addendum to technical memorandum 2 results of phase ...\\bbl2\voli\users\ljf\ljpoo\3 1001948.doc...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Addendum to TechnicalMemorandum 2
Results of Phase IITBSA SoilSampling
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site/Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Kalamazoo, Michigan
May 2000
BBLBLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC,e n g i n e e r s & scientists
![Page 2: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
T E C H N I C A L R E P O R T
RuuE
d g H 0 W H
JUM -1 2000
— \!:RD-SUPERFUND
Addendum to TechnicalMemorandum 2
Results of Phase IITBSA SoilSampling
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site/Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Kalamazoo, Michigan
May 2000
BBLBLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.engineers & scientists
6723 Towpath Road, P.O. Box 66Syracuse, New York, 13214-0066(315)446-9120
![Page 3: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Table of Contents
Section 1. Introduction..................................................................................................................1-1
1.1 Description of Study Area........................................................................................................... 1-11.2 Terrestrial Biota Sampling Investigation..................................................................................... 1-11.3 Phase I and Phase II TBSA Sampling........................................................................................ 1-1
Section 2. Investigation Activities ................................................................................................2-1
2.1 Phase II TBSA Soil Sampling and Analysis................................................................................2-12.2 QA/QC Review of Data...............................................................................................................2-1
Section 3. Investigation Results...................................................................................................3-1
3.1 Field Data ...................................................................................................................................3-13.2 Analytical Data............................................................................................................................3-1
3.2.1 PCB Results ..................................................................................................................3-13.2.2 TOCResults..................................................................................................................3-2
3.3 QA/QC Data Review Results......................................................................................................3-2
Section 4. Preliminary Findings....................................................................................................4-1
4.1 Phase II Soil Sampling Findings.................................................................................................4-14.2 QA/QC Data Review Findings ....................................................................................................4-1
Section 5. References....................................................................................................................5-1
Tables
2-13-13-2
Sample Delivery Groups SummaryTBSA Phase II Composite Samples PCB Analytical ResultsTBSA Phase II Composite Samples TOC Analytical Results
Figures
1 Index to Figures2 TBSA 13 TBSA 3 and TBSA 54 TBSA 105 TBSA 116 TBSA 1 Phase II PCB Data7 TBSA 3 and TBSA 5 Phase II PCB Data8 TBSA 10 Phase II PCB Data9 TBSA 11 Phase II PCB Data
Appendices
A Field DocumentationB QA/QC Accuracy and Precision SummaryC Data Review ReportsD Supporting Documentation
BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJPJ_JPOO\3 IOOI94B.DOC - 5/30/00
![Page 4: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
1. IntroductionThis Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 - Results of Phase IITBSA Soil Sampling presents the results andfindings of the Phase II soil sampling performed by Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc. (BBL) for the Terrestrial BiotaInvestigation conducted in support of the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RemedialInvestigation/Feasibility Study (PJ/FS). The soil sampling was performed in two phases (as described below) toevaluate concentrations of polychlorinated biphenyls (PCB) in select soils as part of the Terrestrial BiotaInvestigation. Sampling activities were performed in accordance with a Biota Sampling Plan (BSP) developed byCamp Dresser & McKee, Inc. (CDM, 1993).
1.1 Description of Study Area
The Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site (Site) includes approximately 80 miles of theKalamazoo River and the lower 3 miles of Portage Creek, a tributary which joins the Kalamazoo River at Kalamazoo,Michigan. The Kalamazoo River is located in southwestern Michigan (Figure 1). The main stem of the KalamazooRiver begins in Albion, at the confluence of the north and south branches, and flows northwesterly for 123 milesthrough Kalamazoo and Allegan counties to Lake Michigan. The Kalamazoo River has a drainage area ofapproximately 2,000 square miles and is fed by more than 400 miles of streams and tributaries.
A Biota Investigation (BBL, 2000) was conducted along portions of approximately 100 miles of the river betweenBattle Creek and the river's mouth, near Saugatuck. A more extensive review of the physical setting andcharacteristics of the study area is contained in the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund SiteDescription of the Current Situation report (BBEPC, 1992).
1.2 Terrestrial Biota Sampling Investigation
The Terrestrial Biota Investigation was designed to generate PCB data from selected species for use in the ecologicalrisk assessment component of the RI and to estimate exposure of identified consumer species that use these speciesas food sources. Another objective of the Terrestrial Biota Investigation was to examine the relationship between soilPCB concentrations and biota PCB concentrations. The investigation consisted of terrestrial biota sampling in fivedesignated Terrestrial Biota Sampling Areas (TBSAs) representative of specific ranges of soil PCB concentrations.Sampling provided PCB data for surface soils and target biota species.
1.3 Phase I and Phase II TBSA Sampling
Phase I of the TBSA soil sampling was conducted on September 28 through October 1,1993. The objective of PhaseI was to collect soil samples from 11 candidate TBSAs for PCB immunoassay analysis. The results of the Phase IPCB analyses then served as a screening step to enable the selection of potentially five TBSAs for further soilsampling (Phase U). The results of the Phase I PCB analyses are provided in the Michigan Department of NaturalResources (MDNR)-approved Technical Memorandum 2 - Results of Phase I TBSA Soil Sampling (BBL, 1994).
The 11 candidate TBSAs were selected in accordance with the BSP (CDM, 1993). The BSP identified 11preliminary TBSAs along the Kalamazoo River based on the availability of suitable habitat for small mammals andsuspected PCB concentrations in surficial soils. In Phase I PCB screening, former impoundment sediment sampleswere collected from sampling grids approximately 1,500 feet by 500 feet in dimension. In each of the 11 TBSAs,eight individual samples were collected, homogenized, and analyzed as a composite sample.
_________________________________BLASLAND, BOUCK & LEE. INC._______________________________\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•)
![Page 5: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were selected for further, more intensive soil sampling duringthe 1993-1994 Terrestrial Biota Investigation. These five TBSAs are:
TBSA 1 - Just upstream of the Swan Creek confluence with the Kalamazoo River (Figure 2);
TBSA 3 - Near the confluence of Shnable Creek with the Kalamazoo River upstream of theTrowbridge Dam (Figure 3);
TBSA 5 - Upstream of the Schnable Creek confluence with the Kalamazoo River (Figure 3);
TBSA 10 - Along the Kalamazoo River, behind the City of Plainwell wastewater treatment plant(Figure 4); and
TBSA 11 - Approximately 2.25 miles upstream of the 1-94 Bridge, near Wattles Park (representativeof background conditions) (Figure 5).
Phase n sampling consisted of soil sampling of the five selected TBSAs. The sampling was performed in November1993 in accordance with the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RI/FS Work Plan(Work Plan) (BBEPC, 1993a).
This Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 presents the results and findings of the Phase n soil sampling of TBSAs1, 3, 5, 10, and 11 and includes analytical data, chain of custody forms, and results of the quality assurance/qualitycontrol (QA/QC) review of the analytical data. The results of the 1993-1994 biota sampling are presented inTechnical Memorandum 14 - Biota Investigation (BBL, 2000).
BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.\\BB1_2\VOL I\USERS\L|FUJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -- 5/30,00 -j _
![Page 6: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
2. Investigation ActivitiesSoil from five TBSAs were evaluated by sampling and analysis. The investigative activities discussed in this sectionwere conducted as described in Section 5.4.1.6 of the Work Plan (BBEPC, 1993a).
2.1 Phase II TBSA Soil Sampling and Analysis
Phase II soil sampling was performed November 10 through 12, 1993. In each TBSA, a 200-by-150 foot samplinggrid was established and divided into five 40-by-150 foot strips. Eight surface soil borings were obtained fromrandomly selected locations within each strip. Samples were taken from the top 1 -foot of soil. Fifteen grams of soilfrom each boring were composited and homogenized to form a single composite sample representing each strip,resulting in five composite samples per TBSA.
Samples were collected using stainless-steel scoops or a stainless-steel auger. All equipment was cleaned inaccordance with the procedures outlined in the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund SiteRI/FS Field Sampling Plan (BBEPC, 1993b).
Samples were sent to Aquatec, Inc. of Colchester, Vermont, (currently known as Severn Trent Laboratories) andanalyzed for total PCB and total organic carbon (TOC). TOC is measured as a percent dry weight and indicates theproportion of the sample composed of organic material.
Field activities were documented in field notes presented as Appendix A.
2.2 QA/QC Review of Data
Data from three sample delivery groups (SDGs) for Phase n TBSA soil samples collected between November 10 and12, 1993 were reviewed for QA/QC compliance with method guidelines and project-specific requirements. TheSDGs and their associated samples are presented in Table 2-1.
Each data package from the laboratory was reviewed as outlined in the Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP)(BBEPC, 1993c). The review included an evaluation of holding times, calibration requirements (initial andcontinuing), blank contamination, surrogate spike recovery (where applicable), matrix spike and duplicateperformance, laboratory control sample recovery, and analyte identification, as applicable.
A summary assessment of the precision and accuracy of the analytical data is found in Appendix B. The completeresults of the data review are found in Appendix C.
Chain of custody forms are presented in the supporting documentation included in Appendix D.
BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.\\BBL2\VOLI\USERSjgPiLJPOC\3IOOI948.DOC- 5/30,00 2-1
![Page 7: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
3. Investigation Results
3.1 Field Data
The field data provided within the field notes in Appendix A were comprised of field maps and soil sampledescriptions. The field maps provide the approximate location of the individual soil samples within each TBSA,accompanied by a description of the sample in accordance with Unified Soil Classification System guidelines.
Soils within each individual TBSA sampling location were relatively consistent with respect to color and texture.Soils within TBSA 1 were described as brown to dark brown fine sand, silt, and clay to brown to dark brown siltyclay. Soils within TBSA 3 were described as gray to dark gray clay with traces of silt. Soils within TBSA 5 wereconsistently described as dark gray clay. Soils within TBSA 10 varied from gray to dark gray clay with fine tomedium brown/orange sand to brown to dark brown silt with medium brown/gray sand. TBSA 11 soils weredescribed as dark brown silt with fine, light brown sand.
3.2 Analytical Data
Soil samples were analyzed for PCB and TOC. The following subsection provides a summary of the soil analyticalresults.
3.2.1 PCB Results
PCB analytical data for the Phase H TBSA soil samples are presented in Table 3-1 and on Figures 6, 7, 8, and 9. PCBwere detected in all of the composite soil samples from TBSAs 1, 3, 5, and 10. At the background location (TBSA11), PCB were detected in two of the five composite soil samples.
Total PCB concentrations in soil from TBSA 1 (quantified as Aroclors 1242, 1248, 1254, and 1260) ranged froman estimated 0.065 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) to 0.20 mg/kg, with an arithmetic average concentration of 0.16± 0.053 mg/kg. Total PCB concentrations in soil from TBSA 3 (quantified as Aroclors 1248,1254, and 1260) rangedfrom an estimated 20 mg/kg to an estimated 33 mg/kg, with an arithmetic average concentration of 25 ± 5.4 mg/kg.Total PCB concentrations in soil from TBSA 5 (quantified as Aroclors 1248, 1254, and 1260) ranged from anestimated 24 mg/kg to 35 mg/kg, with an arithmetic average concentration of 27 ± 4.5 mg/kg. Total PCBconcentrations in soil from TBSA 10 (quantified as Aroclor 1248, 1254, and 1260) ranged from 4.2 mg/kg to 10mg/kg, with an arithmetic average concentration of 6.5 ± 2.5 mg/kg. The two detected PCB concentrations from thebackground location (TBSA 11) were 0.28 mg/kg and 0.39 mg/kg (quantified as Aroclors 1248 and 1254), with allsamples having an arithmetic average concentration of 0.17 ± 0.16 mg/kg.
In addition to the five composite samples collected per TBSA, additional composite samples were collected at TBSAs1,3, and 5. Each additional sample consisted of a composite of three 30 gram samples collected at three wormsampling locations. Even though the sampling program did not specify the collection of these additional compositesamples, for completeness, the results of the PCB analysis of these samples are reported in Table 3-1. The total PCBconcentration from the composite sample collected from the TBSA 1 worm sampling locations was an estimated 0.23mg/kg; the total PCB concentration from the composite sample collected from the TBSA 3 worm sampling locationswas 25 mg/kg; and the total PCB concentration from the composite sample collected from the TBSA 5 wormsampling locations was 15 mg/kg.
_________________________________BLASLAND, BOUCK& LEE. INC._______________________________\\B8a\Vdl\USERaLJfMJPOWIOOI948.DOC-- 5/3<MX> 3.-)
![Page 8: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
3.2.2 TOC Results
TOC results from TBSA 1 soil samples ranged from 3.1 to 5.8 percent, with an arithmetic average value of 4.3 ± 0.98percent. TOC results from TBSA 3 soil samples ranged from 8.3 to 10.2 percent, with an arithmetic average valueof 9.4 ± 0.87 percent. TOC results from TBSA 5 soil samples ranged from 8.2 to 9.3 percent, with an arithmeticaverage value of 8.6 ± 0.44 percent. TOC results from TBSA 10 soil samples ranged from 4.5 to 13.5 percent, withan arithmetic average value of 7.4 ± 3.8 percent. TOC results from TBSA 11 soil samples ranged from 8.2 percent(duplicate sample result of 15.4 percent) to 16.0 percent, with an arithmetic average value of 13.4 + 2.1 percent. Theresults of the Phase II TBSA soil TOC analysis are presented in Table 3-2.
3.3 QA/QC Data Review Results
Data from three SDGs for the Phase n TBSA soil samples were reviewed for QA/QC compliance with methodguidelines and project specific requirements. Each data package was reviewed as outlined in the QAPP (BBEPC,1993c). Specifically included were an evaluation of holding times, calibration requirements (initial and continuing),blank contamination, surrogate spike recovery (where applicable), matrix spike and duplicate performance, laboratorycontrol sample recovery, and analyte identification, as applicable.
The following summarizes the findings of the QA/QC data review. A more detailed analysis of data quality is foundin the Data Review Reports included in Appendix C. An assessment of data accuracy and precision is found inAppendix B.
PCB Analysis
• Analyses were performed following modified United States Environmental Protection Agency SW-846Method 8081. Data were reported on an Aroclor-specific basis.
• With the exception of sample K12019, all samples were originally extracted and analyzed within the method-specified holding times. Due to surrogate recovery problems, samples K12022 and K1203 8 were reextractedover the specified holding time. All data for sample K12019 and the reextracted samples were qualified asestimated based on the holding time violations.
• No Aroclors were present in the method or rinse blanks.• Recovery for one surrogate was below control limits in 15 samples. Data qualification was warranted for
only one of the 15 samples based on the excursions. Recoveries for both surrogates were above control limitsin one sample. Since no Aroclors were detected in the sample, the recoveries had no impact on the reporteddata.
• All reported matrix spike recoveries were within control limits. All matrix spike blank recoveries were alsowithin control limits.
• All field duplicate results were acceptable, with one of the three duplicate pairs replicating throughnondetection.
• All initial calibrations were within method specifications. With one exception, all continuing calibrationstandards were also within method specifications. No reported data were associated with the noncompliantstandard.
BLASLAND. BOUCK& LEE, INC.\\BBL2\VOLI\USERaLJF\gPOW IOOI948.DOC -- 5/30AX) 3_2
![Page 9: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
4. Preliminary FindingsThe results of the Phase II TBSA soil sampling will be incorporated into Technical Memorandum 14 - BiotaInvestigation (BBL, 2000), which documents the results of the biota investigation.
4.1 Phase II Soil Sampling Findings
The analytical Phase II results were within the same ranges as the Phase I immunoassay results, summarized in thefollowing table.
TBSA
1351011
Phase I Results(mg/kg)
< 1 to 10< 5 to 10020to> 100Ito40< 1
Phase II ArithmeticAverage and Standard
Deviation Results (mg/kg)0.16 ±0.05325 ± 5.427 + 4.56.5 ±2.50.1710.16
The highest soil arithmetic average PCB concentrations in Phase II were observed in TBSA 3 and TBSA 5. Thelowest arithmetic average PCB concentrations in Phase n were observed in TBSA 1 and TBSA 11. PCBconcentrations tended to be greatest within areas of high organic carbon content (TBSAs 3 and 5), with TOC resultsranging between 8.2 and 10.2 percent in these TBSAs. Likewise, in areas of low TOC (TBSA 1), PCBconcentrations tended to be low.
The average PCB soil concentrations in TBSAs 3, 5, and 10 well exceed the surficial soils PCB concentration (0.7mg/kg) that would be protective of terrestrial receptors, as proposed in the final Baseline Ecological Risk Assessmentfor the Site (MDEQ, 1999).
4.2 QA/QC Data Review Findings
Other than for the deviations noted in Section 3.3, the data are acceptable for use as reported by the laboratory andcan be used for remedial decision-making purposes.
BLASLAND, BOUCK& LEE. INC.\\BBL2\VO.I\USERS\LJPU.JPO(A3IOOI948.DOC -- 5/3<VX> 4-1
![Page 10: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
5. ReferencesBBEPC, 1992. (Blasland & Bouck Engineers, P.C.), Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund
Site Description of the Current Situation. (Syracuse, NY: July 1992).
BBEPC, 1993a. Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RI/FS Work Plan. (Syracuse NY:July 1993).
BBEPC, 1993b. Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RI/FS Field Sampling Plan.(Syracuse, NY: July 1993).
BBEPC, 1993c. Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RI/FS Quality Assurance ProjectPlan. (Syracuse, NY: June 1993).
BBL, 1994. (Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc.). Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RI/FSTechnical Memorandum 2, Results ofPhaselTBSA Soil Sampling. (Syracuse, NY: February 1994).
BBL, 2000. Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site RI/FS Technical Memorandum 14- Biota Investigation. (Syracuse, NY: 2000).
COM, 1993. (Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc.). Biota Sampling Plan for the Allied Paper, Inc./PortageCreek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site. (Detroit, MI: October 1993).
MDEQ, 1999. Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the Kalamazoo River Superfund Site. (Lansing, MI: June1999).
BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.\\BBL2\VOL IMJSERSJJFMJPCW1001948.DOC -- 5/3CWO
![Page 11: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
B L A S L A N D . B O U C K , & L E E . I N C .
e n g i n e e r s 4 s c i e n t i s t s
Tables
![Page 12: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
TABLE 2-1
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE
SAMPLE DELIVERY GROUP SUMMARY
Sample DeliveryGroup40734
40738
40869
Sample IDK12012K12013K12014K12015K12016K12017K12018K12019K12020K12021K12023K 12024K12025K12026K12027K12028K12029K12030K 12033K12031K12034K12035K12036K12037K12038K12039K12040K12042K12043K12044
MatrixSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoil
Rinse BlankSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoil
Rinse BlankSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoilSoil
LocationTBSA10-1TBSA10-2TBSA10-3TBSA10-4TBSA10-5TBSA11-1TBSA11-2TBSA11-3TBSA11-4TBSA11-5
TBSA5-1TBSA5-2TBSA5-3TBSA5-4TBSA5-5TBSA3-1TBSA3-2TBSA3-4TBSA3-3TBSA3-5
TBSA1-1TBSA1-2TBSA1-3TBSA1-4TBSA1-5TBSA1-6TBSA3-6TBSA5-6
AnalysisPCB
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
TOCXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXX
Duplicate
K 12022
K12032
K12041
MS/MSD
X
X
F:\USERS\LJP\LJPOO\3100tbls, 2-1 Page 1 of 1 5/26/00
![Page 13: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
TABLE 3-1
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE
TBSA PHASE II COMPOSITE SAMPLES PCB ANALYTICAL RESULTS1
SampleNumber BBL Sample ID
Aroclor 1242(mg/kg)
Aroclor 1248(mg/kg)
Aroclor 1254(mg/kg)
Aroclor 1260(mg/kg)
TBSA1K12036K12037
K12038REK 12039K 12040K12041K12042
TBSA1-1TBSA 1-2TBSA 1-3TBSA 1-4TBSA 1-5
TBSA 1-5 (DUP)TBSA 1-6*
ND(0.076U)ND(0.075U)
0.045 JND(0.078U)ND(0.073U)ND(0.077U)ND(0.072U)
0.051 JND(0.075U)ND(0.075UJ)ND(0.078U)ND(0.073U)ND(0.077U)ND(0.072U)
0.061 J0.20
0.093 J0.17
0.065 J0.0770.20
0.034 JND(0.075U)
0.033 J0.032 J
ND(0.073U)ND(0.077U)
0.030 JArithmetic Average Concentration2' 3
Standard DeviationTBSA 3
K12029K12030K12031K12032K12033K12034K12043
TBSA3-1TBSA3-2TBSA3-3
TBSA3-3 (DUP)TBSA3-4TBSA3-5TBSA3-6*
ND(2.0U)ND(2.9U)ND(2.8U)ND(2.8U)ND(1.9U)ND(2.8U)ND(2.3U)
17302120161525
3.8ND(2.9U)
5.84.62.75.2
ND(2.3U)
ND(2.0U)2.6 J
ND(2.8U)1.5J1.7 J1.3 J
ND(2.3U)Arithmetic Average Concentration2' 3
Standard Deviation
Total PCB(mg/kg)
0.15J0.20
0.17 J0.20 J0.065 J0.0770.23 J0.160.053
2133 J27
26 J20 J22 J25255.4
TBSA 5K12024K12025K12026K 12027K12028K12044
TBSA5-1TBSA5-2TBSA5-3TBSA5-4TBSA5-5TBSA5-6*
ND(1.8U)ND(2.7U)ND(1.8U)ND(1.8U)ND(1.8U)ND(0.92U)
193121202511
3.7ND(2.7U)
1.82.5
ND(1.8U)3.8
1.8 J3.52.21.7 J2.7
ND(0.92U)Arithmetic Average Concentration3
Standard Deviation
25 J3525
24 J2815274.5
TBSA 10K12012K12013K12014K12015K12016
TBSA 10-1TBSA 10-2TBSA 10-3TBSA 10-4TBSA 10-5
ND(0.36U)ND(0.40U)ND(0.38U)ND(0.87U)ND(0.51U)
3.33.82.98.76.4
0.891.91.11.51.1
ND(0.36U)ND(0.40U)
0.26 JND(0.87U)
0.70Arithmetic Average Concentration
Standard DeviationTBSA 11
K12017K12018K12019K12020K12021K 12022
TBSA11-1TBSA 11 -2TBSA 11 -3TBSA11-4TBSA 11 -5
TBSA 11 -5 (DUP)
ND(0.15U)ND(0.14U)ND(0.12UJ)ND(O.llU)ND(O.llU)ND(O.IOU)
0.22ND(0.14U)
0.39 JND(O.llU)ND(O.llU)ND(O.IOU)
0.061 JND(0.14U)ND(0.12UJ)ND(O.llU)ND(O.llU)ND(O.IOU)
ND(0.15U)ND(0.14U)ND(0.12UJ)ND(O.llU)ND(O.llU)ND(O.IOU)
Arithmetic Average Concentration2' 4
Standard Deviation
4.25.7
4.3 J108.26.52.5
0.28 JND
0.39 JNDNDND0.170.16
See notes on page 2.
F:\USERS\LJP\LJPOO\3100tbls, 3-1 Page 1 of 2 5/26/00
![Page 14: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
TABLE 3-1
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE
TBSA PHASE II COMPOSITE SAMPLES PCB ANALYTICAL RESULTS1
Notes:1 - Showing only the results for compounds detected above the quantitation limit.2 - Duplicate samples were averaged with the original sample for the calculation of the overall
arithmetic average concentration and standard deviation.Composite samples taken specifically from the worm sampling locations (i.e., TBSA 1-6,TBSA3-6, and TBSA5-6) are reported as reference; however, they are not included in thecalculation of arithmetic average PCB concentration.
4 - For nondetects, one-half the reporting limit was used as a proxy concentration for thecalculation of the overall arithmetic average concentration and standard deviation.
* - Supplemental sample collected at worm sampling locations.DUP - Duplicate sample.All samples collected from the 0.0 to 1.0-foot interval.
Notes Explaining Data Qualifiers:J - The compound was positively identified; however, the associated numerical value
is an estimated concentration only.U - The compound was analyzed for but not detected. The associated value is the
compound quantitation limit.UJ - The compound was not detected above the reported quantitation limit. However, the
reported limit is approximate and may or may not represent the actual limit of quantitation.ND- Not detected.
F:\USERS\LJP\LJPOO\3100tbls.3-1 Page 2 Of 2 5/26/00
![Page 15: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
TABLE 3-2
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE
TBSA PHASE H COMPOSITE SAMPLES TOC ANALYTICAL RESULTS
SampleNumber BBL Sample ID
TBSA1K12036K12037K12038K12039K 12040
TBSA1-1TBSA1-2TBSA1-3TBSA 1-4TBSA 1-5
Arithmetic Average ConcentrationStandard Deviation
TOC(%)
3.13.94.35.84.44.3
0.98TBSA 3
K12029K12030K12031K12033K12034
TBSA3-1TBSA3-2TBSA3-3TBSA3-4TBSA3-5
Arithmetic Average ConcentrationStandard Deviation
10.28.710.08.310.09.4
0.87TBSA 5
K12024K12025K 12026K12027K12028
TBSA5-1TBSA5-2TBSA5-3TBSA5-4TBSA5-5
Arithmetic Average ConcentrationStandard Deviation
8.88.28.59.38.38.6
0.44TBSA 10
K12012K12013K12014K12015K12016
TBSA 10-1TBSA 10-2TBSA 10-3TBSA 10-4TBSA10-5
Arithmetic Average ConcentrationStandard Deviation
4.54.95.58.513.57.43.8
TBSA 11K12017K12018K12019K12020K12021K12022
TBSA11-1TBSA11-2TBSA11-3TBSA11-4TBSA11-5
TBSA11-5(DUP)Arithmetic Average Concentration
Standard Deviation
16.015.213.111.18.215.413.42.1
See notes on page 2.
F:\USERS\LJP\LJPOO\3100tbls, 3-2 Page 1 of 2 5/26/00
![Page 16: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
TABLE 3-2
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE
TBSA PHASE E COMPOSITE SAMPLES TOC ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Notes:i Duplicate samples were averaged with the original sample for the calculation of the overall
arithmetic average concentration and standard deviation.DUP - Duplicate sample.All samples collected from the 0.0 to 1.0-foot interval.
F:\USERS\LJP\LJPOO\3100tbls, 3-2 Page 2 Of 2 5/26/00
![Page 17: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
B L A S L A N D . B O U C K , & L E E , I N C .
engineers & s c i e n t i s t s
Figures
![Page 18: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
KEY:(SEE FIGURE INDICATEDFOR LOCATIONS OFTHE FOLLOWING SITES)
LEGEND
FIGURE NUMBERAND AREA DESCRIBED
ALLEGAN. KALAMAZOO AND CALHOUN COUNTY MAPPINGOBTAINED FROM MICHIGAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEM.
ALLEGAN COUNTYKALAMAZOO COUNTYCALHOUN COUNTY——
MICHIGANNOT TO SCALE
f: 6430JB97L: ON—.OFT--HEF'4/14/00 SYR-S4-RIP JHS OCC64924403X64524801 -DUG
KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER. INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER
SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPLING
INDEX TO FIGURES
HHL BUSUNO, 60UCK it LEE. INC.engineers & scientists
FIGURE
1
![Page 19: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
FORMERFENNVILLEGAGINGSTAT1
LEGEND
TBSA 1
NOTE:
1. PLANIMETRIC MAPPING OBTAINED FROMMICHIGAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
2. SAMPLING AREAS APPROXIMATED BYBLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE. INC.
2400'
SCALE
4800'
P: S4S-DJ-«L: OH--.OFf.-HtF-4/14/00 S1*-S4-*U> N€S OCC64S24403\64S248Qg.O«C
KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER
SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPLING
TBSA 1
HHL BLASUNO, BOUCK * LEE. INC.engineers & scientists
FIGURE
![Page 20: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
P: 64S-DJ-BU ON-'.OFF-«REF«4/14/00 SYR-M-RLP JUS OCC64U4403\64324B06.01IC
LEGEND
NOTE:
1. PLANIUETRIC MAPPING OBTAINED FROMMICHIGAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
2. SAMPLING AREAS APPROXIMATED BY8LASLANO. BOUCK 4t LEE. INC.
2400'
SCALE
4800'
KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER
SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPLING
TBSA 3 AND TBSA 5
BUSLAND. BOUCK ft LEE, INC.engineers & scientists
FIGURE
![Page 21: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
RIVER12TH STREETLANDFILL OU
AU£GAN CO.KMMMZOO C0\
NOTE:
1. PLANIMETRIC MAPPING OBTAINED FROMMICHIGAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
2. SAMPLING AREAS APPROXIMATED BYBLASLANO, BOUCK & LEE. INC.
2400'
SCALE
4800'
P: 645-OJ-8
4/14/00 SYR-S4-RIP NCS DCC64S244OJ\64a24aO5.DOC
KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER
SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2
RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPLING
TBSA 10
HtiL BLASLAHO. BOUCK t LEE. INC.engineers & scientists
FIGURE
4
![Page 22: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
BATTLE CREEK
1. PLAMMETRIC MAPPING OBTAINED FROMMICHIGAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
2. SAMPLING AREAS APPROXIMATEO BYBLASLANO. BOUCK & LEE. INC.
2400'
SCALE
4800'
P: 64S-OJ-BL; OM-'.OFF—«£f4/14/00 SW»-S4-RU> JUS OCC645244OJ\64524602.0»C
KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER. INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER
SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPLING
TBSA 11
8USLAND. BOUCK ft LEE, INC.engineers & scientists
FIGURE
![Page 23: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
I
LEGEND
TBSA 1
NOTE:
1. PLANIMETRIC MAPPING OBTAINED FROM MICHIGANRESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
2. SAMPUNG AREAS APPROXIMATED BY BLASLAND,BOUCK * LEE. INC.
3. SAMPLES REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF 8INDIVIDUAL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM THE 0TO 1 FOOT DEPTH.
4. DATA REFLECT TOTAL PCB CONCENTRATIONS(mq/kg) DERIVED FROM THE SUM OF INDIVIDUALAROCLORs. AROCIOR-SPECIFIC RESULTS AREPRESENTED IN TABLE 3-1.
5. J - THE COMPOUND WAS POSITIVELY IDENTIFIEDHOWEVER. THE ASSOCIATED NUMERICAL VALUEIS AN ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION ONLY.
FORMERFENNV1LLEGAGINGSTAT1
TBSA 1LocationTBSA1-1TBSA1-2TBSA1-3TBSA1-4TBSA1-5TBSA1-5(dup)
PCB (mq/kg)0.15 J0.200.17 J0.20 J0.065 J0.077
P: 845-OJ-S<.: ON-'.OFF-IIEF*4/14/00 SYH-M-RIP NES OCCS4S244Oe\S4S2480t .0*6
KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER. INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER
SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPUNG
TBSA 1 PHASE II PCB DATA
HHJL BLASLAND. BOUCK * LEE, INC.engineers & scientists
FIGURE
![Page 24: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
P:64S-OJ-B
4/14/00 S-m-54-m.P NES OCC64S24408\64324802.DWG
LEGEND
NOTE:
1. PLANIMETRIC MAPPING OBTAINED FROM MICHIGANRESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
2. SAMPLING AREAS APPROXIMATED BY BLASLANO,BOUCK * LEE. INC.
3. SAMPLES REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF 8INDIVIDUAL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM THE 0TO 1 FOOT DEPTH.
4. DATA REFLECT TOTAL PCB CONCENTRATIONS(mgAg) DERIVED FROM THE SUM OF INDIVIDUALAROCLORs. AROCLOR-SPEOFIC RESULTS AREPRESENTED IN TABLE 3-1.
5. J - THE COMPOUND WAS POSITIVELY IDENTIFIEDHOWEVER. THE ASSOCIATED NUMERICAL VALUEIS AN ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION ONLY.
2400'
SCALE
4800'
KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER
SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPUNG
TBSA 3 AND TBSA 5PHASE II PCB DATA
HHL BUSLAND. BOUCK 4 LEE, INC.engineers & scientists
FIGURE
![Page 25: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
LEGEND
TBSA 10 "ILocationTBSA10-1TBSA10-2TBSA10-3TBSA10-4TBSA10-5
PCB (mg/kq)4.25.74.3 J108.2
TBSA 10
NOTE:
1. PLANIMETRIC MAPPING OBTAINED FROM MICHIGANRESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
2. SAMPUNG AREAS APPROXIMATED BY BLASLANO.80UCK * LEE. INC.
3. SAMPLES REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF 8INDIVIDUAL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM THE 0TO 1 FOOT DEPTH.
4. DATA REFLECT TOTAL PCB CONCENTRATIONS(mgAg) DERIVED FROM THE SUM OF INDIVIDUALAROCLORs. AROCLOR-SPEOnC RESULTS AREPRESENTED IN TABLE 3-1.
5. J - THE COMPOUND WAS POSITIVELY IDENTIFIEDHOWEVER. THE ASSOCIATED NUMERICAL VALUEIS AN ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION ONLY.
2400'
SCALE
4800'
\KAIMUOOO
P: S4S-OJ-6U ON.',OFF-1KF«4/14/00 STR-M-RLP NES DCCS4i2440e\64$34BOJ.OM;
KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER. INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMA200 RIVER
SUPERFUNO SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPLING
TBSA 10 PHASE II PCB DATA
HBL BLASLANO. MUCK * LEE, INC.engineers & scientists
FIGURE
8
![Page 26: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
1. PLANIMETRlC MAPPING OBTAINED FROM MICHIGANRESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEMS.
2. SAMPLING AREAS APPROXIMATED BY BLASLAND.BOUCK & LEE. INC.
BATTLE CREEK
SAMPLES REPRESENT A COMPOSITE OF 8INDIVIDUAL SAMPLES COLLECTED FROM THE 0TO 1 FOOT DEPTH.
DATA REFLECT TOTAL PCB CONCENTRATIONSDERIVED FROM THE SUM OF INDIVIDUAL
AROCLOR*. AROCLOR-SPEOFIC RESULTS AREPRESENTED IN TABLE 3-1.
5. J - THE COMPOUND WAS POSITIVELY IDENTIFIEDHOWEVER. THE ASSOCIATED NUMERICAL VALUEIS AN ESTIMATED CONCENTRATION ONLY.
6. ND- NOT DETECTED
CERESCO
ON-'.OfF.IW/14/00 SYR-S4-RLP NCS DCC
KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUPALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER
SUPERFUND SITEADDENDUM TO TECHNICAL MEMORANDUM 2RESULTS OF PHASE II TBSA SOIL SAMPLING
TBSA 11 PHASE II PCB DATA
BHL BLASLAND, BOUCK ft LEE, INC.engineers & scientists
FIGURE
![Page 27: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
B L A S L A N D , B O U C K ,
engineers & s c i e n t i s t
Appendices
![Page 28: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
B L A S L A N D , B O U C K , & L E E , INC.
engineers & s c i e n t i s t s
Appendix A
![Page 29: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
![Page 30: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
![Page 31: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
![Page 32: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
![Page 33: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
r*-r.'t' ;j":A'-'.•**'*.•*.*•» LJO'.I-J^/ . ,
![Page 34: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
![Page 35: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
![Page 36: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
'.!•• -. -V -.••;•:- '..• '/ •.• • •;•"•','••.''
![Page 37: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
![Page 38: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
![Page 39: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
![Page 40: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
![Page 41: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
![Page 42: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
f'Pf:
![Page 43: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
![Page 44: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
![Page 45: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
![Page 46: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
' '•• •• i •;. ,''. •' - •; *'
![Page 47: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
![Page 48: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
![Page 49: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
; :-
J>
r1
„._. s-ne,A->
_ .._/-*'
_ _ _ . / < £
__. ... ..*?
_.._.*«>..
_^ _...f ?
///
__ y^/- .
_./*£_..
Sfcevett
*
Sf
/#
l<*
£-3
....&.
__ 4S....X/5-
N*J. l^t^^TT^^^^"
.-^4
f> ft-
.7 ...36>JZ
/<*z?
f Z .
<?zz-
' *"c.
&£/vr
&7 __/r?>vr>»y . . ._/*•£..__/^ ..
^«^7" ._ 7
. -i/je/t>
z/27
_ y^_^
^>?7s-/iO
/vr:
5 :A^
7
._ fe.. 2$.
_... ^«V?o
_/*..-<XT>-
^^^^^^^^T^^W^
•ss>f
r/^21A.
y?rK7&&rfV
77.._.^•/73
•sf*f~t—
/7V .
/10J6> 3
/7/
y. 2/^j/^T./?2
<r«
_../•?..
_^7. >3~
_/»/-xyy
/<6
/> ^
/•»?„_....
^&_.__'
.97_..
_??._......
49 ___//f___^i-_
;r
--XP^ BI ^VM
J.
"'Ja 'v*--w?5?Y?,r:',
I
:IMW
X^'-v^-''"''» ' , . • • ' • • • • • ' ' . . - .••i •.•••:•' •.•'l.'Vt-.-'.-vi
,:v?A,v.%».rtK'.•V%':^-v^v^s-:?r^
![Page 50: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
B L A S L A N D , B O U C K , & L E E , INC .
engineers & s c i e n t i s t s
Appendix B
![Page 51: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Appendix BQA/QC Review of Data - Summary of Precision and Accuracy
Data packages for the Phase II TBSA soil sample analyses were reviewed and inspected for analytical precision andaccuracy. Three SDGs containing the sediment samples were reviewed and evaluated. The SDGs and theirassociated samples are presented in Table 2-1.
Analytical precision was assessed by comparing the percent recoveries of the matrix spike (MS) and matrix spikeduplicate (MSD) samples. Field duplicates were also used to assess the overall precision of the laboratory analyses.The relative percent differences (RPDs) between percent recoveries were calculated for each pair of duplicateanalyses.
In addition to the MS data, other indicators of accuracy, such as surrogate spike and blank spike recoveries, wereexamined to assess the analytical method's accuracy.
An overall precision and accuracy summary, as assessed through the review of QA/QC information includingMS/MSD recoveries and RPDs between recoveries, matrix spike blank (MSB) recoveries, field duplicate RPD results,surrogate spike recoveries and contamination levels in the blanks, is presented below. A more detailed review of dataquality can be found in the Data Review Reports included in Appendix C.
B. 1 Precision and Accuracy for PCB Laboratory Analyses
All reported MS/MSD recoveries were within control limits. Recovery of Aroclor 1242 in the MS/MSD associatedwith SDG# 40734 could not, however, be calculated due to interference from Aroclor 1248 present in the unspikedsample. Matrix spike recoveries for Aroclor 1242 ranged from 47 to 51 percent with an average of 49 percent, whilerecoveries for Aroclor 1254 ranged from 40 to 93 percent with an average of 70 percent.
The precision of the matrix spikes as measured by the RPD between the MS and MSD recoveries ranged from 15to 48 percent with an average of 32 percent for Aroclor 1254. The RPD for Aroclor 1242 was 8.
All matrix spike blank recoveries were within control limits with Aroclor 1242 recoveries ranging from 39 to 82percent with an average of 60 percent, and Aroclor 1254 recoveries ranging from 66 to 94 percent with and averageof 80 percent.
Precision of the field duplicates was acceptable for all of the three duplicate pairs, with one of the three replicatingthrough non-detection.
Recovery for one surrogate was below control limits in samples K12012, K12013, K12015, K12016, K12024,K12025, K12026, K12027, K12028, K12029, K12030, K13033, K12043 and K12044. Since recoveries for thesecond surrogate were within control limits, no data were qualified based on the single surrogate recoveries.Recovery for one surrogate was also below control limits in sample K1203 8, but since the recovery was less than 10percent all positive data for the sample were qualified as estimated and all non-detect data were rejected. The samplewas subsequently reextracted and reanalyzed with acceptable surrogate recoveries. Recoveries for both surrogateswere above control limits in sample K12022. Since no Aroclors were detected in the sample, the high recoveries haveno impact on the reported data. Overall, surrogate recoveries for tetrachloro-m-xylene (TCMX) ranged from 4 to 158percent with an average of 63 percent and recoveries for decachlorobiphenyl (DCB) ranged from 72 to 163 percentwith an average of 92 percent.
No Aroclors were detected in the method or rinse blanks.
___________________________________BL>\SLAND, BOUCK & LEE, INC.U:\LJPOOCJ IOOAPXB.DOC •• 5/26/00
![Page 52: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
The %D for one continuing calibration standard was outside the method-specified limit resulting in the qualificationof data for samples K12022RE. No data from this analysis was, however, reported.
The data reported for samples K12019 and K1203 8 are taken from analyses which were performed outside thespecified holding times. All data for these samples have been qualified as estimated based on the holding timeviolations.
BLASLAND. BOUCK & LEE, INC.U:\LJPCTO IOOAPXB.DOC - 5/26/00 B-2
![Page 53: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
B L A S L A N D , B O U C K , & L E E . I N C .
n g i n e e r s & s c i e n t i s t s
Appendix C
![Page 54: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
DATA REVIEW FOR
ALLIED PAPER. INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE
SDG# 40734
PCB ANALYSES
TBSA - PHASE II
Analyses performed by:
Aquatec, Inc.Colchester, Vermont
Review performed by:
Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc.Syracuse, New York
![Page 55: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Summary
The following is an assessment of the PCB data package for SDG # 40734 for theTBSA - Phase II sampling of the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo RiverSuperfund Site. Included with this assessment are the data review check sheets usedin the review of the package and sample results for PCB analyses. Analyses wereperformed on the following samples:
Sample ID
K12012
K12013
K12014
K12015
K12016
K12017
K12018
K12019
K12020
K12021
K12022
K12023
K12024
K12025
K12026
K12027
K12028
K12029
K12030
K12033*
Lab ID
204311
204312
204313
204314
204315
204316
204317
204318
204319
204320
204321
204322
204323
204324
204325
204326
204327
204328
204329
204330
Matrix
soil
soil
soil
soil
soil
soil
soil
soil
soil
soil
soil
rinse blank
soil
soil
soil
soil
soil
soil
soil
soil
Sample Date
11/10/93
1 1/10/93
11/10/93
11/10/93
11/10/93
11/10/93
11/10/93
11/10/93
11/10/93
11/10/93
11/10/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
1 1/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
MS/MSD analysis performed on sample
1*40734
![Page 56: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Introduction
Analyses were performed according to the USEPA SW-846 method 8081, modified forPCB only analysis.
The data review process is intended to evaluate the data on a technical basis. Itis assumed that the data package represents the best efforts of the laboratory andhad already been subjected to adequate and sufficient quality review prior tosubmission.
During the review process, laboratory qualified and unqualified data are verifiedagainst the supporting documentation. Based on this evaluation, qualifier codes maybe added, deleted, or modified by the data reviewer. Results are qualified with thefollowing codes in accordance with National Functional Guidelines:
U The compound was analyzed for but not detected. The associated valueis the compound quantitation limit.
J The compound was positively identified; however, the associated numericalvalue is an estimated concentration only.
B The compound has been found in the sample as well as its associatedblank, its presence in the sample may be suspect.
N The analysis indicates the presence of a compound for which there ispresumptive evidence to make a tentative identification.
JN The analysis indicates the presence of a compound for which there ispresumptive evidence to make a tentative identification. The associatednumerical value is an estimated concentration only.
E The compound was quantitated above the calibration range.
D Concentration is based on a diluted sample analysis.
UJ The com'pound was not detected above the reported sample quantitationlimit. However, the reported limit is approximate and may or may notrepresent the actual limit of quantitation.
R The sample results are rejected.
Two facts should be noted by all data users. First, the "R" flag means that theassociated value is unusable. In other words, due to significant QC problems, theanalysis is invalid and provides no information as to whether the compound is presentor not. "R" values should not appear on data tables because they cannot be reliedupon, even as a last resort. The second fact to keep in mind is that no compoundconcentration, even if it has passed all QC test, is guaranteed to be accurate. StrictQC serves to increase confidence in data but any value potentially contains error.
U40734
![Page 57: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
The data presented in the package has been derived using a procedure developedby Aquatec, Inc. in an attempt to improve the analytical process of calibration,identification, and quantitation of PCBs as Aroclors. Key components of thisprocedure include:
Calibration
The response function of the electron capture detector is inherently non-linear,and while significant linearization is achieved for this detector by electronicmeans, some non-linearity remains. Power function linearization is used to"straighten the curve" and allow the use of response factors for calibrationpurposes.
During the initial calibration a response factor is calculated for each peak in theindividual Aroclors.
A weighted response factor calculation has been used to adjust for non-linearityat the low end of the calibration curve.
Identification
Peak retention times are relative. Retention times are in set windows relativeto the time markers DCB and TCMX. Time markers adjust for minor variationsin column flow or instrument condition and allow the use of very tight windowswhich minimizes the number of both false positive and false negative peakidentifications.
The determination of "which Aroclor or mixture of Aroclors will produce achromatogram most similar to that of the residue" is made by expressing theunknown sample chromatogram as a linear combination of the Aroclors. The"most similar" Aroclor or mixture of Aroclors is determined by using a leastsquares minimization of the difference between the unknown chromatogram andthe linear combination of Aroclors. This is similar to the procedure presentedby L.E. Slivon, P.M. Schumacher and A. Alford-Stevens for the determination ofAroclor composition from GC/MS level of chlorination results.
Identification/quantitation of Aroclors in samples is based on the combinedresponse of two columns, typically RTX-5 and RTX-35. The pooling of responsecombines the unique qualities of both columns to derive a more defined Aroclorpattern which less likely to be affected by interferents. Identification/quantitationdata for the individual columns is provided in the package and can be used asa check on the combined column results.
1*40734
![Page 58: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Data Assessment
1. Holding Time
The QAPP-specified holding times for PCB analyses of soil samples are 12 daysfrom date of sample receipt to extraction and 40 days from extraction toanalysis.
Sample K12019 was extracted 13 days over the specified holding time andsample K12022-RE was analyzed 17 days over the specified holding time. Alldata for these samples have been qualified as estimated based on the holdingtime violations. All other samples were extracted and analyzed within thespecified holding times.
2. Blank Contamination
Quality assurance blanks, i.e., method, field or rinse blanks, are prepared toidentify any contamination which may have been introduced into the samplesduring sample preparation or field activity. Method blanks measure laboratorycontamination. Field and rinse blanks measure contamination of samples duringfield operations.
No target compounds were detected in the method or rinse blanks.
3. System Performance
The system performance was acceptable for both columns.
4. Calibration
Satisfactory instrument calibration is established to insure that the instrument iscapable of producing acceptable quantitative data. An initial calibrationdemonstrates that the instrument is capable of giving acceptable performance atthe beginning of an experimental sequence. The continuing calibration verifiesthat the instrument is giving satisfactory daily performance.
4.1 Initial Calibration
The method allows a maximum RSD of 20%. The %RSD was within thespecified limit for all Aroclors.
4.2 Continuing Calibration
A maximum %D of 15 is allowed. All continuing calibrations were withinthe specified limits with the following exception:
1*40734
![Page 59: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Instrument HP2087 1/13/94 - 23:19
Aroclor 1248 24.0%
All data for the associated sample K12022-RE have been qualified asestimated based on the %D.
Surrogates / System Monitoring Compounds
All samples to be analyzed for organic compounds are spiked with surrogatecompounds prior to sample preparation to evaluate overall laboratoryperformance and efficiency of the analytical technique.
Recovery for one surrogate was below control limits in samples K12012, K12013,K12015, K12016, K12024, K12025, K12026, K12027, K12028, K12029, K12030,K12033, K12033MS and K12033MSD. Since recoveries for the remainingsurrogate were within control limits, no data have been qualified based onthe deviations. Recoveries for both surrogates were above control limits insample K12022. Since no target compounds were detected in the sample, thehigh recoveries have no impact on the reported data. All other samplesurrogate recoveries were within control limits.
Compound Identification
The determination of Aroclor presence is made by expressing the unknownsample chromatogram as a linear combination of the Aroclors. The most similarAroclor or mixture of Aroclors is determined by using a least squaresminimization of the difference between the unknown chromatogram and the linearcombination of Aroclors.
Identification/quantitation of Aroclors is based on the combined response of theRTX-5 and RTX-35 columns. Identification/quantitation data for the individualcolumns is provided in the package and has been used as a check on thecombined column results.
A review of the sample chromatograms indicate that the Aroclors have beencorrectly identified/quantitated.
7. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate/Matrix Spike Blank
Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate data are used to assess the precisionand accuracy of the analytical method.
Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries for Aroclor 1242 could not becalculated due to interference from Aroclor 1248 present in the unspiked sample.Aroclor 1254 matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries were withincontrol limits, but the relative percent difference (RPD) between recoveries was
IS40734
![Page 60: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
above the control limit,performance alone.
No data have been qualified based on matrix spike
All matrix spike blank recoveries were within control limits.
Field Duplicates
Results for duplicate samples are summarized below:
Sample ID / Duplicate ID
K12021 / K12022
Compound
ND
SampleResult
--
DuplicateResult
--
RPD
NA
ND Nor detected.NA Compound not detected in sample and/or duplicate. RPD not applicable.
The samples replicate through non-detection.
General Comments
The recommended data usage for sample reanalyses is as follows:
K12022 and K12022-REAll surrogate recoveries were above control limits in the originalanalysis of sample K12022. The sample was subsequently reanalyzedover the specified holding time, resulting in the qualification of alldata as estimated. Since no Aroclors were detected in either theoriginal analysis or the reanalysis, and since the reanalysis wasperformed over the specified holding time, it is recommended thatdata from the original analysis be used for all Aroclors.
10. System Performance and Overall Assessment
Overall system performance was acceptable. Other than for those deviationsspecifically mentioned in this review, the overall data quality is within theguidelines listed in the analytical method.
IS40734
![Page 61: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
DATA REVIEW CHECKLIST
![Page 62: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
PCB Data Review Checklist
YES NO NA
Data Completeness and Deliverables
Is there a narrative or cover letter present?
Are the samples numbers included in the narrative?
Are the sample chain-of-custodies present?
Do the chain-of-custodies indicate any problems withsample receipt or sample condition?
Holding Times
Have any holding times been exceeded?
Surrogate Recovery
Are surrogate recovery forms present?
Are all the samples listed on the appropriate surrogaterecovery form?
Are the outliers correctly marked with an asterisk?
Were recoveries of TCX or DCB outside specified limitsfor any sample or blank?
If yes, were the samples reanalyzed?
Matrix Spikes
Is there a matrix spike recovery form present?
Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency?
How many spike recoveries were outside of QC limits?
0 out of 2
How many RPDs for matrix spike and matrix spikeduplicate were outside of QC limits?
1 out of 1
Blanks
Is a Method Blank Summary Form present?
Has a method blank been analyzed for each set ofsamples or for each 20 samples, whichever is morefrequent?
Is the chromatographic performance acceptable for eachinstrument?
Do any method/reagent/instrument blanks have positiveresults?
1940734
![Page 63: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
PCB Data Review Checklist - Page 2
_____________________________________________YES______NO______NA
Do any field/rinse blanks have positive results? ____ X
Are percent recoveries of the compounds used to checkthe efficiency of the cleanup procedure within QC limits?
Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated withevery sample?
Calibration and GC Performance
Are the following chromatograms and data printoutspresent?
Aroclor 1016/1260
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Are Initial Calibration Summary Forms present andcomplete for each column and analytical sequence?
Are the linearity criteria for the initial analyses withinlimits for both columns (20% RSD)
Have all samples been injected within a 12 hour periodbeginning with the injection of a calibration standard?
Is a Calibration Verification Summary Form present andcomplete for each continuing standard analyzed?
Are %D values for all compounds within limits (15%)?
Analytical Sequence Check
Is a analytical sequence form present and complete foreach column and each period of analyses? X
Was the proper analytical sequence followed? X
Cleanup Efficiency Verification
If GPC cleanup was performed, is Gel PermeationChromatography Check Form present? ___
(•40734
![Page 64: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
PCB Data Review Checklist - Page 3
_____________________________________________YES_____NO______NA
PCB Identification
Is both a combined and single column AroclorIdentification Report present for every sample? X ____
Do the combined column and individual column Arocloridentifications agree? _X_
Were there any false negatives? ___
Was GC/MS confirmation provided when required? ___
Compound Quantitation and Reported Detection Limits
Are the reporting limits adjusted to reflect sampledilutions, and for soils, sample moisture? X
Chromatogram Quality
Were the baselines stable? _X_
Were any electronegative displacement (negative peaks)or unusual peaks detected? ___
Field Duplicates
Where field duplicates submitted with the samples? X
H40734
![Page 65: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
PCB Holding Time and SurrogateRecovery Summary
Sample ID
K12012
K12013
K12014
K12015
K12016
K12017
K12018
K12019
K12020
K12021
K12022
K12022RE
K12023
K12024
K12025
K12026
K12027
K12028
K12029
K12030
K12033
K12033MS
K12033MSD
Holding Time
+ 13
+ 17
Surrogates
TCX
1 (50)
1 (50)
J (55)
1 (53)
1 (162)
1 (50)
l (55)
1 (53)
l (47)
1 (52)
1 (46)
1 (53)
1 (49)
1 (49)
1 (45)
DCB
I (163)
Surrogate StandardsTCX Tetrachloro-m-xyleneDCB Decachlorobiphenyl
Qualifiers:D Surrogates diluted outl Recovery highl Recovery low
Unless otherwise noted, all parameters are within specified limits.
U40734
![Page 66: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
PCB Calibration Summary
Instrument: HP2618Column: RTX-35 / RTX-5
Date:
Time:
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Decachlorobiphenyl
Affected Samples:
12/9/93 2218
to12/10/93 1816
Initial Cal.
%RSD
3.9 / 4.4
4.4 / 4.7
3.0 / 3.3
3.7 / 4.6
3.0 / 3.1
2.4 / 2.8
3.0 / 2.8
4.9 / 5.2
9.3 / 9.9
12/15
1444
Cont.Cal.
%D
0.5
12/15
1520
Cont.Cal.
%D
5.5
12/16
0112
Cont.Cal.
%D
5.5
12/16
0147
Cont.Cal.
%D
5.5
12/16
0851
Cont.Cal.
%D
5.0
12/16
0926
Cont.Cal.
%D
0.0
U40734
![Page 67: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
PCB Calibration Summary - Page 2
Instrument: HP2618Column: RTX-35 / RTX-5
Date:
Time:
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Decachlorobiphenyl
Affected Samples:
Initial Cal.
%RSD
12/16
1628
Cont.Cal.
%D
3.5
12/16
1704
Cont.Cal.
%D
4.0
12/17
0140
Cont.Cal.
%D
4.0
12/17
0215
Cont.Cal.
%D
7.5
12/17
0546
Cont.Cal.
%D
0.5
12/17
0622
Cont.Cal.
%D
4.5
IS40734
![Page 68: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
PCB Calibration Summary - Page 3
Instrument: HP2087Column: RTX-35 / RTX-5
Date.
Time:
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Decachlorobiphenyl
Affected Samples:
1/8/94 0354
to1/9/94 0122
Initial Cal.
%RSD
4.4 / 3.2
3.9 / 3.0
4.2 / 4.5
4.3 / 4.0
6.2 / 5.5
6.2 / 3.9
4.1 / 3.9
3.5 / 10.1
13.8 / 8.8
1/13
1505
Cont.Cal.
%D
15.0
1/13
1543
Cont.Cal.
%D
10.0
1/13
2319
Cont.Cal.
%D
24.0
K12022RE
1/13
2357
Cont.Cal.
%D
11.5
Cont.Cal.
%D
Cont.Cal.
%D
1*40734
![Page 69: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
CORRECTED ANALYSIS SUMMARY FORMS
![Page 70: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)5.0
69.99
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
K12012»
SDG:
20431111/13/9311/17/9312/16/93
N
40734
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-11 1 096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1 016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
360 U360 U360 U360 U3300890360 U
![Page 71: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)5.0
63.25
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
K12013
SDG:
20431211/13/9311/17/9312/16/93
N
40734
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
400 U400 U400 U400 U38001900400 U
![Page 72: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)5.0
66.50
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
K12014
SDG:
20431311/13/9311/17/931 2/1 6/93
N
40734
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
380 U380 U380 U380 U29001100260 J
![Page 73: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uU
10.057.89
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
K12015
SDG:
20431411/13/9311/17/9312/16/93
N
40734
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
870 U870 U870 U870 U
87001500870 U
![Page 74: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)5.0
49.87
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
K12016
SDG:
20431511/13/9311/17/9312/16/93
N
40734
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-21 1 1 04-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232ArocIor-1 242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
510 U510 U510 U510 U64001100700
![Page 75: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.01.0
(g)(uL)
1.034.37
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAI
PCB
EPA SAMPLE NO.
K12017
SDG: 40734
Lab Sample ID: 204316Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
11/13/9311/17/9312/16/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
150 U150 U150 U150 U22061 J150 U
![Page 76: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)1.0
36.96
Case: PCB
K12018
SDG: 40734
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
2043171 1 /1 3/9311/17/9312/16/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242A rod or- 1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
140 U140 U140 U140 U140 U140 U140 U
![Page 77: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)1.0
42.11
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
K12019
SDG:
20431811/13/931 2/06/931 2/1 6/93
N
40734
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
120120120120390120120
UTuxrUTUT
3~uTUT
![Page 78: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)1.0
46.31
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
K1 2020
SDG:
20431911/13/9311/17/931 2/1 6/93
N
40734
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-21 1 1 04-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-11 1 096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1254Aroclor-1 260
110 U110 U110 U110 U110 U110 U110 U
![Page 79: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUA!
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)1.0
49.13
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
K12021
SDG:
2043201 1 /1 3/9311/17/9312/16/93
N
40734
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
110 U110 U110 U110 U110 U110 U110 U
![Page 80: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)1.0
50.47
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
K12022
SDG:
20432111/13/9311/17/9312/16/93
N
40734
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232ArocIor-1242Aroclor-1 248ArocIor-1254Aroclor-1 260
100 U100 U100 U100 U100 U100 U100 U
![Page 81: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.01.0
(g)(uL)
1.050.47
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAI
PCB
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
SDG: /(0734
204321R111/t3/931V/17/9301/13/94
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND /CONCENTRATION/ (ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016 /Aroclor-1221 /ArocIor-1232 /Aroclor-1242 /Aroclor-1248 /ArocIor-1254 /Aroclor-1260/
/
100 J0 05100 tfUS100 kfO3100 wvr\100 JO\S$100 wvXS100 OU^S
![Page 82: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Volume:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
91082
Water1005 (mL)1 .0 (uL)1.0
Case: PCB
K12023
SDG: 40734
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
20432211/13/9311/18/931 2/1 6/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/L) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242ArocloM 248Aroclor-1254ArocloM 260
0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U
![Page 83: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
91082
SOIL10.01.0
(g)(uU
20.056.46
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAIK12024
PCB SDG: 40734
Lab Sample ID: 204323Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
11/13/9311/17/9312/15/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
1800 U1800 U1800 U1800 U1900037001 800 J
![Page 84: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.01.0
(g)(uL)
30.057.00
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAIPCB
EPA SAMPLE NO.
K12025
SDG: 40734
Lab Sample ID: 204324Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
11/13/9311/17/9312/15/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1 01 6Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
2700 U2700 U2700 U2700 U
310002700 U3500
![Page 85: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.01.0
(g)(uL)
20.056.39
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAIK12026
PCB SDG: 40734
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
20432511/13/9311/17/9312/15/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
1800 U1800 U1800 U1800 U
2100018002200
![Page 86: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)
20.056.73
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
K12027
SDG:
20432611/13/9311/17/9312/15/93
N
40734
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
1800 U1800 U1800 U1800 U
2000025001700 J
![Page 87: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)
20.056.44
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
K12028
SDG:
20432711/13/9311/17/931 2/1 6/93
N
40734
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-21 1 1 04-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-11 1 096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
1800 U1800 U1800 U1800 U
250001800 U2700
![Page 88: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.Contract: 91082
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAI
PCB
ERA SAMPLE NO.
K12029
SDG: 40734
Phase Type: ____SOILPhase Weight: 10.0
Injection Volume: ____1.0Dilution Factor: ____20.0
% Solids: 50.70
(uL)
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
20432811/13/9311/17/9312/16/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
2000 U2000 U2000 U2000 U1700038002000 U
![Page 89: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)
30.052.39
Case: PCB
K12030
SDG: 40734
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
20432911/13/9311/17/931 2/1 6/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
2900 U2900 U2900 U2900 U300002900 U2600 J
![Page 90: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUA)
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)
20.054.00
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
K1 2033
SDG:
20433011/13/9311/17/931 2/1 6/93
N
40734
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-11 1 096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1 221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
1900 U1900 U1900 U1900 U1600027001700 J
![Page 91: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
DATA REVIEW FOR
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE
SDG# 40738
PCB ANALYSES
TBSA - PHASE
Analyses performed by:
Aquatec, Inc.Colchester, Vermont
Review performed by:
Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc.Syracuse, New York
![Page 92: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
Summary
The following is an assessment of the PCB data package for SDG # 40738 for theTBSA - Phase II sampling of the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo RiverSuperfund Site. Included with this assessment are the data review check sheets usedin the review of the package and sample results for PCB analyses. Analyses wereperformed on the following samples:
Sample ID
K12031
K12032
K12034
K12035
K12036
K12037*
K12038
K12039
K12040
K12041
Lab ID
204335
204336
204337
204338
204339
204340
204342
204343
204344
204345
Matrix
soil
soil
soil
rinse blank
soil
soil
soil
soil
soil
soil
Sample Date
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
11/12/93
11/12/93
11/12/93
11/12/93
11/12/93
11/12/93
11/12/93
MS/MSD analysis performed on sample
1(40738
![Page 93: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
Introduction
Analyses were performed according to the USEPA SW-846 method 8081, modified forPCB only analysis.
The data review process is intended to evaluate the data on a technical basis. Itis assumed that the data package represents the best efforts of the laboratory andhad already been subjected to adequate and sufficient quality review prior tosubmission.
During the review process, laboratory qualified and unqualified data are verifiedagainst the supporting documentation. Based on this evaluation, qualifier codes maybe added, deleted, or modified by the data reviewer. Results are qualified with thefollowing codes in accordance with National Functional Guidelines:
U The compound was analyzed for but not detected. The associated valueis the compound quantitation limit.
J The compound was positively identified; however, the associated numericalvalue is an estimated concentration only.
B The compound has been found in the sample as well as its associatedblank, its presence in the sample may be suspect.
N The analysis indicates the presence of a compound for which there ispresumptive evidence to make a tentative identification.
JN The analysis indicates the presence of a compound for which there ispresumptive evidence to make a tentative identification. The associatednumerical value is an estimated concentration only.
E The compound was quantitated above the calibration range.
D Concentration is based on a diluted sample analysis.
UJ The compound was not detected above the reported sample quantitationlimit. However, the reported limit is approximate and may or may notrepresent the actual limit of quantitation.
R The sample results are rejected.
Two facts should be noted by all data users. First, the "R" flag means that theassociated value is unusable. In other words, due to significant QC problems, theanalysis is invalid and provides no information as to whether the compound is presentor not. "R" values should not appear on data tables because they cannot be reliedupon, even as a last resort. The second fact to keep in mind is that no compoundconcentration, even if it has passed all QC test, is guaranteed to be accurate. StrictQC serves to increase confidence in data but any value potentially contains error.
U40738
![Page 94: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
The data presented in the package has been derived using a procedure developedby Aquatec, Inc. in an attempt to improve the analytical process of calibration,identification, and quantitation of PCBs as Aroclors. Key components of thisprocedure include:
Calibration
The response function of the electron capture detector is inherently non-linear,and while significant linearization is achieved for this detector by electronicmeans, some non-linearity remains. Power function linearization is used to"straighten the curve" and allow the use of response factors for calibrationpurposes.
During the initial calibration a response factor is calculated for each peak in theindividual Aroclors.
A weighted response factor calculation has been used to adjust for non-linearityat the low end of the calibration curve.
Identification
Peak retention times are relative. Retention times are in set windows relativeto the time markers DCS and TCMX. Time markers adjust for minor variationsin column flow or instrument condition and allow the use of very tight windowswhich minimizes the number of both false positive and false negative peakidentifications.
The determination of "which Aroclor or mixture of Aroclors will produce achromatogram most similar to that of the residue" is made by expressing theunknown sample chromatogram as a linear combination of the Aroclors. The"most similar" Aroclor or mixture of Aroclors is determined by using a leastsquares minimization of the difference between the unknown chromatogram andthe linear combination of Aroclors. This is similar to the procedure presentedby L.E. Slivon, P.M. Schumacher and A. Alford-Stevens for the determination ofAroclor composition from GC/MS level of chlorination results.
Identification/quantitation of Aroclors in samples is based on the combinedresponse of two columns, typically RTX-5 and RTX-35. The pooling of responsecombines the unique qualities of both columns to derive a more defined Aroclorpattern which less likely to be affected by interferents. Identification/quantitationdata for the individual columns is provided in the package and can be used asa check on the combined column results.
U40738
![Page 95: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
Data Assessment
1. Holding Time
The QAPP-specified holding times for PCS analyses of soil samples are 12 daysfrom date of sample receipt to extraction and 40 days from extraction toanalysis.
All samples were originally extracted and analyzed within the specified holdingtimes. Due to poor surrogate recovery, sample K12038 was reextracted over thespecified holding time. All data for the reextracted sample have been qualifiedas estimated based on the holding time violation.
2. Blank Contamination
Quality assurance blanks, i.e., method, field or rinse blanks, are prepared toidentify any contamination which may have been introduced into the samplesduring sample preparation or field activity. Method blanks measure laboratorycontamination. Field and rinse blanks measure contamination of samples duringfield operations.
No target compounds were detected in the method or rinse blanks.
3. System Performance
The system performance was acceptable for both columns.
4. Calibration
Satisfactory instrument calibration is established to insure that the instrument iscapable of producing acceptable quantitative data. An initial calibrationdemonstrates that the instrument is capable of giving acceptable performance atthe beginning of an experimental sequence. The continuing calibration verifiesthat the instrument is giving satisfactory daily performance.
4.1 Initial Calibration
The method allows a maximum RSD of 20%. The %RSD was within thespecified limit for all Aroclors.
4.2 Continuing Calibration
A maximum %D of 15 is allowed. All continuing calibrations were withinthe specified limit.
1*40738
![Page 96: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
5. Surrogates / System Monitoring Compounds
All samples to be analyzed for organic compounds are spiked with surrogatecompounds prior to sample preparation to evaluate overall laboratoryperformance and efficiency of the analytical technique.
Recovery for one surrogate was below 10 percent in sample K12038. Allpositive data have been qualified as estimated and all non-detect data havebeen rejected in the sample based on the recovery. The sample was laterreextracted and reanalyzed with acceptable surrogate recoveries. All othersample surrogate recoveries were within control limits.
6. Compound Identification
The determination of Aroclor presence is made by expressing the unknownsample chromatogram as a linear combination of the Aroclors. The most similarAroclor or mixture of Aroclors is determined by using a least squaresminimization of the difference between the unknown chromatogram and the linearcombination of Aroclors.
Identification/quantitation of Aroclors is based on the combined response of theRTX-5 and RTX-35 columns. Identification/quantitation data for the individualcolumns is provided in the package and has been used as a check on thecombined column results.
A review of the sample chromatograms indicate that the Aroclors have beencorrectly identified/quantitated.
7. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate/Matrix Spike Blank
Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate data are used to assess the precisionand accuracy of the analytical method.
All matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate recoveries and relative percentdifferences between recoveries were within control limits. All matrix spike blankrecoveries were also within control limits.
8. Field Duplicates
Results for duplicate samples are summarized as follows:
U40738
![Page 97: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
Sample ID / Duplicate ID
K12031 / K12032
K12040 / K12041
Compound
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Aroclor 1254
SampleResult
21000
5800
ND
65
DuplicateResult
20000
4800
1500
77
RPD*
2.6%
16.9%
RPD based on total PCB content.ND Nor detected.
The duplicate results are acceptable.
9. General Comments
The recommended data usage for sample reanalyses is as follows:
K12038 and K12038-RERecovery for one surrogate less than 10 percent in the originalanalysis of sample K12038. Based on the recovery, all postive datawere qualified as estimated and all non-detect data were rejected inthe sample. The sample was subsequently reextracted andreanalyzed over the specified holding time, resulting in thequalification of all data as estimated. Since the reanalysis resultedin more usable data, it is recommended that data from this analysisbe used for all Aroclors.
10. System Performance and Overall Assessment
Overall system performance was acceptable. Other than for those deviationsspecifically mentioned in this review, the overall data quality is within theguidelines listed in the analytical method.
1*40738
![Page 98: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
DATA REVIEW CHECKLIST
![Page 99: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
PCB Data Review Checklist
YES NO NA
Data Completeness and Deliverables
Is there a narrative or cover letter present? _X_
Are the samples numbers included in the narrative? _X_
Are the sample chain-of-custodies present? _X_
Do the chain-of-custodies indicate any problems withsample receipt or sample condition? _X_
Holding Times
Have any holding times been exceeded? _X_
Surrogate Recovery
Are surrogate recovery forms present? _X_
Are all the samples listed on the appropriate surrogaterecovery form? _X_
Are the outliers correctly marked with an asterisk? _X_
Were recoveries of TCX or DCB outside specified limitsfor any sample or blank? X
If yes, were the samples reanalyzed? X
Matrix Spikes
Is there a matrix spike recovery form present? _X_
Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency? _X_
How many spike recoveries were outside of QC limits?
0 out of 4
How many RPDs for matrix spike and matrix spikeduplicate were outside of QC limits?
0 out of 2
Blanks
Is a Method Blank Summary Form present? X
Has a method blank been analyzed for each set ofsamples or for each 20 samples, whichever is morefrequent?
Is the chromatographic performance acceptable for eachinstrument?
Do any method/reagent/instrument blanks have positiveresults?
U40738
![Page 100: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
PCB Data Review Checklist - Page 2
__________________________________________YES_____NO_____NA
Do any field/rinse blanks have positive results? ____ X ___
Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated withevery sample? X ____ ___
Calibration and GC Performance
Are the following chromatograms and data printoutspresent?
Aroclor 1016/1260 X ____ ___
Aroclor 1221 X ____
Aroclor 1232 X ____
Aroclor 1242 X ____
Aroclor 1248 X ____
Aroclor 1254 X
Are Initial Calibration Summary Forms present andcomplete for each column and analytical sequence?
Are the linearity criteria for the initial analyses withinlimits for both columns (20% RSD)
Have all samples been injected within a 12 hour periodbeginning with the injection of a calibration standard?
Is a Calibration Verification Summary Form present andcomplete for each continuing standard analyzed?
Are %D values for all compounds within limits (15%)?
Analytical Sequence Check
Is a analytical sequence form present and complete foreach column and each period of analyses?
Was the proper analytical sequence followed?
Cleanup Efficiency Verification
If GPC cleanup was performed, is Gel PermeationChromatography Check Form present?
Are percent recoveries of the compounds used to checkthe efficiency of the cleanup procedure within QC limits?
U40738
![Page 101: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
PCB Data Review Checklist - Page 3
__________________________________________YES_____NO_____NA
PCB IdentificationIs both a combined and single column AroclorIdentification Report present for every sample? X ____ ___
Do the combined column and individual column Arocloridentifications agree? _X_
Were there any false negatives? ___
Was GC/MS confirmation provided when required? ___
Compound Quantitation and Reported Detection Limits
Are the reporting limits adjusted to reflect sampledilutions, and for soils, sample moisture? X
Chromatogram Quality
Were the baselines stable? _X_
Were any electronegative displacement (negative peaks)or unusual peaks detected? ___
Field Duplicates
Where field duplicates submitted with the samples? X
1*40738
![Page 102: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
PCB Holding Time and SurrogateRecovery Summary
Sample ID
K12031
K12032
K12034
K12035
K12036
K12037
K12037MS
K12037MSD
K12038
K12038RE
K12039
K12040
K12041
Holding Time
+29
Surrogates
TCX
1 (4)
DCB
Surrogate StandardsTCX Tetrachloro-m-xyleneDCB Decachlorobiphenyl
Qualifiers:D Surrogates diluted outi Recovery high1 Recovery low
Unless otherwise noted, all parameters are within specified limits.
U40738
![Page 103: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
PCB Calibration Summary
Instrument: HP2618Column: RTX-35 / RTX-5
Date:
Time:
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Decachlorobiphenyl
Affected Samples:
12/9/93 2218
to12/10/93 1816
Initial Cal.
%RSD
3.9 / 4.4
4.4 / 4.7
3.0 / 3.3
3.7 / 4.6
3.0 / 3.1
2.4 / 2.8
3.0 / 2.8
4.9 / 5.2
9.3 / 9.9
12/15
0223
Cont.Cal.
%D
2.5
12/15
0258
Cont.Cal.
%D
2.0
12/15
1001
Cont.Cal.
%D
1.5
12/15
1037
Cont.Cal.
%D
0.0
12/15
1444
Cont.Cal.
%D
0.5
12/15
1520
Cont.Cal.
%D
5.5
1S40738
![Page 104: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
CORRECTED ANALYSIS SUMMARY FORMS
![Page 105: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
PCB Calibration Summary - Page 2
Instrument: HP2087Column: RTX-35 / RTX-5
Date:
Time:
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Decachlorobiphenyl
Affected Samples:
1/8/94 0354
to1/9/94 0122
Initial Cal.
%RSD
4.4 / 3.2
3.9 / 3.0
4.2 / 4.5
4.3 / 4.0
6.2 / 5.5
6.2 / 3.9
4.1 / 3.9
3.5 / 10.1
13.8 / 8.8
1/13
0652
Cont.Cal.
%D
12.5
1/13
0730
Cont.Cal.
%D
7.0
1/13
1505
Cont.Cal.
%D
15.0
1/13
1543
Cont.Cal.
%D
Cont.Cal.
%D
Cont.Cal.
%D
U40738
![Page 106: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.1 (g)1 .0 (uL)
30.054.80
Case: PCB
K12031
SDG: 40738
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
20433511/13/9311/17/9312/15/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
2800 U2800 U2800 U2800 U2100058002800 U
![Page 107: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1.0 |uL)
30.054.68
Case: PCB
K12032
SDG: 40738
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
20433611/13/9311/17/9312/15/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
ArocIor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
2800 U2800 U2800 U2800 U2000046001500 J
![Page 108: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
91082
SOIL10.11.0
(g)(uL)
30.054.41
Lab Code:
Case:AQUAI
K12034
PCB SDG: 40738
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
20433711/13/9311/17/9312/15/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
2800 U2800 U
,_ 2800 U2800 U1500052001300 J
![Page 109: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUA)
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Volume:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
91082
Water1000 (mL)1 .0 (uL)1.0
Case: PCS
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
K12035
SDG:
20433811/13/9311/18/9312/15/93
N
40738
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/U Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U
![Page 110: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract: 91082
Phase Type: SOILPhase Weight: ___10.0
Injection Volume: ______1.0Dilution Factor: ____1.0
% Solids: 66.46
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAI
PCB
.(g)(uL)
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
K12036
SDG: 40738
20433911/13/9311/17/9312/15/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254ArocIor-1260
76 U76 U76 U76 U51 J61 J34 J
![Page 111: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1 .0 (uL)1.0
66.97
Case: PCB
K12037
SDG: 40738
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
20434011/13/9311/17/931 2/1 5/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION{ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
75 U75 U75 U75 U75 U20075 U
![Page 112: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.11.0
(g)(uL)
1.067.43
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAI
PCB
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:' /11 /13/93Date Extracted/7 11/17/93Date
Sulfur CleAnaly 12/15/93
n-up: N (Y/N)
CAS NO. COMPOUND / CONCENTRATION/ (ug/Kg) Q
12074-11-2 ——— ArocloMQiO ———————————11104 28 2 ——— Aroclor/221 ———————————11141-16-5 ——— Aiuildi-1232 ———————————53469-21 -9 ——— A;xfclor 1242 ——————————12672-29-6 — /A^roelaf >1248 ——————————11097-69-1 / Aroclor-125411096-82-X — AroeloM260 ———————————
/
/•T
/ 4^74_
————— 74 ——————110
———— 74 ——————
n 9U 'c-•J 1
—— tf VL'fj— tr V
— tr t— n V
^—— o £
f
•>
KB0005222
000090
![Page 113: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract: 91082
Phase Type: SOILPhase Weight: ___10.0
Injection Volume: ____1.0Dilution Factor: ____1.0
% Solids: 67.43
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAI
PCB
.(9)luL)
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
K12038RE
SDG: 40738
204342R111/13/9312/22/9301/13/94
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 2 54Aroclor-1 260
75757545759333
4J-GG^^3,tf\rj ^jkfOJ:r
j
m~-
KB0005234
000102
![Page 114: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: _ Aquatec, Inc.
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.01.0
(g)(uL)
1.064.74
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAI
PCB
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
K12039
SDG: 40738
20434311/13/9311/17/9312/15/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016ArocIor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
78 U78 U78 U78 U78 U17032 J
![Page 115: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.11.0
(g)(uL)
1.068.64
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAI
PCS
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
K12040
SDG: 40738
20434411/13/9311/17/9312/15/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1 221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
73 U73 U73 U73 U73 U65 J73 U
![Page 116: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name; Aquatec, Inc.Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL9.91.0
(g)<uL)
1.066.12
Lab Code:Case:
AQUAI
PCB
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
K12041
SDG: 40738
20434511/13/9311/17/9312/15/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 24 8Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
77 U77 U77 U77 U77 U7777 U
![Page 117: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
DATA REVIEW FOR
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVERSUPERFUND SITE
SDG# 40869
PCB ANALYSES
TBSA - PHASE
Analyses performed by:
Aquatec, Inc.Colchester, Vermont
Review performed by:
Blasland, Bouck & Lee, Inc.Syracuse, New York
![Page 118: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
Summary
The following is an assessment of the PCB data package for SDG # 40869 for theTBSA - Phase II sampling of the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo RiverSuperfund Site. Included with this assessment are the data review check sheets usedin the review of the package and sample results for PCB analyses. Analyses wereperformed on the following samples:
Sample ID
K12042
K12043
K12044
Lab ID
205065
205066
205067
Matrix
soil
soil
soil
Sample Date
11/12/93
11/11/93
11/11/93
IS40869
![Page 119: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
Introduction
Analyses were performed according to the USEPA SW-846 method 8081, modified forPCB only analysis.
The data review process is intended to evaluate the data on a technical basis. Itis assumed that the data package represents the best efforts of the laboratory andhad already been subjected to adequate and sufficient quality review prior tosubmission.
During the review process, laboratory qualified and unqualified data are verifiedagainst the supporting documentation. Based on this evaluation, qualifier codes maybe added, deleted, or modified by the data reviewer. Results are qualified with thefollowing codes in accordance with National Functional Guidelines:
U The compound was analyzed for but not detected. The associated valueis the compound quantitation limit.
J The compound was positively identified; however, the associated numericalvalue is an estimated concentration only.
B The compound has been found in the sample as well as its associatedblank, its presence in the sample may be suspect.
N The analysis indicates the presence of a compound for which there ispresumptive evidence to make a tentative identification.
JN The analysis indicates the presence of a compound for which there ispresumptive evidence to make a tentative identification. The associatednumerical value is an estimated concentration only.
E The compound was quantitated above the calibration range.
D Concentration is based on a diluted sample analysis.
UJ The compound was not detected above the reported sample quantitationlimit. However, the reported limit is approximate and may or may notrepresent the actual limit of quantitation.
R The sample results are rejected.
Two facts should be noted by all data users. First, the "R" flag means that theassociated value is unusable. In other words, due to significant QC problems, theanalysis is invalid and provides no information as to whether the compound is presentor not. "R" values should not appear on data tables because they cannot be reliedupon, even as a last resort. The second fact to keep in mind is that no compoundconcentration, even if it has passed all QC test, is guaranteed to be accurate. StrictQC serves to increase confidence in data but any value potentially contains error.
U40869
![Page 120: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
The data presented in the package has been derived using a procedure developedby Aquatec, Inc. in an attempt to improve the analytical process of calibration,identification, and quantitation of RGBs as Aroclors. Key components of thisprocedure include:
Calibration
The response function of the electron capture detector is inherently non-linear,and while significant linearization is achieved for this detector by electronicmeans, some non-linearity remains. Power function linearization is used to"straighten the curve" and allow the use of response factors for calibrationpurposes.
During the initial calibration a response factor is calculated for each peak in theindividual Aroclors.
A weighted response factor calculation has been used to adjust for non-linearityat the low end of the calibration curve.
Identification
Peak retention times are relative. Retention times are in set windows relativeto the time markers DCB and TCMX. Time markers adjust for minor variationsin column flow or instrument condition and allow the use of very tight windowswhich minimizes the number of both false positive and false negative peakidentifications.
The determination of "which Aroclor or mixture of Aroclors will produce achromatogram most similar to that of the residue" is made by expressing theunknown sample chromatogram as a linear combination of the Aroclors. The"most similar" Aroclor or mixture of Aroclors is determined by using a leastsquares minimization of the difference between the unknown chromatogram andthe linear combination of Aroclors. This is similar to the procedure presentedby L.E. Slivon, P.M. Schumacher and A. Alford-Stevens for the determination ofAroclor composition from GC/MS level of chlorination results.
Identification/quantitation of Aroclors in samples is based on the combinedresponse of two columns, typically RTX-5 and RTX-35. The pooling of responsecombines the unique qualities of both columns to derive a more defined Aroclorpattern which less likely to be affected by interferents. Identification/quantitationdata for the individual columns is provided in the package and can be used asa check on the combined column results.
H40869
![Page 121: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
Data Assessment
Holding Time
The QAPP-specified holding times for PCB analyses of soil samples are 12 daysfrom date of sample receipt to extraction and 40 days from extraction toanalysis.
All samples were extracted and analyzed within the specified holding times.
Blank Contamination
Quality assurance blanks, i.e., method, field or rinse blanks, are prepared toidentify any contamination which may have been introduced into the samplesduring sample preparation or field activity. Method blanks measure laboratorycontamination. Field and rinse blanks measure contamination of samples duringfield operations.
No target compounds were detected in the method or rinse blanks.
3. System Performance
The system performance was acceptable for both columns.
4. Calibration
Satisfactory instrument calibration is established to insure that the instrument iscapable of producing acceptable quantitative data. An initial calibrationdemonstrates that the instrument is capable of giving acceptable performance atthe beginning of an experimental sequence. The continuing calibration verifiesthat the instrument is giving satisfactory daily performance.
4.1 Initial Calibration
The method allows a maximum RSD of 20%. The %RSD was within thespecified limit for all Aroclors.
4.2 Continuing Calibration
A maximum %D of 15 is allowed. All continuing calibrations were withinthe specified limit.
U40869
![Page 122: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
Surrogates / System Monitoring Compounds
All samples to be analyzed for organic compounds are spiked with surrogatecompounds prior to sample preparation to evaluate overall laboratoryperformance and efficiency of the analytical technique.
Recovery for one surrogate was below control limits in samples K12043 andK12044. Since recoveries for the remaining surrogate were within control limits,no data have been qualified based on the deviations. All other samplesurrogate recoveries were within control limits.
Compound Identification
The determination of Aroclor presence is made by expressing the unknownsample chromatogram as a linear combination of the Aroclors. The most similarAroclor or mixture of Aroclors is determined by using a least squaresminimization of the difference between the unknown chromatogram and the linearcombination of Aroclors.
Identification/quantitation of Aroclors is based on the combined response of theRTX-5 and RTX-35 columns. Identification/quantitation data for the individualcolumns is provided in the package and has been used as a check on thecombined column results.
A review of the sample chromatograms indicate that the Aroclors have beencorrectly identified/quantitated.
7. Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate/Matrix Spike Blank
Matrix spike and matrix spike duplicate data are used to assess the precisionand accuracy of the analytical method.
No matrix spike or matrix spike duplicate was included in this data set.
8. Field Duplicates
No field duplicates were included in this data set.
10. System Performance and Overall Assessment
Overall system performance was acceptable. Other than for those deviationsspecifically mentioned in this review, the overall data quality is within theguidelines listed in the analytical method.
ti40B69
![Page 123: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
DATA REVIEW CHECKLIST
![Page 124: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
PCB Data Review Checklist
YES NO NA
Data Completeness and Deliverables
Is there a narrative or cover letter present?
Are the samples numbers included in the narrative?
Are the sample chain-of-custodies present?
Do the chain-of-custodies indicate any problems withsample receipt or sample condition?
Holding Times
Have any holding times been exceeded?
Surrogate Recovery
Are surrogate recovery forms present?
Are all the samples listed on the appropriate surrogaterecovery form?
Are the outliers correctly marked with an asterisk?
Were recoveries of TCX or DCB outside specified limitsfor any sample or blank?
If yes, were the samples reanalyzed?
Matrix Spikes
Is there a matrix spike recovery form present?
Were matrix spikes analyzed at the required frequency?
How many spike recoveries were outside of QC limits?
NA out of NA
How many RPDs for'matrix spike and matrix spikeduplicate were outside of QC limits?
NA out of NA
Blanks
Is a Method Blank Summary Form present?
Has a method blank been analyzed for each set ofsamples or for each 20 samples, whichever is morefrequent?
Is the chromatographic performance acceptable for eachinstrument?
Do any method/reagent/instrument blanks have positiveresults?
1140869
![Page 125: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
PCB Data Review Checklist - Page 2
_____________________________________________YES_____NO______NA
Do any field/rinse blanks have positive results? ____ X
Are there field/rinse/equipment blanks associated withevery sample? X
Calibration and GC Performance
Are the following chromatograms and data printoutspresent?
Aroclor 1016/1260 _X_
Aroclor 1221 _X_
Aroclor 1232 _X_
Aroclor 1242 X
Are Initial Calibration Summary Forms present andcomplete for each column and analytical sequence?
Are the linearity criteria for the initial analyses withinlimits for both columns (20% RSD)
Have all samples been injected within a 12 hour periodbeginning with the injection of a calibration standard?
Is a Calibration Verification Summary Form present andcomplete for each continuing standard analyzed?
Are %D values for all compounds within limits (15%)?
Analytical Sequence Check
Is a analytical sequence form present and complete foreach column and each period of analyses?
Was the proper analytical sequence followed?
Cleanup Efficiency Verification
If GPC cleanup was performed, is Gel PermeationChromatography Check Form present?
Are percent recoveries of the compounds used to checkthe efficiency of the cleanup procedure within QC limits?
Aroclor 1248 X
Aroclor 1254 X
1*40869
![Page 126: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
PCB Data Review Checklist - Page 3
_____________________________________________YES_____NO______NA
PCB Identification
Is both a combined and single column AroclorIdentification Report present for every sample? X ____ ___
Do the combined column and individual column Arocloridentifications agree? _X_
Were there any false negatives? ___
Was GC/MS confirmation provided when required? ___
Compound Quantitation and Reported Detection Limits
Are the reporting limits adjusted to reflect sampledilutions, and for soils, sample moisture? _X_
Chromatogram Quality
Were the baselines stable? _X_
Were any electronegative displacement (negative peaks)or unusual peaks detected? ___
Field Duplicates
Where field duplicates submitted with the samples? __
1140869
![Page 127: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
PCB Holding Time and SurrogateRecovery Summary
Sample 10 Holding Time Surrogates
TCX DCB
K12042
K12043 I (48)
K12044 (41)
Surrogate StandardsTCX Tetrachloro-m-xyleneDCB Oecachlorobiphenyl
Qualifiers:0 Surrogates diluted out! Recovery highJ Recovery low
Unless otherwise noted, all parameters are within specified limits.
1(40669
![Page 128: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
PCB Calibration Summary
Instrument: HPYYYYColumn: RTX-35 / RTX-5
Date:
Time:
Aroclor 1016
Aroclor 1221
Aroclor 1232
Aroclor 1242
Aroclor 1248
Aroclor 1254
Aroclor 1260
Tetrachloro-m-xylene
Decachlorobiphenyl
Affected Samples:
12/30/93 1502to
12/31/93 1158
Initial Cal.
%RSD
4.6 / 3.9
3.3 / 4.2
2.4 / 3.1
4.9 / 3.0
3.6 / 3.0
3.1 / 2.6
4.1 / 2.9
6.8 / 3.1
3.5 / 7.8
12/31
1312
Cont.Cal.
%D
2.5
12/31
1348
Cont.Cal.
%D
7.0
12/31
2112
Cont.Cal.
%D
4.5
12/31
2149
Cont.Cal.
%D
3.0
1/1
0512
Cont.Cal.
%D
2.0
1/1
0549
Cont.Cal.
%D
4.0
U40869
![Page 129: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
CORRECTED ANALYSIS SUMMARY FORMS
![Page 130: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.11.0
(g)(uL)
1.069.51
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAI
PCB
Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
K12042
SDG: 40869
Lab Sample ID: 20506511 /20/9311/21/9312/31/93
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-21 1 1 04-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1260
72 U72 U72 U72 U72 U
20030 J
![Page 131: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUA)
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.1 <g)1.0 (uL)
20.044.00
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
K1 2043
SDG:
2050661 1 /20/9311/21/9312/31/93
Y
40869
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND - CONCENTRATION{ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1254Aroclor-1 260
2300 U2300 U2300 U2300 U250002300 U2300 U
![Page 132: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1.0 (uL)
10.054.46
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
K 12044
SDG:
20506711/20/9311/21/9312/31/93
Y
40869
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND ~ CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1248Arodor-1 254ArocIor-1260
920 U920 U920 U920 U
110003800920 U
![Page 133: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
Kalamazoo TBSA TOC Results
Sample Number
K12012
K12013
K12014
K12015
K12016
K12017
K12018
K12019
K12020
K12021
K12022
K12024
K12025
K12026
K12027
K12028
K12029
K12030
K12031
K12033
K12034
K12036
K12037
K12038
K12039
K12040
: ;• Location
TBSA10-1
TBSA10-2
TBSA10-3
TBSA10-4
TBSA10-5
TBSA11-1
TBSA11-2
TBSA11-3
TBSA11-4
TBSA11-5
D-1
TBSA5-1
TBSA5-2
TBSA5-3
TBSA5-4
TBSA5-5
TBSA3-1
TBSA3-2
TBSA3-3
TBSA3-4
TBSA3-5
TBSA1-1
TBSA1-2
TBSA1-3
TBSA1-4
TBSA1-5
TOC Result (%)
4.5
4.9
5.5
8.5
13.5
16.0
15.2
13.1
11.1
8.2
15.4
8.8
8.2
8.5
9.3
8.3
10.2
8.7
10.0
8.3
10.0
3.1
3.9
4.3
5.8
4.4
![Page 134: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
B L A S L A N D , B O U C K , & L E E , I N C
e n g i n e e r s & s c i e n t i s t s
Appendix D
![Page 135: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
BLASLAND ft BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.C.6723 Towpalh Road, Box 66Syracuse, New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD 1-0 «*7&3/J
COo
-=*<* §oo
PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
J?. ve r- -SAMPLERS: (Signature)
STA.NO. DATE TIME STATION LOCATION REMARKS
TSJAf-3
TBSA3-I
X /to 30
TBSA3-3 KI203I
D-l KI103*
/OZ033
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME
13:00Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received for Laboratory by:(Signature)
DATE TIME Remarks:
7/12/9313937MHCOR Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files
KB0005132
![Page 136: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
iLn^
BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.C.6723 Towpath Road. Box 66Syracuse. New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD o
ooo
PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
SAMPLERS>fS/gnaft/
STA. NO. DATE TIME STATION LOCATION REMARKS
TBrtl-l
T83/SI-Z /f / * 0
'U* /: /•? «>
•fe. f*ID Crt-Jrr* Jffhnk
KI2.04I
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE
Relinquished by: (Signature)
TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature)
Received by: (Signature)
DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received for Laboratory by:(Signature)
DATE TIME Remarks:X f.
7/12/931393786HCDR Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files
KB0005133
![Page 137: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
BLASLAND ft BOUCK ENGINEERS. P.C.6723 Towpath Road. Box 66Syracuse. New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDPROJ.NO. PROJECT NAME
-TBSASAMPLERS: (i
STA.NO. DATE TIME STATION LOCATION REMARKS
KIZOI3."/L/ion*
TB4KIO-1
101,01 e.T&JAihl /ion?TBiAlt-Z
TBsA /)- V%/ft H . I 1 0 Z . I
0- Lr.oo
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE
.llnqulshed by: (Signature) DATE
TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature)
Received by: (Signature)
DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
TIME Relinquished by: (Signature) TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received for Laboratory by:(Signature)
DATE TIME Remarks:"X Jf t
T/12/9313937B6HCOR Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files
![Page 138: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.C.6723 Towpath Road, Box 66Syracuse, New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
-^>//T !
PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
SAMPLERS: (Signature)
STA.NO. DATE TIME STATION LOCATION REMARKS
TB3A4-3110 t 7
TB5A1-I
TBSA3-S K\ZQ3l
D-lTff/43-y /< 12033
Relinquished by: (Signature)
'/-^U,;^Rallnqulshea by: (Signature)
DATE
nk/%TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
DATE TIME Received by: (S Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received (or Laboratory by:(Signature)
DATE TIME Remarks:
7/12/931393786HCDR Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files
![Page 139: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.C.6723 Towpath Road, Box 66Syracuse. New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDPROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
SAMPLERS: (Signature)
STA.NO. DATE STATION LOCATION REMARKS
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE
Relinquished by: Signature)
TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
OJ***.*%• •
O
SATE TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) "DATT TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) eceived for Laboratory by:
7/12/9313937B6HCDR Distribution: Orlglr^yAccompanles Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files
KB0007592
![Page 140: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
Inchcape Testing Services 35 South Park DriveColchester, VT 05446Tel. 802-655-1203Aquatec Laboratories *«• 802-655-1248
January 13, 1994
Ms. Laurie JohnstonBlasland & Bouck Engineers6723 Towpath Road, Box 66Syracuse, NY 13214
Re: Analytical Results-Kalamazoo SiteAquatec Project No. 91082Case No. PCS: SDG No. 40869 ______
Dear Ms. Johnston:
Enclosed are the analytical results for samples received intactby Aquatec on November 20, 1993. The analyses for these sampleswere performed in accordance with the methodologies specified inthe Quality Assurance Project Plan. Laboratory numbers andquality control samples were assigned as follows:
Client Aquatec SampleSample ID Lab No. Matrix
Samples Received on November 20, 1993ETR No. 40869
K12042 205065 SoilK12043 205066 SoilK12044 205067 Soil
The samples in this delivery group as well as the associatedmethod blank received sulfur clean-up prior to the Arocloranalysis.
Samples in this delivery group were reported as the best match tocombinations of the seven Aroclor standards. In general, thestandard Aroclors are sufficiently unique to provide preciseidentifications and quantitations of complex mixtures withminimal weathering. For highly altered samples, certain subtleidentification distinctions, such as the difference between 1016and 1242 become less precise. In all cases, quantitation remainshighly reliable.
Sincerely,
Karen R. ChirgwinLaboratory Operations Director
Enclosure
91082B2DEC93 KB0007591
OO&C& f
![Page 141: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
AROCLOR SURROGATE RECOVERY
Lab Name:Lab Code:SAS No.:
Aouatec. Inc.AQUAI
Contract:Case No.:SDG No.:
123456789
1011121314151617181920
EPASAMPLE NO.
?BLkF6KIZOHZKaWKaoH^
.«
S1(TCX) #
<37[ 7«
H-S *•!>."HI #!)
S2(DEC) #
• < ? lso
- 12. TX- CM TV
5152
(TCX)(DEC)
Tetrachloro-meta-XyleneDecachlorobiphenyl
PROJECT SPECIFICQC LIMITS(60-150)(60-150)
# Column to be used to flag recovery values* Values outside of QC limitsD Surrogates calculated using diluted analysis.A - Extracted surrogates diluted out, surrogates added to
diluted extract as retention time markers.
page of
KB0007596
![Page 142: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
Lab Name: Aouatec. Inc.Lab Code: AQUAI
Lab Sample 10:102^35 rpBLfcWMatrix: (soil/water) ScM -
Date Extracted:Date Analyzed!!):Time Analyzed(l):
GCIDd):"GC ColumnU):
Contract:Case: ?££.
U / 7 I 1 3LeveKL/M):
Date Analyzed^):Time Analyzed(2):
H?yyy/ GC Column(2);
LAB ID CLIENT IDDATE
ANALYZED 1DATE
ANALYZED 2123456789
101112131415161718192021222324252627282930
CLOSES ''zoso&i.105061 '
K\2.o41 -K\~2.oH3 ^^ i o /\ j_jy.jP^ I f lJ r^l ••* ^,
'
,z/ 31/^jI2-/31//3|2./J?//^3
^/3l/f3IZ/3//1^ ^/-2/3//f3
page _Lof_]_.KB0007597
000007
![Page 143: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/143.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.01.0
(g)(uL)
1.0100
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAI
PCB
EPA SAMPLE NO.
PBLKFG
SDG: 40869
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
202433
11/21/9312/31/93
(Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATIONtug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U
KB0008051
![Page 144: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/144.jpg)
AroulorcalibTarion~5ffmrfrary —:alibration of 30-Dec-1993 15:02 through 31-Dec-1993 11:58.•ICD1:[8080] 27.28 30DEC9313054ETHOD: 8080 PCB:AN
—— -rrfX
Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations
SJF - HPyyyy
Peak »
234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
- 394041
RT1 7.6077.9187.9718.3828.5689.4769.88610.22910.55110.72210.84210.92711.19311.67711.83111.97212.08312.36012.50012.66412.76313.34813.46413.69813.78313.87214.13314.25414.34114.45414.63014.82015.03715.07815.25515.48015.51215.87116.35116.59216.793
Aroclor7.50518.53314.89649.5210.85516.7460.7912.3553.5561.8080.98818.5864.4090.6640.1522.2933.1422.2731.2330.3633.4331.1130.6481.3110.5790.3201.3870.6432.4582.1510.602
0.2740.627
2.3260.3380.3370.7460.509
12217.1%
2.4X1.6X2.2X2.3X
5. OX
4. OX
4.8X5.6X
4.3X
11. 9X
20.
Aroclor6.40013.09012.41449.1982.72847.0052.6389.67014.3816.0883.21569.99222.4483.3220.96513.43819.18614.2466.0301.85022.9207.2025.30810.3054.0450.6888.7305.03817.39016.0613.1381.4533.12215.5951.7661.8042.4541.290
1S3L8. OX4.6X2.5X1.1X7.7X3.3X7.2X1.5X1.2X
11. IX
2.5X2.6X6.4X1.2X2.9X
2.2X1.5X6.BX3.5X
2.7X3.6X3.9X
3.2X2.3X
Aroclop5.8116.7289.51746.7295.88696.6545.93922.29332.59713.6257.361
149.46952.8148.5262.88832.49748.46037.74916.3234.84053.42817.90413.26426.35210.4460.5924.48010.2616.4624.1364.8451.0640.2130.8800.567
10166.5X1.6X7.7X3.8X3.9X6.3X1.6X1.4X2.4X8.1X6.4X7.6X1.8X1.4X7.9X5.2X3. OX1.7X4.9X1.0X1.3X1.7X3.7X3.1X2.1X
7.2X2.9X3. OX2.0%
54.
Aroclor4.6685.2027.54736.8764.59277.3804.66317.55625.69210.8325.674
122.10141.2006.7182.21925.09838.73429.54112.9433.78645.19814.54110.71922.5038.7801.53419.94810.03037.19634.6177.6463.8228.50635.4374.7565.2866.6124.169
12425. OX
1.5X2.6X2.8X4.4X4.9X3. OX0.6X0.7X8.8X
13. OX1.9X2. OX6.2X2.4X6.7X
1.9X1.4X3.7X3.2X0.6X2.2X2.3X3.4X1.7X
1.7X5.1X3.6X3.3X3.5X6.2X
Aroclor0.3031.6210.7294.0061.44237.7901.2079.0249.6734.1221.31383.35519.5829.9973.09112.48373.41450.54218.5975.32074.53222.44818.80441.59911.6942.58537.47317.46277.32166.22723.9109.54925.92469.48014.48516.02120.34112.455
1248
6.2X
6.2X3. OX
4.2X3.8X20.
2.5X3.2X7.5X6. OX1.6X1.3X1.8X2.1X2.9X3.3X7.0X8.4X2.5X4.1X3.7X5.8X1.3X3.8X2.6X7.9X3. IX3.2X5.1X5. OX
Aroclor
1.551
0.4191.168
0.381
0.5751.204
0.22850.71513.532
26.1262.1881.7628.2840.49510.200
37.11712.84873.00719.74293.94841.23628.37332.30857.31318.015
12543.2X
2.4X0.9X
2.3X
7.7X
2.4X2.3%1.1X1.4X1.5X1.2X0.9X1.4X4.4X4.2X
Aroclor1.5820.1800.5230.981
0.333
0.406
0.1992.592
0.488
0.357
1.0200.4870.28330.8484.35439.376
1.4391.1265.832
1260
6.9X
4.7X
1.9X2.8X1.4X
4.4X
too
o
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 6.8777 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.5899.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01194 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quant Station is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT* 1.06016.
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALJBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)
KB0007644
(SJF)31-DEC-93 12:52:57
![Page 145: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/145.jpg)
:alibration of 30-0ec-1993 15:02 through 31-Dec-1993 11:58.1CD1:[8080J 27,28 300EC9313051ETHOO: 8080 PCB:AN
SJF - HPyyyy
Peak Response Factors and Relative DeviationsPeak «
434445464748495051525354555657585960616263646566676869707172
V l
RT Aroclor 122116.979 0.85917.08217.32717.41217.600 0.45317.67117.96118.19918.85818.991 0.29419.04719.15919.21319.48319.62319.87320.06220.07720.54421.04221.05421.34321.41321.52721.75422.51623.10123.26724.81225.16226.406 0.687
Total: 172.8 3.3X
Compoundtetrachloro-meta-xylenedecach I orobi pheny I
Aroclor 124.116 1
2.2592.1240.1211.0610.8131.739
0.3370.7060.442
0.180
0.294
1.090
0.3260.558
0.2800.701
463.8 2
Mean RT6.8777
27.5899
32 Aroclor 1016 Aroclor.2% 12.114
0.6308.895
0.1881.774
6.3913.190
0.1720.2731.952
0.169
0.519
0.235
2.088
2.603
0.657 0.638
.4X 767.0 4.6X 801.5
Retention Time Marker/SurrogateRT Dev. Range RT Crft.
-.0154 to .0112 Passes...-.0143 to .0123 Passes...
1242 .Aroclor 12484.3X" 38.470 4.95C
1.509 7.2X2.6% 25.748 4.2X
15.4070.5494.793 3.5X1.651
19.410 5.9X
0.3611.081
2.6X 4.844 5.5X0.3Z70.617
1.742
0.882
1.049
0.2550.496
0.1600.772
4.9X 1030.0 3.6X
Standard SummaryMean RF Recovery2597.087 71.4 to1550.885 86.6 to
Aroclor 1254123.604 4.4X
9.141 6.9X5.625
84.747 4.2X72.635 2.9X9.714 1.7X
63.793 1.1X16.899 6.4X
43.150 2.7X
6.804 5.9X23.982 9. OX92.667 5. IX4.855 7.8X9.100 2.5X
0.54727.971 4.4X
12.747 3.5X3.180
16.826 4.2X
2.171 1.7X10.281 3.3X0.2930.6860.760
1174.9 3. IX
Range Surr Crit111.8% ** Fails *112.4% Passes...
Aroclor19.18551.75618.245
109.95816.377
133.27743.904
37.63726.249
66.034104.15176.692
39.1639.336
90.44341.684
19.745187.117
4.21648.91998.58114.23536.84710.847
1397.0
12603.2*1.9X2.4X
1.5X2.3X1.7%3.8X
3.7X1.9X
5.3X6.3X2.6X
4.8X4.1X
4.1X2.7X
3.8X6.5X4.BX4.8XB.1X4.6X4.6X1.4X
4.1X
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 6.8777 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.5899.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/• 0.01194 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantisation is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.06016.
10OO
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALJBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)
KB0007645
(SJF)31-DEC-93 12:52:58
![Page 146: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/146.jpg)
ArDclorcalibT3rion~Snmrrrary — —Calibration of 30-Dec-1993 15:02 through 31-1>ec-1993 11:58.HCD1:[8080] 27,28 300EC931305METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN
JX-SJF - HPyyyy
Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations
OCDOO
Peak »234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
- 394041424344454647
"S.3937.3698.6118.8548.9159.09010.29310.39710.46210.73711.01011.30011.59311.67711.90912.24512.50112.68212.95413.09113.24913.36713.81313.93514.24614.53514.73514.93115.07115.20115.33615.35615.58915.93915.97716.18316.37616.77416.96217.14717.30317.40617.50517.91617.93417.95618.270
Aroclor30.3889.19323.42117.35058.8153.7019.15511.7221.2827.3421.3281.4491.7989.9806.4003.3531.1230.3452.7423.2821.8813.2512.3513.0220.7030.1251.6653.0803.096
2.2331.1560.8251.1800.3850.4940.3151.0230.153
'
ft2,1*10. 9X •8.7X1.0X1.5X3.7X1.6X
3. OX7.7X
42.1.8X2.3X9.6X18.
12. OX
2.5X10. 2X22.
6.7X3.4X
6.6X
Acoclor17.3866.02016.489
H.05157.0212.99933.80825.4013.68429.6761.4886.3264.42450.99831.11017.4765.2942.05817.75616.57710.29422.16014.62219.4035.5200.8310.81310.60820.96721.7771.50817.5174.9872.6100.4872.1353.0591.7796.2271.612
0.357
12326.2X9.1X0.7X
2.8X4. OX4.5X3.9X3.1X3.6X1.9X4. OX2.7X14.9X3.6X1.6X3.8X2.9X2.7X1.8X5. OX1.0X0.6X1.7X1.6X
2. OX1.9X2. OX
3.4X5.2X6.6X
6.7X9.9X3.2X
Aroclor0.8908.55110.94554.0481.06473.89648.0358.46466.047
1.33014.7629.425
122.45272.06441.37014.0565.16743.46941.09927.31854.25630.53350.21011.8401.0100.6825.1577.9139.4081.3530.687
0.128
1016
2.4X
2. IX4.9X7. OX5.5X2. OX3.4X4.4X1.5X13. 5X1.9X1.9X4.2X4. OX2.7X3.5X6.8X4.7X2.2X2.4X1.8X1.8X
2.4X2.4X3.1X
Aroclor0.6786.672
8.75942.9710.87959.35038.3206.67652.564
1.65511.4927.59694.93956.52331.97311.1584.11135.19733.19721.81243.77628.44441.97510.9341.8331.93323.89044.23746.4173.57638.06512.8597.8061.2806.201B.8815.53017.1194.464
1.116
1242
2.4X2.3X4. OX
6. OX3.9X2.5X2.3X3.6X1.6X14. 8X2.9X1.1X3.9X2.9X1.5X2.8X4.6X3.9X0.8X0.7X2.2X1.2X5.5X1.2X1.3X1.5X5.9X3.8X8.5X3.5X8.9X2.3X5. OX
0.8X7.1X
Aroclor
0.5090.5232.3354.83433.6321.76823.1251.4973.9791.84358.55129.77616.52214.7135.78170.05554.77033.54681.45632.27971.00218.1331.6903.25243.88390.71192.391
10.02469.863
36.36022.4373.53618.10826.51216.443
50.95413.312
2.954
1248
6.4X
4.2X17.3.5X4. OX3.9X
3.4X1.0X3.3X1.4X1.2X2.7X2.5X1.5X0.9X1.7X3.6X3.3X4.5X3.3X2.2X2.4X2.1X6.9X2.6X2.2X11. 3X2.1X2.3X2.7X3.2X2.2X
9.3X
Aroclor
2.0940.444
0.8370.4500.9731.369
0.935
0.4160.7220.25154.65716.92331.3092.94211.9612.4980.2170.54311.32143.92092.21914.79424.092113.64345.5866.53437.70772.81723.11010.860145.580
21.8418.538
1254
82.1.8X
95.
3.8X10. 1X0.6X4.3X1.7X2.7X
0.8X1.0X4. OX2.5X2.4X4.2X1.7X3.1%0.5X3.1X3.3X4.1X1.1X
1.9X
Aroclor
2.1400.5470.5920.3860.5831.0910.7640.8030.7560.3280.0960.8362.751
0.5490.3010.555
0.2340.53236.6450.0935.72747.2880.3281.4077.088
20.64323.567
52.475
1260
2.BX
28.
11. IX
2.5X
1.6X2.3X
3.6X6.7X3.9X2.3X
1.3X
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 7.9728 and decachlorobiphenyl at 28.8239.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/• 0.01194 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT* 1.04787.
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CAUBRATION 5.2-3(I2AUG93 1142)
KB0007646
(SJF)31-DEC-93 12:52:58
![Page 147: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/147.jpg)
Calibration of 30-Dec-1993 15:02 through 31-Dec-1993 11:58.MCD1:[80BO] 27,28 300EC931305METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN
SJF - HPyyyy
Peak Response Factors and Relative DeviationsPeak #— ra~
49505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576777879808182838485
RT Aroclor 122118.38718.449 0.58518.77618.92919.05619.273 0.11619.36919.39419.409 0.35619.73219.80019.98720.07320.275 0.19320.57020.59220.89321.07521.27121.46021.73521.93422.10022.12522.32922.34122.50322.73722.98323.18423.79524.10724.30024.81125.35926.06026.25627.486 0.794
Total: 233.2 4.2X
Compoundtetrachloro-meta-xylenedecachlorobiphenyl
Aroclor 12
3.186 4
0.1101.130
2.295 60.351
1.172
0.7310.2940.223
0.5750.2950.184
1.310 3
0.6050.3370.339
0.363
0.905
543.7 3
Mean RT7.9728
28.8239
32 Aroclor 1016 Aroclor
.OX 11.104
0.3150.3741.610
.9X 8.2990.400
2.704
2.593 0.997
0.483
.4X 0.172
0.157
3.121
0.912 0.964
.IX 844.3 3.9X 904.4
Retention Time Marker/SurrogateRT Dev. Range RT Crit.
-.0128 to .0094 Passes...-.0128 to .0094 Passes...
1242 Aroclor 1248
1.8X 31.809 2. OX
0.8440.5693.675 2.2X
4.9X 25.682 6.2X1.267 4.4X
0.6850.678
2.7X 6.868 2.3X0.205
0.5290.2322.137
0.4480.234
1.0030.257
1.040
0.5820.2210.227
0.215
1.006
3. OX 1143.5 3. OX
Standard SummaryMean RF Recovery2977.565 76.7 to1767.319 93.4 to
Aroclor 1254
103.434 0.8X6.891 8.3X3.583 8.6X
11.813 2.6X64.435 2.8X
69.528 3.5X
20.740 2.8X3.3158.468 3.6X9.581 5.6X
119.851 1.2X8.655 7.2X
5.8534.830
30.546 3.8X0.5527.908 17.4.970 18.
16.986 2.9X3.499 5.5X
1.66516.832 1.3X0.417
13.605 1.7X0.7210.9390.5370.6160.878
0.977
ii44?7"™*"r6%
Range Surr Crit108. 5X ** Fails *113.9% Passes...
Aroclor121.562
6.4020.962
19.466143.56948.585
53.80433.123
15.007156.924
16.48088.50046.00311.85112.31490.98248.92130.907
6.46614.528
203.9302.8175.372
95.75142.18146.5972.489
20.05347.5752.362
13.712===r==ss:1658.3
12604.2X
4.1X
2. OX2.5X1.5X
4.8X2.4X
2.2X2.2X
8.3X2.2X1.9X2.2X2. OX2. OX1.4X3.3X
5.5X4.8X2.6X2.4X2.8X5.4X1.5X2. OX3.2X2.0X3.4X5.3X1.9X
:=====2.9X
Motes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 7.9728 and decachlorobiphenyl at 28.8239.2) Peaks chosen within window of •*•/- 0.01194 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHTA 1.04787.
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALIBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)
KB0007647
(SJF)31-DEC-93 12:52:58
![Page 148: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/148.jpg)
CH271230.XLS
CALIBRATION SUMMARYBACK CALCULATIONS
Lab ID:GC:
Col. 1 :Col. 2:
AQUATEC, INC.HPyyyy
RTX-35RTX-5
Calib date(s): 30-DEC-93 15:0231-DEC-93 11:58
File: 27, 28 30DEC931305
to
Standards
Aroclor 1016Cal Fact
% DiffAroclor 1221
Cal Fact%Diff
Aroclor 1 232Cal Fact
% DiffAroclor 1 242
Cal Fact% Diff
Aroclor 1 248Cal Fact
% DiffAroclor 1 254
Cal Fact% Diff
Aroclor 1260Cal Fact
% Diff
50ppb
56.11.122-1254.91.098-1049.30.986
155.71.114-1148.4
0.9683
49.10.982
246.7
0.9347
100ppb
1031.030
-3105
1.050-5
1081.080
-8102
1.020-2
93.20.932
798.00.980
294.9
0.9495
200ppb
2081.040
-4207
1.035-4
2041.020
-2197
0.9852
1920.960
4198
0.9901
2001.000
0
400ppb
3960.990
1401
1.0030
3940.985
2402
1.005-1
3990.998
0402
1.005-1
3960.990
1
800ppb
7870.984
2782
0.9782
7880.985
2772
0.9654
8091.011
-1803
1.0040
8131.016
-2
%RSD
5.4
4.5
4.1
5.7
3.2
1.2
3.6
Cal Fact - Calc. Cone. / Nominal Cone.
%RSD = STD Dev / Mean of Cal Fact
% Diff = (Nominal Amt-Calc Amt) / Nominal Amt* 100KB0007637
Page 1
![Page 149: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/149.jpg)
PCBCHST.XLT
. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY
Lab ID:GC:
Col. 1:______Col. 2: fiTx-5"
AQUATEC, INC.Initial Calib.
date/time: ISO'2 ' to
Check Standard File: 27 1% "3 iDEDate: I a/3//f 3
Compound/4R CLHS -^
NominalAmount (ppb)"2^0 x-
Calc.Amount (ppb)
J<?T /-% Diff.1-5- -
Check Standard File:Date:Time:
CompoundAR (oik ^
Nominal_ Amount (ppbj
O-06 s-
Calc.Amount (ppb)"Zl^ s
% Diff.1-O
Check Standard Rle:/272^Date: |-aTime; ^
CompoundA^ \-2.M^ ^
NominalAmount (ppb)2^^> /"
Calc.Amount (ppb)
!<?( ^% Diff.^.r -
Check Standard Rle: 27 2g 3lDEC^3lQ55: f£Date:Time;
CompoundA^? l"2//2, /-
NominalAmount (ppb)2^?£)
Calc.Amount (ppb)
h -Z*?^ ^% Diff.^>.d> X
Check Standard Rle: 2-7Date:Q|/g|/nTime;
CompoundASQH^ ^«
NominalAmount (ppb)Q-oa x^"
Calc.Amount (ppb).
/<U ^% Diff.I.O *
Page__j_of_JZ.KB0007638
00004B
![Page 150: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/150.jpg)
PCBCHST.XLT
. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY
Lab ID:GC:
Col. 1 :'Col. 2:
Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
AQUATEC, INC.H?YWV^TV~35~ftTx-5~
Standard Rle: "2-7. 2 S 3 I £>E<
Initial Calib.date/time: f2/3«/<?3 |5~02
X "
CompoundjAfS 1*" cW ^^
ft l^ i j I ^^
NominalAmount (ppb)
*20~<r> ^
Standard Rle:
CompoundNominal
_ Amount {ppb)
Standard Rle:
CompoundNominal
Amount (ppb)
Standard Rle:
CompoundNominal
Amount (ppb)
Standard Rle:
CompoundNominal
Amount {ppb)
fc/3f/'P |I5$
Date:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
f?2_ ^
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb).
b^^ '
% Diff.H.o "
% Diff.
% Diff.
% Diff.
% Diff.
to
Page of 2KB0007639
000047
![Page 151: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/151.jpg)
BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.O.6723 Towpath Road, Box 66Syracuse. New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD
/\7T>0;
PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME Zoo
SAMPLERS: (Signature)
STA. NO. DATE
.XJ
TIME STATION LOCATION REMARKS
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) 'ATE TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME iecelved for Laboratory by:
Z/93
DATE TIME Remarks:
KB0007592DIs __ on: ( a/Ac __intes nient " ~MoC "natos ~ " Filer
![Page 152: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/152.jpg)
F-0430
AQUATEC SAMPLE LOG-IN SHEET
Aquatec, Inc. I ^r f
Receded By
AJ? L . Log-in Date: U
Case Number:.Sample DenVeryGroup No: ___ CLIENT
SAMPLEi
CORRESPONDING
SAMPLETAG1
ASSIGNEDLABi
REMARKS:CONDITIONOF SAMPLE
SHIPMENT, ETC.
REMARKS:
1. Custody Sealfe)
2. Custody Seal Nos.:
3. Chain-of-CnstodyRecords
4. Sample Informatioa
5. Airbill
6. Airbffl No.:
7. Sample TagsSample TagNnmben
8. Sample Condition'
9. Does information oncustody records, sampleinformation sheets, andsample tags agree?
IQ.DateReceiTedatLab:
KlZoMZ noSloScl^ ?
Q.r\AUlau»
Sample Transfer
Fraction: £r^4
• Contact Project Director.
Logbook No:.
Date:. Logbook Page No:. KB0008095
000492
![Page 153: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/153.jpg)
METHOD:8080 PCB:EXS BATCH ID: 2VH
CASE:SDG:DATE:ANALYST: JJS>SPIKED BY:!WI
J,
(o.l x/ V/ V/ y y V y yv/ y y y V/ v
> P.O /a- 8.1
![Page 154: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/154.jpg)
riIOD:8080_PCB:EXW MATRIX: WATER LEVhL: LOW
E: pCR
LVST: 'jED BY:
NESSED BY: >
Munple id Client id§11.1
242/
1o;i§i3.1
with
Hex
isfi56. 7.
1f+
aJ
J
Sa\t.
1a
mv>9. 10.1
7 JIQOO x)
'o
vf
•— -«fc. IIK - »«rkihe«i <- nrinled l>v: SOW on 11-18-9307:08:48
L^A
KB0006235
![Page 155: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/155.jpg)
LIENT(s):
DG:
NALYST: ^\ SPIKED BY: c)\ S'ITNESSED BY:
Lab sample id Client id ampl
e we
ight
(lO
gm) la
r NajS
O*, m
ixgr
anu
xhle
t
20g
Tra
IUIT
.L
O C
*°\':*>
0
d?t*°iMW3.1
hn w
/I:l
hex
/aA
2.T
3 appr
ox
4.1 5.
ghB
h 0.
o. F
ilter
9.1
.0 m
l3
— «
gh G
PCr
5 m
l
hang
e/0 *
* .
_ y
loll
(J-t>
t(t*G
f
3 3KX
to 5
.0 m
l" C
*g|
ml t
o a
vial
fer
) -5
CO
_. S
ulfu
rie A
cidy
H^0
4 Lo
uf
A C
one
to 1
.0m
l
_ 3
gm sQ
ka g
el c
lean-
r1 Sili
ca f
el L
ouf
C
1 oaI
18.1 19.1
1!y v/ V-L-
>Aqualec, Inc. — Extraction worksheet — printed by: JKZ on 12-22-9310:40:54 KB0006236
![Page 156: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/156.jpg)
Inchcape Testing Services 5 5 South Park DriveColcheiter.VT 05446Tel. 802-453-1203Aquatec Laboratories *«• 8024555.1248
January 21, 1994
Ms. Laurie JohnstonBlasland & Bouck Engineers6723 Towpath Road, Box 66Syracuse, NY 13214
Re: Analytical Results-Kalamazoo SiteAquatec Project No. 91082Case No. PCS; SDG No. 40734_____
Dear Ms. Johnston:
Enclosed are the analytical results for samples received intactby Aquatec on November 13, 1993. The analyses for these sampleswere performed in accordance with the methodologies specified inthe Quality Assurance Project Plan. Laboratory numbers andquality control samples were assigned as follows:
Client Aquatec SampleSample ID Lab No. Matrix
Samples Received on November 13, 1993ETR No. 40734
K12012 204311 SoilK12013 204312 SoilK12014 204313 SoilK12015 204314 SoilK12016 204315 SoilK12017. 204316 SoilK12018 204317 SoilK12019 204318 SoilK12020 204319 SoilK12021 204320 SoilK12022 204321 SoilK12023 204322 SoilK12024 204323 SoilK12025 204324 SoilK12026 204325 SoilK12027 204326 SoilK12028 204327 SoilK12029 204328 SoilK12030 204329 SoilK12033 204330 SoilK12033MS 204330MS SoilK12033MSD 204330MD SoilMSB 204331 Solid
![Page 157: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/157.jpg)
Ms. Laurie JohnstonJanuary 21, 1994Page 2
Sample labeled K12019 was compromised during the extractionprocedure. This sample was re-extracted outside the prescribedholding time and analyzed.
Due to high concentration of Aroclor 1248 in samples labeledK12033, K12033MS and K12033MD, matrix recoveries could not becalculated for Aroclor 1242.
Low surrogate recoveries for tetrachloro-m-xylene were observedfor many samples in this delivery group.
High surrogate recoveries were observed for sample labeled K12002which may be attributed to evaporative loss of the extract as aresult of a defective vial. Post-GPC archives were subjected tothe appropriate clean-ups and subsequently analyzed outside theprescribed holding time. All surrogate recoveries were withinthe control limits. Both sets of data have been presented withthis case submittal.
Samples in this delivery group were reported as the best match tocombinations of the seven Aroclor standards. In general, thestandard Aroclors are sufficiently unique to provide preciseidentifications and quantitations of complex mixtures withminimal weathering. For highly altered samples, certain subtleidentification distinctions, such as the difference between 1016and 1242 become less precise. In all cases, quantitation remainshighly reliable.
Sine
R. ChirgwinLaboratory Operations Director
KRC/jg
Enclosure
91082B2DEC93
![Page 158: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/158.jpg)
AROCLOR SURROGATE RECOVERY
Lab Name:Lab Code:SAS No.:
123456789
1011121314151617181920
S1 (TCX) «S2 (DEC) «
Aauatec. Inc.AQUAI
EPASAMPLE NO.
?$Lkf=YkttoiHKnots' sK12016 *-K12027KiaC2$ . 'K 1202.1 sKI2030 /K12-033 sfASB 'KftotZ Vktt.oi3 /KttOlf xkftO'S" 'K»2tfl^ x
K\2ol7 x
KI20I? ^K\-2.020 ,K \i^2 1 JK\1022.
S1(TCX) #
^50 *D-55T ^tD'53 4T> .H7 *Dv52 *D >1C *DX
S"3 *D -'•H -*I>x52 *-D '£"0 *1>ST *D "Cl 0 >?5" ^fj> ^53 *D /£S ^^ 0CM | '
C767 J\l^A jjL1 j Cr ^^ -X^
Contract:Case No.:SDG No.:
S2(DEC) #
74 x-^f s>.107 "D
' ^« D.87 D.^5~ I>.
' 31 D'^7 5)'90 D.32. 3).75- I>,83 v)-•^7 p /
' ^0 D -' ^r fcl^f '
•77f 5^ *•*'
"75* sl&2> * '
^|0?-i.
VCBH073f
x
X
^
PROJECT SPECQC LIMITS
• Tetrachloro-meta-Xylene (60-150)« Decachlorobiphenyl , (60-150)
# Column to be used to flag recovery values* Values outside of QC limitsD Surrogates calculated using diluted analysis.A - Extracted surrogates diluted out, surrogates added to
diluted extract as retention time markers.
page of
![Page 159: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/159.jpg)
AROCLOR SURROGATE RECOVERY
Lab Name:Lab Code:SAS No.:
Aciuatec. Inc.AQUA!
Contract:Case No.:SDG No.:
123456789
1011121314151617181920
EPASAMPLE NO.
knowYBi-kFL?gU6H xKI2023 x
Ka033MSKlO-O^MSD?8/JC£YRE. -"kiaoziRE. x
\
SIRCX) *
£745" * .4H *• xGoHI *I>,U ^*. ^v* \I ™ *\ _' -^ *
73 x
"71 ^
S2(DEC) #
SO-43 *-x76 ' x
'32 /^ D,tfl D^?^ X
I4/
5152
(TCX)(DEC)
Tetrachloro-meta-XyleneDecachlorobiphenyl
PROJECT SPECIFICQC LIMITS(60-150)(60-150)
# Column to be used to flag recovery values• Values outside of QC limitsD Surrogates calculated using diluted analysis.A - Extracted surrogates diluted out, surrogates added to
diluted extract as retention time markers.
page. of
![Page 160: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/160.jpg)
SOIL AROCLOR MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE RECOVERY
Lab Name:Lab Code:SAS No.:*
Aquatec, Inc.AQUA1
EPA Sample No.; KHQ33
Contract:Case No.;SDGNo.:
CompoundAroc!or1242Arodor 1254
SPIKEADDED(UG/KGJ4151 <-1051 '
SAMPLECONCENTRATION
(UG/KG)0.0 '
-2.643 '
MSCONCENTRATION
(UG/KG)o.o ^#
3722- -
MS%REC #
0 -*
£5--
QCLIMITS
REC.39-15029-131
CompoundArodor 1242Arodor 1254
SPIKEADDED(UG/KG)^1£1 x
M5°( '
MSDCONCENTRATION
(UG/KG)o.o tt
63££ -
MSD |*- IREC # I RPD #
0 * | 0 *
Ho ' | 'i* -*•
QCLIMITS
RPD3030
QCLIMITS
'REC.39-15029-131
# Column used to flag recovery and RPD values whh an asterisk* Values outside of QC limits
RPD; eLSpike Recovery:
out of ___2_out of
outside limits4____ outside limits
Comments:
in
4-o Kt'cvh l€.Vg\ Arodor/ip-f t
![Page 161: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/161.jpg)
3EAROCLOR
MATRIX SPIKE BLANK RECOVERY
Lab Name: Aouatec. Inc.Lab Code: AQUAISAS No.: __________
Contract:CaseNo.:SDG No.: HOT 31
EPA Sample No.;
CompoundAroclor 1 242Aroclor 1254
SPIKEADDED(UG/KG)Sooo '5000 /
MSBCONCENTRATION
(UG/KG)l*?3«-
331"? ^
MSB%
REC #31 '66 /
QCLIMITS
REC.39-15029-131
# Column used to flag recovery and RPD values whh an asterisk* Values outside of QC limits
Spike Recovery: 0 out of outside limits
_ Comments:
![Page 162: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/162.jpg)
Lab Name:Lab Code:
Lab Sample-ID:Matrix: (s oil/wate r)
Date Extracted:Date Analyzed(l):Time Analyzed(l):
GCID(l) :GC Column(1):
12
• 3456789
101112131415161718192021222324252627282930
FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
Aouatec. Inc.AQUAI
RTy-3S"
LAB ID CLIENT ID
Contract;Case:
SDG No;Level(UM); Lou/
Date Analyzed(2);Time Analyzed(2):
GC1D(2):GC Column(2);
DATEANALYZED 1
peg -
DATEANALYZED 2
•2. OH 323 -
-201321,
10^3302.^331
2^313
- &2.QI6
KI2033
Kiaoa
kiac/7Kiao IS
K 12022.
U/lfe/13
I2/IS/13
U/S/13
U/ffr/13
11 / 16/13
\tl
li/it/K1 6 4 3
page of
![Page 163: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/163.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
ERA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (g)1.0 (uL)1.0100
Case: PCB
PBLKEY
SDG: 40734
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
195551
11/17/9312/15/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U
![Page 164: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/164.jpg)
FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
Lab Name:Lab Code:
Aciuatec. Inc.AQUAI
Lab Sample ID:ifgs£nRiMatrix: (soil/water)
Date Extracted:Date Analyzedd):Time Analyzedd): _____
GCIDd): HP2037GC Columnd): RTy-g
01/13I&2I
LAB ID CLIENT ID
Contract:Case:
SDG No:LeveUL/M):
Date Analyzed!!}:Time Analyzed^):
GC ID(2):GC Column(2):
DATEANALYZED 1
qioaz
DATEANALYZED 2
123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829.30
•zo'm/Ri /
••
K 12022 RE s-
*
'
•
0!/i3/<W /
.
0'//3/?y x
-
page of \
![Page 165: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/165.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
EPA SAMPLE NO.
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc. Lab Code: AQUAI
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.0 (o)1.0 (uL)1.0100
Case: PCB
Lab Sample ID:DateDateDate
Sulfur
Received:Extracted:Analyzed:Clean-up:
PBLXEYRE
SDG: 40734
1 95551 R1
11/17/9301/13/94
N <Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U
![Page 166: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/166.jpg)
Lab Name:Lab Code:
Lab Sample ID:Matrix:{soil/water)
Date Extracted:Date Analyzedd):Time Analyzedd):
GCIDd):GCColumnd):
FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
Aauatec. Inc.AQUA1
Contract:Case:
SDG No:'Level{L/M):'
Date Analyzed{2):Time Analyzed(2):
GC ID(2):'GC Column(2):
Low
if 07"HP2&I3
LAB ID CLIENT IDDATE
ANALYZED 1DATE
ANALYZED 2123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829.30
aoH3!S ki2on
. -
*
^ U//*/«3 ' \^}tl/v '*
-
page J_of_L
![Page 167: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/167.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.01.0
(g)(uU
1.0100
Lab Code:Case:
AQUAI
PCB
EPA SAMPLE NO.
PBLKFL
SDG: 40734
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
202438
12/06/9312/16/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U
![Page 168: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/168.jpg)
Lab Name:Lab Code:
Lab Sample ID:Matrix:(soil/water)
Date Extracted:Date Analyzed(l):Time Analyzedd):
GCID(I):GC Column( 1):
FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
Aouatec. Inc.AQUAI
11/13/43li/14/te
Contract:Case:
SDG No:"LeveHL/M):^
Date Ana!yzed(2):Time Analyzed(2):
GCID{2):^GC Column(2):
PCS
I7//6/T3
P 2 / f _
%Tx-3£
LAB ID CLIENT IDDATE
ANALYZED 1DATE
ANALYZED 2123456789
101112131415161718192021222324252627282930
^04312. ^
••
KI202.3 s
' ' **
*
ia//C/l3
.
IV/6A3 X
-
page of
![Page 169: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/169.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.Contract: 91082
Phase Type: WaterPhase Volume: ___1000
Injection Volume: ____1.0Dilution Factor: 1.0
Lab Code:Case:
AQUAIPCB
EPA SAMPLE NO.
PBLK6H
SDG: 40734
.(mL)(uL)
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
202110
11/18/9312/16/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/L) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1242ArocloM 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1260
0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U
![Page 170: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/170.jpg)
Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 9-Dec-1993 22:18 through 10-T)ec-HC01:[8080] 05,06 09DEC932026METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN
1993 18:16. JDS - HP2618
Peak Response Factors and Relative DeviationsPeak »
2345678910111213H151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950
RT7.1307.8838.0138.7218.7889.1349.1569.5589.74210.61110.80811.00011.32111.62311.70811.78311.89211.98112.66612.79612.92713.03313.26913.39913.47213.55513.64614.16014.27114.47614.55514.64114.97315.05215.14715.30615.46615.64715.70415.84216.04316.08716.24016.39416.61316.80816.92217.01617.19617.356
Aroclor83.5590.91323.42711.18022.71960.47946.707150.5922.6407.18144.8902.5008.0124.58912.5354.4952.81015.6852.3261.1638.83910.88315.3493.7243.6661.21810.8524.2352.9375.4502.1245.0652.4129.2868.0982.2390.4170.7902.824
6.7781.3020.1651.1972.6681.0822.990
!?2L11. IX8. OX5.5X0.9X3.3X1.6X1.9%2.5%6.7X5.5X33.6.7X12. 5X
5.7X3. OX
5.9X2.4X55.7.1X1.8X10.8X6.6X12. 7X
2. IX3.3X4.7X
6.9X
4.1X
7.3X
4.4X
Aroclor48. 3340.50714.6087.28518.72642.80437.614146.5738.7085.777
130.5838.79734.1275.39848.95818.83910.39975.84212.3044.77748.35160.38758.17820.88120.7866.84571.78827.33921.52738.96314.70031.73518.01861 .82457.24012.3322.4525.04512.604
52.7790.1606.9291.1286.8440.8359.9475.53616.814
J?3?u14.5X
4.7X3.3X2.8X1.9X4.9X3.2X8.4X8.6X5.4X5. OX1.5X4.5X1.8X1.7X3. IX1.1X0.2X15.3.5X3.5X17.2.7X1.4X3.2X0.8X1.2X1.6X2.1X2.3X1.5X1.3X1.3X1.8X1.4X8.3X1.3X3. OX3.6X5.5X2.7X1.5X0.6X
Aroclor5.029
4.77917.66323.67729.760141.54519.9382.147
278.39919.75178.477109.19843.72424.395176.54830.67212.256116.744147.371136.77854.43456.05217.233172.64166.59151.92798.64438.37316.78536.24524.03415.76918.7714.0711.1721.9362.200
1.506
101686.
17.3.6X2.5X4.1X3.7X5.1X6.1X3.4X1.5X3.1X2.0X3.2X1.6X4.4X9.6X4.9X5. IX10. 7X3. OX3.4X2. IX.4X.3%.2X.9X.7X.8%
2. OX1.6X2.7X1.8X7.8X23.
5.9X2.2X
Aroclor4.7355.1713.41213.94518.61423.283108.20215.6421.572
219.03815.47960.88185.76833.79218.469136.48624.4599.60888.027116.782112.44842.84344.05013.661137.90353.34841.47982.21131.15769.79134.581127.452119.20628.7276.46712.97531 .635
114.1490.67617.7483.47919.5653.12625.96616.89546.473
124278.
4. OX2.9X2.7X4.4X3.3X2.3X5.9X1.0X2.1X2.2X2.4X3.7X1.7X3.9X5.9X4.8X4.4X13. 7X2.5X2.7X2.3X1.5X2.4X2.9X2.9X2.6X1.9X2. OX1.8X2.6X2.6X4.9X2.7X
5.1X3.4X10. OX2.9X2.8X2.1X1.9X
Aroclor2.840
0.4561.0026.6182.00811.3834.699
110.0354.17330.1365.08131.54911.5333.28263.80934.22811.97143.197216.065172.90868.49260.66218.263236.81977.72070.219145.16738.926122.90655.933248.818214.54682.33519.18831.43189.352
202.5652.05751.27510.53255.4718.13574.35047.885138.055
1248
73.5.4X38.2.6X10. 2X6.8X7.4X1.6X2.3X2.6X1.1X1.3X1.6X4.2X3.4X3.1X5.8X9.4X3. OX4.4X3.3X2. OX1.9X1.3X1.5X1.4X0.6X2.1X0.6X2. IX4.2X2.4X2.8X3.9X4.8X4.5X2.4X5.2X2.3X5.8X0.7X0.7%0.5X
Aroclor3.0216.2360.7436.2720.9650.8520.3504.9540.1090.6144.5651.1690.1821.5224.4700.6830.950
169.14860.1534.6691.09693.2608.1927.66432.960
34.7578.940
128.74646.171249.38464.69349.518319.656140.3015.717
101.44820.819115.698209.39269.810431.460
1254
4.3X
39.
4.4X
8.7X
4.1X21.4.5X0.9X2.3X4.7X2.4X1.0X1.3X1.6X0.9X3.4X1.3X1.7X3.2X1.8X5.1X2.4X1.9X1.2X2.6X2. OX1.8X
Aroclor3.1.15
7.5250.5760.1076.6360.5381.2520.3963.6430.1120.5053.261
0.2151.2810.2370.2820.75110.20113.3980.4540.1891.7210.5980.3780.6990.2480.7460.3291.7281.140
110.31617.242141.118
1.316
5.8890.3684.55823.7880.32971.089
1260
4.9X
73.
5.8X
3.9X
5.2X2.6X2.7%2.5%
4.7X
5.5X1.9X
1.9X
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.0838 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.4052.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quant itat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.08891.
CJ?
oo
Inchcape Testing ServicesArmatec Laboratories AROCl.OR CALIBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142) f.rDS)16-DEC-93 19:01:.'
![Page 171: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/171.jpg)
Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 9-Dec-1993 22:18 through 10-1»ec-1993 18:16.HCD1:[8080] 05,06 090EC932026METHOD: 8080 PCS:AN
RTT-35JDS - HPZ618
Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviationsik *TT~525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990
17.43817.65317.72617.78917.89217.96018.19218.40318.56318.58218.97519.10119.14819.24219.28519.43619.51719.63519.84720.01920.17220.43920.86221.11321.17921.19321.27921.45721.65222.12622.41322.62022.75622.84423.26923.68624.05324.18824.53125.970
Total:
Compound
Aroclor 12211.101
0.107
1.785 6.2X0.963
0.386
1.601
0.880
0.0880.465
1.139
O.T16
0.809
2.008
636.4 4.4X
tet rach I oro-meta-xyl enedecachlorobiphenyl
Aroclor 1232 Aroclor 1016 Aroclor0.1930.547
8.7887.4080.4173.7900.269
7.601
1.023
0.0851.4532.9171.8711.927
0.2082.2560.837
0.4700.3404.093
0.100
1.5162.3000.470
0.9270.1610.3390.9962.368
SSSSBBB3
1428.6
Mean
24
4
13
5
60
6
6
5
34
0.5990.1832.679
.1X 0.339 31.772
.1X 16.8370.754
.OX 5.7060.968
.3X 24.228
1.3940.8571.746
.2X 8.2290.194
1242
11.8%
2.3X3.8X
4.4X
3.6X
4.1X
1.218 2.288 65.0.317
.8X 2.569
1.222
0.915.1X 0.861
.8X 0.415
1.378 0.834
7. OX
2.115 6.6X 2.094.___
RT8.0838
27.4052
ToX 210378 3~9% 2347^5 i^TX
Retention Time Marker/SurrogateRT Dev. Range RT Crit.
-.0127 to .0118 Passes...-.0141 to .0148 Passes...
StandardMean8264.4722.
Aroclor 1248
2.2627.741 6.3X
86.747 0.8X49.341 1.0X2.296 9.8X
14.855 1.8X2.650 4.2X
6.23267.763 2. OX
3.1562.097 18.5.158 8. OX
19.170 2.6X1.4764.794 69.0.7130.1326.849 3.6X0.6632.549 11. 5X
0.3493.533 6.5X
0.9031.827 10. 3X0.294
1.009 42.0.1870.2160.5792.374
3236~0 iToX
SummaryRF Recovery095 72.3 to965 94.1 to
Aroclor51.97033.63020.0539.556
283.664223.75237.474
205.970
9.55767.495
138.623146.524.
29.08626.29492.676
335.13319.73338.37614.4772.151
106.80715.40646.048
12.19662.002
1.2630.2450.1729.290
40.210
1.7341.0440.1701.1312.3222.504
=s===r==
4500.1
1254
0.7X3.8X4.6X2. OX2.3X0.5X2.1X
2.5X8.8X
2.7X
3.9X2. OX1.3X2.2X0.2X2.9X2.9X8.8X2.7X2.2X2.8X
2.7X1.5X
1.2X1.8X
51.
6. OX
2.4X
Aroclor168.59663.813
0.309
376.68061.798
444.390
2.502167.331
140.73595.067
235.218374.018270.253148.83810.63437.629
320.113148.550
70.79972.029
644.2629.324
16.7597.662
186.431351.438
74.5887.900
10.3423.910
51.260124.148
12601.6X.1.6X
2.6X0.6X1.7X
6.1X4.2%
1.4X3.9X
3. OX3.4X1.5X1.3X6.8X3.1X1.9%0.7%
2.6X2.3X4.4X4.7X3.5%5.7%2.4X5.6X2.7X8.7X6.9%3.7%2.4%3.6%
37.655 1.2X==============
5173.3 3. OX
Range Surr Crit113.8X ** Fails *112. 3X Passes...
CMC3OJoCDO
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.0838 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.4052.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT* 1.08891.
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR CALIBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142) (JDS)l6-DEC-93 19:01:.'
![Page 172: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/172.jpg)
Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 9-Oec-1993 22:18 through 10-"biMC01:[8080] 05,06 09DEC932026METHOD: 8080 PCB:AH
RTx^Sec-1993 18:16.
Pei
Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations
JDS - HP2618
tf2345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243
6.2877.4099.6119.8529.90610.07811.29111.35311.60811.86312.39712.47612.69413.23113.37713.61913.73013.86913.98514.38014.49214.77015.02715.37215.49715.60815.73415.93916.26616.44116.61716.96517.13217.29217.43317.51917.60417.97218.35318.42018.69818.82718.917
Aroclor1.52437.93224.90920.12865.95213.6548.5442.07010.1543.0031.288
11.6153.5691.6560.5584.9326.2542.8104.8021.8913.9961.0450.1881.8953.8924.5680.9192.7761.8051.0810.1150.5330.8020.5031.3300.3770.7211.293
12216. IX4.3X5.2X6.3X2.4X6.4X12. 5X5.1X60.
6.2X14. 7X11. 9X11. 7X
6.4X7.3X
8.1X6.4X
4.3X
Aroclor1.54120.76916.89615.73462.05347.47228.8475.03139.4389.0074.87859.97220.4339.0343.29728.35227.99215.60332.96414.08028.0248.6051.07313.58527.69730.9883.18721.5829.0134.5730.6523.1384.6882.6667.6282.9013.1264.9590.3540.252
12327.5X3.1X4.2X8.4X3.4X1.7X1.3X30.1.5X14. 8X
6.3X5.4X1.5X5.7X1.2X16.1.4X0.9X3.7X1.8X4.2X6.3X3.5X2. IX4.5X4.1X2.5X
9.3X6.5X10.0X6.4X4. OX17.
Aroclor1.4311.1228.79112.39259.118104.67166.22911.58789.39019.98111.614150.58950.30823.6788.64070.37166.42242.47281.64536.06272.06718.6801.1256.90410.92716.6172.3311.070
0.078
10162.3X
2.8X
7.5X2.6X4.8X2.2X14. 4X1.8X7.5X4.1X6.5X6.1X2.6X5.8X4. IX11. IX2.7X1.4X2.6X1.9X2.8X10.4X5.1X3.7X7.4X
Aroclor1.5110.8576.5029.08243.85682.36951.7209.18969.78115.9708.863
112.25538.04118.9507.00256.19354.66433.53764.75529.14059.47417.0513.02731.20259.17766.9237.45547.56222.85013.2182.0359.45113.8368.72221.8586.9685.29815.1090.6720.509
12429. OX3. OX11. 4X4.3X3.2X1.9X10. 7X1.6X8.7X8.1X7.8X2.2X5. IX2.8X12.4%1.2X1.9X4.8X3.1X4.8X17.6.6X4.4X2.9X3.5X5.8X1.7X3.7X5.2X4.2X5.3X4.2X5.7X6.4X
Aroclor1.5350.7280.4072.4623.82044.6871.72028.7936.2261.72463.33218.32422.8019.083
105.76784.52549.191116.23041.90296.28027.1094.78754.416115.419132.31218.58085.01962.40035.1395.90227.00339.64124.889
67.46220.77713.32840.9551.7732.2501.689
12484.3*
8.0X
4.5X3.8X
2.3X32.
4.1X5.4X2. OX3.5X5. OX8.1X2.6X1.0X0.9X1.7X2.5X10. 1X4.5X3. OX0.9X2.6X5.2X3.3X7.6X2.6X1.5X2.3X1.8X2.8X2. OX
Aroclor1.5470.4232.5500.3631.1740.5861.0531.632
0.2230.9890.42984.93929.94046.3014.74317.2603.7540.72214.28856.571152.78525.91543.580190.99772.56911.32258.998111.22436.82420.524217.48646.777100.806138.47215.2267.54821.517
12544.9X
5.1X
3.8X20.
0.8X4.6X3.7X7. OX7.4X4.3X3.5X1.4X1.5X2.4X2.1X6.1X1.2X2.9X2.8X1.3X2.5X1.2X5. OX3.9X7.3X15.4.4X
Aroclor1.6090.5242.6810.4460.7970.5361.0061.8140.8180.2180.1364.827
0.7340.2140.4880.1400.2170.63359.9610.1129.33673.0340.1962.18611.638
35.96036.05788.205203.28713.7182.27233.404
12608.5*
6.5X
5. OX
2.4X3.6X2.7X
4.5X3. OX3.3X1.8X4.8X4. OX10.4X1.5X
COC5CMOOO
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.9903 and decachlorobiphenyl at 28.3545.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT* 1.06493.
Inchcape Testing ServicesAauatec Laboratories AROCLOR CALIBRATION 5.2-3H2AUG93 1142) (JDS)16-DEC-93 19:01:5
![Page 173: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/173.jpg)
Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 9-Dec-1993 22:18 through 10-T>ec-MCD1:[8080] 05,06 09DEC932026METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN
1993 18:16. JDS - HP2618
Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations
V4546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576:ara
RT Aroclor 122119.105 0.16519.21119.266 0.44319.50519.57419.730 0.75619.80619.980 0.24620.23620.40620.49420.65120.84620.98921.22421.39821.53921.57121.74321.86421 .96522.06722.27822.46022.98423.13423.23923.41423.90224.45825.18925.41426.810 1.244rsssss EBSSBESSEESEEETotal: 257.9 4.7X
Aroclor 12321.763 5.6X
2.731 6.2X0.5390.3890.4220.2131.819 4.5X0.233
1.0320.5140.2990.1140.9710.5090.261
0.136
2.013 6.9X
0.887
0.5460.580
0.586
1.450BSSEBESSSSESaB
660.1 3.3X
Aroclor 1016 Aroclor 12422.232 8.4X
9.919 6.3X0.746
0.504 1.008 57.0.4174.204 4.6X0.372
0.0811.543
0.105
0.5970.142
0.209
0.216
1.470 1.385SEBEEESEESSEEE BSSEEE=S3!====E
1048.3 4.4X 1149.8 4.6X
Retention Time Marker/Surrogate StandardCompoundtetrachloro-meta-xylenedecachlorobiphenyl
Mean RT8.9903 -
28.3545 -
RT Oev. Range RT Crit. Mean.0170 to .0097 Passes... 3648..0167 to .0122 Passes... 2597.
Aroclor 12485.913 4.5X
29.409 5. OX2.461 10.8X
1.982 66.1.159
10.269 2.2X1.142
0.6850.4083.284 3.5X
0.6920.380
1.1980.3090.127
1.486
0.804
0.3360.355
0.309
1.435S2===S========
1544.5 3. IX
SummaryRF Recovery048 76.7 to843 94.6 to
Aroclor104.52475.576
34.269
14.64416.463
179.66316.606
10.9728.656
48.9032.349
13.3658.517
22.7445.5183.349
27.6481.1580.389
20.877
1.3391.7130.7880.7801.335
1.581========
2165.8
2.6X
2.1X
3. OX3.7X2.3X4.2X
5.3X5.1X2.5X
2.2X3.5X
4.8X8.3X7.7X
2.1X
2. OX
==:====2.8X
Aroclor228.79881.764
83.82358.8212.828
25.781235.34433.304
7.195147.85377.40320.80321.528
147.38881.58645.175
13.30724.9393.201
316.5734.1819.693
140.1506.920
70.60576.8163.855
29.10964.8664.037
21.632========2676.5
12602. OX1.3X
3.6X2.6X
3.7X3.4X1.4X6.4X2.3X1.3X2.9X2.4X1.2X1.0X2.3X
2.6X2.2X7.1X3.2X
11. 1X6. IX4. OX2.4X1.7X1.0X7.4X1.2X1.0X5.8X1.5X
======
2.8X
Range Surr Crit113. 6X **118. 1X **
Fails *Fails *
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.9903 and decachlorobiphenyl at 28.3545.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3} Quant Station is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT* 1.06493.
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR CALIBRATION 5.2-3(I2AUG93 1142) (JDS)16-DEC-93 19:01:f
![Page 174: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/174.jpg)
CH051209.XLS
CALIBRATION SUMMARYBACK CALCULATIONS
Lab ID:GC:
Col. 1 :Col. 2:
AQUATEC, INC.HP2618
RTX-35RTX-5
Calib date(s): 09-DEC-93 22:18
Rle:
10-DEC-93 18:16
05,06 09DEC932026
to
Standards
Aroclor 1016Cal Fact
%DiffAroclor 1221
Cal Fact% Diff
Aroclor 1232Cal Fact
%DiffAroclor 1 242
Cal Fact%Diff
Aroclor 1 248Cal Fact
% DiffAroclor 1 254
Cal Fact% Diff
Aroclor 1 260Cal Fact
% Diff
50PPb
53.61.072
-754.41.088
-953.01.060
-652.31.046
-551.11.022
-251.31.026
-349.40.988
1
100PPb
1011.010
-1105
1.050-5
1041.040
-497.8
0.9782
99.50.995
1100
1.0000
96.80.968
3
200PPb
2091.045
-5205
1.025-3
1840.920
8195
0.9753
2011.005
-1197
0.9852
1980.990
1
400ppb
4001.000
0402
1.005-1
4041.010
-1404
1.010-1
3970.993
1401
1.0030
3930.983
2
800ppb
7870.984
2783
0.9792
7890.986
1794
0.9931
7950.994
1800
1.0000
8121.015
-2
%RSD
3.5
4.1
5.4
2.9
1.2
1.5
1.7
Cal Fact = Calc. Cone. / Nominal Cone.
%RSD = STD Dev / Mean of Cal Fact
% Diff = (Nominal Amt-Calc Amt) / Nominal Amt* 100
Page 1 000279
![Page 175: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/175.jpg)
PCBCHST.XLT
. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY
Lab ID:GC:
Col. 1 iCol. 2:
Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
AQUATEC, INC.WP16/3 -"RTv-35" -^Tx- - 5~ -
Standard Rle: fl*T OL Whttl
Initial Calib.date/time: l2/^Vl3 0.21 "
3195-233 '' '
CompoundA\J « i-% ii A ^f\ \\. 1 Z i O ^^
NominalAmount (ppb)
Q.OO "
Standard Rle: £)£" />£, 1 t/DEd^^ R?"2 "34 '—— •« *t\lf ——— |_ii£ —— nr fc J —— t —— j —— -t—\ —————
CompoundAft Y2SH ^
NominalAmount (ppb)
•ZOO x-
Standard Rle: 05~ h(f ITDECI^I^^ (3 '-r" y •
CompoundAft niK ^
NominalAmount (ppb)2.00 ^
Standard Rle: ^5]^)^ \?"D6d^3l$06 14 ^/
CompoundAR \7.(,0 <r
NominalAmount (ppb)
2o<5 x'
Standard Rle: 65" 06 f5"D£<n3l8^6 2.^ ^y
CompoundAR ii^s x
NominalAmount (ppb)•zoo x-
H/ '0/13 ISI6'
Date:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
/11) x
Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
1ST *-
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)1 6^ x
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
IS'I x
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb).
1^0 x
iHH^ ^
% Diff.D.5- <
ll»K/«I5"2o
% Diff.5~.S"/
ia/i6/w01(7. x
% Diff.5T.5- -
/2//^/<?3-'OIH7 ,
% Diff.S7S- ,
/2//^J'0«5"f -
%Diff.6T.O .--
Page of000231
![Page 176: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/176.jpg)
Lab ID:GC:_
Col. 11._Col. 2:
PCBCHST.XLT
. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY
AQUATEC, INC.Initial Calib.
date/time: (3/01/13fr/lfl/13
to
Check Standard File: OS M
Check Standard File:
27Date: [21 It faTime:
CompoundA"R lfll£ -~
NominalAmount (ppb)100 x-
Calc.Amount (ppb)
"2.60 •*•
% Diff .0.0 "
Date;Time:
CompoundAtt I2^S ^
NominalAmount (ppbj2,00 —
Calc.Amount (ppb)
113 '% Diff."3.-T -
Date:Check Standard Rle: OS. oG \SV£C<\3\$OC.
CompoundA* iaM2 -
NominalAmount (ppb)
"Zoo *•*
Calc.Amount (ppb)
Hi '% Diff.*f.O '
Check Standard File: UDate:Time:
CompoundAT? 124^ ^
NominalAmount (ppb)
"Z00 ^
Calc.Amount (ppb)
112 -%Diff.^.o x
Check Standard Rle: py.^ \(c^L.<\3\(\LiSJ
Date:Time:
Compound/WllffY ^
NominalAmount (ppb)2c>0 ^
Calc.Amount (ppb)./«" -
% Diff."T.S- -
Pace of 3
000282
![Page 177: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/177.jpg)
PCBCHST.XLT
- AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY
Lab ID: AQUATEC, INC.GC:
Col. 1fCol. 2:
Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
tf?26f«'RTX-3S1
KTV-5-
Initial Calib.date/time: lfl/flf/9"} i"2.ltf^
Standard Rle: 05*0£ I 6DE<^3 H</5T. IS /^^» X
CompoundAZ IT-1/
. NominalAmount (ppb)
"2-60 ^
Standard Rle: 06. f)6 I & DB^.^3 \°\ti£ [°( '" *
CompoundA^ Y^frO /
NominalAmount (ppb)2oo ^
Standard Rle:
CompoundNominal
Amount (ppb)
Standard Rle:
CompoundNominal
Amount (ppb)
Standard Rle:
CompoundNominal
Amount (ppb)
)ijln {^3 \$\6
Date:Time:
Calc. -Amount (ppb)
l?1 --
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
/^ | „
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb).
tit ft/13 'QS'iC s
% Diff.0*5~ '
^n/v-0611 "
% Diff.y.sr '
% Diff.
% Diff.
% Diff.
to
Page 3 of 3000233
![Page 178: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/178.jpg)
Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:22.HCO1:18080] 03,04 07JAH941940METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN
RTX-5JDS - HP2087
Peak Response Factors and Relative DeviationsPeak «
2345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
8.2609.5329.8119.84510.02710.65411.33211.39911.67611.95412.51412.60312.83713.42813.60313.87213.97514.12714.25914.69414.81815.12115.41215.90816.03316.17916.40816.76516.95717.14817.54617.72917.90818.06118.16618.25618.66719.08619.149
Aroclor 122123.954 5. OX6.445 6.9X15.955 3. OX13.090 2.4X41.889 0.9X0.7437.011 17.0.8205.519 5. OX0.9620.6586.780 4.8X2.3890.8300.2342.2092.0931.1882.235 9.4X1.1311.8820.4650.8741.7352.0060.3541.2050.8113.928
0.2880.3590.205
0.5320.123
Aroclor13.0004.01310.82710.42539.8132.25625.90616.3452.53821.1094.3132.60433.30011.6084.3941.48313.76412.1897.19115.6208.35013.2343.9056.26212.61413.9311.3259.8014.5031.9510.2981.4272.0501.1583.2351.1401.9442.656
12324.5X
2.6X2.8X2.4X3.6X5.7X12. 1X5.4X3.7X7.4X1.9X5. OX3.8X8. OX5.4X8.5X7.8X1.8X6.7X2.8X7.2X7.7X4.5X3.2X7. OX4.7X
Aroclor0.6215.7448.45938.5445.35058.23134.8685.99147.88910.4866.31282.38027.75211.7194.13034.80231 .93719.74039.03419.85033.5658.6623.1184.9527.3271.0400.4380.6463.650
1016
1.7X3.2X0.4X2.8X4.4X4.3X2. 8X1.7X4.4X5.5X3.9X4.4X2.2X6.2X2.7X3.4X2.6X2. IX3.5X2.5X6. OX11. IX7.8X3.2X
Aroclor0.5244.3056.45029.2974.36145.71027.3104.75837.1287.9274.79961.03720.7099.1543.23727.31824.76815.38230.14316.37127.1797.74414.13126.28428.9103.31121.24711.5615.8270.9374.1026.0663.864
9.3462.6956.295
1242
3.1X4.1X3. OX5.5X4.8X7.7X3.6X5.3X6.7X3.8X4.4X1.8X8.9X2.8X4.1X3. OX2.2X3.6X2.2X5.3X5.7X4.7X4.4X4.3X2.6X7.3X
7.4X6.2X7.6X5.4X
Aroclor0.1400.2341.5552.7811.21125.43510.7401.13915.9222.6350.87136.88310.78811.3694.36753.13840.56123.21955.34822.01345.00012.41224.89151.13456.7448.66837.65731.11118.5872.42311.24916.97010.68127.6538.10116.760
1248
7.9X7.9X2.3X
4.1X7.8X5.1X5.8X2.4X6.1X4.8X3.9X3. OX5. OX4. OX6.3X7.4X8.5X6.3X4.8X1.1X9.5X3.3X22.
5.6X5.6X6.4X
6.6X8.7X13. OX
Aroclor0.098
1.4440.1820.663
0.681
0.1210.4410.17940.79112.13021.6732.6408.0491.5476.60424.88467.47911.66118.77586.83032.1324.86224.42145.58116.1729.92285.14919.43445.86954.193
1254
6.6X
1.7X6.8X4.5X5.5X11. OX6.2%4. OX1.3X5.0%3. OX2.5X11. OX4.4X3.7X4.2%5.5%3.9X5.3X6.2X
Aroclor0.251
1.4820.2110.3730.4730.876
0.520
2.321
0.3150.252
0.27827.1574.03831.8884.6451.2965.24716.32715.35537.46183.032
1260
5.8X
4.1X5.9X4.4%
13. 4X1.3%6.9%2.9%4.7%
CO07o
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.8937 and decachlorobiphenyl at 29.1350.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT 1.07443.
Inchcape Testing ServicesAmiatec T.nborntories AROCLOR CALIBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142) (JDS)14-JAN-94 13:55:32
![Page 179: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/179.jpg)
Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:22.NCD1:[80BO] 03,04 07JAN941940METHOD: 8080 PCB:AM
JDS • HP2087
Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations
**«4243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970
S*3S=a
RT Aroclor 122119.47319.70819.91720.04520.06220.09720.37120.44320.61720.70220.89821.18221.46821.64321.86922.02622.29022.48222.64022.67522.85723.00323.22823.66824.26024.53224.71825.74526.39927.811 0.598====== ==============
Total: 151.5 3.0%
Compoundtetrachloro-meta-xylenedecachlorobiphenyl
Aroclor 1232 Aroclor 1016 Aroclor
0.642
1.086
0.179
0.605
0.4030.177
0.3730.182
0.810
0.3520.2160.248
0.2450.713
ss=ss==sss=&348.7 4.
Mean RT8.8937
29.1350
0.777
3.8310.282
0.212
1.2420.135
0.496
0.657 0.586!S3 BSS===a===SS=S SS==SS===
5% 557.9 3.2% 567.8
Retention Time Marker/SurrogateRT Dev. Ranae RT Crit.
-.0137 to .0108 Passes...-.0150 to .0117 Passes...
1242 Aroclor 12480.8610.8612.150
11.147 10.2%0.955
0.3620.3833.407 12.6%0.4190.277
1.137
0.2790.140
0.448
0.608
0.3310.137
0.699===== ==============
4.0% 725.0 5.5%
Standard SummaryMean RF Recovery2132.442 82.5 to1319.215 91.1 to
Aroclor7.0368.588
38.335
35.726
13.063
5.3626.469
60.1806.3704.0923.214
17.251
5.0313.201
8.1722.1261.2669.888
7.8090.5680.6870.3270.5420.690
========
890.6
125413.7%
7.4%1.5%
2.8%
5.2%
8.8%6.3%1.9%8.6%9.8%
5.1%
3.6%8.2%
7.6%
2.1%
3.7%
======
3.9%
Aroclor 15.772 1
12.48883.68834.679
30.77627.542
10.49282.48713.89658.29130.5007.8528.771
57.51432.15318.276
5.6239.348
110.2904.391
50.51129.83832.58513.30728.28910.318
==========
1043.5
2601.4X8.6%2.5%3.6%
5.9%5.0%
9.2%5.9%4.9%2.5%2.2%7.1%6.2%1.8%1.6%3.4%
8.8%8.1%3.0%5.7%2.1%2.3%1.6%2.1%2.2%0.8%:====
3.9%
Range Surr Crit109.8% **131.2% **
Fails *Fails *
o0}COooCD
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.8937 and decachlorobiphenyl at 29.13SO.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/* 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitation is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT' 1.07443.
Inchcape Testing ServicesT .ahnrntories AROCLOR CALIBRATION 5.2-302AUG93 1142) (JDS)14-JAN-94 13:55:32
![Page 180: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/180.jpg)
Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:22.NC01:[8080] 03,04 07JAN941940METHOD: 8080 PCB:AM
RTX-35
Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations
JDS - HP2087
Peak f23456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
6\7flf8.3688.7068.7419.1589.349
10.26110.66111.00511.32311.49711.60611.70112.44012.57712.71812.83913.08513.22813.29513.39313.49714.05514.17314.39914.48214.57414.94015.02815.13115.30515.47715.67415.73115.89016.10816.16616.500
Aroclor19.2465.130
12.4969.868
31.8370.4768.8810.5841.4662.3310.8680.5432.3980.6180.1301.3381.8011.621
0.7720.3031.7610.9250.4720.9700.4711.1000.6931.3191.1440.493
0.0980.390
0.9520.215
12217. IX5.8X
4.4X2.5X1.3X
4.4X
11. 3X
11.7X
Aroclor10.8964.202
8.7187.971
30.9821.708
27.4481.8046.5549.8043.5922.056
12.7713.0760.7537.825
10.9089.6605.2584.5411.757
12.4276.0983.8797.0933.3824.6593.7639.2848.7772.887
0.8301.962
7.5781.273
12328.4X6.7X
4.3X2.2X0.7X4.4X3.3X
4. OX3. OX6.6X
7.4X
8.9X1.2X2. OX
7.3X
3.8X1.9Xa.ox5.5X4.3X9.3X5.7X6.6X7. 8X5.8X
7.8X
Aroclor0.5654.016
4.6716.156
29.4774.138
59.0514.100
15.39922.3268.5254.893
30.7907.6782.318
19.36527.13824.77713.24011.8324.247
30.83614.1089.548
18.0778.5803.0656.9234.0502.5163.482
0.6450.125
0.2690.396
1016
6. OX
3.7X4.3X3.2X3.4X5.5X5.6X4.2X2.8X4.6X5.5X5.3X2.6X
11. OX9.4X3.1X3.3X
5.9X7.3X3. OX2.5X3.9X4.1X2.6X
5.6X6.8X
5.9X
Aroclor0.6453.174
3.5994.849
22.7533.175
46.5743.170
11.76617.2946.5223.620
23.2725.8271.630
14.39221.42419.49810.5289.3223.336
24.51411.7377.644
15.0047.123
10.6827.591
19.73818.5706.645
2.4885.315
16.9113.321
1242
7.0X
3.2X6.5X2. OX3.2X6.3X4.2X1.8X1.9X3.4X2.3X3.9X5.3X7.4X6.5X4.1X4.2X
7.5X
2.6X3.5X6.1X4. OX3.6X5.1X4.1X4.4X4. OX4.8X
4.9X
5.4X5.8X
Aroclor
0.1791.106
0.3752.0720.878
23.1740.7435.7256.1722.0760.758
10.8477.1242.1576.963
40.44931 .39316.54813.1344.678
43.08316.42012.76526.5709.546
20.76013.16139.38934.18717.786
6.36615.254
31.2289.583
1248
6.7X
10. 4X
5.8X
5.5X6. OX
14. 7X
8.7X1.9X7.3X
10. 7X3.1X2.3X5.3X4.5X7.7X4.2X3.1X5.7X6.4X1.4X
12. 7X5.3X7.4X7.9X2.6X
9.7X4.2X
10. 5X4.1X
Aroclor
1.046
0.150
0.888
0.108
0.1820.792
0.12030.8249.701
1.457
16.4362.1541.3395.547
5.480
18.9907.990
47.03911.81511.06753.83723.768
18.659
1254
2.7X
3.1X7.2X
3.5X
10. 3X
10. 3X
7.9X4.8%3.4X4.8X5.8X3.9X4.3X
3.6X
Aroclor
1.068
0.211
0.643
0.091
0.139
0.1031.675
0.278
0.106
0.2010.126
19.7853.029
22.338
1.004
1260
26.
4.3X5.7X
4.4X
27.
COooo
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 7.6321 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.7071.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitation is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.02960.
Inchcape Testing ServicesA nnofo^ T AROH OR rAURRATION 5.?.-3mATIO03 11421 (•JDS114-JAN-94 13:55:32
![Page 181: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/181.jpg)
Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:22.MCD1:(80801 03.04 07JAN941940METHOD: 8080 PCS:AM
Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations
JOS - HP2087
Peak *— w4041424344•••f4546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
16.74216.95717.18817.38517.56217.64517.88418.21618.23518 48818.71719.54519.64119.95320.09120.31820.51420.97121.45821.73121.91122.12222.85323.41023.57024.54725.04325.37026.563Total:
Aroclor 1221 Aroclor 12320
0.191 10.411 1
00.428 2
10
000
10
0
00
0.112 00
0.517 0
.226
.104
.569
.658
.507
.589
.551
.201
.395
.290
.225
.283
.681
.244
.408
.133
.218
.596115.4 3.9X 259.1 4.2%
Aroclor 1016 Aroclor 12420.3.4.2.7.
3.0.
0.1.
2.
0.
575204 4.9%243 13. OX127156 6.7X
752856
158115
033
147
0.126 0.090
0.562 0.408.0 4.4% 419
526?6 ZTix
Aroclor1.7709.14211.8416.97121.5890.08810.9420.5452.347
0.7802.7590.2700.3452.627
0.5910.1730.3330.127
1248
6.7X8. OX
12.8%8.2%
13. 3X
53.
0.600==============
546.5 6.2%
Aroclor3.49119.03433.4899.90667.3496.63148.6646.65333.01532.453
14.59549.5074.3646.3610.42119.5082.3519.4041.4846.3290.1320.2310.466
12548.85i5.7X7.1%12. 5X7.9%22.4.5%
9.9%6.3%6.4%13.8%7.3%
15.0%12.0%23.
4.6X
3.5X
0.617
Aroclor0.7393.93310.85730.97012.73565.34210.09767.55525.00520.11235.79854.94145.78224.4086.16456.25925.36214.14495.5852.96530.76254.9531.8919.87623.4578.740
~645l8 6~2% "789 2
1260
20.
5.5X7.7X3.7%
5.5%2.5%8.4%10.3%3.7%4.7%1.9%4.7%4.9%8.3%2.5%3.0%3.5%3.2%2.0%3.0%4.5%1.3%1.9%1.6%
"ZTlX
Compound____________ Mean RTtetrachloro-meta-xylene 7.6321decachlorobiphenyl 27.7071
Retention Time Marker/Surrogate Standard SummaryRT Crlt.RT Dev. Range
-.0165 to .0146-.0182 to .0129
Passes...Passes...
Mean RF1669.9871153.447
Recovery Range74.8 to 108.3%90.2 to 127.9X
Surr Cn't** Fails *** Fails *
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 7.6321 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.7071.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quant1 tation is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.02960.
Inchcape Testing Services
![Page 182: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/182.jpg)
CH030107.XLS
CALIBRATION SUMMARYBACK CALCULATIONS
Lab ID: AQUATEC, INC.GC:
Col. 1:Col. 2:
HP2087RTX-5
RTX-35
Calib date(s): 01/08/94 03:5401/09/94 01:22
Rle: 03, 04 07JAN941940
to
1
'1
—
—
Standards
Aroclor 1016Cal Fact
% DiffAroclor 1221
Cal Fact%Diff
Aroclor 1 232Cal Fact
%DiffAroclor 1 242
Cal Fact%Diff
Aroclor 1248Cal Fact
% DiffAroclor 1254
Cal Fact%Diff
Aroclor 1 260Cal Fact
% Diff
50PPb
50.31.006
-154.71.094
-939.10.782
2243.60.872
1350.51.010
-147.30.946
550.61.012
-1
100PPb
97.70.977
299.00.990
187.90.879
1298.60.986
195.60.956
496.9
0.9693
99.90.999
0
200PPb
2061.030
-3199
0.9951
1840.920
8211
1.055-6
2051.025
-3197
0.9852
2021.010
-1
400PPb
3960.990
1402
1.005-1
4071.018
-2394
0.9852
3720.930
7412
1.030-3
3870.968
3
800ppb
8011.001
0792
0.9901
7880.985
2797
0.9960
8241.030
-3797
0.9960
8111.014
-1
%RSD
2.0
4.4
10.1
6.8
4.5
3.2
1.9
Cal Fact = Calc. Cone. / Nominal Cone.
%RSD = STD Dev / Mean of Cal Fact
% Diff = (Nominal Amt-Calc Amt) / Nominal Amt* 100
Page 1 000280
![Page 183: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/183.jpg)
PCBCHST.XLT
. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY
Lab ID:GC:
Col. 1f_Col. 2:
AQUATEC, INC.Initial Calib.
date/time: Q l 0 3 f Y 03S''/ to
Check Standard Rle; Ql OH——Date: o i/I a/Time:
Compound/R 124? X
NominalAmount (ppb)a oo x
Calc.Amount (ppb)
|7<? s"% Diff.\s.o -
Check Standard Hie: ffb.OH f2JW/fS42. 26Date;Time:
CompoundXR /0/6 x'
NominalAmount (ppb)200 X
Calc.Amount (ppb)
/SO x^
% Diff.IO.O <•
Check Standard File: (ft. (ft
Check Standard nie: 03
Check Standard Rle:
Date:Time: 231?
Compound4R f2V« /"
NominalAmount (ppb)200 /
Calc.Amount (ppb)l« x
% Diff.1.1.0 "
Date: Qi/>3/'?t/ ^Time: .35"7 X
Compoundy4K\1fl
NominalAmount (ppb)200 ^
Calc.Amount (ppb)177 -x-
% Diff.'H,s ^
Date:Time:
CompoundNominal
Amount (ppb)Calc.
Amount (ppb). % Diff.
Page of
000284
![Page 184: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/184.jpg)
BLASLAND ft BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.O.6723 Towpath Road. Box 66Syracuse, New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX 315-449-0017 CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDPROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
SAMPLERS:
STA.NO. DATE TIME o STATION LOCATION REMARKS
TBifao-t
TBlMO-t
TB1A0-*T&SAil-l /oka KIZOI*
TBJAH-Z u*TBlAH-3 7/0/13
TBsAl\-1
TBSAlt'-S '/»/,*D- 1
RB-i r-oo k /3 /+, n /<
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE
Inqulshed by: (Signature) DATE
TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature)
Received by: (Signature)
DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
TIME Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received for Laboratory by:(Signature)
DATE TIME
/Zoo
Remarks:*
*vv o if7/12/9313837B6HCOR Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files
![Page 185: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/185.jpg)
.//T
BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.C.6723 Towpath Road, Box 66Syracuse, New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017
/
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORD -Jo/Js(t<<PROJ.NO. PROJECT NAME
XcJo.n~o.ti oo J?. e »- S-fr* J^,SAMPLERS: ture)
STA.NO. DATE TIME STATION LOCATION REMARKS
K /toK.I1O T.&
"/»/<** VZ0Z.7
KiZov.lt
713*43- /
lt.a3O
TBSA3-3D-l KllOlz.
/OZQ3»
Relinquished by: '(Signature) DATE
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE
TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature)
Received by: (Signature)
DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
TIME Relinquished by: (Signature) •DAfr TIME Rellnqulshed by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received (or Laboratory by:(Signature)
DATE TIME Remarks:
7/12/931393786HCOR Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files
![Page 186: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/186.jpg)
F-0430
AQUATEC SAMPLE LOG-IN SHEET
fj.Kv.rn., Aquatec. Inc. Pag. I «r /
Recebed By (Print Name): Poun<=ls-LO«£. Log-in Date:.
JSample DeUrery
CLIENTSAMPLE
1
CORRESPONDING
SAMPLETAG
ASSIGNEDLABf
REMARKS:CONDITIONOF SAMPLE
SHIPMENT, ETC.
REMARKS:
1. Custody SealOO
2. Custody Seal Nos.:
3. Chain-of-CnstodyRecords
4. Sample InformationSheets
5.Airbffl
6. Airbill No.:
7. Sample TagsSample TagNumbers
8. Sample Condition:
9. Does information oncustody records, sampleinformation sheets, andsample tags agree?
ki-zo fto taK.I'ZOl'5
KI-2017
04-ib O'oli
PjaeetttfAbsent*)
Kl'iOZ
ot Listed)[oaCnain-of-j —
10.111. Time Recdred:
KI10Z7
*r ZO4-3II x« ** f S9
As t-tjut e/ j's
A cA.A4AA.-oA -
204- -i 16
20^3)7
A** tdfsif c c
o/
6& f 1 £ x SV*A /tt-i. f cf , 4 O
f3/a.t
Oft COO f '4 si
\F V-
Sample Transfer
rv.. "//»/**
30 H5204-^30 M
MSB
* Contact Project Director.
Reviewed by: Logbook No:.
Logbook Pag* No:.
001327
![Page 187: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/187.jpg)
SD6, :
aquatec INC.• An Inchcapr Company
55 SOUTH PARK DRIVE. COLCHESTER. VT 05446
Page _' of /
Discrepancies between sample bottles/labels and C-of-C
C • o " C so a. >*^>\. S3 •{ t so s° o -e
JC 1*2-01'*> - / •
C " o -
"//f/11
001328
![Page 188: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/188.jpg)
"HO *'*"HH) "" '%;n<J» •-
SPIKED BY:WITNESSED BY:
CUeMU
mix
20pn
s
Tran
sf
.0 n
dSO
. Is
0.45
goI«tf
II5. 6. 7. I. 9.1
1•
10.
1>n
11.1
O
O
h&
0 m
l
ml t
o n-up H O
S*
I" .*T 11 i
"lS. 16. 17.
ai
18.1 2^00
1316
z xXX.X
K 10.0lo,o Nl \
20*4318 X10.0 Xlao y/ X10.010.0 //,10,010.0 y^ Xy\/
icl 10.0 v3.0H32& 10.0204333 10.0
10.0 v X^20^/331 7(0.0 V V
f'. Aquatec, Inc. - Extraction worksheet - printed by: IKZ on 11-16-9308:59:34 f7.-QjCf'3 'indicates numeric field
i i i • i i i
![Page 189: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/189.jpg)
METHOD:8080 PCB-.l MATRIX: SOIL
.0ml
SDG:_Jp7Ji: DATE; l-lf-
ANALYST; *g S^SPIKED BY:____WITNESSED BY:
1•
UbnoipkU g\ Client Id8 |5 Si
1. 2. 3.1 4.1 5.
uth
N
ct to
a
.45 u
m
Ehrte
e
Conc
e
Fille
r t
ml w
/
LlVEL: LOW —— ——
N
: 3J*—-
•ato
«. 9.1 10.i l
11.1 12.
fi
I.--B13.1
.14.1 15. 16. .17. 1S.I 19.1
SKI :A ^^
i.,r -. pYinrtlrm wnrk<ih<et - prinlerf hv: IKZ on 01-11-9416:09:24
![Page 190: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/190.jpg)
^Ho*34•ATE:
ANALYST:__SPIKED BY:WITNESSED BY: JdL^
labile Id*™ Client Id
1 "^ T..V H
1 Ib I
3J
0113.1
0 m
l 50.
0
6 hn
w/l:
lto
t*
j
"I f""'^ ••* .•
X J H'.a 3 3
III.;6. 7. ». 9.*
f- '-
1
1S
10. 11./II12.
O13.1 14.*
II I M15. 16. 17.
33
1S.I
COr-!CO
S<=>l
19.1
xo.o V \/ J. y v/
,• X
Aqustec. Inc. - Extraction worksheet - printed by: WMAon 12-06-93 07:28:17I I ' I -T———|———I———I———I————|————[— I t --r -1—1-1- -i—i—i
^_ \
![Page 191: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/191.jpg)
)08f —B:E MA \: j>"
i ANALYST; W/MA-SPIKEDBY:
Aqutlee, Inc. - Extraction worksheet — printed by: JKZ on 12-16-9309:01:13i • • i i i i i i i
![Page 192: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/192.jpg)
<;3 s
\
\\
\
.—r
\
\
\
?*
\
-c
o
\
\
A
\
Sample Volume (1000ml)
_pH between 5 «nd 9
„ 100 ul 0.2pT^g?1 I»w 100 ul 6.0 ppm AK1242/12M matrix»Mtxk)t»__________
t«
fHex exchan(e
. Cone to 2-3 ml
Sulfuric Acid
„ Cone to 1.0ml
3 jm i3)c* (cl i^ Silic* gel Lot*.
H in i
P Cone to 1.0ml
320
n
K>
T
![Page 193: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/193.jpg)
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories
53 South Park DriveColchester. VT 05446Tel. 802-655-1203Fax. 802-655-1248
January 24, 1994
Ms. Laurie JohnstonBlasland & Bouck Engineers6723 Towpath Road, Box 66Syracuse, NY 13214
Re: Analytical Results-Kalamazoo SiteAquatec Project No. 91082Case No. PCS; SDG No. 40738______
Dear Ms. Johnston:
Enclosed are the analytical results for samples received intactby Aquatec on November 13, 1993. The analyses for these sampleswere performed in accordance with the methodologies specified inthe Quality Assurance Project Plan. Laboratory numbers andquality control samples were assigned as follows:
ClientSample ID
AquatecLab No.
K12031K12032K12034K12035K12036K12037MSK12037MSDK12037REPMSBK12038K12039K12040K12041
204335204336204337204338204339204340MS204340MD204340DP204341204342204343204344204345
SampleMatrix
Samples Received on November 13, 1993ETR No. 40738
SoilSoilSoil-Soil <Z-\oSoilSoilSoilSoilSolid.SoilSoilSoilSoil
KB0005130
ooooo,
![Page 194: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/194.jpg)
Ms. Laurie JohnstonJanuary 24, 1994Page 2
Low surrogate recoveries for tetrachloro-ia-xylene were observedfor sample labeled K12038. The sample was re-extracted outsideof the prescribed holding time and reanalyzed with all recoverieswithin the limits. Both sets of analyses have been included inthis case submittal.
Samples in this delivery group were reported as the best match tocombinations of the seven Aroclor standards. In general, thestandard Aroclors are sufficiently unique to provide preciseidentifications and quantitations of complex mixtures withminimal weathering. For highly altered samples, certain subtleidentification distinctions, such as the difference between 1016and 1242 become less precise. In all cases, quantitation remainshighly reliable.
Sincerely,
AjS-/U————
Karen R. ChirgwinLaboratory Operations Director
KRC/jg
Enclosure
91082B2DEC93
KB0005131
![Page 195: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/195.jpg)
AROCLOR SURROGATE RECOVERY
Lab Name:Lab Code:SAS No.:
Aouatec. Inc.AQUAI
Contract:Case No.:SDG No.:
?C6
123456789
1011121314151617181920
EPASAMPLE NO.
?BLk£HK I103S-fBLkEZ.KI203(Kn.032.kU034KQ034K \1037K ao37tfSJC12.0VVVSD/A6BKI2033K»2G31KllOHOXuOHlPSU^BKl7038Rt-
S1(TCX) #
H4 *' 65"-8H-<^Z D
6^ D•^61 D.'^7.-gs-'^3 D.pa Dr ^5^ $• f * -'SI• <&<,^««-^o -1- <?3
S2(DEC) #
- 77go
,n-IB D- US' 5>- IIST D.- ^2,
^2.- W b.
3$ D- (02 f c -
92.-10'I*' ^' IOH
M*
5152
(TCX)(DEC)
Tetrachloro-meta-XyleneDecachlorobiphenyl
PROJECT SPECIFICQC LIMITS(60-150)(60-150)
# Column to be used to flag recovery values* Values outside of QC limitsD Surrogates calculated using diluted analysis.A - Extracted surrogates diluted out, surrogates added to
diluted extract as retention time markers.
page of \
KB0005138
OOOOC'9
![Page 196: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/196.jpg)
SOIL AROCLOR MATRIX SPIKE/MATRIX SPIKE DUPUCATE RECOVERY
Lab Name:Lab Code:SAS No.:'
Aquatec, Inc.AQUA1
EPA Sample No.;
Contra ccCase No.:SDG No.:'
P<iB
CompoundAroclor 1242Arodor1254
SPIKEADDED(UG/KG)ism *7Stl '
SAMPLECONCENTRATION
(UG/KG)0.0 '
^os=- acw.7
MSCONCENTRATION
(UG/KG)3S"7$71S3
MS
REC #*/7 -13 -
QCLIMITSREC.
39-15029-131
crs. ..
CompoundArodor1242Arodor12S4
SPIKEADDED(UG/KG)HU '1M66 X
MSDCONCENTRATION
(UG/KG)•371 16m /
MSD |%. 1REC # 1 RPD *
SI '| «io ^| /S" ^
QCLIMITS
RPD3030
QCLIMITSREC.
39-15029-131
# Column used to flag recovery and RPD values with an asterisk* Values outside of QC limits
RPD: 0Spike Recovery:
out of 2____ outside limitsout of 4 outside limits
Comments:
KB0005139
000009
![Page 197: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/197.jpg)
3EAROCLOR
MATRIX SPIKE BLANK RECOVERY
Lab Name:Lab Code:SAS No.:
Aouatec. Inc.AQUAI
Contract:Case No.:SDG No.: M0733
EPA Sample No.; MSB
CompoundAroclor 1 242Aroclor 1254
SPIKEADDED{UG/KG)SOOo£000 /
MSBCONCENTRATION
(UG/KG)Ho$146SI '
MSB%
REC 912. 'W '
QCLIMITS
REC.39-15029-131
# Column used to flag recovery and RPD values with an asterisk' Values outside of QC limits
Spike Recovery: 0 out of z- outside limits
Comments:
KB0005140
000010
![Page 198: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/198.jpg)
FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
Lab Name:Lab Code:
Lab Sample ID:Matrix: (soil/water)
Date Extracted:Date Analyzed(l):Time Analyzedd):
GCIDd):GC Columnd):
e:e:D:sr)d:1):I):1):1):
123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829.30
Aauatec. Inc.AOUAI
15*552 ^PRLktz)^c<\
n/n/13 „a/ (5/13 -CWfHP16/8 -
RTv- 3? x
LAB ID20^335" <201336101331704331d0V:W020H3HOM5 -•2.0f340MS?20T3HI2.04 3fia 043^33.01 3HH2013^5"
.-
CLIENT IDkiao.3iKi1<?3lkii<?34K»2036 'KQ037K>ic>37MS -K \zo37MST) x
MSBKI203?KH031fcdOHOKlIO^I'
*
Contract:Case:
SDG No:LeveHL/M):
Date Analyzed(2):Time Analyzed(2):
GC ID(2):GC Column(2):
DATEANALYZED 1IV (5713(V/5-/13l2//ff/131 1/ IS"/ 13ill IS 1 33IX/'SV^il/l^/O12/15/13\"Ll\^l^2>t"2-//S7^3d/ Iff/13(2//S-/^3
?CB4073^to*tZ/ /5/1304^VHP2£^RTx-S~
DATEANALYZED 2/2 //5"/^3
: /^ / / ^ "_ /^3/2. //^ /*i3/ 2. / / 6"/*7 /.2 1 11^ 1*) 312.' 1 l^ /°)T,f2 / /T / ^ -?/Z llT 1*)^/2/l*5 /•=) ^ii-Li£lai.~>fZ ) /s""/^3»z //^ /^^
page of
KB0005H2
000012
![Page 199: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/199.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
EPA SAMPLE NO.
91082
SOIL10.01.0
(g)(uL)
1.0100
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAIPBLKEZ
PCB SDG: 40738
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
195552
11/17/9312/15/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1 221Aroclor-1232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U
KB0006122
000980
![Page 200: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/200.jpg)
Lab Name:Lab Code:
Lab Sample ID:Matrix: (soil/water)
Date Extracted:Date Analyzed! 1):Time Analyzed! 1):
GCIDd):GC Columnd):
FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
Aauatec. Inc.AQUA!
HP 3-037
Contract: _Case:
SDG No:"LevellL/M):"
Date Analyzed(2):Time Analyzed(2):
GC ID{2}:"GC Co!umn(2):
OlViHP 2 0«7
LAB ID CLIENT IDDATE
ANALYZED 1DATE
ANALYZED 2123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829.30
OOH341R1 ' <tt£?3l4*B. /
'
•
Oi/i3/?f ' OI/I3/W '
-
page i of \KB0005141
000011
![Page 201: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/201.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.
Contract:
Phase Type:Phase Weight:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
% Solids:
91082
SOIL10.01.0
(g)(uL)
1.0100
Lab Code:
Case:
AQUAI
PCB
EPA SAMPLE NO.
PBLKGB
SDG: 40738
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
202454
12/22/9301/13/94
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-91 2672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/Kg) Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1 242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U50 U
KB0006111
![Page 202: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/202.jpg)
Lab Name:Lab Code:
Lab Sample ID:Matrix: (soil/water)
Date Extracted:Date Analyzed^):Time Analyzed(l):
GCIDd):GC Column t1):
FORM 4AROCLOR METHOD BLANK SUMMARY
Aouatec. Inc.AQUAI
U/lS/13
Contract:Case:
SDG No:"LeveKL/M):'
Date Analyzed{2):Time Analyzed(2):
KBHQ73?
0333
HPGCID(2); HP
GC Column(2): P>T>Vry-3£
LAB ID CLIENT IDDATE
ANALYZED 1DATE
ANALYZED 2123456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829.30
2CimS -
••
KU03S"
'•
•
I1//S/43 lV/5/43 x
-
•
*
page of f. KB0005143
000013
![Page 203: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/203.jpg)
FORM 1AROCLOR ANALYSIS DATA SHEET
Lab Name: Aquatec, Inc.Contract: 91082
Lab Code:Case:
AQUAI
PCB
EPA SAMPLE NO.
PBLK6H
SDG: 40738
Phase Type:Phase Volume:
Injection Volume:Dilution Factor:
Water10001.0
(mL)(uU
1.0
Lab Sample ID:Date Received:Date Extracted:Date Analyzed:
Sulfur Clean-up:
202110
11/18/9312/15/93
N (Y/N)
CAS NO.
12674-11-211104-28-211141-16-553469-21-912672-29-611097-69-111096-82-5
COMPOUND CONCENTRATION(ug/U Q
Aroclor-1016Aroclor-1221Aroclor-1 232Aroclor-1242Aroclor-1 248Aroclor-1 254Aroclor-1 260
0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U0.050 U
KB0006137
0009SM
![Page 204: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/204.jpg)
Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 9-Dec-1993 22:18 through 10-DMCD1:[80BO] 05.06 09DEC932026METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN
iec-1993 18:16.RTx-35
JDS - HP2618
Peak Response Factors and Relative DeviationsPeak 0
234567891011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738394041424344454647484950
RT7.1307.8838.0138.7218.7889.1349.1569.5589.74210.61110.80811.00011.32111.62311.70811.78311.89211.98112.66612.79612.92713.03313.26913.39913.47213.55513.64614.16014.27114.47614.55514.64114.97315.05215.14715.30615.46615.64715.70415.84216.04316.08716.24016.39416.61316.80816.92217.01617.19617.356
Aroclor83.5590.91323.42711.18022.71960.47946.707150.5922.6407.18144.8902.5008.0124.58912.5354.4952.81015.6852.3261.1638.83910.88315.3493.7243.6661.21810.8524.2352.9375.4502.1245.0652.4129.2868.0982.2390.4170.7902.8246.778
1.3020.1651.197
2.6681.0822.990
1?2L11. IX8. OX5.5X0.9X3.3X1.6X1.9X2.5X6.7X5.5X33.6.7X12. 5X
5.7X3. OX
5.9X2.4X55.7. IX1.8X10. 8X6.6X12. 7X
2.1X3.3X4.7X
6.9X
4. IX
7.3X
4.4X
Aroclor48.3340.50714.6087.28518.72642.80437.614146.5738.7085.777
130.5838.79734.1275.39848.95818.83910.39975.84212.3044.77748.35160.38758.17820.88120.7866.84571.78827.33921.52738.96314.70031.73518.01861.82457.24012.3322.4525.04512.60452.7790.1606.9291.1286.8440.8359.9475.53616.814
123214. 5X4.7X3.3X2.8X1.9X4.9X3.2X8.4X8.6X5.4X5. OX1.5X4.5X1.8X1.7X3. IX1.1X0.2X15.3.5X3.5X17.2.7X1.4X3.2X0.8X1.2X1.6X2. IX2.3X.5X.3X.3X.8X.4X
8.3X1.3X3. OX3.6X5.5X2.7X1.5X0.6X
Aroclor5.029
4.77917.66323.67729.760141.54519.9382.147
278.39919.75178.477109.19843.72424.395176.54830.67212.256116.744147.371136.77854.43456.05217.233172.64166.59151.92798.64438.37316.78536.24524.03415.76918.7714.0711.1721.9362.200
1.506
101686.
17.3.6X2.5X4.1X3.7X5.1X6.1X3.4X1.5X3.1X2. OX3.2X1.6X4.4X9.6X4.9X5. IX10. 7X3. OX3.4X2.1X.4X.3X.2X.9X.7X.ax
2. OX1.6X2.7X1.8X7.8X23.5.9X2.2X
Aroclor4.7355.1713.41213.94518.61423.283108.20215.6421.572
219.03815.47960.88185.76833.79218.469136.48624.4599.60888.027116.782112.44842.84344.05013.661137.90353.34841.47982.21131.15769.79134.581127.452119.20628.7276.46712.97531.635114.1490.67617.7483.47919.5653.12625.96616.89546.473
124278.
4. OX2.9X2.7X4.4X3.3X2.3X5.9X1.0X2. IX2.2X2.4X3.7X1.7X3.9X5.9X4.8X4.4X13. 7X2.5X2.7X2.3X1.5X2.4X2.9X2.9X2.6X1.9X2. OX1.8X2.6X2.6X4.9X2.7X5.1X3.4X10. OX2.9X2.8X2.1X1.9X
Aroclor2.840
0.4561.0026.618
2.00811.3834.699
110.0354.17330.1365.08131.54911.5333.28263.80934.22811.97143.197216.065172.90868.49260.66218.263236.81977.72070.219145.16738.926122.90655.933248.818214.54682.33519.18831.43189.352202.5652.05751.27510.53255.4718.13574.35047.885138.055
1248
73.
5.4X38.2.6X10. 2X6.8X7.4X1.6X2.3X2.6X1.1X1.3X1.6X4.2X3.4X3.1X5.8X9.4X3. OX4.4X3.3X2. OX1.9X1.3X1.5X1.4X0.6X2.1X0.6X2. IX4.2X2.4X2.8X3.9X4.8X4.5X2.4X5.2X2.3X5.8X0.7X0.7X0.5X
Aroclor3.0216.2360.743
6.2720.9650.8520.3504.9540.109
. 0.6144.5651.1690.1821.5224.4700.6830.950
169.14860.153
4.6691.09693.2608.1927.66432.96034.7578.940
128.74646.171249.38464.69349.518319.656140.301
5.717101.44820.819115.698209.39269.810431.460
1254
4.3X
39. -
4.4X
8.7X
4. IX21.4.5X0.9X2.3X4.7X2.4X1.0X1.3X1.6X0.9X3.4X1.3X1.7X3.2X1.8X5.1X2.4X1.9X1.2X2.6X2. OX1.8X
Aroclor3.1157.5250.5760.1076.6360.5381.2520.3963.6430.1120.5053.261
0.2151.2810.2370.2820.75110.20113.3980.4540.1891.7210.5980.3780.6990.2480.7460.3291.7281.140
110.31617.242141.118
1.316
5.8890.3684.55823.7880.32971.089
1260
4.9X
73.
5.8X
3.9X
5.2X2.6X2.7X2.5X
4.7X5.5X1.9X1.9X
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.0838 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.4052.2) Peaks chosen within window of «•/• 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.08891.
CDT—I
ooo
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALJBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)
KB0005293
(SJF)14-DEC-93 17:45:07
![Page 205: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/205.jpg)
Arocior uaiioration nummaryCalibration of 9-Dec-1993 22:18 through 10-Dec-1993 18:16.MC01:[8080] 05.06 09DEC932026METHOD: 8080 PCS:AN
IV i \-JJJDS - HP2618
Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviationsik nTT525354555657585960616263646566676869707172737475767778798081828384858687888990
KT17.43817.65317.72617.78917.89217.96018.19218.40318.56318.58218.97519.10119.14819.24219.28519.43619.51719.63519.84720.01920.17220.43920.86221.11321.17921.19321.27921.45721.65222.12622.41322.62022.75622.84423.26923.66624.05324.18824.53125.970
Total:
Compound
Arocior 12211.101
0.107
1.785 6.2X0.963
0.386
1.601
0.880
0.0880.465
1.139
0.116
0.809
2.008
636.4 4.4X
tetrachloro-meta-xylenedecachlorobiphenyl
Arocior 1232 Arocior 1016 Arocior
0.1930.547
8.788 27.408 40.4173.790 40.269
7.601 13
1.023
0.0851.4532.917 51.8711 .927 60
0.2082.256 60.837
0.4700.3404.093 6
0.100
1.5162.300 50.470
0.927 340.1610.3390.9962.368
1428.6 3
Mean RT8.0838
27.4052
0.5990.1832.679
.1X 0.339 31.772
.1X 16.8370.754
.OX 5.7060.968
.3X 24.228
1.3940.8571.746
.2X 8.2290.194
1.218 2.2880.317
.8X 2.569
1.222
0.915.IX 0.861
.8X 0.415
1.378 O.B34
2.115 6.6X 2.094
.OX 2103.8 3.9X 2347.5
Retention Time Marker/SurrogateRT Dev. Range RT Crit.
-.0127 to .0118 Passes...-.0141 to .0148 Passes...
1242
11. 8X
2.3X3.8X
4.4X
3.'6X
4.1X
65.
7. OX
3.7X
Arocior 1248
2.2627.741 6
86.747 049.341 12.296 9
14.855 12.650 4
6.23267.763 2
3.1562.097 185.158 8
19.170 21.4764.794 690.7130.1326.849 30.6632.549 11
0.3493.533 6
0.9031.827 100.294
1.009 420.1870.2160.5792.374
3236.0 3
.3X
.8X
.OX
.8X
.8%
.2%
.OX
.
.OX
.6X
.
.6X
.5X
.5X
.3X
t
.OX
Arocior51.97033.63020.0539.556
283.664223.75237.474
205.970
9.55767.495
138.623146.524
29.08626.29492.676
335.13319.73338.37614.4772.151
106.80715.40646.048
12.19662.002
1.2630.2450.1729.290
40.210
1.7341.0440.1701.1312.3222.504
4500.1
1254
0.7X3.8X4.6X2. OX2.3X0.5X2.1X
2.5X8.8X
•.2.7X
3.9X2. OX1.3X2.2X0.2X2.9X2.9X8.8X2.7X2.2X2.8X
2.7X1.5X
1.2X1.8X
51.
6. OX
2.4X
Arocior168.59663.813
0.309
376.68061.798
444.390
2.502167.331
140.73595.067
235.218374.018270.253148.83810.63437.629
320.113148.550
70.79972.029
644.2629.324
16.7597.662
186.431351.43874.5887.900
10.3423.910
51.260124.14837.655
5173.3
12601.6X1.6X
2.6X0.6X1.7X
6.1X4.2X
1.4X3.9X
3. OX3.4X1.5X1.3X6.8X3. IX1.9X0.7X
2.6X2.3X4.4X4.7X3.5X5.7X2.4X5.6X2.7X8.7X6.9X3.7X2.4X3.6X1.2X
3. OX
Standard SummaryMean82644722
RF Recovery.095 72.3.965 94.1
toto
Range Surr Crit113. 8X ** Fails *112.3X Passes...
o
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.0838 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.4052.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT' 1.08891.
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CAUBRATION 5.2-3(!2AUG93 1142)
KB0005294
(SJF)14-DEC-93 17:45:07
![Page 206: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/206.jpg)
Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 9-Dec-1993 22:18 through 10-1)
RTx-5MCD1:18080) 05,06 090EC932026METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN
iec-1993 18:16.
Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations
JDS - HP2618
Peak #2345678910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243
RT6.2877.4099.6119.8529.90610.07811.29111.35311.60811.86312.39712.47612.69413.23113.37713.61913.73013.86913.98514.38014.49214.77015.02715.37215.49715.60815.73415.93916.26616.44116.61716.96517.13217.29217.43317.51917.60417.97218.35318.42018.69818.82718.917
Aroclor1.52437.93224.90920.12865.95213.6548.5442.07010.1543.0031.28811.6153.5691.6560.5584.9326.2542.8104.8021.8913.9961.0450.1881.8953.8924.5680.9192.7761.8051.0810.1150.5330.8020.503
1.3300.3770.7211.293
1PJ«6.1%4.3X5.2X
6.3X2.4X6.4X
12.5%5.1X60.
6.2X14. 7X11. 9X
11. 7X
6.4%
7.3X
8. IX6.4X
4.3X
Aroclor1.54120.76916.896
15.73462.05347.47228.6475.03139.4389.0074.87859.97220.4339.0343.29728.35227.99215.60332.96414.08028.0248.6051.07313.58527.69730.9883.18721.5829.0134.5730.6523.1384.6882.666
7.6282.9013.1264.9590.3540.252
12327.5X3. IX4.2%
8.4X3.4X1.7X1.3X30.1.5X14.8%
6.3X5.4X1.5X5.7X1.2X16.1.4X0.9X3.7X1.8X4.2X6.3X3.5X2.1X4.5X4.1X2.5X
9.3X6.5X10. OX6.4X4. OX17.
Aroclor1.4311.1228.791
12.39259.118104.67166.22911.58789.39019.98111.614150.58950.30823.6788.64070.37166.42242.47281.64536.06272.06718.6801.1256.90410.92716.6172.3311.070
0.078
10162.3X2.8X
7.5X2.6X4. 8X2.2X14.4%1.8X7.5X4.1X6.5X6.1X2.6X5.8X4.1X
11.1%2.7X1.4X2.6X1.9X2.8X10.4%5.1X3.7X7.4X
Aroclor1.5110.8576.5029.08243.85682.36951.7209.18969.78115.9708.863
112.25538.04118.9507.00256.19354.66433.53764.75529.14059.47417.0513.02731.20259.17766.9237.45547.56222.85013.2182.0359.45113.8368.72221.8586.9685.29815.1090.6720.509
WL9. OX3. OX
11.4%4.3X3.2X1.9X10. 7X1.6X8.7X
8.1X7.8X2.2X5. IX2.8X12.4%1.2X1.9X4.8X3. IX4.8X17.6.6X4.4X2.9X3.5X5.8X1.7X3.7X5.2X4.2X5.3X4.2X5.7X6.4X
Aroclor1.5350.7280.4072.4623.82044.6871.72028.7936.2261.72463.33218.32422.8019.083
105.76784.52549.191116.23041.90296.28027.1094.78754.416115.419132.31218.58085.01962.40035.1395.90227.00339.64124.88967.46220.77713.32840.9551.7732.2501.689
12484.3X
8. OX
4.5X3.8X
2.3X32.
4. IX5.4X2. OX3.5X5. OX8.1X2.6X1.0X0.9X1.7X2.5X10. 1X4.5X3. OX0.9X2.6X5.2X3.3X
7.6X2.6X1.5X2.3X
1.8X2.8X
2. OX
Aroclor1.5470.4232.5500.3631.1740.586
1.0531.632
0.2230.9890.42984.93929.94046.3014.74317.2603.7540.72214.28856.571152.78525.91543.580190.99772.56911.32258.998111.22436.82420.524217.48646.777100.806138.47215.2267.54821.517
12544.9X
5.1X
3.8X20.0.8X4.6X3.7X7.0X7.4X4.3X3.5X1.4X1.5X2.4X2.1X6.1X1.2X2.9X2.8X1.3X2.5X1.2X5. OX3.9X7.3X15.4.4X
Aroclor1.6090.5242.681
0.4460.7970.5361.0061.8140.8180.2180.136
4.827
0.7340.2140.4880.1400.2170.63359.9610.1129.33673.034
0.1962.18611.638
35.96036.05788.205203.28713.7182.27233.404
12608.5%
6.5X
5. OX
2.4X3.6X2.7X
4.5X3. OX3.3X1.8X4.8X
4. OX10.4%1.5X
CvJC£>•5—1
o
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.9903 and decachlorobiphenyl at 28.3545.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/• 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quant itat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.06493.
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALIBRATION 5.2-3(I2AUG93 1142)
KB0005295
(SJF)14-DEC-93 17:45:08
![Page 207: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/207.jpg)
Arocior L,aiiDrauon nummaryCalibration of 9-Dec-1993 22:18 through 10-Dec-1993 18:16.MCD1:[8080] 05,06 090EC932026METHOD: 8080_PCB:AN
KTx-SJDS - HP2618
Peak Response Factors and Relative DeviationsPeak «
4546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970717273747576
======
RT Arocior 122119.105 0.16519.21119.266 0.44319.50519.57419.730 0.75619.80619.980 0.24620.23620.40620.49420.65120.84620.98921.22421.39821.53921.57121.74321.86421.96522.06722.27822.46022.98423.13423.23923.41423.90224.45825.18925.41426.810 1.244====== ==============
Total: 257.9 4.7X
Arocior 12321.763 5.6X
2.731 6.2X0.5390.3890.4220.2131.819 4.5%0.233
1.0320.5140.2990.1140.9710.5090.261
0.136
2.013 6.9X
0.887
0.5460.580
0.586
1.450==============
660.1 3.3X
Arocior 1016 Arocior 12422.232 8.4X
9.919 6.3X0.746
0.504 1.008 57.0.4174.204 4.6X0.372
0.0811.543
0.105
0.5970.142
0.209
0.216
1 .470 1 .385============== S3aE====S=SS===
1048.3 4.4X 1149.8 4.6X
Retention Time Marker/Surrogate StandardCompoundtetrschloro-meta-xylenedecachlorobiphenyl
Mean RT8.9903 -
28.3545 -
RT Oev. Range RT Crft. Mean.0170 to .0097 Passes... 3648..0167 to .0122 Passes... 2597.
Arocior 12485.913 4.5X
29.409 5. OX2.461 10. 8X
1.982 66.1.159
10.269 2.2X1.142
0.6850.4083.284 3.5X
0.6920.380
1.1980.3090.127
1.486
0.804
0.3360.355
0.309
1.435==============1544.5 3.1X
SummaryRF Recovery048 76.7 to843 94.6 to
Arocior104.52475.576
34.269
14.64416.463
179.66316.606
10.9728.656
48.9032.349
13.3658.517
22.7445.5183.349
27.6481.1580.389
20.877
1.3391.7130.7880.7801.335
1.581========
2165.8
12542.6X
2. IX
3. OX3.7X2.3X4.2X
5.3X5.1X2.5X
2.2X3.5X
4.8X8.3X7.7X
2. IX
2. OX
======
2.8X
Arocior228.79881.764
83.82358.8212.828
25.781235.34433.3047.195
147.85377.40320.80321.528
147.38881.58645.175
13.30724.9393.201
316.5734.1819.693
140.1506.920
70.60576.8163.855
29.10964.8664.037
21.632==3=====
2676.5
12602. OX1.3X
3.6X2.6X
3.7X3.4X1.4X6.4X2.3X1.3X2.9X2.4X1.2X1.0X2.3X
2.6X2.2X7.1X3.2X
11. 1X6.1X4. OX2.4X1.7X1.0X7.4X1.2X1.0X5.8X1.5X
=3====
2.8X
COCOtT— iCDCDo
Range Surr Crit113. 6X **118. 1X **
Fails *Fails *
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.9903 and decachlorobiphenyl at 28.3545.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01257 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitation is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.06493.
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALJBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)
KB0005296
(SJF)I4-DEC-93 17:45:08
![Page 208: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/208.jpg)
CH051209.XLS
CALIBRATION SUMMARYBACK CALCULATIONS
Lab ID:GC:
Col. 1:Col. 2:
AQUATEC, INC.HP2618
RTX-35RTX-5
Calib date(s): 09-DEC-93 22:18
File:
10-DEC-93 18:16
05,06 09DEC932026
to
Standards
Aroclor 1016Cal Fact
% DiffAroclor 1221
Cal Fact% Diff
Aroclor 1 232Cal Fact
% DiffAroclor 1242
Cal Fact% Diff
Aroclor 1 248Cal Fact
% DiffAroclor 1 254
Cal Fact, % Diff
Aroclor 1 260Cal Fact
% Diff
50ppb
53.61.072
-754.41.088
-953.01.060
-652.31.046
-551.11.022
-251.31.026
-349.4
0.9881
100ppb
1011.010
-1105
1.050-5
1041.040
-497.80.978
299.5
0.9951
1001.000
096.8
0.9683
200ppb
2091.045
-5205
1.025-3
1840.920
8195
0.9753
2011.005
-1197
0.9852
1980.990
1
400ppb
4001.000
0402
1.005-1
4041.010
-1404
1.010-1
3970.993
1401
1.0030
3930.983
2
800ppb
7870.984
2783
0.9792
7890.986
1794
0.9931
7950.994
1800
1.0000 J
8121.015
-2
%RSD
3.5
4.1
5.4
2.9
1.2
1.5
1.7
Cal Fact = Calc. Cone. / Nominal Cone.
%RSD = STD Dev / Mean of Cal Fact
% Diff = (Nominal Amt-Calc Amt) / Nominal Amt* 100
Page 1
KB0005282
![Page 209: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/209.jpg)
PCBCHST.XLT
. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY
Lab ID: AQUATEC, INC.GC:
Col. 1 :Col. 2:
Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
UPZUSfcrx-SS"RTx-5"
Standard Rle: 0$ D&> (HDE
Initial Calib.date/time: (T./01/13 2al3 to
Cl3/qS?_. IZ '/ s
CompoundA% |9^<3 ^
NominalAmount (ppb)-200
Standard Rle: OS. 01, \ DEd13 1^52, |3* J
CompoundlARlOlt /•
NominalAmount (ppb)O.OO <*
Standard Rle: 0$ 0& I^DE£*t3 '9S"2.2£T' X
CompoundAR I 'S ^^~
NominalAmount (ppb)"i-Cio ^
StandardRle: ^5 /)^ IH tlGC^S H52 2<£^ ^
CompoundAR \^^ '
NominalAmount (ppb)"2c?0 ''
Standard Rle: QS. 06 1 H E(1^3 1 9 5"!. 33
Compound/4R [2.4"?
NominalAmount (ppb)•zoo <-'
\-\jto jw jsi'6 '
Date:"" Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)Ho"
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)101^ '
Date:^ Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
il1~? s
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)100 s-
Date:•^ Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb).i 1 .""
l^/i^/13O17-3
% Diff.X 5"
»2/«5"/^3^2.?^ ^
% Diff."2. £7
ll//S/?J/ ^ O / ^
% Diff.f-5- -
ll/(b/93
% Diff.ao
\znsfa*'lijl ^
% Diff.0.5" ^
x'
^
^
**•
Page ( of
KB0005284
000151
![Page 210: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/210.jpg)
PCBCHST.XLT
. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY
Lab ID: AQUATEC, INC.r*r*. UP 0 /* /4uv»: v\\ * v I o
Col. 1: ^-3^Col. 2: ^-S~
Initial Calib.date/time: r2./0<f/<?3 22i£
Check Standard File: 05~ O& /</DE<l<?3 / ?S"2. ^ x-
Check
Check
Check
Check
X >
CompoundA^! /3t>H
NominalAmount (ppb)33O
Standard File:
CompoundNominal
Amount (ppb)
Standard File:
CompoundNominal
Amount (ppb)
Standard Rle:
CompoundNominal
Amount (ppb)
Standard File:
CompoundNominal
Amount (ppb)
\if (0/45 I«t6
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)/ 3^1
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb).
)2/)£/?3|5"20 ^
% Diff.5.5
% Diff.
% Diff.
% Diff.
% Diff.
to
^-
Pajje "Z of 2
KB0005285
000152
![Page 211: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/211.jpg)
Ajoclor Calibration Summary:alibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:22.(GDI:[8080] 03,04 07JAN941940(ETHOD: 8080 PCB:AN
KiAO
Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations
JDS - HP2087
Peak #" "T~
23456789
10111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940
RT7.2348.2609.5329.8119.845
10.02710.65411.33211.39911.67611.95412.51412.60312.83713.42813.60313.87213.97514.12714.25914.69414.81815.12115.41215.90816.03316.17916.40816.76516.95717.14817.54617.72917.90818.06118.16618.25618.66719.08619.149
Aroclor23.9546.445
15.955
13.09041 .8890.7437.011
0.8205.5190.9620.6586.7802.3890.8300.2342.2092.0931.1882.2351.1311.8820.4650.8741.7352.0060.3541.2050.8113.928
0.2880.3590.205
0.5320.123
12215. OX6.9X3. OX
2.4X0.9X
17.
5. OX
4.8X
9.4X
Aroclor13.000
4.01310.827
10.42539.8132.256
25.90616.3452.538
21.1094.3132.604
33.30011.6084.3941.483
13.76412.1897.191
15.6208.350
13.2343.9056.262
12.61413.931
1.3259.8014.5031.9510.2981.4272.0501.158
3.2351.1401.9442.656
12324.5*
2.6X
2.8X2.4X
3.6X5.7X
12. 1X5.4X3.7X7.4X1.9X5. OX3. 8Xa.ox5.4X8.5X7.8X1.8X6.7X2.BX7.2X7.7X4.5X3.2X
7. OX4.7X
Aroclor0.621
5.744
8.45938.5445.350
58.23134.866
5.99147.88910.4866.312
82.38027.75211.7194.130
34.80231.93719.74039.03419.85033.5658.6623.1184.9527.3271.0400.4380.6463.650
1016
1.7X
3.2X0.4X2.8X4.4X4.3X2.8X1.7X4.4X5.5X3.9X4.4X2.2X6.2X2.7X3.4X2.6X2.1X3.5X2.5X6. OX
11. IX7.8X3.2X
Aroclor0.524
4.305
6.45029.297
4.36145.71027.3104.758
37.1287.9274.799
61.03720.709
9.1543.237
27.31824.76815.38230.14316.37127.1797.744
14.13126.28428.9103.311
21.24711.5615.8270.9374.1026.0663.864
9.3462.695
6.295
1242
3.1X
4.1X3. OX
5.5X4.8X7.7X3.6X5.3X6.7X3.8X4.4X1.8X8.9X2.8X4.1X3. OX2.2X3.6X2.2X5.3X5.7X4.7X4.4X
4.3X2.6X7.3X
7.4X6.2X7.6X
5.4X
Aroclor0.140
0.2341.555
2.7811.211
25.43510.740
1.13915.9222.6350.871
36.88310.78811.3694.367
53.13840.56123.21955.34822.01345.00012.41224.89151.13456.7448.668
37.65731.11118.5872.423
11.24916.97010.681
27.6538.101
16.760
1248
7.9X
7.9X
2.3X
4. IX7.8X
5.1X5.8X2.4X6.1X4.8X3.9X3. OX5. OX4. OX6.3X7.4X8.5X6.3X4.8X1.1X9.5X3.3X
22.
5.6X5.6X6.4X
6.6X8.7X
13. OX
Aroclor0.098
1.444
0.182
0.663
0.681
0.1210.4410.179
40.79112.130
21.6732.6408.0491.5476.604
24.88467.47911.66118.77586.83032.1324.862
24.42145.58116.1729.922
85.14919.43445.86954.193
1254
6.6X
1.7X6.8X
4.5X
5.5X
11. OX6.2X4. OX1.3X5. OX3. OX2.5X
11. OX4.4X3.7X4.2X5.5X3.9X5.3X
6.2X
Aroclor0.251
1.482
0.211
0.3730.473
0.876
0.520
2.321
0.315
0.252
0.27827.157
4.03831.8884.645
1.2965.247
16.32715.35537.46183.032
1260
5.8X
4. IX
5.9X4.4X
13.4X
1.3X6.9X2.9X4.7X
cvoo
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 8.8937 and decachlorobiphenyl at 29.1350.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.07443.
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALIBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)
KB0005379
(JDS)14-JAN-94 13:55:32
![Page 212: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/212.jpg)
Aroclor Calibration SummaryCalibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:22.HCD1:[8080] 03,04 07JAN941940METHOD: 8080_PCB:AM
KiAOJDS • HP2087
Notes:
Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations
TT4243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667686970
1)2)3)
RT Aroclor 122119.47319.70819.91720.04520.06220.09720.37120.44320.61720.70220.89821.18221 .46821.64321 .86922.02622.29022.48222.64022.67522.85723.00323.22823.66824.26024.53224.71825.74526.39927.811 0.598Total: 151.5 3. OX
Compoundtetrachloro-meta-xylenedecach I orobi pheny I
Aroclor 1232 Aroclor 1016 Aroclor 1242
0.642
1.0860.179
0.6050.4030.177
0.3730.182
0.8100.3520.2160.2480.2450.713348.7 4
Mean RT8.893729.1350
0.777
3.8310.2820.212•1.2420.135
0.496
0.657 0.586.5X 557.9 3.2X 567.8 4. OX
Retention Time Marker/Surrogate StandardRT Dev. Range RT Crit. Mean-.0137 to .0108 Passes... 2132.-.0150 to .0117 Passes... 1319.
Aroclor 12460.8610.8612.150
11.147 10. 2X0.9550.3620.3833.407 12.6X0.4190.2771.1370.2790.1400.448
0.6080.3310.137
0.699725.0 5.5X
Summary
Aroclor 12547.8.38.
35.13.5.6.60.6.4.3.17.
5.3.6.2.1.9.7.0.0.0.0.0.
036588335726063
362469180370092214251
031201172126266888809568687327542690
890.6
RF Recovery Range442 82.5 to 109.215 91.1 to 131.
Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at B.8937 and decachlorobiphenyl atPeaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.Quantitation is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT* 1.07443.
BX2X
29
13. 7X7.4X1.5X2.8X5.2X8.BX6.3X1.9X8.6X9.8X5. IX
3.6X8.2X7.6X
2. IX3.7X
3.9X
Aroclor 12605128334
302710821358307857321859
1104502932132810
.772
.488
.688
.679
.776
.542
.492
.487
.896
.291
.500
.852
.771
.514
.153
.276
.623
.348
.290
.391
.511
.838
.585
.307
.289
.3181043.5
8.2.3.
5.5.9.5.4.2.2.7.6.1.1.3.8.8.3.5.2.2.1.2.2.0.3.
JA6X5X6X
9XOX2X9X9X5X2X1X2X8X6X4X8XIXOX7XIX3X6X1X2XBX9X
Surr Crit****
.1350
Fails *Fails *
•
c:oo
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLO^CAUBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)
KB0005380
(JDS)14-JAN-94 13:55:32
![Page 213: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/213.jpg)
/\rocior uanoracion nummaryCalibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:22.HCD1:C8080] 03,04 07JAN941940METHOD: 8080 PCBrAM
K1A-JD
Peak Response Factors and Relative Deviations
JDS • HP2087
Peak *
23456789
1011121314151617181920212223242526272829303132333435363738
6.7018.3688.7068.7419.1589.349
10.26110.66111.00511.32311.49711.60611.70112.44012.57712.71812.83913.08513.22813.29513.39313.49714.05514.17314.39914.48214.57414.94015.02815.13115.30515.47715.67415.73115.89016.10816.16616.500
Aroclor 122119.246 7.1*5.130 5.8X
12.496 4.4X9.868 2.5X
31.837 1.3X0.4768.881 4.4X0.5841.4662.331 11.3%0.8680.5432.398 11. 7X0.6180.1301.3381.8011.621
0.7720.3031.7610.9250.4720.9700.4711.1000.6931.3191.1440.493
0.0980.390
0.9520.215
Aroclor10.8964.202
8.7187.971
30.9821.708
27.4481.8046.5549.8043.5922.056
12.7713.0760.7537.825
10.9089.6605.2584.5411.757
12.4276.0983.8797.0933.3824.6593.7639.2848.7772.887
0.8301.962
7.5781.273
'fi3?,,8.4X6.7X
4.3X2.2X0.7X4.4X3.3X
4. OX3. OX6.6X
7.4X
8.9X1.2X2. OX
7.3X
3.8X1.9Xa. ox5.5X4.3X9.3X5.7X6.6X7.8X5.8X
7.8X
Aroclor0.5654.016
4.6716.156
29.4774.138
59.0514.100
15.39922.3268.5254.893
30.7907.6782.318
19.36527.13824.77713.24011.8324.247
30.83614.1089.548
18.0778.5803.0656.9234.0502.5163.482
0.6450.125
0.2690.396
1016
6. OX
3.7X4.3X3.2X3.4X5.5X5.6X4.2X2.8X4.6X5.5X5.3X2.6X
11. OX9.4X3.1X3.3X
5.9X7.3X3. OX2.5X3.9X4.1X2.6X
5.6X6.8X
5.9X
Aroclor0.6453.174
3.5994.849
22.7533.175
46.5743.170
11.76617.2946.5223.620
23.2725.8271.630
14.39221.42419.49810.5289.3223.336
24.51411.7377.644
15.0047.123
10.6827.591
19.73818.5706.645
2.4885.315
16.9113.321
1242
7.0X
3.2X6.5X2. OX3.2X6.3X4.2X1.8X1.9X3.4X2.3X3.9X5.3X7.4X6.5X4.1X4.2X
7.5X
2.6X3.5X6.1X4. OX3.6X5. IX4.1X4.4X4. OX4.8X
4.9X
5.4X5.8X
Aroclor
0.1791.106
0.3752.0720.878
23.1740.7435.7256.1722.0760.758
10.8477.1242.1576.963
40.44931.39316.54813.1344.678
43.08316.42012.76526.5709.546
20.76013.16139.38934.18717.786
6.36615.254
31.2289.583
1248
6.7X
10.4%
5.8X
5.5X6. OX
14. 7X
8.7X1.9X7.3X
10. 7X3. IX2.3X5.3X4.5X7.7X4.2X3. IX5.7X6.4X1.4X
12. 7X5.3X7.4X7.9X2.6X
9.7X4.2X
10. 5X4. IX
Aroclor
1.046
0.150
0.888
0.108
0.1820.792
0.12030.8249.701
1.457
16.4362.1541.3395.547
5.480
18.9907.990
47.03911.81511.06753.83723.768
18.659
1254
2.7X
3. IX7.2X
3.5X
10. 3X
10.3X
7.9X4.8X3.4X4.8X5.8X3.9X4.3X
3.6X
Aroclor
1.068
0.211
0.643
0.091
0.139
0.1031.675
0.278
0.106
0.2010.126
19.7853.029
22.338
1.004
1260
26.
4.3X5.7X
4.4X
27.
Or^,O
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 7.6321 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.7071.2) Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quant itat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT* 1.02960.
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALIBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)
KB0005381
(JDS)14-JAN-94 13:55:32
![Page 214: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/214.jpg)
Arocior Calibration summaryCalibration of 8-Jan-1994 03:54 through 9-Jan-1994 01:2Z.MCD1:C8080] 03,04 07JAN941940METHOD: 8080 PCB:AN
JDS - HP2087
Peak Response Factors and Relative DeviationsPeak n— 39~
40414243444546474849505152535455565758596061626364656667
T6774716.95717.18817.38517.56217.64517.88418.21618.23518.48818.71719.54519.64119.95320.09120.31820.51420.97121.45821.73121.91122.12222.85323.41023.57024.54725.04325.37026.563Total:
Arocior 1221 Arocior 12320.
0.191 1.0.411 1.
0.0.428 2.
1.
0.
0.0.0.
1.0.0.0.0.
0.112 0.0.
0.517 0.115.4 3.9X 259
226104569658507
589551
201395290
225283
681244408133218596.1 4.2X
Arocior 1016 Arocior 12420.3.4.2.7.
3.0.
0.1.
2.
0.
0.126 0.
0.562 0.408.0 4.4X 419
575204 4.9X243 13. OX127156 6.7X
752856
158115
033
147
090
526.6 4.3X
Arocior 12481.9.11.6.21.0.10.0.2.
0.2.0.0.2.
0.0.0.0.
0.
770142 6.7X841 8. OX971 12.8X589 8.2X088942 13.3X545347
780759270345627 53.
591173333127
600546.5 6.2X
Arocior3.49119.03433.4899.90667.3496.63148.6646.65333.01532.453
14.59549.5074.3646.3610.42119.5082.3519.4041.4846.3290.1320.2310.4660.617645.8
1254B.8X5.7X7.1X12. 5X7.9X22.4.5X9.9X6.3X6.4X
13. 8X7.3X15. OX12. OX23.
4.6X
3.5X
6.2X
Arocior0.7393.93310.85730.97012.73565.34210.09767.55525.00520.11235.79854.94145.78224.4086.16456.25925.36214.14495.5852.96530.76254.953
1.8919.87623.4578.740789.2
1260
20.
5.5X7.7X3.7X
5.5X2.5X8.4X10. 3X3.7X4.7X1.9X4.7X4.9X8.3X2.5X3. OX3.5X3.2X2. OX3. OX4.5X1.3X1.9X1.6X4. IX
00-*?CJoCDO
Compound____________ Mean RTtetrachloro-meta-xylene 7.6321decachlorobiphenyl 27.7071
Retention Time Marker/Surrogate Standard SummaryRT Dev. Range-.0165 to-.0182 to
.0146
.0129
RT Crit.Passes...Passes...
Mean RF1669.9871153.447
Recovery Range74.8 to 108.3%90.2 to 127.9X
Surr Crit** Fails *** Fails *
Notes:1) Retention times linearly adjusted to place tetrachloro-meta-xylene at 7.6321 and decachlorobiphenyl at 27.7071.2} Peaks chosen within window of +/- 0.01337 of the mean RT of corresponding peaks in all mixtures.3) Quantitat ion is based on HEIGHTS; instrument response is linearized by RESPONSE = HEIGHT" 1.02960.
Inchcape Testing ServicesAquatec Laboratories AROCLOR_CALIBRATION 5.2-3(12AUG93 1142)
KB0005382
(JDS)14-JAN-94 13:55:32
![Page 215: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/215.jpg)
CH030107.XLS
CALIBRATION SUMMARYBACK CALCULATIONS
I/
Lab ID: AQUATEC, INC.GC:
Col. 1:Col. 2:
HP2087RTX-5
RTX-35
Calib date(s): 01/08/94 03:54
Rle:
01/09/94 01:22
03, 0407JAN941940
to
Standards
Aroclor 1016Cal Fact
% DiffAroclor 1221
Cal Fact% Diff
Aroclor 1 232Cal Fact
% DiffAroclor 1 242
Cal Fact%Diff
Aroclor 1 248Cal Fact
% DiffAroclor 1 254
Cal Fact% Diff
Aroclor 1 260Cal Fact
%Diff
50ppb
50.31.006
-154.71.094
-939.10.782
2243.60.872
1350.51.010
-147.30.946
550.61.012
-1
100ppb
97.70.977
299.0
0.9901
87.90.879
• 1298.6
0.9861
95.60.956
496.90.969
399.9
0.9990
200ppb
2061.030
-3199
0.9951
1840.920
8211
1.055-6
2051.025
-3197
0.9852
2021.010
-1
400ppb
3960.990
1402
1.005-1
4071.018
-2394
0.9852
3720.930
7412
1.030-3
3870.968
3
800ppb
8011.001
0792
0.9901
7880.985
2797
0.9960
8241.030
-3797
0.9960
8111.014
-1
%RSD
2.0
4.4
10.1
6.8
4.5
3.2
1.9
Cal Fact - Calc. Cone. / Nominal Cone.
%RSD = STD Dev / Mean of Cal Fact
% Diff = (Nominal Amt-Calc Amt) / Nominal Amt* 100
PagelKB0005283
000150
![Page 216: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/216.jpg)
PCBCHST.XLT
. AROCLOR CHECK STANDARD SUMMARY
Lab ID: AQUATEC, INC.GC:
Col. 1 :'Col. 2:
Check
Check
Check
Check
Check
HP701? 7RTx-5"RT> -3$
Standard Rle: 03 OH (Z^A
Initial Calib.date/time: Oi/ ' 0$ 1 ' 3'"i 055"1X
M^?^IS42. /2 -'* /
CompoundAD , -JLIOrt i\ 1 / r O ^
NominalAmount (ppb)
- "2.06 S'
Standard Rle: /)3 OH I'lTAN'H 1 £42, 13 ^-/ '
CompoundAR 116-0 x-
NominalAmount (ppb)^100 s*
Standard Rle: £3 pH 1 ZT/(^ fV l^^2 2^"-^' y
CompoundAR 11 ' ^
NominalAmount (ppb)20O
Standard Rle: /93 £)^ HJ^W^ \W2 2t>s s
Compound• A^. /oi^, ^^
NominalAmount (ppb)•200 ^
Standard Rle:
CompoundNominal
Amount (ppb)
di/01/W 012.2s-
Date:*~ Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
I75~
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount {ppb)136' s~
Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)
- 1 7 0 ^
Date:s^ Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb)\4I0 ^
Date:Time:
Calc.Amount (ppb).
<9£S"2. -"
% Diff.- I2.S" -
O(/f3/17 i/'^573^ x
% Diff.1.0 ,-
/5.//3mi5"PS~ x-
% Diff.l^^3 •-
01/13/91i^3 ^
% Diff./0.0 "
% Diff.
Page of
KB0005286
000153
![Page 217: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/217.jpg)
<J • ' "S
BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.C.6723 Towpalh Road, Box 66Syracuse, New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017
as- H
CHAIN OF CUSTODYCOo
-jfe//, OPROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
. ve f -SAMPLERS: (Signature)
STA. NO. DATE TIME STATION LOCATION
oo
REMARKS
110T&Af-S
TBSAS-*
TBSAl-1x
TBSA3-3 KnozlD-t. K 12.03
KIZ033
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received for Laboratory by:(Signature)
DATE TIME Remarks:f t i*-.
7/12S31393786HCOH Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files
KB0005132
![Page 218: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/218.jpg)
BLASLAND & BOUCK ENGINEERS, P.C.6723 Towpath Road. Box 66Syracuse. New York 13214-0066TEL: 315-446-9120FAX: 315-449-0017
*.
CHAIN OF CUSTODY RECORDA
ooooo
PROJ. NO. PROJECT NAME
SAMPLERS>(S/gnafu
STA. NO. DATE TIMEa:8 STATION LOCATION REMARKS
- */»/* /c / * o 5 7
/< /? 057TBaAl-
T&
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE
III 1
TIME
I5.&0
Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received by: (Signature) Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Relinquished by: (Signature)
Relinquished by: (Signature) DATE TIME Received for Laboratory by:(Signature)
DATE TIME
/tooRemarks:
.X t
7/12/931393786HCOR Distribution: Original Accompanies Shipment; Copy to Coordinator Field Files
KB0005133
![Page 219: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/219.jpg)
F-0430
AQUATEC SAMPLE LOG-IN SHEET
!atrVi-fT Aauatec. Inc. / «r 1
Receded By (Print Name):. . Poai Log-in Date: JLt
Case Number:. /Sample Deorery \, — —^ /Grouo No: HO Loy / CLIENT
SAMPLE1
CORRESPONDING
SAMPLETAG1
ASSIGNEDLAB1
REMARKS:CONDITIONOF SAMPLE
SHIPMENT. ETC.
REMARKS:
1. Custody Seal(s)
2. Custody Seal Nos.:
3. Chain-of-CustodyRecords
4. Simple InformationSheets
5. Airbill
6. Airbffl No.:
7.Sample TagNumbers
8. Sample Condition;
9. Does information oncustody records, sampleinformation sheets, andsample tags agree?
10. Date Receired at Lab:11. Time Recefoed:
?Abse0r«
A/o
'tss &< st'st
COO /S SI
20 4
2044,40
MS tOA-Si
/V.
tJ /A ZO 4-34-1 £* fo r / x?
no
KIZO4-0
Qnta^Brofcw*/Qakiiif
A. *4 O ,+*.
XJ/IXV-L. .^Sf SO
er*
a li"*{* **S
IS
x»^ 19 X
Sample Transfer
• Contact Project Director.
(MlRenewed by:. Logbook No:.KB0006245
Date:. n Logbook Page No:.
001097
![Page 220: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/220.jpg)
£Tf*l : £>
aquatec INC.• An Inchrajx- Company
55 SOUTH PARK DRIVE. COLCHESTER. VT OS446
Page _ of ^
Discrepancies betveen sample bottles/labels and C-of-C
K 1 t C O -1 <* V
C - o - C
fL Slsi fL CO r-< f t
f e O-^ ef f ff( O , _____ C - o -
<; g> , y "At .
~ C
K f.-Z 04- / •' O -7
C ' ~ O - .**J Oi
O. xuL ei.
^ixt^, ^3 -/^ Jfe~, A'<*.'?* c-o~ r f si OLA*^ sy*ffsv s*> e» -f -^
Ktto'b*? -2.04-0 '.
/? ^a. £ / jf 'si A •/•/-
1 Y/ v -& O 4 n. / S> t a *t /*t*\ f SI**L o - C, Co.
KB0006246
001093
![Page 221: Addendum to Technical Memorandum 2 Results of Phase ...\\BBL2\VOLI\USERS\LJF\LJPOO\3 1001948.DOC -• 5/30/00 •) _•) Based on the results of Phase I screening, five TBSAs were](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022071115/5fefaef5b32a7d049922d4d6/html5/thumbnails/221.jpg)
LIENTb);ASE:
ITNESSED BY
Aquaiec, Inc. — Exinction worksheet — printed by; JKZ on 11-16-93 08:58:40 KB0006234