. 9285...

    It came after

    the passage of the

    countrys first

    arbitration law,

    Republic Act No. 876,

    and almost

    after the

    countrys accession tothe New York

    Convention.

    It is certainly a

    welcome

    development and,perhaps not

    coincidentally, arrives

    at a time when the

    countrys

    economy is moving

    forward once again.

    It provides a more

    and

    framework for

    the development of an

    alternative dispute

    resolution system.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    17/31

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    18/31

    The courts are directed to

    give due regard to the

    policy of

    arbitration

    Prior to the passage of R.A.

    No. 9285, an arbitration

    agreement could be defeatedby impleading or joining either

    as plaintiff or defendant a

    person who was not a party to

    the arbitration agreement.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    19/31

    It provides for a system of

    arbitration, i.e., InternationalCommercial Arbitration and

    Domestic Arbitration.

    It expressly declares arbitration

    proceedings, including the

    records, evidence, and arbitral

    award, to be .

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    20/31

    It expressly provides that arbitration

    may nevertheless be commenced or

    continued, and an award may be

    made, despite the pendency of a

    related issue before the court.

    It provides that, unless otherwise

    agreed by the parties, the arbitrator

    may be of nationality. With this

    clarification, the parties now have a

    larger pool of arbitrators to choose

    from.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    21/31

    May include but shall not be limited

    to preliminary injunction directedagainst a party, appointment of

    receivers or detention, preservation,

    inspection of property that is the

    subject of the dispute in arbitration.

    It expressly declares that any

    ground other than the grounds

    specified under the law for vacating

    a domestic arbitral award shall be

    disregarded.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    22/31

    It declares that any ground other than

    the grounds specified in Article V of the

    New York Convention for vacating aforeign arbitral award shall be

    disregarded.

    Lack of a valid arbitration agreement;

    Violation of due process;

    Excess of the arbitral tribunals authority;

    Irregularity in the composition of the

    arbitral tribunal or arbitral procedure;

    andThe award has been set aside

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    23/31

    A. TRANSFIELD PHILIPPINES, INC. vs. LUZONHYDRO CORPORATION, G.R. No. 146717,May 19, 2006

    :

    Enforceability of foreign arbitral awards; and

    Right of parties to an arbitration proceedingto obtain provisional relief from the courts

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    24/31

    B. GONZALES vs. CLIMAX MINING LTD.G.R. Nos. 161957 and 167994, Jan. 22, 2007

    :

    , it held that a underRule 45 is the proper mode of appeal inchallenging the orders of the trial court in anaction to compel arbitration.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    25/31

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    26/31

    B. GONZALES vs. CLIMAX MINING LTD.G.R. Nos. 161957 and 167994, Jan. 22, 2007

    :

    , modifying its earlier ruling,

    the Supreme Court in Gonzales introducedthewidely-accepted doctrine of separability,which states that the validity of thecontaining the agreement to submit to

    arbitration does not affect the applicability ofthe itself.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    27/31

    Under the

    circumstances,

    arbitration is truly

    worth cultivating.It possesses many

    features, as

    follows:

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    28/31

    First, unlike

    judges, arbitrators

    are burdened

    by heavy

    caseloads.

    Second, there is a

    of

    arbitrators to draw

    from. Unlike thetraditional

    judges, arbitrators

    do not have to be

    lawyers.

    Third, the fees of

    arbitrators are

    fixed by law. They

    are flexible and

    adjustaccording to the

    complexities of the

    case and the

    reputation of the

    arbitrator.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    29/31

    Fourth, arbitration

    has the indirect

    benefit of

    the court

    dockets by

    diverting cases

    away from them.

    Fifth, for those of the

    perception that the

    courts are unable to

    protect investors inan

    manner, arbitration

    addresses the

    concern of partiality.

    Sixth, the costs of

    arbitration are

    by the parties.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    30/31

    The Philippines hascome a long way since

    arbitration made its firstappearance in

    the Spanish Code of CivilProcedure. Now that the

    wave is upon us, thechallenge is to and

    it.

  • 7/30/2019 ADR Report--Bacolta and Barrete

    31/31

    Main Reference: www.philippinesforum.com

    !

    Reported by: Estella Marie Barrete and Jessica J Bacolta