adj therapy in endometrial cancer
DESCRIPTION
The role of adjuvant therapy in endometrial cancer and when to instituteTRANSCRIPT
ADJUVANT THERAPY IN EARLY ENDOMETRIAL CANCERWHEN TO GO ?
K.S.ReddyPondicherry
CANCER INCIDENCE - ESTIMATES
2
GLOBOCAN, IARC
YEAR AGE GROUP
INDIA USA
CERVIX UTERI
CORPUS UTERI
CERVIX UTERI
CORPUS UTERI
2012* AGE < 65 107287 9178 10545 29041
AGE > 65 15557 3147 2421 20604
2015* AGE < 65 115060 9985 10819 30341
AGE > 65 17254 3492 2676 22859
Accts for 1.1% of all cancers as compared to 7% in USA
Introduction
• EC usually diagnosed at early stage (up to 80% diagnosed as stage I, 13% as stage II)
• 5-year OS as high as 88% in stage I disease.
• Subgroups of patients with early stages have significantly decreased 5-OS rates, based on various prognostic factors, such as
• Myometrial invasion & grade 3 have a 5-OS of 66%.
4
Endometrial cancer is often divided into 2 subtypes:
• Type I (75% of cases) etiologically related to
unopposed estrogens and occurs mostly in
Hyperplastic Endometrium - Estrogen related.
Younger, Perimenopausal and Heavier patients
Better prognosis
• Type II (10% of cases) occurs mostly in
Atrophic Endometrium with 3 atypical
histological subtypes such as clear cell,
papillary serous cancer and poorly differentiated
Associated with high virulence,
advanced stage at diagnosis and poor prognosis.
Unrelated to estrogen stimulation
Occurs in older & thinner women 5
Surgery is the primary treatment of both localized and advanced disease,
Adequate surgical staging and pathological review are the prerequisites for any discussion about individual need for an adjuvant therapy
6
Staging FIGO – 1988 FIGO 2010
I A: Tumor limited to endometrium
I B: Invasion to < 50% of myometrium
I C: Invasion to > 50% of myometrium
II A: Cervical glandular involvement only
II B: Cervical stromal invasion
III A: Tumor invades serosa and/or adnexa and/or positive
peritoneal cytology
III B: Vaginal metastases
III C: Metastases to pelvic or para aortic nodes
IV A: Tumor invasion of bladder and/or bowel mucosa
IV B: Distant metastases, including abdominal metastases
and/or inguinal lymph nodes
I: Tumor confined to the corpus uteri
I A: No or < half myometrial invasion
I B: Invasion ≥ half of myometrium
II: Cervical stromal invasion but not beyond the uterus
III: Local and/or regional spread
III A: Tumor invades the serosa of the corpus uteri and/or adnexa
III B: Vaginal and/or parametrial inv
III C: Metastases to pelvic and /or PA LN C1: Pelvic node involvement
C2: PA LN involvement ± pelvic lymph node involvement
IV A: Tumor invades bladder and/or bowel mucosa,
B: Distant metastases (abd mets/ inguinal LN mets)
7
Peritoneal Cytology is done, does not affect staging
Proposed definition of ‘risk’ RISK GROUPS (1)
Low risk:• Grade 1–2 histology, with invasion through
less than 50% of the myometrium. • Grade 3 without myometrial invasion. • Disease confined to the uterine fundus.• No lympho-vascular space invasion (LVSI)• No evidence of metastases.
8
RISK GROUPS (2)
High-intermediate • Moderately-poorly differentiated tumor• Presence of LVSI• More than 50% myometrial invasion• Age >50 with any 2 risk factors above• Age >70 with any 1 risk factor• No evidence of metastases
All others considered as “Low intermediate risk.”
9
RISK GROUPS (3)
High risk:• Serosal involvement ( any Grade )• Positive Peritoneal Cytology • IC Gr. 3• Adnexal involvement • Pelvic or Para aortic nodal metastases
(any Grade and MMI)
10
Radiotherapy in high-risk early endometrial cancer
• Complex• Controversial • Confusing
11
PORTEC-1PORTEC-1 study group (1990-97) aimed to
Determine the impact of pelvic irradiation without additional brachytherapy on the outcome in patients with early stage endometrial cancer
The surgical procedure was a simple
total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo oophorectomy (TAH-BSO) without any
lymphadenectomy.
714 patients - IBG2, IBG3, ICG1, ICG2
(ICG3 specifically NOT included)
Randomized to NAT vs 46 Gy pelvic RT
No brachytherapy
12
Role of RT in non-formally staged EC?
PORTEC - 1(Creutzberg CL et al, J Clin Oncol 2004, Scholten IJROBP 2005)
– 10 yr LR failure rate: S – 14%, S+RT – 5% (p < 0.001)• 73% of LRF’s were isolated vaginal
Subgroup Analysis of risk factors– Risk factors – age ≥ 60, Gr 3, ≥ 50% myometrial inv.
• If at least 2 of 3 risk factors present• 10 yr. LRF rate: S- 23.1%, S+RT – 4.6%
– Late toxicity - 5 yr. actuarial rates• All grades: S – 4%, S+RT – 26% (p < 0.0001)• Grade 1: S - 4%, S+RT – 17%• Grade 3-4: S+RT – 3%
13
14
FIFTEEN-YEAR RADIOTHERAPY OUTCOMES OF THE RANDOMIZED PORTEC-1 TRIAL
CREUTZBERG et al.IJROBP 81(4), 2011
15
Radiation therapyPelvic EBRT was administered with a target volume that included the parametrial tissues, the proximal two thirds of the vagina, and lymphatic drainage regions along the internal iliac vessels up to the promontory. The superior field border was at the L5–S1 disc.The total dose was 46 Gy in 2-Gy daily fractions. The PORTEC trial was done before three dimensional conformal treatment planning techniques had been introduced. Radiation was delivered by AP-PA opposed fields(30%), three-field (18%) or four-field techniques (52%) Calculation of the dose distribution on the central axis and specification at isocenter or midplane
Role of RT in surgically staged ECGOG # 99 (2004)
16
GOG # 99 (2004)
• Complete surgical staging including pelvic and para-aortic node sampling
• Surgical stage IB, IC, IIA (occult) and IIB (occult)• All histologic types except serous papillary and
clear cell• Randomized to pelvic RT vs. no further therapy
17
GOG 99 (2004) – at 4 years (Keys, et al Gynecol Oncol 2004)
No RT arm (N = 202)WPRT arm (N = 190)
Vaginal Rec. Pelvic Rec. Distant Rec. Over all survival
EBRT No RT EBRT No RT EBRT No RT EBRT No RT
2(1.1%) 13(6.4%) 1(0.5%) 5(2.5%) 10(5.3%) 13(6.4%) 92% 86%
Statistically significant
Statistically not significant
18
GOG #99: CONCLUSION
• Adjunctive RT in early stage intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma decreases the risk of recurrence, but should be limited to patients whose risk factors fit a “high intermediate risk” definition.
• “Use of adjunctive RT in women with intermediate risk EC decreases the risk of recurrences but has an inappreciable effect on overall survival”
Keys et al. Gynecol Oncol 2004; 92:744-751.
19
Patterns of failure in early endometrial cancer undergoing surgery only– implications for
treatment
• The majority of pelvic failures in both PORTEC and GOG 99 were isolated vaginal
• Are non-radiated isolated vaginal failures curable?
• Predictors of vaginal relapse– Gr 3 histology, LVSI+
(Mariani, Gyn Oncol 2005)
• Can adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy address potential vaginal failures, and improve the therapeutic index?
20
Two important phase III randomized trials reported in 2007-2008
21
22
Trial design for ASTEC/EN.5
Surgery
High risk pathology and no macroscopic disease
RANDOMIZE
No external beam RT External beam RT
Primary endpoint: Overall survival
Secondary endpoint: Recurrence-free survival
905 cases
453 cases 452 cases
(51% Brachytherapy) (52% Brachytherapy)
71% TAH BSO29% TAH BSO PLN
23
Outcomes of ASTEC/EN.5
24
Outcomes of ASTEC/EN.5EBRT: N-452 OBSERVATION: N-453
Vag. Rec. Pelvic Rec. Distant Rec. Over all survival
EBRT OBSE EBRT OBSE EBRT OBSE EBRT OBSE
7 (1.5%)
17 (3.8%)
6 (1.3%)
12 (2.6%)
34 (7.5%)
31 (6.8%)
84% 84%
25
ASTEC/EN.5 CONCLUSION• Overall morbidity (which included documented
postsurgical complications) was greater in the radiation therapy study arm (60% vs 26%).
• No differences in recurrence-free, disease-specific, or overall survival (hazard ratio 1.01; P = 0.98)
• Although it was not a primary end point of the study (Not randomized to receive or not)
Vault brachytherapy– Decreased the risk of isolated recurrence in the vagina (hazard ratio: 0.53; P = .038). – This reduction in local recurrence did not influence survival.
26
• EBRT alone is not indicated in the treatment of women with early-stage endometrial cancer at intermediate risk of relapse
• Further refinement of which subgroups of women might benefit from treatment would require an individual patient data meta-analysis.
27
28
PORTEC – 2 (2008)
Vaginal brachytherapy versus external beam pelvic radiotherapy for high-intermediate risk
endometrial cancer: Results of the randomized PORTEC-2 trial
R. A. Nout, H. Putter, I. M. Joergenliemk-Schulz, J. J. Jobsen, L. C. Lutgens, E. M. van der Steen-Banasik, J. W. Mens, A. Slot, V. T. Smit and C. L. Creutzberg
Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Medisch Spectrum Twente, Enschede, Netherlands; MAASTricht Radiation Oncology Clinic, Maastricht, Netherlands; Radiotherapy Institute Arnhem, Arnhem, Netherlands; Daniel den Hoed Cancer Center, Rotterdam, Netherlands
29
PORTEC – 2 Design
TAH / BSO no LNDEligibility:
High intermediate risk group-age>60+ IC G1-2 or IB G3
-stage IIaN=427 pts
EBRTN=214
BrachytherapyN=213
Primary endpoint: rate of vaginal relapseSecondary endpoints: OS, QOL
30
PORTEC – 2 Trial Results
EBRT
Vaginal relapse: 1.9%
Loco reg. relapse: 2.5%
Distant relapse: 5.7%
Pelvic relapse: 0.6%
No deaths: 20 pts
DFS: 89%
OS: 90%
BT P
0.9% (p = 0.97)
4% (p = 0.15)
6.3% (p = 0.37)
3.5% (p = 0.03)
20 pts
89%
90%
Median F/U 36 months
31
PORTEC – 2 Toxicity Results
EBRT
QOL Diarrhea ~30%
Impairment in: ~30%
daily activities
Decreased social: ~20%
functioning
G1-2 GI toxicity: 54%
G1-2 GU toxicity: 27%
Skin toxicity: 20%
BT P
~10% (p = 0.001)
~13% (p = 0.03)
~10% (p=0.001)
13% (p = 0.001)
22% (p=0.1)
2% (p = 0.001)
32
PORTEC – 2 Conclusions
• VBT as effective as EBRT for intermediate high risk EC. Despite the slightly but significantly increased pelvic failure rate in the VBT arm.
• OS and RFS were similar.• QOL significantly better with brachytherapy• VBT should be the treatment of choice for
patients with high-intermediate risk EC.• Remaining question:
Treat at recurrence or treat upfront?
33
GOG # 99 vs PORTEC-2
GOG # 99
(2004)
EBRT in early stage intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma decreases the risk of recurrence, but should be limited to patients whose risk factors fit a “high intermediate” risk definition.
PORTEC-2
(2008)
Brachytherapy should be the treatment of choice for patients with high intermediate risk endometrial carcinoma.
34
Cost of therapy
• IVBT less costly than external beam RT
• Patient convenience
• Ancillary costs– Time to recovery
– Time away from home/employment
35
NSGO EORTC
A randomized phase-III study on adjuvant treatment with radiation (RT) ± chemotherapy
(CT) in early stage high-risk endometrial cancer (NSGO-EC-9501/EORTC 55991)
On behalf of NSGO and EORTC
T. Hogberg1, P. Rosenberg1, G. Kristensen1, CF de Oliviera2, R de Pont Christensen1 B Sorbe1, C Lundgren1, H Andersson1, T Salmi1, NS Reed2.
1Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology, Odense, Denmark, 2Europ Org for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium.
Eur J Cancer. 2010 September ; 46(13): 2422–2431. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2010.06.002. 36
NSGO EC-9501/EORTC-55991
Radical surgery TAH+BSO (+PLA)
RT+CT
RT
CT+RTOR
Randomization
Primary endpoint Progression-free survival (PFS)
Surgical stage I, II, IIIA ( positive peritoneal fluid cytology only), or IIIC (positive pelvic lymph nodes only)
Endometrioid Type – 61%Serous, clear cell, or anaplastic carcinomas (39%) were eligible regardless of other risk factors
44 Gy XRT ± optional brachytherapy (BT:39%)
196 cases
186 cases
382 cases
May 1996 to January 2007
(BT:44%)
37
38
Pelvic RT was given according to departmental guidelines (≥44 Gy). RT was given before CT in the RT-CT arm.
Optional vaginal brachytherapy had to be decided before randomization.
CT consisted of four courses of o Doxorubicin/epirubicin 50 mg/m2 and cisplatin
50 mg/m2 every four weeks.o Amendment in Aug 2004 (291 patients
included) allowed alternative CT regimens, including:
o Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2+epirubicin 60 mg/m2 or o Doxorubicin 40 mg/m2+carboplatin AUC 5 ; oro Paclitaxel 175 mg/m2+carboplatin AUC 5-6
every three weeks.
NSGO EC-9501/EORTC-55991Results
• Cancer-specific overall survival improved in radiation/ chemotherapy group (10% at 5 y. from 78 % to 88 %).
• Combined modality improved progression-free but also cancer specific overall survival
• No difference of overall survival by randomization between combined modality and radiation alone
• RT+CT was better than RT alone.
• The next question is if RT+CT better than CT alone
39
Rationale for combining chemotherapy and external beam radiation in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer-
RTOG 9708 study (2004)
• Combined-modality treatment may be the optimal
approach to minimize the risk of pelvic and distant
recurrence.
Feasibility of this approach was tested by the RTOG 9708 study that treated patients with
Grade 2 or 3 endometrial adenocarcinoma with either >50%MI, Cervical stromal invasion, or
Pelvic-confined extrauterine disease
with concurrent chemoradiation
(Cisplatin 50 mg/m2 on days 1 and28) followed by adjuvant chemotherapy 4 cycles of cisplatin and paclitaxel given at 4-week intervals).
40
• Toxicity was acceptable and 98% of patients were able to complete the planned treatment regimen.
• Overall survival and disease-free survival rates at 4 years were 85% and 81%, respectively.
• The pelvic recurrence rate was only 2% at 4 years.
Greven K et al, Preliminary analysis of RTOG 9708: Adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy combined with cisplatin/paclitaxel chemotherapy after
surgery for patients with high-risk endometrial cancer.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004;59:168-173.
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Key Question #1: Which patients with endometrioid endometrial cancerrequire no additional therapy after hysterectomy?• Following total abdominal hysterectomy with or without node
dissection, no radiation therapy is a reasonable option for patients with
1) no residual disease in the hysterectomy specimen despite positive biopsy (Grade: strong recommendation, low-quality evidence)
2) grade 1 or 2 cancers with either no invasion or less than 50% myometrial invasion, especially when no other high-risk features are present (Grade: strong recommendation, high-quality evidence).• Patients with the following pathologic features may be reasonably
treated with or without vaginal brachytherapy
1) grade 3 cancers without myometrial invasion (Grade: strong recommendation, low-quality evidence)
2) grade 1 or 2 cancers with less than 50%myometrial invasion and higher risk features such as age greater than 60 and/or lymphovascular space invasion (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).
48
Key Question #2: Which patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer should receive vaginal cuff radiation?
• Vaginal cuff brachytherapy is as effective as pelvic radiation therapy at preventing vaginal recurrence for patients with
1) grade 1 or 2 cancers with ≥50% myometrial invasion or
2) grade 3 tumors with <50% myometrial invasion
(Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).• Vaginal cuff brachytherapy is preferred to pelvic radiation in
patients with these risk factors particularly in patients who have had comprehensive nodal assessment
(Grade: strong recommendation, low-quality evidence).
49
Key Question #3A: Which women with early stage endometrial cancer should receive postoperative external beam radiation?
Pelvic radiation is an effective means of decreasing pelvic recurrence for early stage patients but has not been proven to improve overall survival.
1) Patients with grade 3 cancer with ≥50% myometrial invasion or cervical stroma invasion may benefit from pelvic radiation to reduce the risk of pelvic recurrence
(Grade: strong recommendation, high-quality evidence).
2) Patients with grade1 or 2 tumors with ≥50% myometrial invasion may also benefit from pelvic radiation to reduce pelvic recurrence rates if other risk factors are present such as age > 60 years and/or LVSI
(Grade: strong recommendation, high-quality evidence).
50
Key Question #3B: Which women with stage III-IVA endometrial cancer shouldreceive postoperative external beam radiation?
The use of pelvic radiation has been shown to improve survival in some settings. The best available evidence at this time suggests that a reasonable option for adjuvant treatment of patients with positive nodes, or involved uterine serosa, ovaries/fallopian tubes, vagina, bladder, or rectum includes external beam radiation therapy as well as adjuvant chemotherapy (Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence).
Chemotherapy (Grade: weak recommendation, moderate-quality evidence) or Radiation therapy alone (Grade:
weak recommendation, low-quality evidence) may be considered for some patients based on pathologic risk factors for pelvic recurrence.
51
Key Question #4: When should brachytherapy be used in addition toexternal beam radiation?
• Prospective data is lacking to validate the use of vaginal brachytherapy after pelvic radiation and retrospective studies show little conclusive evidence of a benefit, albeit with small patient numbers.
• Use of vaginal brachytherapy in patients also undergoing pelvic external beam radiation may not generally be
warranted, unless risk factors for vaginal recurrence are ….present
(Grade: weak recommendation, low-quality evidence).
52
Key Question #5: How should radiation therapy and chemotherapy be integrated in the management of endometrial cancer?
The best available evidence suggests that concurrent chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is indicated for patients with positive nodes or involved uterine serosa, ovaries/fallopian tubes, vagina, bladder, or rectum
(Grade: strong recommendation, moderate-quality evidence). Alternative sequencing strategies with external beam radiation and chemotherapy are also acceptable
(Grade: weak recommendation, low-quality evidence).
Chemotherapy (moderate-quality evidence) or radiation therapy alone (low-quality evidence) may be considered for some patients based on pathologic risk factors for pelvic recurrence.
53
54