adopted report transport and infrastructure committee meeting · transport capital works program q3...

789 Adopted Report

of the

Transport and Infrastructure Committee Meeting

held

Thursday 14 May 2020 at

9am

City of Gold Coast Council Chambers 135 Bundall Road Surfers Paradise

789th Council Meeting 27 May 2020 2 Transport And Infrastructure Committee Meeting 14 May 2020 Adopted Report

Index 789 Adopted Report

Transport and Infrastructure Committee Meeting Thursday 14 May 2020

9am

Item Direct. File Page Subject

1 TI LG115/1358/01/2020(P1) 4 Transport And Infrastructure Action List & Forward Planning Schedule

2 TI FN334/375/02/08(P1) 9 2019-20 Local Area Works Program – Additions

3 TI LG343/1045/13/01(P1) 14 Asset Condition And Infrastructure Renewal Requirement

Closed Session

4# ##

TI RD500387/46/05(P1) 34 Old Coach Road Upgrade Stage 2 / Bermuda Street Extension Planning Update

Open Session

General Business

5## TI FN334/375/02/08(P1) 64 Funding For Lighting Along Lake Orr Boardwalk Varsity Lakes

6 TI FN334/375/02/08(P1) 65 Funding For Lighting Between Cheltenham Drive And Muirfield Place Robina

# Officer’s Recommendation changed by Committee

## Committee Recommendation changed by Council KEY: OCEO - Office of the Chief Executive Officer OCOO Office of the Chief Operating Officer EPE - Economy, Planning and Environment OS - Organisational Services LC - Lifestyle and Community TI - Transport and Infrastructure WW - Water and Waste

789th Council Meeting 27 May 2020 3 Transport And Infrastructure Committee Meeting 14 May 2020 Adopted Report ADOPTION BY COUNCIL 27 MAY 2020 RESOLUTION G20.0527.009 moved Cr PC Young seconded Cr Taylor That the Report of the Transport and Infrastructure Committee Meeting of Thursday 14 May 2020, covered by Recommendations numbered TI20.0514.001 to TI20.0514.006, be adopted with the exception of Recommendation Numbers TI20.0514.004 and TI20.0514.005 which were specifically resolved.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY ATTENDANCE Cr P C Young (Chairperson) Cr D Taylor Cr W Owen-Jones Cr C Caldwell Cr B Patterson (left the meeting at 10.21am) Cr H Vorster Cr M Hammel (Visitor) Cr R Bayldon-Lumsden (Visitor) Cr G Tozer (Visitor) Cr D McDonald (Visitor) Cr G O’Neill (Visitor) Mr A Twine Director Transport and Infrastructure Mr M Hulse Manager Infrastructure Delivery Mr M Tilly Manager Transport and Traffic Mr J Wagner A/Manager City Assets Mr D Braby Executive Coordinator Asset Management, City Assets Mr N Prasser Executive Coordinator Transport Planning, Policy and Program,

Transport and Traffic APOLOGIES / LEAVE OF ABSENCE PROCEDURAL MOTION moved Cr Vorster seconded Cr Taylor That the apology of Cr PJ Young be noted. CARRIED PRESENTATIONS Item 3: Asset Condition and Infrastructure Renewal Requirement – David Braby – Executive

Coordinator Asset Management – City Assets Item 4: Old Coach Road Upgrade Stage 2 / Bermuda Street Extension Planning Update

[Confidential] – Matthew Tilly – Manager Transport and Traffic Overview of Pinch-Point Program Approach – Matthew Tilly – Manager Transport and Traffic Transport Capital Works Program Q3 2019-20 Update – Matthew Tilly – Manager Transport and Traffic


ITEM 1 TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ACTION LIST & FORWARD PLANNING SCHEDULE LG115/1358/01/2020(P1)

TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE COMMITTEE Item Action Officer Action/Previous Resolution

Transport and Infrastructure Committee Meeting (all meetings)

Action List and Forward Planning Schedule A Twine – Director Transport and Infrastructure

Standing Item.

2019-20 Capital Works Program - Approvals M Hulse – Infrastructure Delivery Report as required.

2019-20 Local Area Works Program – Additions M Hulse – Infrastructure Delivery Report as required.

(790) Transport and Infrastructure Committee Meeting – 10 June 2020

The Southport Spit Master Plan – Implementation Update (Capital)

D Stewart – Infrastructure Delivery To provide an update to Council on The Spit master plan implementation – Capital Works.

HOTA Project Update Report Stage 1 (Ex. G18.0731.007, Ex. G18.0227.007, Ex G18.1030.009, Ex G19.0326.005, Ex G19.0920.009, EX G20.0218.007)

T Windsor – Infrastructure Delivery That the next Stage 1 update report be brought back to Council in July 2020.

Response To Petition: Hooning Activity Currumbin Creek Road, Currumbin Valley (EX.G20.0303.030)

M Tilly – Transport & Traffic That the above Petition be received and referred to the appropriate committee for consideration and report to Council.


ITEM 1 (Continued) TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE ACTION LIST AND FORWARD PLANNING SCHEDULE LG115/1358/01/2020(P1)

(791) Transport and Infrastructure Committee Meeting – 16 July 2020

Gold Coast Dive Attraction Update Report D Stewart – Infrastructure Delivery To provide an update to Council on the Gold Coast Dive Attraction.

Northern Bus Proposal and East/West Bus Rapid Transit Proposal

M Tilly / A Stewart – Transport & Traffic

To outline our proposal to subsidise bus service in the northern urban growth area in liaison with TransLink.

Chevron Island to Surfers Paradise Green Bridge Business Case

M Tilly / T Clark – Transport & Traffic

To provide findings of the business case and to seek support for the project.

Sustainable Pavement Management Plan D Braby / D McNeilage – City Assets

To seek Council approval of the Sustainable Pavement Management Plan (SPMP).

(792) Transport and Infrastructure Committee Meeting – 13 August 2020

Public Transport Infrastructure Program (PTIP) M Tilly / N Prasser – Transport & Traffic

To advise elected representatives the intent of the PTIP and what will be delivered concurrent to and post achieving our DDA compliance requirements as at December 2022.


T Windsor – Infrastructure Delivery That the next Stage 1 update report be brought back to Council in August 2020.

Tweed River Entrance Sand Bypass Project – Transition

S Hunt / P Prenzler / Z Elliott-Perkins – City Assets

A report on the future operation of the Tweed River Entrance Sand Bypass Project (TRESBP).



(793) Transport and Infrastructure Committee Meeting – 3 September 2020

Active Transport Network Plan and Green Bridge 10 Year Implementation Plan

M Tilly / N Prasser – Transport & Traffic

To seek Council endorsement of ATN Plan and Green Bridge 10 Year Implementation Plan (including providing a citywide perspective on complying with the requirements of the Disability Discrimination Act (DDA) when designing and constructing pathways and the proposed way forward with project development activity).

Yatala Freight Study M Tilly / N Prasser – Transport & Traffic

To advise elected representatives on the outcomes of the study including future actions and initiatives.

Propose Change To Issue Permits Under Local Law For Temporary Road Closures

Debbie Middleditch / Brigid Kudzius – Transport & Traffic

To advise the Transport and Infrastructure Committee of the intention to change to issuing Permits under Local Law 11 for temporary road closures and to introduce a cost recovery fee for the issuing of permits.

Pimpama West Service Road - Business Case M Tilly / N Prasser – Transport & Traffic

To advise Council on the outcomes of the business case and the proposed way forward with project development and delivery



(794) Transport and Infrastructure Committee Meeting – 15 October 2020

Palm Beach Local Area Transport Study M Tilly / N Prasser – Transport & Traffic

To advise elected representatives on the outcomes of the study including future actions and initiatives.

City of Gold Coast Local Disaster Management Plan L Connery – Business & Program Management

To seek Council endorsement of the City of Gold Coast Local Disaster Management Plan V9 which has been reviewed and revised as required annually.

Private Seawalls

P Prenzler / D Hamilton / D Pistol – City Assets

To provide an update to Council on the City’s progress with the Queensland Government to resolve tenure issues associated with private seawalls on State land.

Stormwater Drainage Management Plan And 4 Year Implementation Plan

S Krueger – City Assets To seek Council approval for the updated priority outcomes relating to the management of the city’s current and future stormwater network and four year implementation plan.

(795) Transport and Infrastructure Committee Meeting – 12 November 2020

Gold Coast Parking Plan (2021 - 2026) M Tilly / N Prasser – Transport & Traffic

To seek council endorsement of the Plan.

Gold Coast Road Safety Plan (2021 - 2026) M Tilly / N Prasser – Transport & Traffic

To seek council endorsement of the Plan.



(796) Transport and Infrastructure Committee Meeting – 1 December 2020

State Of The Transport Network 2020 M Tilly / N Prasser – Transport & Traffic

To provide Council with an update on the State of the Transport Network 2020


T Windsor – Infrastructure Delivery That the next Stage 1 update report be brought back to Council in November 2020.

RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council resolves as follows: That the Transport and Infrastructure Directorate Action List and Forward Planning Schedule for the Transport and Infrastructure Committee be noted. Authorised by: Alton Twine Director Transport and Infrastructure iSPOT#72563694 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TI20.0514.001 moved Cr Caldwell seconded Cr Patterson That the Transport and Infrastructure Directorate Action List and Forward Planning Schedule for the Transport and Infrastructure Committee be noted.

CARRIED


ITEM 2 INFRASTRUCTURE DELIVERY 2019-20 LOCAL AREA WORKS PROGRAM – ADDITIONS FN334/375/02/08(P1) Refer 2 page attachment 1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY 1.1 I recommend that Attachment 2.2 of this report be considered in Closed Session

pursuant to section 275 (1) of the Local Government Regulation 2012 for the reason that the matter involves the local government’s budget.

1.2 That the Attachment 2.2 be deemed a confidential document in accordance with

sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009 and that the attachment remain confidential unless Council decides otherwise by resolution.

2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Not Applicable. 3 PURPOSE OF REPORT The purpose of this report is for Council to approve additions to the 2019-20 Local Area Works Program as detailed in Attachment 2.1. 4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS Not Applicable. 5 DISCUSSION Councillors in conjunction with City officers have suggested that the projects in Attachment 2.1 be added to the 2019-20 Local Area Works Program. 6 ALIGNMENT TO THE CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND

OPERATIONAL PLAN These projects satisfy the following: 1.0 The best place to live and visit

1.4 We have fast, frequent and reliable public transport. We can get around the city easily and cheaply.

2.0 Prosperity built on a strong diverse economy 2.3 We have infrastructure that supports productivity and growth. We have connected and vibrant economic precincts.

3.0 People contribute to a strong community spirit

3.6 We are an active community. We enjoy the city and its enviable climate.


ITEM 2 (Continued) 2019-20 LOCAL AREA WORKS PROGRAM – ADDITIONS FN334/375/02/08(P1) 7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS Funds are available within the various Local Area Works allocations to carry out the works as indicated in Attachment 2.1 within the 2019-20 financial year. Details of the additional annual operational/maintenance costs, estimated new/upgrade and renewal costs and estimated useful life of the new assets created are shown in Attachment 2.1. The new/upgrade cost is the cost to create or upgrade the asset. The works proposed in this report can be maintained and operated adequately based on the current 10 year financial plan's growth factors and maintenance budgets. 8 RISK MANAGEMENT Transport and Infrastructure’s project teams will mitigate risk through project development and delivery phases in accordance with the risk management procedure 6-3 which is aligned with the Risk Management Standards AS/NZS 31000:2018. 9 STATUTORY MATTERS Not Applicable. 10 COUNCIL POLICIES Local Area Works and Services Program Policy (iSPOT #22891397). 11 DELEGATIONS Not Applicable. 12 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION Name and Title of the Stakeholder Consulted

Directorate or Organisation

Is the Stakeholder Satisfied With Content of Report and Recommendations (Yes/No) (comment as appropriate)

Andrew Reid, Senior Project Manager - LAW

Transport and Infrastructure

Yes

13 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS The community, ratepayers and visitors to the Gold Coast will benefit from the new and improved facilities funded from the Local Area Works Program as listed in Attachment 2.1. 14 TIMING Projects listed with “TBA” will be added to the Local Area Works Program once formally approved by Council and included in Design/Construction Programs for implementation in conjunction with other priority works.


ITEM 2 (Continued) 2019-20 LOCAL AREA WORKS PROGRAM – ADDITIONS FN334/375/02/08(P1) 15 CONCLUSION The proposed additions to the Local Area Works and Services Program as suggested by divisional councillors in conjunction with City officers are listed in Attachment 2.1. It is recommended that Council approve the additions in order that they can be implemented as soon as practicable. 16 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council resolves as follows: 1 That Attachment 2.2 be deemed a confidential document in accordance with sections

171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009 and that the attachment remain confidential unless Council decides otherwise by resolution.

2 That the additions listed in Attachment 2.1 be approved for the 2019-20 Local Area

Works Program. Author: Authorised by: Garry Ellis Alton Twine Program Coordinator Project Management Unit Director Transport and Infrastructure 24 April 2020 iSPOT:#76282956 + Atts#76282738 & #76282929 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TI20.0514.002 moved Cr Caldwell seconded Cr Patterson 1 That Attachment 2.2 be deemed a confidential document in accordance with

sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009 and that the attachment remain confidential unless Council decides otherwise by resolution.

2 That the additions listed in Attachment 2.1 be approved for the 2019-20 Local

Area Works Program.

CARRIED


Attachment 2.1

TRANSPORT AND INFRASTRUCTURE – ADDITIONS

Project

Manager

Div

Project

No

Location

Description

Proposed Local Area Works Allocation

New / Upgrade. Preliminary Estimated

Capital costs $

Additional

Annual Operations

& Maintenance

Costs $

Estimate

Useful Life Years

A. Reid (CR491441)

8 TBA Pappas Way, Carrara

Construction of a concrete footpath and pedestrian refuge from Paddington Drive heading east 60m. The works include;

· Detail design of refuge · Survey · Construct a 60m x 1.5m wide concrete

path · Construct 16m² dry stack wall · Install 5m safety fencing · Reconstruct 2 x pedestrian access ramps · Install pre-cast pedestrian refuge · Signage · Line marking · Site restoration works · Traffic control

53,800 1,076 50

iSpot # 76282738


ITEM 3 CITY ASSETS ASSET CONDITION AND INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL REQUIREMENT LG343/1045/13/01(P1) Refer 8 page attachment 1 BASIS FOR CONFIDENTIALITY Not Applicable. 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Not Applicable. 3 PURPOSE OF REPORT The purpose of this report is to provide an overview of asset condition and infrastructure renewal requirements for Transport, Flood Mitigation and Stormwater Drainage and Beaches and Waterways assets. 4 PREVIOUS RESOLUTIONS SBF19.0513.007 (in part) “That prior to 2020-21 budget deliberations, Standing Committees review the outputs of the Asset Management Plans for relevant categories of infrastructure, with particular emphasis on infrastructure renewal requirements and underlying asset condition information.” 5 DISCUSSION Background Infrastructure asset management is a systematic approach to managing infrastructure assets through all lifecycle phases. This involves applying a combination of engineering, financial and other technical practices to the management of infrastructure: costs; opportunities; risks; and performance. Put simply, asset management is understanding the following about our infrastructure: § What assets do we have responsibility for and where are they? § What condition are our assets currently in and how are they performing over time? § When did we last maintain our assets, when are they next scheduled for maintenance

and what is our maintenance strategy? § When do we need to replace or upgrade each asset and what is our renewal/

upgrade strategy? The objective of effective asset management is to minimise asset lifecycle costs (such as ongoing maintenance and renewal) whilst managing the City’s assets in a safe and serviceable condition. Consistent with legislative trends across Australia, the Queensland Local Government Act (2009) has requirements for Councils to develop and adopt long-term asset management plans. While legislation has been one driver of asset management planning, it is important to recognise that it is good management practice to utilise these techniques to strike an acceptable balance between the management of infrastructure assets, our customer expectations and risks to achieve financially sustainable outcomes.


ITEM 3 (Continued) ASSET CONDITION AND INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL REQUIREMENT LG343/1045/13/01(P1) Asset Management Plans for infrastructure assets are updated annually as part of the planning and budget process. The outputs of the Asset Management Plans are summarised into the Total Asset Management Plan and presented to Council for adoption in conjunction with adoption of the annual budget. Asset Condition Assessment and Monitoring Asset condition assessment is a fundamental activity supporting the effective management of the City’s assets. It enables the City to monitor the condition and performance of our vast networks of assets over time and determine whether assets need maintenance or renewal. The condition information collected allows the City to forecast renewal budget requirements into the future based on current and historical condition information. Transport and Infrastructure has established prioritised, cyclic condition assessment programs to ensure regular monitoring of higher risk transport, flood mitigation and stormwater drainage and beaches and waterway assets occurs. The outputs from these condition assessment programs are used to plan and prioritise forward capital renewal and maintenance programs to treat infrastructure in poor and very poor condition. When developing work programs to undertake condition assessments, consideration is given to the benefit/cost of these, with a number of factors influencing the prioritisation of condition assessments; for example asset criticality/profile, age, environment, utilisation, location, etc. Although condition assessments are very important, it is not always affordable or practical to assess the condition of all infrastructure assets. Representative condition data, historical information and technical knowledge of assets generally provide an informed view of assets at intervention (i.e. requiring renewal), likelihood and consequences of asset failure and ultimately financial requirements to ensure assets remain functional and in service. Asset Condition Rating Descriptions The condition profile of assets in the Asset Management Plans and supporting Condition Assessment Plans is represented using the ratings of: Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor and Very Poor. For a description of each of the condition ratings refer Attachment 3.1, for example: § Poor condition refers to assets that have a number of minor defects and/or some

major defects compromising its function while increasing risk and ongoing maintenance cost. Assets in poor condition may require renewal of minor or major components.

§ Very poor condition refers to assets that have a number of major defects or have physically failed, i.e. the functionality of the asset is substantially reduced or the asset is asset can no longer serve its intended purpose. Assets in very poor condition require component or complete renewal or need to be disposed.


ITEM 3 (Continued) ASSET CONDITION AND INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL REQUIREMENT LG343/1045/13/01(P1) Asset Deterioration An assets condition deteriorates as it progresses through its lifecycle, with remediation costs to address defects generally increasing as it ages. The rate of an assets deterioration depends on a number of factors, including: § Environment – assets in harsher environments deteriorate faster § Utilisation – assets with high utilisation deteriorate faster § Asset material – assets constructed with susceptible material types can deteriorate

faster i.e. softwood timber Proposed Timing of Infrastructure Renewal Works The annual update of the Asset Management Plans includes revised infrastructure renewal requirements based on analysis of recent and historic asset condition information, renewal modelling and technical expertise. In conjunction with this analysis, consideration is given to appropriate timing for the renewal works including: § Which assets are in poor or very poor condition and are at intervention (i.e. require

renewal works in the immediate forthcoming years) § Which assets are in poor or very poor condition and are nearing intervention (i.e.

require further investigation/analysis and/or require renewal works in the outer years) It should be noted that renewal intervention points will vary between different asset types. For some lower risk/less critical asset types (i.e. kerb and channel), it may be more appropriate and more cost effective to allow assets to progress into later stages of their lifecycle prior to intervention i.e. into poor or very poor condition and replace the asset at that stage. Alternatively, there are some asset types that should not be ‘run to failure’ and may require early intervention. For example, infrastructure that supports critical services and/or has significant consequences of failure (such as a road bridge) may require part or complete renewal at an earlier stage in their lifecycle to maintain safety and asset serviceability. The drivers for asset renewal intervention include other factors in addition to asset condition such as identified asset functional deficiency, asset risk profile and change in asset utilisation. Asset Condition Profile For condition profiles refer to: § Attachment 3.2 – Transport Asset Management Summary § Attachment 3.3 – Flood Mitigation & Drainage Asset Management Summary § Attachment 3.4 – Beaches & Waterways Asset Management Summary The condition profiles illustrate that the majority of Transport, Flood Mitigation & Drainage and Beaches & Waterways assets are mostly in Very Good, Good and Fair condition. There are a small percentage of assets in Poor and Very Poor condition which is expected as assets progress through their lifecycle.


ITEM 3 (Continued) ASSET CONDITION AND INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL REQUIREMENT LG343/1045/13/01(P1) It should be noted that a large proportion of the Flood Mitigation and Drainage asset portfolio, particularly stormwater pipes, have not been physically condition assessed due to logistical challenges in assessing a vast network of buried infrastructure. A steadily expanding Stormwater Pipe CCTV Program is progressively being implemented and over the past 3 years. In total, the City has now assessed 6% or approximately 150km of the stormwater pipe network. The focus for this program is advancing the City’s understanding of the condition of the vast underground drainage network (over 2550kms of stormwater pipes) and how it is performing over time. This program continues to expand and assess more of the stormwater pipe network at a greater rate in 2020-21 and beyond. Transport Assets Summary – Road Pavement The City is responsible for 3,230 kilometres of local roads, growing each year by approximately 25 kilometres. The majority of the City’s road surface and pavement asset base is in very good, good or fair condition range. A large contributor to this result is the City’s residential roads which make up the largest proportion (58%) of the overall road network. There are fewer high traffic roads such as arterial and sub-arterial roads, however by comparison; these roads are in fair overall condition due to higher traffic volumes and heavy vehicle use. These roads attract the bulk of renewal investment due to the higher costs to renew these roads which include traffic control measures and more comprehensive road pavement structures to handle heavier vehicles. A proposed investment of $24.6M for the Road Rehabilitation and Reseal Program and $15.6M for the Road Reconstruction Program for 2020-21 will ensure that road pavement is maintained in a safe and functional condition and assets that require renewal are addressed in a timely manner. A dedicated Road Preservation Treatment Program is planned to be implemented as part of the Road Rehabilitation and Reseal Program in order to undertake low cost surface treatments early in the road surface asset life. These treatments can significantly extend low traffic asphalt surface lives up to 50% from 20 to 30 years (depending on traffic loading and environmental factors). In 2019-20 the Road Rehabilitation and Reseal Program budget was $23.4M and Road Reconstruction Program $14.1M. Comparative data on asset condition has been obtained from the Australian Local Government Association: National State of the Assets Report November 2018 and compared to relevant condition data in the Asset Management Plans as shown below. By comparison the City road network overall is in very good condition. Transport - Surface & Pavement National State of the Assets Report Comparison Condition Rating City of Gold Coast*

(Sealed Roads) National Average**

(Sealed Roads) 1 & 2 - Very Good / Good 93% 66% 3 – Fair 5% 25% 4 & 5 – Poor / Very Poor# 2% 9% * Average % of surface and pavement condition combined ** National average includes data from metropolitan, regional and shire Councils throughout Australia # See description previously outlined under section Asset Condition Rating Descriptions


ITEM 3 (Continued) ASSET CONDITION AND INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL REQUIREMENT LG343/1045/13/01(P1) Transport Assets Summary – Bridges The majority of bridge and major culvert assets are also considered to be in very good or good condition range, however during the 2018-19 condition assessment of all City Assets bridges and major culverts, a number of assets requiring renewal intervention were identified. There are no known safety issues for bridges and major culverts identified as at or nearing renewal intervention. All structures undergo detailed investigation and assessment to determine the required timing and the scope of the renewal or maintenance works that is required. Structures are also added to a more intensive monitoring program until renewal works are complete. In order to maintain bridge and major culvert assets in a safe and functional condition an investment of $10.6M is proposed in 2020-21. $5.9M was provided for bridge renewal works in 2019-20. This increase in renewal funding requirement is to address the additional assets identified at renewal intervention in the 2018-19 condition assessment program. Comparative data for bridges from the Australian Local Government Association: National State of the Assets Report November 2018 and data in the Asset Management Plans are shown below. By comparison, the City’s bridge assets are in good overall condition. Transport – Concrete Bridges National State of the Assets Report Comparison Condition Rating City of Gold Coast*

(Concrete Bridges) National Average** (Concrete Bridges)

1 & 2 - Very Good / Good 87% 75% 3 – Fair 12% 21% 4 & 5 – Poor / Very Poor 1% 4% *Average % of vehicle and pedestrian bridges combined **National average includes data from metropolitan, regional and shire Councils throughout Australia Transport Assets Summary – Other Transport Assets The condition assessment program for retaining walls within road reserves has identified the majority of walls are in good overall condition however some walls particularly those constructed of rock and mortar, rock or interlocking block walls are reaching their renewal intervention point. As a result, an investment of $2.2M for the Landslips & Retaining Walls Renewal Program for 2020-21 is proposed to ensure works are undertaken in a timely manner. This program also addresses any required remediation of any new landslips. $2.9M was allocated for retaining wall renewal and landslip works in 2019-20. A study and data capture exercise has identified a number of issues around the management and condition of the City’s lighting and banner poles, electrical and communication pits and conduit assets within road reserves. An asset register data capture project has now been completed for poles and pits which has resulted in a complete register of all City owned poles, pits and switchboards including their geographic location. Subsequent to this, a condition assessment program has commenced for all poles. The next step in this project involves mapping all City owned buried conduit assets, sourced from survey plans along with field data capture and verification. To address ageing and deteriorating light and banner pole assets, a new pole asset renewal program with an allocation of $500,000 has been included in the draft budget commencing in 2020-21.


ITEM 3 (Continued) ASSET CONDITION AND INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL REQUIREMENT LG343/1045/13/01(P1) The condition assessment program for pathway structures such as boardwalks, stairs, ramps and timber pathways has identified some significant deterioration. To address this, a new Pathway Structures Renewal Program has been proposed with an allocation of $160,000 in the proposed budget commencing in 2020-21. Other than the abovementioned major transport assets, there are some road inventory assets such as fences, bus shelters and traffic signals at their renewal intervention points. Appropriate works have been programmed (maintenance or renewal) for these assets in the forward capital works and asset maintenance programs. Flood Mitigation & Drainage Assets Summary – Stormwater Pipe Network A small proportion (0.2% or 6km) of stormwater pipes mostly constructed within tidal areas of the City are experiencing accelerated deterioration due to exposure to corrosive environments and tidal movement. A cyclic condition assessment program targeting tidal pipe outlets evaluates the condition of these assets and identifies those at renewal intervention for inclusion within the Stormwater Pipe Reline / Renewal Program. The stormwater pipe closed-circuit television (CCTV) program has been expanded to assess pipes further upstream of tidal outlet pipes which may also be affected by higher tides. The results of these assessments confirm a greater number of pipes are affected by tidal movement. Pipes exposed to these environmental conditions, deteriorate at an accelerated pace compared to normal pipes due to salt water corroding the structure of the pipe. Tidal movement can also affect soil and material surrounding these pipes which can result in voids leading to property and infrastructure damage. The proactive relining of these assets is a very high priority for the City. Since the Stormwater Pipe Reline Program was established, 350 pipes (approximately 14 km) have been relined. The 10 year forecast has been updated based on the increased assessment information gathered to date with $2.4M proposed for 2020-21 for the Stormwater Pipe Renewal Program. Minor culvert pipes are used to direct stormwater under and away from roads. The condition assessment program for these assets was expanded in 2017-18 and with continued assessment works approximately 1880 culvert pipes have now been inspected (52% of the asset base). All minor culverts identified from the condition assessment to date as being at intervention have been programmed for renewal within the existing Minor Culverts Renewal Program over the next 3 years. Typical issues identified include pipe fractures or pipe joint displacement due to insufficient material cover on top of the pipes usually caused by road/ traffic loads or incorrect pipe class installed. An increased renewal program to address minor culverts identified in poor condition has been included in the draft 2020-21 budget. Increases to this program are anticipated as further condition assessments are undertaken over the next few years. Comparative data for the stormwater network from the Australian Local Government Association: National State of the Assets Report November 2018 and data in the Asset Management Plans is shown below. By comparison, the City’s stormwater network assets are in very good overall condition.


ITEM 3 (Continued) ASSET CONDITION AND INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL REQUIREMENT LG343/1045/13/01(P1) Flood Mitigation & Drainage – Stormwater Network National State of the Assets Report Comparison Condition Rating City of Gold Coast*

(Stormwater) National Average

(Stormwater) 1 / 2 - Very Good & Good 97% 67% 3 – Fair 1% 26% 4 / 5 – Poor & Very Poor 2% 7% *The majority of Flood Mitigation & Drainage asset condition assessment information has been assumed based on asset age. Planned condition assessment activities over the next 5 years will provide Council with more accurate condition assessment information. Flood Mitigation & Drainage Assets Summary – Other Assets Analysis of the last two years of surface drain condition assessment data has resulted in a proposed reduction of the Open Drain Renewal Program for 2020-21 to $100,000. $285,560 was allocated in 2019-20 for open drain asset renewal. Water Sensitive Urban Design (WSUD) assets such as bio-retention and sediment basins are assessed on a regular basis. Some WSUD assets have been identified in very poor condition however these types of assets can still function in this condition even though sediment and vegetation can impede the filtration media and process that these assets use to treat incoming water. WSUD assets requiring significant renewal works have been listed within the capital program to be addressed. The remaining assets are being addressed through maintenance program works such as sediment and vegetation removal and planting. Beaches & Waterways Assets Summary The majority of beaches and waterways assets are subjected to severe weather and corrosive environments which can reduce the performance and impact the expected useful lives of these assets. In addition to this, many assets are in popular public and tourist areas which have high utilisation rates requiring a rigorous asset management regime. Regular asset inspections and maintenance programs are in place to proactively manage these shorter life assets such as timber viewing platforms, boardwalks and beach access structures. Three percent of the beaches and waterways asset portfolio is currently in poor to very poor condition. A small number of stairs, platforms, boardwalks and boat ramps have been identified as being at their renewal intervention point as part of a proactive asset inspection regime. These assets have been included in the forward capital work program for renewal and/or upgrade. Composite fibre reinforced plastic material is being used more commonly to replace timber structures with the aim of achieving longer asset lives in harsh environmental conditions. The performance and effectiveness of these materials will be monitored over time through the cyclic condition assessment programs. A small number of boat ramps have been identified as being in poor to very poor condition. These ramps are industrial boat ramps which have restricted access (are not accessible by the general public) and are used by City contractors to conduct maintenance works on an as needs basis. Any required works on these assets have been programmed on a project by project basis in the capital works program.


ITEM 3 (Continued) ASSET CONDITION AND INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL REQUIREMENT LG343/1045/13/01(P1) Revetment walls protect both public and private infrastructure along City canals. These assets are often difficult to access being partially buried or tidally inundated and can typically suffer from undermining at the toe of the wall, cracking, rotation or movement of the wall and erosion of backfill material. These issues are addressed via revetment wall renewal or the application of rock scour protection. Currently revetment walls are renewed and planned for on a site by site basis with 4% currently at renewal intervention. Renewal projects are listed within the capital program, with a dedicated forward works program planned from 2022-23 onwards. Significant increases in this program are anticipated to address the ageing network of revetment walls into the future. The State of the Canals Report is a rolling survey program that takes height measurements within the canal system and compares to the previously reported figures then determines if any works are required to maintain the canal profile. Canals that are subject to scour can destabilise adjacent revetment walls whereas canals that are too shallow will restrict access. This program of works is addressed via ongoing maintenance and operational programs. All City owned seawalls are progressively inspected by Registered Professional Engineers of Queensland to determine if they are constructed in accordance with the City’s standard design for ocean beach seawalls. Inspections are performed by removing overlying sand and removing sufficient rock to inspect the cross sectional profile of the wall (termed a ‘peel back’). These inspections determine seawall stability, assess that armouring is adequate and whether reinstatement or repairs to the wall are required in-line with the City’s compliance standard. Through this process of condition assessment, certification of the seawall is then made by a Registered Professional Engineer of Queensland if the seawall has been constructed to the City’s standard design and is in an appropriate condition. Seawalls are also inspected and certified if they are eroded or exposed following heavy sea conditions. Prioritisation of seawall condition assessment and construction is based on factors including likelihood of exposure, asset age and condition, and risk. The focus of the seawall assessment and renewal program has been to target priority sections of the seawall. Infrastructure Renewal Requirement The infrastructure renewal requirements for 2020-21 in accordance with the updated Asset Management Plans as being driven by end of life renewal (as opposed to new and upgrade) is $68.0 million, the breakdown of which is as follows: § $59.99 million - Transport § $5.92 million – Flood Mitigation & Drainage § $2.09 million – Beaches & Waterways It should be noted that: § If renewal requirements for 2020-21 are not funded a ‘renewal backlog’ will

accumulate, which increases the potential for service interruptions and asset failures. § The renewal requirement beyond 2020-21 is subject to further review as additional

condition data is collected over time and the City has more detailed understanding of asset performance, future asset renewal and upgrade forecasting will advance significantly.


ITEM 3 (Continued) ASSET CONDITION AND INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL REQUIREMENT LG343/1045/13/01(P1) Infrastructure Renewal Requirement: 2020-21 Movement and 10 Year Forecast Trend § As stated above, renewal requirements are further reviewed annually including

analysis of additional condition data that has been collected, along with other factors such as changes in construction costs and infrastructure renewal techniques.

§ See Attachment 3.5 for the movement in the renewal requirements for 2020-21 in comparison to the predicted 2020-21 renewal requirement from last year’s Total Asset Management Plan.

§ Also, see Attachment 3.6 for an overview of the renewal forecast 10 Year trend, including the annual average increase (or decrease) in the forecast renewal trend in comparison to the predicted 10 year renewal requirement from last year’s Total Asset Management Plan.

6 ALIGNMENT TO CORPORATE PLAN, CORPORATE STRATEGIES AND

OPERATIONAL PLAN Supporting delivery of the Gold Coast 2022, as follows: B. We plan for the future of the city Key Plans and Programs of Work: Manage the maintenance, renewal and delivery of infrastructure for the city through the Total Asset Management Plan and the forward Capital Works Program 7 FUNDING AND RESOURCING REQUIREMENTS Funding for asset renewals will form part of budget deliberations through Special Budget & Finance Committee. 8 RISK MANAGEMENT The following Office of the Chief Operating Officer (OCOO) directorate risk is related to asset management: CR000425 Asset Management maturity below industry level resulting in sub-optimal

management of the life-cycle and costs for infrastructure assets. In the last few years there has been substantial improvement in the City’s asset management maturity. The further advancement of asset management planning is a key mitigation of this corporate risk, in particular: improving the integrity of renewal forecasts (through collection of additional condition data, understanding of how the City’s assets are performing over time and advancements in renewal forecasting); further analysis of risk exposures; and the ongoing updating of Asset Management Plans. 9 STATUTORY MATTERS Statutory requirements for Asset Management Plans are detailed in: § Queensland Local Government Act (2009), Section 104 § Local Government Regulation 2012, Sections 167 and 168


ITEM 3 (Continued) ASSET CONDITION AND INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL REQUIREMENT LG343/1045/13/01(P1) 10 COUNCIL POLICIES On 19 June 2015, the Council approved the Asset Management Policy that: § Sets out Council’s strategic intent for asset management; § Defines the roles and responsibilities for asset management; and § Provides a set of guiding principles to inform asset management decision making. This report does not result in any changes to the above policy. 11 DELEGATIONS Not Applicable. 12 COORDINATION & CONSULTATION Name and/or Title of the Stakeholder Consulted

Directorate or Organisation

Is the Stakeholder Satisfied With Content of Report and Recommendations (Yes/No) (comment as appropriate)

Andrew Llewellyn Manager Corporate Asset Management

Office of the Chief Operating Officer

Yes

13 STAKEHOLDER IMPACTS Not Applicable. 14 TIMING The outputs of the Asset Management Plans will be summarised into the Total Asset Management Plan and presented to Council for adoption in conjunction with adoption of the annual budget. 15 CONCLUSION Transport, Flood Mitigation & Stormwater Drainage and Beaches & Waterways assets are mostly in very good, good or fair condition. A small percentage of these assets are in poor condition which is expected as assets progress through their lifecycle. These have been scheduled for renewal or maintenance via rolling capital renewal and asset maintenance programs. All assets that have been assessed as in poor or very poor condition are being actively managed to ensure public safety is maintained and the assets remain serviceable until renewal or maintenance works are completed as per normal asset management practice. With the steady expansion of the Transport, Flood Mitigation & Stormwater Drainage and Beaches & Waterways asset condition assessment programs, an increased understanding of how various types of assets are performing over time and which assets require further renewal investment is becoming evident. Further expansion of these programs will underpin future capital works planning and development of a robust forward 4 year capital program.


ITEM 3 (Continued) ASSET CONDITION AND INFRASTRUCTURE RENEWAL REQUIREMENT LG343/1045/13/01(P1) Continuing to invest in infrastructure renewal to the required extent is essential to ensure the sustainability of the infrastructure base, especially as the City’s assets age. It is important to continue to invest in both asset condition assessment programs and infrastructure renewal to ensure that the City understands how its infrastructure is performing and a ‘renewal backlog’ does not accumulate that would increase the potential for service interruptions and asset failures. The Total Asset Management Plan will be presented to Council as part of the 2020-21 budget deliberations. Funding for infrastructure renewals will form part of budget deliberations through Special Budget & Finance Committee. It is important that the City continues to invest in infrastructure renewal to ensure that ‘renewal backlogs’ do not accumulate that would increase the potential for service interruptions, asset failures and future costs to maintain the City’s assets. 16 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council resolves as follows: That Council notes the contents of this report. Author: Authorised by: David Braby Alton Twine Executive Coordinator Asset Management 27 March 2020

Director Transport and Infrastructure

iSpot #75821671 + Attchs: #75887108, #76236165, #76236181, #76236207, #75837169 & #75887285 COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TI20.0514.003 moved Cr Caldwell seconded Cr Patterson That Council notes the contents of this report.

CARRIED


Attachment 3.1 Condition Rating Descriptions

Condition Rating Scheme Generic Indicators of Asset Condition

Maintenance / Renewal Action Previous

Total AMPs

Total AMP

5 Point Rating

Good

Very Good 1

Asset is new or as new Asset has no defects

No additional maintenance required No renewal required

Good 2

Asset is fully functional Only minor signs of wear & tear

Minor additional maintenance may be required No renewal required

Fair

Fair 3

Asset is functional Obvious signs of some deterioration

Ongoing maintenance required Renewal of minor components may be required

Poor 4

Asset functionality is reduced Number of minor defects and/or some major defects Increased risk of service interruptions

Substantial ongoing maintenance required Renewal of minor and/or major components may be required

Poor Very Poor 5

Asset functionality substantially reduced or not functional Significant number of major defects or asset has failed Substantially increased risk of service interruptions or service interruption has occurred

Renewal of major components or complete asset required or Asset requires disposal

Note: The 5 point condition rating scheme is generally used for undertaking condition assessments and is used in the individual Asset Management Plans.


Attachment 3.2 Transport Asset Management Plan Summary


Attachment 3.3 FMD Asset Management Plan Summary


Attachment 3.4 Beaches & Waterways Asset Management Plan Summary


Attachment 3.5 Movement in Infrastructure Renewal Requirement 2020-21 The following table explains the movement increased and/ or decreased from the predicted 2020-21 renewal requirement (in today’s dollars) from last year’s Total Asset Management Plan.

Asset Management

Plan

Movement Comments on Updated Renewal Requirement

Transport $2.7m increase

The most significant increase to the renewal program for Transport has been with the Bridges and Major Culvert Renewal Program with four new projects and the existing project estimates updated based on detailed investigation and design.

In addition to this many of the larger asset renewal programs have been increased since the previous forecast including:

§ Road Pavement Rehabilitation & Reseal Program

§ Kerb & Channel Replacement Program

§ Retaining Walls & Landslip Repair Program

§ Extractive Industries Program

There is also a new renewal program introduced being the Transport Pathway Structures Renewal Program which was created to address the needs of assets such as boardwalks, stairs, ramps and timber pathways.

Flood Mitigation and Drainage

$2.4m decrease

The replacement of Teemangum Street Culvert Renewal has been deferred from 2020-21 to 2021-22 ($3,360,000 reduction in 2020/21) combined with increases to the following renewal programs:

§ Pipe Relining ($632,000)

§ Minor Culvert Renewal ($82,800)

As well as the addition to the program of open channel renewal works at Nollamara Street, Elanora ($500,000) and the Bio Basin at Cobalt Circuit, Coomera ($180,000)

Beaches and Waterways

$0.2m decrease

No change in the annual renewal requirement for the Beaches & Waterways Portfolio for the 2020-21 Financial Year.

For details of forecast renewal requirements in future years refer to Attachment 3.2, 3.3 and 3.4 and also see Attachment 3.6 for an overview of forecast renewal requirement 10 year trend.


Attachment 3.6 Overview of Renewal Forecast 10 Year Trend The proposed Capital Works Program considered as part of the 2020-21 budget discussions categorises infrastructure capital works projects as: § End of life renewal driven § New and upgrade driven It is important to note that in some instances infrastructure capital works projects driven by ‘end of life renewal’ contain a component of upgrade works, for example: § Replacement of a particular bridge at end of life with a new bridge that includes a

separate pedestrian and cyclists lane (where none previously existed). § Replacement of a water main at end of life with a larger pipe size to accommodate

projected urban densification in the area the asset services. The following figures and percentages are based on the capital works projects categorised as end of life renewal driven which can contain a component of upgrade works. The following provides an overview of the renewal forecast trend for the forward 10 years, including the annual average increase (or decrease) in the renewal forecast trend in comparison to the predicted 10 year renewal requirement from last year’s Total Asset Management Plan. Since last year’s forecast the proposed cumulative 10 year capital renewal forecast has increased by 11% ($66M) for Transport & Infrastructure. As a part of the overall Capital Program forecast for Transport & Infrastructure, end of life renewal projects make up approximately 39% of this budget over the forward 10 years. The Transport asset renewal program has increased by 14.6% ($76M) over the full 10 year program. This is due primarily to increases in the bridges and major culvert renewal and retaining wall renewal programs over the forward 10 years. These increases are supported by data and information arising from the condition assessment programs and are to maintain the current condition of transport infrastructure provided to the community. The forecast renewal demand over the forward 10 years for flood mitigation and drainage assets is significantly less than for transport even though the flood mitigation and drainage portfolio is higher in overall replacement cost. This indicates that as further condition assessment information is obtained and the asset base ages it is highly likely that the renewal funding forecast for Flood Mitigation and Drainage will change significantly. To date 6% (by replacement value) of stormwater pipe network assets have been condition assessed and as further data becomes available this renewal forecast is expected to increase given the steady rate of contributed assets received by the City annually and the ageing of the network as a whole. The overall Flood Mitigation & Drainage renewal program has decreased by 15.1% ($11.8M) over the forward 10 year program. Despite an anticipated increase in the renewal program, this is predominantly due to the reclassification of the driver for catchment programs on the capital program from end of life renewal driven to new and upgrade. While these work programs will likely result in asset renewal – the primary driver for these projects are upgrade for capacity to meet flood drainage outcomes and targets resulting from development.


The 10 year renewal forecast for beaches and waterway assets remains fairly consistent with renewal forecasts presented last year. A gradual increase in renewal funding is required over time as assets age and new assets continue to be constructed. It is expected that as further condition assessments are completed and assets age, it is likely the renewal funding forecasts will likely grow at a slow but steady rate to address an increasing number of assets reaching renewal intervention. A funding plan will be developed to address this level of investment.


CLOSED SESSION LOCAL GOVERNMENT ACT 2009 AND SUPPORTING REGULATIONS PROCEDURAL MOTION moved Cr Vorster seconded Cr Patterson That the Committee move into Closed Session pursuant to section 275(1) of the Local Government Regulation 2012, for the consideration of the following item/s for the reason/s shown:-

Item Subject Reason

4 Old Coach Road Upgrade Stage 2 / Bermuda Street Extension Planning Update

Budget Matter & Prejudicial Matter

CARRIED

PROCEDURAL MOTION moved Cr PC Young seconded Cr Owen-Jones That the Committee move into Open Session.

CARRIED Following resumption into Open Session, Item 4 was moved and carried as shown on the following pages.


ITEM 4 (Continued) OLD COACH ROAD UPGRADE STAGE 2 / BERMUDA STREET EXTENSION PLANNING UPDATE RD500387/46/05(P1) 16 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that Council resolves as follows: 1 That the report be deemed a confidential document and be treated as such in

accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009 and that the document remain confidential unless Council decides otherwise by resolution.

2 That the contents of this report are noted. 3 That Council endorse the preferred option of Old Coach Road Upgrade Stage 2 /

Bermuda Street Extension project as a basis for progressing design and agreement with the Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads, and progression through Council’s Special Budget Committee.

4 That the City write to the Department of Transport and Main Roads to seek a funding

and/or delivery partnership for the Old Coach Road Upgrade Stage 2 / Bermuda Street Extension project.

Author: Authorised by: Nick Prasser Alton Twine Executive Coordinator Transport Policy, Planning and Programs

Director Transport and Infrastructure

1 May 2020 iSpot: #76223331 Cr Patterson left the meeting. Changed Recommendation COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TI20.0514.004 moved Cr Vorster seconded Cr PC Young 1 That the report be deemed a confidential document and be treated as such in

accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009 and that the document remain confidential unless Council decides otherwise by resolution.

2 That the City write to the Department of Transport and Main Roads to seek a delivery

partnership for the Old Coach Road Upgrade Stage 2 / Bermuda Street Extension project.

3 That Council endorse the preferred option of Old Coach Road Upgrade Stage 2 /

Bermuda Street Extension project as a basis for progressing design and agreement with the Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads, and progression through Council’s Special Budget Committee subject to the outcome of 2 above.

4 That the City also write to the Federal Government seeking a funding contribution

towards the project consistent with the Federal Government’s investments in ‘roads of strategic importance’.

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY

Cr Patterson was absent for the vote.


ITEM 4 (Continued) OLD COACH ROAD UPGRADE STAGE 2 / BERMUDA STREET EXTENSION PLANNING UPDATE RD500387/46/05(P1) Committee Recommendation Changed at Council 27 May 2020 RESOLUTION G20.0527.008 moved Cr Tozer seconded Cr McDonald That Committee Recommendation TI20.0514.004 be adopted with a change to part 1 such that it reads as follows:- 1 That the report/attachment be deemed non-confidential except for those parts

deemed by the Chief Executive Officer to remain confidential in accordance with sections 171 (3) and 200 (5) of the Local Government Act 2009.

2 That the City write to the Department of Transport and Main Roads to seek a delivery partnership for the Old Coach Road Upgrade Stage 2 / Bermuda Street Extension project.

3 That Council endorse the preferred option of Old Coach Road Upgrade Stage 2 / Bermuda Street Extension project as a basis for progressing design and agreement with the Queensland Department of Transport and Main Roads, and progression through Council’s Special Budget Committee subject to the outcome of 2 above.

4 That the City also write to the Federal Government seeking a funding contribution towards the project consistent with the Federal Government’s investments in ‘roads of strategic importance’.

A division was called. For 15 Cr Hammel, Cr Owen-Jones, Cr Gates, Cr Caldwell, Cr PJ Young,

Cr Patterson, Cr Bayldon-Lumsden, Cr La Castra, Cr Tozer, Cr Taylor, Cr Vorster, Cr PC Young, Cr McDonald, Cr O’Neill, Cr Tate

Against 0 Abstained 0 Absent 0 Did Not Vote 0

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY


ITEM 5 GENERAL BUSINESS FUNDING FOR LIGHTING ALONG LAKE ORR BOARDWALK VARSITY LAKES FN334/375/02/08(P1) COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TI20.0514.005 moved Cr Vorster seconded Cr PC Young That an amount of $231,500 be allocated from Division 11 Local Area Works 2019-20 budget for lighting along the Lake Orr boardwalk Varsity Lakes (CR606764).

CARRIED Cr Patterson was absent for the vote. Committee Recommendation Changed at Council 27 May 2020 RESOLUTION G20.0527.007 moved Cr Vorster seconded Cr PC Young That Committee Recommendation TI20.0514.005 not be adopted but in lieu thereof reads as follows:- 1 That an amount of $266,000 be allocated from the Division 11 Local Area Works

and Services Budget 2019-20 to progress stages 6, 7 and 8 of the Lake Orr lighting plan (CR606764).

2 That City officers take all reasonable steps to mitigate amenity concerns of residents in the Edgewater Residences in the design and construction of the pathway lighting in stage 6.

CARRIED


ITEM 6 GENERAL BUSINESS FUNDING FOR LIGHTING BETWEEN CHELTENHAM DRIVE AND MUIRFIELD PLACE ROBINA FN334/375/02/08(P1) COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION TI20.0514.006 moved Cr Vorster seconded Cr PC Young That an amount of $47,000 be allocated from Division 11 Local Area Works 2019-20 budget for lighting between Cheltenham Drive and Muirfield Place Robina (CR355795).

CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY Cr Patterson was absent for the vote. There being no further business the meeting closed at 11.10am.


These Pages

Numbered 1 to 66

Constitute The Report Of The Meeting

Of The Transport and Infrastructure Committee

Held Thursday 14 May 2020

adopted report transport and infrastructure committee meeting · transport capital works program q3...

Documents