ADORE vs SCIENTOLOGY

I gotta make a few comments here.

CANONICALIZATION OF AUDITING COMMANDS

What items you run is much more important than how you run them,but using questions to run items is death.

Death, death, death.

For example who and what questions are rampant in Scientology, buteven Scientology offers different ways of running the same thing.

So rather than run "What did your mother do to you?" you could run'Tell me something your mother did to you", which is a command, orsimply 'Spot something your mother did to you."

We call the 'Spot item' form of command the canonical form, as itwill always work, but there might be times when other forms might workbetter or be more grammatically correct.

QUESTIONS

The issue of questions in auditing is serious matter, as the bankruns on questions, they are the cylinders of the bank's car, and youcan't push one cylinder around without moving all (the trillions) ofother ones too.

Every time you ask a preclear 'What's the matter', well he's got atrillion years of matter to hand you, all in deep failed question churn.

Who, how, what, where, when, why, which, is it, and can it.

Mostly :)

Thus question asking about one item, restimulates ALL items thereever were or ever will be.

The ITEM does not cause the restim, the EFFORTS TO ANSWER THEQUESTION do.

That's because heavy efforts to answer questions are common to allitems. It's the WANTING TO KNOW that drives the bank.

The bank creators knew that truth seekers would be a problem,eventually finding their way to clear, so they made sure that seeking,searching, finding, looking for, and question asking were charged to thehilt.

Seeking, searching, finding, and looking for ANSWERS is the way todeath.

Seeking, searching, finding, and looking for QUESTIONS is the wayback to life.

Your preclear thinks that

Questions are the problem and answers are the solution.

The clear understands that

Answers are the problem, questions are the solution.

Thus even if the item is a proper item to be running, the amount ofcharge stirred up by QUESTION ASKING will often swamp the amount ofcharge coming off that item, and the preclear is worse for the wear.

Thus for any item, we first canonicalize it, then try to create aform to run it in that is as far way from asking a question as possible.

We want auditing COMMANDS, not questions, always, always, always.

If the preclear can honestly say 'I don't know' to the auditingcommand, then it is too close to a question.

The big joke here is we do not want to audit BY asking questinos,you want to audit asking questions by NOT asking questions.

When it comes to auditing questions, asking questions is deadly,because it just give the preclear another question!

Self auditing, or figure figure as LRH calls it, is mostlythe preclear asking questions of himself over and over, and is a deadlywaste of time, and not at all related to solo auditing where one istrying to spot and erase the question asking altogether.

Source has no answers and no questions.

The basic solo auditing program is simply:

1.) Spot something of notice.

2.) Spot a question about that item.

Repeat 2 until no more, then go back to 1.

E/P: No questions, no answers. Wise. At peace.

As a reminder, complete canonicalization of an item would involveboth the NO and the SOME forms. Often the SOME won't run until the NOruns first, and staying in sync is critical to really running the twoway flows out.

Spot NO item. (Pretended NO, not-ised) Spot SOME item.

The preclear is never aberrated by a stuck one way flow, but by TWOstuck one way flows, IS *AND* ISN'T.

NOT KNOW.

LRH had a fantastic process that seems to be given little attentionin the Church standard line up, and which in fact should be run on theChurch itself by those having a problem with it.

Spot a condition or item and then run:

"What do or could you not know about that item."

First we canonicalize it to:

"Spot something you could or do not know about that item."

This is a rough one, because it offers a contradiction to thepreclear, how can he tell you something he doesn't know, if he doesn'tknow it?

For example,

"Tell me something you could or don't know about your mother?"

Well if you don't know it, how can you tell it?

This process is NOT meant to find answers for you about yourmother, but to find QUESTIONS!

So the preclear may not know how old she is, but he can say

"I don't know how old she is."

"I don't know where she was born."

"I don't know if she was raped by her father."

But you see each of these are QUESTIONS in disguise.

"How old is she?"

"Where was she born?"

"Was she raped by her father?"

So why not approach the item directly simply by running

"Spot a question you have or could have about your mother."

This form runs exactly the same thing, gets right to the point, thequestions, and gets the preclear to not know the answers anyhow, BECAUSETHE ANSWER TO MOTHER ARE ALL THE QUESTIONS HE HAS ASKED AND FAILED TOANSWER ABOUT HER.

Nothing will chill out a somatic faster than getting all the

questions off of it.

Spot a condition. Tell me a question you have about thatcondition.

Remember the questions are a deceit, they are an effort to KEEP THESOMATIC AROUND by pretending to want to find out about it, so he can dosomething about it.

A service facsimile is an excuse for not expressing a resentment byasking a question. The E/P of running out the service fac is 'OperatingSolo Cool'. - Adore

It isn't necessary to find any answers to get better, it is onlynecessary to spot the missed or bypassed questions that are causing thepersistence.

That's a big statement, dig it and don't leave it.

Once the preclear settles into this, he will suddenly be able tospot and feel when his bank is convulsing with its fountain head ofquestion asking, even if he hasn't a clue what the question is. It willbe ALL his questions.

When this convulsing is chilled out the bank will stop growing moresolid every living second the preclear is alive.

THE POWER PROCESSES

The Power process are merely running the top 3 items on theAwareness Characteristic Chart, SOURCE, EXISTENCE and CONDITIONS.

Source is what is cause or not cause.

Existence is what is or what isn't.

And Conditions are how things are or are not causally connected orconditional upon each other.

For example, a condition to getting across the river is to have abridge there. Or a condition to staying alive is being able to eat, and

a condition to being able to eat is to be able to hunt or grow food.

These causal necessaries to change existence from how it is to howyou might want it to be, form a web of 'travel' that the being mustcausally walk to get from where he is to where he wants to be.

Thus conditions are not just more of existence, they are the'barriers' of getting from one existence to another. The same barriersthat make up the freedoms, barriers and purposes of games.

So scientology runs Power Process 4 as

Spot a Source, Spot a not Source.

Well that's pretty close to canon isn't it?

We would run instead

Spot NO source. Spot SOME source.

Grammar isn't too important, as these ideas are beyond language andwords, but get the preclear running it however he feels comfortable withthe commands.

Scientology runs Power Process 5 as

What is? What isn't?

Flunk. Into the garbage pail you go.

Run it as:

Spot NO is. Spot SOME is. Spot NO something. Spot SOME something. Spot NO nothing. Spot SOME nothing.

Scientology runs power process 6 as

Spot an existing condition Tell me how you handled it.

This is pretty close to canon, but misses the NO.

This also tends to confuse condition with UNWANTED existence, whichis not what it is meant to run, as condition is meant to be defined asit is used on the awareness characteristic chart.

Spot NO condition, Spot SOME condition Spot NO handle, Spot SOME handle

Spot NO problem, Spot SOME problem. Spot NO solution, Spot SOME solution.

OK, now one last comment.

The power processes simply run the top 3 items of theawareness characteristic chart.

Why keep it secret? You have already published the chart.

What else do you expect people to do with it except canonize itand run it?

Why not run ALL the items on the chart the same way, using straightauditing form?

Spot NO oblivion, Spot SOME oblivion Spot NO criminality, Spot SOME criminality

If you really want power to be handled for good, run the wholechart from bottom to top multiple times using NO and SOME.

That will give you a power clear like no one has seen before.

Here is the full awareness characteristic chart. http://www.clearing.org/cgi/archive.cgi?/electra/acc.memo

Homer

------------------------------------------------------------------------Homer Wilson Smith The Paths of Lovers Art Matrix - Lightlink(607) 277-0959 KC2ITF Cross Internet Access, Ithaca NY

homer@lightlink.com In the Line of Duty http://www.lightlink.comThu Sep 23 14:46:07 EDT 2010