adaptive metric learning for saliency detection
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Adaptive metric learning for saliency detection](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5884f6fb1a28abf76f8b720d/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Adaptive metric learning for saliency detection
![Page 2: Adaptive metric learning for saliency detection](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5884f6fb1a28abf76f8b720d/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
OBJECTIVE
Using GML & SML technique, salient features of objects from the background of an image is detected very efficiently.
![Page 3: Adaptive metric learning for saliency detection](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5884f6fb1a28abf76f8b720d/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ABSTRACT
The GML and SML together and experimentally find the combining result which would work well.
Based on low-level features, we will find a super pixel wise image without loosing pixels.
Fisher vector coding approach is a better distinguish for salient objects from the background detection.
![Page 4: Adaptive metric learning for saliency detection](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5884f6fb1a28abf76f8b720d/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
EXISTING SYSTEM
The saliency of a super pixel can be estimated by the Euclidean distance from the most certain foreground and background seeds.
![Page 5: Adaptive metric learning for saliency detection](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5884f6fb1a28abf76f8b720d/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
DISADVANTAGES
Not in accurate manner
Processing is so lengthy
No key generation will be possible
![Page 6: Adaptive metric learning for saliency detection](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5884f6fb1a28abf76f8b720d/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
PROPOSED SYSTEMS Instead of measuring distance on the Euclidean
space, a learning method can be presented based on two complementary Mahalanobis distance metrics:
1) Generic metric learning (GML) 2) Specific metric learning (SML).
GML aims at the global distribution of the whole training set, while SML considers the specific structure of a single image.
![Page 7: Adaptive metric learning for saliency detection](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5884f6fb1a28abf76f8b720d/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Fig. The comparison between the Euclidean distance space and the Mahalanobis distance space
![Page 8: Adaptive metric learning for saliency detection](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5884f6fb1a28abf76f8b720d/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ADVANTAGES
Key generation.
Matching of the pixels will be done easily.
![Page 9: Adaptive metric learning for saliency detection](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022080421/5884f6fb1a28abf76f8b720d/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Thank you