addressing new research questions using the netherlands kinship panel study
DESCRIPTION
Addressing new research questions using the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study. Pearl A. Dykstra Erasmus University Rotterdam 6th International Conference of Panel Data Users in Switzerland Lausanne, June 8 – 9, 2011. Aat Liefbroer Eva-Maria Merz Trudie Knijn Aafke Komter Claartje Mulder - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Addressing new research questions using
the Netherlands Kinship Panel Study
Pearl A. DykstraErasmus University Rotterdam
6th International Conference of Panel Data Users in Switzerland
Lausanne, June 8 – 9, 2011
Aat LiefbroerEva-Maria Merz
Trudie KnijnAafke Komter
Claartje Mulder
Matthijs Kalmijn
Pearl Dykstra
Funding:
• Major investments
• Royal Academy of Arts and Sciences
• Participating institutes
New research questions:
• from the start
• as opportunities presented themselves
Three central research questions:
1. nature and strength of family ties, and changes
over time (solidarity)
2. differences: how to explain?
3. differences: implications for individuals, families,
and society
(questions of inequality, cohesion, modernization,
and identity)
26 September 2006
24 January 2007
23 March 2007
6 October 2007
7 December 2007
25 January 2008
Ingrid DoortenThe Division of Unpaid Work in theHousehold: A Stubborn Pattern?
15 September 2008
26 May 2009
26 June 2009
25 September 2009
6 November 2009
12 February 2010
17 May 2010
2 December 2010
8 December 2010
14 January 2011
25 January 2011
New research questions from the start
Netherlands Kinship Panel Study:
A multi-actor,
multi-method, go to
panel study go to
on solidarity in family relationships
Anchor(17<age<80) Current Partner
Children (max. 2) (age>14)
Parent 1
Sibling 1 (age>14)
Parentin-law 1
Sibling n (age>14)Sibling 3
(age>14)Sibling2 (age>14)
Parentin-law 2
Grandparents
Parent 2
Ex-partner
Friend
Family members in the NKPS
Grandchild
Child n (age>14)Child 4
(age>14)Child 3 (age>14)
Multi-actor (1)
Discrepancies in parent’s and child’s reports
(Mandemakers & Dykstra, JMF 2008)
Hypotheses:
• generational stake
• self-enhancement*
• family obligations*
• dissatisfaction*
• relationship quality*
Multi-actor (2)
Intergenerational transmission of kinship norms
(De Vries, Kalmijn & Liefbroer, SSR 2009)
Hypotheses (sibling model)
• direct norm transmission*
• socialization of obedience*
• shared background back
Multi-method (1)
• combination CAPI / CAWI / CATI
• qualitative studies supplementing quantitative
analyses
Multi-method (2)
Selected topics qualitative studies
• black sheep in the family
(Komter, Voorpostel & Pels, JFI 2010)
• non-standard work schedules
(Mills & Täht, JMF 2010)
• ethnicity and intergenerational solidarity
(Schans & Komter, JAS forthcoming)
• young and late parenthood
(Rijken & Knijn, DR 2009)
• etc. back
Wave 1 Wave 2 Wave 3
Year 2002-04 2006-07 2010-11
N (main sample) 8161 6026 4390
Response 45% 74% 73%
Method
CAPI 100% 95% 18%
CATI 3% * 27% **
CAWI 1% * 55% **
* option only at later stage; ** option from the start
New research questions as opportunities
presented themselves
• collaboration with historians
• record linkage
• Generations and Gender Programme
Historical Sample of the Netherlands (HSN)
• life history information taken from population
registers (a.o. fertility, residential, employment)
• HSN: cohorts ≤ 1922
• NKPS: cohorts ≥ 1923
• span past and present
E.g.: Long-term changes in the living arrangements
of children in the Netherlands
Van Gaalen & Van Poppel, JFI 2009
Changes in privacy regulations
• linkage of survey data with registry information
(via NCBS)
• in wave 2: 93% of respondents provided
permission for linkage
• 99% of respondents identified in registers
• registry information: a.o. social security benefits,
taxable income, health care usage
E.g. Family care and public care. Schenk, Dykstra,
& Maas, A & S forthcoming
NKPS: model for GGP (PAU –UNECE)
• GGP is successor of Family & Fertililty Surveys
• 20 countries participating at present
• combination of survey and contextual data
• wave 1 data currently available for 11 countries
• NKPS = Dutch GGP
New questions
• how are interactions in families shaped
by welfare state provisions?
• can our theoretical paradigms be
transplanted to Eastern Europe?
• are social trends characterized by
convergence?
In conclusion, the NKPS
• has put Dutch family scholars on the academic map
• has been a training ground for young scholars
• serves as a source of information for policy makers
• exemplifies that families are about both the young
and the old