addendum to technical memorandum 2 results of phase ...\\bbl2\voli\users\ljf\ljpoo\3 1001948.doc...

221
Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase IITBSA Soil Sampling Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/ Kalamazoo River Superfund Site/ Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Kalamazoo, Michigan May 2000 BBL BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC, engineers & scientists

Upload: others

Post on 12-Sep-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Addendum to TechnicalMemorandum 2

Results of Phase IITBSA SoilSampling

Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site/Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study

Kalamazoo, Michigan

May 2000

BBLBLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC,e n g i n e e r s & scientists

Page 2: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T

RuuE

d g H 0 W H

JUM -1 2000

— \!:RD-SUPERFUND

Addendum to TechnicalMemorandum 2

Results of Phase IITBSA SoilSampling

Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site/Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study

Kalamazoo, Michigan

May 2000

BBLBLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.engineers & scientists

6723 Towpath Road, P.O. Box 66Syracuse, New York, 13214-0066(315)446-9120

Page 3: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Table of Contents

Section 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................1-1

1.1 Description of Study Area........................................................................................................... 1-11.2 Terrestrial Biota Sampling Investigation..................................................................................... 1-11.3 Phase I and Phase II TBSA Sampling........................................................................................ 1-1

Section 2. Investigation Activities ................................................................................................2-1

2.1 Phase II TBSA Soil Sampling and Analysis................................................................................2-12.2 QA/QC Review of Data...............................................................................................................2-1

Section 3. Investigation Results...................................................................................................3-1

3.1 Field Data ...................................................................................................................................3-13.2 Analytical Data............................................................................................................................3-1

3.2.1 PCB Results ..................................................................................................................3-13.2.2 TOCResults..................................................................................................................3-2

3.3 QA/QC Data Review Results......................................................................................................3-2

Section 4. Preliminary Findings....................................................................................................4-1

4.1 Phase II Soil Sampling Findings.................................................................................................4-14.2 QA/QC Data Review Findings ....................................................................................................4-1

Section 5. References....................................................................................................................5-1

Tables

2-13-13-2

Sample Delivery Groups SummaryTBSA Phase II Composite Samples PCB Analytical ResultsTBSA Phase II Composite Samples TOC Analytical Results

Figures

1 Index to Figures2 TBSA 13 TBSA 3 and TBSA 54 TBSA 105 TBSA 116 TBSA 1 Phase II PCB Data7 TBSA 3 and TBSA 5 Phase II PCB Data8 TBSA 10 Phase II PCB Data9 TBSA 11 Phase II PCB Data

Appendices

A Field DocumentationB QA/QC Accuracy and Precision SummaryC Data Review ReportsD Supporting Documentation

BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJPJ_JPOO\3 IOOI94B.DOC - 5/30/00

Page 4: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

1. IntroductionThis Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 - Results of Phase IITBSA Soil Sampling presents the results andfindings of the Phase II soil sampling performed by Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. (BBL) for the Terrestrial BiotaInvestigation conducted in support of the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RemedialInvestigation/Feasibility Study (PJ/FS). The soil sampling was performed in two phases (as described below) toevaluate concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in select soils as part of the Terrestrial BiotaInvestigation. Sampling activities were performed in accordance with a Biota Sampling Plan (BSP) developed byCamp Dresser & McKee, Inc. (CDM, 1993).

1.1 Description of Study Area

The Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site (Site) includes approximately 80 miles of theKalamazoo River and the lower 3 miles of Portage Creek, a tributary which joins the Kalamazoo River at Kalamazoo,Michigan. The Kalamazoo River is located in southwestern Michigan (Figure 1). The main stem of the KalamazooRiver begins in Albion, at the confluence of the north and south branches, and flows northwesterly for 123 milesthrough Kalamazoo and Allegan counties to Lake Michigan. The Kalamazoo River has a drainage area ofapproximately 2,000 square miles and is fed by more than 400 miles of streams and tributaries.

A Biota Investigation (BBL, 2000) was conducted along portions of approximately 100 miles of the river betweenBattle Creek and the river's mouth, near Saugatuck. A more extensive review of the physical setting andcharacteristics of the study area is contained in the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund SiteDescription of the Current Situation report (BBEPC, 1992).

1.2 Terrestrial Biota Sampling Investigation

The Terrestrial Biota Investigation was designed to generate PCB data from selected species for use in the ecologicalrisk assessment component of the RI and to estimate exposure of identified consumer species that use these speciesas food sources. Another objective of the Terrestrial Biota Investigation was to examine the relationship between soilPCB concentrations and biota PCB concentrations. The investigation consisted of terrestrial biota sampling in fivedesignated Terrestrial Biota Sampling Areas (TBSAs) representative of specific ranges of soil PCB concentrations.Sampling provided PCB data for surface soils and target biota species.

1.3 Phase I and Phase II TBSA Sampling

Phase I of the TBSA soil sampling was conducted on September 28 through October 1,1993. The objective of PhaseI was to collect soil samples from 11 candidate TBSAs for PCB immunoassay analysis. The results of the Phase IPCB analyses then served as a screening step to enable the selection of potentially five TBSAs for further soilsampling (Phase U). The results of the Phase I PCB analyses are provided in the Michigan Department of NaturalResources (MDNR)-approved Technical Memorandum 2 - Results of Phase I TBSA Soil Sampling (BBL, 1994).

The 11 candidate TBSAs were selected in accordance with the BSP (CDM, 1993). The BSP identified 11preliminary TBSAs along the Kalamazoo River based on the availability of suitable habitat for small mammals andsuspected PCB concentrations in surficial soils. In Phase I PCB screening, former impoundment sediment sampleswere collected from sampling grids approximately 1,500 feet by 500 feet in dimension. In each of the 11 TBSAs,eight individual samples were collected, homogenized, and analyzed as a composite sample.

_________________________________BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE. INC._______________________________\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•)

Page 5: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were selected for further, more intensive soil sampling duringthe 1993-1994 Terrestrial Biota Investigation. These five TBSAs are:

TBSA 1 - Just upstream of the Swan Creek confluence with the Kalamazoo River (Figure 2);

TBSA 3 - Near the confluence of Shnable Creek with the Kalamazoo River upstream of theTrowbridge Dam (Figure 3);

TBSA 5 - Upstream of the Schnable Creek confluence with the Kalamazoo River (Figure 3);

TBSA 10 - Along the Kalamazoo River, behind the City of Plainwell wastewater treatment plant(Figure 4); and

TBSA 11 - Approximately 2.25 miles upstream of the 1-94 Bridge, near Wattles Park (representativeof background conditions) (Figure 5).

Phase n sampling consisted of soil sampling of the five selected TBSAs. The sampling was performed in November1993 in accordance with the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RI/FS Work Plan(Work Plan) (BBEPC, 1993a).

This Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 presents the results and findings of the Phase n soil sampling of TBSAs1, 3, 5, 10, and 11 and includes analytical data, chain of custody forms, and results of the quality assurance/qualitycontrol (QA/QC) review of the analytical data. The results of the 1993-1994 biota sampling are presented inTechnical Memorandum 14 - Biota Investigation (BBL, 2000).

BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.\\BB1_2\VOL I\USERS\L|FUJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -- 5/30,00 -j _

Page 6: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

2. Investigation ActivitiesSoil from five TBSAs were evaluated by sampling and analysis. The investigative activities discussed in this sectionwere conducted as described in Section 5.4.1.6 of the Work Plan (BBEPC, 1993a).

2.1 Phase II TBSA Soil Sampling and Analysis

Phase II soil sampling was performed November 10 through 12, 1993. In each TBSA, a 200-by-150 foot samplinggrid was established and divided into five 40-by-150 foot strips. Eight surface soil borings were obtained fromrandomly selected locations within each strip. Samples were taken from the top 1 -foot of soil. Fifteen grams of soilfrom each boring were composited and homogenized to form a single composite sample representing each strip,resulting in five composite samples per TBSA.

Samples were collected using stainless-steel scoops or a stainless-steel auger. All equipment was cleaned inaccordance with the procedures outlined in the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund SiteRI/FS Field Sampling Plan (BBEPC, 1993b).

Samples were sent to Aquatec, Inc. of Colchester, Vermont, (currently known as Severn Trent Laboratories) andanalyzed for total PCB and total organic carbon (TOC). TOC is measured as a percent dry weight and indicates theproportion of the sample composed of organic material.

Field activities were documented in field notes presented as Appendix A.

2.2 QA/QC Review of Data

Data from three sample delivery groups (SDGs) for Phase n TBSA soil samples collected between November 10 and12, 1993 were reviewed for QA/QC compliance with method guidelines and project-specific requirements. TheSDGs and their associated samples are presented in Table 2-1.

Each data package from the laboratory was reviewed as outlined in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)(BBEPC, 1993c). The review included an evaluation of holding times, calibration requirements (initial andcontinuing), blank contamination, surrogate spike recovery (where applicable), matrix spike and duplicateperformance, laboratory control sample recovery, and analyte identification, as applicable.

A summary assessment of the precision and accuracy of the analytical data is found in Appendix B. The completeresults of the data review are found in Appendix C.

Chain of custody forms are presented in the supporting documentation included in Appendix D.

BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.\\BBL2\VOLI\USERSjgPiLJPOC\3IOOI948.DOC- 5/30,00 2-1

Page 7: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

3. Investigation Results

3.1 Field Data

The field data provided within the field notes in Appendix A were comprised of field maps and soil sampledescriptions. The field maps provide the approximate location of the individual soil samples within each TBSA,accompanied by a description of the sample in accordance with Unified Soil Classification System guidelines.

Soils within each individual TBSA sampling location were relatively consistent with respect to color and texture.Soils within TBSA 1 were described as brown to dark brown fine sand, silt, and clay to brown to dark brown siltyclay. Soils within TBSA 3 were described as gray to dark gray clay with traces of silt. Soils within TBSA 5 wereconsistently described as dark gray clay. Soils within TBSA 10 varied from gray to dark gray clay with fine tomedium brown/orange sand to brown to dark brown silt with medium brown/gray sand. TBSA 11 soils weredescribed as dark brown silt with fine, light brown sand.

3.2 Analytical Data

Soil samples were analyzed for PCB and TOC. The following subsection provides a summary of the soil analyticalresults.

3.2.1 PCB Results

PCB analytical data for the Phase H TBSA soil samples are presented in Table 3-1 and on Figures 6, 7, 8, and 9. PCBwere detected in all of the composite soil samples from TBSAs 1, 3, 5, and 10. At the background location (TBSA11), PCB were detected in two of the five composite soil samples.

Total PCB concentrations in soil from TBSA 1 (quantified as Aroclors 1242, 1248, 1254, and 1260) ranged froman estimated 0.065 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to 0.20 mg/kg, with an arithmetic average concentration of 0.16± 0.053 mg/kg. Total PCB concentrations in soil from TBSA 3 (quantified as Aroclors 1248,1254, and 1260) rangedfrom an estimated 20 mg/kg to an estimated 33 mg/kg, with an arithmetic average concentration of 25 ± 5.4 mg/kg.Total PCB concentrations in soil from TBSA 5 (quantified as Aroclors 1248, 1254, and 1260) ranged from anestimated 24 mg/kg to 35 mg/kg, with an arithmetic average concentration of 27 ± 4.5 mg/kg. Total PCBconcentrations in soil from TBSA 10 (quantified as Aroclor 1248, 1254, and 1260) ranged from 4.2 mg/kg to 10mg/kg, with an arithmetic average concentration of 6.5 ± 2.5 mg/kg. The two detected PCB concentrations from thebackground location (TBSA 11) were 0.28 mg/kg and 0.39 mg/kg (quantified as Aroclors 1248 and 1254), with allsamples having an arithmetic average concentration of 0.17 ± 0.16 mg/kg.

In addition to the five composite samples collected per TBSA, additional composite samples were collected at TBSAs1,3, and 5. Each additional sample consisted of a composite of three 30 gram samples collected at three wormsampling locations. Even though the sampling program did not specify the collection of these additional compositesamples, for completeness, the results of the PCB analysis of these samples are reported in Table 3-1. The total PCBconcentration from the composite sample collected from the TBSA 1 worm sampling locations was an estimated 0.23mg/kg; the total PCB concentration from the composite sample collected from the TBSA 3 worm sampling locationswas 25 mg/kg; and the total PCB concentration from the composite sample collected from the TBSA 5 wormsampling locations was 15 mg/kg.

_________________________________BLASLAND, BOUCK& LEE. INC._______________________________\\B8a\Vdl\USERaLJfMJPOWIOOI948.DOC-- 5/3<MX> 3.-)

Page 8: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

3.2.2 TOC Results

TOC results from TBSA 1 soil samples ranged from 3.1 to 5.8 percent, with an arithmetic average value of 4.3 ± 0.98percent. TOC results from TBSA 3 soil samples ranged from 8.3 to 10.2 percent, with an arithmetic average valueof 9.4 ± 0.87 percent. TOC results from TBSA 5 soil samples ranged from 8.2 to 9.3 percent, with an arithmeticaverage value of 8.6 ± 0.44 percent. TOC results from TBSA 10 soil samples ranged from 4.5 to 13.5 percent, withan arithmetic average value of 7.4 ± 3.8 percent. TOC results from TBSA 11 soil samples ranged from 8.2 percent(duplicate sample result of 15.4 percent) to 16.0 percent, with an arithmetic average value of 13.4 + 2.1 percent. Theresults of the Phase II TBSA soil TOC analysis are presented in Table 3-2.

3.3 QA/QC Data Review Results

Data from three SDGs for the Phase n TBSA soil samples were reviewed for QA/QC compliance with methodguidelines and project specific requirements. Each data package was reviewed as outlined in the QAPP (BBEPC,1993c). Specifically included were an evaluation of holding times, calibration requirements (initial and continuing),blank contamination, surrogate spike recovery (where applicable), matrix spike and duplicate performance, laboratorycontrol sample recovery, and analyte identification, as applicable.

The following summarizes the findings of the QA/QC data review. A more detailed analysis of data quality is foundin the Data Review Reports included in Appendix C. An assessment of data accuracy and precision is found inAppendix B.

PCB Analysis

• Analyses were performed following modified United States Environmental Protection Agency SW-846Method 8081. Data were reported on an Aroclor-specific basis.

• With the exception of sample K12019, all samples were originally extracted and analyzed within the method-specified holding times. Due to surrogate recovery problems, samples K12022 and K1203 8 were reextractedover the specified holding time. All data for sample K12019 and the reextracted samples were qualified asestimated based on the holding time violations.

• No Aroclors were present in the method or rinse blanks.• Recovery for one surrogate was below control limits in 15 samples. Data qualification was warranted for

only one of the 15 samples based on the excursions. Recoveries for both surrogates were above control limitsin one sample. Since no Aroclors were detected in the sample, the recoveries had no impact on the reporteddata.

• All reported matrix spike recoveries were within control limits. All matrix spike blank recoveries were alsowithin control limits.

• All field duplicate results were acceptable, with one of the three duplicate pairs replicating throughnondetection.

• All initial calibrations were within method specifications. With one exception, all continuing calibrationstandards were also within method specifications. No reported data were associated with the noncompliantstandard.

BLASLAND. BOUCK& LEE, INC.\\BBL2\VOLI\USERaLJF\gPOW IOOI948.DOC -- 5/30AX) 3_2

Page 9: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

4. Preliminary FindingsThe results of the Phase II TBSA soil sampling will be incorporated into Technical Memorandum 14 - BiotaInvestigation (BBL, 2000), which documents the results of the biota investigation.

4.1 Phase II Soil Sampling Findings

The analytical Phase II results were within the same ranges as the Phase I immunoassay results, summarized in thefollowing table.

TBSA

1351011

Phase I Results(mg/kg)

< 1 to 10< 5 to 10020to> 100Ito40< 1

Phase II ArithmeticAverage and Standard

Deviation Results (mg/kg)0.16 ±0.05325 ± 5.427 + 4.56.5 ±2.50.1710.16

The highest soil arithmetic average PCB concentrations in Phase II were observed in TBSA 3 and TBSA 5. Thelowest arithmetic average PCB concentrations in Phase n were observed in TBSA 1 and TBSA 11. PCBconcentrations tended to be greatest within areas of high organic carbon content (TBSAs 3 and 5), with TOC resultsranging between 8.2 and 10.2 percent in these TBSAs. Likewise, in areas of low TOC (TBSA 1), PCBconcentrations tended to be low.

The average PCB soil concentrations in TBSAs 3, 5, and 10 well exceed the surficial soils PCB concentration (0.7mg/kg) that would be protective of terrestrial receptors, as proposed in the final Baseline Ecological Risk Assessmentfor the Site (MDEQ, 1999).

4.2 QA/QC Data Review Findings

Other than for the deviations noted in Section 3.3, the data are acceptable for use as reported by the laboratory andcan be used for remedial decision-making purposes.

BLASLAND, BOUCK& LEE. INC.\\BBL2\VO.I\USERS\LJPU.JPO(A3IOOI948.DOC -- 5/3<VX> 4-1

Page 10: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

5. ReferencesBBEPC, 1992. (Blasland & Bouck Engineers, P.C.), Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund

Site Description of the Current Situation. (Syracuse, NY: July 1992).

BBEPC, 1993a. Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RI/FS Work Plan. (Syracuse NY:July 1993).

BBEPC, 1993b. Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RI/FS Field Sampling Plan.(Syracuse, NY: July 1993).

BBEPC, 1993c. Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RI/FS Quality Assurance ProjectPlan. (Syracuse, NY: June 1993).

BBL, 1994. (Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc.). Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RI/FSTechnical Memorandum 2, Results ofPhaselTBSA Soil Sampling. (Syracuse, NY: February 1994).

BBL, 2000. Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RI/FS Technical Memorandum 14- Biota Investigation. (Syracuse, NY: 2000).

COM, 1993. (Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc.). Biota Sampling Plan for the Allied Paper, Inc./PortageCreek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site. (Detroit, MI: October 1993).

MDEQ, 1999. Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the Kalamazoo River Superfund Site. (Lansing, MI: June1999).

BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.\\BBL2\VOL IMJSERSJJFMJPCW1001948.DOC -- 5/3CWO

Page 11: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

B L A S L A N D . B O U C K , & L E E . I N C .

e n g i n e e r s 4 s c i e n t i s t s

Tables

Page 12: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

TABLE 2-1

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE

SAMPLE DELIVERY GROUP SUMMARY

Sample DeliveryGroup40734

40738

40869

Sample IDK12012K12013K12014K12015K12016K12017K12018K12019K12020K12021K12023K 12024K12025K12026K12027K12028K12029K12030K 12033K12031K12034K12035K12036K12037K12038K12039K12040K12042K12043K12044

MatrixSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoil

Rinse BlankSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoil

Rinse BlankSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoil

LocationTBSA10-1TBSA10-2TBSA10-3TBSA10-4TBSA10-5TBSA11-1TBSA11-2TBSA11-3TBSA11-4TBSA11-5

TBSA5-1TBSA5-2TBSA5-3TBSA5-4TBSA5-5TBSA3-1TBSA3-2TBSA3-4TBSA3-3TBSA3-5

TBSA1-1TBSA1-2TBSA1-3TBSA1-4TBSA1-5TBSA1-6TBSA3-6TBSA5-6

AnalysisPCB

XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

TOCXXXXXXXXXX

XXXXXXXXXX

XXXXX

Duplicate

K 12022

K12032

K12041

MS/MSD

X

X

F:\USERS\LJP\LJPOO\3100tbls, 2-1 Page 1 of 1 5/26/00

Page 13: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

TABLE 3-1

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE

TBSA PHASE II COMPOSITE SAMPLES PCB ANALYTICAL RESULTS1

SampleNumber BBL Sample ID

Aroclor 1242(mg/kg)

Aroclor 1248(mg/kg)

Aroclor 1254(mg/kg)

Aroclor 1260(mg/kg)

TBSA1K12036K12037

K12038REK 12039K 12040K12041K12042

TBSA1-1TBSA 1-2TBSA 1-3TBSA 1-4TBSA 1-5

TBSA 1-5 (DUP)TBSA 1-6*

ND(0.076U)ND(0.075U)

0.045 JND(0.078U)ND(0.073U)ND(0.077U)ND(0.072U)

0.051 JND(0.075U)ND(0.075UJ)ND(0.078U)ND(0.073U)ND(0.077U)ND(0.072U)

0.061 J0.20

0.093 J0.17

0.065 J0.0770.20

0.034 JND(0.075U)

0.033 J0.032 J

ND(0.073U)ND(0.077U)

0.030 JArithmetic Average Concentration2' 3

Standard DeviationTBSA 3

K12029K12030K12031K12032K12033K12034K12043

TBSA3-1TBSA3-2TBSA3-3

TBSA3-3 (DUP)TBSA3-4TBSA3-5TBSA3-6*

ND(2.0U)ND(2.9U)ND(2.8U)ND(2.8U)ND(1.9U)ND(2.8U)ND(2.3U)

17302120161525

3.8ND(2.9U)

5.84.62.75.2

ND(2.3U)

ND(2.0U)2.6 J

ND(2.8U)1.5J1.7 J1.3 J

ND(2.3U)Arithmetic Average Concentration2' 3

Standard Deviation

Total PCB(mg/kg)

0.15J0.20

0.17 J0.20 J0.065 J0.0770.23 J0.160.053

2133 J27

26 J20 J22 J25255.4

TBSA 5K12024K12025K12026K 12027K12028K12044

TBSA5-1TBSA5-2TBSA5-3TBSA5-4TBSA5-5TBSA5-6*

ND(1.8U)ND(2.7U)ND(1.8U)ND(1.8U)ND(1.8U)ND(0.92U)

193121202511

3.7ND(2.7U)

1.82.5

ND(1.8U)3.8

1.8 J3.52.21.7 J2.7

ND(0.92U)Arithmetic Average Concentration3

Standard Deviation

25 J3525

24 J2815274.5

TBSA 10K12012K12013K12014K12015K12016

TBSA 10-1TBSA 10-2TBSA 10-3TBSA 10-4TBSA 10-5

ND(0.36U)ND(0.40U)ND(0.38U)ND(0.87U)ND(0.51U)

3.33.82.98.76.4

0.891.91.11.51.1

ND(0.36U)ND(0.40U)

0.26 JND(0.87U)

0.70Arithmetic Average Concentration

Standard DeviationTBSA 11

K12017K12018K12019K12020K12021K 12022

TBSA11-1TBSA 11 -2TBSA 11 -3TBSA11-4TBSA 11 -5

TBSA 11 -5 (DUP)

ND(0.15U)ND(0.14U)ND(0.12UJ)ND(O.llU)ND(O.llU)ND(O.IOU)

0.22ND(0.14U)

0.39 JND(O.llU)ND(O.llU)ND(O.IOU)

0.061 JND(0.14U)ND(0.12UJ)ND(O.llU)ND(O.llU)ND(O.IOU)

ND(0.15U)ND(0.14U)ND(0.12UJ)ND(O.llU)ND(O.llU)ND(O.IOU)

Arithmetic Average Concentration2' 4

Standard Deviation

4.25.7

4.3 J108.26.52.5

0.28 JND

0.39 JNDNDND0.170.16

See notes on page 2.

F:\USERS\LJP\LJPOO\3100tbls, 3-1 Page 1 of 2 5/26/00

Page 14: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

TABLE 3-1

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE

TBSA PHASE II COMPOSITE SAMPLES PCB ANALYTICAL RESULTS1

Notes:1 - Showing only the results for compounds detected above the quantitation limit.2 - Duplicate samples were averaged with the original sample for the calculation of the overall

arithmetic average concentration and standard deviation.Composite samples taken specifically from the worm sampling locations (i.e., TBSA 1-6,TBSA3-6, and TBSA5-6) are reported as reference; however, they are not included in thecalculation of arithmetic average PCB concentration.

4 - For nondetects, one-half the reporting limit was used as a proxy concentration for thecalculation of the overall arithmetic average concentration and standard deviation.

* - Supplemental sample collected at worm sampling locations.DUP - Duplicate sample.All samples collected from the 0.0 to 1.0-foot interval.

Notes Explaining Data Qualifiers:J - The compound was positively identified; however, the associated numerical value

is an estimated concentration only.U - The compound was analyzed for but not detected. The associated value is the

compound quantitation limit.UJ - The compound was not detected above the reported quantitation limit. However, the

reported limit is approximate and may or may not represent the actual limit of quantitation.ND- Not detected.

F:\USERS\LJP\LJPOO\3100tbls.3-1 Page 2 Of 2 5/26/00

Page 15: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

TABLE 3-2

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE

TBSA PHASE H COMPOSITE SAMPLES TOC ANALYTICAL RESULTS

SampleNumber BBL Sample ID

TBSA1K12036K12037K12038K12039K 12040

TBSA1-1TBSA1-2TBSA1-3TBSA 1-4TBSA 1-5

Arithmetic Average ConcentrationStandard Deviation

TOC(%)

3.13.94.35.84.44.3

0.98TBSA 3

K12029K12030K12031K12033K12034

TBSA3-1TBSA3-2TBSA3-3TBSA3-4TBSA3-5

Arithmetic Average ConcentrationStandard Deviation

10.28.710.08.310.09.4

0.87TBSA 5

K12024K12025K 12026K12027K12028

TBSA5-1TBSA5-2TBSA5-3TBSA5-4TBSA5-5

Arithmetic Average ConcentrationStandard Deviation

8.88.28.59.38.38.6

0.44TBSA 10

K12012K12013K12014K12015K12016

TBSA 10-1TBSA 10-2TBSA 10-3TBSA 10-4TBSA10-5

Arithmetic Average ConcentrationStandard Deviation

4.54.95.58.513.57.43.8

TBSA 11K12017K12018K12019K12020K12021K12022

TBSA11-1TBSA11-2TBSA11-3TBSA11-4TBSA11-5

TBSA11-5(DUP)Arithmetic Average Concentration

Standard Deviation

16.015.213.111.18.215.413.42.1

See notes on page 2.

F:\USERS\LJP\LJPOO\3100tbls, 3-2 Page 1 of 2 5/26/00

Page 16: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

TABLE 3-2

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE

TBSA PHASE E COMPOSITE SAMPLES TOC ANALYTICAL RESULTS

Notes:i Duplicate samples were averaged with the original sample for the calculation of the overall

arithmetic average concentration and standard deviation.DUP - Duplicate sample.All samples collected from the 0.0 to 1.0-foot interval.

F:\USERS\LJP\LJPOO\3100tbls, 3-2 Page 2 Of 2 5/26/00

Page 17: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

B L A S L A N D . B O U C K , & L E E , I N C .

engineers & s c i e n t i s t s

Figures

Page 18: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

KEY:(SEE FIGURE INDICATEDFOR LOCATIONS OFTHE FOLLOWING SITES)

LEGEND

FIGURE NUMBERAND AREA DESCRIBED

ALLEGAN. KALAMAZOO AND CALHOUN COUNTY MAPPINGOBTAINED FROM MICHIGAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEM.

ALLEGAN COUNTYKALAMAZOO COUNTYCALHOUN COUNTY——

MICHIGANNOT TO SCALE

f: 6430JB97L: ON—.OFT--HEF'4/14/00 SYR-S4-RIP JHS OCC64924403X64524801 -DUG

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER. INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER

SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPLING

INDEX TO FIGURES

HHL BUSUNO, 60UCK it LEE. INC.engineers & scientists

FIGURE

1

Page 19: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORMERFENNVILLEGAGINGSTAT1

LEGEND

TBSA 1

NOTE:

1. PLANIMETRIC MAPPING OBTAINED FROMMICHIGAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.

2. SAMPLING AREAS APPROXIMATED BYBLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE. INC.

2400'

SCALE

4800'

P: S4S-DJ-«L: OH--.OFf.-HtF-4/14/00 S1*-S4-*U> N€S OCC64S24403\64S248Qg.O«C

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER

SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPLING

TBSA 1

HHL BLASUNO, BOUCK * LEE. INC.engineers & scientists

FIGURE

Page 20: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

P: 64S-DJ-BU ON-'.OFF-«REF«4/14/00 SYR-M-RLP JUS OCC64U4403\64324B06.01IC

LEGEND

NOTE:

1. PLANIUETRIC MAPPING OBTAINED FROMMICHIGAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.

2. SAMPLING AREAS APPROXIMATED BY8LASLANO. BOUCK 4t LEE. INC.

2400'

SCALE

4800'

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER

SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPLING

TBSA 3 AND TBSA 5

BUSLAND. BOUCK ft LEE, INC.engineers & scientists

FIGURE

Page 21: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

RIVER12TH STREETLANDFILL OU

AU£GAN CO.KMMMZOO C0\

NOTE:

1. PLANIMETRIC MAPPING OBTAINED FROMMICHIGAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.

2. SAMPLING AREAS APPROXIMATED BYBLASLANO, BOUCK & LEE. INC.

2400'

SCALE

4800'

P: 645-OJ-8

4/14/00 SYR-S4-RIP NCS DCC64S244OJ\64a24aO5.DOC

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER

SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2

RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPLING

TBSA 10

HtiL BLASLAHO. BOUCK t LEE. INC.engineers & scientists

FIGURE

4

Page 22: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

BATTLE CREEK

1. PLAMMETRIC MAPPING OBTAINED FROMMICHIGAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.

2. SAMPLING AREAS APPROXIMATEO BYBLASLANO. BOUCK & LEE. INC.

2400'

SCALE

4800'

P: 64S-OJ-BL; OM-'.OFF—«£f4/14/00 SW»-S4-RU> JUS OCC645244OJ\64524602.0»C

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER. INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER

SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPLING

TBSA 11

8USLAND. BOUCK ft LEE, INC.engineers & scientists

FIGURE

Page 23: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

I

LEGEND

TBSA 1

NOTE:

1. PLANIMETRIC MAPPING OBTAINED FROM MICHIGANRESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.

2. SAMPUNG AREAS APPROXIMATED BY BLASLAND,BOUCK * LEE. INC.

3. SAMPLES REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF 8INDIVIDUAL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM THE 0TO 1 FOOT DEPTH.

4. DATA REFLECT TOTAL PCB CONCENTRATIONS(mq/kg) DERIVED FROM THE SUM OF INDIVIDUALAROCLORs. AROCIOR-SPECIFIC RESULTS AREPRESENTED IN TABLE 3-1.

5. J - THE COMPOUND WAS POSITIVELY IDENTIFIEDHOWEVER. THE ASSOCIATED NUMERICAL VALUEIS AN ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION ONLY.

FORMERFENNV1LLEGAGINGSTAT1

TBSA 1LocationTBSA1-1TBSA1-2TBSA1-3TBSA1-4TBSA1-5TBSA1-5(dup)

PCB (mq/kg)0.15 J0.200.17 J0.20 J0.065 J0.077

P: 845-OJ-S<.: ON-'.OFF-IIEF*4/14/00 SYH-M-RIP NES OCCS4S244Oe\S4S2480t .0*6

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER. INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER

SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPUNG

TBSA 1 PHASE II PCB DATA

HHJL BLASLAND. BOUCK * LEE, INC.engineers & scientists

FIGURE

Page 24: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

P:64S-OJ-B

4/14/00 S-m-54-m.P NES OCC64S24408\64324802.DWG

LEGEND

NOTE:

1. PLANIMETRIC MAPPING OBTAINED FROM MICHIGANRESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.

2. SAMPLING AREAS APPROXIMATED BY BLASLANO,BOUCK * LEE. INC.

3. SAMPLES REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF 8INDIVIDUAL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM THE 0TO 1 FOOT DEPTH.

4. DATA REFLECT TOTAL PCB CONCENTRATIONS(mgAg) DERIVED FROM THE SUM OF INDIVIDUALAROCLORs. AROCLOR-SPEOFIC RESULTS AREPRESENTED IN TABLE 3-1.

5. J - THE COMPOUND WAS POSITIVELY IDENTIFIEDHOWEVER. THE ASSOCIATED NUMERICAL VALUEIS AN ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION ONLY.

2400'

SCALE

4800'

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER

SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPUNG

TBSA 3 AND TBSA 5PHASE II PCB DATA

HHL BUSLAND. BOUCK 4 LEE, INC.engineers & scientists

FIGURE

Page 25: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

LEGEND

TBSA 10 "ILocationTBSA10-1TBSA10-2TBSA10-3TBSA10-4TBSA10-5

PCB (mg/kq)4.25.74.3 J108.2

TBSA 10

NOTE:

1. PLANIMETRIC MAPPING OBTAINED FROM MICHIGANRESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.

2. SAMPUNG AREAS APPROXIMATED BY BLASLANO.80UCK * LEE. INC.

3. SAMPLES REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF 8INDIVIDUAL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM THE 0TO 1 FOOT DEPTH.

4. DATA REFLECT TOTAL PCB CONCENTRATIONS(mgAg) DERIVED FROM THE SUM OF INDIVIDUALAROCLORs. AROCLOR-SPEOnC RESULTS AREPRESENTED IN TABLE 3-1.

5. J - THE COMPOUND WAS POSITIVELY IDENTIFIEDHOWEVER. THE ASSOCIATED NUMERICAL VALUEIS AN ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION ONLY.

2400'

SCALE

4800'

\KAIMUOOO

P: S4S-OJ-6U ON.',OFF-1KF«4/14/00 STR-M-RLP NES DCCS4i2440e\64$34BOJ.OM;

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER. INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMA200 RIVER

SUPERFUNO SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPLING

TBSA 10 PHASE II PCB DATA

HBL BLASLANO. MUCK * LEE, INC.engineers & scientists

FIGURE

8

Page 26: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

1. PLANIMETRlC MAPPING OBTAINED FROM MICHIGANRESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.

2. SAMPLING AREAS APPROXIMATED BY BLASLAND.BOUCK & LEE. INC.

BATTLE CREEK

SAMPLES REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF 8INDIVIDUAL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM THE 0TO 1 FOOT DEPTH.

DATA REFLECT TOTAL PCB CONCENTRATIONSDERIVED FROM THE SUM OF INDIVIDUAL

AROCLOR*. AROCLOR-SPEOFIC RESULTS AREPRESENTED IN TABLE 3-1.

5. J - THE COMPOUND WAS POSITIVELY IDENTIFIEDHOWEVER. THE ASSOCIATED NUMERICAL VALUEIS AN ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION ONLY.

6. ND- NOT DETECTED

CERESCO

ON-'.OfF.IW/14/00 SYR-S4-RLP NCS DCC

KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER

SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPLING

TBSA 11 PHASE II PCB DATA

BHL BLASLAND, BOUCK ft LEE, INC.engineers & scientists

FIGURE

Page 27: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

B L A S L A N D , B O U C K ,

engineers & s c i e n t i s t

Appendices

Page 28: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

B L A S L A N D , B O U C K , & L E E , INC.

engineers & s c i e n t i s t s

Appendix A

Page 29: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 30: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 31: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 32: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 33: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

r*-r.'t' ;j":A'-'.•**'*.•*.*•» LJO'.I-J^/ . ,

Page 34: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 35: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 36: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

'.!•• -. -V -.••;•:- '..• '/ •.• • •;•"•','••.''

Page 37: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 38: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 39: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 40: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 41: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 42: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

f'Pf:

Page 43: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 44: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 45: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 46: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

' '•• •• i •;. ,''. •' - •; *'

Page 47: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 48: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were
Page 49: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

; :-

J>

r1

„._. s-ne,A->

_ .._/-*'

_ _ _ . / < £

__. ... ..*?

_.._.*«>..

_^ _...f ?

///

__ y^/- .

_./*£_..

Sfcevett

*

Sf

/#

l<*

£-3

....&.

__ 4S....X/5-

N*J. l^t^^TT^^^^"

.-^4

f> ft-

.7 ...36>JZ

/<*z?

f Z .

<?zz-

' *"c.

&£/vr

&7 __/r?>vr>»y . . ._/*•£..__/^ ..

^«^7" ._ 7

. -i/je/t>

z/27

_ y^_^

^>?7s-/iO

/vr:

5 :A^

7

._ fe.. 2$.

_... ^«V?o

_/*..-<XT>-

^^^^^^^^T^^W^

•ss>f

r/^21A.

y?rK7&&rfV

77.._.^•/73

•sf*f~t—

/7V .

/10J6> 3

/7/

y. 2/^j/^T./?2

<r«

_../•?..

_^7. >3~

_/»/-xyy

/<6

/> ^

/•»?„_....

^&_.__'

.97_..

_??._......

49 ___//f___^i-_

;r

--XP^ BI ^VM

J.

"'Ja 'v*--w?5?Y?,r:',

I

:IMW

X^'-v^-''"''» ' , . • • ' • • • • • ' ' . . - .••i •.•••:•' •.•'l.'Vt-.-'.-vi

,:v?A,v.%».rtK'.•V%':^-v^v^s-:?r^

Page 50: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

B L A S L A N D , B O U C K , & L E E , INC .

engineers & s c i e n t i s t s

Appendix B

Page 51: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Appendix BQA/QC Review of Data - Summary of Precision and Accuracy

Data packages for the Phase II TBSA soil sample analyses were reviewed and inspected for analytical precision andaccuracy. Three SDGs containing the sediment samples were reviewed and evaluated. The SDGs and theirassociated samples are presented in Table 2-1.

Analytical precision was assessed by comparing the percent recoveries of the matrix spike (MS) and matrix spikeduplicate (MSD) samples. Field duplicates were also used to assess the overall precision of the laboratory analyses.The relative percent differences (RPDs) between percent recoveries were calculated for each pair of duplicateanalyses.

In addition to the MS data, other indicators of accuracy, such as surrogate spike and blank spike recoveries, wereexamined to assess the analytical method's accuracy.

An overall precision and accuracy summary, as assessed through the review of QA/QC information includingMS/MSD recoveries and RPDs between recoveries, matrix spike blank (MSB) recoveries, field duplicate RPD results,surrogate spike recoveries and contamination levels in the blanks, is presented below. A more detailed review of dataquality can be found in the Data Review Reports included in Appendix C.

B. 1 Precision and Accuracy for PCB Laboratory Analyses

All reported MS/MSD recoveries were within control limits. Recovery of Aroclor 1242 in the MS/MSD associatedwith SDG# 40734 could not, however, be calculated due to interference from Aroclor 1248 present in the unspikedsample. Matrix spike recoveries for Aroclor 1242 ranged from 47 to 51 percent with an average of 49 percent, whilerecoveries for Aroclor 1254 ranged from 40 to 93 percent with an average of 70 percent.

The precision of the matrix spikes as measured by the RPD between the MS and MSD recoveries ranged from 15to 48 percent with an average of 32 percent for Aroclor 1254. The RPD for Aroclor 1242 was 8.

All matrix spike blank recoveries were within control limits with Aroclor 1242 recoveries ranging from 39 to 82percent with an average of 60 percent, and Aroclor 1254 recoveries ranging from 66 to 94 percent with and averageof 80 percent.

Precision of the field duplicates was acceptable for all of the three duplicate pairs, with one of the three replicatingthrough non-detection.

Recovery for one surrogate was below control limits in samples K12012, K12013, K12015, K12016, K12024,K12025, K12026, K12027, K12028, K12029, K12030, K13033, K12043 and K12044. Since recoveries for thesecond surrogate were within control limits, no data were qualified based on the single surrogate recoveries.Recovery for one surrogate was also below control limits in sample K1203 8, but since the recovery was less than 10percent all positive data for the sample were qualified as estimated and all non-detect data were rejected. The samplewas subsequently reextracted and reanalyzed with acceptable surrogate recoveries. Recoveries for both surrogateswere above control limits in sample K12022. Since no Aroclors were detected in the sample, the high recoveries haveno impact on the reported data. Overall, surrogate recoveries for tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) ranged from 4 to 158percent with an average of 63 percent and recoveries for decachlorobiphenyl (DCB) ranged from 72 to 163 percentwith an average of 92 percent.

No Aroclors were detected in the method or rinse blanks.

___________________________________BL>\SLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.U:\LJPOOCJ IOOAPXB.DOC •• 5/26/00

Page 52: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

The %D for one continuing calibration standard was outside the method-specified limit resulting in the qualificationof data for samples K12022RE. No data from this analysis was, however, reported.

The data reported for samples K12019 and K1203 8 are taken from analyses which were performed outside thespecified holding times. All data for these samples have been qualified as estimated based on the holding timeviolations.

BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.U:\LJPCTO IOOAPXB.DOC - 5/26/00 B-2

Page 53: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

B L A S L A N D , B O U C K , & L E E . I N C .

n g i n e e r s & s c i e n t i s t s

Appendix C

Page 54: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

DATA REVIEW FOR

ALLIED PAPER. INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE

SDG# 40734

PCB ANALYSES

TBSA - PHASE II

Analyses performed by:

Aquatec, Inc.Colchester, Vermont

Review performed by:

Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc.Syracuse, New York

Page 55: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Summary

The following is an assessment of the PCB data package for SDG # 40734 for theTBSA - Phase II sampling of the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo RiverSuperfund Site. Included with this assessment are the data review check sheets usedin the review of the package and sample results for PCB analyses. Analyses wereperformed on the following samples:

Sample ID

K12012

K12013

K12014

K12015

K12016

K12017

K12018

K12019

K12020

K12021

K12022

K12023

K12024

K12025

K12026

K12027

K12028

K12029

K12030

K12033*

Lab ID

204311

204312

204313

204314

204315

204316

204317

204318

204319

204320

204321

204322

204323

204324

204325

204326

204327

204328

204329

204330

Matrix

soil

soil

soil

soil

soil

soil

soil

soil

soil

soil

soil

rinse blank

soil

soil

soil

soil

soil

soil

soil

soil

Sample Date

11/10/93

1 1/10/93

11/10/93

11/10/93

11/10/93

11/10/93

11/10/93

11/10/93

11/10/93

11/10/93

11/10/93

11/11/93

11/11/93

1 1/11/93

11/11/93

11/11/93

11/11/93

11/11/93

11/11/93

11/11/93

MS/MSD analysis performed on sample

1*40734

Page 56: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Introduction

Analyses were performed according to the USEPA SW-846 method 8081, modified forPCB only analysis.

The data review process is intended to evaluate the data on a technical basis. Itis assumed that the data package represents the best efforts of the laboratory andhad already been subjected to adequate and sufficient quality review prior tosubmission.

During the review process, laboratory qualified and unqualified data are verifiedagainst the supporting documentation. Based on this evaluation, qualifier codes maybe added, deleted, or modified by the data reviewer. Results are qualified with thefollowing codes in accordance with National Functional Guidelines:

U The compound was analyzed for but not detected. The associated valueis the compound quantitation limit.

J The compound was positively identified; however, the associated numericalvalue is an estimated concentration only.

B The compound has been found in the sample as well as its associatedblank, its presence in the sample may be suspect.

N The analysis indicates the presence of a compound for which there ispresumptive evidence to make a tentative identification.

JN The analysis indicates the presence of a compound for which there ispresumptive evidence to make a tentative identification. The associatednumerical value is an estimated concentration only.

E The compound was quantitated above the calibration range.

D Concentration is based on a diluted sample analysis.

UJ The com'pound was not detected above the reported sample quantitationlimit. However, the reported limit is approximate and may or may notrepresent the actual limit of quantitation.

R The sample results are rejected.

Two facts should be noted by all data users. First, the "R" flag means that theassociated value is unusable. In other words, due to significant QC problems, theanalysis is invalid and provides no information as to whether the compound is presentor not. "R" values should not appear on data tables because they cannot be reliedupon, even as a last resort. The second fact to keep in mind is that no compoundconcentration, even if it has passed all QC test, is guaranteed to be accurate. StrictQC serves to increase confidence in data but any value potentially contains error.

U40734

Page 57: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

The data presented in the package has been derived using a procedure developedby Aquatec, Inc. in an attempt to improve the analytical process of calibration,identification, and quantitation of PCBs as Aroclors. Key components of thisprocedure include:

Calibration

The response function of the electron capture detector is inherently non-linear,and while significant linearization is achieved for this detector by electronicmeans, some non-linearity remains. Power function linearization is used to"straighten the curve" and allow the use of response factors for calibrationpurposes.

During the initial calibration a response factor is calculated for each peak in theindividual Aroclors.

A weighted response factor calculation has been used to adjust for non-linearityat the low end of the calibration curve.

Identification

Peak retention times are relative. Retention times are in set windows relativeto the time markers DCB and TCMX. Time markers adjust for minor variationsin column flow or instrument condition and allow the use of very tight windowswhich minimizes the number of both false positive and false negative peakidentifications.

The determination of "which Aroclor or mixture of Aroclors will produce achromatogram most similar to that of the residue" is made by expressing theunknown sample chromatogram as a linear combination of the Aroclors. The"most similar" Aroclor or mixture of Aroclors is determined by using a leastsquares minimization of the difference between the unknown chromatogram andthe linear combination of Aroclors. This is similar to the procedure presentedby L.E. Slivon, P.M. Schumacher and A. Alford-Stevens for the determination ofAroclor composition from GC/MS level of chlorination results.

Identification/quantitation of Aroclors in samples is based on the combinedresponse of two columns, typically RTX-5 and RTX-35. The pooling of responsecombines the unique qualities of both columns to derive a more defined Aroclorpattern which less likely to be affected by interferents. Identification/quantitationdata for the individual columns is provided in the package and can be used asa check on the combined column results.

1*40734

Page 58: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Data Assessment

1. Holding Time

The QAPP-specified holding times for PCB analyses of soil samples are 12 daysfrom date of sample receipt to extraction and 40 days from extraction toanalysis.

Sample K12019 was extracted 13 days over the specified holding time andsample K12022-RE was analyzed 17 days over the specified holding time. Alldata for these samples have been qualified as estimated based on the holdingtime violations. All other samples were extracted and analyzed within thespecified holding times.

2. Blank Contamination

Quality assurance blanks, i.e., method, field or rinse blanks, are prepared toidentify any contamination which may have been introduced into the samplesduring sample preparation or field activity. Method blanks measure laboratorycontamination. Field and rinse blanks measure contamination of samples duringfield operations.

No target compounds were detected in the method or rinse blanks.

3. System Performance

The system performance was acceptable for both columns.

4. Calibration

Satisfactory instrument calibration is established to insure that the instrument iscapable of producing acceptable quantitative data. An initial calibrationdemonstrates that the instrument is capable of giving acceptable performance atthe beginning of an experimental sequence. The continuing calibration verifiesthat the instrument is giving satisfactory daily performance.

4.1 Initial Calibration

The method allows a maximum RSD of 20%. The %RSD was within thespecified limit for all Aroclors.

4.2 Continuing Calibration

A maximum %D of 15 is allowed. All continuing calibrations were withinthe specified limits with the following exception:

1*40734

Page 59: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Instrument HP2087 1/13/94 - 23:19

Aroclor 1248 24.0%

All data for the associated sample K12022-RE have been qualified asestimated based on the %D.

Surrogates / System Monitoring Compounds

All samples to be analyzed for organic compounds are spiked with surrogatecompounds prior to sample preparation to evaluate overall laboratoryperformance and efficiency of the analytical technique.

Recovery for one surrogate was below control limits in samples K12012, K12013,K12015, K12016, K12024, K12025, K12026, K12027, K12028, K12029, K12030,K12033, K12033MS and K12033MSD. Since recoveries for the remainingsurrogate were within control limits, no data have been qualified based onthe deviations. Recoveries for both surrogates were above control limits insample K12022. Since no target compounds were detected in the sample, thehigh recoveries have no impact on the reported data. All other samplesurrogate recoveries were within control limits.

Compound Identification

The determination of Aroclor presence is made by expressing the unknownsample chromatogram as a linear combination of the Aroclors. The most similarAroclor or mixture of Aroclors is determined by using a least squaresminimization of the difference between the unknown chromatogram and the linearcombination of Aroclors.

Identification/quantitation of Aroclors is based on the combined response of theRTX-5 and RTX-35 columns. Identification/quantitation data for the individualcolumns is provided in the package and has been used as a check on thecombined column results.

A review of the sample chromatograms indicate that the Aroclors have beencorrectly identified/quantitated.

7. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate/Matrix Spike Blank

Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate data are used to assess the precisionand accuracy of the analytical method.

Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries for Aroclor 1242 could not becalculated due to interference from Aroclor 1248 present in the unspiked sample.Aroclor 1254 matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries were withincontrol limits, but the relative percent difference (RPD) between recoveries was

IS40734

Page 60: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

above the control limit,performance alone.

No data have been qualified based on matrix spike

All matrix spike blank recoveries were within control limits.

Field Duplicates

Results for duplicate samples are summarized below:

Sample ID / Duplicate ID

K12021 / K12022

Compound

ND

SampleResult

--

DuplicateResult

--

RPD

NA

ND Nor detected.NA Compound not detected in sample and/or duplicate. RPD not applicable.

The samples replicate through non-detection.

General Comments

The recommended data usage for sample reanalyses is as follows:

K12022 and K12022-REAll surrogate recoveries were above control limits in the originalanalysis of sample K12022. The sample was subsequently reanalyzedover the specified holding time, resulting in the qualification of alldata as estimated. Since no Aroclors were detected in either theoriginal analysis or the reanalysis, and since the reanalysis wasperformed over the specified holding time, it is recommended thatdata from the original analysis be used for all Aroclors.

10. System Performance and Overall Assessment

Overall system performance was acceptable. Other than for those deviationsspecifically mentioned in this review, the overall data quality is within theguidelines listed in the analytical method.

IS40734

Page 61: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

DATA REVIEW CHECKLIST

Page 62: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Data Review Checklist

YES NO NA

Data Completeness and Deliverables

Is there a narrative or cover letter present?

Are the samples numbers included in the narrative?

Are the sample chain-of-custodies present?

Do the chain-of-custodies indicate any problems withsample receipt or sample condition?

Holding Times

Have any holding times been exceeded?

Surrogate Recovery

Are surrogate recovery forms present?

Are all the samples listed on the appropriate surrogaterecovery form?

Are the outliers correctly marked with an asterisk?

Were recoveries of TCX or DCB outside specified limitsfor any sample or blank?

If yes, were the samples reanalyzed?

Matrix Spikes

Is there a matrix spike recovery form present?

Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency?

How many spike recoveries were outside of QC limits?

0 out of 2

How many RPDs for matrix spike and matrix spikeduplicate were outside of QC limits?

1 out of 1

Blanks

Is a Method Blank Summary Form present?

Has a method blank been analyzed for each set ofsamples or for each 20 samples, whichever is morefrequent?

Is the chromatographic performance acceptable for eachinstrument?

Do any method/reagent/instrument blanks have positiveresults?

1940734

Page 63: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Data Review Checklist - Page 2

_____________________________________________YES______NO______NA

Do any field/rinse blanks have positive results? ____ X

Are percent recoveries of the compounds used to checkthe efficiency of the cleanup procedure within QC limits?

Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated withevery sample?

Calibration and GC Performance

Are the following chromatograms and data printoutspresent?

Aroclor 1016/1260

Aroclor 1221

Aroclor 1232

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Are Initial Calibration Summary Forms present andcomplete for each column and analytical sequence?

Are the linearity criteria for the initial analyses withinlimits for both columns (20% RSD)

Have all samples been injected within a 12 hour periodbeginning with the injection of a calibration standard?

Is a Calibration Verification Summary Form present andcomplete for each continuing standard analyzed?

Are %D values for all compounds within limits (15%)?

Analytical Sequence Check

Is a analytical sequence form present and complete foreach column and each period of analyses? X

Was the proper analytical sequence followed? X

Cleanup Efficiency Verification

If GPC cleanup was performed, is Gel PermeationChromatography Check Form present? ___

(•40734

Page 64: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Data Review Checklist - Page 3

_____________________________________________YES_____NO______NA

PCB Identification

Is both a combined and single column AroclorIdentification Report present for every sample? X ____

Do the combined column and individual column Arocloridentifications agree? _X_

Were there any false negatives? ___

Was GC/MS confirmation provided when required? ___

Compound Quantitation and Reported Detection Limits

Are the reporting limits adjusted to reflect sampledilutions, and for soils, sample moisture? X

Chromatogram Quality

Were the baselines stable? _X_

Were any electronegative displacement (negative peaks)or unusual peaks detected? ___

Field Duplicates

Where field duplicates submitted with the samples? X

H40734

Page 65: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Holding Time and SurrogateRecovery Summary

Sample ID

K12012

K12013

K12014

K12015

K12016

K12017

K12018

K12019

K12020

K12021

K12022

K12022RE

K12023

K12024

K12025

K12026

K12027

K12028

K12029

K12030

K12033

K12033MS

K12033MSD

Holding Time

+ 13

+ 17

Surrogates

TCX

1 (50)

1 (50)

J (55)

1 (53)

1 (162)

1 (50)

l (55)

1 (53)

l (47)

1 (52)

1 (46)

1 (53)

1 (49)

1 (49)

1 (45)

DCB

I (163)

Surrogate StandardsTCX Tetrachloro-m-xyleneDCB Decachlorobiphenyl

Qualifiers:D Surrogates diluted outl Recovery highl Recovery low

Unless otherwise noted, all parameters are within specified limits.

U40734

Page 66: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Calibration Summary

Instrument: HP2618Column: RTX-35 / RTX-5

Date:

Time:

Aroclor 1016

Aroclor 1221

Aroclor 1232

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

Affected Samples:

12/9/93 2218

to12/10/93 1816

Initial Cal.

%RSD

3.9 / 4.4

4.4 / 4.7

3.0 / 3.3

3.7 / 4.6

3.0 / 3.1

2.4 / 2.8

3.0 / 2.8

4.9 / 5.2

9.3 / 9.9

12/15

1444

Cont.Cal.

%D

0.5

12/15

1520

Cont.Cal.

%D

5.5

12/16

0112

Cont.Cal.

%D

5.5

12/16

0147

Cont.Cal.

%D

5.5

12/16

0851

Cont.Cal.

%D

5.0

12/16

0926

Cont.Cal.

%D

0.0

U40734

Page 67: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Calibration Summary - Page 2

Instrument: HP2618Column: RTX-35 / RTX-5

Date:

Time:

Aroclor 1016

Aroclor 1221

Aroclor 1232

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

Affected Samples:

Initial Cal.

%RSD

12/16

1628

Cont.Cal.

%D

3.5

12/16

1704

Cont.Cal.

%D

4.0

12/17

0140

Cont.Cal.

%D

4.0

12/17

0215

Cont.Cal.

%D

7.5

12/17

0546

Cont.Cal.

%D

0.5

12/17

0622

Cont.Cal.

%D

4.5

IS40734

Page 68: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Calibration Summary - Page 3

Instrument: HP2087Column: RTX-35 / RTX-5

Date.

Time:

Aroclor 1016

Aroclor 1221

Aroclor 1232

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

Affected Samples:

1/8/94 0354

to1/9/94 0122

Initial Cal.

%RSD

4.4 / 3.2

3.9 / 3.0

4.2 / 4.5

4.3 / 4.0

6.2 / 5.5

6.2 / 3.9

4.1 / 3.9

3.5 / 10.1

13.8 / 8.8

1/13

1505

Cont.Cal.

%D

15.0

1/13

1543

Cont.Cal.

%D

10.0

1/13

2319

Cont.Cal.

%D

24.0

K12022RE

1/13

2357

Cont.Cal.

%D

11.5

Cont.Cal.

%D

Cont.Cal.

%D

1*40734

Page 69: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

CORRECTED ANALYSIS SUMMARY FORMS

Page 70: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

ERA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)5.0

69.99

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

K12012»

SDG:

20431111/13/9311/17/9312/16/93

N

40734

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-11 1 096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1 016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

360 U360 U360 U360 U3300890360 U

Page 71: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)5.0

63.25

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

K12013

SDG:

20431211/13/9311/17/9312/16/93

N

40734

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

400 U400 U400 U400 U38001900400 U

Page 72: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)5.0

66.50

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

K12014

SDG:

20431311/13/9311/17/931 2/1 6/93

N

40734

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

380 U380 U380 U380 U29001100260 J

Page 73: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uU

10.057.89

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

K12015

SDG:

20431411/13/9311/17/9312/16/93

N

40734

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

870 U870 U870 U870 U

87001500870 U

Page 74: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

ERA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)5.0

49.87

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

K12016

SDG:

20431511/13/9311/17/9312/16/93

N

40734

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-21 1 1 04-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232ArocIor-1 242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

510 U510 U510 U510 U64001100700

Page 75: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.01.0

(g)(uL)

1.034.37

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAI

PCB

EPA SAMPLE NO.

K12017

SDG: 40734

Lab Sample ID: 204316Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

11/13/9311/17/9312/16/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

150 U150 U150 U150 U22061 J150 U

Page 76: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)1.0

36.96

Case: PCB

K12018

SDG: 40734

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

2043171 1 /1 3/9311/17/9312/16/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242A rod or- 1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

140 U140 U140 U140 U140 U140 U140 U

Page 77: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)1.0

42.11

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

K12019

SDG:

20431811/13/931 2/06/931 2/1 6/93

N

40734

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

120120120120390120120

UTuxrUTUT

3~uTUT

Page 78: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)1.0

46.31

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

K1 2020

SDG:

20431911/13/9311/17/931 2/1 6/93

N

40734

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-21 1 1 04-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-11 1 096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1254Aroclor-1 260

110 U110 U110 U110 U110 U110 U110 U

Page 79: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUA!

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)1.0

49.13

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

K12021

SDG:

2043201 1 /1 3/9311/17/9312/16/93

N

40734

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

110 U110 U110 U110 U110 U110 U110 U

Page 80: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

ERA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)1.0

50.47

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

K12022

SDG:

20432111/13/9311/17/9312/16/93

N

40734

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232ArocIor-1242Aroclor-1 248ArocIor-1254Aroclor-1 260

100 U100 U100 U100 U100 U100 U100 U

Page 81: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.01.0

(g)(uL)

1.050.47

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAI

PCB

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

SDG: /(0734

204321R111/t3/931V/17/9301/13/94

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND /CONCENTRATION/ (ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016 /Aroclor-1221 /ArocIor-1232 /Aroclor-1242 /Aroclor-1248 /ArocIor-1254 /Aroclor-1260/

/

100 J0 05100 tfUS100 kfO3100 wvr\100 JO\S$100 wvXS100 OU^S

Page 82: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

ERA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Volume:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

91082

Water1005 (mL)1 .0 (uL)1.0

Case: PCB

K12023

SDG: 40734

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

20432211/13/9311/18/931 2/1 6/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/L) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242ArocloM 248Aroclor-1254ArocloM 260

0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U

Page 83: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

EPA SAMPLE NO.

91082

SOIL10.01.0

(g)(uU

20.056.46

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAIK12024

PCB SDG: 40734

Lab Sample ID: 204323Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

11/13/9311/17/9312/15/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

1800 U1800 U1800 U1800 U1900037001 800 J

Page 84: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.01.0

(g)(uL)

30.057.00

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAIPCB

EPA SAMPLE NO.

K12025

SDG: 40734

Lab Sample ID: 204324Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

11/13/9311/17/9312/15/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1 01 6Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

2700 U2700 U2700 U2700 U

310002700 U3500

Page 85: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

ERA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.01.0

(g)(uL)

20.056.39

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAIK12026

PCB SDG: 40734

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

20432511/13/9311/17/9312/15/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

1800 U1800 U1800 U1800 U

2100018002200

Page 86: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

ERA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)

20.056.73

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

K12027

SDG:

20432611/13/9311/17/9312/15/93

N

40734

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

1800 U1800 U1800 U1800 U

2000025001700 J

Page 87: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

ERA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)

20.056.44

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

K12028

SDG:

20432711/13/9311/17/931 2/1 6/93

N

40734

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-21 1 1 04-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-11 1 096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

1800 U1800 U1800 U1800 U

250001800 U2700

Page 88: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.Contract: 91082

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAI

PCB

ERA SAMPLE NO.

K12029

SDG: 40734

Phase Type: ____SOILPhase Weight: 10.0

Injection Volume: ____1.0Dilution Factor: ____20.0

% Solids: 50.70

(uL)

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

20432811/13/9311/17/9312/16/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

2000 U2000 U2000 U2000 U1700038002000 U

Page 89: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)

30.052.39

Case: PCB

K12030

SDG: 40734

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

20432911/13/9311/17/931 2/1 6/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

2900 U2900 U2900 U2900 U300002900 U2600 J

Page 90: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUA)

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)

20.054.00

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

K1 2033

SDG:

20433011/13/9311/17/931 2/1 6/93

N

40734

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-11 1 096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1 221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

1900 U1900 U1900 U1900 U1600027001700 J

Page 91: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

DATA REVIEW FOR

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE

SDG# 40738

PCB ANALYSES

TBSA - PHASE

Analyses performed by:

Aquatec, Inc.Colchester, Vermont

Review performed by:

Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc.Syracuse, New York

Page 92: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Summary

The following is an assessment of the PCB data package for SDG # 40738 for theTBSA - Phase II sampling of the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo RiverSuperfund Site. Included with this assessment are the data review check sheets usedin the review of the package and sample results for PCB analyses. Analyses wereperformed on the following samples:

Sample ID

K12031

K12032

K12034

K12035

K12036

K12037*

K12038

K12039

K12040

K12041

Lab ID

204335

204336

204337

204338

204339

204340

204342

204343

204344

204345

Matrix

soil

soil

soil

rinse blank

soil

soil

soil

soil

soil

soil

Sample Date

11/11/93

11/11/93

11/11/93

11/12/93

11/12/93

11/12/93

11/12/93

11/12/93

11/12/93

11/12/93

MS/MSD analysis performed on sample

1(40738

Page 93: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Introduction

Analyses were performed according to the USEPA SW-846 method 8081, modified forPCB only analysis.

The data review process is intended to evaluate the data on a technical basis. Itis assumed that the data package represents the best efforts of the laboratory andhad already been subjected to adequate and sufficient quality review prior tosubmission.

During the review process, laboratory qualified and unqualified data are verifiedagainst the supporting documentation. Based on this evaluation, qualifier codes maybe added, deleted, or modified by the data reviewer. Results are qualified with thefollowing codes in accordance with National Functional Guidelines:

U The compound was analyzed for but not detected. The associated valueis the compound quantitation limit.

J The compound was positively identified; however, the associated numericalvalue is an estimated concentration only.

B The compound has been found in the sample as well as its associatedblank, its presence in the sample may be suspect.

N The analysis indicates the presence of a compound for which there ispresumptive evidence to make a tentative identification.

JN The analysis indicates the presence of a compound for which there ispresumptive evidence to make a tentative identification. The associatednumerical value is an estimated concentration only.

E The compound was quantitated above the calibration range.

D Concentration is based on a diluted sample analysis.

UJ The compound was not detected above the reported sample quantitationlimit. However, the reported limit is approximate and may or may notrepresent the actual limit of quantitation.

R The sample results are rejected.

Two facts should be noted by all data users. First, the "R" flag means that theassociated value is unusable. In other words, due to significant QC problems, theanalysis is invalid and provides no information as to whether the compound is presentor not. "R" values should not appear on data tables because they cannot be reliedupon, even as a last resort. The second fact to keep in mind is that no compoundconcentration, even if it has passed all QC test, is guaranteed to be accurate. StrictQC serves to increase confidence in data but any value potentially contains error.

U40738

Page 94: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

The data presented in the package has been derived using a procedure developedby Aquatec, Inc. in an attempt to improve the analytical process of calibration,identification, and quantitation of PCBs as Aroclors. Key components of thisprocedure include:

Calibration

The response function of the electron capture detector is inherently non-linear,and while significant linearization is achieved for this detector by electronicmeans, some non-linearity remains. Power function linearization is used to"straighten the curve" and allow the use of response factors for calibrationpurposes.

During the initial calibration a response factor is calculated for each peak in theindividual Aroclors.

A weighted response factor calculation has been used to adjust for non-linearityat the low end of the calibration curve.

Identification

Peak retention times are relative. Retention times are in set windows relativeto the time markers DCS and TCMX. Time markers adjust for minor variationsin column flow or instrument condition and allow the use of very tight windowswhich minimizes the number of both false positive and false negative peakidentifications.

The determination of "which Aroclor or mixture of Aroclors will produce achromatogram most similar to that of the residue" is made by expressing theunknown sample chromatogram as a linear combination of the Aroclors. The"most similar" Aroclor or mixture of Aroclors is determined by using a leastsquares minimization of the difference between the unknown chromatogram andthe linear combination of Aroclors. This is similar to the procedure presentedby L.E. Slivon, P.M. Schumacher and A. Alford-Stevens for the determination ofAroclor composition from GC/MS level of chlorination results.

Identification/quantitation of Aroclors in samples is based on the combinedresponse of two columns, typically RTX-5 and RTX-35. The pooling of responsecombines the unique qualities of both columns to derive a more defined Aroclorpattern which less likely to be affected by interferents. Identification/quantitationdata for the individual columns is provided in the package and can be used asa check on the combined column results.

U40738

Page 95: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Data Assessment

1. Holding Time

The QAPP-specified holding times for PCS analyses of soil samples are 12 daysfrom date of sample receipt to extraction and 40 days from extraction toanalysis.

All samples were originally extracted and analyzed within the specified holdingtimes. Due to poor surrogate recovery, sample K12038 was reextracted over thespecified holding time. All data for the reextracted sample have been qualifiedas estimated based on the holding time violation.

2. Blank Contamination

Quality assurance blanks, i.e., method, field or rinse blanks, are prepared toidentify any contamination which may have been introduced into the samplesduring sample preparation or field activity. Method blanks measure laboratorycontamination. Field and rinse blanks measure contamination of samples duringfield operations.

No target compounds were detected in the method or rinse blanks.

3. System Performance

The system performance was acceptable for both columns.

4. Calibration

Satisfactory instrument calibration is established to insure that the instrument iscapable of producing acceptable quantitative data. An initial calibrationdemonstrates that the instrument is capable of giving acceptable performance atthe beginning of an experimental sequence. The continuing calibration verifiesthat the instrument is giving satisfactory daily performance.

4.1 Initial Calibration

The method allows a maximum RSD of 20%. The %RSD was within thespecified limit for all Aroclors.

4.2 Continuing Calibration

A maximum %D of 15 is allowed. All continuing calibrations were withinthe specified limit.

1*40738

Page 96: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

5. Surrogates / System Monitoring Compounds

All samples to be analyzed for organic compounds are spiked with surrogatecompounds prior to sample preparation to evaluate overall laboratoryperformance and efficiency of the analytical technique.

Recovery for one surrogate was below 10 percent in sample K12038. Allpositive data have been qualified as estimated and all non-detect data havebeen rejected in the sample based on the recovery. The sample was laterreextracted and reanalyzed with acceptable surrogate recoveries. All othersample surrogate recoveries were within control limits.

6. Compound Identification

The determination of Aroclor presence is made by expressing the unknownsample chromatogram as a linear combination of the Aroclors. The most similarAroclor or mixture of Aroclors is determined by using a least squaresminimization of the difference between the unknown chromatogram and the linearcombination of Aroclors.

Identification/quantitation of Aroclors is based on the combined response of theRTX-5 and RTX-35 columns. Identification/quantitation data for the individualcolumns is provided in the package and has been used as a check on thecombined column results.

A review of the sample chromatograms indicate that the Aroclors have beencorrectly identified/quantitated.

7. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate/Matrix Spike Blank

Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate data are used to assess the precisionand accuracy of the analytical method.

All matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries and relative percentdifferences between recoveries were within control limits. All matrix spike blankrecoveries were also within control limits.

8. Field Duplicates

Results for duplicate samples are summarized as follows:

U40738

Page 97: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Sample ID / Duplicate ID

K12031 / K12032

K12040 / K12041

Compound

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Aroclor 1254

SampleResult

21000

5800

ND

65

DuplicateResult

20000

4800

1500

77

RPD*

2.6%

16.9%

RPD based on total PCB content.ND Nor detected.

The duplicate results are acceptable.

9. General Comments

The recommended data usage for sample reanalyses is as follows:

K12038 and K12038-RERecovery for one surrogate less than 10 percent in the originalanalysis of sample K12038. Based on the recovery, all postive datawere qualified as estimated and all non-detect data were rejected inthe sample. The sample was subsequently reextracted andreanalyzed over the specified holding time, resulting in thequalification of all data as estimated. Since the reanalysis resultedin more usable data, it is recommended that data from this analysisbe used for all Aroclors.

10. System Performance and Overall Assessment

Overall system performance was acceptable. Other than for those deviationsspecifically mentioned in this review, the overall data quality is within theguidelines listed in the analytical method.

1*40738

Page 98: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

DATA REVIEW CHECKLIST

Page 99: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Data Review Checklist

YES NO NA

Data Completeness and Deliverables

Is there a narrative or cover letter present? _X_

Are the samples numbers included in the narrative? _X_

Are the sample chain-of-custodies present? _X_

Do the chain-of-custodies indicate any problems withsample receipt or sample condition? _X_

Holding Times

Have any holding times been exceeded? _X_

Surrogate Recovery

Are surrogate recovery forms present? _X_

Are all the samples listed on the appropriate surrogaterecovery form? _X_

Are the outliers correctly marked with an asterisk? _X_

Were recoveries of TCX or DCB outside specified limitsfor any sample or blank? X

If yes, were the samples reanalyzed? X

Matrix Spikes

Is there a matrix spike recovery form present? _X_

Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency? _X_

How many spike recoveries were outside of QC limits?

0 out of 4

How many RPDs for matrix spike and matrix spikeduplicate were outside of QC limits?

0 out of 2

Blanks

Is a Method Blank Summary Form present? X

Has a method blank been analyzed for each set ofsamples or for each 20 samples, whichever is morefrequent?

Is the chromatographic performance acceptable for eachinstrument?

Do any method/reagent/instrument blanks have positiveresults?

U40738

Page 100: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Data Review Checklist - Page 2

__________________________________________YES_____NO_____NA

Do any field/rinse blanks have positive results? ____ X ___

Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated withevery sample? X ____ ___

Calibration and GC Performance

Are the following chromatograms and data printoutspresent?

Aroclor 1016/1260 X ____ ___

Aroclor 1221 X ____

Aroclor 1232 X ____

Aroclor 1242 X ____

Aroclor 1248 X ____

Aroclor 1254 X

Are Initial Calibration Summary Forms present andcomplete for each column and analytical sequence?

Are the linearity criteria for the initial analyses withinlimits for both columns (20% RSD)

Have all samples been injected within a 12 hour periodbeginning with the injection of a calibration standard?

Is a Calibration Verification Summary Form present andcomplete for each continuing standard analyzed?

Are %D values for all compounds within limits (15%)?

Analytical Sequence Check

Is a analytical sequence form present and complete foreach column and each period of analyses?

Was the proper analytical sequence followed?

Cleanup Efficiency Verification

If GPC cleanup was performed, is Gel PermeationChromatography Check Form present?

Are percent recoveries of the compounds used to checkthe efficiency of the cleanup procedure within QC limits?

U40738

Page 101: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Data Review Checklist - Page 3

__________________________________________YES_____NO_____NA

PCB IdentificationIs both a combined and single column AroclorIdentification Report present for every sample? X ____ ___

Do the combined column and individual column Arocloridentifications agree? _X_

Were there any false negatives? ___

Was GC/MS confirmation provided when required? ___

Compound Quantitation and Reported Detection Limits

Are the reporting limits adjusted to reflect sampledilutions, and for soils, sample moisture? X

Chromatogram Quality

Were the baselines stable? _X_

Were any electronegative displacement (negative peaks)or unusual peaks detected? ___

Field Duplicates

Where field duplicates submitted with the samples? X

1*40738

Page 102: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Holding Time and SurrogateRecovery Summary

Sample ID

K12031

K12032

K12034

K12035

K12036

K12037

K12037MS

K12037MSD

K12038

K12038RE

K12039

K12040

K12041

Holding Time

+29

Surrogates

TCX

1 (4)

DCB

Surrogate StandardsTCX Tetrachloro-m-xyleneDCB Decachlorobiphenyl

Qualifiers:D Surrogates diluted outi Recovery high1 Recovery low

Unless otherwise noted, all parameters are within specified limits.

U40738

Page 103: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Calibration Summary

Instrument: HP2618Column: RTX-35 / RTX-5

Date:

Time:

Aroclor 1016

Aroclor 1221

Aroclor 1232

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

Affected Samples:

12/9/93 2218

to12/10/93 1816

Initial Cal.

%RSD

3.9 / 4.4

4.4 / 4.7

3.0 / 3.3

3.7 / 4.6

3.0 / 3.1

2.4 / 2.8

3.0 / 2.8

4.9 / 5.2

9.3 / 9.9

12/15

0223

Cont.Cal.

%D

2.5

12/15

0258

Cont.Cal.

%D

2.0

12/15

1001

Cont.Cal.

%D

1.5

12/15

1037

Cont.Cal.

%D

0.0

12/15

1444

Cont.Cal.

%D

0.5

12/15

1520

Cont.Cal.

%D

5.5

1S40738

Page 104: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

CORRECTED ANALYSIS SUMMARY FORMS

Page 105: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Calibration Summary - Page 2

Instrument: HP2087Column: RTX-35 / RTX-5

Date:

Time:

Aroclor 1016

Aroclor 1221

Aroclor 1232

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

Affected Samples:

1/8/94 0354

to1/9/94 0122

Initial Cal.

%RSD

4.4 / 3.2

3.9 / 3.0

4.2 / 4.5

4.3 / 4.0

6.2 / 5.5

6.2 / 3.9

4.1 / 3.9

3.5 / 10.1

13.8 / 8.8

1/13

0652

Cont.Cal.

%D

12.5

1/13

0730

Cont.Cal.

%D

7.0

1/13

1505

Cont.Cal.

%D

15.0

1/13

1543

Cont.Cal.

%D

Cont.Cal.

%D

Cont.Cal.

%D

U40738

Page 106: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

ERA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.1 (g)1 .0 (uL)

30.054.80

Case: PCB

K12031

SDG: 40738

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

20433511/13/9311/17/9312/15/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

2800 U2800 U2800 U2800 U2100058002800 U

Page 107: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1.0 |uL)

30.054.68

Case: PCB

K12032

SDG: 40738

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

20433611/13/9311/17/9312/15/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

ArocIor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

2800 U2800 U2800 U2800 U2000046001500 J

Page 108: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

EPA SAMPLE NO.

91082

SOIL10.11.0

(g)(uL)

30.054.41

Lab Code:

Case:AQUAI

K12034

PCB SDG: 40738

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

20433711/13/9311/17/9312/15/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

2800 U2800 U

,_ 2800 U2800 U1500052001300 J

Page 109: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUA)

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Volume:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

91082

Water1000 (mL)1 .0 (uL)1.0

Case: PCS

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

K12035

SDG:

20433811/13/9311/18/9312/15/93

N

40738

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/U Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U

Page 110: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract: 91082

Phase Type: SOILPhase Weight: ___10.0

Injection Volume: ______1.0Dilution Factor: ____1.0

% Solids: 66.46

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAI

PCB

.(g)(uL)

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

EPA SAMPLE NO.

K12036

SDG: 40738

20433911/13/9311/17/9312/15/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254ArocIor-1260

76 U76 U76 U76 U51 J61 J34 J

Page 111: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)1.0

66.97

Case: PCB

K12037

SDG: 40738

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

20434011/13/9311/17/931 2/1 5/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION{ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

75 U75 U75 U75 U75 U20075 U

Page 112: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.11.0

(g)(uL)

1.067.43

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAI

PCB

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:' /11 /13/93Date Extracted/7 11/17/93Date

Sulfur CleAnaly 12/15/93

n-up: N (Y/N)

CAS NO. COMPOUND / CONCENTRATION/ (ug/Kg) Q

12074-11-2 ——— ArocloMQiO ———————————11104 28 2 ——— Aroclor/221 ———————————11141-16-5 ——— Aiuildi-1232 ———————————53469-21 -9 ——— A;xfclor 1242 ——————————12672-29-6 — /A^roelaf >1248 ——————————11097-69-1 / Aroclor-125411096-82-X — AroeloM260 ———————————

/

/•T

/ 4^74_

————— 74 ——————110

———— 74 ——————

n 9U 'c-•J 1

—— tf VL'fj— tr V

— tr t— n V

^—— o £

f

•>

KB0005222

000090

Page 113: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract: 91082

Phase Type: SOILPhase Weight: ___10.0

Injection Volume: ____1.0Dilution Factor: ____1.0

% Solids: 67.43

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAI

PCB

.(9)luL)

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

EPA SAMPLE NO.

K12038RE

SDG: 40738

204342R111/13/9312/22/9301/13/94

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 2 54Aroclor-1 260

75757545759333

4J-GG^^3,tf\rj ^jkfOJ:r

j

m~-

KB0005234

000102

Page 114: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: _ Aquatec, Inc.

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.01.0

(g)(uL)

1.064.74

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAI

PCB

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

EPA SAMPLE NO.

K12039

SDG: 40738

20434311/13/9311/17/9312/15/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016ArocIor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

78 U78 U78 U78 U78 U17032 J

Page 115: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

ERA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.11.0

(g)(uL)

1.068.64

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAI

PCS

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

K12040

SDG: 40738

20434411/13/9311/17/9312/15/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1 221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

73 U73 U73 U73 U73 U65 J73 U

Page 116: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name; Aquatec, Inc.Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL9.91.0

(g)<uL)

1.066.12

Lab Code:Case:

AQUAI

PCB

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

EPA SAMPLE NO.

K12041

SDG: 40738

20434511/13/9311/17/9312/15/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 24 8Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

77 U77 U77 U77 U77 U7777 U

Page 117: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

DATA REVIEW FOR

ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE

SDG# 40869

PCB ANALYSES

TBSA - PHASE

Analyses performed by:

Aquatec, Inc.Colchester, Vermont

Review performed by:

Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc.Syracuse, New York

Page 118: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Summary

The following is an assessment of the PCB data package for SDG # 40869 for theTBSA - Phase II sampling of the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo RiverSuperfund Site. Included with this assessment are the data review check sheets usedin the review of the package and sample results for PCB analyses. Analyses wereperformed on the following samples:

Sample ID

K12042

K12043

K12044

Lab ID

205065

205066

205067

Matrix

soil

soil

soil

Sample Date

11/12/93

11/11/93

11/11/93

IS40869

Page 119: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Introduction

Analyses were performed according to the USEPA SW-846 method 8081, modified forPCB only analysis.

The data review process is intended to evaluate the data on a technical basis. Itis assumed that the data package represents the best efforts of the laboratory andhad already been subjected to adequate and sufficient quality review prior tosubmission.

During the review process, laboratory qualified and unqualified data are verifiedagainst the supporting documentation. Based on this evaluation, qualifier codes maybe added, deleted, or modified by the data reviewer. Results are qualified with thefollowing codes in accordance with National Functional Guidelines:

U The compound was analyzed for but not detected. The associated valueis the compound quantitation limit.

J The compound was positively identified; however, the associated numericalvalue is an estimated concentration only.

B The compound has been found in the sample as well as its associatedblank, its presence in the sample may be suspect.

N The analysis indicates the presence of a compound for which there ispresumptive evidence to make a tentative identification.

JN The analysis indicates the presence of a compound for which there ispresumptive evidence to make a tentative identification. The associatednumerical value is an estimated concentration only.

E The compound was quantitated above the calibration range.

D Concentration is based on a diluted sample analysis.

UJ The compound was not detected above the reported sample quantitationlimit. However, the reported limit is approximate and may or may notrepresent the actual limit of quantitation.

R The sample results are rejected.

Two facts should be noted by all data users. First, the "R" flag means that theassociated value is unusable. In other words, due to significant QC problems, theanalysis is invalid and provides no information as to whether the compound is presentor not. "R" values should not appear on data tables because they cannot be reliedupon, even as a last resort. The second fact to keep in mind is that no compoundconcentration, even if it has passed all QC test, is guaranteed to be accurate. StrictQC serves to increase confidence in data but any value potentially contains error.

U40869

Page 120: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

The data presented in the package has been derived using a procedure developedby Aquatec, Inc. in an attempt to improve the analytical process of calibration,identification, and quantitation of RGBs as Aroclors. Key components of thisprocedure include:

Calibration

The response function of the electron capture detector is inherently non-linear,and while significant linearization is achieved for this detector by electronicmeans, some non-linearity remains. Power function linearization is used to"straighten the curve" and allow the use of response factors for calibrationpurposes.

During the initial calibration a response factor is calculated for each peak in theindividual Aroclors.

A weighted response factor calculation has been used to adjust for non-linearityat the low end of the calibration curve.

Identification

Peak retention times are relative. Retention times are in set windows relativeto the time markers DCB and TCMX. Time markers adjust for minor variationsin column flow or instrument condition and allow the use of very tight windowswhich minimizes the number of both false positive and false negative peakidentifications.

The determination of "which Aroclor or mixture of Aroclors will produce achromatogram most similar to that of the residue" is made by expressing theunknown sample chromatogram as a linear combination of the Aroclors. The"most similar" Aroclor or mixture of Aroclors is determined by using a leastsquares minimization of the difference between the unknown chromatogram andthe linear combination of Aroclors. This is similar to the procedure presentedby L.E. Slivon, P.M. Schumacher and A. Alford-Stevens for the determination ofAroclor composition from GC/MS level of chlorination results.

Identification/quantitation of Aroclors in samples is based on the combinedresponse of two columns, typically RTX-5 and RTX-35. The pooling of responsecombines the unique qualities of both columns to derive a more defined Aroclorpattern which less likely to be affected by interferents. Identification/quantitationdata for the individual columns is provided in the package and can be used asa check on the combined column results.

H40869

Page 121: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Data Assessment

Holding Time

The QAPP-specified holding times for PCB analyses of soil samples are 12 daysfrom date of sample receipt to extraction and 40 days from extraction toanalysis.

All samples were extracted and analyzed within the specified holding times.

Blank Contamination

Quality assurance blanks, i.e., method, field or rinse blanks, are prepared toidentify any contamination which may have been introduced into the samplesduring sample preparation or field activity. Method blanks measure laboratorycontamination. Field and rinse blanks measure contamination of samples duringfield operations.

No target compounds were detected in the method or rinse blanks.

3. System Performance

The system performance was acceptable for both columns.

4. Calibration

Satisfactory instrument calibration is established to insure that the instrument iscapable of producing acceptable quantitative data. An initial calibrationdemonstrates that the instrument is capable of giving acceptable performance atthe beginning of an experimental sequence. The continuing calibration verifiesthat the instrument is giving satisfactory daily performance.

4.1 Initial Calibration

The method allows a maximum RSD of 20%. The %RSD was within thespecified limit for all Aroclors.

4.2 Continuing Calibration

A maximum %D of 15 is allowed. All continuing calibrations were withinthe specified limit.

U40869

Page 122: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Surrogates / System Monitoring Compounds

All samples to be analyzed for organic compounds are spiked with surrogatecompounds prior to sample preparation to evaluate overall laboratoryperformance and efficiency of the analytical technique.

Recovery for one surrogate was below control limits in samples K12043 andK12044. Since recoveries for the remaining surrogate were within control limits,no data have been qualified based on the deviations. All other samplesurrogate recoveries were within control limits.

Compound Identification

The determination of Aroclor presence is made by expressing the unknownsample chromatogram as a linear combination of the Aroclors. The most similarAroclor or mixture of Aroclors is determined by using a least squaresminimization of the difference between the unknown chromatogram and the linearcombination of Aroclors.

Identification/quantitation of Aroclors is based on the combined response of theRTX-5 and RTX-35 columns. Identification/quantitation data for the individualcolumns is provided in the package and has been used as a check on thecombined column results.

A review of the sample chromatograms indicate that the Aroclors have beencorrectly identified/quantitated.

7. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate/Matrix Spike Blank

Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate data are used to assess the precisionand accuracy of the analytical method.

No matrix spike or matrix spike duplicate was included in this data set.

8. Field Duplicates

No field duplicates were included in this data set.

10. System Performance and Overall Assessment

Overall system performance was acceptable. Other than for those deviationsspecifically mentioned in this review, the overall data quality is within theguidelines listed in the analytical method.

ti40B69

Page 123: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

DATA REVIEW CHECKLIST

Page 124: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Data Review Checklist

YES NO NA

Data Completeness and Deliverables

Is there a narrative or cover letter present?

Are the samples numbers included in the narrative?

Are the sample chain-of-custodies present?

Do the chain-of-custodies indicate any problems withsample receipt or sample condition?

Holding Times

Have any holding times been exceeded?

Surrogate Recovery

Are surrogate recovery forms present?

Are all the samples listed on the appropriate surrogaterecovery form?

Are the outliers correctly marked with an asterisk?

Were recoveries of TCX or DCB outside specified limitsfor any sample or blank?

If yes, were the samples reanalyzed?

Matrix Spikes

Is there a matrix spike recovery form present?

Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency?

How many spike recoveries were outside of QC limits?

NA out of NA

How many RPDs for'matrix spike and matrix spikeduplicate were outside of QC limits?

NA out of NA

Blanks

Is a Method Blank Summary Form present?

Has a method blank been analyzed for each set ofsamples or for each 20 samples, whichever is morefrequent?

Is the chromatographic performance acceptable for eachinstrument?

Do any method/reagent/instrument blanks have positiveresults?

1140869

Page 125: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Data Review Checklist - Page 2

_____________________________________________YES_____NO______NA

Do any field/rinse blanks have positive results? ____ X

Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated withevery sample? X

Calibration and GC Performance

Are the following chromatograms and data printoutspresent?

Aroclor 1016/1260 _X_

Aroclor 1221 _X_

Aroclor 1232 _X_

Aroclor 1242 X

Are Initial Calibration Summary Forms present andcomplete for each column and analytical sequence?

Are the linearity criteria for the initial analyses withinlimits for both columns (20% RSD)

Have all samples been injected within a 12 hour periodbeginning with the injection of a calibration standard?

Is a Calibration Verification Summary Form present andcomplete for each continuing standard analyzed?

Are %D values for all compounds within limits (15%)?

Analytical Sequence Check

Is a analytical sequence form present and complete foreach column and each period of analyses?

Was the proper analytical sequence followed?

Cleanup Efficiency Verification

If GPC cleanup was performed, is Gel PermeationChromatography Check Form present?

Are percent recoveries of the compounds used to checkthe efficiency of the cleanup procedure within QC limits?

Aroclor 1248 X

Aroclor 1254 X

1*40869

Page 126: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Data Review Checklist - Page 3

_____________________________________________YES_____NO______NA

PCB Identification

Is both a combined and single column AroclorIdentification Report present for every sample? X ____ ___

Do the combined column and individual column Arocloridentifications agree? _X_

Were there any false negatives? ___

Was GC/MS confirmation provided when required? ___

Compound Quantitation and Reported Detection Limits

Are the reporting limits adjusted to reflect sampledilutions, and for soils, sample moisture? _X_

Chromatogram Quality

Were the baselines stable? _X_

Were any electronegative displacement (negative peaks)or unusual peaks detected? ___

Field Duplicates

Where field duplicates submitted with the samples? __

1140869

Page 127: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Holding Time and SurrogateRecovery Summary

Sample 10 Holding Time Surrogates

TCX DCB

K12042

K12043 I (48)

K12044 (41)

Surrogate StandardsTCX Tetrachloro-m-xyleneDCB Oecachlorobiphenyl

Qualifiers:0 Surrogates diluted out! Recovery highJ Recovery low

Unless otherwise noted, all parameters are within specified limits.

1(40669

Page 128: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCB Calibration Summary

Instrument: HPYYYYColumn: RTX-35 / RTX-5

Date:

Time:

Aroclor 1016

Aroclor 1221

Aroclor 1232

Aroclor 1242

Aroclor 1248

Aroclor 1254

Aroclor 1260

Tetrachloro-m-xylene

Decachlorobiphenyl

Affected Samples:

12/30/93 1502to

12/31/93 1158

Initial Cal.

%RSD

4.6 / 3.9

3.3 / 4.2

2.4 / 3.1

4.9 / 3.0

3.6 / 3.0

3.1 / 2.6

4.1 / 2.9

6.8 / 3.1

3.5 / 7.8

12/31

1312

Cont.Cal.

%D

2.5

12/31

1348

Cont.Cal.

%D

7.0

12/31

2112

Cont.Cal.

%D

4.5

12/31

2149

Cont.Cal.

%D

3.0

1/1

0512

Cont.Cal.

%D

2.0

1/1

0549

Cont.Cal.

%D

4.0

U40869

Page 129: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

CORRECTED ANALYSIS SUMMARY FORMS

Page 130: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.11.0

(g)(uL)

1.069.51

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAI

PCB

Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

EPA SAMPLE NO.

K12042

SDG: 40869

Lab Sample ID: 20506511 /20/9311/21/9312/31/93

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-21 1 1 04-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1260

72 U72 U72 U72 U72 U

20030 J

Page 131: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUA)

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.1 <g)1.0 (uL)

20.044.00

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

K1 2043

SDG:

2050661 1 /20/9311/21/9312/31/93

Y

40869

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND - CONCENTRATION{ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1254Aroclor-1 260

2300 U2300 U2300 U2300 U250002300 U2300 U

Page 132: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1.0 (uL)

10.054.46

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

K 12044

SDG:

20506711/20/9311/21/9312/31/93

Y

40869

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND ~ CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1248Arodor-1 254ArocIor-1260

920 U920 U920 U920 U

110003800920 U

Page 133: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Kalamazoo TBSA TOC Results

Sample Number

K12012

K12013

K12014

K12015

K12016

K12017

K12018

K12019

K12020

K12021

K12022

K12024

K12025

K12026

K12027

K12028

K12029

K12030

K12031

K12033

K12034

K12036

K12037

K12038

K12039

K12040

: ;• Location

TBSA10-1

TBSA10-2

TBSA10-3

TBSA10-4

TBSA10-5

TBSA11-1

TBSA11-2

TBSA11-3

TBSA11-4

TBSA11-5

D-1

TBSA5-1

TBSA5-2

TBSA5-3

TBSA5-4

TBSA5-5

TBSA3-1

TBSA3-2

TBSA3-3

TBSA3-4

TBSA3-5

TBSA1-1

TBSA1-2

TBSA1-3

TBSA1-4

TBSA1-5

TOC Result (%)

4.5

4.9

5.5

8.5

13.5

16.0

15.2

13.1

11.1

8.2

15.4

8.8

8.2

8.5

9.3

8.3

10.2

8.7

10.0

8.3

10.0

3.1

3.9

4.3

5.8

4.4

Page 134: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

B L A S L A N D , B O U C K , & L E E , I N C

e n g i n e e r s & s c i e n t i s t s

Appendix D

Page 135: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

BLASLAND ft BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.C.6723 Towpalh Road, Box 66Syracuse, New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD 1-0 «*7&3/J

COo

-=*<* §oo

PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME

J?. ve r- -SAMPLERS: (Signature)

STA.NO. DATE TIME STATION LOCATION REMARKS

TSJAf-3

TBSA3-I

X /to 30

TBSA3-3 KI203I

D-l KI103*

/OZ033

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME

13:00Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received for Laboratory by:(Signature)

DATE TIME Remarks:

7/12/9313937MHCOR Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files

KB0005132

Page 136: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

iLn^

BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.C.6723 Towpath Road. Box 66Syracuse. New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD o

ooo

PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME

SAMPLERS>fS/gnaft/

STA. NO. DATE TIME STATION LOCATION REMARKS

TBrtl-l

T83/SI-Z /f / * 0

'U* /: /•? «>

•fe. f*ID Crt-Jrr* Jffhnk

KI2.04I

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE

Relinquished by: (Signature)

TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature)

Received by: (Signature)

DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received for Laboratory by:(Signature)

DATE TIME Remarks:X f.

7/12/931393786HCDR Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files

KB0005133

Page 137: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

BLASLAND ft BOUCK ENGINEERS. P.C.6723 Towpath Road. Box 66Syracuse. New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDPROJ.NO. PROJECT NAME

-TBSASAMPLERS: (i

STA.NO. DATE TIME STATION LOCATION REMARKS

KIZOI3."/L/ion*

TB4KIO-1

101,01 e.T&JAihl /ion?TBiAlt-Z

TBsA /)- V%/ft H . I 1 0 Z . I

0- Lr.oo

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE

.llnqulshed by: (Signature) DATE

TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature)

Received by: (Signature)

DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

TIME Relinquished by: (Signature) TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received for Laboratory by:(Signature)

DATE TIME Remarks:"X Jf t

T/12/9313937B6HCOR Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files

Page 138: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.C.6723 Towpath Road, Box 66Syracuse, New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD

-^>//T !

PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME

SAMPLERS: (Signature)

STA.NO. DATE TIME STATION LOCATION REMARKS

TB3A4-3110 t 7

TB5A1-I

TBSA3-S K\ZQ3l

D-lTff/43-y /< 12033

Relinquished by: (Signature)

'/-^U,;^Rallnqulshea by: (Signature)

DATE

nk/%TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

DATE TIME Received by: (S Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received (or Laboratory by:(Signature)

DATE TIME Remarks:

7/12/931393786HCDR Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files

Page 139: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.C.6723 Towpath Road, Box 66Syracuse. New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDPROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME

SAMPLERS: (Signature)

STA.NO. DATE STATION LOCATION REMARKS

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE

Relinquished by: Signature)

TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

OJ***.*%• •

O

SATE TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) "DATT TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

Relinquished by: (Signature) eceived for Laboratory by:

7/12/9313937B6HCDR Distribution: Orlglr^yAccompanles Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files

KB0007592

Page 140: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Inchcape Testing Services 35 South Park DriveColchester, VT 05446Tel. 802-655-1203Aquatec Laboratories *«• 802-655-1248

January 13, 1994

Ms. Laurie JohnstonBlasland & Bouck Engineers6723 Towpath Road, Box 66Syracuse, NY 13214

Re: Analytical Results-Kalamazoo SiteAquatec Project No. 91082Case No. PCS: SDG No. 40869 ______

Dear Ms. Johnston:

Enclosed are the analytical results for samples received intactby Aquatec on November 20, 1993. The analyses for these sampleswere performed in accordance with the methodologies specified inthe Quality Assurance Project Plan. Laboratory numbers andquality control samples were assigned as follows:

Client Aquatec SampleSample ID Lab No. Matrix

Samples Received on November 20, 1993ETR No. 40869

K12042 205065 SoilK12043 205066 SoilK12044 205067 Soil

The samples in this delivery group as well as the associatedmethod blank received sulfur clean-up prior to the Arocloranalysis.

Samples in this delivery group were reported as the best match tocombinations of the seven Aroclor standards. In general, thestandard Aroclors are sufficiently unique to provide preciseidentifications and quantitations of complex mixtures withminimal weathering. For highly altered samples, certain subtleidentification distinctions, such as the difference between 1016and 1242 become less precise. In all cases, quantitation remainshighly reliable.

Sincerely,

Karen R. ChirgwinLaboratory Operations Director

Enclosure

91082B2DEC93 KB0007591

OO&C& f

Page 141: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

AROCLOR SURROGATE RECOVERY

Lab Name:Lab Code:SAS No.:

Aouatec. Inc.AQUAI

Contract:Case No.:SDG No.:

123456789

1011121314151617181920

EPASAMPLE NO.

?BLkF6KIZOHZKaWKaoH^

S1(TCX) #

<37[ 7«

H-S *•!>."HI #!)

S2(DEC) #

• < ? lso

- 12. TX- CM TV

5152

(TCX)(DEC)

Tetrachloro-meta-XyleneDecachlorobiphenyl

PROJECT SPECIFICQC LIMITS(60-150)(60-150)

# Column to be used to flag recovery values* Values outside of QC limitsD Surrogates calculated using diluted analysis.A - Extracted surrogates diluted out, surrogates added to

diluted extract as retention time markers.

page of

KB0007596

Page 142: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY

Lab Name: Aouatec. Inc.Lab Code: AQUAI

Lab Sample 10:102^35 rpBLfcWMatrix: (soil/water) ScM -

Date Extracted:Date Analyzed!!):Time Analyzed(l):

GCIDd):"GC ColumnU):

Contract:Case: ?££.

U / 7 I 1 3LeveKL/M):

Date Analyzed^):Time Analyzed(2):

H?yyy/ GC Column(2);

LAB ID CLIENT IDDATE

ANALYZED 1DATE

ANALYZED 2123456789

101112131415161718192021222324252627282930

CLOSES ''zoso&i.105061 '

K\2.o41 -K\~2.oH3 ^^ i o /\ j_jy.jP^ I f lJ r^l ••* ^,

'

,z/ 31/^jI2-/31//3|2./J?//^3

^/3l/f3IZ/3//1^ ^/-2/3//f3

page _Lof_]_.KB0007597

000007

Page 143: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.01.0

(g)(uL)

1.0100

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAI

PCB

EPA SAMPLE NO.

PBLKFG

SDG: 40869

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

202433

11/21/9312/31/93

(Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONtug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U

KB0008051

Page 144: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

AroulorcalibTarion~5ffmrfrary —:alibration of 30-Dec-1993 15:02 through 31-Dec-1993 11:58.•ICD1:[8080] 27.28 30DEC9313054ETHOD: 8080 PCB:AN

—— -rrfX

Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations

SJF - HPyyyy

Peak »

234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738

- 394041

RT1 7.6077.9187.9718.3828.5689.4769.88610.22910.55110.72210.84210.92711.19311.67711.83111.97212.08312.36012.50012.66412.76313.34813.46413.69813.78313.87214.13314.25414.34114.45414.63014.82015.03715.07815.25515.48015.51215.87116.35116.59216.793

Aroclor7.50518.53314.89649.5210.85516.7460.7912.3553.5561.8080.98818.5864.4090.6640.1522.2933.1422.2731.2330.3633.4331.1130.6481.3110.5790.3201.3870.6432.4582.1510.602

0.2740.627

2.3260.3380.3370.7460.509

12217.1%

2.4X1.6X2.2X2.3X

5. OX

4. OX

4.8X5.6X

4.3X

11. 9X

20.

Aroclor6.40013.09012.41449.1982.72847.0052.6389.67014.3816.0883.21569.99222.4483.3220.96513.43819.18614.2466.0301.85022.9207.2025.30810.3054.0450.6888.7305.03817.39016.0613.1381.4533.12215.5951.7661.8042.4541.290

1S3L8. OX4.6X2.5X1.1X7.7X3.3X7.2X1.5X1.2X

11. IX

2.5X2.6X6.4X1.2X2.9X

2.2X1.5X6.BX3.5X

2.7X3.6X3.9X

3.2X2.3X

Aroclop5.8116.7289.51746.7295.88696.6545.93922.29332.59713.6257.361

149.46952.8148.5262.88832.49748.46037.74916.3234.84053.42817.90413.26426.35210.4460.5924.48010.2616.4624.1364.8451.0640.2130.8800.567

10166.5X1.6X7.7X3.8X3.9X6.3X1.6X1.4X2.4X8.1X6.4X7.6X1.8X1.4X7.9X5.2X3. OX1.7X4.9X1.0X1.3X1.7X3.7X3.1X2.1X

7.2X2.9X3. OX2.0%

54.

Aroclor4.6685.2027.54736.8764.59277.3804.66317.55625.69210.8325.674

122.10141.2006.7182.21925.09838.73429.54112.9433.78645.19814.54110.71922.5038.7801.53419.94810.03037.19634.6177.6463.8228.50635.4374.7565.2866.6124.169

12425. OX

1.5X2.6X2.8X4.4X4.9X3. OX0.6X0.7X8.8X

13. OX1.9X2. OX6.2X2.4X6.7X

1.9X1.4X3.7X3.2X0.6X2.2X2.3X3.4X1.7X

1.7X5.1X3.6X3.3X3.5X6.2X

Aroclor0.3031.6210.7294.0061.44237.7901.2079.0249.6734.1221.31383.35519.5829.9973.09112.48373.41450.54218.5975.32074.53222.44818.80441.59911.6942.58537.47317.46277.32166.22723.9109.54925.92469.48014.48516.02120.34112.455

1248

6.2X

6.2X3. OX

4.2X3.8X20.

2.5X3.2X7.5X6. OX1.6X1.3X1.8X2.1X2.9X3.3X7.0X8.4X2.5X4.1X3.7X5.8X1.3X3.8X2.6X7.9X3. IX3.2X5.1X5. OX

Aroclor

1.551

0.4191.168

0.381

0.5751.204

0.22850.71513.532

26.1262.1881.7628.2840.49510.200

37.11712.84873.00719.74293.94841.23628.37332.30857.31318.015

12543.2X

2.4X0.9X

2.3X

7.7X

2.4X2.3%1.1X1.4X1.5X1.2X0.9X1.4X4.4X4.2X

Aroclor1.5820.1800.5230.981

0.333

0.406

0.1992.592

0.488

0.357

1.0200.4870.28330.8484.35439.376

1.4391.1265.832

1260

6.9X

4.7X

1.9X2.8X1.4X

4.4X

too

o

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 6.8777 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.5899.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01194 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quant Station is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT* 1.06016.

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALJBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)

KB0007644

(SJF)31-DEC-93 12:52:57

Page 145: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

:alibration of 30-0ec-1993 15:02 through 31-Dec-1993 11:58.1CD1:[8080J 27,28 300EC9313051ETHOO: 8080 PCB:AN

SJF - HPyyyy

Peak Response Factors and Relative DeviationsPeak «

434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172

V l

RT Aroclor 122116.979 0.85917.08217.32717.41217.600 0.45317.67117.96118.19918.85818.991 0.29419.04719.15919.21319.48319.62319.87320.06220.07720.54421.04221.05421.34321.41321.52721.75422.51623.10123.26724.81225.16226.406 0.687

Total: 172.8 3.3X

Compoundtetrachloro-meta-xylenedecach I orobi pheny I

Aroclor 124.116 1

2.2592.1240.1211.0610.8131.739

0.3370.7060.442

0.180

0.294

1.090

0.3260.558

0.2800.701

463.8 2

Mean RT6.8777

27.5899

32 Aroclor 1016 Aroclor.2% 12.114

0.6308.895

0.1881.774

6.3913.190

0.1720.2731.952

0.169

0.519

0.235

2.088

2.603

0.657 0.638

.4X 767.0 4.6X 801.5

Retention Time Marker/SurrogateRT Dev. Range RT Crft.

-.0154 to .0112 Passes...-.0143 to .0123 Passes...

1242 .Aroclor 12484.3X" 38.470 4.95C

1.509 7.2X2.6% 25.748 4.2X

15.4070.5494.793 3.5X1.651

19.410 5.9X

0.3611.081

2.6X 4.844 5.5X0.3Z70.617

1.742

0.882

1.049

0.2550.496

0.1600.772

4.9X 1030.0 3.6X

Standard SummaryMean RF Recovery2597.087 71.4 to1550.885 86.6 to

Aroclor 1254123.604 4.4X

9.141 6.9X5.625

84.747 4.2X72.635 2.9X9.714 1.7X

63.793 1.1X16.899 6.4X

43.150 2.7X

6.804 5.9X23.982 9. OX92.667 5. IX4.855 7.8X9.100 2.5X

0.54727.971 4.4X

12.747 3.5X3.180

16.826 4.2X

2.171 1.7X10.281 3.3X0.2930.6860.760

1174.9 3. IX

Range Surr Crit111.8% ** Fails *112.4% Passes...

Aroclor19.18551.75618.245

109.95816.377

133.27743.904

37.63726.249

66.034104.15176.692

39.1639.336

90.44341.684

19.745187.117

4.21648.91998.58114.23536.84710.847

1397.0

12603.2*1.9X2.4X

1.5X2.3X1.7%3.8X

3.7X1.9X

5.3X6.3X2.6X

4.8X4.1X

4.1X2.7X

3.8X6.5X4.BX4.8XB.1X4.6X4.6X1.4X

4.1X

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 6.8777 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.5899.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/• 0.01194 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantisation is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.06016.

10OO

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALJBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)

KB0007645

(SJF)31-DEC-93 12:52:58

Page 146: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

ArDclorcalibT3rion~Snmrrrary — —Calibration of 30-Dec-1993 15:02 through 31-1>ec-1993 11:58.HCD1:[8080] 27,28 300EC931305METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN

JX-SJF - HPyyyy

Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations

OCDOO

Peak »234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738

- 394041424344454647

"S.3937.3698.6118.8548.9159.09010.29310.39710.46210.73711.01011.30011.59311.67711.90912.24512.50112.68212.95413.09113.24913.36713.81313.93514.24614.53514.73514.93115.07115.20115.33615.35615.58915.93915.97716.18316.37616.77416.96217.14717.30317.40617.50517.91617.93417.95618.270

Aroclor30.3889.19323.42117.35058.8153.7019.15511.7221.2827.3421.3281.4491.7989.9806.4003.3531.1230.3452.7423.2821.8813.2512.3513.0220.7030.1251.6653.0803.096

2.2331.1560.8251.1800.3850.4940.3151.0230.153

'

ft2,1*10. 9X •8.7X1.0X1.5X3.7X1.6X

3. OX7.7X

42.1.8X2.3X9.6X18.

12. OX

2.5X10. 2X22.

6.7X3.4X

6.6X

Acoclor17.3866.02016.489

H.05157.0212.99933.80825.4013.68429.6761.4886.3264.42450.99831.11017.4765.2942.05817.75616.57710.29422.16014.62219.4035.5200.8310.81310.60820.96721.7771.50817.5174.9872.6100.4872.1353.0591.7796.2271.612

0.357

12326.2X9.1X0.7X

2.8X4. OX4.5X3.9X3.1X3.6X1.9X4. OX2.7X14.9X3.6X1.6X3.8X2.9X2.7X1.8X5. OX1.0X0.6X1.7X1.6X

2. OX1.9X2. OX

3.4X5.2X6.6X

6.7X9.9X3.2X

Aroclor0.8908.55110.94554.0481.06473.89648.0358.46466.047

1.33014.7629.425

122.45272.06441.37014.0565.16743.46941.09927.31854.25630.53350.21011.8401.0100.6825.1577.9139.4081.3530.687

0.128

1016

2.4X

2. IX4.9X7. OX5.5X2. OX3.4X4.4X1.5X13. 5X1.9X1.9X4.2X4. OX2.7X3.5X6.8X4.7X2.2X2.4X1.8X1.8X

2.4X2.4X3.1X

Aroclor0.6786.672

8.75942.9710.87959.35038.3206.67652.564

1.65511.4927.59694.93956.52331.97311.1584.11135.19733.19721.81243.77628.44441.97510.9341.8331.93323.89044.23746.4173.57638.06512.8597.8061.2806.201B.8815.53017.1194.464

1.116

1242

2.4X2.3X4. OX

6. OX3.9X2.5X2.3X3.6X1.6X14. 8X2.9X1.1X3.9X2.9X1.5X2.8X4.6X3.9X0.8X0.7X2.2X1.2X5.5X1.2X1.3X1.5X5.9X3.8X8.5X3.5X8.9X2.3X5. OX

0.8X7.1X

Aroclor

0.5090.5232.3354.83433.6321.76823.1251.4973.9791.84358.55129.77616.52214.7135.78170.05554.77033.54681.45632.27971.00218.1331.6903.25243.88390.71192.391

10.02469.863

36.36022.4373.53618.10826.51216.443

50.95413.312

2.954

1248

6.4X

4.2X17.3.5X4. OX3.9X

3.4X1.0X3.3X1.4X1.2X2.7X2.5X1.5X0.9X1.7X3.6X3.3X4.5X3.3X2.2X2.4X2.1X6.9X2.6X2.2X11. 3X2.1X2.3X2.7X3.2X2.2X

9.3X

Aroclor

2.0940.444

0.8370.4500.9731.369

0.935

0.4160.7220.25154.65716.92331.3092.94211.9612.4980.2170.54311.32143.92092.21914.79424.092113.64345.5866.53437.70772.81723.11010.860145.580

21.8418.538

1254

82.1.8X

95.

3.8X10. 1X0.6X4.3X1.7X2.7X

0.8X1.0X4. OX2.5X2.4X4.2X1.7X3.1%0.5X3.1X3.3X4.1X1.1X

1.9X

Aroclor

2.1400.5470.5920.3860.5831.0910.7640.8030.7560.3280.0960.8362.751

0.5490.3010.555

0.2340.53236.6450.0935.72747.2880.3281.4077.088

20.64323.567

52.475

1260

2.BX

28.

11. IX

2.5X

1.6X2.3X

3.6X6.7X3.9X2.3X

1.3X

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 7.9728 and decachlorobiphenyl at 28.8239.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/• 0.01194 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT* 1.04787.

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CAUBRATION 5.2-3(I2AUG93 1142)

KB0007646

(SJF)31-DEC-93 12:52:58

Page 147: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Calibration of 30-Dec-1993 15:02 through 31-Dec-1993 11:58.MCD1:[80BO] 27,28 300EC931305METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN

SJF - HPyyyy

Peak Response Factors and Relative DeviationsPeak #— ra~

49505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485

RT Aroclor 122118.38718.449 0.58518.77618.92919.05619.273 0.11619.36919.39419.409 0.35619.73219.80019.98720.07320.275 0.19320.57020.59220.89321.07521.27121.46021.73521.93422.10022.12522.32922.34122.50322.73722.98323.18423.79524.10724.30024.81125.35926.06026.25627.486 0.794

Total: 233.2 4.2X

Compoundtetrachloro-meta-xylenedecachlorobiphenyl

Aroclor 12

3.186 4

0.1101.130

2.295 60.351

1.172

0.7310.2940.223

0.5750.2950.184

1.310 3

0.6050.3370.339

0.363

0.905

543.7 3

Mean RT7.9728

28.8239

32 Aroclor 1016 Aroclor

.OX 11.104

0.3150.3741.610

.9X 8.2990.400

2.704

2.593 0.997

0.483

.4X 0.172

0.157

3.121

0.912 0.964

.IX 844.3 3.9X 904.4

Retention Time Marker/SurrogateRT Dev. Range RT Crit.

-.0128 to .0094 Passes...-.0128 to .0094 Passes...

1242 Aroclor 1248

1.8X 31.809 2. OX

0.8440.5693.675 2.2X

4.9X 25.682 6.2X1.267 4.4X

0.6850.678

2.7X 6.868 2.3X0.205

0.5290.2322.137

0.4480.234

1.0030.257

1.040

0.5820.2210.227

0.215

1.006

3. OX 1143.5 3. OX

Standard SummaryMean RF Recovery2977.565 76.7 to1767.319 93.4 to

Aroclor 1254

103.434 0.8X6.891 8.3X3.583 8.6X

11.813 2.6X64.435 2.8X

69.528 3.5X

20.740 2.8X3.3158.468 3.6X9.581 5.6X

119.851 1.2X8.655 7.2X

5.8534.830

30.546 3.8X0.5527.908 17.4.970 18.

16.986 2.9X3.499 5.5X

1.66516.832 1.3X0.417

13.605 1.7X0.7210.9390.5370.6160.878

0.977

ii44?7"™*"r6%

Range Surr Crit108. 5X ** Fails *113.9% Passes...

Aroclor121.562

6.4020.962

19.466143.56948.585

53.80433.123

15.007156.924

16.48088.50046.00311.85112.31490.98248.92130.907

6.46614.528

203.9302.8175.372

95.75142.18146.5972.489

20.05347.5752.362

13.712===r==ss:1658.3

12604.2X

4.1X

2. OX2.5X1.5X

4.8X2.4X

2.2X2.2X

8.3X2.2X1.9X2.2X2. OX2. OX1.4X3.3X

5.5X4.8X2.6X2.4X2.8X5.4X1.5X2. OX3.2X2.0X3.4X5.3X1.9X

:=====2.9X

Motes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 7.9728 and decachlorobiphenyl at 28.8239.2) Peaks chosen within window of •*•/- 0.01194 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHTA 1.04787.

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALIBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)

KB0007647

(SJF)31-DEC-93 12:52:58

Page 148: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

CH271230.XLS

CALIBRATION SUMMARYBACK CALCULATIONS

Lab ID:GC:

Col. 1 :Col. 2:

AQUATEC, INC.HPyyyy

RTX-35RTX-5

Calib date(s): 30-DEC-93 15:0231-DEC-93 11:58

File: 27, 28 30DEC931305

to

Standards

Aroclor 1016Cal Fact

% DiffAroclor 1221

Cal Fact%Diff

Aroclor 1 232Cal Fact

% DiffAroclor 1 242

Cal Fact% Diff

Aroclor 1 248Cal Fact

% DiffAroclor 1 254

Cal Fact% Diff

Aroclor 1260Cal Fact

% Diff

50ppb

56.11.122-1254.91.098-1049.30.986

155.71.114-1148.4

0.9683

49.10.982

246.7

0.9347

100ppb

1031.030

-3105

1.050-5

1081.080

-8102

1.020-2

93.20.932

798.00.980

294.9

0.9495

200ppb

2081.040

-4207

1.035-4

2041.020

-2197

0.9852

1920.960

4198

0.9901

2001.000

0

400ppb

3960.990

1401

1.0030

3940.985

2402

1.005-1

3990.998

0402

1.005-1

3960.990

1

800ppb

7870.984

2782

0.9782

7880.985

2772

0.9654

8091.011

-1803

1.0040

8131.016

-2

%RSD

5.4

4.5

4.1

5.7

3.2

1.2

3.6

Cal Fact - Calc. Cone. / Nominal Cone.

%RSD = STD Dev / Mean of Cal Fact

% Diff = (Nominal Amt-Calc Amt) / Nominal Amt* 100KB0007637

Page 1

Page 149: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCBCHST.XLT

. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY

Lab ID:GC:

Col. 1:______Col. 2: fiTx-5"

AQUATEC, INC.Initial Calib.

date/time: ISO'2 ' to

Check Standard File: 27 1% "3 iDEDate: I a/3//f 3

Compound/4R CLHS -^

NominalAmount (ppb)"2^0 x-

Calc.Amount (ppb)

J<?T /-% Diff.1-5- -

Check Standard File:Date:Time:

CompoundAR (oik ^

Nominal_ Amount (ppbj

O-06 s-

Calc.Amount (ppb)"Zl^ s

% Diff.1-O

Check Standard Rle:/272^Date: |-aTime; ^

CompoundA^ \-2.M^ ^

NominalAmount (ppb)2^^> /"

Calc.Amount (ppb)

!<?( ^% Diff.^.r -

Check Standard Rle: 27 2g 3lDEC^3lQ55: f£Date:Time;

CompoundA^? l"2//2, /-

NominalAmount (ppb)2^?£)

Calc.Amount (ppb)

h -Z*?^ ^% Diff.^>.d> X

Check Standard Rle: 2-7Date:Q|/g|/nTime;

CompoundASQH^ ^«

NominalAmount (ppb)Q-oa x^"

Calc.Amount (ppb).

/<U ^% Diff.I.O *

Page__j_of_JZ.KB0007638

00004B

Page 150: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCBCHST.XLT

. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY

Lab ID:GC:

Col. 1 :'Col. 2:

Check

Check

Check

Check

Check

AQUATEC, INC.H?YWV^TV~35~ftTx-5~

Standard Rle: "2-7. 2 S 3 I £>E<

Initial Calib.date/time: f2/3«/<?3 |5~02

X "

CompoundjAfS 1*" cW ^^

ft l^ i j I ^^

NominalAmount (ppb)

*20~<r> ^

Standard Rle:

CompoundNominal

_ Amount {ppb)

Standard Rle:

CompoundNominal

Amount (ppb)

Standard Rle:

CompoundNominal

Amount (ppb)

Standard Rle:

CompoundNominal

Amount {ppb)

fc/3f/'P |I5$

Date:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

f?2_ ^

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb).

b^^ '

% Diff.H.o "

% Diff.

% Diff.

% Diff.

% Diff.

to

Page of 2KB0007639

000047

Page 151: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.O.6723 Towpath Road, Box 66Syracuse. New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD

/\7T>0;

PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME Zoo

SAMPLERS: (Signature)

STA. NO. DATE

.XJ

TIME STATION LOCATION REMARKS

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

Relinquished by: (Signature) 'ATE TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME iecelved for Laboratory by:

Z/93

DATE TIME Remarks:

KB0007592DIs __ on: ( a/Ac __intes nient " ~MoC "natos ~ " Filer

Page 152: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

F-0430

AQUATEC SAMPLE LOG-IN SHEET

Aquatec, Inc. I ^r f

Receded By

AJ? L . Log-in Date: U

Case Number:.Sample DenVeryGroup No: ___ CLIENT

SAMPLEi

CORRESPONDING

SAMPLETAG1

ASSIGNEDLABi

REMARKS:CONDITIONOF SAMPLE

SHIPMENT, ETC.

REMARKS:

1. Custody Sealfe)

2. Custody Seal Nos.:

3. Chain-of-CnstodyRecords

4. Sample Informatioa

5. Airbill

6. Airbffl No.:

7. Sample TagsSample TagNnmben

8. Sample Condition'

9. Does information oncustody records, sampleinformation sheets, andsample tags agree?

IQ.DateReceiTedatLab:

KlZoMZ noSloScl^ ?

Q.r\AUlau»

Sample Transfer

Fraction: £r^4

• Contact Project Director.

Logbook No:.

Date:. Logbook Page No:. KB0008095

000492

Page 153: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

METHOD:8080 PCB:EXS BATCH ID: 2VH

CASE:SDG:DATE:ANALYST: JJS>SPIKED BY:!WI

J,

(o.l x/ V/ V/ y y V y yv/ y y y V/ v

> P.O /a- 8.1

Page 154: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

riIOD:8080_PCB:EXW MATRIX: WATER LEVhL: LOW

E: pCR

LVST: 'jED BY:

NESSED BY: >

Munple id Client id§11.1

242/

1o;i§i3.1

with

Hex

isfi56. 7.

1f+

aJ

J

Sa\t.

1a

mv>9. 10.1

7 JIQOO x)

'o

vf

•— -«fc. IIK - »«rkihe«i <- nrinled l>v: SOW on 11-18-9307:08:48

L^A

KB0006235

Page 155: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

LIENT(s):

DG:

NALYST: ^\ SPIKED BY: c)\ S'ITNESSED BY:

Lab sample id Client id ampl

e we

ight

(lO

gm) la

r NajS

O*, m

ixgr

anu

xhle

t

20g

Tra

IUIT

.L

O C

*°\':*>

0

d?t*°iMW3.1

hn w

/I:l

hex

/aA

2.T

3 appr

ox

4.1 5.

ghB

h 0.

o. F

ilter

9.1

.0 m

l3

— «

gh G

PCr

5 m

l

hang

e/0 *

* .

_ y

loll

(J-t>

t(t*G

f

3 3KX

to 5

.0 m

l" C

*g|

ml t

o a

vial

fer

) -5

CO

_. S

ulfu

rie A

cidy

H^0

4 Lo

uf

A C

one

to 1

.0m

l

_ 3

gm sQ

ka g

el c

lean-

r1 Sili

ca f

el L

ouf

C

1 oaI

18.1 19.1

1!y v/ V-L-

>Aqualec, Inc. — Extraction worksheet — printed by: JKZ on 12-22-9310:40:54 KB0006236

Page 156: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Inchcape Testing Services 5 5 South Park DriveColcheiter.VT 05446Tel. 802-453-1203Aquatec Laboratories *«• 8024555.1248

January 21, 1994

Ms. Laurie JohnstonBlasland & Bouck Engineers6723 Towpath Road, Box 66Syracuse, NY 13214

Re: Analytical Results-Kalamazoo SiteAquatec Project No. 91082Case No. PCS; SDG No. 40734_____

Dear Ms. Johnston:

Enclosed are the analytical results for samples received intactby Aquatec on November 13, 1993. The analyses for these sampleswere performed in accordance with the methodologies specified inthe Quality Assurance Project Plan. Laboratory numbers andquality control samples were assigned as follows:

Client Aquatec SampleSample ID Lab No. Matrix

Samples Received on November 13, 1993ETR No. 40734

K12012 204311 SoilK12013 204312 SoilK12014 204313 SoilK12015 204314 SoilK12016 204315 SoilK12017. 204316 SoilK12018 204317 SoilK12019 204318 SoilK12020 204319 SoilK12021 204320 SoilK12022 204321 SoilK12023 204322 SoilK12024 204323 SoilK12025 204324 SoilK12026 204325 SoilK12027 204326 SoilK12028 204327 SoilK12029 204328 SoilK12030 204329 SoilK12033 204330 SoilK12033MS 204330MS SoilK12033MSD 204330MD SoilMSB 204331 Solid

Page 157: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Ms. Laurie JohnstonJanuary 21, 1994Page 2

Sample labeled K12019 was compromised during the extractionprocedure. This sample was re-extracted outside the prescribedholding time and analyzed.

Due to high concentration of Aroclor 1248 in samples labeledK12033, K12033MS and K12033MD, matrix recoveries could not becalculated for Aroclor 1242.

Low surrogate recoveries for tetrachloro-m-xylene were observedfor many samples in this delivery group.

High surrogate recoveries were observed for sample labeled K12002which may be attributed to evaporative loss of the extract as aresult of a defective vial. Post-GPC archives were subjected tothe appropriate clean-ups and subsequently analyzed outside theprescribed holding time. All surrogate recoveries were withinthe control limits. Both sets of data have been presented withthis case submittal.

Samples in this delivery group were reported as the best match tocombinations of the seven Aroclor standards. In general, thestandard Aroclors are sufficiently unique to provide preciseidentifications and quantitations of complex mixtures withminimal weathering. For highly altered samples, certain subtleidentification distinctions, such as the difference between 1016and 1242 become less precise. In all cases, quantitation remainshighly reliable.

Sine

R. ChirgwinLaboratory Operations Director

KRC/jg

Enclosure

91082B2DEC93

Page 158: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

AROCLOR SURROGATE RECOVERY

Lab Name:Lab Code:SAS No.:

123456789

1011121314151617181920

S1 (TCX) «S2 (DEC) «

Aauatec. Inc.AQUAI

EPASAMPLE NO.

?$Lkf=YkttoiHKnots' sK12016 *-K12027KiaC2$ . 'K 1202.1 sKI2030 /K12-033 sfASB 'KftotZ Vktt.oi3 /KttOlf xkftO'S" 'K»2tfl^ x

K\2ol7 x

KI20I? ^K\-2.020 ,K \i^2 1 JK\1022.

S1(TCX) #

^50 *D-55T ^tD'53 4T> .H7 *Dv52 *D >1C *DX

S"3 *D -'•H -*I>x52 *-D '£"0 *1>ST *D "Cl 0 >?5" ^fj> ^53 *D /£S ^^ 0CM | '

C767 J\l^A jjL1 j Cr ^^ -X^

Contract:Case No.:SDG No.:

S2(DEC) #

74 x-^f s>.107 "D

' ^« D.87 D.^5~ I>.

' 31 D'^7 5)'90 D.32. 3).75- I>,83 v)-•^7 p /

' ^0 D -' ^r fcl^f '

•77f 5^ *•*'

"75* sl&2> * '

^|0?-i.

VCBH073f

x

X

^

PROJECT SPECQC LIMITS

• Tetrachloro-meta-Xylene (60-150)« Decachlorobiphenyl , (60-150)

# Column to be used to flag recovery values* Values outside of QC limitsD Surrogates calculated using diluted analysis.A - Extracted surrogates diluted out, surrogates added to

diluted extract as retention time markers.

page of

Page 159: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

AROCLOR SURROGATE RECOVERY

Lab Name:Lab Code:SAS No.:

Aciuatec. Inc.AQUA!

Contract:Case No.:SDG No.:

123456789

1011121314151617181920

EPASAMPLE NO.

knowYBi-kFL?gU6H xKI2023 x

Ka033MSKlO-O^MSD?8/JC£YRE. -"kiaoziRE. x

\

SIRCX) *

£745" * .4H *• xGoHI *I>,U ^*. ^v* \I ™ *\ _' -^ *

73 x

"71 ^

S2(DEC) #

SO-43 *-x76 ' x

'32 /^ D,tfl D^?^ X

I4/

5152

(TCX)(DEC)

Tetrachloro-meta-XyleneDecachlorobiphenyl

PROJECT SPECIFICQC LIMITS(60-150)(60-150)

# Column to be used to flag recovery values• Values outside of QC limitsD Surrogates calculated using diluted analysis.A - Extracted surrogates diluted out, surrogates added to

diluted extract as retention time markers.

page. of

Page 160: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

SOIL AROCLOR MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE RECOVERY

Lab Name:Lab Code:SAS No.:*

Aquatec, Inc.AQUA1

EPA Sample No.; KHQ33

Contract:Case No.;SDGNo.:

CompoundAroc!or1242Arodor 1254

SPIKEADDED(UG/KGJ4151 <-1051 '

SAMPLECONCENTRATION

(UG/KG)0.0 '

-2.643 '

MSCONCENTRATION

(UG/KG)o.o ^#

3722- -

MS%REC #

0 -*

£5--

QCLIMITS

REC.39-15029-131

CompoundArodor 1242Arodor 1254

SPIKEADDED(UG/KG)^1£1 x

M5°( '

MSDCONCENTRATION

(UG/KG)o.o tt

63££ -

MSD |*- IREC # I RPD #

0 * | 0 *

Ho ' | 'i* -*•

QCLIMITS

RPD3030

QCLIMITS

'REC.39-15029-131

# Column used to flag recovery and RPD values whh an asterisk* Values outside of QC limits

RPD; eLSpike Recovery:

out of ___2_out of

outside limits4____ outside limits

Comments:

in

4-o Kt'cvh l€.Vg\ Arodor/ip-f t

Page 161: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

3EAROCLOR

MATRIX SPIKE BLANK RECOVERY

Lab Name: Aouatec. Inc.Lab Code: AQUAISAS No.: __________

Contract:CaseNo.:SDG No.: HOT 31

EPA Sample No.;

CompoundAroclor 1 242Aroclor 1254

SPIKEADDED(UG/KG)Sooo '5000 /

MSBCONCENTRATION

(UG/KG)l*?3«-

331"? ^

MSB%

REC #31 '66 /

QCLIMITS

REC.39-15029-131

# Column used to flag recovery and RPD values whh an asterisk* Values outside of QC limits

Spike Recovery: 0 out of outside limits

_ Comments:

Page 162: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Lab Name:Lab Code:

Lab Sample-ID:Matrix: (s oil/wate r)

Date Extracted:Date Analyzed(l):Time Analyzed(l):

GCID(l) :GC Column(1):

12

• 3456789

101112131415161718192021222324252627282930

FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY

Aouatec. Inc.AQUAI

RTy-3S"

LAB ID CLIENT ID

Contract;Case:

SDG No;Level(UM); Lou/

Date Analyzed(2);Time Analyzed(2):

GC1D(2):GC Column(2);

DATEANALYZED 1

peg -

DATEANALYZED 2

•2. OH 323 -

-201321,

10^3302.^331

2^313

- &2.QI6

KI2033

Kiaoa

kiac/7Kiao IS

K 12022.

U/lfe/13

I2/IS/13

U/S/13

U/ffr/13

11 / 16/13

\tl

li/it/K1 6 4 3

page of

Page 163: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

ERA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (g)1.0 (uL)1.0100

Case: PCB

PBLKEY

SDG: 40734

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

195551

11/17/9312/15/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U

Page 164: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY

Lab Name:Lab Code:

Aciuatec. Inc.AQUAI

Lab Sample ID:ifgs£nRiMatrix: (soil/water)

Date Extracted:Date Analyzedd):Time Analyzedd): _____

GCIDd): HP2037GC Columnd): RTy-g

01/13I&2I

LAB ID CLIENT ID

Contract:Case:

SDG No:LeveUL/M):

Date Analyzed!!}:Time Analyzed^):

GC ID(2):GC Column(2):

DATEANALYZED 1

qioaz

DATEANALYZED 2

123456789

1011121314151617181920212223242526272829.30

•zo'm/Ri /

••

K 12022 RE s-

*

'

0!/i3/<W /

.

0'//3/?y x

-

page of \

Page 165: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

EPA SAMPLE NO.

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.0 (o)1.0 (uL)1.0100

Case: PCB

Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate

Sulfur

Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:

PBLXEYRE

SDG: 40734

1 95551 R1

11/17/9301/13/94

N <Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U

Page 166: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Lab Name:Lab Code:

Lab Sample ID:Matrix:{soil/water)

Date Extracted:Date Analyzedd):Time Analyzedd):

GCIDd):GCColumnd):

FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY

Aauatec. Inc.AQUA1

Contract:Case:

SDG No:'Level{L/M):'

Date Analyzed{2):Time Analyzed(2):

GC ID(2):'GC Column(2):

Low

if 07"HP2&I3

LAB ID CLIENT IDDATE

ANALYZED 1DATE

ANALYZED 2123456789

1011121314151617181920212223242526272829.30

aoH3!S ki2on

. -

*

^ U//*/«3 ' \^}tl/v '*

-

page J_of_L

Page 167: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.01.0

(g)(uU

1.0100

Lab Code:Case:

AQUAI

PCB

EPA SAMPLE NO.

PBLKFL

SDG: 40734

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

202438

12/06/9312/16/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U

Page 168: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Lab Name:Lab Code:

Lab Sample ID:Matrix:(soil/water)

Date Extracted:Date Analyzed(l):Time Analyzedd):

GCID(I):GC Column( 1):

FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY

Aouatec. Inc.AQUAI

11/13/43li/14/te

Contract:Case:

SDG No:"LeveHL/M):^

Date Ana!yzed(2):Time Analyzed(2):

GCID{2):^GC Column(2):

PCS

I7//6/T3

P 2 / f _

%Tx-3£

LAB ID CLIENT IDDATE

ANALYZED 1DATE

ANALYZED 2123456789

101112131415161718192021222324252627282930

^04312. ^

••

KI202.3 s

' ' **

*

ia//C/l3

.

IV/6A3 X

-

page of

Page 169: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.Contract: 91082

Phase Type: WaterPhase Volume: ___1000

Injection Volume: ____1.0Dilution Factor: 1.0

Lab Code:Case:

AQUAIPCB

EPA SAMPLE NO.

PBLK6H

SDG: 40734

.(mL)(uL)

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

202110

11/18/9312/16/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/L) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242ArocloM 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1260

0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U

Page 170: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 9-Dec-1993 22:18 through 10-T)ec-HC01:[8080] 05,06 09DEC932026METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN

1993 18:16. JDS - HP2618

Peak Response Factors and Relative DeviationsPeak »

2345678910111213H151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950

RT7.1307.8838.0138.7218.7889.1349.1569.5589.74210.61110.80811.00011.32111.62311.70811.78311.89211.98112.66612.79612.92713.03313.26913.39913.47213.55513.64614.16014.27114.47614.55514.64114.97315.05215.14715.30615.46615.64715.70415.84216.04316.08716.24016.39416.61316.80816.92217.01617.19617.356

Aroclor83.5590.91323.42711.18022.71960.47946.707150.5922.6407.18144.8902.5008.0124.58912.5354.4952.81015.6852.3261.1638.83910.88315.3493.7243.6661.21810.8524.2352.9375.4502.1245.0652.4129.2868.0982.2390.4170.7902.824

6.7781.3020.1651.1972.6681.0822.990

!?2L11. IX8. OX5.5X0.9X3.3X1.6X1.9%2.5%6.7X5.5X33.6.7X12. 5X

5.7X3. OX

5.9X2.4X55.7.1X1.8X10.8X6.6X12. 7X

2. IX3.3X4.7X

6.9X

4.1X

7.3X

4.4X

Aroclor48. 3340.50714.6087.28518.72642.80437.614146.5738.7085.777

130.5838.79734.1275.39848.95818.83910.39975.84212.3044.77748.35160.38758.17820.88120.7866.84571.78827.33921.52738.96314.70031.73518.01861 .82457.24012.3322.4525.04512.604

52.7790.1606.9291.1286.8440.8359.9475.53616.814

J?3?u14.5X

4.7X3.3X2.8X1.9X4.9X3.2X8.4X8.6X5.4X5. OX1.5X4.5X1.8X1.7X3. IX1.1X0.2X15.3.5X3.5X17.2.7X1.4X3.2X0.8X1.2X1.6X2.1X2.3X1.5X1.3X1.3X1.8X1.4X8.3X1.3X3. OX3.6X5.5X2.7X1.5X0.6X

Aroclor5.029

4.77917.66323.67729.760141.54519.9382.147

278.39919.75178.477109.19843.72424.395176.54830.67212.256116.744147.371136.77854.43456.05217.233172.64166.59151.92798.64438.37316.78536.24524.03415.76918.7714.0711.1721.9362.200

1.506

101686.

17.3.6X2.5X4.1X3.7X5.1X6.1X3.4X1.5X3.1X2.0X3.2X1.6X4.4X9.6X4.9X5. IX10. 7X3. OX3.4X2. IX.4X.3%.2X.9X.7X.8%

2. OX1.6X2.7X1.8X7.8X23.

5.9X2.2X

Aroclor4.7355.1713.41213.94518.61423.283108.20215.6421.572

219.03815.47960.88185.76833.79218.469136.48624.4599.60888.027116.782112.44842.84344.05013.661137.90353.34841.47982.21131.15769.79134.581127.452119.20628.7276.46712.97531 .635

114.1490.67617.7483.47919.5653.12625.96616.89546.473

124278.

4. OX2.9X2.7X4.4X3.3X2.3X5.9X1.0X2.1X2.2X2.4X3.7X1.7X3.9X5.9X4.8X4.4X13. 7X2.5X2.7X2.3X1.5X2.4X2.9X2.9X2.6X1.9X2. OX1.8X2.6X2.6X4.9X2.7X

5.1X3.4X10. OX2.9X2.8X2.1X1.9X

Aroclor2.840

0.4561.0026.6182.00811.3834.699

110.0354.17330.1365.08131.54911.5333.28263.80934.22811.97143.197216.065172.90868.49260.66218.263236.81977.72070.219145.16738.926122.90655.933248.818214.54682.33519.18831.43189.352

202.5652.05751.27510.53255.4718.13574.35047.885138.055

1248

73.5.4X38.2.6X10. 2X6.8X7.4X1.6X2.3X2.6X1.1X1.3X1.6X4.2X3.4X3.1X5.8X9.4X3. OX4.4X3.3X2. OX1.9X1.3X1.5X1.4X0.6X2.1X0.6X2. IX4.2X2.4X2.8X3.9X4.8X4.5X2.4X5.2X2.3X5.8X0.7X0.7%0.5X

Aroclor3.0216.2360.7436.2720.9650.8520.3504.9540.1090.6144.5651.1690.1821.5224.4700.6830.950

169.14860.1534.6691.09693.2608.1927.66432.960

34.7578.940

128.74646.171249.38464.69349.518319.656140.3015.717

101.44820.819115.698209.39269.810431.460

1254

4.3X

39.

4.4X

8.7X

4.1X21.4.5X0.9X2.3X4.7X2.4X1.0X1.3X1.6X0.9X3.4X1.3X1.7X3.2X1.8X5.1X2.4X1.9X1.2X2.6X2. OX1.8X

Aroclor3.1.15

7.5250.5760.1076.6360.5381.2520.3963.6430.1120.5053.261

0.2151.2810.2370.2820.75110.20113.3980.4540.1891.7210.5980.3780.6990.2480.7460.3291.7281.140

110.31617.242141.118

1.316

5.8890.3684.55823.7880.32971.089

1260

4.9X

73.

5.8X

3.9X

5.2X2.6X2.7%2.5%

4.7X

5.5X1.9X

1.9X

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.0838 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.4052.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quant itat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.08891.

CJ?

oo

Inchcape Testing ServicesArmatec Laboratories AROCl.OR CALIBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142) f.rDS)16-DEC-93 19:01:.'

Page 171: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 9-Dec-1993 22:18 through 10-1»ec-1993 18:16.HCD1:[8080] 05,06 090EC932026METHOD: 8080 PCS:AN

RTT-35JDS - HPZ618

Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviationsik *TT~525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990

17.43817.65317.72617.78917.89217.96018.19218.40318.56318.58218.97519.10119.14819.24219.28519.43619.51719.63519.84720.01920.17220.43920.86221.11321.17921.19321.27921.45721.65222.12622.41322.62022.75622.84423.26923.68624.05324.18824.53125.970

Total:

Compound

Aroclor 12211.101

0.107

1.785 6.2X0.963

0.386

1.601

0.880

0.0880.465

1.139

O.T16

0.809

2.008

636.4 4.4X

tet rach I oro-meta-xyl enedecachlorobiphenyl

Aroclor 1232 Aroclor 1016 Aroclor0.1930.547

8.7887.4080.4173.7900.269

7.601

1.023

0.0851.4532.9171.8711.927

0.2082.2560.837

0.4700.3404.093

0.100

1.5162.3000.470

0.9270.1610.3390.9962.368

SSSSBBB3

1428.6

Mean

24

4

13

5

60

6

6

5

34

0.5990.1832.679

.1X 0.339 31.772

.1X 16.8370.754

.OX 5.7060.968

.3X 24.228

1.3940.8571.746

.2X 8.2290.194

1242

11.8%

2.3X3.8X

4.4X

3.6X

4.1X

1.218 2.288 65.0.317

.8X 2.569

1.222

0.915.1X 0.861

.8X 0.415

1.378 0.834

7. OX

2.115 6.6X 2.094.___

RT8.0838

27.4052

ToX 210378 3~9% 2347^5 i^TX

Retention Time Marker/SurrogateRT Dev. Range RT Crit.

-.0127 to .0118 Passes...-.0141 to .0148 Passes...

StandardMean8264.4722.

Aroclor 1248

2.2627.741 6.3X

86.747 0.8X49.341 1.0X2.296 9.8X

14.855 1.8X2.650 4.2X

6.23267.763 2. OX

3.1562.097 18.5.158 8. OX

19.170 2.6X1.4764.794 69.0.7130.1326.849 3.6X0.6632.549 11. 5X

0.3493.533 6.5X

0.9031.827 10. 3X0.294

1.009 42.0.1870.2160.5792.374

3236~0 iToX

SummaryRF Recovery095 72.3 to965 94.1 to

Aroclor51.97033.63020.0539.556

283.664223.75237.474

205.970

9.55767.495

138.623146.524.

29.08626.29492.676

335.13319.73338.37614.4772.151

106.80715.40646.048

12.19662.002

1.2630.2450.1729.290

40.210

1.7341.0440.1701.1312.3222.504

=s===r==

4500.1

1254

0.7X3.8X4.6X2. OX2.3X0.5X2.1X

2.5X8.8X

2.7X

3.9X2. OX1.3X2.2X0.2X2.9X2.9X8.8X2.7X2.2X2.8X

2.7X1.5X

1.2X1.8X

51.

6. OX

2.4X

Aroclor168.59663.813

0.309

376.68061.798

444.390

2.502167.331

140.73595.067

235.218374.018270.253148.83810.63437.629

320.113148.550

70.79972.029

644.2629.324

16.7597.662

186.431351.438

74.5887.900

10.3423.910

51.260124.148

12601.6X.1.6X

2.6X0.6X1.7X

6.1X4.2%

1.4X3.9X

3. OX3.4X1.5X1.3X6.8X3.1X1.9%0.7%

2.6X2.3X4.4X4.7X3.5%5.7%2.4X5.6X2.7X8.7X6.9%3.7%2.4%3.6%

37.655 1.2X==============

5173.3 3. OX

Range Surr Crit113.8X ** Fails *112. 3X Passes...

CMC3OJoCDO

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.0838 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.4052.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT* 1.08891.

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR CALIBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142) (JDS)l6-DEC-93 19:01:.'

Page 172: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 9-Oec-1993 22:18 through 10-"biMC01:[8080] 05,06 09DEC932026METHOD: 8080 PCB:AH

RTx^Sec-1993 18:16.

Pei

Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations

JDS - HP2618

tf2345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243

6.2877.4099.6119.8529.90610.07811.29111.35311.60811.86312.39712.47612.69413.23113.37713.61913.73013.86913.98514.38014.49214.77015.02715.37215.49715.60815.73415.93916.26616.44116.61716.96517.13217.29217.43317.51917.60417.97218.35318.42018.69818.82718.917

Aroclor1.52437.93224.90920.12865.95213.6548.5442.07010.1543.0031.288

11.6153.5691.6560.5584.9326.2542.8104.8021.8913.9961.0450.1881.8953.8924.5680.9192.7761.8051.0810.1150.5330.8020.5031.3300.3770.7211.293

12216. IX4.3X5.2X6.3X2.4X6.4X12. 5X5.1X60.

6.2X14. 7X11. 9X11. 7X

6.4X7.3X

8.1X6.4X

4.3X

Aroclor1.54120.76916.89615.73462.05347.47228.8475.03139.4389.0074.87859.97220.4339.0343.29728.35227.99215.60332.96414.08028.0248.6051.07313.58527.69730.9883.18721.5829.0134.5730.6523.1384.6882.6667.6282.9013.1264.9590.3540.252

12327.5X3.1X4.2X8.4X3.4X1.7X1.3X30.1.5X14. 8X

6.3X5.4X1.5X5.7X1.2X16.1.4X0.9X3.7X1.8X4.2X6.3X3.5X2. IX4.5X4.1X2.5X

9.3X6.5X10.0X6.4X4. OX17.

Aroclor1.4311.1228.79112.39259.118104.67166.22911.58789.39019.98111.614150.58950.30823.6788.64070.37166.42242.47281.64536.06272.06718.6801.1256.90410.92716.6172.3311.070

0.078

10162.3X

2.8X

7.5X2.6X4.8X2.2X14. 4X1.8X7.5X4.1X6.5X6.1X2.6X5.8X4. IX11. IX2.7X1.4X2.6X1.9X2.8X10.4X5.1X3.7X7.4X

Aroclor1.5110.8576.5029.08243.85682.36951.7209.18969.78115.9708.863

112.25538.04118.9507.00256.19354.66433.53764.75529.14059.47417.0513.02731.20259.17766.9237.45547.56222.85013.2182.0359.45113.8368.72221.8586.9685.29815.1090.6720.509

12429. OX3. OX11. 4X4.3X3.2X1.9X10. 7X1.6X8.7X8.1X7.8X2.2X5. IX2.8X12.4%1.2X1.9X4.8X3.1X4.8X17.6.6X4.4X2.9X3.5X5.8X1.7X3.7X5.2X4.2X5.3X4.2X5.7X6.4X

Aroclor1.5350.7280.4072.4623.82044.6871.72028.7936.2261.72463.33218.32422.8019.083

105.76784.52549.191116.23041.90296.28027.1094.78754.416115.419132.31218.58085.01962.40035.1395.90227.00339.64124.889

67.46220.77713.32840.9551.7732.2501.689

12484.3*

8.0X

4.5X3.8X

2.3X32.

4.1X5.4X2. OX3.5X5. OX8.1X2.6X1.0X0.9X1.7X2.5X10. 1X4.5X3. OX0.9X2.6X5.2X3.3X7.6X2.6X1.5X2.3X1.8X2.8X2. OX

Aroclor1.5470.4232.5500.3631.1740.5861.0531.632

0.2230.9890.42984.93929.94046.3014.74317.2603.7540.72214.28856.571152.78525.91543.580190.99772.56911.32258.998111.22436.82420.524217.48646.777100.806138.47215.2267.54821.517

12544.9X

5.1X

3.8X20.

0.8X4.6X3.7X7. OX7.4X4.3X3.5X1.4X1.5X2.4X2.1X6.1X1.2X2.9X2.8X1.3X2.5X1.2X5. OX3.9X7.3X15.4.4X

Aroclor1.6090.5242.6810.4460.7970.5361.0061.8140.8180.2180.1364.827

0.7340.2140.4880.1400.2170.63359.9610.1129.33673.0340.1962.18611.638

35.96036.05788.205203.28713.7182.27233.404

12608.5*

6.5X

5. OX

2.4X3.6X2.7X

4.5X3. OX3.3X1.8X4.8X4. OX10.4X1.5X

COC5CMOOO

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.9903 and decachlorobiphenyl at 28.3545.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT* 1.06493.

Inchcape Testing ServicesAauatec Laboratories AROCLOR CALIBRATION 5.2-3H2AUG93 1142) (JDS)16-DEC-93 19:01:5

Page 173: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 9-Dec-1993 22:18 through 10-T>ec-MCD1:[8080] 05,06 09DEC932026METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN

1993 18:16. JDS - HP2618

Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations

V4546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576:ara

RT Aroclor 122119.105 0.16519.21119.266 0.44319.50519.57419.730 0.75619.80619.980 0.24620.23620.40620.49420.65120.84620.98921.22421.39821.53921.57121.74321.86421 .96522.06722.27822.46022.98423.13423.23923.41423.90224.45825.18925.41426.810 1.244rsssss EBSSBESSEESEEETotal: 257.9 4.7X

Aroclor 12321.763 5.6X

2.731 6.2X0.5390.3890.4220.2131.819 4.5X0.233

1.0320.5140.2990.1140.9710.5090.261

0.136

2.013 6.9X

0.887

0.5460.580

0.586

1.450BSSEBESSSSESaB

660.1 3.3X

Aroclor 1016 Aroclor 12422.232 8.4X

9.919 6.3X0.746

0.504 1.008 57.0.4174.204 4.6X0.372

0.0811.543

0.105

0.5970.142

0.209

0.216

1.470 1.385SEBEEESEESSEEE BSSEEE=S3!====E

1048.3 4.4X 1149.8 4.6X

Retention Time Marker/Surrogate StandardCompoundtetrachloro-meta-xylenedecachlorobiphenyl

Mean RT8.9903 -

28.3545 -

RT Oev. Range RT Crit. Mean.0170 to .0097 Passes... 3648..0167 to .0122 Passes... 2597.

Aroclor 12485.913 4.5X

29.409 5. OX2.461 10.8X

1.982 66.1.159

10.269 2.2X1.142

0.6850.4083.284 3.5X

0.6920.380

1.1980.3090.127

1.486

0.804

0.3360.355

0.309

1.435S2===S========

1544.5 3. IX

SummaryRF Recovery048 76.7 to843 94.6 to

Aroclor104.52475.576

34.269

14.64416.463

179.66316.606

10.9728.656

48.9032.349

13.3658.517

22.7445.5183.349

27.6481.1580.389

20.877

1.3391.7130.7880.7801.335

1.581========

2165.8

2.6X

2.1X

3. OX3.7X2.3X4.2X

5.3X5.1X2.5X

2.2X3.5X

4.8X8.3X7.7X

2.1X

2. OX

==:====2.8X

Aroclor228.79881.764

83.82358.8212.828

25.781235.34433.304

7.195147.85377.40320.80321.528

147.38881.58645.175

13.30724.9393.201

316.5734.1819.693

140.1506.920

70.60576.8163.855

29.10964.8664.037

21.632========2676.5

12602. OX1.3X

3.6X2.6X

3.7X3.4X1.4X6.4X2.3X1.3X2.9X2.4X1.2X1.0X2.3X

2.6X2.2X7.1X3.2X

11. 1X6. IX4. OX2.4X1.7X1.0X7.4X1.2X1.0X5.8X1.5X

======

2.8X

Range Surr Crit113. 6X **118. 1X **

Fails *Fails *

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.9903 and decachlorobiphenyl at 28.3545.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3} Quant Station is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT* 1.06493.

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR CALIBRATION 5.2-3(I2AUG93 1142) (JDS)16-DEC-93 19:01:f

Page 174: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

CH051209.XLS

CALIBRATION SUMMARYBACK CALCULATIONS

Lab ID:GC:

Col. 1 :Col. 2:

AQUATEC, INC.HP2618

RTX-35RTX-5

Calib date(s): 09-DEC-93 22:18

Rle:

10-DEC-93 18:16

05,06 09DEC932026

to

Standards

Aroclor 1016Cal Fact

%DiffAroclor 1221

Cal Fact% Diff

Aroclor 1232Cal Fact

%DiffAroclor 1 242

Cal Fact%Diff

Aroclor 1 248Cal Fact

% DiffAroclor 1 254

Cal Fact% Diff

Aroclor 1 260Cal Fact

% Diff

50PPb

53.61.072

-754.41.088

-953.01.060

-652.31.046

-551.11.022

-251.31.026

-349.40.988

1

100PPb

1011.010

-1105

1.050-5

1041.040

-497.8

0.9782

99.50.995

1100

1.0000

96.80.968

3

200PPb

2091.045

-5205

1.025-3

1840.920

8195

0.9753

2011.005

-1197

0.9852

1980.990

1

400ppb

4001.000

0402

1.005-1

4041.010

-1404

1.010-1

3970.993

1401

1.0030

3930.983

2

800ppb

7870.984

2783

0.9792

7890.986

1794

0.9931

7950.994

1800

1.0000

8121.015

-2

%RSD

3.5

4.1

5.4

2.9

1.2

1.5

1.7

Cal Fact = Calc. Cone. / Nominal Cone.

%RSD = STD Dev / Mean of Cal Fact

% Diff = (Nominal Amt-Calc Amt) / Nominal Amt* 100

Page 1 000279

Page 175: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCBCHST.XLT

. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY

Lab ID:GC:

Col. 1 iCol. 2:

Check

Check

Check

Check

Check

AQUATEC, INC.WP16/3 -"RTv-35" -^Tx- - 5~ -

Standard Rle: fl*T OL Whttl

Initial Calib.date/time: l2/^Vl3 0.21 "

3195-233 '' '

CompoundA\J « i-% ii A ^f\ \\. 1 Z i O ^^

NominalAmount (ppb)

Q.OO "

Standard Rle: £)£" />£, 1 t/DEd^^ R?"2 "34 '—— •« *t\lf ——— |_ii£ —— nr fc J —— t —— j —— -t—\ —————

CompoundAft Y2SH ^

NominalAmount (ppb)

•ZOO x-

Standard Rle: 05~ h(f ITDECI^I^^ (3 '-r" y •

CompoundAft niK ^

NominalAmount (ppb)2.00 ^

Standard Rle: ^5]^)^ \?"D6d^3l$06 14 ^/

CompoundAR \7.(,0 <r

NominalAmount (ppb)

2o<5 x'

Standard Rle: 65" 06 f5"D£<n3l8^6 2.^ ^y

CompoundAR ii^s x

NominalAmount (ppb)•zoo x-

H/ '0/13 ISI6'

Date:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

/11) x

Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

1ST *-

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)1 6^ x

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

IS'I x

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb).

1^0 x

iHH^ ^

% Diff.D.5- <

ll»K/«I5"2o

% Diff.5~.S"/

ia/i6/w01(7. x

% Diff.5T.5- -

/2//^/<?3-'OIH7 ,

% Diff.S7S- ,

/2//^J'0«5"f -

%Diff.6T.O .--

Page of000231

Page 176: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Lab ID:GC:_

Col. 11._Col. 2:

PCBCHST.XLT

. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY

AQUATEC, INC.Initial Calib.

date/time: (3/01/13fr/lfl/13

to

Check Standard File: OS M

Check Standard File:

27Date: [21 It faTime:

CompoundA"R lfll£ -~

NominalAmount (ppb)100 x-

Calc.Amount (ppb)

"2.60 •*•

% Diff .0.0 "

Date;Time:

CompoundAtt I2^S ^

NominalAmount (ppbj2,00 —

Calc.Amount (ppb)

113 '% Diff."3.-T -

Date:Check Standard Rle: OS. oG \SV£C<\3\$OC.

CompoundA* iaM2 -

NominalAmount (ppb)

"Zoo *•*

Calc.Amount (ppb)

Hi '% Diff.*f.O '

Check Standard File: UDate:Time:

CompoundAT? 124^ ^

NominalAmount (ppb)

"Z00 ^

Calc.Amount (ppb)

112 -%Diff.^.o x

Check Standard Rle: py.^ \(c^L.<\3\(\LiSJ

Date:Time:

Compound/WllffY ^

NominalAmount (ppb)2c>0 ^

Calc.Amount (ppb)./«" -

% Diff."T.S- -

Pace of 3

000282

Page 177: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCBCHST.XLT

- AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY

Lab ID: AQUATEC, INC.GC:

Col. 1fCol. 2:

Check

Check

Check

Check

Check

tf?26f«'RTX-3S1

KTV-5-

Initial Calib.date/time: lfl/flf/9"} i"2.ltf^

Standard Rle: 05*0£ I 6DE<^3 H</5T. IS /^^» X

CompoundAZ IT-1/

. NominalAmount (ppb)

"2-60 ^

Standard Rle: 06. f)6 I & DB^.^3 \°\ti£ [°( '" *

CompoundA^ Y^frO /

NominalAmount (ppb)2oo ^

Standard Rle:

CompoundNominal

Amount (ppb)

Standard Rle:

CompoundNominal

Amount (ppb)

Standard Rle:

CompoundNominal

Amount (ppb)

)ijln {^3 \$\6

Date:Time:

Calc. -Amount (ppb)

l?1 --

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

/^ | „

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb).

tit ft/13 'QS'iC s

% Diff.0*5~ '

^n/v-0611 "

% Diff.y.sr '

% Diff.

% Diff.

% Diff.

to

Page 3 of 3000233

Page 178: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:22.HCO1:18080] 03,04 07JAH941940METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN

RTX-5JDS - HP2087

Peak Response Factors and Relative DeviationsPeak «

2345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940

8.2609.5329.8119.84510.02710.65411.33211.39911.67611.95412.51412.60312.83713.42813.60313.87213.97514.12714.25914.69414.81815.12115.41215.90816.03316.17916.40816.76516.95717.14817.54617.72917.90818.06118.16618.25618.66719.08619.149

Aroclor 122123.954 5. OX6.445 6.9X15.955 3. OX13.090 2.4X41.889 0.9X0.7437.011 17.0.8205.519 5. OX0.9620.6586.780 4.8X2.3890.8300.2342.2092.0931.1882.235 9.4X1.1311.8820.4650.8741.7352.0060.3541.2050.8113.928

0.2880.3590.205

0.5320.123

Aroclor13.0004.01310.82710.42539.8132.25625.90616.3452.53821.1094.3132.60433.30011.6084.3941.48313.76412.1897.19115.6208.35013.2343.9056.26212.61413.9311.3259.8014.5031.9510.2981.4272.0501.1583.2351.1401.9442.656

12324.5X

2.6X2.8X2.4X3.6X5.7X12. 1X5.4X3.7X7.4X1.9X5. OX3.8X8. OX5.4X8.5X7.8X1.8X6.7X2.8X7.2X7.7X4.5X3.2X7. OX4.7X

Aroclor0.6215.7448.45938.5445.35058.23134.8685.99147.88910.4866.31282.38027.75211.7194.13034.80231 .93719.74039.03419.85033.5658.6623.1184.9527.3271.0400.4380.6463.650

1016

1.7X3.2X0.4X2.8X4.4X4.3X2. 8X1.7X4.4X5.5X3.9X4.4X2.2X6.2X2.7X3.4X2.6X2. IX3.5X2.5X6. OX11. IX7.8X3.2X

Aroclor0.5244.3056.45029.2974.36145.71027.3104.75837.1287.9274.79961.03720.7099.1543.23727.31824.76815.38230.14316.37127.1797.74414.13126.28428.9103.31121.24711.5615.8270.9374.1026.0663.864

9.3462.6956.295

1242

3.1X4.1X3. OX5.5X4.8X7.7X3.6X5.3X6.7X3.8X4.4X1.8X8.9X2.8X4.1X3. OX2.2X3.6X2.2X5.3X5.7X4.7X4.4X4.3X2.6X7.3X

7.4X6.2X7.6X5.4X

Aroclor0.1400.2341.5552.7811.21125.43510.7401.13915.9222.6350.87136.88310.78811.3694.36753.13840.56123.21955.34822.01345.00012.41224.89151.13456.7448.66837.65731.11118.5872.42311.24916.97010.68127.6538.10116.760

1248

7.9X7.9X2.3X

4.1X7.8X5.1X5.8X2.4X6.1X4.8X3.9X3. OX5. OX4. OX6.3X7.4X8.5X6.3X4.8X1.1X9.5X3.3X22.

5.6X5.6X6.4X

6.6X8.7X13. OX

Aroclor0.098

1.4440.1820.663

0.681

0.1210.4410.17940.79112.13021.6732.6408.0491.5476.60424.88467.47911.66118.77586.83032.1324.86224.42145.58116.1729.92285.14919.43445.86954.193

1254

6.6X

1.7X6.8X4.5X5.5X11. OX6.2%4. OX1.3X5.0%3. OX2.5X11. OX4.4X3.7X4.2%5.5%3.9X5.3X6.2X

Aroclor0.251

1.4820.2110.3730.4730.876

0.520

2.321

0.3150.252

0.27827.1574.03831.8884.6451.2965.24716.32715.35537.46183.032

1260

5.8X

4.1X5.9X4.4%

13. 4X1.3%6.9%2.9%4.7%

CO07o

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.8937 and decachlorobiphenyl at 29.1350.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT 1.07443.

Inchcape Testing ServicesAmiatec T.nborntories AROCLOR CALIBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142) (JDS)14-JAN-94 13:55:32

Page 179: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:22.NCD1:[80BO] 03,04 07JAN941940METHOD: 8080 PCB:AM

JDS • HP2087

Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations

**«4243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970

S*3S=a

RT Aroclor 122119.47319.70819.91720.04520.06220.09720.37120.44320.61720.70220.89821.18221.46821.64321.86922.02622.29022.48222.64022.67522.85723.00323.22823.66824.26024.53224.71825.74526.39927.811 0.598====== ==============

Total: 151.5 3.0%

Compoundtetrachloro-meta-xylenedecachlorobiphenyl

Aroclor 1232 Aroclor 1016 Aroclor

0.642

1.086

0.179

0.605

0.4030.177

0.3730.182

0.810

0.3520.2160.248

0.2450.713

ss=ss==sss=&348.7 4.

Mean RT8.8937

29.1350

0.777

3.8310.282

0.212

1.2420.135

0.496

0.657 0.586!S3 BSS===a===SS=S SS==SS===

5% 557.9 3.2% 567.8

Retention Time Marker/SurrogateRT Dev. Ranae RT Crit.

-.0137 to .0108 Passes...-.0150 to .0117 Passes...

1242 Aroclor 12480.8610.8612.150

11.147 10.2%0.955

0.3620.3833.407 12.6%0.4190.277

1.137

0.2790.140

0.448

0.608

0.3310.137

0.699===== ==============

4.0% 725.0 5.5%

Standard SummaryMean RF Recovery2132.442 82.5 to1319.215 91.1 to

Aroclor7.0368.588

38.335

35.726

13.063

5.3626.469

60.1806.3704.0923.214

17.251

5.0313.201

8.1722.1261.2669.888

7.8090.5680.6870.3270.5420.690

========

890.6

125413.7%

7.4%1.5%

2.8%

5.2%

8.8%6.3%1.9%8.6%9.8%

5.1%

3.6%8.2%

7.6%

2.1%

3.7%

======

3.9%

Aroclor 15.772 1

12.48883.68834.679

30.77627.542

10.49282.48713.89658.29130.5007.8528.771

57.51432.15318.276

5.6239.348

110.2904.391

50.51129.83832.58513.30728.28910.318

==========

1043.5

2601.4X8.6%2.5%3.6%

5.9%5.0%

9.2%5.9%4.9%2.5%2.2%7.1%6.2%1.8%1.6%3.4%

8.8%8.1%3.0%5.7%2.1%2.3%1.6%2.1%2.2%0.8%:====

3.9%

Range Surr Crit109.8% **131.2% **

Fails *Fails *

o0}COooCD

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.8937 and decachlorobiphenyl at 29.13SO.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/* 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitation is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT' 1.07443.

Inchcape Testing ServicesT .ahnrntories AROCLOR CALIBRATION 5.2-302AUG93 1142) (JDS)14-JAN-94 13:55:32

Page 180: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:22.NC01:[8080] 03,04 07JAN941940METHOD: 8080 PCB:AM

RTX-35

Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations

JDS - HP2087

Peak f23456789

1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738

6\7flf8.3688.7068.7419.1589.349

10.26110.66111.00511.32311.49711.60611.70112.44012.57712.71812.83913.08513.22813.29513.39313.49714.05514.17314.39914.48214.57414.94015.02815.13115.30515.47715.67415.73115.89016.10816.16616.500

Aroclor19.2465.130

12.4969.868

31.8370.4768.8810.5841.4662.3310.8680.5432.3980.6180.1301.3381.8011.621

0.7720.3031.7610.9250.4720.9700.4711.1000.6931.3191.1440.493

0.0980.390

0.9520.215

12217. IX5.8X

4.4X2.5X1.3X

4.4X

11. 3X

11.7X

Aroclor10.8964.202

8.7187.971

30.9821.708

27.4481.8046.5549.8043.5922.056

12.7713.0760.7537.825

10.9089.6605.2584.5411.757

12.4276.0983.8797.0933.3824.6593.7639.2848.7772.887

0.8301.962

7.5781.273

12328.4X6.7X

4.3X2.2X0.7X4.4X3.3X

4. OX3. OX6.6X

7.4X

8.9X1.2X2. OX

7.3X

3.8X1.9Xa.ox5.5X4.3X9.3X5.7X6.6X7. 8X5.8X

7.8X

Aroclor0.5654.016

4.6716.156

29.4774.138

59.0514.100

15.39922.3268.5254.893

30.7907.6782.318

19.36527.13824.77713.24011.8324.247

30.83614.1089.548

18.0778.5803.0656.9234.0502.5163.482

0.6450.125

0.2690.396

1016

6. OX

3.7X4.3X3.2X3.4X5.5X5.6X4.2X2.8X4.6X5.5X5.3X2.6X

11. OX9.4X3.1X3.3X

5.9X7.3X3. OX2.5X3.9X4.1X2.6X

5.6X6.8X

5.9X

Aroclor0.6453.174

3.5994.849

22.7533.175

46.5743.170

11.76617.2946.5223.620

23.2725.8271.630

14.39221.42419.49810.5289.3223.336

24.51411.7377.644

15.0047.123

10.6827.591

19.73818.5706.645

2.4885.315

16.9113.321

1242

7.0X

3.2X6.5X2. OX3.2X6.3X4.2X1.8X1.9X3.4X2.3X3.9X5.3X7.4X6.5X4.1X4.2X

7.5X

2.6X3.5X6.1X4. OX3.6X5.1X4.1X4.4X4. OX4.8X

4.9X

5.4X5.8X

Aroclor

0.1791.106

0.3752.0720.878

23.1740.7435.7256.1722.0760.758

10.8477.1242.1576.963

40.44931 .39316.54813.1344.678

43.08316.42012.76526.5709.546

20.76013.16139.38934.18717.786

6.36615.254

31.2289.583

1248

6.7X

10. 4X

5.8X

5.5X6. OX

14. 7X

8.7X1.9X7.3X

10. 7X3.1X2.3X5.3X4.5X7.7X4.2X3.1X5.7X6.4X1.4X

12. 7X5.3X7.4X7.9X2.6X

9.7X4.2X

10. 5X4.1X

Aroclor

1.046

0.150

0.888

0.108

0.1820.792

0.12030.8249.701

1.457

16.4362.1541.3395.547

5.480

18.9907.990

47.03911.81511.06753.83723.768

18.659

1254

2.7X

3.1X7.2X

3.5X

10. 3X

10. 3X

7.9X4.8%3.4X4.8X5.8X3.9X4.3X

3.6X

Aroclor

1.068

0.211

0.643

0.091

0.139

0.1031.675

0.278

0.106

0.2010.126

19.7853.029

22.338

1.004

1260

26.

4.3X5.7X

4.4X

27.

COooo

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 7.6321 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.7071.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitation is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.02960.

Inchcape Testing ServicesA nnofo^ T AROH OR rAURRATION 5.?.-3mATIO03 11421 (•JDS114-JAN-94 13:55:32

Page 181: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:22.MCD1:(80801 03.04 07JAN941940METHOD: 8080 PCS:AM

Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations

JOS - HP2087

Peak *— w4041424344•••f4546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667

16.74216.95717.18817.38517.56217.64517.88418.21618.23518 48818.71719.54519.64119.95320.09120.31820.51420.97121.45821.73121.91122.12222.85323.41023.57024.54725.04325.37026.563Total:

Aroclor 1221 Aroclor 12320

0.191 10.411 1

00.428 2

10

000

10

0

00

0.112 00

0.517 0

.226

.104

.569

.658

.507

.589

.551

.201

.395

.290

.225

.283

.681

.244

.408

.133

.218

.596115.4 3.9X 259.1 4.2%

Aroclor 1016 Aroclor 12420.3.4.2.7.

3.0.

0.1.

2.

0.

575204 4.9%243 13. OX127156 6.7X

752856

158115

033

147

0.126 0.090

0.562 0.408.0 4.4% 419

526?6 ZTix

Aroclor1.7709.14211.8416.97121.5890.08810.9420.5452.347

0.7802.7590.2700.3452.627

0.5910.1730.3330.127

1248

6.7X8. OX

12.8%8.2%

13. 3X

53.

0.600==============

546.5 6.2%

Aroclor3.49119.03433.4899.90667.3496.63148.6646.65333.01532.453

14.59549.5074.3646.3610.42119.5082.3519.4041.4846.3290.1320.2310.466

12548.85i5.7X7.1%12. 5X7.9%22.4.5%

9.9%6.3%6.4%13.8%7.3%

15.0%12.0%23.

4.6X

3.5X

0.617

Aroclor0.7393.93310.85730.97012.73565.34210.09767.55525.00520.11235.79854.94145.78224.4086.16456.25925.36214.14495.5852.96530.76254.9531.8919.87623.4578.740

~645l8 6~2% "789 2

1260

20.

5.5X7.7X3.7%

5.5%2.5%8.4%10.3%3.7%4.7%1.9%4.7%4.9%8.3%2.5%3.0%3.5%3.2%2.0%3.0%4.5%1.3%1.9%1.6%

"ZTlX

Compound____________ Mean RTtetrachloro-meta-xylene 7.6321decachlorobiphenyl 27.7071

Retention Time Marker/Surrogate Standard SummaryRT Crlt.RT Dev. Range

-.0165 to .0146-.0182 to .0129

Passes...Passes...

Mean RF1669.9871153.447

Recovery Range74.8 to 108.3%90.2 to 127.9X

Surr Cn't** Fails *** Fails *

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 7.6321 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.7071.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quant1 tation is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.02960.

Inchcape Testing Services

Page 182: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

CH030107.XLS

CALIBRATION SUMMARYBACK CALCULATIONS

Lab ID: AQUATEC, INC.GC:

Col. 1:Col. 2:

HP2087RTX-5

RTX-35

Calib date(s): 01/08/94 03:5401/09/94 01:22

Rle: 03, 04 07JAN941940

to

1

'1

Standards

Aroclor 1016Cal Fact

% DiffAroclor 1221

Cal Fact%Diff

Aroclor 1 232Cal Fact

%DiffAroclor 1 242

Cal Fact%Diff

Aroclor 1248Cal Fact

% DiffAroclor 1254

Cal Fact%Diff

Aroclor 1 260Cal Fact

% Diff

50PPb

50.31.006

-154.71.094

-939.10.782

2243.60.872

1350.51.010

-147.30.946

550.61.012

-1

100PPb

97.70.977

299.00.990

187.90.879

1298.60.986

195.60.956

496.9

0.9693

99.90.999

0

200PPb

2061.030

-3199

0.9951

1840.920

8211

1.055-6

2051.025

-3197

0.9852

2021.010

-1

400PPb

3960.990

1402

1.005-1

4071.018

-2394

0.9852

3720.930

7412

1.030-3

3870.968

3

800ppb

8011.001

0792

0.9901

7880.985

2797

0.9960

8241.030

-3797

0.9960

8111.014

-1

%RSD

2.0

4.4

10.1

6.8

4.5

3.2

1.9

Cal Fact = Calc. Cone. / Nominal Cone.

%RSD = STD Dev / Mean of Cal Fact

% Diff = (Nominal Amt-Calc Amt) / Nominal Amt* 100

Page 1 000280

Page 183: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCBCHST.XLT

. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY

Lab ID:GC:

Col. 1f_Col. 2:

AQUATEC, INC.Initial Calib.

date/time: Q l 0 3 f Y 03S''/ to

Check Standard Rle; Ql OH——Date: o i/I a/Time:

Compound/R 124? X

NominalAmount (ppb)a oo x

Calc.Amount (ppb)

|7<? s"% Diff.\s.o -

Check Standard Hie: ffb.OH f2JW/fS42. 26Date;Time:

CompoundXR /0/6 x'

NominalAmount (ppb)200 X

Calc.Amount (ppb)

/SO x^

% Diff.IO.O <•

Check Standard File: (ft. (ft

Check Standard nie: 03

Check Standard Rle:

Date:Time: 231?

Compound4R f2V« /"

NominalAmount (ppb)200 /

Calc.Amount (ppb)l« x

% Diff.1.1.0 "

Date: Qi/>3/'?t/ ^Time: .35"7 X

Compoundy4K\1fl

NominalAmount (ppb)200 ^

Calc.Amount (ppb)177 -x-

% Diff.'H,s ^

Date:Time:

CompoundNominal

Amount (ppb)Calc.

Amount (ppb). % Diff.

Page of

000284

Page 184: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

BLASLAND ft BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.O.6723 Towpath Road. Box 66Syracuse, New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX 315-449-0017 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDPROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME

SAMPLERS:

STA.NO. DATE TIME o STATION LOCATION REMARKS

TBifao-t

TBlMO-t

TB1A0-*T&SAil-l /oka KIZOI*

TBJAH-Z u*TBlAH-3 7/0/13

TBsAl\-1

TBSAlt'-S '/»/,*D- 1

RB-i r-oo k /3 /+, n /<

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE

Inqulshed by: (Signature) DATE

TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature)

Received by: (Signature)

DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

TIME Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received for Laboratory by:(Signature)

DATE TIME

/Zoo

Remarks:*

*vv o if7/12/9313837B6HCOR Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files

Page 185: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

.//T

BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.C.6723 Towpath Road, Box 66Syracuse, New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017

/

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD -Jo/Js(t<<PROJ.NO. PROJECT NAME

XcJo.n~o.ti oo J?. e »- S-fr* J^,SAMPLERS: ture)

STA.NO. DATE TIME STATION LOCATION REMARKS

K /toK.I1O T.&

"/»/<** VZ0Z.7

KiZov.lt

713*43- /

lt.a3O

TBSA3-3D-l KllOlz.

/OZQ3»

Relinquished by: '(Signature) DATE

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE

TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature)

Received by: (Signature)

DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

TIME Relinquished by: (Signature) •DAfr TIME Rellnqulshed by: (Signature)

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received (or Laboratory by:(Signature)

DATE TIME Remarks:

7/12/931393786HCOR Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files

Page 186: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

F-0430

AQUATEC SAMPLE LOG-IN SHEET

fj.Kv.rn., Aquatec. Inc. Pag. I «r /

Recebed By (Print Name): Poun<=ls-LO«£. Log-in Date:.

JSample DeUrery

CLIENTSAMPLE

1

CORRESPONDING

SAMPLETAG

ASSIGNEDLABf

REMARKS:CONDITIONOF SAMPLE

SHIPMENT, ETC.

REMARKS:

1. Custody SealOO

2. Custody Seal Nos.:

3. Chain-of-CnstodyRecords

4. Sample InformationSheets

5.Airbffl

6. Airbill No.:

7. Sample TagsSample TagNumbers

8. Sample Condition:

9. Does information oncustody records, sampleinformation sheets, andsample tags agree?

ki-zo fto taK.I'ZOl'5

KI-2017

04-ib O'oli

PjaeetttfAbsent*)

Kl'iOZ

ot Listed)[oaCnain-of-j —

10.111. Time Recdred:

KI10Z7

*r ZO4-3II x« ** f S9

As t-tjut e/ j's

A cA.A4AA.-oA -

204- -i 16

20^3)7

A** tdfsif c c

o/

6& f 1 £ x SV*A /tt-i. f cf , 4 O

f3/a.t

Oft COO f '4 si

\F V-

Sample Transfer

rv.. "//»/**

30 H5204-^30 M

MSB

* Contact Project Director.

Reviewed by: Logbook No:.

Logbook Pag* No:.

001327

Page 187: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

SD6, :

aquatec INC.• An Inchcapr Company

55 SOUTH PARK DRIVE. COLCHESTER. VT 05446

Page _' of /

Discrepancies between sample bottles/labels and C-of-C

C • o " C so a. >*^>\. S3 •{ t so s° o -e

JC 1*2-01'*> - / •

C " o -

"//f/11

001328

Page 188: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

"HO *'*"HH) "" '%;n<J» •-

SPIKED BY:WITNESSED BY:

CUeMU

mix

20pn

s

Tran

sf

.0 n

dSO

. Is

0.45

goI«tf

II5. 6. 7. I. 9.1

1•

10.

1>n

11.1

O

O

h&

0 m

l

ml t

o n-up H O

S*

I" .*T 11 i

"lS. 16. 17.

ai

18.1 2^00

1316

z xXX.X

K 10.0lo,o Nl \

20*4318 X10.0 Xlao y/ X10.010.0 //,10,010.0 y^ Xy\/

icl 10.0 v3.0H32& 10.0204333 10.0

10.0 v X^20^/331 7(0.0 V V

f'. Aquatec, Inc. - Extraction worksheet - printed by: IKZ on 11-16-9308:59:34 f7.-QjCf'3 'indicates numeric field

i i i • i i i

Page 189: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

METHOD:8080 PCB-.l MATRIX: SOIL

.0ml

SDG:_Jp7Ji: DATE; l-lf-

ANALYST; *g S^SPIKED BY:____WITNESSED BY:

1•

UbnoipkU g\ Client Id8 |5 Si

1. 2. 3.1 4.1 5.

uth

N

ct to

a

.45 u

m

Ehrte

e

Conc

e

Fille

r t

ml w

/

LlVEL: LOW —— ——

N

: 3J*—-

•ato

«. 9.1 10.i l

11.1 12.

fi

I.--B13.1

.14.1 15. 16. .17. 1S.I 19.1

SKI :A ^^

i.,r -. pYinrtlrm wnrk<ih<et - prinlerf hv: IKZ on 01-11-9416:09:24

Page 190: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

^Ho*34•ATE:

ANALYST:__SPIKED BY:WITNESSED BY: JdL^

labile Id*™ Client Id

1 "^ T..V H

1 Ib I

3J

0113.1

0 m

l 50.

0

6 hn

w/l:

lto

t*

j

"I f""'^ ••* .•

X J H'.a 3 3

III.;6. 7. ». 9.*

f- '-

1

1S

10. 11./II12.

O13.1 14.*

II I M15. 16. 17.

33

1S.I

COr-!CO

S<=>l

19.1

xo.o V \/ J. y v/

,• X

Aqustec. Inc. - Extraction worksheet - printed by: WMAon 12-06-93 07:28:17I I ' I -T———|———I———I———I————|————[— I t --r -1—1-1- -i—i—i

^_ \

Page 191: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

)08f —B:E MA \: j>"

i ANALYST; W/MA-SPIKEDBY:

Aqutlee, Inc. - Extraction worksheet — printed by: JKZ on 12-16-9309:01:13i • • i i i i i i i

Page 192: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

<;3 s

\

\\

\

.—r

\

\

\

?*

\

-c

o

\

\

A

\

Sample Volume (1000ml)

_pH between 5 «nd 9

„ 100 ul 0.2pT^g?1 I»w 100 ul 6.0 ppm AK1242/12M matrix»Mtxk)t»__________

fHex exchan(e

. Cone to 2-3 ml

Sulfuric Acid

„ Cone to 1.0ml

3 jm i3)c* (cl i^ Silic* gel Lot*.

H in i

P Cone to 1.0ml

320

n

K>

T

Page 193: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories

53 South Park DriveColchester. VT 05446Tel. 802-655-1203Fax. 802-655-1248

January 24, 1994

Ms. Laurie JohnstonBlasland & Bouck Engineers6723 Towpath Road, Box 66Syracuse, NY 13214

Re: Analytical Results-Kalamazoo SiteAquatec Project No. 91082Case No. PCS; SDG No. 40738______

Dear Ms. Johnston:

Enclosed are the analytical results for samples received intactby Aquatec on November 13, 1993. The analyses for these sampleswere performed in accordance with the methodologies specified inthe Quality Assurance Project Plan. Laboratory numbers andquality control samples were assigned as follows:

ClientSample ID

AquatecLab No.

K12031K12032K12034K12035K12036K12037MSK12037MSDK12037REPMSBK12038K12039K12040K12041

204335204336204337204338204339204340MS204340MD204340DP204341204342204343204344204345

SampleMatrix

Samples Received on November 13, 1993ETR No. 40738

SoilSoilSoil-Soil <Z-\oSoilSoilSoilSoilSolid.SoilSoilSoilSoil

KB0005130

ooooo,

Page 194: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Ms. Laurie JohnstonJanuary 24, 1994Page 2

Low surrogate recoveries for tetrachloro-ia-xylene were observedfor sample labeled K12038. The sample was re-extracted outsideof the prescribed holding time and reanalyzed with all recoverieswithin the limits. Both sets of analyses have been included inthis case submittal.

Samples in this delivery group were reported as the best match tocombinations of the seven Aroclor standards. In general, thestandard Aroclors are sufficiently unique to provide preciseidentifications and quantitations of complex mixtures withminimal weathering. For highly altered samples, certain subtleidentification distinctions, such as the difference between 1016and 1242 become less precise. In all cases, quantitation remainshighly reliable.

Sincerely,

AjS-/U————

Karen R. ChirgwinLaboratory Operations Director

KRC/jg

Enclosure

91082B2DEC93

KB0005131

Page 195: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

AROCLOR SURROGATE RECOVERY

Lab Name:Lab Code:SAS No.:

Aouatec. Inc.AQUAI

Contract:Case No.:SDG No.:

?C6

123456789

1011121314151617181920

EPASAMPLE NO.

?BLk£HK I103S-fBLkEZ.KI203(Kn.032.kU034KQ034K \1037K ao37tfSJC12.0VVVSD/A6BKI2033K»2G31KllOHOXuOHlPSU^BKl7038Rt-

S1(TCX) #

H4 *' 65"-8H-<^Z D

6^ D•^61 D.'^7.-gs-'^3 D.pa Dr ^5^ $• f * -'SI• <&<,^««-^o -1- <?3

S2(DEC) #

- 77go

,n-IB D- US' 5>- IIST D.- ^2,

^2.- W b.

3$ D- (02 f c -

92.-10'I*' ^' IOH

M*

5152

(TCX)(DEC)

Tetrachloro-meta-XyleneDecachlorobiphenyl

PROJECT SPECIFICQC LIMITS(60-150)(60-150)

# Column to be used to flag recovery values* Values outside of QC limitsD Surrogates calculated using diluted analysis.A - Extracted surrogates diluted out, surrogates added to

diluted extract as retention time markers.

page of \

KB0005138

OOOOC'9

Page 196: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

SOIL AROCLOR MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE RECOVERY

Lab Name:Lab Code:SAS No.:'

Aquatec, Inc.AQUA1

EPA Sample No.;

Contra ccCase No.:SDG No.:'

P<iB

CompoundAroclor 1242Arodor1254

SPIKEADDED(UG/KG)ism *7Stl '

SAMPLECONCENTRATION

(UG/KG)0.0 '

^os=- acw.7

MSCONCENTRATION

(UG/KG)3S"7$71S3

MS

REC #*/7 -13 -

QCLIMITSREC.

39-15029-131

crs. ..

CompoundArodor1242Arodor12S4

SPIKEADDED(UG/KG)HU '1M66 X

MSDCONCENTRATION

(UG/KG)•371 16m /

MSD |%. 1REC # 1 RPD *

SI '| «io ^| /S" ^

QCLIMITS

RPD3030

QCLIMITSREC.

39-15029-131

# Column used to flag recovery and RPD values with an asterisk* Values outside of QC limits

RPD: 0Spike Recovery:

out of 2____ outside limitsout of 4 outside limits

Comments:

KB0005139

000009

Page 197: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

3EAROCLOR

MATRIX SPIKE BLANK RECOVERY

Lab Name:Lab Code:SAS No.:

Aouatec. Inc.AQUAI

Contract:Case No.:SDG No.: M0733

EPA Sample No.; MSB

CompoundAroclor 1 242Aroclor 1254

SPIKEADDED{UG/KG)SOOo£000 /

MSBCONCENTRATION

(UG/KG)Ho$146SI '

MSB%

REC 912. 'W '

QCLIMITS

REC.39-15029-131

# Column used to flag recovery and RPD values with an asterisk' Values outside of QC limits

Spike Recovery: 0 out of z- outside limits

Comments:

KB0005140

000010

Page 198: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY

Lab Name:Lab Code:

Lab Sample ID:Matrix: (soil/water)

Date Extracted:Date Analyzed(l):Time Analyzedd):

GCIDd):GC Columnd):

e:e:D:sr)d:1):I):1):1):

123456789

1011121314151617181920212223242526272829.30

Aauatec. Inc.AOUAI

15*552 ^PRLktz)^c<\

n/n/13 „a/ (5/13 -CWfHP16/8 -

RTv- 3? x

LAB ID20^335" <201336101331704331d0V:W020H3HOM5 -•2.0f340MS?20T3HI2.04 3fia 043^33.01 3HH2013^5"

.-

CLIENT IDkiao.3iKi1<?3lkii<?34K»2036 'KQ037K>ic>37MS -K \zo37MST) x

MSBKI203?KH031fcdOHOKlIO^I'

*

Contract:Case:

SDG No:LeveHL/M):

Date Analyzed(2):Time Analyzed(2):

GC ID(2):GC Column(2):

DATEANALYZED 1IV (5713(V/5-/13l2//ff/131 1/ IS"/ 13ill IS 1 33IX/'SV^il/l^/O12/15/13\"Ll\^l^2>t"2-//S7^3d/ Iff/13(2//S-/^3

?CB4073^to*tZ/ /5/1304^VHP2£^RTx-S~

DATEANALYZED 2/2 //5"/^3

: /^ / / ^ "_ /^3/2. //^ /*i3/ 2. / / 6"/*7 /.2 1 11^ 1*) 312.' 1 l^ /°)T,f2 / /T / ^ -?/Z llT 1*)^/2/l*5 /•=) ^ii-Li£lai.~>fZ ) /s""/^3»z //^ /^^

page of

KB0005H2

000012

Page 199: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

EPA SAMPLE NO.

91082

SOIL10.01.0

(g)(uL)

1.0100

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAIPBLKEZ

PCB SDG: 40738

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

195552

11/17/9312/15/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1 221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U

KB0006122

000980

Page 200: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Lab Name:Lab Code:

Lab Sample ID:Matrix: (soil/water)

Date Extracted:Date Analyzed! 1):Time Analyzed! 1):

GCIDd):GC Columnd):

FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY

Aauatec. Inc.AQUA!

HP 3-037

Contract: _Case:

SDG No:"LevellL/M):"

Date Analyzed(2):Time Analyzed(2):

GC ID{2}:"GC Co!umn(2):

OlViHP 2 0«7

LAB ID CLIENT IDDATE

ANALYZED 1DATE

ANALYZED 2123456789

1011121314151617181920212223242526272829.30

OOH341R1 ' <tt£?3l4*B. /

'

Oi/i3/?f ' OI/I3/W '

-

page i of \KB0005141

000011

Page 201: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.

Contract:

Phase Type:Phase Weight:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

% Solids:

91082

SOIL10.01.0

(g)(uL)

1.0100

Lab Code:

Case:

AQUAI

PCB

EPA SAMPLE NO.

PBLKGB

SDG: 40738

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

202454

12/22/9301/13/94

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U

KB0006111

Page 202: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Lab Name:Lab Code:

Lab Sample ID:Matrix: (soil/water)

Date Extracted:Date Analyzed^):Time Analyzed(l):

GCIDd):GC Column t1):

FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY

Aouatec. Inc.AQUAI

U/lS/13

Contract:Case:

SDG No:"LeveKL/M):'

Date Analyzed{2):Time Analyzed(2):

KBHQ73?

0333

HPGCID(2); HP

GC Column(2): P>T>Vry-3£

LAB ID CLIENT IDDATE

ANALYZED 1DATE

ANALYZED 2123456789

1011121314151617181920212223242526272829.30

2CimS -

••

KU03S"

'•

I1//S/43 lV/5/43 x

-

*

page of f. KB0005143

000013

Page 203: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET

Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.Contract: 91082

Lab Code:Case:

AQUAI

PCB

EPA SAMPLE NO.

PBLK6H

SDG: 40738

Phase Type:Phase Volume:

Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:

Water10001.0

(mL)(uU

1.0

Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:

Sulfur Clean-up:

202110

11/18/9312/15/93

N (Y/N)

CAS NO.

12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5

COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/U Q

Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260

0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U

KB0006137

0009SM

Page 204: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 9-Dec-1993 22:18 through 10-DMCD1:[80BO] 05.06 09DEC932026METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN

iec-1993 18:16.RTx-35

JDS - HP2618

Peak Response Factors and Relative DeviationsPeak 0

234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950

RT7.1307.8838.0138.7218.7889.1349.1569.5589.74210.61110.80811.00011.32111.62311.70811.78311.89211.98112.66612.79612.92713.03313.26913.39913.47213.55513.64614.16014.27114.47614.55514.64114.97315.05215.14715.30615.46615.64715.70415.84216.04316.08716.24016.39416.61316.80816.92217.01617.19617.356

Aroclor83.5590.91323.42711.18022.71960.47946.707150.5922.6407.18144.8902.5008.0124.58912.5354.4952.81015.6852.3261.1638.83910.88315.3493.7243.6661.21810.8524.2352.9375.4502.1245.0652.4129.2868.0982.2390.4170.7902.8246.778

1.3020.1651.197

2.6681.0822.990

1?2L11. IX8. OX5.5X0.9X3.3X1.6X1.9X2.5X6.7X5.5X33.6.7X12. 5X

5.7X3. OX

5.9X2.4X55.7. IX1.8X10. 8X6.6X12. 7X

2.1X3.3X4.7X

6.9X

4. IX

7.3X

4.4X

Aroclor48.3340.50714.6087.28518.72642.80437.614146.5738.7085.777

130.5838.79734.1275.39848.95818.83910.39975.84212.3044.77748.35160.38758.17820.88120.7866.84571.78827.33921.52738.96314.70031.73518.01861.82457.24012.3322.4525.04512.60452.7790.1606.9291.1286.8440.8359.9475.53616.814

123214. 5X4.7X3.3X2.8X1.9X4.9X3.2X8.4X8.6X5.4X5. OX1.5X4.5X1.8X1.7X3. IX1.1X0.2X15.3.5X3.5X17.2.7X1.4X3.2X0.8X1.2X1.6X2. IX2.3X.5X.3X.3X.8X.4X

8.3X1.3X3. OX3.6X5.5X2.7X1.5X0.6X

Aroclor5.029

4.77917.66323.67729.760141.54519.9382.147

278.39919.75178.477109.19843.72424.395176.54830.67212.256116.744147.371136.77854.43456.05217.233172.64166.59151.92798.64438.37316.78536.24524.03415.76918.7714.0711.1721.9362.200

1.506

101686.

17.3.6X2.5X4.1X3.7X5.1X6.1X3.4X1.5X3.1X2. OX3.2X1.6X4.4X9.6X4.9X5. IX10. 7X3. OX3.4X2.1X.4X.3X.2X.9X.7X.ax

2. OX1.6X2.7X1.8X7.8X23.5.9X2.2X

Aroclor4.7355.1713.41213.94518.61423.283108.20215.6421.572

219.03815.47960.88185.76833.79218.469136.48624.4599.60888.027116.782112.44842.84344.05013.661137.90353.34841.47982.21131.15769.79134.581127.452119.20628.7276.46712.97531.635114.1490.67617.7483.47919.5653.12625.96616.89546.473

124278.

4. OX2.9X2.7X4.4X3.3X2.3X5.9X1.0X2. IX2.2X2.4X3.7X1.7X3.9X5.9X4.8X4.4X13. 7X2.5X2.7X2.3X1.5X2.4X2.9X2.9X2.6X1.9X2. OX1.8X2.6X2.6X4.9X2.7X5.1X3.4X10. OX2.9X2.8X2.1X1.9X

Aroclor2.840

0.4561.0026.618

2.00811.3834.699

110.0354.17330.1365.08131.54911.5333.28263.80934.22811.97143.197216.065172.90868.49260.66218.263236.81977.72070.219145.16738.926122.90655.933248.818214.54682.33519.18831.43189.352202.5652.05751.27510.53255.4718.13574.35047.885138.055

1248

73.

5.4X38.2.6X10. 2X6.8X7.4X1.6X2.3X2.6X1.1X1.3X1.6X4.2X3.4X3.1X5.8X9.4X3. OX4.4X3.3X2. OX1.9X1.3X1.5X1.4X0.6X2.1X0.6X2. IX4.2X2.4X2.8X3.9X4.8X4.5X2.4X5.2X2.3X5.8X0.7X0.7X0.5X

Aroclor3.0216.2360.743

6.2720.9650.8520.3504.9540.109

. 0.6144.5651.1690.1821.5224.4700.6830.950

169.14860.153

4.6691.09693.2608.1927.66432.96034.7578.940

128.74646.171249.38464.69349.518319.656140.301

5.717101.44820.819115.698209.39269.810431.460

1254

4.3X

39. -

4.4X

8.7X

4. IX21.4.5X0.9X2.3X4.7X2.4X1.0X1.3X1.6X0.9X3.4X1.3X1.7X3.2X1.8X5.1X2.4X1.9X1.2X2.6X2. OX1.8X

Aroclor3.1157.5250.5760.1076.6360.5381.2520.3963.6430.1120.5053.261

0.2151.2810.2370.2820.75110.20113.3980.4540.1891.7210.5980.3780.6990.2480.7460.3291.7281.140

110.31617.242141.118

1.316

5.8890.3684.55823.7880.32971.089

1260

4.9X

73.

5.8X

3.9X

5.2X2.6X2.7X2.5X

4.7X5.5X1.9X1.9X

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.0838 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.4052.2) Peaks chosen within window of «•/• 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.08891.

CDT—I

ooo

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALJBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)

KB0005293

(SJF)14-DEC-93 17:45:07

Page 205: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Arocior uaiioration nummaryCalibration of 9-Dec-1993 22:18 through 10-Dec-1993 18:16.MC01:[8080] 05.06 09DEC932026METHOD: 8080 PCS:AN

IV i \-JJJDS - HP2618

Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviationsik nTT525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990

KT17.43817.65317.72617.78917.89217.96018.19218.40318.56318.58218.97519.10119.14819.24219.28519.43619.51719.63519.84720.01920.17220.43920.86221.11321.17921.19321.27921.45721.65222.12622.41322.62022.75622.84423.26923.66624.05324.18824.53125.970

Total:

Compound

Arocior 12211.101

0.107

1.785 6.2X0.963

0.386

1.601

0.880

0.0880.465

1.139

0.116

0.809

2.008

636.4 4.4X

tetrachloro-meta-xylenedecachlorobiphenyl

Arocior 1232 Arocior 1016 Arocior

0.1930.547

8.788 27.408 40.4173.790 40.269

7.601 13

1.023

0.0851.4532.917 51.8711 .927 60

0.2082.256 60.837

0.4700.3404.093 6

0.100

1.5162.300 50.470

0.927 340.1610.3390.9962.368

1428.6 3

Mean RT8.0838

27.4052

0.5990.1832.679

.1X 0.339 31.772

.1X 16.8370.754

.OX 5.7060.968

.3X 24.228

1.3940.8571.746

.2X 8.2290.194

1.218 2.2880.317

.8X 2.569

1.222

0.915.IX 0.861

.8X 0.415

1.378 O.B34

2.115 6.6X 2.094

.OX 2103.8 3.9X 2347.5

Retention Time Marker/SurrogateRT Dev. Range RT Crit.

-.0127 to .0118 Passes...-.0141 to .0148 Passes...

1242

11. 8X

2.3X3.8X

4.4X

3.'6X

4.1X

65.

7. OX

3.7X

Arocior 1248

2.2627.741 6

86.747 049.341 12.296 9

14.855 12.650 4

6.23267.763 2

3.1562.097 185.158 8

19.170 21.4764.794 690.7130.1326.849 30.6632.549 11

0.3493.533 6

0.9031.827 100.294

1.009 420.1870.2160.5792.374

3236.0 3

.3X

.8X

.OX

.8X

.8%

.2%

.OX

.

.OX

.6X

.

.6X

.5X

.5X

.3X

t

.OX

Arocior51.97033.63020.0539.556

283.664223.75237.474

205.970

9.55767.495

138.623146.524

29.08626.29492.676

335.13319.73338.37614.4772.151

106.80715.40646.048

12.19662.002

1.2630.2450.1729.290

40.210

1.7341.0440.1701.1312.3222.504

4500.1

1254

0.7X3.8X4.6X2. OX2.3X0.5X2.1X

2.5X8.8X

•.2.7X

3.9X2. OX1.3X2.2X0.2X2.9X2.9X8.8X2.7X2.2X2.8X

2.7X1.5X

1.2X1.8X

51.

6. OX

2.4X

Arocior168.59663.813

0.309

376.68061.798

444.390

2.502167.331

140.73595.067

235.218374.018270.253148.83810.63437.629

320.113148.550

70.79972.029

644.2629.324

16.7597.662

186.431351.43874.5887.900

10.3423.910

51.260124.14837.655

5173.3

12601.6X1.6X

2.6X0.6X1.7X

6.1X4.2X

1.4X3.9X

3. OX3.4X1.5X1.3X6.8X3. IX1.9X0.7X

2.6X2.3X4.4X4.7X3.5X5.7X2.4X5.6X2.7X8.7X6.9X3.7X2.4X3.6X1.2X

3. OX

Standard SummaryMean82644722

RF Recovery.095 72.3.965 94.1

toto

Range Surr Crit113. 8X ** Fails *112.3X Passes...

o

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.0838 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.4052.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT' 1.08891.

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CAUBRATION 5.2-3(!2AUG93 1142)

KB0005294

(SJF)14-DEC-93 17:45:07

Page 206: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 9-Dec-1993 22:18 through 10-1)

RTx-5MCD1:18080) 05,06 090EC932026METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN

iec-1993 18:16.

Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations

JDS - HP2618

Peak #2345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243

RT6.2877.4099.6119.8529.90610.07811.29111.35311.60811.86312.39712.47612.69413.23113.37713.61913.73013.86913.98514.38014.49214.77015.02715.37215.49715.60815.73415.93916.26616.44116.61716.96517.13217.29217.43317.51917.60417.97218.35318.42018.69818.82718.917

Aroclor1.52437.93224.90920.12865.95213.6548.5442.07010.1543.0031.28811.6153.5691.6560.5584.9326.2542.8104.8021.8913.9961.0450.1881.8953.8924.5680.9192.7761.8051.0810.1150.5330.8020.503

1.3300.3770.7211.293

1PJ«6.1%4.3X5.2X

6.3X2.4X6.4X

12.5%5.1X60.

6.2X14. 7X11. 9X

11. 7X

6.4%

7.3X

8. IX6.4X

4.3X

Aroclor1.54120.76916.896

15.73462.05347.47228.6475.03139.4389.0074.87859.97220.4339.0343.29728.35227.99215.60332.96414.08028.0248.6051.07313.58527.69730.9883.18721.5829.0134.5730.6523.1384.6882.666

7.6282.9013.1264.9590.3540.252

12327.5X3. IX4.2%

8.4X3.4X1.7X1.3X30.1.5X14.8%

6.3X5.4X1.5X5.7X1.2X16.1.4X0.9X3.7X1.8X4.2X6.3X3.5X2.1X4.5X4.1X2.5X

9.3X6.5X10. OX6.4X4. OX17.

Aroclor1.4311.1228.791

12.39259.118104.67166.22911.58789.39019.98111.614150.58950.30823.6788.64070.37166.42242.47281.64536.06272.06718.6801.1256.90410.92716.6172.3311.070

0.078

10162.3X2.8X

7.5X2.6X4. 8X2.2X14.4%1.8X7.5X4.1X6.5X6.1X2.6X5.8X4.1X

11.1%2.7X1.4X2.6X1.9X2.8X10.4%5.1X3.7X7.4X

Aroclor1.5110.8576.5029.08243.85682.36951.7209.18969.78115.9708.863

112.25538.04118.9507.00256.19354.66433.53764.75529.14059.47417.0513.02731.20259.17766.9237.45547.56222.85013.2182.0359.45113.8368.72221.8586.9685.29815.1090.6720.509

WL9. OX3. OX

11.4%4.3X3.2X1.9X10. 7X1.6X8.7X

8.1X7.8X2.2X5. IX2.8X12.4%1.2X1.9X4.8X3. IX4.8X17.6.6X4.4X2.9X3.5X5.8X1.7X3.7X5.2X4.2X5.3X4.2X5.7X6.4X

Aroclor1.5350.7280.4072.4623.82044.6871.72028.7936.2261.72463.33218.32422.8019.083

105.76784.52549.191116.23041.90296.28027.1094.78754.416115.419132.31218.58085.01962.40035.1395.90227.00339.64124.88967.46220.77713.32840.9551.7732.2501.689

12484.3X

8. OX

4.5X3.8X

2.3X32.

4. IX5.4X2. OX3.5X5. OX8.1X2.6X1.0X0.9X1.7X2.5X10. 1X4.5X3. OX0.9X2.6X5.2X3.3X

7.6X2.6X1.5X2.3X

1.8X2.8X

2. OX

Aroclor1.5470.4232.5500.3631.1740.586

1.0531.632

0.2230.9890.42984.93929.94046.3014.74317.2603.7540.72214.28856.571152.78525.91543.580190.99772.56911.32258.998111.22436.82420.524217.48646.777100.806138.47215.2267.54821.517

12544.9X

5.1X

3.8X20.0.8X4.6X3.7X7.0X7.4X4.3X3.5X1.4X1.5X2.4X2.1X6.1X1.2X2.9X2.8X1.3X2.5X1.2X5. OX3.9X7.3X15.4.4X

Aroclor1.6090.5242.681

0.4460.7970.5361.0061.8140.8180.2180.136

4.827

0.7340.2140.4880.1400.2170.63359.9610.1129.33673.034

0.1962.18611.638

35.96036.05788.205203.28713.7182.27233.404

12608.5%

6.5X

5. OX

2.4X3.6X2.7X

4.5X3. OX3.3X1.8X4.8X

4. OX10.4%1.5X

CvJC£>•5—1

o

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.9903 and decachlorobiphenyl at 28.3545.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/• 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quant itat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.06493.

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALIBRATION 5.2-3(I2AUG93 1142)

KB0005295

(SJF)14-DEC-93 17:45:08

Page 207: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Arocior L,aiiDrauon nummaryCalibration of 9-Dec-1993 22:18 through 10-Dec-1993 18:16.MCD1:[8080] 05,06 090EC932026METHOD: 8080_PCB:AN

KTx-SJDS - HP2618

Peak Response Factors and Relative DeviationsPeak «

4546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576

======

RT Arocior 122119.105 0.16519.21119.266 0.44319.50519.57419.730 0.75619.80619.980 0.24620.23620.40620.49420.65120.84620.98921.22421.39821.53921.57121.74321.86421.96522.06722.27822.46022.98423.13423.23923.41423.90224.45825.18925.41426.810 1.244====== ==============

Total: 257.9 4.7X

Arocior 12321.763 5.6X

2.731 6.2X0.5390.3890.4220.2131.819 4.5%0.233

1.0320.5140.2990.1140.9710.5090.261

0.136

2.013 6.9X

0.887

0.5460.580

0.586

1.450==============

660.1 3.3X

Arocior 1016 Arocior 12422.232 8.4X

9.919 6.3X0.746

0.504 1.008 57.0.4174.204 4.6X0.372

0.0811.543

0.105

0.5970.142

0.209

0.216

1 .470 1 .385============== S3aE====S=SS===

1048.3 4.4X 1149.8 4.6X

Retention Time Marker/Surrogate StandardCompoundtetrschloro-meta-xylenedecachlorobiphenyl

Mean RT8.9903 -

28.3545 -

RT Oev. Range RT Crft. Mean.0170 to .0097 Passes... 3648..0167 to .0122 Passes... 2597.

Arocior 12485.913 4.5X

29.409 5. OX2.461 10. 8X

1.982 66.1.159

10.269 2.2X1.142

0.6850.4083.284 3.5X

0.6920.380

1.1980.3090.127

1.486

0.804

0.3360.355

0.309

1.435==============1544.5 3.1X

SummaryRF Recovery048 76.7 to843 94.6 to

Arocior104.52475.576

34.269

14.64416.463

179.66316.606

10.9728.656

48.9032.349

13.3658.517

22.7445.5183.349

27.6481.1580.389

20.877

1.3391.7130.7880.7801.335

1.581========

2165.8

12542.6X

2. IX

3. OX3.7X2.3X4.2X

5.3X5.1X2.5X

2.2X3.5X

4.8X8.3X7.7X

2. IX

2. OX

======

2.8X

Arocior228.79881.764

83.82358.8212.828

25.781235.34433.3047.195

147.85377.40320.80321.528

147.38881.58645.175

13.30724.9393.201

316.5734.1819.693

140.1506.920

70.60576.8163.855

29.10964.8664.037

21.632==3=====

2676.5

12602. OX1.3X

3.6X2.6X

3.7X3.4X1.4X6.4X2.3X1.3X2.9X2.4X1.2X1.0X2.3X

2.6X2.2X7.1X3.2X

11. 1X6.1X4. OX2.4X1.7X1.0X7.4X1.2X1.0X5.8X1.5X

=3====

2.8X

COCOtT— iCDCDo

Range Surr Crit113. 6X **118. 1X **

Fails *Fails *

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.9903 and decachlorobiphenyl at 28.3545.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitation is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.06493.

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALJBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)

KB0005296

(SJF)I4-DEC-93 17:45:08

Page 208: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

CH051209.XLS

CALIBRATION SUMMARYBACK CALCULATIONS

Lab ID:GC:

Col. 1:Col. 2:

AQUATEC, INC.HP2618

RTX-35RTX-5

Calib date(s): 09-DEC-93 22:18

File:

10-DEC-93 18:16

05,06 09DEC932026

to

Standards

Aroclor 1016Cal Fact

% DiffAroclor 1221

Cal Fact% Diff

Aroclor 1 232Cal Fact

% DiffAroclor 1242

Cal Fact% Diff

Aroclor 1 248Cal Fact

% DiffAroclor 1 254

Cal Fact, % Diff

Aroclor 1 260Cal Fact

% Diff

50ppb

53.61.072

-754.41.088

-953.01.060

-652.31.046

-551.11.022

-251.31.026

-349.4

0.9881

100ppb

1011.010

-1105

1.050-5

1041.040

-497.80.978

299.5

0.9951

1001.000

096.8

0.9683

200ppb

2091.045

-5205

1.025-3

1840.920

8195

0.9753

2011.005

-1197

0.9852

1980.990

1

400ppb

4001.000

0402

1.005-1

4041.010

-1404

1.010-1

3970.993

1401

1.0030

3930.983

2

800ppb

7870.984

2783

0.9792

7890.986

1794

0.9931

7950.994

1800

1.0000 J

8121.015

-2

%RSD

3.5

4.1

5.4

2.9

1.2

1.5

1.7

Cal Fact = Calc. Cone. / Nominal Cone.

%RSD = STD Dev / Mean of Cal Fact

% Diff = (Nominal Amt-Calc Amt) / Nominal Amt* 100

Page 1

KB0005282

Page 209: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCBCHST.XLT

. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY

Lab ID: AQUATEC, INC.GC:

Col. 1 :Col. 2:

Check

Check

Check

Check

Check

UPZUSfcrx-SS"RTx-5"

Standard Rle: 0$ D&> (HDE

Initial Calib.date/time: (T./01/13 2al3 to

Cl3/qS?_. IZ '/ s

CompoundA% |9^<3 ^

NominalAmount (ppb)-200

Standard Rle: OS. 01, \ DEd13 1^52, |3* J

CompoundlARlOlt /•

NominalAmount (ppb)O.OO <*

Standard Rle: 0$ 0& I^DE£*t3 '9S"2.2£T' X

CompoundAR I 'S ^^~

NominalAmount (ppb)"i-Cio ^

StandardRle: ^5 /)^ IH tlGC^S H52 2<£^ ^

CompoundAR \^^ '

NominalAmount (ppb)"2c?0 ''

Standard Rle: QS. 06 1 H E(1^3 1 9 5"!. 33

Compound/4R [2.4"?

NominalAmount (ppb)•zoo <-'

\-\jto jw jsi'6 '

Date:"" Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)Ho"

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)101^ '

Date:^ Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

il1~? s

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)100 s-

Date:•^ Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb).i 1 .""

l^/i^/13O17-3

% Diff.X 5"

»2/«5"/^3^2.?^ ^

% Diff."2. £7

ll//S/?J/ ^ O / ^

% Diff.f-5- -

ll/(b/93

% Diff.ao

\znsfa*'lijl ^

% Diff.0.5" ^

x'

^

^

**•

Page ( of

KB0005284

000151

Page 210: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCBCHST.XLT

. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY

Lab ID: AQUATEC, INC.r*r*. UP 0 /* /4uv»: v\\ * v I o

Col. 1: ^-3^Col. 2: ^-S~

Initial Calib.date/time: r2./0<f/<?3 22i£

Check Standard File: 05~ O& /</DE<l<?3 / ?S"2. ^ x-

Check

Check

Check

Check

X >

CompoundA^! /3t>H

NominalAmount (ppb)33O

Standard File:

CompoundNominal

Amount (ppb)

Standard File:

CompoundNominal

Amount (ppb)

Standard Rle:

CompoundNominal

Amount (ppb)

Standard File:

CompoundNominal

Amount (ppb)

\if (0/45 I«t6

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)/ 3^1

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb).

)2/)£/?3|5"20 ^

% Diff.5.5

% Diff.

% Diff.

% Diff.

% Diff.

to

^-

Pajje "Z of 2

KB0005285

000152

Page 211: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Ajoclor Calibration Summary:alibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:22.(GDI:[8080] 03,04 07JAN941940(ETHOD: 8080 PCB:AN

KiAO

Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations

JDS - HP2087

Peak #" "T~

23456789

10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940

RT7.2348.2609.5329.8119.845

10.02710.65411.33211.39911.67611.95412.51412.60312.83713.42813.60313.87213.97514.12714.25914.69414.81815.12115.41215.90816.03316.17916.40816.76516.95717.14817.54617.72917.90818.06118.16618.25618.66719.08619.149

Aroclor23.9546.445

15.955

13.09041 .8890.7437.011

0.8205.5190.9620.6586.7802.3890.8300.2342.2092.0931.1882.2351.1311.8820.4650.8741.7352.0060.3541.2050.8113.928

0.2880.3590.205

0.5320.123

12215. OX6.9X3. OX

2.4X0.9X

17.

5. OX

4.8X

9.4X

Aroclor13.000

4.01310.827

10.42539.8132.256

25.90616.3452.538

21.1094.3132.604

33.30011.6084.3941.483

13.76412.1897.191

15.6208.350

13.2343.9056.262

12.61413.931

1.3259.8014.5031.9510.2981.4272.0501.158

3.2351.1401.9442.656

12324.5*

2.6X

2.8X2.4X

3.6X5.7X

12. 1X5.4X3.7X7.4X1.9X5. OX3. 8Xa.ox5.4X8.5X7.8X1.8X6.7X2.BX7.2X7.7X4.5X3.2X

7. OX4.7X

Aroclor0.621

5.744

8.45938.5445.350

58.23134.866

5.99147.88910.4866.312

82.38027.75211.7194.130

34.80231.93719.74039.03419.85033.5658.6623.1184.9527.3271.0400.4380.6463.650

1016

1.7X

3.2X0.4X2.8X4.4X4.3X2.8X1.7X4.4X5.5X3.9X4.4X2.2X6.2X2.7X3.4X2.6X2.1X3.5X2.5X6. OX

11. IX7.8X3.2X

Aroclor0.524

4.305

6.45029.297

4.36145.71027.3104.758

37.1287.9274.799

61.03720.709

9.1543.237

27.31824.76815.38230.14316.37127.1797.744

14.13126.28428.9103.311

21.24711.5615.8270.9374.1026.0663.864

9.3462.695

6.295

1242

3.1X

4.1X3. OX

5.5X4.8X7.7X3.6X5.3X6.7X3.8X4.4X1.8X8.9X2.8X4.1X3. OX2.2X3.6X2.2X5.3X5.7X4.7X4.4X

4.3X2.6X7.3X

7.4X6.2X7.6X

5.4X

Aroclor0.140

0.2341.555

2.7811.211

25.43510.740

1.13915.9222.6350.871

36.88310.78811.3694.367

53.13840.56123.21955.34822.01345.00012.41224.89151.13456.7448.668

37.65731.11118.5872.423

11.24916.97010.681

27.6538.101

16.760

1248

7.9X

7.9X

2.3X

4. IX7.8X

5.1X5.8X2.4X6.1X4.8X3.9X3. OX5. OX4. OX6.3X7.4X8.5X6.3X4.8X1.1X9.5X3.3X

22.

5.6X5.6X6.4X

6.6X8.7X

13. OX

Aroclor0.098

1.444

0.182

0.663

0.681

0.1210.4410.179

40.79112.130

21.6732.6408.0491.5476.604

24.88467.47911.66118.77586.83032.1324.862

24.42145.58116.1729.922

85.14919.43445.86954.193

1254

6.6X

1.7X6.8X

4.5X

5.5X

11. OX6.2X4. OX1.3X5. OX3. OX2.5X

11. OX4.4X3.7X4.2X5.5X3.9X5.3X

6.2X

Aroclor0.251

1.482

0.211

0.3730.473

0.876

0.520

2.321

0.315

0.252

0.27827.157

4.03831.8884.645

1.2965.247

16.32715.35537.46183.032

1260

5.8X

4. IX

5.9X4.4X

13.4X

1.3X6.9X2.9X4.7X

cvoo

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.8937 and decachlorobiphenyl at 29.1350.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.07443.

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALIBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)

KB0005379

(JDS)14-JAN-94 13:55:32

Page 212: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:22.HCD1:[8080] 03,04 07JAN941940METHOD: 8080_PCB:AM

KiAOJDS • HP2087

Notes:

Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations

TT4243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970

1)2)3)

RT Aroclor 122119.47319.70819.91720.04520.06220.09720.37120.44320.61720.70220.89821.18221 .46821.64321 .86922.02622.29022.48222.64022.67522.85723.00323.22823.66824.26024.53224.71825.74526.39927.811 0.598Total: 151.5 3. OX

Compoundtetrachloro-meta-xylenedecach I orobi pheny I

Aroclor 1232 Aroclor 1016 Aroclor 1242

0.642

1.0860.179

0.6050.4030.177

0.3730.182

0.8100.3520.2160.2480.2450.713348.7 4

Mean RT8.893729.1350

0.777

3.8310.2820.212•1.2420.135

0.496

0.657 0.586.5X 557.9 3.2X 567.8 4. OX

Retention Time Marker/Surrogate StandardRT Dev. Range RT Crit. Mean-.0137 to .0108 Passes... 2132.-.0150 to .0117 Passes... 1319.

Aroclor 12460.8610.8612.150

11.147 10. 2X0.9550.3620.3833.407 12.6X0.4190.2771.1370.2790.1400.448

0.6080.3310.137

0.699725.0 5.5X

Summary

Aroclor 12547.8.38.

35.13.5.6.60.6.4.3.17.

5.3.6.2.1.9.7.0.0.0.0.0.

036588335726063

362469180370092214251

031201172126266888809568687327542690

890.6

RF Recovery Range442 82.5 to 109.215 91.1 to 131.

Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at B.8937 and decachlorobiphenyl atPeaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.Quantitation is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT* 1.07443.

BX2X

29

13. 7X7.4X1.5X2.8X5.2X8.BX6.3X1.9X8.6X9.8X5. IX

3.6X8.2X7.6X

2. IX3.7X

3.9X

Aroclor 12605128334

302710821358307857321859

1104502932132810

.772

.488

.688

.679

.776

.542

.492

.487

.896

.291

.500

.852

.771

.514

.153

.276

.623

.348

.290

.391

.511

.838

.585

.307

.289

.3181043.5

8.2.3.

5.5.9.5.4.2.2.7.6.1.1.3.8.8.3.5.2.2.1.2.2.0.3.

JA6X5X6X

9XOX2X9X9X5X2X1X2X8X6X4X8XIXOX7XIX3X6X1X2XBX9X

Surr Crit****

.1350

Fails *Fails *

c:oo

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLO^CAUBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)

KB0005380

(JDS)14-JAN-94 13:55:32

Page 213: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

/\rocior uanoracion nummaryCalibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:22.HCD1:C8080] 03,04 07JAN941940METHOD: 8080 PCBrAM

K1A-JD

Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations

JDS • HP2087

Peak *

23456789

1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738

6.7018.3688.7068.7419.1589.349

10.26110.66111.00511.32311.49711.60611.70112.44012.57712.71812.83913.08513.22813.29513.39313.49714.05514.17314.39914.48214.57414.94015.02815.13115.30515.47715.67415.73115.89016.10816.16616.500

Aroclor 122119.246 7.1*5.130 5.8X

12.496 4.4X9.868 2.5X

31.837 1.3X0.4768.881 4.4X0.5841.4662.331 11.3%0.8680.5432.398 11. 7X0.6180.1301.3381.8011.621

0.7720.3031.7610.9250.4720.9700.4711.1000.6931.3191.1440.493

0.0980.390

0.9520.215

Aroclor10.8964.202

8.7187.971

30.9821.708

27.4481.8046.5549.8043.5922.056

12.7713.0760.7537.825

10.9089.6605.2584.5411.757

12.4276.0983.8797.0933.3824.6593.7639.2848.7772.887

0.8301.962

7.5781.273

'fi3?,,8.4X6.7X

4.3X2.2X0.7X4.4X3.3X

4. OX3. OX6.6X

7.4X

8.9X1.2X2. OX

7.3X

3.8X1.9Xa. ox5.5X4.3X9.3X5.7X6.6X7.8X5.8X

7.8X

Aroclor0.5654.016

4.6716.156

29.4774.138

59.0514.100

15.39922.3268.5254.893

30.7907.6782.318

19.36527.13824.77713.24011.8324.247

30.83614.1089.548

18.0778.5803.0656.9234.0502.5163.482

0.6450.125

0.2690.396

1016

6. OX

3.7X4.3X3.2X3.4X5.5X5.6X4.2X2.8X4.6X5.5X5.3X2.6X

11. OX9.4X3.1X3.3X

5.9X7.3X3. OX2.5X3.9X4.1X2.6X

5.6X6.8X

5.9X

Aroclor0.6453.174

3.5994.849

22.7533.175

46.5743.170

11.76617.2946.5223.620

23.2725.8271.630

14.39221.42419.49810.5289.3223.336

24.51411.7377.644

15.0047.123

10.6827.591

19.73818.5706.645

2.4885.315

16.9113.321

1242

7.0X

3.2X6.5X2. OX3.2X6.3X4.2X1.8X1.9X3.4X2.3X3.9X5.3X7.4X6.5X4.1X4.2X

7.5X

2.6X3.5X6.1X4. OX3.6X5. IX4.1X4.4X4. OX4.8X

4.9X

5.4X5.8X

Aroclor

0.1791.106

0.3752.0720.878

23.1740.7435.7256.1722.0760.758

10.8477.1242.1576.963

40.44931.39316.54813.1344.678

43.08316.42012.76526.5709.546

20.76013.16139.38934.18717.786

6.36615.254

31.2289.583

1248

6.7X

10.4%

5.8X

5.5X6. OX

14. 7X

8.7X1.9X7.3X

10. 7X3. IX2.3X5.3X4.5X7.7X4.2X3. IX5.7X6.4X1.4X

12. 7X5.3X7.4X7.9X2.6X

9.7X4.2X

10. 5X4. IX

Aroclor

1.046

0.150

0.888

0.108

0.1820.792

0.12030.8249.701

1.457

16.4362.1541.3395.547

5.480

18.9907.990

47.03911.81511.06753.83723.768

18.659

1254

2.7X

3. IX7.2X

3.5X

10. 3X

10.3X

7.9X4.8X3.4X4.8X5.8X3.9X4.3X

3.6X

Aroclor

1.068

0.211

0.643

0.091

0.139

0.1031.675

0.278

0.106

0.2010.126

19.7853.029

22.338

1.004

1260

26.

4.3X5.7X

4.4X

27.

Or^,O

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 7.6321 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.7071.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quant itat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT* 1.02960.

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALIBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)

KB0005381

(JDS)14-JAN-94 13:55:32

Page 214: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

Arocior Calibration summaryCalibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:2Z.MCD1:C8080] 03,04 07JAN941940METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN

JDS - HP2087

Peak Response Factors and Relative DeviationsPeak n— 39~

40414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667

T6774716.95717.18817.38517.56217.64517.88418.21618.23518.48818.71719.54519.64119.95320.09120.31820.51420.97121.45821.73121.91122.12222.85323.41023.57024.54725.04325.37026.563Total:

Arocior 1221 Arocior 12320.

0.191 1.0.411 1.

0.0.428 2.

1.

0.

0.0.0.

1.0.0.0.0.

0.112 0.0.

0.517 0.115.4 3.9X 259

226104569658507

589551

201395290

225283

681244408133218596.1 4.2X

Arocior 1016 Arocior 12420.3.4.2.7.

3.0.

0.1.

2.

0.

0.126 0.

0.562 0.408.0 4.4X 419

575204 4.9X243 13. OX127156 6.7X

752856

158115

033

147

090

526.6 4.3X

Arocior 12481.9.11.6.21.0.10.0.2.

0.2.0.0.2.

0.0.0.0.

0.

770142 6.7X841 8. OX971 12.8X589 8.2X088942 13.3X545347

780759270345627 53.

591173333127

600546.5 6.2X

Arocior3.49119.03433.4899.90667.3496.63148.6646.65333.01532.453

14.59549.5074.3646.3610.42119.5082.3519.4041.4846.3290.1320.2310.4660.617645.8

1254B.8X5.7X7.1X12. 5X7.9X22.4.5X9.9X6.3X6.4X

13. 8X7.3X15. OX12. OX23.

4.6X

3.5X

6.2X

Arocior0.7393.93310.85730.97012.73565.34210.09767.55525.00520.11235.79854.94145.78224.4086.16456.25925.36214.14495.5852.96530.76254.953

1.8919.87623.4578.740789.2

1260

20.

5.5X7.7X3.7X

5.5X2.5X8.4X10. 3X3.7X4.7X1.9X4.7X4.9X8.3X2.5X3. OX3.5X3.2X2. OX3. OX4.5X1.3X1.9X1.6X4. IX

00-*?CJoCDO

Compound____________ Mean RTtetrachloro-meta-xylene 7.6321decachlorobiphenyl 27.7071

Retention Time Marker/Surrogate Standard SummaryRT Dev. Range-.0165 to-.0182 to

.0146

.0129

RT Crit.Passes...Passes...

Mean RF1669.9871153.447

Recovery Range74.8 to 108.3%90.2 to 127.9X

Surr Crit** Fails *** Fails *

Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 7.6321 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.7071.2} Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.02960.

Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALIBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)

KB0005382

(JDS)14-JAN-94 13:55:32

Page 215: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

CH030107.XLS

CALIBRATION SUMMARYBACK CALCULATIONS

I/

Lab ID: AQUATEC, INC.GC:

Col. 1:Col. 2:

HP2087RTX-5

RTX-35

Calib date(s): 01/08/94 03:54

Rle:

01/09/94 01:22

03, 0407JAN941940

to

Standards

Aroclor 1016Cal Fact

% DiffAroclor 1221

Cal Fact% Diff

Aroclor 1 232Cal Fact

% DiffAroclor 1 242

Cal Fact%Diff

Aroclor 1 248Cal Fact

% DiffAroclor 1 254

Cal Fact% Diff

Aroclor 1 260Cal Fact

%Diff

50ppb

50.31.006

-154.71.094

-939.10.782

2243.60.872

1350.51.010

-147.30.946

550.61.012

-1

100ppb

97.70.977

299.0

0.9901

87.90.879

• 1298.6

0.9861

95.60.956

496.90.969

399.9

0.9990

200ppb

2061.030

-3199

0.9951

1840.920

8211

1.055-6

2051.025

-3197

0.9852

2021.010

-1

400ppb

3960.990

1402

1.005-1

4071.018

-2394

0.9852

3720.930

7412

1.030-3

3870.968

3

800ppb

8011.001

0792

0.9901

7880.985

2797

0.9960

8241.030

-3797

0.9960

8111.014

-1

%RSD

2.0

4.4

10.1

6.8

4.5

3.2

1.9

Cal Fact - Calc. Cone. / Nominal Cone.

%RSD = STD Dev / Mean of Cal Fact

% Diff = (Nominal Amt-Calc Amt) / Nominal Amt* 100

PagelKB0005283

000150

Page 216: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

PCBCHST.XLT

. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY

Lab ID: AQUATEC, INC.GC:

Col. 1 :'Col. 2:

Check

Check

Check

Check

Check

HP701? 7RTx-5"RT> -3$

Standard Rle: 03 OH (Z^A

Initial Calib.date/time: Oi/ ' 0$ 1 ' 3'"i 055"1X

M^?^IS42. /2 -'* /

CompoundAD , -JLIOrt i\ 1 / r O ^

NominalAmount (ppb)

- "2.06 S'

Standard Rle: /)3 OH I'lTAN'H 1 £42, 13 ^-/ '

CompoundAR 116-0 x-

NominalAmount (ppb)^100 s*

Standard Rle: £3 pH 1 ZT/(^ fV l^^2 2^"-^' y

CompoundAR 11 ' ^

NominalAmount (ppb)20O

Standard Rle: /93 £)^ HJ^W^ \W2 2t>s s

Compound• A^. /oi^, ^^

NominalAmount (ppb)•200 ^

Standard Rle:

CompoundNominal

Amount (ppb)

di/01/W 012.2s-

Date:*~ Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

I75~

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount {ppb)136' s~

Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)

- 1 7 0 ^

Date:s^ Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb)\4I0 ^

Date:Time:

Calc.Amount (ppb).

<9£S"2. -"

% Diff.- I2.S" -

O(/f3/17 i/'^573^ x

% Diff.1.0 ,-

/5.//3mi5"PS~ x-

% Diff.l^^3 •-

01/13/91i^3 ^

% Diff./0.0 "

% Diff.

Page of

KB0005286

000153

Page 217: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

<J • ' "S

BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.C.6723 Towpalh Road, Box 66Syracuse, New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017

as- H

CHAIN OF CUSTODYCOo

-jfe//, OPROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME

. ve f -SAMPLERS: (Signature)

STA. NO. DATE TIME STATION LOCATION

oo

REMARKS

110T&Af-S

TBSAS-*

TBSAl-1x

TBSA3-3 KnozlD-t. K 12.03

KIZ033

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received for Laboratory by:(Signature)

DATE TIME Remarks:f t i*-.

7/12S31393786HCOH Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files

KB0005132

Page 218: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.C.6723 Towpath Road. Box 66Syracuse. New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017

*.

CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDA

ooooo

PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME

SAMPLERS>(S/gnafu

STA. NO. DATE TIMEa:8 STATION LOCATION REMARKS

- */»/* /c / * o 5 7

/< /? 057TBaAl-

T&

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE

III 1

TIME

I5.&0

Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)

Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received for Laboratory by:(Signature)

DATE TIME

/tooRemarks:

.X t

7/12/931393786HCOR Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files

KB0005133

Page 219: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

F-0430

AQUATEC SAMPLE LOG-IN SHEET

!atrVi-fT Aauatec. Inc. / «r 1

Receded By (Print Name):. . Poai Log-in Date: JLt

Case Number:. /Sample Deorery \, — —^ /Grouo No: HO Loy / CLIENT

SAMPLE1

CORRESPONDING

SAMPLETAG1

ASSIGNEDLAB1

REMARKS:CONDITIONOF SAMPLE

SHIPMENT. ETC.

REMARKS:

1. Custody Seal(s)

2. Custody Seal Nos.:

3. Chain-of-CustodyRecords

4. Simple InformationSheets

5. Airbill

6. Airbffl No.:

7.Sample TagNumbers

8. Sample Condition;

9. Does information oncustody records, sampleinformation sheets, andsample tags agree?

10. Date Receired at Lab:11. Time Recefoed:

?Abse0r«

A/o

'tss &< st'st

COO /S SI

20 4

2044,40

MS tOA-Si

/V.

tJ /A ZO 4-34-1 £* fo r / x?

no

KIZO4-0

Qnta^Brofcw*/Qakiiif

A. *4 O ,+*.

XJ/IXV-L. .^Sf SO

er*

a li"*{* **S

IS

x»^ 19 X

Sample Transfer

• Contact Project Director.

(MlRenewed by:. Logbook No:.KB0006245

Date:. n Logbook Page No:.

001097

Page 220: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

£Tf*l : £>

aquatec INC.• An Inchrajx- Company

55 SOUTH PARK DRIVE. COLCHESTER. VT OS446

Page _ of ^

Discrepancies betveen sample bottles/labels and C-of-C

K 1 t C O -1 <* V

C - o - C

fL Slsi fL CO r-< f t

f e O-^ ef f ff( O , _____ C - o -

<; g> , y "At .

~ C

K f.-Z 04- / •' O -7

C ' ~ O - .**J Oi

O. xuL ei.

^ixt^, ^3 -/^ Jfe~, A'<*.'?* c-o~ r f si OLA*^ sy*ffsv s*> e» -f -^

Ktto'b*? -2.04-0 '.

/? ^a. £ / jf 'si A •/•/-

1 Y/ v -& O 4 n. / S> t a *t /*t*\ f SI**L o - C, Co.

KB0006246

001093

Page 221: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were

LIENTb);ASE:

ITNESSED BY

Aquaiec, Inc. — Exinction worksheet — printed by; JKZ on 11-16-93 08:58:40 KB0006234