adjacency pairs analysis of conversation between …eprints.ums.ac.id/61540/12/cover page_putri...
TRANSCRIPT
ADJACENCY PAIRS ANALYSIS OF CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE
HOST (STEPHEN COLBERT) AND THE GUEST (MICHAELL OBAMA)
IN THE LATE SHOW CBS TV SERIES
RESEARCH PAPER
Submitted as a Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for Getting Bachelor Degree of
Education in English Department
Proposed By:
PUTRI MAYASARI
A320140033
DEPARTMENT OF ENGLISH EDUCATION
SCHOOL OF TEACHER TRAINING AND EDUCATION
UNIVERSITAS MUHAMMADIYAH OF SURAKARTA
2018
ii
APPROVAL
ADJACENCY PAIRS ANALYSIS OF CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE
HOST (STEPHEN COLBERT) AND THE GUEST (MICHAELL OBAMA)
IN THE LATE SHOW CBS TV SERIES
RESEARCH PAPER
By:
Putri Mayasari
A320140033
Approved to be examined by Consultant
Consultant
Dr. Malikatul Laila, M. Hum.
NIP/NIK. 409
iii
ACCEPTANCE
ADJACENCY PAIRS ANALYSIS OF CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE
HOST (STEPHEN COLBERT) AND THE GUEST (MICHAELL OBAMA)
IN THE LATE SHOW CBS TV SERIES
RESEARCH PAPER
By:
PUTRI MAYASARI
A320140033
Accepted by :
The Board By Examiners of School of Teacher Training and Education
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
The board of examiners:
1. Dr. Malikatul Laila, M.Hum. ( .........................................)
(Chair Person)
2. Agus wijayanto, M.A. Ph.D. ( .........................................)
(Secretary)
3. Drs. Sigit Haryanto, M.Hum. ( .........................................)
(Member)
Surakarta, 4 April 2018
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta
School of Teacher Training and Education
Dean,
Prof. Dr. Harun Joko Prayitno, M.Hum
NIP. 19650428 199303 1 001
iv
PRONOUNCEMENT
I, undersigned below:
Name : Putri Mayasari
NIM : A320140033
Program : Department of English Education
Research Title : ADJACENCY PAIRS ANALYSIS OF
CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE HOST
(STEPHEN COLBERT) AND THE GUEST
(MICHAELL OBAMA) IN THE LATE SHOW
CBS TV SERIES
I truthfully testify that there is no plagiarism of literary work in this research paper
and this research paper I submitted is really a work of mine, except the written
references which are mentioned in bibliography. Later, if it is proved that there is
plagiarism in this research paper, I will be fully responsible.
Surakarta, 4 March 2018
The researcher,
Putri Mayasari
A320140033
v
MOTTOS
Cukuplah ALLAH menjadi pelindung dan cukuplah ALLAH
menjadi penolong (bagimu)
(Qs. An-Nisaa 4:45)
GRATEFUL, THANKFUL
(My mother - Ibu RINI)
Having courage and Be Kindness
(Cinderella)
No Pain No Gain
(Benjamin Franklin)
Berusaha – Berdoa – Berhasil
(Anonymous)
vi
DEDICATION
This litterary work is dedicated to:
My amazing beloved Mother and Father, Aunty, Sister and Brother
BESTFRIENDS
The one and only Cutie Niece (Aashika Rajesh)
vii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Assalamu’alaikum Wr. Wb
Alhamdulillahhirabbil’alamin. All blessings belong to Allah SWT for His
mercy given to the researcher, so she could complete her research paper entitled
ADJACENCY PAIRS ANALYSIS OF CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE
HOST (STEPHEN COLBERT) AND THE GUEST (MICHAELL OBAMA)
IN THE LATE SHOW CBS TV SERIES. In conducting this research the
researcher got so many aids from many people. The researcher would like to express
her deepest gratitude and appreciation to the people in the following list:
1. Prof. Dr. Harun Joko Prayitno, M.Hum., the Dean of School Teacher
Training and Education, Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
2. Mauly Halwat Hikmat, Ph. D., the Chief of Department of English Education,
Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta.
3. Dr. Malikatul Laila, M. Hum., the academic consultant who has given
valuable advice, knowledge and motivation for the researcher.
4. Dr. Malikatul Laila, M. Hum., the consultant who has supported and
encouraged the researcher to conduct this research by giving her great advice
and suggestions, so the researcher can broaden her knowledge about
linguistics.
5. All lecturers of Department of English Education who have become such
great educators and for giving uncountable knowledge to the researcher.
6. Herself, who had been worked hard through this four years to get bachelor
degree.
7. Her beloved mother, father, aunty, sister and brother for their eternal love and
support. The researcher is completely nothing without them.
8. Her one and only niece Aashika Rajesh who always entertains and
accompanies the researcher in any condition.
viii
9. The researcher’s best friends Ayu Monica, Soraya Agustina, Rinda Shinta,
Nindya Nuri, Destie K, Kumara Ningrum, Ilinda Aisyah, Poncho Dewi, Adi
Manggala, M Farhan who always give their best support and be the best
listener ever to the researcher.
10. KKN CUPU SQUAD, yulia, alinda, bastian, dahwi, satrio, and reza who give
another experiences when the researcher was doing KKN.
11. EDSO, member of Second Division 2016/2017, SEGA, and ETP who gives
many experiences during in University.
12. All of DEE friends esspecially in Class A 2014, who have been cheered up
the researcher during his hard times in completing this research.
Last but not the least; the researcher realizes that this research paper is not
perfect. Then, the suggestion and supportive criticism are hoped to make this
research paper to be much better.
Wassalamu’alaikum Wr. Wb
Surakarta, 4 March 2018
The researcher,
Putri Mayasari
A320140033
ix
ADJACENCY PAIRS ANALYSIS OF CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE
HOST (STEPHEN COLBERT) AND THE GUEST (MICHAELL OBAMA)
IN THE LATE SHOW CBS TV SERIES
ABSTRAK
PUTRI MAYASARI, A320140033. ADJACENCY PAIRS ANALYSIS OF
CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE HOST (STEPHEN COLBERT) AND
THE GUEST (MICHAELL OBAMA) IN THE LATE SHOW CBS TV
SERIES. Skripsi. Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan. Universitas
Muhammadiyah Surakarta. 2018.
Penelitian ini merupakan analisis percakapan antara pembawa acara (Stephen
Colbert) dan tamu undangan (Michaell Obama) dalam acara The Late Show with
Stephen Colbert. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah (1) mendiskripsikan formula
adjacency pair yang digunakan dalam percakapan antara pembawa acara (Stephen
Colbert) dan tamu undangan (Michaell Obama) dalam acara The Late Show with
Stephen Colbert, dan (2) untuk menjelaskan sisipan yang ditemukan diantara
adjacency pair.
Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian deskriptif kualitatif untuk
menganalisis permasalahan. Dalam teknik pengumpulan data, peneliti menggunakan
observasi dan dokumentasi. Peneliti menemukan 49 percakapan yang dapat dianalisis
sesuai teori Analisa Percakapan. Dalam menganalisis data, peneliti menggunakan
teori Analisa Percakapan sebagai dasar teori. Untuk menjawab permasalahan yang
pertama, peneliti menggunakan teori pasangan kedekatan. Untuk menjawab
permasalahan yang kedua, peneliti menggunakan teori sisipan diantara pasangan
kedekatan.
Berdasarkan hasil penelitian, peneliti menemukan 71 data percakapan yang
sesuai untuk dianalisis, diantaranya: (1) 47 rumus pasangan pasangan kedekatan
yang terdiri atas: Gr – Gr&Thk; 3 pasangan dari Inf – Ack; Cbi – Den; 16 paasangan
dari Que – Ans; Confr – Diss Agr; 3 pasangan dari Confr – Agr; Confr – Den; Confr
– Ack; Ass – Clar; Thk – Thk; Cgr – Cgr; 3 pasangan dari Comp – Resp; 2 pasangan
dari Req – Rej; Assm – Agr; Assm – Agr; Inf – Agr; Ass – Ack; Confr – Rej; Ass –
Exp; 3 pasangan dari Req – Acc; AG – Ans; Sum&Que – Ans; Off – Acc; and Inv –
Acc,dan (2) 24 tipe sisipan diantara pasangan kedekatan yang terdiri atas: #Cont –
Rep#; #Assm – Rep#; #Ans – Cont#; #Ans – Req#; #Ack – Confr#; #Ack – Rep#;
#Diss Agr – Repet#; #Rej – Repet – Assm#; #Agr – Assm#; #Rej – Ack#; #Thk –
Repet#; #Con – Repet#; #Comp#; #Rej – Repet – Comp#; #Rej – Repet#; #Cont#;
#Ans – Que#; #Ans – Que#; #Rej – Req#; #Confr; Ans – Rep#; #Ans – Que –
Comp#; #Ans – Que#; and #Sug – Rep#.
Kata kunci: analisa percakapan, pasangan kedekatan, urutan sisipan.
x
ADJACENCY PAIRS ANALYSIS OF CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE
HOST (STEPHEN COLBERT) AND THE GUEST (MICHAELL OBAMA)
IN THE LATE SHOW CBS TV SERIES
ABSTRACT
PUTRI MAYASARI, A320140033. ADJACENCY PAIRS ANALYSIS OF
CONVERSATION BETWEEN THE HOST (STEPHEN COLBERT) AND
THE GUEST (MICHAELL OBAMA) IN THE LATE SHOW CBS TV
SERIES. Research Paper. Muhammadiyah University of Surakarta. 2018.
This study is an analysis of adjacency pairs in the conversation between the
host (Stephen Colbert) and the guest (Michaell Obama) in The Late Show with
Stephen Colbert. The aims of the research are (1) To describe the formulations of
adjacency pairs that are used in script conversation between the host and the guest in
The Late Show with Stephen Colbert and Michaell Obama, and (2)To explain the
insertion within the adjacency pairs.
This research uses descriptive qualitative type in investigating the problem. In
the technique of collecting data, the writer uses observation and documentation. The
researcher finds 49 data of conversation in the talk show that suitable to be analyzed.
In analyzing the data, the researcher uses the theory of conversation analysis (CA) as
basic theory. In answering the first problem statement, the researcher uses the theory
of adjacency pair, and to answer the second problem statement the researcher uses
the theory of insertion sequence within adjacency pair.
Based on the result, there are 71 data of conversation that suitable to be
analyzed and those are: (1) 47 patterns of adjacency pair that contains of Gr –
Gr&Thk; 3 pairs of Inf – Ack; Cbi – Den; 16 pairs of Que – Ans; Confr – Diss Agr;
3 pairs of Confr – Agr; Confr – Den; Confr – Ack; Ass – Clar; Thk – Thk; Cgr –
Cgr; 3 pairs of Comp – Resp; 2 pairs of Req – Rej; Assm – Agr; Assm – Agr; Inf –
Agr; Ass – Ack; Confr – Rej; Ass – Exp; 3 pairs of Req – Acc; AG – Ans;
Sum&Que – Ans; Off – Acc; and Inv – Acc, and (2) 24 types of insertion within the
adjacency pair that contains of #Cont – Rep#; #Assm – Rep#; #Ans – Cont#; #Ans –
Req#; #Ack – Confr#; #Ack – Rep#; #Diss Agr – Repet#; #Rej – Repet – Assm#;
#Agr – Assm#; #Rej – Ack#; #Thk – Repet#; #Con – Repet#; #Comp#; #Rej – Repet
– Comp#; #Rej – Repet#; #Cont#; #Ans – Que#; #Ans – Que#; #Rej – Req#; #Confr;
Ans – Rep#; #Ans – Que – Comp#; #Ans – Que#; and #Sug – Rep#.
Keywords: conversation analysis (CA), adjacency pair, and insertion sequence
xi
TABLE OF CONTENT
Page
TITLE PAGE ................................................................................................. i
APPROVAL ................................................................................................... ii
ACCEPTANCE .............................................................................................. iii
PRONOUNCEMENT .................................................................................... iv
MOTTOS ........................................................................................................ v
DEDICATION ................................................................................................ vi
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ............................................................................. vii
ABSTRAK ...................................................................................................... ix
ABSTRACT .................................................................................................... x
TABLE OF CONTENTS ............................................................................... xi
LIST OF TABLE ........................................................................................... xiii
TABLE OF ABBREVIATION ..................................................................... xiv
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION
A. Background of the Study ..................................................................... 1
B. Limitation of the Study ....................................................................... 4
C. Problem Statement .............................................................................. 4
D. Objectives of the Study ....................................................................... 5
E. Benefits of the Study ........................................................................... 5
F. Research Paper Organization .............................................................. 6
CHAPTER II: UNDERLYING THEORY
A. Previous Study ..................................................................................... 7
B. Related Literary Theory ....................................................................... 9
1. Conversation Analisis Theory ......................................................... 9
2. Aspects of CA .................................................................................. 11
xii
3. Notion of Adjacency Pair Analisis .................................................. 12
4. Insertion Sequence ........................................................................... 14
5. IRF (Initiation, Response, Feedback) .............................................. 15
6. Context of Language ....................................................................... 16
7. Language Function .......................................................................... 17
CHAPTER III: RESEARCH METHOD
A. Research Type ...................................................................................... 19
B. Research Object ................................................................................... 20
C. Data and Data Source ........................................................................... 20
D. Methods and Technique of Collecting Data......................................... 20
E. Data Validity ........................................................................................ 20
F. Technique of Analyzing Data .............................................................. 21
CHAPTER IV: ANALYSIS, FINDING AND DISCUSSION
A. Data Analysis ....................................................................................... 22
1. The formulation of Adjacency Pair ................................................. 22
2. Types of Insertion within Adjacency Pair ....................................... 45
B. Finding ................................................................................................. 62
1. The formulation of Adjacency Pair ................................................. 62
2. Types of Insertion within Adjacency Pair ....................................... 63
C. Discussion ............................................................................................ 65
CHAPTER V: CONCLUSION AND SUGGESTION
A. Conclusion ........................................................................................... 67
B. Suggestion ............................................................................................ 69
BIBLIOGRAPHY
APPENDIX
xiii
LIST OF TABLE
1. Table 1. The formulation of adjacency pairs ................................................. 62
2. Table 2. Type of insertion inside the adjacency pairs ................................... 64
xiv
TABLE OF ABBREVIATION
1. Acc : Acceptance
2. Ack : Acknowledgement
3. AG : Attention greeting
4. Agr : Agreement
5. Ans : Answer
6. Ass : Assumption
7. Assm : Assessment
8. Cbi : Command by Insistence
9. Cgr : Congratulations
10. Clar : Clarification
11. Comp : Compliment
12. Confr : Confirmation
13. Cont : Continuent
14. Den : Denial
15. Diss Agr : Dissagreement
16. Exp : Explanaining
17. Gr : Greetings
18. Inf : Information
19. Inv : Inviting
20. Off : Offer
21. Que : Question
22. Rej : Rejection
23. Rep : Repair
24. Req : Request
25. Resp : Response
26. Repet : Repetition
27. Sugg : Suggestion
28. Sum&Que : Summons & Question
29. Thk : Thanks
30. #.........#: hastag to enclose insertion within adjacency pair